Obama vs. The Left: A Fight He Wants?
ABC News’ Rick Klein Reports: President-elect Barack Obama’s selection of Pastor Rick Warren to deliver the invocation at his inauguration has ignited a firestorm of criticism from the gay-rights community, where Warren is considered something of a sworn enemy. Yet Obama’s response to a question about his selection of Warren seems to confirm one perception: that this is a fight that the president-elect isn’t necessarily sorry to be having. “It is no secret that I am a fierce advocate for equality for gay and lesbian Americans,” Obama said Thursday at a press conference in Chicago. “What I’ve also said is that it is important for America to come together, even though we may have disagreements on certain social issues. . . . That’s how it should be, because that’s what America is about.” The fight is an offshoot of a continuing struggle Obama has had with his left flank. His relationship with liberals in the Democratic Party has long stopped just this side of adulation, and some prominent gay-rights leaders have been skeptical about how aggressively he’s committed to their agenda. Still, from an incoming administration that seems very much committed to governing from the center, could it be that this is a fight that is welcomed? The battle comes at a time where the gay-rights community is particularly energized and ready for a fight, in the wake of the California ballot initiative that passed — with Warren’s support — banning gay marriage. But to a centrist audience, including social conservatives, the choice of Warren could be perceived as a conciliatory gesture — Obama making good on his promises to reach across the aisle.
Email
Santorum Clarifies Concerns on Women in Combat
Gulf of Mexico to Become Gulf of America?
Nothing wrong with inclusion of all perspectives. This country is still a “majority rule” society and as such, any one has the ability to voice their position and opinion; however, the law will prevail.
Posted by: Alfred Finch | December 18, 2008, 11:39 am 11:39 am
I don’t know if he is reaching across the isle, doesn’t know who he is or what he wants, or if he just likes controversy. Either way I would say get over it, we have gays, we have gay haters, we have people who just don’t care and we all have to live together.
Posted by: samhiguchi | December 18, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Would they prefer Jeremiah Wright?
Posted by: Deep Release | December 18, 2008, 11:48 am 11:48 am
I think Obama is trying to avoid Bill Clinton’s mistake using up so much political capital on ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ in the very beginning of his administration.
Posted by: bct | December 18, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Rick Warren is a wonderful choice.
Posted by: Parker Terrell | December 18, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Hillary was right. Obama is Naive. He won’t learn until the right tries to impeach him for waking up in the morning.
They hate him and the America he represents.
Reaching out. He should be trying to destroy them. They tried to destroy him during the election.
Posted by: It's Bush Fault. | December 18, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
Rick Warren is not a judger; quit complaining.
Posted by: ssbeck | December 18, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
“It is no secret that I am a fierce advocate for equality for gay and lesbian Americans,” Obama said Thursday at a press conference in Chicago.
—-
This is bull. He was SILENT during the whole Prop 8 debate in CA – and the result? Gays and lesbians were STRIPPED of their civil right to marry. Who’s rights are next? Yours?
He’s no “fierce” defender of gay rights from what I can see. Where’s the evidence?
Posted by: Jeff | December 18, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Obama: You just invited a bigot to give the invocation.
Nice Job.
Posted by: I'm a low info Voter. | December 18, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
ps: Story has changed from Blago-connections to this, hasn’t it?
Posted by: Deep Release | December 18, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
The left is the most intolerant faction in America. This story proves it.
Posted by: mm | December 18, 2008, 11:59 am 11:59 am
So you invited the leader of fake Christianity to give the invocation.
Martin Luther King Jr. Would be proud of you Obama. NOT.
Posted by: Bush did it | December 18, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
Seems the left is as intolerant as they claim the right to be.
Posted by: Jay Fredericks | December 18, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
You don’t reach out to intolerance….
You shun it.
There would be no defense of Obama’s actions if he gave this honor to a racist or an anti-semite. There should be no defense here.
Warren is the antithesis of everything we fought for.
This is pretty sad and indefensible.
Posted by: I'm a low info Voter. | December 18, 2008, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Good choice he’s made in Rick W. Obama is a “family man”. Those with issues on his choice should listen closely to the message. Wise up.
Posted by: Inspire | December 18, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
Why is it lately that on every issue, every day, i have gay rights shoved down my throat?
Posted by: PRINCEP | December 18, 2008, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
Seems the left is as intolerant as they claim the right to be.
Posted by: Jay Fredericks
We didn’t destroy the country.
We have a right to be intolerable of the right.
Duck The Shoe Jay.
Posted by: GOP is for Dummies. | December 18, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
As an Obama opponent I am a bit surprised at this choice. Rick Warren may be a scurge to gays but he has also been on the other side as far as mainline evangelicals are concerned. Overall, I would say a good choice and a very contemporary choice. I guess I am somewhat pleased with it. We shall see if he is going to genuinely reach across the aisle. I would consider this doing that. He may not be reaching to the Far Right side but definitely across the aisle.
Posted by: Starkgranger | December 18, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Who are you to judge? You don’t know if he is a bigot and you don’t know if his relationship with Christ is real or not. Work on your own life instead of trying to judge somebody else.
Be a problem solver instead of pointing out all that is wrong. Do something instead of always saying something. Enough!!!
Posted by: KP | December 18, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
This amazing president-elect is in the process of returning civility to America by insisting that all of us learn to get along, put up with each other and quit shouting insults. I am all for gay marriage, but also think the religious can say what they want. I hope those of us who consider gays “born that way” will vote pro-gay marriage. But, the fight for rights needs to be civil, both sides need to show respect for each other & respect freedom of religion.
Obama is showing us how to be tolerant of all, even religious conservatives, annoying as they are.
Posted by: snowday | December 18, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Do gay have their own Pastor to represent them?? Of course not.
Pastor Rick Warren will be there for a day and you can still continue fighting for your rights.
Please be tolerant and do not course misunderstanding for nothing!
Posted by: FM | December 18, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Turn Your Backs on Bigots
My suggestion for those attending the inauguration ceremonies in D.C. who do not agree with Pastor Warren’s religious bigotry is for them to turn their backs to the podium when he delivers the invocation. He may represent the opinions of the right-wing evangelicals, but he certainly doesn’t represent mine.
Posted by: Etbrand9 | December 18, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
It is ONE prayer!
Come on people, get over it already.
Obama is not going to please all the people all the time.
If the idea of having Rick Warren give one prayer is so worthy of such scorn, I can’t imagine how bad the manufactured ‘outrage’ will be when he makes a choice that REALLY crosses them.
A good politician SHOULD honor all opinions her citizenry expouse- not just the ‘ruling’ party opinions. Just becasue that is how Bush and the Right have done things, doesn’t make it correct.
I’m happy to see Obama being inclusive , it is refreshing change.
Posted by: S. Golden | December 18, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
You libs are sooo funny. You are just now figuring out that you have been scammed by Obama??? I find it hard to believe that so many libs are so gullible, he used you and now that he is elected you are being thrown under the bus, just like he has done with so many others. Very funny.
Posted by: billy bob | December 18, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
To the disappointed Obama Robots out there. This is what happens when you elect a man you know nothing about!!!
I, who have been screaming this from the rooftops, have been shouted down, spat upon, denegrated and been called every bad name you can possibly think of…..I shout the obvious fact NOT because I dont want to see an african american as president or I somehow support the disasterous Bush presidency or am hot for Sarah Palin but because the Truth is the Truth.
And the Truth here is that we are going to learn about BO as we go along….
God help us all….
Posted by: opedanderson | December 18, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
I don’t agree with the mythology of the Jesus-ass-kissers who spout the terror tactics of Christianity: “your with Jesus or against him…good vs evil…or Jesus will skewer you on Satan’s pitch fork and you’ll be BBQ’d over the coals for eternity.”
Oh well, add a little BBQ sauce and invite the nation. I agree it’s best to engage those who you oppose than to shut them out. Hopefully this inclusive attitude wilextend to international affairs.
Posted by: Arnie | December 18, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
Obama just lost my respect.
Posted by: Susan | December 18, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Obama is displaying the same tolerance he is asking of all Americans – and which we need now more than ever! If liberals on the far left cannot be more tolerant, what hope is there that those on the far right will tolerate an Obama administration? Folks need to SHUT UP already! This administration is demonstrating the inclusiveness which America needs to heal and move forward!!
Posted by: Deborah from NC | December 18, 2008, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
I think Obama is keeping his promise of uniting America and including Americans of the entire spectrum. The extreme left and the extreme right need to come to the center to deal with the external and internal demons and challenges. Well done Obama. Keep those surprises coming. We don’t mind controversies we welcome them. Shake up America and cleanse it of the swindlers, thieves, hate and fear mongers.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | December 18, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
I guess it’s ok for gays to hate Christians. FYI, no one cares who you sleep with so stop shoving it down everyone’s throat.
Posted by: Discreettool | December 18, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
The Far Left is outraged because they are anti-Christ.
Their idea of a perfect invocation would have been from L. Ron Hubbard.
Posted by: donbl1 | December 18, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
People, this has nothing to do with inclusion. Rick Warren is a man who has painted the gay community in a very ugly light. How would blacks or Jews or Catholics or Hispanics feel if Obama had chosen someone who equated them with pedophiles or incest abusers?
Posted by: Steve | December 18, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Will you please stop trying to force gay rights down our throats. Just because you have accepted an “alternative life style” doesn’t mean the reset of the world has to appease your conscience by excepting it as well.
Posted by: Irritated | December 18, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
The problem with the ultra-left is they want it all their way – they don’t bend.
Obama is president to all people and
this proves it. Because he picked this
person to swear him in doesn’t mean he
is against gays. That’s rediculous.
Posted by: Kathy | December 18, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Susan,
Shows how “tolerant” you are. Go figure.
Posted by: mm | December 18, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Rick Warren is an awesome choice. Mr. Warren did not write the bible. People are upset with him because he preaches and teaches God’s word! LOL..When will we get it together. I don’t hate homosexuals. I do hate the sin as the bible tells us.We are to love each other regardless of our life situations. We all know it’s a sin. We all sin. We are not perfect people. We know not to commit the sin again and move on. It’s more to it then that but I do not want to go into all of it. people are going to be mad at me for writiing this little piece….lol We all know God made Adam and Eve.Case closed. God is Good!
Posted by: Shirl | December 18, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
OBAMA WILL BE GREAT, JUST WAIT AND SEE
Posted by: TRACY | December 18, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
How can gays and lesbians expect tolerance when they are so intolerant. Just as Christian’s do not want the gay and lesbian life style forced on them –the gay and lesbians should not expect to force the acceptance of their lifestyle on others. It is clear that gays and lesbians do not accept the ‘straight” lifestyle of true christians–therefore if they want tolerance they need to extend tolerance.
Posted by: silverlady | December 18, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
I think gay marriage is disgusting….these people should be put banned to a desolate island somewhere…..
not for being gay….but for wanting to get MARRIED!!!!
Posted by: opedanderson | December 18, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Steve,
The gay community is to blame for being placed in a poor light. Their behavior following the passage of Prop 8 is despicable. They are burning crosses, crashing Church services and chanting for Christians to go to hell. These people would be dead if they lived in Iran or Saudi Arabia. The gays themselves are to blame for the poor light that most of America has towards them. They should be thankful that they live in America. They care for noone but themselves. Typical of liberals.
Posted by: mm | December 18, 2008, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Will they be happier if Obama selects a gay pastor to deliver the invocation at his inauguration? Straight people may try to accommodate their needs, but not to change their belief because of gays. Gays have rights to fight for themselves. Straight people have rights to keep their belief. This is what democracy all about.
Posted by: Ashley | December 18, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
I don’t particularly care for this selection. However, I suspect that ANY selection the president-elect makes for the person to deliver the invocation at his inauguration would be controversial. You just can’t please everybody. I genuinely think Obama IS trying to reach across the aisle and we should allow him to do that
Posted by: Kitty Wilberforce | December 18, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
If he wanted to reach across the isle and get a hater, he might as well have got Fred Phelps of Topeka. He is cute from the same cloth.
Posted by: Drew | December 18, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
“This is bull. He was SILENT during the whole Prop 8 debate in CA – and the result? Gays and lesbians were STRIPPED of their civil right to marry”
That was not his fault, so don’t even try that. His position is known…jumping up and down about an issue as divisive as that during a presidential campaign where moderates of the Republican party are in play would have been a colossally bad idea. You have to get INTO office before you can really start to truly have an impact.
As far as using this guy for the invocation. That’s fine with me. I don’t agree with the guy on many issues, but the church’s position on many of these things is no secret. So, whatever. There are too many divisions in this country right now and the more often you can get everybody under the same tent, the better we’ll be for it.
Posted by: Silky | December 18, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Might be better than the pope, or billy grahm, or Jerimiah wright, or Pat Robertson, or ___?__
Who would you choose… no one that President Elect Obama chose. You would find fault no matter who you are.
I would have prefered none. Some would have prefered all… at the same time.
Get over it… it is Obama’s party.
When you are President… you chose.
Posted by: MrSleepy | December 18, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
GOP is for dummies:
The country is not destroyed. Quit being an overdramatic moron. You know very well the far left is the most hateful, intolerant section of the American electorate. The hate that these people possess for anyone who deviates from their viewpoint is truly shocking and disturbing.
Posted by: mm | December 18, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
So Jeremiah Wright, who preached hatred is not ok, but Rick Warren who preaches hatred is ok? Says who? The only way this would be ok by me would be if both of them offered invocation/benedictions. And when will President-elect Obama also acknowledge those citizens who are atheists, agnostics or non-believers? Or is Obama not ready to be President of all the people if that would include them?
Posted by: William | December 18, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
We have a sick generation in which abortion is encouraged, the homosexual lifestyle is recklessly glorified, the porn industry is making billions, and the america’s children are abused and mistreated. Time for Americans to wake up and smell the coffee. We are living a sick times.
Posted by: Gays are sick | December 18, 2008, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
The pronlem with libs and gays is they believe in the anything goes phisolophy. Most Americans dont associate with this mindset but it is being shoved down our throats by the liberal tv and movie producers as well as the MSM. Ones sexual preference does not give someone any rights period and I cannot understand why hollywood thinks we all need to be exposed to gay activity during prime time.
Posted by: billy bob | December 18, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Very disappointing! People who discriminate minorities shouldn’t have anything to say in politics. If Obama is ok with discrimination he should say so – if not he must be out of his mind to let someone like Warren deliver the invocation. I think it is pretty clear that religious hatred won’t get us anywhere…
Posted by: Jan | December 18, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
i wish i would have voted for McCain now…at least then i would have known what i was getting. president elect obama is turning out very different than presidential candidate obama.
how can he invite a bigot to the white house. there is political ‘reaching across the aisle’ and then there is legitimizing bigotry. this falls into the latter. maybe they’re going to have a meeting and decide whose rights to target next.
warren saying that all religions have opposed homosexuality throughout history as a way of justifying prop 8 just proves he doesn’t get it. ANY religion – not just christianity – has no place in my constitution.
Posted by: chubbard | December 18, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
I think Joel Osteen would have been a better choice, since he is not a pastor or preacher, but just a normal guy who fleeces millions of dollars from millions of individuals.
Posted by: devilkev | December 18, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Get ready homosexuals, the divine judgmen is on its way, and it won’t go your way.
Posted by: Don Heinz | December 18, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Wow–what does it say about people in this country when so much is read into the selection of who performs the invocation at an inauguration?
–or the hate that spews forth in those situations?
Ultimately, the sooner power returns to the center from the lunatic left (and lunatic right), the better the nation is.
* *
As for what gay activists think–who cares? I doubt most gays. Instead of reaching the compromise of legal civil unions, they HAD to push for calling it marriage and push, push, push farther than what was acceptable. That’s just stupid and now they have to deal with the blowback.
Posted by: jim | December 18, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
“Gays are sick”. Your posting name says it all for your lack of knowledge. Just because you are having sexual dreams about your same sex and are too afraid to come out of the closest, doesn’t mean they are sick. Try learning something and stop the hate.
Posted by: Drew | December 18, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
“They care for noone but themselves. Typical of liberals.”
Said the proud member of the I’ve Got Mine, You Get Your’s party. You are completely backwards on your understanding of what liberals are and what party is known for being self-centered.
Posted by: Silky | December 18, 2008, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Itsbushfault wrote:
“Hillary was right. Obama is Naive. He won’t learn until the right tries to impeach him for waking up in the morning.
They hate him and the America he represents. ”
Kind of like the left has done to Bush????
Posted by: youmomcalled | December 18, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
JAN, Gays are not minorities.
Posted by: billy bob | December 18, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
Awwwww….what’s a matter? Fred Phellps wasn’t available?
Posted by: Jaden | December 18, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
“i wish i would have voted for McCain now…at least then i would have known what i was getting. president elect obama is turning out very different than presidential candidate obama.”
This is absolutely consistent with his campaign. INCLUSION.
Some of you are complete drama queens.
Posted by: Silky | December 18, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
SILKY, you are right, Obama has consistantly thrown people under the bus.
Posted by: billy bob | December 18, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
This isn’t just about gays. It’s about women, too — whom Rick baby doesn’t seem too fond of.
Then, on the other hand, I think Obama is pretty patronizing about women. Don’t give me that stuff and nonsense about the women on his team. That’s window dressing. From a personal standpoint, he still thinks he’s superior to women and yes, that includes Michelle.
Posted by: beth | December 18, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Silky: Wealthy liberals outnumber wealthy conservatives by 4 to 1. They control the media, the universities and most corporations. You have been drinking the kool aid for too long. It is the liberals who are self-centered and hostile to anyone who question their values. The problem is you have been so brainwashed that I believe the chances of recovery in your case is sadly low. You will be a dependant tool to the liberals who desire nothing but to control you and those like you. But then, if you are too stupid to see this, you deserve that.
Posted by: mm | December 18, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
I think Joel Osteen would have been a better choice, since he’s not a pastor or a preacher, but just a regular guy who fleece’s millions of dollars from millions of people.
Posted by: devilkev | December 18, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
mm:
Gays have the right to stick on their beliefs. No one should impose to them to what they do not believe in. But still they have to abide the laws like any other!
Posted by: FM | December 18, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Princep….when people’s rights and liberties are in question there will always be protest. I am certain there is some interesting if not profound rationale as to why Obama selected the reverend to preside at his inauguration. stay tuned as they say.
Posted by: Kyle | December 18, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
“i wish i would have voted for McCain now…at least then i would have known what i was getting. president elect obama is turning out very different than presidential candidate obama.”
Really Chubbard? That’s what I heard people warning about Obama, but I guess you had to just be like the rest of the “followers” and listen to the celeberity gods and goddesses but hey, I guess you’ve got your 4 years, you made your bed.
Posted by: stupidpeople | December 18, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Oh, God forbid that he angers the left!!! As someone who did not support Obama, I take this a sign that maybe he understands that he’s supposed to represent everyone, not just the left.
Posted by: Chris | December 18, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Good Choice OBAMA!!!!
Posted by: Audra | December 18, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
I’m not into promoting mega church preachers whether they are anti or pro gay. Rick Warren is just another rich fat gas bag that makes his living off scamming people. Dunno why they don’t give some old time country preacher the honor of delivering the invocation.
Posted by: Clint | December 18, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
billy bob: The often reported 10% of the population of America being gay is grossly overstated and wrong. The Kinsey Report out of Indiana University which studies sexual behavior of Americans found that gays number no more than 3% of the population. Those in Hollywood and the MSM often overestimate their numbers. Yes they are minorities.
Posted by: mm | December 18, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Obama will learn the hard way in the middle of his first term. The other side will not have pity on him when something goes wrong when he is in office. Obama needs to build his base that will stand out to republicans and the haters. Obama, please don’t allow Rick to parttake in the inauguration.
Posted by: nate | December 18, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
I am sick and tired of hearing about this ‘issue’ and the politicizing of sexual preference. I do not care if you are white, black, purple or pink, gay, straight or none of the above… KEEP YOUR OWN FREAKING personal life PERSONAL and quit forcing me to hear about it, read about it, listen to you whine about it and all the other crap constantly pushed at me and my family. Obama is a grown man and he can make his OWN choice using his OWN VALUES not yours. I do not agree with everything he does or says BUT I DO THINK HE IS THE BEST CHOICE we have made in a long time. For you gay people, you keep whining and pushing and whining and pushing and trying to force the rest of us to agree and accept. Do you realize all you are doing is pushing even those that are like me farther and farther away? Live your own dam life and stay out of mine. You made your OWN choice for your life style, let me make my own without you constantly in my face everywhere I turn. You want ‘change’ then do it the right way and vote and talk to your politicians… but quit forcing the rest of us to ‘listen’ to your ideals and morals because there are not as many that agree with you as you might want to think or believe. Just because one or two large cites ‘seem’ to have come to your side don’t think that reflects the entire country… one or two politicians or people with money getting a ‘win’ for your side does not at all show the true real feelings MOST people have on this issue. That California vote should have opened your eyes to this but instead you cannot seem to understand this. You want to be accepted as people? Then keep your sexual habits and preferences in your bedroom where it belongs, not out forcing my kids to hear and be taught about it because you think it is part of the natural order. Only I have that right as their parents. If they choose that path, then as a parent it is my job to help them through it and learn about it… but not before IF that should happen… and it dam well should not be anyone elses business.
Posted by: Todd | December 18, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
I think it’s fine that he chosesomeone more to the right. I think it’s a good thing he gives a voice to all. We are all entitled to our opinions. Making laws we need to be a bit more fussy, but when it comes to saying what you think is right or wrong, we’re all entitled to our say. And this guy is not being elected to any office, so pick the good out, ignore the bad. He’s not making any laws. Respect Obama’s pick. It’s his day. He’s trying to be inclusive. I’m socially liberal and I”m fine with this. keep the country open and let all voices feel they are being heard and respected for being able to speak, even if they are opinions I dont agree with, that’s fine. I’m all for opinions. So long as you’re not writing some law to define MY behavior, speak all you want.
Posted by: mary in the homeland | December 18, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
No one is asking you to live the lifestyle of the gays and lesbians. You don’t want to live it, so be it, but, don’t think you should have a right to laws that say they shouldn’t live their choice. Warren is very much against it and if Obama isn’t, this is sending the wrong message. Humans are humans and they have the same rights as others. Which is worse a marriage of two gays and/or lesbians or adulterers or wife beaters or child abusers? Come on people!!!
Posted by: zeuser89 | December 18, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
So if Obama’s so invested in having a wide range of viewpoints represented at his inaugural does that mean he’ll be including someone from the KKK?
Posted by: Andrew | December 18, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
“Gays and lesbians were STRIPPED of their civil right to marry. “…why can’t you jsut have civil unions? why do you have this obsession to be equal to a man and women? why? you’re not. I dont say that you’re any less or any more, your just different, so what??? men are not women, women are not men, heterosexuals are not homosexuals. so what? Heterosexuals have marriage, homosexuals havecivil unions. All the same rights, all the same legal status, all teh same commitment, so what’s the big deal? this I dont understand? are you really making such a big deal over a word?
Posted by: rebecca | December 18, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
Quite clearly, Rick Warren sandbagged Obama in the interview. McCain had the questions before the interview – who would think otherwise.
Posted by: James Davidson | December 18, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
I wonder how Obama would have felt if a preacher in the 60′s was chosen to give the invocation that was outspoken in saying that biracial marriage was unnatural…or unholy.
and his mother lived in a neighborhood where they bought into that argument…
how safe his mother would feel walking down the street daily…or at night…
how would he feel about the President of the united states choosing a vocal advocate for that belief (as popular as it was at the time…and as small as the population of biracial couples was) to give the Religious speech at our most important national event as a country.
would he say that that President was being “inclusive” and “reaching across the aisle”
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
“SILKY, you are right, Obama has consistantly thrown people under the bus.”
No, he hasn’t. And nobody has been thrown under the bus here. Anybody feeling betrayed and saying they’re sorry they voted for him, blah, blah, blah…is not seeing the big picture. This is simply about uniting people. There is no reason to suggest his position on gays has changed or has been misrepresented. You’re not going to change people’s attitudes, the change is going to come through legislation.
Posted by: Silky | December 18, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
Where is the good rev wright??
Why would he not choose his spiritual advisor of 20 years?
A man that barry called “father-figure”, “best friend”.
A man that married barry and his wife, baptized their two daughters.
A man who inspired barry so much from one of his sermons “Audacity of Hope”, he wrote a book which he titled “Audacity of Hope”.
The reason is obvious. barry will throw anyone under the bus to acheive power.
His preacher, his grandmother, his good friend rezko.
Posted by: keepthechange | December 18, 2008, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
mm, gays are not minorities, if they were they would have legal rights by law as do real minorities in this country.
Posted by: billy bob | December 18, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
it is not about marriage
it is about ALL the OTHER Statements this guy has said about other Americans being less than and reallly outdated and harmful beliefs and preaching that has come from him.
I am sure there were very nice men in the 60′s also who taught that biracial marriage was a sin or unnatural.
again how would Obama have felt if a president said he was “reaching out” by chossing that (at the time very popular view about such a small population)
this was a very big mistake considering what he represented and said he stood for and said he knew when he ran.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Today and every single day, we all need Jehovah, GOD in our lives!!!!
Jehovah, GOD made man and woman in the image of himself!!!
The purpose to our life is to be fruitful and multiply!!!
I don’t agree with most religion or what people do with their lives but I do believe in the BIBLE and I try to live my life the way JESUS taught us!!!
I resent that the people of the Gay & Lesbian Community are up in arms about President-elect Obama trying to stop him from having a personnal relationship with Jehovah, GOD!!!!
YALL NEED TO PRAY!!!!
It’s his day!!!!
HE CAN HAVE WHOM EVER HE LIKE!!!!
CASE CLOSED!!!
Posted by: sisterdearest09 | December 18, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
“Silky: Wealthy liberals outnumber wealthy conservatives by 4 to 1. They control the media, the universities and most corporations. You have been drinking the kool aid for too long. It is the liberals who are self-centered and hostile to anyone who question their values. The problem is you have been so brainwashed that I believe the chances of recovery in your case is sadly low. You will be a dependant tool to the liberals who desire nothing but to control you and those like you. But then, if you are too stupid to see this, you deserve that.”
Don’t mistake not suffering fools gladly with being intolerant.
Posted by: Silky | December 18, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Has the thought occured to any one to pray for God’s will to be done instead of your own? Jusy maybe this is what God has ordained for our country at this time.
Posted by: mary laymon | December 18, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
the right…
They hate him and the America he represents.
Reaching out. He should be trying to destroy them. They tried to destroy him during the election.
****************
Destroy them? Like ultraconservatives should destroy the left? Obama is showing wisdom and temperance, perhaps he will live up to the message of change and working together toward a better future. Hatred like this will only cause more us to more divided and encourage the violence that already runs rampant in the world and here in our own nation.
Posted by: jenn | December 18, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
silky
should he have a preacher that preaches women are less than men…or wives should turn the other cheek if they are beaten buy their husbands
or preaches that mixed race marriages are unnnatural?
all beliefs that were widely held and in some situations continue to be held…
would he have agreed that a president should pick someone to be the religious moral authority on the stage after they were vocal in pushing those beliefs?
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Good move, Barry. Really appreciate your selecting this mental and moral giant for this role. You will sure bring the Right on board. But maybe McCain was right-who are you?
Posted by: Paul | December 18, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
The Gay community is trying to paint a picture where disapproval is the same thing as hatred. Most of society does not approve or condone the “gay lifestyle”. Most of society does not “hate’ gay people. I do not approve of my dog digging a hole in the back yard but I don’t hate him. Disapproval and hatred are not the same thing and I for one am tired of the attempt to blur the line or redefine words to suit the gay agenda.
Posted by: Dan | December 18, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
SILKY, why would he not have his long time (20yrs) pastor Rev. Wright swear him in? Because obama dissasociated himself (threw under the bus) with the Rev. when it was clear that this could cost him the presidency. If Obama was not running for president I would bet you as much as you want that he would still be attending that church. What do you not understand about this???
Posted by: billy bob | December 18, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
I am so disappointed in Rick Warren. He has been at my church and I did not think he was for real and now I know he is not. What can he pray for – that Obama will not believe it abortion, same sex marriage, Christian principles and doctrines. In his book “Audicity of Hope” Obama said “he did not know what happened before the Big Bang.” That is evolution and what does he believe in. Has he ever said he was a Christian or did going to Rev. Wright’s church make him a Christian. And why didn’t he ask Rev. Wright to pray? I am so terribly disappointed in Rick Warren as I know most of the people I know are. I will never attend another place where I know he will be. Christian people feel so strongly about this and why wouldn’t they.
Posted by: Janice | December 18, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
I certainly don’t follow this Reverend and/or believe in what he preaches. But, if Obama wants to have him at his inaguration, so be it! Selective bible thumpers unite!
Posted by: Denise | December 18, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
As a gay man this choice is disturbing. For me, it sends a message that Mr. O not nearly as “inclusive” as he espouses. Rev. Warren is a discriminator. He is one of the few that attempts to put a less harsh face on his disapproval of gay people, but he is a discriminator nonetheless. Perhaps another prayer should be offered by the Grand Dragon of the KKK. Then all things would be equal?
Posted by: SFRussell1963 | December 18, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
So move to Massachusetts where Barney Frank (an openly gay congressman) is from. Massachusetts is pro-gay. Move there, then cede from the union. You can rename it Massive-gay-ness. Go there, marry and have gay sex. Everyone in Massive-gay-ness can speak with lisps and be as queer as you want. You can all be interior designers. What a concept!
Posted by: Robert | December 18, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
There are liberals and there are liberals, just like there are conservatives and there are conservatives, these identities are no longer applicable because they no longer define the politics of the person they’re hanging on.
Posted by: John Locke | December 18, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
and it is not “his day”
it is the country’s day.
It is the millions of Americans who fought to get him in office’s day.
It is the gay men and women who walked darkened snowy streets under the fear and threat of violence and anger to whom they are in Iowa and New Hampshire’s day.
Inclusion is great.
I may be gay…but I am a centrist.
I love his cabinet.
This is not that.
This was a mistake.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
We’re not going to like (everything) he does. Obama is not Santa Claus. He has to make choices. It is His inauguration and of course it the People’s inauguration too. But come on people, it’s just a prayer.
Posted by: Nancy | December 18, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
I’m not aware of any KKK pastors, though I’m sure they exist. I’d say the vast majority of Christian pastors oppose homosexuality. This is not inconsistent statistically.
Posted by: Silky | December 18, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
Rick Warren will get his spotlight. He will try to milk it for all it’s worth. He will get neive people to send him money all because if this appearance. However, this puts Rick Warren in the public/media spotlight. Everyone will be trying to find something on him…good and bad. The blinded minds will not see the bad. That is a given.
Posted by: Wayne | December 18, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
I know people are upset but this is just a political move to make the far right be okay with him. But he should have picked someone else though. This is total politics in an effort to “bring people together”
Posted by: Laron | December 18, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
and this is not a far left issue.
it is a centrist vs. right issue
Rick Warren argues that evolution doesn’t exist…gays are on the same par as pedophiles and a number of other issues that give give backing to those who feel empowered by anger and violence toward people who are different.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Rick Warren is sloth, he needs to fast or lay off the beer.
Posted by: Bryan | December 18, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Billy Bob, your understanding of the concept of being “thrown under the bus” is inaccurate. Although what you cite is not a case, it is commonplace in politics and certainly at the Presidential level for their to be scapegoats in order to protect the President. Hell, there’s a guy whose job it is to stand in from of the bullet.
Posted by: Silky | December 18, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
AMERICA need to start reading the BIBLE!!!
We all should be living our lives according to the BIBLE!!!!
Posted by: sisterdearest09 | December 18, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
What’s wrong with Obama choosing Rick Warren to give the invocation? It’s not the DNP’s inauguration. It’s Obamas!! And he can have whomever he wants. Rick Warren may very well be or become this century’s Billy Graham.
Posted by: Paula | December 18, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
The problem with gays are that they suck.
Posted by: Bart | December 18, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Ok, if gays, Christians do not agree to each other, then Obama has to bring the “Sheik” to his inaugural, and everybody has to put a glue to the mouth!
Posted by: FM | December 18, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
The Republicans always have their evangelicals with their anti gay attitudes delivering sermons at the Republican inaugurations. Yet no one ever complains. Infact, there are a lot of gay Republicans who sit and listen to the sermons from the Anti gay Evangelical ministers all the time, with no protests, smiling and nodding their heads. Hypocrites.
If Obama selected someone very left, there would be even more critism.
The best choice, however, would have been if he selected a catholic priest, a minister, a rabbi, a budist, a muslim, a hindu, a shawman, a witch, a wizard, a magician (conjurer), a voodoo priest, and any other religious leader who enjoys freedom of religion. Yet I know there would still be a lot of complaints.
Posted by: mere | December 18, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
silky
the majority of Christian pastors (evangelicals are not the majority of Christian Pastors) have not been vocal advocates of comparing homosexuality to “adults who marry children” or other references that Warren has made…
most Christian preachers are much more centered in todays day than Warren.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
Wow! The intolerance of the left is unbelievable. Barack is starting to be hated by the far left. He might not be too bad afterall.
Posted by: chaos | December 18, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Surprise of the century: B. Obama has now been elected, and as predicted by millions, he now gets to do what he wants without regard to the people who put him in office. I, myself, do not support gay “marriage”, but it should come as no surprise that Mr. Obama is doing exactly what he wants now that he may safely do so without risking the wrath of the voters. Wake up, people, wake up.
Posted by: Lisa Again | December 18, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Pastor Rick Warren is a fine choice. Gays, shut up.
Posted by: Walt | December 18, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
“What do you not understand about this???”
Nothing. What you need to understand is that I don’t care. That’s irrelevant to me, because I know that he doesn’t share all of his views. He’s not going to get into office and start going at Americans.
Posted by: Silky | December 18, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
HA! Liberal homosexuals trying to compare their “struggle” to that of blacks in the 60s. Sometimes comedy is best when it comes from reality. What a bunch of whiners. While I didn’t vote for PEBO, this pick shows how intolerant the “party of tolerance” really is. The words HYPOCRITE comes to mind.
Posted by: i just love him soooo much | December 18, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Oh, boy, we have a gay and lesbian band in the inauguration parade, an evangelical providing over the Messiah during the inauguration and then we have such comments on here? I’m ashamed of all of you! Why, the Messiah wouldn’t have it any other way! We are ALL his people! STOP THE EARTH, I WANT TO GET OFF THE PLANET BEFORE IT EMPLODES! Who in their right mind voted for this idiot, anyway? Holy friggin richeous mother of the primordial proceedings from some unknown planet on the other side of the sun!
Posted by: Thateldoo | December 18, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
sisterdearest
which one
the one rewritten by King James?
it is time for people to start realizing that the base of almost all of the bible is founded in “trying to be happy and trying not to hurt other people”
the outliers and morality that is inconsiostent with the rest of it…were most likely created for self empowerment by people who reinterpreted the words along the way.
but you need a brain and pretty good moral compass to see that.
this issue has nothing to do with that base presence of “balance between trying to be happy and trying not to hurt other people”
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
“AMERICA need to start reading the BIBLE!!!
We all should be living our lives according to the BIBLE!!!!”
No, we certainly do not. That’s a terrible idea. But we should be living our lives according to the Golden Rule.
Posted by: Silky | December 18, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
You lost in California on Prop 8 and you’re going to lose this argument as well. Don’t kid yourselves. This is NOT a GAY nation nor is it a nation who likes the GAY community very much. People are getting tired of this “gayness” crap and I’m one of them. Knock it off gay people!
Posted by: Bill | December 18, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
The EXTREME left has simply verified Anne Coulter’s accusation…they are GODLESS!!! Based on their own blogs, critisms and rants, one would believe that the extreme left would rather NOT have an invocation for this historical moment. We may not agree on Obama’s policies, but to fight over his choice for who leads us in prayer is just childish!
Posted by: Independent_Thinker | December 18, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
I doubt such a sweeping statement about “the left” or “the right” in this country is either provable or true. No one asked me or any of you I bet what we thought of Warren giving the invocation. Do any of us consider ourselves on “the left.” Perhaps in some instances. If “the left” refers to those of us who saw the invasion of Iraq for instance as being unnecessary and unwise, then count me in. Maybe there is such a thing as “the left” or even “the far left.” But too often it is a way of conveniently but inaccurately labeling people for the purpose of making a political point based upon the false supposition that this nation is neatly divided into left and right, liberal and conservative, etc. Most of us are a mixture of all of the above.
Posted by: david armendale | December 18, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
SILKY, you just dont get it, and probably never will.
Posted by: billy bob | December 18, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
i just love him so much
you obviously were never beaten walking home from the train in 1994 like some of us…because some local kids found out you were gay.
and that it was okay because something was “wrong with you”
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
We don’t need gay rights activists trying to dictate who Mr. Obama should or shouldn’t invite to speak at his inauguration. As this country moves more and more toward an anti-Christian attitude, it’s nice to see that the president-elect is giving a Christian minister the chance to speak. I’m personally sick hearing the gay-atheist-radical left bash Christians. By the way, it’s not only Christians who oppose gay marraige. The Jewish and Muslim religions are as much or more opposed to homosexuality than Christians, but it’s not “politically correct” to bash those religions, is it?
Posted by: david | December 18, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
So, who is Obama going to have at his inauguration who represent the mirror image of Rick Warren? You can’t being the country together if you only have one side represented. We have the rich mega-church fundamentalist….where’s the poor country church pastor community socialist?
Posted by: Wayne | December 18, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
“Firestorm?” More like a Fire Island storm…
Posted by: 12_angry_men | December 18, 2008, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
Would the Gay & Lesbian Community accept Bishop J. T. Jakes??????
I would like to know!!!!!
Posted by: sisterdearest09 | December 18, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
“SILKY, you just dont get it, and probably never will.”
No, I get it perfectly. You have already done the accounting on his administration’s accomplishments before he’s even been sworn in. It is you who doesn’t get it. Let’s wait until he…y’know…is actually the President before we start doing the math on him, shall we?
Posted by: Silky | December 18, 2008, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
I’m Muslim and I hate gays. Whadda ya think of that queers?
Posted by: Abdula | December 18, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
billybob–Silky is one of those “I know everything” left wingers. Kinda like all of my college professors except my engineering teachers. Those were the only ones that taught anything about LOGIC and REASONING.
Posted by: i just love him soooo much | December 18, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Bill
I don’t know where you live
but most of the country could care less about people being gay.
they do care about people who call gay people less than …or have anger toward gay people…just for being gay.
the only ones holding on to anger toward gay people are those who need something to empower themselves because their lives suck on some level…
or have a teensy weensy issue going on indies their own heads…
hmmm Bill…lol
it is true that those most vocal angry people tend to come out down the road
because otherwise there really is no reason to have that much anger…
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
“It is no secret that I am a fierce advocate for equality for gay and lesbian Americans,” really?? Obama, your stance is as opaque as expected for a politician. I would love to see your ‘stance’ as an advocate for glbt rights. Most politicians are afraid of it, because it dosen’t appeal to their own personal future.
Posted by: gdguyinbalt | December 18, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Rick Warren’s choice is most wonderful
picking by BHO. America has faced with economic and moral collapse. I’ve been tired with watching that NY, NJ, IL and CA have being been SODOM & GOMORRAH. I don’t understand why Democratic leaders, Pelosi and Harry have just been watching all craps. This is Democratic one of principals that married congressmen have a affair with other women is basic. Read followings ;
Cohen (D-NJ Rep.-Porn w/child at office)
Rod Blago(D-ILL Gov.-Criminal to sale the seat)
David Paterson(D-NY Gov. took cocain,had affairs 3 times)
Jim McGreevey(D-NJ Gov.married affair w/gay)
Eilot Spilzer(D-NY Gov.to buy prostitution)
Charles Rangel (D-Rep NY, Tax Fraud, my district),John Ed (D-Canditate ,NC), Tim Mahoney (D-Rep.Fla), Newsome (D-SF Mayor, affair w/wife of his aid), Tony Villar (D-LA Mayor, divorced as affair)
Posted by: Janet -NY | December 18, 2008, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Posted by: Todd | Dec 18, 2008 12:33:39 PM
Thanks for sharing your frustration about what you think as unnatural, being aggressively shove down your throat. No one should disagree that there is no room for intolerance and discrimination but there should also be an acceptance of straight sensitivities and tolerance of the views and accommodation of main stream Americans and reciprocity of tolerance.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | December 18, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
they HAD to push for calling it marriage and push, push, push farther than what was acceptable. That’s just stupid and now they have to deal with the blowback.
Well said.
Posted by: antboss | December 18, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Once again the liberal left has demonstrated that inclusiveness and diversity does not include anyone who dares to disagree with them.
Posted by: Bruce Small | December 18, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
dl–You’re right. I was repeatedly jumped by black and Hispanic gangs in my younger years. Does that mean I dispise all blacks and Hispanics? NO. “Get over it” is what the left keeps telling us these days.
Posted by: i just love him soooo much | December 18, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
dt: People are tired of this political correctness. We DO NOT have to accept the gay community, especially when they parade down the street in West Hollywood in g-strings and fairy wings. That’s crap.
Posted by: Bill | December 18, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
One thing we can always rely upon is the media to keep Americans stirred up and fighting…they tell a little but don’t know how to finish…So let’s set our sites higher for 2012….Alfred E Newman for President
Posted by: lotzahair | December 18, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Hmmm, I think they should do with the gays and lesbians what they did to my forefathers, the American Indian, put them all on reservations! My heterosexual rights are being violated. I’m calling the ACLU.
Posted by: Thateldoo | December 18, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
You know Im an average guy that leans heavily left. However I am married with 4 children. I live in Puyallup Wa. Im GETTING REAL SICK OF SEEING LITTLE 16 TEENAGE BOYS HOLDING HANDS WALKING IN THE MALL I THINK ITS DISCUSTING AND IT MAKES MY STOMACH TURN. and I dont want my kids seeing it. So be gay just dont throw it in our face.
Posted by: James | December 18, 2008, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
er, yeah move to Massachusetts all bigots if you can stand- the lowest divorce rate, one of the lowest unemployment rates, high school test scores, good support of the arts and the greatest medical centers and universities in the world, MIT and Harvard. Oh and we love our gays!
Posted by: Paul | December 18, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
I am gay. I voted for Obama. He can pick the person he wishes to say a prayer. Don’t we believe in religious freedom?
Posted by: Rodney Wilson | December 18, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Christ and true Christianity offers what the world needs, like or or not. And what’s not to like about morality, values, ethics, family, charity, helping others, nursing, medical programs, youth outreach, business ethics, etc. Its all good, as the saying goes!
True Christianity changes people from the inside out. Its all about transformation, not reformation. When people are changed, everthing and everyone around them benefits.
Posted by: Bren | December 18, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
I wished he had gotten a black, hell, fire and brimstone preacher from the south…. and I am white. I am tired of hearing about rights that certain people are always screaming about. Its the same ones over and over. The ones who sit here and have to read and hear about never mention our rights. I say live and let live… pary for people and let God take care of the things that we can’t.
Posted by: AlwaySmilin | December 18, 2008, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
The gay community thought they were going to fit right into the new Obamanation(Abomination).
Posted by: i just love him soooo much | December 18, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
WAY TO GO BARACK !!!!!!!
ALL YOU LOONS ON THE “FAR LEFT” AND THE “FAR RIGHT” CAN %^&* OFF !!!!!!
Posted by: Joe6Pack | December 18, 2008, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Silky:
No, we certainly do not. That’s a terrible idea. But we should be living our lives according to the Golden Rule.
************
The Golden Rule of Silky!!!
I’m sorry that you don’t have Jehovah, GOD in your life!!!!
He blesses believers as well as sinners every day!!!
Posted by: sisterdearest09 | December 18, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
You know… I didn’t vote for president elect Obama but I am becoming more and more impressed with him as I see his wisdom on alot of things. I applaud him for reaching out and using someone who doesn’t necessarily agree with him on all of the issues. This shows a trememdous amount of wisdom and tolerance on his part.
Posted by: Faith | December 18, 2008, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
No one said anything about the Gay band that is playing at the inaugeration. I guess its all balanced out.
Posted by: Its Me2 | December 18, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
YAWN …. why do the religious right wingers care so much about who sleeps with who and who gets married to whom?
Far left liberals … “god fearing” Christians and whatever religions will always be a huge part of America (I for one think it’s all about tricking one’s self into believing something thats not true, for the sake of believing)
But likewise differences in beliefs and livestyles are reality! You all need to grow up!!
Posted by: sweet | December 18, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Reading the above posts simply enforces my belief that there are too many STUPID people living in MY great nation. If you cannot understand the principles of democracy—-go AWAY–far AWAY. Prop 8 LOST!
Posted by: rld | December 18, 2008, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
lotzahair—Alfred E Newman, wasn’t he hispanic? LOL LOL, this posting is becoming so comical, I think I’ll complain to the White House, or is that a racial slur now days? I’m so confused over political correctness!
Posted by: Thateldoo | December 18, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
sweet–Conservatives don’t care who anyone sleeps with. None of this would be an issue if the gay community would stop telling us. I mean “getting into people’s faces” about it.
Posted by: i just love him soooo much | December 18, 2008, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Just like the dating scene, gays simply cannot win.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Arnie: with your hateful comments about christians you just showed that you are an intolerant bigot.
Marriage is between a man and a woman, if you don’t like it or are neither, blame Mother Nature.
Posted by: drbichat | December 18, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
Might as well invite David Duke to say something as well. After all he speaks for others in this country that believe like some people are talking here on this blog! Hateful folks that feel they have a ‘special’ place here because they are ‘straight’. Sad bunch..evolve!
Posted by: gdguyinbalt | December 18, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Our motto: “In God is our trust” – part of the lyrics of National Anthem; reflects that no one should deny how much God weigh in American history and life. God bless America.
Posted by: Ashley | December 18, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
I frankly do not care who is speaking for about 2 minutes at the inagruation. Who is going to fix this economy and get people working again? Who is going to get our soldiers home? Who is going to make sure all Americans have adequate health care? Who is going to fix our educational system sp that our children are ready and able to compete in this world? These are the issues that we need to be worring about, not who is sleeping with whom. God will render the final judgements NOT you or me.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | December 18, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
As an Obama supporter, I am angry, aghast and dissappointed over a choice of minister is so open about his discrimination against same sex couples and intolerance to people of other faiths.
This might be a good choice to appeal to the GOP Evangelical base, but this is not the time for politics or the change that we wanted to occur. Its a throw back to BUSH!
Posted by: scott jeffries | December 18, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Uh OH, I just noticed somthing when i looked at the picture of Obama and Warren. Obama has his hand on Warrens butt, it is all starting to add up, this is not good.
Posted by: billy bob | December 18, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Warren’s church specifically excludes gay and lesbian people from membership in his church … is this any different than when the Mormon church excluded blacks? Get real people … Obama has elevated Warren to a position in this country that is unwarranted!
Posted by: Cassandra Washington | December 18, 2008, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Warren’s church specifically excludes gay and lesbian people from membership in his church … is this any different than when the Mormon church excluded blacks? Get real people … Obama has elevated Warren to a position in this country that is unwarranted!
Posted by: Cassandra Washington | December 18, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
What strikes me is that back in 2006, it was the Right that was upset when Warren invited Obama to speak on the subject of AIDS at Saddleback. (http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/TheNote/Story?id=2690195&page=2) At the time, they called Obama a, “sick and sinister evil” It seems to me that neither the extreme left, nor the extreme right is very tolerant. Is Obama the Anti-Christ? Is Rick Warren, preaching anything that hasn’t been in the Bible for nearly 2000 years? It’s time to stop throwing temper tantrums, and start talking about our differences like civilized adults.
Posted by: Luis | December 18, 2008, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
HEY, waddya want, a priest from the “Flying Spaghetti Monster” church? Most of the American public believes in this Christian fantasy stuff, so Obama has to keep ‘em happy. I look forward to the day when neuroscientists will identify the embryologic origin of sexual orientation, forcing the CHRISTIANS to APOLOGIZE for their nasty nonsense that GAYS CHOOSE to commit sin by choosing their “lifestyle”. Sure, millions of 12 year olds suddenly wake up one morning and say, “I think I’ll dump that Jesus guy and try the cool gay lifestyle.” Of course, the people who swallow this nonsense are the same ones who burned witches and believe in magical invisible white guys with long hair who live in the sky, so no surprise there!
Posted by: AlChemist | December 18, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
No matter who he picks someone is going to be unhappy. It’s his choice and if you are SOO opposed to his decision don’t vote for him again. Otherwise, let the man alone.
Posted by: ucantpleaseallpeople | December 18, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
dl:
which one
the one rewritten by King James?
it is time for people to start realizing that the base of almost all of the bible is founded in “trying to be happy and trying not to hurt other people”
the outliers and morality that is inconsiostent with the rest of it…were most likely created for self empowerment by people who reinterpreted the words along the way.
but you need a brain and pretty good moral compass to see that.
this issue has nothing to do with that base presence of “balance between trying to be happy and trying not to hurt other people”
**********
You need to form your sentence correctly and spell check your words before you try to attack me!!!!
You do not make ANY SENSE!!!!
Intelligent is what I am and looking at what is going on in this cruel world and on this blog lets me know that you have not and don’t want to know your CREATOR!!!!!
YOU ARE FULL OF RUBBISH!!!!
CASE CLOSED!!!!
Posted by: sisterdearest09 | December 18, 2008, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
What does gay horse eat for breakfast?
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
HAYYYYYYYYYY!
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
ijustlovehimsomuch—I knew a farmer, asked him which was better, a sheep or a cow, he said, I’ve never had a sheep before. I guess if a man has never had a woman before, he wouldn’t know which was better!
What was the topic of this post, anyway?
Posted by: Thateldoo | December 18, 2008, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
We voted for Mr. Obama but are truly shocked by his choice of Warren. We watched the so called ‘debate’ that Warren hosted and Warren’s partiality to McCain was so obvious that it was a wonder his nose wasn’t black by the time they were done.
Poor choice for a minister (?)Those who are calling for tolerance of this man’s philosophies are more than likely those who do NOT believe in tolerance for gays, and anyone else who does not believe exactly as they do.
Posted by: Vallybear | December 18, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
To all those on the far-left outraged at the Warren pick: here’s a history lesson and you don’t have to go back very far. In fact, the lesson is only a month old: The GOP got massacred last month because they became a party that ONLY appealed to the 20% of Americans with far-right positions. McCain was forced into the Airhead Palin pick precisely because of that. That pick (and his pandering to the Limbaugh/Hannity right) cost him massive support in the middle. Pragmatism ain’t such a bad idea every now and then…
Posted by: History 101 | December 18, 2008, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
The bible was written by mere mortals called man. It is their account of God. Simply because they have written it doesn’t mean all of it is true. Perhaps it is one of the biggest hoaxes ever perpertrated on man!!! My point is this.. if there is a God, that God would would be ever loving, ever forgiving and ever tolerant, since he would have created all. It makes no difference by what route or belief you use to get to your God, because in the end it is all one God, and I know that he would be truly ashamed of how his flock is acting. We are all the same in his eyes and the hate that is spewed against people who are different than you is not what believing in God is about…!!! There is nothing wrong with any of us and we are all entitled to the same rights as anyone else!!
Posted by: zeuser89 | December 18, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
To the poster who wrote that “this is bull. Obama was silent during the Prop 8 debate…” Wake up and get a clue man. Had Obama ran around ranting about Prop 8 in the weeks prior to the election, do you know who would be the Vice President-elect right now? That’s right, Sarah Palin. How would you have liked them apples?
Posted by: Morning Coffee | December 18, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
valleybear—NO, WE didn’t vote for this idiot, YOU DID and now you have to live whith your choice, although, I don’t feel we had much to choose from to begin with!
Posted by: Thateldoo | December 18, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
I am one that agrees thatgay marriage should be banned,and should not be legalized, but make sure they have the same rights with their partners as heterosexual couples do. Whatever they do in their bedrooms is their business. This pastor says nothing to me, I believe Obama is smart enought to go with the majority. If blacks think Obama is going to push any of their agenda, they better think again. This man goes with the majority.
Posted by: Patriotic American | December 18, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Do you know what I love about all of this? The far left and pro gay rights people whine and complain about equal treatment. They get on their high horse and tell us we are all wrong for discriminating against gays. They are people too and their voices should be heard. But when someone from the right, a conservative Christian speaks, which is his right, to beleive how he wants to they call him a bigot b/c he doesn’t beleive the same way. I think it is time the liberal left in this country starts looking in a mirror. Practice what you preach! Maybe the right will be more receptive to your views or at least listen to you when you respect their views. Just b/c the beleive differently doesn’t make them wrong.
Posted by: Wells747 | December 18, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
If one looks at an issue long enough he begins to see the opposite viewpoint. I am beginning to agree with the Left. We should take “One Nation under God” from the pledge. While were are at it, let’s remove indivisible. Can anyone say Balkanization? “A heretic is a man who sees with his own eyes.” Gotthold Ephraim Lessing.
Posted by: AmericanHeretic | December 18, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Mr. Warren is going to be there to say a prayer — nothing more. everybody take a deep breath and move on to something that’s really going to affect us in the long term. I assure you that six or eight months from now, no one is going to remember who gave the invocation.
Posted by: Katherine | December 18, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
People need to get a grip. The guy is just offering an invocation. He is not setting policy. This is supposed to be a government by the people. As long as the guy doesn’t get offensive, let him talk. No matter what side of the gay or abortion issue you are on, both sides need to LISTEN to the other side. We don’t have to agree, but we do need to listen. I have no problem with the right voicing their opinions as long as I’m not forced to follow their lead.
Posted by: Catherine | December 18, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
zeus–Please dirext me to where in the Constitution it says that marriage is a RIGHT.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
I love Rick Warren and I think all homos should be hung.
Posted by: Larry Craig | December 18, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Obama supporters are turning against him. Let me check … yes, Fox is reporting that hell has just frozen over.
Posted by: MadeInUSA | December 18, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
I would be very surprised if Obama makes any attempt in his first term to advocate for gay marriage…to do so at a time when he needs the support of the conservative party to get legislation passed to deal with our economic crisis and the war in Iraq would be political suicide. While I symapathize with the plight of gay Americans and voted to allow gay marriage in my state, most Americans do not view gay marriage as a more significant issue than the economy and/or Iraq. By choosing Warren, Obama again (as he has with several Republican picks in his cabinet) is demonstrating that he will be a moderate president – NOT a liberal one. Given the needs of our country right now, I think he is on the correct path.
Posted by: allie08 | December 18, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
wells747—Well said, my friend, well said!
Posted by: Thateldoo | December 18, 2008, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Obama is a bust. We didn’t elect him to ‘reach out’ to conservatives. We elected him to stop conservatives.
Posted by: Tor | December 18, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Jeff
Obama is for gay rights , he said that gays should be allowed to have civil unions and power of attorney etc. He also said in his debate he was against gay marriage. So am I .In no religion are same sex couples allowed to marry, Im fine with Civil unions but Obama never said ever he was for Gay marriage.
Posted by: Carramea | December 18, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Thateldoo… I think U R right about Alfred E Newman
Posted by: lotzahair | December 18, 2008, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
The fight here is not between Mr. Obama and anybody, or the “right” against the “left”, or anyone being stripped of any percieved civil rights that never existed. The fight here is between the Gay Community and Mother Nature. Regardless of what anyone thinks, or likes, Nature is never going to allow a way of life that is fundemantally detrimental to the existance of the species, to have the upper hand. Argue with me all you want, it won’t trump Mother Nature!
Posted by: AlchyDave25 | December 18, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Face it folks the majority of heterosexaul parents would not perfer their child to be gay most would accept and love their child, they just would not perfer it.
Posted by: david | December 18, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
I find it ironic that when Obama was campaigning he was maligned over and over again by McCain, Palin, and company for being the leftest of the left. Personally I never thought so, and he is proving to be much more of a centrist. And that’s a good thing. Now both ends of the political spectrum can complain…
Posted by: counting crows | December 18, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
lotzahair—LOL LOL LOL, it’s good to see humor among this mess we are in!
Posted by: Thateldoo | December 18, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
I voted for Obama and again he said he would reach across the aisles. The problem with this country is the unyielding partinship shown for both parties. We can not accomplish much in this country if we cant get the senate and congress vote together. Didnt people listen to what Obama said he said he would REACH accross the aisles to the other party.
I knew he was never far left , I would not have voted for him if he was.
We lived fairly well under Clinton and he could get the Republicans on his side
Also Reagan could get democrats to vote on his policies. That is what makes a good president
Posted by: Carramea | December 18, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Gays and Lesbians are not the only people who should be outraged by Obama’s choice of Warren.
Let’s recall: this isn’t just a “difference of opinion,” it is elevating and celebrating and giving the bully pulpit to a man who equates homosexuality to pedophilia and incest..i.e., with criminal activity. He led the charge against prop 8 and is completely in keeping with evangelical commitments to eroding the separation of church and state. Warren should be free to preach whatever he wants, but what troubles me is what this says about Obama: that he condones and indeed celebrates intolerance in the political sphere just so long as it justifies itself by reference to religious conviction. That’s bad politics, and bad religion.
Posted by: cameotoo | December 18, 2008, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Cassandra Washington | Dec 18, 2008 1:30:49 PM –
Cassandra, President Obama has revealed his true colors. . .WHITE! Get over it.
Posted by: Troy | December 18, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
AlchyDave–Agreed. If all humans were to suddenly adapt the gay lifestyle, humankind would cease to exist. Mother Nature, you can’t beat her.
Posted by: i just love him soooo much | December 18, 2008, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Who cares who gives the invocation? The astonishing thing is that something like this is required at all. The existence of God is a mass delusion. Might as well pray to Santa or the Easter Bunny. And besides, whatever happened to separation of church and state?
Posted by: AandW1991 | December 18, 2008, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Have any of the people posting comments that refer to Rick Warren as a “bigot” ever met the man? Have you ever listened to a sermon of his or read one of his books? Have you ever listened to him in an interview? A bigot is defined as someone who treats members of a group with hatred and intolerance. Why are you intolerant of Rick Warren? Rick Warren has never said he hated or could not tolerate gays. He’s never called them names like “bigot”. In fact you will find that he welcomes them into the church and expresses his desire to see the church love gays. He has taken action to protect/preserve one of his beliefs, the belief that marriage should be for a man and woman. Gays have taken action to try to protect what they believe is right. Rick Warren would never call them bigots for doing that.
Posted by: Jim | December 18, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Intolerance will not be tolerated!
Posted by: scotty | December 18, 2008, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
I, for one, am appalled. He is trying to include everyone, but this guy? He will raise his stature and Mr. Warren and his “religion” are not mainstream despite purporting to be Christian….yes, these people think they are all going to heaven and anyone who doesn’t agree with them will go to hell….not exactly a teaching of Christ.
Posted by: Jenna | December 18, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Catherine & Katherine:
Well said!!!!!
This is the time for all of us to come together, REGARDLESS!!!!
Posted by: sisterdearest09 | December 18, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
IN THIS SOCIETY, no one would ‘choose’ to be gay. But we’re changing as a country. ‘Mother Nature’ has been making homosexuals since the beginning and will continue. I pray that Obama will help win equal rights for those that have worked hard to make this country great! He could have picked a better person to open this wonderful event though, for sure.
Posted by: gdguyinbalt | December 18, 2008, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Nate and all others . . .
You can easily say “stop whining” or this and that . . . you are the right to do as you please. I do not think the gay community shoves anything down another’s throat. You mention stop showing it during prime time . . . then am I suppose to be subjected to seeing a heterosexual couple engaged in sexual activity. What’s the difference. I keep my business private; I do not actively support any public agenda; I do not protest for “equal rights.” What I do want, however, is people such as yourself nagging/complaining about what you believe is right or wrong to start evaluating your own life. With your posting, it is evident you are just like many other people . . . mindless and intolerant.
Posted by: Disgruntled | December 18, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Nate and all others . . .
You can easily say “stop whining” or this and that . . . you are the right to do as you please. I do not think the gay community shoves anything down another’s throat. You mention stop showing it during prime time . . . then am I suppose to be subjected to seeing a heterosexual couple engaged in sexual activity. What’s the difference. I keep my business private; I do not actively support any public agenda; I do not protest for “equal rights.” What I do want, however, is people such as yourself nagging/complaining about what you believe is right or wrong to start evaluating your own life. With your posting, it is evident you are just like many other people . . . mindless and intolerant.
Posted by: Disgruntled | December 18, 2008, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Jim–What makes Warren a bigot to these people is that he doesn’t agree with them. As we have come to see time after time, if you don’t agree with a liberal, you are automatically a racist, or bigot, or ignorant.
Posted by: i just love him soooo much | December 18, 2008, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Disgruntled – I agree. I think everyone should get out a dictionary and look up the words intolerant and bigot and so on – then see who matches the definition.
Posted by: Jim | December 18, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
AandW1991—Don’t be messing with the Easter Bunny and DON’T EVEN START WITH SANTA!
Posted by: Thateldoo | December 18, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Gee …. Rhonda Byrne and The Secret not available?
LOL to the extreme left. HRC supporters knew you were being had. Suck it up.
Posted by: beebop | December 18, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
I meant that for I just love him . . .
Posted by: Jim | December 18, 2008, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
True Christians are praying for Obama, not against him. Christians are praying he will do what is best for America.
Could it be possible that Obama picked the pastor who he believes will have his prayers answered for the good of our country?
Posted by: Daniel James | December 18, 2008, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Much ado about nothing. Next article, please.
Posted by: hey Scoob | December 18, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Mother Nature doesn’t “make” gay people. These people CHOOSE to live their lives a certain way. I call it laziness. To lazy to find an opposite sex partner? Go to a gay bar and have your jollies for the night.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
I am gay, and while I may not agree with everything Pastor Rick Warre says I don’t have a problem with him speaking at the inauguration. I look at it this way Christ said to love thy neighbor as thy self well he is my neighbor and I will show him respect and perhaps he will show me that same respect.
Posted by: Nathan | December 18, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
JD… you must be 15.
Posted by: gdguyinbalt | December 18, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
I don’t know what all the fuss is about.
It’s great that Mr. Obama chose Rick Warren to swear him in.Where else but in this great country of our’s can a Closet Homosexual receive such an honor.
Posted by: J.C. | December 18, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
The left is open to all opinions, except those that conflict with its own narrow viewpoint.
Posted by: DougBH | December 18, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Obama’s walking the walk by picking Rick Warren. I think that’s a good thing, and all the more so because it’s painful politically. The country needs to see that, because the fact is that we aren’t going to agree on everything and we have to learn to deal. As for all this “gay agenda” and “having it shoved in my face” business, did anyone stop to think that if gay people could get married, they’d probably get out of your faces? You could still disapprove of them all you wanted if that happened, you know. You could make rude faces at them, and protest their weddings, and tell your kids that being gay is sick and wrong, and it would all be just like the good old days. I doubt you’d notice a difference, except that gay people would avoid you for being a jerk to them instead of yelling at you for helping to impede their access to the institution of marriage. Wouldn’t you like that better?
Posted by: Lilla | December 18, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
AAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWW SHUT UP!!!
I mean my goodness Rick Warren is just one in a million of others who don’t believe as you do! What are you going to do protest the majority of the world? It is just for a single prayer, he is not moving into the White House and if he was that would be Obama’s choice. Everybody don’t believe as you believe, just like you try to tell Christians you don’t believe as they do.
Big WHOOP!!!
Posted by: Oh, Boo Hoo | December 18, 2008, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
The Roman Empire was openly gay, what happened to them?
Posted by: Thateldoo | December 18, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
You are all going to hell.
Posted by: God | December 18, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
balt–Not quite. I have just never been lazy enough to give up on women.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
To label Warren as a “right wing evangelical” is ridiculously naive.
In the evangelical world, Rick Warren is considered a progressive. He and Jim Wallis (president of Sojourners magazine) are the modern face of the progressive Christian movement. This movement is more focused on eradicating poverty and hunger than on debating abortion and gay marriage.
And as supposedly open-minded lefties would point out, stereotyping anyone is the first step in biggotry. Evangelicals are politically diverse just as any other “group” you want to label is.
As an evangelical Christian who voted for Obama, I think his choices so far show the balance and civility he promised. I’m very pleased with his choices so far.
Posted by: Independent | December 18, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
All of you Obamabots – Don’t cry about this because your getting exactly what you voted for…..an empty suit that will play both sides on any issue
Posted by: atlanta3430 | December 18, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
oh,boohoo—You can’t say White House, it’s now a racial slur, sorry!
Posted by: Thateldoo | December 18, 2008, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
This is hilarious. I thought all of you wanted him because he would create a new kind of government that reached across the aisle. You don’t want him to reach across the aisle, you want him to advocate your own brand of leftist hatred.
Posted by: Ricky | December 18, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
Do you know what I love about all of this? The far left and pro gay rights people whine and complain about equal treatment. They get on their high horse and tell us we are all wrong for discriminating against gays. They are people too and their voices should be heard. But when someone from the right, a conservative Christian speaks, which is his right, to beleive how he wants to they call him a bigot b/c he doesn’t beleive the same way. I think it is time the liberal left in this country starts looking in a mirror. Practice what you preach! Maybe the right will be more receptive to your views or at least listen to you when you respect their views. Just b/c the beleive differently doesn’t make them wrong.
Posted by: Wells747
_____________________________
Amen to this comment. The liberal left are totally intolerant of anyone who doesn’t agree with them
Posted by: ibeme | December 18, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
If Mother Nature “makes” gay people, then why didn’t she put reproductive organs inside a man’s rectum?
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
So is Obama going to have a KKK representative at the inauguration??
Posted by: Sterling Dafydd | December 18, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Bamy is a baby killer and Pastor Warren has lost all with this alliance. Pastor, like Simon Peter after the crucifixion, “You are known by the company you keep.
Posted by: Maxify55 | December 18, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Innocently, I am not a hate person, i have gay friends,I love lesbeans. But i think they have no right, they are sick people who need help and prayers?they need love,they should not be advocating it? Same marriage? what the objective?
please forgive me I Come from the Dark World[Africa] where there is no Gays because it is Immoral>>America is great,with unchecked freedom which has room for immorality such as gayism>> Obama has a right to pick his choice.
Posted by: JOMUKA | December 18, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
If you try to satisfy all parties on any issue, you satisfy no one.
Posted by: Newsrook | December 18, 2008, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
God: I look forward to meeting you there!!
Posted by: zeuser89 | December 18, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
The shock-and-awe anger over Rick Warren is – well, shocking! Warren has done more to set a different tone for evangelicals than any other modern pastor. He is distinctly anything but what many consider to be the Religious Right. A little flexibility would be nice from those who constantly demand diversity and tolerance.
Posted by: B J | December 18, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
JD, don’t know..ask your women.
Posted by: gdguyinbalt | December 18, 2008, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
Sterling Dafydd—YES, the KKK will be the one holding the cross when the prayer is given!
Posted by: Thateldoo | December 18, 2008, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Get off of it. Would not matter who he picked, it’s bound to offend someone.
Posted by: ludwig43 | December 18, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Just because someone doesn’t agree with a lifestyle or actions that their religion deems unacceptable doesn’t make them a bigot. If calling people names helps you sleep better at night, go ahead, but it doesn’t make it true. Some of you will never understand the connection that exists between humans and God. That’s okay. No one is forcing you to do anything or believe anything. But you can’t fault people for obeying God or for following the example that Jesus Christ set. You want people to leave you alone and mind their own business….let you live your life….then extend the same courtesty to others.
Posted by: Obamama | December 18, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
McCain was right. Barry is bonkers.
Posted by: Paul | December 18, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Did anyone expect anything but extreme from obama?
C’mon folks He is a radical, there is controversal and scandalous things surrounding this man constantly.
He Wants to be the Complete Center of Attention, He wants everyone to love him and think he is the Greatest.
Radicals do Radical things
Posted by: seah | December 18, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
JD: When God said man should not be alone he didn’t give him Steve, he gave him Eve. So how is it that Steve & Joe/Tonya & Eve or okay by the Creator?
Sodom & Gomorrah/Babylon do they not know why they were destroyed?
Posted by: Good Point | December 18, 2008, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Geeeez, you would have thought Obama nominated this Warren guy to the Supreme Court. I think it was a brilliant move, reach out to the conservatives with a guy like Warren who for all practical purposes will be disposed of once the inaugeral is completed. The gay/lesbo community look like a bunch of trouble makers for objecting to such a meaningless issue.
Posted by: Bruce W | December 18, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
They do not want Obama to reach across the aisle they want a reach around!
Posted by: Dave | December 18, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Regardless of what people think of Obama’s decision, it is consistent with the vision for America he cast in his victory speech (see below), so I’m not sure why so many people are surprised by this.
“There are many who won’t agree with every decision or policy I make as President, and we know that government can’t solve every problem. But I will always be honest with you about the challenges we face. I will listen to you, especially when we disagree. And above all, I will ask you join in the work of remaking this nation the only way it’s been done in America for two-hundred and twenty-one years – block by block, brick by brick, calloused hand by calloused hand…Let us resist the temptation to fall back on the same partisanship and pettiness and immaturity that has poisoned our politics for so long. Let us remember that it was a man from this state who first carried the banner of the Republican Party to the White House – a party founded on the values of self-reliance, individual liberty, and national unity. Those are values we all share, and while the Democratic Party has won a great victory tonight, we do so with a measure of humility and determination to heal the divides that have held back our progress. As Lincoln said to a nation far more divided than ours, “We are not enemies, but friends…though passion may have strained it must not break our bonds of affection.” And to those Americans whose support I have yet to earn – I may not have won your vote, but I hear your voices, I need your help, and I will be your President too.”
Posted by: danno | December 18, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Picking Warren to do his invocation does not mean that Obama is against gay/lesbian rights. There are many aspects to being President, but the one at the top is he is President of all Americans- conservative or liberal, evangelical or athiest. Being outraged is a human emotion, but using that outrage to create a wider chasm between those against gay rights and those for equality is not the answer. I am for equality for all American citizens and I’m not gay, but I believe that denying one group a fundemental right based on religious or any other belief is just plain wrong. However, I also know that bring both sides to the communications table is the only answer becuase it puts a face on the problem. It’s easy to say “those gays are the problem.” It’s much harder to say that “Fred and John are the problem.” (Or Cidy and Mary….) The same goes for the other side. Obama is searching for a way over the hurdle, instead of building a higher hurdle. Maybe it’s time to put the emotion on the back-burner and work toward a solution. Who knows, Warren may not be as closed-minded as you think.
Posted by: algwriter | December 18, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Dave–Thank you. I’m fighting a cold and laughter really helps clear me up.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
alg–Again. Please point me to where in the Constitution it says that marraige is a RIGHT.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
After the Jeremiah Wright scandal, you would think that Mr. Obama would understand that just because someone has a differing opinion does not mean that they are worthy of engaging in dialogue, much less spiritual guidance. Obama may be trying to reach across the aisles in his choice, but all he is really doing is saying “its ok to hate, as long as its done with the backing of religion”. This is very akin to say choosing a neo-nazi to eulogize a jew and doing it in a way that says “get along”. Somethings don’t mix, some messages you DON’T want to send. I was an Obama advocator until this decision.
Posted by: Jim | December 18, 2008, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Jomuka
You sound about as intelligent as ahkmadenijead did when he said at columbia college “we don’t have gays in iran, America is full of immoral behavior”. Yeah, that is because they get their freaking heads cut off there!(and I would imagine the treatment gays receive in africa is not much better then in iran).
However, I did get a chuckle seeing all of the liberal traitors mouths drop at columbia that day. Afterall, they were just being “open minded” by inviting an American hating, holocaust denying, nut to speak at America’s prestigous college platform. All the liberals just looked like complete fools. Ha Ha!
Posted by: keepthechange | December 18, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
So, as a liberal, how may I best demonstrate tolerance for opposing viewpoints? Because it sounds like some of you are saying that liberals are intolerant because they express opposition to things they oppose. Being open-minded and tolerant doesn’t mean not opposing anything. In my mind, it’s important that as a liberal I avoid advocating the enactment of laws that would prevent people with opposing viewpoints from having and expressing them. In my mind, there’s room for both Pastor Warren’s invocation and gay marriage in that framework. And if someone says that they think gay people are sick and ought to be put in institutions, I’m not going to suggest that sort of talk should be against the law, but you bet I’m going to say I think it’s wrong!
Posted by: Lilla | December 18, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
danno—Didn’t Hitler give that same speach, about re-making the country block by block, I need your help? It was the Hitler Youth that he mobilized by the millions to go block by block! I fear this man as I fear Socialism!
Posted by: Thateldoo | December 18, 2008, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
this move is to placate the republicians fcrom not looking into more of the blago/resko dealings of Obama and to get them off a potential scandal developing with Bill Richardson and more alledged pay to play with hbis donors..Federal Grand Jury is already looking into this, but ABC, NBC, And CBS are afraid to talk about it
Posted by: obusha 09 | December 18, 2008, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
JD
so you don’t think Americans have a right to get married?
well that sums up the argument doesn’t it
oy
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Warren is there to pray – not write policy.
I don’t agree with Warren, but I don’t have an issue with this…and gays and lesbians should not think that every decision Obama makes is either pro or against gays. If he had picked a Rabbi, people would be “offended”; a Priest, monk….all the same potential “anger”.
Who should he have picked that would make everyone happy?
Posted by: scooterfoot | December 18, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Here we go.. Let the games begin. Who cares if this guy does a prayer. I’d much rather have him take his 10 min of prayer than influencing 4 years of policy. Let the religious right have their 10 min. The reform in the church community is coming and soon we will be relieved of all the old tired thinking that exists today. Then we can maybe not have Christianity shoved down our throats for forced into our lives. Then we can hear about love instead of Christian intolerance and hatred. I can only hope.
Posted by: Steve | December 18, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
keepthechange–Right you are. Every once in a while liberal double-standards are exposed for all to see. They enjoyed telling all that liberalism is so great that even a man like Ahmadinejad can speak his mind in our country. That is until he said something they didn’t agree with.
Liberals, America’s laughing stock.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Who cares?
Posted by: Gail Norton | December 18, 2008, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
If Obama wanted to be inclusive he should have chosen a Unitarian to speak. They include all religions in their worship.
Posted by: Joe | December 18, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Obama has claimed his entire campaign that he is in fact a CHRISTIAN !! Good choice, I applaud this decision-that coming from a life-long republican. Mr. Obama, you need to read the bible in it’s entirety and not just pick and choose the warm & fuzzy stuff to believe in. It’s either all the truth or it’s all false. There are no gray areas….even when it’s hard and not popular to stand by God’s Word, it still needs to be stood upon as His Word.
May God Bless you in these next 4 years.
Posted by: KF | December 18, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Dearest Thateldoo:
Are you on some kind of drugs?
Posted by: seansatx | December 18, 2008, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Maybe Obama will be reaching out to other hateful people, like David Duke, so that he can keep “reaching across the aisle” and make sure he fills his inauguration with diversity. I DOUBT THAT. I’m really offended. I wish I had voted for Hillary.
Posted by: effort | December 18, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
dl—YES, Americans have the right to get married, as my neighbor just married his dog! It’s perfectly legal to marry anyone!
Posted by: Thateldoo | December 18, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
I think it is a disgrace. We should not have ANY religious nuts there. We need to move beyond superstition.
Posted by: tjw | December 18, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
If Rick Warren has spoken against black people or Jewish people or any other minority group there is NO WAY he would be given this honor. What this tells me is what I’ve long suspected of Obama: He is not a friend of LGBT citizens and will use us to make him appear “centrist.” It’s yet another slap in the face.
Posted by: Tracy | December 18, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
I don’t think any religious figures or religious events should be intermingled with state issues anyway. That said, yeah, I think Obama should have been more sensitive to the insult that this reverend represents to a minority group – gays. Those who try to control others based on their own religious or other unfounded prejudices should realize that it’s none of their business who someone wants to marry and shut the f up. Maybe we should put more restrictions on who non-gays could marry, see how you like that. And that said, I still have great hope for Obama; let’s cut him some slack! He’s not even president yet, for heaven’s sake.
Posted by: hope | December 18, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Ok, so he gets a someone that does not get along with gays….so? Whats the big freakin deal? Whoever he picks, a particular group will have a problem with that person. I am reading this crap about right wing and left wing. They are pissed cause the majority rules and the gays did not get what they want. So. Majority rules, you do not like it, move some where else. Geez this is just becoming more childish everyday…
Posted by: Citizen in FL | December 18, 2008, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
This is such a funny discussion! The Anti-Christ! Let’s let Obama select who he wants to do what he wants, and see how it goes? We here don’t have a vote on any of his appointments or choices, so….. I don’t think whatever this Rick Warren person does on Inauguration Day is going to have any effect on anything. Let’s just breathe. We definitely have bigger problems. (And any gay folks who got robbed with Prop 8 can come to Massachusetts – it’s a nice place! – and settle here, and get married.
Posted by: paintpaintpaint | December 18, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Independent
to say that Rick warren is not right wing
is moronic
He does not believe in evolution (he says gays prove that evolution doesn’t exist)
He often states about people going to hell.
He has compared gays to pedophiles and “people who try to marry children”
If progressive evangelical means you don’t think people should be arrested for being gay…yeah …he is a progressive evangelical
but guess what most preachers and priests and ministers etc…are left of Rick Warren.
There are many many many more religious views…christian views that are to the left of Warren than to the right of Warren.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Hats off to President Elect Obama and Pastor Warren. The act of praying at the inauguration is not anti-anything. It’s just an acknowlegdment that as we begin a new era in our country’s development, we need God’s guidance and help to move our country forward for all people. Afterall, the angel proclaimed, “Peace, and on Earth, good will toward all people.” Let’s pray that that prayer is heard for all Americans.
Posted by: prophet john | December 18, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Simply demonstrates the intolerance of the liberals, they are anything but.
Posted by: Bob | December 18, 2008, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
*glimmer* of hope coming from Obama…despite all the naive hater’s out there…Right ON….choosing Warren a person of integrity…..
Posted by: gah | December 18, 2008, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
this is not a small issue
that would be like saying a person in the 60′s …a preacher who preached against interracial “fraternization” vocally and often…being chosen by the president would be okay.
same thing different decade…
how do you think president elect Obama would have felt about the inclusiveness of that?
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
seansatx—LOL LOL LOL, it’s not possible to read such postings without going to the extreme! And, believe me, if you were to read Obama’s Agenda, page by page, you would NOT think my comments had anything to do with drugs! Please go to change dot gov and read, read with an open mind, then return here and comment again!
Posted by: Thateldoo | December 18, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Its remarkable how many posts here defend the choice of Warren by arguing that the “left” is showing “intolerance.” So let me get this straight: you’d be cool with giving the invocation to somebody who openly declares YOUR orientation and sexual identity a form of criminal deviancy, akin to pedophilia an incest? A preacher who considers YOU an aberration that deserves to be patronizingly “loved” like a sick puppy?
Reaching out for a diversity of viewpoints in the name of “unity” is one thing: pandering to prejudices of “religious conviction” is quite another. I believe Obama is engaged in the latter.
Posted by: cameotoo | December 18, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
I don’t think any pastor, preacher, priest, rabbi, etc… has any place in politcs, let alone a nasty, bigoted evangelical like Rick Warren.
Posted by: effort | December 18, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
dl–No. The RIGHTS we are blessed with as citizens are all covered by the Constitution. Marriage is not one of them. Marriage is a CHOICE between a man and a woman. Much like laying with the same sex is to gay people.
I don’t need the government to tell me who I have the CHOICE of to spend my life and bear children with. That is between me and mine.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
especially if his mother lived in a neighborhood that bought into that popularly held belief about a small “left wing” section of the population.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Bob
An “open minded” liberal is about as easy to find as an “patriotic” liberal.
Posted by: keepthechange | December 18, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
JD
you have the RIGHT to marry the person you love.
denying you that would be denying you the most basic structure of our society…
our society is built on the oppotunity to be two by two
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Sounds like a major hissy-fit from the “community”.
Chill-out, folks – just go decorate something.
Posted by: ALEX H. | December 18, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
If gays are “born that way”,and they are not, then the gay community would have to say ,”Pedafiles are born that way, which also is not true.
Posted by: waitingfor Jesus | December 18, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
JD, the 14th Amendment guarantees equal protection of the laws for everyone. In the simplest terms, it means that our government, its institutions, and its laws may not treat people differently based on certain characteristics like race or sex. Marriage is a legal institution in this country; however, men and women are treated differently in that only men are allowed to marry women, and only women are allowed to marry men. Both sexes are therefore denied equal treatment within this institution. You can deny equal access to the institution on the basis of things like the incapacity of one party (being unable to give legal consent due to infancy, insanity, being dead, already being married to someone else, being a houseplant, etc.), but we couldn’t do it on the basis of race, and we shouldn’t be able to do it on the basis of sex.
Posted by: Lilla | December 18, 2008, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
WONDERFUL!!! Mr. Obama has ticked-off various political persuasions about “something,” yet offers enough to keep them on board! Brilliant strategy. He can avoid being accused of pandering to one leaning. I look forward to this man’s leadership. We will be at the “healthy” center.
Listen up! Gays are, were, and will be here. Whether you like it or not, gay marriage is on the horizon. It may not be here today but it is my prediction that our country will have this freedom under 5 years. You have to ask yourself; What is it that gay people know about marriage that (given the divorce rate)heterosexual people do not know about? Especially, since gay people are fighting SO hard for this priviledge, yet heterosexuals take marriage so lightly and for granted?
Men. Let’s not cite the statistics of how many men have had at least one homosexual experience or fantasized about such. Church men, in particular–don’t get me started…
By the way, the revered King James version of which we so fervently hold… well, there is MUCH credible evidence that Queen James, err…King James, walked “lightly,” and loved her…err, his heels. So, who knows what her…err, his motivations were! (snap) (snap)
Posted by: FS | December 18, 2008, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Keepthechange
Lincoln Kennedy Roosevelt Franklin MLK etc etc….
all called liberals at one time or another.
so yeah it is as easy to find as a liberal that you would call patriotic
in fact they tend to be the most patriotic in our history.
and have stood up for our country and the ideals that it is built on.
our founding fathers…the writers of the constitution …all elitists..and mostly liberals of their day.
stupid is as stupid types.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Why do headlines always aim to incite drama? The Gay-Lesbian Community can be displeased without the “Left” in all its totality being enraged. The Gay-Lesbian Community may be PART of the left, but the “left” is a WHOLE LOT more than just the Gay-Lesbian Community.
Posted by: RobbieSue | December 18, 2008, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
I am the straightest man in this here town but I am dissappointed Barry didnt invite one of those very popular ‘No interacial marrriage” preachers so as to reach out to the big racist community. Come on Barry, be truly inclusive.
Posted by: Paul | December 18, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
dl–NO. I have the priviledge of marrying the person I CHOOSE to. I have the RIGHT to say what I please, I have the RIGHT to a speedy trial, etc… Let’s face it, the dl’s of the world will never be happy until all fits under your umbrella of “acceptable behavior.” The only problem is, you are arguing against a large majority that doesn’t agree with you. And making yourselves even more on the fringe. If you “get in my face,” expect to lose some teeth.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
dear waitingfor jesus:
Most pedophiles (correct spelling by the way) are NOT homosexuals.
Posted by: seansatx | December 18, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
waiting forjesus
if you can’t tell the difference between two adults loving each other and an adult taking advantage and hurting a child…
people shouldn’t let you near their kids.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
What Obama is doing, that seems to be flipping everyone out, is something that the GOP have no moxy for, that is government from the center. The GOP talk the talk, but they seldom if ever have walked the walk, especially this last 8 DISMAL years.
Posted by: PRESIDENT OBAMA | December 18, 2008, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
This country was founded on God and His word, so I think it’s great that Obama has chosen a Godly man that stands on God’s Word. My only hope is that Obama values God’s Word the same and stands up for it over the next 4 years.
Posted by: Jess | December 18, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
as a gay person i don’t have a problem with Pastor Warren. this is a diverse nation and i think the inauguration will encourage healing. during his campaign the President-Elect deplored pitting group against group. gay people have to be tolerant as well. civil rights are much more important than the right to marry—one is a civil-rights issue the other a religious one. i am surprised that many gays feel so strongly about gay marriage and are cavalier about workplace rights and inclusion under the civil rights act.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 18, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Rick Warren is a coset “New Age-er” who’s only interest is destroying the Christian faith from within for the next generation. Of course Obama, a fellow false prohpet, would be happy to embrace him. Who is surprised by this?
Posted by: please! | December 18, 2008, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Hmmmm….I wonder if the outgoing VP’s gay daughter will be in attendance. I try to be tolerant of all faiths as long as they are “consistent” and not “hypocritical” as fundies sometimes tend to be.
Posted by: Denise | December 18, 2008, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
JD
I won’t lose teeth trust me
and the majority overhwlemingly agreees with me
this is not about marriage…I could care less…but the facts are there…
the only people fighting like you are against it
are people who are fearful of themselves…
and their own proclivities
or whose lives suck so bad that have to empower themselves by oppressing someone else.
and 20 years from now that is how your children (god bless them ) will view it.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Being inclusive – seriously taking into account both sides – is what democracy is about; otherwise, you only have a ‘dictatorship’ of the majority.
Posted by: Blaine | December 18, 2008, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
and I do not care about gay marriage that much
I care about the moron mentality that fights against it for absolutely moronic reasoning.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
It’s pretty easy to be tolerant of the right when it’s not your rights being put to a vote. Where’s the right’s tolerance of gays? Yes, gay people are angry. We’ve always been short changed. I’m sorry if some of you moderates can’t understand this. Obama could have chosen better and I can’t help but feel a little bit apprehesive about his presidency. The gays can help you get elected, but after you win who needs them.
Posted by: Frank | December 18, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
AMERICA PLEASE STOP BEING PITY AND GET A LIFE. THE MAN IS JUST PERFORMING THE DAMN INAUGURATION, SO WHAT. WHY IS EVERYONE MACRO MANAGING OBAMA, HOWEVER, BUSH DID WHAT THE HELL HE WANTS AND ALL OF YOU HAVE THE TIME TO BE ON THIS CHAT LINE TALKING ABOUT THIS STUPID ISSUE. YOU NEED TO WORRY ABOUT YOUR OWN BEHINDS AND WHETHER YOU HAVE A JOB, HOUSE OR EVEN WAKE UP TOMMORROW. I CANNOT BELIEVE THE PITINESS OF THIS COUNTRY. WHOEVER PERFORMS THE DAMN INAURATION WILL A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE THAN SOMEONE ELSE NO MATTER WHO HE OR SHE IS. WE JUST NEED A REASON TO WHINE!! I HAVE MORE RESPECT FOR THE FOUR YEAR OLD CHILDREN IN PRE-SCHOOL AT LEAST WE KNOW WHY THEY ARE IMMATURE.
Posted by: Robin | December 18, 2008, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
Yes, I know, Pastor Rick Warren is there to support President Obama,
not the other way around. But, why choose someone so divisive? Why
pander to those who oppose what Obama stands for? This country needs
spiritual inspiration… not a religious slap in the face!
In the USA, all religious groups have the “Constitutional Right” to
determine their own individual belief systems and regulate their
members. Evangelical and Fundamentalist religious groups specifically
exclude and denounce gay marriage, abortion rights and their
supporters. However, many other religious groups do not share the same
beliefs and support gay marriage and abortion rights.
Hmmm… Should government mandate and enforce the belief system of
specific religious groups? Should government honor the belief systems
of all religious groups?
Hopefully, this will serve to unite us on our few areas of agreement,
such as jobs, education and health care.
Posted by: jpinsatx | December 18, 2008, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Dear queers: don’t like Obama’s choice? Then you should’ve voted for Hillary.
Posted by: Notthatgullible | December 18, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Listen up gay people!! We, as a country, don’t want gay marriage!! What part of that don’t you understand? The most liberal state in the country just voted it down!! We don’t want it!! It doesn’t matter how many protests you have, how many old ladies you knock down in the street, how loud you scream, how many violent and destructive things you do. . .WE STILL DON’T WANT IT!!!
Posted by: Present | December 18, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
I thought it was Obama’s inagural not the gays-He can pick who he wants. And for the record there is no such thing as CIVIL RIGHTS for gays- It is such a thing as human rights. Everyone I believe has the right to do whatever they want in their OWN HOME with a consenting adult. I am heterosexual and have the same right. But I keep my business to myself and not broadcast my sexual conquests. There should be NO special rights for who you sleep with. If so I want my special rights(don’t leave me out). Marriage is from God. God said what marriage was-a union of one man to one woman. Many gays hate GOD but want to use his word “marriage”. Call it something else you want but not marriage. For the record most gays are rude and demanding(because they are unhappy). That lifestyle is degrading and will NEVER be accepted by the masses because it represents death(to the human race). They want the word marriage to be accepted for something they know in their heart is wrong.
Posted by: LOWES4321 | December 18, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Paul wall
it is not Warren’s stances on gay marriage that are the issue here …as much as the statements about gays that lead to those stances.
you should read some of Warren’s statements and beleifs on homosexuality…and who is going to hell… and his comparisons.
It is anything but inclusive…or anything like that of what Obama ran on regarding inclusivity.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
Man created god, not god man. A prayer from ANYONE will do. It’s formality.
Posted by: gdguyinbalt | December 18, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Frank—I appreciate your candidness, and you have spoken the truth about Obama’s next step being questionable towards those that supported him (I did not). Please read his Agenda. I pray that our Great Nation will live through the next 4 years!
Posted by: Thateldoo | December 18, 2008, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Obama + Rick Warren = CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN……..LOL
Posted by: CW | December 18, 2008, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
NEWS FLASH- There are still more christian’s in this country than sodomites and lip locking lesbian’s. So crawl back in the closet and quit crying.
Posted by: don't tell don't worry | December 18, 2008, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Yes, the economy, jobs, war and other issues may be important, but look at it from a gay person’s perspective. In this last elections states have taken away our rights to marry AND raise children (Arkansas). What issue is more important to you than your families? That’s why I’m so angry. They (the right) are coming after our families. There is nothing more important.
Posted by: Frank | December 18, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Reaching across the aisle, being all inclusive, governing from the center: all watchwords to placate bankers and the military industrial complex. The only thing that’s going to keep Obama and his crew of happy centrists on the path of change and hope is getting people who are being destroyed by the downward spiraling economy out in the streets. Otherwise change will just become a forgotten campaign slogan and hope will turn into cycnicism and then its every person for themselves. If Obama becomes liberal camouflage for big business, he’ll do more damage then Bush.
Posted by: Joel Miller | December 18, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
again I ask
what if this preacher preached popularly held beliefs of the past
like women should subortinate to men in marriage and if they are beaten they should turn the other cheek
or that interracial marriage was unnatural
or all Jews are going to hell (Oh warren did say that)
people need to take a look at what Warren has said
if this were any other subculture Obama would never say it was okay for him to give this national religius honor.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
The way Obama is going he will either have most of the country supporting him in one way or another or most of the country will hate him.
Posted by: nickames | December 18, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
It doesn’t matter who he chooses for this. All Religion does is cause wars and hate between people (I think these posts prove that). All Religion is false! And yes, 95% of the population of earch is absolutely brainwashed into believing in Religion.
Posted by: Gary | December 18, 2008, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Sorry meant to say EARTH…lol
Posted by: Gary | December 18, 2008, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
lilla–The 14th Amendment was writtn to grant RIGHTS to freed slaves. Not for “in you face” homosexuals to be granted the priviledge of marriage. Learn your history.
Are black people not offended by these comparisons to the civil rights era of the 60s? I know I am, and I’m a white guy.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Obama is pandering to the homophobia of his black constituency. Yes, studies have shown that blacks are far more bigoted than the rest of the poulation.
Posted by: Anna G | December 18, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
dl–Did you vote for BHO?
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
LOWES4321. Interesting posting but I would have to disagree. There are laws (on the books which have been recently employed), that prohibits certain behaviors within your own home, even if the adults are consenting.
It has always been my position that ALL unions be registered as civil (the State) and there be second religious ceremony. IF a religion (the Church) accepts “whatever” fine. If not, fine. I believe this would be the true seperation of church & state?
Posted by: FS | December 18, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
FIRST, AS AN AFRICN-AMERICAN, I TIRED OF PEOPLE SAYING THAT GAY RIGHTS IS JUST LIKE CIVIL RIGHTS. THAT IS B.S. FIRST, I DID NOT CHOOSE THE COLOR OF MY SKIN, HOWEVER, I SURELY MADE THE CHOICE OF WHO I SLEEP WITH. I’M SICK OF THE GAY B.S. ALSO, I SICK OF THIS NOTION THAT YOU ARE BORN GAY. PLEASE!!!! IF THAT IS TRUE, THAN A CHILD MOLESTER CAN SAY HE OR SHE CANNOT HELP WHO THEY ARE ATTRACTED TO. IF THAT IS TRUE, THEN WHY DO WE NOT SLEEP WITH OUR PARENTS OR SIBLINGS; BECAUSE WE KNOW BETTER. WE LIVE IN A CULTURE THAT TELLS US NOT TO SLEEP WITH ANIMALS, CHILDREN AND OUR FAMILY. THE QUESTION IS WHY DOES AMERICA THINKS IT’S OKAY TO SLEEP WITH THE SAME SEX. IF EVERYONE WAS GAY, HOW WOULD WE CONTINUE WITH LIFE??? I WILL NOT BEND ON MY VALUES, GOD, FOR NO ONE, NOT EVEN THIS COUNTRY!!!!
Posted by: Robin | December 18, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
Oh brother!! How very STUPID for people to get upset about this. So the preacher who says the first prayer is a right winger AND the preacher who says the last prayer is a left winger. I think that’s GREAT! The problem is that each “side” wants Obama to be on “their side”. He is EVERYBODY’s president and is very smart to have everybody represented, regardless of his personal views. That’s the way it SHOULD be. I am all for Gay rights and I really think they should be allowed to marry but, ya know what? They are just plain WRONG to get all “booty hurt” about who says the first prayer. It’s like that old saying “You’re either with us or against us”. Well, that old saying just isn’t true but so many right wingers AND left wingers take that stance.
Posted by: LetsKeepItReal | December 18, 2008, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
Wow…. so many Obama love slaves are getting disgruntled, and the guy isn’t even in office yet. HA HA HA I will be the first to say I told you so. He is a politician which means he is a lier or he wouldn’t be a good politician. There is no change coming, there is no sunshine and golden harp music awaiting you. Just more typical political lies and garbage. I hope I am wrong and he makes this country into the best it ever has been, but I doubt it. We haven’t had a president who gave a crap about this country since Reagan and none before in my lifetime. Ford, Carter and Bush Senior were jokes. Clinton sold our country to the Saudi’s and Nafta then set up the economy to fall with unreasonably low interest rates and policy’s that have ultimately came to doom our economy. Bush had the chance to save our country and it’s economy but sold it to the oil companies and let the mess hit the fan without leading us away from it. Obama is not worried about our country in the least. He is showing his true colors and later he will show us his true agenda. I hope I am wrong and he is really really really great but I don’t think so. Nothing will change except the name on the door on the White House.
Posted by: Bored at work | December 18, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Obama is a sellout. Look at his trail of used and cast aside former allies. Gay people are just the latest. I didn’t want to think about it before, but the guy has a pattern of this kind of cut-throat politics. Ugh.
Posted by: effort | December 18, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Someone commented, This country is still a “majority rule” society. Well let us not forget that is how Nazis came to power and how a 11 million people, Jews and other undersirables were exterminated. Majority rule can quickly turn to tryranny of the majority, but when only the minority who is being ruled against is complaining then guess what, the listening audience may be limited.
How quickly we forget that as of 1967 there 16 states were interracial marriage was illegal. Obama’s parents would not have been able to marry in these states. But Obama was not part of this history and unlike gays who are part of this history he is removed from it despite what he says. Reality is when it happens to you.
Proposition 8 was not about taking anyone else’s rights away but about granting rigts to those who don’t have them. When those opposing Prop. 8 made it about their rights then they made it tyranny of the majority and not democracy. Wake up, America, there is a difference. When you begin to make execeptions or suggestions at the possibility of legalizing the absurd then we have not come very far from 1967.
Posted by: Richard Natoli-Rombach | December 18, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
J D | Dec 18, 2008 2:58:39 PM –
He campaigned for him.
Posted by: yoyo | December 18, 2008, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
On the subject of intolerance. Most gay folks would implore us to believe that they are born, or “hard wired” that way. I have no proof to the contrary, so I am prepared, until/unless conclusive evidence shows them wrong, to accept that. I however, am “hard wired” to be revulsed and disgusted by gay sexual activity (NOT Gay people). I was born that way. The Gay Community will not accept that. They label me bigotted and insist I CAN change. That being the case, why, praytell, can’t THEY change? If, on the other hand, THEY CAN change, why should we change our laws to coddle and accomodate them? Now, if they, in fact, cannot change, and because of that they understand and accept the fact that I can’t change either, WHAT ABSURD IMBECILITY MAKES THEM INSIST THAT I SHOULD. AND, if they understand that I can’t, and won’t, what makes them fantasize that I will endorse changing any laws?
Posted by: AlchyDave25 | December 18, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Obama should express his support for gay and lesbian community at his choices right away to educate the public. It’s still 4 years away from 2012. His silent and choices of people who are against GLBT go along with the public/church who demonize GLBT. Obama should have acted if he really meant “change” is change.
Posted by: HH | December 18, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
WWJD?
Jesus would not judge anyone.
Jesus had love, forgiveness, compassion, and tolerance for all people.
Please, instead of fighting over such “issues” try to find a way to really make this world a better place where so much suffering and struggle no longer exists.
Besides, nobody has a “right” to demand anything of anyone which is within their constitutional rights, including Rick Wareren and Barack Obama. This is America where freedom is supposed to be for all people, not just “politically correct”persons bowing to specific agendas.
WHO ARE THE INTOLERANT ONES HERE REALLY?
Rick Warren’s Purpose Driven Life book is a beautiful testament to how we all could try harder to live a life with “true’ purpose for all people and not just ourselves.
Peace!
Posted by: Barbara in Chicago | December 18, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Robin, you are such a hypocrite. I’m only glad not all white people were narrow minded like you during the civil rights era or you’d still be sitting at the back of the bus. Shame on you. And as far as skin color goes, at least when you got home you could relate to your burdens with your family. Gay people don’t have that same benefit.
Posted by: Frank | December 18, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
So, would Obama’s idea of inclusiveness and honoring different viewpoints include having a member of the KKK speak at the inauguaral? Nope. I didn’t think so. Obama’s a Grade A hypocrite who has chosen to provide a platform to someone who equates homophobia with pedophilia and incest.
Posted by: Mark | December 18, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Well boo hoo Frank, I guess you’ll just have to settle with having IDENTICAL rights to everybody else. When are you people going to learn that making a “lifestyle choice” is not grounds for getting special treatment and extra rights. You made your choice, live with it and stop expecting the world to change course and submit to your whims.
Posted by: howwouldiknow | December 18, 2008, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
If I could take my Obama vote back, I would. This is a calculated move by Obama to please the blacks–especially the blacks– and social conservatives and to insult the gays who voted for him.
Posted by: Bob | December 18, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
gang put it in perspective is right
if the person who was saying the first prayer said often and actively that interracial marriage was unnatural and a sin…(as used to be a very popular belief)
would Obama be upset that a President would pick that person to give the first prayer.
would he buy the “reaching across the aisle” and “inclusivity of including exclusivity”
as the reason
no.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
JD: You really need to get over yourself. The very same thing you are spoutingabout your rights and your choices and you are trying to shut those who disagree with your views. The old double standard..YOU can’t have it both ways. How do you know that in this society the majority feels the way you do? Have you, yourself, talked to every living being in the US or are you just assuming that is correct because you believe it to be? MAke sure you have all of the facts before you spout yuor vicious anger. Marriage is not a right it is a choice, but, we accept “marriage” as if it is a right, so if two people of the opposite sex truly love each other, what is the problem for them to get married? I mean they are not asking you to live their life..it really makes no diference and in the end we are not the one who makes the final judgement..so leave them alone.
Posted by: zeuser89 | December 18, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
I consider myself a moderate.Meaning to me that I listen and have found a balance between the right and left.The “Word” itself has been described as a double edged sword.Obama’s agenda is to bring America together.This means he will pull from people on the left and the right.Some people aren’t happy with his pastor pick.What’s new about that? Obama has the ability and sense that some Americans have to look past a person’s ” faults” and see the good that they have to offer.None of us are completely good or bad. In the pulpit, however, the content of the preacher’s message become prey of people’s opinion. Here’s mine. Warren or Wright both aren’t as good or as horrible as we proclaim them to be. Only the Lord knows their heart truly. A soundbite or best seller isn’t going to reveal all of it.Warren is leading a prayer to God. Hopefully the Lord will shed his wisdom to some of you…..soon.
Posted by: TV | December 18, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
To: Effort,
You are as ignorant as it gets. Obama is not here to please you or anyone else. His job is eradicated the B.S. that the Bush created. Religion, sexual perference, color is the least of our problems. I voted for OBAMA because I need him to invest in the middle class. I could give a damn about his pick for the invocation. He ran an excellent campaign and is doing an awesome job with his transition team. AND AMERICA HAS NOTHING BETTER TO DO THEN TO WHINE ABOUT THE MOST STUPIDEST ISSUE THERE IS!!!! TALK ABOUT PITY!!!
Posted by: Robin | December 18, 2008, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Dear waiting for Jesus, stop waiting. He’s not coming back. He was a mentally unbalanced man who was killed years ago. You’ve bought into a mass delusion. Give it up.
Posted by: wake up | December 18, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
whoa- are you all really arguing about gay people being born that way/not born that way? Why?
The article is about Obama choosing someone to speak at his historic inauguration that is very, very homophobic. It is the WORST possible message to send to the American people.
Posted by: johnwayne | December 18, 2008, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Except, AlchyDave25, your disposition to be repulsed by gay activities is conditioned…you WERE’NT born that way…
Posted by: Jazz | December 18, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
To wake up:
You shouldn’t talk about things you know nothing about.
Posted by: Jess | December 18, 2008, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
I want to rescind my vote for Obama. His cabinet is nothing more than recycled has beens from the Clinton era thats gone by. Rick Warren is a symbol of hate like Bush is. This is not the change I voted for
Posted by: Mark Levy | December 18, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Not sure why it matters that there are more people who oppose gay marriage and other rights for gay people, than there are people who support them. When the Supreme Court rules on a Constitutional issue, the fact that the decision is unpopular doesn’t make a darn bit of difference. So, to the people who DON’T WANT GAY MARRIAGE, that won’t change a thing if it’s decided that laws prohibiting it are unconstiutional. You will still be able to oppose gay marriage–it will just happen anyway. Can you live with that?
Posted by: Lilla | December 18, 2008, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
WWJD?
Posted by: TV | December 18, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Wow, Robin, I hope there are very few people like you left in the world. You’re one ugly human being.
Posted by: Steven | December 18, 2008, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
OBAMA JUST MADE A HUGE MISTAKE.
Posted by: Dan | December 18, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Robin
you pick who you are attracted to?
so you like the ladies?
since you can choose.
I wonder jhow many people on here can choose like Robin.
all you guys…you like the menses…just choosing the ladies?
stupid is as stupid types.
it is not a choice who you are physically attracted to
and there is slowly being realized that there may be a scientific and sociological reason why a species has a certain percentage of homosexuality in it’s midst.
perhaps so some aren’t focused on just the advancement of their own gene pool but the humanity as a whole
perhaps if we didn’t have such moronic and weird hateful bologne going on we would discover that.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Obama is no friend of the gay community and he never has been. This choice proves it.
Posted by: William G. Schulz | December 18, 2008, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
and Robin oppression and violence toward any population in the US
is not
“the stupidest issue there is”
your argument might be though.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Obama + Rick Warren = CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN….LOL
Posted by: CW | December 18, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Robin, take that kind of garbage to your chat rooms.
Posted by: effort | December 18, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
zeus–I know Californians(the most left wing of any populace) voted against Prop 8. Is that MAJORITY enough for you? Why don’t you go to any of the red states and see what the MAJORITY thinks. Face it, gay people are acting like their world is gonna come to an end if they are not allowed to marry. The hetro community has spoken, which is the MAJORITY, and you are showing your intolerance by not accepting it.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Change you can believe in? What a joke! I want Hillary. We’d probably have Maya Angelou delivering the invocation instead of this hateful dirtbag Rick Warren.
Posted by: Chandra | December 18, 2008, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
JD, just wait until the California Supreme Court overturns Prop 8. Then we’ll see how tolerant you are.
Posted by: Frank | December 18, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Do most christians actually read their bibles or do they just believe what they hear from pastors about what it says? I’ve actually read it, a few times now, and I just wish that people would do their own research and decide things for themselves, then they might notice that homosexuality is less mentioned in their big book than greed is. How much is RW worth again?
Posted by: 77anonymous77 | December 18, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
JD-
If gay people were allowed equal rights (allowed to marry) what would that do to you, personally? How would it really effect you?
Posted by: effort | December 18, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
TO: DL
YOUR ARGUMENT MAKES NO SENSE. LIKE I PREVIOUSLY STATE, “YOU ARE NOT BORN GAY”. THE MIND IS THE MOST POWERFUL ORGAN IN THE BODY. YOU CAN CONTROL WHO OR WHAT YOU ARE ATTRACTED TO. WE LIVE IN A COUNTRY THAT ALLOWS HOMO-SEXUALITY. IT’S ILLEGAL IN OTHER COUNTRIES. JUST BECAUSE YOU ATTRACTED TO SOMEONE OR SOMETHING DOES NOT MAKE IT RIGHT. LIKE I SAID, CHILD MOLESTERS ARE ATTRACTED TO CHILDREN, DOES IT MAKE IT RIGHT!!!
Posted by: robin | December 18, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Rick Warren is not as intolerant as Obama’s own pastor from his church in Chicago. He probably refused the invitation, since he hates America.
Posted by: Cher | December 18, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
JD
do you read
this is not about the marriage issue…oy
it is about Warren’s statements about gays
which feeds the marriage issue.
most of the population is way past the moronic belief that gays are going to hell and blah blah blah…yes most…no matter what Hannity wants to say…
Warren still believes in that outdates weird belief that gays are on par with pedophiles and incest.
Homosexuality hurts NO ONE.
This is all about self empowerment for people who want to feel better by excluding other people.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Having moral values and believing in God does not make one a bigot – the other side is not the only one who should be heard – gays need help – they need to know there is help out there for those with all types of temptations…
Posted by: Hope | December 18, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
The one good thing about this whole controversy is that it’s forcing all the ignorant homophobic bigots out of their closets where we can see them. Kharma’s a drag. Wait ’til someone hates on you. Especially you, Robin, What an ugly excuse for a human being.
Posted by: Tom | December 18, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Obama’s a piece of work. A true professaional politician: “I’m an advocate of gay and lesbian Americans rights, just not right now”. LMFAO
Posted by: Don | December 18, 2008, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Robin as I have said before…
if you can’t tell the difference between two adults who love each other and an adult taking advantage of hurting a child
then people should keep their children away from you.
and considering you think that you are choosing who you are attracted to… I would say they should keep both boys and girls away from you.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
to 77anonymous77:
Although it may not be mentioned as much as other subjects it does not change the fact that homosexuality it a sin and sin separates you from God, unless you repent.
Posted by: Jess | December 18, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Robin: you ignorant slut. I could not use my brain organ no matter how much I try to be attracted to men. Who fed you that bs? You got issues girl.
LMAO
Posted by: Don | December 18, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
A political firestorm, most folks agree with this minister. The militant gay rights folks will have an uproar and they do have the ear of the media. It is amazing that less than 1 percent of the population can get so much press, but it happens.
Posted by: Brad | December 18, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
Robin is the only self-admitted black person posting here. So far she has been called “stupid,” “ignorant” and “ugly.” So much for the “party of tolerance.”
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
So Robin, if you can control and choose who you’re attracted then YOU could CHOOSE to be attracted to someone of the same sex. If so, congrats, you’re a bi-sexual. Oh, wait, never mind, no gay or bi-sexual would ever want you.
Posted by: Eric | December 18, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
TO: DL
OBAMA AND WARREN ARE TRYING TO OPPRESS AND COMMIT VIOLENCE, WOW – GET A LIFE. IF YOU A HETER, BI-, HOMO, YOU ARE PROTECTED BY YOUR CIVIL RIGHTS. OKAY.
Posted by: Robin | December 18, 2008, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Robin, more than anyone else on this site you really disgust me. People who saw that the black people were being treated unfairly in this country fought for them even though it never really affected them or their families. Now when you are enjoying the rights that should have been yours from the beginning, you come along and want to take away gay peoples rights. The irony in this is sickening.
Posted by: Frank | December 18, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
DL:
You think homosexuality hurts no one, it hurts EVERYONE! It separate you from nowing the true everloving God.
Posted by: Jess | December 18, 2008, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
We know, we know. You’re here, you’re queer. Make sure to tell that to Satan when you meet him.
Posted by: i just love him soooo much | December 18, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Obama claims he’s a fierce advocate for gay and lesbain rights. LOL!!! There’s only one thing Obama’s for. Obama.
Posted by: Mark | December 18, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
JD, learn your jurisprudence. The 14th Amendment was written to enumerate the right of all citizens to equal protection of the laws. The Constitution does not “grant” rights. It protects them by limiting the government’s power. When the 14th Amendment was passed, it was with the purpose of protecting the rights of freed slaves by requiring government to treat everyone equally, but the tricky thing about amending the constitution is that you’re stuck with the language you put into it. You don’t get to back and say “well, we only meant for that to apply to certain people” (that would be especially ridiculous given the plain language of this particular amendment). The 14th Amendment has since been the basis for numerous civil rights decisions on everything from abortion rights to the treatment of prisoners. You can be offended by gay people invoking the 14th Amendment in defense of their rights, but that’s exactly what it’s there for.
Posted by: Lilla | December 18, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
someone really needs to ask him in front of a camera
or Joe Biden
what he would do if a president chose a preacher who was vocal about interacial relationships being unnatural or a sin as was the popularly held belief that his mother faced …
that on occasion incited anger and violence toward those who fell in love with someone of a different race.
if a president picked that preacher to give the National Inauguration Invocation saying he was being inclusive by including exclusivity…
what would Obama have said about that president.
I think he would have said he
“is full of Sh..” I am pretty sure that is exactly what obama would have said.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
What is so wrong with what Robin is saying. If anything you are all hating Robin and contradicting yourselves.
Posted by: Angelo | December 18, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
As a gay man I’m okay with this. I do agree that the far left has become many of the things they claim to hate about the right. I see it with many of my friends, who have become almost totalitarianism in there way of thinking. They of course they don’t see it, but I do. Obama clearly said in his campaign he would bring everyone to the table and his choice here reflects that.
Posted by: john | December 18, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
If Obama didnt pick Warren he wouldnt be doing what he said he would do. Which is why I voted for him. So the people who get upset look like the shallow ones. All voices.
Posted by: North Park | December 18, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
Hey bible wackos, you can save your preachy hellfire garbage. No one here wants to hear that crap.
Posted by: effort | December 18, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
JD, Robin is not “stupid,” “ignorant” and “ugly” because of her skin color. She is “stupid,” “ignorant” and “ugly” because of her hate.
Posted by: Frank | December 18, 2008, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
John: If you are a gay man then Obama is giving a platform to a man who has equated you with pedophiles and incest abusers. Are you truly okay with that?
Posted by: Mark | December 18, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
I think it’s cool that he chose a closet-case homosexual.
Posted by: monty | December 18, 2008, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Here is the problem, the liberals are angry that Obama is not oppressing non-liberals.
Posted by: Angelo | December 18, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
John, I honestly hope you’re right.
Posted by: Frank | December 18, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
Robin–you are seeing this issue in the right light. Gays are trying to say that they are being oppressed the same way blacks were pre-1965. I don’t recall mass lynchings of homos, them being taken captive and seperated from their roots, or being denied their chance at prosperity. They are just trying to make “gay” mainstream. Keep up the good fight.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Jess
I know God…
and God hating homos…is not God.
why normal people can not see that almost every excerpt of the bible is based on the balance between “trying to be happy and trying not to hurt other people”
this gay thing…has nothing to do with that balance…
neither does beating your wife
or a few other things in there…
and knowing that it has been interpreted over 2000 years by some very …differing opinion keeping gentleman… King James being one…
you might think a smart person would realize… the outliers…are probably not part of the rest that is completely coherent with itself.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Based on Robin’s comments maybe there really is some truth about how deep homophobia runs in the black community. Truly ironic given all the hate that was tossed their way for so long. Ignorance knows no reason.
Posted by: Chandra | December 18, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
I agree with Monty. That’s usually the case with the loudest anti-gay people.
Closet cases, gay pasts, self-hate= anti-gay movement
Posted by: jackson | December 18, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
I agree with Monty. That’s usually the case with the loudest anti-gay people.
Closet cases, gay pasts, self-hate= anti-gay movement
Posted by: jackson | December 18, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
effort | Dec 18, 2008 3:28:39 PM –
I don’t mind listening to any argument so speak for yourself and enjoy the heat.
Posted by: Angelo | December 18, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
Effort, what are you afraid of, aren’t we all entitled to free speech?
Posted by: Jess | December 18, 2008, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
JD, remember the holocaust? You truly are stupid.
Posted by: Frank | December 18, 2008, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
afraid? no, I’m just tired of people like you ramming your religion down my throat.
Posted by: jackson | December 18, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Hey JD…trust me, no one is trying to compare themselves to Robin. Who in the world would want to?
Posted by: Gale | December 18, 2008, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Jackson, Why can’t a Godly man simply preach the Word, instead he’s a closet, I don’t think so, you have lost touch with reality.
Posted by: Jess | December 18, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
jackson | Dec 18, 2008 3:34:11 PM –
and we are tired of getting the “Tolerance” propaganda down our throat. Welcome to America.
Posted by: Angelo | December 18, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
I’m not ramming anything.
Posted by: Jess | December 18, 2008, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Apparently Robin thinks that “shouting” with ALL CAPS drives the point home. I’ll say this: it matches the blaring, over-the-top ignorance expressed in the post itself. And how quickly some segments of the “oppressed” are willing to do unto others as was done unto them. Are the struggles of LBGT identical to those of African-Americans? No, but each continue to face ignorance, hatred, and prejudice in our society. I would be equally uncomfortable with a racially bigoted pastor giving the invocation.
The bottom line is that there are plenty of wise, centrist, inclusive religious folk who could have given this invocation: Obama’s choice IS divisive and the thousands of posts here show just how raw feelings are on this. How does lime-lighting a mega-church evangelical whose views are the polar opposite of those who voted for Obama demonstrate healing, unity, or the values of inclusiveness Obama espouses? To me it represents capitulation to the very voices that we’ve been drowning in for the last decade. Ditto the majority of Obama’s cabinet choices.
Posted by: cameotoo | December 18, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
frank–Did the Holocaust happen in America? The more you argue the more you show to be thinking with the wrong head.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
JD
Gays can hide behind skin color your right
but to their mental detriment…
but you are wrong in the fact that gays are not beaten (and acceptably) on a regular basis
or fired on a regular basis
they have no recourse or way to report that…
or a way to record that.
do you know where the term “fag2ot” comes from…they used homosexuals to test witch burnings…and in england a “fag2ot” is a bundle of sticks used to light fires…
do you know that when Hitler rose up the first people he collected and “sent away”…the homosexuals…
and most people ignored it because they were homosexuals… but then they came after the “blacks” and then the “jews”
so no …the oppression was not the same as other oppressed populations
but if you lined them up with every other population…they…we… are the most universally hated.
and partly because of the same things that Rick warren has preached.
that we are on the same level of pedophiles.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
In the future:
“While Obama does not agree with [insert dictator's name here] stance on stoning women for adultery, Obama has great admiration for [dictator] and hopes we can look past our differences.”
Posted by: Hp | December 18, 2008, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
Jess, Ted Haggard was just preachin’ the word. And Larry Craig was just tap dancing.
Posted by: Frank | December 18, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Angelo: “and we are tired of getting the “Tolerance” propaganda down our throat. Welcome to America.”
Well, America was SUPPOSED to be a tolerant and welcomong beacon of hope, until the theocrats ruined it.
Posted by: jock59801 | December 18, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
JD; You are such a high and mighty person. It must be very hard to live with yourself. I have friends and family in CA and they are very tolerable of gays/lesbians but voted against the Prop. for fear of retaliation from friends and co workers. So that issue is dead in the water. Alot of people don’t voter their heart for that same reason or because they want to be on the band wagon for the person they know will win, they don’t like going against the crowd, makes them feel like a loser. It doesn’t matter anyway whether you like it or not and why don’t you ever answer the question that I and others have asked you? How does a gay/lesbian marriage interfere with your life? It doesn’t you are just a big bully who likes to talk stupid and feel good about themselves in the process…that is a character flaw of a man who has to work twice as hard to try to prove that he is a man…perhaps unsure of yourself?
Posted by: zeuser89 | December 18, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
dl — do you not understand that pedophiles can use the same logic you use for being attracted to the same sex?
They can say that they were born attracted to children, and I will ask the same question that Robin asked, Does that make it right?
Posted by: Angelo | December 18, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
According to homos, anyone that is against “gay marriage”(oxymoron) is a closet homo.
They wish. Just because they are too lazy to find an opposite sex partner doesn’t mean that the rest of us have given up. These people have proven they have no morals, so they re trying to project it onto others.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
To: Frank
Please do allowed me to disgust you. First, how dare you compare what African Americans went through to what Gays are going through. THAT IS INSULTING. THERE WAS A GENOCIDE COMMITTED ON OUR PEOPLE. SECOND, I WOULD NOT HAVE VOTED FOR OR AGAINST PROP 8 BECAUSE I DO FEEL THAT ADULTS HAVE A RIGHT TO LIVE THEIR LIVES THE WAY THEY WANT. HOWEVER, I DO HAVE A RIGHT TO BELIEVE IN MY FAITH AND ITS VALUES.
WE BOTH BELIEVE WE ARE RIGHT, HOWEVER, I DO NOT DISRESPECT HOW YOU FEEL. YOU BELIEFS DO NOT MAKE ME SICK BECAUSE THEY ARE YOUR FEELINGS AND I RESPECT THEM.
Posted by: Robin | December 18, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
JD, come out of the closet already. Spending your afternoon trolling on this website shows me where your head is at.
Posted by: Frank | December 18, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Angelo
one more time
if you can not tell the difference between two adults who love each other and an adult who takes advantage of and hurts a child then people should not let you around their children.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
zeus–You’re right. It won’t affect me. But were does the line get drawn? Since pedophiles CHOOSE to “love” children, then can they be next in your Obamanation(Abomination)?
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
J D you must then be a person of impeccable morals, right? You know, because you’re hetero? Lord knows all heteros are absolutely perfect and have never done anything wrong!
Posted by: Hp | December 18, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
He should’ve picked Al Gore to give the Global Warming Religion invocation. Global Warming is based more on faith and less on fact than any of the religions in the world.
Al would’ve been a perfect choice, in my opinion.
Posted by: RobbyL | December 18, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
dl | Dec 18, 2008 3:43:46 PM –
You are condemning a person because they feel that they were born with something that they can not control. OR, are you saying that pedophilia is a choice?
Posted by: Angelo | December 18, 2008, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
JAZZ:
That is your contention, mine is that if my feelings are the result of conditioning, so is being Gay. If you can presume this about me, without a shred of knowledge about my past, then surely you can provide demonstrable, conclusive, scientific proof to support it. Absent that, I contend that my position, being the choice of the vast majority of humanity, validates my logic and my conclusions.
Posted by: AlchyDave25 | December 18, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
Robin, There was a genocide commited on my people too in Germany in the 40′s and pretty much throughout history. Being gay like being black made you less of a person. Don’t hide behind religion and take sides with the same Fascists who if had been alive during slavery would have used the good book to whack blacks back to the fields just like they’re trying to whack gays back in the closet today.
Posted by: Frank | December 18, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
frank–In homo’s eyes everyone is gay. Only problem is that homos have been proven by Mother Naure to be wrong. Otherwise, she would have put reproductive organs inside a man’s rectum.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
Robin: you give God, love, and humanity a bad name.
Posted by: Andrew | December 18, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Its funny to see ABC news allow DL to spew hate EVERY post…yet they take ALL posts down that have the opposite view?
Posted by: tehevo | December 18, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
Robin do you know the suicide rate difference in the gay vs. straight population.
In todays society if any population was beaten as much as the homosexual population has been in the last decade for being part of that subset population there would be an overhwelming national outrage.
Every year in every city in America…never mind rural places…gay men and women are attacked for just being gay.
African Americans have had genocide and gays have fought for them
Women have had their rights removed and gays have fought for them
etc etc.
if you had to stack a hierarchical grouping of who society found most okay to throw away…
(and there are study upon study and even games they play that over and over reinforce this) it is the homosexual.
until you read a little more and accept yourself a little more I don’t think you will understand that all of these things are bad
and we fight for ALL of them to be corrected.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
i think a lot of people on this board need to get saved
Posted by: Christ4ever | December 18, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
see what I mean? DL is ignorant as well as bias.
Posted by: tehevo | December 18, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
tehevo
what hate
I never say a hateful thing
ever.
I call a person a moron on occasion but never hateful
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
No matter how you were born, being attracted to the opposite or same sex and enjoying a relationship between two consenting adults is LEGAL. Sex with children is illegal. Gay marraige will win out…anything else would be NOT equal. Obama made a poor choice in this man..that simple.
Posted by: gdguyinbalt | December 18, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
tehevo
if educated means ignorant
then yeah
you are educated and I am ignorant.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
jd- even if you were “really drunk,” it still counts as a gay experience.
Posted by: Hp | December 18, 2008, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
I dont appreciate that you get to spew all your bile, and there can be no dissent….you are the one who needs to take a closer look at yourself dl. I pity you.
Posted by: tehevo | December 18, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
I am a liberal and a strong advocate for gay marriage. That being said, I think the cultural and religious division that has been ripping this country apart needs to STOP. I despise what Warren stands for, but we all need to find ways to constructively engage each other, not just ignore or push away the people we don’t agree with.
Posted by: Jim | December 18, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
I am the heterosexual brother of a wonderful, loving, kind lesbian sister. The comments of Robin, Angelo, JD, etc. disgust me and make me momentarily embarassed to be straight. My sister no more CHOSE to be gay than I CHOSE to be straight. We are the way we are and each way is perfect in and of itself. I have oftenm thought that people who are homophobic have a self-hatred born from sexual confusion. Why else would they be so obsessed with homosexuality?
Posted by: Eddie | December 18, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
I’m sorry, when in history were homos bought and sold as property? Other than by other homos?
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
tehevo
there is no bile
what bile
do you even know what bile means? oy
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Hp, JD did say that he wished all gay men were “hung”. Could that have been a Freudian slip?
Posted by: Frank | December 18, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
JD…I really think you need to check yourself into a mental health faciltiy pronto.
Posted by: Edward | December 18, 2008, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
J D | Dec 18, 2008 3:53:31 PM –
Acutally they kind of are in the porn industry.
Posted by: yoyo | December 18, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
hp–The morning after a “drunken night” I would wake up next to an “obese-American” woman.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
wow, what happened with all this tolerance talk from the left? oh that’s only when YOU’RE shouting it at the Right
Posted by: lifesense | December 18, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
wow, what happened with all this tolerance talk from the left? oh that’s only when YOU’RE shouting it at the Right
Posted by: lifesense | December 18, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
JD, there were gay slaves. Gays aren’t just white. You are such a tool.
Posted by: Frank | December 18, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
I’m with Eddie. My older brother was a jock in high school and he was always pointing the finger at other guys, calling them “fags” and stuff. He wasn’t a nice person back then. In college he finally got real with himself and came out. It’s always the people in the closet who are so obsessed- they are often gay and hiding it. I feel sorry for them, it’s a sad way to live.
Posted by: sarah | December 18, 2008, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
frank–That wasn’t me that made the “hung” comment. Unlike you, I do not wish to have anything put in my mouth. Even words.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
DL:
I WILL REMOVE CHILDREN FROM THE EQUATION BECAUSE THEY ARE INNOCENT. IS IT OKAY FOR TWO SISTERS TO SLEEP TOGETHER IS IT OKAY FOR FOR GROWN ADULT DAUGHTER TO SLEEP WITH HER MOTHER. IS OKAY FOR GROWN ADULT TO SLEEP WITH ITS DOG, IS IT OKAY FOR ME TO SLEEP WITH MY GROWN ADULT COUSIN? SEE THERE IS CULTURE TODAY THAT BELIEVES IT IS OKAY TO DO WHATEVER FEELS GOOD. WHETHER ITS COMMITTING ADULTRY, HAVING THREESOMES, TEENAGE SEX, AND ON AND ON. I SEE THE RAMIFICATIONS OF HOMO-SEXUALITY AND BI-SEXUALITY, AND SADLY IT NOT POSITIVE BECAUSE THE LACK OF RESPONSBILITY. HOWEVER, IF IT IS BEAUTIFUL IN YOUR COMMUNITY OR WORLD, I HONESTLY BELIEVE THAT YOU SHOULD BE TRULY HAPPY.
HOWEVER, OBAMA SHOULD NOT BE BLAMED BECAUSE HE CHOOSE WARREN TO DO INVOCATION. THE LEFT WING CANNOT BE DOUBLE STANDARD AND ASK FOR TOLERANCE AND THEY ARE NOT BEING TOLERANT;
Posted by: Robin | December 18, 2008, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
I’m very happy that Rick Warren has been chosen for the Invocation. While some of his views may be politically incorrect, he has done real work in AIDS and orphans charities in the U.S. and abroad.
Posted by: Suzanne | December 18, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Folks, it seems like this post has descended from a debate about Rick Warren giving the invocation at Obama’s inaugural into JDs personal homosexual porn fantasy. He can’t seem to stop talking about and imagining men’s body parts. Maybe we should just stop.
Posted by: Edward | December 18, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
LOL, I’m loving this!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I have been sitting here reading the hate spew form both sides for over 30 minutes now…I AM NOT PRO-GAY, You should not, and I hope you are not, ever able to get married, what you do in your bedroom is your business, but STOP trying to push your sin on me!!!!! I have enough of my own, I don’t need to constantly have your’s also shoved in my face!!!! By the way, I voted McCain, didn’t do any good, but I LOVE seeing that all you gay Obama voters are all mad… What, did you actually think he was all for gay rights???? Here is a news flash, unless you are gay, no-one really cares about your “rights” to marry!
Posted by: NOGAYMARRIAGE | December 18, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
see, that’s exactly what I’m talking about. Notice how J D throws in the little homosexual references? That guy has issues.
Posted by: sarah | December 18, 2008, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Robin, we are all tolerant of your complete inability to spell or use correct grammar so maybe you should be tolerant of others as well.
Posted by: Chris | December 18, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
and Jim I agree with you
but that doesn’t mean a position of the stature of giving the national invocation for the presidential Inauguration should be given to someone who advocates that it’s okay for wives to be subserviant to their husbands or that interracial relationships are unnatural should have that opportunity or position.
I am not a political person on the gay issue…I dont care about gay marriage really
but I fought for a man who said he wants this to be about inclusivity
and his idea of inclusivity is to choose the religious figure who is a strong advocate of exclusivity and judgment on me as being that of a pedophile…
should be his choice for the national religious platform.
and please please don’t tell me that Rick warren is a moderate
his statements do not make it safer for me to walk down the street where people believe what he preaches and that my difference may make it okay for them to try and beat me because of that difference…being on par with (as he says) “adults who try to marry or have sex with children”
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Exactly who could be chosen that would make everyone happy. No One Exists To Fit That Bill.
Posted by: Sharon | December 18, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
It’s good to be tolerant, provided that tolerance is reciprocated. But unless things really change, the progressives once again will lose in the end. Their progressivism makes them tolerant of other views. Their adversaries, however, have shown no tolerance for progressive views. My bet is that Obama’s good nature and optimism will leave him with the short end of the stick in the long run.
Posted by: wil500son | December 18, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Rick Warren is a man of compassion and kindness. More than many of the folks on BOTH sides of the gay issue.
Posted by: steve | December 18, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
well, actually I voted for Hillary. I never trusted Obama because he kept throwing his friends under the bus when he got what he wanted from them. She would have been so much better.
Posted by: sarah | December 18, 2008, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Uh oh. I must have done something right. Homos are putting down their decorator magazines and turning off Lifetime to bash little ole me.
An army of pink stands against me. I probably be a little more scared if they didn’t have on those little bity shorts and work boots.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
seriously J D, you’ve got problems. It’s funny how everyone can see right through you. Keep talking, you’re cracking me up with your descriptive fantasies.
Posted by: sarah | December 18, 2008, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
The trend is clearly established: Obama interprets “reaching across the aisle” to be the sole obligation of progressives on the left to move steadily to the right: where in his cabinet choices or in this choice is a similar sacrifice demanded of the right? From where I sit I see nothing but capitulation and an abandonment of the very principles and the people who got him elected. Hugely disappointing.
Posted by: cametoo | December 18, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
I believe in gay women, just not gay men.
Posted by: Kevin | December 18, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Eddie
Do not be disgusted? You are attracted to women because you live in culture where the norm is hetersexuality. Eddie, we are not attracted to the opposite when we are young. Do our young minds really know how to turned on??? Wow, I do not think so. You realized during puberty or middle school that you start liking the same or opposite sex. It depends on what a child has been exposed to at a early age. You assimilate what your parents are doing, or rather the adults or older people or even your peers. But make no mistake it is learned behavior. You want to be accepted so you will do what the majority does. You only do what you have been shown because that all you know.
Posted by: Robin | December 18, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Robin
there are no ramifications of two gay men or two gay women having a relationship…none.
there are from all the other examples you gave…
this is not 1 in a thousand
buy most estimates it is somewhere between 4 and 6 % of the population.
animals are not willing adults…incest has horrible ramifications…
the fact that you can not separate those things should worry you and all those around you.
the fact that you can not see that the only thing that comes from gays being allowed to love who they love is positive
is sad and limited.
to encourage two adult people loving each other in a committed relationship that has no ramifications to others…only helps the idea that a committed relationship is a good thing.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
Well, I’m with Sarah. I voted for Hillary. There is something fundamentally untrustworhty about Obama. I think we’re just seeing the tip of the iceberg on that. And, Steve, there is nothing “compassionate” about a man who compares gays to pedophiles. That’s called hate.
Posted by: Christine | December 18, 2008, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
sarah–The only problem I have is that I’m stuck at home with the flu.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Christine, tell me something Obama did that you would consider ‘untrustworthy’ I’m waiting.
Posted by: Kevin | December 18, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
JD: Pedophilia is actually against the law, homosexuality IS NOT! I think some of these posters are right, you do have alot of issues. No matter what you say, it just shows what type of person you are in every word you write and what is glaring between the lnes!!!
Posted by: zeuser89 | December 18, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
This is a state occasion, may I ask why an invocation is called for?
Would not a prayer be more offensive to more Americans?
Posted by: Kate | December 18, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
First off, Rick Warren is a big flaming latent, self-hating homosexual. There are lots of them – like the Rev. who was caught servicing some dude and buying crystal meth and then suddenly became “cured” by prayer.
Second, he says he’s not homophobic because he offered water and doughnuts to protesters? LOL This guy lives in a dream world. He must be ecstatic over all this publicity as it will translate into more book sales. It’s all about money to him, not morality.
Third, and most important, what part of separation of church and state doesn’t he understand. I don’t care if the Bible has described marriage between a man and woman for ions! We’re talking CIVIL marriage here–that is, the GOVERNMENT grants the civil right to marry. IF you want to get “married” in a church synagogue, mosque or a bathtub, GO FOR IT! Just don’t deny gays and lesbians the right to a CIVIL marriage!
Here’s the solution: EVERY couple, gay or straight, is granted a CIVIL marriage license. Then, if you want your faith to bless it as a “marriage” then by all means knock yourselves out.
Posted by: Jeff | December 18, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
I heard Sarah is hot.
Posted by: Kevin | December 18, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Way to go Mr. Obama
Posted by: Real Story | December 18, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
I hear what you are saying dl and agree. You should feel safe walking down any street in any community in this country. It is sad that you do not. I don’t know all the details of what Warren stands for, I guess I should. I was thinking more broadly that in general we all need to be willing communicate with those that we have least in common with. Maybe Obama should not have picked Warren, you may be right. I just hope that at some point in the future we have the capacity to respectfully disagree. I admit it is not easy, though. The thought of having any respect for and finding any common ground with someone who watches Bill O’Reilly or listens to Rush is daunting, but I must try!
Posted by: Jim | December 18, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
JD
trust me some of us are hold outs from the Spartan empire…
and a few of us gay Rugby guys are guys that would make you shake in your boots…what might keep you from shaking in your boots is that we are reasonable adults who have brains in our heads to realize you aren’t worth it in anything outside a verbal match up.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Atleast I didn’t catch HIV/AIDS, right Frank?
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
Robin, your ignorance is truly breathtaking. My gay sister and I were raised in the same household by two very loving parents. One of us (me) is straight. The other (my sister) is gay. that flies in the face of your ridiculous theory. My “theory” would be that you lack education, were raised in an abusive or overly religious home, and are either very lonely or a frustrated lesbian.
Posted by: Edward | December 18, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
Rick Warren’s tacky Saddleback Church attracts the dumbest of the evangelical Christians. His congregation is made up of mostly ingorant bigots who believe the world is ten thousand years old. Obama could have selected a respectable religious leader from a pool of hundreds. Why did he select this homophobic ignoramous?
Posted by: anna g | December 18, 2008, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
Edward,
My guess is that Robin is that frustrated lesbian.
Posted by: Kevin | December 18, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
dl–Seen 300 a few too many times have we?
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Jim
totally
most of America doesn’t realize that the nice guy who speaks so pleasantly has some very …backward …opinions on what homosexuality is and women’s rights are.
I do not think Obama subscribes to his screwed up thinking…but it was a big big mistake and now he is covering it up.
which is making him look really hypocritical in a way that we have not seen on this level.
I am sure he would feel the same if a president chose a preacher who preached interracial fraternization was unnatural or unholy. he would be overwhelmingly the first guy out to call that president out on it.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
There’s NO way I believe that a gay guy is more rugged than us straight dudes.
Posted by: Kevin | December 18, 2008, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
JD
you betcha
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Uh, Kevin, why don’t we start with the whole “I never knew Rev. Wright said the types of things that have been shown on TV.” Or “I am a fierce advocate of gay rights.” Or ” I guarantee I will have all troops out of Irag within 16 months.” Or “I never would have voted to authorize the war in Iraq.” Or “My father was airlifted out of Kenya by the Kennedy family.” Does that give you a start?
Posted by: Christine | December 18, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
dl–And what would happen if your beloved 300 were gay? None of us we be here.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Kevin,
You did not have to go there. I’m not a frustrated lesbian. Please why should I be, I have the same thing as any other women. I can feel my own breast and I’m surely flexible enough to eat. If that was my choice!!!!
Posted by: Robin | December 18, 2008, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Rick Warren likens same-sex marriage to pedophilia and incest. Ironic, since both have strong biblical traditions.
He also says marriage discrimination is right because every major religion has banned same-sex marriage for 5,000 years.
But for at least 8,000 years every major religion also endorsed, tacitly or explicitly, slavery. And every major religion since the dawn of civilization has promoted misogyny, sometimes brutally. Does the age of these beliefs make them right?
As long as there’s been an LGBT civil rights movement, politicians have pandered for support, only to undermine LGBT civil rights as soon as it’s politically expedient to do so. Obama seems to be repeating the pattern, and this is very disappointing.
Bigotry and ignorance, cloaked in religious ideology, is wrong and much more dangerous than blatant prejudice. The time has come to speak out against religious leaders who pick and choose the “correct” morality as reflected in the bible or other religious texts.
Obama says the choice of Warren reflects the right to disagree. But would he have chosen someone who offends any other minority? Would he have chosen someone like Reverend Wright, who disagrees with the privilege of white people?
This choice is myopic and insulting, and is a sad start to the Obama administration.
Posted by: W. Anderson | December 18, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
And didn’t the Spartans in 300 laugh at the Athenians as “boy lovers?”
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Homos give us diaper wearing straights a bad name.
Posted by: David Vitter | December 18, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Christine,
Let me guess. You stay inside all day and listen to Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity. That’s your first mistake. There is NO way you can be well informed getting your ‘information’ from those 2 clowns.
Posted by: Kevin | December 18, 2008, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Having some disagreements is one thing, disagreeing on Human Rights is another. What if Warren didn’t support interacial marriage? it’s really not any different.
Posted by: Nicholas | December 18, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
“Homos give us diaper wearing straights a bad name.”
Bwuauhahahahahaha…
Posted by: Kevin | December 18, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
EDDIE: I understand how you came to belive in your position. However, with all due respect, I am not “obsessed” with homosexuality, only repulsed and disgusted by homosexual activity. I’ve no problem with Gay people. I AM, however, obessed with protecting an institution and way of life that have been accepted for thousands of years. To me, the redefining of the concept of marriage to include same sex couples, is as dangerous as redefining the word pedofile, or rapist, or car. If two people want to live together with certain legal protections, call it unisexing, or cohabisexing, change the tax codes etc. and get on with life. I AM MARRIED. Gays are not! Words MEAN something, and for good reason!
Posted by: AlchyDave25 | December 18, 2008, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
I wonder how Robin would feel if George Bush had had a member of the KKK speak at his inaugural? Would that have been okay Robin? After all, that’s just being inclusive, right?
Posted by: Alan | December 18, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
I am a fundamentalist. I beleive in the literal interpretation of the Iliad and Odyssey. I think Obama could have chosen a more inclusive person to speak at his swearing in. O Bright Apollo, save us all.
Posted by: Hylas | December 18, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
So what have learned today for the homo community?
All opposed to “gay marriage”(oxymoron) are closet homos. We get all our information from Hannity/Rush. And we are comparable to the Gestapo.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Why is it that far reaching liberals are so intolerant of Christians. You cry and moan that we should live and let live. Just because someone disagrees with a lifestyle does not make them any less than you who disagree with them. You cant have it both ways……sorry
Posted by: Trying to understand | December 18, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
dl, maybe I shouldn’t mention this, (because I can’t cite the exact study–maybe you know it), but since Robin admitted to being an African American female, there is a study which showed that black women had a higher intolerance of gays–particularly gay men, then women of other ethnicities. What the study concluded is that it had nothing to do with sexual preference or morality but more to do with the lack of men particularly black men available. Gay men are viewed competitively.
Posted by: FS | December 18, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Gay men suck.
Posted by: Kevin | December 18, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
The Only Problem I have with Gays are the “AIDS” Factor. Their Sexual Preference is their own but the Repercussions of their Preferences are Something We ALL will be exposed to, suffer from, and pay for as a Soceity. What Body Part they want to Stick in their Holes is their business BUT when they cross over in Normal Soceity then We the Sheeple are Affected or Infected. Keep All of It in Your Own Bedroom…Including the Diseases. Our Schools are Already Dealing with Hepa B & HIV Problems therefore having to take Mandatory Precautions for ALL Teachers and Students B/C of Someone Else’ Bad Sexual Choices or Drug Habits.
Posted by: Mpass86 | December 18, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Given that the Rev. Joseph Lowery will be giving the benediction, I’d say that Obama has achieved a balance of religious perspectives.
Posted by: Eleonora27 | December 18, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Are you kidding me AlchyDave? Have you read any history? Ancient civilization was filled with homosexuality. In fact, it was revered. And why in the world does homosexual “activity” repulse you? If you’re not a repressed gay then why do you even think about the sexual activities of others? I’m comfortable with my heterosexuality so I don’t spend time thinking about the sexual activites of others. Why do you?
Posted by: Eddie | December 18, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
ID..you are too extreme. There are many differnet groups in America that are discriminated on the daily basis. What you have to learn is that “hating” and having a hiss fit is not going to push the “rights” for gays. There are better ways to make effective change. Being negative/or acting negative/ugly is not one of them. It will actually turn people away!!!!!YOU have to be tolerate to ALL people even though you may disagree otherwise your double standard is not worth the attention.
Posted by: people | December 18, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Would you fudge-packers please stop using the term ‘homophobia’? Just because someone disagrees with your disgusting, perverted lifestyle, it doesn’t mean they’re afraid of you or your sickness. Trust me on this point: I fear no queer.
Posted by: Notthatgullible | December 18, 2008, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Man… this discussion has deteriorated since I checked in earlier.
Posted by: OuttaHere | December 18, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
President elect Obama is completely comfortable in any situation with any person or group of people no matter whether they agree or disagree with him. This is why he will be a great leader for us.
Posted by: jeff | December 18, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Great point Jeff.
Posted by: Kevin | December 18, 2008, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
Anyone who believes homosexuals should repent their “sin” should take a good study of Leviticus, then READ the biblical accounts of Jesus’s words about sin, sinners, forgiveness, greed, hate, etc. and really REALLY think if they themselves have repented all of their “sins” yet. Did you appologize to god for wearing pearls, or eating pork/shellfish, or wearing cotton with wool (or any synthetic or mixed fibers), or not forgiving others, or doing anything outside of worship on the sabbath, or ever disrespecting your parents, or ever praying to Jesus instead of just to God (the one and only – it’s one of the top ten rules if you can’t recall)? I don’t believe the bible to be “the truth” myself, but it seems really odd to me that the people that thump it the hardest have never even read the whole thing. Either that or they are prejudicely selective over what parts their god “really meant” for them to follow. I wish enlightenment for you all, that compassion and reason will one day be your compasses, and that you will find true happiness from within yourself, and no longer rely on your beautiful fairy tales which cause such ugly disharmony within humanity. Om mani padme hum.
Posted by: 77anonymous77 | December 18, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
The one common denominator from all the men on theis site that are so “disgusted” by homosexulaity is that they are obsessed with using sexual terms in referring to gay men. Fudge packers, putting things in holes, in mouths, etc. This just solidifies the belief that they are obsessed with gay male sex.
Posted by: Cathy | December 18, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Notthatgullible—”Dear queers: don’t like Obama’s choice? Then you should’ve voted for Hillary.” you poor, pathetic, homophobic, bigoted fool. i hate when teenagers post on here.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 18, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Yeah, you know there’s not really any intelligent discussion going on when you see someone using the word “fudgepacker.”
Man, some people really ought to leave the suburbs every once and a while…
Posted by: JAKE | December 18, 2008, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Mpass….are you completely ignorant to the fact that AIDS crosses all racial and sexual preference boundaries? Are you insane?
Posted by: carrie | December 18, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Alan,
Bush probably head the KKK, however, Warren does not agree with gay marriage the majority of ministers that have performed the invocation in the past does not agree. GAYS NEED TO STOP THINKING THAT THE GENOCIDE OF AFRICAN AMERICANS AND SLAVERY ARE EQUIVALENT TO THEIR ISSUE. THAT IS B.S. AND I’M TELLING YOU ITS B.S. I DO AGREE THAT THE PROP 8 SHOULD HAVE NOT BEEN IN HANDS OF THE VOTERS UNLESS ALL THE VOTERS ARE GAY. HOWEVER, YOU CANNOT TELL OBAMA OR WARREN WHAT TO BELIEVE IN. HE IS NOT THE PRESIDENT OF SEXUAL PERFERENCE, COLOR OR RELIGION, HE IS THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND BUSH DEFINITELY COULD CARELESS!!!
Posted by: Robin | December 18, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Calm down everyone…he just asked him to do the deliver the invocation at his inauguration not become his Vice-President. I mean, who really cares?
Posted by: Chris | December 18, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Just because someone believes it’s a sin to be homosexual does not make them a bigot.
Posted by: Real Story | December 18, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
Somehow human rights are negotiable to Obama. What a fraud. Words are cheap. He can get up and read a speech someone else wrote for him about how he supports this and that…but guess what? Actions speak louder than words.
Given this and his selection of Emmanuel who has links to Blago…the whole Chicago thing…I smell another political fraud.
This fraud that I voted for clearly has no moral compass and is just another politician. I’m disgusted I voted for him and regret doing so.
Posted by: Mark | December 18, 2008, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
If the gays and lesbians don’t like it, maybe they ought to stay the hell home during the inaguration.
Posted by: jtyler@ftmojave.com | December 18, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
carrie–AIDS spread to the straight community due to the perverse acts of homos. That is a FACT.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
I am gay and have been a gay activist for 30 years and I say BRAVO, Obama! It’s about time we had a president who is not an ideologue and can go beyond embracing only those based on “loyalty” or agreement on all issues. Isn’t that what Reagan and Bush did? In picking Warren to simply give a prayer based on common ground, Obama makes a statement that as people we are much more alike than we are different. He is not agreeing with Warren’s political positions, nor should we fear he does. This sets the stage for Obama to challenge existing homophobic government policies with congress on a similar basis. It greatly increases his credibility in arguing for LGBT equal rights and the elimination of DoMA and DADT. Obama has indeed changed politics as usual already. This is not the “your with me or your against me” politics of the Bushes or the Clinton’s for that matter. It’s a brilliant move of inclusion, which he can build on to advocate for LGBT rights. If he can include Warren, he can include us, and isn’t it inclusion that we as LGBT people have been asking for all along?
Posted by: robby10001 | December 18, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Jesus Christ could make an appearance on earth again and give the prayer at Baracks innaguration, and there would be plenty of people would say he was a terrible choice to be the one to give the prayer. Wanna know the best way to make someone on the far left or far right complain? Let the candidate they voted for win the election.
Posted by: jeff | December 18, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
Robin, please take all the energy you are using to hate on others and put it into your education. Oh, and your grammar.
Posted by: Edward | December 18, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
“It’s no secret I’m a fierce advocate for equality for gay and lesbian Americans,” Obama said.
B U L L S H I T
Posted by: JAKE | December 18, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
Rebirth is no more probable than reincarnation. If death is oblivion there is no round of birth and death and nothing to escape. Therefore, “striving diligently” loses its imperative. Why bother? Just be comfortable until the inevitable end
Posted by: Shanti Deva | December 18, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
The Messiah-elect will save us!!
Posted by: Joe | December 18, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
mark–You voted for BHO. Sounds like you should have taken what the right was saying a little more seriously.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
So, RealStory, if I believe it’s a sin to be black does that mean I’m not a racist?
Posted by: Sally | December 18, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
EDDIE: Seems as if you are spending about as much time on this blog as am I. Does that indicate something different on your behalf then mine?
JEFF: I doubt that Mr. Obama would be comfortable spending any significant time with me, in front of a T.V. camera, explaining such topics as “redistribution of wealth”, “Socialism”, “Communism” and insignificant notions such as that. I would never invoke the name of God, curse or raise my voice, I would only demand that he answer the questions I pose, NOT the concepts he so loves to mentally prestidigitate.
Posted by: AlchyDave25 | December 18, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Mpass86. At one time I would have agreed with you. However, how do you explain the very high percentage of men who engage in such behavior but somehow rationalize that they are straight?
This group is similar to the Clinton;”I did not have sex with that woman.” syndome. They would be able to pass a lie detector test.
I’d rather deal with someone who tells me they are gay (and fight for their civil rights), rather than someone who leads a double life and destroys the lives of a woman, possibly children, etc.
So, my point is that I can converse & debate issues with someone who acknowledges that he/she is gay. I have no problem with gays being married. I don’t worry about AIDS etc from this group. All I want to know is that you maintain your lawn & house.
Its those “others” that scare me.
Posted by: FS | December 18, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
OK, a discussion about the merits of Obama’s choice of Pastor Warren to deliver the invocation has now devolved into “ew, gay sex is gross!”
I am a proud liberal Democrat. Rev. Warren will be a friend to us when we go after poverty and violence. We disagree on gay rights, but that shouldn’t make us enemies who can’t fight hunger and suffering together. I know many good Christians who welcome gay couples into their spiritual and social circules, so I also know that Rev. Warren’s views aren’t universal among Christians and that there are Christian leaders who will support the struggle for gay rights with the liberals. And we can always hope that Pastor Warren will understand that we are trying to change secular laws that treat people as though they are not equal to one another, and are not trying to interfere with what Christians teach their children, and that he will see that this cause too is good.
We may not be able to all work together on everything, but we can all work with each other on something, can’t we?
Posted by: lilla | December 18, 2008, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
No JD…AIDS started in Africa, among heterosexual partners.
Posted by: carrie | December 18, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
cathy–The only people “solidified” by your assertion are the same perverts that think homosexuality is normal.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
And, JD, if AIDS were only a gay disease how did it “spread” to the heterosexual community?
Posted by: carrie | December 18, 2008, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
Robin—although i am gay you are very correct to say that gay people should never compare our plight with the African-American struggle for civil rights. and the racism of some gays toward the african-americans after the proposition vote made me sick and not proud to be gay at all.
the african-american story in America is fraught with slavery, torture, murder,rape, impugnity, genocide on a grand scale. yeah gays have been persecuted but to compare the gay struggle to the african-american stuggle is incomprehensible.
but it is worth remebering that many “homosexuals,” as they were called in the ’50s, were marching with african-americans for civil rights for black people and ignoring or putting off their own quest for justice and equality.
gay people need justice and equal protection of the laws. that is a much bigger concern than a prayer. i have no doubt Obama will deliver on the civil rights side, but gay marriage is a tough sell, even to a lot of gays.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 18, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
carrie–No. AIDS in humans began as a homosexual disease and was passed onto the straight community by some bisexual pervert.
The origin of HIV/AIDS is still up for debate.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Gail Norton:
Who cares? We should all care. If Rick Wareen is okay, why not a white supremacist or a Nazi sympathizer? I am middle-aged, white, married and volunteered for the Obama campaign and I’m outraged by this appalling choice.
Posted by: True North 8 | December 18, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
I personally don’t care much about the word marriage
i do care about a man who has reinforced a belief that holds back all of society…
Rick warren is misguided and yes as effeminate as Huckabee… he makes any straight person …never mind gay person’s gaydar go off…I have to agree…
Not to mention the two of them …are just like the rest of them…Ted Haggard, Larry Craig, Lonnie Latham…
tell me if you went to school with them you wouldn’t be wondering…
they all make me look like Goldberg, John Wayne and Xerxes wrapped up in one
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Gail Norton:
Who cares? We should all care. If Rick Wareen is okay, why not a white supremacist or a Nazi sympathizer? I am middle-aged, white, married and volunteered for the Obama campaign and I’m outraged by this appalling choice.
Posted by: True North 8 | December 18, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
good points robby1001 and Jeff. It is just a prayer. GET OVER IT!!!!
Posted by: people | December 18, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
I am gay and have been a gay activist for 30 years and I say BRAVO, Obama! It’s about time we had a president who is not an ideologue and can go beyond embracing only those based on “loyalty” or agreement on all issues. Isn’t that what Reagan and Bush did? In picking Warren to simply give a prayer based on common ground, Obama makes a statement that as people we are much more alike than we are different. He is not agreeing with Warren’s political positions, nor should we fear he does. This sets the stage for Obama to challenge existing homophobic government policies with congress on a similar basis. It greatly increases his credibility in arguing for LGBT equal rights and the elimination of DoMA and DADT. Obama has indeed changed politics as usual already. This is not the “your with me or your against me” politics of the Bushes or the Clinton’s for that matter. It’s a brilliant move of inclusion, which he can build on to advocate for LGBT rights. If he can include Warren, he can include us, and isn’t it inclusion that we as LGBT people have been asking for all along?
Posted by: robby10001 | December 18, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
carrie–If AIDS started as a straight disease, then how did homos acquire it in hugely disproportionate numbers?
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
A lot of you people sure have thrown Obama under the bus real fast like, where is all the tolerance you all talk about???
Posted by: Real Story | December 18, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
To: FS
First, I have a man, second, why would a women be jealous of a gay man. If a man is gay, she would want him to be gay and be with that man. African American women do not feel gay man are a threat. We feel that their is a culture of young boys with no father figure in the household that attributes to our men being gay.
I also believe that there is a promiscous culture that have introduce both sexes to the culture. I volunteer in the high schools and you would believe what they tell me about their sexual experiences, especially when drugs and liquor play a role.
Posted by: robin | December 18, 2008, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Gay is NOT a choice if that’s true when do all straight people choose to be straight? Why would gay people choose a harder lifestyle and end up commiting suicide at a much higher rate that straight people?
And the slipperly slope argument about marrying dogs and pedophilia is ridiculous. Gay relationships hurt absolutely no one! Just ask a Canadian, or a Beligium, or a number of other Europeans.
Changing the definition and the institution of marriage has been done countless times (blacks werent able to get married nor was interracial marriage allowed)
Gay marriage is PROGRESS and people that say just because they are against gay marriage they aren’t homophobes, well yes, you are!
Posted by: Nicholas | December 18, 2008, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Gay rights is going to be tricky. I think that this is part of the trick. If Obama and the left are more inclusive, even to religious nuts, then the right gat-haters become more isolated and foolish looking. The middle will not take the right seriously and become more pro-gay rights. And then it is done, the ballot measures that support gay rights will pass, and the right will be walled off in their little cell of their own making.
Posted by: Sanity Man | December 18, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
President-elect Obama is sending signals to the country, as he did during the campaign, that he will govern from a position of the “radical middle” (my term), in which he is already attempting to be severely inclusive, nonpartisan, civil, moderate, cooperative, and compromising. Recall some of his campaign rhetoric: “Washington gridlock”, “politics as usual,” “reach across the aisle,” and “bi-partisanship,” and lastly, “change we can believe in.” So, the supremely unique politician, I would say leader, who is Barack Obama, is going to force us to forge a “not left, not right, but forward” pragmatism in which the country as a whole will profoundly benefit. Few of us might be pleased at this point. But, just maybe, the future America will look back with a great deal of understanding and gratitude.
Posted by: leedurhamstone | December 18, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Good politics. Good for the country. He’ll also have some political cover when he advocates the end of the Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy.
Posted by: Hank | December 18, 2008, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
realstory–Excellent point. A new philosophy of liberalism must be to chuck the oppostition under the provebial “bus”. The “party of the enlightenend” keeps “evolving” so fast that eventually they will rot from within. Much like we have seen in almost 2 months since BHOs election.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
As a proud gay American man, I am all for inclusion; heck, what do you think that the civil rights movement of the 1960s was all about? But, come on Barack, inclusion of a self-professed Anti-Gay Bigot?! Give me a break! Barack’s rediculously lame arguement is tantamount to having Gov. George Wallace speak at LBJ’s 1964 inauguration! But then again, this is typical Barack Chicago politics style; “baffle ‘em with BS”. In the fine words of Sen. Hillary Clinton; “Shame on you Barack Obama! You know better than that!” Well, we too “Shall Overcome”!
Posted by: PhillyPaul | December 18, 2008, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
SHAME Obama.
Should we have let majority rule on the Civil Rights legislation that passed in the 60s? How quickly he forgot. Oh, wait, he didn’t grow up really knowing what it was like to not have equal rights. Was raised in a white family household and had the Civil Rights legislation to back him up. SHAME SHAME SHAME. He’s all talk and is playing for the next election.
Posted by: Roger | December 18, 2008, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Picking someone to perform a ceremony is not a wholesale endorsement of their policies. There are certain things that the Warren pick represents, and perhaps is the gesture to bury the hatchet with the God squad religious right. The outrage here is indicative of our society’s hypersensitivity to every single issue plaguing us.
Posted by: Kevin | December 18, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
This is a serious mis-step for Obama. It will mar what was going to be a glorious celebration. There is no excuse for discrimination. I actually think it shows an egregious lack of judgment.
Posted by: True North 8 | December 18, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Looks like much of the population that voted for BO feel totally betrayed. This line is one of the best I’ve read: “Obama…needs to remember that this isn’t just his big day, it’s also a huge occasion for our country, and he has a responsibility to present people who represent the best of American life, not the worst”.
Well said–he’s taking what was going to be a glorious occasion and RUINED IT.
Posted by: GS | December 18, 2008, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
J D…
No way would I have voted for McCain. I thought he was very gracious and within his belief system I think he’s a good guy. The problem is his belief system he’s accepted as his reality is seriously flawed.
When someone believes they are doing the right thing and being patriotic and serving their country by flying over villages and dropping Napalm bombs on innocent civilians, burning them alive…on the mere chance they might kill some enemy too…yes, I have a serious problem with the way they see the world.
McCain also served on the board of a group that funded Latin American death squads in the 1980′s. He also has never spoken out against an illegal war in Iraq…a war in which MIT and Johns Hopkins universities reported has killed upwards of a million Iraqi civilians with many of those deaths at the hands of coalition forces.
And just so you don’t think I’m against all wars on principle I actually supported the initial war in Afghanistan until now they just kill civilians at random like they’ve done in every other war.
No, I wish I had not voted or done a write-in. I had hoped that Obama would at least be the better alternative, but he is showing that he cares about making political moves. I have no problem with including people with different ideas, etc. One-party countries are failures. But having different ideas on taxes or education or spending or whatever is one thing. Denying people human rights is an entirely different subject.
And it’s clearly obvious that Obama is willing to sacrifice human rights if it is politically expedient. He’s showing himself to be a complete fraud.
Posted by: Mark | December 18, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Liberals can’t be Bush in reverse. We have just been through eight years of “with us or against us” idiology. If we engage Warren civilly in a discussion on gays then Warren will lose it. Anti-gay behavior makes no sense. But if we just face off and hurle insults at the other side they will not change because their leaders are not talking to anyone but the choir. Why should they be influenced by the left when all the left does is yell at them? This is the trap the GOP and Bush fell in to with the radical right which is now the GOP mainstream.
Calm down. Learn how to play chess.
Posted by: Sanity Man | December 18, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
ABC, I love the article’s title. “Firestorm.” Just what we needed to get these FLAMING HOMOS included.
Posted by: enoughalready | December 18, 2008, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
robby
If you are a gay activist for as long as you say (because I am not) and you are sayinfg Bravo to this choice…
one of two things
you don’t know the statements that Warren has preached
or you mus be …I don’t know…kookoo.
sorry but I am not a gay activist…gay yes gay activist no
this is the first issue …gay issue I have ever been overwhelmingly drawn to speak up about…
probably because I smell hypocrisy and a very destructive (mistaken but destructive) endorsement in this that should have never happened from someone like Obama who ran on and was able to because of intolerance being fought against.
Yet he says to reach across and give that intolerance a platform is inclusivity…
would it be the same to give a platform to someone who believes African Americans are something less than…or interracial relationships were unnatural or that women can be beaten or subjegated on occasion by their husbands?
would that be inclusivity?
would that be talking to our enemies…to have them read the invocation?
would Obama agree with that…if a president did that.
would he not be up in arms if a preacher who preached that interracial relationships were wrong was chosen for the invocation of the President that he fought tooth and nail for
this is not a case of being beholden to a population or about some stupid gay marriage thing (because it is the other statements by Warren that are disturbing more than the gay marriage BS)…
this is a case of being beholden to the equality that he has always held as important and choosing a man who reinforces a part of the population of this nation to feel those who would attack them for being who they were
would have backing from the word of God…and that interpretation was factual and fair enough to be sanctioned by the President of the uNited states of America
it is not the man (warren) alone…it is the message that man embodies…
and the slap at equality and the fight for it…an equality that without it and it’s fight Obama would never be where he is.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Also I want to say one other thing to you fake religious people.
I’m a Christian, and I have no idea what Lord you claim to worship and what religion you claim to follow. But Christianity nowhere preaches hate, nor does it preach to spread hate.
The bible was once used to advocate slavery you know. You are all of the same kind of mindset…you have no understanding of what the Bible really says. I feel sorry for you and will pray for you.
Posted by: Mark | December 18, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
CARRIE: Your hypothesis about the origin of AIDs is probably correct. However, the heterosexual couples involved were likely primates other then Homo Sapiens. The desease, at least in the U.S., probably spread to the Heterosexual Community by way of Bi-Sexuality and other sexual deviations. What prevented it’s containment, and therefore caused the death of millions, was the political invertabrates whom refused to quarentine the (then) small groups in San Francisco and New York know to harbor the virus. It has been (and is) done to limit the spread of Leprosy, Tuberculosis, etc., but fear of the outrage generated by the (dare I say it?) Gay Community allowed the infected to run loose. Run loose they did!
Posted by: AlchyDave25 | December 18, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
Yes PHILLYPAUL….”we shall overcome” overcome…with some tolerance with respect and please be mature about it. Burning crosses, bad mouthing MINORITY groups, etc…..yes the gay movement would have a longer time to overcome if this behavior does not change. IT WILL TURN PEOPLE AWAY!
Posted by: rights | December 18, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
PLEASE EDUCATE ME ON HOMOSEXUALITY BECAUSE WHAT I SEE IS CONFUSING.
FIRST, WOMEN ARE ATTRACTED TO OTHER WOMEN, HOWEVER, I LIVED IN NEW YORK AND THE WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA; I’M NOT GENERALIZING, HOWEVER, THE WOMEN LOOK JUST LIKE MEN AND THEY SAY THEY WEAR A BELT WITH A FAKE —- WHY WEAR A FAKE —– WHEN YOU CAN HAVE A MAN?
ALSO, WITH MEN, SOMETIMES THE MEN LOOK LIKE WOMEN, SO ITS CONFUSING. BECAUSE I DO NOT UNDERSTAND HOW YOU ATTRACTED TO A MAN, AND THEN YOU WALKING DOWN THE STREET HOLDING HANDS AND ONE LOOKS LIKE A WOMEN AND ONE LOOKS LIKE A MAN. SHOULD BOTH LOOK LIKE MEN!!!
Posted by: Robin | December 18, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Well said “Nicholas”. Well said.
Posted by: PhillyPaul | December 18, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
It’s not all about you.
It seems that this whole thread is about gay rights. There are other issues. Rick Warren is a good man who speaks from a heart in tune with God’s words. If you disagree with the Bible then your beef is with God not the man Rick Warren. I’m sure that if you were to convince Rick that his interpretation of the Bible were inaccurate he would change his stance on a given issue. He has studied the teachings of God incarnate his whole life and I for one have never heard anything come out of his mouth that was not in line with the Bible. Rick Warren and God both love homosexuals. They both agree that homosexuality is a sin. Get God to change the words in the Bible and Rick will probably change his opinion too.
This invitation to Rick to speak is a chance for us to hear what Rick Warren feels about the presidency, the nation and his interpretation of what our priorities should be. He will ask a blessing on the nation from his God, and mine. Listen to what he has to say. He might surprise you with his genuine Love for America, Americans and the people of the world.
Posted by: Roger Burton | December 18, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
mark–You made your bed, now sleep in it.
BHO groupies thought he would give them anything they asked for if they would vote for him. Those of us out here knew this would never be possible. So we were able to see him for what he really is. And that is a egomaniacal politician that will/has said anything and everything to get elected.
Hate to say I told you so, but it is true.
Posted by: enoughalready | December 18, 2008, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
How many promises will Obama break before people stop making excuses for him? He has truely pulled the wool over everyones eyes by saying many things he will never follow through on.
The left and the center have been taken for a long ride of double talk.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | December 18, 2008, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
This is Obama’s first official original idea. Looking at his appointments, he’s proving to be a Clinton clone. Hopefully, he won’t become an impeached, disbarred former president like Clinton. I was hoping for some “change” in his cabinet appointments and not recycled Clintonites. Same-o, same-o from the man all about change. I applaud his decision to have Warren.
Posted by: southern_conservative | December 18, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
Warren believes that gays are sinners just like the rest of us and that they need to repent and live right and forsake the gay lifestyle. There is nothing wrong with that message.
Posted by: Come on now | December 18, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
No Roger Burton, you couldn’t be more wrong. Rick Warren obviously doesn’t understand Jesus’s message. His hate speech shows that clearly.
It hurts my heart that so many people are turned away from Christianity because of people like you and Warren who preach hate. I’m not just talking about gay rights…I’m talking about all kinds of issues. So many people equate Christian with hateful people.
It’s just not how it’s supposed to be. Even satan quoted the Bible when he tempted Jesus…and you know what? You have become satan’s words.
Posted by: Mark | December 18, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
What I just cannot understand is why do Gays and Lesbians have so much hate when others do not support or believe in Gay rights. True Christians do not hate gays they just don’t belive in the lifestyle. God does not hate gays, what God hates is their sins of being homosexual. I don’t think anyone should hate Rick Warren just because he doesn’t support the gay and lesbians. Obama may support gay rights as a politician, but believe me, I know he doesn’t personally believe in that lifestyle! His personal beliefs in his heart on this issue are bible-based and what the word of God says-that it is a sin.
Posted by: Noodles | December 18, 2008, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
.Notice how the liberals only obey the law when it benefits them, such as the California Proposition law that the PEOPLE wanted.i think straight people should invade the haters, just like the Gays did in that church in Michigan..
HALLELUHAH
Posted by: james | December 18, 2008, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
carrie—you are correct of course, i know you need anyone to tell you that. but HIV/AIDS did come from Africa and wordwide is a disproportionately found in heterosexuals. there is an epidemic in Africa now with some rates of infected individuals over 25%.
JD is a cruel racist, bigoted, homophobic fool who gets off on hate and says cruel things on any blog on abc he can. why he doensn’t just go to O’Reilly and Limbaugh is beyond me. some people just enjjoy feeling hatred and it’s quite sad. pathetic really.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 18, 2008, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
I don’t hate anyone. Just the “in your face” way that homosexuals have tried to bring their CHOICES into my living room.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
Pastor Rick Warren is wonderful!
Posted by: Cindy | December 18, 2008, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
paulwall–New AIDS cases are almost overwhelmingly in the black community(70%). Is that racist?
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Or is that the “thug life” we ignorant white people “don’t understand?”
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
To “Rights” – What do you mean by “this behavior” – Do you mean standing up for our rights as Americans under the same Constitution? If homophobic straight people [actually that is an oxymoron] have a problem with gay men & women FIGHTING for our rights, then you know what? TOO BAD. We have been treated like second-class citizens long enough. We wont accept Barack’s suggestion of “Civil Unions” because it is simply unconstitutional in nature. I am not drinking from a separate water fountain any longer. I MARRIED my awesome husband in a meaningful same-sex ceremony at Walden Pond in Massachussetts on November 1st and the word “Marriage” made all the difference. So, does Barack consider MASS Gov. Deval Patrick to be a “sinner” or wrong because the Gov. believes in TRUE equality for all? This is just the start America – its a fight worth fighting.
Posted by: PhillyPaul | December 18, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
Noodles—i agree with you completely. it’s also important to remember that not all gays are the same. i am a very liberal person but i don’t hate straight people of christians at all. some gays, myself included, do not like how “california elite gays” present gay people. they do not represent me.
you are right about this issue being about hate. i think Pastor Warren will bring a healing presence and a uniting presence in that we may not agree with him but we can have love and peace and still disagree.
most people, whether they know it or not, know gay people, work with gay people, co-exist with gay people every day. the peace and tolerance is there it just need to be deepened and strengthened.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 18, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
As a lifelong atheist, I was taken aback by the news of Rick Warren’s invitation UNTIL I listened to Barack Obama. His explanation is, as he says, consistent with his notion of who we are as Americans. I respect his decision, which is based on principle, and take a look at my own intolerance.
Posted by: gary | December 18, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
If I work and pay my taxes like everyone else, why can’t I just have the same rights? Let’s try to remember “seperation of church and state”. However, the reaction from my peers over this matter is a little over-the-top. lol
Posted by: Jody Marcel | December 18, 2008, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
JD—you are correct that african-american are disporoportionately affected, and that is a disaster.
the thing is are you happy with that? do you find joy in HIV falling heavily on black people? they have less access to healthcare. most middle-income and wealthy gays live indefinitely with hiv. african-americans are dying by the score because they cannot affort the medication that elite gay men can.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 18, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Now that Obama is under the bus. He can talk to all of his old friends there.
Posted by: chaos | December 18, 2008, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
gary—great post. thank you for that. after i saw the actual video, which was after i started opening my mouth, i felt the same way. obama explined his choice well. and i think it was a good choice. and we’re all better for inclusion and are lesser served by exclusion.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 18, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
JD, I am sorry there are gay people in your living room. Have you considered building a cyclone shelter? That way when the gay people come into your living room and start bothering you, you can move down to the cyclone shelter. You can keep a fridge and some snacks and stuff in it, and it can be called a Gay Shelter. You can tell all your friends that you’re sorry you haven’t been around lately, but you had to hide in your Gay Shelter because it was just getting too gay out there. I’m sure everyone will be very sympathetic and will give you lots of personal space so that you can recover from the ordeal.
Posted by: lilla | December 18, 2008, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Is it possible to have this man deliver a non-Christian invocation? That way at least the non-Christians in the country won’t be offended.
He probably won’t be able to do that, but this is not an entirely Christian country.
Posted by: cookie montgomery | December 18, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Just one last comment before I go back to work!
Religion is, suprise surprise the origin of this conflict and most others. There is such a thing as civil marriages lots of people get married at city hall and I think the gays would be fine with that. Marriage does not have to be religious. In fact in Canada churches are not forced to marry gay people if it goes against their beliefs. Let the religious people have their church marriages and let the gays have their city hall marriages. No harm done everyones happy! That day will come and in maybe 50 years we will look back and say “I cant belive gays werent allowed to marry!”
Posted by: Nicholas | December 18, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
The truth will win. Good choice.
Posted by: St.Peter3 | December 18, 2008, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
Paul Wall- I too agree with you. I do know Gay people, and most of the ones I know are some of the most kind, loving and giving people I know. People in general are all different. And when I talk about sin, remember that sin is sin no matter what it is. If I were to murder,lie, cheat or steal God still hates those sins.
thanks.
Posted by: Noodles | December 18, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
I would hope everyone would respect the individual for his kindness and goodness in helping others, whether they are purple, orange, streight or gay. Respect has no color or sexual preferences. Like the song says “Respect Yourself” Start now to respect yourself.
Posted by: Aunty Zee | December 18, 2008, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
paulwall–Of course I don’t take any satisfaction knowing that blacks now acquire AIDS at a high rate. But when you say that it is due to a lack a healthcare, you are wrong. There is no preventative medicine that can keep one from acquiring AIDS. The only way to not obtain it is by having a lifestyle that is noncondusive to it. Things like sharing needles, and having unprotected gay sex are surefire ways to obtain the “ikky”(as I’ve heard blacks refer to it). When 70% of new HIV cases are in the black community, it tells me that those in the black community are not abiding by such rules. 70% is huge, considering blacks barely makeup 13% of the overall populace.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
As a gay person, I must say that this hurts more than the bigotry I expect from the right wing. I voted for Obama, and would like to state that my upset now how NOTHING to do with being “right” or “left” minded – sexuality is not a matter of political opinion, nor is it a choice one decides to make. Prejudice against ANY minority – whether it be due to race, gender, religion, sexuality, or SES – should never be tolerated or condoned by ANY elected official, regardless of party affiliation. Obama would never choose a speaker that is openly racist, a woman-hater, a bigot, or an anti-semite; so, why should the fact that he chose a homophobe be tolerated?
Posted by: LSF | December 18, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
Ok…I have been an Democrat all of my life and I am 61 years old. If someone like Rick Warren is picked by Obama, I refuse to vote ever again..because there is no point any longer.
Posted by: Gailw | December 18, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Gay’s are the most intolerant group of all and they think if you don’t agree you are intolerant. That is called having an opinion people and we all have a right to our own.
Posted by: thetruthhurts | December 18, 2008, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
TOLERANCE; To be tolerant of other opinions and culture. To understand there are other ways of thinking. To understand that you may not be right all the time. To act with respect to others who do or think differently. This doesn’t sound like Obama voters here.
Posted by: chaos | December 18, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
I am sure that about 5% of Rick Warren evangelicals voted for Obama to be in office. I am sure that overwhelmingly (>90%) glbt people supported Obama – including me. I sent money in a tight financial situation and did all I could to support him. The situation with the invocation by Rick Warren was a body blow to the glbt community and I am personally sick and tired of giving my hard earned resources to Barak Obama until I SEE the inclusiveness that he promised in his election. Warren is no different than Falwell. I was deeply in the evangelical community before I came out and I know how they think.
You gotta “dance with the one who brought you.” Once again, we are sitting by the wall being neglected.
I don’t want any more requests from Obama for money until I SEE Obama’s support for the glbt community.
I’m pissed.
Pamela White
Fair Oaks, California
Posted by: Pamela White | December 18, 2008, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
As a straight person…well said LSF.
Posted by: True North 8 | December 18, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
LSF:
Have you ever heard of Rev. Wright? You say Obama would never choose a speaker that is openly racist, have you heard any of his sermons. You need to get a clue.
Posted by: thetruthhurts | December 18, 2008, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
pamela–Perhaps you should have saved your money. Putting your hopes and dreams into a politician is not very intelligent.
BTW: why is BHO still soliciting donations?
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
I love the choice of Rick Warren. He is the smartest choice. BTW, Rev. Warren is not a money-grubing preacher as some here are depicting him. He and his wife are “upside down” tithers. That means that they give 90% of their income to charity and live on 10%.
Posted by: Sharon O | December 18, 2008, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Funny how all the Obamamites that loved him for his inclusiveness now hate him for his inclusiveness. I guess he should only include the gay and black community and that is ok. You bunch of gay babies need to get a life. REALLY!
Posted by: ficklevoters | December 18, 2008, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
The gays have declared their hateful war on those that stand up for righteousness and Jesus Christ in this this society. Never did our founding fathers think that USA will be anti-Christian. Warren cannot deliver a prayer during a presidential inauguration because he believes that the practice of homosexuality is a sin? Soon these people would want to imprison and kill those that believe against their lifestyle. Silence our voices. But that will not end our voices. We have been through persecutions before. Our leader was in fact crucified for his statements about 2000 years ago. We are not intimdated.
Posted by: Christian not surprised | December 18, 2008, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm
Pamela, are you aware that Obama has chosen Joseph Lowery to give the benediction? I’m no fan of Warren, but it does look as though, by selecting these two very different clergymen, Obama is attempting to present a balanced Christian perspective.
Posted by: Eleonora27 | December 18, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
the Immediate Gratification poeple are not happy with Barrack already. What took so long. Pretty soon they’ll be at the white house protesting their messiah. Why would anybody put any faith in a politician?
Posted by: chaos | December 18, 2008, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
This just goes to show how brainwashed BHO supporters were. Barely 2 months after his election and liberal cracks are beginning to show.
To all gays that are questioning their votes for him, maybe now you should question your lifestyle CHOICE.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Pamela White – your community should be gated!
Posted by: Marcus | December 18, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
MOST blacks hate gay people – so where’s the shock here?
Posted by: Jonathan | December 18, 2008, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
JD (the other one) you don’t remember “mass lynchings of homos” because you don’t want to. Constant police raids, constant police brutality, being arrested for wearing clothing not appropriate to one’s gender, being arrested for consuming alcohol or serving it to homosexuals, being fired for being gay, being denied housing for being gay, being beaten and tied to a fencepost in Wyoming and left to die for being gay…the list goes on. But as long as you don’t want to remember then we can just remain the focus of your ignorance without you having to feel guilty about it.
Posted by: JD | December 18, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
The IG’s are mad as hell and they aren’t going to like BO anymore. He won’t even notice. He is headed for the center because he actually wants to be a good pres? He might not be to bad after all.
Posted by: chaos | December 18, 2008, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
Wow all these people who want tolerance are intolerant of others, those who want their oppression to end still want to oppress others, those who want equal rights only want them for themselves and not others, or more exactly they just want special privileges. Everyone is at each others throat….. Wow Obama’s doing a bang up job bringing us together as a nation…
Can’t you feel the love.
Seriously it seems gays are the most intolerant of all popular social groups, rivaling the Klan and Skin Heads. Your not doing yourself any good acting like this. You want people to be tolerant of your lifestyle but want to oppress those who have a differing opinion like Robin. Many of the responses to Robins posts are far more viral and hate filled than the stuff she has posted but it’s OK to say those things because you don’t agree with her? You really need better quality meds, and please please don’t have children, they deserve better parents.
This country was founded on free speech, I don’t have to agree with what you say but it is your right to say it.
P.S. Oh yeah, your all going to hell, have a nice day. ;)
Posted by: Bored at work | December 18, 2008, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
The Warren choice is small potatoes compared tot he larger trend: Obama puts the onus of “reaching across the aisle” squarely on the the shoulders of the progressive left that got him elected. His choices so far indicate no requirement for a commensurate sacrifice from the “right,” and indeed things are shaping up to carry on the worst instincts of both the Bush and Clinton administrations. The only difference in our foreign policy will be that we now add we add a dash more “American idealism” into our bombing campaigns. We have in no way transcended the mindset of “American exceptionalism,” where we believe that our “good intentions” justify our too often abhorrent foreign adventures. And for those claiming that this is a left wing cabinet: he cross-wired his appointments. Exhibit A: Hillary Clinton is a social progressive, but a foreign policy hawk more to the right than her husband. If Obama wanted the “lefty” Clinton he would have given her Health and Social Services. But he want the the “Hillary the Hawk”—you remember, the one who four square behind the Iraq debacle, against talking with our enemies, and all for the “war on terror” and the Constitutional crises it engenders. Obama is jettisoning his vision and his mandate before he even gets into office. The writing was on the wall when he capitulated on FISA…downhill ever since.
Posted by: cameotoo | December 18, 2008, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
jd–I never did that to anyone. So why should I feel guilty about it? You are trying to make a “civil rights” struggle by invoking the same images of the ACTUAL Civil Right Era of the 60s, but the comparison is night and day.
Blacks were born with black skin; homos have the ability to live a hetero lifestyle. The just CHOOSE to be lazy and have given up on finding an opposite sex partner. My buddies are my closest option if I CHOOSE to be gay, but I nor they have CHOSEN to be so lazy that we would willingly practice acts that are detrimental to humankinds existence. That and how could a man not find the female body 100x more attractive than a male.
The old saying “Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned” is not going to be changed to “Hell hath no fury like a woman and/or homo scorned.” Women are the reason I get up in the morning, smile too much, and spend money making my ugly mug look more attractive. Homos get up in the morning and should pray for forgiveness for supporting a lifestyle that if all practiced, humans would have been extinct long ago.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
you didn’t really believe the campaign promises again did you!!@!
Posted by: Tom Powers | December 18, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
its bush’s fault – I hate to tell you but McCain/Palin did anything but try to destroy Obama. You are extremely naive. Did you see any Wright commercials during the campaign?Anything remotely like the swift boats? Did you hear about DNC/Chicago corruption in any of the ads? The most low down thing McCain did is rush to D.C. when the financial markets collasped. Yeah that really destroyed Obama. You only heard issues from McCain and Palin. Kind of an embarrassment but obviously Obama cannot select his own Pastor so he chose one of the most popular pastors in the nation. Not bad at all.
Posted by: lindz1989 | December 18, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
I think the gays should just chill and enjoy the inaugural festivities.
Posted by: Kevin | December 18, 2008, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
This is an absolute firestorm fueled by a controversy starved media. It’s been pretty slow as far as Obama controversy goes so they are working hard trying to spark a flame. It’s a pathetic attempt to build a story for sale.
Posted by: dan | December 18, 2008, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
I am in elected office, and I find it critical to work with the opposite side of the isle. To do this, you need to select those who will hold a reasonable conversation and avoid the hate slingers.
Warren has impressed me as someone that holds views I disagree with but is willing to not focus only on differences but will also acknowledge agreements.
Everyone with different views on choice and gays is not our enemy. Some are because their only goal is to promote hate.
I am a very strong Democrat and liberal. I think Obama is heading in the right direction. Lets not copy the extreme’s in either party who promote hate and discourage inclusion.
Posted by: Pat Higgins | December 18, 2008, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
It is highly unlikely that there will be much of a “coming together” or “all inclusivness in Mr. Obama’s Presidancy to speak of. Why? Because those of us whom take personal responsibility for choosing to purchase medical insurance over a new car payment, or renting instead of taking on a mortgage payment we KNEW was to good to be true are tired. Those of us whom are proud to work a “menial job” rather then collect disability, or willing to go to school longer so we don’t have too dig ditches, ARE FED UP WITH “REDISTRIBUTING” OUR MONEY TO THOSE OF YOU WHO DON’T! Go get a job or starve! Those we’re my choices.
Posted by: AlchyDave25 | December 18, 2008, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
Mr “Public Official” Pat Higgins–It is tough to work across a narrow strip of land located in a large body of water(ISLE).
Since you work across the AISLE so often, learn to spell the word.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
alchydave–Preaching to the chior here buddy. I work 2 jobs, am working on my masters(EE), drive a beat up old truck, and still rent. I would be the perfect candidate for BHO’s New Deal ideas; only my conscience tells me to not be a MOOCH of my fellow countrymen.
The Democratic Party is not the FDRs and JFKs of the old days. Now the Democratic Party is the part of no accountability/responsibility.(Frank, Dodd, Pelosi) Today’s example, Pelosi trying to force Bush to take responsibility for the auto bailout.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Pat Higgins,
You are a hypocrite. It is one thing to work with others on issues like taxes, education, health care, etc.
But it is completely different to “work with other people” on issues regarding human rights. What do you not understand about equality.
Would you negotiate with dictators committing genocide or starving their people because “it’s important to work with people on the other side of the aisle”? What about Iran if they wanted to throw all Christians in jail or execute them….you want to work with them too?
Posted by: Mark | December 18, 2008, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
Also, why have Frank and Dodd not be made to answer for their role in the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac meltdown? Afterall, they were in charge of the oversight committees that were supposed to be RESPONSIBLE for watching out for the taxpayer. We the people, HA!
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
We didn’t destroy the country.
We have a right to be intolerable of the right.
Posted by: GOP is for Dummies.
That statement is unbelievably and ridiculously arrogant.
Posted by: Brady | December 18, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
I think the people who say this is no big deal are missing an important point. If Rick Warren was just someone who opposed gay marriage I would agree with you. But it goes much deeper than that. Rick Warren has said some very hurtful and ugly things about gays and lesbians – particularly that homosexuality is akin to pedophilia, incest, and beastiality. This is what has so wounded the gay community, not his position on gay marriage. For a moment just imagine that someone was saying such things about you or someone you loved and then was invited to give the prayer at the inauguration. Ouch.
Posted by: chris | December 18, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
I think the Rev. Warren is exactly the man who President elect Obama should choose! If the left and the gays don’t like it, well they can’t have everything their way! I think Obama is moving more toward the middle and that is a good thing!
Posted by: carlyonsue | December 18, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
who would they prefer? Louis Farrakan or Rev Wright?
Posted by: Melvin | December 18, 2008, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
First, I must say,I am a Christian who does not appreciate Rick Warren’s style. I’d invite another pastor – maybe Franklin Graham, or R.C. Sproul. But I’m not the President Elect. As for Warren’s position on gay politics… 1) I am sure that Warren does not hate anyone – anyone who practices any behavior in the privacy of their own homes, 2) I am sure that Warren prays for any gay person with whom he has had personal interaction, and 3) I am sure that Warren’s position on gay political matters will not be what he’ll be discussing in the Invocation address. He’ll be asking God to bless and direct this new talented young leader.
I’m also asking God to do this.
Posted by: Kenneth | December 18, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
carolynsue–I actually agree with you.
Posted by: J D | December 18, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
This is not a matter of “Left” or “Liberals” vs. Obama. Nor is this a dispute of ideas. Rick Warren is a man who clearly expresses his willingness to exclude an oppressed minority group based upon status from the full benefits – and entitlements of liberty. This would be the equivalent of having a white supremacist give the invocation. Shame on Barack Obama. Whatever credits I had given him for his willingness to heal the rifts between us are now gone.
Posted by: J.S. Seitlin | December 18, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
This is not a matter of “Left” or “Liberals” vs. Obama. Nor is this a dispute of ideas. Rick Warren is a man who clearly expresses his willingness to exclude an oppressed minority group based upon status from the full benefits – and entitlements of liberty. This would be the equivalent of having a white supremacist give the invocation. Shame on Barack Obama. Whatever credits I had given him for his willingness to heal the rifts between us are now gone.
Posted by: J.S. Seitlin | December 18, 2008, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
I think with this invitation that Barack Obama might be showing signs that he may not be as far left as the left wing gays and liberal democrats thought he was. I think this is a good thing!
Posted by: carlyonsue | December 18, 2008, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
J D:
Your views on the Gay issue may be a tad harsher then mine, but if I ever can, I’ll cover your rear my friend!
Posted by: AlchyDave25 | December 18, 2008, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
HIV/AIDS is also available through blood transfusions. Not all people do each other, some are just unlucky to have needed blood that was infected, like my nephew. He was not gay he was only 5! I am a true believer in the fact that all things happen for a reason. I no longer attend church due tot he fact that first it is about giving money and second it is about constantly telling us that that those who do not follow God will perish and don’t forget that only Baptists will go to heaven, that is a good one! My husband was Baptist and I was Lutheran and his mother didn’t like our relationship for that reason, we married anyway, 38 years ago, and neither one of us attend an organized religion..they stray too far from the message and are too judgemental..wow, imagine that!!
Posted by: zeuser89 | December 18, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
I think that evangelical Christians might want to re-think whether they consider Warren to be their default spokesperson. The fact that even the secular media is calling his message a “muted religious” message should be very concerning to those who hold deeply biblical convications. Its impossible to reconcile a “muted religious” message with the clear and unambiguous message of the Scriptures. We have to wake up and realize when we are re-inventing Jesus and the apostle Paul into something that is palatable to our postmodern relativistic sensibilities.
Posted by: AJ | December 18, 2008, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
I am a democrat and a supporter of gay rights…however the gay population better be carefull…they are a major, major minority and need the support of the mainstream to do anything…Obama is trying to unite all of america not just fight for you…convince people on the power of your argument not demonizing people who disagree with you…people like me will stop supporting your causes if you appear as intolerant as the right…
Posted by: bob | December 18, 2008, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Would Obama have invited a pastor who disapproved of interracial marriages? Equality for some is equality for none. I am a heterosexual who voted for Obama, and I am disappointed in his choosing a preacher based on his popularity, rather than his beliefs.
Posted by: Paula | December 18, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
CARLYNONSUE:
I’m mildly embarrassed to admit that there may be some truth to what you say. I certainly hope so! If There is, we can’t get too much of a good thing!
Posted by: AlchyDave25 | December 18, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
CARLYNONSUE:
I’m mildly embarrassed to admit that there may be some truth to what you say. I certainly hope so! If There is, we can’t get too much of a good thing!
Posted by: AlchyDave25 | December 18, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
I am liking Big O more each day, this guy just might turn out to be OK!
Posted by: david | December 18, 2008, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
Thanks for pointing this out, Eleonora27: http://www.ajc.com/gwinnett/content/metro/stories/2008/12/17/lowery_obama.html
I had not heard, amid all of the Rick Warren discussion.
Posted by: Kenneth | December 18, 2008, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
Do not panic at this time in America.This is not about economic disaster but about blessing the new president elct and not on curse on any Americans regardless of faith, sex or religion.
Global Freeze
Posted by: Global Freeze | December 18, 2008, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm
Do not panic at this time in America.This is not about economic disaster but about blessing the new president elect and not a curse on any Americans regardless of faith, sex or religion.
Global Freeze
Posted by: Global Freeze | December 18, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
I want to clarify something that seems to confuse the right wing religious bigots on this thread. If there is anything that the history of the 20th century taught is, it’s that tolerance of everything is the quickest way to wipe out tolerance completely.
Tolerance does not mean tolerance of everything; it means tolerance of everything except intolerance. “Tolerance means tolerance of intolerance!”, on the other hand, is the cry of generally intolerant people who think that generally tolerant (not absolutely tolerant) people who use this tolerance of intolerance as a means to increase their power and increase intolerance. This has now happened over and over again.
Now, gay people are not intolerant of Christians. Many gay people are Christian, including me (I do not regard this as making me “better” than non-Christians, but it’s a fact that my own relationship with ultimate reality owes itself to Christianity). Gay people and others who are committed to tolerance (generally, not absolutely) are, however, intolerant of attempts to foment intolerance and to write it into law. Mr. Warren has successfully done this, and intends to continue doing it. Opposing his selection to give the opening prayer at the inauguration of a president we worked hard to help elect is a matter of intolerance of intolerance, which is not incompatible with intolerance generally, but the only way it can be preserved.
Posted by: Alan | December 18, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Well folks, Things can always be much worse and as Ronald Reagan once said about the public factions complaining to him: “If You Do Not Like It Where You Are Now, Then Move”…So get off your duffs and head to Canada, Australia or wherever else you perceive as the perfect place for you, but NOT South Dakota(America’s Outback) as they have more hangups and discriminations than anyplace else–just ask the Sioux people!
Posted by: rayobilly | December 18, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
This media made story is a perfect example of how the liberal media actively works to manipulate public opinion.
Any sensible and well informed person know this story is meaningless. Obama will pick liberal judges who will invent a constitutional right to gay marriage.
The purpose of the story is to create the illusion that it is controversial to support keeping the defintion of marriage know to every society for millenia as between a man and a woman. The headline “firestorm” says it all when only a small percentage of the population cares. News stories are written in such a way that it gives the illusion that controversial and fringe people in the same sex marriage issue are those that are against it rather than those that are for it.
If, for example, a pro-life group protested a selection, the liberal media would not even bother with a story. In the slim chance it would, the headline and story would be written is such a way to make pro-life advocates appear to be a fringe group.
These type of stories done over and over again do have an impact on public opinion. The same-sex marriage advocates know it and the media know it, so they play the charade that they are upset with Obama, but they know he’s their man.
This story has has the benefit for Obama to give the illusion he is moderate, when in fact he will work to redefine marriage with judicial appointments.
Posted by: Jerry | December 18, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
Obama knows the radical left are outliers and not who he needs support from in order to have a successful presidency. What, did they think that electing someone that said they were on their side legitimized their extremism? Aberrant outliers. Obama needs normal.
Posted by: Npage | December 18, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Why on earth would you, Mr. Obama, pick Mr. Warren to do an invocation at such an important event?
Posted by: mom | December 18, 2008, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
where is all the outcry from gay rights activists against barry???!!!! for obama to turn his back on them before he even gets elected is pathetic!!!! where is the outcry??!! oh how i wish ann curry from NBC news would ask obama if “he is a homophobe” like she asked rick warren a little while back. and do it with the same voice and in the same context as she asked warren too. where is the outrage liberals??!! HYPOCRITES.
Posted by: tim | December 18, 2008, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
VERY WELL SAID JERRY. i couldnt agree more, as sickening as it it.
Posted by: tim | December 18, 2008, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
Just like Obama to throw the gays under the bus.!! CHANGE YOU CAN BELIEVE IN…LOL
Posted by: CW | December 18, 2008, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm
Gays and lesbians are not happy about Rick Warren’s support of Proposition 8 in California. They are demanding “marriage equality”. Why does marriage equality seem so illusive? Is there a way for two men to blend their DNA in their offspring? Until that happens naturally we will not have true marriage equality. Protests can not change that basic reality.
William Wesley Roughton
Posted by: William Wesley Roughton | December 18, 2008, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
mom – Barack Obama has already said that he asked Rick Warren because Rev Warren invited Obama to speak at his church even though Rev Warren knew Obama’s view were very different from his own. Mr. Obama said that he asked Rick Warren to give the invocation because Obama’s bid for the Presidency was all about openness and Rick Warren embodied that.
GET OVER IT, RIDICULOUS LEFT. Obama’s doing something decent and you aren’t even human enough to recognize it.
Posted by: NPage | December 18, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
I feel bamboozled. I would never have donated my money (what little money I have) or worked locally to help get Barack elected if I knew he’d have that hateful man speak at the big night. Saying gays are on par with pedophiles and incest? My God, can I please take my vote back?
Posted by: Stacey | December 18, 2008, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm
it’s not about marriage the man said homosexuals are the moral equivalent of pedophiles…
any man that can’t tell the difference between two adults who love each other and an adult who takes advantage and hurts a child …should not be near children.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
npage…
not sure if you realize this, but the left is not very good at recognizing anything. even when its totally apparent to others. thes is ALWAYS a villain to those on the left.
Posted by: tim | December 18, 2008, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
stacey…
you win!!!! you are the first person i have heard say so far, that you want to take your vote for obama back!!! that HAS to be a record?! evenr before he is sworn in, thats amazing… lol
Posted by: tim | December 18, 2008, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
mom – Obama said why he chose Warren. He’s an open minded person who invited Obama to speak at his church even though Warren knew Obama supported positions diametrically opposed to his own. Obama wants an open minded and fair presidency. That’s not so hard to understand.
-Page
Posted by: NPage | December 18, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Npage
would Barry say it was inclusive if 50 years ago or inthe late 60 and early 70′s a president invited a Pastor who preached actively and policitally that interracial marriage and fraternization was unnatural and unholy
and his mother lived in neighborhoods that held those beliefs strongly
and Obama campaigned for said President who campaigned on equality (and Rick Warren called gays equal to pedophiles) then asked that preacher who preached such the antithesis of that… to be the lead religious figure to kick off his Presidency and the national Inauguration of his presidency?
what do you think Obama would say if said president than said it was being inclusive to ask the preacher who said his mother was going to hell or that he was going to hell because he came out of an unholy event?…the President saying that was inclusive to include and FEATURE int the most prominent spot he is allowed… the mans exclusivity and disgust for some of the population?
this is not just about marriage…the man has said some vile and backward things about gays.
America just has not heard them.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
and by the way Rick to answer your post question…
does he want this fight…
NO.
absolutely not.
He loses support of those who support gays… by as much as this is shaping to be…his job is going to get very hard.
Let us remember there are a lot more gays and lesbians and their families and supporters… …than evangelicals that say gays are pedophiles.
and he knows it.
Posted by: dl | December 18, 2008, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
I totally support the choice of Rick Warren! Many denominations and churches are against gay marriage. You couldn’t have the Pope or Billy Graham or Franklin Graham or a Mormon without the same problem.
Rick Warren is a good choice because he has invited Obama to events in the past. Warren is not like the stereotype of fundamentalists.
Rick Warren is a best-selling evangelical author. He has called for churches to oppose global warming. He and his wife, Kay, give 30% of their book earnings to charities to fight AIDS in Africa. I hope having Rick Warren will help make peace between Obama and evangelicals.
Posted by: Two See | December 18, 2008, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
dl…
what you are forgetting, is that even though warren has said some terrible things, HE HAS A LOT OF INFLUENCE. therefore, all obama is doing is getting in the ring. you cant win the fight without jumping in the ring.
Posted by: tim | December 18, 2008, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Stacey,
All sin is sin. A little white lie is morally equivalent to perjury before a grand jury. Borrowing a pack of gum from a convenience store is moraly equivalent to a $50 Billion ponzi scheme. And sexual deviance of any kind is morally equivalent to sexual deviance of any other kind.
However, according to Rick Warren’s beliefs, we’re all sinners that need someone to take our guilt away. Rick Warren then proceeds to tell people how they can have their sins taken away forever.
If someone believed you were going to be hit by a locomotive, you wouldn’t mind it if they told you about a way not to be hit by that locomotive, would you?
I hope not. Because in that case, you would be considered VERY CLOSE MINDED.
-Page
Posted by: NPage | December 18, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
I’m a bit relieved that every Presidential decision over the next four years won’t have to pass through a GLBT filter first. The Gay Rights Lobby apparently is going to hear the word NO occasionally. Get used to it.
Posted by: john | December 18, 2008, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
dl – read my post to Stacey. It is for all of the close minded.
-Page
Posted by: NPage | December 18, 2008, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
J D—i respect what you wrote about in your post and apologize for writing that you are a racist. i am sorry. and you are certainly correct in how HIV is acquired and agree with you that there is certainly no cure. the only thing i would differ with you is on the access to healthcare. the majority of african-americans who get HIV are poor and lack access to the type of healthcare that a middle-class person does. there are drugs that people can take (antiretrovirals) that will inhibit conversion to AIDS for years, for some people decades. wealthy and middle-class gay men can “afford” to get HIV. they are well insured and can perform unprotected sex with many partners. i hope that the CDC, Health and Human Services can make a concerted effort to educate minorities and convey the seriousness of risky sexual behavior. i honestly don’t think minorities living in crippling poverty ever really get much information on AIDS, if any at all. many think it is a “gay disease” and don’t worry since they are heterosexuals. i’m gay but i would like to make a moral arguement that uneducated minorities deserve access to the same drug treatments that gay white yuppies get. they should get the same drugs. i know african-americans living inpoverty who get infected with HIV and are dead in 16 months. that is similar to third world nations. often in a big city the gay elite get infected with HIV (being fully educated to how it is contracted), get the regimen of treatment drugs and live for well over ten years while an african-american living in that same city, has not received education on prevention dies at 1 year.
the moral irony is that african-americans living in poverty getting infected are acquiring the virus through unprotected hetero-sexual sex (like the bible says, according to churches), even in a marriage, while middle-class gays who are “commiting sin” live the good life for decades in many cases.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 18, 2008, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
Well put, John. The P-E will be the Prez, not anybody’s puppet. (At least, that’s what we’re all hoping.)
Posted by: NPage | December 18, 2008, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
Why do people keep saying this is a silly diasgreement over gay marriage and differences in opinon? Gay Americans can deal with differences of opinion as well as anyone. Don’t forget, gays are black, white, asian, hispanic, jewish, catholic, muslim, mormon,christian, young, old, upper class, working class, and on and on. Gays don’t all have the same opinions or beliefs as one another. We’re a diverse group. Most of the closest people in my life are not gay. BUT BUT BUT…this is not about differences and diversity. This is about Obama giving a platform to a man who has said hateful, demeaning things about gays and lesbians. Obama would never invite a minister who was a racist or an anti-semite. So why does he feel it is okay to include a homophobe?
Posted by: Charla | December 18, 2008, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
john—”relieved that every Presidential decision over the next four years won’t have to pass through a GLBT filter.” john, i am gay and i wholehaertedly agree with you. there are many gays who are turned of by the “Hollywood elite gays” and are not interested in the agenda they are pushing. i used to donate to the Human Rights Campaign when they were trying to have gay and lesbians covered by the civil rights act. when it got to the divisiveness of marriage i quit. because civil unions weren’t enough, partner benefits weren’t enough, adopting wasn’t enough and it came to forcing the agenda down everybody’s throat. it got ugly last month. gays turned on african-americans! i am a liberal person but i feel that dialog is better than dictat. there is a civil way to approach these elections and there is an uncivil way. and as long as gays act in an uncivil manner they (we) will get the same in return. the gay elite is doing many gays and lesbians no favors.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 18, 2008, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
Obama has the right idea. I hope they gas and slaughter them gays next. Then any muslims and non-christians.
“If a man lies with a male as with a women, both of them shall be put to death for their abominable deed; they have forfeited their lives.” Leviticus 20:13
PUT TO DEATH
People need to follow the Bible more! Those fake Christians who don’t understand the Word of God and what He tells us to do!
Go Obama! I hope that you continue on the path of rightiousness!
Posted by: damngays | December 18, 2008, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
This must be a joke. Right? The Gays? Who are they anyway? Who cares? Shall we all reread the book of Leviticus starting at Chapter 18 ff….That says it all…..Get on the bus or get off it! Rick Warren is the only choice to do the prayer. You go Rick…Someone needs to stand up for the true Christian
minority….
Posted by: John the Great Pumpkin | December 18, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Damn homosexuals taking over our country. Should be put to death, all of them. Like the Bible says.
Posted by: joe_roel | December 18, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
It comes off as really phony to denounce Rev. Wright for his hatefull remarks towards one group of Americans, but be so forgiving towards Rick Warren’s hatefull words towards another group. For me, Obama was never the savior some people saw(I voted for Hillary), hope this wakes up some people.
Posted by: A. C. | December 18, 2008, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
JD (the other one) you don’t remember “mass lynchings and executions of Christian/Jews” because you don’t want to. Constant police raids, constant police brutality, being arrested for wearing clothing not appropriate to one’s religion, being fired for being Christian/Jew, being denied housing for being Christian/Jew, being beaten and tied to a fencepost in Germany/Iraq and Burma and left to die for being Christian/Jew… the list goes on. But as long as you don’t want to remember then we can just remain the focus of your ignorance without you having to feel guilty about it. Yes, being forced to accept perversion because of the hate and brutality of the queer nation… your intolerance speaks volumes.
Posted by: ObamaNation | December 18, 2008, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
homosexuals are faking it
they are lyers and sinnars and are going to burn!11
Posted by: Jesus4Life | December 18, 2008, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm
Thank God to Obama. Hes the dang worst person who has ever lived in Ameerica. He is a dirty Muslim who brainwashed Americans into believing that he is the new saviour. Obama will NEVER be the new saviour. Jesus will alaways be that person.The person who will come back soon and save us from condemnation.
But Obama you may be at the beginning of earning your soul back for siding with a true Christian hero who is Warren Jeffs to speak at your ceremony. Maybe you can learn from him. How the world should be. Maybe you will realize you cannot save America and you can go back to Saudi Araba. Where you came from. And only then Obama can you begin to save your soul.
Posted by: ChadWhite | December 18, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
Thank God to Obama. Hes the dang worst person who has ever lived in Ameerica. He is a dirty Muslim who brainwashed Americans into believing that he is the new saviour. Obama will NEVER be the new saviour. Jesus will alaways be that person.The person who will come back soon and save us from condemnation.
But Obama you may be at the beginning of earning your soul back for siding with a true Christian hero who is Warren Jeffs to speak at your ceremony. Maybe you can learn from him. How the world should be. Maybe you will realize you cannot save America and you can go back to Saudi Araba. Where you came from. And only then Obama can you begin to save your soul.
Posted by: ChadWhite | December 18, 2008, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
You people posting about killing others because they are gay are not Christians and should not attempt to pose as Christians to make others hate them.
The Jesus of the Bible did not harm one hair on anyone’s head but came to take the punishment that had been declared upon sinful mankind. And He did so by dying the most hideous death of his day.
Don’t pull that Old Testament stuff out, unless you’re prepared to eat only kosher foods (i.e. no more bacon), walk through the desert, not use products made from pitch, and not let women talk in church.
I’m sure you’re not.
Posted by: NPage | December 18, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
wow—there are people discussing serious disagreements in a somewhat civil way. can we leave the bible quotes out of it. it contributes nothing to the dialog. even the devil can cite scripture!
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 18, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
The simple thing to do is what I intend to do. When the good pastor opens his yap, I mute the television and get a cup of coffee.
Posted by: profm2 | December 18, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
ha h aha Ocrapa used all his supporters money and hard work to help promote this maggot.
OMG Obama is a disgrace.
Posted by: Tor | December 18, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
Reposting…
Folks on this board saying that gays should be killed because it “says so in the Bible” are not Christians. I don’t know what you are but you are not Christians.
If you’d like to pull out the laws from the Old Testament and start stoning folks, be sure you’re ready for the whole thing. Disobediant children should be stoned, murders should be given a city of refuge or killed themselves, those caught in adultery shoulld be stoned (what is that, like 80% of Americans?), you should all go live in tents for special celebrations once a year, you shouldn’t eat any meat near the back of the cow (rump roasts and all hamburgers are out), you can never eat bacon…and so on.
You’re masquerading as something you’re not so you can stir up hatred against Christians.
Christians believe that their savior came to save them AND EVERYBODY ELSE from the punishment that was in the Old Testament and the ultimate punishment, everlasting death.
Your hate-mongering isn’t Christian – IT’S HATE. There are laws, in this country, against that.
-Page
Posted by: NPage | December 18, 2008, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
NPage—what you wrote is beautiful, especially this time of year. we should hope for the best in people. Jesus is about love not hatred. your words rimind us that love is what it’s all about. i apologized to a person on this blog for saying harsh things. i didn’t want to hate him (or her) and i think once that hatred left i could understand what he was attempting to say.
i hope everyone watches the video that began this blog. the President-Elect explained his choice. as a gay person i am happy with his choice. i would like to know more about Pastor Warren.
often we are taught and told who to hate by family, church, school.
we need to learn to love one another. our differences aren’t as big as our common hope for peace.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 18, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
The “gay” concern is a red herring. Obama is clearly using Rick Warren (albeit with Warren’s approval) to reinforce the ridiculous notion that he is a Christian. It’s designed strictly to corral political support that Obama believes is intellectual soft. Obama has no intention of actually governing in accordance with anything evangelical. He has made that abundantly clear. When he doesn’t he will be in for a rude awakening from evangelicals who have plenty of experience dealing with Bill Clinton’s “Christianity” and his Rick Warren-Tony Campolo.
Posted by: A Difference | December 18, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Paul Wall – For the first time, I agree with you. Well said.
Posted by: NPage | December 18, 2008, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
just the title Rick Klein wrote “Obama vs. The Left: A Fight He Wants?”…encourages fighting, in-fighting from the get-go. if it was just Obama responding it would have been no big deal. i think journalism loves encouraging (for lack of a better word) culture wars and fans the flames of disagreement.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 18, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
NPage—”well said.”—it was your words that inspired me. thank you for that. it is no small thing. in fact quite the opposite.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 18, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
Paul – lol. I just read your post directed at me. So…for the second time, I agree with you. :-)
Posted by: NPage | December 18, 2008, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
My God. You people on both sides of the aisle are utterly sick. Frankly, the homophobes and the screeching anti-Warrens have considerably more in common than the rest of us do. Fanaticism in whatever guise is both ridiculous and, sometimes, dangerous.
Grow up, all of you. Warren will be giving the invocation; the Rev. Joseph Lowery will deliver the benediction. They are men of different experiences and different views on the subject of gays and other matters. In other words, they represent differing American social views, which is as it should be. We are far too large and heterogeneous a country to expect a president NOT to try to respect our very complex diversity. Is there some reason that you do not grasp that?
Posted by: Eleonora27 | December 18, 2008, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
NPage—and that makes the third time you’ve inspired me :)
happy holidays and merry christmas and i hope the new year is better than this year.
peace.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 18, 2008, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
Homosexuals are only about 2% of the population at best and not all of them want “marriage”. Don’t cave to the tyranny of the minority !
Posted by: Ron | December 18, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
Ron—as a gay guy i agree with you. the hollywood gay elite do not represent many gay people’s views. marriage is not a concern of mine. and the way gays behaved after the election was appalling, especially the racism. it was over the top and didn’t change any minds. change comes with diplomacy. as a guy person i am living ok. i’m happy with my nation, the new president, Pastor Warren. this is Obama’s day, he should chose who he wants to pray at his inauguration.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 18, 2008, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Need I remind you Christians that if Obama says he is Christian? It is SO not right for you to judge on that. I do believe it’s in the bible. I am with Elonora27. Both sides are just obnoxious on this issue. And guys back off the gay hate. That’s not taught by God either. What has happened to religion in this nation? I don’t care to hear some athiest pipe in some smart answer to this either. Somebody needs to start remotely respecting the other side here.
Posted by: Susan-1 | December 18, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
Just curious: How many straight people are actually homophobic (as defined by a dictionary) as the gay people love to call us?
Show of hands?
No one?
That’s what I thought.
Not liking or even hating someone is not a phobia.
Posted by: Justin K. | December 18, 2008, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
>Seems the left is as intolerant as they claim the right to be.
>>>
Gee I always love this kind of blanket statement. So the Left is more interested is spliting America in half instead of joining America together?
The only oppinion that counts is the lefts?
Seems like the Left feels like the smartest people in the room is the people that agree with them. ROFL. Such arrogance.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | December 18, 2008, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
There are millions of people who do not believe in proposition 8. I believe marriage equals a man and a woman. The male and female body was built the way it is for this reason. If there are gay and lesbian people who do not like the fact that everyone does not believe in gay marriage then they need to quickly get over it. I do not want my kids or neices and nephews seeing explotive man on man or woman on woman. Many do not find that wonderful. You have to deal with that fact. As proud as they are to be gay, I am just as proud and just adament about my beliefs. I will fight for my beliefs as well. I do not want my children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews exposed to nasty open sex acts often shown in these crazy protests. Our beliefs and we who do not believe in gay marriage have just as much a right as you have to say to do believe. You are no better than anyone else. Marriage is a male and female only.
Posted by: American for Change | December 18, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm
I would have liked to see Joel Osteen; I truly enjoy his sermons but he picked Rick Waren. It is what it is. Everyone who doesn’t like it, get over it…he will be the “peoples” president not just liberals or Democrats.
Posted by: LeeBee | December 18, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
And Lilla, you ignorant, trifling, disrepectful person.
Do not ever compare freeing slaves to you choosing to homosexuality and forcing it down everyone’s throats. Until a gay person is on a plantation, sold and purchased and have been a slave, how dare you compare what you are to what African Americans ancestors have endured. Until you endure slavery for 400 years, shut up. Until you are owned and brought is slave ships packed like sardines, shut up. Until you are raped and whipped and killed and denied being acknowledged a human person, yet alone a voter SHUT UP. YOU IGNORANCE is SHOWING !!!!
Posted by: Change Agent | December 18, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
And Lilla, you ignorant, trifling, disrepectful person.
Do not ever compare freeing slaves to you choosing to homosexuality and forcing it down everyone’s throats. Until a gay person is on a plantation, sold and purchased and have been a slave, how dare you compare what you are to what African Americans ancestors have endured. Until you endure slavery for 400 years, shut up. Until you are owned and brought is slave ships packed like sardines, shut up. Until you are raped and whipped and killed and denied being acknowledged a human person, yet alone a voter SHUT UP. YOUR IGNORANCE is SHOWING !!!!
Posted by: Change Agent | December 18, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
At least Jeremia Wright’s ‘controversial’ comments were based on historical facts. Warren is just another idiot picking one part of the bible to harp on and make himself popular w/ bigots. I prefer J. Wright.
Posted by: Tor | December 18, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
There are millions of Americans who do believe in proposition 8. I believe marriage equals a man and a woman. The male and female body was built the way it is for this reason. If there are gay and lesbian people who do not like the fact that everyone does not believe in gay marriage, then they need to quickly get over it. I do not want my kids or nieces and nephews seeing exploitive man on man or woman on woman. Many do not find that wonderful. You have to deal with that fact. As proud as they are to be gay, I am just as proud and just adamant about my beliefs. I will fight for my beliefs as well. I do not want my children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews exposed to nasty open sex acts often shown in these crazy protests. We feel strongly about our beliefs and we who do not believe in gay marriage. We have just as much a right to say what we believe, as you have to say you do not believe. You are no better than anyone else. Marriage is a male and female only. I don’t care if you circled the Mormon Temple, you have circle most homes in America and most churches who lives by the bible to capture all who are against Gay marriage. There is no such thing. Pastor Rick Warren presents no controversy.
Posted by: Christian Woman | December 18, 2008, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
I don’t like Warren. I think he is another so-called evangelist that espouses hate under the cloak of self annointed sainthood by discriminating against gays, and women’s rights.
One thing I just learned though that went UNREPORTED is that there will be 2 ministers attending, one that does not hold the same beliefs as Warren. This I think is the leadership we need. One that understands, one that acknowledges the right of people to worship however they choose. Unity under our great free country. I like it. Now that I have the whole STORY.
Posted by: Newsrook | December 18, 2008, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
Yoo hoo. Where are you? Moderates and tolerants, where are you????
Posted by: ssbeck | December 18, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Just because someone has a strong point of view doesn’t make them a bigot. We have the right in this country to discriminate for ourselves that which we think is wrong from that which we think is right. If that makes one a bigot, then we are all bigots and the label is meaningless.
Posted by: Stitch | December 18, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
It would be a whole lot better for all of us if he had left ALL of the religious types out of the inaugural. I had really hoped we were through pandering to the religous nuts when we did not elect McCain. We are a secular country and need to completely separate church and state.
Posted by: Libertarian | December 18, 2008, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
I am almost shocked with outrage of gay community against American most respectable pastor, Rick Warren.
Please American gays and lesbians,
wake up and open your eyes. President-elected in United States Obama no more can’t be representitive for American gay of 1%, but should be it for Christian of 88% even though you voted him. Rick Warren was a wonderful choice
by BHO.
Posted by: Jung -NY | December 18, 2008, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
Most countries in the world do not have the hang ups that Americans have with sex. This is because we were founded by puritans escaping religious prosecution in Europe. These ultra conservatives took their guns and colonized America. Once they were done they held on to their guns and their conservative ideas about human sexuality (that’s why we can go to the movies and see violence with guns more easily than we can see love with sex). The growth of liberal ideas in America are a natural reaction to the confining nature of this religious intolerance. Call it ‘ideological Darwinism’ if you will. This does not mean religion will or must die out nor does it mean that liberals are ‘in charge’. It means that we must adapt and co-exsist to survive and be better than we were or are now. We must listen to one another. Obama’s choice shocked me at first- I’m not crazy about Warren and some of his POVs- but as soon as you start excluding people you don’t agree with than you are left with a one sided debate. There is no balance. Liberals- don’t tell people to ‘shut up’, encourage them to listen and not shout others down. Ditto to the conservatives. Peace on Earth to y’all.
Posted by: us | December 18, 2008, 11:40 pm 11:40 pm
Obama supporters should shut up. This is par for the course for someone who is only about himself. He will throw his friends and supporters under the bus whenever it is convenient. You voted for him, now live with the consequences.
Posted by: nick | December 18, 2008, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
Obama is using this as an opportunity to sober up the perverts. He knows that the overwhelming majority of Americans want perverts to stay in their own bedrooms and away from their kids’ schools. Can they take a hint, or does he need to give them a two-by-four between the eyes?
Posted by: ragnar30066 | December 18, 2008, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm
The guy is giving a prayer. What is the problem again?
Posted by: Iraq Vet | December 19, 2008, 12:30 am 12:30 am
All the gay bashers really need to experience city life. I live in a Gigantic city full of homosexuals. And you know what? They make the best neigbors. But I do think marriage is between a man and a woman by definition. However, Gays should be afforded the same rights and since they cannot bare children they should be able to adopt. Civil Unions is acceptable but not marriage. Besides, marriage is way overrated.
Posted by: JJ | December 19, 2008, 12:38 am 12:38 am
Slavery is not dead and still goes on all around the world even now. Violent acts of homophobia that result in sexual assault, rape and death have as long a history as slavery and are ongoing around the world even now. Religious leaders throughout history have had no qualms in getting involved in politics, especially in this country, despite our Constitution’s clear mandate of separation between church and state. Everything old is new again — will Obama really be the change agent he claims to be?
Posted by: Marol Kisan | December 19, 2008, 12:41 am 12:41 am
Putting religion aside for a moment – let’s look at nature as a whole. In nature, it is natural for a female and male to be together to continue with their species. Otherwise their species will die and fade off in this world. Well, gay marriages are not natural and not part of what nature had intended. Continuing in this path will lead to extinction. Period.
Posted by: nature | December 19, 2008, 12:43 am 12:43 am
America is all about inclusion, tolerance and coexisting. As minority, the gays have been prejudiced for such a long time and now they have finally gained increasig acceptance. We have to protect the minorities and clearly if conservative christians are not main stream, they must also be lifted up and represented as well. African Americans are definitely a minority group in the U.S. why would they support to elect Obama president if they believe their rights are just as important as rights of christian conservatives .. can we all just get along? Where’s Rodney King?
Posted by: R Tse | December 19, 2008, 12:45 am 12:45 am
Rick Warren is a bigotted @$$. He and his far right religious fanatics use the word of God to spread their hatred for those who don’t tow their line. The far left wacko gay activists are about as pathetic. Who cares about either or their divisive politics and opinions. The country would be much better off if both would shut up and go away.
Posted by: dk | December 19, 2008, 12:46 am 12:46 am
Ya know, no matter who he chose, it would have made somebody unhappy. It’s his inauguration, let him decide who he wants to do it.
Did you plan your wedding by asking everybody in your town to vote on the arrangements?
Posted by: FemaleVeteran | December 19, 2008, 12:47 am 12:47 am
If I could get up just one day and not have to hear gay folks whining about their rights I would be so happy. Do they expect to just take over and say to hell with straight folks…which are normal by the way. Obama is a straight man with a wife, did you all really think he considered you to be equal. He is a Christian and no matter what you say christianity will prevail.
Posted by: 4honeybee | December 19, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am
To those who disagree: ” Work on your own life instead of trying to judge somebody else.” DITTO!!!
Posted by: Open minded | December 19, 2008, 1:48 am 1:48 am
Obama stated he is against gay marriage so why the extreme left wing gay community is unset. The media is saying Obama and Warren have different views of gay marriage. They do not. The gay community need not to be so extreme and intolerant and bigoted. They do not get what they want they demand that we need to yield to them. This is a democracy with first amendment right of free speech and the President should have the right to choose who he wants to pray and not have to ask the gay community for permission.
Posted by: pohcd | December 19, 2008, 1:49 am 1:49 am
If choosing Rick Warren were really about offering different points of views then why doesn’t he invite a racist and an anti-semite to give prayers also just to even things out.
Posted by: sam | December 19, 2008, 2:30 am 2:30 am
The Gay community has taken it too far …Sure , discrimination against gay is bad and has no place in America , but must the gays rub it in the face of others with their Gay marriage thing ??? Don’t get me wrong , I do not discriminate gay people or condone discrimination against anyone , much less gay people and sure , a lot of people who are gay are very talented , but Gay marriage is a step too far … Domestic partnership is okay , but Marriage ??? isn’t it the term for bondage between the Human Male and Female species ??? and God and religion aside , is it not for the shake of continuing a speci’s lineage that a Male and Female come together and reproduce off-springs ? Taken it further in highly advanced society , we have marriages which is but the evolution of the need to have the male and female coming together to prolong that speci’s footprint in the planet . So, Gay people must take others’ viewpoints into account also or they will risk alienating themselves . And also God and religion aside , is it not nature’s law that in mamals , only the union of a Male and A Female can produce off-spring and NOT 2 males or 2 females for that matter??? This is beyond Religion and political viewpoints and individual reasoning , it is how we are , it is MOther Nature , it exist before our arrival on this planet ..it is a fact , so let’s get it straight once and for all!
Posted by: alohaone | December 19, 2008, 3:49 am 3:49 am
Until 2 men can get together and produce a baby without the help of another woman the way a male and female couple does , I do not see why they are the same thing ! . Yes everyone is equal , but different events called for different names . Christmas is not the same as the Buddha’s birthday , why must we want to call the Buddha’s birthday Christmas ??? If 2 gay men want to live together , so be it , but why do they want us to call their union “Marriage” which is the term for The Union between the Female and Male species of the Human race??? This is crazy and need to be stopped as soon as possible for everyone’s shake!
Posted by: alohaone | December 19, 2008, 4:14 am 4:14 am
OBAMA’s firs F!@#$k UP. Disappointing to the gay community. And a Big win to all those ignorant hating righteous beings. A sad day indeed. :(
Posted by: Antonio | December 19, 2008, 5:03 am 5:03 am
i dont know why anybody, makes this such a big deal, you republicans have lost and now you are trying to turn OBAMA in to some gay haters and watnot, you know you should recognise the DEFEAT i told YOU you were going to lose, but when i see your comments here i realise that OBAMA has really won and you finaly going to give up power, because critics goes with any american president, so who mc cain would have picked A GAY PASTOR with republicans? i dont think so , so please chill go to TEXAS OR OKLAHOMA OR SOMEWHERE sit down and make up more lies
Posted by: basco | December 19, 2008, 5:10 am 5:10 am
Personally I think the man is an evangelical thug. However I also know Barack doesn’t agree with all warren’s mumble jumbo either. sometime you have to dumb it down a little to get the job.
Posted by: Ted | December 19, 2008, 5:57 am 5:57 am
I don’t like Obama, and I don’t like Rick Warren. However, this hoola over Obama’s choice to deliver a prayer is much ado about nothing. Gay rights activists have their priorities in the wrong place as usual. Instead of marching against preachers delivering invocations and “marriage”, they need to get back into gear fighting the rampant increase in HIV infections in their community due to the rise in unsafe sex and the ridiculous use of crystal meth and other recreational drugs and the explosion of online sex hookup sites. Once again, fiddling while Rome burns…
Posted by: Cy Brown | December 19, 2008, 6:12 am 6:12 am
What a dumb ass move on Obama’s part.
He got the gay vote then he pulls this move, a stab in the back to gays. Sure has my blood boiling.
The ‘black nation’ of the USA struggled getting treated like human beings, so have the gay population. Obama’s ostracizing himself before he even gets into office. Course now he’s also ostracizing the gays and treating us like his race has been treated.
If there was a vote by the citizens of who he can put into his cabinet, this would be one I’d vote against.
Posted by: dar | December 19, 2008, 6:56 am 6:56 am
The President-elect’s choice of Reverend Warren to participate his inauguration is a stinging slap in the face to all of those LGBT people who invested themselves in Obama’s campaign and who honored him with their votes. To include someone in this important event who has worked diligently to deny LGBT people their rights under the law and guaranteed under our Constitution shows a lack of sensitivity to the needs and aspirations of the gay community who substantially supported his candidacy and election. Reverend Warren and others of his ilk who’s preaching against our community causes those disposed toward violence to physically attack and in some cases kill us is not worthy of the honor being bestowed upon him. There are many pastors, rabbis and mullahs who minister to and support all of the members of their congregations even those who happen to be LGBT. Any of those men or women would have been a more appropriate choice. To claim that inviting Reverend Warren to be a part of his inauguration indicates that “what we have to do is to be able to create an atmosphere where we can disagree without being disagreeable” is at best disingenuous and at worst an insult to the intelligence of the LGBT community. I dare say that if Reverend Warren was as vehement a racist as he is a homophobe he would not have been Obama’s choice to pray for his presidency and our country. As a gay man and a supporter of President-elect Obama I am deeply disappointed that he has chosen to disrespect and disregard the feelings of the great numbers of LGBT Americans who believed in what we were told during the campaign and who enthusiastically supported him with our time and with our votes.
Posted by: Brian, Decatur, GA | December 19, 2008, 7:05 am 7:05 am
“It is no secret that I am a fierce advocate for equality for gay and lesbian Americans,” Obama said Thursday at a press conference in Chicago.
Why of course, everybody except homosexuals know the Progressive Left uses homosexuality as a perpetual cash pipeline for campaign donations. That said; it wasn’t Mormons who defeated Gay Marriage in California, it was Obama’s black and latino supporters who voted against gay marriage
Leftists are not about rights, they’re about power and making the money to keep that power.
“is a stinging slap in the face to all of those LGBT people who invested themselves in Obama’s campaign and who honored him with their votes.”
Oh please, like all those sexist, racists, homophobic, environmentalist stuck on the Democrat Slave Plantation you’ll forever vote for the Progressive Left come hell or high water; you need your Slave master.
Posted by: syn | December 19, 2008, 8:31 am 8:31 am
“It is no secret that I am a fierce advocate for equality for gay and lesbian Americans,” Obama said Thursday at a press conference in Chicago.
Why of course, everybody except homosexuals know the Progressive Left uses homosexuality as a perpetual cash pipeline for campaign donations. That said; it wasn’t Mormons who defeated Gay Marriage in California, it was Obama’s black and latino supporters who voted against gay marriage
Leftists are not about rights, they’re about power and making the money to keep that power.
“is a stinging slap in the face to all of those LGBT people who invested themselves in Obama’s campaign and who honored him with their votes.”
Oh please, like all those sexist, racists, homophobic, environmentalist stuck on the Democrat Slave Plantation you’ll forever vote for the Progressive Left come hell or high water; you need your Slave master.
Posted by: syn | December 19, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am
So Obama sat in a Christian black church for 20 years and the gays think that he isn’t a homophobe. Believing a politician is your mistake.
Posted by: chaos | December 19, 2008, 8:35 am 8:35 am
Its interesting how people are more “caught-up” with the gay sex act than that of gay civil rights. It just shows me how ill-informed we all are (even gays) regarding this issue.
In my opinion, gay marriage is just about fairness, and plain decency…
Let me ask all of you this question or give you something to ponder; How would you feel if you have spent 40 years together as a couple, building a life together, and then one dies leaving the estate (even with a will) to the surviving partner. Yet, family members (not necessarily immediate) can contest the validity of that couple’s union and strip the surviving partner of everything? Happens quite often depending upon the state.
Using this same couple… how would you feel if you are not allowed to visit this person in the hospital, be kept informed of their medical care, make decisions regarding their health (especially since you are intimately aware of what they would want), etc. because this union is not looked upon as legal?
How would you feel if your son, daughter, brother, sister were walking down the street, AND given the culture you came from, it being quite normal for same sexes to hold hands or have one’s arm around the other. It does not necessarily mean one is gay. However, a group observes this and makes that assumption. They then beat both people senselessly and even kills one? Just happened here in NYC (the cosmopolitan place!)
Unfortunately, “civil unions” cover a lot of ground but much is not covered by that legal status.
Posted by: FS | December 19, 2008, 9:00 am 9:00 am
Let’s have a preacher who gets up and explains the wrongs of miscegenation. Oops, the Christians (and even the Republicans – nee Southern ‘Democrats’) moved away from that one. Gays: the last group you’re allowed to hate. Whoopie!
Posted by: sdr65 | December 19, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am
While I think there were better candidates that our newly elected President could have picked, I’m hesitant to read too much into this choice.
Warren has somewhat positioned himself as a “pastor to the presidents,” in much the way Billy Graham did, so I suppose he was a logical choice in that regard.
President Obama (which, incidentally, is how he should be referred to) could have made a “safer” choice – and that might have been smarter for him from a political standpoint – but he recognizes that our country has become deeply divided- by politics, by religion, by economic status.
In order for our society to survive, we all need to reach out to those we may strongly disagree with. When you do this, you can change minds and change beliefs. When you don’t do this, you simply foster the “us vs. them” mentality that has been strangling this country for years.
His critics in the comments above will continue to scoff at this, but I believe it to be true.
Was the inaugural invocation the best venue to do this? No, it wasn’t. As remarkable a person as he his, our new President is still just a man and he will make mistakes.
I think that the LGBT is right to be upset, but I hope that they, and everyone else, will give President Obama the benefit of doubt and reserve judgment for when the time comes to do actual policy making.
Posted by: David | December 19, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
“Leftists are not about rights, they’re about power and making the money to keep that power.”
This statement would be entirely true – IF you swapped “left” for “right.”
The “right” has clearly done more than anyone to erode the American Constitution over the past eight years.
And what “power” have the so-called “leftists” had that they’ve tried to keep?
Posted by: David | December 19, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am
Get over yourselves! Rick Warren is
a respected pastor.
You are a small group that has gotten
pretty much everything you want. You
are lucky to be living in the U.S.A. where
you have a right to fight for your “rights”.
I didn’t vote for Obama. This is a nice
gesture for him to reach across the aisle and indicate he is willing to listen to ALL Americans.
Stop being so self-centered and realize
you are not the only ones who live and
work in this country who have rights. Stop WHINING!!!
Posted by: littleleers | December 19, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
Time to give up on the dems who always throw us under the bus. Also time to stop shoving “gay rights down their throats”. Time to join the republican party and slash my taxes. Cut education to the bone (no kids) welfare, work programs affirm action (got a good job already, no thanks)libraries, litteracy (already can read and buy my own books). Childhood enrichment (nah, probably off themselves when they realize they are gay anyway).
Posted by: RT | December 19, 2008, 10:44 am 10:44 am
Gays are making a big mistake here bgy targeting Christians. Christianity is one religion that grows in persecution. Be careful gays.
Posted by: Big Mistake | December 19, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
“I’m so confused over political correctness!”
It’s simply. Try not to be a d***. It’s really not that difficult.
“Time to give up on the dems who always throw us under the bus. Also time to stop shoving “gay rights down their throats”.”
Yeah, damn people and their “rights.” Hey, I’m as annoyed as anybody when I see gay people trying to make others uncomfortable with their gayness. But there are idiots in all shapes and sizes and sexual orientations. So whatever. But gay people aren’t going anywhere…you’re not going to change them, so let’s all just live and let live, eh? There’s no reason they shouldn’t be afforded the same benefits of any other union.
Posted by: Silky | December 19, 2008, 11:12 am 11:12 am
“You are a small group that has gotten
pretty much everything you want. You
are lucky to be living in the U.S.A. where
you have a right to fight for your “rights”.”
You are lucky to be living the U.S.A. where you are free to be a complete fricking moron.
Posted by: Silky | December 19, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
?. Silky, Read the post — it might take a few time.- RT
Posted by: RT | December 19, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am
Honestly, I can’t follow your post and I have no idea what the broader point is. But I’m a big fan of “litteracy.”
Posted by: Silky | December 19, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Let’s crucify Rick Warren now!!!
Posted by: Gay Right Guy | December 19, 2008, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Big Mistake, I don’t believe the gay population has targeted Christians. I would think it to be quite the opposite! It is wonderful that YOU have YOUR religion and that YOUR religion works for YOU. However, YOUR beliefs may be in opposition of opinions and beliefs held by others. Would you like to to be subjected to something that you have no belief in?
That’s why I say that ALL unions should be civil. Everyone on an equal base! If a religion chooses to recognize a whatever marriage than so be it. If not, so be it.
Gays are, were, and will be here. Whether you like it or not, gay marriage is on the horizon. It may not be here today but it is my prediction that our country will have this freedom under 5 years.
You have to ask yourself; What is it that gay people know about marriage that (given the divorce rate)heterosexual people do not know about? Especially, since gay people are fighting SO hard for this priviledge.
Yet heterosexuals take marriage so lightly and for granted. If we are such believers in marriage, maybe we should be more concerned about divorce laws rather than who is marrying whom?
So, if this minister is against gay marriage, so be it! I am more interested in knowing what he is doing and how he counsels his congregation regarding divorce.
Posted by: FS | December 19, 2008, 11:52 am 11:52 am
For those of you whom feel the U.S.A. is backward on our dealings with homosexuals. What is the percentage of homosexuals to heterosexuals in this country? Why should such a small, cul-de-sac micro-society have the “right”, let alone the ability, to demand aquiscience from the rest of us? In about 70 countries in the world, homosexuality is flat out illegal. In 7 of those countries, the penalty for being a convicted homosexual is extermination. What “rights” are denied a homosexual that are given to any single (unmarried) person? To use the Courts to get what you want is to subvert Democracy.
Posted by: AlchyDave25 | December 19, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
I don’t know why people are surprised by this. Obama has been very open about his Christian faith, talked about it often on the campaign trail – and Christianity is not a cafeteria-style religion. You can’t pick and choose which parts of the faith you’re going to follow and which you’re going to throw by the wayside. It doesn’t work that way. Why is it surprising that a devout Christian would share some of the same values with this famous pastor?
Posted by: Sharp shooter | December 19, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
I’m a pretty liberal guy, but I never trusted Obama. He’s a heavily marketed product, a slick, slimey guy from Chicago who has done anything to get where he is. To think he is the lone innocent in the world of nasty, corrupt Chicago politics is naive. Look at the people he’s used and turned his back on when they started being a liability.
What bothers me now is that his supporters still insist that he is simply “reaching across the aise,” which is complete BS. How anyone can truly believe that is beyond me. He is not a true friend to any group unless it directly helps himself. He’s as arrogant and as phoney as they come.
And this blog, with its high school gay jokes, is embarrassing. It’s hard to believe some slow people actually still think like that.
Posted by: Jeep | December 19, 2008, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
MR. OBAMA, GUESS THIS JUST PROVES THAT IF YOU ARE NOT WHITE IN AMERICA, NOTHING YOU DO WILL EVER BE GOOD ENOUGH.
THESE GAYS CLAIM DISCRIMINATION, BUT ARE THE FIRST TO DENY OTHERS THE RIGHT TO FREE SPEECH AND ASSOCIATION.
LMAO.
Posted by: CHUCK | December 19, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Gay Right Guy | Dec 19, 2008 11:34:30 AM
Right, only your perverted views should be tolerated.
Posted by: Smack | December 19, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
That’s nice- a comment from alchey about exterminating gays. What a pyscopath. Let me guess, “Christian?”
Posted by: jeep | December 19, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
jeep | Dec 19, 2008 12:14:35 PM –
Did you actually read his post? Because he is not calling for the extermination of gays. He says in about 7 countries they are trying to do that. Let me guess, “Illiterate?”
Posted by: Smack | December 19, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
FS, your absolutely right! Please send me a postcard from Tehran – soon.
Posted by: WestVA | December 19, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
FS, your absolutely right! Please send me a postcard from Tehran – soon.
Posted by: WestVA | December 19, 2008, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
JEEP: I didn’t create the fact, just brought it to your attention! Other then “Shoot the messenger”, whats on your agenda for the day?
Posted by: AlchyDave25 | December 19, 2008, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
AlchyDave25, you are correct BUT it does not mean that homosexuality does not exist–especially in Muslim countries. I say to you again, let’s not cite the statistics of how many men have had at least one homosexual experience or fantasized about such. Church men, in particular–don’t get me started…
Anyway, that is not the issue. The fact of it is, given that the divorce rate is so high, what are you doing to preserve the sanctity of marriage? What actions are you taking to curtail the high rate of divorce amongst heterosexuals?
Finally, I must say though, that you do come across as one of those… “He who doth protest too much, just might be….”
Posted by: FS | December 19, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Gays are clueless when it comes to marriage just like many heterosexuals. Modern America has made marriage out to be a mere sexual union based on mutual feelings of affection. Marriage however is not about that and has not been about that through centuries in cultures. Marriage was a design to to raise the kids. Marriage provides kids the best environment for parents to raise children that share their OWN genes. Of course there are exceptions to this. But marriage is about having and raising children for the vast majority of the married people. Gays cannot by nature have children through their marriage relationship. No, it is not just about puppy love. Our society and our children will continue to suffer until we realize this truth.
Posted by: Gays Clueless | December 19, 2008, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
JEEP: I noticed you failed to make any comments about the rest of my post. Could it be that, unlike many Gay folk and their supporters, you choose not to fly in the face of both the facts, AND the majority? If so, you have a leg up on many people.
Posted by: AlchyDave25 | December 19, 2008, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
FS:
Nice try, sweetheart. Clumsy, ackward, but you get points for the effort.
Some homosexual marriages have ALREADY failed and resulted in divorce.
I have been heterosexually married for over 40 years.
I am pointing out facts.
You are attempting (poorly) to use redirection to obscure that. ( Don’t blush, it’s a tactic commonly used by those whose arguments lack substance.)
If I point out that Alaska is north of me, and you don’t like that, it is unimpressive for you to respond that New York is east of me.
Posted by: AlchyDave25 | December 19, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Obama is not “reaching across the aisle” – he’s already in the aisle you all are claiming he’s reaching across to! Obama is a Christian. He can not be all things – a devout Christian (that he claims to be) while at the same time in favor of gay marriage or increased abortion. during the election, people were just so eager for change that they morphed Obama into whatever they wanted to be – fierce proponent of gay marriage, protector of women’s rights, devout Christian, etc. People saw what they wanted to see. The reality is that he’s just a man, and seems he struggles with spiritual issues just like the rest of us.
Posted by: Me Again | December 19, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
AlchyDave25, thanks for the compliment. However, you failed to answer the question. Given, that the divorce rate is so high, what are you doing to preserve the sanctity of marriage amongst heterosexuals? What actions are you taking to curtail the high rate of divorce amongst heterosexuals?
Posted by: FS | December 19, 2008, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Fudge packing and dildo donning(excuse the graffic description please, I think most people forget what homo behavior actually does) is an immoral, weird and disgusting behavior, not a minority statis. I am intolerant that this behavior should be promoted to our society and our children should be taught such is acceptable but that does not make me intolerant of people and it is my choice to believe what God says as right. That does not make me a bigot, to reject immoral behavior and I do not hate anyone, nor am I phobic. I really do not care what this segment of society (2%) do in private and I don’t dictate to them or others what they should or should not do, as sad as these behaviors are. That the left is raging over the selection of Rick Warren shows their personal intolerance for anyone who lives and teaches Biblical norms for society, (which is the majority of America). You know, we don’t shove Jesus Christ down anyones throat, Christianity graciously invites others to repent of wrong doing and know Him. Unlike Radical Islam, which forces people to be Islamic or die. Whether anyone likes it or not, God, the Creator will be the one who decides everyones eternal fate. Americans have the right to have civil, righteous laws and traditional values in our land. Our Bill of Rights and Constitution guarantees this right.
Persoanlly, I think Rick Warren is an excellent choice for a Pres. Innvocation, because prayer from a righteous man is what is needed for our country. I was deeply disturbed at election results, but now we must pray for our leadership. God knows they need help! That is our duty.
Posted by: di | December 19, 2008, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Screw morality! This issue is not about Homosexuality. It is about equal rights. People do not get married by the church; people get a marriage certificate issued to them by the local government. The fact that a church leader would even take up this fight and a President would invite him to give the invocation is appalling. It sets a very precedent. Some church leaders can still find passages in the bible that justifies slavery.
Posted by: jc | December 19, 2008, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Obama has forever tarnished his message of hope and change by pandering to mega church leader Rick Warren. Warren angers not just gay people but moderate christians that were hoping for the end of flirting with christian extreamists. Now Obama has proven that he is no better than George w. Bush. Obama is willing to throw his democratic supporters uner the bus hoping to pick up the evengelical vote in his reelection bid.
Posted by: Carlin | December 20, 2008, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm