Obama Tries to Move Beyond Blagojevich; Promises More Details Soon
ABC NEW’S SUNLEN MILLER REPORTS:
President-elect Barack Obama clearly wanted to move beyond Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich at today’s press conference at the Drake hotel in Chicago. During opening remarks, the president-elect did not mention the results of his interview investigation, preferring instead to stick to the purpose of today’s press conference: the announcement of posts within his energy and environmental team.
Obama took three questions –- only one of which was related to Blagojevich –- and was asked about the Chicago Tribune’s reporting this weekend that his incoming chief of staff, Rahm Emmanuel, had discussions with the governor’s staff.
Obama answered by repeating the mantra that he started last Thursday, “I had no contact with the governor’s office, and I had no contact with anybody in the governor’s office. And what I indicated last week is that there was nothing that my office did that was in any way inappropriate or related to the charges that have been brought.”
Obama said that the review done by his Transition Team backed up his statement and he promised more details soon.
“There is nothing in the review that was presented to me that in any way contradicted my earlier statements that this appalling set of circumstances that we’ve seen arise had nothing to do with my office and that, you know, those facts will be forthcoming to all of you in due course.”
The president-elect called his Transition Team’s internal review, “thorough and comprehensive,” and explained that the U.S. attorney’s office had asked to hold off releasing the detailed results of their investigation for a week for the public.
“I would ask for your patience, because I do not want to interfere with an ongoing investigation,” he added.
– Sunlen Miller

Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
He’ll release his self-investigation Christmas Eve. Late. What is “inappropriate,” anyway.
Posted by: Mesquito | December 15, 2008, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
Jake, these last two posts are practically the same. Why the need for repetition?
As I wrote on the earlier post, Sunlen Miller’s reporting has been less than impressive.
Posted by: Question | December 15, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
I guess it sounds sort of reasonable although its awfully curious that it is being held until he is safely on a private beach in Hawaii and cant take any questions.
I hope this isnt an auger for the whole Clinton III administration where they announce everything is fine but no one gets to see anything.
And I think there is still a question if Obama was being cagey about this reference to his “transition staff”.
Posted by: BertieW | December 15, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
explained that the U.S. attorney’s office had asked to hold off releasing the detailed results of their investigation for a week for the public
Mr. Tapper, how is that a “dodge”?
Posted by: Anderson | December 15, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
The roll out went well enough. Obama handled the few Blago questions well, although the press gave him a major break by not pressing the issue further. Mainly, did Obama and his team delay after being approached by Fitzgerald, or was it vice versa?
Posted by: matt | December 15, 2008, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Jake,
Did you add that Fitzgerald has commented that indeed that he asked the Obama team to wait a week before they release their findings? It was announced on CNN.
FITZGERALD’S STATMENT:
“United States Attorney Patrick Fitzgerald confirmed the request in a statement, saying the extra time will allow his office to “conduct certain interviews.”
I have a feeling that there will be no there there when this is all released next week.
Posted by: Cameron | December 15, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
I’m sorry but where did you get the idea that Obama dodged the questions? I saw the full press conference. He announced his team, and took questions.
A dodge would have been “I’m not going to comment on it” or “it would be inappropriate for me to comment.” Instead, he actually answered the question, reiterated that he had no involvement, and that his staff had no inappropriate involvement and said that the only reason that they couldn’t release the report is b/c the US Attorney’s Office requested that they don’t until the 22nd of Dec.
Your characterization is inaccurate at best, and a flat-out-lie at worst.
Posted by: David | December 15, 2008, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
Your use of the word dodge is misleading and offensive. Shame on you Mr. Tapper. Of all the network coverage ABC seems to want to imply a connection when there does not apepar to be any.
Posted by: Terry | December 15, 2008, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
He’s already involved in a scandal and he hasn’t even been sworn in yet.
Posted by: Joan | December 15, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Obama defining what appropriate is – I’ve seen his examples of appropriate before, it’s called Chicago – hate to sound pessimistic but we’re doomed as a country and embarrassed internationally
Posted by: richardm | December 15, 2008, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Of course, Obama will dodge uncomfortable questions. If he is as smart as everyone says he is, he should know what is going on in the old neighborhood. When Blago faces 20 years, I have a feeling he will squeal like a pig.
Posted by: Mihann | December 15, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
Your reporting is misleading and disingenuous.
Posted by: Thinking | December 15, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
I was counting on change. Hope President Obama doesn’t let us down.
Posted by: t42 | December 15, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Wow, you newsies are really OBSESSED with this, aren’t you? Plays well in the right wing echo chamber, but nowhere else. Getting dull, folks.
Posted by: Tungsten | December 15, 2008, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
Don’t you know that it takes time to get the stories straight? After all, they DID approach Rod first. Good going, Jake. Maybe next week SNL will do a skit on Rahm’s colorful language.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | December 15, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Obama helped run ole Blago’s campaign in 2002 and supported him in 06. Come on people. Get real…Politics are dirty and Obama is from a very dirty area of politics. How do you think he got into the state senate anyway? Look it up. You Obama maniacs are deaf, dumb and blind.
Posted by: Deborah DeBarr | December 15, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
The media definitely looking for something negative here.
Posted by: liz | December 15, 2008, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
There is nothing wrong with using the word “dodges”. It is what happened. Getting defensive over the choice of words is what is dragging this story on and on.
Posted by: Tom | December 15, 2008, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Obama is not responsible for the mistakes of this Blago guy. When there is an ongoing investigation, there is only so much information you can release to the public. Obama is not stupid. Call him a “dodger” if you want to; he’s not going to make any dumb mistakes; he is too smart for that. There are people that want to see Obama fall; not going to happen!! Get over it!!
Posted by: liz | December 15, 2008, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Obama uses language very carfully just like Mr. Bill Clinton. Be prepared for 4 more years of further parsing of his words. Go back and check what he initially said and compare it to the latest comments and you will see what I mean.
Posted by: Clintionsthirdterm | December 15, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
I do not think Obama had any personally contact other than probably mentioned some names he would like to fill his Senate seat. There’s nothing wrong with that and no story except Obama is not saying that but dodging the question. Just answer truthfully and no problem. On other hand it’s great that these far left wing nuts (just replacing the far right wing that they use) are having a problem with the media. I never heard any complaints when the media was going after Bush.Grow up and get use to it you will have four years of it.
Posted by: pohcd | December 15, 2008, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
There is nothing to indicate that Obama was actually involved in the scheme. If there is, it hasn’t come out yet. People who are against him would use anything possible to make him look bad.
Posted by: Scorpredhead | December 15, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
WOW!! Such nitpicking. Blago got himself in big trouble and somehow Obama is blamed for it! Go figure!
Posted by: liz | December 15, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
I don’t think it’s sunk in yet that Obama is really our new President. Trying to bring him down before he’s in office. That’s why we’re in the shape we’re in; we are definitely not humble people; more like mischievous.
Posted by: liz | December 15, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
Sounds like you have a difficult time sleeping at night.
Posted by: liz | December 15, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
OMG I recently was demoted due to my companies drop in sales. I am 100% republican and I have been placed working with a 100% democrat. I find it disturbing and fascinating to listen to his distorted view of the world. This is an angry man and he will dye young from his anger. This man is a fool and he lets others think for him. I encouraged him to get out and promote his party. Listening to him is the best weapon the republicans have. I encourage all democrats to get out and promote your party.
Posted by: txptuprise | December 15, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
Payback. We’ve listened to 8 years of trumped-up crap regarding Bush. Virtually everything negative was blamed on Bush. Ask Dan Rather. The shoe (not either of the ones thrown at Bush) is on the other foot. Stop crying about it and get used to it. Everything is about to be The Prophet’s fault.
Posted by: Don | December 15, 2008, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
Jake, I watched the press conference. PE Obama did not “dodge” the queston. He stated that they had the results, but they were asked to withhold them by Fitzgerald until next week. Fitzgerald confirmed that. So where’s the “dodge”?
Posted by: Bill | December 15, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
Palin/Shoe ’08 !!!!
Posted by: Joe6Pack | December 15, 2008, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
“WOW!! Such nitpicking. Blago got himself in big trouble and somehow Obama is blamed for it! Go figure!”
Get used to it, children. This is what it was like over he last eight years.
You’re laughable.
Posted by: drjohn | December 15, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
Well, let’s see…
Obama went from “we” to “I” and “no contact” to “no inappropriate contact.”
What else will surprise?
Posted by: drjohn | December 15, 2008, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
Not fair!
Posted by: drjohn | December 15, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
Obama’s typical pattern; 1st deny, then distance, then condemn, then under the bus they go….
Posted by: rich | December 15, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Don, your wishful thinking and fantasies will not come true as you hope for. Obama is not involved in this mess. If anything, this case regarding the Illinois governor will prove that Obama’s character and intergrity is beyond reproach. The Illinois governor, himself, is a character witness to Obama’s innocense. Stay tuned, and maybe,you might be invited to Obama’s innaugural ball in January. The Obama that I know is the one you do not or will ever know.
Posted by: what667 | December 15, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
It was a good point!
AND valid.
Posted by: drjohn | December 15, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
I am just totally appalled that there are those Obama sheeple who are so enthralled by this man that they absolutely refuse to believe that he is capable of any wrong.
Obama did his “own” investigation, and found himself innocent, huh? Do you know how absurd this is? Do you remember when Bush did his own investigation of his staff during their actions with katrina, that he was roundly criticized for that! So why aren’t you criticizing Obama now? Do you really think that Obama would find himself guilty? LOL!
And, if Obama is truly innocent, as he says, why in the world would that interfere with Fitz’s investigation? If Obama’s staff is truly out of the loop in guilt, then what could it possibly interfere with Fitzgerald?
What does “in due course” mean?
And why won’t Emmanual talk? What’s wrong?
Obama: “This is not the me I knew”.
What promises will he break, how will he betray you, how will he LIE to you next, before you begin to realize that he is a fraud?
LOL!
Posted by: decentAmerican | December 15, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Obama lies, the country dies
Posted by: al Be | December 15, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Which “wishful thinking and fantasies” is that, what? You mean like concluding that BHO is completely exhonerated already? BZZZZZT. Oops, that was your conclusion. Nevermind. Continue with the love fest.
Posted by: Don | December 15, 2008, 8:13 pm 8:13 pm
OBAMA IS AN EXPERT AT DODGING QUESTIONS..
Posted by: CW | December 15, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
The real news was Obama’s energy and environmental picks for the cabinet, along with his expressed global warming concerns and the creation of a green job sector. But instead the report mainly drew attention to the innuendos of the Blago controversy.
Posted by: kat | December 15, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
I don’t beieve anyone really wants to see Obama fall, not if they are human, BUT if Obama is involved than he should step down and give McCain the presidency. I hope not and would not believe all that was said on wire since they knew they were being taped and could have said things to look innocent.The biggest loser here so far is Jackson Jr., (will not get seat)and unless he talks everyone will be just fine. He won’t talk because he would incriminate himself if indeed he was buying seat. Obama actually wins again because conversation proved he wasn’t interested and would only show appreciation. Question is, was that a way to protect Obama since they knew conversation was recorded. Too messy and unfortunatly Fitzgerald dropped the ball too early. Why was he so anxious is also odd. Anyway, we need to move on and if there’s evidence Obama was in it he will have a miserable 4 years and better to hand over presidency to McCain as Biden would also be questionable.
Posted by: zorra | December 15, 2008, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
Is this what we are to expect for the next four years? Obama gets to investigate any allegations against him or his administration and release the results as if they are a real finding? Surprise, surprise… Mr. Obama after what I’m sure was an exhastive study has concluded in his own opinion he has done nothing wrong. Wow, what arrogance.
Can you imagine what the press would do to someone like Sarah Palin if she pulled this kind of stunt and said she was going to investigate complaints against her all by herself? The press would be in an uproar. With Mr. Obama this idiocy gets a pass.
Posted by: James | December 15, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
Oh so it is not dodge now as the headli8ne was earlier.
Gee Jake we want to know did you mean dodge, or Obama promises, Are your words carefully chosen, what did you know, and when did you know it?
Posted by: Thinking | December 15, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
Jake, you have uncanny ability to twist the facts. Didn’t Obama campaign said that they had the results, but they were asked to withhold them by Fitzgerald until next week. Fitzgerald confirmed that. You are carefully ignoring this background info to paint presedent elect in bad light. It now looks likely that Fitzgerald started investigation based on complaint from Obama team. When that info comes out next week, where will you right-wing nuts save your face?
Posted by: TwentyFirstCentury American | December 15, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
Obama, as with Clinton, is both brilliant and stupid. Media’s orchestration of the Obama line that
Start with an articulate, educated man, take away all honor and accountability and you have today’s prototypical American politician.
Anyone so insane to believe the tripe that Obama represents anything other than Clinton’s third corruption filled term is unfit to vote; but 63,000,000 suckers will re-elect this puppet for a forth term of the fraud machine come 2012.
With “leaders” like Obama, Frank and Dodd, America’s glide path to destruction is assured.
Posted by: Tate | December 15, 2008, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
I am savoring Obama’s victory and ascension to the presidency of the United States, but here comes Illinois governor to distract my attention. I am very upset.
Posted by: what667 | December 15, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
I m very sure , that Obama is totally innocent of everything. He never did anything wrong. He is pure as the whitest snow.He is not a part of all this Chicago corroption. He is very honest and very inteligent and very smart, and i just dont know why anyone would be suspicious of any wrong doing by Obama and Michelle. And if i was living in Chicago, I would be moving to Arizona for sure.
Posted by: Jack | December 15, 2008, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
PEBO is a product of Chicago palm greasing politics. How do you think he got so far so fast?
Blago is just a post script compared to PEBO!
PEBO is the product of very dirty Chicago smack down politics!
Blago is a just distraction, the real Chicago manipulating jerk is PEBO.
Posted by: aware2u | December 15, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
what666, if you are upset now you will be really upset when Bill Richardson faces the same type of accusations involving pay for play politics.
Posted by: James | December 15, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
Jake. Please report what went on in the Illinois House just now. They voted to NOT have a special election(which Blagojevich said today he would be fine with)and stay with the governor’s appointment. There was much said about Madigan calling them back in and then trying to get impeachment going. Bottom line: the Speaker(who moved up the Illinois primary for Obama) doesn’t want to take the chance of the people possibly electing a republican-so the power of appointment stays in place. Maybe he expects his daughter Lisa to have some luck at the Il. Supreme Court to have Blagojevich removed…but so far they’ve been silent. After the vote, Madigan adjourned until Jan.12th. There still is a committee to look into impeachment, but the rest went home. The silence is deafening.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | December 15, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
I’m shocked that the drive-by media has the gall to ask the Messiah any question at all! The nerve of the press! I don’t trust Obama, his Agenda nor his speech as he constantly say’s “ahh”!
Posted by: Thateldoo | December 15, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
Illinois is a traditionally corrupt state. So it doesn’t surprise me that Obama has met more people who have been in trouble with the law than McCain. I do believe he is innocent and that we cannot blindly throw out accusations unless there is proof to back up that claim. However, I do want Obama to release the contacts he has made with the governor so that we could put this all behind us.
Posted by: Andrew | December 15, 2008, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm
So what would the right wingers say if Obama released his audit before the proseutor wants him to? I know, “He is obstructing justice!” So by cooperating with the investigation the kooky right wingers now claim “He’s hiding something.” LOL
Obama has been accused of NOTHING my bitter Republican friends.
Posted by: Daniel T. | December 15, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
Obama was a lawyer and is a fairly clever linguist. He knows very well how to parse words (as he has been doing it for quite some time). I have always believed that Obama was not what he and the media portrayed him to be. One example, there is much more to the Obama residence purchase with Rezko than Obama has admitted so far (why would Rezko, a now convicted con man/swindler, basically hand Obama a $500,000 gift of land). I just find it so sad that the media didn’t do its job before Obama was elected (course then who would Obama have paid all the 800 million dollars to for advertising). The Iraq war and the electing of this president are the direct result of the media’s influence.
Posted by: Susan | December 15, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
The headline about dodging is misleading, to say the least. Obama is categorically not dodging questions, but complying with the request of Fitzgerald’s criminal investigation. Where’s the respect for the rule of law?
Posted by: kat | December 15, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
Andrew,
I see you parrot Rush Limbaugh. “drive bt media.” LOL
Why don’t you try thinking for yourself?
Posted by: Daniel T. | December 15, 2008, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm
ok..folks..I think that Blago was upset because after he help him ( Obama ) all he gets is gratitude. Question: What did Blago do for Obama ? It will interesting to know…..
Posted by: Frank | December 15, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
TWENTY FIRST CENTURY AMERICAN—when did you pull your head out of the sand? Obama’s team did their own search to help cover-up all their own wrong-doing! I’m sorry, but if Obama’s team was going to HELP, they should have done their own investigation months ago! Another LEFT WING blunder in politics!
Posted by: Thateldoo | December 15, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
This will continue to be a political mess and time consuming distraction until such time that the public is privy to A)Obama’s version of the story and B)The Feds version of the story!—– No, wait—- that’s when it will really get going, because undoubtedly, the two won’t match!
Just like Hot Rod’s lawyer, Genson, warned today, “If I’m trying the case, it’s going to be a fight.”
“Impeachment and criminal proceedings?” asked a reporter.
“Impeachment and criminal proceedings,” Genson replied
Posted by: roscoe02 | December 15, 2008, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
I wonder that you commentors are not the president! You seem to have all the answers, and from both sides, too! My God, this is laughable. Have you seen the enemy? It is you, check the mirror. What tickles me the most is: do any of you actually think that this endless posting will make a difference? this too shall pass…
Posted by: dave | December 15, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
Susan,
Where do you get your facts? Rezko did not “hand Obama a 500,000 dollar real estate gift.” Obama bought a house from a couple unrelated to Rezko for MARKET value. They were the highest bidders. They then bought a small portion of the ajoining lot from Rezko’s wife for 104,000 dollars. Which was about 50 grand ABOVE market value.
This deal has been looked at by Republican, Annenberg FACT CHECK, and Rezko prosecutors. There was NOTHING ILLEGAL.
I know you hate Obama, but that does not mean you are right in advancing out and out lies.
Posted by: Daniel T. | December 15, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
One thing we can all count on, Hot Rod doesn’t have thae balls to paddle the boat down river all alone. I’m sure he’s counting on plenty of assistance!
Posted by: roscoe02 | December 15, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Daniel T. —the piece your missing is the fact that Rezcko’s wife HAD to buy that lot at that time— or it was a dealbreaker for Obama’s purchase of the home—- the home and the adjoining lot was a package deal and Obama couldn’t swallow the whole thing!
Posted by: roscoe02 | December 15, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
James -
Palin’s already done this sort of thing. When she didn’t like the report of the bi-partisan legislative commitee, she filed a complaint against herself with the State Personnel Board, the members of which are gubenatorial appointees.
While a VP candidate, she promised to release all materials from those Board hearings. Rather than keeping her word, she’s now decided that “it’s time to move on” and won’t release the materials.
I’ve yet to see any “press uproar” on her lying…again.
Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | December 15, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
Chicago Bob,
So Obama is guilty of a crime for supporting Blago, the then Democratic nominee for Governor of his state?
You all seem to feel Obama should be prosecuted over who he knows. You do know that your boy Bush knew Kenny Boy Lay, of Enron? You do know that your guy McCain was friendly with a retired mafia Don? Also Chales Keating, one of the biggest white collar crooks in the history of this country? Gordon Liddy, a hard core criminal?
In this country we do not prosecute people based on who they know.
You do know that Obama distanced himself from Blago two years ago? Blago was the only Democratic governor NOT asked to speak at the Democratic National Convention.
Posted by: Daniel T. | December 15, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
Hey Chicago Bob,
Was Gerald Ford a criminal for supporting Richard Nixon in both the 68 and 72 presidential elections.
We do NOT prosecute people based on who they support in elections.
Posted by: Daniel T. | December 15, 2008, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
Susan,
Kudos for common sense. No one including Rush much less the ABC frauds figured out the deeding of the small patch of land from Rezko to Obama essentially gave Obama a $500,000 to $800,000 lot. Rezko’s now undersized lot is un-buildable. Obama now holds the deed to the Rezko lot: anyone wanting to build on that lot must buy back the sliver transfered to Obama. Rezko’s lot is worthless without it. A perfectly legal but perfectly fraudulent conveyance of $800,000 from Rezko to Obama. Every person in America with a brain should be asking how the media has been turned over to brain dead drones like Trapper that don’t dare reveal blatant frauds like Obama for fear of stopping the advance of a bigger more corrupt government-media complex.
Posted by: Tate | December 15, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
Roscoe,
Obama paid Rezko’s wife 50 grand more than the lot was worth. It was poor judgement for Obama to go to Rezko’s wife, but nothing was given to him. He paid ABOVE market value for the lot.
Rezko’s wife later sold the rest of the lot for a profit. She was in the real estate business.
This deal was looked at. There was NOTHING illegal.
Posted by: Daniel T. | December 15, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
You do know that Obama distanced himself from Blago two years ago? Blago was the only Democratic governor NOT asked to speak at the Democratic National Convention.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
So Obama the reformer did not endorse Blago in IL when he ran? Wait he campaigned for Blago. Did Obama say anything critical when Blago ran? HMMM nope.
Do I think you can convict Obama? nope.
Do I think Obama is guilty of knowing this was all going on but not reporting it? YEP! but to prove any of this in IL would be a magic trick that I would pay money to see.
He will be the President, warts and all. Is he the man he campaigned and told people he was? Nope, you were one of Barum’s favorites.
What do I want? The Rose colored glasses off! No more lemmings following the pied piper over the cliff. What this man says in front of the camera is not who he really is. Remember what Blago said when the camera was NOT rolling. Look at Obama and think Blago.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | December 15, 2008, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
Tate,
Rezko’s wife SOLD the lot. I guess Limbaugh forgot to tell you that. LOL
Posted by: Daniel T. | December 15, 2008, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
It is most important now, that we all just move beyond this Blago thing, as Obama is not part of any of this, he is innocent.
Posted by: Sandy | December 15, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
Daniel T. — it was a favor from a close associate who is now a convicted felon— it was stupid, shortsighted and doesn’t smell right. It’s just one more example of the muddy waters in and around the political arena from where Obama has risen. Obama needed a favor and his buddy— buddy’s wife helped him out! And his buddy is a crook!
Posted by: roscoe02 | December 15, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
from ANNENBERG FACT CHECK.
“As for that claim about Rezko helping Obama buy his house, well, we’ve dealt with that one before. The gist of the story: In 2005, Barack and Michelle Obama found a house that they wanted to purchase. The property had been divided into two parcels, one containing a house and the other undeveloped land. The owner had listed the properties separately. After considerable haggling, the seller accepted the Obamas’ third bid of $1.65 million for the parcel containing the house. Tony Rezko’s wife, Rita, purchased the adjoining lot for $625,000.
When the Obamas wanted to increase the size of their yard, they approached the Rezkos about purchasing a strip of the adjacent parcel. Obama told the Sun-Times that a 10-foot strip of the 60-foot lot appraised for $40,000. The Obamas nevertheless paid Rita $104,500 (or 1/6 of the total purchase price of her lot) for the strip. In 2007, Rita sold the remaining lot for $575,000 (or roughly a $54,500 profit on the overall property).
McCain’s ad, however, is worded in a way that could leave a false impression. It says Rezko “helped him buy his million-dollar mansion” by “purchasing part of the property he couldn’t afford.” That’s true, but only because the seller wanted to sell the two parcels as a unit and the Obamas couldn’t afford both. Rezko did not make a gift of any property to the Obamas. Furthermore, the fact that his wife sold her lot for more than she paid for it contradicts any suggestion that the Rezkos overpaid for their part of the deal as a way of getting the seller to lower the price to the Obamas for their part.”
________________________________________
Poor right wingers. They can’t be right every often when augthey get all of their information from DRUGGIE Limbaugh!!
Posted by: Daniel T. | December 15, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Sandy,
Obama is innocent of what?
Pay to play? I doubt it. But you
wont catch him at it.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | December 15, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
Roscoe,
It was NOT illegal. Should we arrest him for it?
The Bush family has engaged in deals like this for years. Ever look into how Bush got his share of the Texas Rangers baseball team?
Posted by: Daniel T. | December 15, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
The wingnuts just want to believe. But, alas, it is not true, he did not do anything wrong.
And what’s wrong with with telling the press that the subject has changed, when there is no story here.
Posted by: SanityMan | December 15, 2008, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
Wishful thinking? >>
Daniel T.
I wish Obama was who he said he was. Sad but he played the part rock star and told everyone he was everything.
His true identity is still masked by the Presses love struck image of him.
How will he govern is yet to be seen. He is very inexperienced. He was shown the ropes in a pay to play state. Where you use the government against the people to beat extort money from them.
I wish things were different but they are not.
I hope the Feds descend like locus on IL to clean the clock of the Chicago IL/Cook County machine.
Corrupt judges lawyers congress etc.
I hope we pass laws forbidding lawyers from running for office.
That would help.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | December 15, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
>>>It is most important now, that we all just move beyond this Blago thing…<<< I disagree. I think the press should spend about as much time on it as they spent on that "Valerie Plame thing." Which, if I recall, was more than a few days.
Posted by: Son of Rodin | December 15, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
I think the impeachment trial should prove to be interesting news. I wonder if they will start to use the title Democratic Governor Rod Blago or will they stay with the non party titling because he is a Democrat? Bias is everywhere
Posted by: ChicagoBob | December 15, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
>>>How he [Obama] will govern is yet to be seen. He is very inexperienced.<<< Yes, and the Russians know it. Is it just coincidence that they have chosen this moment to make a strong naval showing in the waters off Venezuala? Nothing the Russians do is coincidental.
Posted by: Son of Rodin | December 15, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
I wonder how many throw away cell phones Blago has bought so he can make calls and deals so he wont talk during a trial.
That will be worth far more than the 500K.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | December 15, 2008, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
With all due respect, how long should it take for Obama to get to the bottom of this within his own administrative staff, and present the “results” of his “internal investigation”? It’s a relatively simple process, since all the people being “investigated” work for him. The fact that he hasn’t wrapped this up in a few days indicates that they are either (a) stalling for time in an attempt to obfuscate and destroy evidence, or (b) completely incompetent. Either one does not bode well for the country. Hillary certainly could have gotten a handle on this by now, if her staff were being “investigated” internally for something like this.
Posted by: Son of Rodin | December 15, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
The wingnuts just want to believe.
>>>
The wingnuts are just being realists.
If you hang out with drug dealers you probably know what they do. You also know its against the law. Now if you were a reformer you would call the cops. If you were a career climber you would use his contacts to move up.
Or if you liked the life style you got a job being a drug dealer.
I figure Obama the non reformer just used the connects and moved up. Great character eh?
Posted by: ChicagoBob | December 15, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
BHO may not have done anything illegal, but he sure isn’t handling this scandal very well. If he cn’t stand up to members of his adoring media and tell them “Look this is how it is” than what chance does he have against the anti-American regimes outside our borders?
Simply put, BHO showed his inexperience. Now we are all supposed to trust him to run the free world? I wouldn’t trust him to watch my ham sandwich.
Posted by: i just love him soooo much | December 15, 2008, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
Hey Daniel T. and other Obama kool-aid drinkers: the lot remains unbuildable as is. Obama bought the key to a $600,000 lot for $104,500. Rezko’s wife’s (big stinky hint OKADs) sale of an unbuildable lot for $675,000 simply adds another layer for punch drunk drones to perpetrate. Fraudulent conveyance is a crime everywhere except Obama’s Chicago where it passes for initiation to the club.
Utterly mind melting when OKADs pretend Obama cut ties to Blago. Yeah, the Obama/Emmanuel power mobsters had no contact regarding Obama’s senate seat with the gov. they got elected. It’s not the crime it’s the cover up and ABC’s obfuscation to explain away the connection of a thousand dots is breath-taking.
Posted by: Tate | December 15, 2008, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
Surely, Obama is not going to release this information next week when he is on vacation in Hawaii and during the Christmas holidays. Technically, there is nothing wrong with doing this, but it is not the transparency and CHANGE that he promised to the US electorate. I sure hope that Obama doesn’t begin arguing about the true definition of “Change” in the same way that a past president argued about the true definition of “is”.
Posted by: Paul | December 15, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
If Obama has the courage to cleanse his staff and expel Rahm Emanuel it would demonstrate good governance. If however, he white washes the situation and continues on Chicago Style, then we are in for trouble. After Jan 20, Obama will be in charge of the FBI and can have the matter set aside.
Posted by: JoeForSure | December 15, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm
I think Obama’s Presidency is going to be one long expensive nightmare.
Posted by: dlc | December 15, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
cannot be as long and expensive as bush’
if it is we will not need to worry, it will be the end of this country.
bush has just about done that.
in eight years,
there is a god
bush does not get another term
Posted by: bush the usa | December 16, 2008, 1:00 am 1:00 am
I find it quite comical that the Messiah hasn’t even been resurrected, I mean inaugurated, yet and we find ourselves in scandal number one. I have a feeling that this is going to be a bizarre four years! Definitely change we can believe in!!
Posted by: TxBoB | December 16, 2008, 7:29 am 7:29 am
obama is already learning to be a good spin doctor. he is not being forthcoming. emanuel had no business talking to blago about candidates acceptable to obama for the senate seat. indirectly obama was trying to influence the senate with his preferred list of candidates. the question is, what did obama know and when did he know it? so far, obama is slipping into the quicksand of half-truths, spin doctoring, coverup. obama is proving to be more of the same. there is no change, there is no–yes, we can. it is now: yes, i can because i won. obama isn’t even sworn in and the stench of corruption is beginning to swirl about him. stay tuned to obama’s change!
Posted by: Lawrence | December 16, 2008, 7:41 am 7:41 am
I think before Americans say “we are used to corruption, etc., the verdict is not even in as to whether Obama is a US CITIZEN. IS HE ELIGIBLE TO BE OUR NEXT PRESIDENT????????? I already have a bitter taste in my mouth with this one. Why should we ‘accept’ what’s going on and let Obama know he’s not fooling us!!!!!!!!!!!! He is sly and extremely deception, and what burns me is his past connections in Illinois. And, no, this isn’t about smearing him because he is a Democrat. Enough is enough!!! The Americans are entitled to honesty.
Pat H.
Posted by: Pat H. | December 16, 2008, 9:06 am 9:06 am
Daniel T : Where do YOU get your facts?
Obama bought his house for hundreds of thousands of dollars under market value, and he bought on the EXACT SAME day that Rezko bought a lot from the EXACT SAME person.
The land the Obama’s later bought from the Rezko’s was another sweetheart deal for the Obamas, even Obama says so. It made Obama’s property worth a lot more, and made the Rezko lot virtually impossible to develop.
The lot that Rezko bought wasn’t sold on the open market, it was “sold” to another one of Rezkos business ventures.
Then a couple months later Obama helped put $15,000,000 into a project headed by Rezko..
Sorry, there’s clearly something shady going on there. If you were capable of thinking for yourself you’d be able to see it.
Posted by: howwouldiknow | December 16, 2008, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Obama is a product of the pay to play system.
The Rich and Powerful people behind Obama though, have covered up, buried, destoryed and altered stuff in the process.
One day his team has bragging rights they are working with Blago to fill the seat, then Obama turns around with no one has talked to him, then yes someone did, now he will get back to you with more information.
The Office of the President Elect are up to their eye balls in this.
You can bet Obama team will give the Feds information to be kept out of it. Like they did in Rezko Scandal.
Posted by: seah | December 16, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
“If Obama has the courage to cleanse his staff and expel Rahm Emanuel it would demonstrate good governance.”
No freaking way. Rahm Emmanuel is an enormous asset. He’s not going anywhere. And why would he even think about dumping him? He’s not even accused of anything by anybody with two brain cells to scrape together.
Posted by: Silky | December 16, 2008, 10:36 am 10:36 am
“then Obama turns around with no one has talked to him, then yes someone did, now he will get back to you with more information.”
You need to pay closer attention. Obama has not budged an inch on his initial story. He said HE did not have direct contact with Blago or his staff on the subject. He never said nobody on his staff talked to them. Please…you people really need to stop making stuff up. It’s immature and it is bad for the country.
Posted by: Silky | December 16, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
SCANDAL= OBAMA. even if he is not guilty we are going to listening to this for 2 years.
Posted by: chaos | December 16, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
BO is a smooth-talking, slimey politician who happened to come from the worst political machine in the United States today. How many times will we here this statement about shady people in his life….
“That is not uuuhhhh the uuuuhhhh person that I uuuuughhh knew”.
Posted by: Dave | December 16, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Sunlen Miller writes:
“Obama said that the review done by his Transition Team backed up his statement … ”
Astonishing!
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 16, 2008, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Can anyone imagine the media handling of this ridiculous situation if this were a republican prez-elect, gov, chief of staff ect??? The media would be shouting it from the rooftops. Story titles would be something like…
“Republican Party Finished?”
“Corruption Erodes Repulicans!”
“Republicans Deep in Scandal!”
I am still waiting to see a (D) by blago’s name. The media has turned into a propaganda machine as corrupt as barry’s chicago.
Posted by: Dave | December 16, 2008, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Pat H. -”the verdict is not even in as to whether Obama is a US CITIZEN. IS HE ELIGIBLE TO BE OUR NEXT PRESIDENT?????????”
Sorry Mrs. H the verdict is in on his citizenship, the supreme court acknowlegde that he is a citizen so can you please move on to something better. Also please read the US Constitution, it will let you know how citizenship is considered. Thanks
Posted by: Michelle | December 16, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
I am sorry but to my understanding Rahm Emmanuel is the person who informed the FBI of the Governers dealings.
Posted by: Michelle | December 16, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
“Can anyone imagine the media handling of this ridiculous situation if this were a republican prez-elect, gov, chief of staff ect??? The media would be shouting it from the rooftops.”
It’s almost incomprehensible. And it’s not as if these “post-partisan” mobster-celebrities are actually DEMOCRATs, except for having hijacked the party.
You gotta wonder whether the “change” voters had in mind was the FURTHER elevation of John Kerry, most responsible for elevating Obama’s empty birthday suit from the corrupt Chicago machine to the, God forbid, White House …
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 16, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
According to this morning’s Chicago Tribune, Obama has specifically been asked by Patrick Fitzgerald NOT to discuss the results of the internal query with the press until Fitzgerald’s people can finish their own interviews. Fitzgerald has confirmed that he made this request.
Posted by: Eleonora27 | December 16, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
This is really my last post,if everyone that posted comments believeing that Obama will not have spoken to the Governer is of course not from Chicago or the area of Chicago.Right after President-elect Obama won there has been talks about his seat. It has always been known that the Governer and Obama both will have a say so in the who will take Obama seat, which is not uncommon. But what Obama was saying is that in the talks with the governer there was not anything that was inappropriately said between the two. Also Obama can have anyone he wants to talk to the Governer wheather it is Rahm Emmanuel or Hillary Clinton. The important thing here is that this is our President and we need to stand behind him the same way we stood behind President Bush war,his helplessness of Hurricane Katrina rescue,this failing economy and many more.With that being said I believe that we should be able to stand tall behind our President-elect,until farther evidence comes out that proves me wrong or you right.
Posted by: Michelle | December 16, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
“SCANDAL= OBAMA. even if he is not guilty we are going to listening to this for 2 years.”
Hope for change: if Blagojevitch can stay alive long enough to rat Obama out, maybe we won’t have to listen to Him, OR to his bait-and-switch gang of mobsters and political retreads, for more than a couple more WEEKS.
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 16, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
Obama only answers questions he told someone to ask. Why doesn’t somebody ask him who the doctor is that delivered him? Get real facts, not anything the MSM spews out these days.
Posted by: anonymous | December 16, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
“Why doesn’t somebody ask him who the doctor is that delivered him?”
Isn’t The One still claiming he just appeared miraculously there in The Manger?
“How much is that doggie in The Manger,
the one with the fake DNA?”
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 16, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
Question is why does the media feel the need to keep asking these questions of Obama and his staff,when the prosecutors offices has stated that they have requested he and his staff not comment until some time next week.
This certainly demonstrates that the media has mioptic vision and must be totally deaf. Obama’s comment should be asked and answered, period.
You GOPers wanting to compare this to Bush and his regime, need only go back on a myriad of issues where they refused to comment because of an ongoing case. All Obama is doing is delaying a bit at Fitzgerald’s request.
Bunch of you need to get a life.
Posted by: Tom. Tescher | December 16, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
Michelle,
If you think the birth certificate issue has been resolved, then can you tell us all what the doctor’s name is who delivered Obama and at which hospital this event occurred? If you think it doesn’t matter, think again.
Posted by: shar | December 16, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Shar-Who are the Doctor’s that delivered you?
Posted by: Michelle | December 16, 2008, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Rev Wright was right for all those years! You guys are really mean and RACIST. It is by no means a reflection of Barry’s character or his judgement simply because he has more friends going to prison than Al capone. You are all starting to make me not proud of my country again!
Posted by: michelle obama | December 16, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
I am not a crook I didn’t anything wrong and we, ah.. er.. I didn’t do anything that you know about. signed BO
Posted by: chaos | December 16, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Barrack is no Bill Clinton. His smooth talking is not so smooth anymore. we, ahhhhhhhh, er ahhhhhhhhhhh I didn’t do it
Posted by: chaos | December 16, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
“If you think the birth certificate issue has been resolved, then can you tell us all what the doctor’s name is who delivered Obama and at which hospital this event occurred? If you think it doesn’t matter, think again.”
The FEC considers the birth certificate requirement satisfied. It’s done. The asylums are the only placing it’s still being discussed.
Posted by: Silky | December 16, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
“The asylums are the only placing it’s still being discussed.”
LOL Silky you are right.
Also, the birth certificate is not an issue if at least one of your parents are US citizens.Can someone please read the US Constitution or ask an eighth grade who took the Constitution test what qualify a person to be a US citizen. Thanks.
Posted by: Michelle | December 16, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm