Cheney: Uncut and Uncompromising
From Guest Blogger Jonathan Karl
Here’s a web-exclusive extended version of the ABC News interview with Vice President Dick Cheney.
Notice how, in virtually the same breath, Cheney goes from taking hard-line positions on counter-terrorism to praising Obama’s national security team. As the interview progresses, the Vice President takes a series of positions that effectively put him to the right of his own administration: He defends waterboarding, for example, and calls for keeping the Gitmo prison open indefinitely even as the Bush Administration has banned the practice of waterboarding and declared an intention to close Gitmo. But listen to where Cheney goes next in this interview: he praises the national security team assembled by Barack Obama.
To Obama supporters uneasy about the Gates/Jones/Clinton appointments: Don’t worry, Cheney thinks they are just fine.
Jonathan Karl
Email
Mitt Romney's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Romney Makes His Case to Conservatives at CPAC
I WWII it wasn’t ‘Water boarding’, it was taking them out in the woods & shooting them. All this under Roosevelt. Of course they did worse to us – that why we did it. Water boarding get info from terrorists…Sometimes Necessary Unfortunately.
Posted by: Da Truth | December 17, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
If that’s the evil Emperor Palpatine, then God bless America and the Empire. We did what we had to do to fight the war on terror and put tyrants on notice.
Thank you Cheney and W
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
That was an inauspicious note to end on, Cheney expressing confidence in the Obama security team.
Posted by: kat | December 17, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
“To Obama supporters uneasy about the Gates/Jones/Clinton appointments: Don’t worry, Cheney thinks they are just fine.”
Editorialize much? Thats the job of the commentors.
Posted by: BertieW | December 17, 2008, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
That man is as plotting and duplicitous as the devil himself. We all know it wasn’t Bush’s staggering intellect behind the decisions that led to our dismal state of affairs. It was the man behind the curtain, that “burgess meredith_penguin” looking guy with the popeye squint.
Posted by: Klatu Verata Nicto | December 17, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Fine “Da Truth”, we’re just as bad as enemies. Remember that the next time you wrap yourself in the flag and speak about how great and glorious America is.
You can’t have it both ways, either we’re the “good” guys or we’re just like them.
Posted by: JR | December 17, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
“I WWII it wasn’t ‘Water boarding’, it was taking them out in the woods & shooting them. All this under Roosevelt.”
Yes and they were called war crimes.
“Of course they did worse to us – that why we did it.”
Great, now right wingers want to emulate the Nazis.
“Water boarding get info from terrorists…Sometimes Necessary Unfortunately.”
Why stop with terrorists?
Why not have waterboarding legal as part of criminal interrogations?
Posted by: Ryan C | December 17, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
The man is taunting us — all of us, including George Bush. He thinks he’s getting away with — well, MURDER. He’s laying it all out — admitting to the lies about Iraq, the torture, wiretapping, everything, so that Bush has no choice but to pardon him and the whole administration. We are such nansy-pansies.
Posted by: hang | December 17, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
No there is a difference between the genocide of 6 million Jews and the “total war” it took to bring the Nazis and Tojo regime to heel.
If someone doesn’t realize that! – it is they that don’t have the moral compass of a snake, and your support of America (in what role in the world, I wonder??)doesn’t mean much
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Cheney looks pretty healthy. His bionic steel heart must be pumping just fine. I wonder if he’s gone back today to his bunker in the Wyoming mountains.
Posted by: Kat | December 17, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
wow. I have never felt very strongly about President Bush (tend to like him a bit), but this man is just evil. I have read a lot about him but this is my first time watching his interviews. I watched the debate four years ago, but only remember it barely. Now I see what people are talking about. He is arrogant, hateful looking and just looks downright evil. That thing Bush said about being able to look into people eyes etc… Wow, this guy!! i’m still disturbed by this interview even though it has finished playing. Compare it to Bush’s interview. He talks like the president, acts like it and snaps back like he is… something, I don’t know what. Thank God he was not actually elected President and thank god Pres Bush made it safe and sound.
“they don’t have the same rights as American citizens???” are you serious?? This from the team that claims to have gone to Iraq to ‘liberate’ the people? They are human!! All humans should have equal rights in the eyes of the law, regardless of their citizenship. Dear readers of this blog, I hope you don’t subscribe to that kind of thought regardless of your political affiliation.
Posted by: Question | December 17, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
NO, Islamist terrorists are not citizens, they are not wanted where they are citizens.
Do they deserve human treatment? Yes, but when “humans” do evil and are holding out information, what do you do?
Quick, Mr. Dukakis, your wife is buried in a shallow grave and will be out of oxygen in an hour. You got the gutless monster in a jail cell. Do we “lean” on him or not? Clock’s tickin
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Then the question DA truth raises still needs to be answered,
put another way – why wasn’t Truman and all our WWII generals executed for war crimes and the Hiroshima incineration?
Back to you, Rev Wright.
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Cheney just admitted to war crimes. Torture is a war crime. It is morally reprehensible. I can not help but wonder why there is not more outrage over his comments in his latest interview. Not only is torturing someone horrible it is strategically bad for the US in the long term. If US soldiers are captured and tortured what sort of moral ground can we stand on. It makes the US look horrible to the international community, it gives all the recruiting tools terrorist organizations need, it opens captured troops to torture without international outrage, and is a suspect means of gaining intelligence (a tortured prisoner will most likely say anything to stop torture, rather true or not and let the interrogators hear whatever they wanted to hear in the first place.)All of these things weaken the US strategically with, in my mind, no benefit at all. And it crosses a moral line that I find reprehensible. Cheney should be tried and put into prison for war crimes. Maybe punishing him will help wake this country from falling slowly into moral decline — from the lack of ethics in business and politics and in general society.
Posted by: Ordermonger | December 17, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Another moral question – this one from current events.
You’re a rural Pakistani tribesman and you’re fighting the Taliban. They shot your chief and beheaded his assistants. (Behind the scenes they beat your daughter for going to school, whipped your wife bloody for showing skin, and sodomized your brother).
They just dug up your chief, hung him up high and insulted his body and your honor in every way.
Are you intimidated or are you enraged?
If the latter, are you sure who has the high moral ground?
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
“it opens captured troops to torture without international outrage”
Excuse me, when in the last 25 years has there been ARAB outrage, Muslim outrage at any captive, civilian or military, of the Islamist terrorist?????
And what good is “international outrage” that and 2.50 may buy you a Starbucks???
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Khalid Sheik Mohammed’s interrogation resulted in very good, actionable intelligence. I’d like to see you dispute this — even though it mostly still top secret.
The cell structure of Al Qaeda was busted it is now built on the local subsidiary model, which is rather easily infiltrated by friendlies, Algerian to Zanisbar
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
FYI. Water boarding began before the Japanese used it in WWII. It started way back in the Spanish Inquisition. For those who defend the practice, its historical context should perhaps be more accurate.
Posted by: kat | December 17, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Da Truth:
The but he did it too argument is petty and a waste of time. I was not alive during Roosevelt’s time and I can do nothing about what has already happened. But we are all living through the present with an oppurtunity to speak up now and set a precedent for future generations, a positive one not a negative one. Using someone else as a justification for current actions is an excuse plain and simple. It is passing the buck on for our own actions so that we do not have to think about it. The US has a position of power in the world and should be leading by example, not becoming the bully.
Posted by: Ordermonger | December 17, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
How many TERRORISTS have we released from Guantanamo who went on to commit “REAL War Crimes’;………….. at least 6-8.
Also, after the election the GRAND ILLUSTERIOUS MEDIA finally admitted that, it is going to be VERY hard to release many of the prisoners because no one wants to take them. Other COUNTRIES are indirectly admitting that they are criminals (as they try to bash us for falsely imprisoning them).
Why did the Media wait till after the election to admit this !!!
Posted by: Da Truth | December 17, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
The cell structure of Al Qaeda was busted? Give me a break. Al Qaeda and cells of terrorism are flourishing like crazy throughout the globe.
Posted by: kat | December 17, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
Yes, kat, and being broken as fast as they come into being. You have to have secure communications, secure financial channels, and ease of anonymous travel to pull off an “international operation” – those are gone. Thanks to who?? Can you say it? Obama needs Jones. Obama needs Robert Gates. Elsewise back to the “wall” between intelligence and prosecution of the 1990s DOJ. Even Hillary knows better than that now
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
“Then the question DA truth raises still needs to be answered,
put another way – why wasn’t Truman and all our WWII generals executed for war crimes and the Hiroshima incineration?”
Because we won the war.
Posted by: Ryan C | December 17, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Thank you Rev Wright.
Not it was a “total war” worth waging.
Not that it saved a million GIs and probably million of Japanese, civilian and military from the destruction, disease and starvation of a prolonged siege (Proof – see Okinawa and Iwo Jima run-ups)
Well then let’s be the winner then cause I dont want Putin, I dont want Ahmadenijad, I don’t even want a bunch of businessmen from Peking ruling my life.
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
It is sad that this country has been led to such levels of paranoia that people don’t think they would survive without things like ‘intelligence’, ‘war on this thing or that’ etc. The more you push that line of survival, the harder its going to get for future generations to ever be/feel safe. Have you realized that you are destroying your own freedom and liberty? And I don’t understand what you mean by ‘you liberals’ and you this… Don’t you realize those sort of things don’t mean much anymore.
Anyways I am far too young to be exposing myself to this sort of hatefulness, so I will stop reading the posts by people here. Discussions here can be very interesting but this is not one of those times. I would hate to be brainwashed by those who are themselves brainwashed to sad levels. THANK GOD that there is a generation of people who will live to inherit this country who seem to have more sense than some of those who are presently populating it.
Looking forward to the day we can finally inherit this country….
Posted by: Question | December 17, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
“Khalid Sheik Mohammed’s interrogation resulted in very good, actionable intelligence. I’d like to see you dispute this — even though it mostly still top secret.”
If its mostly still top secret how do you know the interrogation resulted in good actionable intelligence?
Because George Bush said so?
ROFLMAO.
Posted by: Ryan C | December 17, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
“Yes, kat, and being broken as fast as they come into being.”
That wasn’t the case with the Mumbai massacre. Furthermore, the subject was of torture and the progress you’re claiming can’t reasonably be attributed to Shiekh Mohammed being tortured. Good Day.
Posted by: kat | December 17, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
It may interest you “Question” that there already was a generation like that. It is now called the Greatest Generation.
Look and Learn
“The building process began in December 1932, with the NSL-sponsored Chicago Antiwar Conference, a relatively nonsectarian affair that brought Communist, Socialist, pacifist, and liberal student activists together around a common anti-war program-advocating Campus demonstrations and anti-ROTC campaigns. These anti-war activists received aid from their British counterparts in 1933, when students at Oxford University made headlines on both sides of the Atlantic by endorsing a pacifist pledge refusing to fight “for King and country.” Recognizing an exciting protest tactic when they saw one, student activists in the United States adopted an Americanized version of the Oxford Pledge, in which students declared that they would “refuse to Support the government of the United States in any war it might undertake.” By autumn 1933 this pledge had been taken by students at anti-war conferences across the United States, and a national poll found thirty-nine percent of the American student body endorsing the pledge”
Oh well promises are meant to be broken
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
“Not that it saved a million GIs and probably million of Japanese, civilian and military from the destruction, disease and starvation of a prolonged siege (Proof – see Okinawa and Iwo Jima run-ups)”
Spoken like someone who learned their WW2 history from John Wayne.
Posted by: Ryan C | December 17, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Because my dear sir, the evidence if you read beyond HEADLINES says so. Al Qaeda structure broken, new cells and subsidiaries infiltrated, working with dozens of governments throughout the world to stem the threat, the war that Osama declared on us 25 years ago, and Khomeini 30 years ago.
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
“Excuse me, when in the last 25 years has there been ARAB outrage, Muslim outrage at any captive, civilian or military, of the Islamist terrorist?????”
Two Islamic militant groups, Hezbollah and Hamas, issued strongly worded condemnations yesterday of the videotaped beheading of American civilian Nick Berg in Iraq.
Lebanon’s Hezbollah and the militant Palestinian group Hamas, labelled terrorist organizations by the US, said the slaying was un-Islamic”
And those are the militants.
Posted by: Ryan C | December 17, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Half a million “purple hearts” were ordered in the Spring of 1945. Germany had fallen, any questions???
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
“Al Qaeda structure broken, new cells and subsidiaries infiltrated”
Last throes of the the insurgency?
BTW smaller local cells not connected to a larger global structure will be alot harder to infiltrate, track down and disrupt.
“working with dozens of governments throughout the world to stem the threat”
Too bad the Bush admin wasted about 3 years of cooperation telling the world our way or the highway to say nothing of the damage he has done to world relations and our standing as a moral beacon.
Posted by: Ryan C | December 17, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
So Bush saved America from another terrorist attack. Hmmmmm. Tens of trillions of dollars to fight a handful of guys with boxcutters. There’s a legacy.
Posted by: Ron Sampson | December 17, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Excuse me you give me the lame excuses of Hamas and Hezbollah, did they REALLY tell their friends to obey the commandments. Where did they strike against their straying brethren? Even in Iraq, the Iranian Special groups and Mahdi Army the real siblings of the above did not strike against Al Qaeda, they killed innocent Sunnis and any govt figures. It took the Anbar Sunni awakening to blast away at the beheaders, right? Right!!!??
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
NO, not 10 Trillion 600 billion – small difference, huh. Our regular military budget without war is 400 billion (a topic for another day), these are supplementary in Iraq, Afghanistan, Phillipines, Pakistan, Algeria, Somalia and whereever else the monsters poke their heads.
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
“strongly worded condemnations”
like “That’s not the Bin Laden I know”, “Zarqawi has insisted on being a divisive figure” (Get it divis-ive, beheading, never mind), “It is a sad and painful day for terrorism when something like this happens”
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
“Half a million “purple hearts” were”
Why would you put purple hearts in quotes?
Is that like the purple heart bandaids classy Republicans sported in 2004?
Posted by: Ryan C | December 17, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
You asked for it robert b and I gave it to you.
Posted by: Ryan C | December 17, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
No, I just wanted to set the medal away from the actual body parts that our men in uniform have sacrificed for our country.
Also note that those WWII purple hearts medals were used up through the Vietnam war.
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
You have given me what? Talk, talk, talk.
I’ve given facts and history and that action is worth ten thousand words because omission can be much worse in the face of real evil ideologies of the 20th and now the 21 century.
That is real scary to the leftist in his ivory tower.
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
“Excuse me you give me the lame excuses of Hamas and Hezbollah, did they REALLY tell their friends to obey the commandments.”
You asked for Muslim outrage.
I gave you outrage from militants and terrorists at other terrorists.
Not good enough?
Meanwhile, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia became the first Arab states to denounce the beheading.
The Emirates’ information minister, Sheikh Abdullah, issued a statement Wednesday night during a visit to Washington. “We are ashamed, because these terrorists carried out this attack in the name of our religion and our culture,” he said. “This brutal act has nothing to do with Islam or our Arab values.”
Saudi Arabia’s ambassador to the United States called the decapitation “criminal and inhuman.” “It is not out of character for them (al-Qaeda members) to commit acts that violate the teachings of Islam, a noble religion that deplores such acts,” Prince Bandar told reporters in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Posted by: Ryan C | December 17, 2008, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
“You have given me what? Talk, talk, talk.”
You asked for 1 example of outrage.
I gave you several.
Now you move the goalposts.
Posted by: Ryan C | December 17, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
“Also note that those WWII purple hearts medals were used up through the Vietnam war.”
Actually we have are still using those in Iraq & Afghanistan.
Posted by: Ryan C | December 17, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Yes since Khalid Sheik Mohammed was the chief operational planner, the interrogation did puncture the cell organizations he communicated with, and the planning strategies he implemented which include logistics, training, financing, communications.
One should remember that KSM’s nephew Ramzi Yousef, planned and executed the first WTC bombing in 1993 (He’s still in prison too by the way). So he and his family were very good at what they do.
Mumbai. Yes a new operation, but not a new but a really old organization – the Kashmir thing has been going on long before Bin Laden was born. But as far as comparison to an Al Qaeda operation, look and see they needed dependence on Pakistani govt resources (that of course is another can of worms) and needed the subtefuge of hopefully rogue Pakistani agencies for logistics and training.
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
“One should remember that KSM’s nephew Ramzi Yousef, planned and executed the first WTC bombing in 1993 (He’s still in prison too by the way). So he and his family were very good at what they do.”
Imagine that a terrorist arrested, convicted and sitting in jail.
Too bad the country got an unprepared moron in 2001 that ignored warnings and could have cared less about terrorism.
Posted by: Ryan C | December 17, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
A final note perhaps on purple hearts.
I meant of course that those purple hearts medals created in the spring of 1945 were not used up for many years.
500,000 advance order meant for the invasion of Japan. That was my point.
The millions of Japanese who would have died from starvation and disease from a prolonged siege would of course have had the honor of the Emperor not medals, but fortunately Hirohito and his imperial aides finally talked sense into the General Staff after Hiroshima and Nagasaki
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
“but fortunately Hirohito and his imperial aides finally talked sense into the General Staff after Hiroshima and Nagasaki”
Japan was ready to surrender when the Russians declared war on them after we had taken Okinawa but before we dropped the nukes.
There was also a mini coup that delayed the Japanese acceptance of unconditional surrender which would have likely happened after the 1st atomic bomb.
Posted by: Ryan C | December 17, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
Read Madeline Albright’s “Memo to the President Elect”. The CoC receives scary memos all the time like the Presidential Daily Briefing of August 6 (coincidentally Hiroshima day) 2001 (8 months into Bush administration, Clinton’s CIA man held over but Atty Gen just confirmed). In retrospect it looks pretty damning Al Qaeda determined to strike, planes, WTC even mentioning KSM nephew Ramzi Yousef.
One problem, where were the terrorists?
Already in the US. How?
Two problem, access to flight training, financing and anonymous travel and communications. How?
The 20th terrorist, Zacarias Moussaoui had been detained for suspicious activities but his computer not searched until after. How? Why?
The answer is the “wall” between intelligence, prosecution, and foreign action. Without it, proactive is only a word, only a hope not a reality. The Patriot Act and revised FISA changed that.
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
“Japan was ready to surrender when the Russians declared war on them after we had taken Okinawa but before we dropped the nukes”
Some myths aren’t worth writing down. Yeah the Russians whose forces were concentrated a continent away, the Russians whose navy Japan blew away a hundred years before and in 1945 the USSR had nothing in the Pacific. Yes they might have been helpful in “reclaiming” Manchuria and Korea if the war had dragged on, but they had no effect on Japan’s calculations on defending the homeland.
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
“Some myths aren’t worth writing down. Yeah the Russians whose forces were concentrated a continent away,”
The Russians beat the Japanese earlier in the war. Its where Zukov “made his bones”.
They also invaded Manchuria and some Japanese islands in the middle of the atomic bombings.
“the Russians whose navy Japan blew away a hundred years before”
That was 40 years earlier.
Gee based on that I guess the Americans could never stand up to a Japanese Navy that decimated them 4 years earlier.
“and in 1945 the USSR had nothing in the Pacific.”
The Russians were planning on invading Japan before we did.
Posted by: Ryan C | December 17, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
“The CoC receives scary memos all the time like the Presidential Daily Briefing of August 6″
The country was not even on alert.
Bush went on vacation.
Then in the middle of the attack on 9/11, he sat there clueless in front of school children before disappearing for the rest of the day.
Posted by: Ryan C | December 17, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
“The Russians were planning on invading Japan before we did”
With what, fishing boats??
But forget the Russian version of D-day.
Move back a step – Shipping 5 million men, armaments, supplies over one or two railroad lines thru Siberia??
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Finally Ryan a fact – Zhukov did have a million men in the East and tanks because new factories had sprung up east of the Urals.
But how to move men and tanks – millions of men – what was USSR amphibious and sea transport in Pacific or total in 1945??
And 30 trains a day to Siberia in summer 1945 was impressive. In winter – I don’t think so.
It was our navy, army and marines nobody else’s that would make the difference.
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
Wikipedia
“By August 1945, the Pacific Fleet had already had two cruisers, one flagship, ten destroyers, two torpedo boats, 19 patrol boats, 78 submarines, ten minelayers, 52 minesweepers” Earlier there had been a transfer of “More than 140,000 sailors from the Pacific Fleet were incorporated in the rifle brigades and other units on the Western Front”
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
Glad our pacifist idealist heroes have 20-20 hindsight.
Alert – with what?
Homeland security – didnt exist
Transportation Security – didn’t exist.
The existing baggage handlers and security on alert. OK, yeah that would do it.
All hands on intelligence – to do what? Patriot Act did not exist.
The same quandary occurred to the Clinton Administration for the Millenium Plot. It was actually I believe a Canadian customs agent that saved the bombing of LAX by detaining a terrorist suspect trying to enter. There were FBI and police in many places especially NY and DC but do what?
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
Now we know what the W stands for.
George Waterboard Bush
Posted by: ejansen | December 17, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
zhukov rep as general from nazi front. there was no “early” victory over japan, they weren’t at war. zhukov “bones made” was stalin pleased at stealing n china industry. using those same trains. mao never forgot
Posted by: robert b | December 17, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
A man with big time business connections in the military/industrial complex should not be making decisions that create war (and profits). The bottom line justifies the means.
Posted by: pefros | December 18, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am
Both Bush & Cheney admitted that they lied..
They were going into Iraq regardless.
Blood is on their hands.
No Iraqi imminent attack, no Nukes…..
lies…… all lies…..
Investigate
indict
prosecute
trials for treason and war crimes
jail [ with 'water boarding' every day ]
Posted by: US of A | December 18, 2008, 3:23 am 3:23 am
robert b
no revisionist dogma or B.S. will save Bush & Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfewitz etc.
You ‘know’ what they ‘knew’ and it was wrong and your being foolish, like Bush & Cheney you’ll say anything to deny the truth of the errors and malfeasance of the Iraq war fiasco.
Posted by: US of A | December 18, 2008, 3:31 am 3:31 am
“Alert – with what?
Homeland security – didnt exist
Transportation Security – didn’t exist.”
“As airstrikes against Iraq continue, officials at Los Angeles International and other major airports across the country are urging passengers to arrive early and expect closer screening during the busy Christmas travel period.
At LAX, acting Airport Police Chief John Bangs said federal officials have called for “enhanced vigilance” but have not ordered a security alert.”
That is from 1998.
Posted by: Ryan C | December 18, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
“zhukov rep as general from nazi front. there was no “early” victory over japan, they weren’t at war.”
Zhukov left the dangerous environment of Moscow to command the First Soviet Mongolian Army Group, and saw action against the Japanese on the Manchurian border (1938-1939). What began as a routine border skirmish—the Japanese testing the resolve of the Soviets to defend their territory—rapidly escalated into a full-scale war, the Japanese pushing forward with 80,000 troops, 180 tanks and 450 aircraft.
Zhukov requested major reinforcements and on August 15, 1939 he ordered what seemed at first to be a conventional frontal attack. However, Zhukov had held back two tank brigades, which he, in a daring and entirely successful manouvere, then ordered to advance around both flanks of the battle. Supported by motorized artillery and infantry, the two mobile battle groups encircled the 6th Japanese army and captured their vulnerable supply areas. Within several days the Japanese troops were defeated. For this operation Zhukov was awarded the title of the Hero of the Soviet Union. Outside of the Soviet Union, however, it remained little-known, as by this time World War II had begun in Europe. Zhukov’s pioneering use of mobile armour went unheeded by the west, and in consequence the German Blitzkrieg twelve months later came as a great surprise.
Promoted to full general in 1940 Zhukov was briefly chief of STAVKA before a disagreement with Stalin led to him being replaced in June by Marshal Boris Shaposhnikov (who was in turn replaced by Alexander Vasilevsky in November).
Posted by: Ryan C | December 18, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
The internet has made instant scholars out of most citizens. The purpose of research is not to solely find facts to prove a certain point of view. But, to find facts that give precedent to qualify actions. In Iraq the US has shown that we are in fact afraid to confront the true enemy if they exist. President Bush and VP Cheney are the absolute worse tandem in US history. I dub them affectionately, the Idiot and the Devil.
Posted by: Kevin L Young,Th.M, Ph.D. | December 19, 2008, 7:04 am 7:04 am