Obama Opposes Blago Action
President-elect Obama released this statement on Gov. Blagojevich appointing someone to fill Mr. Obama’s remaining Senate term:
"Roland Burris is a good man and a fine public servant," said Obama, "but the Senate Democrats made it clear weeks ago that they cannot accept an appointment made by a governor who is accused of selling this very Senate seat. I agree with their decision, and it is extremely disappointing that Gov. Blagojevich has chosen to ignore it. I believe the best resolution would be for the governor to resign his office and allow a lawful and appropriate process of succession to take place. While Gov. Blagojevich is entitled to his day in court, the people of Illinois are entitled to a functioning government and major decisions free of taint and controversy."
- jpt
Email
Santorum Clarifies Concerns on Women in Combat
Gulf of Mexico to Become Gulf of America?
The One — whose last memorable word on the middle east was that “Israel’s security is sacrosanct” assurance to AIPAC — can’t bring himself to comment publicly on the slaughter in Gaza, but manages to weigh in on the Mobocrats’ lineup?
Maybe He should resign.
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 30, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Why in the world would Mr. Burris allow himself to be pulled into this battle. One would think if he were inclined to protect himself, he would have flat out refused this “appointment.”
Posted by: Yankee | December 30, 2008, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Obama publicly opposes Blago but privately cheers him on.
Posted by: ham | December 30, 2008, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
I bet Barack developed a real pain in his you know what when the announcement was made. Shame on him. To get to where he is on his lack of experience, to reject Blagojevich’s appointment of a guy who’s been serving for four decades and is far more qualified than himself…far more qualified than his pal Valerie…is not going to set well. The Illinois house could have solved this whole thing by voting for, instead of rejecting, a special election.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | December 30, 2008, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
WHAT A JOKE…. Like those are his own words….
Posted by: Lumberman_63 | December 30, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
While Obama opposes Blago’s action, I oppose Obama. Based on the shananigans surrounding both the election and Obama’s senate seat, neither one of them, in my opinion, has the moral authority to be in leadership positions in this country!
Posted by: steelwaters | December 30, 2008, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
steelwaters:
based on your expressed opposition to Obama, I believe it’s fair to suggest that you did not vote for him on Nov. 4th, 2008…..I hope you voted…Okay, I digressed a little….
Having said that, does it really matter that you oppose Obama? I think not….Why do I think not?
‘CAUSE HE WON THE PRESIDENCY!!!!!
get use to that for 8 years….okay, buddy.
Posted by: shalom | December 30, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
ham:
how do you know that?
do you spend private moments with Obama?
Posted by: shalom | December 30, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
Obama’s NOT a Senator, having resigned early … to bring down this drama before it could complicate His coronation. Mightta made His move too soon, huh?
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 30, 2008, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
You see even Governor is able to make appointment of political office, even while all the charges are levied against him. It’s not just Obama who can appoint this person and that person. Even Mr. Bush can appoint this and that.
Posted by: young_voter | December 30, 2008, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Well now you would think that the big O would know that they have no grounds to not seat Burris…what with O being a constitutional lawyer and all.
Posted by: samhiguchi | December 30, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
Posted by Belle Starr
The One — whose last memorable word on the middle east was that “Israel’s security is sacrosanct” assurance to AIPAC can’t bring himself to comment publicly on the slaughter in Gaza, but manages to weigh in on the Mobocrats’ lineup?
Maybe He should resign.
_______________________________________-
Just wondering, Do you hate everyone, or just Barack Obama? I will pray for You.
Posted by: fempharoh08 | December 30, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
jpt quotes Obama:
“the people of Illinois are entitled to a functioning government and major decisions free of taint and controversy.”
“Taint and controversy”?? Emanating from ChiCAgo, font of electoral purity? Horrors!
Obama wasn’t so all-fired fussy about how He Himself rose to represent the sainted state of Illinois, however …
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 30, 2008, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
Obama has spoken. Burress if seated will be booted out.
Posted by: Cameron | December 30, 2008, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Obama looks like an idiot.
Posted by: Jenny | December 30, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
“Obama has spoken. Burress if seated will be booted out.”
And the serfs will noisily storm the Winter Palace, right after.
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 30, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Wow! You’d think a former attorney/law professor would have more respect for the innocent until proven guilty rule. I’m disappointed in Obama. The governor is trying to do the right thing for the state of Illinois. Burris is a good man. He would do a good job for his state. I’m ashamed that Obama and the Senate can’t put politics and pettiness aside and stop meddling with the appointment.
Posted by: C'est la vie | December 30, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
What a joke???
Posted by: NC Voter | December 30, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Belle – you should confirm information and know what you’re talking about before posting. Obama is NOT yet President and no longer the Illinois Senator, so what exactly would he be resigning from?
RL – it scares me to think that people like you might actually vote. Obama was not commenting on Blago’s choice; he’s commenting on the fact that Blago, the self-serving loser that he is, even made a choice at all! No “appointment”, even from someone they prefer would be acceptable because it is grossly tainted. Get it? You should be more concerned that your Governor doesn’t give a rat’s about you or the people of Illinios.
Posted by: max | December 30, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
atty general Roland Burris is an excellent choice……
Although I support Obama for president, I think his hands is a bit tied when it comes to this appointment…..
Roland Burris is a superb choice, and I hope he is seated…..In fact, I think he will……and just let the fight get started….
Why? Because Obama is only the 3rd Black US senator elected since Reconstruction…….that means a long, long, long, long time ago…….so long ago that the KKK was not yet organized…….
anyway, we don’t need folks trying to stop Burris’ appointment…..He’s an exceptional man….And the US senate not only can use him, but at least 12 more African Americans…..that would bring balance to the percentage of AA population in the US….13%
Posted by: shalom | December 30, 2008, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
It is disappointing that the President-elect would weigh in on this before the Gov has had the barest opportunity at due process. When Pastor, oops I mean Dr., Dobson was precocious enough to mock the Constitutional Law credentials of candidate Obama I was appalled at the gall. Now I worry that my assumption that my belief that the future president knew the law meant that he respected it. Nobody in Pubic Office should have taken a stand as though the U.S. Attorney’s evidence was the same as guilt. I think that many people will be found to be on the wrong side of this question for taking strong stands before the evidence is in. We need a qualified Senator from Illinois. It would seem that the choice should be generally acceptable. Prejudging is worst than unfairly judging altogether. Let’s remember what is important about our Constitution and our concepts of fairness and let the process proceed. If the Governor is guilty of something so be it. That should be addressed when it is time to address it. Not now.
Posted by: R.J. Haas | December 30, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
“You’d think a former attorney/law professor … ”
Nah: U/C sort of moved to spruce up His academic status during the campaign, but He was a lecturer. A BORING one, some say.
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 30, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
Shalom, I am African American and I just want GOOD QUALIFIED, HONEST PEOPLE IN OFFICE.
I don ‘t care if they black or green.
Obama is not making a good impression. By saying “we only have one president at a time” is the same for voting “present” as he did in the Senate. Obama is not ready for our failing economy or Israel or the war. Obama just wants to “play president”.
Blago has trumped Obama and Illinois in with this one. Obama and his crew are a laughingstock.
Posted by: Jenny | December 30, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Funny thing is, this scandal would die down so much sooner if the Democratic senators and Obama would just shut up. Blago has not been convicted. He has a constitutional obligation to appoint a Senator. He’s doing his job. Yes, he may have hoped to profit from this appointment, but in the end, he did the right thing. If the opposition would just shut up, the scandal would die a quiet death and we can get back to the work of pretending to solve the nation’s problems.
One other thought – you have to wonder why Obama is so eager for Blago to step down before he’s had his day in court. Something about this story doesn’t make sense. Obama, as president-elect and protector of the constitution, should be the first to withhold judgment until Blago has had his day in court.
Posted by: Uno | December 30, 2008, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
“Belle – … Obama is NOT yet President and no longer the Illinois Senator, so what exactly would he be resigning from?”
From the pathetic little PEBO throne in Hawaii, from which The One presumes to throw thunderbolts at Illinois pols less corrupt than He.
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 30, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
steelwaters Too bad, he’s gonna be your president. Ha
Posted by: jim bob | December 30, 2008, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
Mr. President elect. It’s not your call. You are not the Emperor elect.
Posted by: Etbrand9 | December 30, 2008, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
Obama is “The One” and we should never question his judgment. If he says the gov. should step down before having a fair trial, then that’s the way it will be. Who does this governor think he is anyway?
Posted by: Me | December 30, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
………prissy like those numerous idiotic Bushies that have infected the White House for the past eight years
Posted by: seansatx | December 30, 2008, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
All I can say is just more Obamadrama and he hasn’t even been sworn in yet.
“There’s only one President at a time.” Really? Well, maybe you should stop jetting off on foreign junkets and toting around all those stupid imitation presidential seals, flags and signs.
This is the sort of garbage we’re gonna have to put up with for the next four years.
Obama will only want to play President when he feels like it. It makes one wonder if he’s just gonna collapse with the vapors once he’s actually faced with the reality of the huge job he just got handed.
Posted by: Jenny | December 30, 2008, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Maxc: for your information the governor has not been convicted of a crime and is still the governor to perform his duties. Where have you been. And as far as corruption its people like you that elected a candidate like Obama for president who is not squeaky clean himself. The facts are he like America so much he became friends with a many that bombed this country three times and killed people. Plus what about Wright, Farrakhan,Rezko whom he was attorney for and father P. And his words of change. What change. He brought in the former people from the Clinton administration because he cannot not and never will be able to run this country. He needs all the help he can get. Out with the old Washington politics but back in with the old politics only Clinton’s.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | December 30, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
“Mr. President elect. It’s not your call. You are not the Emperor elect.”
Sshhh! He’ll be … crushed.
(Look for Mr. Gibbs to point out to the surviving press that were He NOT Emperor elect, the media wouldn’t be full of pictures of Him wearing NO CLOTHES.)
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 30, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Wow, I actually feel sorry for Burris, because he’s probably a great choice, but caught behind this silliness. He’s not going to be confirmed. No Blago choice will be. Blago’s attorney even acknowledged this before his client went rouge.
I think Blago’s dirty and that the tapes will confirm that. I think that Blago will do what corrupt officials usually do and try to play this out on the legal field. If he gets off on a technicality, like trying to get the tapes thrown out, it still amounts to him being dirty — and I don’t know about you, but I don’t want a dirty official making ANY decisions for me.
I do agree that if Obama and everyone else would just shut up, this would play out anyway.
Posted by: max | December 30, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
Seriously, Bush and the Republicans leave the country in a complete mess and then immediately start criticizing someone who hasn’t even taken office.
This smells . .. of the worst of America.
Posted by: pefros | December 30, 2008, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Is anyone seeing the bigger picture in this whole scenario?
We have a senate and a president-elect telling (ordering, really) an elected, sitting governor to not perform his duties. This, is actually an issue of state’s rights. The senate and president have absolutely no control over state governors – I envision that changing over the next few years as the Federal government tries to reign in state governments and bring them under central control.
This is just the beginning.
Posted by: Big picture | December 30, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
What really gets to me are the posters on here that criticize an incoming President before he has been sworn in and get a chance to DO something.
These same ones have no ill will or words to the outgoing administration that had 8 years of “hands on” with multiple disasters, politically and physically.
Posted by: seansatx | December 30, 2008, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
I can’t help but think Barrack Obama’s election to the presidency has been a major step forward for America even though I disagree with his stance on some issues.
OTOH, Gov Blago’s elitist attitude smacks of nothing more than politics that are common in Chicago. It’s past time to put the ‘bad guys’ in prison, or wherever they belong. Just get them out of power.
Posted by: norm15002000 | December 30, 2008, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
max: People like you who read half of a statement and then interpret to your liking don’t scare me. I see that you did not see or listen to the session that voted down a special election. Get it? ALL the Illinois legislators are to blame for this. Do you really think that Blagojevich is the ONLY one that wants something for something? Get real. Do you really think any of them give a rat’s? They could have voted to let the people decide. Do yourself a favor, see for yourself instead of reading the newspaper and watching the television where you only get half the story.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | December 30, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
wow, mark it on the calender. for once, i actually agree with president barry… lol
Posted by: tim | December 30, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Yankee: Use common sense. Why would anyone want to refuse a senate seat? I wouldn’t say no myself if I was in his shoes. Senate seats are not tainted. Wake up and smell the coffe. There is no such seat. Burris was right to accept it and I understand they cannot block it. Jessie White will not get my vote anymore plus Durbin, Reid or any other democrat should keep their mouths shut and take care of their own busines. The governor hasn’t been to court yet or convicted. He has the power and he is right to use it. This is America not Russia.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | December 30, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
“Bush and the Republicans leave the country in a complete mess … ”
Aided and abetted at every turn by the hijaced Democrats, including His Highness — who voted FOR domestic surveillance, the Patriot Act, Iraq war funding, etc.
And if Bush (or Clinton, for that matter) had tried this kind of electoral meddling and mau-mauing as president elect, a way’d have been found NOT to inaugurate ‘em.
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 30, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
“What really gets to me are the posters on here that criticize an incoming President before he has been sworn in and get a chance to DO something.” Posted by: seansatx |
Seansatx, I think the criticism is over what Obama is actually doing – not what he will do once he is sworn in. He may not have been sworn in yet, but he still decided to comment on the situation (a situation he has no control over). He’s an elected official. He’s open to criticism. And he shouldn’t be siding with the Senate on this one. But if it makes you feel any better, I’ve criticized the many bad moves Bush has made too. But this conversation is not about Bush.
Posted by: No name calling please | December 30, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
Aided and abetted by whomever, Bush and the Republicans have taken America to the brink of disaster.
And people on here take cheap, biased shots at someone who hasn’t even taken office. It’s the pathetic side of America at its worst.
Ignorance and attempts to tear the opponent down.
When America gets this pathetic it’s chances of pulling itself out of the abyss get less and less.
Why don’t you grow up and do something positive.
Posted by: pefros | December 30, 2008, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
yeah that has been on my mind lately too… funny how liberals sit and talk about how we need to “stop the senseless killing of our troops” overseas, but you dont hear them talk about stoping the skyrocketing murder rate in chicago.. or the spillover from tiajuana and the war on the border with mexico… what about those “innocents”.. its all about a political agenda with the left.
Posted by: tim | December 30, 2008, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Dearest No name calling please
You are very right, this isn’t about Bush, but it shouldn’t be about Obama, even if he made a “comment”. We all make comments, the story is about Blago and his appointment to the senate. Regardless of how qualified the appointee, the current Gov is under a cloud of suspicion.
I take exception to the blame being placed on Obama and not the idiot Gov.
Posted by: seansatx | December 30, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
“This, is actually an issue of state’s rights.”
This is actually an issue of corrupt bullying thugs, posing as arbiters of law and order, and — God help us! — political morality.
If little Barky wanted to sell or otherwise bestow the Illinois Senate seat Himself, maybe he shouldda stayed IN it, even if it cut into His vacation time.
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 30, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
RL – are you a member to the Illinois state govenment? Do you have some sort of inside knowledge the rest of us don’t? I bet you don’t. Barring that, I get my news and information the same way you do. I just apply common sense. But you know what, all may be rotten in Denmark, but that does not mean we the people should ignore it when it is blatant! I’m not naive. I know the history of Chicago/Illinois politics, and yes, in general most politicians are out for self. And yes, I did know that they chose not to go the special election route — but why do you think that is? What other harm and dirty politics could Blago put in action while that played out? I’m certain the Dems played out all their options and likely scenarios. Honestly, this is a weak game of chess that Blago and the people of Illinois will lose — only in the short term.
Posted by: max | December 30, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
pefros…
why cant we criticize obama??!! beacause he is “your boy”??!! get real.. he already HAS a politicl past. he already HAS voted on the issues. he already HAS campaigned and told us his (very broad, generic) vision for americas future. just because he has not been sworn in yet does not mean we dont know where he stands on the issues right? we shouldnt criticize him on what he HASNT done yet, but as far as his political agenda, and ideas, its fair game my friend. get over it. just because you think he is going to save the world, dosent change the fact that WE ALREADY KNOW HIS THOUGHTS ON THE ISSUES. if he is “godlike” like all of you seem to think, then none of those thoughts should change right??
Posted by: tim | December 30, 2008, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
Oooops, there goes the governors pardon…..
Posted by: wayne | December 30, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
seansatx – Reread the headline – this story is very much about Obama.
Yes, I agree that this whole scenario started with a corrupt governor making a foolish, illegal move. But in the end, it seems to me like he’s trying to make a bad situation better – his appointee is beyond reproach and is an excellent choice.
Obama chose to make a public statement about this – he probably should have left it alone and let it play out. He is a public official. His comments and opinions are fair game. Look, I like Obama, but I think he and the democrats are making a big mistake by opposing this appointment – it will just drag out the story longer and will do no good for the people of Illinois.
Posted by: No name calling please | December 30, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Wouldn’t it make for an interesting plot twist for Bush to pardon Blago? That would send a strong message from the Republicans to the Democrats!
Posted by: Big Picture | December 30, 2008, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
max, maybe I do. One thing’s for sure-you don’t.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | December 30, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Big Picture – ROFLMAO!
Posted by: max | December 30, 2008, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
DO ANY OF YOU LIVE IN ILLINOIS?? WELL I DO, AND BLAGO HAS BEEN A DISGRACE TO OUR STATE FOR SIX YEARS. OBAMA IS TRYING TO PROTECT THE VERY STATE HE WORKED HARD IN PRIOR TO HIS ELECTION AND I WILL SUPPORT HIM FOR THE NEXT EIGHT YEARS FOR IT. BLAGO SHOULD HAVE BEEN GONE A LONG TIME AGO. HE IS SO GUILTY, AND I AM SICK OF HEARING ABOUT INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE. THERE IS NO OTHERWISE IN THIS SITUATION. ILLINOIS IS ONE OF THE WORST STATES TO LIVE IN RIGHT NOW THANKS TO MR. BLAGO, SO IF YOU AREN’T FROM ILLINOIS YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO COMMENT ON WHAT IS GOING ON HERE BECAUSE YOU AREN’T LIVING THROUGH THE MESS HE CREATED WHEN HE TOOK OFFICE.
Posted by: Ann | December 30, 2008, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
LOL, RL, I’m disappointed. I expected a much better retort. C’mon, enlighten us. I say “us” because clearly you know more about this situation that hasn’t been reported. C’mon, share. I’m definitely open to learning knew things.
Posted by: max | December 30, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
Tim, no one that voted for Obama considers him to be “god-like” or “messiah” or “saintly”.
That is all manufactured by those that didn’t vote for him. The Neo-bots. period.
I voted for the guy, and I can honestly tell you, I don’t believe ANY politician knows how to get us out of the pickle we are in. As an independent, I voted the “old” party out. Obama god-like? Not by any stretch of the imagination…I’ll reserve any comments about him until after a year goes by, the same as I did for Bush.
Posted by: seansatx | December 30, 2008, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
“Wouldn’t it make for an interesting plot twist for Bush to pardon Blago? That would send a strong message from the Republicans to the Democrats!”
Blago’s not been conVICted of anything. In other words, in LAW, he’s as pure as the driven snow, as theoretically flawless as hallowed hornswoggler Obama.
So … it’d take some kind of extraordinary executive excess, comparable to The CHANGEling’s PRE-executive excess, for Bush to “pardon” Governor Blagojevich.
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 30, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
It’s too bad Bush isn’t in charge of this whole affair – he was the master of so many situations. Or Cheney – Mr. Halliburton would know what to do, and whose pockets to line.
Posted by: pefros | December 30, 2008, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
While Obama is publicly denouncing Blagojevich and calling for his resignation, the reality is that Obama is shaking in his boots that Blag will be brought to order. The minute the Chigago governor loses power, he will start to talk. And what tales he will tell about his old buddy, Barack Obama.
Posted by: the rawhide kid | December 30, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
What, like Obama ran Halliburton before he was shifted over to the Vice Presidency to line up the single source contracts? Money in money out – all your money. Can you say Cheney boys and girls? Any Obama corruption (and none has been legally brought to light) pales in comparison with the Cheney old boys network.
Posted by: pefros | December 30, 2008, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
Can you say the Bush family, the Saudi’s, the oil Kingdoms and democracy in the middle east boys and girls. Again, anything you can pull out on Obama would pale in comparison.
Posted by: pefros | December 30, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
why are so many on here wanting barack obama and our country to fail?
the past eight years have been hard on our country, and you all know it.
so why, are so many of you us citizens wishing ill for the new president and hence our country.
Posted by: bushed the usa | December 30, 2008, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
“The minute the Chigago governor loses power, he will start to talk. And what tales he will tell about his old buddy, Barack Obama.”
And Axelrod. And Rahm Emanuel. And Emil Jones. And Rezko. And who KNOWS who … Hence the mau-mauing from the PEBO throne, and bluster from the formerly-Democratic Party’s hijacked “leadership”: they’d like Blago to fold, and creep away silently with a dirty deal of some kind.
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 30, 2008, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
Before Obama took up with Axelrod and Ayers, and started playing dirty, former Panther Bobby Rush whupped Obama in Chicago 2-to-1.
With Rush now supporting Burris, look for the PEBO bus to back waay up, before The One finds Himself under it, for a … change.
from AFP:
“Illinois congressman and civil rights leader Bobby Rush used racially tinged language and urged them “to not hang and lynch the appointee as you try to castigate the appointer.”
“Rush said Burris is a “worthy” candidate and noted that with Obama’s departure, there will be no African-Americans in the Senate.
“I don’t think that anyone — any US senator, who’s sitting in the Senate, right now, wants to go on record to deny one African-American for being seated in the US Senate,” Rush said as he joined Burris and Blagojevich at a press conference.”
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 30, 2008, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
Barry opposes Blago’s actions ? I think this is hilarious…Maybe BO should have his transition team investigate…meanwhile back at the ranch they need to investigate BO too…He takes the moral high road on all of his outstanding issues and lawsuits answering to no one, he thinks he is above the law, Chicago thug politics in action. At least, with Mr Burris the people of Illinois may get a vote other than PASS, as BO must have been sleeping rather than addressing the Senate issues…Sounds like the Rev Wright church…zzzzzzzzzz
Posted by: lotzahair | December 30, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
While Obama is publicly denouncing Blagojevich and calling for his resignation, the reality is that Obama is shaking in his boots that Blag will be brought to order The minute the Chigago governor loses power, he will start to talk
Posted by: the rawhide kid | Dec 30, 2008 8:08:28 PM
_______________________
What you text there make NO SENSE.
You pretty much contradict yourself.
If blago as you say lost his power and is going to talk , Then wouldn’t Obama refrain from saying anything negative which is calling for his job.
Here is a little tid bit I bet you didn’t know , Obama and blago seem close BUT not that close, outside of Obama advising him on his early campaign run ,
For example when Obama ran against alan keys for the senate seat , blago came out and SUPPORTED Alan keyes NOT Obama…go figure.
Posted by: mike | December 30, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
At the end of the day when Blago talks, Obama and company will be implicated. It’s funny how Obama is operating from Hawaii instead of Illinois. Blago’s Senate appointment is more qualified than Obama was for both Senate and Presidency. Quit the whining!
Posted by: stacy | December 30, 2008, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
Don’t worry BO even though you may have quit your DAY JOB too soon..I am sure that your NOW proud to be an American wife can support you. Just don’t know who you will find to satisfy your over inflated ego. After throwing all your friends under the bus, did you think Blago would ask you what you thought about this appointment ? Looks like the laugh is on you .
Posted by: lotzahair | December 30, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
Re: Obama throwing friends under the bus.
The reason you say that is because you can’t find any corruption on Obama’s part.
Corruption is the Bush family and their ties to the non-democratic Saudis and oil Kingdoms, and Cheney moving from Halliburton to the Vice-Presidency and the ensuing single source contracts and the gorging of money to their oil, banking and military industrial buddies.
Posted by: pefros | December 30, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
It’s funny how Obama is operating from Hawaii instead of Illinois.
Posted by: stacy | Dec 30, 2008 8:41:08 PM
________________________
Another dumb comment , The man is from hawaii, So what if he wants to go there before he takes office.,it doesn’t make any difference where he is , he is the President elect .
what do you think would be so different if he was staying there in chi-town.
You act like he is some civilian, where people can walk up to his house, be it the press or anyone else.
Posted by: mike | December 30, 2008, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
“It’s funny how Obama is operating from Hawaii instead of Illinois.”
Teevee says The One’s hot-footing it to DC. Presumably to try to keep Rush et al. from hijacking the Democratic Party BACK.
Wonder whose side Jesse Jackson’s on? Don’t EVEN wonder :^).
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 30, 2008, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
There is nothing dumb about “It’s funny how Obama is operating from Hawaii instead of Illinois.” Obama has a home in Illinois. He represented Illinois. Is Hawaii going to become his Crawford? The real implication is that he is trying to distance himself from his good ole buddies from Chicago and Illinois.
Posted by: sue | December 30, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
If I was Mr. O and I just had to say something about the Blago incident I would direct my message at the FBI.
Note to future FBI spies and managers: Next time a situation comes up where a governor is trying to auction off a position, be way more discrete in stopping such activity. While stopping something bad from happening is a good thing, doing it in such a that treats the accused as if the bad thing actually happened is a bad way of doing it. A simple knock on the door and a ‘private’ discussion with the governor was all that was needed. Play the tapes back to the governor and give him or her a chance to straighten up and fly right. The idea is to stop something bad from happening and not to make bad things happen to people.
Posted by: Robert | December 30, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Obama went to Hawaii for a vacation.
Posted by: pefros | December 30, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
You know – a holiday. It’s the Christmas season. President Bush is also on vacation despite the situation in the middle east.
Posted by: pefros | December 30, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
“Is Hawaii going to become his Crawford?”
One thing about retreating to an elite enclave on an island in the middle of the Pacific is that it can be made exTREMEly difficult for Cindy Sheehan or somebody to bring protestors to lay seige by camping in the ditches.
If this whole “Blago” thing should turn out to have been an elaborate sting, of course, The One might not be NEEDing a Crawford …
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 30, 2008, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
It is a mystery that PEBO is so fast to get Blago out of office, and so far Blago is innocent of any wrong doing.I think Blago will be cleared of everything and will stay in Office as governer.What will PEBO say?
Posted by: Joe | December 30, 2008, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Blago is still the Gov.. not convicted of anything
Go take a dump obama, Blago is within his rights to appoint anyone he wants.. so suck it up dude
Posted by: who cares | December 30, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
All you people claiming Blago is innocent until proven guilty. The man has been heard on tapes with statements about his desire to make money off any possible appointee to the vacant Senate seat. duh! Where is the innocence?
I’ll tell you, it doesn’t exist with dearest Blago.
Posted by: seansatx | December 30, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
“All you people claiming Blago is innocent until proven guilty. The man has been heard on tapes … ”
In LAW, Blagojevich IS innocent until proven guilty.
And for all we know, the Governor’s end of the conversations was … scripted … by … Fitzgerald? military intelligence? Fitzgerald AND military intelligence? … some unlikely foreign power? … in order to draw out … traitors, or whoever.
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 30, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
Good God Belle…scripted?
and I supposed he had a gun to his head in addition to the statements being scripted. Keep drinkin’ that Holiday egg-nog girl….lmao
Posted by: seansatx | December 30, 2008, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
As a citizen of Texas, DEB…..
I can tell you the good ol boyz bought George W Bush for Prez..you think Chicago is the ONLY political cesspool?
Posted by: seansatx | December 30, 2008, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Who….or what is a Bobbie Rush? Is
Illinois proud of this guy? Guess so.
They elected Blago, Obama, and anyone
else the Daleys told them to. If I were
Rush, I’d opt for less national air
time. That would allow the press to
spend more time opining on Obama’s pecs.
Posted by: CandyKane | December 30, 2008, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
Now, the Republicans scream about “due process” and “innocent until proven guilty.” These same people have been rendered Obama guilty of everything from murder to money laundering to accepting bribes to having faked his birth certificate simply because “he’s from the cesspool of Illinois” or “somebody posted it on the Internet.”
The same people who are defending Blago as “innocent” today were saying Obama was guilty of something simply because he might have had conversations with Blago.
We know what’s going on. Republicans want Burris to get the appointment because there’s not a chance he could get re-elected in 2010. Good luck with that.
Posted by: Carolinagirl | December 30, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
looks like ABC News is bias too. Heaven forbid if you say anything negative about Obama or his home state.
I’ll say it again……Chicago is a political cesspool! People, you just bought your first U.S. President!!!!!
Posted by: deb | December 30, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Deb, here’s a little geography lesson: Chicago is not a state. Fail!
Posted by: Carolinagirl | December 30, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Didn’t Obama endorse Blago more than
once for the governorship? Are we to
ignore this now that Blago is in deep
doo-doo? Can Obama walk away AGAIN
from a long relationship with nothing
stuck to his teflon shoes, no odor,
no connection? Si, se puedo!
Posted by: CandyKane | December 30, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
If Obama and the rest of Democrats oppose Mr. Burris they must be racists.
Posted by: Cheney | December 30, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
There is no long term relationship Candykane….Blago was once a supporter of Alan Keyes over Obama…
There is no teflon
There is no reationship.
No!,se puedo
Posted by: seansatx | December 30, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
I dont like Blago-he seems as sleazy as the day is long, but Reid and The One have no right to tell him what to do. The legislature should have impeached him, that would have been a constitutional solution. As it is now under the law,we are stuck with Burris.
Posted by: Michael ONeal | December 30, 2008, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Hey right on CandyKane, you got it right. Obama has the slobbering liberals and media in his pocket. Just like the story “The Emperor Has No Clothes”
Posted by: deb | December 30, 2008, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
Seansatx, don’t make stuff up. Blago NEVER endorsed Keyes over Obama. That never happened and you should be ashamed for saying something so completely false.
Keyes was always a complete joke in the senate race and even the republicans were ashamed of him. The notion that a sitting democratic governor would endorse a crazy republican over the democratic candidate who was 40 points ahead is lunacy!
Posted by: Carolinagirl | December 30, 2008, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
Whatever glory Illinois received from an Obama victory has been taken away by the Blago appointment.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | December 30, 2008, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
seansatx:
You are going to have a long four years
covering for Ohbama and the Chicago-
Illinois machine from which he comes.
At times you will feel frustrated and
betrayed by those you admire most. But
you will soldier on. It’s a liberal thing.
Posted by: CandyKane | December 30, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm
Ive agreed with you so far carolina girl, but Blago was not a sitting Gov when the endorsement was made.
Blago and Obama were never friends.
Posted by: seansatx | December 30, 2008, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
yeah candycane, kinda like the neo-con thing, huh. Voice of experience from the past 8 years?
Posted by: seansatx | December 30, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Everybody knows Blago and Obama were friends.
Posted by: deb | December 30, 2008, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
Just amazing!
Senator Stevens was a convicted criminal, but got a standing in the US Senate. lol
Senator Burris is an upstanding citizen; and the democrats are now playing politics instead of tackling the real issues facing America.
Harry Reid did not have the balls to stand up to the war criminals in the White House, who actually got thousands of Americans killed. Now old Harry is grandstanding over Senator Burris?
What a laughing stock! lol
Blago HAS NOT even been indicted, much less convicted.
Again, Americans are wasting time over trivialities, even though there are so many real and pressing issues.
Posted by: Patriot | December 30, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
seansatx, what are you talking about the last 8 years???? Only the last two years of deomocrat congress has messed up this economy.
Posted by: deb | December 30, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
Blago is INNOCENT, until proven guilty!
Blago is being tried in the court of public opinion by the flawed Fitzgerald.
AG Fitzgerald is obviously playing politics, instead of being judicial.
Posted by: Patriot | December 30, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
It’s well known that Obama was never
“really” friends with anyone who could
now cause him political grief. I mean,
that’s a given…right, seansatx? Wright, Ayres and Rezko were all figments of the neo-cons’imagination.
Like I said your malady is….a liberal
thing. And you are forced to live it.
Posted by: CandyKane | December 30, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm
Patriot!
Thank you for your honesty…especially setting the record straight on the fact that there are more pressing issues than this.
Thanks for getting me back “on track”
Posted by: seansatx | December 30, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
the country’s economy did not Just Happen down the wrong road within the last two years……DEB please wake up.
It has been a culmination stemming from greed and corruption from the Bush administration. It didn’t help matters when Dems turned the other way when it was convenient. You and Candykane seem to be under the impression that I am a dem myself. Wrong yet again. I have stated in messages past on this forum that I am an Independent. You two are simply trying to take one side only. The Neo-con
I could care less about the “Libs” OR you idiot “Neo-nutz”
Posted by: seansatx | December 30, 2008, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
I think Fitzgerald is the new Ken Starr.
Posted by: Politico | December 30, 2008, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Who gives a rip what the ‘Chosen One’ opposes.
Posted by: Sluggo | December 30, 2008, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
>>Ive agreed with you so far carolina girl, but Blago was not a sitting Gov when the endorsement was made.
Blago and Obama were never friends>>
What on earth are you talking about???
Blago was elected governor in 2002. Obama ran for the US senate in 2004. Keyes was brought in to run against him in the general election when his republican opponent dropped out because of the scandal surrounding his divorce.
2004 was the only time Obama ever ran against Keyes since Keyes isn’t even from Illinois! In 2004, Blago was the governor of IL. He DID NOT endorse Keyes.
It’s true that Blago and Obama were never really friends but Obama endorsed Obama in the general in 2002 and for reelection in 2006.
Posted by: Carolinagirl | December 30, 2008, 11:10 pm 11:10 pm
Dont you love this Dem chypocrisy!
The media finds Blago gulity of corrupt conduct even though Obama and Rahm ( who are from the same chicago political machine) are considered innocent! Blago should be given a fair trial and not this guilty by public opinion, even though the media seems determined not to apply the same standard for Obama and his team.
Posted by: Greg h | December 30, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
Politico, I believe you are right.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | December 31, 2008, 12:05 am 12:05 am
Interesting to see all these anti-Obama types desperately scratching around for any little bit of dirt on Obama . . . and coming up with so little in the way of corruption.
Corruption is the Bush family and their ties to the non-democratic Saudis and oil Kingdoms, and Cheney moving from Halliburton to the Vice-Presidency and the ensuing single source contracts and the gorging of money to their oil, banking and military industrial buddies.
Posted by: pefros | December 31, 2008, 1:08 am 1:08 am
pefros:
God bless you! Have you sent away for
the Obama commemorative plates yet?
So far, I’ve only gone for the “limited”
minted coins. I’m ordering more than
the stated limit per household because
I, like you, want to be a part of this
historical moment.
Posted by: grizzly bare | December 31, 2008, 2:00 am 2:00 am
I will say Blago is a very smart man he will beat the charges against for three reason
1. Wasnt he attempted to sell Obama seat
well he never did that.
2. Democrats in the state look foolish by not giving him due process and are attempting a power grab that is in itself corrupt looking.
3. It clears the Obama admin. if they were to let him serve, they would have one more democrat, black, and the field is clear to replace him with a democrat, instead of fightin this they could take this issue off the table and be smart let the legal process run its course.
My democrats have overplayed their hand by not going ahead with special election they brought this on themselves. Being so concerned that the GOP would take the seat my democrats are so concerned with power they often forget that in this country you are innocent until prover guilty
Posted by: QT of Chattanooga | December 31, 2008, 4:01 am 4:01 am
Sen Reid, Durbin, and democrats in the senate look like idiots denying a qualified candidate because of the allegations and didnt bother to look into the legal ramaifications they are about to do something unconstitional for people that have been on the capitol for years they never even look at the damn document that swore to uphold and protect. My fellow democrats I think it time for term limits
US Rep. 3-two year terms only
US Sen. 2-six year only
Without term limits these same idiots who brought our first majority of both houses of congress will no doubt put us back in minority status in 2010
Posted by: QT of Chattanooga | December 31, 2008, 4:13 am 4:13 am
Nice message.
Posted by: ranjit | December 31, 2008, 4:18 am 4:18 am
Belle — RE: “executive excess” At least it would not be unfamiliar territory for Bush! :D
“I’m a uniter, not a divider” “I’m going to restore dignity to the office of President” “Mission accomplished” As my (few) right-wing friends blindly retorted in y2k. Those who do not learn from the past…
Posted by: Expat_in_UK | December 31, 2008, 4:25 am 4:25 am
To ranjit
Thanx and I hope my fellows democrats take a deep breath, step back and with clear head and think now that Gov. Blago
made his pick get the subject out of the news everyday they try and fight this it stays in the news Republicans mouth’s are watering because now they have alot of democrats saying stupid things these will 30sec ads in 2010 thanx fellow democrats you are going to blow our majority over stupid power grabs.
Posted by: QT of Chattanooga | December 31, 2008, 4:29 am 4:29 am
Burris is the Alan Keyes of the Dems. Totally without credibility.
Posted by: MDA | December 31, 2008, 6:26 am 6:26 am
The people of IL have rejected Burris 3 times in the last decades.
Burris is not fit to be Senator.
This problem will be resolved soon with Blago’s indictment by Fitzgerald. Blago will be forced to resign and the next Governor will cancel and re-nominate.
Posted by: Steve_NJ | December 31, 2008, 7:24 am 7:24 am
No matter how much I like Obama,I must say Blago out-smarted him and the other Democrats. By putting Burris there, he threw race in the air. The blacks will now be rooting for a black replacement and if Obama denies him and the seat ends up not going to another blackman, I can promise you, Obama will come out with tough wounds. I cant help but want a thief to win sometimes. Admit it or not, Blago is smart.
Posted by: vuzous | December 31, 2008, 7:57 am 7:57 am
Obama will try to stay above and out of the this Blago/Burris fray. I doubt you’ll hear anything more from PEBO on this topic unless something else blows up. He certainly won’t be pushing any Senate action to keep Blago’s man out of D.C.
Posted by: matt | December 31, 2008, 7:58 am 7:58 am
GO BROTHER BURRIS!!!! whats up Obama you don’t like another brother getting ahead?????
Posted by: Jeff | December 31, 2008, 8:19 am 8:19 am
Maybe Sen. Dodd could check out the credibility of the new appointee. He could call the CEO of Countrywide for assistance. Then he could check with Charlie Rangle to assist with the financial disclosures.
Posted by: jamescbuilder | December 31, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am
“There’s only one Governor of Illinois at a time”, and the prima donna PEBO ain’t it.
When the slaughter in Gaza called for a statement from Barry, there was none — any statement would have put him up against His promise to AIPAC that Israel is sacrosanct” …
At the same time, The One made PLENTY of statements about the Illinois Senate seat he vacated to avoid another “bailout” vote.
Prematurely imperious, the flighty figurehead wants to tell the state of Illinois AND the US Senate what to do, after abandoning both.
Hope for revelations from Illinois to derail His coronation. The bloom is off this frail flower.
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 31, 2008, 8:50 am 8:50 am
Hey Belle Starr,
I’ve been seeing your drivel here far too long. If Obama tipped his hand in the mid-east, in either direction you’d attack him in either case. If Obama stayed silent on the disgraceful Blago actions you’d attack him for being silent. Might you do some soul-searching and look for a way you can support a united country, and move away from reactionary partisanship, where you automatically define yourself opposite of the opposition party’s leader.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | December 31, 2008, 9:28 am 9:28 am
“the opposition party’s leader.”
Both of the ruling political parties in the US have been hijacked by special interests: the Republicans by the neo-cons, the Democrats by whatever you call the Chicago machine that’s installed Obama/Biden et al.
As a Democrat, my hope is that democratic forces will be able to upset the mob-friendnly Chicago organization’s apple cart without an actual domestic uprising. And indeed, it looks as though this is beginning to happen.
Barry Obama’s never won a fair election, or a fair rhetorical fight — like He says, he’s the guy who brings a gun to the knife fight.
Note that if you don’t like what I write, you don’t have to read it.
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 31, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am
(re-post corrects typing error)
“There’s only one Governor of Illinois at a time”, and the prima donna PEBO ain’t it.
When the slaughter in Gaza called for a statement from Barry, there was none — any statement would have put him up against His promise to AIPAC that Israel is “sacrosanct” …
At the same time, The One made PLENTY of statements about the Illinois Senate seat he vacated to avoid another “bailout” vote.
Prematurely imperious, the flighty figurehead wants to tell the state of Illinois AND the US Senate what to do, after abandoning both.
Hope for revelations from Illinois to derail His coronation. The bloom is off this frail flower.
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 31, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Steve: Your wrong about Burris. He knows more about politics than Obama hasn’t learned yet. And Obama is not as smart as people think. He duped the public. He picked Clinton’s people because he needs all the help he can get. He lacks the experience to run this country. Hillary will have to take care of the mess in Israel
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | December 31, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
shalom: What makes you think Obama will be elected again? Going against Burris being appointed may be his downfall with the black people. Besides that, he has no say so in this matter. The governor is in power right now and Reid, Durbin and Jesse White should shut their mouth and mind their own business. By degrading Burris they are going to get a backlash from blacks on the southside of Chicago. I can’t wait to hear about it.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | December 31, 2008, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Belle Starr: You are absolutely right. Did you know that Obama use to be friends with a man connected to the PLO now Hamas and he was invited to dinner at Obama’s house several times. He is a pretense. He doesn’t have the capabilities to run this country. Hillary will have to clean up the mess for him. He will be president in name only and Cinton’s people will be running the country for him. He wanted the presidency to show that a half black man could be president and he duped the public. I didn’t vote for him and never will.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | December 31, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
jeff: You are so right about Obama. He burns the candles at both ends. He is as backhanded as they come. The only reason he won the nomination is because Nancy, Dean and Reid made their deals with the superdelegates for favors granted if they switch their votes. Hillary had more superdelegates than Obama but they switched. Dean gave Obama half of Hillary’s delegates from MI and FL to make sure she didn’t get the nomination. And Obama discussions with Clinton’s people before he won the nomination thru Axelrod. His nomination was a farce and he didn’t deserve it. It was taken from Hillary and the Clinton’s were well aware of that fact. But there is an old saying “you reap what you sow” and he will be doing plenty of sowing yet. Wait until he gets into office.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | December 31, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
“Wait until he gets into office.”
IF he gets into office: Barry’s unseemly Senate meddling may loosen enough lips that he (Axelrod? Emanuel?) will wind up, for all we know, sharing a cell with Rezko.
If He DOES take office, no amount of press buffing and Cheshire Cat grin is going to put the shine back: Humpty Dumpty has had a great fall.
Posted by: Belle Starr | December 31, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Mariann, just because PE Obama (learn some respect lady) is going against the appointment of a black man isn’t going to send blacks into a frenzy! Sorry dear, we read, we write, we can think beyond color! Of course we would be suspect of any appointment made by the Gov. and the best way for this accomplished gentleman to get the senate seat is to wait and see what the outcome of the Gov. issue’s are! Also the gentleman that you are so busy connecting PE Obama to received a very large grant from a committee John McCain headed, maybe you should do your research before you try and connect PE Obama to people you find unsavory!
Posted by: try the truth | December 31, 2008, 11:10 am 11:10 am
Hey Belle, what senate meddling? Please tell us what info you have that the Federal Govt. doesn’t?
Posted by: try the truth | December 31, 2008, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Whoever it is they should know that the real ‘Humpty Dumpty’ is the GOP.
They have crashed and burned. We’ll have to see who really ends up in jail.
Posted by: Skip | December 31, 2008, 11:38 am 11:38 am
If Burris had any ethical decency, he would have declined. The African American community have nothing to do with the corruption in Illinois. Blago is trying to use the African American community by getting them involved in this Senate mess.
At 71, Burris could not win a major election in Illinois but is willing to slither his way into the Senate.
Burris is tainting his good name and reputation for Blago.
What have Blago promised him??????????
WHAT A STUPID MESS!!!!!
Posted by: sisterdearest09 | December 31, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Interesting to see all these anti-Obama types desperately scratching around for any little bit of dirt on Obama . . . and coming up with so little in the way of corruption.
Corruption is the Bush family and their ties to the non-democratic Saudis and oil Kingdoms, and Cheney moving from Halliburton to the Vice-Presidency and the ensuing single source contracts and the gorging of money to their oil, banking and military industrial buddies.
Posted by: pefros | December 31, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Obama opposes Blago action.
Doesn’t mean squat.
Burris is in. He’s been legally
appointed U.S. Senator from the
state of Illinois by governor
Blagojevich.
Posted by: anon | December 31, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
Who should end up in jail?
The U.S. Attorney in Chicago.
Posted by: anon | December 31, 2008, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
anon
The secretary of state has to recognize the Senator… Which he hasn’t.
Posted by: MM | December 31, 2008, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
The Supreme Court of Illinois
will soon rule that, in this
matter, the secretary of state
is merely a pencil pusher and
will direct him to sign the
governor’s proclamation.
Posted by: anon | January 1, 2009, 1:47 am 1:47 am
pefros writes; Corruption is the Bush family and their ties to the non-democratic Saudis and oil Kingdoms, and Cheney moving from Halliburton to the Vice-Presidency and the ensuing single source contracts and the gorging of money to their oil, banking and military industrial buddies.
this democratic talking point is old and invalid….. the report of the Clintons taking the MOST money from the saudies and the China TELLS IT ALL. the democrats are the ones selling this country out and it will all come to a head very soon. pefros your what we call a demobot.. just repeating false brainless talking points to no end…blah blah blah…
Posted by: gerard | January 1, 2009, 9:09 am 9:09 am
“Who should end up in jail?”
We’re guessing the answer isn’t “only Rezko”.
Posted by: anon | January 1, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Sorry gerald, just simply because you say something doesn’t make it true . .. and some talking points are absolutely the truth.
Corruption is the Bush family and their ties to the non-democratic Saudis and oil Kingdoms, and Cheney moving from Halliburton to the Vice-Presidency and the ensuing single source contracts and the gorging of money to their oil, banking and military industrial buddies.
Posted by: pefros | January 3, 2009, 12:09 am 12:09 am
Bush leaves this country in a mess -s with the help of the Democratic congress. Prior to them taking over the house there was NO MESS!!! Period!
Posted by: Bam | January 3, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm