In the Name of Transparency, Obama Team Posts Memos from Outside Groups
You may recall last week’s posting on the Obama Transition Team’s Transparency efforts… specifically it’s "Your Seat at the Table" page, where voters can offer their feedback and also read memos and such from outside groups that meet with the OTT.
The OTT has now posted some of the memos it has received from CITA Wireless Industry, unions, La Raza, and various other groups.
The 80-page National Education Association memo is perhaps the most instructive as it captures the demanding tone of some interest groups. “NEA should be intimately involved from the beginning in discussions on any issues that impact our members," the teachers’ union says. "We would like to provide input before proposals are drafted, rather than simply reacting to already drafted proposals.”
On the whole, nothing earth-shattering but certain a departure from previous administrations. Congressional Quarterly has a story about the documents HERE.
– jpt

Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
“On the whole, nothing earth-shattering but certain a departure from previous administrations.”
This is part of the reason I voted for Obama.
I don’t expect him to reinvent government but to change the course we have been on in terms of government secrecy.
Posted by: Ryan C | December 8, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
Does this hard line on accountability go beyond the transparent transition process?
Posted by: matt | December 8, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
I imagine the NEA isn’t too pleased with the continuation and the support shown towards the No Child Left Behind Act. Contrary to PR, it hasn’t been that successful and has serious flaws, both in its assumptions and its enactment.
Posted by: kat | December 8, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
I think this is really interesting.
I wonder what the consequences will be. Will interest groups stop writing memos to the President? Will they learn to write for a different audience?
Will they find a way around it?
Which interest groups will not be subject to having their memos be posted?
Posted by: MayBee | December 8, 2008, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Under the Bushies, La Raza and teachers have been demonized. I’m both and I’m as American as they come. Obama has nothing to be ashamed of here. The shame lies with those among us who hate and divide. 8 years of Bushism is enough. I can hardly wait until Dubya’s last day in office to return to a fresh, clean and decent America.
Posted by: buzzie | December 8, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
I’m sure the evidence for his faked birth certificate, Ayres associations, KGB implant, and whatever else are within these thousands of pages. I encourage the right wing to comb through them all very carefully.
Posted by: Tungsten | December 8, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
Yeah- they need to keep themselves busy on the change gov website looking for conspiracies while we dominate the blogs. Great idea, Tungsten!
Posted by: charlie brown | December 8, 2008, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
Ted Kennedys no child bill does leave something to be desired but it was/is a step in the right direction.
Did the NEA memo mention education for the kids or were they just worried about the duespayers?
Posted by: smith | December 8, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
With Kennedy, the NCLB was supposed to even out the learning between white and non white, the rich and the poor. Under the Bush administration, the legislation became a method that on the basis of monetary incentive for teachers and funding for schools actually strengthened differences between the advantaged and disadvantaged. The schools which needed the funding and the accolades the least were the ones who were rewarded, while the struggling schools were further stigmatized and put in danger of loosing funds. There were across the board percentages of students who must pass, regardless of the schools’ and student body makeup. In the meantime, the Bush administration pushed for vouchers for private schools as the struggling schools worsened. I know that in some districts, schools which were special education hub schools disbanded their programs and their students were dispersed into the district so their test scores wouldn’t pull down their scores. In short, what started out as a noble idea by Kennedy deteriorated quickly into a ruthless struggle for schools to survive- ironically, the ones the bill was designed to help in the first place.
Smith, if you’re concerned about the NEA being more concerned about their dues than students and education, then you should by all means take a read of the memo yourself.
Posted by: kat | December 8, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
Giving money to the NEA is a proven waste! Might as well give it to Barney and Chris to pocket as they please. With no scrutiny or care. As you can very well see that added $$ did nothing and continues to do nothing to this day.
La Raza is a joke and should be outlawed as a Less that nothing leftist party of do nothings. Can their program and the illegal immigrants that they sponsor. Since when do ILLEGALS have rights in a country where they are here ILLEGALLY? I now understand why Lady Justice has her eyes blindfolded!
Posted by: commrat72 | December 9, 2008, 7:00 am 7:00 am
Most of these Education Programs are just another loop hole for local politicians to cheat the taxpayer. The No Kid program is another example.The schools and teachers are moving “Special Ed” kids out and crash tutoring and proctoring the kids, that they can’t, to pass their competency to graduate exams. If someone tells me that the schools are substituting students for the tests, I’ll believe it. Not because I’m ignorant, but because that is the way it works. Get the government money at all costs. Twenty years ago, they just passed the kids on. Now they phony up the test results. The result is the same and everyone can see it. More graduations, less drop-outs, but the kids are no smarter.
Posted by: elb | December 9, 2008, 7:04 am 7:04 am
What an amazing change from the last administration during which Cheney assembled big oil and coal lobbyists to develop energy policy and then refused to reveal the participants, subjects discussed or decisions made. Good start, Barack.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | December 9, 2008, 8:53 am 8:53 am
Okay, I read the NEA memo and if the order in which they presented their requests is also what they consider to be highest priorities, it looks like creating new government positions for themselves is the most pressing problem we face today, followed closely by the fact that our schools aren’t environmentally friendly enough and then that emphasizing basic skills is a problem. We need to get more global people. Math is only worthy when taught in tandem with How Crystals Make our Chakras align.
Okay, so I made that last part up, but seriously, making sure that employees are allowed to force unions via the Employee Freedom of Choice Act and insisting our schools be bilingual? As a parent, these are hardly the things at the top of my list of wants for my child.
Posted by: Jen B. | December 9, 2008, 8:58 am 8:58 am
“What an amazing change from the last administration during which Cheney assembled big oil and coal lobbyists to develop energy policy and then refused to reveal the participants, subjects discussed or decisions made. Good start, Barack.”
We still don’t know what happened in those meetings even with FOIA requests
Posted by: Ryan C | December 9, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Much ado about nothing. If you believe Obama’s adminsitartion will be “transparent,” you believe only those people earning $250,000 or more will suffer during the next four years.
Posted by: Colony14Author | December 9, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
One thing the Democrats do better than any other group – KOWTOW to the UNIONS!
They know where their votes come from and they’ll move heaven and earth to deliver on promises made!
Look how they’re doing anything and everything to screw the taxpayers with the Big 3 bailout to make sure the UNIONS get paid back for votes delivered!
Posted by: Lee | December 9, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Jen- That’s an interesting interpretation. I don’t understand your concern about the NEA wanting the government to create positions for them. There was a lot of bureaucracy to wade through, but no mention of the government funding positions for the National Education Association. There were concerns expressed about NCLB that weren’t too different from my own. Teaching math with crystals has nothing to do with the 21st Century Skills portion of the document which emphasizes that US education become economically competitive. Most of the emphasis was on core areas like math, reading, and science with a multidisciplinary approach. Again, teaching math with crystals isn’t an accurate way to describe combining the math and science disciplines, which in reality, are very complimentary to one another.
Posted by: kat | December 9, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm