Dec 4, 2008 8:32pm

Dems Give White House Ultimatum on Auto Bailout

ABC News’ Z. Byron Wolf Reports: Democrats sent a clear message to the White House tonight – make some of the $700 financial industry bailout money available to the domestic auto industry or else. And they want an answer by Friday.

Auto makers returned to Capitol Hill today two weeks after a chilly reception from bailout weary lawmakers.

And while pleas from GM, Chrysler and Ford for bridge loans seemed to have some effect, prospects remain dim for an auto industry bailout passing Congress this year even though any later could spell the end of GM, according to prepared testimony from CEO Rick Wagoner.

The White House and Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson have rejected the notion of using money from the so-called TARP – a $700 billion package passed by Congress in October to stabilize the financial industry.

But in a letter Thursday night, Democratic leaders in the House and Senate told President Bush he must commit funds from either the TARP or the federal reserve or they will be unable to pass anything in Congress.

"Your decision to utilize the TARP funds, or to work with the Federal Reserve to make available assistance through its existing lending programs, or both, are essential to the Congress’ ability to address this critical economic situation in a timely manner, and would also eliminate the uncertainties inherent in the legislative process, " say Senate Makority Leader Harry Reid, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Democratic committee chairmen in the letter.

They go on: "We are very hopeful that we can work cooperatively with the Administration and the Federal Reserve to provide urgent assistance and support our domestic auto industry, just as other nations are doing, during this extraordinarily difficult global economic collapse. We look forward to hearing from you on an expedited basis, since we will be notifying colleagues tomorrow of next week’s session

User Comments

Thank you obstructionist Democrats. One good crook deserves another. House Republicans fight the bailout, and the DNC tries to blackmail the laim duck into bailing out the auto industry who has outsourced american jobs overseas. The Democrats should choke on it! And the Republicans should let ‘em ROT!!!

Posted by: please! | December 4, 2008, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

It’s become political. If Bush agrees and it doesn’t work, the dems can blame Bush. If he agrees and it does work (which I doubt), then the dems say they had to force his hand to do the right thing. If he doesn’t agree and the Beg 3 go belly up, it’s Bushes fault, If he doesn’t agree and they don’t go belly up and file chapter 11, the dems will still take credit. Such is the way of Washington politics.

Posted by: LongT | December 4, 2008, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

“Or else” ? Mr. President, do not give them anything……..

Posted by: larryesperando | December 4, 2008, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

NO BAILOUT FOR THE AUTO INDUSTRY!

Posted by: rdf | December 4, 2008, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

Why is everything politics with the Democrats.
Please, just once, do something for the country and not your reelection.

Posted by: donbl | December 4, 2008, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

Everybody seems to forget the millions of people who need the auto industry to support their families!!!! What about them? What about my family? Why punish us for others mistakes? Think about other people for once….

Posted by: brwil | December 4, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

Ha, now this is funny. The Dems in congress can’t or don’t want to make a decision so they Bush to bail them out of being held accountable. Stiffs.

Posted by: chuck | December 4, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

Bush for wall street
Dems for auto street

Posted by: driivecom | December 4, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

How is this a threat?
“Democratic leaders in the House and Senate told President Bush he must commit funds from either the TARP or the federal reserve or they will be unable to pass anything in Congress.”
They were unable to pass anything in Congress for the last 8 years.

Posted by: Frederick MIchael | December 4, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Why should tax payers give the auto industry one penny? Those guys will just waste the money and then come back again asking for more money.

Posted by: James in San Diego | December 4, 2008, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Or else WHAT?!! These clowns have done zip nada zilch since 2006. They denied the GSE needed any oversight, lied about FNMA and FMAC corruption and brought this crisis on our country… the world, actually, in the first place. They’ve gotten rich, and they passed that minimum wage increase stuck in a defense funding bill. Let Obama bail out the union bums in MI who vote Dem anyway.

Posted by: BridgeLoanToNowhere | December 4, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

We need a strong “Third” party in this country to balance out these idiots. why bail out these jerks? They have sold the public “crappy” vehicles for decades and expect Americans to buy their garbage. I have no sympathy for these clowns…let them go down hard.

Posted by: tony bell | December 4, 2008, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

There’s a Senate makority leader now?

Posted by: Sherwin L. | December 4, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

I was adamently opposed to the bailout and wrote my congressmen repeatedly saying VOTE NO. But, now that it’s passed and the the money is going to be spent anyway, why should it be just to help the crooked Wall Street thieves and not the US automakers also? At least the automakers have come back with some sensible business plans and concessions. The failed financial crooks are still handing out multi-million dollar bonuses and wasting money left and right.

Posted by: RobbieSue | December 4, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Typical Democrats in the Obama mold. Force someone else to make a tough decision, don’t actually make one yourself. Pass the buck – or vote present – it’s all the same anyways.

Posted by: Jim | December 4, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

“Why punish us for others mistakes?”
Precisely.
Why should the rest of us pay for the auto inudstry’s stupidity?
Why should the rest of us have to pick up the check for the UAW and it’s idiocy in not doing anything to help stop the bad decisions?
Why should electricians making $40 an hour bail out auto workers making $80 an hour?
Why does America owe auto workers a living?

Posted by: drjohn | December 4, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

I see a post by brwil that says “Why punish us for others mistakes?” Now the vast majority of working Americans work for companies who will get NO federal assistance if they go belly up. It’s something that you’re supposed to realize before you decide to work somewhere.

Posted by: worker | December 4, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

There is really only one way to change the direction of the US auto industry – at least within a 2-3 year time frame. Chapter 11 allows EVERYTHING to get restructured including the management and board. A “bridge loan” only prolongs the inevitable.

Posted by: EKW | December 4, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

BTW, Wall St. can also go to hell.

Posted by: drjohn | December 4, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

During the election for President did we not hear the Democrats lambaste McCain on the “bailout”? Obama voted for it, and now the Senate is pushing for even more money for the UAW. Why can’t the UAW loan the money to the automakers?????

Posted by: Bob | December 4, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Please everyone, help out the millions of people who’s jobs contribute to making parts for cars, their income to then pay their rent or mortgage, food, and other bills ! Give them the bridge loan then when the economy turns around everyone can pat each other on the back and say we won ! HELP … how did we forget the reason for the season !

Posted by: B | December 4, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

It’s time for Bush to behave like a Democrat – deflect responsibility. He should write a letter back. “I’ll do whatever President-Elect Obama tells me to do.”

Posted by: MichelleO | December 4, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Bush should call their bluff. They’re trying to pin this on him in case everything goes up in flames.

Posted by: john | December 4, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Mr. President,
Let the dem’s know they can stuff it where sun doesn’t shine. Leave this bad policy decsion all on them and force them to vote for new bailout money. Cut the spicket off. Maybe bankruptcy is exactly what these poorly run and poorly unionized businesses need.

Posted by: Lee | December 4, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Do you all realize the effect of these 3 liquidating? Try $35 Billion in unemployment claims for starters. There are whole towns and cities in California who live and die by Nissan truck plants… yes, Chrysler manufactures Nissan trucks in California. They make parts and components in rural towns ALL across America, oh and don’t forget the VW routen minivan that is manufactured in the US by Chrysler, and that Mercedes plant in Alabama? Gone too.
Do your friggin homework. You’re talking about a depression if these 3 fail, and that’s just for starters.

Posted by: bjs | December 4, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

Welcome to the United Socialist of America, for we are no longer a capitalist nation. Have the oil companies bail-out the auto industry. They need each other.
Now that would be capitalism at work.

Posted by: BamBamAJ | December 4, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

If the dems want to give it so bad, let them bring it up for vote so all could see that public opinion don’t mean squat to them. This kind of threat will only turn the independents back to the republican side in 2010. Whether your for it or against it, the people have spoken and their wishes should be respected. Just who in the heck do they think they are. Now that they have firmly politicized this, the “Big 3″ car sales will really bottom out if they go against the taxpayers wishes. If they really want to help the “big 3″ they should offer $10,000 tax incentive for buying american made autos. At least the consumer would benefit from the money being thrown around.

Posted by: Will | December 4, 2008, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Reid and Pelosi cannot find votes from their Democratic Congress so they’re going to coerce Bush into doing what they can’t get done?
What total jerks.

Posted by: drjohn | December 4, 2008, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

why are we bailing out the financial sector too? They’ll just squander our money and live like kings and queens. Let them all fail, and let God sort it out. Or at least we could go with a reboot or a fresh start, after hitting the bottom and the skids.

Posted by: Longshot | December 4, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

BJS – Let them all die. They have been too fat and unresponsive to the market for years. The Democrats have fought Bush for years, and created this mess. Let em rot in h%^LL.

Posted by: Bob | December 4, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

The big 3 simply are not viable entities with their bloated labor costs. Until that elephant in the room is addressed, no federal money. And no ‘we promise to re-open labor negotiations’ is not enough. A 20-30% pay cut is better than a 100% pay cut when the big 3 go under.

Posted by: AJ | December 4, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

“why are we bailing out the financial sector too?”
Do as I have done. Write to all your representatives and demand the bailouts/handouts stop.

Posted by: drjohn | December 4, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Why not give everybody in America a $5000.00 car credit to use with only American car makers? At least we would get some good out of the deal and it would help auto makers too? No, that makes too much sense.

Posted by: Ron in Georgia | December 4, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

The auto industry needs a root canal and the Democrats think a couple of aspirin will make the problem go away. If Chapter 11 ia OK for the airline industry it should be good enough for the auto industry. BTW, these problems didn’t just show up with the economic crisis, the Big 3 bigwigs have been screwing up for decades.

Posted by: Tom Campbell | December 4, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

“make some of the $700 financial industry bailout money available to the domestic auto industry or else.”
Or else what?? Bush is on his way out, so what are you clowns going to do??
Why don’t the Dems bring up the fact that the foreign car makers here in the U.S. pay their American workers 40 percent less than the Big 3?? Oops! Can’t risk those union votes!
No more charity to ANY industry! Where’s MY bailout? Stay the hell out of my wallet!!!!
Welcome to the USSA – The United Socialist States of America

Posted by: pwhited | December 4, 2008, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

For those of you who worry about the “Big 3″ going belly up and fading into the sunset, that’s the last thing that the “Big 3″ would want. If they don’t get the dough, then they’ll do whatever they SHOULD do, namely Chapter 11, and come back even stronger. Even if they throw money at them, with the economy the way it is, and the anger from over 60% of taxpayers who are saying enough is enough, they won’t be selling many cars anyway. The money they get will only let them continue their lavish lifestyles for a little longer.

Posted by: Will | December 4, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

If Cheney would just tell “W” what to do
even if the congress would pass a bill… Bush would have to sign it
Bush already has the money… he and Paulson want to skim some of it off wall street.

Posted by: mr sleepy | December 4, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

“Posted by: brwil | Dec 4, 2008 9:13:11 PM”
You’re kidding right? You want taxpayers to subsidize private industry jobs? What happens when all of the Big 3 fail to return to profitability because they can’t get the master extortionists the UAW to agree to wage and benefit agreements in line with reality? More taxpayer money? Bankruptcy will NOT mean the end of the Big 3 although it will be the end of the UAW and their support of Democrats.

Posted by: Eric | December 4, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

I would say they can have bailout money on three conditions: #1- Dissolve the UAW. The workers will be re-hired on at a decent wage and when it comes time they are told to get to work or they are fired, they will simply be fired. Remember Ronald Reagan with the air traffic controllers strike? this should be the same. That’s right. No more UAW. No more union labor that helped mightily to get them into this. #2- New management at all three companies, with Lee Iacocca’s playbook in hand. #3-The government owns interest in the companies until the loans are paid back in full and they are profitable again.

Posted by: DSS | December 4, 2008, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Dear Mr. President and Congress,
As a member of the United States Marines, I would like to ask the Congress and current Administration for an immediate bailout. I don’t really need the money to survive, but then again neither does anyone you are willing to help. If it would help expedite the process I am willing to rack on an enormous amount of debt and then blame it on the American people.That seems to be the way to get what we want. So Mr. President and Congress, I urge you to accept this bailout proposal as it could be essential to my future well being.
How pathetic!! We really need to start taking responsibility for our actions and stop expecting others to take care of us. Whatever happened to the old days when if you ran out of money you went out of business. If the government had bailed out every other automaker in history we would now be bailing out the big 10,000 and not the Big 3. It really is time to grow up.

Posted by: Jeremy | December 4, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

I say “loan” them the money with the following must meet objectives:
1. Reduce Upper management by 50%
2. Eliminate all Executive bonuses.
3. All three automakers must hire a combined 20,000 new employeees.
4. Models built in foriegn countries cannot be sold in the US.
5. All parts for US made autos must be built in the US.
6. MPG standards will be 25-35 MPG with exception to trucks which will need to meet 20-25 MPG.

Posted by: Stab | December 4, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm

To the Democrats. Forget askign the WH to do anything. You control Congress. Just pass whatever legislation you wish. Take a vote. Stand up and be counted.

Posted by: D in West Virginia | December 4, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Democrats have to be the lowest scum on the earth.

Posted by: mark | December 4, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Donbl, sorry about your luck but the entire country cannot shoulder the load of the ~3 million lost jobs in tax dollars. One of these jokers said they’re burning through $5 billion a month. There is NO bailout that will fix that. These companies need to find the way out of their own darkness THEY created themselves, or die trying. If they die, someone else will rise up. The unfortunate difference is, “someone else” may be Japanese or European. Such a shame… we invented cars but other nations found ways to do it better.
Probably because they don’t bow to unions.

Posted by: Scattershot | December 4, 2008, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

Democrat Rep. John Dingell got nearly a million from the auto industry. And for him, the stakes aren’t just political, they’re personal.
“There’s an actual conflict,” said Ryan Alexander of the nonprofit group Taxpayers for Common Sense. “His personal financial health, you know, the wealth of his family is tied up in the car industry.”
Dingell’s wife Debbie once worked as a lobbyist for GM.
When she married the congressman, she became a senior GM executive at an undisclosed salary. And we found the couple has extensive GM assets.
Dingell’s current financial disclosure filed in May lists GM stock worth up to $350,000, options worth up to $1 million more, and a GM pension fund. In 2000, among the Dingells’ GM assets were stock options worth up to $5 million.
And in 1998, the congressman reported selling GM stock options worth up to $1 million dollars.
Dingell wouldn’t agree to an interview.

Posted by: betty | December 4, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

President Bush DON’T GIVE THEM A THING.
Or else what????? NO BAILOUT NO WAY !!!!

Posted by: CW | December 4, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Now we know why they spent all that money on a new greeting center at the capital. The lines are going to be very long to get in and ask for a bailout. Come one, Come all, (except for all you Joe Taxpayers)and fill your pockets, for their is a new kid in town and his name is petulance.

Posted by: Will | December 4, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

The BIG 3 Can’t admit to Congress they have a Chapter 11 plan because if they accepted government bailout money and THEN filed bankrupcty that would be fraud.
Watch these charletons take the government billions and then a month or two later file chapter 11. Then the crooked Democrats will be able to keep their UNIONs happy by using OUR money to keep the monster afloat under chapter 11 for a couple of years.

Posted by: gen | December 4, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

I find it funny how the Big 3 are asking for money. They say that they will use it to build better cars that are fuel efficient. However, every time I turn on the TV, I see a commercial from them advertising trucks. Chevy with the Silverado, or Ford with the “new” F-150. Take a hint Detroit… the American public does not want trucks. We can’t afford to drive them anymore. They cost too much to buy and run. Try building quality cars that are fuel efficient. That is why Toyota and Honda have won. Also, its time for the UAW to go. It was a great idea when it was started. They helped employees achieve fair wages and a good working environment. However, as time went on they got greedy. No it is coming back to bite them. It is time for the workers to take a deep pay cut and make the wages that the current market sets.

Posted by: Joe_With_Common_Sense | December 4, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

These are LOANS people, not a bailout. Lines of credit are used by almost all companies every day in the normal course of business. The credit crunch has hit the automakers from several directions, none of which are their fault, making the normal channels for obtaining cash dry up.
From all the negativity towards the domestic auto industry and the autoworkers, it appears most of you think that the union line workers are the only auto industry employees besides the executives. There are tens of thousands of white collar professionals such as automotive engineers, finance, marketing, research, and facilities people with college degrees, many of them being advanced degrees. They all make equivalent or less than the same positions in other industries. Since you are mad at the executives, many of which the white collar employees also have little use for, you want to punish all of them by letting their industry fold because of the government’s lack of oversight of the banking industry?
Why the double standard for the loan approvals? For the politicians, it’s because they have investments in Wall Street, not Woodward Avenue.
How do I tell my three children, all under 6, that we have out of our house because there are no jobs in Michigan and Daddy can no longer pay for our home? I am not an overpaid line worker or fork truck operator, but an engineer that works 50-60 hours a week while collecting a 40hr/week salary. I worked my way through college, didn’t borrow a cent for my education,

Posted by: TerryD | December 4, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Chysler’s private owners should reach into their own pockets to save their investment. It’s not like they don’t have other money, but I guess they don’t want to throw any more of their good money after bad.

Posted by: tiredtoo | December 4, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

The most spinless Congress I ever saw.

Posted by: United Ass Wipers | December 4, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Great posts drjohn.

Posted by: orangecat | December 4, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

They are not just loans.
They are non recourse loans, which means once they get the money and fund the UAW pensions, they will file for Ch 11 anyway.

Posted by: United Ass Wipers | December 4, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

I spent the last 3 years trying to buy an american made fuel efficient 4 cylinder truckto replace my aging dodge 4 door 4 cylinder car.
I couldnt find one truck with a 4 cylinder in it that got even 25 mpg.
I sent emails to all of the automakers 3 times in the past 2 years or more.
Each time they told me Were sorry you dont like our big huge gas guzzling trucks
So finally when my car died i had to buy a replacement and i only could afford 1 truck..
So i had no choice when gas was at 4.50 per gallon but to buy a toyota tacoma
And now the big 3 are crying because as they flew in their jets they threatened to lay off their workers
for their STUPID and Arrogant mistakes
while the japanese made Fuel efficient cars that actually WORK..
Im sorry i really am to all the workers
But i cannot support a bailout with these MORONS running the big 3
hey the leftists tell us they know how to make green cars lets get all the environmentalists to bail them out.
Starting with the hot air baffon al gore
between the Goracle and the GAG Messiah oobama surly they can just waive their majic wand and fix everything..
or is that the wicked witch pelozi?

Posted by: jcila | December 4, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Just like a Democrat.Can’t make a decision
so get Bush to do it and then blame him
if it doesn’t work. I hope Pres. Bush doesn’t give them a thing. !!!!
Auto companies messed it up. Then THEY should clean it up. NO MORE BAILOUTS !!!!

Posted by: CW | December 4, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

It’s called creative destruction (schumpeter), you dumb democrats in Congress. It’s called letting pay for their mistakes and the changes in the global market. It’s called having to pay the price for having maintained unions that are bleeding you dry. It’s called dying GM. It’s called “Adios,” and “hasta la vista, baby.”
Don’t worry, as you lay their bleeding to death, I am sure some vultures will come by to buy pieces of you or else all of you. They’ll get rid of the unions, the out-dated mode of production, and the business as usual model — then like a phoenix, a new bird will rise from your ashes.
Let’s withhold the money and use it for better causes. You GM must die, and your unions must go with you.
It’s time for real change.

Posted by: lavampire | December 4, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

The question to ask yourself:
Given what the automakers have proposed, would you put $10K of your own money behind their efforts? If you wouldn’t, than neither should the government on our behalf.

Posted by: Brian | December 4, 2008, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

1955 negotiations between UAW & Ford was the Supplemental Unemployment Benefit program—-SUB. The Philosphy behind the SUB was that auto workers shoud not be penalized for being unemployed du to conditions beyond their control. From 1956-1959, Ford paid out more than $105 million to unemployed workers mainly as a result of the 1958 recession, when the nat’l unemployment rose to 7%. GM UAW has the Job Bank Program that pays a laid off GM UAW worker 90% of his pay for a year………..

Posted by: 55Mariposa | December 4, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

Guys. $700 Billion of tax payers money are already committed. By diverting $34 Billion to needed auto industry tax payers are not paying a penny more. Instead of big wall street fatcats paying themselves big paychecks, I would rather trust my money to exececutives in auto industry who will pay themselves $1 per year and save millions of workers of Detroit and Ohio from ruins…
Republicns are digging themselves in to hole by supporting bankers and not blue coller workers… and then you wonder why Ohio went Blue ?

Posted by: Andy Desai | December 4, 2008, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

There were signs heading into Thursday that prospects for a bailout are grim, with both Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., and Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., laying the groundwork for blaming the Bush administration if plans for the automakers collapse. This was from an earlier report done by ABC….PELOSI, REID, AND DODD…you are a bunch of lairs and crooks….

Posted by: 55Mariposa | December 4, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

It would appear to me that the Eastern Auto Makers should by out the American industry in a free-market situation if the American Auto Makers we a viable industry — which it is not because of past concession to the UAW, obsolete management practices, and lack of innovation. It appears that the loop-hole which allowed the gas guzzlers to enrich the oil industry (which Bush is a part of) has cost all Americans. American cars are better than ever — however the profits are not on par. The workers, and taxpayers must once again pay for another Liazze-faire Bush policy — which was proven to be ineffective int he 1930s.

Posted by: olin tucker | December 4, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

Don’t bail out the auto industry. It is simple as that. They made this problem themselves, therefore they can fix it themselves. BTW, the UAW is a joke.
This is coming from a person who happens to lean toward the left when it comes to politics.

Posted by: RadChad | December 4, 2008, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

The White House should drop it right back in the lap of Congress—- decide what needs to be done and submit it for approaval!!

Posted by: roscoe02 | December 4, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

OR ELSE???? Do those jerks realize who they’re talking to?

Posted by: billb | December 4, 2008, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm

First, I vote and have voted split party for several elections. Secondly, if both the republicans and Bush don’t help the automotive industry, then all should be impeached. You may consider this radical however, I don’t care about political parties or care about political alignment. I do care about he people that will be adversely affected by automotive bankruptcy. If our government fails to help, then we all fail.

Posted by: NavyVet79 | December 4, 2008, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

I’d rather see an employed $45/Hr UAW worker than a former employed $75/Hr one.

Posted by: Lee Iacocca | December 4, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

RobbieSue — this is over and above what has already been approved!

Posted by: roscoe02 | December 4, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

This is all just posturing on Congresses part, didn’t Obama make deals with the Unions to get elected? If I recall, at alot of Obama’s rallies, the Unions were right behind him. He owes them, & we all know what happens when you cross the Unions—
By the way, my husbad & I are part of the 8% unemployed, can I get a bail out????

Posted by: Olivia | December 4, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Best thing he could do and probably the only good thing while he is in office…

Posted by: NH voter | December 4, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

To NavyVet79. Do you favor impeaching Congress or throwing them out if they do not vote for a bailout. They control congress, let them forget the White Hosue and vote for it. It si that simply. Why blame Bush. He is soon gone. let congress vote yes and it is over.

Posted by: D of West Virginia | December 4, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

Don’t buy into the hype that the country will go under without the Big 3. the other will be more than happy to pick up the slack.
Did the country stop shopping when K-Mart filed for bankruptcy?

Posted by: Lee Iacocca | December 4, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

First, the UAW gives Congress a written statement / a legal document stating ALL the benefits that they are going to give up, permanently. Next, the Big 3 gives Congress a written statement stating what they are going to give up permanently. Last the Board of Directors will forfeit ALL stock, stock options and future compensation for the next 10 years.

Posted by: 55Mariposa | December 4, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Well Terry, that is very unfortunate, but if it truly is a loan, lets consider a few things. If a person went into a bank and asked to borrow money they would be asked how much they make. Well, if you are losing money every month you don’t have income. They would look at how much debt that person has and if they make their payment on time. Well, again if a company like GM is losing 5000000000 dollars a month by some estimates they certainly have too much debt. So if we look at this simply as a loan, guess what, their application is hereby rejected by the bank. i.e. the American people. Maybe we should go and find the former owners of all the other failed companies in history and apologize to them for not helping them simply because they were not big enough. That is some pretty screwed up math. You must have more debt than anyone else before we can give you a loan. Maybe thats why all the banks are needing “loans”. The less you make and more you owe the better your chances of getting a loan? No wonder we are in the mess we are in.

Posted by: Jeremy | December 4, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

This is a clear outrage! The people of these United States have spoken. 61% of the American people, the very same people who’ve hired these dimwits, oppose the bailout. 2010 will be nigh, and Pelosi, Reid, and her freaking gang will hear from us. They will be fired! The good lot of them! I tell you my fellow patriots, it is time to teach these jack asses who the boss really is. Republican and Democrats alike must be prepared to pay the price. Both have done great harm to our country. You folks want real change? And I’m not talking about the change that Obama has promised, because if you look at his cabinet, it is more of the same. I’m talking about “We the people…” Wake up America. Wake up real fast. Our liberty, our freedom, our very way of life is at stake here. To the legislative body of these United States, take heed, for the voices of the patriots who shed their blood and forged this nation of ours will haunt you. Their voices will be heard once more throughout this land and you will have very little power to stop them. Folks, you want real change, lets get rid of the Dodds, the Kennedys, and everyone that has made a lifelong and lifetime career out of the legislative seats they hold. It is time to push for Senatorial term limits. Now, that is real change. Let us have ourselves a Revolution. A revolution Thomas Jefferson encouraged us to have every 20 years. ;) Our nation’s capital needs an enema. It is time we purged our nations capital by replacing them with folks in 2010 that will carry on with the people’s business. It is time we elect folks who will not go against the will of the people. It is time for real change. We the people must be heard.

Posted by: Mike | December 4, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

LMAO at the COWARDS in Congress

Posted by: Bail out me | December 4, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

For those of you that vote for foreign cars, do you know that most of the knowledge they gained was from our Big 3 because of exchange programs? Do you also know that their companies were financially supported by their respective governments? Finally do you know that their increase in North American sales were due to NAFTA? Do your homework, then criticize. Yes they need to reduce costs, yes they need to produce more fuel efficient vehicles, yes, yes, yes. Years ago we complained about foreign investments, now they own over 75% of our debt. Most consumer goods are manufactured overseas with brand labels that say made somewhere else. Wake up folks – how much more do you want foreign countries to subsidize and own of our country.

Posted by: NavyVet79 | December 4, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

NavyVet79………did you get paid $75 an hour when you were employed by the Navy? Heck no, and you got horrable health care as well…. So why do I want my tax money going to so over paid UAW worker that makes $75 an hour, which includes $25 in wages and $50 an hour in benefits. And the UAW doesn’t want to give up ANY concessions to keep the Big 3 afloat… SO, NO BAIL OUT until the UAW comes down from the mountain and gets in touch with the real world….Once the UAW gives up 80% of their ridiculous benefits and the CEO’s, CFO’s, Board of Directors give up ALL their compensation, performance bonus, stock options and last 3 years of stock bonuses then I will want my gov’t to give the Big 3 a bail out.

Posted by: 55Mariposa | December 4, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Andy Desai — so far, Congress isn’t willing to divert any of the $700Billion from the TARP fund to the BEG3—-They insist it needs to be over and above. Although, some discussion in today’s Congressional hearing was about—– “have you you guys thought about going to the bank? We just gave the Banks $700Billion to support the ongoing concern of businesses. In fact, one of the Congessmen, can’t remember who, in the discussion with the CEO’s who each drove to DC in their hybids—– he asked—- did you pass any banks on the way here??? The CEOs from the BEG3 really didn’t see the humor in it!

Posted by: roscoe02 | December 4, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

What happens when there aren’t any jobs here to pay our mortgages, foreclosures hit the roughly 3 million households the auto industry employs… The mortgage companies are going to come back and say they have more bad assets!
Here is the root cause of the financial meltdown. People don’t have a job to pay their mortgage! When people don’t have money to pay their bills the foreclosure crisis will get even worse. The bad assets the government is buying right now as a good investment with a potential return in 5 years is going to take much longer to become profitable.
No one seems to realize the amount of burden that will be transferred to the government (i.e. pensions, health care, unemployment claims) if the Big 3 reorganize under Chapter 11. No one cares about the burden of the economy the Big 3 carry right now.
Both parties need to understand the calamity of their indecision and inaction!
If the country wants to let the Big 3 go into bankruptcy, then let it be so. I am not sure all of the jobs that are left in the US will be able to pick up what the auto industry will let fall to the ground. But we will see.
Oh and let’s not forget all of the taxes that are paid by employees!

Posted by: Mike | December 4, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

FORD = FOUND ON the ROAD DEAD +++ that’s what my father used to say. He loved his chevy’s back then. Fighting in WWII, he was so anti Japanese, that he wouldn’t even eat Chinese food (Please don’t ask me to explain). Before he got sick, he was thinking about buying a Toyota. For him to come around after all those years of hating the Japanese says a lot about how the “Big 3″ lost their most loyal customers over the years. It’s not just how big the Union has gotten, but what they did to their automobiles over the years. Once known for their dependability and well built chassis, they have become the Poster Child for undependability and cars that seem to self destruct. I agree with lavampire +++ “then like a phoenix, a new bird will rise from your ashes” and will build the car that will save the U.S. economy.

Posted by: Will | December 4, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Its not about democrats or republicans, its about the political nature of the game. Hopefully Obama will help in that arena, but who knows for sure. DONT DO A BAILOUT, let the capital markets decide what to do. This will dump management and force a proper negotiation with the autoworkers. no on e will let them go, they will be acquired.

Posted by: morgan | December 4, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Did you know the major of your “American Made” car wasn’t made in America?
It’s only assembled here.

Posted by: Lee Iacocca | December 4, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

That’s right allow the Big 3 to fail so you idiots can purchase cars from Communist China sold on the parking lots at WalMart by minimum wage employees. Tell Congress and the President to find a solution which “works” for America for a change.

Posted by: Mr. Green Jeans | December 4, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

Yay America! We sure know what we’re doing!

Posted by: Lark | December 4, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

I do not support the bailout one bit. The Auto Union is a wing of the Democratic Party and their greedy and selfish union contracts are the cause of this mess. The Auto Union should not get another nickel.

Posted by: Moe | December 4, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

I cant believe the double standards. You pay off wall street no questions but dont want to bail out main street auto companies that actually makes things. Even if inferior, at least its our car industry. Remember the families.

Posted by: rich | December 4, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

Mr. Green Jeans: Where is the WalMart located that sells cars from China? Or did you just make that up?

Posted by: D of WV | December 4, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

GM UAW worker $75 an hour, Toyota USA worker $40 an hour. That is a $35 an hour difference in pay per hour per worker. $35 X 40 hours X 52 weeks X 150,000 GM UAW workers = $10.5 BILLION DOLLARS DIFFERENCE IN ONE YEAR BETWEEN GM AND TOYOTA… And you wonder WHY the Big 3 is going under and need $45 billion dollars to stay a float for 4 months…….

Posted by: 55Mariposa | December 4, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

NH voter – I favor throwing them out if they don’t vote yes. They screwed up the financial bail out, they want Bush (lame duck) to support automotive, and they have stood ideally by for the past 12-18 months on other issues. Bush can trim his own hair these days let alone fix the crisis. I still think he should have his butt impeached though for gross incompetence as the leader of our nation.

Posted by: NavyVet79 | December 4, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

“They’ll get rid of the unions, the out-dated mode of production, and the business as usual model — then like a phoenix, a new bird will rise from your ashes. ”
You obviously don’t live in the midwest… ashes remain ashes… But, I know.. you don’t care what happens to us… Michigan with a 30% unemployment rate? Who cares! 3 million jobs lost? No big deal!
Bushie can give money carte blanche to his pals in New York, but not one dime for the backbone of the American economy?
I’m glad the Dems are forcing his hand on this… he is the one to blame and he is doing to to punish the blue midwestern states… who cares how many people suffer as a result of his greed and spite? After all, he ate birthday cake during Katrina.

Posted by: Mike | December 4, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

or else??? what you’ll not confirm Obama’s picks so come Jan 20 you’ll blame Bush for your presidents in ability to due anything. Uncertainties inherent in the legislative process??? sorry you are so scared of the processes of our government that for over 200 years have kept us in the forefront of the world. Maybe it’s time for a change if you are an incumbent candidate you can no longer run for office in the House or Senate time to start electing “new blood” in our congress.

Posted by: Eric | December 4, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

“Here is the root cause of the financial meltdown. People don’t have a job to pay their mortgage! When people don’t have money to pay their bills the foreclosure crisis will get even worse. The bad assets the government is buying right now as a good investment with a potential return in 5 years is going to take much longer to become profitable.”
Wrong, Thr root cause is people spending more than they make or can even make payments on. It’s people buying $400,000 homes when they make $30,000 a year. It’s people wanting to start out here it took there parents 50 or 60 years to get. I don’t like to say it, but in a free market economy we have to take responsibility for our own economic problems and stop blaming the government for not helping when it’s not there job. Imagine how bad things would be if the government had been involved. Remember, the opposite of progress is congress.

Posted by: Jeremy | December 4, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

I watched the Congressional hearings today—- Congress sure has sore a$$ after what happened to the TARP funding. Sounds like they won’t approve squat without some serious strings attached. Such as— 1) Gov’t. appointed trustee/board of trustees with the authority to hire and fire management as well as Board of Directors 2) Trustee to have full authority to dictate any necessary restructuring of the businesses 3) Trustee to have full authority on the spending and use of taxpayer funding. 4) Taxpayer funding to be repaid prior to any other financial obligations 5) No dividend payouts to stockholders. 6) Forced consolidation of GM and Chrysler if the Board of Trustees deems it to be financially prudent. By their own admission today, GM and Chrysler indicated this was $8-$10 Billion in savings/ year. 7) Trustee to have full authority to establish compensation levels of management and Board of Directors 8) UAW to concede to wage and benefit structure equal to that of the foreign transplant companies— down to the penny! Gettelfinger looked like a deer in the headlights when he was told this. 9) 50% of the cash in the UAW pension funds to be put back into the company coffers as equity to assist in paying existing debts. 10) No taxpayer funding to be used to develop foreign relationships, plants, acquisitions, mergers, purchases, etc. 11) Forced reduction in numbers of dealerships.
I Sure hope they stick to their guns!!!!

Posted by: roscoe02 | December 4, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

“Please, just once, do something for the country and not your reelection.”
Saving 3 million jobs IS country first… I realize that you elitist don’t care about us over in flyover country, but this is like an economic Katrina to us, and you are eating birthday cake and dancing on our graves…

Posted by: Mike | December 4, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

The Auto Union does not deserve anything because it supports a socialist party. Since the union wants socialism, then it needs to see what socialism brings. It is not up to those of us who work for a fair wage to support greedy unions.

Posted by: Moe | December 4, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

“Why should the rest of us pay for the auto inudstry’s stupidity?”
Exactly! Why should the midwest be economically devastated while Wall Street gets all the money they want?
“Why should electricians making $40 an hour bail out auto workers making $80 an hour?”
Autoworkers don’t make that kind of money. That number is bogus… it includes retiree pension costs… average UAW wage is $28 an hour and starting wage is $14 an hour with no benefits…

Posted by: Mike | December 4, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

I was opposed to the bailout. But it passed any way and the the money is going to be spent, why should it just be use to help the idiots on Wall Street and the thieves they are and not the US automakers also? At least the automakers have come back with a business plans and concessions. The failed banking crooks are still handing out multi-million dollar bonuses and wasting money left and right.

Posted by: Stacy | December 4, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

MichelleO…….You said …..”It’s time for Bush to behave like a Democrat – deflect responsibility. He should write a letter back. “I’ll do whatever President-Elect Obama tells me to do.”…….BRILLIANT IDEA !!!!!

Posted by: CW | December 4, 2008, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

Mike,
maybe you need to finally move out of Michigan. I hear auto plants are opening up left and right in the South.

Posted by: Lee Iacocca | December 4, 2008, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm

55Mariposa – no I didn’t make 75.00 in Navy and most autoworkers don’t either. Do your homework because I have both as a buyer of cars and a supplier to automotive? I’ve been buying GM products for 30 years and damn proud of it, just like spending 6 years in the military. Christ, this is about american workers losing their jobs. What country are you from?

Posted by: NavyVet79 | December 4, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

Mr. Green Jeans—- Yo! Mr. Green Jeans! Whatever works!

Posted by: roscoe02 | December 4, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

Just because one thing passes I am opposed to does not mean I am going to support something else i oppose all in the name of fairness.

Posted by: Jeremy | December 4, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

Please stop all the bailout nonsense!! Get rid of UAW, get rid of all the green junks regulations, big three for sure will overcome anything!!!!!

Posted by: Wing | December 4, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

We have to bailout Wall St because we are obligated from the crap Fannie and Freddie was doing. You’ll notice not everyone on Wall St got a bailout.
Maybe it’s high time we nationalized the Big 3. How would you feel about that, UAW?

Posted by: Lee Iacocca | December 4, 2008, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

No bailout for Detroit’s Big 3. Congress better listen to the American Voters or else you will be booted out in 2010. President Bush should stand firm in his belief that the American taxpayer should not risk good monies on bad investment. Let’s get real, with the state of the national and global economy and the financial trouble facing Detroit’s Big 3, the $34B is not enough to get them back to the black period. First it was $25B, now it’s $35B after everything is said and done it will be $125B. So the answer is NO! Let them file for Chapter 11 and try to re-organize just like any other business establishment. What make the executives at the Detroit Big 3 and UAW so special that they can suck these companies dry and run it to the ground with their special interest and expect the tax payers to bail them out. Like I’ve said all these elected officials better check the polls as 61 percent of the American public reject any and or all bailout plans for Detroit big 3. Be reminded that you elected officials are servants of the people which means that you’re supposed to act on behalf of the best interest of the American public as a whole. P.S. President elect. Obama pls. also take notice of this. The voters overwhelmingly voted for you in hopes of a President who will hear and act according to what the public wants.

Posted by: JYCLTD | December 4, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

750 billion should have never been given to the jews who run wall street who have financially raped the american people and the country. The banks should be natioalized.

Posted by: Vermont Royster | December 4, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Why on earth is all this time being spent on EMPTY words from both sides of this negotiating table? Exactly WHY do all these employees go down the tubes? WHO’s been holding the purse strings to all the payroll deductions these folks have been contributing to over all these years?
Perhaps ALL the big wigs of the big 3 AND the UAW need to EACH make a hefty contribution and bail themselves out. Since they seem to be the only winners in this fiasco of raping the public, government, AND the workers.

Posted by: iyamacog | December 4, 2008, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

D of WV
Communist Chinese cars coming soon to all WalMarts “D’ if we once again put American industry and workers in breadlines! Have you been aslepp for the past 15 years or too busy shopping at WalMart to take note?

Posted by: Mr. Green Jeans | December 4, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

The UAW is part of the Democratic Party. It is a political appendage.
The Democratic Party supports global warming alarmism, high taxes, the United Nations, welfare, redistribution of wealth – these are the reasons the automakers are going under.
No, the UAW does not deserve a bailout. It helps ruin the economy and expand the administrative state and the expansion of the government. The UAW has brought this mess to the Big 3, to its workers, and to the country as a whole.
I say NO to the bailout.

Posted by: Moe | December 4, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

let them fail and then reorganize.. capitalism is failing and thank GOD for that!… the only ones we should bail out are the workers, not the company execs… these losers have not sold me a car EVER because they make crappy cars! i’ve had hondas and have had no complaints

Posted by: earthisnotflat | December 4, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

I didn’t favor the original bailout package whose original vaguely worded 63 pages I read…and those pages were never changed as it passed form House to Senate and back again; 300+ pages of pork was added to it so people would vote for it. I don’t favor a bailout here, either. If we are going to bailout the auto industry (who cannot even remember back to the Crater era and learn from that) then we should also bailout Rite-Aide, Circuit City and every other financially struggling company. Sorry, the big 3 need to visit the bankruptcy court like every other business.

Posted by: PHopkinsRPh | December 4, 2008, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

The Democrats want to bail out the UAW because it is UAW money that funds the Democrats and helps their elections.
The Democrats are taking your taxes to PAY for the votes they BOUGHT. Just like Fannie and Freddie, the UAW sells votes.

Posted by: John | December 4, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

American cars ARE NOT made in America. They are only assembled in America.
Big difference.

Posted by: Lee Iacocca | December 4, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

This is simply hilarious—- Congress gives the Whitehouse and ultimatum— Make TARP funds available, or else! Why can’t Congress decide how to address the situation—- It was quite apparent in today’s Congressional hearing—- it’s a hot potatoe that they don’t even want to get close to! So, what do they want to do— punt to the White House— What a bunch of wimps!

Posted by: roscoe02 | December 4, 2008, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

No one said you created it Tracy. The Big Guys did. I’m sorry for your plight. NO ONE is having it easy these days. And it’s only going to get worse.

Posted by: iymacog | December 4, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

This is a nice spirited, bs conversation. How many of us voted yes for the Wall Street bail out and our votes counted? How many of us think that our opinion about the automotive bailout really counts or got a chance to vote on that topic? I will not buy a foreign car from Wal-mart, K-mart, or any other mart. I will endorse and support a bail out of OUR automotive industry and workers. It’s a disgrace to me as a US citizen and vet if you don’t support the request, even if you don’t get to vote on it. Quit complaining and stand up for American workers.

Posted by: NavyVet79 | December 4, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Mr. Green jones. Where is the location of the Walmart selling cars that were made in china? You said it was true, but it sounds like you really know where that is happening!

Posted by: D of WV | December 4, 2008, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm

Michigan is a disaster because it votes for a tax raising, anti-business democrat liberal for governor. Then it send liberals to congress to further ruin the economy. And now Michigan wants to steal from us to pay for democrat mistakes that they voted for.

Posted by: Mork | December 4, 2008, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

So it’s selfish to work hard and want to keep your money. Thats news to me. Heaven forbid I work and keep what I make. Tracy maybe you should try doing the same instead of expecting me to help you out, because I would rather go back to Iraq and make money tax free than give it to whining greedy people like yourself. Look on monster.com. Even someone with a handout attitude like yours could probably find someone willing to handout a job to you, but don’t forget to pay taxes so all the other unemployed people who haven’t looked for a job in months can continue to mooch off us.

Posted by: Jeremy | December 4, 2008, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm

Boo Hoo to Michigan.
How is that any different than the textile industry that used to be in S Carolina. Or the steel industry that used to be in Pennsylvania?
Where was there taxpayer money for those so others could keep their coffee shops open?
You dinks think you are the only ones who had to adjust since Clinton went around peddling China to the WTO?
It’s high time you join the party.

Posted by: Lee Iacocca | December 4, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

I can sum this whole argument up….America is the only country in the world that has fat poor people. Think long and hard about that one everybody.

Posted by: btdt | December 4, 2008, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Pelosi and Reid must be amongst
the majority of Obama voters who
don’t know the Democrats control
Congress already.

Posted by: Ed | December 4, 2008, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

There is a lot of hue and cry to give money to the big 3 so workers do not lose their jobs. Remember that there are 12 car manufacutring plants in the US owned by foreign car companies. So if there is a bailout and it is sucessful, then these other car manufacturing plants in the US will slow down or go out of business. The workers at these plants will lose their jobs. How do we help those US workers and their suppliers. So why should the govt. help one group of workers to put another set of workers out of buisiness. Especially since Congress will be using taxpayers money from everyone.
Oh, does it have anythign to do with the fact taht only one group of workers are represneted by Unions?

Posted by: D of WV | December 4, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

The unions fought hard to put as many republicans out of jobs as the could in November. Now the UAW is having a tough time finding any republicans to help them save thier jobs. Strange!!!!

Posted by: Don | December 4, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Stutz, Studebaker and Nash are also looking for a bailout too…

Posted by: Evilclay | December 4, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

NO BAILOUT FOR THE AUTO INDUSTRY!

Posted by: Democrat All My LIfe | December 4, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

would it not be illegal if we bail them out knowing that they will file chapter 11.
let obama bail them out once he comes into office-the unions supported him and he owes them.
sounds to me the dems do not want to shoulder the blame when the bailout fails to turn things around for the big 3.

Posted by: mae g | December 4, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

I’ll take a Chinese car. I hear they cost half as much and are twice as good.

Posted by: Lee Iacocca | December 4, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

Hey Mae, ‘shoulder blame’???
OMG, are you kidding? NO ONE is able to accept responsibility. That includes any politician.

Posted by: iyamacog | December 4, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

“America is the only country where poor people are fat.”
LOL

Posted by: Mork | December 4, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Mr. Green Jeans:
You said That WalMart is selling cars made in China. Everyone knows that is untrue. So I keep asking you where that is happening to show that you are unwilling to debate or discuss this issue with facts. You are just using made up stuff.

Posted by: D of WV | December 4, 2008, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

“Stutz, Studebaker and Nash are also looking for a bailout too…”
So are Crosby, Stills, and Nash

Posted by: Nhg | December 4, 2008, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Why should the farmers and ranchers in America (who by the way make an average of less than $10.00/hour) pay for a bail out of the union strapped corporations. They have paid their dues when they purchase farm equipment, parts and supplies. No one considers bailing them out when it hails them out or they get dried out…..NO MORE BAIL OUTS FOR ANY CORPORATIONS, THEY INVEST OVERSEAS.IF YOU DON’T BELIEVE IT, ASK TO SEE THE BOOKS, THEY KEEP 3 SETS…PD

Posted by: PD | December 4, 2008, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

This is the best FREE entertainment I’ve had in a very long time! *G*

Posted by: iyamacog | December 4, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

roscoe02, No, they are saying approve providing these loans OUT of the $700B package that has already been approved so that we don’t have to consider spending anymore above and beyond that $700B. Half of that $700B has already been committed to (and partially paid out to the failed wall street). And the other $350 will have to be approved by Congress to be released later. They are saying, approve using some of the $350K that’s already approved to provide LOANS for the 3 automakers, or there is no way we will be able to garner approval to release the remaining $350B when the time comes.

Posted by: RobbieSue | December 4, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

RobbieSue: Congress is saying a lto of stuff to the WH. But the simple fact is that Congress can pass a law to take the $35 billion out of whatever they wish and give it to the big 3. No need to ask WH for anything. So why don’t they do that? Just stand up and vote it out.

Posted by: D of WV | December 4, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

I am comment number 299 in politics last night about this particular issue. I am rep./demo., whomever is best for the job, and sorry, but I do not believe that a contribution to the auto industry is in the best interest of this country. These people have made a fortune off of the American public and abroad, and what they are essentially asking us is to keep them from losing their profit margin. Look at the BIG picture, people. Even if we contribute on this end, we are still going to pay on the ultimate end. If we DO THIS, prices will not come down, they will soar higher(which they will probably do, either way), and we will be paying for their mistakes and lack of interest in more efficient vehicles for years yet to come.

Posted by: David L Pippin | December 4, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Hey Russ, dont hold your breath on that $1/gal. Exxon made gazillions this year. Imagine that. We’re merely having a tiny break before it begins rising next month.

Posted by: iyamacog | December 4, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Look, you HAVE to pay your workers REALLY well if you want them to buy and drive those huge $40,000.00 trucks we are making.
I even bought one once, my truck payment and house payment were almost the same.
What the hell was I thinking…

Posted by: Russ | December 4, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

They should not bailout, loan, whatever you want to call it. The only thing I think that is acceptable is bankruptcy court. They can work on getting rid of the unions which was the first cause of this mess. Then they can hire reasonably priced employees. I don’t feel like paying for the auto industry, they should have seen this coming years ago and worked on it when they had time. Sorry.

Posted by: lhart56 | December 4, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

The ignorance displayed in the majority of the posts here is astounding. 1) Bush turned to Dems in Congress six weeks ago to get support for his financial bailout plan…to the tune of $700 billion. 2) The Dems are still dealing with slim majorities so its not as if they’re currently dealing from a position of strength..remember, its not the new Congress yet. 3)The auto industry is asking for $34 billion in bridge loans and the Dems want to tap some of that completely oversight-free handouts from Paulson fund. 4)the auto industry is the LAST major manufacturing industry in this country…(and if we go to war with another nation, we will have no domestic manufacturing infrastructure to turn to grind out all the necessary machines of nation-state warfare.) The “transplants” building factories int he deep South are almost exclusively ASSEMBLY plants only. 5) to a large degree our high tech is tied in some fashion pr another to the old nuts and bolts of building cars and will brain drain this country overnight come the death of industry 6) high worker wages beget high worker wages…it is utterly self-defeating for American workers to wish away unionized labor and participate in its villification by the “captains of industry and their Republican sychophants.
The race to the bottom that will ensue once labor’s back is broken will shock every one of you who are out there blithely cheering the death of American auto manufacturing.

Posted by: cameotoo | December 4, 2008, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

I’m telling you, the workers can’t afford 80% of what they’ll be manufacturing on $30/hour…the UAW could definitely step in a pony up here too though.

Posted by: Russ | December 4, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

This is NOT the end of the world.
And the sky is NOT falling……

Posted by: iyamacog | December 4, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Did the big 3 auto makers think of you when the put the gas guzzlers on the market? Did they think of you when they got the big bonuses for a great job they did? Did the UAW think of you when they go on strike for higher wages. Did the UAW think of you when they created the job bank? I am sure they will think of you when they take your tax money..

Posted by: Al | December 4, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Where’s Bush been hiding? Oh yea, he’s been busy pushing through measure to strip our civil rights, tear down the environment and allowing healthcare professionals to refuse to perform any procedure that conflicts with their religious values. God Help Us.
44 MORE DAYS TIL OBAMA!

Posted by: Jeff | December 4, 2008, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Jeff, I cant wait ’til your GOD fixes us.
Wake up son……

Posted by: iyamacog | December 4, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

The Dems promote “one world government” and multiculturism. Now, when it is time to ?buy American”, there is not enough sentiment of patriotism to make it happen.

Posted by: Truth | December 4, 2008, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

We need to give them more $$ to make more of THESE??? Who’s gonna buy em??? Quick, everyone go get your $42,000.00 and go out and buy a Yukon!!!
New 2009 GMC Cars:
2009 GMC Acadia
2009 GMC Canyon
2009 GMC Envoy
2009 GMC Savana
2009 GMC Sierra
2009 GMC Yukon
2009 GMC Yukon XL
2009 GMC Yukon XL 1500
2009 GMC Yukon XL 2500
2009 GMC Yukon XL 1500
Fuel Economy MSRP Range Drivetrain(s)
EPA Highway (mpg): 20
EPA City (mpg): 14
$41,640 – $44,475
Four Wheel Drive;

Posted by: Russ | December 4, 2008, 11:22 pm 11:22 pm

oh, if the gov would just give me a $1000.00 personal stimulas check I could go buy that $42,000.00 Yukon. NOT, that ain’t happening either.

Posted by: Russ | December 4, 2008, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Cameotoo: The workers at the factories in the South are US workers and US taxpayers. Do you wish to see them get laid off if your help to the big 3 is sucessful? Then what do you do to help those workers? Does Congress now bail out those palnts?
And even if the Congress bails out the big 3 and they continue to make cars who will buy the cars? People are out of work? Now one might say people cannot get credit so they cannot buy cars. So does Congress urge banks to give people who can not make car payments (remember Congress required that with mortgages and we have an enromous foreclosurer probloem). Does Congress then guarantee these car loans so they can buy the cars that Congress gave money to the big 3 to build?
Really does nto make any sense does it. If people are not buying cars what do you do. Everyone seems to be ignoring that. All fo the talk is aobut giving out money now so the big 3 can stay alive for a while.
Lets face it. If they get no money, Ford survives. it said it can live for a year. GM goes Chapter 11 and reorganizes and cuts costs including paying Union workers to not work. Chryslar is gone, but it is owned by some venture guys who knew what they were getting into a few years ago in any event. Besides they stripped the credit company out fo Chryslar and that is all they wanted.

Posted by: D of WV | December 4, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

Thousands of people work at McDonald’s,John Deere,Disneyland,AT&T-what if every company had a problem?We cannot bail out every failing American business; it would be a black hole vacuum just sucking the life out of every American family with more taxes.Thanks to Democrats and NAFTA,our jobs went over the boarder and so did the Big 3′s profits.They should have been watching their budgets.NO-Let Bush leave office and the Dems can lie in their own bed of chaos.

Posted by: Eliza | December 4, 2008, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

ha Bush is about 40 days and a wake up out the White House… I wonder who will the Dems blame when Bush is back in Texas?
Oh and why is Barney Frank not in handcuffs?

Posted by: Jibreel Riley | December 4, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

RobbieSue— Sorry, but the Congress is not saying “approve out of the TARP funds”. They are attemping to approve additional funding. And are having a difficult time justifying it! One suggestion from a Congressman today was—”go to the Bank, we already approved $700Billion to the banks, why don’t you go to the banks?! As a fallback, now Congress is screaming to the WhiteHouse that they need to approve fnding from TARP, because Congress can’t agree on a plan! It’s a hot Potatoe no one wants to touch it! Whoever touches it last will burn in h3ll!

Posted by: roscoe02 | December 4, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

What the Democrats are saying is that nothing will pass because of the Republicans; they don’t have enough votes unless more Republicans sign on. Also, not all Democrats are on board but more Republicans. Remember this slim margin that everyone talks about in the Senate is like one and that’s only because of two independents and one of those is actually a Republican in disguise. It’s 50-49 since Obama resigned.

Posted by: Here in Ohio | December 4, 2008, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

JRiley, could it be cuz Frank is a democrat??? Dont wanna make waves now do we?

Posted by: iyamacog | December 4, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

Here in Ohio: Why didn’t Obama stay in the Senate? Then he could have voted on this issue. I am sure he wnated to take a stand.

Posted by: D of WV | December 4, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

They can’t move the massive inventories of autos they have sitting around now, many units yet to even make it to dealer lots.
Loans are tight, interest rates suck unless you walk on water financially and nobody can or wants an incredibly expensive burden at a bad deal in a time of such low confidence and insecurity.
Any loans, bailouts or whatever the hell you want to call them are just postponing the inevitable for these companies unless they restructure their business models. The amount of discretionary income for spending of the average consumer has been plummenting for years under Bush fiscal policy. Oh, he’s pacified us well enough I suppose with supposed tax cuts(miniscule for the majority of average Americans while fuel and food costs skyrocketed) and a couple stimulus checks and we’re pretty easily fooled really.

Posted by: Russ | December 4, 2008, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm

Who is John Galt?

Posted by: Texas | December 4, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

Congress can’t pass a bailout plan so they want Bush to give them the money so he can be on the hook with the public while Obama remains silent. Obama is a weakling. NO BAILOUTS FOR ANYONE!

Posted by: No Bailout Funds | December 4, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Why are the Dems looking at Bush to make this call? They have both the House and Senate. One thing they do not want to do is vote on the bailout now because then the public could see how each member voted. Cowards.

Posted by: Chuck | December 4, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

um, for all you guys all about the Dems have the House and Senate now…it’s still the same depending on when the vote is, the vote would include all the current lame duckers from either side that are about to be ousted by the newly elected…

Posted by: Russ | December 4, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm

I would like to see the Democrats take this opportunity to negotiate some of the very poor business practices that the auto industry has engaged in. Why not use this moment to set a new direction that takes into account a loss of jobs from building plants overseas and global warming? If the U.S. government would become part owner in the auto industry, let’s do what any good owner would, have a say in the way that the company is run.

Posted by: Scott | December 4, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm

and Obama isn’t President YET, and has no official presidential power…
and Bush isn’t absolved of all responsibily for this incredible mess he has created over the last 8 years just because he’s leaving and it’s not all Obama’s fault, in fact, it’s none of Obama’s fault and hopefully he can help us out of this mess

Posted by: Russ | December 4, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

Oh Scott, like how we actually have a say in what the politicians decide???

Posted by: iyamacog | December 4, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

So the Republicans give away over a TRILLION dollars to Wall Street fools who do not make anything or really contribute much of anything to the improvement of society…
So the Democrats want to help restore the backbone of American exports and manufacturing (actually making something) with a $35 billion loan and the Republicans don’t want to do it.
Facts are that Republicans are very stupid people. Economies grow when we actually make things. They are too dumb to know this and that is a big reason we are in this HUGE mess.

Posted by: John | December 4, 2008, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm

I don’t know any auto manufacturing working that makes $30 dollars a hour unless skilled trades. I think Unions need to be updated. But most workers over15 years make almost $25hr. But this isn’t the samething. These people sign up knowing its a Union place of work. They will work hard manufacturing for 20 or more years and age like they’ve been there for 4 years. They look twice and twice as worn out. The Union is like any other Union, trains for trade. The only difference is this one is manufacturing. Both my parents work at Fairfax II plant in KS and both depend on bailout…. Both have earned there waged and sacrificed physically for the job they do.
I’m sick of hearing its inflated wages, retirement, and benefits is what put them in the whole.
The government has allowed international business market in US. Instead of closing it like most countries. The governments hasn’t standardized pay scales, allows drastic inflation. Didn’t monitor the important parts of our country’s financial sectors. Didn’t watch the housing market. Basically our government is who is suppose to the supervising force in this country has not paid attention till all red flags went up. 2 years too late from when it had started.
Blame the Union all you want, but the union didn’t hurt every lending sector in this country! The Union didn’t take your job. The Union didn’t make most of you ignore having a good savings, or not reading the final contract on your mortgage. It didn’t raise gas prices.
I blame us Americans for not using our head and government for not responding when we needed them to avoid this.

Posted by: chase | December 4, 2008, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

For thoses bashing Bush, did you not read the ABC article that stated that Bush is not doing anything without consulting Obama. That is pretty thoughtfull….I mean Bush could hand Obama a BIG mess but he doesn’t want to screw up Obama’s financial plan to get the economy back on track.

Posted by: 55Mariposa | December 4, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Republican idiots, all the time.

Posted by: bluemeat | December 4, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

we are socialist because of capitalism
why fight it?
corporate feudalism or guild wars or no money property rights damn them all third party spoilers our only hope

Posted by: Basil | December 4, 2008, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

So many stupid people in your country. If the big three fail the consequences will be huge. I think most of the “haters” hate american made cars, period. regardless of quality, gas mileage, price, etc.
Education needs the bailout.

Posted by: AmericaTheClueless | December 4, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

It is interesting to note how vicious the anti-middle class, and anti lower middle class tone in these posts becomes a when it comes to saving the jobs of people without MBAs. Its very sad.

Posted by: larry | December 4, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

When greed subsides, we may begin to make some headway. Does anyone see that as a possibility any time soon?

Posted by: iyamacog | December 4, 2008, 11:50 pm 11:50 pm

no bailout.
waste of money.
bankruptcy will keep the company afloat. It will clean out the problems. Ford builds the most modern plant in Brazil. the problem is the UAW union. There will never be a solid
American car manufacturer as long as the UAW suck everyone dry for welfare.

Posted by: Democrat All My LIfe | December 4, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

To all the people against the bailout, let me remind you something. First and foremost, the Big 3 are NOT ASKING FOR A BAILOUT, they are asking for a BRIDGE LOAN that will be repaid.
Second of all, and even more importantly, if these companies went under, we would lose MILLIONS of jobs in a matter of weeks. We would put ourselves into an economic hole that would take decades to get out from.
Yet you don’t want them to help them because? The Democrats want it? What exactly else is there?

Posted by: Andrew | December 4, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

Welcome to the United States of the Third World.
The only difference between the US working class and the working class of just about every country south of the border is that they know who their enemy is.
This backbiting and sniping MUST end. We are ALL in this mess together: a defeat for one is a defeat for all. Anyone who can’t see that is playing right into the hands of the ruling class.

Posted by: twistedboomer | December 4, 2008, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

Ultimatum? Screw Them!
Do not cave in to these Democrat
Party Cretins.
The vast majority of the American
People are against the proposed
Auto Industry Bailout.
If the Democrats want this bailout
so bad let them pass it in the
New Congress and on President Obama’s
watch!
You Democrats wanted control of the
Congress and the Whitehouse and now they
have it effective in January of 2009!
President Bush has taken enough
unwarranted blame during his term.
Let him go home in peace!
Thank you Mr President for
keeping us safe since the 9/11 attacks!

Posted by: reaganfan | December 4, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

this is about breaking a union.

Posted by: geenjean | December 4, 2008, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

Russ: Check your facts. Democrats conroll the house now. They will have a larger majority after the lame ducks leave, but they control the house now. The Senate consists of 48 Democrats and two independents who align themsleves with the Democrats. Before Obama resigned the Democratcs had one more. So it is tied or if the Governor of Illinois who is a Democratic were to appoint someone then the Democratics would control the Senate. So let /congress vote. The hosue first and when it pases then the pressure will be on the Senate to do better than 50-49. But let Congress stand up and vote.

Posted by: d or wv | December 4, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

No bail-out. It is enough

Posted by: nelson | December 4, 2008, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

chase…….according to UAW President Gettlefinger the financial problem is the Big 3 problem….I quote Mr. Dumb Axs Gettlefinger….Wall Street Journal dated 11/17/08….”This industry is in a crisis situation NOT of its own making” Mr. Gettelfinger said, blaming the mortgage crisis, credit crunch and financial sector meltdown for the auto sector’s condition….. It took a two-day strike, extraordinary solidarity and more than two months of tough bargaining for 73,000 UAW members at General Motors to bring home a new contract with unprecedented product and investment commitments.
With the protection of U.S. manufacturing jobs at the top of the union’s bargaining agenda, UAW negotiators insisted on — and won — solid pledges from GM to build specific products in specific plants.
GM also agreed to a moratorium on outsourcing, a pledge to insource more than 3,000 UAW jobs and a commitment to hire 3,000 temporary workers as permanent GM employees.
“For too many years, America has stood idly by while industries moved overseas,” said UAW President Ron Gettelfinger. “U.S. autoworkers made a decision: We were fighting for U.S. auto jobs. We made progress at GM, and we’re going to continue to advocate for a strong U.S. manufacturing sector.”
The tentative agreement, reached at 3:05 a.m. Sept. 26,2007, delivers solid economic gains for active and retired members, despite repeated attempts by GM to impose harsh takeaways
The agreement will deliver more than $13,000 in economic gains for a typical UAW member, including a $3,000 signing bonus, two 3 percent lump sums and a 4 percent lump sum.
Active workers will see their comprehensive health care coverage continue, with dental, hearing and other benefits improved. Retired workers will have their health benefits secured by a Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association (VEBA), prefunded by GM with $29.9 billion in cash and other assets. The fund can only be used to pay retiree health benefits, and will remain solvent for decades regardless of the financial condition of GM. So does the GM UAW worker who got TWO 3% raises last year want to give those raises back?? I will settle for them returning the $3000 signing bonus that they got last year…

Posted by: 55Mariposa | December 4, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

What is this? Nothing on Fox News tonight?
Alan Colmes too busy to take your calls?
Can’t wait to find out how you all react when you actually have something substantial to blame Democrats about.
It looks like the Kool-Aid class has finally lost its taste for all things “American.”
It’s about time.

Posted by: Jim Spriggs | December 4, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

Andrew, WHEN does this bailout LOAN receive payment? When one wants a loan, it’s usually because there’s no funds in the pot to continue. So how does a band-aid help a gaping wound???

Posted by: iyamacog | December 4, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

The stupidity and heartlessness of most of these posts is just stunning. This isn’t a joke and believe me EVERY American will pay the price if GM et al go down. If you think “who cares?” about the states of Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Wisconsin, Kentucky etc. just wait till the effects come to your town! It is no exaggeration to say that we will lose virtually our entire manufacturing base in this country-really, what else do we actually PRODUCE here anymore? You think that doesn’t matter? By the way, the only reason Toyota, Honda, BMW and others have plants in the US is because they can’t have access to parts and services without building here; the loss of the suppliers that will fall like dominos will remove their incentive to continue to operate here. They will go off to cheaper locales taking thousands more jobs with them. Do you also know that the mythical $80/hr UAW workers supposedly make is only calculated with the cost of retiree pensions factored in….the foreign auto companies haven’t operated in the US long enough to have retiree costs build up and workers no longer are promised traditional pensions in ANY auto company. Actually salaries vary between union and non-union auto companies by only 3-5 dollars per hour. Is that worth decimating this industry and destroying the unions? You people who are so bitter about Democrats, stupid auto industry executives and union workers who make more than you do need to grow up, get a life and face the facts that this is not some idealogical argument about what industries/companies are better that others; this is about peoples lives, homes, livelihoods and communities. Once again,grow up and display some humanity. Unless you want to watch this country fall to pieces.

Posted by: Margaret | December 4, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

Please don’t refer to LIEberman as a Dem or aligned with Dems

Posted by: Russ | December 4, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Margaret: Are you willing to bail out every company in the US who makes things and is having a diffcult time? Or only the companies with union workers?

Posted by: d of WV | December 4, 2008, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

reaganfan says:
“President Bush has taken enough
unwarranted blame during his term.
Let him go home in peace!
Thank you Mr President for
keeping us safe since the 9/11 attacks!”
Pretty much sums up why the Republican party is done and probably gone for good.

Posted by: Jim Spriggs | December 5, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Margaret…….did you say, ‘WILL’ lose manufacturing?

Posted by: iyamacog | December 5, 2008, 12:01 am 12:01 am

How many of ya’ll know how safe our borders are? Our borders are this safe….U.S. Border Patrol reports and confirmed that there were 54 recorded incursions into the U.S. by Mexican military or other government agents between October 2005 and October 2007. In most of these incursions, the Mexican agents were armed….. I am sure they were chasing the Mexican Drug Cartel but I want THE FENCE built along the Texas & Mexico border…

Posted by: 55Mariposa | December 5, 2008, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Guys, Bush was horrible and voters kicked your lot to the curb.
Now try to remain quiet.

Posted by: T of PDX | December 5, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

You have the politicians who sleep with detroit who sleep with wall street who sleep with the politicians and all you back-biting republican ditto-heads who want absolutely no accountability and all you idiot spineless democrats who want no blame.
Listen to you people. The perfect populace: like barking poodles and chihauhaus yapping at the big rich dogs who pay no attention to your little lives. What a world we Americans have made.

Posted by: lastrefuge | December 5, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am

When will Obama, Pelosi, Reid, etc lead by example and give up their salaries!
Obama is a millionare, so is Pelosi, Kerry, Reid, etc, etc, etc when will they give up their salaries?
The nation could save millions if not billions if politicians around the nation, from BOTH parties gave up their salaries which is paid by our tax dollars.
If Obama is such a great leader who demeaned and belittled CEOs for having such high salaries and bonuses, why doesn’t he lead by example and give up his $400,000 Presidential salary.
Obama, Reid, Pelosi, Kennedy, etc are all millionares, why don’t they give up some of their millions and infuse it into the american economy if they care so much about the poor and middle class?
Where is Obama’s leadership?

Posted by: CJ | December 5, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

cameotoo — 1) The testimony in Congress today indicates that the true need for the BEG3 is somewhere between $75&125Billion for this bailout. 2)The manufacturing facilities of the BEG3 are nothing more than assembly facilities- equal to the transplant facilities. There is really no difference. 75% of the component parts are outsourced. 3) None of the current discussions of this situation indicates the US will give up it’s ability to produce products essential to our military needs. 4) If they can’t figure out how to produce a product that you and I want to buy—- why are we even having a discussion???

Posted by: roscoe02 | December 5, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

ah, depends on how quick a vote you want
while Democrats hold a majority in the chamber, they need to peel away a few Republicans to get the 60 votes required to limit debate, plus not all Dems are in support of this yet.

Posted by: Russ | December 5, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

I just heard that the NFL wants a bailout next, apparently they’ve had a ruff year. Since they have a union I’m sure the Dems will go for that one too, anything for future votes right??

Posted by: ynot | December 5, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Apparently few of you passed US History in high school.
You do remember that “let them all fail and let God sort them out” was the mantra of the Hoover administration, too. THAT turned out well. Typical conservatives to not use their heads and not know their facts or their history.
Yes, a bridge loan is expensive, but not half as expensive as a collapse created by 30 years of conservative policies. Sure, give them the money, then require these giants to do something responsible for the country for once rather than looking to their own overstuffed wallets.

Posted by: Doug K | December 5, 2008, 12:09 am 12:09 am

Morons and thieves cannot solve this economic mess. Bush and the Dems are both morons and thieves. Bush bailed out his banker buddies and the Dems want to payoff the unions who got them elected—get real folks, as long as you call yourself a democrat or republican, you can number yourself under the FOOLS label-taken for a ride by liars, thieves and idiots. Get out of the democratic and republican parties and find yourself a party with some real honest class or watch your country never recover from this mess. If you think Obama can save the US, you are sadly mistaken just as Bush took us for a ride on the border-care about American people he did not or he would not have allowed bad illegals to come here and murder hundreds of citizens while saying silly things like they all came here to work! Total liars all!!!

Posted by: rockychance | December 5, 2008, 12:10 am 12:10 am

I am amused by comments blaming the Democrats for the current economic mess. The main reason we are in this situation is the lifting of regulations over the financial services industry. Most economists say this one reason has brought us this very unique crisis. Phil Gramm, McCain’s economic advisor, more than anyone else, bears much of the blame. He pushed a bill that repealed the depression era Glass-Steagall Act in 1999. This allowed banks to take more risks with less oversight, allowed banks to become brokers, sell insurance and to join the obscenely leveraged world of derivatives. A shadow banking system created at least 80 trillion dollars of derivatives so complicated that no one seems to understand them. Bernanke needed intense tutorials from top hedge fund managers to understand them. These people are con men; criminals. They were leveraged as much as 300 to 1!!! The Republican desire to deregulate all businesses and trust them to be honest was the main cause. Sen Gramm joined the board of UBS after he got the legislation passed and became a lobbyist for the banking industry. UBS gave him a huge payoff and bought Paine webber a few months after the legislation passed. They are currently facing indictments for 3000 cases of tax fraud.

Posted by: Mike | December 5, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Oh Doug, and once they have funds in hand, what do you think they’ll do with it?….And then what? Will they be back in 3 mos for more? Or will it only take a month for them to use it up on, WHAT?

Posted by: iyamacog | December 5, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Posted by: Margaret | Dec 4, 2008 11:56:34 PM
is one of the few really smart people who have posted here. What the heck is wrong with most of you people? I, for one, don’t care to see the Pension Guarantee Corporation utilized to take on the burdens of these massive pension obligations and let the shareholders get off scott-free. Let THEM assume the risks, and let THEM pay back these loans we need to make.
The auto manufacturers need to do what ever other company that needs to raise cash must do. Slash the prices (and I mean slash), sell all that inventory and then fire up the manufacturing again.
Stop trying to force a long, miserable depression onto the rest of us. Think it through.

Posted by: Jeff | December 5, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

You guys do realize when these people lose their jobs and cant pay their mortgages… The GVT will have to throw another 500 billion into the banks to cover the losses on those foreclosures.
But most of you only think about the immediate future.

Posted by: mcfail | December 5, 2008, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Ironic, the idiot president gave congress the same ultimatum: pass this three page bailout or the sky would fall. How quickly you republicans forget it was this clown that called for the bailout to begin with. ……and they wonder why they lost and chose Palin as their hero!

Posted by: Beverly from Colorado Springs | December 5, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

If you raise your hand and swear to defend the American people against harm and you do not, you should go directly to jail—-Most of Washinton failed us and belongs in jail!!!!!

Posted by: rockychance | December 5, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

The big question is whether or not it would actually do any good. A loan that will probably work, why not? A loan that is just one of many others down the line maybe that won’t be paid back and folks lose their jobs anyway? But there is no crystal ball on this.
The fact that it’s a whole type of American industry, and not just a specific company, is what’s weird. If they’re pressured to make more expensive cars with more expensive emission controls and mileage improvement gadgets then they’ll be in more trouble because who can afford to buy them?
In a free market, people buy what they think is the best product, and if for many that product is foreign-made then so be it. But, why they (American car companies) aren’t offering a better line of products is something I don’t understand. It’s almost as if they expect to stay in business just because they’re there.
I’d be on board if they’d start making ’57 Chevys and ’68 Mustangs again.

Posted by: Grand Old Party | December 5, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

“Bush’s new Katrina: the economy. Isn’t there anything that Bush touched that didn’t turn to poo poo?”
Illegal Immigration. It’s booming

Posted by: Margo | December 5, 2008, 12:13 am 12:13 am

d of WV:
I am no union worker; I am the daughter of a former GM manager. Manager, not executive. I know first hand how difficult the unions were to deal with in the 70′s and 80′s but those days are LONG gone…My point is that UAW workers are paid a comparable wage to other auto workers in the US and are given a bum rap. As for bailing out other failing industries we do that every day; the Republicans simply pick and chose who to help. You think an oil company would be allowed to go belly up? The simple fact is that the sheer number of people who would be personally impacted by the lose of the auto companies is astromomical. Unlike the failure of your local Burger King. That is sheer fact, and my personal bias-and I admit that I have one-has nothing to do with it.

Posted by: Margaret | December 5, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

So let me get this straight. The Republicans said the economy would crash unless we have bankers on Wall Street $700 BILLION dollars, but they won’t even given the American auto industry $34 Billion? And even after we gave Wall Street this money, they are still withholding credit from people which is the root cause of the auto crisis?
And Republicans wonder why they just lost this election in a landslide. Keep it up Pukes and you won’t ever win another election in this century.
Always go with the workers over the bankers. That’s just common sense.

Posted by: Sophia | December 5, 2008, 12:14 am 12:14 am

Andrew………I am not against a bail out….what I am against is OUR gov’t handing over 34 billion dollars to the Big 3 without any strings attached….there are NO concessions from the UAW, who is the MAJOR reason why the Big 3 are going down and sinking fast. GM UAW worker makes $75 an hour—$25 in wages and $50 in benefits. Toyota worker makes $40 an hour—-$25 in wages and $15 in benefits. Do the math…75-40= $35 an hour difference in pay between GM & Toyota..$35 X 40 hours X 52 weeks x 150,000 UAW workers = 10.5 BILLION DOLLARS difference in pay between a GM & Toyota worker for ONE YEAR….in the 2007 Contract that the UAW received on Sept. 26,2007, The UAW President Gettlefinger negociated the “JOB BANK PROGRAM” which guarantees NEARLY FULL wages & benefits for worker who lose their jobs due to automation or plant closure…….They get paid up to a year if they are unemployed…UAW worker gets free child care, 68 paid holidays over the next 4 years…that is 12 paid holidays a year. How many paid holidays do you get in a year? 9 or 10 which is the standard in the REAL NON union world…. All these benefits/perks for the UAW worker cost money and where is the company going to get the money to pay for ALL their PERKS…US the hard working tax payers…sorry but I only get 9 paid holidays, and my employer pays for my health insurance. My employer doesn’t pay for my spouse & or my kids to be on my insurance plan like GM does for the UAW worker….

Posted by: 55Mariposa | December 5, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

YOU GUYS BETTER SPEED IT UP
THE BIG THREE AUTO KEEP INCREASING
THE BAILOUT REQUEST AT THE RATE THEY
ARE GOING IT WILL BE 50 BILLION SOON…
COULD IT BE THEY NEED ABOUT SAY
5 BILLION A MONTH FOREVER…..
AND NOW ABOUT THAT BRIDGE TO NO WHERE

Posted by: Anita Yova | December 5, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Ok, you absolutely HAVE to have the 4WD SUV. Do you want an $7,000.00 used Toyata 4Runner with 150,000 miles or a new $42,000.00 Yukon (you have to pay for your choice). Oh, both vehicles will have equal longevity.
Let’s vote.

Posted by: Russ | December 5, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

It’s really not that difficult. First of all, we simply can’t let millions of workers go on the unemployment lines (I don’t give a rats #ss about the execs) – so – give them the money but make all of the execs resign (with NO parachutes except lead ones) – cut the middle management pay by 30 – 40% – and let the union workers buy into the companies. Then make sure that they agree to build cars that can compete with the Japanese within 5 years. Let the execs eat $%#t

Posted by: truth-or-consequences | December 5, 2008, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Just to add to the thought for the dummies to understand. European and Japanese car makers made smaller and more efficient vehicles because that is what people wanted. They wanted them because gas was expensive in their countries due to high government taxes on gas. In the good old US of A, could a government put a big tax on gas? No way, it is after all, AMERICA where you better not tax me. It’s my money. And I can buy big cars and trucks because this is America! Well, how did that work out for you?

Posted by: Smart Guy | December 5, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

The con’s suffered an unmerciful crushing defeat and have nowhere to turn. Explains a lot of the bitterness here.

Posted by: T in PDX | December 5, 2008, 12:17 am 12:17 am

The UAW is a scam. It is a system designed to steal money from companies and shareholders. It turned a powerhouse of American ingenuity and turned it into a welfare system for democrat voters. Sure, you hate capitalism except when you steal from it.

Posted by: UAW Scam | December 5, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

I think the big 3 should get bridge loans out of the TARP funds. Obviously, Paulson doesn’t know what to do with the money. Thus far, he’s spread it around to banks that are reluctant to loan it out, and to AIG, a company that will be giving its executives “cash awards” (not bonuses), amounting to millions. Well, THAT worked out well, didn’t it?
I don’t look for Bush to do any decision-making right now. He’s too busy helping Karl Rove re-write history and spin his (Bush’s) legacy. What a jerk!

Posted by: Big 3 need loans | December 5, 2008, 12:18 am 12:18 am

These big3 CEOs figured out a way to spend an additional $9B while they drove in their hybrids?? Hybrids that are about 10yrs behind the Prius??
And they blame the whole sorry state of affairs on the ecomony? Oh please! spare us the condescension and take some ownership of your screw-ups.
No bailout without a top-level housecleaning at these companies.

Posted by: Neel | December 5, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Those who resist helping the Big Three, how would you justify not helping them out.
Think about if your father worked in the auto industry.
Come on dudes. We gave those thieves and body snatchers on wall street help. They screwed millions of American out of more money then we throw away on Bush’s legacy. I think it had something to do with WMD’s. Of course the war wasn’t Bush’s fault. He had faulty intelligence,you understand.

Posted by: John Preamble | December 5, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am

D of WV *** Obama never voted on anything—– The only vote he knows is “Present”!

Posted by: roscoe02 | December 5, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Bush and his partners in crimes the Senate and House Republicans have no problem bailing out and giving hundreds of billions to the banks and the white collar works with like or no safe guards or questions asked. But let it come to the auto industry and the blue collar works the Republicans say no. The only real reason behind this to to bust the UAW union and any chances of law being passed to help workers get unions in the future. I want to remind you Republicans out there that 2010 will be another election that you will see your numbers once more go down because you do not relate to what most people want, and just your ever shrinking base wants. I look for the day that the Republican party is no more.

Posted by: bob wright | December 5, 2008, 12:20 am 12:20 am

If the UAW and other unions go down, the Republican party goes down and ceases being a political party in the U.S.
You will create a backlash of those “Reagan Republicans” against the GOP because they will be broke, jobless, and wondering why the GOP sold them out.
They will get to see the real GOP for what it is…a corporate lackey solely interested in what’s good for business instead of people. They will wake from their slumber after all these years and return to the Democratic party. Ohio will go the way of California and never vote for another Republican again. You can say the same for the entire Mid-West. The Southwest is already trending the Dem’s way. The Northeast is gone for good. The Southeast is also trending towards Democrats.
Pretty soon the GOP will only have 2 or 3 states in the South and Idaho, Utah, Kansas, and Oklahoma to lie to. You can’t have a political party if you’re only competitive in a handful of states.
Way to go Republicans. You’ve ruined your own party by selling out the common man.

Posted by: Sophia | December 5, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

Jeremy, I wish I had written your last post myself.
Beautiful!
Tell it like it is bro.

Posted by: John Preamble | December 5, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

The dems support global warming nonsense and now can’t deal with the results.

Posted by: Global Warming | December 5, 2008, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Mike……….you were almost correct whith your facts…The Glass Steagall Act was repealed under Clinton by Clinton’s buddy Greenspan, ROBERT RUBIN & Sandy Weill. Who did the merger on Travelers, Salomon Smith Barnery & Citibank….

Posted by: 55Mariposa | December 5, 2008, 12:24 am 12:24 am

You people seem to forget a few things:
1. The auto industry helped build this country to where it is now and helped win a WWII. The auto industry was there for us and we owe them a loan.
2. Fixing the economy by letting millions lose jobs? Wrong answer. We need to repair the manufacturing industry in this country and the auto industry is the way to start fixing things.
3. ITS A LOAN! WE THE TAXPAYERS WILL MAKE MONEY BY LOANING THEM MONEY! We gave them money before and they paid it back.
4. If you want better cars and a voice in the direction the industry goes, you loan them money with caveats. Not giving them money means they will owe us nothing after they restructure.
5. Filing bankruptcy will allow the Big 3 to DUMP their pensions and money they owe to their workers, sending the economy into a death spiral. And WE will have to cover those plans
6. The average UAW makes $28 an hour, not $80–thats a inflated number the Big 3 use because theyre adding in pensions and other health benefits they owe to all their workers past and present.

Posted by: cal5000 | December 5, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

Blame Bush as long as we could! What a pair of losers.

Posted by: Mineko | December 5, 2008, 12:25 am 12:25 am

It’s time to nationalize the Big 3, and put them to work building green transportation vehicles – cars, mass transit buses, trains, etc.

Posted by: JaneC | December 5, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

THIS JUST IN THE BIG 3 AUTO MAKERS
WILL GO ON STRIKE UNTIL THEIR
REQUEST ARE COMPLIED WITH….
want to bet how that will end?

Posted by: Anita Yova | December 5, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

I say help out the big three BUT attach some strict strings…for instance give them five years to develop cars that get over 100 mpg.
The thought of just bailing out the auto industry makes me cringe, but I think this is an incredible and unprecedented opportunity to force their hand and steer them down a path that is in our nations interest (get off oil, cleaner air, better auto products).

Posted by: Aaron | December 5, 2008, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Most of you anti-Democrat-minded people are missing the entire purpose of going to the White House. The Dems are saying that they do not believe they can get enough votes through the House in support of a bailout for the auto industry. If it doesn’t get through the House, it can’t be voted on in the Senate. Get it?
But, I think they SHOULD call a vote – just so the entire world can see all of the scumbag Democrats AND Republicans who would vote against the workers, and who don’t seem to give a rat’s ass about the prospect of seeing Depression 2.0.

Posted by: Jade | December 5, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Have an employee owned company.
Give each employee half of their present salary in stock
Let them decide who they want to lead the company.
If they work hard and make the right decisions they will reap the rewards and see their stock skyrocket.
If they bicker and do nothing they will suffer the consequenses.

Posted by: HERB PLASTER | December 5, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

The administrationg should not think twice about LENDING $34 or $100 or $200 billion dollars to this important AMERICAN industry. Toyota, Honda, Hyuandia only employ a small percentage of their workforce here in the non-union south where they also get hefty incentives from the southern states to locate some factories there. Not to mention that the vast majority of foreign auto manufactures’ workers have health care provided as a benefit for being a citizen! Talk about stupidity, if this administration does not provide direct aid (like every other industrialized & smart country is doing for their automakers right now) then this country will be headed for a depression and not just a recession.

Posted by: Patrick | December 5, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

About time the Dems got off their dead arses and decided to do something positive. The ramifications of the Big 3 going down are unthinkable. This would only hasten the burgeoning 3rd world economy that the Republicans have brought about thru deregulation.

Posted by: puciret | December 5, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

There has been zero accountability from Paulson about where this money has gone: likely part of the ongoing heist enacted by the GOP BUSH/CHENEY. Some of you folks who are such staunch supporters of all things GOP should take a look at KBR’s treatment of our troops in IRAQ . . . There is a good deal of corroborating testimony about a war profiteer with deep roots in the administration treating our troops worse than the enemy. As far as the auto industry goes, the bigwigs are all connected to big oil. They have obstructed ANY and ALL legislation that might have actually helped them avoid the moment they have come to. Why enable. At the very least, these mega corporations should be broken down into smaller separately run facilities so that there can be more transparency, nimbleness and accountability. You also need to hold your GOP leadership for their role in taking all kinds of money and jobs off shore, in an effort to deliberately enrich themselves while lowering the standard of living for most other Americans. Love of Country?
Love of Jesus? I don’t think so. I think Jesus weeps for the way a lot of GOP sheep have been duped by the likes of worthless egos like Limbaugh, Hannity and Bush.

Posted by: Septima | December 5, 2008, 12:28 am 12:28 am

Aaron: What do you do if they do not build a car that gets 100 mpg in 5 years? What do you do if people do not buy whatever car they make?

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

34 billion dollars is a cheap 3 months in Iraq. What a waste that is. And the alternative to the Big 3 LOAN is putting about how many million people out of work. The Repubs sure have their priorities in order.

Posted by: John R. | December 5, 2008, 12:29 am 12:29 am

I think the problem is a lot deeper than people here realize and I don’t feel I have enough information to make the final decision that so many here are quick to make.
The car industry, while making many mistakes over the years, seems to be in the current “Crisis” because nobody can afford to buy a car now, or get credit to buy a car now. Maybe we have the Wall Street fiasco to blame for that and not just the auto industry?
IF we are to bail out Wall Street and in a completely ineffective way so far, why is the Auto industry not worthy?
Paulson has changed his mind so many times on how to attack the Wall Street problem, it’s obvious no one in Washington has a clue what they are doing. It seems a little senseless to point fingers at the Democrats when both parties are clearly to blame for both of these problems.
The real problem seems to me to be FAILURE TO WORK TOGETHER FOR THE COMMON GOOD. The parties are so quick to draw lines and stand opposed rather than search out common ground and stand together. AND THAT IS BOTH PARTIES FAULT.
I’d like us to stop trying to assess blame and get to the root of these problems and work together rather than try to divide the country in camps and hurl insults at each other.
Can we try that for a at least 90 days and see if it helps?

Posted by: Marcus Aurelius | December 5, 2008, 12:31 am 12:31 am

It is so pitiful that we allowed Bush/Paulson to emergency BAILOUT all their friends on Wall Street but will not lift ONE FINGER to help people like ourselves. Republicans are such hypocrites. All the big oil boys made millions and now that their SHIELD will no longer be in office look at the price of gas. The de-regulators are being put out of Washington and look at what their friends did to the economy before they left. Now people like you and I, approximately 3,000,000, will lose their jobs, homes and God only knows what else, and we act like it’s too much to try and save them. I wonder how you’ll feel when it’s the company YOU WORK FOR?!?!?

Posted by: bChandra | December 5, 2008, 12:32 am 12:32 am

OK, for an idea, how about a bailout that is not given to the autocompanies but to consumers. Give $5K to consumers that purchase a new car from a dealer that offers $2K discount on cars over 25MPG. Consumers choose the make model they want, American or not.

Posted by: david | December 5, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

The UAW goes down, guess what GOP, you can kiss all your elections good bye. Reagan Democrats will flock back to the Democratic Party because they will be broke living in a tent city.
That’s what Republicans want. Everyone can’t create out of thin air a credit default swap. This country needs to actually make things. Our trade deficits are so large because we import absolutely everything into this country with no restrictions. This undermines our own workers.
For all of you lazzie faire Republicans who think the demise of the Big 3 won’t touch you, you just wait. You’ll soon find out how important this industry is. There will be an unstoppable domino effect on all industries. And what will be left standing?
Walmart, McDonalds, and bankers. The bankers will continue on with the assistance of the Republicans.
When you find yourself fighting tooth and nail to get a job as a Walmart greeter, remember how you sold out the blue collar worker in America.
If the Big 3 go down, get used to not being the number 1 economy in the world anymore.
And Republicans, get used to being in the wilderness for generations to come because you will never win another election in this century.

Posted by: Sophia | December 5, 2008, 12:33 am 12:33 am

I wish we wouldn’t bail them out , then the idiots on this site would once and for all see what a real recession/depression looks like. You people are fools,
probably the same people attacking universal health care that I wish would get some horrible disease and run out of money only to end up getting dumped on the streets of Los Angeles
wow this is amazing

Posted by: bwood | December 5, 2008, 12:35 am 12:35 am

The UAW and the Big 3 describe their economic importance to the USA as so large that they literally run the country.In other words, they are the rulers – we are the beholden!If so, how did we get into this spot? Or is it a lie? I think the latter. If they can bluff the citizens into believing this then we deserve what they will give us.
Without them the hole they will leave in our ecomomy will fill quickly and easily by others – and maybe Detroit and similar cities in disastrous straits will become the”shining cities on the hill” again.

Posted by: maynard | December 5, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

The UAW and the Big 3 describe their economic importance to the USA as so large that they literally run the country.In other words, they are the rulers – we are the beholden!If so, how did we get into this spot? Or is it a lie? I think the latter. If they can bluff the citizens into believing this then we deserve what they will give us.
Without them the hole they will leave in our ecomomy will fill quickly and easily by others – and maybe Detroit and similar cities in disastrous straits will become the”shining cities on the hill” again.

Posted by: maynard | December 5, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

Yes, by all mean’s blame it on the Dem’s. When are you people going to own up to the fact that this IS Bush’s fault,and the Republican’s who RAN the show for 6 year’s fault. Those bastards need to take responsibility for once. AND you idiot’s who kept voting for them.

Posted by: Teas | December 5, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

My information on Phil Gramm did not come from left wing blogs. It came first from conservative economists and, after I saw what had happened, it was fleshed out by old fashioned research. There is a reason regulations are needed for most industries. Greed gets out of control and in the name of profit, corners are cut on safety and too many risks are taken with money management. Just as there are traffic laws and laws on our behavior, i.e stealing, assault, etc., there are regulations on industry so they won’t screw the public. And, speaking of anti regulation politicians, was it McCain who said he wanted to deregulate the health care industry just like Republicans deregulated the financial industry? I really admire McCain, but he spent too much time with the Phil Gramms of the world! After the Keating 5 scandal he should have learned.

Posted by: Mike | December 5, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am

Stop dumping on workers. UAW workers do NOT get $75/hour.
Where does that come from? Andrew Ross Sorkin at the NYTimes. He was the one who wrote, “At General Motors, the average worker is paid $70 an hour including health care and pension costs.” This has been picked up by Charles Krauthammer and Newt Gingrich and every facts optional conservative and sadly a lot of effort optional liberals and independents. And it’s false. It’s a way to come up with a big outlandish sexy number and a way blame the workers in the union for the disaster in Detroit.
The Center for Automotive Research said that the average hourly wage at GM, Chrysler and Ford last year was not $70 an hour, but $28 an hour.
Where does that crazy figure of $70 come from?
If you take all the hourly wages the Big Three are paying their employees and add the health benefits they get and you add in their pensions and you add in what the companies pay in health care to their retired workers and you add in the pensions they pay to retired workers and you add in the money they pay to the surviving spouses of the dead retired workers, you take that big number and then you divide it by the number of hours actually worked by just the active auto industry employees, your answer is then 70. It’s like asking what is the average salary of everyone in the United States. Then you add in the Social Security check being sent to anybody who is retired but then you only divide it by the number of active workers. It’s mathematically and intellectually dishonest. The guys in Detroit in dread of their jobs vanishing before Christmas are making $28 an hour, maybe $38 with benefits and pension. Now they are also getting this $70 an hour fabrication thrown at them. All thanks to the intellectually dishonest Andrew Ross Sorkin and the New York Times.

Posted by: B.N.N. | December 5, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am

Why should the taxpayers pay for the bad business decisions of the automakers? I’ve not learned anything from business school that says, “When your business fails, charge the taxpayers for it.” What I learned is that when a business fails, the owner suffers the loss.
The government will be better off spending the money for infrastructure projects that will provide work for those who will lose their jobs in the auto industry, instead of wasting it on cars that people won’t buy. At least, the people will benefit from the new roads and bridges that will be constructed.

Posted by: RFBorjal | December 5, 2008, 12:39 am 12:39 am

55Mariposa,
Sophia is right about Republican prospects post-auto failure Depression. You obviously don’t realize that the “smart” state of Kentucky is home to 3 Ford and one GM plants and many suppliers. So I don’t care how many racists and fundamentalists live there, they will no longer be voting Republican! And I can say this, because I live in Kentucky! (At many times a great embarassment).

Posted by: Margaret | December 5, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

55Mariposa said, in part:
“the “JOB BANK PROGRAM” which guarantees NEARLY FULL wages & benefits for worker who lose their jobs due to automation or plant closure…”
Isn’t this kind of like what CEOs, CFOs, sports coaches, sports players, etc., etc., etc. get if they’re fired or cut or injured? I don’t agree with all of the “perks” that UAW members are getting, but the UAW has already made concessions and, as I understand it, is willing to make more. And at the end of the day, when an employee has put in 40 years of his/her life on a factory floor, is there any reason why he shouldn’t have a decent pension to live on?
My husband is a retired union carpenter. During his working years, he made a decent living, but he worked his a$$ off. During his career, he got NO (that’s right, NO) paid holidays (you don’t work, you don’t get paid); he got NO paid vacation (if we took a vacation, it was on our dime…no pay); he got NO paid sick days (again, no work gets you no pay). We did get health insurance paid, but now that he’s retired, we buy it ourselves. He DOES have an adequate pension – but he earned it.
The UAW is NOT the boogey-man in this whole thing. But it’s the UAW members that will be hurting the most if our government lets them go belly-up. The guys at the top, who did this, will (as always) come out smelling like a rose. We MUST save our auto industry.

Posted by: Don't lose the auto industry | December 5, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am

This playground is getting too muddy.
I’m taking my marbles elsewhere, where older kids know how to play.

Posted by: iyamacog | December 5, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

First off let me remind the majority of the low information posters who are well who else NeoCons. This is not a bail out but a loan. Also, if the big 3 go down it will create a economic catastrophic event not scene since the great depression. It will have a ripple effect that would have unconscionable consequences. Beginning at the Auto Plant working its way through the supplier networks, to the Diners who supply meals for the shift workers, to the coffee stands across the street to the office supply store around the corner. For those of you who think you would be safe cause you live outside the rust belt are sadly mistaken.

Posted by: Dave | December 5, 2008, 12:42 am 12:42 am

55Mariposa,
First of all, get your facts straight. Obama blew McCain away in Iowa. He WON that state. lol. You fail to realize that all the Democrats need is OHIO and the Republicans will never win another election ever again. D’uh.
Plus, states like KS, KY, LA, etc, have combined, a total population less than California or even MI/OH. Republicans only win states where NOBODY lives. But keep it up. We’ll even start taking states like TN, KY, and Texas when people in those states realize that the GOP only stands for Wall Street and big corporations.
The country’s demographics are changing fast and they are going against the GOP. The Republican party will become extinct within the next decade. Count on it.
____________________
Sophia..You forgot about Texas, Lousianna, Mississippi, Alabama, TN, Iowa, Kansas, KY,…all voted for McCain. At least there are still a few SMART people in those states… Only the states like Michigan, Ohio, California that are big UNION states voted for the dumb Azs Dem’s and their hand outs….

Posted by: Sophia | December 5, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Many don’t work for the auto industry and the industries we work in never got bailouts.
Why the Big 3 so special? Nobody else making cars in this country? At least the transplants are using American suppliers,the Big 3 don’t even do much of that anymore because of the UAW costs.
American made cars aren’t made in America, they are only assembled here.
I say good riddance to all involved. You did it to yourselves, not deregulation (which Bush hasn’t deregulated anything), not the housing crisis (which was brought on by the GSE’s), and certainly not Iraq.
You did this to yourselves and YOU need to bailout yourself, not me.

Posted by: Lee Iacocca | December 5, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am

Hey I got an idea. Lets get rid of the unions and the 40 hour work week and the minium wage. Let’s teach those bums in congress. by punishing all the businesses related to the auto industry. Sure the japanese companies are just waiting to take over. I can’t believe that the majority of this country wants to punish the workers. So be it. But we need the big three and if you doubt it ask yourself how am I affected by the auto industry. You might be surprised by the answer.
Companies like Goodyear will be hurt.
Chemical companies and polymer companies will be hurt. textile companies. Steel companies. Mom and pop restaurants. Newspapers and TV stations. Macy’s JC Penny’s Sears.
Losing the automotive companies or lettingthem fail is like setting of an atomic bomb on ourselves. We don’t subsidize our auto industry like other countries. We are just willing to let it all fall down because we are angry. Well let reasoned thought prevail. Let’s not play russian roulette with our futures and those of our children.
The UAW is not the enemy. Yes the have been some generous contracts in the past. but currently the UAW has a two tier wage system. The older guys make more money and the new guys coming in have a longer time to get to the higher wage.
Health care is a major factor to the troubles of the auto industry. People live longer and are costing the companies more because of retiree benifits. Now God Bless GM, Ford and Chrysler because they thought enough of their workers to agree to retiree benefits. Some places after a lifetime of work it’s out the door with you and hope you saved your money cause we ain’t helping.
So stop all the Union bashing. THe foreign auto plants wouldn’t pay as well as they do it it weren’t for the UAW. If it wasn’t for unions We’d all be working six days a week 12 to 16 hour days for whatever wage our company wanted to pay us. I don’t think anyone wants to go back to that time. We need to grow up and realize that our fellow workers need help. We as a nation need to do business like our competitors. We need to national health care. Take that burden of the backs of our businesses. Loan the big three the money. give us a car credit for buying an american car. do away with that silly credit for buying an oversized vehicle which lead to everyone who owned a business going out and buying hummers and other gas hogs. God help us. Cause giving the auto industry a loan is helping ourselves too.

Posted by: MikeC | December 5, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Margaret — there is also a huge Toyota facility in Kentucky as well!

Posted by: roscoe02 | December 5, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am

No bailout! No one bailed me out from the three lemons I bought from Detroit that had lots of time left on their warranties but had multiple problems they tried to get out of fixing. Their cars are junk and they knew it and didn’t care. I have NO sympathy for them. They did it to themselves. I will NEVER by another American car! NEVER!

Posted by: marew | December 5, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

I usually blog about biking, but my Ford just died while the auto bailout has been in the news. I decided not to buy another one, the taxpayer bailout will be giving enough of my money to the big three. See how I foudn a way to get a reliable american car at http://bicyclespokesman.com/wheres-my-auto-bailout/

Posted by: Mike | December 5, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am

Marcus…what do you say to a UAW President Gettlefinger, who tells you that the Union is not going to give up any concessions? And if you force us to give up concessions we will go on STRIKE….. The following needs to happen for me in order for OUR Gov’t to hand the Big 3 $100 billion dollars.
1. All salary employees will have to take a min of a 10% pay cut. 2. NO performance bonus for the UAW worker 3. No JOB BANK PROGRAM that pays a laid off UAW worker 90% of his wages & benefits up to one year. 4. UAW can’t go on strike for 10 years 5. No more pension plans 6. No more health insurance pension plans 7. No more pay raises for UAW, Salary employees. 8. No more free child care 9. The Big 3 will provide PAID health insurance to the employee ONLY…no spouse no depend coverage unless the employee pays for their coverage. 10 Only 9-10 paid holidays. 11. No getting paid while your machine is being repaired. 12. UAW can’t tell the Big 3 which cars are to be manufactured at this plant or that plant…yes this is in their latest contract. 13. NO OVER TIME….. 14. Reduce the number of dealerships in the US by 30% GM has 7000 dealerships compared to Toyota’s 1500 dealerships. 15. Reduce the number of styles of cars 16. Reduce the number of lines of cars…GM produces Cadillac, Saab, Buick, Pontiac, GMC, Saturn, Chevrolet and Hummer…GM needs to elimiate 4 of those lines. 17. Board of Directors need to return the last 3 years of stock options and pay. 18. Any Executive that has received stock options in the last 3 years need to return all proceeds that they made when they sold the stocks. 19. In one year if the bleeding is not stopped,and the company breaking even then let the doors stay open. if not close the company down. 20. Leave 40% of the bail out money for the suppliers… to bridge the gap to nowhere. I think….that are ALL my requirements that I want MY Gov’t to demand the
Big 3 & the UAW to do in order to receive $100 billion dollars to cover their expensives for the next 4 months.

Posted by: 55Mariposa | December 5, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

Bad mouthing Bush is a waste of time
his record speaks for itself
bailout keep on dreaming……

Posted by: Anita Yova | December 5, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am

Margaret: If you are embarrsed with kentucky why don’t you move to Michigan. The big 3 car companies are located there. A lot of union workers are located there. And Michigan has some of the highest state taxes int eh country–jsut raised them you know.

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am

Polls show 60% of America is against the bailout for Ford, GM, and Chrysler. Unless 60% of America is Republican, stop putting the blame on them. Didn’t Obama get 52% of the vote? that means 8% of Democrats must hate America too.
Chapter 11 is the only way.

Posted by: Tom | December 5, 2008, 12:48 am 12:48 am

Blame it on the Dems…
Blame it on the Dems…
How stupid can these Pavlov Dog Republicans with their fake purest idiology – “no bail out!” “no bail out.” mantra.
Dude when your house is on fire – put out the freaking blaze – don’t stand and debate the merits of your trickle down the sinkhole economics. What am I talking about. We can “save,” a country from Saddam and spend trillions, but we won’t help Detroit? Why b/c we got a bunch of fools and clowns that think that tax breaks are the panacea for everything even the common cold – and that idiology of the Milton Friedman is the coolest thing.
Dude read a little bit of Keynes – and learn something other than talking points!

Posted by: Jackson | December 5, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Way to go Dems; time to stand up to this idiot who probably still thinks “the fundamentals of the economy are still strong.”

Posted by: Hopeful Patriot | December 5, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Tom:
It is even higher–12%

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

This bailout will go through, it’ll just come after Obama becomes President. You idiot Republicans will think you have won something and scream about the Dems giving away all this money and the public has spoken, blah, blah, blah.
Everyone will laugh at you given your dismissal economic record of the past 8 years.
Then we Democrats will get all the credit for having saved the American auto industry. MILLIONS OF PEOPLE, whose jobs will be saved, will favor the Democrats for a generation or more (kind of like what happened after the Great Depression with Roosevelt).
You Republicans won’t win Michigan, Pennsylvania, OHIO, Missouri and all those other midwestern states again. Thus you’ll never win another national election in our lifetime.
You people are far and away the dumbest SOB’s on Planet Earth. Honestly. That’s no joke. Like the saying goes: you would honestly cut off your nose just to spite your face.
Enjoy opposition, you’ll be there for a while.

Posted by: jp | December 5, 2008, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Roscoe02;
One Toyota plant doesn’t make up for the loss of GM and Ford. By the way, I guess you guys won’t mind paying my 80 year old mother’s pension when GM fails, because you will be….you will be paying for her pension through the Guarantee Corporation as well as thousands of others. Better start saving!

Posted by: Margaret | December 5, 2008, 12:51 am 12:51 am

“Why not give everybody in America a $5000.00 car credit to use with only American car makers? At least we would get some good out of the deal and it would help auto makers too? No, that makes too much sense.”
Because . . . that would help US. Can’t have that. Have to have all the spoils go to cronies. Which in the Democrats case, include the unions.

Posted by: Alana | December 5, 2008, 12:52 am 12:52 am

Henry Paulson is a financial man, he was with Sach, before he joined Bush administration. He’ll do anything using tax payer’s money to help his financial buddies. Lehman Bros was Sach’s competitor so Paulson let Lehman disappeared. D3 need a higher up person in Bush administration to sweet talk Bush into bailing them out.
D3 not only failed to introduce reliable fuel efficient vehicles for the US market they also let production cost run out of control. Starting with their executive pay which run in the millions of dollars to the unreasonable union’s job bank. The problem is a CEO making more than $10 million plus benefits no doubt cannot be successful in getting labor’s agreement to pay or benefit cuts. Actually D3 labor is relatively underpaid if pay ratio of D3 CEO vs worker is compared to that of US foreign auto makers. Furthermore D3 wouldn’t be in such a sad shape as they are now if they hadn’t lobbied so hard against improving fuel efficiency when Pres. Clinton was in office.

Posted by: ctla567 | December 5, 2008, 12:53 am 12:53 am

“I’m carrying so much pork [home to Texas] I’m beginning to get trichinosis.”

Posted by: budget hawk Phil Graham | December 5, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

Jp; You have displayed such deep thought in your presentation of the facts and opinions. Clearly the work of someone who has studied this issue for years. Let me ask you for an additonal thought or two. Who will buy all of the cars that the bailout will keep the companies afloat so they can build? And if the bailout helps the big 3, I assume the US workers at the 12 foreign plants in the US will lose all or many of their jobs. These are US workers and US taxpayers. What do we do to help them. Give them a bail out? Or do you not care becasue they arenot union workers?

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

The United States is short step away from economic depression, a thing so bad that any one of us would look back upon today from next year and wish we had the chance to give the Big 3 ten times as much money.
We cannot let those jobs go under. If those jobs are lost it will bring us all down.
You who say you would never bail them out will wish a year from now that you could go back in time and shine those executive’s shoes and fetch them drinks if it could stop the hell this country has become because we didn’t stop the depression – now! while we have the chance.
These times, now, these economic times are different than all others that we can imagine – it is as bad as it can possibly get – now.
We don’t even have time to argue. We have to do, or to support, every effort to stop an economic depression now! – or we will have one.

Posted by: C.P.T.L. | December 5, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Amazing. Reading these comments makes me afraid for my country. Hello to all the idiots against the bailout. You already destroyed this country, now you must sacrifice to build it back.

Posted by: Max | December 5, 2008, 12:55 am 12:55 am

Don’t believe everything you hear on the news little bo sheeps. There is a whole lot more at stake than Ford, GM & Chisler. The disasterous past 8 years is right on Republican’s sagging shoulders. Don’t infect the real world with your idiocy anymore. Shut up and watch how adults handle government

Posted by: Augustus | December 5, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

RFBorjal— Glad to see a sensable posting here— Some of this stuff is just nuts!— I hope you are in business to make money as opposed to receive money!

Posted by: roscoe02 | December 5, 2008, 12:56 am 12:56 am

I wonder what a Toyota will cost when GM, Ford and Chrysler are gone?

Posted by: Ian | December 5, 2008, 12:57 am 12:57 am

MikeC…….sorry to disappoint you but if Ford, GM didn’t agree with the UAW then the union worker went on Strike…so FORD & GM had no choice but to give into their demands….90% of the business in the REAL World do NOT have a Pension plan. The business leaves it up to the EMPLOYEE to save or spend their money the way they see fit. We save our money instead of buying big screen tv’s, Infact we don’t even have a sterio sytem in the house. We save our money…..and live within our means. My daughter told me that she was deprive 6th grader because she didn’t have a cell phone….She finally got a cell phone in 8th grade….

Posted by: 55Mariposa | December 5, 2008, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Ian: There are other car companies!

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 12:59 am 12:59 am

Bush will go down in history as the most disgracefully, CRIMINALLY incompetent president in the history of this country. If he lets the auto industry go down the tubes – 3 million + American jobs – that means a DEPRESSION as bad as the last one, and the Republican party will shoulder the FULL blame and will NEVER rise again. $700 BILLION for all the useless CRIMINAL parasites on wall street who produce absolutely NOTHING, but not a penny for the working man who built this nation up from nothing. That’s the CRIMINAL INSANITY of the RepuliCONN Party.

Posted by: Worker Rob | December 5, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am

d of WV:
I moved to Kentucky from Michigan; I LOVE Michigan! It is a wonderful state with intelligent, open-minded people and I wish I could still live there. I was there a few weeks ago, visiting my old home in Oakland County and the whole state looks (and feels) like a bomb went off there…it is heartbreaking. Kentucky has nothing on the states of Ohio (where I actually grew up) and Michigan. It is a provincial state filled with a lot of stupid people and I live in the most liberal part of the state. Don’t try and give me this red state song-and dance; people here almost never have decent insurance (unless they work for the University or the state) and feel lucky to make $12/hr. I made more than that working a part time job at Banana Republic 10 years ago in Michigan! The South is a hellhole.

Posted by: Margaret | December 5, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am

The market price for GM is $3 billion. Pay the shares off at $6 B and buy the thing. Then operate it without the guilt of worrying if it will fold. Throw in Chrysler for a few $B more. Create an American Car Manufacturer, specifically kept going to preserve the industrial base in the USA. Consider this the government’s investment in maintaining that industrial base.
If you want to remove a great deal of social costs from the auto manufacturers then provide a universal national health care, payed from income taxes. A savings in paper work, removal of the cause of 1/2 of all bankruptcies, and a generally more stable life for Americans.

Posted by: Nick Radonic | December 5, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

budget hawk Phil Graham — let me help you, my freezer is empty!

Posted by: roscoe02 | December 5, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

55Mariposa,
No one is talking about some stereo system and cell phone. What are you, some kind of child? People have mortgages, car notes, and college tuition to pay!

Posted by: Sophia | December 5, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

Worker Rob: You blame Bush. He is effectively gone. Move on to deal with the current problem. Do not continue to run agaisnt Bush. The election is over. Let the Congress vote for a bailout. The house is controleld by Democrats. Let them vote. The Senate is controlled by the Democrats (one less vote since Obama resigned).

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

I think it makes sense for the Democrats to force the Bush administration to provide some of the TARP money to provide credit for the auto industry. The REASON the $700B was allocated for the banks was to ease credit so that it be available for the REAL economy. The banks have refused to ease credit and provide loans to legitimate businesses and consumers. – Therefore, it should be up to the Congress or President to take part of this money and do what the banks have refused to do. Also, it does not make sense to allocate additional monies when this money has already been allocated and is being misused by the banks

Posted by: Leo | December 5, 2008, 1:03 am 1:03 am

“Remember the families.” “What about the workers and our jobs.”
Cry me a river.
Those families with their big paychecks and lovely benefits packages don’t care one bit about MY family.
Why should we go into debt as a country so others can live better than we do?
Get another job and live like the rest of us, how about. Insecurity and all.

Posted by: Alana | December 5, 2008, 1:06 am 1:06 am

d of wv,
It doesn’t make sense for the Dems to bring it to a vote if Bush will just veto it. The Dems need this lame duck until Jan 20th, when a REAL president can then take over.

Posted by: Sophia | December 5, 2008, 1:07 am 1:07 am

All of you who oppose the Auto bailout and whine and cry about how terrible Congress is and how we have to get rid of Congress and the Dems. Just remember when you voted for the Republicans in 01 and 04 you voted for financial policies that have placed us where we are now. You did this to yourselves. The Republican tax cuts, wars, lack of regulation, giving preference to corporations has brought this nation to it knees. Dont blame the workers. Its Republican greed that has done it. Workers for the big 3 dont get paid anymore than those who work for the foreign companies. Shame on you who voted for Bush and his ilk. Just go Away and let the Dems try to get this nation back on track, you guys have had your day and you blew it.

Posted by: Vietvet68 | December 5, 2008, 1:09 am 1:09 am

When a sick person dies, do you deny them medicine if you can afford it? The auto industry is sick. Yes, they’ve made mistakes, but they still have good to offer our country. It’s not the greatest thing that’s ever happened, but if we let them go we let hard workers go under too. And if a depression is coming, it’ll cost a hell of a lot more than it already has.
The money should come from the already approved $700 billion. Don’t force Congress to think about borrowing more!

Posted by: Adam | December 5, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

This should come out of the TARP money. We don’t have any additional money, and we can’t afford to let them fail right now. It’s part of the economic recovery package.
Good for the dems.

Posted by: Michelle | December 5, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

It’s about time that wall street stopped bitching about bailing out others and faced up to the fact that they brought down the whole world with their greed and corruption. Their countrymen are suffering badly and and need help. it’s time to pay up.

Posted by: Robert Berke | December 5, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

Frederick MIchael, if you exchange “unable” with the intended meaning ‘unwilling’, it depicts the passive aggressive whines and threats that are the HALLMARK of the Democratic party perfectly.

Posted by: zak | December 5, 2008, 1:10 am 1:10 am

Alana,
I bet those UAW workers are paying more income and payroll taxes then your entire family combined. Everyone here claims they are multimillionaires and such. If this is the case, they are simply loaning themselves back the money they pay in taxes.
These people are the TAXPAYER. The $12 an hour job some of these low info voters work don’t create the tax revenue to keep this ship afloat. And they have the audacity to complain as if they pay anything in taxes! The Middle Class is what keeps this economy floating.

Posted by: Sophia | December 5, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am

Stop the hysterics, Chapter 11 is not that big a deal. Airlines do it and come back stronger, so can Detroit.

Posted by: rgc | December 5, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Sophia…the point is if a UAW worker can’t live on $26 an hour and paid health insurance and no OTHER benefits then their job is not worth saving. In hard times, you have to do with out and I haven’t heard about ONE SINGLE concession that the UAW is willing to give up….with that attitude then the Big 3 needs to file chapter 11 and let the bankruptcy judge tell the UAW what benefits they will get to keep. I did NOT say cut the wages of the UAW worker, but I AM saying cut their benefits…..along with salary personnel. Why did Ford build that nice new plant in Brazil? Because the UAW would not allow Ford to built it in the United States because Ford would have to lay off people. That is why the UAW is fixing to cause a LOT of workers to lose their jobs.

Posted by: 55Mariposa | December 5, 2008, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Bailout or not ………
100 year Recession… what then?

Posted by: Anita Yova | December 5, 2008, 1:13 am 1:13 am

What really concerns me is the double standard for Wall Street and the Auto industry and the propensity of readers to constantly blame the unions. “Damn those workers and their $80,000 jobs!”. It’s funny we don’t hold wall street up to the same standards. Sounds like a class issue to me.
Sure everyone is going to have to give up something if we want a manufacturing base in the country – but the real problem is our inability to deal with the reality of our unsustainable lifestyles (I’ll save that for another discussion).
On another note, American workers’ wages have been stagnant for the past 15 years while the price of health care, education food, etc… have skyrocketed. We have seen the biggest transfer of public wealth to private sector ever – and wealth has been unequally distributed. So before we blame those “evil” unions who try to get workers a share of the pie, lets chuck the notion that we all are going to get rich one day, end the socialist fear mongering, live in reality, and stop giving our wealth away to the richest 2% of the population.

Posted by: SRS | December 5, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

The $75 an hour figure is total bull. It’s arrived at by taking all wages to today’s workers together with all benefits to retired workers then dividing that figure only by the number of today’s workers. In reality auto workers average closer to $28 an hour with maybe $38 including benefits, let’s even say 40 and change, not even close to the bogus $75 an hour figure.
Once again the American working majority is being bamboozled into thinking workers are the enemy. This is the only country on earth where workering stiffs are STUPID enough to believe that the party of the power and wealth elite, the GOP, is their best buddy and fellow working stiffs are to blame for all their problems. Pathetic.
Whatever you think of the bailout the American auto worker is not the bad guy here and if we had universal health care, like everyone else, we’d have no trouble being competitive. That is if the CEOs weren’t idiots or in league with the oil industry to keep us all using as much gas as possible. Did anyone complain about our tax dollars being spent in tax breaks for people buying huge SUVs? Nope.
We’d also have higher quality healthcare for lower cost instead of a third world infant mortality rate with the world’s highest health care cost.
Of course we actually DO have universal healthcare. It’s called the ER and it’s the least efficient most expensive form of healthcare in the world and we are ALL already paying for it. So if you are against universal health care because you don’t want to pay other people’s health care costs, too late. You already do . It just costs WAY more than in any other modern industialized country. And if you buy the GOP spin that it’s all the workers’ fault you’re just hopelessly gullible,

Posted by: Felix | December 5, 2008, 1:15 am 1:15 am

> Adam asked: When a sick person dies, do you deny them medicine if you can afford it?
Well Adam, if they’ve died, I’m sure as hell not going to spend money on medicine for them.

Posted by: Dan | December 5, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

OMG! Seriously? The Dems have been such a pathetic lot of ineffectual wusses for so many years, who knew that they actually had it in them to fight with fire? Today Barney Frank was all crying and whining that Obama won’t step up and take a stand on some issues to help them out. Well, maybe like a Father who’s got to give a kid space to grow up and stand on his own two feet, the Dems in Congress need to find their own voice and power to finally stand their ground with this now Lamest-Ever-Duck. It’s time for the Dems in Congress to grow up and act like a group of adults who can take responsibility and make wise choices to help get this nation back on track again. Geez… it’s about freakin’ time, people.

Posted by: Leiah | December 5, 2008, 1:16 am 1:16 am

Barney Frank was wayyyy out of line today. Obama isn’t even the President-elect yet. He only becomes that when the Electoral College votes, so he shouldn’t be saying anything about current politics.

Posted by: Dan | December 5, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

While I do not like what the US automakers have done to the industry, we must save the industry. 4 million additional people on the street looking for jobs is not acceptable. We have to save what we can of those jobs.
One thing for sure, whatever the Republicans are saying about it is a baldface lie. Do you think they are suddenly starting to tell the truth about anything because they lost the election? LOL

Posted by: Bill Melater | December 5, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am

The Republicans have lost their minds. They really don’t understand what’s at stake. They deserve to cease as a real political party based on sheer stupidity alone.

Posted by: Sophia | December 5, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

As the comic Ron White said:
“you can’t fix stupid”
We ALL made this happen, not just Wall Street, Banks, Auto industry, Pharma, …
We are paying for what we refused to pay for up to now.
In the book “Hot, Flat, Crowded” Tom thinks we have a choice; otherwise we will become a BANANA republic. Up to now we were governed by a junta military govt that promised lower taxes and higher standard of living.
Compared to any EU country, we probably could not qualify economically to join them. Sad.

Posted by: sylviechen | December 5, 2008, 1:21 am 1:21 am

Has everyone gone completely crazy in this country? The unions are on OUR side, people! They always have been. Like having Saturdays and Sundays for a weekend? That concept was created and made to happen by unions. Minimum wage so you have a base that, although it has hardly paced with inflation, at least makes sure the rich fat cats pay you SOMETHING for your labor. Another union idea. Safety regulations and worker’s comp? Ever get hurt on the job? Minimum age requirements for certain types of work? Time was a 12 year old laborer could just slip on an oily factory overpass or touch bare exposed power lines when he was too exhausted from his 12 hour days every day of the week–and his family could just go suck it if he got hurt through his “carelessness”.
I started my engineering career in the 80′s, when EVERY company over a certain size paid for FULL health care (I don’t remember any co-pays), FULL dental care, a retirement PENSION–not some stupid stock market savings plan that might tank and leave you with nothing–and other benefits, not the least of which was a wage that could support a family with ONE worker so one parent could actually parent the kids. Engineers were salaried employees, not union members, but it was the unions that made the entire nation lift itself up to give all workers the right to a living wage, health care, a safe environment and eventual retirement with a decent home and thanks for a job well done.
Just because everyone bought into Reaganomics, let corporations turn themselves into “multinationals” so they could go overseas and exploit workers in undeveloped countries with no regulations of any type, and cheapened every single thing they made while taking away the concept of pensions, fair wages, and health care so the heads could compensate themselves several hundred times higher than their employees and make enormous profits that never stop growing.
It is NOT the fault of the few unions big enough to withstand the onslaught that has been going on for at least 20-30 years that the unsustainable idea of constant insane profit GROWTH has finally had it’s bubble burst.
Let’s get over our middle class insomnia and amnesia before the middle class itself completely disappears. Instead of putting down unions, if you work for a living rather than speculate or live in the rarefied world of upper management, it is time to UNIONIZE!

Posted by: fiorastar | December 5, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

Sophia…everone pays roughly 8% in fed’l taxes, your employer pays the other 8%. Then you have 10-15% taken out for income taxes.. Everyone roughly has 20 to 25% taken out of their gross pay for taxes, social security etc.
I don’t think the UAW worker has more taxes taken out of their pay check than anyone else that works. How much does the UAW worker pay the union in dues?????

Posted by: 55Mariposa | December 5, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am

d of wva “Worker Rob: You blame Bush. He is effectively gone.”
But he isn’t gone – THAT’S the problem. He should be in prison by now, but he isn’t. The Democrats can’t pass anything until the new Congress comes in – and by then it may be too late.
This needs to be done NOW. There are millions of jobs on the line RIGHT NOW! But that arrogant aristocratic monkey in the White House HATES working people so much that he would rather see them and their families out on the street than for the government to do anything to save their jobs. If you’re a worthless Wall Street gambler who breaks all the rules, crashes the economy and produces absolutely nothing – NO PROBLEM – we’ll give you TRILLIONS of dollars – no questions asked, no public disclosure, and no oversight.
Because that’s always what it’s been about with RepubliCONNS anyway – transferring more and more money from the taxes of working people into the pockets of parasites who don’t want to work. That’s what the Iraq War is all about, that’s what $4.50 gasoline was all about, and everything else in this country since that perverted CRIMINAL resident in the White House befouled the White House with his presence. Obama will need to spend at least a month fumigating the place and expelling evil spirits.

Posted by: Worker Rob | December 5, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Dan: Obama had a view on a lot of things during the campaign. Let him stand up and be counted now. is he for or against the bailout.

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Worker Rob: Let me help you a little bit with how government works. Congress is in session now. It can pass legislation.

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

d f WV:
Guess what? Life before this NATIONAL calamity that Bush and the Republicans have inflicted on us was better and I would go back to my nice job at Ford with my part time job at Banana if I could. That is the point; you make some smart ass comment about going back as if it is some joke. Life as most-at least many- Americans knew it is gone, or going away. I’m sure you have some crack to make about why you shouldn’t have to subsidize the bailout of other people’s livelihoods and pensions but you are ignoring the main point. I am in my 40′s and I have always believed, like most Americans, that there were real opportunities for a better life and that things would always get better. And generally, things did get better. Until Bush came along. He has literally destroyed the American dream. He did not destroy the auto companies; they certainly bear some of the blame. But he is certainly responsible for the economic collapse that was built on the back of excessive deregulation and laissez faire policies. We may never be able to live in real affluence and comfort again. And the response and attitudes of ignorant, jealous people who live in areas that have never experienced real economic security and opportunity is disgusting. Just because you may never have lived outside of a holler doesn’t mean that we should all have to live like that.

Posted by: Margaret | December 5, 2008, 1:25 am 1:25 am

Look, I don’t agree with these clowns at all, but to be fair, I seriously doubt that “OR ELSE” was a direct quote from their letter. That’s just shoddy reporting.
Also at the risk of being the devil’s advocate, I wouldn’t put the blame on the “Democrats” for this…the reason Pelosi & Crew had to write this is because the rest of the Democrats in Congress WON’T support it.
“Saving 3 million jobs IS country first… I realize that you elitist don’t care about us over in flyover country…”
My main concern when reading ANYTHING about the economy is how it will affect the average American. Absolutely. Still, my company is closing branches left and right and I don’t know if I’ll have a job when I go in to work the next day. Where’s MY bailout?? Of course I feel for you, but other people outside of the auto-financial sectors are suffering as well.

Posted by: Kirsten | December 5, 2008, 1:29 am 1:29 am

Assisting the Big 3 at this of crisis is much more of a Main Street issue than bailing out Wall Street. As much as I dislike government intervention, the fact that 1 out of every 10 jobs is linked to the auto industry means that if the Big 3 go under, then this recession we are experiencing is almost certain to enter into a depression. Let’s not forget that Big 3 employees are consumers too, so if they lose their jobs, the other economies — food, retail, entertainment, etc. — that depend on spending will also suffer. More restaurants will close. Retail shops will suffer. Recreation and the travel industry will be devastated. More jobs will be lost and there will be a domino effect. For once, the old adage here is true: an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

Posted by: Paul | December 5, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am

Socialism? see:Pentagon and Patent Office been around a long time. Dems need to force feed it down their throats. Why do so many people hate the niddle class?

Posted by: alex | December 5, 2008, 1:32 am 1:32 am

RepubliCONNS HATE the American Auto Industry because they HATE the idea of any working man getting a fair shake. It’s as simple as that and it’s always been that way. If auto workers were living in shacks and eating out of dumpsters like they do in Mexico – RepubliCONNS would be all for saving their jobs. But because American autoworkers have a strong union and they are a powerful voice in American politics – they have to be humbled and driven into the street.
RepubliCONNS HATE the Middle Class – always have, always will.

Posted by: Worker Rob | December 5, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

Kirsten is right on. Pelosi wrote the “or else” letter becasue Pelosi cannto get a majority of the Democrats to vote yes for a bailout fo the big 3. Remember whne the original TARP legislation came before the hosue Pelosi was unable to get about 75 Demoncrats in the Hosue to vote yes and she blamed the Republicans for not getting more Republicans to vote yes. She failed to admit that she could not get enough Democrats to vote yes. So on this lets have the hosue and Senate vote and see where everyone stands.

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

d of wv – It is irrelevant what Obama said during the campaign. He isn’t President until January 20th, so his views don’t count on something that it is up to President Bush to rule on. If Bush wants his opinion on it, he can call him (which I believe he has done). Other than that, Obama has nothing to say about it. He isn’t even the official President-Elect yet.

Posted by: Dan | December 5, 2008, 1:33 am 1:33 am

For all those who say “what about my job and my family’s future???” Well that is what you get when you don’t get a real education, settle for a mediocre job in manufacturing, and join a union thinking all will be well. Go to college, get a degree, create your own future. Control your own destiny.

Posted by: p diddy ca | December 5, 2008, 1:35 am 1:35 am

Bush should go on National TV tomorrow night and tell the American people that he will sign any bill on the Auto bailout presented to him, that has been passed by the Democratic Majority Congress, lead by Pelosi and Reid.
Result: 2010 Republican Congressional LANDSLIDE!

Posted by: bucko36 | December 5, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

Impeach the bastard.

Posted by: Playin Possum | December 5, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

Kirsten……..obviously you don’t know NANCY PELOSI…..who flys back to California every weekend on a private jet….and that is the truth….

Posted by: 55Mariposa | December 5, 2008, 1:36 am 1:36 am

i know its not worth posting this, but what the hell. I can only take so much outright stupidity before reacting.
First, I’ll address the vilification of the unions.
Remember, unions represent working men and women, your neighbors and relatives. These are the residents of America. Theoretically, the government exists as by virtue of coordination among many of these “ordinary people.” It is supposed to serve them. Like every other Western industrial nation has already done, as a people we should decide that it is in our interest to not see three million of us suddenly become unemployed.
Also, people seem to forget that union contracts are the products of negotiations. Its not like the UAW stole from anyone. The auto industry, as an independent economic entity, chose to enter into contracts with its workers. If anything, the failure of these companies is a shared responsibility between both groups, although one would expect that the leadership of the big three would have enough foresight not to sign a suicide pact.
People sure seem bloodthirsty on this issue. But don’t forget, we are currently living through a slow-burning economic disaster. We have not come close to the bottom yet, and each shock to the economy will only drive us deeper. In a few months, the government is likely to drop 700 billion dollars on a stimulus bill to keep the economy from declining further by creating public sector jobs building infrastructure. This policy has broad support, including that of Bill Gates, Warren Buffett and almost every mainstream economist who’s opinion I’ve seen. Mainstream economic theory states that when the economy spirals downward with no mediating force, it will shrink until someone picks up the slack. In the worst cases, that actor is the government. It appears that this is the situation we’re in now.
Best case scenario: the stimulus creates Obama’s goal of 2.5 million jobs. Logically, It seems unwise to pass up a chance to save three million jobs for only 32 billion dollars. Especially now, when the consequences of a collapse will be multiplied by virtue of the country’s imperiled economy.
Now, quickly, I’d like to address the politics of this situation. The democrats right now have 51 votes in the Senate. 60 votes will be needed to pass any legislative auto bailout. There is no way the democrats will convince nine republican senators to vote for an auto bailout. Therefore, it is nearly impossible for democratic congressional leadership to do anything at this point.
Everyone who claims that this statement by the democrats to Bush is cowardice does not understand the issue. It is more of a desperate plea than cowardice. If no bill passes and Bush does not use his presidential authority, GM will collapse within two months. It is impossible for the democrats to pass a bill without republican support, which they won’t get, so their pleading with Bush to do something.
The consequences if GM does collapse will play out over a long period of time and will be felt by families in the form of bankruptcy, economic anxiety, passing on even basic needs, making compromises such as not going to college. It is not something to celebrate.
One final point, after the collapse of an auto company, its widely believed that consumers will stop purchasing their cars and trucks. It makes a lot of sense: there is the taint of failure as well as the possibility that parts and service might disappear in the near future. In other words, there is a good chance that chapter 11 bankruptcy could turn into chapter 7 bankruptcy (even more likely with the unavailability of financing), resulting in the liquidation of the company and all of its jobs. Just imagine the wasted opportunity that would be represented by the empty factories across America should this occur.
Alright, that’s enough. Time to hit send and never return to this horrible corner of the internet. For the record, i wrote this rant straight through in about twenty minutes with no editing, so I apologize for anything unclear or incorrect. There is not much that is incorrect, however. Depending on who’s reading, there is probably a lot that is unclear, out of your grasp, etc.

Posted by: bob | December 5, 2008, 1:37 am 1:37 am

Wake up folks. Its too late for finger pointing and conspiracy theorists. If the auto industry folds, the soup lines will be longer than in the 1930s depression. This time the hungry may be carrying glocks. Its time to pull together or go down together. The alternative is that the USA will be doomed to third-world status with no chance of recovery & you won’t be able to pronounce the name of your car, assuming you have one.

Posted by: hedy | December 5, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am

As one of those companies currently being affected by the automotive turndown, I say give them the loan. You know the word LOAN, right, it means they have to pay the money back.
You want to talk about trickle down economics?? Here’s trickle down – the Big 3 fold, their seat manufacturers folds, their spring manufacturers fold, the steel and plastics industries are dealt and unforeseen blow. The current job loss estimate we are hearing would be the result only scratches the surface.
Folks, THIS is main street – save it before wall street.

Posted by: Danigirl | December 5, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am

Definitely tell Paulsen to use some of the $700 billion for these guys. Oh, and while we’re at it, how about a full accounting disclosure of where all of the spent money has gone, and what the companies who received the aid did with it?
Got an answer for that one Hank?

Posted by: arkangel3 | December 5, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am

Dan:
It is not up to President bush to “rule” on it. The Congress is in session. it can pass legislation to give a bailout to the big 3. Bush can or cannot veto it, but lets have Congress stand up and be counted. I think that would be a very interesting vote. Further I do think Obama’s views count. He will be the next President and he is the leader of the Dempocratic party. His views are certainly not controlling, but I think everyone would be interested in what they are and it may help osme Congressman in deciding how to vote. Why are you opposed to Obamam giving his views on thsi subject?

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 1:38 am 1:38 am

people just don’t get, are the automobile companies to blame? sure. but our economy is in such dire condition right now, that if the big three fail, the amount of unemployed people will devastate the economy. There are so many companies that do business for and with the auto companies, they would all probably go out of business as well. These are the same people who don’t want to bailout homeowners, and the continual foreclosure of properties is a major reason the economy can’t get back on track. Its the big picture we have to think about, The auto companies have done a lot of this to themselves but
the country can’t afford to have more unemployeed people right now

Posted by: stuart | December 5, 2008, 1:39 am 1:39 am

Ain’t it great how all these republicans are blaming the democrats for this mess- not the party that was in power for the last 8 years. Quit playing politics? You gotta be kidding me. GW NEVER made a non political decision in his entire tenure. The truth is we are shooting ourselves in the foot if we let the big 3 die. It’s bush’s mess, but we’d all better help clean it up.

Posted by: stealth | December 5, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

The narrow, greedy viewpoints of many of these postings is sickening and disturbing.
The fact the administration and the Fed can toss AIG a $180,000,000,000 loan to cover their stupid bets without batting an eye just so we do not upset the Chinese while allowing industrial collapse of this country, is virtually criminal and patently stupid. The domestic auto companies are not the ones who de-regulated our financial system and turned it into the world’s biggest casino. They are not the ones who wrote the mounds of bad mortgage paper that have imperiled this economy. They are not the ones whose appetites for big, fat SUV’s and 2 hour commutes drove up the demand for oil. They are not the ones who speculated on it’s price and caused it to skyrocket by rattling their sabers in the Mideast. They simply were not prepared when the whole silly exercise finally turned, and Americans discovered they did not have any money left. They are and will continue to be viable businesses that produce useful things unlike all of the geniuses on Wall Street who think they can create wealth out of greed and thin air. The bilious criticism they are getting is totally misdirected and not unlike the anger of greedy, selfish children.
Remember, the Auto industry created the middle class in this country. If our new paradigm of corporate success is Wall Mart rather than GM, then we will ALL be soon living in trailers with no health care wondering how to buy food and pay our bills… and when our currency finally collapses, we will not even be able to afford any shiny crap from China!
We can only build our way out of this mess and US automakers must play a key role in developing new, green vehicles that we will sell here and all over the world. Do not forget, our automakers HAVE been successful in getting foreign market share in developing countries and taxes from their future profits will go into OUR pockets. They suffer in this country because we have tilted OUR playing field against US! A big part of this are their legacy costs that feed OUR bloated heath care system. This is something that, along with fair trade legislation, the next administration must fix. In the mean time, their collapse would be bad; I mean “crossing-the-streams” bad!
Remember, the automakers and their congressional supporters are seeking a bridge loan that will enable them to avoid an extinction level event. Their collapse will domino and take this whole Country down to a place it has not seen since the 1930′s. This is not a handout and having them go under is uglier than we can imagine and will affect everyone in this country for generations.

Posted by: Alex Kovic | December 5, 2008, 1:41 am 1:41 am

d of wv – In other news articles, you’ll find that he has given his opinion to President Bush that part of the 700 billion dollars that Congress passed should go to the auto makers. Congress feels the same way. They want the auto makers to receive money from the 700 million dollar package. It’s up to President Bush to make that happen.

Posted by: Dan | December 5, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

Reading the reaction from these right wingers is pretty scary. They’d save any banker any day but working people no way. Frankly we don’t need a third party as one suggested we need to split the country in two one side with the narrow minded mean spirited selfish right and the other with the rest of us who actually care about others. The fact is the money has already been passed by congress to treasury and should be used to help our auto industry not just the banks and force them to restructure. What we should not do is print more money for bailouts. All new spending should be for infrastructure and jobs. Period end of story. To say the democrats have done nothing since 06 is total crap, they basically stopped the insane right wing agenda. Just that is a miracle! All you people seem not to want to be involved in our democratic process and hate it so much, what is it you want? A strong man. That is what the germans and Italian were like in the 30′s, sick of democracy (too lazy really to do the work) and what they got were dictators. So if you love dictators so much, move out of this great democratic country. And people please learn to be a little more civil, I know it is hard for you but just give it a shot. You are not helping your country or yourself much.

Posted by: Butai | December 5, 2008, 1:45 am 1:45 am

“Worker Rob: Let me help you a little bit with how government works. Congress is in session now. It can pass legislation.”
Clue for the WV HILLBILLY: The Democrats only have a 1 vote majority in the Senate, and Republicans are filibustering absolutely EVERYTHING – which means they currently need at least 60 votes, which they don’t have. And even then it’s pointless because Bush will veto.
Prediction: If Bush and the RepubliCONNS let the auto industry crash and they wend up driving this country into a Depression because they hate hate strong unions, it will be the end of the RepubliCONN party. Which might be a good thing in the long run. But there will also be a whole lot of pain and poverty in this country for a very long time.

Posted by: Worker Rob | December 5, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am

Hey P. Diddy, a lot of college educated people work for the auto industry. Your trite argument about creating your own future is just a bunch of sanctimonious garbage. Where will an engineering degree get you when there is no one left to hire you? When there is no investment capital available to fund your new venture? When we all have college degrees what value do you think they will have? Most bank tellers have a 4 year degree. For $12 an hour. We live in an interconnected society and this crap about creating your own destiny is meaningless if you don’t have a strong, stable infrastructure to support it.

Posted by: Margaret | December 5, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am

Dan: Please give me the web site for the news article. And since it appears that Buash will not do this on his own do you support Congress jsut voting on it and getting it done.

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 1:47 am 1:47 am

If GM, Ford, etc. go under we’ll be in a depression within six months.
The loss of jobs, pensions, manufacturing, connected industries and overall effect on the economy will touch everybody in some way, shape or form.
Hide and watch.

Posted by: Jack | December 5, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

Everyone is so upset with auto workers and no one blinked an eye at 700 billion for wall street. even now no one wants to take some of that 700 billion from wall street and help out millions of american workers who will lose their jobs, health insurance, and retirement funds – which they worked for and paid into for over 30 years?
exactly how is saving these workers and retirees so much worse than bankrolling wall street high rollers who continue to squander and waste money like it is nothing? They didnt even have to ASK for money. 700 billion was just handed over with NO OVERSIGHT.
Typical Republican double standard. Give to the rich and take from the middle class who work their fingers to the bone.If you think working in a factory is easy, I suggest you try a couple hours in a foundy some time.

Posted by: retired | December 5, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am

Everyone who is against bailing out the auto industry thinks they have nothing to lose if the auto industry fails. I wonder how long it would take to change their tune if they worked for the auto industry and it was the only show in town. I don’t think auto CEU’s should be bailed out and wouldn’t lose out at least directly if they fail but I don’t want to see my neighbor have to lose his job either. Hold management responsible, make them pay it back, force them to build better vehicles but please go light on the political Dem/Rep rhetoric and look at it through a more objecyive lens. The next industry to go belly up may be yours. “it’s a recession when your neighbor loses his job; it’s a depression when you lose your own” – Harry S. Truman

Posted by: Jon | December 5, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

The ignorance and stupidity of some of the people posting here is astonishing. I agree the auto industry has been shortsighted, selfish, and unable to keep up with competitors, which under the rules of capitalism, means they should fail and go out of business.
BUT, what happens then? How many people lose their jobs? Their pensions? How many more people end up on welfare? What happens to the tax base of Detroit, a city already suffering massive urban decay if these auto companies shut down? What happens to the dealers, the parts houses, the distributors, the body fixers, the insurance industry when it all ripples through?
How blith and easy it is for a stupid person to just say “let them fail” and throw blame, without even thinking the problem through. $700 Billion is a LOT of money. The taxpayer is already on the hook for years and years to come, to fix a problem in the financial services sector that was directly attributable to Bush’s “free market” disdain for oversight and regulation.
Out of that $700 Billion, it isn’t possible to pull $34 Billion to keep up to a million people working, at a time when unemployment is rising rapidly? How stupid can you be.
Blaming Democrats does not fix the problem. Remember, Bush is the Enron President. He’s run the country like his best buddy, Ken Lay, ran Enron. Two peas in a pod. But what’s happening to America is far worse than what happened to Enron.
However, the fundamentals are the same: the richest 1% partied at the top and squandered their resources, hurtiing the rest of us through mismanagement, corruption, and chicanery.
All of it falls squarely on the shoulders of Bush….. he’s been President for eight years and the buck stops there.

Posted by: Spitfire | December 5, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am

why is it that the crooks who run the big banks and insurance companies, can just waltz in and get billions, no questions asked, and the auto companies are made to jump through all kinds of hoops? I will tell you why, because you are talking white collar vs. blue collar, I don’t know if you people who say no bailout for the auto companies realize it, but if they go, the economic crisis will get worse then it is already. Finally, why is it that the banks who are supposed to make loans are restricting consumer credit, this is hurting everyone, of course the fat cats dont care, they already have theirs.

Posted by: beachrat | December 5, 2008, 1:50 am 1:50 am

Republicans parting shot before they leave this January are solidly behind hurting working Americans.
No questions asked for the financial bail out of the wealthy banks, and finance industry; no cut in pay or perks or bonuses or jet flights or no visible signs of monitoring or regulating either. Just a no holds barred give away to them. When Republicans are asked to salvage an American industry that if not given aid will surely effect millions of Americans and render them unemployed; they then obstruct any remedy.
Americans should not forget this assault on the American worker from main street and the aid they freely gave to wall street. Voters next voting cycle, should remember this; so that we may completely eliminate this party of anti Americans.

Posted by: Anthony Look | December 5, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am

Wow, the density of the posts here is astounding. Do any of you republicans realize that your “president” is still in charge? The dems wont be in charge until Jan 20, then they will take the blame for everything. As it now stands the republicans will take all the blame for leaving the country to fail. The dems are playing the game to win, and to help the many thousands. Forcing shrub’s hand will reinforce the appearance that he couldn’t care less about the middle class or the country, it’s a win-win for the dems. After all the epic fail of the current administration good luck getting a president elected.

Posted by: BatGuano | December 5, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am

The solution for restructuring a company whose corporate leaders have let it go is called Chapter 11.

Posted by: Mary | December 5, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am

Worker Rob: What is the billnumber of the last piece of legislation that was filbustered in teh Senate? Waht was the date? i bet you do not know it. You say they are filbustering everything, but I bet you have no facts. None. Now Bush might veto it. But lets have the hosue and Senate vote on it and see what the vote is. I suspect that neither the Hosue nor Senate will pass it. So the Democrats do not wish to vote on it becasue htey do not wish to shwo it will fail. But in aobut 40 days they will ahve to take some action one way or the other. So even if it fails now we willhave a better udnerstanding of the faults of the proposed legislation and if it passes–great it is donw and we can move on to other things. By the way if the bailout goes forward the the big three are sucessufl and the otehr car companies in the US lsoe buisness and those US workers and US taxpayers are laid off hwo do you wish to help them. Give them a bailout. I mean you would nto stop with jsut the big three workers woudl you?

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 1:52 am 1:52 am

I don’t remember this kind of ridiculous tripe when Chrysler was bailed out.
Anybody know enough about history to remember that?
Based on the silly comments here, it sure doesn’t sound like it.

Posted by: Dalton | December 5, 2008, 1:53 am 1:53 am

Mary: “The solution for restructuring a company whose corporate leaders have let it go is called Chapter 11.”
Which includes walking away from pensions, insurance, unions and any form of obligation to the workforce, regardless of their length of tenure.
Call a friend who worked for TWA or United Airlines and ask them about what happened to their pensions.

Posted by: Dalton | December 5, 2008, 1:55 am 1:55 am

I agree with the large majority here, NO bailout for American Auto Makers! By the way, where’s MY $600.00 “Stimulus Check”?

Posted by: Judyshome | December 5, 2008, 1:57 am 1:57 am

Right now we spend 10 billion a month in Iraq.
The money the auto industry wants is about 10 -15 weeks of THAT investment.

Posted by: Jack | December 5, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

Dalton, I agree with you. I spent 8 years at Pan Am and was there the day we collapsed. I was young enough to recoup my pension losses but watched many co-workers and friends lose it all.

Posted by: Margaret | December 5, 2008, 1:59 am 1:59 am

Margaret – My wife worked for TWA for 32 years and collects a pension of $600 a month, versus the $3,000 she should be collecting.
American snatched them up and walked away from all obligations.
There are 1,000′s or people who worked for United for comparable periods who get nothing.
I think 99% of this is really nothing more than a form of union busting and has nothing to do with whether they’ll get the bailout…which, by the way…they will.

Posted by: Dalton | December 5, 2008, 2:04 am 2:04 am

“I bet those UAW workers are paying more income and payroll taxes then your entire family combined. Everyone here claims they are multimillionaires and such. If this is the case, they are simply loaning themselves back the money they pay in taxes.
“These people are the TAXPAYER. The $12 an hour job some of these low info voters work don’t create the tax revenue to keep this ship afloat. And they have the audacity to complain as if they pay anything in taxes! The Middle Class is what keeps this economy floating.”
—-
Sophia, what do you think the rest of us are? Not the taxpayer?
If they make more money and pay more taxes, so what? Maybe the rest of us in the middle class would like to make more money and pay more taxes as a result.
What I’m getting at is you seem to be missing my point. What is so special about these people that the rest of us should support them?
Are you saying that we should pay for them to keep making that much money so that they can pay more taxes than we do? I don’t think I’m quite that giving.

Posted by: Alana | December 5, 2008, 2:05 am 2:05 am

WVA Hillbilly asks: “Worker Rob: What is the billnumber of the last piece of legislation that was filbustered in teh Senate? Waht was the date?”
12/3/08 The last thing a RepubliCONN filibustered was only lifted today. For months now, RepubliCONNS (Jim Bunning of Kentucky) have put a hold on the confirmation of an inspector general for the $700 billion TARP fund. For months that criminal errand boy from Goldman Sachs – Paulson – has been doling hundreds of billions of dollars out to his co-conspirators on Wall Street with absolutely NO OVERSIGHT? Why? Because that’s the way the RepubliCONNS wanted it, and they filibuster EVERYTHING to get what they want.

Posted by: Worker Rob | December 5, 2008, 2:07 am 2:07 am

Well that’s it. I just read that Obama uses a Zune music player. It is made in Japan by non union workers. I mean even iPod while made in China is made by Union workers. But both are foreign made. Everyone supporting the bialout throw away both your iPods and Zune–made overseas. I guess if you oppose the bailout you get a pass.

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 2:09 am 2:09 am

Mr. Look, don’t forget those of us who have lost large percentages of $$ in retirement accounts linked to the state of the stock market. We’re not all current American workers.

Posted by: judyshome | December 5, 2008, 2:10 am 2:10 am

How about this: We don’t give the auto industry a bailout for their auto business but we do pay to subsidize the retooling of their underutilized capacity to implement national transportation infrastructure. It’ll take awhile for the capacity to be put to this use, but we need the lead time anyway. The plan would put Americans to work helping to build America rather than pouring money down a rathole. The retooling money and the future contracts for light rail, high speed rail (hopefully mag-rail someday) would provide a financial crutch for the big three to hopefully transition their core auto business into to a truly competitive domestic industry.

Posted by: theOtherJK | December 5, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am

Worker Rob: Putting a hold on an appointment is not a filbuster. Study up on how your government works. You do not put holds on legislation. Two different things.

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 2:11 am 2:11 am

“or else….”
“or else….”
… or else, we’ll ask you again.

Posted by: Edward | December 5, 2008, 2:14 am 2:14 am

“Worker Rob: Putting a hold on an appointment is not a filbuster.”
It certainly IS a filibuster. That’s the way filibusters work. WAKE UP – It’s not “Mr. Smith Goes to Washington” anymore. All that anyone has to do in the Senate is to say they want to put a hold on something, and then it takes 60 votes to take the hold off. They don’t even have to publicly disclose who it is. That’s the way filibusterers work in the Senate. And that’s what RepubliCONNS have been doing with EVERTHING. And that’s why the public voted eight more of them out last election.

Posted by: Worker Rob | December 5, 2008, 2:20 am 2:20 am

“Everyone is so upset with auto workers and no one blinked an eye at 700 billion for wall street”
I notice people keep saying that, but that’s just not true. There were a lot of people who were against that bail-out, but were told the world would end if we didn’t have it.
And they passed it regardless of whether people wanted it or not.
Now it’s this, and the world will end if we don’t get this. What’s next? That’s why people are balking.
For my part, if they take it out of the money they’ve already taken, that seems all right by me.

Posted by: Alana | December 5, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am

Hey Alana, you don’t think you “are quite that giving?” I think it is safe to say that you are a selfish, vindictive person. Why should you pay to help support others in need? Why should you concern yourself with the welfare of others? This is the kind of viewpoint and argument that sickens and frightens me. This isn’t about you having to invest your measly tax dollars to support the “lavish” lifestyles of union workers. This is about understanding that many millions of people will be severely hurt by the actions of our government, the executives of the companies they work for and by the economic tidal wave that is engulfing the whole world. And if you think you won’t be paying more in taxes to pay for their unemployment insurance, Medicaid expenses and so on then you need to think again. The cost to you and every other taxpayer will be much greater than the cost of the proposed bailout. But I would guess that you think those fat and happy union workers should be thrown out on the streets!

Posted by: Margaret | December 5, 2008, 2:22 am 2:22 am

Why should Nissan and VW get a bailout from American taxpayers? If Nissan wants to keep making their pickup trucks (by GM factory) or VW wants to keep making their minivan (by Chrysler), they can pay up for the production lines at the bankruptcy auction.

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am

No, Margaret, I’m not so giving as to put my children’s future in hock so that some workers can enjoy good wages and benefits and security while the rest of us go without.
Mind you, the arguments about the collapse of the economy do appeal to me. But if you consider it “selfish” because I don’t want to pay so that other people can enjoy higher wages, benefits, and security than the rest of us, well, count me “selfish.”
I’ll count you as “not selfish” when you turn over some of your paycheck to my family.

Posted by: Alana | December 5, 2008, 2:26 am 2:26 am

If we the tax payers can waste money such as billions of dollars to stay in IRAQ, why can’t we spend some of it to keep manufacturing and US workers employed in the US? I don’t like my tax dollars being spent for the jerks on wall street who sit at their jobs not breaking a sweat and playing around with other peoples money. But we bailed them out, so we need to bail out the auto industry also.

Posted by: LilSugar | December 5, 2008, 2:28 am 2:28 am

The ignorance of many of the above posters is breathtaking. These expeditures will increase the national debt, but in the short run it will not matter to us–you will not notice it if you are “middle class.” In the long run the recovery will enable a shift in focus toward reduction of the great national debt. But if the clueless right wing prevails, and we lose the manufacturing capability represented by the “Detroit 3,” millions of people will suffer in inumerable ways for years to come. We must let Keynesian economics work; it’s our only chance as a nation. The 19th century thinking of the right has helped to get us in this fix, and it most certainly offers no rational solutions for getting us out of trouble.

Posted by: Jonggmaster | December 5, 2008, 2:32 am 2:32 am

Hey Alana, I don’t know where or how you live but if you haven’t reached the living standard of the average automotive worker in the Midwest than I think it is safe to say that I-and those workers-probably have subsidized you and your community to some degree. You clearly haven’t thought out your argument enough to realize it. You exhibit every crumb of self satisfaction and sanctimony I expect of your average Republican. And FYI: wouldn’t we all be better off if instead of working to lower the living standards of auto workers we worked to raise the living standards of every one else.(maybe even you.)

Posted by: Margaret | December 5, 2008, 2:35 am 2:35 am

Margaret,
Why not pay the union workers $1million/hour and give each of them a shovel, have half of them dig a hole in the ground and the other fill the hole back up?
They cars that they are building have about as much economic value as the holes in the ground, as they pile up unsold in dealer lots and ports. At least, hole digging will use up less natural resources than piling up unsold cars and cause less pollution.
See, higher living standard doesn’t come from government printing up paper money. Higher living standards have to come from making goods and services that people are willing to buy. All government money printing can accomplish is taking food and medicine from someone else to give it to a person who is not making anything useful. Government bureacrats are not making food and they are not medicaal doctors. Someone somewhere in the real economy has to deliver those services. The more workers are tied up making unwanted goods, like those big-three branded cars, the less people are out there doing real much needed work turning out things like food and medical services. Time for retraining. That’s what economic downturns are for. For once, Americans are living a less lavish life, therefore much of the industries catering to lavish life style, like those making giagantic SUV’s, have to cut back and use resources more efficiently; that’s a good thing. Only politicians would get in the way of that.

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 2:40 am 2:40 am

LilSugar,
The next argument will be, if the big-3 gets the bail out, why not the department store? why not the pazza parlor? why not the horse saddle maker? Where does it end?
For what it’s worth, both the Iraq War and the bank bailouts are mistakes. Two wrongs (or three wrongs) do not make a right.

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am

the average u.a.w. worker makes $28 per hour,not$80.the u.a.w. has made concessions;two tiered pay scale,take over pension plan and is ready to take more cuts.unions are the only reason working people have any reasonable standard of living in this robber baron society.bush 1 should use tarp $ to loan automakers,more later if needed

Posted by: njdunlap | December 5, 2008, 2:51 am 2:51 am

Bush Junior…THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER. Republicans have destroyed America in eight years flat. Everyone in America that voted for these criminals should be put in prison. GOOD RIDDANCE TO GARBAGE.

Posted by: wilder | December 5, 2008, 2:53 am 2:53 am

JonggMaster,
The Big-3 do not at all represent the manufacturing prowess of the US. In fact, the most up-to-date plants that the Big-3′s have are in Canada, Brazil and China. The most up-to-date auto manufacturing plants in the US are those turning out Toyota’s, Honda’s, BMW’s, and etc.. The most productive manufacturing plants in the US are those owned by the likes of Intel and Boeing. The bailout proposal is in essence to rob from all those productive American manufacturers and their workers in order to reward the abject failures that the Big-3 plants are. How is that going to improve the manufacturing base in the US?
Keynesian economics never worked in real life. Hitler did not pull German economy out of the Great Depresison by building the Autobahn, nor did FDR with his myriads of programs. Keynes’ invention of “Aggregate Demand” flies in the face of Economics (the study of efficient allocation of limited resources) because “aggregate” means undifferentiated. That’s where you find a battleship is the equal of 1000 cars, for GDP and for “Aggregate Demand” . . . whereas everyone ever engaged in real life knows that they are not the same, nor is sending millions of young men to die half a world away a desirable solution for unemployment . . . a policy that both Hitler and FDR embarked on after their Keynesian economic policies failed.

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 2:57 am 2:57 am

With the election upon them and the country in crash mode, Congress gave the administration what it had asked for. With the election behind them, their hearts harden a little. Republican opposition dooms a Congressional rescue in any case. There is no way 60 votes for closure is possible and over riding a veto is even less possible. If the administration wants anything done, it must use the authority already given and spend $30b of the $350b on hand.

Posted by: William Williams | December 5, 2008, 2:59 am 2:59 am

Margaret, what makes you think I’m a republican? And what makes you think I haven’t reached a reasonable standard of living?
You haven’t subsidized me one bit, so no need to give yourself airs.
In fact, I’ve subsidized them – I’ve bought Ford cars! Because I always wanted to buy American, and help American workers. (Tried to get my husband to, too!)
My point is in regards to all the crying in this thread about how we should all save their jobs.
(Not about the economic implications of not doing so – there, one has something of an argument.)
My point is there are a whole lot of working Americans out there – including me and mine – who aren’t getting bail-outs, loans, or anything else. And won’t.
It is not incumbent on me or anyone else to make sure any of these particular individuals retain their particular jobs, benefits, or security. I have no moral imperative to make sure that someone else has an easier life than the rest of us.
Who’s looking after our jobs, retirement, benefits, and security? Or is it that we just don’t count?
And how is it “selfish” of me not to want others bailed out while we are not?
I’m not working to “lower the standards of living” of auto workers. But neither am I working to raise them.
Asking me to work for auto workers to maintain their standard of living is a bit outre. That was my point.
After all, no one is doing it for the rest of us. We just get the bill.
National economic considerations aside, my point was that one shouldn’t make sympathy plays to people who face the same issues as the auto workers, expecting them to put auto workers’ interests above their own.
Not to mention a lot of people don’t think the bail-outs (or loans) are in the national interest, either.

Posted by: Alana | December 5, 2008, 3:02 am 3:02 am

This isn’t about saving a CEO’s job or shareholder value. If these companies go belly up, those CEOs will still do just fine. The cities, counties, and states that depend on the incomes generated by the auto industry as a tax base are the ones who will get stuck with the bill. So do we pay all the former auto workers unemployment benefits and food stamps or do we pay to keep them working? Do we send more and more money to the communities to keep crime under control and prevent an even further collapse of the economy, or do we pay to keep the auto industry working? We are paying one way or the other.
Or we could just sell the whole thing off to the Chinese for pennies on the dollar. Trust me, they are licking their chops at the thought of a big three bankruptcy.

Posted by: LA2000 | December 5, 2008, 3:10 am 3:10 am

bjs said:
Do you all realize the effect of these 3 liquidating? Try $35 Billion in unemployment claims for starters. There are whole towns and cities in California who live and die by Nissan truck plants… yes, Chrysler manufactures Nissan trucks in California. They make parts and components in rural towns ALL across America, oh and don’t forget the VW routen minivan that is manufactured in the US by Chrysler, and that Mercedes plant in Alabama? Gone too.
Do your friggin homework. You’re talking about a depression if these 3 fail, and that’s just for starters.
Stab said:
I say “loan” them the money with the following must meet objectives:
1. Reduce Upper management by 50%
2. Eliminate all Executive bonuses.
3. All three automakers must hire a combined 20,000 new employeees.
4. Models built in foriegn countries cannot be sold in the US.
5. All parts for US made autos must be built in the US.
6. MPG standards will be 25-35 MPG with exception to trucks which will need to meet 20-25 MPG.
I say they both have it nailed. Except for instead of reducing upper management by 50%–Fire all their asses and put in new blood. THEN LET’S HAVE SOME FREAKIN’ OVERSIGHT!!
Why should the American public give money to Paulson with WITH NO OVERSIGHT to bail out the greedheads on Wall Street WITH NO OVERSIGHT and let the middle class workers of the Auto Industry go down the toilet? Those “lavish salaries and benefits” you speak of built the American middle class, (and BTW, the average hourly salary for union auto workers today is $28 plus benefits). In the days when a union job was a nation builder, a UAW worker could support his or her family while the spouse stayed home to raise the kids, buy a house, send their kids to college and put money away for their retirement so they wouldn’t have to eat cat food and be a burden on society–which is what most of us might have to do now. WAKE UP PEOPLE! The price we will pay if the Big 3 (regardless of their stupidity)go down the tubes will be harsh and lasting. There are too many intertwined businesses connected to them–it would be devastating to the country and make the Great Depression look like a birdwalk. Stop listening to the Republican talking points and start thinking with your brains. It’s about time the Congress quit bailing out the upper class nitwits in the banking and finance industry and started thinking about the blue collar workers who made this country great.

Posted by: glogrrl | December 5, 2008, 3:10 am 3:10 am

What is wrong with bailing out the Auto industry? Such double standard, bail out Paulson’s friends and his pension plan with Goldman Sachs, but let the Auto industry sink and their employee lose their pensions and we the taxpayers get stuck with that bill? So bail the financial charlatans that imploded the market, basically give them the keys after they’ve wrecked the car, but for the auto industry do nothing? Truly idiotic at best.

Posted by: Marcial | December 5, 2008, 3:12 am 3:12 am

njdunlap,
The biggest chunk of UAW labor cost is not direct pay but benefits and legacy cost. The whole benefit package was negatiated in the 50′s as a way to keep out smaller competitions to GM . . . yes, imagine that, two monopolists (GM and UAW) getting together to squeeze out competitors. The result was a pyramid scheme that pre-supposes ever increasing GM volume and UAW head count. The scheme stopped working in the last two decades because UAW membership is shrinking . . . less and less current workers are supporting more and more retirees, and medical cost is spiralling out of control because of government-sanctioned medical monopolies and sky-is-the-limit third-party pay schemes. Bankruptcy and reorganization of those unsustainable schemes is the only opportunity we have before our whole society is bankrupt.
BTW, productivity through competition is the reason behind higher standards of living. Not central planning. The soviets claimed for decades that their workers had higher take-home pay than American counterparts, thanks to their artificially set ruble exchange rate. The reality was that the Lada cars that they were building in the 80′s, having the same design from the 50′s, were worth less than the metal and leather that went into making them. The factories were in reality destroyers of wealth not creators of wealth. The Big-3 plants are approaching that precedence with their sea of unsold cars, and exploding losses.
Also, the era of “Robber Barons” of the late 19th and early 20th century saw the fastest rate of improvement in standards of living in America, at about 4% per capita annual growth rate, measured in hard currency terms (the currency in the US until 1913). US currency ceased to be hard currency after 1933, so the unit of count became suspect for direct comparison. In terms of cars and houses, the per capita economic growth rate between 1929 and 1971 was approximately 0 (Zero!); between 1971 to today is -2% per year, average wage measured in terms of a fraction of an average car cost and average house. -2% per year over 37 years is roughly a 50% reduction in real standards of living! That’s why American middle class is being destroyed.

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 3:16 am 3:16 am

LA2000,
You are presenting two false choices. The real solution is not to subsidize failure, but to reinforce success. The automakers failed not because the bailout is not forthcoming; they failed because they did not deliver cars that people want at prices that people are willing to pay. The factories are not creating value compared to the resources that they are chewing up.
The towns that are dependent on the auto industry should see wage levels decline . . . and when that wage level decline takes place, it will attract new types of employers. The last thing that should happen is turning the place into reservation by throwing government money at it so people don’t have to find productive jobs.

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 3:28 am 3:28 am

Typical class warfare, it’s ok to bail out those with or who controls money, then those who have to work and sweat for it. Change is coming you can bet on it.

Posted by: Nick | December 5, 2008, 3:32 am 3:32 am

It amazes me of those who say Democrats control…It takes 60 votes to pass anything in the Senate and should the President veto it, then take 2/3…So for you Republicans learn how your Government works…Obama isn’t the President yet and Senate only has 49 Dems and 2 Independents with 49 Republicans until Jan 2009. The Auto workers doesn’t get 72hr this is Republican talking point.

Posted by: army193 | December 5, 2008, 3:37 am 3:37 am

glogrrl,
Why 50%? Why not 49% or 51%? why not 48% or 52% . . . heck why not 10% or 90%? You see the arbitrariness of those numbers through from the political process.
Bankruptcy will not mean the end of American auto industry. Toyota, Honda, BMW and etc. are already selling more made-in-America cars today than the Big-three’s. Even if the Big-3 gets liquidated, someone will be picking up the production lines. Most likely, a bnakruptcy of the Big-3 may not even lead to liquidation, but a Chapter-11 reorganization instead. Almost every American airline, excepting Southwest, has gone through the Chapter-11 process. Those who can make it through come out stronger.
Great Depression was caused by government intervention to keep prices artificially high. The only chance we have to avoid another Great Depression is to liquidate wasteful production (like those unsold cars piling up) quicly, so that the market will can adjust to more efficient allocation of resources. A bankruptcy-reorganization of the domestic automakers will be a good step towards it. The threat of bankruptcy will also finally enable the car dealers and/or their creditors to fire-sale the cars on the lots, so they do not rot on the lots.

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 3:38 am 3:38 am

Good grief. Everyone’s frustration is understandable, but we simply cannot afford to let the big three go under at this time. Our national economy is teetering on the precipice of a deep recession or, even worse, a depression. Failing to provide a bridge loan will almost assuredly put us over the edge. There’s still money left over in TARP. It should be used to bail out the big three. At least we’ll be able to see tangible results from our investment.

Posted by: Brian | December 5, 2008, 3:38 am 3:38 am

The Big Three are “too big to fail?”
Heck, the USA is not too big to fail. And is rapidly on the road to proving it.

Posted by: julian schrock | December 5, 2008, 3:44 am 3:44 am

I like the idea of asking the oil companies for loans for the auto industry; after all, they work hand in hand. Or better still, have the oil companies buy out the auto industry; then they could have it all!

Posted by: Gloria | December 5, 2008, 3:53 am 3:53 am

A true capitalist would say no bailout to failing companies. If they can’t compete they SHOULD go belly up. The human cost in lost jobs, wages, benefits, etc. is simply collateral damage. Job security is as impossible as a free lunch. Workers should jump the sinking ship and try to find other jobs.
It’s a cruel dog-eat-dog world out there. Survival of the fittest and all that.
So says the capitalist.

Posted by: julian schrock | December 5, 2008, 3:54 am 3:54 am

Brian,
The poor shape of our current economy is all the more reason why there shouldn’t be a bailout. Why should the executives of those failed company continue to be in charge? Why should the bond holders of those failed companies continue to be paid 8~12% interest rate? Why should the companies keep wasting natural and human resources and churning out cars that nobody wants? What a huge waste!
The process of waste has to stop. The resources and workers should be freed up for some other entreprenuer, perhaps even someone who can make better cars . . . or myriads other things and services that we need.

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 4:05 am 4:05 am

The bottom line is that if the automakers go down, this will cause major domino effects. They will pull many related businesses down with them causing many additional bankruptcies and business failures. In addition, the financial institutions that have lent money to the automakers will suffer more losses. This will cause the financial sytem to freeze up even more, depriving businesses all over the economy with the credit needed to operate. As a result, the recession will be a lot worse than it would otherwise be, the unemployment rate will be a lot higher than it would otherwise be, the loss of tax revenue to the government due to income going down will be much greater than it would otherwise be, and a much larger stimulus package is going to be needed to restore the economy to full employment than would otherwise be needed.
In addition, when the automakers go bankrupt, the stock market is going to take another major nosedive, so that the people whose retirement savings are in the form of stock investments are going to take an even greater hit than they already have.
Letting the automakers go bankrupt will cost the economy a lot more money than the 34B or so that the bailout will cost. Therefore letting the automakers go bankrupt is a classical example of being penny wise and pound foolish.

Posted by: CaptainVideo | December 5, 2008, 4:07 am 4:07 am

“It’s a cruel dog-eat-dog world out there. Survival of the fittest and all that. So says the capitalist.”
The capitalist worships the god Mammon and is perfectly willing to sacrifice workers on the alter of laissez faire dogma.
We should never let the capitalist make economic policy because working people will end up being shafted.

Posted by: CaptainVideo | December 5, 2008, 4:12 am 4:12 am

Julian,
Nobody is going to be eaten, and dogs are not running the world. The full term for “Bankruptcy” is “Bankruptcy Court Protection.” Bankruptcy is the safety net for failed business ventures. When business ventures fail, it should not have any more claim on natural or human resources, so that other businesses can put both to better and more productive purpose. If not for the failure of horse saddle makers and small family farms, the automakers would never have recruited the grand parents of many of the union workers to begin with, and Americans would not have had affordable cars a hundred years ago!
Big-3 have been taking up more natural resources and more human labor than they should for a couple decades now. It’s time for them to move aside, so that someone else with better ideas can bring better products and better services to Americans.

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 4:12 am 4:12 am

Tim:
I am quite aware of the role of the Detroit three in the nation’s manufacturing capabilty. But in the last twenty years I have personally observed the loss of key capabilities in the aerospace industry, and witnessed the emergence of even better capabilities among suppliers in other nations. We must decide what kind of a country we want to have: burger flippers drawn from migrants from the rust belt, or a population offering, at least in part, trained people who can design and manufacture complex devices and machines. It’s very simple: no job, no paycheck, no purchases, no business activity, no service jobs, etc. It will take government investment to break this vicious cycle. This is Keynesian, and it works if the Congress acts appropriately. Timing is everything. Even with an Obama Administration, I suspect the legislative branch will not be up to the job. And, unfortunately, it will result in a final demonstration that our governmental structure is incapable of managing the challenges of the 21st century. (I prefer a parliamentary system.)

Posted by: Jonggmaster | December 5, 2008, 4:16 am 4:16 am

The republicans want to Bust the Unions. That’s it in a nut shell. Look how the republicans give billions to the Criminals on wall street and nothing for the working man.

Posted by: Larry Litwiler | December 5, 2008, 4:20 am 4:20 am

CaptainVideo,
Bankruptcy for the Big-3 means the following:
(1) The 8~12% interest that the carmakers are paying the bond holders will stop. Do you think the bond holders should continue to collect 8-12% from a failed company, effectively paid for by taxpayers, when the FED rate is 1%?
(2) Whether through a court-supervised reorganization or by buyers at liquidation sale, the production mix at the Big-3 will be streamlined. Those related to unsellable vehicles will be stopped. Do you object to that?
All that talk about “domino effect” is nonsense. Any money given to the Big-3 will simply be money stolen from productive members of the society through inflation. Uncle Sam doesn’t have the money saved up and sitting around.

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 4:21 am 4:21 am

Jonggmaster,
So why not give every unemployed person a $1million/hr job digging holes in the ground and filling it back up? Would that qualify as the Keynsian “seed job”? The resultant hyperinflation (people being paid without creating value) would quickly wipe out the entire economy.
High standard living can not be created by from government job protection, for a large economy as a whole anyway. High standard living has to be the result of high productivity. That’s why we need a free market place to switch people from unproductive jobs (like jobs at companies that have failed) to productive jobs.

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 4:27 am 4:27 am

JonggMaster,
BTW, “government investment” is an oxymoron. Government offices are not for profit, so how can anything it does be “investment”? The line between consumption vs. investment is always a blurred one. Even the IRS’s definition of business vs. hobby is 2 out of 5 years have to be profitable. By that standard, the US government has not been making any investment for decades.

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 4:35 am 4:35 am

Congress is really salivating over the prospect of getting to spend even more of our taxpayer money, aren’t they? SPEND, TAX, SPEND, TAX, SPEND, TAX… That’s our Congress.
Gee, I ownder what ever happened to the career field of being a Blacksmith… why didn’t we bail out that failing industry, as we all waved good-bye to our horses and started driving cars?
Ford/GM/Chrysler are just reaching the end of their corporate life, and are now going the way of the “covered wagon wheel makers.” Just let them DIE, and out of their ashes will emerge NEW companies, with NEW management, and a NEW business model that is designed to meet both our current and more importantly, our future transportation needs.
Maybe a company that thinks further outside the box… say for example, providing us with PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION that is every bit as convenient, if not MORE convenient, than owning and maintaining a rapidly depreciable asset like a car or a truck.

Posted by: Fiercely_Independent | December 5, 2008, 4:37 am 4:37 am

If AIG and other financial ruined companies can ask for funds, then I say give it to the Auto industry as well. These people that say too bad look for other work make me sick. Umm, if you spend 15-30 years of your life doing something and it leaves, is it really just that easy? Name me some other jobs that pay over $20/hour that don’t require college or training programs? Why value the financial sector over the auto industry? The auto industry has contributed to taxes and everything else through the years and you just want them dead? Nice.

Posted by: William | December 5, 2008, 4:38 am 4:38 am

William,
I run a small consulting firm on the side… and its in finacial ruin. I haven’t seen a contract in that for several months, and my vice president (my wife) is still waiting for a paycheck… I agreed to pay her $300/hour!! Where is SHE going to find substitute employment????
Using your logic, I should be able to get a bail-out too!!!! Where do I submit my application?
DO you really think that a job should pay $20/hour, and not require a higher education? I think THAT’S at the very root of the problem!!!

Posted by: Fiercely_Independent | December 5, 2008, 4:43 am 4:43 am

William,
Gasoline is $1.80 today, compared to $4.30 a year ago; retailers are offering 50-70% off . . . the $15/hr job today can buy more than twice as much gas and nearly twice as much of most other stuff as $15/hr a year ago. In a recession like we have right now, prices need to come down, and come down quickly to keep market liquid.
As for obsolete skills. Thousands of financial sector jobs are being eliminated as we speak. Farming jobs used to account for 80% of employment when automobile just came on the scene; by the 1960′s, farming jobs accounted for 2%! That’s where all those high paying automaking jobs came from! If the government had heavily taxed the automakers in order to bail out and subsidize the small farmers in the 1910′s and 1920′s, more than half of Americans might still be stuck in back-breaking farming.

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 4:50 am 4:50 am

I’m sorry, but if you run a large corporation that as affected and will affect millions of people and you can give the money to the financial scourge institutions, but can’t bail out an industry that was once this country’s bread and butter, then I think the country as a whole has a problem. Industrial jobs in the past never required a college degree and they paid VERY well. Are you one of these individuals that look down on people for not choosing college for one reason or another? Higher Education is a good thing but by all means it’s not for everyone. I’ve worked quite a few $15/hour jobs that did not require any education. I felt I contributed to the companies I worked and never felt bad because I chose life over college.

Posted by: William | December 5, 2008, 4:52 am 4:52 am

I’ve never seen so much stupidity concentrated in one place before.
There isn’t enough support to pass another bailout bill. Remember, as of now the democrats only have a one vote majority.
It should come from the TARP, but the white house wants it to come from money that’s already been set aside to create energy-efficient vehicles. Does that make sense?

Posted by: Not Paranoid | December 5, 2008, 4:56 am 4:56 am

William,
You asked “Are you one of these individuals that look down on people for not choosing college for one reason or another?”
No, not at all… but they shouldn’t make as much as those who do have a college education, and are using that education to further our country. Someone has to flip burgers at Burger King, but society doesn’t owe them a $75,000/year job either. That’s SOCIALISM!!

Posted by: Fiercely_Independent | December 5, 2008, 5:02 am 5:02 am

I read the bailout plan. The jobs the Congress and people are crying about are going to be cut by 50% if this bailout happens. You have lost your job anyway. I know Congress doesn’t care what people think, but the media does They still go belly up and the other 50% lose their jobs, but the CEO’s have their big bonus and laugh all the way to the bank. Let it go! Let entrepeneurs come in and provide us with low cost cars. If India can produce a $2,000 car that can drive on US roads, so can we. We will get new and better jobs if entrepeneurs come in and build reasonable cost solar, electric, and magnetic transportation. New Jobs! Better Jobs. And it pisses me off that the Democratic Congress that gave the bailout to the banks is now trying to push the blame on the outgoing President. It was them that made TARP and they screwed it up, the idiot doesn’t know what is going on and they knew it, so the idiot gets the blame. The real blame is our corrupt Congress.

Posted by: clancy49 | December 5, 2008, 5:13 am 5:13 am

Society doesn’t owe colleges graduates anything either. So $20/hour is too much for people without a degree? I applaude people who set a goal and stick to it (IE college graduates). However, ALOT of these so called “educated” people have run our institutions and companies into the ground in the past decade. Can you explain how paying a living wage is akin to socialism?

Posted by: william | December 5, 2008, 5:14 am 5:14 am

Let Big Auto go belly up.
We don’t need ‘em.
The next time we need to turn out tanks, subs, armored Humvees & bombers by the gazillions, and overnight, we can just as easily source everything from McDonald’s or Walmart at a much lower price.

Posted by: FG | December 5, 2008, 5:19 am 5:19 am

Wow . The misinformation and ignorance of the American public is staggering . A wise man once said “no one ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public ” or something to that effect .
A 4 cyl. truck ??? Buy a Volkswagon Beetle and marry a bed on it .
The number 1 vehicle sold for over 30 years is the Ford F-150 .Why ? Because America works for a living and if the economy ever picks up again trucks will be the first out of the block to show an improvement . This is evidenced by recent sales numbers showing Toyota dropped 34% over last years Nov. numbers while Ford only dropped 31% due largely to increased F-Series sales.
Speaking or gas guzzling trucks ,if the Big 3 were so stupid why in the hell did the infallible imports launch billion dollar efforts the last few years to get a piece of the highly profitable full size truck market ??? They must really be stupid to invest so much in a dead category LOL
Educate yourselves for god sake .
Big 3 autos have caught the others in quality and in quite a few cases surpassed them .
Safety ? American made leads the pack .
If any of you had read the last U.A.W. contract details you would already know that concessions have been made that brings the domestics in line by 2010 with transplant labor costs .
The only real difference to begin with involved the legacy costs of running a century old industry against a competitor that has no retirees !!!
Don’t forget it was a Big 3 alum that taught the Japanese how to build cars in the first place .
BTW . now that the imports are building so many trucks ,there mileage ratings have dropped .Go figure
P.S. Toyota just built a plant in Canada
. . . to avoid health care costs .Is it becoming clearer or would you prefer to believe ,as the wise Jim Cramer put it ,in the Senator from Toyota :)

Posted by: Scott75 | December 5, 2008, 5:23 am 5:23 am

let’s take this one step at a time…..no company’s were in trouble before the the housing market fell…or the war in Iraq…or the loan’s were given to people too poor to make the payments….and you all say that this was all done in the last 2 years by the democrats!!!!!so we should let America go to crap to please the republicans…WOW now we are moving forward as a Country

Posted by: madashell111 | December 5, 2008, 5:33 am 5:33 am

It’s a lie that autoworkers get $70 (or $75) an hour — that false figure is the lying math of union busters in which the salaries of current workers plus their eventual retirements, plus all the money going to those retired now, are divided by just those working now.
Which amounts to claiming current workers’ paychecks also include the money actually going out to retirees.
The bailout money going to Wall Street, which makes no product (but millionaires of it’s mismanagers and paupers of those with 401ks) — why shouldn’t some of that go as loans to Detroit, which acually creates an American product sold around the world, and employs tens of thousands of workers?
Only the conditions should be: no loans if they lay off 20,000 workers. No loans unless they truly move away from fossil-fuel fossil autos.
(Although I prefer Micheal Moore’s suggestion: that we buy the Auto industry’s stock, which amounts to only 3 billion, and take over and run those industries better. Force Ford and GM to sell us the gas sippers they produce for the rest of the world, and truly go electric and green.)

Posted by: judy brown | December 5, 2008, 5:37 am 5:37 am

Oh, and by the way, where were all you Republicans when your Republican President and Congress created this godawful economic mess?
Cheering them on — and no matter what the Democrats have to do to clean up your mess, you’ll be jeering.
Republicans as the Peanut Gallery, about all they’re good at.

Posted by: judy brown | December 5, 2008, 5:41 am 5:41 am

William,
A person’s educational background is only relevent if his employer, his client and/or his date thinks it’s relevent.
“A living wage” is a ludicrous concept. For the majority of the history of the United States, $20/hr would mean the person is making the top 0.1% on the income cale . . . because $20 was worth nearly a full troy ounce of gold, worth about $750 today! That’s how the dollar was defined until 1913, in terms of gold. Government mandating “living wage” is a self-defeating concept as it only introduces inflation, wiping out real producers in favor of government parasites as the parasites always get the money first, and the real workers the last.
Living standard can only be improved by increasing productivity . . . and that means providing incentive for people to run away from obsolete jobs and switch to new productive ones. The usual mechanism for that is reducing wages for obsolete jobs to such a level that anyone hanging onto it can no longer afford a comfortable living. That’s the reason why small farmers quick farming and became factory workers at the autmaking plats a century ago. If the government had guaranteed a “living wage” on small family farms by taxing the automakers, the grandparents of UAW members would never have left the farm . . . and the living standards of all Americans, including those ex-farmer factory workers’, would have been much lower.

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 5:44 am 5:44 am

It’s the wall street bailout I am against. Nothing tangible saved. The auto industry represents millions of jobs and one of the last manufacturing industries left in the USA post Reaganomics.
The auto CEO’s are now ready to go green, finally. Let Wall Street eat the fruits of it’s own greed. We get nothing from that bailout. At least with an auto bailout we get cars.

Posted by: woodvetch | December 5, 2008, 5:46 am 5:46 am

this is not the end of the world people only the world you and i have perceive it to be and created you clearly reap what you sow and this life,the criminals are in charge of this country,let us clean house for once & all.
may god have mercy on all of us and give us the courage to do what we know is right.
your fellow american
PREZ

Posted by: PREZ | December 5, 2008, 5:52 am 5:52 am

William,
You asked how is “…paying a living wage is akin to socialism?”
I noticed you DIDN’T ask how is “…earning a living wage is akin to socialism?”
Only the one word makes a world of difference. Our society and Government is only obligated to provide OPPORTUNITY to EARN a living wage. There is no American birthright to getting PAID a living wage.
A college education increases your OPPORTUNITY to EARN a living wage, but it doesn’t guarantee you of earning one, and it doesn’t entitle you to one either. NOT having a college education decreases your opportunity to EARN a living wage. Life is about CHOICES, not RIGHTS.

Posted by: Fiercely_Independent | December 5, 2008, 5:52 am 5:52 am

Judy,
It’s not a Republican- or Democrat-exclusive mess. There’s plenty blame to go around for both parties. How many Democrats voted against Iraq War funding? How many Democrats voted against prescription subsidy? How many Democrats voted against federalizing airport screeners and other government expansion programs?
$80/hr is current overall labor cost per worker. The fact that there are less active workers today than retirees goes to show what a pyramid scam the labor contracts from the 50′s have been, all along. Just how correct the “collective negotiation” process has been.
A government-run company with the goal of job preservation . . . hmm, where have we heard that one before? The Soviet Lada factory? It will be guaranteed to turn out obsolete cars that are a complete waste of natural and human resources. Bureacrats have no incentive to innovate . . . and without profit motive, they won’t know how to innovate.

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 5:54 am 5:54 am

FG,
The Big-3 are not involved in munition production nowadays. Besides, I’d be really worried if my life depends on weapons produced with the low quality standards and corner-cutting that the Big-3 are know for.

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 6:00 am 6:00 am

The difficult decision immediately to have to be taken to rescue the world

Posted by: SimbSal | December 5, 2008, 6:01 am 6:01 am

SimbSal,
So you think the world teeters on maintaining the solvency of these three dinosaur corporations?
Interesting…

Posted by: Fiercely_Independent | December 5, 2008, 6:05 am 6:05 am

Woodvtech,
Right now, more Toyota’s, Honda’s, BMW’s, and etc. made in America are sold than are Big-3 branded vehicles sold here. Intel and Boeing turn out far more manufacturing value-addedness than the Big-3 combied. A Big-3 bailout would mean taxing all the successful manufacturers to subsidize the abject failure. That’s not how to preserve or develop a prosperous manufacturing industry.
Bailing out the banks was wrong. Two wrongs do not make a right.

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 6:05 am 6:05 am

Madashell111,
Big-3 have been in trouble for three decades now. Chrysler was on the verge of bankruptcy twice before. GM ran into trouble back in the 90′s. Ford also had its turn. The companies have been kept alive by FED easy money policies; that’s why they were so heavily engaged in auto financing . . . the only division that consistently made money at all in the last couple decades . . . because the FED have been literally stealing from savers to keep those companies going.
Yes, the Big-3 have been hanging around this long not at all because of their manufacturing prowess, but because of the financial subsidy that FED’s easy money policy have robbed the average people, both savers and suppliers, to keep the Big-3 afloat.
What Easy Money policy also produced was tremendous waste. That explains the big vehicle mix with gas guzzling engines that the Big-3 have. Do we really want waste to continue?

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 6:14 am 6:14 am

If you truly want to understand the definitive reason why this government should NOT bail-out the U.S. auto makers see the recent PBS FrontLine special “Heat” online. The by-line says it all: “For years, big business — from oil and coal companies to electric utilities to car manufacturers — have resisted change to environmental policy and stifled the debate over climate change in America and around the globe.” These thugs have acted against their own best long-term interests and against the nation’s long-term interests – FOR DECADES. Now let’s end corporate welfare. The U.S. auto industry needs to bite the dust if they’re too stupid to make it.

Posted by: Reflecting_Pool | December 5, 2008, 6:19 am 6:19 am

glogrrl, your completely wrong. The other manufacturers COMBINED dont even make up half of GMs sales when you take into account all lines, commercial military and consumer.
And people here dont seem to know that BMW,MB,Honda,Toyota,etc all GET MONEY FROM THEIR GOVERNMENTS to compete against US companies. One of the biggest scams of the auto industry is how the rest of the world went out of its way to prevent the US from giving subsidies to its auto industry, while the rest of the world is doing it for theirs to compete directly AGAINST us.
Also not one person here against the loan really understands just how dire it is. The loss of the big 3 would mean BILLIONS in revenue and job cuts, as well as will go to DIRECTLY effecting the other manufacturers in the US who get support, parts, and even labor from US makers due to sharing agreements.
The WHOLE industry is down somewhere in the relm of 30% right now, even the supposed good ones, who are being kept alive by their governments right now though no one will report that fact.
And Tim NO 80 is NOT the overall average for the worker, its about 40 when you include pension benefits. Get your act together and dont listen to republican rhetoric. Its 27-28 per hour + about 15 dollars or so in pension and benefits though even THATS a lie since none of the big three have paid into their pension plans in years now.

Posted by: Jim | December 5, 2008, 6:23 am 6:23 am

I see that most commenters here are drinking deep from the GOP/Limbaugh kool-aid trough. This is not the fault of labor. The UAW has consistently worked with management and made deep concessions with every contract re-negotiation. Auto workers do NOT make $80 an hour. That is a lie told to you by the GOP idiots you listen too. Before you go bashing unions, check out what working conditions were like before their rise. No benefits, sub-standard wages, unsafe working conditions, 60-80 hour work weeks; you know the 1800′s through to the 1920′s and the robber barons. Without organized labor, we’d still be there. If management can exploit you they will. Prior to this economic ‘crisis’ there was no incentive for the American auto makers to alter their product line. The GOP refused to raise CAFE standards, the world was buying American trucks and SUVs (not to mention the more fuel-efficient cars they make in other countries). But now it’s labor’s fault.
No, this is simply fall-out from the banking industry melt-down. The reason they are in this mess is no one is buying ANY cars, not just American cars. Why, because the banks that took billions are just hording the cash, or using it for mergers and acquisitions. They are not lending to potential car buyers. I thought that gift to Paulson’s friends and Bush’s donors was to unfreeze the credit markets. Well,they made a much bigger mess with their credit default swaps and other ludicrous Ponzi type schemes than all three of these manufacturers.
But it’s labor’s fault. Don’t forget that.

Posted by: Bill | December 5, 2008, 6:24 am 6:24 am

Tim,
Can’t you source any of your info? You seem to be so full of facts, but yet I see nothing you have to back your argument. Give me a break.

Posted by: Greg | December 5, 2008, 6:29 am 6:29 am

Simple statement about getting money from the government. I heard this on the radio so I do not dare take credit.
If you take a shower before you put on your suit for work, you get money no problem.
If you shower after you get home from the line, forget it.

Posted by: Greg | December 5, 2008, 6:35 am 6:35 am

Here’s something: Bar the degree or anything of the sort from consideration at any job unless there is a concerted effort to put *citizens* through to get a 4-year degree(at an accredited institution) without cost or at a very substantial discount(95-99%).
As for what cars exist, I am unapologetically a fan of GM. No repair record has shaken that. When the transplants stop fooling people with flashy electronics and glitter over a poky I-4 in a compact body, I’ll listen. Until they do so by making affordable performance in a car, I will do whatever it takes to buy and maintain a Detroit style car.

Posted by: seth | December 5, 2008, 6:36 am 6:36 am

This is ridiculous! Or else what???? Congress doesn’t pass anything in December or January anyway. So what exactly are they threatening the President they are going to do? They can’t get enough votes among themselves – what do they think President Bush can do about it? No wonder their approval rating is lower than the President’s. What don’t they understand about the fact that the American public does not want these bailouts to occur??

Posted by: ellsbells930 | December 5, 2008, 6:38 am 6:38 am

Their approval rating is lower because they can’t get anything done. QED.

Posted by: seth | December 5, 2008, 6:40 am 6:40 am

Folks, we gave $700b to a bunch of corrupt bankers who offered no major plan and no concessions. Now, a minor percentage of that can’t go to middle and lower-middle class workers?
Also, for those of you trashing UAW workers, keep in mind that they spend their entire lives working in loud, dangerous conditions, doing repetitive work. The money they make often goes towards healthcare down the road. How do I know? I live in Michigan, and most of my older relatives have back, joint, and other related problems from working on the line. So stop commenting on a situation you don’t even begin to understand. Our unemployment rate is already 9.3%; running GM into the ground, rather than helping it as it transitions to making better cars, will only cripple our state and other states with auto-related businesses. You might think that won’t impact you, but eventually it will.
Finally, the UAW’s fight for better working conditions for its members has had a positive impact on your lives — all of the safety regulations and worker protections you enjoy came on the backs of the union workers in places like Michigan. It’s time for you to show a little gratitude…or it could be your job next.

Posted by: Chatto | December 5, 2008, 6:41 am 6:41 am

This is a pathetic lack of leadership – just as bad as the ineffective leadership that got the big 3 in the trouble they are in now. Bush needs to make the hard decisions and show them all what needs to be done. Bust up the unions.

Posted by: kitty | December 5, 2008, 6:47 am 6:47 am

The big 3 have been greedy and too slow in moving to green technology vehicles.
No bailout!!
Have them go bankrupt, bring in new leadership, negotiate new contracts with UAW that are appropriate for marketplace, develop only vehicles getting over 35+ mpg, invest and research green technology at a faster pace.
We should be thankful that gas prices have dropped from $4.30 to $1.80, but we should not think that they’ll stay this low. We need to be focused in breaking our dependency on foreign oil!

Posted by: keval | December 5, 2008, 6:52 am 6:52 am

Saving jobs? Get a grip floks, NOBODY is BUYING cars right now. Those jobs are going away bailout or not because the car market is in the tank – for every car maker, but especially for the uncompetitive big three. And in any case, bankruptcy does not mean automatic job losses. Whatever economic value exists in those companies will be taken up by some buyer, just like already happened to Chrysler when Diamler Benz bailed out on them a couple of years ago.

Posted by: Marko | December 5, 2008, 6:55 am 6:55 am

Would someone please tell me how Citigroup can get a 300 billion dollar bailout with no congressional hearing, no oversight, and also no plan to help the american people while an auto company that provides jobs to millions not only in it own company but through it’s suppliers has to gravel for 30 billion. This is ridiculous. I will tell you why. The money to Citicorp will benifit the already rich while the money to the Big 3 will benifit the middle class. This such a sickening redistribution of wealth that there should be criminal charges brought up on anyone who opposes the auto deal if not for any other reason but on principle. The Trickle down economics has failed because the rich have put up the roof gutters right back into their own rain bucket. All of you fools who think that the Big 3 have outsourced all of the jobs just wait to see how many of your neighbors are out of work. I am not in the union and very non union but I am very pro american and this republican rebuke of the auto industry is the latest in unpatriotic class warfare that they have been conducting for the last eight years. January cannot come soon enough. God help us that we make it that long intact. Here a good saying that wraps it up.
Republicans are people too.
Mean, Greedy, Selfish People.

Posted by: Mark | December 5, 2008, 6:55 am 6:55 am

So why do you that post against the LOAN believe you will be unaffected by a auto company collapse?

Posted by: Greg | December 5, 2008, 6:56 am 6:56 am

Good God where did all these stupid people come from, LET DETROIT FAIL? What the hell are you people thinking, you do not live in a vacuum, if Detroit fails this country fails, plain and simple. Some of the people commenting here apparently don’t have the smarts to tie their shoes.

Posted by: Kudzu | December 5, 2008, 6:56 am 6:56 am

Where is this bailout money coming from? Taxpayers are already broke. I ask where is the money coming from and all i get is dumb looks and shrugged shoulders from politicians. Who then is going to bailout the taxpayer when this all topples to the ground.

Posted by: Pepper | December 5, 2008, 6:57 am 6:57 am

Because Bush, the worst example of humanity in the world, let alone the worst example of a US President, is against it says we really should take a serious look into helping the Auto Industry. Bush’s Administration idly let the Oil Industry pillage our wallets and is the ONLY President I can remember who said absolutely nothing when oil suppliers jacked up their prices. His judgment is so bad it’s fortunate for him that breathing is voluntary. Don’t turn our backs on Detroit over politics, particularly the errant Conservative brand.

Posted by: NoBushNoWay | December 5, 2008, 7:04 am 7:04 am

To Chatto:
Please consider how Honda and Toyota are able to build better vehicles without UAW type contracts.
No bailout!!
We need the big 3 to change. Having them go bankrupt will not be the end, but a chance to do things better with new dynamic leadership.
We need short-term pain for long-term gain. If we postpone the short-term pain by throwing money at this problem, we will never do the right thing. Consider the bad decisions over the years by the management at the top 3. We should have had electric vehicles years ago!!

Posted by: keval | December 5, 2008, 7:06 am 7:06 am

White collar produce nothing and get 700 billion while the blue collar manufacture and produce tangible items. If hope the middle class will come to an end then I hope you eventually suffer as well.

Posted by: milman1 | December 5, 2008, 7:09 am 7:09 am

I think they should require the unions to go, Lower the salaries of the CEO and big shots by 75% and lay down strict rules. The unions and the CEO’s and their is the reason they are in trouble. If they had made good cars they wouldn’t be in this problem. Time for them to get their act together and do it their selves. I don’t need them and as long as the Japanese make cars in this country, I will buy their products. I remember the lemons that General Motors built and they would not even talk to us about them back then.

Posted by: barefootboy | December 5, 2008, 7:09 am 7:09 am

Exactly Kudzu. I don’t know why people think that they will somehow be better off if Detroit fails.
Let’s see, let’s put it another way. If I had a thousand dollars and someone convinced me (how I don’t know)to just give them $700 without any type of plan to pay it back or show me what they would actually do with it, I would probably eventually kick my own butt. Oh, wait I get to give it to them the way I want to.
Now, since I didn’t give all of the money away at once I have what i didn’t give away set aside. A buddy of mine comes up to me and asks to borrow $30 dollars for lunch (how ironic to eat). Well, I know what he is doing with it. I know he’s good for it from a previous lunch loan I gave him. OK, maybe he shouldn’t have wasted so much money in Vegas, but he never failed to pay me back in the past.
$24 compared to $700. Not much comparison really.

Posted by: Greg | December 5, 2008, 7:09 am 7:09 am

These are American jobs, American companies. Of course Bush doesn’t want to help and neither do the NeoCons. More for the crooked banks, Wall Street and the other GOP butt buddies….nothing for REAL America.

Posted by: Clint | December 5, 2008, 7:12 am 7:12 am

Nationalize the Auto Industry under the aegis of the EPA and let the goals of personal transportation be guided by survival on all fronts.

Posted by: structurequity | December 5, 2008, 7:14 am 7:14 am

Obviously all the people who don’t want anything to do with socialistic behavior are all debt free with huge savings accounts they can live on through a depression.
History repeats! Lunacy is not trying to right a wrong.
SEE YA IN THE SOUP LINE!

Posted by: didyoueverthinkofthat? | December 5, 2008, 7:16 am 7:16 am

This is a loan. Unlike AIG (300 billion tax payers dollars), Unlike Wall Street (Billions of tax payers dallors). You folks seem to be harsh on an industry that has carried this nation for 100 years, paid taxes for 100 years, and supported millions of Americans for 100 years. If your problem is with the UAW then say it is. Being critical of the industry itself, sounds more like you really want to rely on China and Japan should we have to engage in war. Because that is what every red-blooded american would have to do. We would have to be at the mercy China, Japan & Tiawan for all war supplies. We have given up enough to NAFTA, now this nation wants to rely on other countries for our security. Keep up this attitute, and our freedoms will be sacrified, giving up our rights- everything our forfathers had fought for. DO YOU WANT TO COMPLETELY RELY ON THESE OTHER COUNTRIES?
I agree, reduce wages, re-negotiate wages, cut exec bonuses, and eliminate job positions that seem redundant. (too many chiefs and not enough indians). The nepitism in the UAW is very prominent, and needs to stop. We must have true talent in the workplace and you can not do that with someone who has been cultured by greed and the misconceptions that you are worth more than you really are. I am a true believer that you are paid what your worth. Aything more, shame on them, anything less, shame on me.

Posted by: DKD | December 5, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am

If the Big 3 Car companies go into bankruptcy, they are unlikely to make it out.
Would you buy a car from a company that is bankrupt? Who would finance the car companies to get them out of bankruptcy?
The car manufacturing industry is not like the airline industry where all the do is fly from 1 place to another or the retail industry where you can buy new merchandise and rent new space and start up. Car companies need part suppliers that can’t easily be replaced if they go out of business.
The parts manufacturer’s will go out of business next. They supply parts for both domestic and many foreign cars that are made in the US. Thus, even the foreign car plants in the US might close (as noted in 1 post, some of the foreign cars are made by the Big 3 auto makers).
All of the domestic dealerships, repair shops, car transport companies would go out of business.
All of the jobs in car manufacturing – parts, new cars, would go overseas.
This would likely cause a depression in the US (and push unemployment up >10%). The depression would likely last years. You would need to pay unemployment benefits and health insurance for all of the unemployed people.
Most of these jobs would never come back.
All of the purchasing power of all of the people employed in the domestic car manufacturing, sales, and service industries would be lost.
Community support and advertising provided by domestic car companies and local auto dealerships would be gone.
We should at least try to save them. We are spending $700 billion on the financial system and they are asking for
$34 billion.
GM and the other companies actually make popular, fuel efficient cars in Europe so if they can use those cars as a starting point, they might do well.
Think carefully about this. If the Big 3 go under, we might very well be heading for another Great Depression. Already we are in the worse recession since the Great Depression. Unlike other recent recessions, all of the major economies of the world are in or heading into recession.

Posted by: DM | December 5, 2008, 7:18 am 7:18 am

Ford and GM already build cars that meet the future US standards. Thing is, they only sell them in Europe. Look at Ford’s UK website, the cars are not only nicer, but they are very efficient.
The Economy cannot absorb 3 million lost jobs…..period. Why are we having this discussion? Since we are talking about workers and not fat cat Wall Street managers, Republicans do not seem to care. If you watch the hearings, the auto makers were put in a hot seat and you can see the contempt in the committees attitude. When Wall Street was there FOR THE SAME REASON AND FOR MORE MONEY it looked like a cigar lounge. For Wall Street it was “You need money, here, have all you want, we will not give you any oversight at all”. For the Auto Industry it was “You here for average Americans, we can’t have that, by the way, how did you get here”. It’s crazy.

Posted by: Jackson | December 5, 2008, 7:19 am 7:19 am

Look like the right wing is not finished wrecking America. If GM falls it will be like dominoes…..depression…..

Posted by: lighthorseharry | December 5, 2008, 7:20 am 7:20 am

I wonder if this would even be an issue if Paulson worked at GM before becoming Treasury Secretary instead of previously working for Goldman Sachs?
Maybe he would have pushed just as hard for the auto makers and the puppet (Bush) would have agreed and the appropriations would have been passed in a week.

Posted by: Greg | December 5, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am

The downward spiralling economic heart-attack in the US is showing some of the historical earmarks of a seismic catastrophe of unintended consequences from an opaque (non-transparent), incomprehensible, arbitrary, inconsistent treasury policy decisions regarding a series of bailout versus no-bailout decisions.
Recessions and depressions are seldom caused by exactly identical sets of factors. People would probably not know which one single miscalculation at the Federal Reserve, or the Treasury, or Congress, or the White House, out of a cumulative and mounting series of miscalculations, causes the final fatal blow that sends the economy and the nation spiralling out of control. BUT, the mounting evidence of cumulative dysfunctional decision processes at top levels of corporate and governmental decision makers is becoming more apparent with each passing day of this long crisis.
Historians will no doubt untangle the web of folly on hindsight. It’s leaders with little wisdom or foresight that trigger such seismic calamities. It’s the people that suffer. But who put those foolish leaders in positions of power?

Posted by: Chopin | December 5, 2008, 7:21 am 7:21 am

Bail ‘em out. This country can’t stand another major industry collapse. If they tank it effects their suppliers and their employees and ultimately everyone else. Why should the financial industry be the only free ride. It’s a loan. They’ll have to pay back. Make ‘em go green and give ‘em the money.

Posted by: imma_wake | December 5, 2008, 7:22 am 7:22 am

Only a $700 bailout?
And here I thought we were talking billions!

Posted by: bud nathans | December 5, 2008, 7:25 am 7:25 am

Too funny. I hope all you righties are ready for the depression your pushing for. AIG? White collar men making six figures. No questions asked. A middle class worker making 50K? Let them starve. If they don’t get theirs your not getting yours so watch out what you hope for.
And why are these righies so willing to give all our industries to foreigners?

Posted by: Wally | December 5, 2008, 7:28 am 7:28 am

I am fascinated by all of this conversation. While Japan, South Korea, and Germany all provide bridge loans to help out the other automakers, and we the United States provide subsidies for foreign car manufacturers to build factories in our country, so many Americans are not willing to assist essentially our largest employer of blue collar workers in a time of economic downturn. We are willing to help those people who do not make anything (Wall Street Banking and Investment companies) but we would consider letting US manufacturing fail. Which means that United States steel folds, all the companies that makes parts for these companies, all the companies (large and small) that support these workers – we let them fail too.
Helping out these industries right now is not Socialist, as some would argue, its simply attempting to survive this mess.

Posted by: JustSteve | December 5, 2008, 7:28 am 7:28 am

WHY is it an IMMEDIATE EMERGENCY for the Big 3 to get this bailout money?
Can’t they wait until January 20, for Obama to sign this bill? After all, the Democrats won the state of Michigan, so the Dems should support the bailout. Why is there such desperation and it has to be done right now?
I support the bailout LOAN, but I do not think it has to be right now.

Posted by: anotherperspective1 | December 5, 2008, 7:30 am 7:30 am

I was just notified yesterday I will lose my job in two months. I heard no mention of a bailout. I have little sympathy for these people. I don’t have the demographics handy, but I believe Michigan continues to vote Democrats into office as quickly as they can. This tells me their plan is to destroy the state as quickly as possible. Providing this money would therefore be self-defeating.

Posted by: KJB | December 5, 2008, 7:30 am 7:30 am

Heard of an analogy?
Simply comparing the numbers.
$700 billion and no answers, plans or oversight.
$24 billion and all of the answers they were asked for.
24 vs. 700
Do you see the comparison?

Posted by: Greg | December 5, 2008, 7:30 am 7:30 am

I see the republicans on this board think they still run the country because they did SUCH a good job over the last 8 years. Go away and let the dems do what they have to to get us back on track. Maybe you arrogance will wear off after you lose your ob and your house because of republican policies…

Posted by: ohplease! | December 5, 2008, 7:36 am 7:36 am

Yeah..let em’ go bankrupt. Send 3M to the streets and let every one of those $75 per hour jerks walk out. Yeah..who cares if 3M Americans out of work. Bush will save us..We could send them to LA and they could clear those towns of garbage from LA to TX. They could live in those asbestos trailers. Eventually we could create another state. Call it the State of Poverty directly funded by unemployment insurance and Medicare and food stamps. Screw em’. They deserve it. We could have direct rail transport from suburbs of Detroit right to that new state. Maybe we could get Joe the Plumber to be president and Phil Gramm Treasurer. Yeah. Then bring back Delay, after his pardon, and then have Cheney head dept of the (immigration) fence.
We could set up all those cars that ain’t selling and have them live in brand new caddys and olds and lincolns.
And then Bush could come down and tell us once again how we need to attack Iraq because they were responsible for 9/11.
And then let’s give another $700B to the top 1% like we’ve done since 2003 so that Cheney gets another $334,000 tax refund.
When someone intelligently explains to me how all this financial disaster came together at this one point in history and states just one implemented plan of Bush and treasury that actually worked so far then I will join the lynch mob who want the car companies to just fold up and go away.
Paulson is in Asia while America melts down. Bush is on national TV attempting to skew history and blaming intel for Iraq.
And for those 59M Americans who voted for Bush in 2004. You’re still dumb!

Posted by: Jim Let Em Go Bankrupt..Yeah | December 5, 2008, 7:40 am 7:40 am

Congratulations Democrats!
We can’t afford to lose this industry no matter who’s fault their failure is. The Chinese and Japanese will buy it off and we’ll lose more jobs as they outsource even more. Europe has been much wiser and less divided. They’ve set a good example that we should follow.

Posted by: ilouie | December 5, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am

Why should the auto industry and its employees be given this special treatment? Lots of other folks are out of work too and lost their homes.
The only way to clean up the corruption and money grubbers in our country is to let it fall to the bottom of the barrel and start all over. As for the union wage auto workers, get rid of the 11 million illegals in this country and take over their jobs.

Posted by: Jesse | December 5, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am

The US government should order a complete replacement for its vehicle fleet to be delivered over the next four years. The new vehicles must be either plugin electric hybrid, pure electric, or possibly natural gas. Obviously retooling both at the manufacturers and suppliers is required to deliver this order so the government should be willing to prepay a significant part of it as it does for new weapons systems. That gets money into the system fast and creates/saves jobs almost immediately. It lets the suppliers retool as well as the final assemblers.

Posted by: Tom Evslin | December 5, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am

To everyone wishing for the death of the auto industry, if the auto industry dies so does our economy. Yes, they’ve made bad decisions but this is a national emergency. This is not only about the auto industry, dealers and suppliers. It’s about construction, manufacturing, restaurants, grocery stores, etc. It’s about our entire economy. Do you really want to experience a depression? Talk to you grandparents.

Posted by: Eric | December 5, 2008, 7:44 am 7:44 am

All of the commentors on this article make me laugh! This has nothing to do with a bailout for the automakers. Bush and the Republicans jumped on the $700B for the finanical industry with little justification to help out their buddies. Bush and the Republicans actually want the automaker to go under and break up the UAW, which is a HUGE supporter of democrats. It is really just that simple.
WAKE UP FOOLS!!!!

Posted by: Josh | December 5, 2008, 7:45 am 7:45 am

If Congress is going to bail out the auto industry who is run by the UAW just so noone loses their jobs, then they also need to consider bailing out other businesses like Circuit City, Linens and Things and everyother company that is closing its doors. Where does it stop? Who decideds that your job isn’t as important as an auto worker who makes 5,6,7 or 8 times your salary and will continue to make a good salary even after being laid off. They also still have their excellent health insurance at no cost, how many other workers can say that after being laid off? I think if congress wants to bail them out their should be stipulations 1. Workers take a pay cut, 1/2 their salary would be a good start even more better. 2. Give the UAW a kick in the A$$ out of company in other words dissolve it. They are the reason for this problem with obscene wages and benefits. 3. If the worker is laid off he collects unemployment like everyone else and has to provide his own health ins after 30 days. No more free ride for years. 3. No bonuses for anyone, since I the tax payer is going to have an investment in this company I feel there isn’t anyone there that is doing anything to deserve a bonus oh, and we the tax payer decided what the excutives will be earning. 4. Tell them to bring back their overseas plants to AMERICA (the place that is bailing them out). And last but not least, LET THE OIL COMPANIES WITH THEIR BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN PROFITS BAIL OUT THE AUTO INDUSTY, after all how much profit would they lose if it weren’t for gas guzzeling cars? I know your thinking there would be no regulation if the oil companies bail them out well isn’t the oil companies now preventing them from finding other alternatives to gas. There are cars out there invented that use garbage, cooking oil, and various other fuels.

Posted by: Concerned | December 5, 2008, 7:46 am 7:46 am

Boy……….ABC DISNEY has done it’s work well.!
All those kids shows role modeling the WRONG VALUES, have produced a LOT of THINKING CHALLENGED, adults who post here!
Don’t you ever watch Cspan to see the republicans in OBSTRUCTIONIST action for the last 8 years?? The Democrats fault? I don’t think so.
Just who is it that supports the viscious,
character assasignation that passes for elections.? Learn how to be catty viscious, and emphasize winning above playing fair, right there on Hannah Montana!
Paulson has run away with the $700,….. & isn’t using it to FIX the PROBLEM.
The auto WORKERS DO NOT EARN $80.00 per hour; that’s a myth, nor do they design the vehicles or ther advertising, why penalize them? and every little Mom & Pop restaurant, dollar store etc, that would suffer from their job loss?

Posted by: pat | December 5, 2008, 7:49 am 7:49 am

WHOAH ! Back up here a moment. Didn’t we just hear a while back that if the banking system didn’t get our money we would have an economic meltdown ? Now we’re being told that if we don’t bailout the deaf, dumb, and blind american auto industry it will lead to an economic meltdown? AGAIN ? Let the oil companies bail out these car companies that keep pushing SUV’s and bigger and bigger trucks down our throats !!! They have had years to get it together, remember when we bailed them out in the 90′s ? Make a decent product- you’re just a business like any other……poor quality & performance for decades.
Ford makes well designed European models , how hard is it move a factory?
LET THEM FAIL…LET THEM FAIL….LET THEM FAIL….LET THEM FAIL….LET THEM FAIL….!

Posted by: betz55 | December 5, 2008, 7:53 am 7:53 am

Do give them nothing. Let these big
companies see what is it like. When all
the jobs was shipped to China back in
the 1990′s no one seemed to care about
us. Bring those jobs back, stop of this
importing let these companies only bring
about 20% imports in and the country
will most likely get it jobs back &
people can find a job. Furniture &
textiles in America are gone, look
how many people lost jobs then, did
the Dems & rep. care about us? We can
get this country back on track if we
had someone that would help – is the
new president elect willing to do that
Time will tell – NO TO USING MY MONEY
TO BAIL OUT THESE PEOPLE WHO MIS -
MANAGED THE MONEY THEY WAS MAKING!!!

Posted by: Vicky | December 5, 2008, 7:55 am 7:55 am

There’s a balance here. The auto industry provides millions of jobs and support jobs for America, almost 3 million jobs which is about 1-2% of the labor force in America. Additionally, many of these jobs are middle class, with benefits and pension benefits (with unions that collect pension and welfare contributions there is a capital markets component to the industry as well). The destruction of car dealers, manufacturers, third party suppliers and reduction in fuel, transport and support will drive us over the depression edge. We’ll have to support the people as they lose their homes, medical benefits, watch the resultant plunge as their unions liquidate all the managed funds to return them to membership. We need a quantitative analysis of the results, and if we feel the investment is justified we can make it. Iacocca turned Chrysler around from the brink, so it can be done.

Posted by: Regular Guy Economics | December 5, 2008, 7:56 am 7:56 am

Bush going for four:
New York
Bagdad
New Orleans
Detroit
The man is gifted.

Posted by: Trifecta | December 5, 2008, 7:58 am 7:58 am

I think the American people need to be bailed out from the Federal government. When it is time to step up and help us all they want to do is play politics as usual. The economy is not what will eventually sink us all, it will be the lack of government leadership.

Posted by: Gary | December 5, 2008, 7:59 am 7:59 am

Greg -Maybe you should actually READ my post. I did NOT say that Congress has done nothing in the last two years. I said that Congress doesn’t pass anything in December…. because they typically aren’t in session. So don’t give me a lecture on reading. (Besides the fact, you know NOTHING about me and how much TV I watch vs. how much I read).

Posted by: ellsbells930 | December 5, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am

I love my New Escape, But Ford and the others can digg themselves out out of this mess. Or I buy a BMW, VW or Mercedes Benz.
Either way the Bailouts are an insult to the American Public and taxpayers. What was once thought to be a saving of our financial institutions and homeowners, has turned into bailing out the wealthy and inept greedy Dems & independents.
Let the whole thing rot away and find someone else to make your investments with. Get a new bank account at another bank.

Posted by: Butcher | December 5, 2008, 8:00 am 8:00 am

All of those who are complaining about bailing out the auto industry with strings attached, are also sheep when comes to a more massive bailout to the financial industry with absolutely no strings attached.
Bizarre.

Posted by: GW | December 5, 2008, 8:01 am 8:01 am

Do any of you republicans understand how our government works? The congress writes laws the president enacts them and supports them with funding from the federal budget. Duh! Bush can’t just “pass the buck and force others to make a tough decision” as some of you have suggested. He is the president. He has to approve the loan. That’s his role as president. Sheesh.
That said, I don’t like the idea of corporate socialism any better than most of you, but it’s not that simple. Whether we loan them money or just pay it in unemployment benefits when they go belly up, we’re gonna pay either way. We just need to see which will give American taxpayers the best ROI.
As far as the Buy American argument goes, that’s not capitalism, that’s a kind of socialism. Consumers don’t have an obligation to use their hard-earned money to purchase lousy products and underwrite poor leadership at these struggling companies. That would also be a form of the socialism you hate.
Furthermore, do you realize that we already have numerous socialist policies in place? Yes, we do. Why? Because strict capitalism is amoral and doesn’t take in account the welfare of the workers. For instance, social security, unemployment benefits, the minimum wage, worker’s comp, the 40-hour work week, child-employment laws, medicare, medicaid, etc. These all came about as ways to limit the destructive, downward pressure on workers, BECAUSE, if you read your Marx, the cost of labor is the only thing business owners can control. So without these tools in place we’d all be at the mercy of industrialist/capitalists and the petty bourgeoisie.
So don’t be so quick to trash talk socialism. Unfettered capitalism is neither moral or immoral. It’s amoral, and because of this it is the job of governments to manage it in such a way as to allow for making the benefits of capitalism (entrepreneurialism, job creation, wealth creation, etc.) work for everyone equitably without destroying the proletariat in the process. Socialism is all about protecting the workers of the world from the destructive aspects of capitalism. It’s to your benefit to understand this. No one wants to be 100 percent socialist, but when you criticize what you don’t understand you run the risk of hurting yourself and the country. WAKE UP!

Posted by: kallisti7 | December 5, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am

The US auto industry has a giant sucking chest wound from a Desert Eagle .50 cal and the UAW offered up concessions that are roughly equivilent to the free sample of Breathe Right nasal strips which comes with the small box of bandaids.
I wonder how Gettelfinger was able to keep a straight face during his press conference.
The President should give nothing in the way of a bailout to the UAW until they step up to the plate with real concessions. The big 3 need a partner in labor, not a bully who has forced them into an unsustainable business model. To heck with the Detroit, the big 3 and the Dems. The Dems have been masterful in sidesteping blame this year, but the party is over. Bush has his flaws and mistakes, but soon he will not be there to blame and the sheeple will have to wake up.

Posted by: psuross | December 5, 2008, 8:02 am 8:02 am

Big Three Promise Green Future But Spent Millions To Lobby Against It
Let em sink… they’ve had YEARS and plenty of money to get up to snuff long before now. If we weren’t bailing out Wall Street I seriously doubt these clowns would have gotten in line for this latest handout.
They have raped the American public with overpriced inefficient cars for years, bought patents that would have given us 100 mpg or better… and now come whining after they have spent millions lobbying for their own self interests, not having enough to get through next year?

Posted by: littlemoon | December 5, 2008, 8:03 am 8:03 am

Paulson worked hard to get that money for his buddies on Wall Street. It not fair to ask him to share it with anyone else. We don’t want to pi$$ him off, do we?

Posted by: OneFootInTheGrave | December 5, 2008, 8:04 am 8:04 am

Why can’t the automakers get loans from the banks? I thought that’s why we gave the banks a bailout.. so they could keep money circulating, Ie.. LENDING to businesses. I think the dems are right, the banks should recirculate the money in the form of loans. Right now they are sitting on it, or worse, using it to acquire more assets. That is NOT what the taxpayer bargained for.

Posted by: a reader in georgia | December 5, 2008, 8:04 am 8:04 am

Sure the Big 3 have their problems, but they’re pretty much all that’s left in the manufacturing sector in this country. Why NOT bail them out? We’ve already given billions to the financial sector, whose only contribution to our economy is funny money and shell games. At least the Big 3 actually MAKE something useful for this country.
I say buy a controlling stake in them, and thereby get them to make fuel efficient cars here like they do in Europe and elsewhere, and then give us taxpayers (who are now basically shareholders) discounts on these new green cars. Win-win. That way we’ll actually get something back from their bailout, unlike the black hole of the financial industry.

Posted by: Chester | December 5, 2008, 8:08 am 8:08 am

Republican policies caused this economic meltdown, but as usually, the ignorant cowards refuse to do anything about it. In my 61 years on earth, I have never despised a Party more than the Republicans. May those who support their selfish ways rot in hell along with Bush, Cheney and all the freakin Republican crooks who have reeked havoc on this nation. Republican and their party are dead in the eyes of most Americans

Posted by: krb | December 5, 2008, 8:10 am 8:10 am

Why did the “FAT CATS” get it but the auto industry didn’t? Because now it involves avg. people not the Bushies buddies. This is sick Well they just might not get it. Another wonderful peace if the great Bush Legacy! How i brought America to its knees. I GW Bush did what my grand pa Prescott an the Nazi’s couldn’t do This man belongs in jail not Dallas,

Posted by: Bill L | December 5, 2008, 8:10 am 8:10 am

I actually think bankrupcy would be best for the automakers. They are going to shed jobs anyway folks, and bankrupcy means restructuring, not closing the doors. And the best thing of all, it means they get to break their union contracts.

Posted by: Let em Go Under | December 5, 2008, 8:13 am 8:13 am

They’re just trying to pin one more thing on Bush before he leaves office so Obama doesn’t have to deal with it.

Posted by: Suze | December 5, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am

elephant in the room. healthcare costs. driving everyone insane. including unions and corporations. other industrialized nations have nationalized healthcare and the corps and unions don’t have to reconcile that in their business model.
wake up america

Posted by: e | December 5, 2008, 8:17 am 8:17 am

Apart from the politics of politicians and of most of the other posters, here are the facts:
1. The auto industry is not just about cars – it is the basis of most of our entire manufacturing section, literally millions of jobs.
2. Loss of this vital sector means the following:
a. an instant depression
b. loss of American manufacturing independence and national security
c. a further loss of the dwindling American middle class
3. The loan/bailout is chump change compared to the no strings gift made to a handful of do nothing, make nothing money changers.
We live or die with the auto industry and we must accept that lots of “unfair” steps will have to be taken to simply survive.

Posted by: Socrates | December 5, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am

After reading all these comments in favor of letting the Big 3 go under, I am thrilled. Finally the American people realize that funding the big 3 is a waste of time. Oil prices are going to rise again. Food prices are going to rise again even more. It could easily be two years or even longer before the banks are going to extend credit again. We won’t be able to afford the cars they build or the gas to run them. Bailing them out is putting off the inevitable.
Guess what folks!! We are about to become the most environmentally conscious and least obese nation on the planet. Buy a Bike! O and please…BUY AMERICAN!

Posted by: bikes4everyone | December 5, 2008, 8:18 am 8:18 am

Surely the auto industry is more worthy of a bailout than Wall Street. The scandal is not the auto industry but the outrageous giveaway Paulson made with Wall Street. We cannot allow the auto industry to go under. The effects of that will be cataclysmic.

Posted by: Jay | December 5, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am

V. Rogers,
Great points. I actually think we should have bailed out the auto industry rather than the financial industry. And we didn’t put ANY strings on that money we gave to the banks, while we rake the auto guys over the coals. The banks were supposed to use federal money to lend to businesses and consumers. #1- the car makers should qualify for some of those loans.. and #2 more credit means more consumers and businesses will buy more cars. But instead, the banks are sitting on the cash, or acquiring other banks. Once again, working for themselves and not for the good of the nation… with OUR MONEY! Every single politician in washington should be thrown out. And yeah, that includes the messiah Obama.

Posted by: a reader in georgia | December 5, 2008, 8:22 am 8:22 am

After Wall Street we now have Washington Street. After Banks and Automakers bailout we may have the Airlines bailout, Hotels bailout, Restaurants bailout, Casinos bailout, Health Care bailout…

Posted by: Paulo Ferrucio | December 5, 2008, 8:27 am 8:27 am

Hey Mr. President and Democrats. How about you bail ME out. Hey, lets just give that 700 billion to the American people, that’s about 2 million and some change each – now that’s a stimulus package! I’m supporting myself and my 5 month old on 12 bucks an hour yet you want to take money from me to bailout these fat cats? Since we’re just tossing the taxpayers money around, how bout you bail me out?

Posted by: Suze | December 5, 2008, 8:28 am 8:28 am

Why is ok to bail out Wall Street but it’s not ok for Main Street? Yes the auto industry is to blame for their own fiasco but can you really say with a straight face that Wall Street didn’t ask for their troubles? Why isn’t congress asking the banks for a restructuring plan? It’s typical Republican hypocracy. This is Detroit, this is an American icon. Can we just let it die like the rest of America?

Posted by: Richard | December 5, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am

Auto workers do not make $80 a hour! Get your facts straight!! They average $28 dollars a hour! That is a far cry from $80!! Whatever side you are on regarding the bail out make sure your facts are right before you make an arguement.

Posted by: Rebecca | December 5, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

Now it is easy to understand why the Democratically led Congress has an approval rating that is even lower than President Bush’s.

Posted by: Sam | December 5, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

I am sad to read so much hate towards the auto industry. Most of the negative comments are about the UAW. The UAW is only a small part of the picture. It sounds like most Americans think that the entire industry is UAW.Do your homework. I am a designer. I have no union. I went to school got an education and work hard. I have no union. There are thousands of designers, engineers, buyers, analysts, etc… We have no union and our jobs are in jeopardy.

Posted by: momof4 | December 5, 2008, 8:32 am 8:32 am

I own two cars; one a FORD and the other an INFINITI. The Ford has 68,000 miles and the Infiniti 218,000. Both are same year. Why does the Infiniti have three times the mileage….. he runs great. The Ford has been in and out of the shop so many times we couldn’t put mileage on it. No wonder Ford is going bankrupt. The old advertising tag line for Ford was “Job One”. To me it meant Repair One. If your products are inferior, no one will buy them. Then you go bankrupt. Good-bye USA auto industry.

Posted by: Bob | December 5, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am

If they can reward the incompetence and bad management on Wall St then why not Detroit? Detroit has been a bad business model for decades so really they are more deserving than Wall St. Besides the auto guys only want a small fraction of whats been given away on Wall St. I think those poor Detroit CEOs deserve an AIG spa trip! Remember the French revolution and those royal heads? That’s what we need now. Wall St, Washington, Detroit, off with all their heads!

Posted by: Craig | December 5, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am

As a flight attendant and union member for 10 years who had to give major contract concessions when the govnmnt would not give airlines anymore money and we had to save ourselves I was astonished to see what an auto union member makes. It is twice what I make as well as my firefighter husband. I am definately against corprate greed but when your making that kind of money in a small town where cost of living is less, I think the union auto member could give back some. If I have gotten by in a big expensive city with a new house and no credit card debt, they can too!

Posted by: cmoniz | December 5, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am

As a flight attendant and union member for 10 years who had to give major contract concessions when the govnmnt would not give airlines anymore money and we had to save ourselves I was astonished to see what an auto union member makes. It is twice what I make as well as my firefighter husband. I am definately against corprate greed but when your making that kind of money in a small town where cost of living is less, I think the union auto member could give back some. If I have gotten by in a big expensive city with a new house and no credit card debt, they can too!

Posted by: cmoniz | December 5, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am

I’m from Michigan, lived there almost my entire life although I’ve gotten out of there. Those who work(ed) for the Big 3 made their beds and are now being forced to lie in them. NO BAILOUT! It’s one thing to bailout industries that have American’s retirement funds tied into them it’s a wholly different story to bailout a manufacturer. They make a product we Americans don’t really want anymore. It doesn’t matter though because Gov’t is completely out of control and we have NO say in what they do anymore. The BIG 3 will pizz this money away and come asking for more within 3 months. Period.

Posted by: Penny31 | December 5, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am

The majority of American citizens are saying “No bailout!”
The majority of American citizens don’t approve of organized labor and it’s execs.
The majority of Americans don’t like the Wall Street bailout.
Who is listening to the American people?

Posted by: Aaron | December 5, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am

The survival of Capitalism, as well as Democracy, will only occur if a ‘Trickle Up’ bailout is applied. ie, Give the money to the taxpayers and allow them to ‘support’ the companies and industries that provide the ‘consumers’ with the best ‘product’ and ‘service’ available. Survival of the Fittest.

Posted by: Franklin Viola | December 5, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am

A lot of “heat” about the “Big 3″. If you watched the Senate Commitee hearing, Senator Corker (R-Tenn.) made a lot of sense. Even with a “bailout”, they’re not going to make it. Many referenced the Chrysler bailout years ago. Many years ago people were buying cars and banks were loaning money but that is not the case now. What troubles me the most is knowing that the $700 Billion we are flushing down the toilet with the financial institutions could have been put to better use. Home foreclosures, american industry etc. etc. A lot of people are going to end up suffering before this is over. It is all very, very sad.

Posted by: ray sparks | December 5, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am

Whats wrong with everyone..I have heard so many people against this bailout but not many people complaining about the 700 billion BUSH gave the banks that hasnt done squat….Im not for any bailouts but since BUSH and congress was so fast to approve the 700 billion…Take it out of that and give it to them…I would rather the auto industry get it than the banks that have already spent hugh amounts of the money on perks…..I have saw a few people on here feel the way I do…If the bankks had no money due to people not being able to pay off thier loans…Why not take all the money the government could come up with and give it to tax payers to pay thier mortages and credit card bills and auto loans…That would help everyone…The banks would get the money and people could get caught up on thier bills and be able to breath again and not lose everything they had…The real crime was giving the financial instutions the 700 billion…Thats what everyone should be in an uproar about…..Have the banks ever gave anyone of you a break…If you dont have money to pay the banks what do they do…Thats right…Take your property back and sue you for the rest of the money you owe them and kick you to the poor house…

Posted by: pete1960 | December 5, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am

They should let capitalism take its course. If the auto makers fail, they can file bankruptcy. There will be another company to come in and fill the void. Until then, everyone who voted Dem will be happy to know that socialism is rearing its ugly head.

Posted by: val | December 5, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

I am so looking forward to Jan 20, 2009 when the Democrats can fix everything that is wrong with the country. We will have peace and undreamed of prosperity. The stupid Republicans don’t understand that Obama and a Democrat Congress will save us and the Republicans will never win an election again.

Posted by: M. Simon | December 5, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

I was against the initial bailout for the financial corps. However, since it was passed and signed, why not take 5% of it and structure a loan for the auto makers.
Emotionally, I would love to see all the wall street bankers and Detroit automakers fail. Rationally, I think the average american would end up damaged more than any of the execs at these companies, if that happened.

Posted by: Nichole | December 5, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

I love how everyone wants the big three to die so that this country will finally have to go through the hell that it deserves. Admit it, we all want total chaos. Going to the mall is getting boring. This country needs catharsis and political revolution, let teh chips fall where they may.

Posted by: Tpayne | December 5, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

About auto workers supposedly making 80$ and hour: it’s bunk, plain and simple. The median pay for auto workers is 28$/hr. Add benefits and you *might* get to about 40$/hr.
The only way to get that idiotic 73$/hr number being floated about is to add in all the obligations owed RETIRED workers, which the auto industry must now pay out of pocket, BECAUSE THEY STOLE THAT MONEY IN THE PAST AND NOW THEY HAVE TO PAY IT BACK. To blame the auto workers for their bosses stealing their money is rich indeed.

Posted by: DR | December 5, 2008, 8:55 am 8:55 am

Darren: You need to wake up and smell the dollars. The Democrats supported Bush on the bailout plan. The Republicans were all for it after they got their Billions of “pork” added on. That pork alone could have provided the bridge the Big 3 is asking for.

Posted by: ray sparks | December 5, 2008, 8:56 am 8:56 am

Jim Let Em Go Bankrupt,
Can’t we get more Jeff Daniels commercials on to save Michigan? It would just break my poor little heart to see Detroit turn into post-Katrina New Orleans but without all the wind and water. The thought of all those $75/hr unskilled workers left to looting their local Walmart just brings a tear to my eye. But fortunately for Michigan they’ve got effective Kathleen Blanco level competence in Granholm. And fortunately for the rest of the US, the Office of the President Elect has selected Jennifer Granholm to expand Michigan’s awesome economic policies everywhere. Awesome!

Posted by: turtle | December 5, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Wall street gets big money with no
strings attached. So, Wall street
parties and hand out big bonuses.
Even rename some stadiums after
corrupt banks.
The Republicans thinks that is just
dandy.
The Auto industry wants a loan costing
only five percent of what Wall street
bankers get. And the Republicans
become shocked, angry and upset.
Moral of the story, the Republicans
and GOP could care less about the
working people of America.

Posted by: Edward | December 5, 2008, 8:59 am 8:59 am

Half the comments on here are ridiculous.
First, the Democrats cannot make any decisions on whether to use the TARP money for a bail-out. The Presdient and the treasury control the money. So it is not that the dems that are not making a decision, as they are not in control of the money.
Second, this is a loan. It will be paid back. It is not a free give away. Many other countries around the planet are now giving money to support their domestic auto industry. The credit crisis made the auto sectors’ access to capital difficult. The government is being asked to fill the gap. It is only a temporary measure.
Finally, all the firms of Wall Street are getting almost 100x more money from the government with no questions asked. Seems a bit silly to bail-out Wall Street and not take a look at the auto sector as well. If any of the auto companies file for bankrupcy it will push this country much much deeper into a recession.
Bush does not want to act as he does not really care because he is leaving and goverment help goes against everything the Republicans supposively stand for, even though they helped create this credit crisis and recession, which has really hurt the auto sector at a time when they are trying to turn themselves around.

Posted by: Phil | December 5, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am

The Democrat Congress votes the money. The Republican President signs the bill.
Why is that so hard?

Posted by: M. Simon | December 5, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am

When are some people going to learn that the bailout of the big three is not about helping some crooked execs or a bloated union. It is about JOBS in a FAILING ECONOMY. The Nov. Job report just came out 533,000 jobs lost the most since 1974. This economy is headed into a VAST tailspin and you want to take actions that will make it FAR worse??? Are you people INSANE? It isn’t just the union jobs that will be lost, though in and of itself that would be bad enough, it is also about the parts manufacturing jobs and the jobs lost at dupont who make the paint ect ect. Lost jobs mean lost consumers which in turn mean MORE lost jobs and so on. I understand the sentiment to stick it to these guys but now is NOT the time for knee-jerk reactions to the GREATEST economic crisis this country has had since the great depression. Yet still people want to play the blame game. Please, for you sake and mine, stop acting like CHILDREN.

Posted by: Chris | December 5, 2008, 9:02 am 9:02 am

How many of you that are against helping the American Automobile Industry have investments in 401K’s or have jobs? Are you crazy?! If the U.S. automobile industry goes down you can bet the farm that what is currently a recession will turn into another great depression. Is that what you want? Get a brain!

Posted by: Ronald Joseph | December 5, 2008, 9:03 am 9:03 am

“First, the Democrats cannot make any decisions on whether to use the TARP money for a bail-out.”
So pass a new law. That is what Congress does. Complaining about Bush this and Bush that is getting seriously old. CONGRESS writes the laws. The President signs/vetos them.
While you may “think” Bush is a dictator, he is not and does not have the power to be one.
Learn how the US Government functions.

Posted by: Darren | December 5, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

Why can’t the Detroit auto workers give up half of their wages and benefits to help their companies get through this very difficult time? I remember this was what a lot of Koreans did to save their country during the Asian financial crisis in 1997.

Posted by: DelegateMath | December 5, 2008, 9:04 am 9:04 am

Edward,
Your comment is ridiculous. The Demcrats supported the initial $700 bn bailout significantly more than the Republicans. The only reason the pork was added to the bill was to get the Republicans to vote for the bill. Go read your history on this. The Republicans added the pork.
You have no idea what you are talking about. Go re-read the news at the time of the passing of the bill.

Posted by: Phil | December 5, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

Ignorance knows no bounds. Govt should provide funding with first rights to repayment before stock and bond holders. Strict limits on exec salary, no bonuses until full payback to govt and shareholders, unions take major pay cut to levels similar to non-union nationwide. Failure would be far worse for everyone, particularly those who do not deserve to suffer. The “let em fail” crowd has no understanding of the damage that would follow. Restructuring without bankruptcy and while staying in business is the more difficult, but far more rational approach.

Posted by: rsfan | December 5, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am

Funny. Where was this response to the financial industry bailout, which the Bush administration insisted was absolutely necessary or the world economy would collapse.
And where is the outrage to Paulson’s lack of oversight of TARP and Bernanke’s refusal to explain where $2 trillion in Fed loans have gone.
And how can you blame Dems for this when they weren’t even in control of Congress from 2000 to 2006? The Republicans (plus John Dingell) have been behind delaying and reducing the fuel efficiency standards for decades. So we don’t have the vehicles we need. And they watched derivatives and outlandish CEO compensation rape our economy, while using the Fed to push cheap money out the door to disguise the poor economy and defer the collapse as long as possible.
Leave it to Republicans to rewrite history, even before it’s past.

Posted by: ROW | December 5, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

I am amazed at some of the comments on this blog and how ignorant some of you are. You had no problem bailing out Wall Street Corporate Executives–but this is about bailing out Main Street. Do you realize if this “Loan Bridge” is not approved millions of Americans will lose their jobs–not just in the auto industry, but the mom and pop shops [suppliers]? Restaurants? Businesses that profit from this industry. This is not just about the CEO’s this is about the everyday worker, your mom, fathers, sisters, brothers, nieces, nephews,neighbors who feel the effect! Sotp being so stupid and realize the broad impact of what is happening here.
The CEO’s are going to be fine, they are RICH–but you, me and the average, ordinary American will not be!

Posted by: Yvonne | December 5, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

Here’s a PSA for those living in rural Michigan.
Dig lots of holes.
Avoid legal entanglements when the looters in Detroit come for your stuff. And bask in the glow of having helped a union thug find one of President Elect Obama’s “Green Collar Jobs” (as fertilizer)
Dig lots of holes.

Posted by: turtle | December 5, 2008, 9:07 am 9:07 am

Why are the Republicans willing to bailout white collar industry but unwilling to help blue collar industry? Are corporate banking jobs more important than the 3rd shift worker in a Detroit auto assembly line?

Posted by: Steve | December 5, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

The simple truth is that even at the higher cost of $34 Billion the big 3 can not survive without major changes in their operating policy.
The unions have create such a drag on the company resorces that it is unsupportable. The Democrats want to be seen as heros to the UAW without actually doing anything and in 2 or 3 years when the come again to Washington begging for another bailout they can blame Bush. The UAW will continue to pay the democrats and everyone will have forgotten 2008. Maybe

Posted by: Magic | December 5, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

Wake up you Moron’s that are opposed to loans to the auto industry. The whole industry is in trouble. From China to Sweden, their governments are helping them out. What is better? $34 billion dollars to the detroit 3 or $180 Billion dollars lost if they go belly up? How about 3 million people that will be laid off and they collect unemployment? That will cost another $50 billion to the government.
You think your job is safe because you don’t work for the big 3? Think again because there is a cascading effect.
If big 3 goes under, parts suppliers tank, advertising agencies go, homes are lost, no body buys materials for homes, no money for electronics either. Oh, by the way, people cuts down on eating out, restaurants closes, no city taxes, schools cut down on expense…you get the idea moron?
Where were you when govt woke up and gave citigroup another $305 billion dollars on top of the previous $25B?
The auto industry deserves a LOAN because the banks can’t. The banks are in trouble themselves!

Posted by: JoeJoe | December 5, 2008, 9:09 am 9:09 am

Phil,
The democratic congress does not vote the money in this case. The money was already voted on for the TARP fund. The democrats gave Paulson and treasury the blank check for $700 bn. Paulson and Bush have control over where that money is spent. The Democrats once they gave Paulson the blank check now have no control over where the money is going to be spent. They are now asking Bush and Paulson to spend some of that TARP money on the auto sector, which they refuse to do.

Posted by: Jim | December 5, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

OOOOOOH I bet Bush is about to wet his pants. The dems are all about instant gratification, why? The are a product of our generation, they are a bunch of spoiled little kids. The scary thing is next year they will be controlling the money. Were doomed.

Posted by: billy bob | December 5, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am

It’s so easy to say let someone else suffer. But by gosh, if WE are the ones in trouble, I bet you a nickel that we would be asking for help to.
I have mixed emotions about the auto bailout. On one hand, the CEOs and “big wheels” don’t deserve our support. On the other hand, the 10s of thousands innocent workers don’t deserve to lose their job and means to support their family.
Put YOURSELF in the assembly line workers shoes. Would you still tell the Republicans to NOT help you?

Posted by: LOfromMO1 | December 5, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

People seriously…If they fail we WILL go into a Depression. What is wrong with this country??? Too allow manufacturing to die is a shame and one that will come back and bite us. We all need to work together to speak up for the BRIDGE LOAN..not BAILOUT. Doesn’t anyone remember when Chrysler asked the goverment for a loan back in the early 80′s…They paid it back 7 years early and saved the US economy…People pay attention to what’s really happening. Our government leaders- who WE elected are trying to cover their behinds from the mistakes they made with Wall Street that they can’t see whats happening in front of them.

Posted by: Kelly | December 5, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

Russ wrote: “I’m telling you, the workers can’t afford 80% of what they’ll be manufacturing on $30/hour.” ++++ How much do you think the average person buying cars earns?

Posted by: The_Mick | December 5, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

Ronald,
Pass a new law? Why, there is already money available in the TARP fund.
Secondly, Bush can just veto any new law, same effect. The Democrats are still not in control.
Bush is still president and this is still his mess that he created. It is the Bush recession and Bush credit crunch.

Posted by: Bob | December 5, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

JoeJoe,
Simple Solution:
The Democrat Congress votes the money the Republican President signs the bill.

Posted by: M. Simon | December 5, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

The only way I will support the bailout is if the big 3 file ch11 and restructure without a union. Any other plan is doomed to fail.

Posted by: billy bob | December 5, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am

Or else hearings will be held about the 350 billion dollars that Paulson just stole from the government in a socialist handout.

Posted by: T | December 5, 2008, 9:15 am 9:15 am

Congress controls the money even if the majority of you fail to realize how our government works.
Personally I am against government bailouts of any kind but in lieu of the Wall Street Bailout, I think Detroit sharing a small fraction of our money is more than justified. That, or return all the money and let the chips fall where they may.

Posted by: Axe | December 5, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

Kelly,
Simple Solution:
The Democrat Congress votes the money the Republican President signs the bill.

Posted by: M. Simon | December 5, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am

UAW top wage is $28 an hour, Auto Workers at the Toyota plant in Georgetown KY make $25 an hour. Toyota (Japan) by the way gets billions in tax exemptions from state and local government dollars to move plants there.
Henry Ford produced an affordable car, paid high wages and helped create a middle class. (Not bad for an autocrat).
Is there something wrong with having a middle class?
How is this current Gilded Age working for you?
Since when has becoming a country of consumers instead of a nation of manufacturers been a good thing.
Why?
So Walmart can stay in business?
I am reminded of the story of the Manhattan tribe sold its island to Dutch settlers for a chest full of trinkets.
I haven’t seen .anything down at Walmart that is worth trading away my nations wealth or its manufacturing base.
I remember when the word cheap had the connotation of being not well made.
Making decisions to buy and produce environmentally unfriendly inefficient gas guzzling SUV’s may have been a mistake.
How are those icecaps doing?
You may remember the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE).
Although the gas-guzzler tax has a simple purpose — to encourage the production of more efficient cars — the reality of its implementation is different. The tax does apply to the most inefficient passenger cars, such as luxury sedans or high-performance sports cars. However, the federal gas-guzzler tax does not apply to the majority of the environmentally disastrous gas-guzzling vehicles being sold today: light-duty trucks like pickups and SUV’s. When the tax was enacted, light trucks constituted only about 25 percent of new vehicle sales. Congress exempted this class of vehicles to avoid penalizing farmers and construction businesses. Now, however, light trucks and SUV’s make up over 50 half of new vehicle sales. These light trucks directly compete with passenger cars in the consumer market.
Hence the phrase ‘Tax loop big enough to drive an SUV through’.
Buying these vehicles sent the wrong message to Detroit. And it sent the wrong message to the rest of the world and to our children. In what has been called the biggest transference of wealth in history. Money for oil.
Money, influence and security -all for oil.
That being said. This economy is sinking like a stone. In the face of the current financial crisis there is a chance that many people even the auto workers themselves may not be able to get credit at this time to be able to purchase the products they create.
These are dire times.
History shows us that we would be better served if we all work together as both Americans and as caretakers of this planet. As we become solution based individually. Looking at the big picture. Working together. Doing the right thing if for no other reason because it’s the right thing to do.
Those were the values instilled in me growing up here and is now what my conscience contact dictates.
Republican and Democrat division will become outmoded if people cannot come together to face the many challenges that we face today.
Thomas C
Seattle

Posted by: Thomas Cross | December 5, 2008, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Ya know, I could do a search and replace of ‘auto’ with ‘financial’ and turn all the knee-jerk Republican criticisms of the Democrats into Republican criticism of Republicans with the push of a button.
And and BTW the Wall Street bailout costs 10 times as much. Is perspective on a blog too much to ask for?

Posted by: Judge C. Crater | December 5, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

What sad depressing ignorant comments.
When the auto companies fold it won’t be Chapter 11 it will be Chapter 7. Bye bye unions. Bye bye pensions.
Great. Now families that are out of work get to take care of grandpa AND the kids. Way to go patriots!
Oh, and when the web of suppliers lose 50% of their business they go belly up and – whoopsie! – no parts for the Toyota and Honda plants operating in this country. Guess they’ll be pulling up stakes and heading back to countries where the public aren’t so brainwashed they can’t tell their own self-interest from whatever.
Easy to see why the rich have such contempt for the public. They screw you six ways to Sunday for three decades and STILL all you pinheads can think to do is destroy each other.

Posted by: otter | December 5, 2008, 9:18 am 9:18 am

this should be pinned on Bush. How long ago was it he was trying to convince us the economy was just fine? How many times has he been told the housing market was about to fail and he ignored it? How many times was he warned and yet continued to ignore it?
I do not agree with the bailouts but since they were passed why is it just being used to bailout Wall Street? Oh yes…they have better, more powerful connections to Washington.
And then when they receive money they sit on it. They should be lowering interest rates but they aren’t coming down. They still want to make their big bucks fast while borrowing taxpayer money at a low interest rate.
If the auto industry does go belly up most of you who are saying no to bailing out the auto industry will be whining in your Starbucks coffee in a few months.
One way or another this will eventually trickle down to all of us. Isn’t that the theory behind trickle-down economics?
I think those of you who are against bailing out the auto industry probably aren’t feeling the effects of this current economy. You probably still have jobs, are able to pay your mortgages and credit card payments on time, send your kids off to college and buy them a new car to drive around in.
when you start to feel the pinch you will be the first to cry.

Posted by: Mary | December 5, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am

Bob,
If Congress wants to change the way the money is allocated there is a Simple Solution:
The Democrat Congress votes the money the Republican President signs the bill.

Posted by: M. Simon | December 5, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am

DelegateMath,
Yes this is what happens when ~40% of voters don’t pay income taxes but get a say in how the money is spent.
No Representation Without Taxation!

Posted by: turtle | December 5, 2008, 9:23 am 9:23 am

The difference between GM and Toyota is the UAW. This can’t go on! All auto Manufacturer’s sales are way down (31% – 47%). The foreign owned companies simply don’t have the labor and tax burden that the U.S. firms have. Sorry autoworkers, but you have struck and extorted your way into this mess. Hope it was fun while it lasted.

Posted by: N_erdowell | December 5, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

Detroit makes many great cars, and their quality is equal or better than the foreign cars. Toyota, Mercedes, and VW have all experienced quality problems over the last 10 years, and have not been penalized for it by the automotive press. Government regulation is partially responsible for the uncompetitive environment the Big Three are in: exempts foreign car companies from unions; Southern states provide MASSIVE subsidies to foreign companies to open up plants in their states; doesn’t enforce trade laws that allow MASSIVE subsidies by the parent countries of the foreign companies ($4000/Japanese car, $7000/Korean car, $2500/German car, etc.). This doesn’t include the fact that other countries provide healthcare. Would you buy that Hyundai if it cost $7000 more? The Big Three are the heart of American manufacturing. Without a manufacturing sector, we cease to be a great power. We have thrown over a trillion dollars at the finance sector without any strings or guaranties. They have the most easily replaced skills in our economy, and were the ones responsible for getting us into this mess in the first place. Detroit is asking for a loan – not a bailout. It is time to leave the completely failed Supply Side policies behind, and implement Demand Side policies with proven track records. Millions of American jobs and this country’s future are at stake.

Posted by: zpolitics | December 5, 2008, 9:26 am 9:26 am

Wall Street received their bailout with no questions asked, yet the auto industry has to beg and plead. There will be more people out of work if the auto industry falls.
Yes, hold them accountable, make them overhaul their production and make better cars, but give them the bailout. At the very least we will actually SEE where the money is going. Unlike Wall Street, where it went to line the pockets of the higher ups.

Posted by: CCdog | December 5, 2008, 9:27 am 9:27 am

First of all Bush didn’t start this mess.
Maybe that’s what the liberal fascists in our MSM wolfpack press and their close pals and fellow party members, the Dems are saying.
The FACT is Congresses run “economies” and President’s run “wars”
Bush is doing a great job at running the wars, now.
This completely WORTHLESS DEMOCRAT Congress has done NOTHING in the two years since taking power.
EXCEPT …. to run daily “political lyncings” and “endless votes on US troop withdraws from Iraq”. That’s how they spent 2007
Does ANYONE STILL remember that?

Posted by: perceptions | December 5, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

Might as well take it from the “big” bailout. The banks and Wall Street haven’t done anything with it to help the economy.

Posted by: Terri | December 5, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am

It is amazing how some people can’t see the forrest for the trees. What happens to the 3 million people that work directly for the Auto industry if the big three go out of business. Simple, they’re out of work and their spending gets cut. Which means stores restaurants, movie theaters, video stores, gas stations, doctors, ect, have less customers. They in turn start cutting jobs. Then those people start cutting back. Which means stores restaurants, movie theaters, video stores, gas stations, doctors, ect, have less customers. They in turn start cutting jobs. Then those people start cutting back. Which means stores restaurants, movie theaters, video stores, gas stations, ect, have less customers. They in turn start cutting jobs. Then those people start cutting back. And the cycle continues until we are in a depression an unemployment could become as high as 1 in 4 Americans are out of work. If you are employed, and you do not want to keep these 3 million people working in a recessionary period, you are pretty much saying I’m ok with the possibility of losing my job. If these 3 million people head to the unemployment line we are all going to feel it, no matter what your profession is.

Posted by: Sad_Times | December 5, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am

Everyone who is blaming democrats for this charade are blinded by loyalty to a republican party that uses them like cheap prostitutes. Same goes for those who blame republicans. Come on, people. We are getting screwed by WASHINGTON – democrats and republicans. As long as we fall for their strategy of blaming eachother, instead of realizing the obvious, we will continue to be suckers.
That said, we bailed out chrysler once, and they paid back the money early. So take a deep breath, and focus your attention on the real scam being perpetrated by Paulson, with WASHINGTON’S blessing.
WAKE UP AMERICA!!!

Posted by: duhmy | December 5, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Bring on the depression!!!!! It is coming anyway! NO MORE BAILOUTS for ANYONE!!!!!!!!

Posted by: dontbailemout | December 5, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

Just in the hope that my message will sink in, I’ll write it from the perspective of a not altogether US-friendly foreigner.
Sure, your brightest in the automobile industry have totally screwed up. They didn’t have the business acumen to realize that they were on the wrong track making Hummers and the like.
It was willingly aided and abetted by a Republican Congress that did not want to regulate the industry or pass fuel efficiency standards.
The US government, business and citizens share the blame. The thought that they could life forever beyond their means. Now they are heavily indebted to China, Japan and the Saudis. The value of the US$ is down and we, foreigners, can buy US shares, treasury bills, companies and property at bargain basement prices.
From our perspective, you should NOT bail out the US automobile industry. Let it collapse so that your huge unemployment that will follow will even further undermine US economic and military clout.
We are ready to jump into the void that will be created and produce more fuel efficient and reliable cars than those that come out of Detroit.
To conclude, this is the second time in living history that the US “globalized” its greed and inefficiency by exporting to the whole world the worst economic depressions since the dark middle ages. It took 15 years and a world war to get out of the first hole dug in 1929. It’s highly unlikely that the US will be capable to do so this time. The country’s population is too divided (not United); under educated and physically unfit to accomplish anything worthwhile. The poor quality of the contributions to this blog bear evidence.
Come to think of it, you shouldn’t have bailed out the banks, insurers and stockbrokers either.
Ciao,
Foreign View

Posted by: Foreign View | December 5, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

the big 3 need to reinvent themselves in order to survive, even if they get a bailout….first, the union must go. secondly, cars must be more competetive with foreign models, thirdly, executive compensation and perks reduced significantly…personally I could give a damn if they fail….leaders are supposed to be visionaries…seems like the CEO’s saw nothing but the greenback in their paychecks

Posted by: Rick | December 5, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

When a company promises pensions, then underfunds the pension fund to make their profit sheet look better and justify bonuses, future “costs” per worker become inflated to take into account the extra money now needed to make up the shortfall. For example, Maryland’s teachers’ pensions are 98% fully-funded. After Romney, Massachusett’s are only 62% funded. So future taxes (in Maryland’s case most of the pensions are funded by a mandatory 5% wage contribution from the teachers’ paychecks) will barely have to be involved in MD’s case, but will have to cover over 1/3 of the pension liabilities in Mass. So consider two people, one in each state, getting a $2000/month pension. In Maryland that pension costs taxpayers $40. In Mass. it costs $760.
The automakers pension shortfalls in profitable years are coming back to haunt them now. Much of that so-called $71 per hour is due to that.

Posted by: The_Mick | December 5, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am

We are on the brink as an economy. If the Big-three go under so do the rest of us. It is the Great Depression again. The Federal Government has to spend money it does not have in a big way to avoid depression. What better way than to keep the middle class of this country employed (No tax cuts and budget balancing won’t work. tax cuts never stimulate the economy enough to pay for themselves, and budget balancing is what Hoover did).
Time for the partisan passions and ideology to be set aside and start thinking critially.

Posted by: Sanity Man | December 5, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

I really do want to see Congress take a recorded vote on the loans to the auto companies. We know that the Republicans will rish a depression to destroy a union – they have zero interest in the United States of America as a country – a place to live. But what I want to know is exactly which Democrats are willing to vote to kill 3 million jobs.

Posted by: dickdata | December 5, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

DelegateMath,
Community Reinvestment Act? Are you kidding? Really you must be joking. You think the entire credit crunch initially created by the collapsing housing market can be simply traced back to the Communicty Reinvestment Act?
You think Fed interest rate policy, zero oversight on how mortgages were marketed and handed out, financial derivatives, a house for anyone mentality, speculation, inappropriatedly priced risk by credit rating agencies and investors, etc. etc. etc. can all be traced back the the Community Reinvestment Act?
What a joke? Although you cannot blame all the housing collapse on Bush, you can say that his adminstration did very little to monitor the situation and try to control or regulate what was going on. There were plenty of warnings about derivatives and the housing market bubble.

Posted by: Phillip | December 5, 2008, 9:36 am 9:36 am

As usual, the neo con obstructionists fail to look at the realities of the situation. The Democrats in Congress cannot pass any legislation that would help our domestic auto companies (which every other country on earth is doing) because the Republicans, paid off by Toyota and Honda, refuse to give them the 60 votes necessary in the Senate. So, there is no other recourse but the outgoing President. He says he’s for a bailout, let him prove it.

Posted by: Herb Gray | December 5, 2008, 9:37 am 9:37 am

ROW says,
“Bush is doing a great job at running the wars, now.”
HAHAHAHA!!! your a funny guy. But something tells me you’re not joking. but you are a joke!

Posted by: OMG | December 5, 2008, 9:38 am 9:38 am

How is the bailout going to help the US automakers? Are car sales going to suddenly increase? No. How long until they Big 3 are back on capital hill begging for more money? Fall ’09? How much more next time?
Half the problem with the Big 3 is the overhead with pensions and healthcare for the union. This is a taste of what’s coming down the pike with Social Security and Medicare. The AARP sheep keep voting more and more benes for retires that they didn’t pay for. Gee, who’s going to pay for this? Raise taxes on working people, borrow money, or print money?

Posted by: turtle | December 5, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

OMG:
Actually, I didn’t say anything about Bush’s ability to run wars, which of course has been consistently atrocious. If Bush had been in George Washington’s spot, we’d all be British.
Must be a case of mistaken ID.

Posted by: ROW | December 5, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am

It’s interesting how many people are against ‘bailing out’ the big 3. It’s a start-over viewpoint that indicates many think the whole system is broken and continual ‘patching’ is pointless.
Everyone is looking for someone to blame, but it is ‘the system,’ which is at the basis. Marketing departments and advertising agencies ‘created demand’ and stopped listening to what people wanted.
Economic arrogance increased with deregulation and the media promotion of multi-million salaries of CEO’s and owning a lot, as the societal ideal. Why didn’t the best business people in the world see this coming? Or did they? The two percent who collected all the money coming out of middle-class pockets are not hurting.
We should all be hoping we get bi-partisan support of a comprehensive program to ‘upgrade America,’ with clean energy jobs and training and a revamp of healthcare and education. This is a ‘nexus,’ a point in time from which SF writers choose ‘alternate realities.’ Upgrade America. Now.

Posted by: SF Writer | December 5, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Why don’t we let the the banks that we have bailed out with the TARP monies loan money to the Auto Manufacturers—That way the money is used for the purpose it was intended for TROUBLED ASSETS

Posted by: Dennis | December 5, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am

HOw did “they” manage to convince working Americans that the unions are our enemy? This will go down in political science history as the greatest PR accomplishment in the history of politics. Workers against unions. think about it.
HELLO!!!
the culprits are the visionless managers who spent their energies lobbying congress to enable them to continue producing crap and to avoid innovation.
It’s all so surreal, to read all these anti union posts. I guess REAL AMERICANS don’t work union jobs.

Posted by: ugh | December 5, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

“Compassionate conservatives”? What a bunch of unmitigated crap…The Republicans find it impossible to look beyond their own noses. They are incapable of understanding anything beyond their own wallets. Studies have shown that their is a direct correlation between economic contractions or downturns and Republican presidential administrations. There’s a reason for this. It’s called greed and selfishness. They are the hoarders and that is why “trickle down” has never worked. If we lose the auto industry, everyone loses, period…Except the ultra wealthy who will ride out the economic storm without any difficulty whatsoever, smiling all the while as the country returns to pre-New Deal economics.

Posted by: Rev | December 5, 2008, 9:44 am 9:44 am

I agree with the Dems on this one. The auto makers are asking for a LOAN more than a bailout–like the one Chrysler paid back with interest over a decade ago–and they’re willing to agree to a lot more conditions than have been asked of the banks. I cannot see the wisdom of giving 700 billion to white collar workers, and not using even 30 billion of that for the blue collar workers.

Posted by: Yvaughn | December 5, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Turtle:
“Gee, who’s going to pay for this? Raise taxes on working people, borrow money, or print money?”
Aside from the fact that the Republican Party has been running a thirty year program to bankrupt the nation just so it could kill The New Deal, so far the Republican answers to your question have been:
cut taxes for the wealthy
borrow money from China
print money to mask the problem
Now our entire economy is so screwed the ONLY solution is government spending to create jobs, because the wealthy won’t invest in producing goods and services no one can afford to buy, and their money is all tied up in unproductive, unregulated derivatives, anyway.

Posted by: ROW | December 5, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

To all of you screaming about the auto industry: any idea how many other businesses will fail as a result of the auto industry ceasing to exist. It will mean restaurants, shoe stores, clothing stores, hardware stores, and one and on and on. I guess your job is the only one that matters, huh? You people are the epitome of self interest and you are the reason this country is so screwed up!

Posted by: FastMovingCloud | December 5, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

My bad, ROW. it was “perceptions’” post.

Posted by: OMG | December 5, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

For those who keep asking why bail out the banks but not the Big 3, here is the answer:
We still need the banks. Every one of us does. We don’t need the Big 3 because they can’t compete with the rest of the world. If people are not buying their cars, what is the point of throwing any money at them?

Posted by: DelegateMath | December 5, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

Get with it people. We’re talking about 5 MILLION jobs. We’re talking about a loan. Chrysler was able to repay a similar loan made in the 70′s. Check your facts. Auto workers don’t make $80 an hour, auto makers claim labor COSTS them $80 per man hour but they factor in pensions and healthcare for people who are already retired, insurance to have workers on the plant, even the costs of electricity and plumbing in the break rooms. American Auto workers are paid closer to $20 an hour; $28 with benefits. You are suckers for believing a bunch of guys who make closer to $30,000 an hour when they cry hardship for having to pay people who make just over that in a year.
We loose the auto industry say buh-bye to the recession and hello to a depression. Say buh-bye to one more sector where the US can be inovative and develop new important technologies and hello to making $10 an hour in some crappy job working for Toyota in Alabama (which, trust me, no self respecting Japanese person would do).
WAKE UP! Give them the loan, charge them interest and FORCE THEM to move into the 21st century.

Posted by: Maggiee | December 5, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

bail-out no-one.where was a bail-out for AMC(american motors)they needed bailed quite some time ago. bad decisions make business’ go out of business. these companies are the epitomy of bad-decision making, and deserve to go out of business. my 1973 oldsmobile gets 20 miles to the gallon, it was built over 30 years ago. am i to believe that they haven’t had a choice in making more fuel efficient,yet affordable vehicles? in making gas guzzling suv’s.that they have been incapable of making not just a select few models more efficient but most models capable of better gas mileage, and less models fuel in-efficient?these companies are a big part of the problem whenever someone mentions “oil dependancy”. it used to be automobiles were affordable without loans or credit.now you can’t even consider buying a car with-out a loan through a credit company. i don’t know who is bilking the public worse, the auto industry,the housing industry or the energy industry. inflation must be balanced by deflation. costs of living are rising dramatically simply because greedy, over-paid, immoral, unethical business practices. the automotive industries have been participating in this. why should they be rewarded??????? companies that make bad decisions will fail, companies that make good decisions will flourish. the automotive giants haven’t made good decisions in quite a long time. after they go out of business, others will go into business,hopefully they will treat the public with more respect, and use better decision making. maybe new companies will be more concerned with being less oil dependant instead of lining their pockets, be more concerned with the well-being of their country. maybe be the countries’ wing-man instead of making the country be the wing-man. it’s very sad the auto-workers are stuck in the middle, but they wouldn’t be the first to lose a job because the company closed.

Posted by: battleroaron | December 5, 2008, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Is it me or don’t I recall Bush giving a TAX REBATE for vechicles over 6500 pounds? You know those SUV things? Yep, Detroit Management needs a kick in the options/bonuses/salary pants. Yes, the big 3 got themselves into this with both Democrat & Republican help over the last 30 years. The big 3 closed down plants, got concessions from workers, retirees and those nasty unions then gave themselves bonuses and more stock options because the BS quarterly reports should double digit profits after “reducing” costs and becoming more “efficient”. Detriot has been re-selling re-badged Toyotas, Hundais Kias, Opels, Mazdas, Mitsubishis, Suzukis, etc. as GEO’s, Malibus, Avenders, & Festivas. At least Ford uses Ford of Europe products such as the Contour and Focus to name a few so they have had the technology for over 30 years to produce and or learn fromt their foriegn competition. All that aside, the government has been complicit in BS’ing us as much as the big 3. It’s both Dems and Reps so wake up and realize whatever got us here eliminating more working class jobs and letting them go under is not going to teach the management a lesson, hell they have enough tax loopholes to pay less tax then the line workers combined. Fix the issues once and for all. Get efficient, manage the cost (especially the management pay and comps), give tax credits for fuel efficient models not SUV’s unless they truly are used for WORK like construction, plumbing, farming etc. not Real Estate, or company management vechicles etc. and lets really get to a pay for performance business model not the good old boy network. In fact, why doesn’t the government use more fuel efficent vechicles instead of the limo’s and SUV’s themselves and lead by example?. Hell I’d love to work on the board of directors, get my 5 digit salary to meet a few times a year to ok company decisions and cover all my “cost” to attend those meetings etc. while I take my family on vacation. Come kids wake up! The more people employed the more tax revenues the government gets from salaries, purchases etc. and the less people on the “entitlement” rolls you republicans cry about all the time. It’s not rocket science here. Just look around your own work place and you can see the games that are played. Ever been bough by another company? Isn’t it great how the big boys can excercise their stock options immediately even when the company is not profitiable.

Posted by: Bill Smith | December 5, 2008, 9:51 am 9:51 am

NO Bailout for the Auto Industry.
They need to pull some of the cash from their unions litte socialist plan to pay for its workers forever.
Its time to let them declare bankruptcy and reorganize their firm. We do not need to take money from struggling tax payers to fund these unions.
I was against the bailout of wallstreet (& I work in the industry) but its done.
This has to be stopped before we go from spending all of our money on the war to spending it on the government ineffectively running public companies.
Now rental car companies want a part of the bailout company?!?! Where does it end?

Posted by: Rochelle | December 5, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Ok..I can’t believe how many people live inside a bubble. First of all, I am not a fan of the UAW-never have been. I am worried about my family as a result of this crisis. We are one of the many suppliers and the real worry we are facing now is this- how are we going to get more steel if we can’t get an extension on our credit line because the banks won’t ease up?? People are down from 45 hours to 25..how can you provide for your family? This will effect every single American regardless of your gender, age, Religion, political view. We can’t expect our next President to come in on a white horse and save the day, because it isn’t going to happen.

Posted by: Kelly | December 5, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Oh and I forgot to add, give the auto industry a loan or pay just as much in unemployment, lost taxes and welfare when all of those people loose their jobs and you can BET you’ll never see a DIME of that money back.

Posted by: Maggiee | December 5, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

First of all the news media has a severe play in the finacial mess that this country is in.
Second is that a comoditiy based economic system is a spelling for disaster. What ever happened to he who has more gold, silver, copper etc. wins. At least and economic structure on these items is hard core based and not a bunch of useless paper that it is written on.
Third is we have no choice but to bailout the auto industry..How many of you still run hay burners (horses) not many the farmland that was once is no more again to the overseas markets. The trickel down effect will be astronomical. It is not all the auto industry’s fault either what about greedy OPEC, Tree huggers who have us laws that we dont need. I think the goverment needs to stop protecting the stupid people and let them be stupid..

Posted by: RANDALL | December 5, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am

LET THE OIL COMPANIES BAIL OUT DETROIT!!!!

Posted by: Richard | December 5, 2008, 9:54 am 9:54 am

OMG: No problem. Easy mistake to make.
Re: Republicans trying to blame the economy on the Community Reinvestment Act.
That act, way back in 1979, established the fact that two people with the same credit scores, regardless of race, would get the same rates, which of course until that time was far from the case. And would no doubt still be true today if Republicans had their way.
What brings empire’s down?
As Kevin Phillips’ research shows (Spanish, Dutch, British):
- concentration of wealth
- increasing focus on financial wagering instead of goods and services
- military over-reach
Sound familiar? Sound like thirty years of voodoo economics?
Jared Diamond’s assessment of why civilization Collapse?
- environmental degradadtion
- resource depletion
- climate change
Hmmmm.
Republican rule = Disaster.
Time to reboot.
Ixnay on the oodoo-vay conomics-eay

Posted by: ROW | December 5, 2008, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Pelosi, Reid and Dems are desperately looking for a patsy to hang this bailout disaster on. They don’t need Bush’s approval and he has made his stand on it quite clear. You want to screw the taxpayer, then you get the blame for your own behavior. No one to hang it on this time. Butt covering at its best. People don’t want the bailout no matter how Congress tries to sel lthis dog to the public

Posted by: Suzie | December 5, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

The Dems should bring out the big club: bailout or impeachment.

Posted by: sam | December 5, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am

If the Big 3 have any chance to succeed, I think we shoud lend a helping hand. The fact is they had this problem since the early 1980′s and they just couldn’t fix it. That’s why no one is willing to lend them any money.

Posted by: DelegateMath | December 5, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

Ok..I can’t believe how many people live inside a bubble. First of all, I am not a fan of the UAW-never have been. I am worried about my family as a result of this crisis. We are one of the many suppliers and the real worry we are facing now is this- how are we going to get more steel if we can’t get an extension on our credit line because the banks won’t ease up?? People are down from 45 hours to 25..how can you provide for your family? This will effect every single American regardless of your gender, age, Religion, political view. We can’t expect our next President to come in on a white horse and save the day, because it isn’t going to happen.

Posted by: Kelly | December 5, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

The management teams at the the big three have shown themselves to be driven to incompetency by their greed — to bail them out is rewarding their wrongs.
Let’s bailout the workers by making the the big 3 employee owned. Any bailout funds would be used to buy stock in these companies. Each worker would have a vested interest in keeping the company thriving (good, old fashioned capitalism.) We can save the auto industry if the government and our auto industry work together — like they did in WWII — to create new, green transportation technologies.

Posted by: lennyp | December 5, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Npoe. Sorry Dems, find another sucker. After al ltheir talk of doing things without Bush’s approval, they don’t have the stones to pull the trigger becasue they know they will get blamed. Bush is out the door, he isn’t going to approve this disaster of a bailout.
This horro show bailiut is all yours Dems and Obama. The MSM idiotically gives BO credit when the market is on the uptick but comes up with any and every excuse other then BO and his horrible choices when it dives. Nope, this baby is all yours to screw up on a grand scale. Tax payers don’t want it, so it’s your necks on the line if you decide to go ahead and pay kickbacks to the big 3 and your union croines

Posted by: Jack J. | December 5, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Let them crash and burn and take the unions with them.

Posted by: stagmar | December 5, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am

Kelly:
I hear you on the auto industry collapse leading to depression.
I want to say, however, they we are headed for depression, regardless.
30 years of concentration of wealth and de-regulation have recreated the conditions of 1929.
Add to that the Republicans penchant for borrowing money to cut taxes and reduce interest rates to give away cheap money and we have a long-lasting disaster.
I suggest we pay the auto-industry to shut down their gas guzzler plants and re-tool them for efficient, green vehicle plants ASAP, without laying anyone off.
It won’t be cheap but we’ll keep the jobs AND get the vehicles we need.
And if we fix healthcare, we can draw down that cost to the industry as well.
Amazing how in 50 years we have gone from the western nation that was first in working the fewest hours for the best pay and benefits to virtually last. And Republican rank & file want to blame their co-workers, rather than their CEO’s, who have raped us for decades at the hands of their Party, their votes.

Posted by: ROW | December 5, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Thomas Cross – The top wage for the UAW is not $28, because our local news station interviewed a man who works for Chrysler who is making $29/hr(base- before overtime) and he had only been there 16 years.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | December 5, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am

I do not think the bail out is the way to go, it has already been said it will only help short issues. So why bail out? I am very sorry for anyone who maybe put out of work over it, but thats the fault of there bosses high up on the chain not the American tax payers. Also I have a number of frineds & family who have lost jobs here in the last few weeks, & these people are not getting help. All I hear about is the possible out of work autoworker, what about all these people out of work that have nothing to do with the auto industry? Also one of the ways to fix the big 3 is they need US to go buy cars… WE CAN’T WE ARE BROKE!!!!

Posted by: Cindy | December 5, 2008, 10:06 am 10:06 am

Jack J
Funny, this auto bailout is a pimple on the butt of the elephantine Financial Services industry bailout, which has done nothing. And that was the bailout Bush and Paulson insisted was necessary to save the world. And the money has been frittered away. That’s 10 times as much money as this auto bailout.
Where are your complaintes about Bush and Paulson on AIG et al???
And the auto bailout is 100 less than the amount the Fed has lent to other companies it refuses to disclose.
And the $35 billion auto bailout is three months in IRAQ.
And, BTW, it is LESS than the Bush administration has BLED, per month, for eight years.
Stick that in your pipe and smoke it.

Posted by: ROW | December 5, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Row:
You are correct in all areas. Every single politican is too blame- both red and blue. This has been coming along time and we were warned, but no one wanted to listen and now the sheriff and come a calling…….

Posted by: Kelly | December 5, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Or else what?
Bush is the lamest of lame ducks and our legislative branch has been trying to steamroller him and us for years.
Bush isn’t trying to get anything passed anyway.
He should thumb his nose at them and tell them about his pottery barn slogan.
You broke it, you buy it.

Posted by: gene of Omaha | December 5, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

During the period of transition, it may be fair the outcoming president wraps up tiny things, makes arrangement for the incoming president in terms of the big issues, especially considering the failed economic policy.

Posted by: 상율 한 | December 5, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am

Kelly – if no one wants to buy the cars the Big 3 are making, you, as a supplier are going to go out of business anyway. Who is going to bail you out? We have two vehicles, a Honda CR-V and a Chevy Colorado. Guess which one is in the shop more often? The Chevy. Guess which one gets 27-28 mpg? The Honda. The Big 3, even with their hybrids can’t match Honda & Toyota’s regular cars. My father just took a trip in his Toyota Corolla and got 40 mpg. If it had been up to me, we would not have purchased the Colorado. I had a Honda Accord that got over 30 mpg when it was 16 years old. We only got rid of it because the body was just starting to show some signs of rust. What Big3 vehicle can match that?

Posted by: ellsbells930 | December 5, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am

WE NEED A COMPLETE NEW CON-gress ! They are all CROOKS!!!

Posted by: Dave | December 5, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Why is it that everytime we hear Congress talking about a bailout, they call it the government’s money? It’s not their money–it’s my money, your money, OUR money. WE THE PEOPLE are the government and frankly, let these bloated guys go belly up and then they will be forced to compete in the real world like the Japanese who’ve had the foresight to develop cars that people want to buy. A plague on all your houses, Detroit!

Posted by: "Taxpayer" | December 5, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

let the big 3 morons go under. along with the UAW THUGS that brought this on themselves!!
this country has been becoming more and more socialist for 40 years now…and all OBama is gonna do is another new deal…which didn’t work the first time
I hope america and all you socialist democRAT stooges learn the hard way, that socialism doesn’t work. the government cannot take care of you.

Posted by: t | December 5, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Anyone against the bridge loan to the auto industry actually an employee of the industry, supporting family? Didn’t think so. If we don’t provide a line of credit while they get their stuff together, it will impact all of us directly or indirectly. Fair or unfair? Please. We are talking real people with real problems. Get smart.

Posted by: CE | December 5, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

The ignorance displayed by some of these comments is astounding. If the automakers go under, the social costs to taxpayers will far outweigh the amounts being asked for under the bailout. The fact that middle-class Americans don’t seem to understand how the elite has manipulated them for the past 40-years is indicative of the anti-intellectualism that permeates our society.
While we should all be disgusted with how the Big 3 have been managed and the outsourcing that’s occurred, if these companies fail the economic devastation will be more horrific than anything we’ve seen to date. Without a strong manufacturing base, Americans will soon be working for third world wages and anyone who believes otherwise simply hasn’t been paying attention. The majority of Americans looked the other way as Republicans introduced laissez-faire economics to this country, and when the “free market” failed many of you continued to stick your heads in the sand while Bush and Company privatized the profits and socialized the losses for Wall Street. However, when it comes to preserving one of our most vital industries and literally millions of blue-collar jobs, the majority seems incapable of recognizing the ramifications.
The collective stupidity of this country is just one of the reasons why we’ve become the laughing stock of the global community. Our status as a world leader is quickly diminishing, for the sakes of your children or grandchildren or anyone else you care about, please wake up and educate yourselves.

Posted by: Finch | December 5, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am

“Why punish us for others mistakes?”
Precisely. Why punish every taxpayer for the incompetence of the Big Three?
BTW, given that their combined market cap is around $6 billion, why would anyone consider giving them $34 billion to blow in 6 months?

Posted by: Gaius | December 5, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

All this nonsense about the superiority of foriegn cars is baloney. I have owned both. I like Nissan. I own a chrysler (Pacifica), which has 127,000 miles on it and all I’ve ever had to do as far as repairs is recently get a new battery. That is a better record than my Nissan or Toyotas that I’ve owned. I get 20 miles to the gallon, which is comparable to the same class japanese model.

Posted by: duhmy | December 5, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am

The Republicans have spent the last 8 years catering to the rich robber barons on wall street and now we are going to let the millions of auto related jobs dry up? Boy, what a bunch of crap. The whole thing stinks to high heaven, but sometimes one has to hold their nose and do what is right for out country and letting this many people fail is not right and anyone who says it is can sit back in their mansion and sip their brandy.

Posted by: hmmmmmer | December 5, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

They have to be more careful….they have already seem the mistakes made with the last bailouts & they have hopefully learned from that mistake…look what AIG did & DC knows the American public is really ticked off. I’m glad they are takine there time with this. It was said yesterday that these billions will only help them for a short amount of time & they will not be able to payback the loan unless WE all go outr & buy new cars. Most of us can’t afford to go buy a car right now & won’t for a long time. That means billions of $$ will be wasted on a something that can’t be saved. These company’s need to start over from top to bottom on a smaller scale. Everyone won’t win, but everyone wouldn’t loose.

Posted by: Cindy | December 5, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Of course the Auto industry should not be bailed out. They more or less said that they would be back within a year asking for even more money. The debate in Congress should be on how to help the workers who WILL lose their jobs (sooner or later) and not on how to save uncompetitive, failing companies.
Republican deregulation of the financial sector and inane borrowing to hand out $600 checks has put us in bad financial straits. And the Democrats’ protectionist trade policies have crippled have lead to the American auto industry becoming irrelevant.

Posted by: Matt | December 5, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Heck yeah cowboys and cowgirls, why should GWB worry about another few million Americans out of work? It won’t bother him a bit – he and Laura will sleep very well in their new $2million house in January. Everyone else in America can sleep in their cars, if they have one left, that is. I hear its getting pretty full under the bridges also.

Posted by: Ron | December 5, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Theres too many car companys out there, too many car dealerships , too many cars, and what if we hard even harder times ahead which is what there saying. Do you lend/give this 60 billion(I’ve watched the livefeed) in all to comanys which there is maybe no market to come? And thus they will all lose there jobs anyway so why put this money into just delaying whats coming.

Posted by: Ricco46 | December 5, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am

Should have read, “make some of that 700 billion dollar financial industry bailout money available to our large union voter block or else.” I say or else. There are reasons why our domestic auto industry is in trouble but I see no solutions offered, just an extended hand. You just a well take the money and wrap it around a big rock and throw it off the bridge and get ready to do it again and again. Once a hand-out always a hand-out…This will be the first mistake the Dems will make in a new administration and will come back to haunt them, us, for the next four years.

Posted by: socalindep | December 5, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

I oppose a bailout for the auto makers with a passion and I’m a Democrat. I feel that if the CEOs, CFOs, etc would just conceed and take pay cuts, then they wouldn’t be causing this burden on themselves. They are the ones drainning the companies and having to lay off all those employees. Think about, Ceo that’s on a 1Million Dollar A Yr Salary, takes a pay cut of lets say 200,000/yr, and a reg employee salary of 20,000, that would keep 1000 ppl working. Imagine if they all did…. But they won’t because they’re greedy and thats what got them in this mess to begin with. The damages were self-inflicked for the most part.

Posted by: Ron | December 5, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Hi LongT, I like your comment. Its funny.

Posted by: Cliffton | December 5, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

The money will come from the TARP since congress needs to authorize the spending of the final $350 billion. So Treasury will get to spend most and the auto makers will get $34 billion. It is just gamesmanship now about who is going to get the $316 billion that Treasury will divy up and while everyone says the homeowners, who’s pocket will the money eventually fall in.

Posted by: polijam.com | December 5, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am

Posted by: LongT | Dec 4, 2008 9:01:00 PM
correct! it is Bush’s fault no matter what ! No matter that it was the stupid Dems. who help drive up OIL PRICES for the last 2 years , thus feeding into this depression that we are having by now. No Matter that it was Dems’ dreams of having the low-income families to have houses beyond their means that starting the Corporate Greed (which Repulican is certainly a part of ) which start it all this . Have any doubt ? Remember , for the whole last years , GAS on the Average was 3.5dollars/gallon , now , consider a family of 4 , how would that gas price drove up the prices of your electric bills , monthly gas bills , food bills , shipping bills ….I said that family will have to pay at least $400 more than what they would if GAS had been around $2 like now (which is too late by the way ) , SEE how people are late on mortgage payments that started all THIS??????? Tell me if the above is not true ??? In free enterprise , let the big 3 go into re-organization like anyone else , let them rid of the Unions’ contracts that is unfair to US companies , let them face the pain to grow , IF NOT , please also consider BAILING OUT the Airlines , the shipping ocmpanies , the Insurances …..and JOE the NoBody like me !

Posted by: alohaone | December 5, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

I agree with socalindep 100%

Posted by: Ron | December 5, 2008, 10:30 am 10:30 am

I have a suggestion, if the democrats think pulling the auto unions out of the mess THEY made how about a deal, Bush’s 95 federal judges the dems have not approved for Bush’s approval of the give away, THAT would be worth something to those union people who voted for Obama…

Posted by: Bill Lyons | December 5, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Hi LongT, I like your comment.
First, politic is dirty and then now politic is funny. Bush is most unlucky American President or most unfortunate American President because not long after he was sworn in and then 9/11 happened. He tried to protect US citizens from major terror attack on US soil and it is success until now but media shot down him for methods of interrogation on captive terrorists and invading Iraq. Bin Laden and his associate are thanking to Human right advocates and left wing journalists from Tora Bora valley. A few months away from end of his presidency duty sub-prime mortgage problem was exploded. Actually, he was heritage from democrat government’s failure of country intelligent agency and relaxing financial rule from Clinton administration. C’mon Dems, let blame everything on him before he leave Whitehouse. One day, history will rewrite itself for who is a good President and who is a worst President in American’s history.

Posted by: Cliffton | December 5, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

To OMG: Republicans aren’t very smart, that’s why they can’t spell, and why they’re Republicans.
To all: Should the auto industry be bailed out? No. They have failed. However, if they fail we are all going to feel it. There is no doubt about that. This economy can’t take much more, and this is why the Dem’s are pushing a bailout. They care about the American people.
And if big 3 do receive a bailout what do they plan to do with it? Well, they will use the same body types that are already in production, and simply change the engine a little bit. They already have factories for this. They may build a few new ones. We will have the same cars, with gas mileage slightly better. 34 billion dollars worth ought to be sufficient for more than enough of the new factories, but they won’t spend all the money on that. They’re crooks. The heads of these companies need to be fired immediately and new leadership should be put in.

Posted by: Reid | December 5, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Anyone who opposes the American auto industry and anyone who hates unions is hates the United States.
If the American auto industry is allowed to die, so will America.
Support UAW, support our workers or GET OUT.

Posted by: unholy33 | December 5, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am

This started in the 80s when the government started buying out the farmers of america to force us to purchase foods at markets grown in Mexico and other contries. Today, less than 10% of all the food we consume, is grown here in america. We have state governments giving property and tax breaks to our competitors to operate their business here at our tax paying expence. Look on the shelves at the store. Most products say “distributed from” new york, california, most major ports. This is an idication that we have been loosing american jobs for almost 30 years. To the government, this should be a big concern. Why would we want to be totally reliant on imported product to eat, drive, and protect ourselves during times of war.
As a nation of consumers, we need to wise up. Look at the labels, take notice of the product we about to purchase. The news recently posted an article about the imported toys with lead in it, yet millions of americans will purchase these and let their kids play with poisoned toys. If an american company were to produce such a toy, the product would be pulled from the selves immediately. What makes the imports so different or special that they are not pulled from the shelves? YOU THE CONSUMER…! As long as you buy non us products, you pay… in more than one way. How much more can americans take before, we the people, understand we are no longer a self-sustainable nation. This is something we should all be concerned with.

Posted by: DKD | December 5, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Do you love America? SUPPORT OUR AUTO WORKERS.

Posted by: unholy33 | December 5, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Having our federal government own and operate the auto industry makes sense.
That means NO MONEY FOR OUR MILITARY!
Hip-hip! Hoo-ray!

Posted by: unholy33 | December 5, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

“Bail out the auto industry or else?”
Or else what, Democrats???
Idiots.

Posted by: MyFellowAmericans | December 5, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am

Please tell me, specifically, what the “dems did in the past two years” to drive up oil prices?
Honestly, I’d like to know.

Posted by: Reid | December 5, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

It is time to quit playing politics and do something righht or wrong

Posted by: Lee S,Benson AZ | December 5, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Detroit is in paradigm paralysis. Both the Execs with their MBA’s, and the UAW are to blame for their lack of foresight. No bridge loan should be given. The only option for real and positive economic change is Chapt. 11 reorginization. Yes, austerity hurts for a short while, but in the years to come, a stronger and more intelligent economy evolves.

Posted by: Jeff | December 5, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Republicans are obstructionist and ideologues on solving the unemployment crisis. Congress asked Fed Chairman Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Paulson to appear at hearings on the automotive industry, both said no. The US should not pay the salaries of government employees if they do not participate in the people’s business.

Posted by: Eric L. Prentis | December 5, 2008, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Why didn’t any one say no when the government paid 150 billion to AIG? Is this single insurance company much more important than the U.S. auto industrial to the U.S. economic? How many people does AIG employs and what does it produce? It seems that we all are so happy to rescue the wall street, but not the working people.

Posted by: sherm | December 5, 2008, 10:42 am 10:42 am

The Republicans who have filibustered everything the Dems have tried to do in the last two years will just block it anyway. Bail out the banks with no strings attached and leave 2 million Americans hanging out to dry is typical Republican operations that are bringing on the second Republican Great Depression.
It will be so nice after January 20th to see an end to socialism for the rich and democracy for the middle class.

Posted by: Mark2100 | December 5, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Anyone who opposes unions or the Democratic party is un-American.
Anyone who opposes the Big Three is un-American.
Anyone who STILL supports Bush needs to be DEPORTED.

Posted by: unholy33 | December 5, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

So no help for anybody, especially people whose employees are unionized and members of the middle class? Anybody who tries to save 3 million jobs is an obstructionist? Do we need to have the uaw members put on neckties and register Republican to be worthy of your sympathy or help?

Posted by: Brian Meyers | December 5, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am

The Dems rewrote, approved and voted for the $700 billion bailout bill, but not until they’d added another $150 billion of pork to the original bill. The Republicans voted against the financial markets bailout. The Democratic majority is solely to blame for the bailout. Now our congress wants to bail out the Big 3 knowing full well that another bailout (the Big 3 just got $25 billion as part of the $700 billion/$850 billion financial bailout, thanks to pork additive) will accomplish only a delay in the demise of the Big 3. Let this political folly, too, be solely that of the Democrats. The Democratic party couldn’t care less about the jobs or the companies. What they treasure is the votes of the UAW. Taxpayer dollars are about to be used to buy votes again.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | December 5, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Perhaps the message should be this: Sen. Shelby, the south will never see another penny of federal money for the next 2-4 years if this bailout fails. The northern states have been propping you up for nearly 30 years and it is over.
Thank you.

Posted by: Dave from Oregon | December 5, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Regardless of how one feels about the bailout, the current auto-industry mess is almost entirely due to the credit crunch, which is entirely due to non-regulation and massive, acceleration of long-term concentration of wealth, executive corruption and massive, largely unnecessary deficit spending over the past eight years. The first six years with Bush and his Republican Congrees. The last two with the record-setting fillibuster Republicans and Bush veto.

Posted by: ROW | December 5, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

I can’t even imagine what the US would be like if the Big-3 went bankrupt.
It would affect every State in the Union. All the auto suppliers in every state; ie, plastics, iron workers, tin, chrome, carpeting, fabric and leather seating, glass, paint, radios, computers, electronics, etc. would be liquidated. All the truckers and railroads which carry these cars to all the different states would be brought to their knees. All the dealers in every state and all their employees would go down. All the advertising dollars which keep newspapers, magazines, TV, radio and others alive would be lost. All the charities that are supported by the Big-3 would be devastated.
All the buildings that house the specialized auto manufacturing companies would be empty and no property taxes collected on them.
All the millions of retirees in every state would lose their health care and pensions which would have to be paid by the federal government.
All the millions of laid-off workers would have to collect unemployment. We would soon run out of our ability to pay these people.
All the banks and bondsmen who have loaned money to all these companies would not be able to collect their money.
The Chinese want to get into the auto industry really bad, but can’t because they don’t have the technology. They think they can buy out out companies cheap because we’re hurting bad. The Big-3 are the only manufacturing base left in the US.
We HAVE to keep the Big-3 alive.

Posted by: Cookie | December 5, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Sounds like they’re priming to pin the descent into a Depression on the Republicans for standing in the way of an auto bailout.
Opponents of a GM loan are in for a big shock if they think that letting GM stiff thousands of small business suppliers throughout the US by filing for debt protection won’t have any impact at home, no matter how far from Detroit.

Posted by: MuskgonCritic | December 5, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am

unholy33 : “Do you love America? SUPPORT OUR AUTO WORKERS.” What about other poorly managed industries filled with overpayed, inefficient workers? If you “love America” shouldn’t you be demanding the government bail out every failed business?

Posted by: howwouldiknow | December 5, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am

Japan, Germany, South Korea, China, and Southern States (home of the foreign automakers) are against this bailout.
Their paid-for mouthpieces in congress (Sen. Shelby, et al.), the media, and on Wall St. are pushing for the collapse of the Detroit 3. Why? Duh! More money for them.
Wall St. will profit by selling off, at dirt cheap prices, the pieces of America’s home grown auto industry to the Chinese, who have plenty of our cash, said they would, and want another way of taking our money from us and enslaving us further. With the help of the crooks and lobbyists, and our stupidity, they can get hundreds of billions of dollars worth of the latest technology for pennies on the dollar. They won’t even need to spy on us ever again.
The other foreign automakers, who have been bailed-out by their own governments already and for years were playing dirty dumping games, breaking all the rules, all while being propped up by their people and their friends in congress.
The taxpayers are being fooled by those against this auto bailout/loan. $30 billion is cheap compared to the $200 billion + taxpayers WILL have to spend as a direct result of this. Try paying for that during a depression. We just gave hundreds of billions to rescue Wall St. and now Wall St. and Beijing are telling us not to help Detroit and Main Streets all over the country! And we’re not idiots for listening to these crooks!? This bailout, handout, or whatever you want to call it, is the cheapest way out of this mess! Look at the numbers!
Wake up! Why would all these smart, rich people be telling you things that will devastate the American economy and weaken America forever? In a depression, if you are sitting on hordes of cash, you can buy anything for pennies on the dollar. You think the wealth gap is huge now? Wait till these Wall St. and foreign looters buy up the country you love – while saddling you and future generations with all the losses and debt that will make their bargains of century possible. This is Shock and Awe, but against us. Look at the real numbers and consequences of not saving ourselves from these people!
If there was ever a time for a knee-jerk patriotic reaction to these traitorous agents of economic destruction, it is now. Don’t get fooled again! Call, e-mail, and fax your so-called reps or get ready to salute made in China American flags, while the President’s Communist-owned GM motorcade drives by.
Oh, and that is the least alarmist version of what is going on. But hey, we can still chant USA! USA! USA! at ballgames.

Posted by: Paul_Revere | December 5, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

I agree that we should fund these loans using TARP money. At least we would know where $34 billion of $700 billion went.

Posted by: Jim in Missouri | December 5, 2008, 10:50 am 10:50 am

Get rid of the unions?
Do you know what happened in the days before the unions had any power?
Children were forced to work 14-hour days.
Employees had no rights, female employees were RAPED by their employers and had no voice.
UNIONS are there to see to it that the American worker is paid fairly and given health care. Why are so many American manufacturing workers lacking health care? The unions are weak.
You like that, don’t you?
That’s because you HATE America.

Posted by: unholy33 | December 5, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

I don’t like the games politicians play anymore than any other average American. However, the automotive industry needs to be bailed out for the same reasons that the myriad of companies that are already getting money needed to be bailed out. Not bailing them out, means companies closing down – which means American workers out of business! Whether they’ve outsourced portions of their workforce or not, the automotive industry still employees a lot of Americans right here in America. In many cases, the automotive industry has an interesting phenomenon in that many of its plants are the sole or largest employer in towns across America. Dooming the automotive industry, dooms thousands of American families and several entire American towns. In the end, the equation is simple – rescuing American businesses means rescuing American jobs means rescuing American families.
Do not misunderstand me – I do not think they should be given a blank check or a no strings attached check – they should be forced to do just what they are being forced to do now – presenting comprehensive plans on how they will use the money and how those plans will result in a competitive future and a return on the taxpayer investment that is bailout money. There also needs to be a penalty for not following through with those plans.
However, in my opinion, the question is no longer do we rescue – but how do we frame the rescue so that we, the American people, and the American automotive industry come out stronger in the end.

Posted by: Rose | December 5, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Dave from Oregon : “Perhaps the message should be this: Sen. Shelby, the south will never see another penny of federal money for the next 2-4 years if this bailout fails. The northern states have been propping you up for nearly 30 years and it is over.” Yes, it’s over.. because the economies of northern states are in shambles and business is all moving south. Funny how Democrats hammering businesses at every turn has that effect.

Posted by: howwouldiknow | December 5, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Too late.
We’ve been in the Second Great Depression for years.
Thank you, Republican Party.
The party of multi-national corporations who talk American family values, but don’t value American families.
Every Republican should be deported-or worse.

Posted by: unholy33 | December 5, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

mmonroeliveson:
The $700 billion bailout was begged for by Bush and his Treasury secretary, claiming that they could re-open credit markets and that the world economy would collapse without it.
The $700 billion is roughly the same deficit the Bush administration has been running annually now for six years.
>90% of the national debt is directly rrelated to Republican administrations.
Obama is not even President yet.
By the time Bush is done, he will have more than doubled the national debt in eight years. The first six years with his rubber-stamp Republican Congress, the last two with his filluster-record-setting Senate Republicans and his veto.
The Republican party has not been the party of fiscal responsibility since Eisenhower.
Thirty years of trickle-down economics and de-regulated “free” markets have led to massively concentrated wealth, a ten-fold increase in executive pay and virtually stagnant growth at every other level, massive national debt, massive corporate corruption, massive flight of capital to offshore tax havens and the general decline of the world’s financial superpower.
The latest report projects that by 2025 the U.S. will be, at best, a “leader among equals.” Unless the Democrats can dig us out of this Republican hole.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

Posted by: ROW | December 5, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

you right wingers sure talk a big game, but try selling any of your products with a 10-15% unemployment rate. its already near 7% and we haven’t even seen the fallout from the car companies going under yet. the key to any recovery is job creation. losing millions of jobs will not put us on the road to recovery.
what they are asking for is only a fraction of what Wall Street has been promised. take a small fraction of the ridiculously huge bailout for the banking crooks and shift it to an industry that actually produces goods in America. Make the money loans contingent upon a sensible business plan for the future.

Posted by: babbitt | December 5, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Let the federal government bail EVERYONE out. No need to work anymore. No need for new ideas. Let’s give up on this stupid capitalism experiment and go with the socialism/communism way, it’s so much more desirable. Now, everyone repeat after me, “Kum ba ya…”

Posted by: Ed | December 5, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am

The Dems are all about handouts . . . but who’s bailing out the American people?! 1 in 10 homes are foreclosing or threatening to foreclose because American families can’t afford them. Who’s helping the rest of us?
Nobody. Let the 3 automakers solve their financial budgets just like American families are solving theirs.

Posted by: sean | December 5, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

The bankruptcy period will give the 3 automakers the opportunity to reorganize and stabilize their financial base. The union will be liquidated and sent into past history, several thousand un-needed jobs will be eliminated, new leadership will emerge (hopefully) and their innovative-genius R&D group can finally heed some much needed life into a dinosaur of a company. In the beginning the economy will definitely feel the impact of the lay-offs but in the long (and short) run our economy will be better off for it.

Posted by: Lassiter | December 5, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

This started in the 80s when the government started buying out the farmers of america to force us to purchase foods at markets grown in Mexico and other contries. Today, less than 10% of all the food we consume, is grown here in america. We have state governments giving property and tax breaks to our competitors to operate their business here at our tax paying expence. Look on the shelves at the store. Most products say “distributed from” new york, california, most major ports. This is an idication that we have been loosing american jobs for almost 30 years. To the government, this should be a big concern. Why would we want to be totally reliant on imported product to eat, drive, and protect ourselves during times of war.
As a nation of consumers, we need to wise up. Look at the labels, take notice of the product we about to purchase. The news recently posted an article about the imported toys with lead in it, yet millions of americans will purchase these and let their kids play with poisoned toys. If an american company were to produce such a toy, the product would be pulled from the selves immediately. What makes the imports so different or special that they are not pulled from the shelves? YOU THE CONSUMER…! As long as you buy non US made products, you pay… in more than one way. How much more can americans take before, we the people, understand we are no longer a self-sustainable nation. This is something we should all be concerned with. Especially if we close our borders for reasons we know we will eventually have. WAR!

Posted by: DKD | December 5, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

The problem is that everything Bush touches turns to crap. Why would you trust him with $700b, that like trusting Cheaney with a gun. All these people calling for the auto industry to fail should be ashamed of themselves. 70% of our GDP is based upon spending so if they lose their jobs then that hurts the economy. While I dont agree with the top down theory of the bailout, if we dont do anything it will only make the problem worse.

Posted by: BEM | December 5, 2008, 11:04 am 11:04 am

Many of the commenters seem to think that the current Congress has a broad Democratic majority. Not so. Democrats do not have the votes without decisive action by the administration. Even if the President and Treasury secretary were to jump in enthusiastically, I doubt there are adequate votes for an auto bailout, but in the absence of the such administrative support, the Democratic leaders are right: The can’t pass it. No threat; just fact.

Posted by: rsh | December 5, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Never buy the hired help a Coke or you’ll spoil ‘em. From then on they’ll expect it. The first bailout money was a mistake. Now they’re already back for more. We should have never started the bailouts. Let the nature of bad business take it’s course.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | December 5, 2008, 11:05 am 11:05 am

The right wingers are crying “politics” and when they were in control, stuck the Dems in basement rooms to hold hearings and moved committee hearings to new locations at the last minute to create chaos. This is nothing by comparison, and I didn’t hear any complaints from the Right when they did it. So suck it up and get used to it.

Posted by: Dogs4Pals | December 5, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am

This country needs electic cars. Are we going to just give that opportunity away? Bush is buying 300 billion in stock in banks owned by his friends. If Bush is against it, then it must be a good idea.

Posted by: rainhut | December 5, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am

We are in recession and possibly headed for depression. Printing and borrowing more money only exacerbates the situation. Many big and small businesses are destined to fail. Only the good and useful well managed businesses will survive. The sooner we let the bad businesses fail, the sooner we can begin reconstruction of our economy.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | December 5, 2008, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Sean wrote: “The Dems are all about handouts”
Corporate bail-outs are a Republican construct, going back to the S&L failures, which resulted from the same failed economic policies…
In comparison, the auto-bailout is tiny. The Republicans are just trying to make political hay with it because they are out of options for pinning their financial disaster on Dems.
Even the Bush/Paulson $700B bailout, after all, is only slightly larger than Bush’s annual deficit for the past eight years.
And ALL of this is dwarfed by the $2 trillion the Fed recently lent to unnamed corporations, or the $2 trillion in future Iraq expenses over the next generation, or the $6 trillion Bush has already heaped onto the national debt, more than doubling it…

Posted by: ROW | December 5, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am

mmonroeliveson: “Printing and borrowing more money only exacerbates the situation.”
Where have you been the past eight years while the Bush administration has been doubling the debt by printing and borrowing money?
Now, the government HAS to print and borrow money to stimulate the economy, because the wealthy aren’t going to invest in producing goods and services no one can afford to buy. Besides, they are too busy playing with unproductive, unregulated derivatives…
Sorry, the hole has already been dug. We are out of options. Not Hoover, but FDR will get us out of this.

Posted by: ROW | December 5, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

I find it funny that Bush and his rupublican rubber-stampers raised politicking over policy to a new level for 6 years. Afterwards, they conveniently reversed their ‘filibustering is evil’ stance to set new records for filibustering – a political move to prevent the dems from fixing their colossal mess.
Now this might be business as usual in Washington, but the fact that you republicans so readily identify the behavior in the dems now that your ideology has crashed and burned in historic fashion but you made excuses for it during the Bush ‘wreck our country’ 6 year tour of epic failure; makes you hypocrites of the first order.

Posted by: klutzak | December 5, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Bailing out the auto industry is nothing compared to the money we’ve wasted in Iraq.
To Hell with our soldiers!
Support our auto workers!
Support those who can actually WIN a battle.

Posted by: unholy33 | December 5, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Bail out or no bail out. It would be justified to bail out the Big three if we can get rid of the UAW…

Posted by: tommy | December 5, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

the auto industry bailed out the nation’s economy after 9/11 at the government’s request, now it is time for the government to bail out the auto industry

Posted by: fool's gold | December 5, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Attempts to establish blame are fruitless. We’re all in this together and we’re here because of things done or not done by both parties for various reasons. Basically the major part of fault lies with the congress who makes the laws, appropriates all expenditures, and bears the responsibility of oversight.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | December 5, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am

The American public hasn’t seen even a tinge of results from the fed’s bailout of Wall St. Credit card banks have tightened their holders’ available credit lines and hiked their interest rates sky high. The stock market has been on a rollercoaster spiraling down eroding savings and retirement funds as it goes, foreclosures are still at a record pace and when you don’t know whether you’ll have a job tomorrow, you’re not in the market for your dream house because unemployment across all
sectors of our economy is rising at an
increasing rate daily. Bush & Paulson need to use part of that $700 billion to bailout the auto industry. Sure, it gone along with the ‘bigger is better’ mentality in the face of the fact that the buying public was increasingly turning to smaller, more fuel efficient foreign vehicles even before gas prices soared to $4.00/gal. But, whether we like it or not, EVERYTHING marketed to we Americans carried the tag ‘bigger is better’, from hamburgers, to big screen TVs, to homes and autos, and, folks, we bought them. We subscribed to instant gratification, ‘put it on the plastic’, mentality. If Bush, et al, fail to bail out the auto industry, our economy will go from acknowledged recession to full-blown depression. Both Wall St. & the Big 3 automakers MUST, with any bailout funds they receive, operate transparently and the American public MUST know exactly what regulations apply to how those bailouts are used and enforced. Furthermore, the public has the right and needs to know exactly how the recipients of gov’t bailouts plan to repay them, at what rate of interest, and over how long a term. These bailout(s) aren’t gifts, they’re loans and the same rules and regs that apply to any of us when we borrow, must also apply to Wall St. & the Big 3 auto makers.

Posted by: nanameow | December 5, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Every Republican should be tried for treason against the United States of America in a kangaroo court and deported to Iraq where they can fight their war without our help.

Posted by: unholy33 | December 5, 2008, 11:23 am 11:23 am

What’s wrong with socialism?
There are no poor people under socialism.

Posted by: unholy33 | December 5, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Getting rid of the UAW will only mean poverty for workers.
The CEOs will only get more money.

Posted by: unholy33 | December 5, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Getting rid of the UAW will only mean poverty for workers.
The CEOs will only get more money.

Posted by: unholy33 | December 5, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Hats off to all of you driving Foreign Cars. My wife have 3 GM products and 1 Toyota. The Toyota is the biggest piece of junk I’ve ever owned. Now we may be left with this little rubber band tin can camry as the choice. American Autos do make some good stuff. I’ve got the proof.
Honda and Toyota-Brought to you by those who originally brought you Pearl Harbor.

Posted by: Billy | December 5, 2008, 11:26 am 11:26 am

lots of idiotic posts here.where to begin???? we bailed out wall street, with no strings attached. that hasn’t done one thing to help matters. we just have a treasury secretary who is from wall street and used to be the ceo of goldman sacks. see how it works???? why not give some of the TARP money to the auto industry to keep it from collapse? i don’t think posters here realize what will happen if our entire auto industry collapses. it’s not just crappy chevrolets and gmc’s. we’re talking an entire industry-universe that includes parts and dealers and a huge network of businesses that rely on the big 3. if we let the big 3 fail, we are going to see entire populations of this country in food lines and in foreclosure. it will DEEPEN the problem.we were so quick to bail out wall street, when it is wall street that started this whole problem with their crazy investment schemes and unregulated investment instruments. it’s absolutely crazy. these guys got away with the biggest theft of american tax dollars in history, and now we are blaming our single biggest blue collar sector for wanting a handout. it’s shameful.

Posted by: preemptivelove | December 5, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

I see a LOT of posts here that seem to be of the opinion that JOBS are a valid reason to ‘lend’ the Auto industry lots of money. This is simply asinine, anyone who even remotely supports this idea, particularly with Jobs as the primary decision factor, may as well forget calling themselves a Republican, Democrat, or ‘Independasnt’. Call yourself what you are: A Socialist.
My industry is getting hit HARD too, much harder than the Auto Industry. I’ve adapted. Things aren’t perfect for me, but in our capitalist society, the weak get weeded out, and the ones who work hard and make wise decisions float to the top of the cream.
This “weeding out the stupid/outdated/lazy/mismanaged” effect of capitalism is what made this country stronger, and simply BETTER than any other country since time began.
Here’s a cold reality: If you work for a mismanaged company, look for other work. If you . . .or an organization representing you participated in the downfall of your company . . . oh well, that sucks, but that’s life too.
I do feel for the individuals that may lose their jobs, even their homes. But this is the cost of mismanagment, be it a car company or a labor union that is mismanaged and driven by greed and selfishness.
We can’t keep bailing out mismanaged companies. Le tht echips fall where they may. It isn’t like these cars are being made for another planet. People need cars, and they will be built to supply the demand. If “the big three” go down, Toyota, Nissan, etc will be there to fill this need. WHich . . .means they’ll need to build more cars than they do now . . .which means jobs to fill this increased need for their product.
People today seem to think that our government is a giant nanny who will cover us if we blow our allowance on bubble gum and licorice.
No. We have to say NO. We have to be vigilant to avoid becoming just another socialist nation where mediocrity is forgiven, even rewarded and hard work/intelligent managment is merely looked on as a cash cow to bail out the inept, greedy corporate/union morons

Posted by: Ronfucius | December 5, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

It truly is amazing reading through these comments, how ignorant most of these people are. The Democrats can not pass an auto bailout bill because they don’t have the votes from the Republicans — and some Democrats, so I am not totally blaming you whiney GOP’ers.
Thus, they are asking the funds come from TARP. Whether or not you believe the auto industry needs to be bailed out or not, Dems can not move with out Republican help. And seeing how the Republicans stymied every legislative attempt since Dems gained power in 2006, I don’t hold out much hope for the next 4 years.
The GOP is not looking to compromise on anything but only for capitulation on every issue by the Democrats. That is what causes grid lock — that and an ignorant mass that can be bothered to understand complex issues — like the auto bailout.

Posted by: Todd | December 5, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am

EXXON Should help pay for the bailout… the big 3′s CEO’s were in bed prostituting themselves to Big oil.
The big american auto industry raked in billions selling Monster trucks and SUV’s. Yet for all those years they never even bothered to reinvest or develop anything new?
These CEO’s are 100% at fault, they are the problem. If they get bailed out they should be fired… SIMPLE AS THAT!

Posted by: Squierghia74 | December 5, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

Don’t help the Detroit 3! Millions of jobs on the line… collapse of the GLOBAL automotive industry.
Does the term, DEPRESSION, mean anything to you? Idiots!

Posted by: allan_krueger | December 5, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am

The bailout for the auto industry is not a Republican or Democrat issue. I’m a Republican, but I understand that there is a time for everything. This is not the time to be overly conservative. The bottom line is that every person in America will feel the collapse of the auto industry. Start thinking long term people. This is not just any old commercial business on the line. The collapse of the auto industry would be a heavy blow to America’s infrastructure. They are the focal point of thousands of other businesses that would fail along with them. We can’t afford this kind of damage to an economy that is already struggling.

Posted by: Mike | December 5, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

And they want an answer by Friday.
OK YOU HAVE TO TWO STEPS BELOW BUSH
NOT TO KNOW HIS ANSWER……NO !!!
Now say that every 5 mins. until Bush
leaves office…. and no this is not
the psychic hot line after 8 years
most people know what he is going to !
GET A LIFE……………..

Posted by: Anita Yova | December 5, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

ROW : “Funny how you can say that when Republicans have ruled government for the past eight years.”
Really? The governments of northern states are, and have been, Democrat controlled. Do you think it’s just a coincidence that the auto industry is building plants in the south, and closing them in the north? Northern states have, by far, the highest tax rates in the country. Educate yourself, your ignorance is making you look like a fool.

Posted by: howwouldiknow | December 5, 2008, 11:32 am 11:32 am

The Democrats did make a decision. They told the White House to release part of the $700B bailout intended for the financial institutions, which the administration has refused to do. The Democrats and others do not want to see additional money sent to the auto industry when almost half of the $700 remains. That money should be used, if any, toward the whole problem not one of the main problems, the current administration-sponsored financial industry.
Don’t blame Democrats for what the 8+years of stone-walling and poor decision-making this Republican administration has done, including not listening to the prior warnings of financial disaster and not regulating the financial industry. It is time to think of the PEOPLE as a whole not just business as the whole. This administration is still in charge and their lack of taking responsibility sums up the heads of the current administration. Financial growth and strength comes from the bottom up by people who are employed and spending income, not the failed “trickle-down” theory which its creator said never worked and it has never worked. The solvency of this country depends on workers. Make the auto industry meet specific criteria for the bailout, including government monitoring (oversight). The current administration does not know what oversight is about because they refused accountability like their leadership. They are responsible for the mess we are in along with some (few) Democrats. Anyone who voted for this lame duck administration is responsible for this mess too. So shut up and get out of the way while problkem-solvers proceed to find an answer and adjust accordingly.

Posted by: Dbiddle | December 5, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am

It is simply. The Democrats control the hosue now. They can pass a bailout. The Democrats control the Senate 50 to 49 (Obama resigned or it woudl be 51 to 49) (two independents align with the Democrats. So the Senate can pass the bailout now. So everyone who keeps arguing that Bush should do this or that–forget it. the Democrats can do it now. let them do it.

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

The domestic auto industry is a wealth creater for the US economy. Germany, Japan and Korea governments financially support their auto companies because of the cash they generate.
Why are people so emotional about this issue and so blind to basic facts about simple economic principles.

Posted by: AP | December 5, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am

One of you bright folks please tell this East Texas school teacher why we bailed out the idiotic banks and the idiotic overspending homeowners that caused most of this mess, but you don’t want to bail out blue collar jobs. In my conservative neck of the Country, we call that a hypocrite. Let every one of those banks fail. NOW.
My wife and I, both school teachers, paid off our 16oo sq ft brick home in 6 years. And some of you will bail out the overspending bank and homeowners, and no one else? Guess there’s one born every minute…..

Posted by: Billy | December 5, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

Posted by: howwouldiknow”
I didn’t notice much of prosperity in the South. In fact, a lot of south states in the with all those tax brakes don’t flourish with new auto industry. And they are going to close many of those new plants. Go figure!

Posted by: ghost | December 5, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

AP : If these companies were generating wealth, they wouldn’t need a bailout. These companies are LOSING money, they’re generating debt. You can live off debt for a while, but it’s not a long term solution.

Posted by: howwouldiknow | December 5, 2008, 11:42 am 11:42 am

The world is not in good shape South Korea
may go broke before this is over
as well as others…….
IT WOULD BE FUNNY IF THEY GAVE THE BIG
3 THE WHOLE 700 BILLION AND STILL SOLD NO
CARS TO SPEAK OF FOR YEARS…
WHO YOU GONNA BLAME……FATE?

Posted by: Anita Yova | December 5, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am

Question: Will someone tell me how the auto guys will pay back the bailout. Many say it is a loan and not a give away. Ok so how do they pay it back. The only way is to make and sell cars. how will they do that. The car demand is flat and has decresed in Us form 16 million a year to aobut 10 million a year. The costs are very high labor and etc. Poeple are not workign so how do they afford a car. does the govt give everyone money so they can but a car.

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Mr Bush please stop hiding and give the last TRUE American industry the help they need to fight the Asian attack on our homeland!

Posted by: bobbyd | December 5, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am

When you are a passenger in a sinking ship, you pick up a bucket and start working…there will be time enough to point the finger and to fling blame. I cannot understand the southern anti-union mentality and the blame being cast on organized labor by southern political leaders. Labor in america has been the engine that powered the captalistic machine, yeah, they may need to make some concessions, but those concessions should be based on what is right and what is fair. We should remember that most americans are not investors but laborers,here we willingly assist the investor class and tear down the workers, What kind of madness is this? GIVE THEM THE HELP! Long live the american worker, and long live the UNIONS they together once made this country the greatest producer nation on earth. I for one say that if Globalism means the death knell for our manufacturing base, then to hell with globalism…before its too late!

Posted by: Prizmm | December 5, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

Hey guys: The GM CEO just said that his electric car will not be competitive in price or performance with a gasoline car until about 2016 or 2017. Do the taxpayers have enough money to give these guys to hang around for about 8 years and then hope and pray that people buy this new electric car. Oh, where will the electric come form to prwer up this new car? Burn coal. No Obama will nto permit that. What about necular power to generate electric–No Democrats opposed to that Well it does not appear to be a problem for another 8 years as the car will not be competitive until then

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am

AP; Germany is socialist, a part of the European Trade Union. Japan is headed by an emperor. Korea is a dictatorship. How dare you expect the United States government to operate according to their standards?

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | December 5, 2008, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Ghost : Funny how none of the talk about lost auto industry jobs ever mention Toyota plants. Funny thing is that, despite your claims of them closing, Toyota is building new factories in the south. BMW is building new factories in the south. Subaru is building new factories in the south. Meanwhile car makers in business unfriendly northern states are closing factory after factory.. go figure.

Posted by: howwouldiknow | December 5, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Ghost: The domestic automotive Industry generates over $160 Billion a year in local, state and federal taxes not to mention generates 2-3 million jobs that further support local businesses in many hundreds of communities.
THAT is cash generation.

Posted by: AP | December 5, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am

I’m following the auto industry saga with considerable disgust. So far Paulson has spent $350m bailing out the wealthy, not helping the middle class. Now, grossly overpaid auto executives running companies that have grossly overpaid workers and who have foisted poorly designed, poorly manufactured on the public for decades are begging for the chance to waste our money, since theirs is all gone. This is like Robin Hood in reverse.
LET THEM GO BANKRUPT!!!!! The companies will not disappear, but they just might get realistic. And you can’t save them in their current state no matter how much of my money you give them.
NO ALMS FOR THE RICH UNTIL THEY CUT THEIR SALARIES, CUT THEIR BONUSES, CHANGE THEIR LABOR CONTRACTS AND DEMONSTRATE THAT THEY CAN BECOME COMPETITIVE!

Posted by: Don Hiorth | December 5, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Question: Why is Alabama Senator Shelby screaming against helping the Big 3 and wants them to die.
Answer: His state has given billions of dollars in tax free abatements to a Honda, Hyundai and Mercedes plant recently built in ALABAMA. He wins after he removes the competition and thus can increase production, since these plants are almost idle recently due to poor consumer demand!

Posted by: bobbyd | December 5, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

howwouldiknow has a good point. If you give big 3 money and it works then the US wokrers at the new and exisiting auto plants of foreign companies such as those in the South will be out of work. Will someone who favors the bailout please tell us what you would then do to help these US workers who are out of work because you helped other US workers

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am

A man was layed off.
He Got up the next morning as his coffee maker, made in India, was brewing.
He shaved with his electric shaver, made in Korea.
He turned on his TV, made in China, and watched the news.
He got dressed-clothes made in Pakistan.
Then he got in his car, made by a a Japanese company, and as he drove off, wondered why it was so hard to find a job in the good ole U S A.
Thanks foreign car company drivers. I laugh every time I see a Toyota with an American flag on the back

Posted by: Billy | December 5, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

AP. Yous say the suto guys generate billions in local and state and federal taxes. So why give them money, lets just give it to the local and state and back to the feds. Seems like that is quicker and more direct. Is that what you favor.

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Has anyone called for cutting the salary of the union CEO guy who is testifying to one dollar?

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

NO MATTER WHAT THEY DO THIS WILL
NOT END GOOD…………………

Posted by: Anita Yova | December 5, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Simply stated the $700 billion bailout package is specifically targeted for rescuing the financial industry, the exception being the pork barrel additive of a $25 billion appropriation for the auto industry that the auto industry already blew. It would be illegal to give any more money from that package to the auto industry. Now the Democratic congress is all over our lame duck President, urging him to violate the provisions of the legislation they passed and trying to pass the blame to him as well. Don’t worry unions, Obama’s New Party politics will soon have everyone working for the government with union scale and benefits. It’s the socialist way. That’s why socialist governments fail. Just keep on adding commitments to our government and enforce those commitments and watch our own government fail.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | December 5, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Billy : Most Toyotas sold in the US are made in the US. I’m not sure what your point is…

Posted by: howwouldiknow | December 5, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

d of WV:
Germany, Japan and South Korea are capitolistic democracies, although, somewhat more socialistic at times than ours. North Korea is a dictatorship and Japanese emporers only have as much power as British monarchs.
The point I was trying to make is that if you look at the US economy as a business and specifically look at the auto industry as a business case, it would by wise to invest $34 billion into an industry that generattes hundreds of billion of dollars each year. Other countries take this approach out of simple logic!!!

Posted by: AP | December 5, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Politics at it’s best!

Posted by: LongT | December 5, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

If you are bored with the politicans psoturing on the bailout and blaming everyone else int he world and etc. check out the live O J Simpson sentencing hearings on eh internet.

Posted by: d of wv | December 5, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

AP; I’m afraid your claim of tax generation by the Big 3 is historic information. Right now they need more than $160 billion/yr. from the government just to stay afloat. Let the deceased rest in peace.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | December 5, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

howwouldiknow-It is still a foreign-based company and most of the profits go overseas. This is not hard to figure out. They are only here because the try to look American. When the others are gone, they’ll ship thiers overseas because we won’t have a choice.
Every Honda and Toyota driver can take credit for this. My wife actually bought one (Toyota) and it has been the biggest piece of tin can camry junk I have every been associated with. And that is all we might have left? They bailed the idiotic banks and homebuyers who caused most of this. I don’t get that.

Posted by: Billy | December 5, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

AP : South Korea is a republic with elected officials. You call giving these billions to the “big 3″ and investment. Well, investments are supposed to have a positive return. Currently, there is no reason to believe there will be a positive return. In reality your argument is that we need to throw money at it to prevent a problem from getting worse. But the problem there is that in 3 months they’ll need another 50 billion, and 3 months later another 50 billion, and so for and so on for eternity. They need to convince us that they’re worth the investment, that they have some plan to become viable.

Posted by: howwouldiknow | December 5, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

For all of you who think that the UAW is to blame for this, and who want to “bust the unions,” (someone even called them UAW “THUGS”), you don’t know what you’re talking about. I worked in “pink collar” non-union jobs all my life – one with a farm implement manufacturer and one with a city. Both entities also had union workers. Each and every time the union folks negotiated a new contract, or went on strike to get better working conditions, the non-union folks then got just a little bit BETTER than what the union had negotiated. Repeating: BETTER than what the union had negotiated. Better hourly rate, maybe an additional paid sick day, maybe a bit more into our pension fund – but BETTER than what the union had negotiated. That’s just the way it is (or was).
My point is that if the unions go down, so will everyone elses working conditions, pay, benefits, etc. This country NEEDS labor unions. Without them, what will prevent businesses from reducing your pay and benefits? (And don’t think they won’t…it’s a very rare business that actually appreciates and values its employees.)
So I find the outrage at UAW pay and benefits ridiculous. Why not also list the pay and benefits of middle management and higher ups?
And while I’m at it, I’d like to know how much money advertising adds to the price of each and every vehicle. Seems like every third commercial in the evening is a car commercial.

Posted by: Give 'em a loan | December 5, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Lots of O.J.’s Motions denied in the O.J. sentencing . . . . wish that Judge was sitting on the Committee the Auto CEO’s are begging in front of

Posted by: Ronfucius | December 5, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Just a quick idea on the Big 3 auto bailout. Rather than give a large loan package to the companies themselves, there may be a better way to respond. First the government should purchase a large stake in the companies to gain control of management and force a new strategic vision. That would cost $2-$5b in stock purchases. Second, rather than loan the companies $30b+ with no guarantee of a payback, use the money to offer a $10,000 rebate per new car purchase on vehicles that meet at least a 24mpg fuel rating. This would have a three fold effect:
1. It would stimulate demand for Big 3 products and boost sales.
2. It would benefit consumers who need to make a new car purchase or want to shift into a more fuel efficient vehicle and stimulate consumer spending.
3. Motivate lenders to make auto loans since the rebate would reduce the loan to value ratio.
All stakeholders would benefit: the Big 3 would benefit from increase sales and moving current inventory, lenders would have a relatively safe market to make loans and earn a return, consumers would be able to buy a fuel efficient American automobile at a discount, and the government would benefit from a increase in the share value it’s stock purchase.

Posted by: bhportlandmaine | December 5, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm

I don’t like that Congress feels they can tell the President what to do or else?? What is that? Anyway, I agree with some who earlier stated it will affect the American worker and their families who are employed by the Big 3. Help the Big 3 however make sure they keep the jobs HOME vs. overseas.

Posted by: dkihnley | December 5, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

d of wv: Right now they are asking for $34 billion so they can finish restructuring over the next two years. If in two years they fail, they will have generated far more cash for the government than the 34 billion dollar investment.
If they are successful they will continue to generate money for years to come plus pay back the original 34 billion with interest. Seems pretty simple to me that congress should opt for the 34 billion and force an organized restructuring that will make them successful. It can potentially work and they payoff for the American economy is HUGE.

Posted by: AP | December 5, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Billy : The profits for Toyota cars go to the shareholders of Toyota, which includes people from all over the world. The profits ( if they ever made any ) from a GM car goes to shareholders of GM, which includes people from all over the world. I care where a car is made, I don’t care which set of international investors make money off it.
And seriously, your rant about Toyota is idiotic. There’s a reason why year after year Toyotas are rated among the highest quality cars made. I drove a Toyota for 10 years and 250,000 miles.. and it still got 40mpg. You can’t get that performance from a new GM product.

Posted by: howwouldiknow | December 5, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

Calm down kids. This isn’t about being democrat or republican. It’s also not about approving of the behavior of the auto industry. And, it’s not about making comparisons to anything else that is off the topic. IT’S ABOUT BEING AN AMERICAN. Our country is perched on the edge of a major depression if the auto industry goes under. Use your heads! We elect leaders who are responsible for not allowing that to happen while they quibble with eachother. The President of the United States, regardless of the timing during his term, has no business hiding in the White House and not stepping up to the plate to save OUR COUNTRY! You all do remember that’s his JOB. Right??

Posted by: Annie | December 5, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

America, when will we wake up!!!!
All the comments on here stating that the Big 3 should not be bailed out are all spouting POLITICAL reasons – don’t let the dems win, don’t let the repubs win, don’t let the unions win – How about referring to the situation as LETTING THE PEOPLE WIN!!! Not helping the big three, but the PEOPLE that will be affected by its demise. Why is it easier to bailout banks, investment firms, but not PEOPLE – if the big three go down because of politics this whole country will be like New Orleans after Katrina!! For once in this new century let’s do what is right and moral and not political or fiscal.

Posted by: Sheri | December 5, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

Hey, Pelosi, Reid and NObama…stick it. Let the Auto folks fold and start all over. Maybe they can rebuild themselves the way we in the Airline industry had to.

Posted by: Joe | December 5, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

I understand why the union started & that it was great…but not anymore. The Government has plenty of labor laws that are enforced. The union is no longer needed. I’m tired of hearing about the poor auto workers. I know a couple & the are not poor. I work in a law office, it would take me 5 years to make what they make putting bumpers on at the GM plant here in TN. I could show these automakers how to spend money the right way & save a lot of jobs..not all. THese compaines are way to big, they need to start over from top to bottom & get smaller until people can start affording new cars again.

Posted by: CRC | December 5, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

The automotive industry and it’s more than 2000 suppliers create technology advances that are used in Aerospace, military and many other industries.
I would rather have our national security based on technology derived in the US rather than foriegn countries.

Posted by: AP | December 5, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Now is the time for congress to set strong environmental standards for the car industry. Meeting these standards must be a condition of bailout.

Posted by: toes | December 5, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

howwouldiknow-well your name says it all. You CAN and I DO get that kind of performance out of GM products. I have for years. My wife and I own A CAMRY and it has been a piece of junk. You see, I have personal experience with both, so it is not an idiotic rant. The Toyota has been the biggest joke of a car we have ever owned. But as I said, much of the corporate profits go overseas because that is where they are based. Stating my experience as face is not rant. But thhen again, your name clues me in.
because

Posted by: Billy | December 5, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

I have been angered by unions, I have been disenchanted with my own union, I have not seen a perfect labor management symbiosis in my life, yet I will always stand on the side of organized labor. The individual does not have power in any corporate negotiation the collective of labor can balance to some extent the playing field. Anyone posting here who is anti-union and who has benefitted from union activity even indirectly, yet rails against collective bargaining is a hypocrite. I’ll be the first to say the union isn’t perfect…I liken it to a flat tire miles from any help… you forge ahead until such time as the problem can be fixed or addressed…you don’t abandon the vehicle! The Unions have value even if the leadership has an agenda that may be anathema…but you don’t abandon the collective stregnth of these organization. The advent of collective bargaining/union association has over all been positive, if not perfect!

Posted by: Prizmm | December 5, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Sheri: If a major airline goes in to chapter 11 bankruptcy then they will still have passengers due to captive localized monopolies and relative low cost of plane tickets.
If GM, Chrysler or Ford goes into Chapter 11 no one will buy $20-40k cars out of fear the OEM’s could go into chapter 7 and will no longer produce service parts meaning your purchased car will not work. Also, if one if the big three goes into bankruptcy many of the more than 2000 parts suppliers will soon follow which could collapse the industry.

Posted by: AP | December 5, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

btw howwouldiknow–no one yet has said why the banks got a FREE PASS and billions instantly, yet automakers have done more explaining and specifying and yet still are stuck. If they are denied, those banks and overspending homeowners should be denied and fall flat. We paid for a 1600 sq ft brick home in East Texas on two teachers salaries in 6 years. Nobody bailed us out. No bailout for Detroit-no bailout for anybody. ANYTHING ELSE IS HYPOCRITICAL.

Posted by: Billy | December 5, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Dem’s can take a hike to where the sun does not shine. The auto makers do NOT deserve a bailout. They had no BUSINESS coming like children whining for candy, demanding ANYTHING. Let them declare bankruptcy. I’ll buy from Honda or Volkswagon until they get their crap together!

Posted by: debraraes | December 5, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Let free markets and capitalism solve the problem?
All of the sheeple and would-be Joe-the-Tycoons railing against this issue and throwing around fluff words like socialism, don’t know the dirty secret that the successful business elite know. The key to success in Mega-Multinational America has always been to privatize profits and socialize losses – by hook(usually tax loopholes) or crook(lobbyists and your elected officials).
The foreign automakers in the South were subsidized with taxpayer dollars in order to lure them there. And before that, their illegal “free-market” dumping of cars (and electronics, and everything you buy at Walmart) below cost into our markets so they could succeed against us was perpetrated through “socialist” subsidies from their governments, who also, by the way, prevented our cars and goods from being sold there with trade barriers and out-right prohibitions! So cut the crap about us not being competitive. We have been free-trade saps fighting unfair-trade assassins!
The free-market fantasy that earnest entrepreneurs, and knee-jerk ditto-heads on the right believe in, is one of the ways foreign companies, with help from lobbyists, Wall St., politicians, and American traitor-capitalists have used to slowly, but methodically, gut our manufacturing base. We are a decade or so away from being a majority foreign “owned” nation – they are our financial masters. A depression triggered by the collapse of Detroit and its lifelines into Main St. will reduce that to 2 years.
Don’t believe me? Calculate the losses on Wall St. and then imagine if you could buy all of those valuable assets at fire-sale prices. Wait for the real crisis to pass and cut short the manufactured one, and bam! Oh look! The first issue of the Forbes Trillionaires List is out!
The rest of the world is not playing the same game as us. They are running a game on us – helped out by our own home-grown profiteers. They plan for 20 years out, adapt their educational systems for the needs of the future, invest in modern infrastructure, and subsidize vital industries so that they can dominate global markets (Airbus, Honda, Toyota, Hyundai et al.) while protecting domestic markets from foreign products – you know, Made in U.S.A. stuff.
We think about the next quarterly results, listen to disaster-capitalists who urge us to keep the faith, while they loot and pillage at the taxpayer’s expense, build bridges to nowhere, and refuse to take an Aspirin because we think the heart attack will somehow make us stronger!
Take off the rose colored, made in China glasses and look behind the curtain at your capitalist comrades! Can you smell the stench of hypocrisy emanating from Wall St., congress, and the White House? We’ve spent decades dismantling freedom, real capitalism, fiscal responsibility, and sending our money and dignity off to China, Japan, Germany, Korea, and the Middle East.
But yeah unions, decent wages, workers rights and safety, and wanting to make things in America instead of importing them are to blame.
Bartender! I’ll have what he’s having, but with a melamine chaser!

Posted by: Paul_Revere | December 5, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

I like chapter 11. The judge can bust the unions and the company has it done for them. It looks like ACORN organizers will have new company cars in 4 years for Obama re-election campaign.

Posted by: seven | December 5, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Then your part of the problem debraraes

Posted by: Billy | December 5, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

Why do American workers place so little value on themselves and the work they perform? Why do they think that it’s okay that executives make millions while they’re lucky to make $10 to $14 an hour with limited, if any, benefits? A recent strike at American Axle in Detroit epitomizes the plight of the blue-collar workers. When all was said and done, union workers took a 50% pay cut while the CEO still walked off with his $12-million salary.
Until southern blue-collar workers lose the anti-union mentality and understand the valuable contributions they make to our overall economic health, they will continue to see their wages stagnate and income disparity will become a fact of life – the middle class is relegating itself into poverty while the rich get richer. For decades, the elite have laughed all the way to the bank while they tricked the American worker into voting against his or her own best interests by busting unions, degrading their quality of life, and convincing them that jobs will be lost if they ask for decent wages.
Those who decry socializing vital resources are the least informed members of our society. Labor costs associated with foreign automakers are often lower because the countries in which they are based provide socialized healthcare. Capitalism leads to nothing more than unmitigated greed and the concentration of wealth at the upper tiers of a society. Unions help establish a standard of living and workplace safety regulations that benefit the Greater Good instead of the good of a few. Stop devaluing yourselves, take off the blinders, and understand that if the foreign automakers take over yet another American industry, many of you will live just above the poverty line for the rest of your lives.

Posted by: Finch | December 5, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Let’s not bail out the auto industry and let them fail and cot int Chapter 11 followed immediately by Chapter 7 and then we”l see something our great grandparents or grandparents say in their times. The stock market drop like a rock, jobs dry up, loss of the manufacturing base in the country, and another great depression as we loose 3 million jobs related directly to the auto industry and all of the ancillary jobs that depend on the workers in the factory being able to spend money.

Posted by: anoyamous | December 5, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

WOW Paul_Revere…….Your actually looking at the #1 root cause for the national problem and not just the automotive problem. Unfortunately I agree with your last statement.

Posted by: AP | December 5, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Let’s face it, the auto industry as we know it is doomed. This shouldn’t be a surprise. The industry has failed to adapt its processes for the past 30 years. They only started coming on board in the past 10 years and by then it was too late and the union doesn’t help. The american idustry thought they could do business as they did in the 40′s and 50′s and survive. It caught up to them and now it’s eating their lunch. Our auto makers dropped the ball. I worked in the auto industry and we knew 4 years ago that one of the big three were in trouble. There was already talks about at least one of the going under. With all this being said, it appreas govt has to step in due to the timing of everything else going on. What they should do is use the 25 billion that was already approved for THEM on fuel efficient cars. Oh wait, Pelosi won’t let them because it was made specifically for R&D so she can keep her environmetal image and pretend she’s getting the job done. USE THE MONEY! It won’t matter if it’s available in 5 years when there is no auto industry.

Posted by: rxc242 | December 5, 2008, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

Well fine. If the Republicans really want it on their record that they bailed out white collar people while sending ‘joe the plumber’ to the poorhouse, let them.
The best thing for Dems to do, from a purely mercenery point of view, would be to fight hard for the auto worker and then fail, bemoaning the callusness of the Republicans toward the common man and the ease with which Bushco gave money to Wall St.
Congress was so eager and quick to fork over $700+ Billion for the financial industry when they were in trouble… even though they don’t actually produce anything tangible. But when the auto industry — blue collar, instead of white collar — asks for a comparatively measly $30+ billion, they’re rebuffed at every turn… even though they produce something tangible. Even if the $30 billion doesn’t save them, at least we’ll have some CARS left over, rather than nothing.
If the Big Three go down, this country will never recover. The riples will tear apart communities, destroy schools, and crash our economy, and we will not be able to recover in anyone’s lifetime.
The Democrats are right on this one. They’re fighting for the average American here. The Republicans obviously couldn’t care less. They’d rather cling to their dogma than do anything prudent or practical or pragmatic.

Posted by: pmbAustin | December 5, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

Paul R,
I do love your insight on this issue.
The real problem is when we ship our product overseas and they put a huge $$ price tag on it so NO ONE can afford it. Yet, they practically give things away here in the US and people buy it to save $$, regardless of the sacrifice on quality/longevity/safety.
Good observations! Keep up the information, somewhere along this journey, “We the people” need to wise up and take care of our own…

Posted by: DKD | December 5, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

To mmonroeliveson:
Good and well managed businesses will fail in this deep recession, and even more if we realize a depression by letting our domestic auotomobile business collapse. The problem with you ideologs is that you are clueless with respect to the interconnectedness of elements of the economy. Chaos theory will soon be a better basis for understanding what is happening than the chatter of the right wing. Monetarism has failed, unregulated capitalism has failed, neoconservative dreams have not been realized. It is now time for pragmatic solutions. The right have none to offer.

Posted by: Jonggmaster | December 5, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

NONONONONONO don’t even a penny for this money guzzling companies. The other auto companies are just fine. Sorry for the incompetice but its a fact

Posted by: moneymaster | December 5, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

How long can people making $12-$17 per hour be expected to buy cars built for $70 per hour? The Big 3 can’t survive anyway! Laid off and unemployed are not going to buy a car. The Banks are not making loans even to people who are working. Detroit WILL fall, BUT the Japanese will be close behind, with no one ABLE to buy a car!!

Posted by: Ed Baker | December 5, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

I was against bailing out AIG or any insurance company. I don’t want the auto companies to be bailed out of their own mismanagement. NO!

Posted by: Luis Young | December 5, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Impeach Pelosi-
She is like jello when it comes to making a leadership decision-she lets it slide right off and blames President Bush for the slimy aftermath.
Get rid of Harry Reid, Chris Dodd, and Barney Frank.
I don’t understand why any voter would put these people back in the drivers seat with their records of stupid and self-interest decisions.
All I have to do is see their lips moving to remind me why I am a proud Republican.

Posted by: CreekProf | December 5, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

Does anyone remember the purpose of the $700 Billion Bailout? To FREE UP credit!!!
Tell the financial institutions, that already have the money, to free it up and LEND it to the Big 3

Posted by: Ed Baker | December 5, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

This double standard is amazing. It is ok to bail out the big banks who made stupid decisions and overpaid their management, but not the auto companies that did the same thing? The bailouts stink to be quite frank (all of them), but it would be economic suicide to allow the banking sector to fail or allow the auto industry (which employs three million people directly or indirectly) to fail. If the government allows the auto industry to fail, then the economies of the midwest will be heavily damaged, which will ruin small businesses in the local communities and damage the national economy also. By losing our domestic auto industry, we will increase our trade deficit by record amounts and the nation will have to pay unemployment, pension, and welfare benefits to even more people. Loan them the money and make all parties in the industry make concessions to fix this important industry and save the economy

Posted by: Joe | December 5, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Why does everyone say AVERAGE American worker when talking about the auto line workers. The average auto line worker makes, NOT EARNS, $71 PER HOUR not including benefits or 6 to 12 time what MOST Americans earn. A typical Ford production line worker makes more money in 3 months than I make in a year. If this person has worked any length of time, he/ she should have a paid off their house, cars, boats, saved for the kids education. Tell the Big 3′s Employees and executives to all go out and but another $40,000 SUV and save their own company!!

Posted by: Ed Baker | December 5, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Let’s quit quibbling and politicizing this. focus on what really facts and truths and not just one side of the coin.
yes, there will be massive layoffs and job loss IF one or all of the Big 3 fail. Don’t forget the power of Chapter 11 and Reorganziation! It creates a “leaner and meaner” company with focus and attention to creating revenue and sales from satisfying the markets (what a concept, imagine).
There is no way in @#$% that the Big 3 should receive taxpayer assistance or any form of bailout.
and the union won’t be $%&@ if the Big 3 (term used loosely) fold. something of nothing still is nothing.
Believe me there are savvy investors out there mobilizing to create profit from any one or these failed or near failed business.
yeah, its an economic step back but it won’t be doom and gloom. Time for the Big 3 to face the music…if they want to continue playing then the band must reorganize.

Posted by: Brian in Miami | December 5, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

We need a BIG gas-guzzler tax for all the SUV owners. We need a BIG foreign-car tax for all those foreign car buyers. And we need a $12,000 incentive check for all the Patriotic Americans that will buy a new fuel-efficient American made car.

Posted by: pt | December 5, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm

I agree with the poster that said “why should the 700 billion only go to Wall Street”? It’s okay to help AIG and Citi but not auto? 500 thousand people lost their jobs in November and Bush wants to put even more people out of work???? What is wrong with him???? Forget about party or what will make you look good think about the good of this country you incompetent war monger!

Posted by: Hege! | December 5, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Is it me or have most Americans gone stupid. This isn’t just about the big three. There are thousands of small businesses in the USA that are in business because of GM, Chrysler and Ford. Machine shops, restaurants, exporters, delivery services, payroll companies, uniform companies, shoe stores, cleaning companies…etc…etc. All these companies hire us, millions of Americans, which helps us make a living and put food on the table for our families. Wake up and smell the coffee…think for yourself. Most of you out there now just listen to some dumb politician, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly and don’t really have a clue. Who cares about what Democrats or Republicans are saying. We know what is the right thing to do, if you people just think and look at the big picture. Our country is going down in flames and you idiots are stil arguing political parties. Idiots!!

Posted by: Izzy | December 5, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

Well, now that I’ve had my daily laugh reading all of your comments, I’ll go get my 2007 Suzi Q Gran Vitara washed and spicky span!
Oh, BTW, if I drive my car reasonably well and sensibly, I get 24-26 mpg city, and 26-32 mpg on the highway. Thanks, Suzuki…we gonna be friends for a long time.
You auto workers have had it way too good for way too long of a time. Now the party’s over and you have to clean up.
Sorry, no more money! Bye bye!
Dak!

Posted by: Dakotahgeo | December 5, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

Izzy, you are soooooo right! The Republicans don’t even know the election is over yet, lolol. They are still interested in past glories of the GOP. By the time they come out of their stupor, President Biden will have finished his second term, heh heh heh.
I think we are going to see the Democrats clean house something fierce
come January 20! So far they have been
hampered in their efforts to do anything by grouchy Repugs who are smarting from their shellacking Nov. 4;
I think we are to be pretty joyful when
we have not only a majority in both House and Senate but have a few sensible
Republicans in each House guarantee a
veto-proof/filibuster-proof consensus.
Personally, I can’t wait.
Dak!

Posted by: Dakotahgeo | December 5, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Why do all these people keep saying that the auto workers make ONLY $28 per hour?
My mother worked for GM. When she retired in 1991 as a tool room attendant, she was making $25 per hour. These poor folks haven’t had a raise in a whole 17 years? In 40 years of work, I’ve never made more than $20 per hour, usually much less.

Posted by: Ted Johnson | December 5, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

The $70/hour UAW wage has been debunked by every credible news organization in this country – autoworkers don’t make close to that figure and just like everyone else, their wages have remained flat or decreased over the past few years.
The fact that so many posting on this board still believe that falsehood is just further proof of how easy it is to manipulate the American people with outright lies and propaganda. The likes of Limbaugh and Fox News have done an excellent job of dumbing down the American people.

Posted by: Finch | December 5, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

We have a bankrupt banking industry and a bankrupt government, both of which were, and still are, being robbed by each other… think about it.
Why don’t the incensed taxpayers who want to steal the poor UAW widow’s $6,000.00/year pension and healthcare benefits demand the jobs, pensions and healthcare benefits from those wall street, banking and insurance company thieves and their accomplices, the politicians, who are running the shame-the-UAW-circus in DC?????
Answer: Because all politicians are professional hate mongers and skilled manipulators without a conscience (like criminals), and they’ve skillfully manipulated their constituency (through a barrage of media coverage espousing concerns for the taxpayers, of all people… what a joke that is…) into expressing their hate for a predominately black segment (racial hate is very, very powerful) of the working class (UAW) in order to destroy a union while they still control the bankruptcy courts (and you thought you were living in a democracy with a fair judicial system).
NOTE: Republicans hate unions because unions only want to ‘redistribute’ wealth more equitably.

Posted by: cz | December 5, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

AP said “If GM, Chrysler or Ford goes into Chapter 11 no one will buy $20-40k cars out of fear the OEM’s could go into chapter 7 and will no longer produce service parts meaning your purchased car will not work.” That statement doesn’t hold water. Even if the Big3 go belly up, SOMEONE will produce parts for the current autos because there will be a MARKET for them. Gee – what a novel idea….producing what people need.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | December 5, 2008, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm

unholy33 said “What’s wrong with socialism?
There are no poor people under socialism.”
Maybe you’d better read up on what socialism is… there are ONLY poor people under socialism.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | December 5, 2008, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

THE BIG 3 SHOULD ALL TAKE A CUT IN THERE WAGES PLUS ALL THE WORKERS DO THE SAME AND MAYBE THE PUBLIC WILL SUPPORT THEM AND BUY THERE OVER PRICE AUTOS.
SAME GOES FOR CANADA THE UNION IS OVER PAID ALL WELL AS THE CO.

Posted by: FEAR21 | December 5, 2008, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Bush and the Republicans have literally wasted nearly a trillion taxpayer dollars on their Iraq misadventure. And they are STILL burning through in excess of $2 billion per week on the Iraq quagmire – a creature entirely of Bush and the Republicans’ creation. And now they’re actually quibbling about a lousy $41 billion to save the most important remaining industry in this country?!?!? That’s not even two months’ worth of feeding the black hole of Iraq. Talk about idiotic! Can we still get Bush impeached immediately?????

Posted by: Ourrias | December 5, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

A case for bail out, A bail out actually helps US tax payer, It is all about how much value addition is done in US (by Autos) as opposed to how much is done outside.
GM’s revenue is $160 Billion this year. Let us assume it $120 Billion next year. Of this $80 Billion is through US operations. And their cost/expense is $80 billion as they are not making any profit. Of this $80 billion government is actually getting $20 Billion as tax revenue. Let me show how. The cost or expense for any product ultimately is income to some employee minus the cost of imported content. In GM case it maybe income to assembly plant worker, or the parts factory worker or the steel manufacturer worker, or the power plant worker or the paint factory worker or the leather factory worker. All these employees pay taxes state+federal of at least 25 %, which comes to $20 Billion.
Let us look at the other scenario, If GM disappears today, people will buy $80 Billions imported cars or foreign cars assembled in US. Of this assembled cars in most cases at least 50% parts (engine, gear box,..) is imported. Assuming that $20 Billion of value added in US for foreign cars. The Government tax revenue at 25% level is $5 Billion. On the rest, government gets 5% import duty, which comes to 3 billion. So the government tax revenue is $8 Billion.
The Loan Guarantee which GM is asking is $13 billion!

Posted by: tom | December 5, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

The hole Economic down turn is the fult of Republican Neocon party in the first place an yes they do deserve blame for the failing of Americas Economy!!!

Posted by: Gary | December 5, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

Izzy,
By that logic, why don’t we just give every unemployed person $1million/yr, let them spend the money into the economy?
You have swallowed the Keynesian “Aggregate Demand” lie. The concept of “Aggregate Demand” flies in the face of Economics (which means the efficient allocation of limited resources). When was the last time you went into the grocery store and bought “Aggregate Meat”? Instead, you bought whatever type and cut of meat based on your own value judgement on a “good deal.” In the Keynsian logic, your search for “a good deal” is mortal sin; instead, you should over pay! In fact, if you pay $20/lb for some rotten meat is better than paying $7/lb for steak; if you get sick from eating the rotten meat, the Keynesian Econometrics gets a further boost from your emergency room bill! Now is your standard of living higher because you overpaid for rotten meat and get sick from it? as compared to if you bought the $7/lb fresh steak that you’d enjoy?
Government bailouts and subsidies are just like that $10/lb rotten meat that someone puts a gun to your head and force you to buy and eat to bail out the grocer. Forced purchasing and eating will not make the economy better, despite all the government statistics. What they will accomplish is WASTE!
The Big-3 are failing because consumers have decided that the vehicles that they make are worth less than material and labor going into them. It’s time to throw away their rotten business plans/models, instead of forcing taxpayers to eat it up. Economics is about the efficient allocation of resources; perpetrating uneconomic businesses is sheer waste.
When the Big-3, or buyers of their assets at liquidation, can get rid of the burden of corporate bonds that currently paying 8-12% under Bankruptcy Court surpervised reorganization, there may actually be more businesses for the small businesses that serve healthy carmakers.

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Tom,
Your numbers are not making sense. The GM production can not physically disappear tomorrow. Someone will be buying it and retooling it, or have it sold off in pieces. Whatever happens, if the consumer demand for cars are still there, they will be buying cars. To the extent that some other manufacturer can meet that demand more efficiently and turn a profit, the government will actually collect a tax on income without fronting anything.
GM is not breaking even. It’s losing billions of dollars every quarter. That’s why it’s asking for a bail out. The losses that GM makes now will negatively affect government tax income in the following years. If the consumer demand for cars is there, the suppliers to GM can sell parts to some other manufacturers fulfilling that demand. If the consumer demand is not there, then what’s the point of having parts makers and GM churning out products that nobody wants? Why not just let the taxpayers give all them a shovel and go dig holes in the ground.

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

The righties didn’t want the first bail-out.
How quickly you forget.
But what people wanted didn’t matter to Congress.
It was the end of the world then, and it is the end of the world now.
How many more industries are going to come along needing money to prevent the end of the world?

Posted by: Alana | December 5, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

JonggMaster,
The government doesn’t have money lying around somewhere to do all those bailouts. All the money comes from inflating money supply, i.e. debasing the money that savers and successful producers have. All govoernment bailouts are in effect robbing companies that make products that people do want to prolong the angony at companies that waste resources churning out goods that people do not want. If the government keeps doing that, chaos will be the inevitable reality.
There is a reason behind all economic acitivies: creating value by turning less expensive input factors into products/services that other people want more than they do the input factors. The Big-3 have clearly failed in that regard. It makes no sense for them to continue taking up so much natural resources and human labor, and keep polluting the enviornment, just to churn out cars that pile up on dealer lots. Someone else needs to step in and put the natural resources and human labor to better use.

Posted by: Tim | December 5, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

As I recall this Wall Street bailout happened just before the first presidential debate. Everybody was so busy screaming McCain was a Bushey and Obama was the Change. It was Democrat vs Republican. The Congress snuck in the bailout before the American working poor even knew what happened. I was paying attention and I blogged my little fingers to the bone screaming No Corporate Welfare. Most others were too busy to notice and were too concerned about the candidates and their images. I wrote to my Senators and both voted against the Wall Street Bailout. One is Democrat and one is Republican. Don’t blame Americans for not complaining about the Wall Street bailout. We did scream No, only a few listened and Congress shoved it through before any one paid attention. I hold both Congress and President Bush responsible.

Posted by: clancy49 | December 5, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Can anybody give me a reason Citibank got 20 billion last week without a question raised or asking??????…..and Big 3 get grilled for asking. They would not be asking if the banks were loaning money.
Keep preaching your hatred and none of you will be driving your foreign cars when you don’t have jobs. Live American, buy American, be an American.

Posted by: pureroll | December 5, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

Just wondering folks.
If the big three go under, who will build the vehicles for the military?
Isn’t this a security issue too.
China? Korea? Maybe Vietnam will get into the business. Doesn’t Russia make cars?
I wonder if they can make Hummers?
I think it is very strange to hear so many people trash US auto makers when half of the people I see on the street are driving these enormous SUV’s and swear that they need them for some stupid reason and now that the obvious fact that they are not sustainable, they now blame the maker.
We need to look for solutions that are in the best interest for the country.
We made a mistake in buying in to the big is better scheme, not thinking about the future. Big cars, big profits, think about today not tomorrow.
Now is not the time to be short sided and ditch one of our last remaining manufacturing bases.
We are bleeding jobs and I hear little people turning their backs on our own.
its a damn shame.
Forget this Democratic and Republican debate. We did it to ourselves!
Now how are we going to get ourselves out of this mess and be the great country that we were and can still be. We need to save the working MIDDLE CLASS!!! Screw Clinton, screw Bush

Posted by: EAP | December 5, 2008, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

No bailout for the Big3 means disaster for our economy. The idiots posting here sat silently as congress handed out Trillions to the wall street boys and said nothing. Now that it is a bunch of blue collar folks looking for a helping hand, these same bimbos scream at the top of their deceitful voices: NO WAY! Why? They have been brain washed into believing that “true” work is performed by these robber barrons on wall street and not the hard working folks out in the factories throughout the country. We in this country allowed the textile industry to vanquish – drive out into the rural areas of SC, GA, and MS and we will see the horrific devastation left behind. In these communities there is no tax base to support the local schools, children growing up in poverty, and all the other symptoms of poverty.
I’m an EE and have spent my entire life in a white collar environment but I only have to look within my own family to see the hardship resulting from this misplaced set of values.
I urge all of you to be a bit more thoughtful and stop bashing folks that might earn their living by working on a factory floor or in some other blue-collar capacity such as furniture making.

Posted by: AtlantaBill | December 5, 2008, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

For everyone that has posted the the UAW worker does NOT make $70-$75 an hour needs a refresher course in
MATH 101………..This is DIRECTLY off the UAW GM website…This pertains to the NEW contract between GM & UAW on Sept. 26,2007…..GM workers who are on the adtive roll will receive an up-front settlement bonus of $3,000. Workers on pre-retirement leave, in protected status, on temporary LAYOFF, on Family & Medical Leave or various other leaves of absence of not more than 90 days, are also ELIGIBLE for the bonus. THREE add’l bonuses will be paid in the second, third and fourth years of the agreement. In Oct. 2008, UAW GM workers with seniority as of 9/15/08 will receive a LUMB-SUM performance bonus eaual to 3% of qualified earning (including base wages, COLA, overtime, shift & seven-day operator premiums, call-in pay, vacation, holiday & other paid time off) over the preceding 52 pay periods. In Oct. 2009 workers will receive a LUMB-SUM bonus equal to 4% of qualified earnings. A final performance bonus, equal to 3% of qualified earnings will be paid 10/2010. FU UAW workers and you do too make $75 an hour….you are stupid enough to take a $25 an hour in pay and $50 in benefits..instead you should have demand more in pay and less benefits……….AND I HAVE more BS benefits that the UAW workers get…see the next post because it will make you sick…

Posted by: 55Mariposa | December 5, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

NEW UAW HIRES at GM 401(k) program…..GM wil contribute $1 per compensated hour into all new hires 401k plans…..So $40 dollar a week X 52 weeks a year = $2,080.00 that GM puts into your retirement accout. INDEPENDENCE DAY WEEK SHUTDOWN PAY…THAT IS RIGHT PAY…… The Independence Day week shutdown at GM…During the week of the Independence Day Holiday, seniority UAW workers wil receive 4 days (32 hours) OFF at their REGULAR rate of pay, including shift and seven-day operation premiums. Eligibility is unchanged from the 2003-2007 agreement. Over the term of the proposed agreement, the 32 hours of shutdown pay are worth an average of $950 each year for a typical GM assembler.

Posted by: 55Mariposa | December 5, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Profit Sharing…The profit-sharing formula will continue unchanged. Your bargaining team resisted management attempst to put a cap on profit sharing payouts; UAW GM workers will share fully in any profits tht their hard work & sacrifice make possible. TOTAL HOURLY WAGE INCREASES OF A GM UAW WORKER……..Assembler $26.09+2.03 (COLA) = $28.12…now start adding in your health care cost + pension plan + health insurance pension + free child care + Job BANK PROGRAM + health insurance for the entire family +overtime + 4days of shut down for the 4th of JULY + 12 paid holidays = $78.12…..And that is HOW the economist, legal analyist and CPA’s come up with the UAW worker making $70-$78 an hour…..

Posted by: 55Mariposa | December 5, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

Just watched Barney Frank on CNN. They have reached a compromise and will vote next week. Should pass, no problem. $15 Billion to be released in short time from the $25 billion originally allocated for green re-tooling. That money will be replaced in a few weeks. A more long term strategy will be worked out after 1/20/2009. YES!

Posted by: jjw555 | December 5, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

I think we should BOYCOTT THE BIG THREE, then see were they stand !!
Our government is not for the people only big business !!

Posted by: Mike | December 5, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

No plan B!! A fitting epitaph. Get out of the way Nancy and Frank they are going down.

Posted by: PaleRider | December 5, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Hey Tim from a couple of days ago: Re-read my post of the other day…..the 50% firing idea was a quote from Stab. I said fire all their asses and start all over again. And Row, you seem to be a logical intelligent person with good ideas. Keep blogging. And Joe from the airlines—well, you didn’t have to worry in bankruptcy about guaranteeing the warranty on the flight, such as an automaker has to do for the car the consumer buys. Would you buy a car from a bankrupt dealer? Of course not…..there are no guarantees from those guys! And all you posters that are blaming the Dems for everything—the Republican administration has spent the last 8 years deregulating everything in sight until there are virtually no regulations against greedy unscrupulous people and companies left. That’s why the economy is going down the tubes….sub prime mortgage lenders pressured unqualified homebuyers to buy, buy, buy. They told them the value of their house would increase and they could sell it and make a profit. Now, who doesn’t like a profit? It wasn’t the fault of the poor, unqualified homebuyers….they just bought into the American dream and believed their Dear Leader Bush when he said, in 2002 (look it up) that he was going to make it possible for everyone to have just as nice a house as everybody else by getting rid of those pesky rules for qualified buyers. And as to the last 2 years of a Democratic majority in Congress–it was just barely, a slim 50-49 Senate lead with Tim Johnson out with a stroke much of that time, and the Republicans fillibustering everything the Dems wanted to do—about 1500 times, I believe. So don’t go saying the Dems were responsible for not getting anything done. The obstructionists were the Republicans–and the veto-ingist (is that a word?) President in the history of the Republic. That veto pen was smokin’!
So, let’s quit blaming everybody else for the mess that the Bush administration has made of this country–don’t forget–he had a multi-multi-million dollar surplus when he came into office, courtesy of the Clinton administration, and now we’re 13 Trillion in debt. Nice work, W! January can’t come soon enough!

Posted by: glogrrl | December 5, 2008, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm

Why are we in this turmoil? How many years did the auto makers live in excess, being paid millions of dollars each year that the companies earned a profit and receiving multi-million dollar bonuses, even in the past few years they have received these bonuses when their companies were not profiting. Workers are paid whether they work or not, and are paid extremely well, up to one third as much as the foreign car companies who were building their factories in the USA.
The executives are not focusing on the future thinking they can continue business as usual forever. Again the foreign car companies took the high road and outperform GM, Ford, and Chrysler by developing highbred vehicles and again US manufacturers are playing catch up and loosing market share.
What ever happened to the American advantage. I believe we have great minds in the US but their ideas are not being heard. We need innovation in the auto industry and if they can’t hack it, they should just close their doors.
Why is the failure of our auto manufacturers and their ability to survive up to the American taxpayer, or the Democrat, Republican, politician to bail them out. The US does not subsidize their auto manufacturers like many other countries do. Perhaps low cost loans will help them to survive, but it is not our obligation to bail out everyone that cries.
I feel bad for the millions of families that could be affected by this troubled industry, but they too should have been preparing for this type of event.

Posted by: Jim S | December 5, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

EAP,
Hummer was a civlianized version of HUMVEEE, which was/is made by AM General, not part of any Big-3. GM bought the marketting brand of “Hummer,” which makes Hummer2 and Hummer3, both of which are Chevy trucks skinned to look like the Hummber/HUMVEE made by AM General.
The middle class is not created by artificial wage levels or artificial jobs. The middle class is created and supported by the workers’ own productivity. Otherwise, there wouldn’t be the products to support their level of consumption.

Posted by: Tim | December 6, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am

AtlantaBill,
SC, GA and MS were never textile centers of the US. The northeast mill towns were. The poverty you see in SC, GA and MS is the direct result of the inequitable monetary system that we have. Whenever the FED creates new money, the government contractors and bankers get to spend the money first therefore experience the least of the detrimental effect of inflation; the farmers down south are the last in line to get and spend that new money, therefore feel the full brunt of savings/wealth destruction caused by government monetary debasement. That’s part of the very purpose of the federal monetary system, otherwise what do you think makes the entire country to send food and other resources to those parasites in DC and NYC? It costs them nothing to print up the funny looking paper, and you are forced at gun point to exchange the fruit of your labor for those funny papers. “Bailouts” are just schemes to spread some of those funny papers to their cronies . . . all which means someone will get the fruit of your labor for nothing!

Posted by: Tim | December 6, 2008, 2:59 am 2:59 am

What’s wrong with buying cars from a bankrupt dealer? or even a bankrupt carmaker? DeLoreans are at the very top in terms of keeping their original value compared to all other mass produced cars from the early 1980′s. . . the company has been bankrupt for over two decades! There are mechanics and restoration shops dedicated to DeLoreans because there is a market demand! Imagine that, businesses thrive or die depending on whether consumers want them . . . instead of some bureacrats dictating which company lives and which one dies. If and when the cars on the lots are liquidated in fire sales, there will be a huge market for maintaining them even if the Big-3 are no longer with us. Renault and Fiat pulled out of the US market in the 80′s, yet you still see 20+ year old Renault and Fiat running around on the roads, because the market has been able to keep the support network long after the companies departed.

Posted by: Tim | December 6, 2008, 3:07 am 3:07 am

The Democrats are trying to force to keep a promise that their candidate made? I once had a Cadillac that cost twice the price in repairs as the sticker price. I gave it away last year with less than 80,000 miles on it and not a dent or flaw and new tires. Now the guy who has it can’t keep it on the road either, and he is a mechanic! The Big 3 make shoddy products and have scared away their base customers. Let’s not keep throwing money at them like I did that Cadillac! I never hear complaints from Lexus owners!

Posted by: Robin Marks | December 6, 2008, 4:58 am 4:58 am

Let them go bankrupt!! No bailout!!
It is the best way for all.
The labor contracts with the union would be null and void. That is a good thing!
The unemployed people won’t starve, they can get rehired at a fraction of what they were so ridiculously getting paid.
Reduce their wages back to reality and that reduces the price of vehicles which will result in more sales.
The only thing that will fix this is to let the unavoidable happen, Chapter 11.
They should also learn from their mistakes and never let unions get in. Infact, unions should now become illegal.

Posted by: Union's Fault | December 6, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am

The UAW was responsible for much of what is wrong with the Big 3. Let them bailout the auto makers. If each union member loaned $10,000 to the auto makers the immediate financing problem would be resolved. It would also provide an incentive for the union to act responsibly, which they have not in a very long time.
No bailout with our tax dollars.

Posted by: James | December 6, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

Mr. President,
No bail out money unless it is tied to the unions giving up their bloated pension plans and reducing their salaries to the same level as non-union auto makers.
Oh, and if you can add in a mandate that would prevent giving union thugs the right to know how other workers vote when it comes to the decision of whether to unionize or not that would be very good. Otherwise tell them to get lost!

Posted by: nick | December 6, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

any money including the wallstreet buyout. will be spent to fatten the pockets of the already wealthy.our gov buys everything at a inflated price( 500$ hammers) what makes us think they can make good business judgements. I for one think the dems screwed this country up by letting all our jobs go accross the borders.shut down this practice and people in the u.s. get more jobs. nafta was the beginning of the end for our economy. thanks democrats

Posted by: jim | December 6, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Has everyone forgotten their American History? Three generations of my family have worked in the American Auto Industry. My Grandfather worked in the foundry plants, my other Grandfather worked at Fisher Body with my father who both found opportunities at GM and Ford respectively having worked the remainder of their 30+ year careers. This is a story of loyalty. Where a worker is loyal to a company and a company is loyal to its employee and its community through exemplary corporate citizenship. While America went off to war to fight totalitarianism in WWII it was Detroit that became the Arsenal of Democracy. My wife’s Grandfather worked with Rosie the Riveter at the Detroit Rouge kicking out amphiphibious vehicles for military use, his brother-in-law was hired by Henry Ford out of Buffalo, New York to come get the Willow Run Bomber Plant to work. Before his arrival, Willow Run was jokingly called, “Will It Run?” After introducing lean manufacturing into the Willow Run Bomber Plant, the facility kicked out a bomber every hour around the clock. These bombers liberated Europe and secured America’s Freedom.
Now Ford, Chrysler, and GM have fallen and they need a hand up, not a hand out. They are not looking for a bailout in the likes of AIG, IndyMac, Freddie Mac, and Fannie Mae, and other banks that got money without even asking for it. Since when is a loan a handout or a bailout? Does that everyone who ever purchased a home got a bailout? The designers and engineers of the Arsenal of Democracy gave us the Greatest Generation that makes today even possible. These LOANS from the US Government will make this generation of designers and engineers the Arsenal of the US Economym the Environment, and National Security for our nation as it rises to the meet the challenges to forever be the beacon of freedom from that shining city on a hill that is America.

Posted by: Aaron | December 6, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

The auto industry in America is OK, the industry in Detroit is defunct and neanderthal. My guess is that when the dems are done paying back the UAW Uncle Sam will have been on the hook for 200 billions and Toyota will still be number 1.

Posted by: Bob Shanahan | December 6, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Give the Auto industry this chance; and if they do not pull of then, then so be it….
hey, I drive a Lexus…….If GM, Ford, and Chrysler were to fail, do we actually think Lexus, BMW, Mercedes, Toyota, Nissain and others will lower their already too high prices?
We should maintain competition…
GM and Ford: Please produce something more appealing besides the corvette and Pony Car….Okay!!! you too Chrysler…
Come out with something else…. Make your cars more durable…..Use different side view mirrors on the Mustangs besides plastic…

Posted by: shalom | December 6, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Dems? Who cares what the dems want? They’re not going to be in office next term anyway. If you voted for any sort of bailout, you’ll have to go to work next term. You’re outta here.

Posted by: Maxify55 | December 6, 2008, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

The Democrats are absolutely right. If companies like Ford, Chrysler & GM can’t go to banks for loans then what’s the point of TARP? If these loans cannot come from banks, then these loans absolutely should come from TARP funds.

Posted by: Dugese | December 6, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

We are caught by our own education system. God said not to seek after riches. The goal in life is not employment; that has brought the world problems including the financial crisis, energy crisis and auto industry crisis.
If we repaired the auto industry, we would continue the same destructive lifestyle that is killing us physically, emotionally and spiritually.
The gaol is not employment; it is a retirement lifestyle where our time is our own to create a garden paradise where the trees, plants and animals give food in our neighborhoods.
If we did this in 1929, we would not have the world problems we see now: pollution, global warming, energy crisis, food crisis, poverty, disease, war, immigration, drugs and crime, and child care, elder care, and health care systems.
The Global Climate Change Talks are going on in Poland now trying to solve these problems. We do not need to put more road-blocks in the way.

Posted by: Marie Devine | December 6, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

Sophia said:
Always go with the workers over the bankers. That’s just common sense.
That’s not an intelligent statement,
Sophia! There would be No Workers or
Jobs for that matter without Banks and
Bankers! Duh!
Who do you think lends money to
companies so they can expand their
businesses and hire more workers?
The tooth fairy?
The Democrats, Barney Frank and
Chris Dodd are responsible for the
Mortgage Crisis through their lack of
oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac!
Through threats and intimidation the
Democrats forced banks to make
“subprime” loans to people with bad
credit histories and who were bound to
default on their loans!
The credit crunch caused by the
Mortgage Crisis spread the misery to
the rest of our economy!
So if you want to point fingers you need
go no further than the Democrat Party!
Those are the facts, Sophia!

Posted by: reaganfan | December 6, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

Take the money for the Big 3 out of the TARP funds. AIG execs will just have to skip a few executive retreats and bonuses.

Posted by: 1bluestocking | December 6, 2008, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

unbelieveable!!! and i thought all the ignorant people were in congress!!! it is vital for the economy of this nation for the big 3 TO BE BAILED OUT. do you think if the big 3 go under it is only going to affect the auto makers? wrong, it will affect the twenty thousand plus dealerships in this country, their suppliers, banks etc. list goes on and on. this will not be a trickle effect it will be a TSUNAMI!!!!!!

Posted by: bmp | December 7, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

I see people commenting that they will be losing thier jobs if the auto industry files chapter 11. They say they “only” make 40 an hour. Here is the simple math. The median income for families in the US is $48,201, thats a hair over $24 an hour. Thats about what I make. The UAW has priced their workers out of competitivness. I work in the airline business. I still have a job just like countless thousands of others. Let the Auto companies file bankrutpcy, reorganize, become stronger. Stop paying exorbitant rates for labor. Whats next? McDonalds asking for a government bailout because thier workers dont make $25 an hour?

Posted by: Tucsonscott | December 7, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

lets get to the core of the problem!!! get rid of the united auto workers union.

Posted by: bmp | December 7, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

To BMP: The autoworkers get $25.00 an hour just like you do. How about we cut both (You and the UAW) your wages to $10.00 an hour would you agree to that???? I did not think so….Because you all hate the Union so much how about everyone take a 50% pay cut including the Union workers How does that sound??? Not one of you whiners would do that would you???
I am amazed at all the people that want the big 3 to fail. You people are the same idiots that think We have a real oil shortage. (NOT) That $5.00 a gallon gas was because of a severe shortage (not) and We should just continue giving Citi and AIG Billions NO QUESTIONS ASKED?? What is it going to take to get Citi and AIG execs grilled?? There are a slew of much better run banks then Citi,So why $300 billion for them.You also bash the Union, If it were not for the Union EVERYONE in this country would be making $1.00 an hour. Those wages that the autoworkers make have caused you NON union people to get a better wage also. Otherwise I wish you all agreat time on 52 weeks of unemployment!! You deserve it. Enjoy watching AIG hold big lavish parties at YOUR expense while you no longer have a job. Oh I forgot maybe Senator Shelby can introduce you to his favorite Japanese companies in Alabama and MAYBE you can get a job paying $22.00 an hour in Alabama..

Posted by: joe b | December 7, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

A bunch of people were against the Bear Sterns bailout – worried that doing it once might encourage other similar bailout. The same people and a few more were against the Fannie/Freddy bailout – worried that we might be setting a precedent. We hoped that maybe a line was finally being drawn when we let Lehman go under … That hope lasted less than a week. Then 700 billion more and 80 billion more and 35 billion more and more and more. Where do we draw the line? On what basis? Which straw will be the last one? Which industry will be the new essential industry after we bail out the domestic auto industry? I challenge anyone who is for this bailout/loan to tell us exactly where and for whom their line is drawn. I challenge any one griping about non-hourly worker compensation to say exactly how much is too much to pay someone. I want specifics, not just “well that’s too much” or “they’re too big”.

Posted by: readrover | December 7, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

to joe b
i have already taken my paycut, and yes almost 50%. how about you?

Posted by: bmp | December 7, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

all i hear is what the democrats are doing bush and all his croneys have robbed the american people for 8 years why dont i hear a out cry on that billion of dollors dished out to no bid contracts to his and chaney rich buddys IE haliburton just to name one blackwater just to name two waste is waste wheather its the dem or the repub

Posted by: j bethea | December 7, 2008, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

so how much does the UAW ceo make? Let him accept $1.00 per year and reduce the costs.

Posted by: rst | December 7, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Pelosi liner her pockets with natural gas money and handed her husband 90,000+ for services. Put her money, the backers of Reid, the Kennedy and Kerry money together and they can pay for the bail out themselves. About time they kick in some money instead of demanding actions which fall on the common taxpayers.

Posted by: s63m | December 7, 2008, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm

Westinghouse Pitsburgh announced 15 years ago, “America is not a country for Manufacturing” “America is Sales and Service”. They annouced then selling the lamp business to Phillips, and large turbines & generators to Siemens. I sold Westibghouse Air Cond.
So now when you drive in USA you see Shopping malls, instead of factories.
The big 3 auto makers will fail next.

Posted by: Michael F. Bendik | December 8, 2008, 10:03 am 10:03 am

are the air line industry next for a bailout/?

Posted by: Allison_Samuel | December 9, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

maybe not air line industry… how bout the big 3 rail road companies or maybe trucking industry. either one of them go under you’ll see the US come to a complete stop!!

Posted by: ben | December 10, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Ben is right when it comes to the bail out. since America depends on trucks and rails… I support the bail out of the big 3. because means my job would go bye bye like many other parts suppliers..

Posted by: truck_driver | December 11, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

I believe that it is high time that a graph be created and published that breaks down where all the money goes. a nice bar graph for each car, that breaks down the cost by concept development, engineering, assembly planning, tooling up, raw material purchase, purchased parts, assembly labor, marketing, management and executive pay. lets go back in time and show how these contributed to he cost of the vehicles in the past. Let us see the trends in the expenses and costs and compensations. let us see the diffrence between labor costs and executive compensation. Let’s see what tunes people sing then. my bet is that it will be an easy sell that the executives can afford to, and should be required to, fund the bailout that is required as the result of their own decisions and guidance. At least that’s my guess. Can someone provide this?

Posted by: Palmtree | December 14, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
Deborah

Posted by: Deborah | December 22, 2008, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.