Will the Arab World Take Issue With Rahm’s Israeli Roots and Pro-Israel Views?
Israeli newspapers are already rejoicing about President-elect Obama’s selection of Rep. Rahm Emanuel, D-Ill., to be his White House chief of staff.
As the Israeli newspaper Ha’aretz notes, Emanuel "is the son of a Jerusalem-born pediatrician who was a member of the Irgun (Etzel or IZL), a militant Zionist group that operated in Palestine between 1931 and 1948." Emanuel’s father told the newspaper that his son was named after a fallen combatant named Rahamim.
In the Israel newspaper Ma’ariv, Emanuel’s father, Dr. Benjamin Emanuel said, "Obviously he will influence the president to be pro-Israel. Why wouldn’t he be? What is he, an Arab? He’s not going to clean the floors of the White House."
Rahm Emanuel headed Bill Clinton’s finance committee during the Arkansas governor’s first presidential run, but he left to be a civilian volunteer for the Israel Defense Forces during the 1991 Gulf War. He rust-proofed brakes in one of Israel’s northern bases.
Ali Abunimah of the Electronic Intifadah seems upset at Obama’s selection of a "pro-Israel hardliner."
"There could not be a more provocative appointment than Rahm Emanuel, if he wanted to send a signal that he is going to stick by a quite hard-line pro-Israel policy," Abunimah said on Democracy Now.
Abunimah pointed out that Emanuel’s middle name is "Israel," and described Emanuel’s father as "a gun runner for the Irgun, the Zionist, pre-Israel Zionist, militia that carried out numerous terrorist attacks on Palestinian civilians, including the bombing of the King David Hotel. Of course, Rahm Emanuel himself is not responsible for any of that, but his record is sometimes far to the right of President Bush when it comes to supporting Israel."
In the coming hours we’ll see what the reaction is from the Arab media.
- jpt
Email
White House Blinks Amid Catholic Church Anger?
Navy SEAL Commander Advised: Get the Hell Out of the Media
Emanuel participated in Israel’s 1982 war of aggression against Lebanon (not as a soldier but in the rear lines repairing equipment). That war was a particularly brutal war, killing an estimated 17,825 Lebanese.
Posted by: Flash Override | November 6, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Think of the untenable position that Rahm will be in. Joe, the freaking plumber, agreed that Obama would be the death of Isreal. I guess Rahm will be sweating bullets while Obama plans Isreal’s end.
Actually, as far as I can tell from what I have read, The Chief of Staff isn’t a policy maker, more like the President’s liason with the staff.
Posted by: SUSIE | November 6, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
I don’t care what Israelis and Arabs think. It’s time we demand American foreign policy be made in Washington D.C.-not Tel Avi, Baghdad, or Mexico City. The rest of the world will never understand that in American is doesn’t matter if you have a president named “Hussein” and a chief-of-staff named “Israel”.
Posted by: B. Bear | November 6, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
I have satalite and dont get fox this sucks almost as bad as tuesday did.
Posted by: Ronnie | November 6, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Let’s hope that Rahm Emanuel holds somewhat more enlightened views of Arabs, than those apparently offered today by his own father. “Clean the floors”, indeed.
Posted by: Donald from Hawaii | November 6, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
So the neo-cons complained that Obama wasn’t pro-Israel ENOUGH and now they complain that he may to much pro-Israel, maybe neo-cons just like to complain about anything not neo-con.
Posted by: JR | November 6, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
Rahm Emanuel is an American citizen and has had a distinguished career in public service to this country. That he is a Jew is his religious faith; that he supports Israel as the Jewish Homeland is part of a Jew’s religious faith — it is in in no way a political statement. Palestine was partitioned by the United Nations via the Balfour Declaration and 60 years ago the State of Israel was recognized, and has since held a seat among other member
countries in the UN, except for the Arab states which are her neighbors. History isn’t the strong suit of a great many Americans — neither their own nor world history — just watch “Jay Walking” on Jay Leno’s show.
Posted by: nanameow | November 6, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
I think it’s a GOOD thing for the Arabs, actually. Rahm inoculates Obama against a complaints that his support of Israel is “soft”. This will actually allow him take a hard line against settlements, which Israel would have ignored.
Don’t mistake Rahm for a Tel Aviv pushover, he’ll tell them where to stick it. Which, occasionally, they need to be told. I tell you, Israelis are harder on Israel than most US administrations.
Posted by: Tungsten | November 6, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
Look, intelligent people can handle these situations.
They work for the greater good. They put their feelings aside and work for the USA.
This is something that some Republicans and quite a few of the religious “bent” (Catholics come to mind in their vehement disgust of Biden, because as a US Senator, he puts his nation before his religion – the abortion issue) can’t understand that people of intelligence work for the big picture not their own agenda (hum, maybe like Cheney).
Take a deep breathe and grow up. Small minds make for a small world. The US has become insulated and stale…the future with Obama may have some challenges but his calm personality and intelligence can make the US fresh and formidable in the world.
Don’t judge each appointment on the little we know of these individuals…if Obama has confidence in them that’s probably enough.
Bush never selected his “crew” – Cheney was the master mind and Bush the “puppet” and see what the outcome has been.
I think we should be proud of the Americans that we have serving in office that are from different
backgrounds and experiences.
As a middle age white woman I think it’s time that we shake things up and get a true representation of our country in our government.
Proudly voted for Obama.
Posted by: scooterfoot | November 6, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
Hey flash override, go back to school and learn how to read. The news article specifies “1991 Gulf War”, not 1982 and when was the last time you checked out how many Israelis have been slaughtered by their neighbors?
Posted by: nygranny | November 6, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
All of this “old people’s” past garbage is making me sick. Sure, Barack chose Rahm – he is the best person for the job and Barack trusts him! What is this? Oh, they all thought Barack was an “Arab” – I get it – to clean White House floors, I guess. Yuck! Bigotry – no matter who spouts it is disgusting.
Barack has always loved Israel, and yet he has compassion for Palestinians – as he should. Rahm isn’t POTUS. Obama is. Let him do his job.
I love Israel, too – but NO one should step on others – No one. Give Palestinians the West Bank.
Posted by: Independant American Woman | November 6, 2008, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
The comments by Rahms father imply that the role of an arab would be a servile one, of cleaning floors.It is a disgusting, racist statement and if Rahm does not publicly condemn his fathers statement,then he is not fit to be in Obamas team.I have a feeling of unease already about how genuine Obama will be in bringing justice to the Palestinians. With all previous administrations it has been a case of all talk and no resolution.Obama has promised change.Giving a pro Israel hawk a key position is no change.Its now up to Obama to deliver.
Posted by: richard slater | November 6, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
Let’s wait and see how all Obama’s appointments balance out before we start freaking over this one. I am confident that Mr. Emanuel is capable of holding differing views than his parent. Don’t most of us?
Posted by: shockolit | November 6, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
Do you think Obama selected him because of his pro-israel policies or him being the partisan Bulldog?
If it’s because of pro-Israel…then Obama lied to many that he wants to be a change agent ..his appointment will confirm to Arab world that American administration is too pro-Israel.
If he selected him because he is a Bulldog, and we are having another “Carl Rove” in the white House…then where is the CHANGE there?????
Posted by: frieda | November 6, 2008, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
why don’t we all just take a wait and see attitude. At least we can follow the thinking about what he is doing,even if we don’t understand it yet.
over the last eight years, with bush, there has not been much that he has done that has made any sense. we all just watched with our mouth open, in unbelief.
Bush could not even articulate what he was trying to do.
what is happening now with obama, to me, is a sure testament to how bad the bush presidency has been. it has been so bad, everyone, and i mean everyone
wants to move on and get away from bush as quick as possible. even bush.
I truly do think if bush could, he would leave the white house tonight.
Posted by: one world, one people,please | November 6, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
OK people, a chief of staff is not a Secretary of State or Secretary of Defense.
Rahm Emanuel is very capable of doing this job.
Let’s not condemn too hastily.
Posted by: Rev. Ike | November 6, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
Great, we all love Obama, why would he do this? I thought he wanted world peace. We can’t get there by partnering with a pro-Israeli hardliner. This is absolutely insane. So much for peace. First wolfowitz and firth and now another hardcore pro Israeli warmonger. If you want peace in that region don’t stock your team with people who view arabs as their mortal enemy. jeez…
Posted by: noah | November 6, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
I’m an Arab myself and have some things to say about this subject.
First, Rahm Emanual’s father can say and think whatever he likes, it doesn’t mean anything. It just shows he’s a bitter man. Plus please keep in mind that people in the Middleast tend to speak like that, Arabs and Israelis. It really doesn’t mean much. Reality and pragmatism are much more important.
Second, Rahm being pro Israel is a good thing, it means he is very keen on peace. Why would he want to prolong Israel’s war with the Palestinians.
Posted by: Sam Ahmed | November 6, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
actually the appointment is intriuging. the best leaders surround themselves with strong people of all sides. Especially with those that hold opposite thoughts than their own. its the best way of gaining insight.
Posted by: acumen | November 6, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
This is from a Jewish Blog:
Peace-processors take heart: Rahm, precisely because he’s a lover of Israel, will not have much patience with Israeli excuse-making, so when the next Prime Minister tells President Obama that as much as he’d love to, he can’t dismantle the Neve Manyak settlement outpost, or whichever outpost needs dismantling, because of a) domestic politics; b) security concerns, or c) the Bible, Rahm will call out such nonsense, and it will be very hard for right-wing Israelis to come back and accuse him of being a self-hating Jew. This is not to say that he’s unaware of Palestinian dysfunction, or Iranian extremism, but that he has a good grasp of some of Israel’s foibles as well. All in all, it’s a very heartening choice.
Posted by: Lou | November 6, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
We’ve had Christians, Catholics, White Men and now an African-American serving as President of the United States. We almost had a woman. But, not a Jew. Who do you think will break the glass ceiling first, a women or a Jew? Probably a woman. In the meanwhile, it’s nice to see Rahm Emanuel appointed chief-of-staff. It’s a mitzvah.
Halli Casser-Jayne
Posted by: Halli Casser-Jayne | November 6, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
most of the people who post here today seem to have all the answers to the U.S.A.’s problems!Where were you when “Bush” needed you?If you are so smart..why don’t you have a job working for the Federal Gov.? Share your brilliance!!Stop sitting behind your computer guzzling beer and give us some real answers!
Posted by: orangecat | November 6, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
I do not remember Obama promising to be tougher on Israel. The consevatives lied when they said Obama would not support the Jewish state.
Posted by: tim | November 6, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
Jesus people calm DOWN and let our President-Elect get his team set up, FIRST PLEASE.
Posted by: Ranger Phx | November 6, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Richard Slater, Frieda, et al – don’t you think it’s kind of funny that throughout the campaign people were calling Obama all sorts of names, slying implying that he’s not a supporter of Israel? First, he’s called a Muslim, then he’s got “terrorist” connections, then there’s footage of him at a benefit with hard-liner Arabs, and everyone’s all “we can’t trust him because of his associations.” So now, as President-elect, he appoints a tough, let’s get things man who happens to be a Jew, and people aren’t happy with that either. For goodness sake, for some of you there’s nothing Obama can do right. I don’t think Rahm’s appointment as Obama’s chief of staff has anything to do with Israel or Palestine or the Middle East. Rahm is tough, competent, and gets things done. And THAT is why Obama wants him in his administration. Leave it alone.
Posted by: counting crows | November 6, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
The Arab world will have to decide who is more important, the President of the United States or his chief of staff?
Posted by: matt | November 6, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
I don’t hold this chap responsible for his dad’s slanderous remarks, and I won’t pre-judge. However, something needs to be done over there by my folks’ old mutha land, lest things continue on the current path (bad enough), or get worse. If Rahm can help by deflecting accusations of Obama-bias (how could he be biased against Jews or Israel if he proclaimed that the whole of Jerusalem should be the eternal capital of Israel, something no president has ever said??) or offering any kind of expertise while some sort of settlement on these matters is pursued once and for all, then fine, however the jury is still out on this one until we see what happens, but he’s appointed and there’s nothing we can do except watch. I hope the parties understand that not settling this and prolonging the situation in the Middle East and continuing settlements is not good policy for Israel and is rather short-sighted and will lead to more perpetual conflict. On the other hand, everyone benefits if a mutually beneficial agreement is reached. Perhaps the whole thing is intentionally Orwellian — perpetual war. Ah, but that’s too cynical.
As an educated Arab-American who writes run-on sentences, I am not an apologist, but I do wholly agree with an earlier comment that criticism of Israel is far more muted in the USA than in any other country, even Israel, whose media is much more fair in constructively criticizing failed or inhumane policy there than here, where such a thing is taboo. There are plenty of things to criticize on the side of Israel’s neighbors, but that is done quite adequately in the American media, as is the case with the Palestinians. However, it is often conveniently neglected that the Palestinians ARE in fact, several million people without a homeland, basic freedoms and liberties and services, so an extreme reaction from several thousand out of several million after years without progress should almost be expected (I’m NOT arguing about justifications, just expectations, cause-effect, yada yada).
Finally, in response to another comment below, supporting Israel is not part of a Jew’s religious faith. You are confusing Zionism, a more recent phenomenon and a political movement, with Judaism, one of the great Abrahamic religions. Of course, he may also support Israel because there are other Jews there, but the foundation of Israel in and of itself is not explicitly part of the Jewish faith — a common American misconception, among many others which contribute to the lack of understanding on Middle Eastern matters. But that’s fine, and it’s natural for someone to support a country with people sharing a background common to one’s own. Just a minor detail to correct. OK, I’m done rambling.
Posted by: Youssef | November 6, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
Hell, I am not Jewish and thrill that Rahm Emanuel jumped on board!!!!
Obama’s White House is going to be off the chain!!!!
If you know what I mean!!!!!
NO MEANS NO!!!
Peace!!!
Posted by: sisterdearest09 | November 6, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
Well, as usual people here think Israel is the bad guy despite the fact that the Israelis left Gaza and the palestinians fired on them. It’s ok for arabs to live in Israel but jews can’t live in the palestinian occupied areas. Don’t forget Jordan was palestine too.
Posted by: DavidM | November 6, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
If Rahm sees America as America first, then I’m all for him. That would mean that his ancestry which is easily exploited by the Indian markets for labor, cannot come before his loyalty and patriotism that would see
America get back on its feet by rejecting foreign labor when an
able American could be employed instead.
Posted by: Common Sense | November 6, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm
I think there are some people who are waiting with baited breath for Obama to slip.
But I don’t think that Arabs are the ones to worry about in this case.
If anything, I am worried about some Americans who would like to stir up some controversy and scuttle Obama’s chances at helping to build peace.
Muslims, in general, seem to welcome the change of leadership and seem to feel hopeful about it.
But there are some bitter people in this country who don’t want Obama to succeed in this… so they might try to kick up a fuss over it. (But I doubt any of these people are Arabs or Muslims… they might, however, call themselves “Christians” of a very particular pro-end-end-of-the-world variety or they might, for some other reason, support a continued war between Israelis and Palestinians).
Posted by: blip | November 6, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
Its Great news for the jewish State! Love it! We will prevail
Posted by: David | November 6, 2008, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
You know… Amy Goodman at Democracy Now has been covering election news for the last year…
And this is the first time I have ever seen her quoted here.
Which is strange because she has done many more significant stories… ones which would have been great for people to listen to before the election….
But then after the election, you zoom in on this particular point of conflict, which is purely speculative.
(Including the quote by Rahm’s father is also kind of sketchy… I mean, Rahm is not his father… couldn’t you get a quote from Rahm himself about his plans? If someone was writing a story about my priorities… I would hope someone would ask me rather than my father.)
Posted by: blip | November 6, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
please follow up with iran’s president…..he seems to think that obama is some sort of push over…..
Posted by: chee | November 6, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
Not true… Chee.
Posted by: blip | November 6, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm
But if Emanuel is such a hard-liner… and he and Obama have been friends for so long. And their professional relationship could be construed as “threatening” to Muslims….
Why did you post the story about Obama and Khalidi?
It would seem to be a non-issue. Or at least it would have been responsible, back then, to note Obama’s friendship with a pro-Israeli figure like Emanuel… Right?
Posted by: blip | November 6, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
Why would anyone seek a controversy… especially when these kinds of controversies often result in violence and conflict.
It doesn’t seem responsible to repeat Emanual’s dad’s inflammatory statements if you don’t know what Rahm himself thinks. This kind of reporting could create a false diplomatic impression for people who are trying to establish a good working relationship with Obama.
It deliberately sets out to set prejudice in motion….
Posted by: blip | November 6, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm
They could, but when it comes to the USA on any government choice they will be negative. We are a nation of all religion’s. Obama has made a wise choice, and it would not matter if he was a Baptist, Catholic, Muslim, etc. The fact it is the USA would make them upset. In our own country many will not like a Jewish person getting this job, so maybe the Arab world has some Christian supporters in our own country who will side with the Arabs on this issue.
Posted by: Mike of Ky | November 7, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am
Wow.. He just picked someon and peopl are going mad already, This country “USA” has all peoples in it, If he picked an Arab american would you lose your cookies as well. Grow up.. folks.
Posted by: giveHopeaChance | November 7, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am
WooHoo… Obama brought in a seasoned knife fighter, one of the consummate Washington insiders. Was anybody in America really naive enough to think we’d really be getting change. We’re just bringing in the opposing team.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | November 7, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am
Obama’s job is to appointed the most qualified people to his cabinet. It is the media’s job to speculate on the meaning of the appointments.
It hasn’t been a weeks since the general election and there is too much negativity sweeping the internet.
Give President-Elect Obama some space to work it all out for the good of this country. Give it a break ye of little faith.
Posted by: clarity | November 7, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am
oh, you crazy Republicans, the depth of your sincerity and compassion is just so… well..
just read on…….
Glenn Beck had Erick Erickson on his radio show today to talk about his plans for a Republican bloodbath over Sarah Palin, of which Beck thoroughly approves.
Indeed, Beck believes most conservatives voted for John McCain in the hopes that he would soon die:
I mean, I have to tell you if I heard once, I heard 1,000 times from people, and I never said this, never said this on the air because you just don’t say these things, but I heard a million times from people, “I’m going to vote for John McCain and, you know, I mean, he’s old. Maybe we get Sarah Palin in the first term.” You know what I mean?
Of course, you could occasionally find wingnuts saying such things in public during the campaign, but now that I guess the election is over, the lid is off and the bats are flying out of the belfry.
Posted by: Blue | November 7, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am
what does it mean “republican bloodbath?”
Posted by: one world, one people,please | November 7, 2008, 2:01 am 2:01 am
Rahm is a great politician that has helped Obama in the campaign in three ways: strategy; finance and the critical jewish lobby support and money.
This said it is payback time. Actually, Obama has can manouver better with rahm in the white house instead of COngress. Because he will be his direct boss. Anyways, Arabs shouldn’t be expecting much in the first two years of Obama’s presidency. He still has two xars and a ruined economy to attend.
Most importantly, the US’ middle east foreign policy cannot shift overnight and obama cannot do it alone. The pro Israeli lobby has a hold on Congress not on the presidency. The max Obama can do is influence The state if Israel itself in the soundness of a deal that would appeal to both sides.
Posted by: Smedley B. | November 7, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am
Of course Arabs will take issue with rahm’s appointment, but they’re used to it. They won’t be disillusioned. Obama offered hope to the world just not the Arab world. Since Woodrow Wilson, all American presidents sided with Israel; This is why the appointment of Rahm will be a disappointment but not a surprise. What it will do is push the Arabs further towards hopelessness and all that comes with despair.
Posted by: Smedley B. | November 7, 2008, 4:11 am 4:11 am
You know, a lot of people who clean floors, and whose parents and grandparents cleaned floors — blacks and Hispanics and, yes, Arabs too — voted for Barack Obama and it is in no small measure because of thosevery poor people that Obama became our first African-American president. If president elect Obama has an ounce of self-respect in him he will tell Rahm Emanuel to apologize publicly for his father’s stupid and racist remarks.
“Clean floors”, huh?
Posted by: Steph | November 7, 2008, 4:33 am 4:33 am
Rahm Emanuel, though a Democrat, is a centrist and he is known as the man who gets the job done without taking prisoners.
Washington under Obama will not have the luxury of rest or reprieve. All eyes are on Obama as there are so many things to be done. And Congressman Emanuel is the man he needs to get to the center and achieve results.
I give kudos to the President-Elect’s judgement in picking this achiever as his Chief of Staff.
Posted by: Dare Nigeria | November 7, 2008, 4:35 am 4:35 am
Rahm Emmanuel VOLUNTEERED for a foreign army – not the US army – a foreign army that was occupying Southern Lebanon and was in severe violation of many United Nations resolutions. Imagine the reaction if Obama had picked an Arab for his chief of staff, not just any Arab, but an Arab who had done vehicle maintanace for Hezbollah or Fatah. Rahm Emmanuel was not forced to do military service – like young people in Israel are (though they can refuse). Rahm actively went out of his way to serve in the Israeli army.
Posted by: dispointed | November 7, 2008, 4:39 am 4:39 am
This sends a strong signal to the Arab and Muslim world, that the US is not changing its Middle East agenda. On the domestic side, the 30 billion a year earmarked in the budget for Israel will most likely stand. Citizens might have to contend with belt tightening to repair the broken economy, but Emanuel will make sure Israel still gets their hand out.
Posted by: JoeForSure | November 7, 2008, 4:44 am 4:44 am
As an outsider
The majority voted for change and change is what we hopefully get.
This is a part of it, an intelligent government which can debate among themselves, with the strongest brightest heads of all sorts and a president of the people in the middle to bridge.
If we want a better world we have to try and understand each other, that will be a change and that is what we have to work on, all of us.
Back to the seed, cause from there on we can sow what we want to reep, a healthy environment, without hate, fear and poison, or with other words …a future
Posted by: B and W House | November 7, 2008, 5:15 am 5:15 am
i am new to this blogging game and i really liked most of the comments
they enriched my perception of the appointment and most were presented in a balanced way particularly youssef, halli casser-jayne, counting crowe, tim, acumen, sam ahmed, rev ike, over the top
i agree with those that believe rahm’s father’s views have nothing to do with rahm
my father was an isolationist conservative from the midwest usa and in no way would i ever
wish to be identified with his views
i wish to be appreciated for my own views & would classify myself as an independent, not a party person
i am closest to being aligned with the “green party” in australia
even in saying that i am not absolutely consistent…today i had a beautiful paperbark tree cut down for a satellite installation…some decisions are not easy
i laud those of u who see the positive in the appointment and are adopting a wait and see approach
to be honest, when i read about the appointment, i thought “oh my god what is obama doing?” and then realised that
i certainly don’t know enough to make that comment and then decided to read the blogs
i was amazed the information i casually picked up
thank u all for writing ur thoughts…at the moment i also will take a “wait and see” approach
Posted by: fromdownunder | November 7, 2008, 6:24 am 6:24 am
I think Rahm is a fair choice.
Look at it this way, people, the Chief of Staff’s main job is not one that is for him to push his ideology- it’s not as though Emanuel is going to be Defence Secretary.
To the Arab world, there is no need for them to get disheartened. Obama picked him because he’s competent, tough as nails guy who would be good to help manage the cabinet. He’s not going to be solely influencing Obama’s foreign policy. Obama favours and approach with the aim of resolving the Arab-Israeli conflict peacefully.
Posted by: Grey Matter | November 7, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am
Where’s the “Change we can believe in?”
Posted by: tina | November 7, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am
tina,
If he picked some new guy, you would say he’s picking unqualified people.
Like I said, the CoS’ job is not one to particularly influence the President’s ideology, rather then helping to organize the Cabinet.
Posted by: Grey Matter | November 7, 2008, 7:48 am 7:48 am
Who would have thought that after 21 months of people on the right saying Obama isn’t Pro-Israel.. that Obama is now being criticized for being… “too” Pro-Isreal..
This country is just sick.. I’m so glad that PRESIDENT OBAMA will stop all of this madness of identity politics…
Posted by: Common Sense | November 7, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am
@nygranny,
‘Hey flash override, go back to school and learn how to read. The news article specifies “1991 Gulf War”, not 1982 and when was the last time you checked out how many Israelis have been slaughtered by their neighbors?’
Back in school, we learned to read more than one article and understand that just because a fact isn’t in evidence in one doesn’t mean it is untrue.
My advice to you, nygranny, is that it is better to remain silent and be thought a fool than it is to speak and remove all doubt.
Posted by: Flash Override | November 7, 2008, 8:43 am 8:43 am
tHIS QUESTION IS FOR FLASHOVERIDE
Why is it in our national interest to support the satate of Israel no matter what it does?
Why?
Posted by: Smedley B. | November 7, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am
If you go to the president elects new web page “change.gov” there is an entire pro Israel page with pro Israel agenda. No other country has that on his web page. That plus the addition of Rahm is a very strong message. Israel will still be looked at as doing no worng no matter what. Sorry, thats not change, thats being a sidekick to Israel.
How can you make decisions when you have such a strong pro Israeli voice, so close? Unless the opposite view point is just as close then sorry Palestinians you have to wait another eight years.
Posted by: Sean | November 7, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am
I don’t see how the Cheif of Staff is going to MAKE policy concerning Middle East Affairs so everyone can relax.
He’ll be the Cheif of Staff people, not the President! The reason he’s a good choice is, when given a goal by the president, he’ll get the job done. Remember, his job is to do what the president wants him to do.
Boy…Anti-President-Elect Obama people will find anything to nit pick about won’t they?
Posted by: Greg in MN | November 7, 2008, 9:20 am 9:20 am
“when was the last time you checked out how many Israelis have been slaughtered by their neighbors?”
WOW, Smedley B since you seem like a fan of “checking” stuff out maybe you can tell me what the ratio of Arabs to Israelis killed is?
I assure you the “slaughtering” that you speak of is happening at the hand of Israelis.
Perhaps another question is in order?
Where have most Israelis been killed?
Answer:The majority have been killed outisde the internationally accepted border of Israel.
Posted by: Wow, Smedley B. | November 7, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Posted by: one world, one people,please |
re: “what does it mean “republican bloodbath?”
it means that Republicans, because they lost the 2008 election, are looking to blame someone for their loss, and Republicans can assign blame with great intensity……..
instead of unifying to figure out why their policies were rejected so strongly by the American electorate, Republicans will further insulate themselves by culling their ranks of anyone who they consider ‘unfaithful’ to their ideology as Republicans are a political party with a very intense religious base……
Republicans do not take criticism and ‘free thinking’ as positive attributes.
Posted by: Blue | November 7, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am
I am so tremendously disappointed in President-Elect Obama, but can only hope that Emanuel’s influence won’t be too strong.
The only good news is that Israelis don’t think Emanuel is strict enough on America’s support of them. Good, let’s hope that’s true.
Posted by: Jillian C. York | November 7, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Rahm Emanuel is an excellent choice. Obama will not give in to terrorists.
Posted by: Moe Ben | November 7, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
I am a little disappointed over the choice of Rahm Emanuel. What kind of American goes to serve another country’s (Israeli) army and not the US army.
I think the Arabs need to spent more $$’s like AIPAC and Zionist lobby and buy support like Israeli’s in Congress and the Senate.
Also, I’m sick of being my tax dollars going to Israel.
Posted by: SKhan | November 7, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Mr. Tapper implies this is just an issue for the Arab world. I can assure him that this kind of Israel-centrism in the halls of power is worrying to many Americans as well.
But kudos to him for at least broaching the topic.
Posted by: David G. | November 7, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
I am Pleased wth the decision that Obama made to choose Emanual as his selection of rep. he will be good for Israel and a good influence on the President of the United States of America.
Posted by: Ninette Morgun | November 7, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
I don’t know why there is such a big deal being made.
All we really need, and all we should have demanded of the bush adm.
and the very least we should get
is good, smart,competent people, who will get the job done.
that is what i see in Rham.
and anyway, i don’t know what people are complaining about now.
at first you said obama was an arab.
and a muslim.
so what better way for unity,
than an arab and a jew.
please, let the man do his job.
anything and anyone he brings in will be
for my part, i hope he will put colin powell, over the military and get this war ended properly.
colin powell to help end the war, and get
bin laden, remember him?
better than bush.
Posted by: wow | November 7, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
No.
Posted by: Stephen Gianelli | November 7, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Smedley Butler,
????
What are you talking about?
Posted by: Flash Override | November 7, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
I believe this was very much a political choice on the part of Obama since the large majority of the Jewish vote went McCain. With all fear stirred up by the neo-cons the Democrats needed to assert themselves as still pro-Israeli.
I’ll be waiting to see what kind of impact this has in the middle-east. I’d imagine his fervent pro-Israel history would be unwelcome by Iranian leaders, despite Ahmadinejad’s recent endorsement of Obama’s leadership.
Posted by: Cole | November 7, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
If the Arab World is anything like the rest of the world, they will be more worried about how Emanuel used such underhanded tactics to try to undermine the Democratic position on the Iraq supplemental that he had to be kicked out of the Democratic strategy sessions back in 2007.
He is not the pick you want if your intent is to get out of Iraq.
Posted by: Flash Override | November 7, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Cole,
Obama beat McCain by a 3 to 1 margin among Jewish voters.
Obama got 78% of Jewish votes.
Posted by: Flash Override | November 7, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
This doesn’t shock me. Americans don’t control America.
Posted by: Michelle | November 7, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
This quote appears to be fabricated out of Tapper’s mind. It does not appear on Ha’artz website.
Posted by: Lewis T | November 7, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Let’s get real. Rahm E was a Director of Freddie Mac. He’s one of the people responsible for the current economic crisis. Of course he’s a pitiful choice. But he was probably selected because he’s part of the cover up of the Democrats role in the current economic crisis and he is a staunch, tough, partisan.
This is certainly change you should have counted on.
Posted by: rick g | November 7, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Let’s get our facts straight.
Emanuel had nothing to do with the current financial crisis. He was named to the Board of Directors for the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”) by President Clinton in 2000. He resigned from the board in 2001 when he ran for Congress.
That was way before any of this stuff happened with the current administration.
Posted by: Rev. Ike | November 7, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
I am wondering how can a U.S. citizen with dual citizenship (Israeli), and who served in the Israeli army, obtain a top secret clearance to be the White House chief of staff. Unbelievable.
Posted by: 2plus2 | November 7, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Rahm is a tough SOB who has proven that he can get things done. Obama was smart to pick him as COS. Don’t read foreign policy tea leaves in this choice.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | November 7, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Rahm Emanuel is Howard Stern’s first cousin. I’m more disturbed about that than his stint in the Israeli Army…. no kidding.
Posted by: Deena Rockefeller | November 7, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Gee, I thought the problem for the past two years was that Obama was a secret Israeli hater. It’s hard to choose my own personal favorite from all of the smears, but it’s go to be these lines, which were the summary of another anti-Obama piece on this site:
“As the campaigns compete for Jewish support, it would be political malpractice for rivals (sic) campaigns to not send this blog entry around to big pro-Israel donors. Political Punch 3/4/07 Jake Tapper”
Posted by: Mara | November 7, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Deena – That is truely disturbing. Maybe there is a genetic factor at play.
Posted by: Mara | November 7, 2008, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
Flash: He also supported the Israeli bombing of civilians in Beirut – which the Israeli people did not support. Olmert had his lowest approval ratings at that time – lower than George Bush ever had.
Posted by: Mara | November 7, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Haili: You are aware that Emmanuel worked for years in the Clinton administration? And I am pretty sure that he was Jewish then, too. Along with Rubin?
Posted by: Mara | November 7, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
I like ABC news and I watch it regularly. Ever since I’ve been noticing the provocative articles from Jack Tapper, I’ve noticed his cynical views and reporting.
My views and opinions about ABC news is starting to slide solely because of Jack Tapper’s pretentiously slimy reporting. His reports appear to have a distinctly cynical under current.
ABC news would be better off without this kind of reporting.
Posted by: Local Wolf | November 8, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am
Bush walked into a dream, he had a stong foundation to start with & he blew it. In 8 years America went from a thriving economic & powerful country to a country embedded into a recession, two wars & the largest government debt in American history to the laughing stock of the rest of the world. Bush chose a team of inexpereinced & maverick members to support him.
Posted by: RubyRed Republican | November 8, 2008, 1:26 am 1:26 am
Before the end of his term, Obama’s policies will cause the entire world to erupt in flames.
Posted by: Ben | November 8, 2008, 6:53 am 6:53 am
You can’t please everybody. Our next President didn’t choose him because of politics – he wanted to get the job done. Also, Rahm is a very close friend of his – which means he knows that he will have his best interest at heart. Besides, the man is VERY good at what he does. In the end it will all be revealed.
This will be a great team for America and the world – even if the Palestinians don’t see that right now.
Posted by: Independant American Woman | November 8, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am
I think President-Elect Obama gathers big thinkers with strong opinions as his aides. Perfect! Keep your friends close and your enemies closer. Learn how all kinds of people think!
It may just help us think outside of the box to solve problems and live together on this planet.
Posted by: Mrs. Jude Bourff | November 8, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
WoW!
I want to know what is so objectionable about cleaning floors.
I have NEVER had the money to have someone clean my house.
I have always cleaned my OWN floors.
What a novel thought…
There is nothing wrong with cleaning floors.
There IS something wrong with looking down on those that clean floors.
Posted by: Mrs. Jude Bourff | November 8, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
What does it matter what Emanuel’s position on Israeli issues is? He’s the chief of staff, not the secretary of state. Chief of Staff is a grande operations manager, a guy who controls schedules, who manages time, who is a link between the president and congress. He does not have a policy role.
If Obama had picked Emanuel to be his Secretary of State, we might have cause for concern. However, just because someone in your government is very pro-Israel does not mean they have a say on Israel policy.
Finally, so the guy’s father was Irgun. It was Menachem Begin, a fellow former Irgunist, who made peace with Egypt. No one has asked the father whether he believes today in a 2-state solution.
Moreover, no one has asked the son. Since when is support for Israel anti-two state solution?
Finally,
Posted by: Julie | November 8, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
He’s a perfect choice. Obama’s made a statement to Iran and the rest of the Middle East he’s no pushover.
Good cop; bad cop. I think Obama’s acknowledgment of his own weakness is extremely important.
Posted by: Andrea | November 8, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
as a non-arab I ALSO have a problem with the US’s blind support for Israel… Not just an Arab thing, sorry
Posted by: non arab | November 8, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
It is so funny to read the comments from the Obama fanatics anytime they perceive the slightest bit of negativity in an article about their “flawless” leader. I’m happy that Obama is president, but the Obamabots are so over the top in their defense of everthing he says and does.
Posted by: Lisa | November 8, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
“He’s a perfect choice. Obama’s made a statement to Iran and the rest of the Middle East he’s no pushover.”
No, actually Obama just confirmed what the world already thought of the US and who controls the policy. Shame on Obama. What a coward, needing to over-compensate for any perception about him that showed even a remote compassion towards the suffering of the Palestinians.
Instead of having guts like Powell who talked about the overt prejudice towards Arabs and Muslims, he kept silent and then adds insult to injury by making this move. I now regret my adamant support for this newly-minted AIPAC toady.
And Jake, IRGUN was a TERRORIST ORGANIZATION that existed long before the PLO or Hamas, yet since they’re Jewish, they’re merely called “militant.” Tell that to the thousands of Palestinian civilians killed or driven out of their homes in the 30s and 40s.
Yeah, no media bias when it comes to all things Israel. Sickening
Posted by: Pam | November 8, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
Wow…way to go Obama….you promise everyone CHANGE, and the middle east actually believe you, sent you campaign money and now you just showed them what you think of Hamas.
Posted by: 55Mariposa | November 8, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
You people would complain if he chose Jesus Christ
Posted by: RubyRed Republican | November 8, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
WHEN OBAMA GOT ELECTED, I REJOICED. THE NEXT DAY WHEN I HEARD OF HIS FIRST APPOINTMENT-RAHM EMANUEL, I WAS SOOOOO DISAPPOINTED.
LIKE PALIN, MCCAIN’S LOUSY CHOICE, OBAMA HAS OUTDONE HIM BY SELECTING A PRO IRAQ WAR PERSON AND PRO ISRAELI AGENDA MAN….THIS COUNTRY IS DOOMED!!!
Posted by: marlene | November 9, 2008, 5:16 am 5:16 am
I have been an Obama fan since he annouced his campaign for president. With the selection of Imanuel I will no longer support Obama. Imanuel’s father was a terrotist and Rahm is a radical orthodox Zionist. Thanks Obsma for destroying the hoped for change agenda and being more righwing than Bush. I hope the democrats in congress destroy you. Imanuel will see that only Zionist positions are put in front of Obama and he will completely cut off non-Zionist access to Obama. Instead of change we need, your slogan should be lies to get elected.
Posted by: steve | November 9, 2008, 8:37 am 8:37 am
First off, if you do the research, Emmanuel is for a 2-state solution. I think Obama will work harder than Bush to achieve this.
To be honest, a lot of whether peace will be achieved between Israel and the Palestinians during Obama’s term will be determined by the Israeli election in Feb. 2009, not the American one. I think if Livni wins, you will see progress. If Netanyahu wins, you will see “same old, same old”.
It’s amazing all the extremism out there….neo-cons who think Obama is the “anti-Christ”, people worried that he is too “anti-Israel”, then those who worry that is is “not pro-Israel enough”. Let the facts on the ground play out and give him a chance, I think what he is looking for simply is peace as any sane human being is.
Posted by: Harry | November 9, 2008, 9:12 am 9:12 am
Can we ALL SAY 1 TERM PREZ, IM READY FOR 2012 IF THIS GOV. OF OURS DONT DESTROY THIS COUNTRY 1ST. GOD BLESS AMERICA PEOPLE, AND NOT THE CROOKS THAT LEAD US.
Posted by: US Army Veteran | November 9, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
I agree with Steve whole heartedly. I was shocked and disappointed with Obama choice of Rahm Emanuel. Not only that Rahm is a radical orthodox Zionist, which is a shocking choice, but also Obama could have chosen a more likable person to work with both republicams a democrats to move the country forward.
Obama choice made republicans in congress and else where load their guns for a confrontation with Rahm. Based on Rahm’s politixal record, he is very provocative, profane and partisan.
Obama lied through his campaign. He changed positions on free trade, off-shore drilling, accepting public funds, position form mid-east conflict, and Iraq. He changed positions based on how he can win by rallying people.
The media would have slaughtered any other candidate for changing positions on some of these issues, but the republicans high unpopularity, his eloquency and charisma made the media biased to his favor.
I didn’t vote for Obama or McCain. Still, I am shocked at Obama.
Posted by: Hesham | November 9, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am
Obama promised to bring CHANGE and make politics more civil in Washington.
CHANGE MY ASS MR.OBAMA
Posted by: Hesham | November 9, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
It’s look to me like more of the same!
Posted by: sandraholt | November 9, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am
Emanuel’s appointment is a slap in the face for all those anti-war activists who brought about Obama causus victories!
Posted by: SusiKay | November 9, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
EMANUEL IS CHIEF OF STAFF, NOT SECRETARY OF STATE. IF YOU ALL DID YOUR HOMEWORK YOU WOULD SEE THAT HE BELIEVES IN A PALESTIAN STATE. GIVE HIM A CHANCE BEFORE CONDEMING OBAMA’S CHOICE…I SUPPORTED OBAMA…NOT BECAUSE HE IS BLACK..BUT BECAUSE HE IS A HUMAN BEING WHOM I THINK WILL BE A GOOD PRESIDENT
Posted by: ILENE | November 9, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am
If President Elect Obama had appointed a pro-Palestinian to his cabinet first thing, he would have been labled a “muslim terrorist” by those who are waiting for him to show any ties to the middle east. This was one appointee, allow him the time to balance his cabinet and open his ears to all issues. Obama does want a safe, secure Palestinian state. He wants to end the violations of their basic human rights. He has barely had time to breathe since the election…allow him the time to make informed choices that will represent all and the opportunity to begin sensible dialogue to solve important issues both here and abroad.
Posted by: Tanya | November 9, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Emanuel is a political pit bull and will be effective in rallying the support Obama need to create his “change.”
Emanuel is pro-Israel, the one democracy in the mid-east and the only reliable US ally in the region. Maybe if there was peace partner on the Palestinian there can be true peace… but look what happened to SADAT.
G-d Bless Obama and Israel and peace loving ARABS.
ALex (Houston, TX)
Posted by: Alex | November 9, 2008, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
Damn, I hope nobody tries to interview my dad about my politics. Or me about his.
The remarks by his dad did not connect Arabs to cleaning floors. They were separate statements.
Statement 1: Obviously he will [try to]influence the president to be pro-Israel.
Statement 2: Why wouldn’t he be [trying to influence Obama]? What is he, an Arab? [daddy reminding son that he should have loyalty to Israel]
Statement 3: He’s not going to clean the floors of the White House [as Chief Of Staff [he will have Obama's ear to influence policy, not simply be a gofer or a floor cleaner -- COS].”
Heh, you need to understand the cadence of Jewish thought to get it. The statements are NOT connected.
Posted by: anje | November 9, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Additionally, I still think the reference to cleaning floors was elitist. The whole statement was ill-advised, in fact. I can just see my own father making such a statement. The sub-text, written to his friends, is: See, I told you my son supports Israel.
He shoulda kept his mouth shut. Like father like son I guess.
Posted by: anje | November 9, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
I supported and still support senator Obama.But he needs to balance his appointment by appointing Sen.Chuck Hagel as sec. of state. to balance this thing.
If he fail to do so, I will never support him again.I promise.
Posted by: Andrew | November 9, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
I thought they said earlier that Obama was anti-Isreal? Why all these attack now on his selection of Rahm Emanuel? Please lets give him time to do his job. Those who’re now saying they voted him and would never vote him again are even acting worse than Mcain during the financial crisis. I don’t expect Obama to do anything that’d ever question his patriotism to America again. He told everybody that he’s not going to work with people who would always go with him on every issue but those that can challenge his views all the time to make him lead better. I expect him to appoint people from other political leanings and race like Hispanics/Latinos, Asian and Arab Americans to balance his government and also reflect the coalition the brought about his presidency.
Posted by: Dozy | November 10, 2008, 4:20 am 4:20 am
I’m an Obama supported, and a Jew, and the father of Arab children, and I don’t mind that Obama chose Emanuel as his CoS, as long as Emanuel does Emanuel’s job and not Obama’s. However, it is Obama’s responsibility to denounce such bigotted remarks, especially when made by the father of his CoS!
Posted by: Shlomo | November 12, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Very much to Rahm Emanuel’s credit, he called the Arab-American Anti-Disrimination Committee to apologize for his father’s comments: “From the fullness of my heart, I personally apologize on behalf of my family and me. These are not the values upon which I was raised or those of my family.” During the phone call, “Emanuel added, it is unacceptable to make remarks such as these against any ethnic or religious group.”
As for his serving in (or with) the Israeli Military, that concerned me at first, but considering that such service has in many cases brought (former) Israeli soldiers to become more open-minded and tolerant, Emanuel’s experience there might actually be a good thing.
Posted by: Nick Nayme | November 15, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
The statements made by this Rahm Emanuel character are especially distasteful in the light of the US’s horrific foreign policy excesses in the Arab world, from the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq, to the material, political and economic support to Israel’s horrific persecution of the Palestinian people, to the internment and torture of hundreds of Arab men at Guantanamo without charge or evidence.
Old habits die hard, and given the propensity of the pro Israel lobby in the US to scream accusations of anti Semitism anytime Israel’s repression is criticized, one can be forgiven for asking who the real anti Semites really are now.
Then again, Emmanuel has now apologized for his insensitive comments, so who knows the damage may be shortlived.
Posted by: SAS | November 16, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm