By Lindsey Ellerson

Dec 19, 2008 12:49pm

25,000 More Troops for Afghanistan

ABC News’ Luis Martinez Reports: The latest Pentagon estimate for the number of additional troops needed to fight the Taliban insurgency in Afghanistan has risen to 25,000, ABC News has learned.

Since last fall, the Pentagon has been trying to meet a request from U.S. military commanders in Afghanistan for four additional combat brigades and their support troops, a request estimated to be about 20,000 troops.  Top Pentagon officials have repeatedly said meeting the request could likely take 18 months and is greatly dependent on the continued reduction of US troops in Iraq that would free up units that could then flow into Afghanistan.

A senior defense official tells ABC News that military planners now estimate 25,000 more troops will be needed for Afghanistan.  With 31,000 U.S. troops currently in Afghanistan, it appears that by mid-2010 the number of US troops there will almost double.

Four combat brigades and an aviation brigade would equate to about 16,000 to 18,000 troops, but the numbers are pushed higher by the additional numbers of support troops, known as enablers, that would be needed to assist the combat forces.

The official says adding the enablers had originally produced estimates ranging between 20,000 and 30,000 more troops arriving in Afghanistan over the next 18 months.  However, a recent efficiency review concluded that the number would be about 25,000.   This number is confirmed by another defense official who says that most of the additional troops will be based in southern Afghanistan’s Helmand and Kandahar Provinces. 

In mid-January, the Third Brigade, 10th Mountain Division will be the first of the additional brigades to begin flowing into Afghanistan, but no other combat units have been ordered to go to Afghanistan. 

Last week, Secretary Gates told reporters that he hopes an additional two brigades could be in Afghanistan by the summer of 2009.  Reporters traveling with Gates this past weekend received a briefing from a Senior Military Official who said the brigades that would flow into Afghanistan had been identified by military planners, but no final decisions had been made on their deployments

Though the flow of troops into Afghanistan is greatly dependent on a reduction of US troop levels in Iraq, this official said, "They’re not all a one for one, its not as easy as just to say, the big pieces are off ramping from Iraqi options typically, but when you get into enablers they’re obviously fine-tuned for Afghanistan and not just sort of one for one with respect to Iraq."

The senior defense official agrees saying not every troop requirement in Afghanistan will be met by off-ramping units originally destined for Iraq.  He says Army and Marine units not in the rotation cycle for Iraq could likely be heading to Afghanistan.  One option being explored is looking at how National Guard units could be used to their full potential without breaking requirements for tour lengths and dwell time — the amount of time reserve units are allowed between overseas combat tours.

User Comments

Hmmm, another round of Communist protests looming on the horizon? Or is that war all of a sudden going to turn righteous on January 20th?

Posted by: Grand Old Party | December 19, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

what the……k i thought ol obama was bringing the troops home. now he’s gonna send thousands more to afghanistan. Plus all the troops that are already in Iraq. I think he isn’t realy interested in any change,

Posted by: thomas | December 19, 2008, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

They are probably working on the theory that dumping more people in Afghanistan will reduce the pressure of so many unemployed back home.

Posted by: JoeForSure | December 19, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

This all start on one dark and stormy night, when Ronald Reagan started training the “Afghan Freedom Fighters.” Reagan was also arming and training those who who form the Taliban and the terrorist who planned 9/11.
The Russians approached the White House. Russian was ready to withdraw. Russia warned Reagan that it would be stupid and dangerous leaving Afghanistan with no central government.
Bush divided his forced. This let the Taliban regroup. NATO has lost faith in Bush, We have to have more troops. Mission Accomplished??
Seven years later an

Posted by: Michael Johnson | December 19, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

Goodness, why don’t we do what the Taliban often does and what we did in Iraq. Armed tribesmen are the norm. Hire them to keep the peace and stop the banditry and terrorism that prevails throughout Afghanistan. Pay $25.00/day on stand by and $125.00 a day on combat duty, $5000.00 to the family if the fighter is killed or disabled. It would pump money directly into the villages, keep the peace and protect travelers from banditry. U.S. and Nato troops could back them up and helicopters and aircraft could support fighters who were earning their pay by keeping the peace. Corrupt leaders would see their followers losing their paychecks. This is an idea would probably fail because we are not wihout corruption so maybe we should just leave this mess to the Afghans. Richard of Alaska

Posted by: Richard Wisecarver | December 20, 2008, 4:16 am 4:16 am

Reinstate the draft and start with the children of the Republican hard core. That way they can actually do something instead of standing on a soapbox!

Posted by: Just a dream | December 20, 2008, 7:13 am 7:13 am

We need to quit living in the stone age, we do not need to keep sending foot soliders to combat Terrorist. The U.S.Military is fully capeable of eliminating the problem without losing a lot of lives. This is the country and Pakistan that attacked us, just like the second world war. It should be ended the same way as WWII.

Posted by: gatornation1957 | December 20, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am

Bottom line….. Mr. Bush and his cronies should have invaded Afghanistan with an overwhelming and devastating force, while we as a nation, still had the sympathy and support from the rest of the world. The command should have cut the country off by securing its borders and then strangled our enemies while ensuring they could not escape. This would have sent a message to the entire world on our intent and conviction. I am neither a Republican nor a Democrat, just a concerned American, a retired service member who had one single goal, to get the job done right the first time. This did not happen and now we all will continue to bare the burden of the short sightedness of the exiting regime and the one before that. I’ve been in and all around Afghanistan for 3-1/2 years now, and it sickens me to see the lack of concern and emphasis for destroying the enemy within Afghanistan who attacked our nation, its people and our beliefs. It is only now, after 7 long years of war, that the people in charge of our nation and the military decide that what is necessary to win this war, is more troops on the ground. WOW, and we wonder why our nation is in distress now!?!?!?
“In our Country… one class of men makes war and leaves another to fight it out.
It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, more vengeance, more desolation. War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it; and those who brought war into our country deserve all the curses and maledictions a people can pour out. There is no use trying to reform it. The crueler it is, the sooner it will be over. War is hell.”
William Tecumseh Sherman

Posted by: robby | December 21, 2008, 4:24 am 4:24 am

Neither Afghanistan or Pakistan attacked us. It was Al Qaeda, whose core actors we trained and armed in 1980s. Stop twisting history, so that we can begin to find a solution the problem brought about by your delusions.

Posted by: Matter of Fact | December 22, 2008, 6:47 am 6:47 am

Just a dream said: “Reinstate the draft and start with the children of the Republican hard core.”
LOL. Who do you think is doing the fighting now? Once Obama reinstates the draft (and he will), you lefties will join them. Hope and Change!

Posted by: Chuck | December 28, 2008, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

as long as they dont send my husband :(

Posted by: Elvia | January 1, 2009, 2:46 am 2:46 am

Change?? yeah right! thats never gonna happen. haha. its all bout money and power. money gives u power that all american goverment wants.

Posted by: Uknown | January 1, 2009, 2:49 am 2:49 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.