Today’s Sams
A few days ago, frustrated by Sen. Barack Obama’s abject refusal to hold a full press conference (more than five questions, arranged ahead of time) in more than a month, we started shouting questions to Obama as he boards and de-planes O Force One. We call them "Sams" in tribute to ABC News’ Sam Donaldson, who would shout them to President Ronald Reagan, among others.
Often he ignores the questions. And I’ve been meaning to record his responses but they’re often so lame they haven’t seemed worth the effort.
But, in the interest of information, I’ll start posting them.
Today’s Sams:
Obama boarding the plane in Pueblo, Colo.
ABC News’ Sunlen Miller: Do you have any comment about your aunt? Do you have anything to say about your aunt?
Obama: (silence)
Obama deplaning in Springfiled, Mo.
Tapper: Are you worried about the polls tightening?
Obama: I never worry about the polls.
Tapper: You never worry about the polls?
Obama: There something I should worry about, Jake?
And … scene.
- jpt
UPDATE: Some previous Sams from the past few days include:
- What is your reaction to the excursion in Syria (he said he’d get back to us after he found out more details; he didn’t);
- What’s your reaction to the endorsement of former Reagan chief of staff Ken Duberstein (he said he wants everyone’s vote and he appreciates Ken’s);
- Why are you advertising in Arizona (He said he wants to win every state);
- and Geoff Earle from the New York Post, before he was kicked off the plane (but after he’d been told he would have to leave) asked Obama’s reaction to a Rezko-related lawsuit (no response).
I don’t particularly like shouting questions, and you can only get so deep in a shouted question. The whole thing is rather demeaning, but they’ve apparently decided he’s likelier to win if he doesn’t have to face questions from his press corps. And as I’ve written before, it’s not as if Sen. McCain is any more accessible to his press corps.
Email
USS Gabrielle Giffords Honors Courage
Mitt Romney's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
What difference does it make? You guys don’t ask him any real questions anyway.
Posted by: Michelle | November 1, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
“Are you worried about the polls tightening?”
What kind of answer do you expect?
Posted by: ATO | November 1, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
Ah, he called you Jake…. the next President of the United States actually recognized you! How sweeeet!
NOW I understand why you had to post this, Jake. Congratulations! Cheers!
Posted by: heather | November 1, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
Dear Jake,
Why would you want to spend your only question time into asking something no one American cares about?
Democrats for an intelligent and strong president.
Posted by: Andy | November 1, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Did the news reporters have any luck on
McCains response to Palins talking to
a Canadian radio impersonator pretending
to be a high ranking Canadian Governmental
official?
Posted by: spacerook1 | November 1, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
Good Heavens! YOU FORGOT TO ASK HIS SHOE SIZE!!!! That was the MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION!!!!
get a clue JT!
Obama/Biden 2008!!!
Posted by: richard | November 1, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Jake, the polls AREN’T even tightening, on the contrary!
Look at the Obama surge in the Gallup poll, the 13 points lead in today’s CBS poll, the continuous 51% Obama gets for more than a month now in the Rasmussen poll…
So where were you talking about???
Obama’s RCP average NOW is 50,4 percent of the vote, against 43,6 for McCain…
Bush NEVER did that well at this stage of his presidential races. So again, what kind of question WAS that?
And regardless of the actual polls, would a candidate EVER say anything else than that he’s NOT worried or that he doesn’t rely on polls?…
Relax, Jake. There will be plenty of press conferences during the eight years of Obama’s presidency.
Posted by: manning | November 1, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
Jake,
not one of your brighter ideas. I don’t think you guys should be acting like tabloid reporters. You are given that kind of access for a reason, to ask reasonable questions. Respect your profession and the organization you are representing. You can, for example, ask him about what he knows/thinks of the current progress on the bailout plan. That seems to be a more fitting question to ask a potential president, not the garbage you are yelling out. With all due respect to you, of course.
Posted by: Question | November 1, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
Why should he worry? His got the rightous wind behind him, and ACORN.
Posted by: Karl | November 1, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
Jake, what about a VP candidate who not only refuses to EVER give a press conference, but refuses to release her medical record ahead of Election Day ALSO…?
Did you ask the McCain campaign what they are trying to hide by not releasing Palin’s records?
And by the way, your own talking point: if Stevens decides to stay in the race, will Palin vote for him???
(btw Palin’s popularity has SERIOUSLY declined here in Alaska; new ethics trials against her are coming up)
Posted by: Alaskan Fuel | November 1, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
At least he knows your name
Posted by: Vanessa | November 1, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
It does look like the Mr. Obama, the serial liar, will be our President. If he wins, I will be going to work. If he loses, I will stay home.
Posted by: young_voter | November 1, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
Congratulations on trying to get some news out of the O-man, even though it is an act of futility. The O-man knows that nothing said cannot get him in trouble. What bothers me most about all this is his lack of confidence. It seems that he really believes that his campaign may fail. That bothers me a whole lot because I don’t want someone who harbors a lot of doubts to occupy an office that may one day decide the survival of thousands or millions of people.
Also, dear Jake, it would be nice if your chat board teddy bear would stop trashing innocuous posts. There will be enough time for censorship when the O-man gets his “civilian security force”.
Posted by: jcarob | November 1, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
Here’s a crazy ideas for you guys. Read up a little on an issue. Then look at the candidate’s position papers on the issue. Compare what they say in the papers and what they say in interviews. Do a story that explains the issues and the trade-offs each candidate’s position imposes. If your thoughtful analysis reveals a weakness or inconsistency in the candidate’s position, sit back and wait for him or her to call you to discuss the matter.
Oh, sorry, that would require work on our part. Never mind, just shout at the candidate on the steps of the plane and things that will have absolutely no effect on voters’ lives. Easy for you – and easy for me too – easy to ignore. Who reads the MSM anymore. I mean really, who?
Posted by: Pudentilla | November 1, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm
Wow you sound bitter. He’s talked to you enough. How many more questions could you possibly have left about anything important? And after some of these blogs no wonder he dosen’t respond to the press.What about Palin? You don’t seem to be too upset about her not being available to the press.Unless you’re Fox news or Entertainment Tonight. Seems to me she needs to answer a few more questions than Obama does.
Posted by: Miki | November 1, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
Ha, ha…
Jake, you are doing quite a job!
Love you! I think you are putting it all out there; good or bad to each campaign….
Gotta love that…
Posted by: kp | November 1, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
And McCain’s last press conference was…..and how many questions did he allow? Less than five.
And Sarah Palin’s last press conference was….?
Posted by: Mara | November 1, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
I want to know WHY the McCain ticket promotes JOE THE PLUMMER…. HE IS A TAX EVADER and the McCain ticket should not be promoting someone as UNAMERICAN as this guy is! SHAME on the McCain ticket!
Why has the Obama ticket NOT jumping all over this!?!?!?!?
Why isnt the PRESS jumping all over this!?!?
Obama/Biden 2008!!!
Posted by: richard | November 1, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
Miki – He does sound bitter. Back before McCain became a creature of Rick Davis and Charlie Black, he was very charming to the correspondent. Bush has always been real nice to them too. When is the press corps going to understand that we don’t care if the candidate or the President is their best friend? We’ve just lived through almost eight years of Bush. I care what the man’s policies are, what he stands for, and how he runs a campaign. That’s what the press corps should be worried about too.
Posted by: Mara | November 1, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
“they’ve apparently decided he’s likelier to win if he doesn’t have to face questions from his press corps”
My analysis differs, Jake.
I would say: they’ve apparently come to the conclusion that they don’t need to talk to the press corps in order to win this election. So why spend the precious time and energy? What they do is directly talk to the voters. To America.
Posted by: keith | November 1, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
I want to know WHY the McCain ticket promotes JOE THE PLUMMER…. HE IS A TAX EVADER and the McCain ticket should not be promoting someone as UNAMERICAN as this guy is! SHAME on the McCain ticket!
Why has the Obama ticket NOT jumping all over this!?!?!?!?
Why isnt the PRESS jumping all over this!?!?
Obama/Biden 2008!!!
Posted by: richard | Nov 1, 2008 11:49:40 PM
========================================
According to court records, creditors have secured at least two liens against [Joe the Plumber] Wurzelbacher, whose legal name is Samuel. Ohio has a $1,182 lien for owed taxes and St. Charles Mercy Hospital has filed a 2007 lien for $1,261.
Oh my gosh he’s worse then Al Capone… Give me a break.
I think we can all agree that this is critical information.
Not because it says anything about Joe the Plumber, mind you. But it does serve a useful function: it warns any future citizen who might dare question Barack Obama that his life will be closely scrutinized for any irrelevant but embarrassing information.
So, you know. Critical in that sense.
Oh — I almost forgot to mention: Martin Nesbitt, the treasurer of Obama’s campaign has tax liens. So do his companies.
Posted by: NebraskaVoice | November 2, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am
Jake, Obama recently gave a whole interview to your colleague, Charles Gibson.
So he DOES talk to ABC. But, well, eh… not to you.
You’re a lightweight, Jake. This blog is proof of that.
Posted by: beef | November 2, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am
Dearest Jake — please do ask the O next time:
– “Why does your Kenyan grandmother live in squalor, when you said that it is important to help your family, and why does she say that she witnessed your birth in Kenya?”
– just want to see him squirm
Posted by: liberati | November 2, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am
Jake I love ya, but come on. You’re posting, what is it now 41 blogs on Biden and yet Palin has yet to hold a press conference. Considering, I’m gonna give Obama a pass on this one.
Posted by: CJ | November 2, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am
Jake, I guess he was busy talking to Rachel Maddow, Charles Gibson, and the other national journalists who interviewed him this week.
Don’t be petty because you’re just the guy who follows him around.
Posted by: Billy | November 2, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am
So in an interview Tuesday, Spike Lee said the election of Barack Obama is “pre-deortained” — a word that really doesn’t exist, at least in the heads of sane people.
But, the fact is, Spike’s right: Obama’s rise is “pre-deortained,” at least when it comes to anyone who works in the media or entertainment industry.
So why is that?
It’s simple: Obama embodies the most eloquent and appealing combination of every liberal cliché molded into an agreeable life form. He’s able to take every failed policy and every adolescent and/or misguided belief about wealth and make it sound perfectly sensible — even heroic!
He is, in effect, the perfect Hollywood president, not simply because Hollywood loves him, but because Hollywood made him.
Think about this: There has never been, in the history of moviemaking, a noble non-liberal president. Whether he’s played by Michael Douglas or Kevin Kline, what makes him appealing are his simple liberal virtues, i.e. bombing bad guys is wrong, the rich are corrupt and the poor deserve your Porsche.
Where the average Joe sees enterprise, Hollywood and the mainstream media sees American greed. And that’s the cause of all the world’s problems (exempting their own massive coke habits).
Obama is so good at playing this role, that it’s easy to overlook the socialist principles embedded in his ideological core. And that’s scary.
I mean, wasn’t the credit mess nothing more than an act of wealth redistribution? Banks were encouraged to give loans to high-risk folks to buy homes they couldn’t afford. It’s a free lunch that, in the end, we’re all now paying for.
And this is what happens when you decide to rearrange a pie instead of growing it. What you get is sticky fingers, instead of a full stomach.
And if you disagree with me, then you sir, are worse than Mars Blackman.
Posted by: MBNA Joe | November 2, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
Is Barack Obama a socialist? A Marxist? It is hard to believe that question could even be seriously asked of a major party political candidate.
Nevertheless, there have been a few times that voters have gotten a glimpse of Obama in unguarded moments. Glimmers that remind me of the left-wing academic whom I ran into a number of times while we were both at the University of Chicago Law School.
— When Charlie Gibson asked Obama in April why he supported higher capital gains taxes, even if that meant less government revenue and thus less money to give to those Obama wants to help, Obama didn’t challenge Gibson’s claim. Instead he said: “I would look at raising the capital gains tax for purposes of fairness.”
— In the middle of October, when speaking to “Joe the Plumber,” Obama justified higher taxes this way:
“It is not that I want to punish your success. I just want to make sure that everyone who is behind you, that they have a chance for success too. I think that when you spread the wealth around, it is good for everyone.”
— A bombshell was released this weekend when a copy of an interview by Obama on WBEZ-FM, Chicago Public Radio, from 2001 was found (bold italics added):
“The Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society … and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was, um, because the civil rights movement became so court focused, I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that. … I think that you can craft legal theoretical justifications for it legally, any three of us here could come up with a rational for bringing about economic change through the courts.”
Class warfare rhetoric is one thing. But as Obama’s comments to Charlie Gibson indicate, Obama disapproves of the very notion that people should be successful. Why is making the wealthy poorer “fairness,” even when the poor also get less money? The goal is not to help the poor, it’s to keep the wealthy from getting too much. It is apparently better that everyone be poorer than it is to have everyone have more money but a greater dispersion of income.
How is simply giving people money a way to make sure that they “have a chance for success too”? Obama might end up giving people who currently aren’t paying taxes even more money than they currently get from the Earned Income Tax Credit. But he will be doing so at a real cost: he is creating a high effective marginal tax rate that will keep them poor and keep them dependent on the government largess.
Obama’s tax credits are phased out as people earn higher incomes — that is, the government takes money away from you as your income goes up. Someone earning an extra dollar at $40,000 will find that income taxes alone will take 40 cents from that dollar.
Obama’s old comments from WBEZ seem impossible to ignore. Put aside that Obama obviously doesn’t believe that affirmative action represents redistributive justice. Saying that the Supreme Court “never ventured” into “redistribution of wealth” rules that out.
Obama’s constant theme is of transferring wealth, to “spread it around.”
There is so much else beyond his statements. Obama surrounded himself with people who were socialists and communists. Obama’s minister of 20 years, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright with his black liberation theology, a religion described as turning “Jesus into a black Marxist rebel.” Father Michael Pfleger, another Obama spiritual adviser, is also quite leftist. And his associate William Ayers apparently told an author, who was writing a book on 1960s radicals shortly before the foundation was set up in 1995, that “I’m a radical, leftist, small ‘c’ communist.”
In April Obama was caught on tape telling San Francisco donors, in a meeting that was closed to the press, that “it’s not surprising then they get bitter, [small town Pennsylvanians] cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.” It was a very elitist left-wing statement. But the despising of people turning to religion is certainly something held in common by those on the far left.
During the presidential campaign Obama’s past positions have generally been ignored. Why wasn’t there one single question during the debates as to why Obama has so radically changed his positions on so many issues within just a few months?
Who is Obama going to put on the Supreme Court? With Democrats controlling a filibuster-proof Senate, will we be seeing the most extreme left-wing academics in law schools fill up the courts?
Posted by: MBNA Joe | November 2, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am
The press has not vetted Obama.
He lied about public financing – what else is he lying about? The media coverage has been so biased they along with ACORN and $630,000,000 have bought him the White House if he wins.
Posted by: pbatrs | November 2, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am
CJ – Thanks.
Posted by: Mara | November 2, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am
Sorry, Jake. Michelle started this thread on the right note.
First, you need to know how to be relevent.
Lotsa luck.
Posted by: J Edgar | November 2, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am
His arrogance is on full display. His reply to Jake was “pissy” at best. He’s showing his true colors. If he is elected he will bristle at any sign of questioning when he doesn’t want it. Remeber when he got mad last Spring that the press tried to ask him more than 8 questions at a press conference.
The media created this arrogant monster.
Posted by: Lara | November 2, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am
Jake, this is probably just the beginning. Once you guys have dragged him over the finish line, he’ll drop you guys too – until he needs you to boost his poll numbers again. Get used to it.
Posted by: b | November 2, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am
We did our research. We listened to the debates, heard what each party supports and what each opposes. We talked to friends, family and neighbors…and America is making their choices…
It’s now in God’s hands.
God Bless our Country.
God Bless America.
Posted by: Logan | November 2, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
“and Geoff Earle from the New York Post, before he was kicked off the plane.”
Obama’s attitude toward the press is stunning. They love him to death, but if the editorial board of the newspaper you work for endorses McCain, then you get your press pass revoked. And the press plays along. Reminds me of how CNN would willingly kowtow up to Saddam Hussein’s propaganda machine prior to the war. Don’t get me wrong, I am not comparing Obama to the Iraqi dicattaor. Just the press fawning over him in fear of losing access.
Posted by: topo2005 | November 2, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am
lame
Posted by: so | November 2, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am
“…it’s not as if Sen. McCain is any more accessible to his press corps.”
Then report on how you shout, or not shout, question at McCain too.
Posted by: Charity begins at home | November 2, 2008, 1:04 am 1:04 am
If you have not read MBNA Joe – please pay attention if you have not voted.
McCain wants to clean up DC – DC likes all the crooked dealings, they could care less about WE THE PEOPLE. Obama has not been vetted, he is very, very Radical, and I do not believe that most Americans are. He speaks well, but we need more than a good looking suit in DC, we need someone who will represent Country First! The press distort so much. Used to watch CNN, MSNBC and FOX to try to get balance, finally gave up on MSNBC and for the last month posts on CNN have always been closed for comments, go to another site or error message. You see interviews on CNN and they are so out of context They do not want open discussion and it will only get worse with an Obama Presidency. Please wake up before it is to late and we are not allowed to speak our minds and/or vote.
Posted by: pbatrs | November 2, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am
“Vote for the candidate you think has the smarts, temperament and inspirational capacity to unify the country and steer our ship through what could be the rockiest shoals our generation has ever known. Your kids will thank you.”
Sounds like right about now we can use a man who proved his metal by sacrificing 5 years of his life in an absolute hellhole for his country. I call THAT inspirational.
Hmmm… Now, who could that be?
Posted by: topo2005 | November 2, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am
The Media has let the people down this election.
Mr Obama always has gotten Favorable press coverage.
Anything unfavorable was brought up then buried fast.
Any favorable coverage of his opponents was very little. That got buried. The unfavorable was Plaster and ran for days. Even the headlines were horrible.
It truly influenced many votes.
ABC did have the best debate of the election. there should of been more like it.
The People needed to get to know the Candidates, how they answer questions, how they react, what they say. To little of that was done.
Mr Obama remains to be so secretive.
The many lies he has had about major things, That matter. lying about your family and friends. Show a persons Character.
The lies were just brushed away like they were nothing.
It was not campaign rhetoric. it was Character flaws. It was down right deceitful.
The international deceptions. Like the NAFTA deal. That was despicable for a US Senator to do. Tell the American People one thing, then go behind their backs to another countries leaders and tell them, he did not mean it.
Sure That is true Patriotism.
How many other nations has he done that with?
His bad Judgment and lies.
Did he not think someone would know he was lying when he said he barely knew Rezko?
Did he not think someone would know Ayers was more than just a guy in his neighborhood?
Most Amazing one was Wright. Telling the world he never heard his pastor say things like that while he was in Church.
When he got caught in that lie, he was not to happy.
He came back and said he did hear him.
Then went on with his speech which he eloquently called all Americans racist.
What a manipulator.
Posted by: seah | November 2, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am
Obama just keeps putting it out there, doesn’t he? Too elite to communicate with the little people, he feels he’ll do just fine if he can just keep the heat turned up under class warfare. For a guy who professes not liking war, he sure does promote this one to the fullest. And why do Americans, or at least Democrats, buy into this mumbo jumbo? Because it is eloquently delivered? Why do people care if wealth grows for the wealthy as long as wealth grows for you? Do your own hard work and quit trying to expect prosperity to be handed to you. It is so demeaning to lack self-reliance. Blame just avoids the issue. Obama acts as if mysterious forces are preventing you from succeeding. That just smacks of paranoia. Do you think the wealthy desire the poor to be poorer? That’s just ignorant. The wealthier that the poorest person is, the more that person has to spend, thus not only gaining personally but expanding the economy. When one prospers all prosper. When one capable person rests easy allowing others to do for him, that just sucks the life from all of us. Government is not here to assure us prosperity – wherever did that cockeyed notion come from? That is not change we can believe in it is change we should run away from. Government is here to protect life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The actual acquisition of happiness cannot be the responsibility of government (just who do you want to tell you what makes you happy and what does not? Obama? Wright? Rezko? Pelosi?). We must rely on ourselves to find happiness. I should do nothing to compromise your access to happiness and you should do nothing (including redistributing my wealth) that prevents my access to happiness. The Democrats I have left behind insist on this microeconomic interpretation of the world where if an individual is better off everyone is better off. If we give everyone a dollar, prices will inflate until that dollar has no added value. Moreover, the cost of redistributing those dollars means everyone actually has LESS when the exercise is done. This is the essence of Obama economics. If we teach everyone to earn an extra dollar, and if they are willing to do the work to earn it, not only are we all actually wealthier, but the process of learning and earning continues to create wealth after the exercise is over. This is the essence of McCain economics. Think about it – when you do (if you are willing to suspend your hate and class warfare ideals long enough) you like I will leave the Democrat concept of government holding my hand so I cannot fall (or walk on my own) behind, and will vote for a future where all can walk together with each under his or her own power, and where prosperity can truly be shared. If this world makes sense (and how can it not?) you will also vote for McCain. Jake, put these questions to Obama on Omigodpleaseno Force One, eh?
Posted by: Reformed Democrat | November 2, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am
it was awful nice of you to note at the end that mccain is no more accessible to the press; perhaps an equally comprehensive of his daily ‘sams’ will be forthcoming? just in the name of fairness, don’t you know…
Posted by: antijake | November 2, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am
MBNA Joe: “The despising of people on the far left..?” Have you been spending too much time with Sarah Palin? Aside from the Sarah syntax, do you want to provide some evidence for your statement? And what does that statement have to do with anything? I hate to break it to you, but George Will is atheist/agnositc. Is he a Marxist?
And where did you put your facts? “Obama surrounded himself with people who were communists or socialists? Really? Did he live in China? In a kibbutz? In a commune? Or was WORKING at the US Senate? With, say Lugar and McCain? Is McCain a closet socialist? He did say, after all, that if you’ve already made plenty, there’s no problem with sharing a little of it.
There have certainly been startling revelations this week. There are always revelations the week before an election. But my favorite is about Sarah Palin, who has been running around the country lying her little quasi-Christian head off about Obama and communism. Sarah, you see, is actually the Governor of her own little socialist state. In Alaska, they overtax the oil companies, and then they “spread the wealth around” to every single Alaskan. Does that person have to work for the oil company (as in profit-sharing)? No. Does that person have to work at all? No. Can that person be on welfare? Yes. And they get an annual check anyway. Sarah Palin, 2008: “we’re set up, unlike other states in the union, where it’s collectively Alaskans own the resources. So we share in the wealth when the development of these resources occurs.” “Like other states in the union? What union? The woman is so dumb that she does not understand that this IS socialism. Shocking, I say, just shocking.
Posted by: Mara | November 2, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am
I don’t think the polls have been tightening at all.. they were earlier in the week.. but they went back to what they were after Obama’s outstanding infomercial.
Posted by: Kathy | November 2, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am
Jake, Since Obama clearly thinks the press are his personal poodles, and puff pieces in Ebony and documentaries recording his splendiferousness for posterity are more important than real journalists, maybe it is time you all tell us what you really think of Obama. I have been reading lately that no one in the press really “knows” him. Is that true? If he is this insulated in a campaign, I can only imagine the bubble that they will put around him if he is in the White House. This has the feel of all wrong to me, and I hope people take a look at his staged, theatrical, controlled campaign—far beyond what we have ever seen—and ask themselves why Americans seem to be falling for outright propaganda.
Posted by: Jo CHGO | November 2, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am
Which polls are tightening? Obama is up or tied in every single battleground state Bush won in 2004 and he has all of Kerry’s states locked.
Posted by: Kathy | November 2, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am
Jake, you tick off both sides. So you are either a person who likes to be hated (I don’t think so) or a person who uncovers a stone, and let the chips fall where they may. I’ve had my criticiam of you today (not bleeping, text-wise, the offensive title of the purn video mocking Gov Palin was in poor taste, IMHO.) but overall you do a good job.
I try to be careful to not cross the line, so I can’t figure the guidelines here. It seems almost random. i can’t tell if it is bias or not because I haven’t been on this page long emough to figure that one way or the other.
Posted by: topo2005 | November 2, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am
Welcome Reformed Democrat! Yet another new poster who just happpens to b a new poster and just happened to stop by to tell us he’s changing his vote. By golly, the monikers are almost all the same as if they had been drawn from a list. Let’s count how many McCain talking points you can get into one post 1) elite 2) little people 3) class warfare 4) prosperity (is joe the plumber coming soon or is he in nashvile?) 4) Yeah! Rezco 5) Hurrah! Wright! 6) Pelosi 7) Redistrubtion of wealth (where are taxes?) You missed taxes. And I am SO convinced that you were once a Democrat. After 8 years of Bush, all the Democrats are really, really happy with the Republican agenda.
Why don’t you people just say “I’m a Republican, always have been and always will be. There is no reason on earth to vote for this creature who is completely clueless on the economy, cannot remember from week to week what his position is (or changes it by the week) has fouled his own honor, and has no idea what victory in Iraq will look like or cost and has chosen the most idiotic nominee for VP in our country’s history. But I’m a Republican, so I’m gonna vote for him anyway.
By the way, I’m an independent.
Posted by: Mara | November 2, 2008, 1:31 am 1:31 am
Right. (sigh)
Goodnight.
Posted by: topo2005 | November 2, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am
Hang in there, Jake. Your blog is one of the few out there from the MSM that tells it like it is. Thank you for doing your job.
Posted by: lblac | November 2, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am
Shouted question: Where are Governor Palin’s medical records?
No response.
Posted by: DVS | November 2, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am
Jake, don’t feel bad. We won’t ignore you. Ask us any question you like, in fact, and I’m sure we’ll be happy to answer it. We’re with you Jake!
Posted by: ziadora | November 2, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am
Shouted question: Where are Governor Palin’s medical records?
No response.
Posted by: DVS | Nov 2, 2008 1:40:44 AM
—-
She’s hiding the fact that she didn’t have the baby. I mean, come on, she flew 3000 after her water broke?? No way!
Posted by: ziadora | November 2, 2008, 1:44 am 1:44 am
Can you be at all serious about a tough interview for Obama on MSNBC. They are the least credible of any “NEWs” on TV.
Olberman is pure hateful, his rants are as bad as O’Reilly to Barney Frank (D)(however had I been allowed to interview Frank I would have been worse as he has cost most Americans a lot.
Matthews gets chills up his leg when he hears Obama speak? This is a news person?
For those of you who have just tuned into the election, the Main stream media has covered up or very briefly covered anything that did not show worshipful news regarding Obama.
Obama believe in communism,-to Marxism. If this is not what you want for our Country, do some research on him before you vote.
Don’t let them take away our freedoms, they have started even before he is elected and it will be much worse if he is allowed to buy the White House.
Posted by: pbatrs | Nov 2, 2008 1:46:57 AM
—-
blah, blah, blah. Ya sure, whatever.
Posted by: ziadora | November 2, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am
Shouted question:
Senator Obama, can I bum a smoke?
(I’m a smoker. I still wouldn’t vote for him but at least I would give him credit for a glimmer of honesty if he fianlly came out about it.)
Posted by: topo2005 | November 2, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am
And Letterman asks: And what about G. Gordan Liddy?
McCain’s response: Who?
In 1998 Liddy hosted a fundraiser at his house for John McCain’s re-election campaign at which guests could have their pictures taken with McCain and Liddy.[7] Over the years, Liddy, who has referred to McCain as “an old friend,” has made at least four contributions totaling $5,000 to the senator’s campaigns — including $1,000 in 2008.
Posted by: ziadora | November 2, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am
Well Jake was there something he needs to worry about in the polls?
I doot see that tighting, it has stalled.
Posted by: Thinking | November 2, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am
I don’t know if this will get through the censors, but I’ll try anyway. There are a couple of great pieces at the NYT – and I am not always a big NYT fan. They could use a backbone again. But they are acting like there is an election in 2 days and they are acting like journalists.
The first is by Dowd, who can be trivial and vicious – but it is a paen to the John McCain of 2000 – a man I admired, respected and supported. I believe that the lead of this site did as well.
The second ends with this passage, and I wish that all journalists were treating this election with the gravity it deserves. This election is certainly not about the hogwash that has been spewed as news, it’s not about candidates being cozy with journalists, and it’s not even all about us.
“Vote for the candidate you think has the smarts, temperament and inspirational capacity to unify the country and steer our ship through what could be the rockiest shoals our generation has ever known. Your kids will thank you.”
Posted by: Mara | November 2, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am
Obama never really gave any press conferences. All he did was give teleprompter speeches and sometimes stolen speeches
Posted by: MsJoanne | November 2, 2008, 2:02 am 2:02 am
Is there a point here somewhere? You do have the one liner at the end telling us McCain is just the same. I still don’t see why anyone speaks to much of the press, since you don’t look for an answer anyway. All I want is to have the election over and have my candidate dig into the rubbish heap Bush has made of the executive branch and the Constitution.
Posted by: outwest | November 2, 2008, 2:37 am 2:37 am
Jake,
Your trite post realy stirred the pot.
Posted by: clarity | November 2, 2008, 2:56 am 2:56 am
—Jake—
Do a day in the life report for us what you can do! who you talk too! what info they give you!! and what you report..
It would be interesting!
Posted by: Mike NC | November 2, 2008, 3:23 am 3:23 am
Jake,
He is running a tough campaign 24/7, the last 2 years and by now he’s tired of someone weak like you. Your silly questions deserves no answer. What you’re trying to accomplish by telling us this? I used to have a respect for you, but it looks like you have your own agenda. It’s sad you’re acting like a taploid reporter.
Posted by: Sam Lee | November 2, 2008, 4:06 am 4:06 am
OBAMA’S ‘NATIONAL CIVILIAN SECURITY FORCE’ CALL:
IT MAY COST HIM THIS SUPPORTER’S VOTE
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/obamas-national-civilian-security-force-call-scary-11th-hour-revelation
OR http://members.nowpublic.com/scrivener
Posted by: scrivener | November 2, 2008, 4:11 am 4:11 am
One of my post wasnt even posted and this site must have thought I was giving McCain praise this sucks the wont even let democrats like me touch Obama and I’m voting for him.
Posted by: Quintell | November 2, 2008, 4:25 am 4:25 am
This is just the portent of things to come. Obama and Biden don’t like “tough” questions and have gotten a pass from the MSM.
Will Obama be able to get back to you once he’s in office and you ask him a pointed question, Jake?
I think Obama is in for a big wake up call once he takes office.
Posted by: Sally | November 2, 2008, 4:26 am 4:26 am
What bothers me most about this election cycle is that somehow being “average” is a good enough reason for folks to vote for a candidate.
I want someone who is demonstrably smarter than I am, who has a better memory, who has the patience and wisdom to be cautious in making serious decisions that will affect not only his own life, but the lives of 300 million Americans and 12 or more million (illegal) immigrants (even if they can’t or don’t vote). I want someone to look up to, someone I can direct my son’s eyes to as a role model for him I want a president who can not only weigh the information at hand, but knows how to acquire information he needs but doesn’t have at hand.
I won’t vote for an “ordinary Joe.” Let “Joe” be happy being a plumber, or carrying his six-pack around. Until now, Bill Clinton was the most intelligent man we’ve had in the presidential position (regardless of whether or not he was a good president, he was still the smartest). I won’t vote for any one who can’t pronounce the word “nuclear” correctly or who doesn’t even know the names of the heads of state of our two neighboring countries. I can’t vote for a man who has refused for several months to delineate the specific differences between his economic policies and those of the incumbent, sitting president.
I can’t vote for a man who says he wants to keep American troops in a country that doesn’t want them there. I can’t vote for a many who will perpetuate the bad taste America has left in the mouth of the world for the last 8 years.
I won’t voter for… McCain/Palin.
Posted by: Kaelinda | November 2, 2008, 4:49 am 4:49 am
I hope Americans learn a lesson from this election. This isnt American idol and the collaspe of an Obama Adminstration will being with anti-war left he is bascally your pick remember when the bombs start flying because he will protect this country, dont say nothing. I understand this better than any democrat on this site. Once your base stops the checks and the big crowds, who will he fall back onto, us moderates, the conservatives, young folks, Obama is walking into a trap I feel sorry for him he is about make everyone second guess their vote just give it time
Posted by: Quintell | November 2, 2008, 5:04 am 5:04 am
Sam,
What would you answer to someone who asked you a question about a long-lost, distant relative for whom you are not responsible?
Posted by: Paul New man | November 2, 2008, 5:16 am 5:16 am
to Paul Newman
I am my brother’s keeper, blood is thicker and than kool-aid
Posted by: Quintell | November 2, 2008, 5:20 am 5:20 am
Obama went on O’Reilly- on Fox News, a channel that isn’t exactly left-leaning.
O’Reilly, at the end of the interview, admitted that he thought Obama was a really tough guy.
McCain has yet to go on Olberman or any of the left-leaning networks. They have not given Obama a free pass.
There is a story about African-American McCains that were descended from the slaves McCain’s ancestors kept, and McCain has refused to acknowledge them although they are blood-related. Cindy McCain has yet to acknowledge the existence her financially-struggling half-sister who got cut out of their father’s will. It’s not widely reported, is it?
Posted by: Grey Matter | November 2, 2008, 5:32 am 5:32 am
At this point in time everything relevant that could be said has been said. At this point, It seems to me reporters are looking for copy, not truth – and would love to have a “gotcha” as a bonus. Everyone stay calm – the candidates wanting to reduce risk of a “gotcha” in the last 48 hours makes perfect sense. We know each of the candidates as well as we need to.
Posted by: A Canuck | November 2, 2008, 5:59 am 5:59 am
Jake -
Usually enjoy your posts but this one’s navel gazing. Surely there’s something more significant for you to cover.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | November 2, 2008, 6:01 am 6:01 am
Jake: You’ve been going along with Obama for almost two years, and now you’re complaining? If Obama is elected, I hope you take responsibility.
Posted by: tina | November 2, 2008, 6:31 am 6:31 am
Too stupid Jake!
You know very well candidates are on timed schedules!
As for the comments about Obama/Ayers, why haven’t the McCain people talked to Ayers? You can’t fix stupid!
Posted by: James White | November 2, 2008, 7:15 am 7:15 am
It sounds like you’re fishing for controversy. Modern day criticisms of the news tend to be that it’s too liberal or too conservative, but I think the problem is that it’s focused on sensationalism. Perhaps it’s always been that way, but there’s certainly little substance to go along with the sound bites and controversy that reporters seem to relish. I’m wondering what kind of in-depth analysis you expected on the question about the polls?
Posted by: Erik | November 2, 2008, 7:19 am 7:19 am
Jake,
You don’t seem to have anything to write about…the media has had more time with Obama then with GWB in 8 years.
You folks don’t seem to “hound” Palin – who hasn’t answered a serious question that didn’t have a scripted answer.
ABC finally got on the Palin medical records “train”. But given that it’s two days from the election – maybe that was just to appease those inquiring – and you have no intent to keep up the pressure for the media/public to have access to records. (I don’t care – and I think most people won’t care if she had cosmetic surgery; takes cholesterol medication; but what if she has a major medical issue?
Reporting on her deposition from last week would be another thing to check out.
GWB never, ever got intense scrutiny.
Clinton in his last year was investigated with a cost of millions of dollars.
McCain gets nothing investigated (past or present).
Palin is off limits – literally.
I was under the impression that a journalist’s job was to “get the story” – the facts and the truth.
Nothing more or less.
How would you describe the job YOU are doing?
Posted by: scooterfoot | November 2, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am
You’ll soon have to address Obama as Mr. President.
“Mr. President how does it feel to be President?”
Posted by: Gus | November 2, 2008, 7:31 am 7:31 am
It’s a sad state of political affairs when all four major candidates have to limit their own comments to the press for fear of saying something idiotic.
Posted by: loflyer | November 2, 2008, 7:46 am 7:46 am
Better to get used to being demeaned now. If O is elected you will be shouting a lot of questions you won’t get an answer for. In all though, no worries because this (Obama)is what the media wanted…right?!
Posted by: samhiguchi | November 2, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am
Guess they have nothing better to do that print stupid stories like this one.
Posted by: Jwench | November 2, 2008, 8:01 am 8:01 am
“Vote for the candidate you think has the smarts, temperament and inspirational capacity to unify the country and steer our ship through what could be the rockiest shoals our generation has ever known. Your kids will thank you.”
Sounds like right about now we can use a man who proved his metal by sacrificing 5 years of his life in an absolute hellhole for his country. I call THAT inspirational.
Hmmm… Now, who could that be?
I wish that guy still existed but, alas he doesn’t he allowed his handlers to turn him into someone else. I wouldn’t vote for that guy for Dog Catcher.
Posted by: theirmom3kids | November 2, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am
to Paul Newman
I am my brother’s keeper, blood is thicker and than kool-aid
Posted by: Quintell | Nov 2, 2008 5:20:21 AM
The aunt is even a blood relative. She is his stepfather’s half sister.
Posted by: Jwench | November 2, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am
scooterfoot: Come now, anyone who has sat through a college Journalism class knows that the purpose of Journalism is to “Make a Difference”
Posted by: Retired old guy | November 2, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am
I JUST WANT TO ASK MCCAIN—–THE POW—WHAT SONGS OF TREASON HE SANG FOR THE NORTH VIETNAMESE—–NO ONE HAS QUESTIONED HIS BEHAVIOR AS A POW—THE TORTURE CRAP IS JUST THAT CRAP—HE WAS INJURED BAILING OUT OF AIRPLANE—TWO BROKEN SHOULDERS AND A BROKEN LEG—HE GOT MEDICAL ATTENTION FROM THE ENEMY AS THEY KNEW WHO THEY HAD—-SOMETHING HE DOES NOT TALK ABOUT HIS FATHER ADMIRAL MCCAIN THE COMMANDER OF THE PACIFIC FLEET—–THE TORTURE CRAP IS JUST THAT CRAP.LIEING IS SOMETHING HE IS VERY GOOD AT.AND HIS MILITARY RECORDS ARE SEALED SO NONE CAN SEE.
Posted by: rodney | November 2, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am
Ask why he voted against legislation shielding homeowners from liability who protect their families with a hand gun from an intruder that breaks into their house? Ask why he voted against it 4 times!
Posted by: MBNA Joe | November 2, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am
Do you see Jake? Write one little article that doesnt put Obama in a positive light and the Obama kool-aid drinkers will attack you. You have brought this on yourself. Its too late Jake. You helped to get this charlatan elected and now you will pay the price. You should have been doing your job all along.
Posted by: Glenda | November 2, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am
Obama can’t answer w/o his teleprompter. William Ayers was the author of Dreams of my father. Just pick up a copy of Ayers’ “fugitive days” and “Dreams.” Jack Cashill has more research on his web site.
Posted by: Colonel Reb | November 2, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am
old guy —save the crap i know all about mccain the hanoi songbird….you or i would have been hanged or shot.
Posted by: rodney | November 2, 2008, 8:20 am 8:20 am
“Vote for the candidate you think has the smarts, temperament and inspirational capacity to unify the country and steer our ship through what could be the rockiest shoals our generation has ever known. Your kids will thank you.”
——————————-
Unify the country, now that right there is funny!!! I’ve never seen us more divided. As for stearing our ship, he’s got us headed straight for the rocks, tax increases in a recession = depression (go back and read your history books 1920′s). My kids will thank me for giving my vote to a man who will leave them a country and that is John McCain.
Posted by: samhiguchi | November 2, 2008, 8:23 am 8:23 am
Glenda, maybe it is your kool-aid that Jake Tapper is tapping into. It is well known that Jake Tapper has pretty close ties to John McCain and has even declared his fondness for John McCain on at least one occasion. His articles are typically snotty and negative when it comes to Barack Obama. If you think that is “fair”, then you and Jake should go work for Fox News. In fact, I’m not sure ABC news isn’t part of Fox News, their right-of-center bias is very plain to see except by people like you who want to vote for BushII (aka John McSlander). I don’t think right wingers like you and Jake Tapper need to talk about Obama’s not responding to Tapper when Tapper has been so obviously trying to set traps for and do hit pieces on Obama. Why should Obama care for a hostile shill like Tapper?
Posted by: Joe_the_Plumber_ | November 2, 2008, 8:23 am 8:23 am
I am ever-intrigued and amused by “journalists” like Jake Tapper who feel an entitlement to information from anyone, just because they ask.
The sooner the public the media understand and accept there is no entitlement, the better off we all will be. Should someone, like a candidate for public office, choose to respond to questions from a journalist, that would be a blessing for the interviewer.
Journalists should stop their whining and complaining when they don’t get what they want. It makes them appear to be a 3 year old who throws a tantrum.
Quick! Someone dial 911 and ask for a “Waaaaaaaambulance!”
Posted by: saftgek | November 2, 2008, 8:23 am 8:23 am
To Joe Weaselbacker…..I hope you get everything Obama has promised you. Right winger? Me? Hardly. I voted for Kerry in 2004. I just dont drink the kool-aid and you cant stand the truth. Have a nice day, sir.
Posted by: Glenda | November 2, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am
may be responsible for the death of 132 sailors.
Posted by: rodney | November 2, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am
mccain never mentions his father?????
he was a total dissapointment to the admiral.–he cannot hide all the crap he was associated with—definately not a hero in any sense of the word.
Posted by: rodney | November 2, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am
Here’s one Jake: “Senator Obama…how do you expect Jewish Americans to vote for you when you are on tape toasting a PLO Terrorist?”
Here’s another:”Senator Obama…how do you expect Jewish Americans to vote for you when you have worshiped with Louis Farrakhan, the most anti-semitic religious leader in the USA?”
Posted by: MBNA Joe | November 2, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am
Here is the mathematical equation for a John McCain presidency:__(wait for it, here it is): “Mc=W2″. That’s the shortest way to express the truth about the Incontient/Incompetent Republican ticket that doesn’t tell people what it will do to fix the country’s mess, it just attacks Obama and makes generalized ‘promises’ : “my friends, I have the answers to the problems we face: I ain’t going to tell them to you….just trust me that I have them.”
Where is Sam-the-Sham-Weaselbacker today, McScam’s favorite prop? Is he attending a rally for fake plumbers?( Wurzelbacher…ja…Wurzelbacher…ja ja)…”Joe, are ya out there? Joe the Plumber?…Well, you’re all Joe the Plumber” (said flapping arms like a chicken). Sarah Palin seconds the attacks on Obama and thinks average Americans ADMIRE her ignorance.
Posted by: Joe_the_Plumber_ | November 2, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am
Here’s one Jake: “Senator Obama…how do you expect Jewish Americans to vote for you when you are on tape toasting a PLO Terrorist?”
Here’s another:”Senator Obama…how do you expect Jewish Americans to vote for you when you have worshiped with Louis Farrakhan, the most anti-semitic religious leader in the USA?”
Posted by: MBNA Joe | Nov 2, 2008 8:32:09 AM
Here’s one for McCain:
“Senator how do you expect Jewish Americans to vote for you when you were on a board that funded a PLO Terrorist?”
Posted by: Jwench | November 2, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am
mccain cannot give any details on anything—-the —d—student is just that dumb vile hatefull old geser.
Posted by: rodney | November 2, 2008, 8:36 am 8:36 am
george —just go wet start your engine—WATCH THE CREW SCATTER AND LAUGH—–get a freaking truthfull education—-mccain was a total dissapointment to his father–
Posted by: rodney | November 2, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am
Oh Jwench…so stupid…so blind :-)
McCain did not fund him personally, it was a fund giving money to foundations, one foundation that got money was a group that Kahlidi was a member of. Hardly the same as personally associating with him, dinig with him, educating with him, toasting him and sharing his anti-jewish sentiment….please try to educate yourself so you don’t look so foolish.
Posted by: MBNA Joe | November 2, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am
wish someone would come up with some of mccain speeches when he was the hanoi songbird——VERY INTERESTING.some of the things he accused the usa of.
Posted by: rodney | November 2, 2008, 8:51 am 8:51 am
At this point in the game there is little doubt that Obama is the LESSER of the two evils. McBush is a proven liar and cannot be trusted as his word clearly means absolutely nothing.
Jiff
Posted by: Jaime Seagull | November 2, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am
ADMIRAL MCCAIN COMMANDER OF THE PACIFIC FLEET——DID ANYONE EVER WONDER WHY MCCAIN DONT TALK ABOUT HIM——mccain quite simply was a dummy and caused his father a great embarassment–he saved mccains butt–he was a great dissapointment to his father—you or i most likely would have been shot not a hero no way no how.
Posted by: rodney | November 2, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
mccain voted against veterans benifits –not once but several times—he has no respect for the military.
Posted by: rodney | November 2, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am
I stood in line 3 hours Tuesday to hear Obama in Norfolk, Va, 4 hours Thursday in Virginia Beach to hear Obama and 3.5 hours in Virginia Beach yesterday to vote for him. We do not hear Obama ridiculing McCain or Palin. Come on folks, we need to be GRACIOUS WINNERS!
Posted by: SUSIE | November 2, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am
BUSH HAS SHOWN US WHAT –DUMB–CAN DO TO OUR COUNTRY——AND MCCAIN BEING A –D–YES A –D–STUDENT SHOWS WHAT HE IS —DUMB DUMB –AND HIS PICKING PALIN PROVES THAT HE IS FIRST AND HAS NO REGARD FOR WHAT THE LAST 8 YEARS HAVE DONE TO THE USA—AND HE STILL IS DEFENDING THE RICH AND WANTS TO GIVE THEM MORE—-NO WAY NO HOW
OBAMA- BIDEN FOR THE CHANGE WE TRULY NEED.
Posted by: rodney | November 2, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Quick Election Recap on Obama Coverage:
Only “man of color” worthy of Obama’s metrosexual pedigree is Colin Powell – all others thrown under the bus. Media codes black members of Obama’s family the “paternal branch”. Vetting of Obama abruptly ended following “race-baiting” Clintonian tactics. Paying reparations or electing the less experiences candidate via affirmative action? Could Obama have survived Palinesque style interviews? SNL defers stuttering, inarticulate “off script” Obama in favor of bubblehead beauty queen Palin. Is America really prepared to be “bamboozled” into electing a man based on rhetoric over his record? White liberals openly appear to be provoking race riots, from the safety of their GOP-governed gate communities, to vent their frustration in case of Obama loss. Has America ever been less informed about the true record of ANY presidential candidate? Would video of Obama running from the rogue paparazzi trump Dukakis’ tank photo? Will Obama election be liberal media’s first coup since Nixon’s resignation?
Posted by: Jack Carroll | November 2, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Obama runs from the cameras. Why is Obama running for president., He will get more attention than anybody in the world. SHows you he is hiding something
Posted by: hammer | November 2, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
HAMMER
OBAMA HAS BEEN VETED TO NO END–WHAT IS NEXT A RECTAL EXAM.
Posted by: rodney | November 2, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
Obama will lose in a landslide
Posted by: Really the real rodney | November 2, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Of course he won’t answer any questions! Afterall, when he asked Joe for a question, Americans know what he is up to!
Did you hear about his 2001 radio interview? He definitely doesn’t agree with the Founding Father?
Obama doesn’t know that his aunt lives here illegally, just like he doesn’t know much about Khalidi, Ayers, Wright, Rezko, Thomas Raines, Frank Davis, Acorn etc, or that there are 50 states in the US, or he voted against Born alive Act. It is scarry how much this guy doesn’t know or his voters dont know much except that they will get tax refund at the end of the year.
Also, we don’t know any of his days at Columbia U or Harvard. No papertrail. What about his cocaine years? What about his trip to Pakistan during the year that Americans were not allowed to travel there?
Axelrod is very sleazy. What about the right of Joe the Plumber’s tax privacy? After all, Obama was the one that ask Joe for a question.
I guess that is okay to invade Joe’s private life but Obama’s aunt living here illegally for four years and using taxpayer money… how dare that comes out. How many millions more illegal donations did Obama get from illegal aliens or permanent resident instead of citizens and not to mention people who donate over the limit? Where is the check and balance and the public right to know who donated to this guy. The media is so pro Obama, it is embarrasing and Obama is buying young votes. The White House and the Presidency is being bought. More welfare handouts to those that do not earn them! I came from Asia to the States 24 years ago to achieve the American dreams and I am worried what Obama will do to this awesome country.
I expect the media to send their swat teams to the Boston Public Housing and camp there as they did to Joe the Plumber!!
Quickly go find the Woman and interview her why she breaks the US immigration Law. This needs to be front page of all media outlets just like Joe the Plumber story or Sarah Palin wardrobe… I am waiting for some action here!!!! Hurry Media people. Need to see your people fly to Boston and your vans park in front of her apartment.
This is not so much about her aunt being here illegally for four years and broke the immigration law but about Obama’s lies and hypocricy and media bias!
Obama was called upon to visit the military this summer. He skipped one of the stop. However, he did a detour and talked to the German as “Citizen of the World”. I believe that the $700,000 of campaign money used to pay a German event producer to buy the world votes should be put better use to help the injured veterans, or help Blacks at the Housing Projects or war torn African nations family and children. What about the 832,00 to ACORN voter fraught? Let’s spread other people’s wealth but let’s spread Obama’s wealth to promote Obama. That’s all this guy being doing all his short years in Senate.Obama is a Hypocrite and his supporters are ignorant!
Instead, please world “Worship the One”
Obama supporters, please drop to your knees and chant this word….
‘We are not worthy, we are not worthy
Why is it when the people have legit questions about Obama’s fishy association, we are called “Racist”. I can never understand that!
Posted by: ida | November 2, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm