More Troops are Needed as Security Situation in Afghanistan Worsens
ABC News’ Martha Raddatz and Luis Martinez Report: The Taliban have a permanent presence in 72 percent of Afghanistan — up from 54 percent a year ago — according to a report released by an international think tank today.
That conclusion by the International Council on Security and Development was disputed by the Afghan government and NATO.
"We don’t see the figures in this report as being credible at all," NATO spokesman James Appathurai told Reuters. "The Taliban are only present in the south and east which is already less than 50 percent of the country."
What is clear, however, is that the security situation in Afghanistan is deteriorating and more troops are needed.
In the short term, an Army brigade — about 3,700 troops — will be sent to two provinces south of Kabul instead of to the provinces bordering Pakistan, which tells you how bad the security situation is getting so close to the Afghanistan capital. A battalion of combat troops from the 3rd Brigade, 10th Mountain Division will be sent to the volatile Kunar Province along the border with Pakistan, but the bulk of the forces will head to Wardak and Loghar Provinces.
A Defense Official says sending the troops to these provinces will provide the troops needed for areas where there is a weak coalition presence and allow U.S. troops on the border to dedicate even more of their attention to the border provinces where insurgents continue to wage attacks from across their safe haven in Pakistan’s tribal region.
But top commanders in Afghanistan have said they need 20,000 additional U.S. troops in Afghanistan, an idea supported by President-Elect Obama, who said throughout the presidential campaign that he would support sending more troops to Afghanistan. But getting those troops to Afghanistan could take anywhere from 12-18 months as the brunt of the forces will have to come from troops still destined for Iraq.
Obama wants to move all combat troops out of that country within the next 16 months, but much of that will depend on the security situation there.
Some military officials, including General David Petraeus — currently the commander of Centcom and previously the architect of the "surge" in Iraq, want to ensure the exit strategy is executed slowly and deliberately, with a close eye on the situation on the ground. As troops leave, they want to be certain none of their hard-earned gains are lost.
In the meantime, the military services continue to plan for possible deployments to Afghanistan if and when the troops are made available. A Defense Official says the Marines have drawn up plans for possibly sending between 3,000-5,000 Marines to Afghanistan next year, but these are forces that would only be made available if the drawdown of troops continues in Iraq.

Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Gotta guard that record Opium crop and that vital oil pipeline. It’s so nice to know our boys are dying for such a worthy cause.
Posted by: please! | December 8, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
It has always been Afghanistan.
g.w. got us into his ego-legacy war in Iraq. Has only cause American to die, 4,275 and be wounded 43,000. Has built a training ground for terrorist. And a money pit with no bottom.
The bush legacy in action.
The cost will be paid by our children,grandchilden and great granchildren.
Posted by: pete staff | December 8, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Yes, by all means ignore the terrorists in Iraq and focus on the ones in Afghanistan. Sounds like a plan to me!
I guess folks still think that the 9-11 terrorists were natives of Grand Rapids or something.
Leave the poor guys alone until they ACTUALLY COMMIT A CRIME OR ELSE THEY’LL GET MAD AT US AND MIGHT HURT SOMEBODY!
Posted by: Grand Old Party | December 8, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
The fact that we’re shoring up Kabul is very disturbing. Are we losing Afghanistan?
Posted by: Paul | December 8, 2008, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
We’re not losing. We’re just maintaining. Eventually we’ll come to an understanding with the less radical survivors and everything will settle down. Read some history.
Posted by: johnnygolightly | December 9, 2008, 12:19 am 12:19 am
“More troops are needed” because there are pipeline routes to clear of uncooperative locals.
Posted by: dragon | December 9, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am
IF you people would leave other countrys alone and this war is uncalled for,it good old bush bull sh,,,t he is only a alcoholic and playing,little you,big me,game GEORGE BUSH,WAKE PLEASE YOU KILLING US,
Posted by: james | December 11, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
cant war just end everyday more and more people are killed. my sister is gonna be going over there. if were doing this war forever its gotta have some effect nothing is happeneing
Posted by: Shawna | January 4, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm