Some Frank Talk About the Need for Obama to Step Up
"There’s only one president at a time," President-elect Barack Obama has repeated time and time again in recent weeks.
But a powerful House Democrat disagrees. Zero is more like it, says Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., and so Obama better step up.
"At a time of great crisis with mortgage foreclosures and autos, he says we only have one president at a time," Frank told consumer advocates Thursday, according to the Associated Press. "I’m afraid that overstates the number of presidents we have. He’s got to remedy that situation."
How to remedy that?
"He’s going to have to be more assertive than he’s been," demanded Frank.
But while the Massachusetts lawmaker chairs the House Financial Services Committee – which will hear from Detroit’s "Beg Three" tomorrow – his colleague in the upper chamber, Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., heads the Senate Banking Committee, which just welcomed the auto executives to Capitol Hill today.
And after today’s hearing, Dodd gave a much more complimentary of Obama’s work thus far.
"The President-elect has to be – look, as he said, ‘one president at a time’," Dodd told reporters. "Now he’s done a lot already by announcing his economic team, announcing a stimulus package, meeting with governors. He’s made some very important symbolic gestures, a lot more involved than certainly any of us who have been around for a while with presidents-elect. So I welcome what he’s done already."
Just yesterday, Obama weighed in with a preview of today’s auto executives’ encore appearance in Washington, following their much-ridiculed visit two weeks ago.
"It appears, based on reports that we’ve seen, that this time now the executives from these automakers are putting forward a more serious set of plans," Obama said at his Wednesday news conference in Chicago. "I don’t want to comment on them before I’ve actually heard and seen what they’re putting forward. But I’m glad that they recognize the expectations of Congress, certainly, my expectations that we should maintain a viable auto industry, but we should also make sure that any government assistance that’s provided is designed for a — is based on realistic assessments of what the auto market is going to be and a realistic plan for how we’re going to make these companies viable over the long term."
Some Capitol Hill critics have urged Obama and Bush to do more to improve the chances of an automaker bailout getting approved by Congress, but Dodd said that rather than looking to Obama to change the situation, lawmakers should demand more from the Bush Administration.
"I don’t think he wants to get drawn in, and I wouldn’t blame him, in a situation that he could not really effectuate," Dodd said of the President-elect. "It really is up to the existing team that has the ability and authority to respond within a matter of hours to a situation. That’s their job. The President is still the President."
And not only could Bush do more, noted Dodd, but so too could Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, currently on a trip abroad. And Fed chief Ben Bernanke, also.
"The Secretary of the Treasury is in China right now. It’s time to come home. We’ve got a serious problem on our hands. And I realize that he’s got a meeting over there, but we need him here. And I need the Federal Reserve to step up as well."
Obama warned yesterday that he is keeping a watchful eye on how Paulso allocates the $700 billion Troubled Assets Relief Program funds.
"What I can assure you is that my team is very active in reviewing what’s already been done to ensure that when we hit the ground running on January 20th, that any taxpayer money is going to be properly spent," he said, encouraging plans to help homeowners in an effort to help the economy as a whole.
– Jake Tapper and Matt Jaffe
ABC News’ Dean Norland also contributed to this report.
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
Barney Frank says Obama needs to step up? He’s one of the key players who CAUSED this mess. And doesn’t he realize there’s this little thing called the Constitution that says we only have one President at a time? Heck, Obama technically isn’t even President-Elect until Dec. 15th.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | December 4, 2008, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Franks should just shut up.
Obama is not President yet.
Why not ask George Bush to do his damn job for God’s sake.
Bush is president till Jan. 20th, 2009.
Damn it…
Posted by: Steve_NJ | December 4, 2008, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Frank is off-base, just like he was before the big bailout. He had his mouth open with criticism of the Republicans which only stirred up problems. Obama can talk about his plans, who his appointees are, but he can not step into his future role before January 20-even if Bush is house hunting and basically ignoring the fact the place is coming down around him.
Posted by: Jim | December 4, 2008, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Sometimes Barney Frank says some smart things, but most of the time that’s not the case.
Posted by: john_drake19 | December 4, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
The only thing that is going to straighten up this mess is JOBS!! Jobs back in America, with Legal Americans making quality products, and giving Good serverice! Just Like in the good ole’ days! The junk we get when we buy now from abroad is shoddy, and has not quality. Why pay alot for junk? Jobs pay rent and mortages, Jobs make the car payments!
Posted by: disgusted in Ohio | December 4, 2008, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
Franklin Delano Roosevelt had very much the same problem – but also recognized the pitfalls. The outgoing President Herbert Hoover tried repeatedly to get FDR to join him in joint action or in joint statements – even as bank after bank closed its doors. Roosevelt, however, correctly saw that these efforts were all aimed at connecting him with the failures of the Hoover administration which had brought on the Great Depression in the first place.
This fact became startlingly clear when – just before the inauguration (in March, back then) – Hoover telegraphed Roosevelt, imploring him “in the name of confidence” not to alter any of Hoover’s own fiscal policies. When Roosevelt failed to respond, Hoover publicly labeled him a “madman”, and snubbed him during a proforma reception at the White House.
Had Roosevelt allowed himself to be entrapped by Hoover’s overtures, it is very doubtful that he could ever have brought the fresh ideas of the New Deal to any kind of fruition at all: he likely would have been another one-term president like his predecessor, forever tarred with the same brush of political cronyism and failure.
Barack Obama is showing both courage and wisdom in refusing to take any hand in the mechanizations of this failed Bush presidency. I hope he shows continued wisdom by standing his ground and forcing George Bush and the Republicans to accept responsibility for their own errors and the fruits of their avarice.
Posted by: Jordan | December 4, 2008, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
Barney Fank, what a big mouth do nothing. He and a few other people should be put on trial for not doing there job! It’s no wonder the american people don’t look up to most of the wise men in Washington.
Posted by: Mark D Fox | December 4, 2008, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
If Obama believes this then he should shut up and stay out of the limelight. Everyday we hear he’s doing this, doing that, speaking on what should be done in Pakistan, etc. SHUT UP OBAMA – YOU ARE NOT PRESIDENT YET.
Posted by: Irishrose | December 4, 2008, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
The answer is yes! Obviously, Bush is totally incompetent on the economy. Barack needs to step-up to the plate. As far as I’m concerned, Bush can go ahead and move TODAY into his 2.1 million dollar mansion that he bought in Dallas, while the rest of us are losing our shirts over his failed economic policies.
Posted by: Danny | December 4, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
Barney Frank is being a jerk .It’s a shame that Bush and his people have screwed up the economy so bad that the next president will have no honeymoon period as afforded most other new presidents.Obama may have to go to work even before gets into office !!!Hold on people!! It’s going to be a bumpy ride!!!
Posted by: jasper46 | December 4, 2008, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
Obama has been the fastest out of the gate of any president-elect in recent memory. He’s assembled a great team in record time. From what I’ve heard, he’s going to come in with guns blazing, with Congress presenting to him several key bills to sign in the first couple weeks. Bush still constitutionally has all the powers of the presidency. Like Hoover he is a big zero at a time when the country is in need of bold, confident, competent action.
Posted by: hopesprings52 | December 4, 2008, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
One of my two big problems with Obama was the fact that his resume reveals that never stepped up to the plate in the workplace. A lecturer, not a professor, at the University of Chicago, who apparently spent much of his time writing two books about himself. A civil rights lawyer who took the lead on no case of note. A state legislator who’s main accomplishment was a record of “not present” votes.
That being said, I’ve been impressed so far with the job he is doing as President Elect. His appointments have been most reassuring. The Twentieth Amendment to the Constitution provides when a newly elected President is to be inaugurated. If Barney Frank doesn’t like it, he can sponsor an amendment.
Posted by: Bridget | December 4, 2008, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
My Lord can Bush get any more incompetent? That his inaction has caused all the total losers out there to scream that the president elect isn’t doing enough is just the worst form of passive aggression. He’s NOT President YET!! We “have” one. But he’s such a nimrod you are all foaming at the mouth at the guy who does not take office for more than a month.
Grow up, jerks.
Posted by: Paltickin | December 4, 2008, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
No. One president at a time.
But, maybe they could move up the inauguration date again by 10 days or so. That would still let everyone dry out from any New Year’s partying.
Posted by: w_roos | December 4, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Obama has been more of a President in thirty days than that moron bush has been in EIGHT YEARS !!!!
Bush just get the h#ll out !!!
Posted by: Joe6Pack | December 4, 2008, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Barney Frank will never admit his incompetence in this fiasco. Hes a big blow hard who needs to be put out to pasture. Bush does need to do more. I like Obamas cabinet so far. Never thought I would say that. We dont need anymore failure…
Posted by: Glenda | December 4, 2008, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
Great job parroting liberal propaganda, Mark D Fox. Actually, much of the “reforms” of the New Deal were initiated by Hoover. Hoover was a failure – but it had nothing to do with following laissez-faire capitalist dogmas. In fact, he favored tariffs (such as the disasterous Smoot-Hawley Tariff) and increased taxes. Furthermore, he created some precursors to New Deal programs.
I voted for McCain, but am generally pleased with how Obama has composed himself over the past few weeks. With a few exceptions, he has selected a great economic and foreign policy/national security team.
It’s a great thing that he seems to be mainly sticking to centrist/center-right Economic advisors and Realist foreign policy advisors. I hope there’s no place for those who see the recession as an opportunity to make government bigger and more intrusive, such as Paul Krugman. The stimulus he thinks Obama should propose would only continue the fiscal wreck we are in and probably lead to hyperinflation. Obama and America will prosper by honoring the values that made it great, not by surrendering to socialism, immorality, and foreign policy weakness.
Posted by: Joe C. | December 4, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
Tomorrow Friday Dec 5, 2008 the Supreme Court will look at the issue of if Obama is qualified to be President. Since he is not a Natural Born Citizen Obama is NOT eligible to be President and therefore Obama should step down and admit that he is not eligible to be President and allow this country to decide on a legitimate President for the next 4 years. I believe that should be Hillary since she would have been elected if Obama had not tried to run an ilegitimate campaigne.
He is not president elect until Congress certifies the decision of the Electoral College on about January 6 although some say Dec 15.
SCOTUS will declare Obama not eligible and he will not get any votes from the Electoral College.
Watch the Supreme Court tomorrow Friday.
Posted by: Democrat All My LIfe | December 4, 2008, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm
People are allowing their disdain for Barney Frank to interfere with their assessments of his idea. We are living in extraordinary economic times that threaten our survival. Unless we react with extraordinary measures, and immediately, this crisis will only worsen. Bush doesn’t even know what’s happening much less does he care to do anything about it. He needs to be brushed aside with haste. Obama is the only one capable of doing that in the promotion of his own agenda for economic recovery. It’s time to take a page from Bush’s playbook and forget the stupid rules.
Posted by: Butch Dillon | December 4, 2008, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
I learned a new word today from Dodd: effectuate. I guess it really is a word.
Posted by: DS | December 4, 2008, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
We will never be a united nation, just read the comments – democrats will always be big government solution people which always fail. You Democrats should like Bush, he has expanded gov’t to socialist levels. Lets do like Canada and suspend our congress……
Posted by: larryesperando | December 4, 2008, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Actually Butch, after eight years of Bush’s signing statements, Obama ought to set the Executive Branch straight by abiding by all the rules and Constitutional limitations set forth by the framers.
Posted by: Joe C. | December 4, 2008, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
butch dillion – you are doom and gloom. You are willing to sacrifice your freedoms in hopes of a single man. Live free
Posted by: larryesperando | December 4, 2008, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
Hey folks its not about barney franks… IT IS BUSH that isn’t doing his job.
If President Gore had been in office for the last 8 years we wouldn’t be in this shape.
When President Obama takes office things will slowly start improving.
Posted by: mr sleepy | December 4, 2008, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
To all those who think that Bush has been doing nothing– I would like to remind you that we have a president and he has been really busy recently — pardoning all kinds of people and undoing environmental protections — that’s his focus in the last weeks of his administration
Posted by: dejune5678 | December 4, 2008, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
Barney Frank – shut up!!! NObama is NOT the President yet and won’t be until the inauguration in January. In the meantime, the DAMORATS should step up and help clean up the mess that THEY created. What a bunch of crap.
Posted by: MyFellowAmericans | December 4, 2008, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
I think George W. Bush is, without a doubt, the most incompetant president in modern times. I can’t speak to the notion that he is the worst president ever, I wasn’t around for some of them –but he’s the worst in my lifetime.
I support President-Elect Obama, and I can’t wait for high noon on January 20th, 2009 so we can move out this failed regime and get to work saving the country.
However –I agree there is only one president at a time and George Bush still sits in that seat. It would be the height of arrogance for Obama to usurp presidential powers early.
One of my (many) concerns about the Bush Administration was their playing fast and loose with the rule of law –obeying law when it suited them, ignoring law when it didn’t. We can’t very well criticize Bush for that then turn a blind eye if Obama were to move in early.
I think it’s reprehensible that Bush and Co. are writing new rules that will effectively codify things Americans were pretty clear they did not want, according to the last election. Bush and his cohorts have shown they have no class, they are reprehensible and at least some of them deserve their day in court –and then a nice long vacation at Club Fed.
But even with all that, Bush is still the president –until January 20th.
Posted by: Saint Genesius | December 4, 2008, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm
Other than some last minute cash giveaways, Bush has already pretty much abdicated and Let’s face it. As far as “the people” are concerned he was never really there from the beginning. I would refer you to Hurricanes Katrina and Ike, the Depression that we are currently sliding into, two wars, and the great gasoline disaster.
Posted by: jan | December 4, 2008, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
mr sleepy – are you still reliving the 2000 election. Get a life.
Posted by: larryesperando | December 4, 2008, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
“The Secretary of the Treasury is in China right now. It’s time to come home. We’ve got a serious problem on our hands.”
Dodd should be a little smarter and think of the serious problem if China doesn’t lend us the money that Congress has already promised.
Posted by: tiredtoo | December 4, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
…Obviously, it’s too late to change the inauguration date this year, but it could be changed for a future date.
Posted by: w_roos | December 4, 2008, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
I think Obama has to show care not to offend the Bush administration by overstepping. The Bush administration has already driven this nation into the ground. Obama should tread carefully as to not give them cause to blow up and extinguish whatever is left before he takes office.
Posted by: Leslie | December 4, 2008, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Regardless of Frank’s fantasies, Barack Obama has no presidential powers and won’t have any until he’s sworn in.
If I didn’t make a point of getting news from a number of different sources, I’d never have known the huge roles Frank and Dodd played in this mortgage mess.
The committees headed by Frank and Dodd had a great deal of responsibility to oversee the lending institutions. They, along with others, failed to discharge that responsibility yet their failure is being given a pass by the media.
Posted by: MizFW | December 4, 2008, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Well how about that, the neo cons don’t like Barney Frank. What a surprise. They don’t like anyone who has a brain. That’s why they like Bush, he’s clueless.
Posted by: Herb Gray | December 4, 2008, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
The period between election day and innauguration day is a period of time for Obama to get ready by having his administration chosen and ready to take office. Having a elected candidate butting in on things the current administration is working on is bad governmen, bad business, and not workable. President Bush has been more than cooperative in helping Obama get ready for the job. Obama needs to get his bearings in order to be ready in january and Barney Frank needs to resign because he is a #1 cause of the economic crisis. That is what needs to happen.
Posted by: Bill | December 4, 2008, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Senator Obama does not have the legal authority to make decisions as a president until January 20! This is premature criticism. We have a current President, his name is George Bush (he has been an absentee leader for 7 years, live with it) We must suffer 1.5 more months of what the Republicans and Fox News forced us into …. a totally incompetent president named George Bush. Stop trying to blame the incoming president, before he starts the job.
Posted by: michael | December 4, 2008, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Extremist-Republicans are only so anxious for Barack Obama to “take-over” immediately because they know that the more time that passes before the inauguration, the more the American people will learn about just how miserably Republicans including George Bush, the until-recently Republican senate and the until-recently Republican house of representatives, have FAILED us.
Perhaps what we should do is pass a constitutional amendment that if 2 of the following 3 agree: Congress, the Senate, the current President, then the president-elect should take over at a date and time they agree upon.
This year, the current president and all Republicans would have FORCED Barack Obama to take office IMMEDIATELY upon his election on 4 November 2008, because they want to escape blame for what they have wrought upon once mighty America.
Although as any “real American” I would prefer to see Obama “take charge” as even the people at Fox Noise are demanding he do, unlike extremist Republicans I love the U.S. Constitution even when it is inconvenient to my whims. And right now, the Constitution says that WE must wait until 20 January 2009.
Posted by: derek jacobs | December 4, 2008, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Last I checked, George Bush was still President, and Congress needs to demanding that HE, and Paulson, and Bernanke, DO SOMETHING. Of course this cannot wait until Jan 20, and while I’m sure Obama would like to do more (and believe me, I wish he could) unless Bush is willing to legally step aside, he has to wait. The focus needs to be on Bush. He needs to stop being the lame duck he is and ACT. Three pressers on the economy by Obama the same week Bush could only find time to pardon a turkey tells you how out of whack this is. Make that ineffectual loser DO HIS JOB, for pity’s sake! SPEAK UP VOTERS!
Posted by: janine | December 4, 2008, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
President-elect Obama is doing a great job. President-NOT Frank is doing a fine job. We the people are content.
Silly story.
Posted by: ubflamed | December 5, 2008, 12:36 am 12:36 am
Barney Frank, the same guy who said there is no problem for the last 3 years, who oversees Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, who completely does not understand the problem, wants everyone to throw money on the problem. Which has got to tell you its the WRONG SOLUTION. This guy doesn’t have the first clue as to what to do, and wants heads to roll. Its My Way Or The Highway… sounds vaguely familiar approach to Iraq…
Brilliant!
Posted by: Common Sense | December 5, 2008, 12:44 am 12:44 am
Barney needs to chill before he strokes.
Posted by: kat | December 5, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
Bush is way to busy changing laws so the coal companies can trash the environment more efficiently.
He has no time for US.
Posted by: Lame | December 5, 2008, 1:01 am 1:01 am
Barney Frank and Chris Dodd – now there’s a pair to give economic guidance to the country! Let’s add Charlie Wrangel to really straighten things out! And Obana’s actions as senator, to help avoid the current econmic mess, were? … oh yeah … nothing.
Posted by: bob | December 5, 2008, 1:05 am 1:05 am
bush is a bad luck president who cheated his way in the white house and i bet my donkey is more smarter
Posted by: ray | December 5, 2008, 1:20 am 1:20 am
Butch Dillions post is false and should be removed. There is no such action scheduled at the Supreme Court..Berg and Corsi tried to stop the election of Obama’s birth certificate and failed. More right-wing neo-nazi lies..
The truth is detaile below…
Recently FactCheck representatives got a chance to spend some time with the birth certificate, and we can attest to the fact that it is real and three-dimensional and resides at the Obama headquarters in Chicago. We can assure readers that the certificate does bear a raised seal, and that it’s stamped on the back by Hawaii state registrar Alvin T. Onaka (who uses a signature stamp rather than signing individual birth certificates). We even brought home a few photographs.
You can click on the photos to get full-size versions, which haven’t been edited in any way, except that some have been rotated 90 degrees for viewing purposes.
The certificate has all the elements the State Department requires for proving citizenship to obtain a U.S. passport: “your full name, the full name of your parent(s), date and place of birth, sex, date the birth record was filed, and the seal or other certification of the official custodian of such records.” The names, date and place of birth, and filing date are all evident on the scanned version, and you can see the seal above.
The document is a “certification of birth,” also known as a short-form birth certificate. The long form is drawn up by the hospital and includes additional information such as birth weight and parents’ hometowns. The short form is printed by the state and draws from a database with fewer details. The Hawaii Department of Health’s birth record request form does not give the option to request a photocopy of your long-form birth certificate, but their short form has enough information to be acceptable to the State Department. We tried to ask the Hawaii DOH why they only offer the short form, among other questions, but they have not given a response.
The scan released by the campaign shows halos around the black text, making it look (to some) as though the text might have been pasted on top of an image of security paper. But the document itself has no such halos, nor do the close-up photos we took of it. We conclude that the halo seen in the image produced by the campaign is a digital artifact from the scanning process.
We asked the Obama campaign about the date stamp and the blacked-out certificate number. The certificate is stamped June 2007, because that’s when Hawaii officials produced it for the campaign, which requested that document and “all the records we could get our hands on” according to spokesperson Shauna Daly. The campaign didn’t release its copy until 2008, after speculation began to appear on the Internet questioning Obama’s citizenship. The campaign then rushed to release the document, and the rush is responsible for the blacked-out certificate number. Says Shauna: “[We] couldn’t get someone on the phone in Hawaii to tell us whether the number represented some secret information, and we erred on the side of blacking it out. Since then we’ve found out it’s pretty irrelevant for the outside world.” The document we looked at did have a certificate number; it is 151 1961 – 010641.
Posted by: Kate Cooper | December 5, 2008, 1:27 am 1:27 am
kennedy cameroon
plse give time to president-elect
Posted by: kennedy | December 5, 2008, 1:42 am 1:42 am
Steve-NJ:I agree Barney Frank should demand President Bush to do his job.
The president-elect is no President until his inauguration on January 20th.
Posted by: Ennar | December 5, 2008, 3:38 am 3:38 am
To Frank and the People at Fox & Freinds, Hannity, Gibson, Rush, etc.
Obama is President-Elect. He does not yet have the powers of the President and will not until 1/20/2009. It shows your stupidity when you hold him responsible for not taking action before then.
Posted by: Beto | December 5, 2008, 4:00 am 4:00 am
Herb Gray – Barney Frank is the one who convinced Congress 3 YEARS AGO that there was NO problem with Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac. How does that show he has a brain? He is one of the root causes of this mess & he apparently doesn’t understand the Constitution.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | December 5, 2008, 6:55 am 6:55 am
janine – Obama would NOT be President if President Bush stepped aside. D. Cheney would be President. That is the way it works. Obama isn’t even legally President-elect. He won’t be until December 15th when the Electoral College “meets”.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | December 5, 2008, 6:58 am 6:58 am
PLEASE GO AWAY BARNEY FRANK
Posted by: blaze | December 5, 2008, 8:14 am 8:14 am
Ennar: “I agree Barney Frank should demand President Bush to do his job.”….The President IS doing his job. Frank wants the bailout to go through because union jobs are in the mix but he also know the American people (70%) are fed up with the bailouts and don’t want more. If Bush goes along with it Frank gets all his union guys happy and the American people unhappy but blaming Bush. Bush is right….the Big 3 need to go into bankruptcy and restructure and renegotiate some of these outlandish union contracts that place a heavy bruden on manufacturing. It doesn’t make them competitive like Toyota and Honda.
Posted by: Adam | December 5, 2008, 8:16 am 8:16 am
I don’t understand this. Obama is not the president. What is Frank talking about? Step up and do what? Obama is correct and Barney Frank, as usual, needs to take a course in constitutional law. What a weird person.
Posted by: LongT | December 5, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am
You voters in Massachusetts need to seriously consider the viability of this guy Frank next time around. He seems like he doesn’t know the basics.
Posted by: LongT | December 5, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
When will America realize that the same bunch of liberal, robin hood, socialist democrats that BROUGHT US THIS FINANCIAL MESS is the EXACT same group that just spent $700,000,000.00 getting elected to the white house.
How could the American people be so ignorant?
How could the media betray us so badly?
When is BO sending a check for my car payment?
Posted by: dave | December 5, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
If Barney Franks did not have the corrupt liberal media backing he would have been exposed a long time ago as one of the MAIN CHARACTERS THAT BROUGHT US INTO THIS MESS. The fact that one has to look up on the internet to hear barney say again and again……..”Fannie and Freddie are fine, any pressure on these institutions will only limit affordable housing” is shameful.
The media refused and still refuses to do their job.
Did anyone hear Barney say the other day on larry king that we need to have “income equality”.
Liberals are socialists and they have brought this country to its knees and they media have painted them as saviors of all man-kind.
Posted by: dave | December 5, 2008, 9:30 am 9:30 am
Barney Frank was talking about his desire for the Messiah to step it up and allow him to walk to the altar with a boy. The Messiah-elect will save us from the right-wing lunatic straight-marriage-is-the-way-God-designed-it nutjobs!
Posted by: Gary | December 5, 2008, 9:45 am 9:45 am
YOU GOING ON ABOUT THE BIRTH CERTIFICATE REALLY NEED TO GET A LIFE!!! Don’t you think that if there was even a HINT of untawdry evidence that the RNC would not have found it AND used it? Are you saying that you no longer trust Rove, Gingrich, Palin and all the top RNC to do their job in getting the republicans elected? I would think so since you continue with this mess and your “leaders” have let it go!!!!!
Now, the issue at hand. Frank should be chastised for dis-respecting the office of the Presidency. Mr. Obama & Congress should speak out against his statements and re-teach him the lessons of the constitution and the office of the Presidency!
What is FINALLY a relief, (in reading these comments), that there is an overwhelming concensus (amongst the right and the left)regarding his issue. We all feel that Barney Frank is wrong; Mr. Bush is still OUR President; and Mr. Obama will have to wait until January 20th!
Unity is happening folks! We are coming together and agreeing upon “something”!!! The best of America is yet to come!
Let’s mentally hold hands and sing Kum-by-yah!!!!!!
Posted by: FS | December 5, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am
It’s time for the republicans to fessup and admit that they helped create this mess with their non involvment in the crisis of the world which has been going on for the last several years. They have been listening to the lobbyists and not the people. They can demean Obama all they want… he is above all that….why don’t they give him a chance and see what he can do? I feel no matter how successful he may be, they will still criticize him which shows what small minds they have. I’m glad I left the republican party and became an Independent.
Posted by: Pat Napolitano | December 5, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
FS – No one can request the birth certificate except for Mr. Obama. So even if the Republicans thought there was an issue, they couldn’t do anything about it.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | December 5, 2008, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Barney Frank is now realizing that he was one of the dominos that is linked to the collapse of the financial system. Not that he was directly involved, but by the lack of foresight and leadership. So he’s in a pretty pickle now and looking for any lifeline! Sorry Frank, we hate to remind you that Obama is president-elect, to be sworn in on 20 January. Talk to Bush, regardless of how irrelevant he is. Obama can only voice “words” and totally unable to do anything at this time: his hands are tied, according to the Constitution.
So it would be best for you to keep working and stop looking for a scapegoat right now.
Posted by: Karen | December 5, 2008, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Pat
Your “open-minded” approach to BO’s new upcoming job is touching, but in the real world facts matter. And the facts regarding the financial crisis is that it falls in the hands of the Democrats. Just because the media ignores this does not make it untrue. Jimmy carter began the community reinvestment act years ago and the socialist liberals have been gladly spreading the wealth around ever since. Who would have thought FORCING banks to make bad loans to people who could never pay them back? the democrats- it’s really that simple.
Also, BO had very close ties with a community organizer/agitator group ACORN. This group of people actually organized bank sit-ins in Chicago meant to intimidate, the harassment of CEO’s and their families, all in the name of “affordable housing”.
Posted by: dave | December 5, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
As far as his citizenship goes…Obama was born in the United States which makes him an automatic citizen. The same as if any illegals bear children in the United states…they become citizens. At least his Mom was a citizen so what is the problem? I think some people cannot get past the fact that we have a black man for president. I say get over it…he is a man, a citizen and hopefully will be a good president.
Posted by: Pat Napolitano Marietta. Ga. | December 5, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Dave: To some extent, you are correct, however, the republicans have been in power for 8 years. These things which are so repugnant to them now have been going on for several years. Why didn’t the R. party do something about it? Look at this last year….what did Bush do to address the problems which are now rising to greet a new president, whomever he may be. You would think he would want to leave the presidencey with at least one major accomplishment. The democrats have only been strong for the last two years and anything they tried to do were blocked by you know who. However, they do need to share some of the blame. I’m ready for a fresh start with an intelligent person be he white, black or green. Let’s stop blaming each other and get behind our president and see what he does.
Posted by: Pat Napolitano Marietta. Ga. | December 5, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Pat
You are correct that Bush should have done more to stop the crisis. But just think what the the left wing media and socialist dems have said if Bush said that Fannie and Freddie are giving out risky loans…”you just hate poor people!!!”
Also, the dems have held control of CONGRESS for much of the last 20 years which means they controlled the purse strings. Bush, despite many mistakes he DID make, had nothing to do with the financial crisis we are experiencing.
Posted by: dave | December 5, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
“…just think what the the left wing media and socialist dems have said if Bush said that Fannie and Freddie are giving out risky loans…”you just hate poor people!!!”
Why is there this need to assign blame for past actions and discuss hypotheticals? KNOCK! KNOCK! HELLO! WE are in it!!! Any discussions of past actions and things which have never even occured solves nothing! I know! Here is something novel: Democrats (as of this moment) this mess is all the Republicans fault! Republicans (as of this moment) this mess is all the Democrats fault. Now that we have properly settled that everyone (even you) holds some responsibility–let’s move on.
NOW! Should the automobile sector be bailed out? I personally am against it. I still dont think the industry “gets” it and, although it will be painful, let the free-market take over.
Posted by: FS | December 5, 2008, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.
Posted by: RMBarley | December 5, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
dave Sorry but Republicans have controlled Congress for 14 of the past 20 years. You may recall that the Republican congress devoted 2 years to impeaching President Clinton over a BJ. The other years of the Republican Congress were devoted to undoing any regulation of banks and businesses so they could rape the environment and consumers and steal enough money to create the current recession. Oh the Republicans did work on pushing creationism and torture in their spare time.
Posted by: pieceof cake | December 5, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
I can’t wait to get my stimulus check from Barack. I’m going to buy guns with the whole check!
Posted by: CHAOS | December 5, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am
pieceof It was called Perjury! Look it up!
Posted by: RMBarley | December 5, 2008, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.
Posted by: RMBarley | December 5, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
FS
How can we possibly expect to solve the problem if we aren’t willing to look for what caused it?
Posted by: dave | December 5, 2008, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Jake You are the only good reporter at ABC!!!!!!!
Posted by: CHAOS | December 5, 2008, 11:31 am 11:31 am
The new tourist building in DC was supposed to cost 71 million but it ended up costing like 650 million. Does anybody see why government is this problem not the solution?
Posted by: CHAOS | December 5, 2008, 11:33 am 11:33 am
pieceofcake
Don’t argue with 1/2 truths and bad info. The dems have controlled congress for the MAJORITY of the last 20 years, and clinton did not get impeached because he got a bj. He was impeached because he got a bj and lied about it under oath.(slight difference)
Maybe if he was spending less time playing hide the cigar and running around telling everyone how great he was as prez because “more blacks and minorities have had homes under his administration then ever before” we might not be where wer are today.
Posted by: dave | December 5, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Barney Franks is an embarassment to his committee and his party. I applaud the transition team so far and President-Elect Obama. The patience Obama is showing right now is phenomenal. He is the type that wants to jump in and roll up his sleeves. I am sure this is maddening not to be able to do anything but look in and stay informed. Someone in the Democratic party should throttle then muzzle Franks before he shames himself further.
Posted by: afbrat59 | December 5, 2008, 11:56 am 11:56 am
dave Republicans controlled Congress from 1995 to 2007. That’s 12 0f the past 20 years. I would say that 12 of twenty makes Republican control of Congress a majority of the past twenty years. You and I both know taht Clinton was impeached over a BJ. Fortunately Democrats are grown ups and haven’t impeached Bush over far more serious crimes.
Posted by: pieceof cake | December 5, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
David, you are raising a good point but most of the commentary posted here (and in the past) has little, if none to do with objectively looking at the past. In doing that, you will find that this problem hails all the way back to Ronald Reagan and Jack Kemp’s housing initiatives. Bottom line. Its all about de-regulation. Clearly, (to some extent), regulation is something that is needed.
You, in particular cite ACORN. I on the other hand will say that more than ACORN had a hand in approving bad loans; placing people in homes that they could not afford etc. Make no mistake either, that it is only the less fortunate who caused and are caught up in this miasma. I know quite a few very well-to-do (supposedly), intelligent (supposedly), individuals who “on paper” were worth quite a staggering amount but in actuality were leveraged SO much that (in one case)the family barely could pay for the funeral.
Look at some of the foreclosures in Greenwich CT and some very up-scale communities in Florida & California–these are not ACORN folk! Trust me on that one! Look at the derivitives, on top of the derivitives, on top of derivitives created by Wall Street “professionals.” The primary reason these firms are failing and that no one is buying them, is because you can’t evaluate the true intrinsic value of these companies! These investment vehicles were not created by ACORN folk, traded by them, nor capitalized by them. Talk to a small-cap CEO about the deregulation of short-selling, message boards, and how their companies were literally destroyed. NOPE! Not ACORN people! Once again, maybe complete deregulation is not the best way to go!
So, since de-regulation seems to be the problem (measures passed by both Democrats & Republicans) maybe we need to concentrate more upon “what” needs enhanced regulation (as Democrats & Republicans) and try to possibly design some type of market for a these distressed assets in order to stabilize the economy. What I found absolutely hysterical (in a macabre way)the FEDS had to prove to AIG why they were nearly insolvent when they took them over. Let’s not even talk about Lehman Brothers.
So, it was A LOT of people of all colors/incomes/party affiliations and sex, that capitalized upon a lax system and VOILA! Here we are…
Why point a finger? Let’s all work together and fix it (if it can be.) The country feels that Mr. Obama can do the job. …especially after having Sarah Palin thrown in our faces (sorry! I have to do my little dig–but I DO love her!!! she entertains me so!!!!)
Why not rally behind our new President and support him? It will only be to the benefit of us all.
Posted by: FS | December 5, 2008, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
FS
I feel that BO is deserving of the same level of respect that prez Bush has receieved from the media and left over the past 8 years. Sorry, I will not be rallying around BO anytime soon. The man is a socialist in liberal clothing.
pieceofcake
Bush has committed no crime. Saddam used chemical weapons against his own people and murdered more then 700,000 of them. Clinton thought he had WMD’s too, he was just too busy entertaining monica to do anything about it.
Liberals consider any war a poor alternative to sending olive branches and peace pipes to mass murderers and holocaust deniers. I’m surprised they never asked Saddam to come speak at Columbia.
Posted by: dave | December 5, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Dave,
Bush could have been impeached for a wide variety of crimes he committed while in office, just a few for you to mull over:
1) Violation of treaties he was constitutionally obligated to uphold.
2) Authorizing the use of torture by his administration.
3) Ordering leaks of classified information for political purposes.
4) Authorizing electronic spying on US Citizens at home and abroad.
5) Criminal Negligence in the effort to bring to justice, Osama Bin Laden.
6) Overseeing the greatest looting of a countries’ coffers by private industry seen in any country in the history of humanity.
One big difference between everyone who “thought” Sadaam had WMD, and the Bush administration?
Only the Bushies were willing to wage an optional war over questionable intelligence. NO other responsible leader in the world thought the intelligence on Iraqi WMD was justification for going to war. Sanctions? Yes. Inspections, yes. War? No.
Which leads to the greatest crime committed by a presidential administration in recent history, the death of thousands of our soldiers over either a mistake, or incompetence of leadership. Your choice.
Posted by: theREALDave | December 5, 2008, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
The best thing Bush could do at this point is absolutely nothing. He’s done quite enough, thank you, just look around at the catastrophic mess he will leave due to his incredible incompetence. Complete and utter failure – the worst president in the history of this country. It will take us decades to recover.
Posted by: DaveM | December 5, 2008, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
There is no end to the ignorance by some people. The Republicans gained control of the House in 1994 and did not lose it until 2006. Where the heck have some of you been over the years? Mars, Saturn, or Jupiter? GET OVER YOURSELVES!!! Barack Obama WON the election…. PERIOD! I’m sure those of you who are still ticked aren’t going to support him no matter what happens!!! Stop blaming him for everything that has gone wrong in Washington for the past 8 years. The man hasn’t even been sworn in yet so he can’t “step up.” HE DOESN’T HAVE ANY POWER TO ENFORCE ANYTHING YET!!!
Posted by: stopthemadness | December 5, 2008, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
But a powerful House Democrat disagrees. Zero is more like it, says Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., and so Obama better step up. Yeah, choosing this cabinet is easy! Whats going to happen when he has to really get moving on the critical issues that face this nation? Talk is cheap!! Lets see if this super hero really has any guts and any intelligence besides bs!! GOOD JOB TAPPER! GOOD ARTICLE!!!
Posted by: brannigon1 | December 5, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Don’t blame the economy on Bush – like he said to Charlie Gibson – “it was happening before I entered in president and during I entered in president” – what a defense!
Posted by: lasux | December 5, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
It’s time for more people to start asking him to step DOWN. After watching the economy respond to him for the last month, does anybody really want this for another 4 years?
Posted by: howwouldiknow | December 5, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) is now in trouble with the House ethics committee for a variety of ethics violations. He has alot to say about how our tax money is spent. But he’ll probably skate. Isn’t it great!
Posted by: LongT | December 5, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
The RealDave
Dropping water down terrorists noses is not torture.
The Patriot Act was voted through by both democrats and republicans.
Saddam had mustard gas and murdered an estimated 700,000. Why are liberals all about fighting for freedom as long as no one gets hurt. It’s kind of like liberals love of free speech until you say something that they don’t want to hear.
As I said earlier, liberals would rather invite holocaust denying tyrants to speak at their college and call the 9/11 bombers “freedom fighters” than give bush an ounce of credit for keeping their flower power butts safe.
Bottom line……..liberals are traitors, have been for years, and nothing will change their resin-filled minds.
Posted by: Dave | December 5, 2008, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
howwouldiknow – if President Bush stepped down now, then VP Cheney would become President, NOT Obama. I can’t believe how many people do not understand this fact. And what really scares me is that some of these people voted!!
Posted by: ellsbells930 | December 5, 2008, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
What do you expect from a joke like Barney Frank? He was wrong, and he was insulting, and he should be ashamed of himself. I am tired of the Bush-bashing on the Hill and the eagerness of folks like Frank to get Obama involved prematurely. Remember, barney, if Obama wanted to deal more directly with this mess early, he could have maintained his seat in the Senate and taken part in the lame-duck session. He had the good sense not to do so.
I’m heartened to see multiple posters pointing out the Frank is complicit in starting this financial mess in the first place and should not have been returned to COngress, let alone be taken seriously on this matter when he lectures others on how they should behave.
Posted by: moderate | December 5, 2008, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
ellsbells930 – Technically Obama is the President-Elect as defined by the Presidential Transition Act of 1963.
Posted by: MikeMo1947 | December 5, 2008, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
Bush has essentially crawled into a fetal position for his last month and a half.
He’s the one saying hardly anything about the economic crisis, even though he’s still President. We seem to hear more about Obama working out economic plans while Bush says hardly anything about the economic crisis.
It’s been a long eight years.
January 20th, 2009 can’t come soon enough.
(Oh, and Dave, why don’t we just stoop to the terrorists level? What moral authority have we then, to call ourselves a beacon for human rights and democracy then? And how about we actually make sure the guy is a terrorist first? Do you know how many ppl the CIA ended up releasing after detaining them for years and being forced to conclude, they were not terrorists? Liberals are traitors? Har, har, you’re just such a card, you know.)
Posted by: Grey Matter | December 5, 2008, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
MikeMo1947 – it allows them to use the terms, but he still isn’t LEGALLY President-elect until the 2nd Monday after the 1st Tues. in Dec. The Act uses the term “apparent”.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | December 6, 2008, 7:50 am 7:50 am
Barney Frank needs to get off the bottle for a week or 2 before he opens his mouth…When he slathers, I cringe.
Posted by: Roger King | December 6, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
It amazes me that people are anxious for the government to get more involved in “handling” the economic crisis when they are responsible for it in the first place. The economic trouble we have today is directly related to the Community Reinvestment Act, which came into existence in 1977. This legislation has, over time, morphed into a vehicle for direct interference by congress in the dealings of our banking industry. Congress (mainly Democrats but also some Republicans) has applied pressure to the banking industry to accept home mortgage loans that they would not otherwise take on based on the risk of default. This means of extortion by congress was pursued to force banks to give money to low income and minority home owners who simply could not afford the loans if any unforeseen financial hardship hit them (IE: higher gas prices). Congress further compounded the problem by pushing for the formation of derivatives (under Clinton administration) based on these bad mortgages. This was done to mask the extreme risk found in this strategy, thus making the eventual failure much worse. The economic collapse we have seen has been brought about by an estimated failure rate in the mortgage market of six percent. This is shocking. What if the failure rate goes to 20 percent or 30 percent? The people who were the biggest proponents of this scam such as Chris Dodd, Barney Frank, Maxine Waters, and yes – Barack Obama, are now asking us to let them “fix” the mess they created. I for one am not impressed and certainly not hopeful that this group can fix anything and fully expect them to make the situation much worse. If we want to improve our economy and return sanity to the laws that govern our nation we should send congress and the new administration on vacation. Hopefully they will go somewhere where they cannot do any more “fixing”.
Posted by: James | December 6, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
James – It’s the same thing with healthcare. Had the Federal government never created Medicare, we wouldn’t be in the healthcare mess we are now, either. Yet, people think the government can fix it – when they created it in the first place.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | December 6, 2008, 11:54 am 11:54 am
He is not president yet! I guess people will just have to wait until he is. It is admirable that he is getting his team in place but that does not mean he makes decisions now.
Posted by: Carole Davis | December 7, 2008, 7:11 am 7:11 am
We could threaten our enemies with this;Stop messing with us or we will have Bush and Cheney run your country for 8 years. Talk about WMD!!
Posted by: Central Scruitinizer Orlando | December 7, 2008, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
This country is headed for a depression under an Obama administration. The man is a fake. Where is the “Change you can believe in” that he promised.
Meanwhile, I would like to express my appreciation to President Bush for keeping this country safe and free from attacks for more than seven and a half years. Great Job, Mr President Bush.
Posted by: johnny biden | December 7, 2008, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
With Chris Dodd, Barney Franks and Obama looking out for our economic future I can sleep good at night. Right. Obamas new plan is to build roads to get the economy going? What a plan, I guess he thinks he is Roosevelt and he is going to restart the CCR program. Were in trouble here people. i wonder if we can have an election annuled?
Posted by: billy bob | December 8, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm