Super-Zionist Peretz Defends Khalidi
In Sen. John McCain’s last week of campaigning, he and his campaign have done all they can to attack Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi. They’ve called him anti-Semitic, they’ve falsely called him a spokesman for the PLO, they’ve mentioned him on TV as a central argument in their attacks on Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill.
Marty Peretz, editor-in-chief of The New Republic and a longtime strong supporter of Israel, defended Khalidi this week.
"I assume that my Zionist credentials are not in dispute," Peretz writes. "And I have written more appreciative words about Khalidi than Obama ever uttered. In fact, I even invited Khalidi to speak for a Jewish organization with which I work. Moreover, the Israelis are trying to live cooperatively and in peace with Palestinians whose unrelenting positions make Khalidi almost appear like a Zionist."
Ron Kampeas of the Jewish Telegraphic Agency has a supportive take as well. Martin Kramer takes issue.
– jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
So is the LAT off the hook for concealing the video? Or are we simply changing the subject?
Posted by: Judasmac | November 1, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
McCain is using the same sleazy Rove tactics George W. Bush used. He is the same as Bush – under the influence of the slimy right wing of his party. No change there. No change at all.
Posted by: pefros | November 1, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Meanwhile back at the ranch, McCain is polling up to 75 per cent among Israelis generally and when Israeli Americans voted, they went 76 per cent for McCain, according to exit polls. The issue here is Iran and its nukes and the people trust McCain to watch our back when we take then out. No one trusts Obama farther than they can spit. Haaretz ran a story last week that Sarkozy thinks Obama is utterly clueless on Iran. We didn’t have to be told.
Posted by: idov | November 1, 2008, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Jake, just reveal youself and tell us who you have endorsed, and who you will vote for on Tuesday. Tell us any biases you have. I have a bias. My social security number was used by an illegal, and that got stuck on my credit report. That is my bias, against illegal immigrants, such as Obama’s aunt, who is receiving subsidized housing instead of a US citizen.
I also have a bias against an individual who has dedicated a book to Yassar Arafat, and has spoken, explaining the PLOs actions to others, while, when not convenient, saying he was never a spokesman to the PLO. Sounds similar to the behavior of Obama, who claims Khalidi was a ‘neighbor.’ If we were in Mr. Rogers neighborhood, that would be OK. We are not.
Posted by: pr | November 1, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
IT’S THE ECONOMY STUPID.
Is there a reason John McCain would like to change the subject?
Because the GOP ideal of sleeping regulators has put us at the brink of doom, perhaps?
Because of chief advisor Phil Gramm has personal responsibity for the deregulation of ‘credit default swaps’ that intangled and indangered hundreds of firms with no mortgage portfolio into the credit mess?
Because McCain’s own knowledge of economics is, well, none?
Because John McCain proposes transfering wealth? From the middle class. To the millionaires.
BECAUSE JOHN MCCAIN’S ERRATIC BEHAVIOR DURING THE DEBATES AND PARTICULARLY WITH REGARD TO THIS CRISIS HAVE BEEN UNIMPRESSIVE?????
Posted by: John McCain's conscience | November 1, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Mccain Why did you fund Khalidi?
Posted by: TRUE AMERICAN FOR OBAMA/BIDEN | November 1, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Dear ‘Concerned’,
John McCain has already ADMITTED lying.
Wednesday, on the Larry King show, McCain said that Barack Obama is no socialist.
This after he and his running mate called the man a socialist about 300 times in their speeches!
“John McCain. A liar for our times.”
Posted by: A values voter | November 1, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Obama was close friends with Ayers and Khalidi, no doubt about that. Ayers dedicated a previous book to Sirhan Sirhan, who assassinated RFK, who had been dedicated to Israel. Why would anyone dedicate a book to an assasin? And why would anyone befriend a terroist who would do that?
Meanwhile, Fox news tried to question Khalidi, who would hang up on them when they called. So they confronted him , and Khalidi goes runnign away like a criminal. Now, isn’t that strange? If you were asked to comment on Obama, would you go running away like a criminal?
what do they all have to hide?
Why any American patriot, especially American Jews, would vote for this Obama, a man with a secretive and sinister past, is beyond me. What can you possibly be thinking? Obama, because of his associations, would not even pass a security clearance if he was applying for a job with the CIA or FBI. Yet, we want to give him the highest secuirty clearance in the land as President? How did we come to be so foolish?
Posted by: liberati | November 1, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
This was always a NON-ISSUE done to try to get the Jewish vote in Florida for McCain.
I suspect the “leak” of Obama asking Rahm Emmanuel to be his chief of staff was to counteract the GOP smear that Obama “pals around with anti-semitic”.
Posted by: Nancy | November 1, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
The negatives have not worked.
So now what Republicans?
Posted by: Thinking | November 1, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
MCCAIN IS A SLEAZY LIAR, NO MCCAIN NO WAY NO HOW, ITS DISGUSTING THE THINGS HE HAS DONE AND SAID ABOUT SENATOR OBAMA, AND OBAMA HAS NEVER ONCE ATTACKED THAT SENILE OLD FOOL JUST GOES TO SHOW OBAMA HAS CLASS!
Posted by: TRUE AMERICAN FOR OBAMA/BIDEN | November 1, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
liberati,
When you say ‘like a criminal’, you mean the Fox news reporter, right?
Niether Joe the Plumber nor your hair stlylist have any obligation to say anything to any reporter if they don’t want to.
And frankly, only a fool would talk to people whom he expects slander in return.
Posted by: A values voter | November 1, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
The last few days disclosed very relevant issues to Obama’s candidacy, to his youth and position in society. His Mother’s family appears to have not been terribly flush with money to put Obama into post graduate work. Just exactly WHO paid for his post graduate work??? If Obama went for a U.S. student loan to pay for his grad studies, good for him. But if grad money came from sources outside the U.S., or from a domestic agency with ties to the middle east that were NOT from his family in Kenya, then I would say this item is very crucial in his candidacy. His Kenyan family appears not be flush with money. As long as Obama has obscurities in his background, why would people commit to him without full disclosures??
Posted by: MCN | November 1, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Khalidi did not go running away “like a criminal.” He has firmly stated that he will not offer comments of any kind on any of this. It is amazing what kind of negative spin some will put on people’s actions, based on their own preconceived ideas. These nasty comments are shocking.
Posted by: Panthers | November 1, 2008, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
MCN,
Scholarships and student loans. Obama only paid off his and his wife’s student loans last year, with the fruits of his work as an author.
And, what kind of McCathyistic mind do you have to possess to suggest something sinister. No one (except maybe his mom and grandmother) knew the man was going to run for president one day.
Posted by: A values voter | November 1, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
Where’s the video? to paraphrase Walter Mondale. As someone below has observed, this is just more misdirection…changing the subject. Who cares what this wonk or that wonk thinks? How different is that from arrogant newspaper editors hiding the facts behind newsprint generated by agenda driven reporters? Show me the video!
Posted by: jcarob | November 1, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
“As long as [McCain] has obscurities in his background, why would people commit to him without full disclosures??”
Could we please have a list of all the women McCain slept with while in the Navy? Why, oh why, is McCain ‘obscuring his background’?
And besides that, we want every detail in his medical records published in the newspaper. Letting the press look at a summary for a couple of hours just isn’t enough! In particular, where are the psych exams??? Why, oh why, is McCain ‘obscuring his background’?
Posted by: A values voter | November 1, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
So you’re so sure of this, that you’re going on record as specifically accusing John McCain of lying?
—————
I am.
He spent weeks calling Obama a “Socialist”. Then, on national TV, he syas Obama isn’t a socialist. He lied.
He spent weeks, calling Obama a terrorist, then, on national TV, he says Obama is not a terrorist. He lied.
He stated Rashid Khalidi was anti-semetic, a spokesman for the PLO. Now that turns out to be a lie. He lied.
Every attack Palin and McCain have made recently are gross exadurations, inuendo, and blatent lies.
That’s ALL they’ve got. They spend all their efforts trying to discredit Obama since they don’t have anything to offer themselves.
It’s a sure sign Obama is the real leader and McPalin are just followers.
Posted by: Rachel | November 1, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
We need to know the truth about McCain. Why was he palling around with unrepentant terrorist Liddy? Why did he give a keynote speech at an Acorn sponsered event? Why did he give Khalidi’s the terrorist’s company almost a million dollars? Where is his birth certificate? He was born in Panama and is probably not a US citizen. Why is McCain hiding all of this? He must come clean!
Posted by: Chandu | November 1, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
idov – Conveniently, to justify YOUR personal viewpoints, you left out France’s denial that Sarkozy was critical of Obama’s stance on Iran. Never happened m’dear. Never happened. On the contrary, there was a quote “convergence of views” unquote, between the two that you obviously wanted to leave out of your Obama-hating missive. Typical of right-wingers…
Obama/Biden ’08
Posted by: truth-telling Jew | November 1, 2008, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
‘Where’s the video?’ We have the RIGHT to see the video of Obama’s 10 year birthday party!
THE REAL QUESTION IS: What is the reason John McCain would like to change the subject off of the economy?
Why is he willing to spend his precious minutes before the election crying ‘terrorist’, ‘socialist’, ‘radical’???
I WANT TO KNOW HOW THIS COUNTRY IS GOING TO REVERSE THE STAGNANT WAGES OF THE MIDDLE CLASS!
The rest is just horse ****. The more McCain keeps shovelling, the more I am convinced that he would be a worst president than Grant.
Posted by: A values voter | November 1, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Are we suppose to believe you that Khailid was not a spokesperson for the PLO just because you said so?
Get real. Provide some proof.
Posted by: Brandi L. Eave | November 1, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Nice cover, but the issue is what Obama said in that tape the LA Times will not release
Of course they did endorse Obama!!!!
Posted by: volunteer | November 1, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
After the republicans lose the election, who will they blame?
Certainly the Obama campaign, the media, the economy and who knows what else.
The question is really did republicans have anything to offer in a time where the outgoing republican administration is viewed with such disgust both here and around the world, and during a financial crisis in the U.S.?
The answer appears to be the Republicans had no answers that satisfied the electorate..
All they seemed to have was an invective and hate campaign that was rejected.
At a time when America demanded answers and honesty, republicans answered with innuendo, lies and ‘guilt by association’.
Posted by: Blue | November 1, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
When we elect President McCain on Tuesday, who will Obama supporters blame?
It will be either accusations of:
– poll fraud
– racism
Just watch. And, if McCain supporters are unhappy, they will go to court. But, if Obama supporters are unhappy, the will riot.
Which supporters will be more productive for our country? You tell me.
President McCain, thank God for you.
Posted by: liberati | November 1, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Thank you. That would have been easy to miss.
Does it matter to anyone else that some of the statements that Khalidi has made are made by not only American Zionists, but Israelis themselves? Israelis want a country that stands up to its promise – and its founding – and the Likud party and its agenda do not represent that promise. Does it matter to anybody that Khalidi did work for the PLO durng PEACE TALKS? Do any of you even know what the man has said? Does it occur to any of you that everyone in the press knows the real source of this story – and it is not Wallsten – it is a complete bottom feeder of the blogosphere- who no journalist alive would associate with? Way, way, way under Matt Drudge. Doesn’t that tell you something? And what do you expect on to see on this tape? There is not question that both McCain and Obama had associations with Khalidi – not to mention the faculty at the University of Chicago and Columbia. The only difference is that McCain gave him five times more money than the Woods Fund gave to a charity for immigrants in Chicago.
And for the wackjobs who are questioning Tapper’s allegiance to Israel or Sam Zell’s allegiance – you are simply out of your minds.
Posted by: Mara | November 1, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Then why won’t they release the tape? I guess Ayers ,et al are America loving patriots.
Posted by: Ron | November 1, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
IVOV: I don’t know whether you simply switched names, or your post was intentional misleading – but you are completely off. Even if you go to the most conservative polls, Obama leads McCain among Jewish voters 74/22% (Gallup). Is Haaretz a good enough reference for that? (10/24). If not – Gallup shows the same numbers (10/23)
You are completely correct that Israeli voters have favored McCain. I can’t wait to see the numbers from New York, which I believe has the highest Jewish population in the world, outside of Israel?. It didn’t look too good for McCain this morning up on the upper West Side.
Posted by: Mara | November 1, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Ron, Judging from the orignal source, my guess is that there is no tape. But if it puts your mind at rest, I think they had chocolate cake at the going away party.
This whole thing is flat-out weird to me. You people are afraid that Obama might have associated with Muslims. You’re aware that we just spent trillions of dollars and 4000 American lives associating with Muslims, right? And that we put a Muslim government into power in Iraq that is EXACTLY like the Sharia, Muslim government in Iran, right? And that that was part of the surge – to take guns and power away from the Sunnis – who are now refugees, some in their own country, some in Jordan. And that those people – none of them — are pro-Israeli? And that the last major battle, the battle of Basra, was not settled with American help? It was negotiated in IRAN through a MUSLIM cleric? This isn’t from the Huff Post – I married into a militaryfamily and they actually follow military coverage of the war. So the entire upper command of the US government and the US mlitary are associating with the dreaded MUSLIMS – and none f them are very fond of Israel? But you are worried about who Obama had tea with ten years ago? WHen we have bankrupted ourselves to bring Iran and Iraq closer together than they have probably ever been?
Posted by: Mara | November 1, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
“Marty Peretz, editor-in-chief of The New Republic”
The New Republic?
Posted by: Erika | November 1, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
The alternative headline could be:
“Liberal magazine editor defends Khalidi”
Posted by: Erika | November 1, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
When the Historians get finished with George W. Bush, you will find he was one of our better Presidents. Why doesn’t anyone ever mention he has had a Democratic majority in Congress who have a 9% approval rating. At least he has a 30% rating. PJ
Posted by: Helen James | November 1, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Its so sad that a politician like John McCain whom i have admired for so long has just made himself look so silly because of his desperation to become the next US President.
Its a shame to hear all the rubbish that has been said about Senator Obama. None of them is based on truth and when You hear Sarah Palin calling people terrorists, you wonder where she has left her morals and truthfulness as a christian.
Sarah Palin has betrayed all impotant fabric of morals and she has no knowledge of world experience.
Its a shame that Mr McCain has adopted the most disgraceful policy linked to Karl Rove, but the difference this time is, no one is buying it.
People have seen through the Republican Party that has been hijacked by those crooks, using it for their own selfish ends.
Mr McCain you have lost my respect and vote.
Posted by: Gentleman | November 1, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
John McCain – Sarah Palin are doing anything and everything to win. Neither care who they destroy or professionally defame!!
I hope both are sued!!
Actions are despicable!!
Posted by: Sharonklim | November 1, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
Yes, all of Barack Obama’s associates are merely tangential. Allow me to list just a handful:
Jeremiah Wright
William Ayers
Mark Rudd
Tony Rezko
Rashid Khalidi
Khalid al-Mansour
Louis & ‘Mother’ Khadijah Farrakhan:
Posted by: Leann | November 1, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
You know who hasn’t come out in support of Khalidi? Barack Obama. Khalidi was just a fellow professor and a guy whose kids went to the same school.
Regardless, it is the entirety of the tape as reported that people want to see. There were supposedly very anti-Semitic things said there. Bill Ayres was there.
How did Obama interact? How did he respond?
Posted by: MayBee | November 1, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
According to Thomas L. Friedman of the New York Times, writing on June 9, 1982, Mr. Khalidi was at that time “a director of the Palestinian press agency.” That would be Wikalat al-Anba al-Filastinija, or WAFA, the PLO press agency, where Mr. Khalidi’s wife, Mona, was chief English-language editor in 1976-82. Mr. Friedman quotes Mr. Khalidi in his official capacity saying that the Israelis are out to “crush the P.L.O.”
Posted by: B. L. Eave | November 1, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
If Khalidi is the reprehensible character that “Huey Long in Drag” has made him out to be, why did McCain, as Chairman of the IRI, give the guy close to $500,000?
Martin Peretz, editor of the New Republic, is an outspoken advocate for Israeli. Maybe he’s as fed up with the Republican character assassination and “guilt by association” game as the rest of us are.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | November 1, 2008, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
He and his wife WORKED for the PLO and some say he still does. Obama and his wife often had dinner with Khalidi and his wife. Khalidi himself said(before it mattered) that he spent time at Ayers while writing his book.(so did Obama) Khalidi got money from them. They are one big happy family. All this crap coming out and Obama, instead of admitting it, first buries information and when that doesn’t work anymore uses the same stupid excuses. How many times can he say he never did, never knew, barely knew, is not the person I knew, don’t have…etc. He needs to record his answer and just hit play.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | November 1, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
What is happening here is typical of the past few months of the election. The buzz is completely about Obama’s association with Rashid Khalidi at some obscure event in the distant past.
The pundits stress the association, but not the position Khalidi holds at Columbia, not the prestige of the Univerisity, not that Khalidi is a respected scholar, and of course not a serious discussion of any statements and positions and Rashid Khalidi may have made about the situation in Israel/Palestine.
In fact this is how the game is played.
Very similar to the media madness surrounding William Ayers. Forty years after those events the discussion is not only out of context, the context is not even mentioned – out of consideration for former prisoner of war John McCain?
By the way, Gentleman, history may judge the Reagan Revolution, Contract with America, and the Second Coming of a Bush as a group when discussing this period of American history. It might not be as pretty site in hindsight as you would like.
Posted by: n0cent0bsrvr | November 1, 2008, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
It isn’t hard to see past any of the b.s. if you took a look into how campaigning works. It is a persuasive device closely aligned with the advertising/marketing field in that the campaigner researches the needs wants fears etc. of the key demographic. With this information, the campaign attempts to hijack a voter’s thought-process with simple idea’s that play to the person’s self-image. While the bs flows from both sides (that’s just politics people), it has become increasingly easy to predict what comes from the mccain camp. They know “socialism” strikes the fear of god into American hearts. Same with “terrorist.” At least Obama attacks on McCain, while still misleading, are somewhat credible. Conservatives: stop listening to talk radio. At least embrace smart conservatives.
Posted by: patriot maverick hero tito | November 1, 2008, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Obama supporters, say what you want. He ran a dirty campaign against Hillary Clinton when he was supposed to be about change. Because of intimidation, information about him has been buried. He squashes those that disagree. Actually I shouldn’t say he does, he has it done. This is how he operates. He promises everything. I’m waiting to see how long it takes before the excuses start when he can’t keep his promises.
Democrat for McCain/Palin.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | November 1, 2008, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
helen james, it’s not the Democratic majority in Congress that has a 9% approval, or whatever it is, it’s the Congress as a whole. If it was just the Democratic majority that people felt that way about, the polls wouldn’t be unanimous in predicting major Democratic gains in Congress.
Posted by: mike | November 1, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
Honestly, does anybody really know the people they interact with? For all I know my neighbor who I have good relations with could be a terrorist. The fact that I have a conversation with him and invite him over for dinner every now and then doesn’t make me a terrorist or sympathetic to terrorism does it?
Posted by: Voter in Michigan | November 2, 2008, 6:51 am 6:51 am
Summary: “SUPER-zionist” cool with major paper to helping cover up the facts of potential commander-in-chief’s relationship with a profagandist *because the pal is ‘almost Zionist.’ Does Peretz leap tall buildings or just fix the leaks in them when not leading his IDF battalion?
Posted by: MDJ | November 2, 2008, 8:09 am 8:09 am
I have to say I’m incredibly disgusted with so-called Americans who have information at their finger tips, yet still feel it’s okay to besmirch a man like Rashid Khalidi. A man who was born and raised in this country and is also CHRISTIAN (not that it should matter, but since we now live in a nation where people subscribe to the KKK way of thinking, someone who is Muslim is automatically guilty).
This is a man who has worked hard and has both been educated and taught, at some of the most prestigious universities in the world. Instead, you hold up a tax-evading, unlicensed plumber who’s now trying to break into country music, as some folk American hero when all he is is the classic media ##### and phony.
You could only hope to have your children taught by Prof. Khalidi and to aspire to be a rational, non-violent human being. It is not a crime to be a Palestinian or of Palestinian descent, but when the media feeds into the image with its one-sided coverage and waits until the “Super Zionist” gives his *stamp of approval* not to smear this man, then that right there is why the US will never be taken seriously in the rest of the world. What a disgrace.
Posted by: Pamela | November 2, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Could you please comment on the relationship between McCain and Rashid Khalidi? I mean, I understand that McCain has provided Khalidi with tons more money than Obama, so why would he try to smear Obama with his relationship with Khalidi? Or it is just one of Palin’s great ideas?
Posted by: Kobalto | November 2, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm