By Lee Speigel

Dec 26, 2008 6:01pm

Caroline Kennedy: Kennedys Work Twice as Hard

In an interview with NY1, aspiring New York Senator Caroline Kennedy states her case.

"I think that I have relationships in Washington that I would like to put to work," Kennedy told NY1 political anchor Dominic Carter. "I helped run the vice presidential search for Barack Obama.  I have a good working relationship with him.  I want to be able to be a part of the team that uses all my relationships."

Of reports that she had missed voting in several elections, Kennedy said she was “dismayed” to learn that. "There isn’t a good excuse," she said.

The oldest daughter of the late President John F. and first lady Jackie Kennedy said, "most people don’t realize that my mother loved campaigning. … Because you just get to meet people and it is such an education." What would her mother make of Caroline trying to be picked by Gov. David Paterson to replace Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., in the Senate should Clinton be confirmed as secretary of state? "She would roll her eyes about the whole thing — she was an incredible patriot herself and I think she would be really proud, you know, that I was doing this."

Of her brother, John F. Kennedy Jr., Kennedy said, "He would be laughing his head off" about her seeking office. "There is no doubt about that.  Because that was the kind of relationship that we had, you know, he would be 100% behind me.  He always was. And, you know, it would be great if he was here."

But she isn’t trying to capitalize on her name, Kennedy said. She is eager to do the work necessary to be a senator — and presumably to be re-elected in 2010 for the special election to fill Clinton’s seat, and 2012, when the term officially ends.

“I could race Chuck Schumer around all 62 counties and, you know, we’ll see who wins," she joked, referring to New York’s senior senator.

Kennedy responded to recent comments by Rep. Gary Ackerman, D-N.Y., that, "I don’t know what Caroline Kennedy’s qualifications are. Except that she has name recognition, but so does J.Lo. I wouldn’t make J.Lo the senator unless she proved she had great qualifications, but we haven’t seen them yet."

“I admire the journey J. Lo has traveled," said Kennedy. "I’ve been to a school in the Bronx pretty near the house she grew up in and so I actually have a lot of admiration for her, and she looks pretty good. But in terms of public policy and how we spent our adult lives, I don’t think there is really much we have in common.”

Kennedy added, "I know a lot of people have opinions about our family, people in our family — good opinions, bad opinions — that is something that we have grown up with.  But, you know, I can tell you that, in my family in particular, there was a sense that we have to work twice as hard.  It is a question of what do you do with that opportunity?"

- jpt

User Comments

Ha! She defended J. Lo. She didnt realize that was a reductio ad absurdum.
Please send her, she will fit in perfectly.

Posted by: BertieW | December 26, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

If she had grown up in the real world, Caroline Whatever-her-last-name-is would know that women always have to work at least twice as hard as men to be successful and that the woman she’s trying to replace has worked harder than that her whole life. Any other woman with Caroline’s complete lack of qualifications would not be being mentioned. It is her Kennedy name that got her on the vice-presidential selection team, nothing else.
How nice that she has visited a school in the Bronx. Has she said anything at all about a desire to represent the people of New York in the US Senate? Does she even know that that is what Senators do, or does she think she’d be part of Obama’s administration? It seems she has little idea of whose seat she’d be getting. She would not, ever, be running against Schumer. Maybe it’s better if she just doesn’t say anything.

Posted by: Keith | December 26, 2008, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Oh please another cry baby running on their parents name and money- come on New York can’t we do better than this????

Posted by: mimi362 | December 26, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

……”work twice as hard…”?
2 x 0= 0. Only in the donkey party
does this logic fly.

Posted by: CandyKane | December 26, 2008, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Please, everyone….let li’l Caroline
get oooooooonnnnnnnnn with her “listening tour”!

Posted by: CandyKane | December 26, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Obama appeared to work twice as hard….but had William Ayers writing his memiors for him, after missing the deadline from his publisher. Obama is a bad writer as evidenced by the poetry published at his college, and the essay on community organizing that was published by Univ. of Ill. Ayers, is a gifted writer and talks like he writes. Obama cannot talk like Ayers writes. Ayers and Obama met at Cooper’s Union in NYC, at communist meetings, in the early 80s.

Posted by: Colonel Rebel | December 26, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

I have worked hard at my career for about 35 years, I am sure that there are many folks in New York who have done the same in public service to their state. Is’t it nice to have the Kennedy name and to wake up one morning and say- “I think I want to be the Senator for New York! They will love me!I will work harder than anyone”. I guess she forgotten the 100′s of people who have been serving the state for years.

Posted by: Linda | December 26, 2008, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

I hope that the media will continue to be on Mrs. Kennedy case, so that she will learn, appreciate and ultimately admire Mrs. Clinton for what Mrs. Clinton has endured all these years. Mrs. Kennedy has to earn her seat.

Posted by: young_voter | December 26, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

What a shame that Princess didn’t feel the need to put her relationships to work by running for another public office. I guess that’s too much bother — why not just expect to be appointed to a high political office because of your last name.

Posted by: Alex | December 26, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

jpt quotes Caroline Kennedy:
“I helped run the vice presidential search for Barack Obama. I have a good working relationship with him. I want to be able to be a part of the team that uses all my relationships.”
These are reasons to be part of the “Obama” organization’s court — NOT to be a U.S. Senator.
Kennedy sat out the Bush coup with nary a public murmur, not even managing to VOTE. The people of NY — as opposed to DC political celebrities who have “relationships” with Kennedy — might like … Rep. Nadler, or someone else who, unlike Kennedy, doesn’t have to start at the top just because Senator Schumer thinks she’s cute.

Posted by: Belle Starr | December 26, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Linda – Caroline Kennedy has worked in Public Service her entire career. She has raised over $65 million dollars for NY Public Schools and has been a huge advocate of education an the arts. In addition, she also serves on the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund Inc., the American Ballet Theater, the Commission on Presidential Debates and the John F. Kennedy Library Foundation.
She is a lawyer and written two books on civil liberties, an issue that concerns many Americans right now.
She may not be your cup of tea, but she is a dedicated public servant.

Posted by: Paige | December 26, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

“She would not, ever, be running against Schumer. Maybe it’s better if she just doesn’t say anything.”
Wouldn’t THAT be nice?
Maybe little Caroline could become one of Michelle Obama’s ladies of the bedchamber. Obama could use some help dressing herself, if that rouge-et-noir black-widow frock she wore to the acceptance event is any indication.

Posted by: Belle Starr | December 26, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

“she also serves on … the Commission on Presidential Debates”
THAT ought to clinch Governor Paterson’s appointment for Nadler!

Posted by: Belle Starr | December 26, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

The country should consider itself Lucky that Caroline wants to serve. She will no doubt make an excellent senator. Caroline Kennedy is a class act all the way.

Posted by: pt | December 26, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

This freaky little left wing liberal, thinks she is entitled to this seat, because of her name..Remember Her Dad JFK did NOTHING as president, Kennedys are boil on politics

Posted by: Who Cares | December 26, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

(T)he Commission on Presidential Debates? The one that allowed Gwen Ifill to moderate a debate even though she had a book ready to drop on inauguration day about Obama?

Posted by: BlueBlood | December 26, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

“Of reports that she had missed voting in several elections, Kennedy said she was “dismayed” to learn that.”
She didnt know she haddn’t voted? Man, the maid is going to be in trouble.

Posted by: BertieW | December 26, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Her mother loved campaigning? Since when? I was always under the impression she detested it-many books have said so. And books she wrote? If her name was not Kennedy she never would have been published. I am sure she is smart and capable-but let the NY voters decide!

Posted by: deb | December 26, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

She is unqualified..period! Look at what her supporters say..”She cares!”…SO WHAT?..”She’s smart”…so are millions of people..”She’s a lwayer”…LOL all the more reason she should not get it..”She raised so much money”…BFD! When your friends are billionaires and your name is Kennedy, it’s easy to raise money. She has never held public office, frequently does not vote, has basically never left her multi million $ Manhattan penthouse and has no clue what it means to be middle class.

Posted by: Nub-Tail | December 26, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

Hey Deb,
It sounds like Caroline knew her Mom better than the tabloid book writers that were trying to make a quick buck. Give her the office, she is the best political strategist of the past decade for sure. She worked the Kennedy magic to launch Obama into office. That’s got to be worth something.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | December 26, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

“I’ll work twice as hard”…well whoop-dee-doo! So does the landscaper on my lawn.

Posted by: MBNA Joe | December 26, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Hey Nub-tail,
You are obviously filled with right-wing distorted jealousy of all things Kennedy. What do you have to say about Teddy? And Bobby? And Jack? (I can’t say I knew him personally, well enough to call him Jack, but then again I can tell you don’t know Jack either).

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | December 26, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

This is a joke! This woman has no experience. Are the dems sick or what? Oh that’s right, Obama has EVEN LESS EXPERIENCE!

Posted by: Anna | December 26, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

“”….there was a sense that we have to work twice as hard. “” This statement finally solves the mystery of WHY the elitist political hacks always claim that the illegals are such a hardworking bunch.
thank you carOline fo letting that one outta the bag.
and as for j-lo’s nabe ?
what was the big deal ?
Many a worse area nationwide ,and many of us took offense at j-lo’s misrepresentation .

Posted by: salome | December 26, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm

Twice as hard? I doubt that.

Posted by: Huh | December 26, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm

NO WAY, NO MORE INEXPERIENCE SENATORS
As a New Yoker and tax payer, please run and speak out your opinions in 2010 campaign, if Caroline Kennedy
want to have the replacement seat. It’s not time absolutely for New Yorker to need the senete who doesn’t have experience at all, but only family back grounds, money from the late parents and brother. NY has been faced with a lots of problems as Wall St. collapsed. Gov. David unveiled that the budget of 15 Billions and some decades public teachers will be cut by NY States from not three years later, but three weeks later, 2009. The tax revenue of States of NY will reduce from 5 billions up to 11 billions. The anguish of middle class with tax payer in NY over illegal immigrants who never pay taxes, but have taken medical benefits from States Gov have been growing and growing. It’s emerged this county and that county. Many NY residents’ve been afraid of loosing jobs, home and family. The Senete seat must be replaced experiences person only.

Posted by: Janet, Manhattan, NY | December 27, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

Caroline would be an ornament to the House and an ornament to America. Get over it you folks who think experience is everything and breeding is nothing. You are entirely wrong.
Experience can be picked up in a trice. I mean people are already saying Obama is a great President. He has no experience and he hasn’t even been sworn in yet.
Caroline’s background will guide her. She’s a smart and classy women with all the right connections.
Be happy. A bit of quality in the House is a nice change.

Posted by: Oliva | December 27, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

I think Caroline Kennedy has great qualifications — she is a brilliant, educated lawyer, rainmaker, fund raiser, she has the president-elect’s ear, she is intelligent and respected, she knows the political process and life in the public eye. She has specific knowledge of civil liberties and education. SHe will know how to get things done. So what are the qualifications that the critics are actually looking for?

Posted by: dejune5678 | December 27, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Democrats laughed at Sarah Palin because she only governed Alaska. What has Caroline Kennedy run?

Posted by: Tina | December 27, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Alex (7:38:01 p.m.) Caroline is not Mrs. Kennedy; she is Mrs. Schlossberg. Her mother, Jacqueline, was Mrs. Kennedy.
Frankly, I don’t care WHO Caroline admires. Neither of the Clintons stand tall in my book and for good reasons.

Posted by: Jo Marie | December 27, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am

deb (Dec. 26 10:05:07 p.m.)
Caroline Schlossberg has to know that she did not vote in every election.
When presented with that, she was
“dismayed”. I don’t think so.
Maybe some politicians are honest before they are elected, but I believe many (most?) of them sacrifice that value eventually.
Are we observing a wannabe who already has a problem with the truth?
Our federal and state governments need honest people with common sense to represent us and…
We can call that a pipe dream.

Posted by: Jo Marie | December 27, 2008, 2:53 am 2:53 am

Well, at least we now have it in so many words, that the Kennedys intentionally “use all their relationships” intentionally. I wonder if her friends are looking for cover this week.
The whole article is about what she says about what other people are thinking (or she thinks they’re thinking) about the possibility of her being appointed to a position she hasn’t earned. Talk about self-absorption!
If such an interview/article had to be done, this approach IS the only possible take since she hasn’t done anything and certainly doesn’t intend to say anything that anyone can get hold of.
Come to think of it, she’s the perfect match for Obama. No content. All talk. Considered untouchable and unaccountable. My only confusion is why on earth any of the Dimobulbs are negative on her appointment: she’s perfect for them.

Posted by: Ann | December 27, 2008, 7:45 am 7:45 am

further thought–why do liberals get by with being so incredibly stupid and are never called on it in so-called “converations”?
She was dismayed to learn she hadn’t voted?????
What else has she failed to do that she “hasn’t learned yet”?
What an embarrassing teenage response to a FACT. How DOES that conversation go?
“Mrs. Schlossberg, you didn’t vote in several elections.”
“I didn’t? I’m dismayed to learn that.”
Sheesh.

Posted by: Ann | December 27, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am

I’m a Dem but I must say there is a great deal of hypocrisy in the way people slammed Sarah Palin’s lack of experience yet think Carolne Kennedy has the experience to be a Senator? The way she is going about this reeks of entitlement and arrogance. Let the seat be filled by someone who has already served in public office.If Caroline wants the seat, let her run in 2010 and earn it the way Hillary Clinton did. Maybe now Caroline will respect all that Hillary has been through in her political journey.

Posted by: Caryn | December 27, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am

What a response. “I’m dismayed to learn I didn’t even bother to vote in many elections.” You’re right, Caroline, there is no good excuse. Maybe you had an appointment at the spa on those days or your driver was busy. Some of us were actually busy working and supporting our families yet still found time to vote.

Posted by: Samantha | December 27, 2008, 7:58 am 7:58 am

this is a bad move, and so sad for the kennedy name, she would better serve her family name by staying behind the scene, i guess as she has in the past.
it does not seem she has been preparing herself to run for political office.
(i don’t say she needs to have held some office before-but there should have been some public showing of her preparing herself) this really does seem like,well i have raised my kids, and done this and that, hummm, i guess i will try politics, what about me being a senator.
did she ever serve on the pta, school board, anything?
i love going to new york, really like the people, i don’t think they will approve of this,
mr. pattersen may APPOINT her, but i don’t think the people of new york will elect her. it will take her two years just to learn the job.
she should think again about this
mario should be senator.

Posted by: bushed the usa | December 27, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am

Caroline detractors should love this. This morning on Good Morning America Bill Weir’s closing comment after the CK story, “even the Kennedy’s are’nt bullet proof.” I thought journalists were supposed to be professional and impartial.

Posted by: Bert | December 27, 2008, 8:33 am 8:33 am

journalist, being professional, and us not knowing their own personal views went out loooong ago.
plus he must be young and new at this,
because it was a poor choice of words,
(i am and always have been a kennedy supporter, this is just a bad move,
saying the kennedy’ aren’t bullet proof
what kind of nut must he be
as far as i am concerned, anytime we hear good news about a kennedy is good.
they have done much good for this country.

Posted by: bushed the usa | December 27, 2008, 8:45 am 8:45 am

Nothing about Caroline K. Schlossberg impresses me. Her speeches are deadly boring, her responses are rambling and disconnected. If she’s supposed to be America’s princess, she certainly lacks the grace one would expect from such a privileged upbringing. She has chosen to remain in obscurity all her life, and now all of a sudden she emerges from the shadows and expects to be crowned Senator Caroline. “Work twice as hard as everyone else?” Has this woman ever cooked a meal, washed a load of laundry, changed a baby’s diaper, sat up late trying to figure out where the money will come from to pay the mortgage, car payment, grocery bill, credit card bills, electricity bill, phone bill, insurance premiums, etc etc? What exactly is a Kennedy’s concept of work? Whatever it is, you can bet it’s not the same as yours or mine.

Posted by: Coco Chanel | December 27, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

Tina and Ann:
What experience are you talking about?
I thought people learn through mistakes they make!
Our George Bush was an experienced Gov.
now see how he has made the country to slip backwards. 75% are glad to see him pack his bags and disappear.
What experience is it for then?? Those who do not learn through mistakes they make are called “ignorants”!

Posted by: Rita | December 27, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

“But she isn’t trying to capitalize on her name, Kennedy said.”
hahahahahahahahahahaha
Well, I guess that the ability to tell absurd lies with a straight face IS an important qualification to be a successful politician.

Posted by: Bridget | December 27, 2008, 9:59 am 9:59 am

How in the world can the same people who dismissed Sarah Palin as inexperienced think Caroline Kennedy is qualified? Sarah Palin for all of her faults achieved political success based on her own hard work. What has Caroline ever done? Sarah Palin was a mayor, a member of a state wide regulatory board, and then a governor. Caroline Kennedy has basically put out a couple of books that cite poetry.
Where is the media caricature of Caroline saying she was “dismayed” that she hadn’t voted? Where is the same treatment Sarah Palin received? The media once again has shown that it is absolutely incapable of holding Democrats accountable for anything or treating them with the same attitude they treat Republicans.

Posted by: James | December 27, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

James and the rest:
Why are you mixing up the two jobs together?
Sarah Palin was seeking to be the VP and Caroline for a Senator.
The first job needs one to be more intelligent and wider knowledgeable than the latter. Leave alone the experience.

Posted by: Rita | December 27, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am

Well on politico it says that kennedy says she wont run in 2010 if she is not appointed. What’s that about? does she not have the guts to run if she think she’s the best thing for NY? People knock Hillary, but she ran for senate she wasn’t appointed she also took her lumps like a woman. I mean her husband was impeached for lying about having sex(now who does that affect but Hillary and bill?)and she still had the guts to run for president and she came pretty close to winning the dem nod.

Posted by: rachel | December 27, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Caroline K. Schlossberg………….
Why doesn’t she use that name if name
recognition doesn’t matter? Hummm.

Posted by: Mildred | December 27, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

“it would be great if he was here”
Agreed, Ms. Kennedy. John Jr. would have been unstoppable, and they knew that. It takes great courage to take this step. God’s grace and protection upon you.

Posted by: ghost | December 27, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

“Be happy. A bit of quality in the House is a nice change.”
Posted by: Oliva | Dec 27, 2008 12:08:24 AM
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Yeah, add her name to the list. Do
you consider Ted Kennedy ‘quality’?
Maybe she will be his driver.

Posted by: Mildred | December 27, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

“Agreed, Ms. Kennedy. John Jr. would have been unstoppable, and they knew that.”
Actually the bar exam did a pretty good job of stopping him.

Posted by: BertieW | December 27, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Hey Janet from Manhattan,
I did just the opposite of what you asked. I wrote a note to Governor Paterson in FAVOR of Caroline Kennedy. What is experience in New York state anyway? Does that mean a politician who has figured out who to payoff? Caroline Kennedy cannot be bought! Give the lady a turn.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | December 27, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

Hey Bushed in the USA,
Caroline Kennedy raised MILLIONS for public schools. How much did you raise?

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | December 27, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

She says she’ll work twice as hard in the Senate, for someone that has never worked thats not saying much…and she says she won’t run if not anointed. Now that makes perfect sense. She don’t need no stinking campaigning…

Posted by: RBR | December 27, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Please, no more Kennedys anywhere close to DC. Look at their liberal mess they’ve left for our great-great-great grandchildren.

Posted by: Geoffrey | December 27, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

WCM,
I am glad she raised MILLIONS,
and as far as how much i raised,
I have done my fair share, gone to school board meetings, raised 3 kids, sent 2 so far to college, had one working in college call center, asking alumi for donations to help under priv. kids have money to go go good colleges,
considering right now starting a scholarship fund for girls who want to sing, and pay their way to one of the very good local music school here in my town. etc.
but i am not asking anyone to let me become a senator,
so what is your point,in asking ME how much money I have raised for public schools?
i don’t care if you have raised any money or not,
because i can have an opinion about public officials without having matched them act for act.
I still say she is great, but i don’t think she is ready to be a senator.
if she bombs, it will not be good for her part of the legacy of her parents and their name, something it seems she has tried to protect, and keep private for most of her adult life.

Posted by: bushed the usa | December 27, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

Please, no more Kennedys anywhere close to DC. Look at their liberal mess they’ve left for our great-great-great grandchildren.
_________________________________________
Absolutely! Our “great-great great grandchildren” or kids and family members don’t deserve healthcare so kick those darn Kennedy’s out!

Posted by: Paige | December 27, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

Because she is much more a Bouvier than a Kennedy, I’m all for her.

Posted by: Thank God for Karma | December 27, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Her mother married “onasis” and snubbed
her nose at the US. How soon the folks in the US forgets. How many times has a kennedy family member been in trouble with the law? How soon we forget.
Camelot…my foot.

Posted by: Mildred | December 27, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

mildred,
all that you wrote has nothing to do with why cks is not ready to be senator.
just red herring stuff, you are talking.
so i wish you would just leave such out.
cks should not be senator over mario c.
he has earned it, she has not.

Posted by: bushed the usa | December 27, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

bushed the usa: You do your posts, I’ll do mine. Her mother is part of the kennedy history, and she was no saint, she snubbed her nose at the US. This girl has no business in the government…she has hid out for years and now she comes onto the scene and we are suppose to give her this senate seat because she is a kennedy. Why? Just to make sure uncle teddy’s legacy is carried on with more liberal garbage.

Posted by: Mildred | December 27, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

mildred, still the stuff you are writing is a red herring to why SHE SHOULD NOT BE. i agree, she should not be senator, but for different reasons than you,
you say her mother snubbed her nose at the us,
the actural fact is she said “they are killling kennedys, and my children will not be next” now what mother who felt that way, would not leave the country if she could, and take her kids far away,
you may not know the time, or you have forgotten, everyone in the country understood what she left this country.
after going to TWO of her family members funerals, I would leave to.
but still those are not the reason to point out as to why cks should not be senator. if anything following your line of what you are talking about just might get her the sympathy vote.and she gets in there, and the people regret she did.
she has not been hiding out these last few years, MILDRED just did not see her.
she has been very prominent in new york social life,raising money for this and that. but she really should not be senator over Mario Cumo, who has been working and being seen working in gov.
if there were no mario, I would say give her a chance,
but with mario there, he is the one who should have the job.
that personal stull you write is just gossip. talk about the real fact of why she should not be senator.
and her mother,father,or brother, (god rest their souls)
mildred, i don’t think she should be senator either,
but please, mildred, give a better poitn than you have

Posted by: bushed the usa | December 28, 2008, 12:15 am 12:15 am

If Liberals are ignorant enough to elect inexperienced do-as-I-say-not-as-I-do self-serving politicians like a President-elect with questionable relationships and origins, and a U.S. Senator who whose only real experience was covering up for her adulterous husband, what’s another undeserving and unproven politician in Caroline Shloc.. Schloch.. Sh.. “Kennedy”?
Good luck running and keeping the country safe Libbies, you’re going to need it. LOL!!

Posted by: CommonSense | December 28, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

“Of reports that she had missed voting in several elections, Kennedy said she was “dismayed” to learn that.”
Golly … “dismayed”, not “aghast”, “appalled”, or “humiliated”? Pity.
The wanna-be instant Senator DOES realize VOTING is a big part of BEING a Senator, right?

Posted by: Belle Starr | December 28, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am

The same people who bashed Sarah Palin for not having enough experience to be the VP of the United States are the same people supporting Caroline Kennedy for the Senate seat. Sarah has way more experience than Caroline, yet Caroline is being welcomed with open arms. The hypocracy is thick on the left!

Posted by: Jim | December 28, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

The wanna-be instant Senator DOES realize VOTING is a big part of BEING a Senator, right?
Posted by: Belle Starr | Dec 28, 2008 11:53:40 AM
=====================================
She should have said “I can’t believe I,
a Kennedy, got caught”. She didn’t have time to vote…she was doing her charity work. hahahah

Posted by: Josephine | December 28, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

Has anyone heard the audio of Caroline being interviewed. She can barely string a sentence together.

Posted by: Peacy | December 28, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

Being a US Senator is not the same as being the next in line behind a 72-yr old POTUS
The actual requirement to be a US Senator:
“No Person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty Years, and been nine Years a Citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an Inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen.”
CKS is definitely as qualified as anyone else…

Posted by: phillygirl64 | December 28, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

I cannot believe that Caroline K. Schlossberg has a law degree from Harvard. Sarah Palin only had a journalism degree and she is much more politically talented than Caroline Kennedy. Palin is also a much better speaker (who needed work, but you could see she had potential, as well as the moxie.) Caroline Kennedy is a shrinking violet she has nowhere near the political instincts or charisma of Sarah Palin. Palin was torn apart by the media, Caroline gets a pass. There is also no comparison with Hillary Clinton. Hillary Clinton never gave up, she campaigned hard and actually held jobs in law firms.
There are many other people who should be considered for this position before Caroline Kennedy who wants to ride in on her father’s coattails.

Posted by: smc341 | December 29, 2008, 2:44 am 2:44 am

Palin is not a better speaker than Caroline Kennedy. Give me a break. Palin only sounds normal if she’s reading a script. Take away the script and Palin speaks gibberish.

Posted by: Joan | December 29, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Hey New York: We’ll take Caroline and you can have Arnold–The Dumbya of the West!

Posted by: Joan | December 29, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

I believe Caroline Kennedy is hoping to launch herself from this appointed office and run as the first democratic woman presidental canidate. And, of course she will hope to will and “be a first”. Just my 2 cents worth.

Posted by: Deb | December 29, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

I was for Caroline Kennedy for congress until I found out she is for GAY MARRIAGE her DAD would turn over in his grave if he were alive to see this. This country is going to hell in a hand basket. GOD is going to turn HIS back on America if it doesn’t change.

Posted by: jerry | December 30, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

“Palin only sounds normal when she’s reading a script”, says Joan, Dec. 29.
Joan, did you waatch the video of Greta Van Susteren’s visit to the Palin home? You’ll see Sarah in her kitchen chatting with Greta while some of the Palin children were present.
Watch it, Joan. Sarah Palin needs no scripts to sell herself to the world.
On the other hand, have you watched and listened to Caroline K. Schlossberg on video, explaining why she believes she can fill Hillary Clinton’s senate seat?
At least one person counted 200 times that she peppered her speech with “you know” and an endless number of “ums”.
I watched and listened for a few minutes and gave up counting.
Please! Stop making foolish, untrue comments.

Posted by: Jo Marie | January 3, 2009, 2:40 am 2:40 am

Caroline is DISMAYED to hear that she missed voting sometimes?
Sounds like something we’d hear from a senile person!
C’mon, Caroline, you knew that.
Is there an honest politician, or wannabe?

Posted by: Jo Marie | January 3, 2009, 2:51 am 2:51 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.