By Theresa Cook

Dec 22, 2008 8:41am

The Note, 12/22/08: Word Matters — Obama Report Seeks to End Blago Distraction

BY RICK KLEIN It won’t be a long document. It may not even be a very interesting one. It will be no match for the prose of Patrick Fitzgerald (quoting Rod Blagojevich), or the poetry of Rod Blagojevich (quoting Rudyard Kipling). It will not be illustrated with pictures of presidential puppies. It will also not be the last word (or the last distraction) for a president-elect whose world comes just too close to Gov. Rod Blagojevich’s for absolute comfort. But it will be the next set of words — coming Tuesday at the earliest — and they will be the most important words yet in President-elect Barack Obama’s efforts to put daylight between himself and the tawdry Blagojevich affair. Rahm Emanuel, the incoming White House chief of staff, is again the man to watch. What we now know: Emanuel had only one conversation with Blagojevich, D-Ill., in the period under discussion, ABC’s George Stephanopoulos reports.  “The contact, described as a ‘pro-forma’ courtesy call, came as Emanuel was named Chief of Staff for Obama. Most of the discussion concerned Emanuel’s Congressional seat (which had previously been held by Blagojevich), with only a ‘passing reference’ to the Senate vacancy, according to these sources,” Stephanopoulos reports.  “The sources add that the report will show Emanuel also had four phone calls with Blagojevich Chief of Staff John Harris. During those conversations, the Senate seat was discussed. . . . Sources also confirm that Emanuel made the case for picking Obama confidante Valerie Jarrett during at least one of the conversations.  In the course of that conversation, Harris asked if in return for picking Jarrett, ‘all we get is appreciation, right?’ ‘Right,’ Emanuel responded.” Per the AP’s Brett J. Blackledge and Tammy Webber: “Emanuel did contact the governor’s office about the appointment and left Blagojevich with the impression that he was pushing Valerie Jarrett, a close Obama friend, so he wouldn’t have to compete with her in the White House for Obama’s attention, said a person close to Blagojevich. . . . It was not clear whether Blagojevich inferred Emanuel’s motive for advocating Jarrett, or whether Emanuel discussed the appointment with Blagojevich directly or with John Harris, the governor’s then-chief of staff who also is charged in the case, according to the source.”  The fallout: “Emanuel’s refusal to discuss the matter publicly, and the few comments offered by Obama to date, have prompted questions about Emanuel’s ties to Blagojevich and what fallout he’ll face as the criminal case unfolds, although sources have said he is not a target of prosecutors,” Blackledge and Webber write. “Even so, any hint of scandal for Emanuel threatens to tarnish Obama’s promise of new political leadership free of scandal and corruption.” Team Obama hopes to bore the press corps with this one: “There will be no revelations worth burying during the holidays anyway, transition sources say,” Jonathan Weisman reports in The Wall Street Journal. But: “Regardless of how clean the Obama camp is, the release of the report isn’t likely to be clean. Thursday, former President Bill Clinton released a list of 205,000 donors — many of them foreign governments — to his foundation, which he had promised to do as a condition for his wife Sen. Hillary Clinton’s nomination as secretary of state. That set off a scramble to tie donors to policy predicaments facing the Obama administration.”  Does anyone think any amount of information would immediately be deemed sufficient? “He’s stopped short of pledging to release e-mails or other records that could be key to understanding those contacts,” Politico’s Kenneth P. Vogel reports. “A spokeswoman for President-elect Barack Obama said the transition team was not covered by a public information law that Politico cited in requesting copies of Obama staffers’ emails and notes about Blagojevich’s efforts to fill the Senate seat Obama vacated after winning the presidency.”  Newsweek’s Michael Isikoff has five questions for Obama on Blagojevich: “1. Define  ‘inappropriate,’ make good on your pledge of transparency and show us the internal report. All of it. . . . 2. Explain what happened with Senate ‘Candidate 1.’ . . . 3. What did you know about Blago’s exit strategy? . . . 4. Have you shared everything you have on Rezko? . . . 5. Will you promise to leave Fitzgerald alone?”  Your political fallout: Bloomberg’s Kim Chipman and Jonathan D. Salant write up the new TV ad prepped by some political enemies of Big Labor. “The commercial is a not-so-subtle attempt to implicate one of the fastest growing U.S. labor organizations, the Service Employees International Union, in the corruption scandal swirling around Illinois Democrat Rod Blagojevich. The aim isn’t mere union bashing. The larger goal behind the ad campaign is to derail controversial legislation that would make it easier for workers to unionize, the so-called card-check proposal.”  And more fallout, in Chicago (let’s see where this development leads): “A key figure in Gov. Rod Blagojevich’s alleged scheme to sell a U.S. Senate seat has sought immunity from federal authorities in return for his cooperation in their ongoing probe, the Tribune has learned,” the Chicago Tribune’s David Kidwell and John Chase report.  “Raghuveer P. Nayak, an Oak Brook businessman and political fundraiser, is the unnamed ‘Individual D’ who prosecutors say was being squeezed by the governor for campaign cash in return for appointing U.S. Rep. Jesse Jackson Jr. to the Senate seat vacated by President-elect Barack Obama, sources said,” they write. The Chicago Sun-Times has a timeline of Jackson’s contacts with prosecutors, including this exchange: “We did have another conversation the day or so after the presidential election,” the Jackson source said. “The U.S. attorney said we still want to talk to you about these things, but we understand now there’s an open seat, so let’s postpone our meeting again.”  Obama, meanwhile, enjoys some down time in Hawaii: “The Obamas, along with close friends, rented three houses, worth more than $30 million — each a spacious 5,000 square feet, with waterfalls and a lagoon pool that flows throughout,” ABC’s Yunji de Nies reported on “Good Morning America” Monday. “Nestled along a white-sand beach rated among the best in the world and with a view of a lush mountain range, the home has a stone fence,” John McCormick writes in the Los Angeles Times. “But even in paradise, the nation’s problems will not be far away. There are at least three ‘for sale’ signs on the block, and property tax records show that the vacation home, built in 2006, has never been sold.”  “Halfway through his round [of golf], as Mr. Obama stopped by the snack bar, he unexpectedly bumped into a small group of reporters sitting outside the club house. Asked how his game was going, he smiled and conceded, ‘I’m not that good,’ ” The New York Times’ Jeff Zeleny writes. “He chatted for a moment, telling the traveling press pool to have a beer and put it on his tab. No one took him up on the offer.” In the holiday spirit, the best game going is the battle of the undercards — Biden vs. Cheney. “Cheney, offering no regrets or apologies for his aggressive role in guiding national security policies over the past eight years, openly mocked Biden for citing the wrong part of the Constitution during a campaign debate and for pledging to pursue a less expansive agenda than Cheney has,” Dan Eggen writes in The Washington Post.  “If he wants to diminish the office of the vice president, that’s obviously his call,” Cheney said on “Fox News Sunday.” “President-elect Obama will decide what he wants in a vice president and, apparently, from the way they’re talking about it, he does not expect him to have as consequential a role as I have had during my time.” Swinging back: “I think the recommendations, the advice that he has given to President Bush — and maybe advice the president already had decided on before he got it — I’m not making that judgment — has been not healthy for our foreign policy, not healthy for our national security, and it has not been consistent with our Constitution, in my view,” Vice-president-elect Joe Biden told George Stephanopoulos on ABC’s “This Week” Sunday.  “His notion of a unitary executive, meaning that, in time of war, essentially all power, you know, goes to the executive, I think is dead wrong. I think it was mistaken,” Biden said.  Biden is chairing a “middle-class task force” that will determine how the Obama administration’s policies are affecting average Americans. “My focus is going to be, I’m going to chair this group and it is designed to do the one thing we use as a yardstick of economic success of our administration, is the middle class growing? Is the middle class getting better? Is the middle class no longer being left behind? And we’ll look at everything from college affordability to after-school programs. The things that affect people’s daily lives. I will be the guy honchoing that policy," Biden told Stephanopoulos. (How Cheney is that?)  And why is Biden still in the Senate? (And why will he be sworn in for another term that he has not intention of serving out?) “Two reasons. One is that, from my perspective, I shouldn’t acknowledge it, but being sworn in for the seventh time as a United States senator from Delaware, the greatest honor I’ve ever had is the people of Delaware electing me,” Biden said. “And it will in no way effect the seniority of the person who will follow me, number one. Number two, there was a period there when it was thought that it may be useful for me to be in the Senate, in terms of some of the votes that were going to be cast in the Senate that may have been very close, that would have been consistent with our incoming administration’s position that I could have been voting on those. It turned out that did not occur.”  (Consult the Senate historian’s office on this one — but a replacement senator named before the next Senate session would have seniority over all the other freshman, no?) Look for some familiar faces, at a podium near you: “Some of Washington’s best-known Democratic operatives — including Jenny Backus, Jennifer Palmieri and Howard Wolfson — are being considered for top communications roles that would make them the public faces of the Obama administration outside the White House,” Politico’s Mike Allen reports. “Although no final decisions have been made, Backus may be President-elect Barack Obama’s top spokesperson on health issues, Palmieri is in the early stages of consideration for a role at the Pentagon, and Wolfson is being considered — along with Doug Hattaway — for the delicate podium job at the State Department.”  The Rick Warren fallout continues: “Giving that kind of mark of approval and honor to someone who has frankly spoken in ways I and many others have found personally very offensive, I thought that was a mistake for the president-elect to do,” Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., said on CNN.  Checking in on Minnesota (where the recount has already gone on more than a week longer than Florida’s in 2000): “The two sides are heading into a crucial week. On Monday, they are expected to get a new vote count after Secretary of State Mark Ritchie allocates withdrawn ballot challenges to the candidates. On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will consider Coleman’s claim that some votes in Franken strongholds were counted twice. And both sides will try to devise a process for counting any absentee ballots that were mistakenly rejected,” Pat Doyle and Mike Kaszuba report in the Minneapolis Star Tribune.  The St. Paul Pioneer Press has Democrat Al Franken leading by 260 votes — but things will tighten on Monday.  Caroline Kennedy speaks (through a spokesman): “Her stances on key issues, including same-sex marriage, Israel, and Iraq, seemed calibrated to appeal both to New York’s governor, Democrat David Paterson, who will choose the next senator, and its voters, who will have their say in 2010, and again in 2012,” per Politico’s Ben Smith and Glenn Thrush, who get to come out in favor of gay marriage, but to stay on the fence about supporting Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s, I-N.Y., reelection.  The New York Times’ Nicholas Confessore: “She did not provide answers about other issues that may prove more controversial. Ms. Kennedy did not say whether she supports a cap on local property taxes in New York, something that has sharply divided Democrats and Republicans in Albany. And she did not say whether she supports raising state or federal income taxes for the rich to help balance the budget and pay for government programs.”  Al Hunt likes Caroline: “The daughter of the late President John F. Kennedy is a talented woman who possesses a collegial charm that would serve her well in the Senate. None of the other candidates that New York Governor David Paterson reportedly is considering to replace Secretary of State-designate Hillary Clinton offer as compelling a choice. . . . Even some close friends worry whether the private Kennedy is ready for this rough-and-tumble world. Presumably she has thought about that in seeking the post. If so, she’s capable of conquering these challenges.”  Why postings on Craig’s List aren’t getting bites . . .  “Officials are casting doubt on an early projection that 4 million to 5 million people could jam downtown Washington on Inauguration Day, saying it is more likely that the crowd will be about half that size,” Mary Beth Sheridan writes in The Washington Post.  Watch the pricetag: “President-elect Barack Obama has expanded his goals for a massive federal stimulus package to keep pace with the increasingly grim economic outlook, aiming to create or preserve at least 3 million jobs over the next two years,” Lori Montgomery writes in The Washington Post. “The more aggressive target, up from 2.5 million jobs set a month ago, comes after a four-hour meeting last week in which Obama’s top economic advisers told him the economy is now expected to lose as many as 3.5 million jobs over the next year. Obama was told that could drive unemployment, currently at 6.7 percent, above 9 percent, a figure not seen since the recession of the early 1980s.”  Ready to galvanize the right? “Christmas falls on Thursday, but in the nation’s capital it will come in early January, when the 111th Congress convenes and begins assembling an economic stimulus plan worth anywhere from $600 billion to $850 billion, and counting,” McClatchy’s David Lightman and Kevin G. Hall report. “However, lawmakers first must write a bill that, in legislative terms, doesn’t become the year’s biggest Christmas tree, festooned with billions for pet projects and special interest ornaments that are pleasing politically but not necessarily what the economy needs right now. One example: On Friday, The Association of Zoos and Aquariums issued a news release calling for ‘shovel-ready zoo and aquarium infrastructure projects to be eligible for federal stimulus funding.’ “  “The danger is not just the obvious hazard of running up a deficit that becomes a burden after the economy recovers; Obama has promised to be vigilant on that score. The more subtle problem is that as stimulus spending grows, it could become less focused — and less effective,” Doyle MacManus writes in his Los Angeles Times column.  From Dick Keil’s “News You Need” report, from Public Strategies: “On Capitol Hill, House Democrats are quietly talking about what should happen to the House Ways & Means Committee chairmanship should Representative Charlie Rangel’s various brewing ethics troubles force him from the chairmanship.” “Representative Pete Stark of California would be next in line to replace Rangel under the committee’s seniority system, but Richard Neal of Massachusetts has emerged as a dark horse candidate. Neal is seen by many committee watchers as one of the only senior Democrats who has both substance and the personality to lead the committee as well as credibility with the pro-business and socially liberal camps that will weigh heavily on the Tax writing panel’s agenda in the coming year.” More on Levi Johnston’s mom: The drug bust was for oxycontin, per the Anchorage Daily News.  The Kicker: “I thought he merited it at the time.” — Vice President Dick Cheney, on Fox News Sunday, not apologizing for telling Sen. Patrick Leahy to f*** himself.  “How many shots do you need?” — President-elect Barack Obama, to the photographers with him on the golf course in Hawaii.  Bookmark the link below to get The Note’s daily morning analysis:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/the_note/index.html And for up-to-the-minute political updates check out The Note’s new blog . . . all day every day:

http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/

User Comments

How many more inexperienced people can the Democrats dig up for national roles?
First we get their infamous community organizer out of Illinois who hasn’t got a clue and now they want Caroline
“I didn’t vote in many elections” Kennedy to join the Senate. She’ll bring with her a wealth of experience just like Obama— Zero.

Posted by: monalisa | December 22, 2008, 9:11 am 9:11 am

It was smart dump this on a holiday weekend, but the story has no chance of going away anytime soon if Blago decides to “fight, fight, fight” and Fitzgerald the case to trial. Imagine the crisis when Obama aides and associates are forced to the stand…
http://www.political-buzz.com/

Posted by: matt | December 22, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am

I suppose Republicans need a biased news source to cheer them during their wilderness years, and The Note has obviously decided to fill that role. The amount of space you devote to every (non) detail of the Illinois governor’s scandal, in these times the country faces its worst economic news since The Great Depression, is proof as to why noone except partisan Republicans finds The Note relevant.

Posted by: Amy | December 22, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am

CROOKS, just look at the picture of these two guys. What else needs to be said, would you trust these two who are Obamas buds????

Posted by: billy bob | December 22, 2008, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Ah yes, the “report” . . . now, for all those that believe this self-generated propaganda please call me. I have several large bridges I’d like to sell.

Posted by: rplat | December 22, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

He said that, she said that, he infered this, she didn’t do this, what a bunch of BS. Antything to take us away from the real problem THE STATE OF THE UNION UNDER THE CURRENT ADMINISTRATION. The media just likes to stir up dirt. I would like to check into their backgrounds, how they got their jobs, who they payed of to get the job and to get information. That would be interesting.

Posted by: BSKI | December 22, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Rick Klein:
Why can’t you wait and report the real news when the Report is out. This is what we call “gossiping”.
You have gone meandering quoting:
1. The Chicago Sun-Times
2. Los Angeles Times
3. New York Times
4. etc. etc. etc.

Posted by: Rita | December 22, 2008, 9:42 am 9:42 am

The two biggest crooks are in the white house now. Ryan is in jail, Libby got a pardon, Steven was convicted. We have crooks in both parties

Posted by: BSKI | December 22, 2008, 9:46 am 9:46 am

You reporters remind me of two old people that have nothing to do. Yes I am old and that is why I waste my time reading gossip and writing these NOTES

Posted by: BSKI | December 22, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am

“Ah yes, the “report” . . . now, for all those that believe this self-generated propaganda please call me. I have several large bridges I’d like to sell.”
Unless you have evidence, spare us. You’ve got nothing but bitterness. If there’s anything on Obama or Rahm, we’ll know it.

Posted by: Silky | December 22, 2008, 9:49 am 9:49 am

Why are you promoting GS’s report of anonymous sources of OBAMA”s report as fact? Other sources have said there were 21 contacts between Emanuel and Blago’s people, not 4 or 5. This is ridiculous. You’re absolving Obama and his people with very little evidence to back you up.
What a surprise. Obama has found himself not-guilty.

Posted by: beth | December 22, 2008, 9:52 am 9:52 am

I swear…sometimes I feel like the Democrats are trying to act like Obi-Wan Kenobi in the original Star Wars, when they are stopped by the storm troopers going into the town, and he pulls the old Jedi mind control trick on them. (I paraphrase because I am not ao big Star Wars fan and haven’t seen the movie for over 20 years):
“Nothing to see here…let them go.”
The other issues mentioned by those posters ARE issues (the economy, etc.), but whether or not Obama and/or his staff knew that Blago was trying to “sell” the seat, and (more importantly) what they did about it once they found out (which hasn’t been determined to my satisfaction, to say the least) IS important.
This is not a zero sum game…i.e. more reporting on this means less reporting on other issues. Those other issues are still being covered (more than adequately from both sides of the political fence). But this IS an issue that many are interested in and want to know the full details.
That’s great that Obama’s own investigation found nothing wrong; however, I want to know specifics and hear (or read the transcripts of) what was actually said between Obama’s staff and Blago’s staff in order to confirm/corroborate the results of his investigation.

Posted by: MikeO | December 22, 2008, 9:57 am 9:57 am

“You’re absolving Obama and his people with very little evidence to back you up.”
And you’re implicating him with not a single shred of evidence. Not a single person remotely associated with these people has even hinted at any wrong-doing by Obama or Rahm. And certainly not anybody associated with the investigation. On the contrary.

Posted by: Silky | December 22, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Its amazing how much hysteria this drawing.
Whether it was jarret jackson or howdy doody who got the senate spot, that person was going to be a die hard liberal and that’s just what obama was going to get and he knew that. why buy a vote in the senate you were going to get anyways.
this is much adoo about nothing.

Posted by: Omentum | December 22, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Obama’s clean or too smart for that. The more the republicans attack the better he looks. Petty!

Posted by: Perspective | December 22, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am

(Consult the Senate historian’s office on this one — but a replacement senator named before the next Senate session would have seniority over all the other freshman, no?)
Since Biden’s replacement has said he will serve only 2 years, any seniority edge he might get by starting in December would be meaningless.

Posted by: Jerry Skurnik | December 22, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

(Consult the Senate historian’s office on this one — but a replacement senator named before the next Senate session would have seniority over all the other freshman, no?)
Since Biden’s replacement has said he will serve only 2 years, any seniority edge he might get by starting in December would be meaningless.

Posted by: Jerry Skurnik | December 22, 2008, 10:12 am 10:12 am

I think Blago deserves his day in court. He apparently knows what every other politician knows about those seats. The real question is why would any politician spend 13 million for a senate seat that pays 169 thousand a year. Happened in my state. Usually there has to be an agreed exchange for conviction. Cold cash in the freezer kind of proof.

Posted by: rightbehind | December 22, 2008, 10:13 am 10:13 am

The reporting about Blago and Emmanuel consisted of a hodge podge of fragmented quotes from various sources, which were more inflammatory outside their context. It was particularly disjointed to have a quote that pertains simultaneously to Emmanuel and the Clinton library. The distraction the title refers to is coming mainly from political gossip columns like this that use information sources from within the malfeasance ridden Blagojevich office.

Posted by: kat | December 22, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am

“Other sources have said there were 21 contacts between Emanuel and Blago’s people, not 4 or 5.”
The sources that report 21 contacts came from within Blagojevich’s office. That’s not exactly a reliable source for contact information considering it’s an office whose dealings are under criminal investigation.

Posted by: kat | December 22, 2008, 10:25 am 10:25 am

I know the “Messiah Report” hasn’t been released yet, but does anyone in their right mind think that the Messiah is going to FIND SOMETHING BAD? Believing is NOT seeing. I believe in Santa even though I’ve never seen him! I believe there is a lot of things in this report, but we won’t see them, will we! NEVER, EVER LET THE ACCUSED DO THEIR OWN INTERNAL INVESTIGATION! OBAMA, YOU ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED, EVER!

Posted by: Thateldoo | December 22, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am

This is like letting O J Simpson look for the murderer of his wife and her friend! GIVE ME A F’N BREAK! Internal Investigation Findings? Internal (Hiding Anything They Know About) Investigation! PEOPLE, THESE ARE POLITICIANS, GET A CLUE! WAKE UP AMERICA, OUR COUNTRY IS IN DANGER FROM THE MESSIAH!

Posted by: Thateldoo | December 22, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Hate to say it, but this smells like something George Bush would do!

Posted by: NYC-Independent1664 | December 22, 2008, 10:58 am 10:58 am

Small lies don’t count.

Posted by: Rasputin3.14 | December 22, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Blago is corrupt.

Posted by: ryan | December 22, 2008, 11:13 am 11:13 am

There will never be an end to the questions. The Neo-Cons were ticked off when Bill Clinton won the election and tossed out false accusation after false accusation until they finally ran him down on sex. Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin and the rest of the Limbaugh Lemmings will continue to divide the country with accusations and hearsay. Innuendo without fact and divisive rhetoric is the life’s blood of these hacks and FOX news television and radio.

Posted by: dan | December 22, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

I am completely dumbfounded to why the media is craving to find some dirty link between Obama and Gov. Blagojevich. No one on his staff is under investigation–!! How more clear can that be? Nothing else matters!! I think to try and create a story where there is not one just looks foolish on the media’s part, as recent polls show most American’s see no link between the selling of Obama’s seat and the Obama team.
All these dumb questions that you guys want answered makes no sense considering they were not involved or had no previous knowledge of what was going on–Obviously Blagoveich is a crazed lunatic who was in his own sick, dark world. That is truly the only thing that should be looked into and reported. So please grow up media and focus on more important things!

Posted by: Josh | December 22, 2008, 11:18 am 11:18 am

Transparancy you can believe in. HA, HA, HA. These crooks are not even in office yet and there is a scandle they are covering up. This is just the tip of the iceburg with your messiah.

Posted by: billy bob | December 22, 2008, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Ohhh yeahhhh, let’s see. The Obama team knows that this guy was wire tapped so now they’re going to issue a report that lies about how often they spoke or what was said. Knowing that later the FBI can call them on lying. It would be found out. It’s not going to happen people. You guys are killing me. There’s nothing to see here. Move along.

Posted by: NotaSpammer | December 22, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Dan, are you serious??? Clinton was guilty as it gets and then lided to everyone. I know it was the neocons fault he had sex with that woman. HA, HA, HA.

Posted by: billy bob | December 22, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Whether you think Rahm has or has not done anything wrong, Obama’s report is next to useless. It comes across as shifty by releasing a self written report during the holiday week. If I was Obama and I really wanted to come clean, I would be pushing Fitzgerald to release all transcripts of the wiretaps. Granted, now that a case appears pending, release of the transcripts may take a while, but it would still come across as being much more transparent.

Posted by: Hondo | December 22, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am

“There will never be an end to the questions. The Neo-Cons were ticked off when Bill Clinton won the election and tossed out false accusation after false accusation until they finally ran him down on sex. Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin and the rest of the Limbaugh Lemmings will continue to divide the country with accusations and hearsay. Innuendo without fact and divisive rhetoric is the life’s blood of these hacks and FOX news television and radio.”
========================
Excuse my but that tripe you just regurgitated made me vomit on my shoes. Take that trash and sell it to your buddies on the radical leftist.

Posted by: rplat | December 22, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am

The quality of most of the responses here reflect accurately upon the report.

Posted by: kat | December 22, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

“I said thanks but no thanks to that bridge to nowhere”

Posted by: Omentum | December 22, 2008, 11:41 am 11:41 am

My God Rick Klein! :You’ve left right wing bias dripping all over my monitor. I hope it’ll clean off.

Posted by: devilkev | December 22, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am

rplat You right wing nut cases are pathetic. Fortunately you’re also irrelevant.

Posted by: pieceof cake | December 22, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

I await the sequel when truth prevails. The piling on that has occurred seems unprecedented. During this season of Peace and Hope, pray that the shadows may be lifted and the truth revealed.

Posted by: benvictor | December 22, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

Barry is a sleaze. His only only hope to continue his bogus “change we can believe in” is that the media will continue to cover for him.

Posted by: dave | December 22, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Ditto to creo13 @ 12/22/2008 This is no more than a witch hunt.
Some people will put more on you than they can stand themselves.

Posted by: Toni Quillen | December 22, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

There will never be an end to the questions. The Neo-Cons were ticked off when Bill Clinton won the election and tossed out false accusation after false accusation until they finally ran him down on sex. Limbaugh, Hannity, Levin and the rest of the Limbaugh Lemmings will continue to divide the country with accusations and hearsay. Innuendo without fact and divisive rhetoric is the life’s blood of these hacks and FOX news television and radio.
Posted by: dan | Dec 22, 2008 11:18:42 AM
Thanks Dan….

Posted by: shalom | December 22, 2008, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

I can only imagine the
crucifixion that would have followed if this had been a REPUBLICAN prez elect rolling around in the mud with a REPUBLICAN gov from chicago.
The media should all be sent to Cuba to live since they are all working overtime to make sure the United States becomes the next cuba.

Posted by: dave | December 22, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

“Well, we’ve done a thorough investigation and can find no evidence that we have done anything that was not something that we think that you thought that we didn’t do. This should satisfy any questions that you may have about the birth certificate as well.”

Posted by: Hunne | December 22, 2008, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Blago was trying to sell Obama’s Senate seat, and we know for a fact that Rahm was talking to the governor after the election. OF COURSE there are questions, as there should be. You Obama-bots who consume nothing less than entire gallons of Barry-O Kool-Aid need to get a grip and acknowledge that this is not just a petty little story.
There are serious abuse of power issues here and Obama’s campaign is involved, even though their involvement looks to be completely benign.
Can you imagine if the Bush admin tried to do their own investigation and then said “Well, we didn’t do anything”. The press would go nuts. Come on, Obama-bots. Just because your candidate won doesn’t mean you have to be blind to a fault.

Posted by: RobL | December 22, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Amy,
Get a life. We are nowhere near the level of the Great Depression.6% unemployment now versus a 30% unemployment then. Quit drinking the liberal Kool Aid. And when are you people going to learn that it is the liberals who do not want you to succeed by keeping you dependant which in turn assures them a voting block. Sometimes brainwashing is so severe. In your case, you may be hopeless.

Posted by: mm | December 22, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

Buying an elected position!?! Absurd! How parlimentary.

Posted by: DobermanSpencer | December 22, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Shalom,
Your post name meaning peace was nothing like your message. A message filled with spiteful, hateful rhetoric and the labeling of all republicans as neo-cons. Typical liberal hypocrite. You shout at stereotypes and hateful messages, yet yours is just that. Pathetic.

Posted by: mm | December 22, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

I did not vote for Obama, but I am trying to give him the benefit of the doubt and let him prove that he can deliver on all of the promises that he made. That said, we need to see all of the facts and be able to judge for ourselves how Obama handles the sitation. I don’t want to see a whitewashed report done by people that might have something to lose. Obama should direct his staff to release the transcripts and show us he really meant it when he said his government would be transparent. Anything less will just keep people speculating as to what there is to hide.

Posted by: Food for thought | December 22, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

GOP
hmmm. Maybe you should add to your wish list Santa to somehow link this Blago scandal to Obama. But you had to have been nice.
Drats. You’ve been extremely naughty ignoring all of Bush’s scadalous deeds this past eight years.
Hopefully santa will give you a stocking full of “clean coal”

Posted by: Omentum | December 22, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

rplat You right wing nut cases are pathetic. Fortunately you’re also irrelevant.
Posted by: pieceof cake | Dec 22, 2008 12:12:13 PM
================================
It’s call trickle down reality. Those at the top of politics realize it. But the minions who carry their water have yet to realize it.

Posted by: Omentum | December 22, 2008, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

MM
You must remember that an open-minded liberal is about as easy to find as a patriotic liberal. They really just don’t exist!

Posted by: dave | December 22, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Obama can’t hope this “scandal” goes away, because it’s a Republican generated Witch Hunt, and they aren’t about to let this go away. If nothing comes of this one….just wait a week or two and the Repubs will come up with another one. I anticipate Obama will be hounded throughout his administration, just like the witch hunt against Clinton by Ken Starr. By the way, remember how much money Ken Starr spent to find absolutley nothing illegal with Clinton? I hope the press wises up and we don’t have to endure this mindless game for 8 years. If anyone should have been brought up on any type of ethics charges, it’s the crooks Bush, Cheney, Rove, Ashcroft, etc.

Posted by: Jazzy Jaxxi | December 22, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

“The Obamas, along with close friends, rented three houses, worth more than $30 million — each a spacious 5,000 square feet, with waterfalls and a lagoon pool that flows throughout,”
Sounds like your “average citizen” to me, how about you? What a pile of crap this country is in. The “O” will never tell the truth about ANYTHING!!!!!!

Posted by: John W | December 22, 2008, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Jazzy
Clinton lied under oath, that is hardly a “witch hunt”.
Barry is linked to yet another shady person he claims “I uuuhhh had no uuuhh idea that he was a bad aaaahh guy”.
As for Bush lying, not true. He was only saying what his top intelligence was telling him, which was EXACTLY what clinton’s was telling him. Clinton was just too busy entertaining monica to do anything about it.
When will you liberals acknowledge that we found mustard gas and the bodies of 700,000 murdered iraqis from chemical weapons??

Posted by: dave | December 22, 2008, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

billy bob – yes billy bob. The Neo-Cons are a bunch of cry baby poor sports and will do what ever it takes to run down a Democratic President. Extra marital affairs is all the Neo-Cons could get Clinton on even though they accused him of everything from crooked Real Estate deals to the murder of Hillary’s partner. Accusations are easy to throw out and here’s an example. With a name like billy bob it makes me think you’re another hillbilly in the woods doing your best deliverance impersonation. Now it’s your job to prove it wrong simply because you were accused and I’m going to keep implying it’s true until you can prove to my satisfaction different. And by the way, I will never be satisfied because I make money by destroying you with innuendo.

Posted by: dan | December 22, 2008, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

dave:
MM
You must remember that an open-minded liberal is about as easy to find as a patriotic liberal. They really just don’t exist!
__________________________
And a liberal is never wrong – ever. The only people in the world who say bad words or do wrong in society are republicans – according to liberals. Liberal politicians never have affairs, never do anything wrong in congress and never act in criminal ways !!!!

Posted by: Lou | December 22, 2008, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

and if Bush and Cheney were criminals like you liberals like to claim then why doesnt Pelosi, Franks and Reid do something about it. they hate their guts and if there was any reason to impeach them i think they would have done it….

Posted by: Lou | December 22, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

“What we now know: Emanuel had only one conversation with Blagojevich, D-Ill., in the period under discussion, ABC’s George Stephanopoulos reports.”
This cracks me up. We don’t know anything of the sort.. what we KNOW is that a Democrat talking head says somebody told him that Obama is saying that Emanuel had 1 conversation. None of the people in the chain are trustworthy, and there’s no reason to believe any of them.

Posted by: howwouldiknow | December 22, 2008, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

dave,dan,Lou – There is nothing wrong with conservatives, liberals or moderates. The only ones to fear are the extremous at both ends. They think they are always correct and the other side is always wrong. Both extremes are not real Americans because when majority of voters vote in anyone but their candidate. They say things like “most Americans are idiots to believe the lies of the other side.” They are really admitting that their lies were not as convincing as the other sided. The extremes of both sides are not looking for the truth because they already know it. The extremes of both sides are not looking for the truth because they ignore truth that does not support their opinion.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | December 22, 2008, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

So, why aren’t we outraged that Emanuel would call the governor and “suggest” that he appoint an Obama pal and confident to Obama’s former seat? What business does the president-elect’s office have in making that suggestion in the first place? Consider this, the role of a senator is not to be an ally to the president or even support him, the role of a senator is to keep checks on the president – seems an ally isn’t the best person for that job. Who do you think Emmanuel was looking out for when he made that call? The people of Chicago? The governor? or his boss?

Posted by: Keep it real | December 22, 2008, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

The time may come when Obama’s administration does something shabby, but who will believe The Note when they report it, since they hyped Obama’s connection to the Blago scandal, regardless of the fact Patrick Fitzgerald himself said Obama’s team was not implicated? That’s the point, geniuses. I am doing ABC a favor by pointing out that swiftboating Democrats in 2008, in the face of the critical issues facing our nation, is not exactly the best way to rebuild confidence in the coveted college educated audience. But I guess that’s how you keep the Republican viewers happy, so that’s the bottom line. Swiftboat away, Rick Klein. Ka-ching ka-ching. You may catch FOX news yet!

Posted by: Amy | December 22, 2008, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

What questions? word is, it was Obama’s team who was the whistle blower. Concentrate on the problems of the country, Obama. OK? Nobody caresabout the guy with the bad hair. He’s going away soon. You’re clear. Just worry a bout the country. We need you to stay focused.

Posted by: matt | December 22, 2008, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm

Obama is basically an intelligent empty suit surrounded by professionals. Sort of like the current president minus one of the above adjectives.

Posted by: Lee Lawrence | December 22, 2008, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Amy, I really don’t think you have to worry about this site publishing anything critical of Obama. They’ve been covering up for him for a year now, the man could murder 50 babies on the White House lawn on national television and they’d cover for him. You really have nothing to worry about from them.

Posted by: howwouldiknow | December 22, 2008, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Lee lawrence
Before you continue the long-standing, typical liberal “open-minded” attacks on George Bush intelligence, please note that Bush received HIGHER grades at Harvard and Yale than Kerry.
Also, he never FLUNKED out of lawschool like Al Gore did.
He also personally handwrote EVERY fallen soldier’s family a letter. My guess is he didn’t have to plagerize any of the words, like Biden got caught doing in college AND in his first presidential run in 80′s.

Posted by: dave | December 22, 2008, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

“Concentrate on the problems of the country, Obama.”
Freudian slip? Or intentional honesty on where our major problem is?

Posted by: howwouldiknow | December 22, 2008, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

So…don’t expect change or truth from PEBO. He made his way up through the same cesspool as Blago! :(

Posted by: aware2u | December 22, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Is Obama the only virgin in a whorehouse? It is possible, but it makes me wonder. I just don’t know what to think anymore.

Posted by: ScorpRedhead | December 22, 2008, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

I would have more confidence in an INDEPENDENT investigation rather than an internal one. Was there any wire tapping or are we just relying on O’s and Rahm’s “recollections”. Did O just ask Rahm, Did you ever talk to the gov? or is there real clear evidence one way or the other?

Posted by: mccollegemom | December 22, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

mccollegemom;
How about the fact the prosecuter in the case, Patrick Fitzgerald, has said the Obama team is not implicated in the governor’s schemes, and is on tape calling Obama a “m-f-er” for not playing ball with him? Not good enough for you, huh? What justice system do you ascribe to, cause it sure doesn’t sound like the American system.

Posted by: Amy | December 22, 2008, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Obama is not implicated? OK….then why all the lies, subterfuge and obfuscation? Sometimes a duck will in fact quack and walk like a duck. For somebody as clean as a brand-spankin’ new white shirt Obama and company sure do have funny ha-ha way’s about themselves and their associations.

Posted by: Hank G | December 22, 2008, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Obama didn’t do anything illegal, and most likely Emanuel didn’t either. But, I think most people are missing the point. Nobody from Obama’s team had any business in telling the governor who Obama wanted in that Senate seat – that conversation between the governor and Emanuel was unethical and that Obama is more concerned with his own self-interests (having his allies in the Senate) rather than the American people, who would be better served by a person who is willing to put his/her constituents needs before any allegiance to the president. Although it may not have been illegal, the conversation between the governor and Emanuel is very disappointing.

Posted by: News reader | December 22, 2008, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Several weeks into the non-story about Blago and Obama’s team, and (1) the breathless media attention continues (what: the economic meltdown and 2 wars aren’t important?) and (2) the right wing nuts continue to throw stones and make stuff up (I get that; they don’t want to discuss issues or ponder why they lost the last 2 elections). It’s silly season. But I hope everyone has a wonderful holiday.

Posted by: tmginnova | December 22, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Nixon: “I am not a crook.”
Bill Clinton: “I did not have s*xual relations with that woman.”
Barack Obama: “Neither I or anyone from my staff had any contact with the governor’s office about the open Senate seat” … later revised to “Neither I or anyone from my staff had any unethical contact with the governor’s office about the open Senate seat.”

Posted by: Thyme Again | December 22, 2008, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

“I believe there is a lot of things in this report, but we won’t see them, will we! NEVER, EVER LET THE ACCUSED DO THEIR OWN INTERNAL INVESTIGATION! OBAMA, YOU ARE NOT TO BE TRUSTED, EVER!
Posted by: Thateldoo | Dec 22, 2008 10:45:56 AM;
Where did you learn this ‘slick tactic’? (Ha, Ha, Ha) From the regime of ‘The Present Administration???’ And who the hell is “The Accused?” You are absolutely ‘Out of Your Tree!”

Posted by: bobj72 | December 22, 2008, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

thateldoo, Dave, billy bob and the rest of you “Hard Rite Edged, Mindless, NeoCon, STORMTROOPERS” you’re ALL sick, sick, siicckkk… Thank Goodness you’re ALL intellectually impotent – when you’re stimulated! “An 800 pound GORILLA’S urinating in the kitchen (‘the Economy,Wars, etc., etc.’) and your minds are preoccupied with ANTS on the flower pot, on the patio!” SICK, do you hear me, SICK!!!

Posted by: bobj72 | December 22, 2008, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

I find it so funny the neocons have him setup for impeachment before he is even sworn in. They are truly the sorest (sorriest) losers.

Posted by: tendergroins | December 22, 2008, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Blago is a hot head. Obama is clean.
Emanuel is overzealous.
Just think if McCain and Palin were in the “elect” position and the “Levi, your mama is busted for oxycontin” truth was in the spotlight.

Posted by: clarity | December 22, 2008, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm

And I suppose were just supposed to believe this liar? I hope someone makes a deal and takes this fool down.

Posted by: Greg | December 23, 2008, 2:45 am 2:45 am

thinking the only thing that will end the issue is for rahm emanuel to resign. obama by not asking rahm to resign, privately, will always be cast as corrupt if even mildly. rahm should do the right thing and step down. obama is not even sworn in as potus and already there is a taint of scandal swirling around his coming administration. cleaning house is the only option.

Posted by: Lawrence | December 23, 2008, 6:51 am 6:51 am

there is absolutely no reason why Emanuel should step down. he is tough and will be an asset as Obama’s chief-of-staff. he did nothing wrong. Fitzpatrick has indicated that no one on Obama’s staff is an object of his investigation. right-wingers will make a tsunami out of this water under the bridge. let’s move on with the problem-solving and lay off the problem-creating.

Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 8:12 am 8:12 am

“And I suppose were just supposed to believe this liar? I hope someone makes a deal and takes this fool down.”Posted by: Greg | Dec 23, 2008 2:45:40 AM
“thinking the only thing that will end the issue is for rahm emanuel to resign. obama by not asking rahm to resign, privately, will always be cast as corrupt if even mildly. rahm should do the right thing and step down. obama is not even sworn in as potus and already there is a taint of scandal swirling around his coming administration. cleaning house is the only option.” Posted by: Lawrence | Dec 23, 2008 6:51:50 AM
Both of you guys are Arrogant, Ignorant and Unsophisticated NeoCon soldiers. Ask your Masters to “give you a life!”

Posted by: bobj72 | December 23, 2008, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.