Dec 8, 2008 2:00pm

Big Three Bailout: Opinion Update

When it comes to Washington’s support plan for the Big Three automakers, one party’s still not along for the ride: American taxpayers.

Fifty-four percent in a new ABC News/Washington Post poll oppose giving automakers up to $34 billion in federal loans, while 37 percent support it. That’s barely budged from 57-35 percent opposition two weeks ago.

Still, the intensity of opposition has softened – while 30 percent of Americans strongly oppose the idea, that’s eased from 36 percent in an ABC News poll Nov. 23. That, plus the 10 percent undecided, suggest possible flexibility in public attitudes on the plan.

The White House and Congressional leaders are in talks on a stripped-down, roughly $15 billion loan package, including government oversight of auto industry restructuring. ABC News has reported that terms of a deal could come by the end of today.

Views are partisan: Democrats divide on automaker loans by 47-42 percent, while Republicans and independents are more broadly opposed, by 57-36 percent and 55-36 percent respectively. Opposition among Republicans and independents has eased slightly, from just over six in 10 late last month; Republicans have moved from 29 percent support then to 36 percent now.

             Automaker Loans             Support-Oppose               Now    11/23All           37-54%  35-57

Democrats     42-47   42-49Independents  36-55   32-61Republicans   36-57   29-62

Strong opponents still outnumber strong supporters by a substantial margin, 30 percent vs. 17 percent. But as noted there’s been a change in intensity, and it’s occurred specifically among Republicans, whose strong opposition has dropped from 48 percent two weeks ago to 33 percent now.

This poll presented pro and con arguments on the issue, noting that proponents say the loan program is needed to protect auto workers and save a key part of the economy, while opponents say it’s an undeserved bailout and the automakers would be better off reorganizing under bankruptcy laws.

Apart from partisanship, support, though still below a majority, has increased by 8 points among men, to 40 percent; and by 9 points among better-off adults, albeit just to 37 percent.

(This ABC News/Washington Post poll was conducted by telephone Dec. 3-7, 2008, among a random national sample of 1,003 adults. The results have a 3-point error margin for the full sample. Sampling, data collection and tabulation by TNS of Horsham, Pa. Click here for a pdf with the question wording, and here for a discussion of other recent poll questions on the issue.)

User Comments

We should not be supporting bad business strategies and hence failures.
The Big 3 claim that the economy is hurting them. Don’t Toyota, Nissan, Hundai also sell in the same economy? Are they asking for a bailout? No.
These American auto manufacturers need to go the way of the dinosaurs and dodo birds – down in history.

Posted by: DiagonalLife | December 8, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Let the Japanese Auto Makers buy the Big 3…
Opposed to allowing the Chinese Auto Makers.
The Japanese make a better Engine..
The Japanese don’t have Auto Unions…
The Japanese pay around 28-30,000 on average to it’s American workers…
Its that or the American Auto industry is done for..
No matter how many Billions are given to them !!!
They did not learn from the late 70′s and 80′s about Big Gas Guzzlers and now they want to convince us, that they’ve now Learned Their Lesson …
Ha !!!
The only cars that should come off the Assembly lines in America are..
1. Electric Engines
2. Diesel Engines
3. Compressed Natural Gas Engines
Hybrids are a waste of Time.
Note: Europe uses a large amount of Diesel Engines. Mercedes will soon release a Hybrid Diesel-Electric Engine.
Diesel Engines are better to the Ecology and they don’t burn fuel so easily.
If we are going to continue to use Big Gas Guzzling Vehicles, they must be Compressed Natural Gas Vehicles, all Big Vehicles, should strictly be ran by Compressed Natural Gas.
Note: Hummers, Escalades, Various SUV’s, Big Trucks and some Jeeps, must be Compressed Natural Gas ran.
But Most of your standard American cars should be Electric and Diesel Engines.
Here in Georgia, Diesel Engines do not have to have Annual Emissions Testing, while standard fuel cars are mandated by Ga law, to have Emissions testing, in order for Ga. Drivers to get state tags.
Diesel Engines, in comparison to standard Gas Fueled cars are better for the Ecology….Period
Thats My 3 Dollars and some change insight..
Have a Nice Week

Posted by: o. | December 8, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

They need to look at what the Japanese auto workers do to be productive.
Top management does NOT make millions in salary or bonus’, and therefore, if, we bail’em out, they need to restructure, reassess their management, and find those with proven track records to come in and redo the structuring.
These execs are too egotistical for the times right now. They took their eyes of the ball and we all have to pay the price for that. UNFAIR!!!!!

Posted by: LYNDA in CT | December 8, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

If these companies fail, the unemployment of the nation WILL skyrocket!! We can give them the money to just keep them up, and monitor their progress to see if it was truly worth it. If the companies would change their ways, things would go better, hopefully. Something has got to be done now rather than later when 2.5 million people are laid off and unable to go any where else and live off of the government. If we can supply them with what they need to just get by, change their ways and monitor their progress, things have a chance at getting better for them.

Posted by: Anastasia Carter | December 8, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

This just shows that most Americans are too self-centered to view the widespread danger and critical ramifications that a Big Three collapse will bring. The media needs to be doing a better job of reporting that.

Posted by: matt | December 8, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

Yes, the big three have blown it, however the need for a bail out is unquestionly clear. But let’s do it right: limit the amount of money given and insist upon a time-line for improvement and recovery. If they do not recover then let them go under or be bought out by foreign interests. Just the threat of being bought out should improve their dismal performance in the past.

Posted by: Loran | December 8, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

I agree that the UAW membership should have learned when Flint went down and GM pretty muched moved on and left what is now a crime ridden city with a bleak future. Since then many cities that are/were UAW have also sufferd do to the greed of its members But The Manufacturers are not to blame here. The UAW membership is for all its need to have more and more for doing less. The only blame the Big Three are to claim is failure to act sooner perhaps as far back is ten yrs ago. The UAW needs to Step back and take its hits like construction did in the 70′s and let the industry rebuild itself.
We also are always willing to give billions in one kind of aid or another to countries all around the world for what ever reason. No strings attached. But everytime somebody here in the US needs help we want to say no. If we spent half as much in our country for Education, Poverty, Jobs and Housing and Healthcare we would truly be the Powerhouse we have been seen as around the world. Why should so few enjoy the American Dream while so many suffer for them. So many people live below poverty and we do nothing about it. Even more live right above that line working and living in their cars cause the cost of houseing is too high. We as a whole need to stop being the Jones’ while so many suffer needlessly. Americans would not mind paying more for products and services if we could actully afford them. The one good thing about Unions is a fair wage for work preformed. Fair Labor practices are always good for bussiness and happy workers produce more.
I also feel that the free trade aggreement and immigration have led to our countries problem.

Posted by: Robert Childress | December 8, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

The opposition to the auto industry loan is due partly to the biased coverage of the news media. There has been little critical coverage of NO STRINGS ATTACHED trillion dollar bailout of ineptly run New York financial institutions. We don’t even know if those bankers have a fleet of corporate jets, and they’ve thumbed their noses at those of us that think that taxpayers shouldn’t have to pay those outragous salaries and bonuses. And to add insult to injury, these New York banks are using much of the money to buy up more banks, rather than help taxpayers in need. I can see it know. Bush and Paulsen will give the New York bankers hundreds more billions id the auto makers go bankrupt to cover their losses.

Posted by: computerklutz | December 8, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

It is not only in the last 20 years that Detroit has been losing to the competition. It began in the 1950′s when people started buying durable and efficient foreign cars. Detroit has had its head in the sand since them. Bankruptcy is the best solution. Restructuring could then begin with a clean slate. Men with their minds in the 21st century should take over from the present CEOs.

Posted by: Passin Thru | December 8, 2008, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

I just read this about a start-up American car company that’s going to start selling autos next year
It seems to me we should be using our $25 billion to help a whole new breed of American car companies rather than artificially propping up the Big Three dinosaurs.

Posted by: Wes | December 8, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Bailout the big 3 and fire all the CEO’s and their staffs.There are to many American jobs at stake, not to action.

Posted by: trojanmom | December 8, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

If the auto makers get the loans and restructure, how does this ensure that anyone will be able to buy the vehicles thus created. I know that I will hang on to my 15 year old car for a few more years until the value of my savings and investments is restored.
With unemployment at up to 10+% the entire auto industry will be limping for years.

Posted by: Tom | December 8, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

(The Japanese make a better Engine)
gm has been makeing engines for toyota,honda ,kia,deawoo for years
people like to put titles on things the big 3 have had cars that got real good mpg’s but alot of people fail to look in to the facts
they do make big cars ,trucks, suvs , because there is a big market for it, so much so that all the japanes,german,koren car co are make them now
people just dont like the big 3 for some reason they will say toyots is better (ex) the toyota matrix and the pontiac vibe are the same car (drive train, body, frame, SAME) but in every way the toyota got a reviews so how is that byest i dont know

Posted by: me | December 8, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

Today they claimed that only 10% of the cost of a vehicle is Union labor, I want to know what the % is for management then we’ll know who’s paycheck to cut to reduce costs.
All 3 of these company’s are guilty of consumer fraud. They have been producing defective vehicles for 25 years all with chronic problems from Cracking exhaust manifolds to blowing head gaskets and everything bolted to this junk.
When Honda finds an issue in field it was fixed immediatly and not left to the poor consumer 10 miles after it runs out of warranty.
I’ll be sorely disappointed if they don’t find a “Joe the Mechanic” to work on their advisory board.
Somebody who has knowledge and some common sense.

Posted by: Don Gould | December 8, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

I am one of millions of individual tax payers. I do not believe the dire predictions of those in favor of this bailout, nor the certainty that bankruptcy is the wrong course. Polls show citizen opposition ranging from 1.5 – 1 all the way to 2 – 1. Nevertheless congressional leaders are pressing for this action. Do they seek control (no one is less qualified to run an auto company)? 2. Are Democrats paying off those who are the primary cause of failure = the UAW? I and my fellow citizens are living with the pain and fears of this recession, some facing bankruptcy themselves. Why should OUR MONEY (remember, the government does not have any money but what they take from us) be used to bail out those who have failed their way into a corner? Some may look at the 15 billion proposed and say it is not too much to do (remember, it’s our 15 billion, not the government’s) but we know it will not be the end. It will be used as a primary argument for the next 50 billion they will need to stay afloat. Then what? Does anyone really think the geniuses who could not see the banking and insurance collapse coming will be good at managing auto companies. If the government takes over, they don’t have a chance, and that’s another reason not to do this.

Posted by: Ed Livingston | December 8, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

I do not wish for all the hard workers to lose their jobs. But I sure am disgusted at how much CEO’s earn. They are so spoiled and out of touch with the poor and middle class, it is no wonder they had no clue as to what vehicles to make. As a matter of fact a lot of those making dec. for all us are out of touch! So who is going to bail all of us out???
Thank fully God knows.

Posted by: brenda | December 8, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm

I wonder why no one thinks that all of us connected to the auto industry also pay taxes. Maybe GM should stop paying retirement pay and be on par with Toyota. Let’s not invest in America and just support Japan and Korea.

Posted by: billt | December 8, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Some say the Big 3 are too big to fail. They’ve become too big to succeed. It would be imprudent to reward the bad business practices of the Big 3 and the UAWs greedy ways with more taxpayer money. We should let them collectively figure out a realistic approach to survival on their own. These are the best paid workers in America. Surely they can come to accept the reality that they are only laborers. As far as the strongarm UAW people are concerned, they are nothing more than parasites who steal from the shareholders and the workers while making life difficult for the business managers. We no longer have sweat shops in America. Labor unions have served their purpose. Collective bargaining should be made illegal. The Big 3 managers are grossly overpaid as well. Nobody deserves or needs multimillion dollar annual salaries or bonuses or benefit packages like we see in the Big 3. Planned obsolescence in design and manufacture have been replaced by the superior products of foreign competitors. Conditions have changed with globalization. Like it or not it’s time to adapt to those changes. No amount of government subsidizing will change the changes that have occurred. Bankruptcy, discontinuance or selloff of less popular models, restructuring, rethinking pay and benefits are all necessities if these are to become vital companies. No bailouts for private businesses. Let them save themselves or disappear. And let a valuable lesson be thusly learned for all businesses.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | December 8, 2008, 9:09 pm 9:09 pm

so sad.

Posted by: bill morrison | December 8, 2008, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm

UNBELIEVABLE!!! Alm ost every blo, or opinion is WAY OFF on the Facts!! When the USa3 tried to tell people the facts, ALL SORTS OF NON_SENSE WAS ROUGHT UP!! Especially by ABC!! Incredible!… THE USA 3 CAN’t BE allowed to fail (OR LOSE ANMORE MARKET SHARE DUE TO clintons’ selling out THE WORKING MAN aND WOMAN!!!)>>WE , THE USA, that is, WILL BE ON THE HOOK FOR OVER $100 bilion dolllars PER YEAR OR the PENSIOn obligations, un-employment for YEARS!!(screw so-called traing–Re-education, programs!! THE us tried thes them in the early 1980s, NONE OF THEM WORKED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) AND AND, the estimated tax revenues LOST!! from all 50 states! Right-to-work states ARE A GOOD THING —FOR JAPAN, KOREA>KOREA>>>and GERMANY They are TRAITORS TO THE US (maybe, not the Confederate States of America!!) Gee..I wonder why they are SO adamant against the USA 3?..Could it be selby and Corker are protecting the $3-$4 Billion That the USA taxpayers paid for wealthy cos. like Toyota, and honda, and BMW–ALL ALL of which get GOVT. backed FREE Research and Develpoment $$ from their countries!!?? NICE try , GUYS!..You and rest of bankrupt Congress and thieving Wall-Street-Willies ARE JUST COVEING YOUR ##### for stealing $350 BILLION DOLLARS, most of which they don’t even NEED!!FACTS: Det. has downsized their factories for almost 25 years! fact: The UAW has cut their wages in HALF, last year! Fact:8of 10 most efficient auto plants are RUN by Ford GM, and Chrysler! FACT: Ford Quality has SUPASSED Honda AND Toyota!!! GM is almost even!! Fact: THE MOST EFFICIENT FACTORY IN AMERICA is A CHRYSLER-UAW planT!! ALL plants use only EXPERT UAW CRAFTSMEN-Women!!Fact:GM The USA 3 Tried diesels in the US the same time that the VW Rabbit Diesl pick-UP got an honest 50 MPG..ALL stoppped due to Environmentalists Bitching about the ENVIRONMENT!in the ’80s..Only recently have the USa3 and their foreign competition clened up diesel fuels–IT WASN’T THE THIEFING OIL COS.! The oil companies (RIGHT BUSH, and CHENEY?) HAVEN’T had to pay one dime of R&D COSTS! ALL was paid for by the USA3!!OVER $65BILLION JUST FOR THAT!!! GM killed off their ’80s Elect. car after spending BILLIONS of 1980 $$$ on it, because they DIDN’T MEET GOVT. REGULATIONS! AND only a few Envir-Green Party members wanted THEI ltd. range!GAS COS. wouldn’t ALLOW GM TO PAY TO PUT IN PLUGS in their gas stations! Honda and Toyota, untill THIS YEAR!, couldn’t even break-even in JapaN despite free R&D govt. $$$ THEY ONLY MADE MONEY IN THE USA !! ASIA Manipulates Currency to give THEIR carmakers’ a , at last report, an $3500 EDGE IN PRICING vs. USA#!! USA CaRS AE thousands of $$ cheaper than THE REST AND ALREADY GET BETTER MPGs IN EVEY, EVERY, Class of vehicle!! It will only take a FAIR SHOT for USA 3 to KICK EVERYONE ELSES’ ASS!! Heck!..GM is even being brainwashed , To make SURE, it gets LOANS, NOT BAILOUTS LIKE NEW YORK THIEVES!!Right, Hillary?.. JUST AS IN the 1930s Yellow Journalism (HEARST, especially!), Don’t let the facts get in the way of a good story, right MEDIA?! USA 3 $15 billion in LOANS!!!..RICHIES and Thieves $350plus in FREE MONEY -NO PAYBACKS!!

Posted by: Dave Bailey | December 8, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

..HEY “o”…GOOD ONE!! Did you hear that the first 8000 Toyota Trucks’ engines BLEW UP!?.. Toyota had to close factory after fleet cos. WERE stuck w/ Toyota ONLY FIXING ENGINE–LIKE IT OR NOT!!

Posted by: Dave Bailey | December 8, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

..And, Hey ABC-Polling co….If a poll were taken in 1860, or 1940 do you think Americans would have WANTED TO GO TO WAR!??? To stamp out tyranny AND RACISM?!

Posted by: Dave Bailey | December 8, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Why should we bail them out? So the CEOs can pay their million dollar mansions? Its a lessos for Americans who do not know how to save gas and $ and guess what happend, ask for more from our oridnary people to save their behind. Let the losers go and have greener automobils take over. The fittest survive!

Posted by: Dave | December 8, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

I would agree with the need for a structured loan agreement for our auto industry. The snowball effect from the loss of jobs would be tremendous. I personally have never owned a foreign car and never will. I buy American made products whenever possible, problem is the lack of availability in most items. We continue to import poor quality items in this country and Americans keep buying them, wonder why we have lost American jobs. Buying foreign products raises costs on American made products. US manufacturers can’t complete due to higher operating costs. Many factors to consider with the downfall of our auto industry however Americans that continue to purchase foreign vehicles only add to the problem. Now if our Government could be so generous as to cut some checks to the taxpayers of this country that have lost their jobs and face losing their homes, only then will the economy turn around.

Posted by: Teresa NY | December 8, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

I believe that if the auto bailout includes oversight on how the money is being spent, why not impose the same sanctions on the Auto Worker’s Union? It seems to me that the concessions are not enough to demonstrate they are serious about saving the Auto Industry. When union concessions demand pensions to be paid for all retired employees and hourly pay rates that far exceed the average industry pay, these costs will be passed on to the consumer through the car prices in the dealership. In times of economic depression, I do not feel there is any organization, person, agency or business that is above reproach on their spending habits. Why do the Unions seem to be protected from their role in the collapse of the Auto Industry? I am no fan of the Auto Worker CEOs and their mismanagement of the company profits. They should restructure in order to run a profitable business and cut out excessive and reckless spending. But I believe the Unions concessions need as much scrutiny as they are part of the problem as well.
Thanks So Much.

Posted by: DM | December 9, 2008, 6:39 am 6:39 am

Congress is selling the Auto bailout, like, we American people should be backing this,I say Not.Behind every Company no matter how big it is, has a owner.So handing billions of dollars over to these 3 Company’s is really giving their owners Billions of dollars.Now dont you all think these owners are allready Billion’ers.And the Employee’s are making around what 60 dollars + per hour.I make 8.50 per hour, I need to be bailed out, not some company who is allready a Billion’er, or not even its employee’s who make 7-8 times more per hour then I do!

Posted by: Demo Rules | December 9, 2008, 7:35 am 7:35 am

1…the CEO’s AND the Union Workers should get thier pay cut in half. No other way to do it. They’d still be the highest paid in the USA.
2…could let Toyota, Honda and Suzuki buy the Big 3. Then all the people outta work would get jobs making Cars that can be afforded.

Posted by: Ed Reynolds | December 9, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am

Why give the money to the auto makers? give it to the tax payer in the form of a $20,000 voucher or more only good towards the purchase of one of the BIG THREE’s cars that way it helps everyone. What good does it do to give all that money to the auto makers if they can’t sell cars? COME ON PEOPLE USE SOME COMMON SENSE.

Posted by: Mark Mansell | December 9, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

o. – Please get some facts together when ‘dictating’ what ‘you’ think the American public wants.
Wards 10 Best Engines 2008
Audi AG: FSI 2.0L turbocharged DOHC I-4 (Audi A3)
BMW AG: 3.0L turbocharged DOHC I-6 (335i Coupe)
Daimler AG: 3.0L DOHC V-6 Turbodiesel (Mercedes E320 CDI)
Ford Motor Co.: 4.6L SOHC V-8 (Mustang Shelby GT/Bullitt)
General Motors Corp.: 3.6L DOHC V-6 (Cadillac CTS)
General Motors Corp.: 6.0L OHV V-8 Hybrid (GMC Yukon Hybrid)
Honda Motor Co. Ltd.: 3.5L SOHC V-6 (Accord Coupe)
Mazda Motor Corp.: 2.3L DISI turbocharged DOHC I-4 (Mazdaspeed3)
Nissan Motor Co. Ltd.: 3.7L DOHC V-6 (Infiniti G37)
Toyota Motor Corp.: 3.5L DOHC V-6 (Lexus IS 350)
3 engines from domestic manufacturers in 2008 on the list. 2007 saw 2 Ford and one Chrysler (domestic) engine.
“Diesel Engines, in comparison to standard Gas Fueled cars are better for the Ecology….Period”
Please back that opinion up with some real data.

Posted by: TerryD | December 9, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

o.-Let’s come back to reality.
“They did not learn from the late 70′s and 80′s about Big Gas Guzzlers and now they want to convince us, that they’ve now Learned Their Lesson …” Do you have a clue how many BIG GAS GUZZLERS Toyota makes? Tundra (15C,19H), Sequoia (14,17), Land Cruiser (13/18), FJ Cruiser (16/20), 4 Runner (16/21). They make EIGHT different models of trucks and SUV’s. Their Sienna minivan gets 17/23 while Dodge/Chrysler minivans with the largest engine option, a 4.0 litre, get 17/25.

Posted by: TerryD | December 9, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

The Big# 3 loan protestors are divided into 2 basic groups:
1.) People who have jobs supported by foreign companies (profits go back to those foreign companies..)
2.) People who have jobs not affected by foreign companies.
All the rest of us Americans have to battle the foreign invasion for survival…plus, to be more unfair:
the invaders are allowed tax free abatements, no pension funds to support, allow mostly only foreign sub suppliers for components and are subsidized by their own governments.
A one sided playing field!

Posted by: bobbyd | December 9, 2008, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

I think the CEO’s of the big three should be fired just like AIG, and those other crocks then and only then should any mony have been given to these companies. Not the stock holders nor any one at the top should reap when most Americans are either out of work or being layed off period. Get some of those new minds out of MIT, Virgina Tech and other universities to run these companies with new and vigorating idears. The Auto makers have been sleeping with the oil companies for years, They could have made a green car twenty years ago. Thank you

Posted by: Mr. G | December 9, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

Why not do something like this for injured and disabled veterans? Surely, they deserve it more than these guys.

Posted by: law1801 | December 9, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

This is supposed to be a democracy. The American people overwhelmingly were against the 700 billion dollar bailout of the banks. Congress passed it. The American people are overwhelmingly against bailing out the auto industry. Congress is going to pass that too. We no longer live in a democracy where the majority rules. Easily half of the world’s economist think these were bad deals. So how do we get Congress vote the will of the people?

Posted by: George | December 9, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

I think the CEO’s of the big 3 should be fired. If someone is hired to do a job and they are unable to do it they’re fired. It’s evident they have not done their job. How could they even consider taking a bonus. The reason for their down fall like so many others is GREED! I don’t want all those people to loose their jobs. The CEO’s should be ashamed. They need to live like the middle class. I don’t know what else to say except they may God have mercey on us all.

Posted by: Tonya | December 10, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

Who on earth are you polling? The Big 3 ALWAYS stood for advancement of the little guy…By wanting everyone to suceed, now all of a sudden America hates them ? Vehicles today rate on par if not better quality wise with Competitors, they are a major hub of innovation (Onstar GPS) Harbor Reports show the greenest most efficient Plants and all Americans now want is to give it all away? Failure of BIG 3 = America becomming 3rd world country!! All we will be good for is a cheap labor force: Why can’t people see beyond this and look at the big picture? Where is our leaders strategic plan for America? I’m becomming more and more conviced I need to move to Canada or Switzerland…. Maybe Toyoko will have a nice spot for me…

Posted by: Mary | December 10, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

The Congress is failing to recognize fundamental principles of capitalism – this is a sad day in America. ………..

Posted by: Ohg Rea Tone | December 10, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

The poll proves why America is in bad shape economically – the majority of its people apparently have no financial sense.
It is far far cheaper to LOAN these companies money than the bailout that will occur if they go under. Why? Here you go:
1. Did you see what the market did on the idea that these loans would go through? Up about a 1000 points. What happens if it doesn’t? You’ll see it down to 7000 at least and maybe 6000 in a month. Do you know how much market cap that is?
2. In Chapter 11, who takes over the pensions? You and me. How much do you think that will cost?
3. The auto suppliers cannot go out of business – a significant portion of tank parts come from them. We will have to bail out those companies for sure as they cannot survive without the car companies. You’ll see the costs of tank parts rise exponentially.
4. A manufacturing base is key to our national security. If the auto industry isn’t around, the government will need to create another industry that could make jets, bombers, tanks, and ships in times of war. We will not be able to rely on foreign companies (Toyota, Honda, VW – remember our friends from WWII) if the chips fall in the wrong way.
There is a seemingly endless chatter about how Americans don’t want cars or trucks the Big 3 makes. Well, half of America disagrees with you. Also, many ignore that foreign governments ARE bailing out their auto companies. And, although we let these companies sell their cars here, their nations largely block us there (South Korea is a notorious example).
So the job of our representatives is not to enforce majority rule – their job is to think. I think they should craft a good bill, but it is economic suicide to let these industries go under at this point.

Posted by: 1percenter | December 10, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm

People in this country are not going to borrow money to buy new cars, trucks or homes when they are loseing jobs daily. Give every tax payer $250,000 and we will be out of this mess.

Posted by: Bradley Isaman | December 10, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

I’ll tell you why all other car companies are doing fine (apart from having the same sales drop 30%+ as the D-3):
1: They are supported by their own governments at home
2: Many of them are partially owned by their home governments (VW, Renault, Nissan)
3: They protect their home markets so the D-3 cannot sell there (Japan, Korea, even the European Union to a lesser degree)
4: They know how to deal with unions at home which are much stronger than the UAW
5: They get rebates on their Value Added Tax when they export to the US
and the US cannot do the same in return.
6: They get indirect support for Research and Development from their home governments (Japan (remember MITI ?), Korea, Germany)
7: They require joint ventures with local companies for US companies to sell cars in their country (China)
8: They are the largest contributors to the US trade deficit now that oil is back below $50/barrel in spite of their assembly plants in the US
9: They benefit from billions of $ doled out by state and local governments to build their plants in southern states.
10: They have access to patient capital for long term planning that the impatient, corrupt, and short sighted US capital markets can never hope to match.
Is that enough ? Of course the D-3 have made lots of mistakes, but the playing field is not at all level here. Ford/GM compete very well in all other countries with these companies other than in their respective home markets. However, here in the US, the auto industry problems are just the tip of the iceberg. All other industries in the US that compete with foreign companies.. they are all loosing market share.
This is not about replacing one bankrupt company in Michigan with another from Alabama. This is about global competitiveness. We are becoming a branch plant economy where the only jobs are the minimum number of lowest tech jobs necessary to bribe local politicians. For $50 per person ($15B over 300M people), this government could start the process of addressing these problems, but we find it much more satisfying to blame everyone else.

Posted by: DM | December 11, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

I have a toyota and the handle on the passenger side fell off the little console broke off and in the summer I went over a bumpy road at 20 kilometers and my radio sunk into the dash board when I tried to get it fixed under the warranty they told me I didn’t have any warranty even though they sold me the car with warranty. My husband phoned the company here in Lethbridge Alberta Canada and they said they forgot to transfer it over into our name when we bought it so I go back into the dealership here and again they tell me I have no warranty. It will cost me over $800.00 dollars to fix this but now that I’m over the mileage for the warranty I am out of luck. I will never buy another Toyota again my next car will be a GM or Ford or Chysler. Toyota never stepped up to the plate to fix these problems on this car and the dealership wouldn’t even contact me after I wrote there general manager they totally ignored me. Shame on you Toyota.I’m not for a bailout unless they fire the 3 ceo’s of those companies and start over with new management, I’m sure the 3 CEO’s have enough money to retire on. EJ

Posted by: Ej | December 11, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

I am not surprised at the arrogance of the unions! My company location received NO raises last year. We were told that in order to even have a chance to survive we had to give it up. And we did. And, no one left because of that. The incredible arrogance (that word again!) of these people will now quite possibly cause them to run their companies out of business. Thumbs down!

Posted by: Travler55 | December 12, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Mr. Car man…you made your problem. You fix it! I won’t buy another American car until you think “American”…not greed at all expense. Mr. Politican, you pass whatever bill you want. I won’t buy their cars, many others won’t buy their cars, so your wasting our money. And you’ll waste it because you have no desire to be a patriot.
You can make whatever deal you want. If the people don’t trust the system then it’s doomed. The people don’t trust you idiots anymore.
Barney fife, Poo poo Pelosi, Gouging George, Obama Capone (don’t give me a stupid story about how he’s not part of the Chicago system). You’re all part of the stinking corrupt system!
Set your house in order. File chapter 11…make a car that gets 60 mpg.
Congress…Stop manipulating our economy. We’re pissed! You all have no honor. You’re greedy, power hungry, weak humans. I’ll leave out how I really feel.

Posted by: kennedy | December 12, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Do I think auto workers should take pay cuts to try to compensate for deficit? Is that what I’m supposed to answer? Why the hell should they have to suffer for something they had NO CONTROL of?! That’s the stupidest thing I ever heard next to that dumb Chicago governor. Come on bigshots of GM, FORD, and CHRYSLER. Grow some balls, take RESPONSIBILITY and be ACCOUNTABLE for what you’ve screwed up. The prices of the cars are way overinflated for what they’re worth and I’ve got news for you. If they started a buy one get one free sale, they still couldn’t get enough Americans to buy and save their asses. So I guess my answer would be no.

Posted by: George | December 12, 2008, 12:23 am 12:23 am

I’m so sad to say that they should not recv,a bail-out.They spent many yrs.pricing the American people out of the new auto market.The CEO’s pockets got to deep,now we are all going to pay an unbelievable price tag before this is over,

Posted by: David | December 12, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

you can rest asured that the big three will not go under. they will go to chapter 11 and reorg. then the unions can give up a lot.No way can they afford to pay $78/perhr in wages and benfits and stay afloat. Unions have to renogate. thats my 2 cents.

Posted by: robert M | December 12, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

I worked for Japanese company once
Production Line, Let me tell you
If your body wears out You are gone Fired They will kick you out the door
with nothing but your broken parts.So all you people who are for the Japanese autos, I hope you have to work for them someday. Also your senators make 169,000 yearly uaw workers make about 50,000 Who should take a pay cut?

Posted by: ann | December 12, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

It looks like our a natural resorce provider has figured out the answer to our aching economy and they needed to look all the way around the world to India to find people who were glad to work at a fraction of the cost of employement here in the USA.
The truth being is the Boss’s are still the Boss and the people who devised a system of any resorce are still those people and just like a famous screen actor or people who can promote a product and get it to sell if the job is accomplished then the royalties roll in? The truth being though minimum wage is far from the actual living wage that plain working class folks have rose up from? The truth being is does this all honestly make sense and truely have any value behind it? Value used to be what you got for your money and if this country thinks they can con us or the rest of the world with its front of pretty cars that only look good from the road and really hurt once they take to the road. We all need to take this situation/crisis seriously and get down ond dirty and make use of other forms of transportaion and learn the art of patience and kindness and love. Love does,did,can’t,won’t, demand past ways of doing things for the past is just that our past and we need to learn a valuable lesson from all this and you will not need to go to college to figure this one out either so far I have made it on high school education from 25 years ago that I honestly do not even remember anymore. Today I make $2 more that minimum wage and was told to be glad I have a job but it just goes to show you what WE could do for $80 a day? The tricky part is finding a woman who will love you for what she is getting not what she hopes to gain in the economy. With the old saying that 2 are better than one we must admit if it is based in true LOVE U get 3 for the price of thee ONE.
Just a few thoughts to think about? timothy

Posted by: Timothy | December 12, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

This is NOT a bailout for the automakers – that could be achieved through bankruptcy. This is a bailout for the union. They will lose out in a bankruptcy – everyone else will stand to come out ahead.

Posted by: larry5 | December 12, 2008, 3:17 am 3:17 am

WHEN WE ALL ARE IN SOAP LINE THEN WE CAN SAY WE SHOULD HAVE HELP THE AUTO COMPANY!!!!!!

Posted by: GARY | December 12, 2008, 7:31 am 7:31 am

No Bail Out for the UAW, they are the ones that killed Detroit. Even now they will not give concessions.

Posted by: Jo | December 12, 2008, 7:43 am 7:43 am

if they fall we all fall not just michigan

Posted by: b.from.the.d | December 12, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

NO BAIL OUT FOR A BUSINESS WITH A FAILED BUSINESS MODEL. THEY MANAGED TO BURN BILLIONS OF THEIR OWN MONEY, NOW THEY DO THE SAME ON TAX PAYER MONEY. NO AMOUNT OF MONEY WILL HELP THEM AS LONG AS THEY KEEP THE SAME BUSINESS MODEL WITH THE UNION REFUSES TO COMPETE.
EVEN IBM HAS TO CHANGE IN THE 90s TO SURVIVE THE COMPETITION. IBM HAS NO UNION, THOUGH.

Posted by: pmp2008 | December 12, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

There should be no bailout without an
immediate pay cut of all employees at the big three. They will fail again, if
they don’t make drastic changes.

Posted by: Helga W | December 12, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

The auto union is the one that needs to disappear. In our town we have bad cops and we can’t fire them because of the union. We also have bad teachers in our schools and we can’t fire them either.
Workers in companies that are not union
operated get the job done with reasonable pay and with good workers because if they don’t do a good job they get fired. Get rid of unions and prosper.

Posted by: weedy | December 12, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

Not even the silly folks on Capitol Hill believe that any one of these companies can come out of Chapter 11. So, regardless of what you may think, here’s why not: to run a company in Chapter 11, you still need money and you need people buying your product. The odds of a bankrupt GM getting money? Zero (they can’t even get money when not bankrupt). The odds of people lining up to buy GM cars when in bankruptcy? Almost zero.
Chapter 11 protects GM from its creditors. Do you know who they are? Auto suppliers are a big constituency and if they don’t get their money, they go under. This is not the airline industry where people need to continue to fly and purchasing an airline ticket is not buying a car.
Those of you so eager to get rid of unions astound me. Yes, they went too far in many accounts but if you want to see the disparity between rich and poor get even bigger – kill them all off.

Posted by: 1percenter | December 12, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Take this money and invest in companies like Aptera – they are designing for the future NOT just drilling holes in the fenders to make a Chevy into a nostalgic-looking Buick model.

Posted by: Rick_VT | December 12, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Two-seaters aren’t going to get much market share. But your point that innovation has been stifled is true.

Posted by: 1percenters | December 12, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

Let them all go bankrupt. Get away from the union and restructure without them. The only thing the union has done in the last 30 years is changed their name from organized crime to organized labor. They protect the people that don’t have the ability to perform a their job and make everyone else pay for the dead weight.

Posted by: RichC | December 12, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Don’t understand bankruptcy, do you? Chapter 11 doesn’t break the union. And they wouldn’t come out of it. Read my post just a couple above…

Posted by: 1percenter | December 12, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

If the UAW members knows that the big three are so good that they are going to pay back any money loaned to them, then why don’t the UAW members just mortgage their homes and loan the Big Three their own money. We all know the the Big Three will pay the UAW members back and the UAW wouldn’t even have to worry about having their own homes morgaged.

Posted by: buckscc | December 13, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

You think these line workers haven’t already mortgaged their homes? While you sit back and drink your latte, you’d have them out on the streets. But the even dumber part is that your job is next.
I can’t believe there is even discussion about the loan to the car makers. Be it 14 or 140 billion dollars, it’s far cheaper to loan them that money than lose 1-2 trillion dollars in market cap practically overnight, 3 million or more jobs, and pick up the tab on unemployment benefits/health care/pensions for all these folks.
It’s crazy that the mice around here continue to want to shock themselves rather than run the maze.

Posted by: 1percenter | December 13, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

As disgusted as I am with Detroit for spending years giving Americans these big useless SUVS instead of working towards something greener I can’t help but shake my head about all this.
After bankrupting this nation for the last 8 years till we are near a depression the Republicans finally find fiscal responsibility just in time to try to break the unions.
I wonder how much it will cost the government to pay out all those new benefits, food assistance and whatever for the thousands who must pay for Republican fiscal conservatism. The whole phrase makes me grin. They like spending money just fine as long as its wars or wall street. They just aren’t big on the rest of us.

Posted by: Annie | December 13, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

No, we should not bail these auto makers out.
Few are going to buy their bad cars anyway.
Look, we gave money to banks, but they used it to overtake banks and fire people.
Hence, unemployed people do not make a taxbase to bail anyone out, nor can they pay again for a car they already just did with tax money.
Take away the Unions and the jet travel and put the CEO’s in the cars they build, they will be better for it.
Where do you presume to get any money to fund the bailout, if no one can afford to pay taxes?

Posted by: woman citizen | December 13, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

At the immediate comment above: what are you talking about? If the Big 3 go under, then there are no jobs/taxes/etc. Then you will see a real bailout rather than a loan occur. This is not rocket science, the economy cannot withstand so many lost jobs right now.
As for the “bad cars” – over half of America disagrees with you. To me, Toyota builds the most boringly designed cars (and that includes the faux luxury Lexus brand). And, again, Ford made a profit in the 1st quarter this year. If it weren’t for artificially raised gas prices and a credit crunch, all 3 of the car makers would probably be in the black now.

Posted by: 1percenter | December 13, 2008, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

The big three are going bankrupt becuase they aren’t selling their overpriced, semi ok vehicles.
Bail them out by giving vouchers to the American people to take to dealerships US-wide and that will make their inventory go by-by. For once pay the taxpayer, not the big guns.

Posted by: Malinda | December 14, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

It’s an interesting comment on our society when folks are in a race to get paid less. Keep up the good work, pretty soon you might even make the minimum wage.

Posted by: 1percenter | December 14, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

This bailout is ridiculous. How does an industry fail and then need help to try to get back into it? Shouldn’t have have prevented this? all the rich guys that knew what they were doing must immediately pay for their actions, thats the bottom line.
Sincerely,
Ilya

Posted by: Ilya Bodner | December 16, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

Let me see… We give them MONEY to keep them going with no changes, or anything to show for it, other than to pay creditors & employees? And what does the taxpayer get in return? Higher priced, crappy vehicles. And our kids pay for the loans with no guarante they will stay in business. I DON’T THINK SO!
Times the number of employees by the number of small businesses that may fail and tell me it doesn’t carry the same impact, as the BIG 3 on the economy. But the small businesses aren’t telling the Gov “Give Us Money OR Else”. How arogant!
Not to mention the UAW doesn’t/won’t take the lower wages? I amy not be a rocket scientist, but isn’t HAVING a job better than NO job??? I have said for years, the time of the unions have passed, kind of like the dinosaur.
I oppose handing out money “just because” the economy will slump even further. No to the bailout. Not onnly that, what happened to helping the housing industry? It got awefully quiet, and people are still going under with their homes… Where has all this money gone?
Tred, K.C. KS

Posted by: Tred | December 16, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

How come we did not ask for same or similar conditions from the financial institutions that caused this whole mess?
(no one will buy auto’s in this economy)
Financial CEO still get paid big bucks from the fund, while auto CEO’s agreed for a $1 pay – how is that reasonable?
Auto companies need the loans (It is not a bailout stupid, it is a loan).
BTW, republicans, please remember people have long memories and will remember all this next election time too!

Posted by: Hector | December 16, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.