By Lee Speigel

Dec 9, 2008 9:17pm

Obama’s Answer on Blagojevich — and the Questions it Raises

If anything, the criminal complaint against Democratic Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich portrays President-elect Obama and his aides as good guys, since Blago is seen fuming, cursing at Obama for only offering "appreciation" in return for appointing his preferred Senate candidate, Valerie Jarrett.

But this isn’t just a complaint against a guy who happens to, coincidentally, also be a Chicago Democrat. Team Obama is all over the criminal complaint — as seemingly innocent characters, perhaps even potential victims, of the Blago drama. But they’re in there nonetheless, and that is highly unusual.

Incoming White House senior adviser Valerie Jarrett has her own pseudonym – Senate Candidate 1. So is some unnamed individual with ties to the Obama team. Blagojevich has many epithets for the President-elect himself. There are lots of questions about what any of them knew.

Then there’s the big question about how Blago was so sure — so angry — that Team Obama would not pay to play.

Who in the Obama Team was talking to the Governor’s office?

When they found out that Blago wanted to quid pro quo Team Obama (Jarrett gets the Senate seat if Blago gets a Cabinet position, or a good-paying job with a union-affiliated organization, or his wife gets a seat on some corporate boards) what did they do?

Did a member of Team Obama drop a dime on him?

As of now, the lack of answers from Team Obama is all we have. Obama sources say the silence is for two reasons: 1) this is a criminal investigation and they want to be careful about what they’re allowed to say, and 2) they want to talk to everyone, make sure they know just who spoke to whom, and then be able to give one definitive answer with no subsequent shoes dropping.

A problem with this is that President-elect Obama appeared before the cameras today for a previously-scheduled photo op with environmental guru Al Gore.

"Did you have any contact with or were you aware at all of what was happening with your Senate seat?" asked a reporter, the Wall Street’s Journal Jonathan Weisman.

"I had no contact with the Governor or his office," Obama said, "and so we were, I was not aware of what was happening."

As we noted, this contradicted a comment made by Obama senior aide David Axelrod, who told Fox News Chicago about Obama, "I know he’s talked to the governor" — about the Senate seat — "and there are a whole range of names, many of which have surfaced, and I think he has a fondness for a lot of them."

Axelrod has since said he was "mistaken when I told an interviewer last month that the President-elect has spoken directly to Governor Blagojevich about the Senate vacancy. They did not then or at any time discuss the subject."

But there are other problems with Obama’s response as well.

Slate’s John Dickerson writes, Obama saying "I was not aware of what was happening" is "so vague as to be nearly meaningless" and "can mean anything you want it to. It can mean you weren’t aware of anything relating to the Senate seat, or that you weren’t aware the governor was trying to sell the Senate seat, or that you weren’t aware the governor was under federal investigation for trying to sell the Senate seat. ..Was Obama purposefully trying to be unclear? It’s hard to say. It’s a little hard to believe that he didn’t know anything that was happening relating to his old seat."

Then there’s that other part of Obama’s statement — the one that he self-corrects, mid-sentence: "We were, I was not aware of what was happening."

He starts off speaking for the Obama Team. "We were." Then he stops himself and goes back and speaks only for himself. "I was."

He was not aware of what was happening. Not sure about anyone else.

There’s nothing inherently wrong with this self-correction — giving Mr. Obama the benefit of the doubt, he was trying to be precise and presumably at that point he wasn’t sure of who in his team had talked to whom on Team Blago, if anyone.

But it does seem to indicate an unspoken acknowledgement that he doesn’t know the whole story, or at least didn’t at that point.

Sources close to Obama say that he found out about the arrest of Blagojevich at the same time we all did, this morning. But it would seem highly improbable that no one there knew anything.

On its website, President-elect Obama’s Transition Team is making a big deal about transparency, posting memos and information about meetings with various, largely supportive organizations.

True transparency means a little more than that, one might posit. It means telling voters about matters that aren’t entirely comfortable to share.

If one is just counting as being "transparent" the act of sharing meetings with environmental groups delighted to be counting down the days until Wyoming gets its favorite son back, then the notion might not mean much.

And that would mean that in order to truly be transparent, the American people need to find out as much as possible, as soon as possible, about what role anyone Team Obama played in any of the various shenanigans Gov. Blagojevich is accused of committing — or any others we don’t yet know about.

- jpt

User Comments

Ya know, this is all fair, Jake. And I know the media loves to know EVERYTHING and needs tpo know it RIGHT NOW.
But you have to entertain the possibility that some of Obama’s people were involved with tipping off the FBI about what Blago was doing and that the FBI has asked them not to speak publicly about it yet. This IS an ongoing investigation so I would not find that surprising. Maybe they just can’t be as “transparent” as you would like them to be right now. There may be other considerations. Patience, Jake, patience.

Posted by: Lisa | December 9, 2008, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Obama’s people were not involved in tipping off people.
Obama and Rahm were working with Blago to make him governor.
Obama in 2006 even after Fitzgerald was investigating blago for illegal hiring practices still backed Blago. Fitzgerald started a federal investigation in June 2006. In August 2006 Obama still supported Blago for re-election and did a campaign event with him.
Obama overlooked the federal investigation of Blago in 2006 because he needed Blago’s money to set up to run for president.
Remember Blago and Rezko are friends.
Obama needed Rezko’s money to run for president in the beginning.
Just like he said there was no inkling rezko was in trouble when the same Fitzgerald was investigating rezko.
There are no checks and balances with Obama.

Posted by: David | December 9, 2008, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

What a mess for this guy. If the people in Illinois want integrity vote Ron Paul for your governor. I know Dr. Paul doesn’t live in your state, but he is one of the very few ethical people in government who is not bought. Just take a stand for what is right and just and vote for the good doctor. Enough of this corruption already!

Posted by: Huh | December 9, 2008, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

America is asleep at the wheel.
America has turned over this country to corrupt chicago machine politcs.
Rezko was close with Blago and Obama. Both got huge money from Rezko’s corrupt network setting up their careers.
Obama also got a sweetheart mortgage deal from a friend on michelle obama’s board.
Obama also gave earmarks to the employer of michelle obama at the hospital. Michelle Obama’s salary was doubled.
This is hard core corrupt chicago politics.
Axelrod in 2005 who is now Obama’s white house advisor argued that it should be legal to exchange political appointments for favors.
This is not change we can believe.
America has turned over this nation to corrupt chicago poltics.

Posted by: Jeff | December 9, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

How dare you even put President Elect Obama’s name together with Blagojevich. I’m sure he had no knowledge of Blagojevich’s corruption and misdeeds. It’s not like he ever worked with him or associated with him. They were probably only living in the same neighborhood or something.

Posted by: Bill | December 9, 2008, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Can’t wait until 2017 when this long national nightmare of corrupt chicago politics in the white house will be over.
January 20, 2017 will be a great day in america.
Remember Valarie Jarrett was the same Obama advisor who said don’t say anything bad about Farakkan because it might alientate voters.

Posted by: Steve | December 9, 2008, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

Of course his “advisors” were in these negotiations. It is crystal clear if you read the complaint.
Is this really so surprising? Obama has been surrounded by crooks and liars his entire career – and we should believe he is clean as a babys bottom.

Posted by: SandyK | December 9, 2008, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Good Lord! I’m so sick of the questions! Get facts before you post a story like this. The media is looking for a story and will “ask questions” to keep readers and audiences interested. Enough with the bread and circus! I mean no disrespect Jake. I love your reporting but here is the important question. Do you know how many people lost their jobs at my former employer last week? Answer 850! I was apart of the 300 that were laid off a couple of months earlier! The only question I have for Obama is can you fix the economy? The only question I have for the media is can you please report fact instead of questions? We need answers for the economy!

Posted by: Rob | December 9, 2008, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

I already see how the media is going to paint this one. They are already running the stories of Blago cursing Obama, as if that exonerates him.

Posted by: Bill | December 9, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

“Obama’s people were not involved in tipping off people.”
Really, David? And you know that how? The evidence Fitgerald released is pretty clear that Blago wasn’t getting anything he wanted from Obama’s people (and he was pretty darn pissed about it, hence the profane language towards Obama). So if it’s pretty clear Obama’s people weren’t prepared to play along with Blago, it stands to reason there’s a possibility they may have been part of turning in evidence on him.

Posted by: Lisa | December 9, 2008, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Rob is sick of the questions. Wow. I guess we should all just forget about the blatant criminal acts of a state Govenor closely associated with our next President and go back to sleep. We only need worry about lost jobs. No wonder our county is so screwed. See you all in the soup lines!!

Posted by: bill | December 9, 2008, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

Although this is just another day in Chicago politics it makes one wonder as to what kind of corruption will be coming out of the Obama administration in the next few years.

Posted by: Jan | December 9, 2008, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

It seems strange to me that the Govenor and Obama use the same words.

Posted by: olin tucker | December 9, 2008, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Nice reporting Jake.
thanks

Posted by: smith | December 9, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

to Lisa talkingpointsmemo.com is reporting emanuel didn’t tip them off.
Feds had been investigating Blago for 3 years.
There were wiretaps on blago about this before the election.
The feds knew Obama was going to win and they knew Blago could be corrupt in this process so they got the warrent before the election to wiretap blago about the selection process.
Also what does it say about Obama that Fitzgerald was investigating Blago for hiring corruption in June 2006 and Obama still said he supported Blago then. Obama in August 2006 did a campaign even for Blago even thought fitzgerald had a federal investigation on him.

Posted by: Jeff | December 9, 2008, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

I wonder where some of you people shrieking about corruption were when Bush accepted those no-bid contracts from private contractors (and later received large campaign donations from them).
I’d wait and see first, and it’s possible it was the Obama people who tipped-off the FBI about this.

Posted by: Grey Matter | December 9, 2008, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm

Obama by his own words chose Chicago to make his home and start his political career. There isn’t a soul alive that doesn’t know that the Chicago machine is the most corrupt political system in the US. Given that everybody insists that Obama is a genius guy, he most certainly by now has sized up Blago and most certainly knows the score. It is equally clear that at least up until recently he tolerated this man and his slimy behavior for party reasons. As with Wright and several others, it is o.k when they bother other people, but when it becomes personal for Obama that is when the behavior is no longer tolerated. I doubt very much that Axelrod misspoke the first time. He is much too detail oriented to do so.

Posted by: Susan | December 9, 2008, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

Hehe…the extreme republicans and their ilk are so transparent in wanting to smear Obama with anything they can muster in utter and futile desperation…but it just won’t wash…onto the White House with the Obama express and beyond…yippee-ki-yay…

Posted by: Boomer | December 9, 2008, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

Yeah, right Lisa. The FBI’s tapes and documents were filtered through Obama and his political machine. They spoon-fed this carefully scripted story to the duped media as part of a PR campaign. And Blagojevich’s anger? Part of an act. If you get something else from this story, then tell us, and explain your logic as though it’s something we should know.

Posted by: josephbbl | December 9, 2008, 10:18 pm 10:18 pm

To: obamacrat for Palin….Move to Alaska.

Posted by: orangecat | December 9, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Mr. Obama is already the most hypocritical President Elect our country has ever known. He will be the most hypocritical President ever.

Posted by: young_voter | December 9, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

Still, Blagojevich should resign. He should be ashamed of himself. The previous Illinois Governor (who was a Republican) also got convicted.
Sigh.

Posted by: Grey Matter | December 9, 2008, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

orangecat,
I highly doubt “Obamacrat for Palin” was even an Obama supporter. Obama supporters chose an intelligent man instead of the anti-intellectual Palin (because there was the risk of McCain’s age), that was the difference. In fact, Palin frightened many undecideds to go over to Obama.

Posted by: Grey Matter | December 9, 2008, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

You’re exactly right, josephbbl. Patrick Fitzgerald, the FBI, the media… they’re all in cahoots to make Obama look good. It’s all a big conspiracy. Be sure to adjust your tinfoil hat.

Posted by: Lisa | December 9, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Chicago politican going to jail again!
What a shocker!
I would not vote for O, because he would not work in his own community as Mayor or Governor to clean it up. Why did he move to Chicago? To use those corrupt people to move on up. Now he is moving into OUR HOUSE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: tonya | December 9, 2008, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

Why would Barack Obama, who whatever else you might want to accuse him of, is a pretty smart guy, want to taint himself by association with a guy like this, not to mention entertaining any ideas of bribing him! He is on the brink of becoming President. I don’t think he would throw away his reputation over a fixed Senate seat.
Many politicians of both parties are crooked as snakes backs. I don’t think Obama is guilty of anything except wanting to set up a good government and get on with helping us climb out of the mess we are in.

Posted by: Phoenix Lady | December 9, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Obamacrat for Palin: “I used to support President-Elect Barack Obama, but the President Obama has been the worst President ever. Worse than Bush! He has been an utter failure, and his tenure has been ruinous for our great country.”
Great post – I’m still chuckling.

Posted by: jhw539 | December 9, 2008, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Stand Up Chuck,
How nice for you to insult my intelligence. I so appreciate it.
Unfortunately, Obama did not engage in any dealings with this guy over the Senate seat as the RNC is trying to spin it, and the investigator made it clear Obama wasn’t involved. If he was involved, he would’ve been mentioned by the investigator, no?

Posted by: Grey Matter | December 9, 2008, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Thank you for Obama…we have been blessed…now if you can only do something about the sourpuss republicans…

Posted by: Slim Shady | December 9, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm

Grey Matter: “Still, Blagojevich should resign. He should be ashamed of himself.”
Resign? He should be, and likely will be, jailed. The IL congress should impeach him promptly and Democrats should lead the charge.
Every party has corrupt members. The measure of the party is how they deal with them.

Posted by: jhw539 | December 9, 2008, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

To:Josephbbl…Blagojevich’s anger is about not being able to feather his and his wife’s nest.Read any and all internet news…they have same story.Blangojevich and wife want big money and free ride!

Posted by: orangecat | December 9, 2008, 10:32 pm 10:32 pm

jhw539,
Yes, I agree he should be jailed. But while investigations are ongoing, he can still name a person to the Senate seat because he officially is still Governor- and well, there is a good reason why we wouldn’t one him to do so.

Posted by: Grey Matter | December 9, 2008, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

One would think that if anyone from Obama’s circle was involved in any related wrongdoing, Fitzgerald wouldn’t have gone so far out of his way to say that Obama was not involved in the crimes.

Posted by: ATO | December 9, 2008, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

I understand that Obama operatives are on tape talking about appointments for Blagojevich and his wife. This may explain why Obama stopped to change his words in mid sentence.

Posted by: crackmeup | December 9, 2008, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm

When they want you they’ll get you. Politics as usual.
You really think 1/2 of them aren’t sleeping with prostitutes like Spitzer (esp. New Yorkers)-or at least having an affair, or corrupt like Blago.
If they’ve been seen or heard doing bad, everyone knows, if you haven’t, someone still knows. What takes them down?
Enemies. Someone tying their shoes. When they need to align the chess pieces to their liking. In my opinion Obama is tying his shoe or playing chess-most likely both. I voted for him but it doesn’t make me blind to what’s going on.

Posted by: Luke | December 9, 2008, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Why is anyone surprised? Chicago politics are very, very dirty. The questions are: (a) why did Blago at first expect that Obama’s team would play ball with him, and (b) how did he later know that they wouldn’t? Who on Obama’s team was he talking to?
Axelrod has already said that Obama discussed the appointment with Blago. If Blago didn’t discuss this with Obama, who else on the O’s team did he speak to?

Posted by: Mike | December 9, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

Jake, it’s clear to me that any attempt at transparency in politics is wasted on you and most of your fellow reporters. There are many reasons not to comment on an ongoing investigation, several of which you or other commentators have mentioned. I find it funny that, in spite of evidence suggesting that Obama is clean in this situation, y’all are trying to create drama about it. I’m not saying there may not be a sketchy person in his team involved in all of this – maybe let the Feds do their job and we’ll see what happens, no? So much for the “liberal” media – your political leanings are incredibly obvious. If this were Bush, I doubt this would be a story at all in your book – in fact, nobody seems to have picked up and ran with the rather interesting story in today’s LA times about specific Bush administration exit interview talking points.

Posted by: transparency | December 9, 2008, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm

Mcgreevey,Spitzer,Blago,Obama Can any one say party of corruption.

Posted by: Cheney | December 9, 2008, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm

Obama doesn’t like dirty.
Cleanup on Illinois Gov!
Someone named Rahm squashed a Blogo in the aisle.

Posted by: kravitz | December 9, 2008, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm

Jay,
More likely since it’s an ongoing investigation they’re not allowed to comment. So they just say that otherwise the media will dig and dig before the FBI is ready to release more info.
Oh, and his name’s OBAMA, not Osama, you know. Osama’s the guy in the cave somewhere in Afghanistan.

Posted by: Grey Matter | December 9, 2008, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm

Who could name 3 good friends of Obama.
All Obama friends are criminals. Shame to America

Posted by: adam | December 9, 2008, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Look, Obama and the statement of whether there was any discussion with Blago….well, no one has asked when. One would have to assume that they did have conversation – GENERAL conversation. I would see it as unbelieveable if the two of them did not have at least ONE conversation. This does NOT implicate Obama had any absolute knowledge of wrong doings by Blogo…
PLease let’s not let the media, including JT, blow this out of proportion!!!!

Posted by: Richard | December 9, 2008, 11:23 pm 11:23 pm

The Feds have wiretap evidence. Have they released it all? Are any of Obama’s people or Obama on the tapes? This could get interesting.

Posted by: MadJayhawk | December 9, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

adam
Are you that dumb for beleiving Obama’s only friends are criminals (actually that is wrong) or are you lying?

Posted by: unshrub | December 9, 2008, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm

Hmmmmmm. Good friends of Obama…
1. God
2. His Family
3. Joe Biden
4. Oprah
5. Al Gore
6. 63 million american’s that voted for him…
is 63,000,006 good enough for you!?

Posted by: Richard | December 9, 2008, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

Jay,
Yeah, I suppose Obama could do worse then Bush- with Bush’s no-bid Blackwater contracts-NOT! As if we aren’t already in a ditch because of Bush who has engaged in lots of questionable activities. Oh, and did you hear? He also shredded the Constitution and waived the right to habeas corpus.
Richard, the number actually is closer to 70 million- 69,436,525 :) (Counting absentee ballots e.g)

Posted by: Grey Matter | December 9, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Bush, Cheney, Delay. All republicans are tainted and evil. Shame to America.

Posted by: Voice of America | December 9, 2008, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

Thanks for the update on the nearly 70,000,000 friends of Obama!
Additionally, on another of Jake’s blogs, there is a video…Jake acutally states that Obama is not and has not been a good friend of Blogo since 2006!!!!! Obama refused a request by Blogo to speak at the DNC as well.
Why did Jake NOT state this in this blog? Or did he..and I just missed it!?!?

Posted by: Richard | December 9, 2008, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

Richard,
Well, the media is trying to spin it, I guess.
Considering the investigation had already been going on for 3 years, if Obama had any close ties with this guys, I am sure the RNC would have aired it like dirty laundry over and over during the campaign. Some people here keep trying to tie it to Obama, when it is clear from Blagojevich’s conversations the only thing “Senate Candidate No 1″ (whom apparently Obama thought would be a good pick) would give Blago was “gratitude”. In short, they told Blago : NO.
There is a hint that it was Rahm Emanuel who alerted the Feds to the new developments and resulted in the Feds immediately arresting Blagojevich before he could appoint the Senate candidate.

Posted by: Grey Matter | December 9, 2008, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm

And Jake how many more times are you going to raise this issue? You are looking redicules.
Why not do some reporting Jake? The more you blog thye worst you look.

Posted by: Thinking | December 9, 2008, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm

I ended up voting for Obama, after repeatedly trashing him as “just another politician” At this point I’m totally giving him the benefit of the doubt. There are strong negative forces that oppose Obama. However, he looks to have his nose clean on this one, but so far we’ve only seen the tip of the proverbial iceberg. Let’s hope and pray, for the good of us all, that his nose stays clean. Woe is all of us if our President is corrupt. I know there are many who are already pointing fingers based on wishful, harmful speculation. I myself have been there and done that. Not this time – for the greater good we should stick closely to the facts, and the facts alone. That’s all I have to say on this topic.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | December 10, 2008, 12:00 am 12:00 am

Grey Matter…
The media just needs to stick to facts… I find it irritating that Jake did not mention the 3 year investigation….the breaking of ties since 2006 by Obama with Blago….the refusal to let him speak at the DNC…
If anything….Obama is getting a lesson on being careful what he says! I truly believe he handled the situation greatly, and Obama will prevail in knowing nothing more or less than the rest of the IL senate/house did/does!!

Posted by: Richard | December 10, 2008, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Richard,
Exactly. The RNC is now salivating and trying to pin this to Obama. Gee, where was all their outrage when Palin praised Stevens and didn’t join the other Senators and people calling for his resignation? Palin too once worked for Stevens apparently, I vaguely remember reading somewhere.

Posted by: Grey Matter | December 10, 2008, 12:08 am 12:08 am

It’s amazing how quickly history is re-written. Blago is arrested for corruption based on wire tap evidence which is about as concrete as it gets (the wire taps during Watergate brought down a sitting Presudent), and Obama didn’t know anything about. I didn’t go to Harvard but I am not a complete idiot. Let’s start with the revision of Axelrod’s history when he stated unequivocally that Obama had discussed the seat with Blago. He misspoke. Obama used to work for Blago, and probably paid good money for his Senate seat, which might explain why Blago thought he was gonna get a load of cash for Barry’s seat. Blago certainly seemed to know that Barry didn’t want to have to pay for the seat twice even if it meant his good friend would get it. Let’s be honest with ourselves, and demand that questions be asked and answers be given. Obama is as crooked as Blago, but like many around him, he is happy to toss the trash under the Hope and Change express when the time is right. For god sake, the man threw his own grandmother under the tires. It is time to demand answers before we have to impeach the “Motherf***er”.

Posted by: wylovescheney | December 10, 2008, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Why is this news so surprising? When people see how a completely unqualified community activist can come along and BUY a job in the white house, of course some moron like Blagojevich is going to come along and think he can SELL a senate seat…duh

Posted by: TJ | December 10, 2008, 12:21 am 12:21 am

This is filled with innuendo, or as a famous nut case at a madhouse in Ypsilanti, Michigan once said, “insinuendo”, a nice logical schizophenric elision.
Bottom line, the guv was a sleaze, the Obama folks stuffed it to him by appreciating his electoral efforts, gave him squat. But it does give a lot of fodder for writing crap like this which is nothing much more than what the Andersens wrounght; they are called fairy tales.

Posted by: Richard McDonough | December 10, 2008, 12:49 am 12:49 am

TJ,
He didn’t buy the White House.
69 (going on 70) million people and counting put him there. These same people gave him the money, you know? Unqualified? He is an Ivy Leaguer who studied constitutional law…isn’t the POTUS’s job to protect the Constitution? How is someone who graduated at the bottom of their class or who had to go to five diff colleges to get a degree more qualified?

Posted by: Grey Matter | December 10, 2008, 12:54 am 12:54 am

The affidavit explicitly states that there is no evidence that Obama or Obama’s people had anything to do with this. There is no “hidden, unreleased” evidence that the FBI is waiting to spring on Obama. There is no link. Get your facts straight.

Posted by: Ryan | December 10, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

Pray that the nightmare doesn’t even start on January 20, 2009.
It doesn’t HAVE to.

Posted by: tanarg | December 10, 2008, 1:02 am 1:02 am

He DID buy a job in the white house…he broke his promise on campaign finance and bought the job…
My previous comment stands…duh

Posted by: TJ | December 10, 2008, 1:11 am 1:11 am

By the way, lets hope he’s able to BUY some answers now because all he’s shown so far is an ability to read other people’s words off a teleprompter…just like an anchorman.
Oh, make that an “ivy league” anchorman…hehe

Posted by: TJ | December 10, 2008, 1:19 am 1:19 am

Excuse me, this is a criminal investigation. It’s not the time for tell all transparency measures as suggested,which could likely undermine the investigative process. Hopefully, a thorough non partisan housecleaning is underway.

Posted by: kat | December 10, 2008, 1:30 am 1:30 am

Jake, don’t be a pinhead. Of course, either Obama or someone on his team has spoken to Blago. We are talking about Chicago politics, here, This is not news and there is certainly no room for your insinuations. If you really want a Pulitzer that bad, undertake something worthwhile.

Posted by: Jessie Gibson | December 10, 2008, 1:34 am 1:34 am

RE: the “peeps who put him there…
45 (going on 46) million people don’t even know who obama’s VP is…if you gave them the clue “change we can believe in” the number goes up to 51 (going on 52) million people. 35 (going on 36) million people were ACORN recruits who got 1 (going on 2) cookies if they would sign 100 (going on 150) voter registration ballots using NFL player names. In an ironic twist of fate, 17 (going on 18) million of those 35 (going on 36) million of those ACORN recruits were deemed to be more experienced for the white house than a community organizer.

Posted by: TJ | December 10, 2008, 1:40 am 1:40 am

Oh Please Slim Shady…Gag me with a spoon!

Posted by: cpad | December 10, 2008, 2:19 am 2:19 am

Please recall that Harry Truman also got his start via a corrupt political machine (in his case Kansas City), and turnd out to be a competent and near-great president.

Posted by: Other Shoe, Other Foot | December 10, 2008, 2:25 am 2:25 am

TJ
re: ‘When people see how a completely unqualified community activist can come along and BUY a job in the white house,’
lets have some fun ….. change:
When people see how a completely unqualified son of a political dynasty can come along and be appointed the white house and ruin the country while getting people killed for no reason,… Duh….
I’m just sayin’…..

Posted by: Blue | December 10, 2008, 2:39 am 2:39 am

Ha ha, l’ll laugh with the rest of the world, no wonder America is so screwed up.
A very very sick sick country. Remember a disease only gets worse if it is not treated.
911 was the first foot to come down. Is the country waiting for the second to come down.
Or will the people finally after 240 years become honest with themselves, and start to admit it’s all about the rich white man and his sick obsessive desire to maintain control under ANY circumstances.
We have seen it over and over and over again….and NOW it is effecting the whole world.
In case the American people were wondering what the rest of the world thinks about it, your right you should be embarrassed at the lack of responsibility in the world America is portraying.
Americas reputation is the laughing stock of the whole world and the discussions can be heard in any big city, of course of except in America. Maybe that’s where the problem lies?

Posted by: Edwad Mangan | December 10, 2008, 4:12 am 4:12 am

By the way can someone tell me why almost all of these posts are signed anonymously?
Edward

Posted by: Edwad Mangan | December 10, 2008, 4:17 am 4:17 am

I hear Obama is a known associate of one of the Keating 5 named John McCain. They have a suspicious relationship that goes back many years and needs investigation.

Posted by: BishopKingPawn | December 10, 2008, 4:59 am 4:59 am

Maybe OJ and Obama can be cell mates!

Posted by: 1sabre | December 10, 2008, 5:05 am 5:05 am

Too bad the FBI doesn’t have the time, brains,or balls to recover B. Hussein Obama’s Kenyan birth certificate.

Posted by: 1sabre | December 10, 2008, 5:20 am 5:20 am

Hi Grey Matter. Nice string of comments, I am a citizen with a PEBO that I certainly would and did not vote for, but He will be the President soon and that makes him my president.
Two issues with your otherwise reasoned comments.
The whole credit card fund raising thing smacks of the old “no controlling legal authority” argument we heard from the steps of the temple. The lack of accountability and transparency in donors and their citizenship as well as the open door PEBO left subverted the system. This should not stand in future elections and should be reviewed in this election. Someone once asked me if I was upset that Obama switched from his public financing and was surprised that this republican thought nothing of it. But I am upset that the fox ran the hen house.
No bid contracts have a real place in business and government. We see it used daily for quick action. It is, I think, a necessary part getting things done. If you want to scandal monger look at the RMK/BRJ no bids let during the Viet Nam war. You might check the ownership of those companies. Like it or not our elected reps sent us there just like the did in Iraq.
True I am mad still at the lady for spreading Texas flowers along my states freeway, but then I am also still mad at FDR for his contribution of Kudzu to our south, but that’s government for you.

Posted by: smith | December 10, 2008, 5:26 am 5:26 am

It was just SOP to Rod and OB.
BTW, Jake, Joe Scarborough gave you credit for being THE ONLY news reporter with the guts to actually report the possible connection between these two men. On his show this morning, he said ‘Jake Tapper is the only one actually questioning Obama.’
Credos to you on your professionalism.

Posted by: Sami | December 10, 2008, 7:57 am 7:57 am

smith,
Of course there is this risk of fraudulent donations, and according to a report both campaigns filed, it shows that every month, the Obama campaign has to return a few millions in donations found to be illegal/not meeting terms and conditions. Unfortunately, presidential campaigns are getting more and more expensive and the 84 million is not enough (esp with both sides exploiting loopholes in the law- esp the RNC which is very good at fundraising in all prev elections and always outraised Democrats).
Most of the donations are generally legitimate, and it does mobilise a more grassroots sort of effort and encourages more involvement in ordinary citizens. There was this report that claimed the Obama campaign lied about the small-donors. It defined “small” donors as those who donated less then $200 throughout the whole campaign- which, in my opinion, is a pretty low threshold. Many donors, I know, and have told me, they donated $10, $50 here when they got enraged with Sarah Palin or whenever they could scrape together- and usually by the end of the campaign- busted the $200 threshold. Some maxed out too, overtime.
On the issue of no-bid contracts, I would have to disagree. My problem is with the no-bid contracts awarded to companies like Blackwater Security in Iraq. It was not neccessarily an emergency, and bidding would have lowered the price considerably more. Many of these contractors are paid many times more then if a normal American soldier were to do the same job. They have also encouraged soldiers to leave the Army and work for the contractors instead because they are more lucrative- thus further increasing the dependency on contractors and driving up the price of the war. Many of these contractors did not neccessarily do a better job then could have been done by US soldiers or local Iraqis. Iraqis were jobless because of the war, and many were begging for jobs- which were instead given to contractors. Some of these frustrated young men then went to join the insurgency instead.
In the first place, I do not think there should be such widespread use of contractors. In the case of Blackwater, they opened up legal grey areas about the issue of “legal combatants” and how and where they were to be prosecuted when they were charged with committing war crimes. Unlike the armed forces, they are companies- driven more by profit. Cheney has ties with another contractor that has benefited, Halliburton who was awarded a contract. I need not say how there would be a conflict of interest.

Posted by: Grey Matter | December 10, 2008, 8:07 am 8:07 am

Grey
In a transparent government we should no have to say “show me” when it comes to donations especially when the source and total amounts can be so easily hid cannot be verified because of collection methods.
As for contractors, of course there is a better way, there always is. If you assume good about officeholders, as we are all asked to do, and should, until proven otherwise, It is as unfair to Cheney to claim the link is nefarious as it is to Obama over the Blago stuff.
I take it you like Blue Bells and Kudzu.

Posted by: smith | December 10, 2008, 8:52 am 8:52 am

Quit the bs fellas, Washington is the laughing stock of the world. Now that’s something to discuss.
Oh and….
I still have not got a clear answer as to why most of
these posts are signed anonymously?
Edward Mangan
Beijing, China

Posted by: Edwad Mangan | December 10, 2008, 9:08 am 9:08 am

I especially like where the article states, “Then there’s the big question about how Blago was so sure — so angry — that Team Obama would not pay to play. Who in the Obama Team was talking to the Governor’s office?”
==================================
How about NO ONE? How about Blago KNOWING Team Obama wouldn’t play ball because they NEVER did in the past? A perfect example of trying to MAKE news versus simply reporting it.

Posted by: Dems | December 10, 2008, 9:35 am 9:35 am

It is reasonable to assume that Obama has been tied in with Blago and his schemes over the years. That is how Chicago politics seems to work. To save his own skin Blago will talk. When he does we can kiss goodbye to the Obama presidency.

Posted by: David H | December 10, 2008, 10:08 am 10:08 am

This isn’t going to stick to Obama for the same reason Rezko didn’t. People believe in Obama’s character, rightfully so. Yes, his answers were vague and imprecise, much like many of his policy statements. But that doesn’t make him dirty. If anything, I think this reflects positively on him. After all, look at the cesspool he rose from, and he’s still a straight arrow.

Posted by: cordelia525 | December 10, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Thank you. I believe Fitzgerald brought this out NOW to stop Obama from being part of the bribe. Fitzgerald couldn’t go direct to Obama so he circumvented Obama committing a crime by bring this out NOW. Because in and article written by Brian Ross of abc on 12/9/08. One of the things he said is this: The FBI affidavit said Blgo had been told by an ADVISER “the present-elect can get Blgo’s wife on paid corporate boards in exchange for naming the president-elect’s pick to the senate. The FBI was told by two other ADVISERS that Blgo has to “suck it up” for two years. That’s when Blog starting swearing. So, Blgo’s wife would get her job in two years but not right now. Fitzgerald is a democrat and what he did with Scooter Libby proves where his loyalties are.

Posted by: yia | December 10, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am

There is some speculation that, once Blagojevich proposed the quid pro quo, Rahm Emanuel dropped a dime on him to Fitzgerald.

Posted by: Goddard W. Bolt | December 10, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Read the contents of the taped conversations about ‘the unnamed individual’ and put two and two together. What made Blago so mad was that HIS wife was more qualified than Obama’s wife, and yet he was told he would have to wait TWO YEARS for Obama to put Mrs. Blago on a corporate board (like the one that was ‘paid to’ Obama, for Michelle). Blago knew Obama was being hypocritical, so he stated (paraphrased): “My wife has the experience to be on a board now, unlike ‘the unnamed individual’” (Michelle had no experience when she was ‘given’ her corporate board job that pays them dearly each year, both in salary and in company profits). I laughed when I read that these crooks know better than to trust each other — hence, the warning to Blago from his advisor: ‘Be wary of the two year promise’. LOL, if it weren’t so sad for America that BO is our President-elect.

Posted by: Sami | December 10, 2008, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Democrats in Illinois have been backing away from Blago for years. His approval rating, even before his arrest and all this came out, has been 11%. Blago is the only elected Dem governor not to have a role at the Dem convention last summer. Blago was no where near Grant Park on election night. He has been excluded from having any role whatsoever in the Obama transition. Blago would have faced a primary challenge even if this arrest had not taken place. There is no way Obama or his team would have negotiated in any manner with this Democratic pariah.

Posted by: Goddard W. Bolt | December 10, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Wow what a pathetic article. There is no evidence of a connection so JT made some up and vaguely talked about questions being raised. Shocker republican apologist and whiner extraordinaire Joe “how did the intern die in my office” Scarborough thought making stuff up about democrats is great reporting. Way to earn those wing nut points JT. Hey maybe you can accuse Obama of playing the race card.

Posted by: Julian | December 10, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Why is this news so surprising? When people see how a completely unqualified community activist can come along and BUY a job in the white house, of course some moron like Blagojevich is going to come along and think he can SELL a senate seat…duh

Posted by: TJ | December 10, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Yeah, right. Nice try, Jake. No wonder you’re the only one being credited by “Morning Joe.”
At least other journalists know what it actually takes to win a Pulitzer or Emmy.

Posted by: Diane | December 10, 2008, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

It’s an insulting stereotype to assume that any politician who comes from Chicago or receives political support from Chicago is a “crook.” It’s tantamount to claiming that anyone who comes out of Alaska politics is a nitwit who can’t assemble a coherant sentence.
The assumption is disproven by honorable public servants like Congressmen Abner Mikva and Sidney Yates; Senators Paul Douglas, Paul Simon and Adlai Stevenson III; and Governor Adlai Stevenson II.

Posted by: Brooklyn Democrat | December 10, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

You forgot to mention Sarah Palin when listing public servants to disprove an assumption. You know, that public servant who actually has experience governing something that was so much a threat to Dems that they had to send an army to Alaska to find something to demonize her with (but couldn’t)?

Posted by: TJ | December 10, 2008, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

If no-one in Obama’s team knew anything , we should never have elected such a bunch of cretins – it is their job !

Posted by: John | December 10, 2008, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

TJ – You had to go back a few years to get reputable politicians from Illionis. Anyone that lives near Chicago knows how dirty the politicians are. I feel like I need a shower now just talking about it.

Posted by: PD | December 10, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

I am with Kravitz above — Blogo was a little too out there for his own good better to squash it in the beginning than be involved later on — the governor was on a ego trip to large for anyone to trust containment. It’s obvious from his “appreciate” statement that it wasn’t enough. I hope the media will now settle down to the facts and that no one is tainted except the governor.

Posted by: Paulet | December 10, 2008, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Pres.-Elect Obama is quoted as saying “I was not aware of what was happening.” This man literally sees-no-evil, hears-no-evil, smells-no-evil even when he’s in the middle of it. We will witness a look and attitude of bewilderment when one voices concern that he may have been influenced by corrupt Chicago politics. One has to question that so many people attribute great intellect to man who seems so clueless, or perhaps it’s many of my fellow Americans who are clueless!

Posted by: Bobby B. | December 10, 2008, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

David H writes, “It is reasonable to assume that Obama has been tied in with Blago and his schemes over the years. That is how Chicago politics seems to work. To save his own skin Blago will talk. When he does we can kiss goodbye to the Obama presidency.”
==================================
Only in YOUR world is it reasonable. In the ACTUAL world, you have a Congressman from Illinois who hasn’t met with the Governor of Illinois in YEARS. Yet in YOUR world, the Senator (who has been running for the Presidency for two years – LOL) keeps in touch. How pathetic is that?

Posted by: Dems | December 10, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

Blagojevich, Wright, Ayers, Rezko, Pfleger, Acorn…the list goes on. Obama is:
1. Corrupt and “in bed” with those in the list above
2. Unconcerned about what others do around him as long as he gets what he wants
or 3. Too stupid to know what’s going on.
Any one of these three things is unsettling.

Posted by: Leslie Jo | December 11, 2008, 12:03 am 12:03 am

Thanks, Jake. Keep asking questions so we can see how many times they get answered differently.

Posted by: RL in Illinois | December 11, 2008, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Is there a reason why we should believe one of the three statements suggested by Leslie Jo must be true?

Posted by: BishopKingPawn | December 11, 2008, 4:18 am 4:18 am

Is there a reason why we should believe one of the three statements suggested by Leslie Jo must be true?
Yeah, common sense…

Posted by: TJ | December 11, 2008, 5:18 am 5:18 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.