Nov 13, 2008 12:46pm

Rove’s View of How Obama Won

Q: Do you see the election results as a repudiation of your politics?

A: "Our new president-elect won one and a half-points more than George W. Bush won in 2004, and he did so, in great respect, by adopting the methods of the Bush campaign and conducting a vast army of persuasion to identify and get out the vote."

– Karl Rove in the Sunday New York Times Magazine
November 11, 2008

I’m pretty sure I don’t agree with this assessment. What do you think?

- jpt

User Comments

Shouldn’t Rove be in prision by now?

Posted by: Greg in MN | November 13, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

He won because he followed the methods of Community Organizer & Activist Saul Alinsky. Republicans need to walk Obama’s walk to get back into the White House.

Posted by: Juli An | November 13, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Percentage of popular vote
2004
Bush 51 to Kerry 48
51 – 48 = 3
2008
Obama 53 to McCain 46
53 – 46 = 7
Electoral Votes
2004
Bush 286 to Kerry 252
286 – 252 = 34
2008 (MO still to be decided)
Obama 364 to McCain 163
364 – 163 = 201

Posted by: Ryan C | November 13, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Yes, Rove should be in prison for defying a Congressional subpoena to testify. He’s not just a liar, but the guy behind this disastrous Bush/Cheney administration which has destroyed our nation. His fear tactics and hate-mongering did a lot of damage over the years. Why anyone wants to give this creep a forum is beyond me. But you can bet Fox Noise Channel will keep him coming back for more.

Posted by: geecee | November 13, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Someone sure has a good opinion of himself. And Rove downplays Obama’s victory margin here, but wasn’t Bush crowing about a “powerful mandate” and “political capital” after his ’04 win?
This guy does not deserve to have his crackpot analysis seen by the public…
http://www.political-buzz.com/

Posted by: matt | November 13, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Totally disagree!! Guess he was trying to take credit for Obama’s win..lol.

Posted by: Dee | November 13, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

2% more than GWB had 2004, not 1.5%.

Posted by: Ping | November 13, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

“the methods of the Bush campaign”
Would Mr Rove show some courage and spell out what those methods of the Bush campaign actually were? Then perhaps he can hear himself talk and break down laughing.

Posted by: Question | November 13, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Obama won because he was better able to communicate his message. He appealed to moderate Republicans like me, who were on the fence prior to the conventions. He reached out to us and made us feel like we had a voice. McCain pandered to the Far Right Conservatives, who have little in common with most Americans, and in doing so, alienated a large voting block that may very well have voted for him. I am tired of being ignored by the Republican Party. The party is NOT made up of just Far Right Conservatives. In the end, I had to vote for someone I felt could heal the rifts in the country, not drive us farther apart.

Posted by: Dana Swanson | November 13, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Well he’s not lying, which is unusual. But he’s not telling the whole story. Obama certainly did have a Bush-like superior ground game, but he was also an inspiring candidate who ran an issues-based campaign when people were fed up enough with their lives to ignore “character issues”.

Posted by: Tim M | November 13, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

He’s right, except for the part about the FEAR and SMEAR tactics.
Oh, and the part about right-wing divisive culture war tactics.
And the part about continuing disasterous trickle-down economic policies.
And the pro-business/anti-environmental thing.
And the focus on shallow narrative theatrics in place of intelligent substance.
HMMM …
HE’S WRONG.

Posted by: R Mutt | November 13, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

Obama won because the people had enough of enough top down management by fear and when the people have enough and vote with their feet and by a large enough margin its hard for those in power to give up power because it is their job to stay in power at all costs – we see in africa even in the worst of government – where its not who votes its who counts the votes that counts we see attempts at power sharing vs complete meltdown – but as we also see todays revolutionaries are often tomorrows tyrants – Obama won because we the people wanted to change the channel and they could deny it – when people have enough they stand up and stop pretending they are zombies and going along to get along even though they know its wrong – and take back their future – karl rove is just believing in his own propaganda – like everybody else we all change the facts to fit our needs – food for thought – geo geller

Posted by: geo geller | November 13, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm

Rove is IRRELEVANT.
He is the one who said that Obama was lazy and we all know that is not true.
Why isn’t Rove in prison?

Posted by: Cindy | November 13, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Obama didn’t “win” so much as the Republicans “lost”. His margin of a win is far less than the media would have us believe. If the Republicans had their act together, this would not have happened. It is disgracful that the media has so much clout as to be able to actually cuase election turns and wins rather than the people. this is a case of people beling led to the decisions without any real information – and they will have to be holding themselves accountable as we start an even deeper decline. This is not going to be a good thing for our country. Stand up and take your blame.

Posted by: cottonn | November 13, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Obama won because he did not listen to any of Roves commentary on FOX

Posted by: watching | November 13, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

I do not think the Republicans will
see the White House again for
say 50 make it 100 years…. no joke

Posted by: Anita Yova | November 13, 2008, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

I agree with the disagreement of that sentiment.
Or to put it another way, Rove is talking out of his %$£.

Posted by: Aengil | November 13, 2008, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Ryan C has the truth! Go Ryan C! Rove himself predicted a landslide for Obama…did he say anything like that for Bush?
And a “vast army of persuasion”–? Is that like “having good policy” and “promising a change from George W. Bush”? Seems to me the guy who got pinned with the Bush button lost this election. He’s the one who adopted Bush campaign strategies…
On Rove’s suggestion….

Posted by: Jerome | November 13, 2008, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

From these coments it does not appear that Hate politics are over or that we are going to heal the divisions in our country.

Posted by: Bill | November 13, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

That’s like saying George Washington adopted General Howe’s strategy in the revolutionary war because both of them used muskets and black powder.
The two campaigns were based on totally different premises: Rove wanted to divide the electorate and rally the base while Obama wanted to expand his support by offering a unifying message. Rove went for 50%+1, while Obama has tried to build a strong broadbased coalition to support his agenda.
The goals of the campaigns couldn’t be more different, and the outcomes will be too.

Posted by: a | November 13, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Karl sounds like a community organizer! The concept and practice of “getting out the vote” has been around a good deal longer than Karl Rove has.
There are those who didn’t need to rely on distortions, distractions, divisiveness and lying in order to do get out the vote.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | November 13, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Rove likes to pat himself on the back….Rove your tricks did not work this time around. Your clones Steve Smithdt & Tucker Bounds were not able to breakthrough because the American people saw what happened to them in 8 years of the Bush strategy.

Posted by: Lester | November 13, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Obama won because:
1) his entire camp was disciplined
2) he stuck on one message of CHANGE
3) he thought through on VP pick
4) he didnt focus much on negative
campaigning
5) he showed calmness on tackling
problems
6) his 50 states strategy paid off
7) he communicated frequently with
supporters through internet
8) he managed contribution flow very
well
9) he did very well on all 3 debates
10)he was aware which groups to target

Posted by: FM | November 13, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Jake,
I know you media types don’t like to look at facts, but check out the ads Obama ran in the Southwest spreading false rumors about McCain’s stance on immigration.
Worse than Rovian…Carvillian.

Posted by: Roger | November 13, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

cotton: ” His margin of a win is far less than the media would have us believe. ”
His “margin of a win” is a FACT, very simple to grasp numbers that have been painstakingly counted and are publicly reported. It is not a matter of opinion or a matter of spin. Look at the numbers, reality, and think for yourself!
Obama: 66,602,400 votes, 364 electoral college votes
McCain: 58,164,693, 163 electoral college votes

Posted by: jhw539 | November 13, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Too bad for Rove, the public finally woke up for this election. We will note, and remember, what happens in the twilight days of this corrupt criminal enterprise of an administration, such as the last minute regs and the blanket pardon Bush will grant as to his torturing, eavesdropping henchmen. We will also never forget the eight years of misdeeds, bullying and gross incompetence. The republican party will become increasingly Palinized, and more young voters will be there on future election days to repond appropriately. The fact that Rove and his manpuppet Bush in no small measure made this possible, is poetic justice.

Posted by: ToastOnDayOne | November 13, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

Concerned in OH: “0bama won because him and his surrogates made everyone think they’d be a racist if they didn’t vote for him.”
Well, that makes the GOP look even more foolish for not having a single black member in Congress. When they are that disproportionately white (about 13% of America is Black, and about 9% of the Democratic Congressional caucus is black) they left themselves wide open. Republicans don’t even have a single token black member of Congress to deflect such a simple strategy.
(Although to be truthful, your silly theory is absurd – no one knows if you’re ‘racist’ when you cast an anonymous ballot. This is the corner stone of the Republican’s usually-successful Southern Strategy that carried them for over two decades.)

Posted by: jhw539 | November 13, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Wow it is funny how the libs stay bitter even after a win. Poor Poor
liberals can never be happy.

Posted by: Rick | November 13, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Maybe rove & cheney can share the same cell. A federal judge told cheney not to destroy any of his records, so things should get interesting after Jan. 20th. 01-20-2009 The END of an ERROR…

Posted by: pt | November 13, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Obama won because the Republicans have failed for the last 8 years…… they were running the country and were held accountable……
Dems mess up, same thing will happen to them

Posted by: Blue | November 13, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

Rove should be wearing a orange uniform with numbers printed across the back.

Posted by: jen | November 13, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

What is wrong with Rove’s explanation of how Obama won? Obama did NOT use anything related to the Bush win in 2004.
1.] Obama never deviated from his message of ‘SINCERE CHANGE’ to work ‘FOR THE PEOPLE’ instead of the corrupt ways he saw many of his previous predecessors paying off “wealthy friends, cronies and others for whom he may be personally obligated, i.e., Wall Street CEO’s.” He knew that our Federal Government had not been managed in an effort to actually ‘work’ for the people on Main Street, and he knew it would resonate with most of the electorate. Since the time of our founding fathers through FDR, and especially since the time of Nixon, corruption and scandal was the rule of Washington power and Obama knew he could change that status.
T2.] Obama did not use Rove’s “micromanaged groups, regions, and maps” to chart a course. Instead, he banked on his never-ending message and believed in the very people he would offer to help. Rove would NOT know how that type of campaign could be managed because he knows nothing about PEOPLE. For him to say Obama adopted his methods from the Bush campaign is to credit himself for Obama’s win. Nothing could be further from the truth. Rove only knows micromanagement of maps, so it annoys the h*ll out of me to hear him say anything about people and especially about Obama. Rove KNOWS NOTHING ABOUT OBAMA’S WIN!

Posted by: InWantofaUnitedNation | November 13, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

If Palin is a “cancer on the Republican Party” (thank you, David Brooks), Rove is a cancer on the American nation.
By saying Obama won by adopting Bush’s methods Rove is simply trying to give himself credit. David Axelrod, in fact, repudiated Rove’s strategy of activating the base and playing the electoral math to win by one or two swing states. Obama won by about 200 electoral votes and, while not quite pursuing a 50 state strategy, won by opening up new states as battlegrounds, and challenging the Republicans nearly everywhere.
Rove’s statement is just silly. He’s done. And yes, he should be in jail.

Posted by: jon in maryland | November 13, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Rick: “Wow it is funny how the libs stay bitter even after a win.”
Huh, my read of the comments looks more “jubilant” than bitter, but I guess how you perceive it does depend on your own mood.

Posted by: jhw539 | November 13, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Rove is correct, but his answer is not responsive to the question. The Obama campaign certainly turned out the vote, just as the Bush campaign did. That, however has nothing to do with whether the vote constituted a repudiation of Rove’s POLITICS, which it most certainly did.

Posted by: DKNY | November 13, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Jhw539: Still looks like looking back and whinning to me. I only hope the republicans can treat Obama with the same respect the dems gave Bush.

Posted by: Rick | November 13, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

Fittingly, Rove gets it WRONG right from the first line. Obama did nothing even remotely close to, “adopting the methods of the Bush campaign”…Yes, they were organized, but they captured the electorate though a message of true change and something Rove knows NOTHING about—postive messages. Rove brought the dirt to the party and his minions took over McCain’s campaign and basically impoded it. Now we have Joe the Plumber, Palin the 2012 candidate…Please, just go away. This woman has such an inflated sense of entitlement, it is cringe-worthy. I say, to ahead, cut your own political throat by letting her continue to lead the party around by the nose. Unbelievable.

Posted by: tdub | November 13, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Obama won by outspending McCain:
66+ million votes = over $150 million
McCain 58+ million votes = less than $90 million
So basically, 8 million votes cost him $60+ million dollars.
How many votes would Obama have if he would have stuck to the public funding?
Hmmm…probably would have lost

Posted by: Smillykat | November 13, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

R Mutt | Nov 13, 2008 1:06:45 PM
Thanks for the great laugh! I loved it and needed a good belly laugh! Thanks.

Posted by: InWantofaUnitedNation | November 13, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

I would like to stand up and say I am a happy Liberal…please stand up and be counted happy liberals….I suspsect there are 66,602,400 happy liberals out there Rick.

Posted by: SwiftyPA | November 13, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

Can we stop pretending Karl Rove is a political genius now? He never managed to deliver an electoral/popular victory as decisive as those of the Democratic Pres. Candidates before and after Bush.

Posted by: TRBoston | November 13, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Rick :”republicans can treat Obama with the same respect the dems gave Bush. ”
We agree on that. The unanimous Congressional support and blank check the Democrats gave Bush after 9/11 was unprecedented since FDR – Bush got anything he wanted from Congress for a couple years, and the press really challenged nothing he said. If Obama gets half that level of support from the Republicans he will have no problem putting in place the agenda the majority of Americans voted for.

Posted by: jhw539 | November 13, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Turdblossom’s Math? We all recall Rove’s 2006 Math, why would we expect Rove’s mathematical skills to improve in just two years.
Being the ultimate spinmeister Rove even had his flock believing Bush was thee master wordmeister. His next gig is competing against Palin on “Are You Smarter Than A Fith-Grader?”
Alaska and Texas are the US largest states but no one will ever confuse them to be the most intellectually honest.

Posted by: Mr. Green Jeans | November 13, 2008, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Jake, Regardless of one’s political leanings, since when are you as a “journalist” supposed to state your opinion like this? What happened to reporting the story and letting it stand on its own for the readers or viewers to consider? Are you so taken with your personal views that you feel we care about them, or are you so insecure with your beliefs that you are searching for our endorsement?

Posted by: bkm | November 13, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

The only one who should be in prison is your “former” drug using (which is illegal btw) president elect. One of the primary reasons he won is that he bought your vote (which is illegal) with his phony pledge (a confidence game for sure) to give you a tax cut (even though most of the governments income tax revenue comes from the 5% he wants to tax more). So he is going to steal money from one group who rightfully owns it and gives it to another group (hmm sounds like transfer of stolen property which is also illegal BTW).
What about his pal Tony Rezko (one of Obama’s Senate campaign finance committee members)? Rezko was indicted on charges he solicited kickbacks from companies seeking state pension business under his friend Gov. Blagojevich (another crooked Democrat friend of Obama’s). Obama bought some land from the Rezko’s on the cheap (you say he received property bought with illegal funds). Oh that such a fine legal scholar to be involved is so much illegal activity.
Oh BTW I would not expect that $1000 dollar bribe check yet (he won’t be able to pay for it after he tanks the economy the rest of the way). You Democrats’ were so easily duped by someone even slicker then Slick Willie Clinton. I would be laughing really hard right now if it was not for the dire straits that you bone heads put us in during the next 4 years!

Posted by: Scott | November 13, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Obama won because people did not educate themselves. They did not research what the change he promises will actually do to our country. Higher taxes to pay for all the spending he wants to do. It will be another Carter/Clinton presidency, who both contributed to the loosening of the rules for sub prime mortages that caused the economic crisis we are in. They also did not take into account his qualifications, ZERO or his dictatorship personality.

Posted by: HH | November 13, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

so… for those of you who always criticize jake about his political point of views and attack him for not being an unbiased journalist – remember, this is a blog, not a news report… the point is for him to make comments and for his readers to distinguish whether they agree with him or not… so in a sense, you are clicking to read his blog because you ARE wondering what he thinks and you can make your own opinion… maybe some of you are just too old or not up to date with current culture to be able to distinguish the difference between a blog and a news article….

Posted by: cuse1727 | November 13, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

Well I can’t stand Rove for his machievellian tactics in stealing the White House for Bush. But for those commenting on racism being involved in Obama’s victory, I do think there’s some credence with that. The young I think were very pressured by peers to avoid being seen as racists if they did not approve of Obama. Many young also did undoubtedly convince their parents to vote Obama by the youngsters’ sheer passion for Obama. Yes, sad to say, I do think race had a factor in Obama’s election, no matter how hard others try to convince me otherwise.

Posted by: buzziea | November 13, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm

I would like to think that those of us who were smart enough to make the educated decision to vote for Sen Obama know that it was an election run by the Obama Team; not in any way Rove’s.

Posted by: Ranger Phx | November 13, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

Rove should remember as well that he used fear to win the 2004 elections. Putting out Bin Ladens tape a few weeks before surely did the trick.
But lets talk about the 2000 elections when Gore won the majority of popular vote BUT still lost the election. (I mean had the election stolen from him)
Obama’s team went grass roots and door to door. Used his charisma and stuck to his message.

Posted by: Shamaedene | November 13, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Rove’s 2004 methodology was repudiated by the majority of the electorate, who unequivocally voted against divide and conquer, extreme partisanship and the blame game. Such outlandish claims lead ignorant but passionate people to believe things like Obama was a terrorist, Obama was Arab, and Obama would destroy America. I wonder what those people are thinking now that McCain and Palin praised him and called him an honorable American?

Posted by: Lochran | November 13, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

1. i gave obama money and i am glad he spent it the way he did. i will keep giving money as long as it is used to defeat the christian right.
2. bush only won the red states and won by a small amount in 2004 and lost in 2000.
3. obama won an electoral college landslide, based on progressive policies.
4. mccain ran on less taxes less government and the people said no.
5. one last thing-i find it funny that the right is complaining that obama may
cut spending in defense. the same party that says cut spending now wants more spending. i wish the media would ask these republicans where they won’t to cut spending. also lower taxes is the same as increasing spending–they both are meant to increase gdp. if you cut taxes and do nothing else the net revenue would be less than if you did not cut taxes thus cutting taxes equals increasing spending.

Posted by: william | November 13, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

He is half right.
The power of Suggestion, The power of Persuasion. Powerful motivationing Speeches with code words and using them repetitively. Using those Code words in vast Advertising, Every where 24/7 in your face. Getting the youth to spread your word and propaganda.
Mind conditioning, Mind manipulating, Mind stimulation Constantaly, Taking the people down, Telling them what they were to think, what they were to feel, then Building them up appling hype and staging shows and promises of Change and a better life.
Giving them an a common enemy, bush and the government. Instilling in their minds anyone not for you was the enemy and evil. Protraying yourself as Superior and the Only One who care and Only one who could ever help them
Inoculating them into the cause and the sect of Obama followers.

Posted by: seah | November 13, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Anyhow, didn’t McCain run a “Rovian” campaign?

Posted by: JR | November 13, 2008, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

Smillykat | Nov 13, 2008 1:54:55 PM
I’ve got some news for you! NO ONE can BUY AN ELECTION because if you don’t have a ‘quality platform’ and your message is not seen as sincere, it doesn’t matter how much money you have to spend, it won’t help one iota much less buy you any votes. So get over yourself and realize Obama won because “we the people” voted for him and btw, no one paid any of us for our votes. You children need to grow up!

Posted by: InWantofaUnitedNation | November 13, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

David Axelrod is even worse than Rove.
Obama is even more corrupt than Bush. Like Obama told Bill Clinton, you tell me what to do and I will sell it. All of you bought it.
Ex democrat turn independent.

Posted by: Edwin | November 13, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

I am pretty sure I do agree with Rove…

Posted by: RBR | November 13, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

My concern with all these journalists like Jake (and others) giving their opinions in this format or anywhere else is the determination of when they are providing unbiased reporting and when they are giving their personal views. Now, I’m a reporter, now I’m a blogger, now I’m an analyst, now I’m an advisor, etc. Pick one. And, on behalf of those who share my opinion about this, please note that we are neither too old nor out of touch to understand what blogging is. We just recall the days of journalistic integrity and miss it greatly.

Posted by: bkm | November 13, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

>>>>>I’ve got some news for you! NO ONE can BUY AN ELECTION because if you don’t have a ‘quality platform’ and your message is not seen as sincere, it doesn’t matter how much money you have to spend, it won’t help one iota much less buy you any votes. So get over yourself and realize Obama won because “we the people” voted for him and btw, no one paid any of us for our votes. You children need to grow up!<<<<<<<<
Why…you obviously haven't!

Posted by: RBR | November 13, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Rove did not answer the question.

Posted by: Kenneth Pennington | November 13, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

What’s wrong righties? What part of LANDSLIDE don’t you get? It’s time to get over it. We won, you didn’t.

Posted by: Stephen | November 13, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Rove needs to go directly to jail. No passing GO, no $200. What a fool. I hope all republicans are this deluded.

Posted by: Tungsten | November 13, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

One big difference, George Bush didn’t have the mainstream media acting as a public relations arm of his campaign as Barack Obama did.
Other differences: 1.) George Bush never lied about his “commitment” to public financing as Obama did. 2.) George Bush didn’t collect millions of dollars in campaign contributions of $200 or less, as the Obama campaign did, by disabling the mechanism that requires the names of the credit card holders match the credit card number being used to make a donation. And disabling this feature allowed many people to make multiple donations which figured prominently in Obama’s massive windfall of contributions. But, prepare to wait until hell freezes over before you hear as much reported by the public relations arm of our new president-elect, the mainstream media.

Posted by: Thank God for Karma | November 13, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

And this moron has wind behind him while the other moron had wind against him.

Posted by: Americans 1 | November 13, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

I am sure no one had Karl Rove on their mind when voting. If they did they need to get over it. Obama won because of the ecomony. If a Democrat was president, McCain would have won. In my lifetime whenever there is a recession that president’s party loses the white house ie Carter, Bush I, Clinton, Bush 2.

Posted by: Juan | November 13, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Obama won because of the economy and the hate leveled towards Bush. Hillary would have won by even a larger margin. If it wasn’t for the economic problems McCain would have beat Obama … but he wouldn’t have beat Hillary!
And that’s the way it is!!!

Posted by: Francisco Cardenas | November 13, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

The only one who should be in prison is your “former” drug using (which is illegal btw) president elect. One of the primary reasons he won is that he bought your vote (which is illegal) with his phony pledge (a confidence game for sure) to give you a tax cut (even though most of the governments income tax revenue comes from the 5% he wants to tax more).
Posted by: Scott | Nov 13, 2008 2:07:17 PM
————–
You need to understand, tax cut or tax increase are not the problem – it’s a symptom. Our Dearest Leader employed a classic Marxist Class Warfare against its own people. He pandered a group of people, the 95% that he called the Middle Class, and made them to hate a other group of good citizens, the 5% that he basically labeled them the bourgeoisie society worms.
The hatred that he has generated within one Class of the people against another group of the same people is for years to overcome, far more difficult than the color of his skin.

Posted by: Americans 1 | November 13, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

Rove and would be Roves:
It is abundantly clear why your “side” lost the presidential race as well as the down ticket races. One need only read your small-minded missives which demostrate your intellectual shortcomings…

Posted by: Mr. Green Jeans | November 13, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

>>>>>I’ve got some news for you! NO ONE can BUY AN ELECTION…………
Posted by: RBR | Nov 13, 2008 2:35:44 PM
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Are you sure? Remember ACORN? It is happening now in several states that having voter recounts, even votes found in trunks of cars HUM……

Posted by: Monica | November 13, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Let’s not forget the Jim Jones like followers.

Posted by: Kim | November 13, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Bush is on the radio right now talking about the economic crisis and how “our aim should not be larger government” . ..
This from the man who governed in this fashion:
REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT
$421 Billion OVER BUDGET (2002)
$555 Billion OVER BUDGET (2003)
$596 Billion OVER BUDGET (2004)
$554 Billion OVER BUDGET (2005)
$574 Billion OVER BUDGET (2006)
Shut up George. You’re a phony.

Posted by: pefros | November 13, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

The fact is, Hillary LOST! She is the worse of the lot of them. Anyone could beat her. She LOST! I couldn’t be happier, and I am a female. I think voting for her because she is a woman is as bad as voting for O because he is black – both are terrible reasons to vote for the leader of this greatest free nation! I am saddened even more that so many were lead to vote for O by the media and didn’t research him on their own. He voting record speaks louder than the garbage he & the media fed to the population. Remember these words, people, You will have to one day eat them. by the way…anyone check the Illinois Pick 3 lottery on Nov 5? Do it. I dare you.

Posted by: cottonn | November 13, 2008, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

And for those of you saying an election can’t be bought – open up your eyes and read! ACORN has one man, alive by the way, that they registered 72 times! 72 TIMES! In the same office. Now why wouldn’t you catch that? You didn’t want to…that’s why. ACORN, supported by OP by the way (do your research) made a HUGE impact on getting him elected illegally. And watch – you will see 2 or 3 million illegals made into citizens and put on the dole by 2012 so he can be assured of those votes – just wait and see! And we will be supporting many many many more of them by then!

Posted by: cottonn | November 13, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

cottonn,
You are so misinformed and that is unfortunate. Hillary Clinton has a good economic plan, and she wanted to use the pocket candies, $300 billion, that Bush and 0bama wanted to give you, a $600 check, to target the banking, mortgage and financial crisis, more than ONE YEAR ago.
If that had happened, not because the Congressional leaders wanted to choose and support an Affirmative Action candidate, the DOW would probably still near the 14,000 level.

Posted by: Americans 1 | November 13, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Monica, I know those numbers for the six years of Republican rule of White House, Senate and Congress are hard for you to fess up to – they are a disgrace.
Especially in a party like the Republicans who repeatedly lie about being for ‘small government’ when they’re setting new records for GROSS overspending.
And yes, as John McCain the Republican candidate for President said, “the fundamentals of the economy are strong” . . . that was the Republican party line . .. a certainly not the truth at all.

Posted by: pefros | November 13, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

When I went and voted I had to show ID and my voter registration card. So if any unelgible voter got thru, that was the fault of the people at the polling stations not Acorn nor Obama.
Bush stole an election in 2000, Obama won the election,by busting his rump,learning the rules of his party, and making those rules work to his benefit. He ran a darn near flawless campaign with little to no drama. And he won fair and square.
To bad you haters are to bitter and childish to admit that. The person who ran the best campaign won, I know it hurts, I know it makes you want to go and hang yourself from your ceiling fan. But its the god honest truth, and under all that hatred you people have stored up since Hillary LOST.You know deep down that’s true.

Posted by: Proud Obama Supporter | November 13, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

good point bkm… it is sometimes hard to determine whether some journalists are blogging or trying to report news… but with respect to most of jake tapper’s blogs, he’ll report something, make a comment on how he feels, and then ask what other people think.. he’s not saying “this is what i think and that’s the only way it can be”… what he’s trying to do is convince people to be critical.. to think, do i agree with him, or do i think he’s full of crap… and though this is not journalism in the sense that he’s only reporting the facts, it’s intended to get people to think instead of just listening… and at least the way i see it, he’s not reporting his opinions as facts, he’s just giving his thoughts to see who agrees or disagrees…

Posted by: cuse1727 | November 13, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

That’s kind of like saying that the Allies won World War II because they were 1.5% more brutal than the Axis powers.

Posted by: Pacific moderate | November 13, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

self-serving lies.

Posted by: Ed | November 13, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Did ABC subpoena Rove to get him to talk with them?

Posted by: cleduc | November 13, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm

Obama did not win, the Republicans lost. This is still a center right nation, which will never accept Obama’s left-wing politics.
That being said, the Republicans of yesterday do not exist anymore, leaving voters with no real Republicans to vote for.
What we have is a crop of politicos that have grown up winning seats, and the presidency, by throwing red meat to the base. This only worked as long as Republican officerholders retained the values of fiscal responsibility, small government, low taxes, and honest government. They could give voters a reason to vote for them (e.g., small government) while giving voters reasons not to vote for the other guys (e.g., abortion).
Republicans kept winning as long as the brand was intact. But, once in office they did not maintain the Republican brand. They were corrupt, and they let the government grow.
Arguably there are still large numbers of voters who would love to vote for Republicans, if only they could find some. Sadly, Republicans of old have disappeared.

Posted by: David H | November 13, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Rove sounds like a literate Palin.

Posted by: kat | November 13, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

If that is all he said and taken on surface value, then yes, I do, Jake.
You’d have to explain in more detail why you don’t to have a conversation.

Posted by: len | November 13, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm

Rove’s tactics have come to mean dirty campaign tricks. But Rove also revolutionize how to target voters and mobilize volunteers to get out the vote. In that sense, yes, Obama did win the election using Rove’s tactics. And that’s nothing to be ashamed about!

Posted by: Elyse | November 13, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

Actually, I think Obama’s campaign borrowed more from Karl Marx than from Karl Rove. Logos, class and race warfare, platitudes and attitudes…

Posted by: TheOtherKarl | November 13, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

The Republicans (especially Bush) rode into Washington as white-hatted moralists, and then did nothing but loot the treasury. Of course they got booted out. That does not mean people like what the Big-O wants to do. It just means they were given a choice of poisons, and chose what appeared to be the less toxic.

Posted by: David H | November 13, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

pefros;
You just don’t get it…our economy fell in the toilet with this democratic congress with the ‘four stooges’ dodd, franks, reed and pelosi in charge just this year “2008″, period. They knew about Freddy and Fannie…they were solvent, remember how Barney and Maxine Watters reacted. Of course you don’t, they were not republicans.
The fault lies with the democratic congress.
Oil prices have dropped, but with obama and no offshore drilling, see how the oil prices will rise. Obama is not for offshore drilling, but it appears that he just might be in the pockets of what he calls “Big Oil”. You democrats are like trying to explain something to little children. The little children listen and learn more.

Posted by: Monica | November 13, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Monica,
america is known around the world as having the best politicans money can buy.
I just hope Pres elect will stick to his promises and take from the rich (Oprah and the hollywood elite) and give to the poor. (us)
I’m still waiting for my $1000 and the gas card and my mortgage pmt.

Posted by: usa | November 13, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Monica,
america is known around the world as having the best politicans money can buy.
I just hope Pres elect will stick to his promises and take from the rich (Oprah and the hollywood elite) and give to the poor. (us)
I’m still waiting for my $1000 and the gas card and my mortgage pmt.
Posted by: usa | Nov 13, 2008 4:32:58 PM
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Oprah will probably be in obama’s cabinet,making sure we get get all the “free stuff” we have been promised, and crying on strangers shoulders. Just look under your seat and you will find your prize, oh, but don’t forget you will have to pay taxes on it.

Posted by: Monica | November 13, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Republicans should sit down and watch some old Reagan speeches and ask themselves how they got from Reagan to Rove in 20 years.
Imagine, the GOP once had a reason to exist.

Posted by: El_Pajaro | November 13, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Monica, I know those numbers for the six years of Republican rule of White House, Senate and Congress are hard for you to fess up to – they are a disgrace.
Especially in a party like the Republicans who repeatedly lie about being for ‘small government’ when they’re setting new records for GROSS overspending.
REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT
$421 Billion OVER BUDGET (2002)
$555 Billion OVER BUDGET (2003)
$596 Billion OVER BUDGET (2004)
$554 Billion OVER BUDGET (2005)
$574 Billion OVER BUDGET (2006)
And yes, as John McCain the Republican candidate for President said, “the fundamentals of the economy are strong” . . . that was the Republican party line and the Bush mantra as well . .. and certainly far from the truth.

Posted by: pefros | November 13, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

I’m pretty sure I don’t agree with Rove either. This isn’t the first time I’ve read about a conservative insisting that Obama’s victory was because he did something conservatives have been doing successfully for ages. Some guy named Ed Feulner out of Miami credited Obama for “running as a conservative.”

Posted by: purplehawk | November 13, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

I think Rove is right with one exception: The exception is that Obama expanded the Dem base by pulling in the Hispanic vote. So he did more than just rile up the base.
But in general, I think Rove WAS right. Bush had a remarkable get out the vote effort and Obama did too. Just because the media didn’t cover what Bush’s campaign was doing (e.g., driving nursing home patients to the polls, using churches to excite fundies and get them to the polls, etc.) but covered everything Obama’s campaign did in detail doesn’t mean it didn’t happen. (This is one reason many Dems were so shocked by the 2004 results)
Moreover,the MAIN reason the Obama versus McCain popular vote (53% vs. 46%) difference was greater than the popular vote difference between Bush and Kerry (51% to 48%) is that a large number of Republicans (probably the conservative base) sat home rather than vote for McCain. From what I understand, they see him as an apostate: a RINO if you will. So yeah, I think in general, Rove got it right. Both men did a great job getting the vote out of their core constituents. Although Obama should be commended for significantly expanding the Dem base with the Hispanic vote.

Posted by: Anna Karinzky | November 13, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

cottonn: “ACORN has one man, alive by the way, that they registered 72 times! 72 TIMES! In the same office. Now why wouldn’t you catch that”
And you know why we know this? Because it was caught.
What, are you saying he was going to vote 72 times?
:-)

Posted by: DJ | November 13, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

I’ve got an idea!….Let’s take one-part Palinspeak and add it to two-parts Rovespeak…Maybe we’ll get a coherent AND factual thought!….Of course, there is a chance that we’ll just get a Whiskey Sour.

Posted by: TruthHurts | November 13, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

I don’t agree with Rove. The GOP got a thumping, and not just because the Obama campaign did a good job of getting out the vote. It was also because people are sick of his style of dirty campaign tactics.
If you watched the Frontline special on Lee Atwater, Rove’s protégé, you’d see that not much has changed in Republican campaign tactics in the last 20 years. They accused Dukakis’ wife of burning an American flag, trying to paint her as unpatriotic. Sound familiar?

Posted by: cincyr | November 13, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

OMG, Cottonn is right..look at the Illinois Lottery for the Evening pick 3 for November 5th. Wow…pretty weird! Most people just need to read the New King James Study Bible and just read the book of Daniel. It explains it all very clearly. So far the only thing off about this guy is that the AC is supposed to be a man of the military as he will be able to actually slay people. The charmisma is there…the religious background is there, the hidden agenda is there. I’m ready! Are any of you?

Posted by: ellie4u | November 13, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

The same number won the same Illinois Lottery on Christmas Day 2004, and also November 5th of 2001, and also on lots of other days. It’s random, based on (scientific) odds. Next thing you know, you’ll be studying numerology, superstitions, and have Palin’s preacher in Alaska (the visiting one) protect you from witchcraft. Try being reality-based and read your Bible (as opposed to emails) for spiritual guidance. Focusing on the Gospel.
As for Karl Rove, he’s only trying to protect his reputation. PBS broadcast Boogie Man on Tuesday, and I expect he’s more than a bit worried.

Posted by: Tom J | November 14, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

George Bush handed the presidency to Obama by starting a financial panic. Obama will now be blamed for all of the failures of the Bush administration.
It’s a plan, not a mistake.
Carolyn

Posted by: Carolyn Kay | November 14, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

They lost period.Game over.Regroup.Stop hating.Find peace in GOD.

Posted by: CHARLES | November 16, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.