The Note, 12/23/08: Show It All? Report to Test Obama’s Openness
BY RICK KLEIN Who’s happiest that a certain delayed report is coming Tuesday — Mike Duncan, Stephanie Cutter, Rahm Emanuel, or reporters looking forward to the holidays? Who will be most disappointed in what it contains — Mike Duncan, Rod Blagojevich, Jesse Jackson Jr., or reporters looking for a story to take them through the holidays? The report on President-elect Barack Obama’s contacts with members of Blagojevich’s team is set to drop at 4:30 pm ET Tuesday — and with it comes the first major test of Obama’s pledge of openness and transparency (which, we’ll remind you, had nothing to do with showing skin on the beach). The report almost certainly won’t be enough to answer all the questions. For starters, it won’t be able to quote from the transcripts that Patrick Fitzgerald showcased like a trailer to an R-rated winter blockbuster a few weeks back. But if this is really everything — and if we learn in some detail not just who was talking, but what they said — Obama can do his part to unravel the (self-created) mysteries about his involvement in efforts to fill his old senate seat. And he can begin to make good on his pledge of the most open and transparent transition in history — in a way that no list of task-force members, or Change.gov document dumps, can reflect. “President-elect Barack Obama has promised an open transition but, federal open records laws do not apply to his transition team — meaning deliberations, meetings with interest groups or even e-mail communications between his staffers and Illinois Gov. Rod R. Blagojevich are only as open as Mr. Obama wants them to be,” Stephen Dinan writes for the Washington Times. “In the case of those communications, the public will learn Tuesday how forthcoming Mr. Obama is — his campaign has promised to release its report on contacts with Mr. Blagojevich.” “The report, according to three people familiar with its findings, is a memorandum that will lay out a narrative in about a dozen paragraphs the limited contact Mr. Obama’s advisers had with the governor’s office,” Jeff Zeleny writes in The New York Times. Transparency really matters most when the government entity or individuals want it least. That will make this one worth reading. “Rahm Emanuel, the Illinois congressman selected by Mr. Obama as his White House chief of staff, had a handful of contacts with the governor’s office. At least two other names also are expected to be mentioned in the review, including Michael Strautmanis, a longtime aide to Mr. Obama who once worked for Mr. Blagojevich,” Zeleny writes. ABC’s George Stephanopoulos reported Sunday that incoming chief of staff Rahm Emanuel only had one conversation with Blagojevich, D-Ill.., and that the subject of the Senate seat came up only in passing. Add to that four Rahm calls with then-chief-of-staff John Harris, including an Emanuel assurance that all they’d get for picking Valerie Jarrett would be “appreciation.” “You’re going to see this is a lot about nothing,” one Democratic official tells CNN’s Ed Henry. Politico’s Mike Allen describes it as “absolving incoming chief of staff Rahm Emanuel of any impropriety in his contacts with the disgraced Illinois governor’s office.” (Rahm himself won’t be around to face the cameras — he leaves for a 10-day family trip to Africa Tuesday.) One of many reasons the report won’t be enough: “A source close to the Obama transition said the review to be released Tuesday was written by advisers who did not have access to the taped recordings made by Fitzgerald during the investigation,” Michael D. Shear writes for The Washington Post. Another one of those reasons (though he could blame time zones): “Aides say Obama has no plans to make a public statement while he is in Hawaii,” the AP’s Nedra Pickler reports. And another: “Nobody has accused Mr. Obama or his staff of legal wrongdoing. But the transition team’s sometimes awkward handling of the issue has raised anticipation of just what the report might say — and what the fallout might be,” Jonathan Weisman writes in The Wall Street Journal. Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan sits down for questions with the Chicago Tribune: “I’ve never asked to be considered for the Senate seat,” she said. And: “I have publicly said that they should pass legislation creating a special election. . . . [adding jokingly] You want me to drive them?” Vice-president-elect Joe Biden is in Washington Tuesday morning, for a meeting with the economic team. From the transition press office: “Vice President-Elect Joe Biden will be briefed by Larry Summers, Director of the National Economic Council, and other White House economic advisers on new economic developments and the upcoming economic recovery package that Congress is set to begin debating next month.” Also from the transition team Tuesday morning — an 11 am ET photo-op with a Bible, at the Library of Congress: “On January 20th, President-elect Barack Obama will take the oath of office using the same Bible upon which President Lincoln was sworn in at his first inauguration. The Bible is currently part of the collections of the Library of Congress. Though there is no constitutional requirement for the use of a Bible during the swearing-in, Presidents have traditionally used Bibles for the ceremony, choosing a volume with personal or historical significance. President-elect Obama will be the first President sworn in using the Lincoln Bible since its initial use in 1861.” All we’ll probably remember from Obama’s Hawaii vacation: “Fit for Office,” declares the New York Post. “Oh, My Bod! It’s Beach Barack.” Coming Tuesday: “The Obamas are hoping for some more privacy today — they’re holding a memorial for the president-elect’s grandmother, who died just two days before he won the election. It is a private memorial for family and friends, and the press will not be let in,” ABC’s Yunji de Nies reported on “Good Morning America” Tuesday. Remember when all the transition storylines centered on Hillary? For old time’s sake, then: “Even before taking office, Hillary Rodham Clinton is seeking to build a more powerful State Department, with a bigger budget, high-profile special envoys to trouble spots and an expanded role in dealing with global economic issues at a time of crisis,” The New York Times’ Mark Landler and Helene Cooper report. “As Mrs. Clinton puts together her senior team, officials said, she is also trying to carve out a bigger role for the State Department in economic affairs, where the Treasury has dominated during the Bush years,” they write. “Given Mrs. Clinton’s prominence, expanding the department’s portfolio could bring on conflict with other powerful cabinet members.” This is a lot of speeches (but not too many): “Hillary Rodham Clinton has written off $13.1 million in personal money she lent her failed U.S. presidential campaign, new disclosure reports filed with the Federal Election Commission show,” per the AP write-up. “Clinton lent the money to her campaign in several installments last spring as she fought Barack Obama for the Democratic presidential nomination, which she ultimately lost.” (She still owes $6.3 million to vendors — including $5.3 million to Mark Penn’s polling firm.) As the Rick Warren fallout continues, E.J. Dionne Jr. sees an invitation as worth taking by Warren and making by Obama: “Obama and Warren have helped each other in the past, and both know exactly what they’re doing,” he writes. While Richard Cohen sees it as a mistake: “The real problem has nothing to do with ministers and everything to do with Obama’s inability or unwillingness to be a moral leader. Sooner or later, he just might have to stand for something.” As does Boston Globe columnist Derrick Z. Jackson: “Here is Obama exercising terrible judgment on someone who just got done injecting anti-gay ideology into politics in the biggest state in the nation. It is nice that Warren and many evangelicals are increasingly involved in the environment and global poverty. But it seems that Obama is having a little PJSD here, as in Post Jeremiah Stress Disorder.” Driving the day in New York and well beyond: “New York State voters split 40-41 percent on whether Caroline Kennedy is qualified to be a U.S. Senator, but they expect by a 48-25 percent margin that Gov. David Paterson will name her to the Senate seat being vacated by Hillary Clinton, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today.” “Offered a choice, 33 percent of voters say Gov. Paterson should name Ms. Kennedy, while 29 percent say Attorney General Andrew Cuomo should get the nod. . . . Kennedy leads Cuomo 42-27 percent among New York City voters and ties Cuomo 30-30 percent among suburban voters, while Cuomo leads 31-27 percent among upstate voters.” Welcome to the Kennedy rules: “Ms. Kennedy, who has asked Gov. David A. Paterson to appoint her to succeed Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton — and who helped oversee the vetting process for Mr. Obama’s possible running mates — is declining to provide a variety of basic data, including companies she has a stake in and whether she has ever been charged with a crime,” David M. Halbfinger writes in The New York Times. “Ms. Kennedy declined on Monday to reply to those and other questions posed by The New York Times about any potential ethical, legal and financial entanglements. Through a spokesman, she said she would not disclose that kind of information unless and until she becomes a senator,” Halbfinger writes. What did she do working for the New York public schools, exactly? “During the two years Caroline Kennedy worked as a fundraiser and goodwill ambassador for New York City’s schools chancellor, Joel Klein, co-workers would frequently drift by her workspace for a glimpse of the department’s most famous $1-a-year employee. As often as not, they were greeted by an empty chair,” Politico’s Glenn Thrush reports. Thrush: “Because she has taken so few public positions, her education record — or what passes for it — has become just about the only public policy issue on which the 51-year-old political rookie can be judged. The problem is, she hardly left a vapor trail.” Paterson’s box: “Let’s just say there’ll be hell to pay from Uncle Teddy, Cousin Robert Jr. and a dozen other Kennedy family members and, maybe, the White House itself if you end up picking someone other than their current favorite to carry on the Camelot dream,” Fred Dicker writes in the New York Post. Then there’s “Democratic Reps. Carolyn Maloney, Steve Israel, Kirsten Gillibrand, Gary Ackerman, José Serrano, Brian Higgins and a half-dozen others unwilling to be named, all of whom have questioned or challenged the selection of Kennedy as Clinton’s successor. These are all influential and proud elected officials who have toiled in the political vineyards for years, developing powerful local political bases. They won’t be happy if you chose a neophyte because her name is Kennedy,” Dicker writes. Bloomie’s getting anxious: “It’s up to the governor, and I think the governor should make a decision reasonably quickly because this is just getting out of control and everybody’s focusing on the wrong things,” Mayor Michael Bloomberg, I-N.Y., said Monday, per the New York Daily News’ Elizabeth Benjamin. In Minnesota — it’s really cold, and really close: Democrat Al Franken is up by 48, per the Minneapolis Star Tribune. “Today, the state Canvassing Board is scheduled to award votes from thousands of challenges that each candidate had filed against his opponent’s ballots but later withdrew,” Pat Doyle writes. “In addition, disputes over absentee ballots, claims that other votes were counted twice and a number of still-unresolved ballot challenges could change the margin yet again in an election that shows no sign of being settled soon.” The AP’s Patrick Condon: “With the state Canvassing Board ready to award the last pile of votes in Minnesota’s U.S. Senate recount, Democrat Al Franken clung to a narrow lead over Republican incumbent Norm Coleman. The final count, however, showed no sign of being settled soon.” From the Coleman campaign Tuesday morning: “We firmly believe that if this reconciliation is done correctly, without some votes being counted twice and that the ‘fifth pile’ ballots are handled properly, then we will maintain our lead when everything is said and done.” Time for a famous name: “Florida recount guru Benjamin Ginsberg, who played a prominent role on then Texas Gov. George W. Bush’s legal team during the historic 2000 presidential campaign, has been helping Coleman’s recount operation, the Republican senator’s campaign confirmed Monday,” The Hill’s Aaron Blake reports. Gov. Sarah Palin, R-Alaska, talks regrets: “The biggest mistake made was that I could have called more shots on this: the opportunities that were not seized to speak to more Americans via media. I was not allowed to do very many interviews, and the interviews that I did were not necessarily those I would have chosen. But I was so thankful to have the opportunity to run with John McCain that I was not going to argue with the strategy decisions that some of his people were making regarding the media contacts,” she says in an interview with Human Events’ John Gizzi. “But if I would have been in charge, I would have wanted to speak to more reporters because that’s how you get your message out to the electorate.” Would she run for Senate? “That’s not in my sites. There’s so much to do as governor,” Palin said. And will he say goodbye? The White House says President Bush hasn’t made up his mind about a farewell address — something every president since Jimmy Carter — with the exception of George H.W. Bush — has done on his way out of office. The Kicker: “Now I have all the faith in the world in Sen. McCain and his family. But some of the folks around him I did not know, and so it was a kind of a risky thing for me to put my faith in the decisions they were making on my behalf.” — Sarah Palin. Bookmark the link below to get The Note’s daily morning analysis:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/the_note/index.html For up-to-the-minute political updates check out The Note’s new blog . . . all day every day:
http://blogs.abcnews.com/thenote/ Follow The Note blog via Twitter:
http://twitter.com/thenote
Email
Mitt Romney's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Romney Makes His Case to Conservatives at CPAC
The democratic party has been corrupt for years so who cares what the governor did or didn’t do. Secondly, Obama’s Emanuel is not as innocent as Obama claims. And didn’t Obama have close ties to corrupt people? But the American public voted him in anyway. So I feel the governor should stay in office and serve out his term. Obama picked several people who didn’t deserve to be in his administration and Emanuel is one of them. Napolitano is another one. Biden was not the best choice for his VP, Hillary Clinton was. However, Obama didn’t want to be outshined by her as she has the experience he hasn’t learned yet and will never learn because his administration will be running the country and he will sit back and take the credit. Obama is slick but this generation of fools don’t have the brains to sit on or a window to throw them out of especially college students that are too busy with their drugs and booze to know what was best for the country. Obama talked about change and didn’t change anything in Washington. He brought back the Clinton administration. All we need now is Bill Clinton as president. Obama duped the American public and they fell for his lies. The economy is not going to get better and Obama can’t change it. He is no Bill Clinton and the public will regret it. There will be many companies closing down and we will be in a deep recession. And Obama cannot get jobs for people. Obama talks but his BS walks.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | December 23, 2008, 8:29 am 8:29 am
The governor of NY should not appoint Caroline Kennedy to fill Hillary’s seat. She has the nerve to want that seat when she didn’t vote in an election about 6 or 7 times. She doesn’t deserve that seat. All she wants is power. She came out of nowhere to endorse Obama. Where was she before? There are many good state senator’s that are available and have the experience that she hasn’t learned yet.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | December 23, 2008, 8:34 am 8:34 am
Franken should stay as a comic and the American public is dumb for voting for him. He doesn’t belong in politics because he hasn’t got the experience as Coleman. If he wins they need to recount the ballots because some of Coleman’s ballots could have been thrown out. The democratic party is good for corruption and its getting worse. Look what happened to Hillary. She lost the nomination because Nancy Pelosi made deals with the superdelegates to switch their vote and Dean gave Obama Hillary’s delegates from MI and FL. Dean, Reid and Nancy are all corrupt democrats and need to be replaced.
Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | December 23, 2008, 8:38 am 8:38 am
No one is going to buy an internal report from the Obama team as the endgame in the speculation of his staff’s involvement with Blago. And God knows what could blow up at a potential trial…
http://www.political-buzz.com/
Posted by: matt | December 23, 2008, 8:40 am 8:40 am
Openess!!! What a joke!!! This report is an internal investigation to cover up any association with the governor. Then to make it public at 4:30 the day before Christmas Eve. This is not open. This corrupt politics, a cover up and nothing else. Obama is no better than his corrupt Chicago buddies.
Posted by: bb | December 23, 2008, 8:41 am 8:41 am
Marianne, would you mary me?
Posted by: billy bob | December 23, 2008, 8:47 am 8:47 am
OK, first Obama said “no one on my staff”. But why is Rahm so emotional about talking to the media?? NOT ONE MEDIA REPORT HAS ASKED THIS QUESTIONS! It’s just like the media is helping to keep Rahm quiet! Then, “Rahm had one SHORT phone call to Blago”, then, “Rahm has 4 conversations with Blago’s staff”. Then, “OUR INTERNAL INVESTIGATION CANNOT BE RELEASED BY REQUEST OF THE FEDS”. THESE PEOPLE ARE A BUNCH OF LIARS AND CANNOT BE TRUSTED WITH THE SECURITY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.
Posted by: Thateldoo | December 23, 2008, 8:48 am 8:48 am
I think the world of Caroline Kennedy – but, in all reality – being the daughter of a former president is just not enough. What about all the long serving members of the house and state legisltaure?
Posted by: jamescbuilder | December 23, 2008, 8:49 am 8:49 am
james, it’s not that you do a fantastic job in government, it’s who ever has the most money wins, that’s what lets the morons in, not the ones that actually do something for the good of the country and the people, that’s what politics have become IMO of course
Posted by: aussieabrat | December 23, 2008, 9:10 am 9:10 am
Obama putting out information two days before Christmas, when no one is watching. I have to hand it to the man, he’s an operator… but usually, those people don’t last forever. I don’t think this country can take another scandal of corrupt politicians.
Posted by: Here we go Again | December 23, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Mariann for prez
Posted by: jill | December 23, 2008, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Go have some eggnog!
Posted by: KayCee | December 23, 2008, 9:14 am 9:14 am
Thateldoo,bb – Since you know he is crooked, tell me one piece of evidence that Obama or someone on his staff tried to make a deal with Blago. Second, tell me one thing that investigative officials have asked Obama and his people to do that they have ignored or stalled. Officials did not ask Obama to do an internal investigation, but he did anyway. He went beyond what they required. Your opinion is that he is guilty until he provens he is innocent. Even then you won’t believe it because you will say it is a cover-up. It is amazing on some people on both sides claim they know something for sure and state it as fact when they have jumped to a conclusion with no facts.
Posted by: MikeMo1947 | December 23, 2008, 9:16 am 9:16 am
NObama, open and honest? Yeah. Right. And I’m the Queen of England.
Posted by: MyFellowAmericans | December 23, 2008, 9:19 am 9:19 am
Sadly, the past Administration began wrongly and never recovered. We had the Supreme Court intervening in the 2000 election and then, of course, there were the multitude of wrongs that followed. It would be truly tragic for this Nation if this new Administration mimics the pattern of what has been rendered upon this Nation. Hopefully, truth will prevail and ALL will be held accountable.
Posted by: benvictor | December 23, 2008, 9:21 am 9:21 am
So Obama’s in Hawaii and Emmanuel is headed for Africa. How nice that they can afford extended vacations in the sun. The American people are slowly going broke while their politicians play.
Posted by: creeper | December 23, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
You hateful morons realize that Obama is NOT actually President yet, don’t you? Exactly what kind of “change” is he supposed to implement now? You people are delusional. ===========
Mariann, you are an absolute idiot — ANYONE who believes the entire Democratic Party is corrupt is beyond stupid. Politics in general are corrupt, but it has NOTHING to do with party lines; it’s all about money… even for the holier than thou Republicans. ==========
“There will be many companies closing down and we will be in a deep recession.” — ARE YOU KIDDING ME — WHAT IN THE HECK IS GOING ON NOW AS A RESULT OF DUBYA, THE WORST PRESIDENT IN HISTORY? =========
Yea, sure… it’s all someone else’s fault… the damn Democrats.
Posted by: Repubs are sore losers! | December 23, 2008, 9:22 am 9:22 am
“So Obama’s in Hawaii and Emmanuel is headed for Africa. How nice that they can afford extended vacations in the sun. The American people are slowly going broke while their politicians play.”
Give me a break. Don’t like your situation? Work harder and make better decisions.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 9:25 am 9:25 am
obamama is a FRAUD
Posted by: Joe B | December 23, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Talk about the kettle calling the pot black, all this bull about Democratic Party corruption pales by comparison to the corruption and venality of this last Republican administration. Also, small town politics does not get much media coverage, but Republicans in small towns are easily the most corrupt in the world.
Posted by: Herb Gray | December 23, 2008, 9:32 am 9:32 am
Silky
What is the incentive for me to “work harder” if barry just promises to take more from me?
Barry vacationed at a $30million dollar mansion this weekend, and that is fine with me. What is not fine with me, however, is that this messiah of the poor will continue to live like royalty while insisting the rest of us to “spread it around”.
Liberals are always more generous with OTHER people’s $$$.
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Mariann Pepitone – just another self-appointed expert. “Obama’s Emanuel is not as innocent as Obama claims.” “Obama duped the American public and they fell for his lies.” You are stating these as facts. I think you forgot to word these as opinions. If you have some evidence then share it, otherwise it is opinion. I haven’t seen any evidence of either of these and there are other possible conclusions other than the one you jumped to. For example, maybe people believed Obama’s lies more than McCain’s lies. Or maybe they voted for Obama because he told less lies than McCain. For maybe they voted for Obama because of some positive trait that he had that they thought was more important than positive traits of McCain. Or maybe they voted for Obama because they agreed with more of his approach to problems we have than with McCain. Obviously, almost as many people thought McCain would be a better choice. That is not a problem because Americans get to determine who is going to be president every four years. There is always a first and second place. Get over your jumping to conclusion you cannot validate and make a positive contribution to our country.
Posted by: MikeMo1947 | December 23, 2008, 9:34 am 9:34 am
liberalsaresocialists – “Liberals are always more generous with OTHER people’s $$$.” That is not correct. The republicans now hold that record. They almost doubled the national debt in the eight years of Bush presidency and six years of republican control of Congress.
Posted by: MikeMo1947 | December 23, 2008, 9:43 am 9:43 am
Barack Obama is not responsible for the Illinois Governor’s missteps and Caroline Kennedy is hardly unqualified to be a Senator for the State of New York. Let BHO have his say about Blagojevich and be prepared to have another Senator Kennedy of New York. BHO is likely to have put together, as Administrator, the best team we could have to work against the current economic crisis and the country will eventually be thankful for it, if there is any thanks left in this country at all for deeds well done. It may not settle well with some of those who have posted here, but, gee, that’s just too bad, isn’t it?
Posted by: BarackWeCan | December 23, 2008, 9:48 am 9:48 am
“Silky
What is the incentive for me to “work harder” if barry just promises to take more from me?”
People who make this argument crack me up. And scare me. You realize that under his plan the only people seeing an increase in their taxes are those making over $250K a year, right? And those people will see no more than a 4% increase? 4 cents on the dollar in taxes is going to make you unmotivated to work harder? That is terrifying logic.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
MikeMo1947
Listen here, you relentless defender of barry O who claims to be “independent”.
Actually conservatives are FAR more generous with their $$$ to charity. This is what the gov’t has stated after reviewing households/states that went Bush/Kerry in 04′, I didn’t make this up.
One doesn’t have to look much further than Mr. “it’s patriotic to pay higher taxes” biden, and Mr. owns a private yacht,private jet, 5 houses and has $30,000 monthly utility bills Gore (that is one HECK of a “carbon foot print”)
Both of these men have made millions in recent years and have given less then 1% to charity. Again, I did not make this up.
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Blago needs to go, of course. Obama is not involved, and Caroline Kennedy will make an EXCELLENT senator of my state, New York.
Everything else here is just bitter, bitter neocons whining and crying since the election. They’re in for a rough eight years. Nothing could be a better Christmas present! WOOOOHOOO! hehehe
Posted by: Toby2957 | December 23, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Silky,
You are the one who scares me, clearly the sugar from the kool-aid has settled in your brain.
Biden, yes BIDEN, was giving a speech just a month ago when he called wealthy at $150,000. Barry has stated that $200,000 is wealthy. So which is it? What will it be once the socialist and his socialist henchmen pelosi, reid, frank decide on how much more is “patriotic” of me to pay?
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 9:56 am 9:56 am
obama is a fraud. He has suppressed information and has never been open about anything. The media has been nothing more than a circus event around the messiah.The most unnerving aspects about the Democrats’ sweeping victory Nov. 4 are their intolerance for dissent and their willingness to censor and otherwise suppress their opponents– And I suspect, at the end of the day, we will pay an equally high price for Obama’s concealment of truth.
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 9:58 am 9:58 am
MikeMo1947: will you marry me? Thank you for being the voice of reason.
Reading these comments is not good for the blood pressure. Neither is reading The Note, which is determined to distract the public from the real issues, in order to get some kind of “payback” for criticism the Bush administration got fouling up. Oh, Democrats didn’t like the Bush people outting a CIA agent to punish her husband for criticizing the war? Why, we will hound Ralm Emanuel for talking to the Illinois governor about Obama’s replacement, even though by all rights a Representative WOULD talk to a Governor of a state regarding an appointment, as long as nothing was promised in return, which, drumroll, it was NOT! What is most disturbing is the role of the media. Used to be the media was on the side of truth, on the side of the American people. Now, the media act as waterboys for the Republican party. That is what is most disturbing: The Note swiftboating our Peresdident Elect and his staff, for what? Not in the name of accountability, or transparency, but, my guess, to entertain the type of Republican yahoos who comment on this board. The news is not news anymore, its entertainment.
Posted by: Amy | December 23, 2008, 10:00 am 10:00 am
“Biden, yes BIDEN, was giving a speech just a month ago when he called wealthy at $150,000. Barry has stated that $200,000 is wealthy. So which is it?”
Who cares? That’s semantics. And Obama is the PE, not Joe Biden. He will be running the show, unlike the arrangement of the last 8 years. So don’t put too much stock in what Joe Biden says. He has the ear of the President, not the weight of the office.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 10:01 am 10:01 am
“Silky,
You are the one who scares me, clearly the sugar from the kool-aid has settled in your brain.”
That’s your response? For real? Well argued.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 10:02 am 10:02 am
The release today is a test of Obama’s transparency, of his openness? I’s a release of basic contact information which had to be approved by the US Attorney’s office in both it’s timing and I would think, content. I’m sure there will far less circumscribed opportunities in the near future to test his administration’s transparency.
Posted by: kat | December 23, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Writ of Certiorari is still pending and is now scheduled for Conference before U.S. Supreme Court on January 9, 2009. Videos being removed, posts being deleted. There has been a frightening suppression of the facts.
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 10:05 am 10:05 am
-Obama Has Not Released *1.Occidental College records — Not released *2. Columbia College records — Not released *3.Columbia Thesis paper — “Not available” *4. Harvard College records — Not released *5. Selective Service Registration — Not released *6. Medical records — Not released *7. Illinois State Senate schedule — Not available *8. Illinois State Senate records — Not available *9. Law practice client list — Not released *10. Certified Copy of original Birth certificate — Not released *11. Embossed, signed paper Certification of Live Birth — Not released *12. Record of your baptism — Not available Oh and one more thing Senator, I can’t seem to find any articles you published as editor of the Harvard Law Review, or as a Professor at the University of Chicago.
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
please, conspiracy theorists, give us your evidence of Emanuel’s guilt. no matter how transparent Obama is on this issue for the right-wingers it will never be enough. Fitzpatrick has already said neither Obama nor any member of his team is under investigation. calling Obama corrupt just shows how low some people will go, but i know they are just following their leaders: Limbaugh and O’Reilly: no facts please, just trash, trash, trash and hate, hate, hate.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 10:07 am 10:07 am
President-Elect Barack Obama.
Posted by: Amy | December 23, 2008, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Who Wrote Dreams From My Father?
By Jack Cashill
Prior to 1990, when Barack Obama contracted to write Dreams From My Father, he
had written very close to nothing. Then, five years later, this untested 33
year-old produced what Time Magazine has called — with a straight face –
“the best-written memoir ever produced by an American politician.”
The public is asked to believe Obama wrote Dreams From My Father on his own,
almost as though he were some sort of literary idiot savant. I do not buy this
canard for a minute, not at all. Writing is as much a craft as, say, golf. To
put this in perspective, imagine if a friend played a few rounds in the high 90s
and then a few years later, without further practice, made the PGA Tour. It
doesn’t happen…….
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
“Writ of Certiorari is still pending and is now scheduled for Conference before U.S. Supreme Court on January 9, 2009. Videos being removed, posts being deleted. There has been a frightening suppression of the facts.”
It’s almost as if these people realized that had incorrect information and removed it.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 10:10 am 10:10 am
“their intolerance for dissent and their willingness to censor and otherwise suppress their opponents– And I suspect, at the end of the day, we will pay an equally high price for Obama’s concealment of truth.”
HAHAHAHAHA — GWB and the last 8 years anyone? Will the price be higher than the loss of millions of our young men and women? … and let’s not forget the countless billions upon billions of dollars Bush has cost this country. Bush drove us into this recession with this neverending war brought on by his pack of lies about 9/11 & Iraq.
And intolerance & censorship… LMAO! are you kidding me? …again, please see the last 8 years under the current administration.
You Republican lemmings are just downright insane!
Posted by: RBarley is a tool | December 23, 2008, 10:11 am 10:11 am
Mariann Pepitone—blaming the college students, ROFLMFAO! i’ve heard it all. you are funny, seriously. college students (or especially graduates) shouldn’t have the right to vote, should they, Mariann? all the “drunk” students were Obama supporters right, not McCain supporters? Obama won the election by 7,000,000 votes and an Electoral College landslide.
you should use caution when writing people are corrupt and guilty when you have no evidence. but that’s not the right-wing style.
you lost. move on. be happy. celebrate the holidays
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
“I do not buy this
canard for a minute, not at all. Writing is as much a craft as, say, golf. To
put this in perspective, imagine if a friend played a few rounds in the high 90s
and then a few years later, without further practice, made the PGA Tour.”
Not even close. Horrible analogy. And he clearly has command of language, to which anybody who paid any attention to the campaign will attest. Books have editors, too, y’know.
Keep trying. It’s healthy to be this preoccupied with fools’ errands.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Obama complimented Blagojevich for running “a sound administration” with “the right priorities.” He supported his fellow Democrat for re-election in 2006, even though the governor backed someone else over Obama in the U.S. Senate Democratic primary. Both Obama and Blagojevich got extensive money and support from Chicago businessman Antoin “Tony” Rezko. At least one top aide to Obama, Michael Strautmanis, previously worked for Blagojevich.
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 10:14 am 10:14 am
To whoever called Mr RBarley a tool, you are obviously another “open-minded” liberal.
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
And yet, given the biases of the literary establishment, no reviewer of note
has so much as questioned Obama’s role in the writing, then or now. As the
New York Times gushed, Obama was “that rare politician who can write . . ..
and write movingly and genuinely about himself.” These accolades matter
all the more because Obama has built his political persona around his presumably
superior intellect, Dreams being exhibit A.
Shy of a confession by those involved, I will not be able to prove conclusively
that Obama did not write this book. As shall be seen, however, there are only
two real possibilities: one is that Obama experienced a near miraculous
turnaround in his literary abilities; the second is that he had major editorial
help, up to and including a ghostwriter.
The weight of the evidence overwhelming favors the latter conclusion and
strongly suggests who that ghostwriter is. In that this remains something of a
work in progress, I am willing to test my hypothesis against any standard of
proof and appreciate any and all good leads.
In my career in advertising and publishing, I have reviewed the portfolios of a
thousand professional writers, all of them crowded with writing samples, but
only a handful of these writers would have been capable of having a written a
book as stylish as Dreams. I have also written a book on intellectual fraud,
Hoodwinked, and examined any number of bogus biographies that excited the
literary left to the point of complicity, Edward Said’s and Rigoberta
Menchu’s prominent among them, Menchu winning a Nobel Prize for hers..
Obama’s ascent seems to follow a century-old pattern.
Tracing Obama’s literary ascent is complicated by what Politico.com calls a
“scant paper trail.” That trail begins at Occidental College whose
literary magazine published two of Obama’s poems — “Pop” and
“Underground” — in 1981. Obama calls it some “very bad
poetry,” and he does not sell himself short. From “Underground”:
Under water grottos, caverns
Filled with apes
That eat figs.
Stepping on the figs
That the apes
Eat, they crunch.
The apes howl, bare
Their fangs, dance . . .
It would be another decade before Obama had anything in print and this an
edited, unsigned student case comment in the Harvard Law Review unearthed by
Politico. Attorneys who reviewed the piece for Politico described it as “a
fairly standard example of the genre.”
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 10:16 am 10:16 am
Instead of calling RBarly names why don’t you try and dispute some of what they have said? I bet I know the answer…there really is no disputing FACTS!
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Mary @10:00
“The news is not news anymore, its entertainment.”
It’s can also be entertainment attempting to influencing public opinion. But in this case and most, it tends to increase discord, rather than change anyone’s perceptions.
Posted by: kat | December 23, 2008, 10:17 am 10:17 am
Of note, Politico reporters Ben Smith and Jeffrey Resner observe that “the
temperate legal language doesn’t display the rhetorical heights that run
through his memoir, published a few years later.”
Once elected president of the Harvard Law Review –more of a popularity than a
literary contest — Obama contributed not one signed word to the HLR or any
other law journal. As Matthew Franck has pointed out in National Review Online,
“A search of the HeinOnline database of law journals turns up exactly
nothing credited to Obama in any law review anywhere at any time.”
A 1990 New York Times profile on Obama’s election as Harvard’s first
black president caught the eye of agent Jane Dystel. She persuaded Poseidon, a
small imprint of Simon & Schuster, to authorize a roughly $125,000 advance
for Obama’s proposed memoir.
With advance in hand, Obama repaired to Chicago where he dithered. At one
point, in order to finish without interruption, he and wife Michelle decamped to
Bali. Obama was supposed to have finished the book within a year. Bali or not,
advance or no, he could not. He was surely in way over his head..
According to a surprisingly harsh 2006 article by liberal publisher Peter
Osnos, which detailed the “ruthlessness” of Obama’s literary
ascent, Simon & Schuster canceled the contract. Dystel did not give up.
She solicited Times Book, the division of Random House at which Osnos was
publisher. He met with Obama, took his word that he could finish the book, and
authorized a new advance of $40,000.
Then suddenly, somehow, the muse descended on Obama and transformed him from a
struggling, unschooled amateur, with no paper trail beyond an unremarkable legal
note and a poem about fig-stomping apes, into a literary superstar.
To be sure, it is not unusual for successful politicians to hire ghostwriters
– John McCain gives due credit to Mark Salter for his memoir, Faith of My
Fathers — but it is highly unusual for unknown young Chicago lawyers to hire
ghostwriters.
I have attempted to contact Dystel by phone and email without success. It is
highly unlikely she refashioned the book, and Osnos admittedly did not. If my
suspicions are correct, the ghost on this book shared many of Obama’s
sentiments, spoke his language and spent considerable time reworking the text.
I bought Bill Ayers’ 2001 memoir, Fugitive Days, for reasons unrelated to
this project. As I discovered, he writes surprisingly well and very much like
“Obama.” In fact, my first thought was that the two may have shared
the same ghostwriter. Unlike Dreams, however, where the high style is
intermittent, Fugitive Days is infused with the authorial voice in every
sentence. What is more, when Ayers speaks, even off the cuff, he uses a cadence
and vocabulary consistent with his memoir. One does not hear any of Dreams in
Obama’s casual speech.
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Typo: attempting to influence
Posted by: kat | December 23, 2008, 10:18 am 10:18 am
What a relief to know that if I ever run afoul of the law or come under suspicion of wrongdoing I have merely to conduct my own internal investigation to clear myself. America has become a better place today. :P
Posted by: Jeffsmyname | December 23, 2008, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Obama’s memoir was published in June 1995. Earlier that year, Ayers helped
Obama, then a junior lawyer at a minor law firm, get appointed chairman of the
multi-million dollar Chicago Annenberg Challenge grant. In the fall of that
same year, 1995, Ayers and his wife, Weatherwoman Bernardine Dohrn, helped blaze
Obama’s path to political power with a fundraiser in their Chicago home.
In short, Ayers had the means, the motive, the time, the place and the literary
ability to jumpstart Obama’s career. And, as Ayers had to know, a lovely
memoir under Obama’s belt made for a much better resume than an unfulfilled
contract over his head.
For simplicity sake, I will refer to the author of Dreams as “Obama.”
Without question, he contributed much of the book’s raw material,
especially the long-winded accounting of events and conversations, polished just
well enough to pass muster. The book’s fierce, succinct and tightly coiled
social analysis more closely matches the style of Fugitive Days, a much tighter
book.
Ayers and Obama have a good deal in common. In the way of background, both grew
up in comfortable white households and have struggled to find an identity as
righteous black men ever since. Just as Obama resisted “the pure and heady
breeze of privilege” to which he was exposed as a child, Ayers too resisted
“white skin privilege” or at least tried to.
“I also thought I was black,” says Ayers only half-jokingly. As proof
of his righteousness, Ayers named his first son “Malik” after the
newly Islamic Malcolm X and the second son “Zayd” after Zayd Shakur, a
Black Panther killed in a shootout that claimed the life of a New Jersey State
Trooper.
Tellingly, Ayers, like Obama, began his career as a self-described
“community organizer,” Ayers in inner-city Cleveland, Obama in
inner-city Chicago. In short, Ayers was fully capable of crawling inside
Obama’s head and relating in superior prose what the Dreams’ author
calls a “rage at the white world [that] needed no object.”
Indeed, in Dreams, it is on the subject of black rage that Obama writes most
eloquently. Phrases like “full of inarticulate resentments,”
“unruly maleness,” “unadorned insistence on respect” and
“withdrawal into a smaller and smaller coil of rage” lace the book.
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 10:20 am 10:20 am
I think the democratic and republican parties are about equal in corruption. It’s just that it is the democrats turn to be in the limelight. I think we should all take a step back and wait…if Obama does a good job, then it’s good for the country..if not, then there is alway another election. But, gees, let him get in office before we accuse, blame and anihilate him. Things can’t get any worse and a democrate was not in charge. He has great plans and good people to carry them through. As Joe Biden says, let’s wait and see and judge him by what he accomplishes not by what we think he won’t accomplish. Let’s start off with positive feelings instead of negative ones. As far as Warren goes, Obama does not agree with him but he admires his work with the poor which has always been something Obama has been involved with.
Posted by: Pat Napolitano Marietta. Ga. | December 23, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
I think the democratic and republican parties are about equal in corruption. It’s just that it is the democrats turn to be in the limelight. I think we should all take a step back and wait…if Obama does a good job, then it’s good for the country..if not, then there is alway another election. But, gees, let him get in office before we accuse, blame and anihilate him. Things can’t get any worse and a democrate was not in charge. He has great plans and good people to carry them through. As Joe Biden says, let’s wait and see and judge him by what he accomplishes not by what we think he won’t accomplish. Let’s start off with positive feelings instead of negative ones. As far as Warren goes, Obama does not agree with him but he admires his work with the poor which has always been something Obama has been involved with.
Posted by: Pat Napolitano Marietta. Ga. | December 23, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Again, you might have noticed that Obama has been praised going all the way back to his speech at the 2004 DNC for his way with language and communication skills. You’re really barking up the wrong tree with this book.
Do you guys actually have anything of substance? Like anything? All of your whining is speculative. How about growing up and letting the man do his job before judging his merits as a president, eh?
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 10:21 am 10:21 am
The obama thuggery admitted too! They manipulated the campaign, Obama spent years as director of the Developing Communities Project, which operated using Alinsky’s strategies, and was involved with two other Alinsky-oriented entities, Acorn and Project Vote. There has been a huge suppressing movement in the Obama campaign.
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 10:22 am 10:22 am
liberalsaresocialists — I’m sure you’re as open-minded as they come.
Don’t you have some hating to do?
Idiot.
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists is a tool, too | December 23, 2008, 10:24 am 10:24 am
“What a relief to know that if I ever run afoul of the law or come under suspicion of wrongdoing I have merely to conduct my own internal investigation to clear myself. America has become a better place today. :P”‘
Considering he is neither, I don’t see the point. If this had been Bush he’d have simply said F off. At least Obama has been proactive about it.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
The internal obama
campaign idea, is to twist, distort, humiliate, and finally dispirit you. — key techniques used in the Alinsky method. We pay people and organize people to go on all the online sites and play the part of a supporter We do this to stifle your motivation, to destroy your confidence. They did this the whole primary against Hillary, and in the Election against McCain and it worked! They removed videos, suppressed the facts about obama and his associates. The american public was manipulated by saul alinsky’s best student. They will destroy us from within.
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 10:26 am 10:26 am
liberalsaresocialists — what exactly is there to refute on here? All you Repubs who are spouting off nonsense trying to pass it off as fact? Please.
As if there is any reasoning with someone named “liberalsaresocialists”… what have you brought to the table today? Right… just a hateful, name-calling moniker that deems you as irrelevent as all other hateful bigots.
Posted by: amused | December 23, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
liberalsaresocialists—”whoever called Mr RBarley”…let him speak for himself! he’s obviously very creative with distorting facts and writing rubbish without documentation. so there’s a writ of cert before the Supreme Court, the previous two were thrown out and are recycling in a D.C. trash bin. the merits weren’t even heard. thrown out!
Obama is literate. he graduated top of his class in law school and tought constitutional law.
i bow before that before i’ll ever will before some hate, cripracy-driven fool.
President -Elect Obama won the election dispite all the hate thrown at him (it was massive—everyone saw it: “terrorist”, “kill him”, “al qaeda”, “terrorist”, “treason” with McCain and Palin saying nothing just nodding with their sh**-eating grins). the election is over. it was not close. Obama won more than Bush did either term (of course the first one he hardly won).
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 10:28 am 10:28 am
Open and transparent? Pleeease! Obama refuses to release his medical, school, college, and birth records, and the MSM
has not pressed him for them. Anyone else would have been hounded for months. Thanks to the liberal Kool-Aid drinkers, now we have him. What a joke! Unfortunately, it’s on us.
Posted by: Julie | December 23, 2008, 10:29 am 10:29 am
RBarley,
The frightening thing is that 99.9% of Americans have NO idea who Alinsky is. The man actually mapped out ways to paint republicans as racist-REPUBLICANS!
This is the same party that was founded to abolish slavery and who holds Abraham Lincoln and Martin Luther King in its legacy. Doesn’t anyone remember George Wallace these days??
Alinksy taught how to enslave massive groups of people by training people to be “community organizers/agitators by pointing fingers at the “greedy rich white folk” at the top.
Obama and Rev Wright have taken alinsky’s style and mastered it. Barry vacations in $30million dolllar homes and rev racist lives in a $2million dollar mansion. How was America fooled like this?????
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 10:31 am 10:31 am
RBarley—”they will destroy us from within.” then you should high-tail it out of the US and go somewhere safe.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
All I can say is after eight years of the Cheney administration (he really was in charge) what accomplishments can we address….Guantanomo? No….the war?….no. Failing of banks? NO. Auto industry?…No Respect of other countries? No. I feel sorry for Bush as he listened to the wrong man and gave him too much power. I’m looking ahead to a better world. I’ll put my money on Obama/Biden.
Posted by: Pat Napolitano Marietta. Ga. | December 23, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
“What a relief to know that if I ever run afoul of the law or come under suspicion of wrongdoing I have merely to conduct my own internal investigation to clear myself. America has become a better place today. :P”
His investigation is just stating for the record what he says happened. It’s not a criminal investigation, you brainiacs. He hasn’t declared himself a US Attorney and made it a legal thing. He’s simply saying, this is our story. I think some of you misinterpret this as being some kind of legal thing. If there is suspicion of wrong-doing by anybody in the FBI or Justice or wherever, you can be sure they’ll look into it. Until then, get a grip.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Worse still, the suicide of both print and electronic journalism has ensured that, should Barack Obama be elected president, the public will only then learn what they should have known far earlier about their commander-in-chief — but in circumstances and from sources they may well regret.
Posted by: respectfulcitizen | December 23, 2008, 10:33 am 10:33 am
‘Considering he is neither, I don’t see the point. If this had been Bush he’d have simply said F off. At least Obama has been proactive about it.’
The point is his ‘internal report’ amounts to nothing. What you call ‘proactive’ most people would call ‘cover my ass’. And hate to break it to you, but Bush had nothing to do with it. Inserting ‘Bush’ into an argument is an ineffective attempt to divert attention.
Posted by: Jeffsmyname | December 23, 2008, 10:34 am 10:34 am
iberalsaresocialists and Mr R. Barley—are you guys dating. Saul Alinsky, LOL. and you’re serious, too?! LMFAO! you’re too much. since abc, cbs, cnn, msnbc, npr all expect a little proof, why not run home to Rush so he can tell you your opnion?
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 10:35 am 10:35 am
To the person who wrote that articles like this tend to bring discord, I would have to agree. There is one person on here that tends to use several “names” but spouts the same Obama hating, Hillary loving comments. To that person I say try saying one thing positive everyday, you may actually like it. I have found that some people like drama in their lives and this may the platform that the former enjoys. To those who really would like a more peaceful existence, just remember 1 person at a time can make a world of difference. Everyone enjoy your holidays.
Posted by: Indy One | December 23, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Jesus was the biggest liberal of all. WWJD? Tis the season, don’t forget the reason. Marianne Pepitone – go away. Far far away. Your negative spewing is giving me heartburn. Silky – grow a real set.
Posted by: Silent Scream | December 23, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Jeffsmyname—the only reason there is a report is so that stupid fools would stop asking for one. since it doesn’t matter what’s in it, no radical-right conspiracy theorists will read it. i agree that an in-house investigation is of little value, but you all were the ones demanding it. now you’ll get it and say it’s a lie, a cover-up.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 10:38 am 10:38 am
“Thanks to the liberal Kool-Aid drinkers,”
Well, if you had half a clue, you would know that your own party is responsible for his victory. He won over moderate Republicans who have become nauseated by their party and the decisions made by the heads of their party.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Paul, no one asked him for it. If they did, please list your source.
Posted by: Jeffsmyname | December 23, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Paul wall
Do you fantacize about barry O on a nightly basis, or is it just a weekend thing for you?
People like you are the reason barry was allowed to squeak by. No matter what the mounting reasons that surfaced were that exposed barry as a corrupt, anti-American(which most liberals are), anti-capitalist(which all liberals are), racist, you would still vote for him because he is about change. Very sad.
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 10:39 am 10:39 am
liberalsaresocialists – You were talking about liberals being generous with other peoples money and I said the last 8 years disproves that. I guess you must have conceded that point since you have switched the topic to who is more generous with their own money. I don’t have the time to chase you from one complaint to another. Just stick to the truth and admit that both parties contributed to the economic problems we have. Neither party has all the answers and we will never achieve anything significant until they start working together for our nation. Our nation was founded by a group of people who worked together to find common ground to form a United States. It was not just liberals or conservatives or just one party that founded this nation. No one group of liberals, conservatives, democrats or republicans can solve our problems today without working together for our common good.
Posted by: MikeMo1947 | December 23, 2008, 10:43 am 10:43 am
“The point is his ‘internal report’ amounts to nothing. What you call ‘proactive’ most people would call ‘cover my ass’. And hate to break it to you, but Bush had nothing to do with it. Inserting ‘Bush’ into an argument is an ineffective attempt to divert attention.”
No, it’s a way of highlighting the fact that he’s under no obligation to do it, and some….BUSH (somebody you guys somehow, astonishingly, champion)….absolutely would not do it.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 10:45 am 10:45 am
Change – what kind of Change no one bothered to ask?
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
respectfulcitizen
And when what you have predicted does not come to pass, can we expect an apology from you for spreading lies and doubts about our future, most competent President in history? Will you then promise to stop listening to conservative crack radio and start demanding the media report facts, not inuendo?
Posted by: Amy | December 23, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
“Paul, no one asked him for it. If they did, please list your source.”
They didn’t yet, hence the “proactive” reference.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Silky, you’re making an assumption about who I am. Again, Bush had nothing to do with it. Stay on subject if you want to argue about it.
Posted by: Jeffsmyname | December 23, 2008, 10:47 am 10:47 am
If you believe the left is tolerant, open-minded and democratic, you’re in for a rude awakening.
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 10:48 am 10:48 am
In Fugitive Days, “rage” rules and in high style as well. Ayers
tells of how his “rage got started” and how it evolved into an
“uncontrollable rage — fierce frenzy of fire and lava.” Indeed, the
Weathermen’s inaugural act of mass violence was the “Days of Rage”
in 1969 Chicago.
As in Chicago, that rage led Ayers to a sentiment with which Obama was
altogether familiar, “audacity!” Ayers writes, “I felt the
warrior rising up inside of me — audacity and courage, righteousness, of
course, and more audacity.” This is one of several references.
The combination of audacity and rage has produced two memoirs that follow oddly
similar rules. Ayers describes his as “a memory book,” one that
deliberately blurs facts and changes identities and makes no claims at history.
Obama says much the same. In Dreams, some characters are composites. Some
appear out of precise chronology. Names have been changed.
As a control, allow me to introduce my own book, Sucker Punch, which is no
small part a memoir about race, specifically in my relationship, at great
remove, with Muhammad Ali and the world of boxing. In the book, I describe my
own unreconstructed coming of age in racially charged Newark, New Jersey as it
happened. I change no names, create no composite characters, alter no
chronologies. Most memoirs observe the same conventions. Dreams and Fugitive
Days, however, are both suffused with repeated reference to lies, lying and what
Ayers calls, in his pitch perfect post-modern patois, “our constructed
reality.”
“But another part of me knew that what I was telling them was a lie,”
writes Obama, “something I’d constructed from the scraps of information
I’d picked up from my mother.”
“That whole first year seemed like one long lie,” Obama writes of his
first year in college in Los Angeles, one of at least a dozen references to lies
and lying in “Dreams,” a figure nearly matched in “Fugitive
Days.”
The reader knows that Ayers — with some justification — has much to hide. He
senses that Obama does too, but he is never quite sure why. This presumed
poetic license leads to the frequent manipulation of dates to make a political
point.
“I saw a dead body once, as I said, when I was ten, during the Korean
War,” writes Ayers. This correlation is important enough that Ayers
mentions it twice. The only problem is that Ayers was eight when the Korean War
ended.
Obama tells us that when he was ten, he and his family visited the mainland..
On the trip, back in their motel room, they watched the Watergate Hearings on
TV. The problem, of course, is that those hearing started just before Obama
turned twelve.
One could forgive a single missed date, but inconsistent dates and numbers
appear frequently in both books and often reinforce some moment of lost
innocence. In the same spirit, both books abound in detail too closely
remembered and conversations too well recorded. These moments in both books
occasionally lead to an awareness of the nation’s seemingly ineradicable
racism..
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 10:49 am 10:49 am
MikeMo1947,
You are just wrong. Our country was built of CONSERVATIVE principles….
-small efficient gov’t
-large military
-citizen self-reliance
-small taxes for everyone
Liberals have been chipping away at these cornerstone principles for years.
I know you want to spread the blame around like barry wants to spread the wealth, but you are wrong.
Of course there have been pleny of republicans masquerading as conservatives (mccain, bush in his last 4 years) that have not helped the economy. However, liberals hold the blame for the our near economic collapse. They have been trying to turn us into cuba for years and they have almost succeeded with the election of barry castro!
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 10:51 am 10:51 am
In 1970, for instance, the 9-year-old Obama alleges to be visiting the American
embassy Indonesia. While waiting, he chances upon “a collection of Life
magazines neatly displayed in clear plastic binders.”
In one magazine, he reads a story about a black man with an “uneven,
ghostly hue,” who has been rendered grotesque by a chemical treatment.
“There were thousands of people like him,” Obama learned, “black
men and women back in America who’d undergone the same treatment in response
to advertisements that promised happiness as a white person.”
Obama’s attention to detail is a ruse. Life never ran such an article. When
challenged, Obama claimed it was Ebony. Ebony ran no such article either.
Besides, black was beautiful in 1970.
In a similar vein, Ayers tells of hitching a ride in Missouri with
“Bud,” the driver of a “brand-new Peterbilt truck.” The man
proceeds to regale Ayers with a string of dirty jokes — at least two of them
retold word for word — before reaching under his seat and pulling out a large
pistol, his “N****r neutralizer.”
“White people can never quite remember the scope and scale of the
slavocracy,” Ayers reminds the reader again and again, writing as though he
were not a member of this benighted race.
These parallels intrigue perhaps, but they prove little. To add a little
science to the analysis, I identified two similar “nature” passages in
Obama’s and Ayers’ respective memoirs, the first from Fugitive Days:
“I picture the street coming alive, awakening from the fury of winter,
stirred from the chilly spring night by cold glimmers of sunlight angling
through the city.”
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 10:52 am 10:52 am
The second from Dreams:
“Night now fell in midafternoon, especially when the snowstorms rolled in,
boundless prairie storms that set the sky close to the ground, the city lights
reflected against the clouds.”
These two sentences are alike in more than their poetic sense, their length and
their gracefully layered structure. They tabulate nearly identically on the
Flesch Reading Ease Score (FRES), something of a standard in the field.
The “Fugitive Days” excerpt scores a 54 on reading ease and a 12th
grade reading level. The “Dreams’” excerpt scores a 54.8 on
reading ease and a 12th grade reading level. Scores can range from 0 to 121, so
hitting a nearly exact score matters.
A more reliable data-driven way to prove authorship goes under the rubric
“cusum analysis” or QSUM. This analysis begins with the measurement
of sentence length, a significant and telling variable. To compare the two
books, I selected thirty-sentence sequences from Dreams and Fugitive Days, each
of which relates the author’s entry into the world of “community
organizing.”
“Fugitive Days” averaged 23.13 words a sentence. “Dreams”
averaged 23.36 words a sentence. By contrast, the memoir section of
“Sucker Punch” averaged 15 words a sentence.
Interestingly, the 30-sentence sequence that I pulled from Obama’s
conventional political tract, Audacity of Hope, averages more than 29 words a
sentence and clocks in with a 9th grade reading level, three levels below the
earlier cited passages from “Dreams” and “Fugitive Days.”
The differential in the Audacity numbers should not surprise. By the time it
was published in 2006, Obama was a public figure of some wealth, one who could
afford editors and ghost writers.
The publisher of Dreams, the openly liberal Peter Osnos, tells how this came to
be. According to Osnos, Dreams took off during Obama’s much-publicized race
for the U.S. Senate in 2004, nearly ten years after its modest release. After
winning the election, Obama dumped his devoted long time agent, Jane Dystel, and
signed a seven-figure deal with Crown, using only a by-the-hour attorney.
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
““That’s not in my sites……” said Palin. WHY can’t you guys learn to spell? The dictionary defines SIGHTS as “The foreseeable future.”
Posted by: bayou947 | December 23, 2008, 10:53 am 10:53 am
“… was allowed to squeak by.” Really? Go compare margin of victories of the past 3 elections again.
ALL liberals are anti-capitalist? MOST are anti-American?
Tell me what this great Republican regime of yours is doing for our soldiers upon their return home, most of which are injured and/or disabled? These men & women coming home are ignored and forgotten… yet liberals are anti-American?
You hate mongers like to repeatedly spout off about supporting the troops, but what support is offered after they’re home? These soldiers are living in horrible conditions in homes that aren’t equipped for them anymore, and yet, you blame the Democrats/Liberals (yes, because those are synonymous) for being anti-American? On what basis?
I am a liberal Democrat with a family member overseas, and the best support we can offer to him is reassure him that we want him home safely, and that he’ll have a place to come home to. He doesn’t even know what he’s fighting for over there… our soldiers want to come home, too. This is not their battle to fight, and they know it. They are honorable young people who want to fight the good fight, but they’ve seen first hand that this isn’t a winnable fight. Who’s got their back?
liberalsaresocialists, you are an embarrassment to the USA.
Posted by: amused | December 23, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
I think Caroline Kennedy would do a great job… why… because she will be honest and for the people. She is not your typical politician.
Now for the comment of “The democratic party has been corrupt for years so who cares what the governor did or didn’t do.” LOLOL Like the Republicans are honest. Give me a break, what a stupid comment.
Posted by: becky (the real one) | December 23, 2008, 10:54 am 10:54 am
“People like you are the reason barry was allowed to squeak by.”
Pssstttt…it was a landslide. But then again, it’s clear you pay no attention, so you wouldn’t know.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 10:55 am 10:55 am
They must read the nyt for the misguided truth. Keep trying l.A.S. Keep up the good work! Sooner or later the okads will see the light hopefully sooner than later, we have lees than a month.—- see tyYou are just wrong. Our country was built of CONSERVATIVE principles….
-small efficient gov’t
-large military
-citizen self-reliance
-small taxes for everyone
Liberals have been chipping away at these cornerstone principles for years.
I know you want to spread the blame around like barry wants to spread the wealth, but you are wrong.
Of course there have been pleny of republicans masquerading as conservatives (mccain, bush in his last 4 years) that have not helped the economy. However, liberals hold the blame for the our near economic collapse. They have been trying to turn us into cuba for years and they have almost succeeded with the election of barry castro!
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Obama was saying that he was told by the district attorney or attorney general or other that he wasn’t able to tell everything a few days ago, so this article saying he is only limited by himself doesn’t seem accurate, and also he isn’t president yet, so he doesn’t have all presidential powers yet either. so far he is doing really good with change.gov and his e-mails, I am really impressed so far and I did not even vote for him
Posted by: guest | December 23, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Obama pulled off the deal before being sworn in as Senator, this way to avoid
the disclosure and reporting requirements applicable to members of Congress. To
his credit, Osnos publicly scolds Obama for his “ruthlessness” and
“his questionable judgment about using public service as a personal
payday.”
Unfortunately, the technology is not currently available to do a fully reliable
authorship analysis. As expert in the field Patrick Juola of Duquesne
University observed, “The accuracy simply isn’t there.” He cautioned
that for high stakes issues like this one, “The repercussions of a technical
error could be a disaster (in either direction).”
That much said, preliminary QSUM analysis supports an Ayers-Obama link.
Systems designer Ed Gold–with twenty years of high-level experience in image
and signal processing, pattern recognition, and classifier design and
implementation–volunteered to run a QSUM scan on multiple excerpts from both
memoirs. “I have completed the analysis,” he wrote me, “and I think you
will be pleased with the findings.” In assessing the signature of sample
passages from Dreams, he found “a very strong match to all of the Ayers
samples that I processed.”
Like Juola, Gold recognized the limitations of the process and of his own
resources. He has volunteered to make the raw data available to more established
authorship authentication experts, and I will be happy to pass that data along.
Gold saw the complementary value, however, in text analysis, as did Juola, who
encouraged me “to do what you’re already doing . . . good old-fashioned
literary detective work.”
Given that advice, I dug deeper into both memoirs and established one
metaphoric thread that ties the two books together in a way I believe is just
shy of conclusive, a thread that leads back to Bill Ayers’s stint, after
dropping out of college, as a merchant seaman.
“I’d thought that when I signed on that I might write an American
novel about a young man at sea,” says Ayers in his memoir, Fugitive Days,
“but I didn’t have it in me.”
The experience had a powerful impact on Ayers. Years later, he would recall a
nightmare he had while crossing the Atlantic, “a vision of falling
overboard in the middle of the ocean and swimming as fast as I could as the ship
steamed off and disappeared over the horizon.”
Although Ayers has tried to put his anxious ocean-going days behind him, the
language of the sea will not let him go. “I realized that no one else could
ever know this singular experience,” Ayers writes of his maritime
adventures. Yet curiously, much of this same nautical language flows through
Obama’s earth-bound memoir.
“Memory sails out upon a murky sea,” Ayers writes at one point.
Indeed, both he and Obama are obsessed with memory and its instability. The
latter writes of its breaks, its blurs, its edges, its lapses. Obama also has a
fondness for the word “murky” and its aquatic usages.
“The unlucky ones drift into the murky tide of hustles and odd jobs,”
he writes, one of four times “murky” appears in Dreams. Ayers and
Obama also speak often of waves and wind, Obama at least a dozen times on wind
alone. “The wind wipes away my drowsiness, and I feel suddenly
exposed,” he writes in a typical passage. Both also make conspicuous use
of the word “flutter.”
Not surprisingly, Ayers uses “ship” as a metaphor with some
frequency. Early in the book he tells us that his mother is “the captain
of her own ship,” not a substantial one either but “a ragged thing
with fatal leaks” launched into a “sea of carelessness.”
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 10:59 am 10:59 am
“No one group …can solve our problems today without working together for our common good”
Now I want to have your baby, MikeMo.
And, I would add, we need a new direction in journalism in this country. A commitment from the media to develop and uphold professional standards and not allow themselves to be absorbed into the maw of the entertainment industry. (Ok, its probably too late for that.)
Posted by: Amy | December 23, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
“Silky, you’re making an assumption about who I am. Again, Bush had nothing to do with it. Stay on subject if you want to argue about it.”
The Bush comment was not the broader point, which is pretty obvious, but does, again, highlight Obama’s proactive contribution. I never left “on subject”, so you how about you take your own advice?
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
OMG – not only are Repubs very sore losers, but apparently are exceptionally paranoid! Cuba? Are you kidding me?
Lay off the creeper weed already, geez.
Posted by: amused | December 23, 2008, 11:00 am 11:00 am
amused: Could not have said it better. One brother is Iowa National Guard, the other is a Iowa Vet. I pray Obama and his team take a hard good look at how badly our men and women who have been injured, not only physically but mentally, in this war which had no purpose and start from the ground up and stand up and take care of them properly, the way each and every one of us would want taken care of. If that means doing away with VA Hospitals and giving them a free ticket to any hospital and doctor of choice I am all for it. It just makes better since.
Posted by: becky (the real one) | December 23, 2008, 11:01 am 11:01 am
i love all the bushies getting upset about nothing. Your boy had the most exclusive good ole boy currupt administration ever and you knit pick at this crap. Show some accoutability losers. What has the last 8 years brought you and yours? quick piont the the finger to the past(Clinton) and to the future(Obama)… Neve take any blame though cause thats how you selfish spoiled greedy pigs work. Cry me a river, boo hoo…
Posted by: BlueJersey | December 23, 2008, 11:02 am 11:02 am
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz, see ya.
Posted by: Jeffsmyname | December 23, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
If there is any one paragraph in Dreams that has convinced me of Ayers’
involvement it is this one, in which Obama describes the Black Nationalist
message:
“A steady attack on the white race… served as the ballast that could
prevent the ideas of personal and communal responsibility from tipping into an
ocean of despair.”
As a writer, especially in the pre-Google era of Dreams, I would never have
used a metaphor as specific as “ballast” unless I knew exactly what I
was talking about. Seaman Ayers most surely did.
One more item of interest. In his 1997 book, A Kind and Just Parent, Bill
Ayers walks the reader through his Hyde Park neighborhood and identifies the
notable residents therein. Among them are Muhammad Ali, “Minister” Louis
Farrakhan (of whom he writes fondly), “former mayor” Eugene Sawyer,
“poets” Gwendolyn Brooks and Elizabeth Alexander, and “writer” Barack
Obama.
In 1997, Obama was an obscure state senator, a lawyer, and a law school
instructor with one book under his belt that had debuted two years earlier to
little acclaim and lesser sales. In terms of identity, he had more in common
with mayor Sawyer than poet Brooks. The “writer” identification seems
forced and purposefully so, a signal perhaps to those in the know of a persona
in the making that Ayers had himself helped forge.
None of this, of course, proves Ayers’ authorship conclusively, but the
evidence makes him a much more likely candidate than Obama to have written the
best parts of Dreams.
The Obama camp could put all such speculation to rest by producing some
intermediary sign of impending greatness — a school paper, an article, a
notebook, his Columbia thesis, his LSAT scores — but Obama guards these more
zealously than Saddam did his nuclear secrets. And I suspect, at the end of the
day, we will pay an equally high price for Obama’s concealment as
Saddam’s.
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Obama’s team does not seem to have stepped in to allow uncomfortable questions to rise to the top, and instead is allowing his supporters to sanitize the site.
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
amused,
Most soldiers are gone and forgotten? Have you been watching farenheit 911 or something?
You probably don’t know that several of the wounded soldiers sued that traitor mike moore for LYING to them while making his propaganda film. His joe goebells’ crew showed up at the hospital and told the soldiers to describe their injuries for a documentary. Only after the movie came out did they see that they were USED to show how soldiers have been left behind. This was something they did NOT agree with.
Our soldiers receive the best care in the world despite liberals attempts to paint this country as a terrible place.
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 11:07 am 11:07 am
liberalsaresocialists – You are misinformed if you think only the conservatives formed this country. In 1776, the conservatives wanted to stay a part of the British Empire. It was liberals that wanted to break away. About ten years later when we were starting on the Constitutions, do you really think the conservatives said “lets form a new nation that has a government that is broken into three parts and the people vote to replace the leader every 4 years. I know it has never been done before, but let’s follow conservative principles and try something entirely new.” I don’t think so. There were liberal ideas and conservative ideas that created the Constitution. It required compromise to arrive at a Constitution that all 13 colonies would agree with.
Posted by: MikeMo1947 | December 23, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Why the Mortgage Crisis Happened http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/10/what_really_happened_in_the_mo.html
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 11:09 am 11:09 am
liberalsaresocialists -
I’ve never even seen a Michael Moore movie, but that just goes to show how stupid you really are yet again. This has nothing to do with a movie or any one person against the war.
What I have seen are gut-wrenching personal blogs of countless soldiers describing their fear and anger firsthand. It’s horrible and heartbreaking; they deserve so much better.
Our soldiers receive the best care in the world… compared to what? And according to? Bush? Cheney? Limbaugh? O’Reilly? Right… that doesn’t mean it isn’t entirely subpar! Look at the rest of the world and their policies on human rights… not exactly role models across the globe, but that’s beside the point, really.
Posted by: amused | December 23, 2008, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Fyi….again, for those of you who don’t pay attention, yet insist on weighing in…many Democrats are not fans of Michael Moore. He puts way too much of himself into his documentaries and ends up smothering any valid points he raises. He’s bad for the Democratic Party and he’s bad for a healthy dialogue. He’s polarizing where he does not need to be.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 11:22 am 11:22 am
RBarkley:
Have you ever watched an extended interview with Obama? Obama speaks in complete, not to mention, complex, sentences. Ever watched Obama’s speech at the 2004 Democratic convention? That speech is more relevant as to why Obama got support in the his bid then the memoirs he wrote. (Personally, I’ve read Obama’s memoirs, I didn’t find them all that great.) I supported Obama because I agree with his policies and the direction he will take the country: tax cuts for the middleclass, an emphasis on diplomacy over military intervention in other countries, an active agenda to get us off oil and revive our manufacturing industries. If you disagree with Obama’s policies then argue on that, but don’t wear yourself trying to prove Obama is, what? A puppet of sixties radical, now college professor William Ayers? (Ooooh, articulate college professors, scary!)
Posted by: Amy | December 23, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
MikeMO1947
The framers called themselves patriots, which is the furthest thing from liberals as humanly possible.
My argument is that liberals have morphed into something democrats of even 50-60 years ago would barely recognize.
“Ask not what your country can do for you” has turned into “spreading the wealth around”.
Of course some liberal ideas played a role in the building of our constitution, but those ideas do not represent today liberals.
Barney franks constantly talks about income redistribution, mike moore talks about how the world needs to rid itself of capitalism, barry said in an interview that it was a tragedy the courts have not gotten into income redistribution. These ideas are what makes up the modern-day liberal way of thinking .
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 11:27 am 11:27 am
amused,
Please do not call me stupid, that is not very “open minded” of you.
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 11:29 am 11:29 am
“Biden was not the best choice for his VP, Hillary Clinton was. Obama is slick but this generation of fools don’t have the brains to sit on or a window to throw them out of especially college students that are too busy with their drugs and booze to know what was best for the country. Obama talks but his BS walks. Posted by: Mariann Pepitone | Dec 23, 2008 8:29:45 AM
Radical Feminist rhetoric right out of the 60′s manual. It’s unfortunate your sect was unsuccessful in their attempts to “grow your radical-wing of the Democratic party!” (‘Still Crude & Rude – with an attitude.’)
Posted by: bobj72 | December 23, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
So the Obama camp will issue a statement so ambiguously worded there will be lots of wiggle room for details although he’ll adamantly deny any wrongdoing on the part of himself or his staff. Blagojevich has and will continue to deny any wrongdoing as well. Blagojevich can’t charge Obama with any wrongdoing without admitting his own.The FBI meanwhile holds the trump card in the form of recorded conversations. Somewhere in the midst of the three stories lies the truth. All we’ll ever know is whatever part of the story the FBI chooses to make official.
Posted by: MMONROELIVESON | December 23, 2008, 11:35 am 11:35 am
I’ll wait to see the transcripts of the recorded phone conversations. Mr. Obama and his friends merely making claims are worthless.
Posted by: Ron | December 23, 2008, 11:36 am 11:36 am
“amused,
Please do not call me stupid, that is not very “open minded” of you.”
Are you trying to be funny or annoying? I hope annoying is what you’re going for.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
I have trouble believe Obama is a Christian, because he is using the Christmas holiday to reduce press attention to his self-investigation report.
Posted by: tina | December 23, 2008, 11:37 am 11:37 am
silky smooth
Exposing liberals as traitors, socialists, pansies, and anti-American is funny to me, but I am sure it is very annoying to you.
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Merry Christmas Bobj. In the spirit of Christmas I say to all on this board, beware of all leaders. It is the nature of leaders to cause people to do things they would not have done had they not been led to do them. Be true to yourself instead. You’ll never be disappointed.
Posted by: MMONROELIVESON | December 23, 2008, 11:43 am 11:43 am
liberalsaresocialists – Now I understand. You determine the definition of liberal and conservative. You decide what is fact and what is lies. No one can win against you because you control the truth. I think that is the same game Russ Limbaugh and Michael Moore play. But you and they are wrong. No one has a perfect perception of the truth, much less the solution to problems. If it does not benefit you, then it is not the truth. Actually, those are pretty simple rules. I am glad our founding fathers didn’t use those rules or this country would never have been founded or achieved the great things it did. My last post since you are the only one that has been given perfect insight.
Posted by: MikeMo1947 | December 23, 2008, 11:45 am 11:45 am
“Exposing liberals as traitors, socialists, pansies, and anti-American is funny to me, but I am sure it is very annoying to you.”
You must have been an only child, because your imagination, while a little sad, is active.
“I have trouble believe Obama is a Christian, because he is using the Christmas holiday to reduce press attention to his self-investigation report.”
Well, I doubt it. He had nothing to do with the timing. He’s just lucky. But suppose he was capitalizing on the country’s focus being elsewhere…what’s un-Christian about that? It would be shrewd. And politically savvy. Jesus has nothing to do with any benefit Obama is seeing from the holidays. That’s a reaction to media and public interest.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
RBarley: Your man lost, get over it and move on. I know that is hard but that is what us people on the other side did when your idiot won. Get over it and yourself. As for your long posts…nobody cares.
Posted by: wirey | December 23, 2008, 11:49 am 11:49 am
“If it does not benefit you, then it is not the truth.”
It is also ignored.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
“pledge of openness and transparency”
It’s called spoon feeding the press… took a couple weeks to prepare and make sure all their i’s were dotted and t’s crossed…
Posted by: bob | December 23, 2008, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Obama actually won the popular vote by more than 9.5 million votes and won 113 electoral votes that had been Republican in 2008.
Posted by: bhciapol | December 23, 2008, 11:53 am 11:53 am
“”pledge of openness and transparency”
It’s called spoon feeding the press… took a couple weeks to prepare and make sure all their i’s were dotted and t’s crossed…”
Actually, it’s called being resonsible and adhering to the request of the US Attorneys office.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Self-investigate and declare yourself innocent. Nixon should have thought of that
Posted by: JamesJ | December 23, 2008, 11:57 am 11:57 am
As for anyone who believes that B.O. has an honest bone in his body or is going to help get this country back on its feet, Santa Claus is going to pay you a visit tomorrow night too. Naive?
Posted by: Lisa Again | December 23, 2008, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Amy- ummmmmmmm, no ummmmmmmm.ummmmmm, no, ummmmmm,sorry no teleprompter, ummmmm, ear piece not working either, ummmmm, not sure what lie to tell next, ummmm, let me think, ummmmmmm,mmmmm,mmmmm hiden biden ,ummmmm,
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
Obama’s economic narrative of the mortgage crisis ignores the facts. He has put free-market capitalism at the root of the current mortgage industry debacle, denying the real history of government interference in that market.
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
“As for anyone who believes that B.O. has an honest bone in his body or is going to help get this country back on its feet, Santa Claus is going to pay you a visit tomorrow night too. Naive?”
Gee…how insightful. What do you know about ANYTHING?
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Silky
Are you really michelle obama? If you are, have you found a reason to be proud of America yet?
Did you enjoy vacationing in that $30 million dollar mansion this weekend? I am sure you were undoubtedly surrounded by “greedy rich white folk”, as your husband barry called them in his book.
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
“Amy- ummmmmmmm, no ummmmmmmm.ummmmmm, no, ummmmmm,sorry no teleprompter, ummmmm, ear piece not working either, ummmmm, not sure what lie to tell next, ummmm, let me think, ummmmmmm,mmmmm,mmmmm hiden biden ,ummmmm,”
Nice try. I guess you’ve never seen him interviewed or caught any of the debates? Seriously….you have nothing.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Allison Davis, a major fund-raiser for Obama’s US Senate campaign and a former lead partner at Obama’s former law firm. Davis, a developer, was involved in the creation of Grove Parc and has used government subsidies to rehabilitate more than 1,500 units in Chicago, including a North Side building cited by city inspectors last year after chronic plumbing failures resulted in raw sewage spilling into several apartments.
Posted by: Respectfulcitizen | December 23, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
So how many of you think the prosecutor is covering up for the democrats? Since he did not make any charges against Obama and his team he must be covering up something. Should the prosecutor be replaced since he did not find anything or reason to indict Obama or members of his team. If we look hard enough there must be something we can use.
Posted by: Gates | December 23, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
liberalsaresocialists—your use of “all” is categorical and total. i would never say that about conservatives, after all the helped elect President-Elect Obama. i am not anti-american. i am not a communist. seven million more americans voted for Obama than McCain. you can blame that on first-time voters or whatever Rush tells you. i don’t worship Obama, he is the President elect and within a month he will be president. i know that makes you sick. and if you dispise liberals so much why not post on FOX or call Rush. but you crave the divisiveness, don’t you?
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Antoin “Tony” Rezko, perhaps the most important fund-raiser for Obama’s early political campaigns and a friend who helped the Obamas buy a home in 2005. Rezko’s company used government subsidies to rehabilitate more than 1,000 apartments, mostly in and around Obama’s district, then refused to manage the units, leaving the buildings to decay to the point where many no longer were habitable.
(Portion of a VERY interesting article in the Boston Globe)
*http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2008/06/27/grim_proving_ground_for_obamas_housing_policy/***MSM —-Lets connect the dots- Resko, Blagojevich, Emanuel, Daly, Axelrod, Obama, ……..
Posted by: Respectfulcitizen | December 23, 2008, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
I supported Obama because I agree with his policies and the direction he will take the country: tax cuts for the middleclass, an emphasis on diplomacy over military intervention in other countries, an active agenda to get us off oil and revive our manufacturing industries. If you disagree with Obama’s policies then argue on that,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
OK I will bite.
Which of these things do you think Obama will do?
Tax cuts? Nope. I bet he will skip that and blame the economy.
> an emphasis on diplomacy over
>military intervention
Watch what happens in Afganistan.
See if he pulls all troops out of Iraq.
Already you hear him backing away from
his campaign and hes not even in office.
He is hiring all the BUSH people to run the military. ROFL.. If you voted for him on this.
>an active agenda to get us off oil and
>revive our manufacturing
How? How is the president going to do this?
Does he make factories? No.
Does he make laws? No.
If you want the government to make work then you should try the USSR. Its a great place known for their great economy and living conditions.
How about China? etc..
ROFL
The people that bought Obama’s lies are going to be choking on their excuses for many years..
Popeil will need to make a new machine for the Obama supporters named the Obama Excuse-omatic. The device to come up with new reasons that Obama is not delivering on his campaign promises.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | December 23, 2008, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
RBarley – if that is your response to Amy, then I have to assume that Amy is correct. You did not disagree with any of her statements. You just did a comic routine which we know is an exaggeration of reality. But I guess that was the best you could do.
Posted by: MikeMo1947 | December 23, 2008, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Emanuel and Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., wrote to the Federal Communications Commission, urging the agency to act quickly on the sale of Tribune Co. to real-estate magnate Sam Zell. The lawmakers said the FCC shouldn’t allow its review of its media- ownership rules to delay completion of the transaction More Pay to Play? All the Presidents men are in deep. If Obama was a serious reformer don’t you think he would be known for doing this in his own state? Obama supporters have got to be disappointed, but dont be blind.
Posted by: Respectfulcitizen | December 23, 2008, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Both parties have scumbags in them. It is just human nature coming out in a negative way to seek power and control, and to be out there for selfish reasons. Doesn’t matter which party the politician is from, a politician is a politician.
Posted by: ScorpRedhead | December 23, 2008, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
The Union is dying, it will end in smoke and fire.
Stock up on food, water, and ammo. Remember, no mercy to any hard core democrats. They ruined our good republic with their lies.
Posted by: Jessie James | December 23, 2008, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
The media had succeeded in shielding Barack Obama from journalistic scrutiny. It thereby irrevocably destroyed its own reputation. Call me Naive– but I use to think there was a journalistic oath for the truth and unbias reporting. I wonder how they will cover this up? During the election we couldn’t question his associations, his voting record, or his judgement. Will the MSM save their arses and finally vet this joker?
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
It is not truth that matters, but victory. Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it. Weatherman and admitted terrorist William Ayers (whom Obama described in the Philadelphia debate as merely a “neighbor”) was head of the operating arm of the CAC, working with Obama on distributing scores of millions of dollars to grantees in the wards of the city, and you have a topic that the Obama campaign wishes to avoid at all costs.
A compliant media has averted its eyes so far. A timeline of Obama’s career from George Washington University omits it. Why the McCain campaign has not raised more questions on the subject is a question beyond my pay grade. But there are signs it is on the case.
The four plus years (1995-1999) Barack Obama spent as founding chairman of the board of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC) represent his track record as reformer, as someone who reached out in a public-private collaboration and had the audacity to believe his effort would make things better. At the time he became leader of this ambitious project to remake the public schools of Chicago, he was 33 years old and a third year associate at a small Chicago law firm, Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland.
This was a big test for him, his chance to cut his teeth on bringing hope and change to the mostly minority inner city school children trapped in Chicago schools. And he flopped big time, squandering lots of money and the time of many public employees in the process.
Given Senator Obama’s lack of any other posts as leader of an organization, someone unschooled in the ways of the American media might expect that for months reporters have been poring over the records of the project to get an idea of how it managed to fail so badly. Examining the track record of the guy who wants to lead the federal government would seem to be part of the campaign beat for media organizations.
But as a matter of fact, until recently, only a few bloggers were looking into the most important organized effort ever led by Barack Obama, prior to his successful campaigns for public office.
The Cover-up
Now, it appears a cover-up is underway, in order prevent journalists and researchers from getting access to the records of this charitable project housed in a taxpayer supported library. And there is a mystery:
The UIC Library says it is acting on behalf of the donor, whom it refuses to name.
It took Stanly Kurtz, of National Review Online to ask permission to see the files held by the publicly-funded University of Illinois Chicago (UIC). After initially agreeing, The Richard J. Daley Library withdrew permission. Kurtz writes:
“The Special Collections section of the Richard J. Daley Library agreed to let me read them, but just before I boarded my flight to Chicago, the top library officials mysteriously intervened to bar access. Circumstances strongly suggest the likelihood that Bill Ayers himself may have played a pivotal role in this denial. Ayers has long taught at UIC, where the Chicago Annenberg Challenge offices were housed, rent-free. Ayers likely arranged for the files of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge to be housed in the UIC library, and may well have been consulted during my unsuccessful struggle to gain access to the documents.”
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
If Ayers were the sole point of interest in seeking the Annenberg Challenge files promised to Kurtz, all “132 boxes, containing 947 file folders, a total of about 70 linear feet of material”, then the Obama camp might claim it was merely guilt-by association and persuade at least some of its own partisans. But the fact that Obama was in charge of a massive expensive project makes it indisputably a matter of proper vetting to examine his track record at delivering on promises of hope and change.
The Obama camp has already noted that it does not control the archives at UIC. All well and good, though it would be nice for the candidate to plead with the university and the mystery donor to let the sun shine on his track record. After all, he is a new kind of politician.
But even if he doesn’t, the Annenberg Challenge is slowly entering the national consciousness, and that’s very bad news for Barack Obama.
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Resko, Blagojevich, Emauel, Daly, Axelrod, Wright…can’t you remember when all this trash was used in the election and precipitated McCain/Palin loss. americans are so sick of this divisiveness. when you impugn someone’s character that is not respectful, at least when you have no evidence. if you are respectful citizen i suggest you run to the courthouse and file a lawsuit since you have all this evidence of a grand conspiracy. and then the Supreme Court can one day toss out your suit too—straight into a D.C recycling bin like the rest.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
The country is in turmoil but he can afford this;
DECEMBER 22–Here’s the rental listing for the $9 million Hawaiian estate that President-elect Barack Obama is renting over the Christmas holiday. The five-bedroom estate rents for upwards of $3500-a-day and sits on an acre fronting Kailua Beach in Oahu.
Posted by: Jane | December 23, 2008, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
I am willing to sell my soul to the Devil, Rev. Wright, Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dorn, Rashid Khalidi, Father Pflager, Tony Rezko, Louis Farrakhan , who is the highest Bidder? -O
RBarley—- you left out — Nadhmi Auchi— But I’m sure there’s a few more! take note—–The Times of London reports:”A company related to Mr. Auchi, who has a conviction for corruption in France, registered a loan to Mr. Obama’s bagman Antoin ‘Tony’ Rezko on May, 23 2005. Mr. Auchi says the loan, through the Panamanian company Fintrade Services SA, was for $3.5 million.”Three weeks later, Mr. Obama bought a house on the city’s South Side while Mr Rezko’s wife bought the garden plot next door from the same seller on the same day, June 15. Posted by:roscoeo2
Sorry roscoe
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
“The Union is dying, it will end in smoke and fire.
Stock up on food, water, and ammo. Remember, no mercy to any hard core democrats. They ruined our good republic with their lies.”
We don’t want, nor require your mercy. But that’s funny.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Here is his list, they’re all involved——–1. Rod Blagojevich 2. Tony Resko 3. Franklin Raines 4. Kwame Kilpatrick 5. Jim Johnson 6. William Ayers 7. Bernadine Dohrn 8. Rashid Khalidi 9. Jeremiah Wright 10, Father Michael Pfleger 11. Frank Marshall Davis 12. Saul Alinsky 13. Imad Husain 14. Mohammed Hasan Chandoo 15. Wahid Hamid 16.Vinai Thummalapally 17. Sohale Siddiqi 18. Emanuel
The Chameleon is changing his colors! Does anyone think this guy looks like the next Joker in a Batman Movie? I’ve just been trying to decide what his name should be? Teflon Man? The Chameleon? Any ideas?
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
Paul wall
Those names aren’t trash, they are all friends of obama, and had the media done their job they would have been his demise.
One thing you obamabots must realize is that we are more then ready to show BO the same level of respect you have shown Bush over the past 8 years.
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
RBarley—also left out were Mickey Mouse and 532,795 pages of a document proving Obama part of the conspiracy. a handshake does not a conspiracy make. and you could write a book on this blog. no matter how many times you write something ad nauseum it still doesn’t become true. seriously, man, is Rush’s station not taking calls today?
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Self-investigate and declare yourself innocent. Nixon should have thought of that
Posted by: JamesJ LOL too funny, good one.
Posted by: Respectfulcitizen | December 23, 2008, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
“The country is in turmoil but he can afford this;”
I am in awe of these particular posts.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
Obama is as corrupt as the rest of Congress. They lie, cheat and steal to get where they are, and they keep their positions by pandering to lobbyists. They are all the same, corrupt evil worthless pieces of crap.
Posted by: bo | December 23, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
I live in Illinois and he had to know about the
corruption (the Chicago machine) or he chose to look the other way.
I don’t know which is worse.
Posted by: Jane | December 23, 2008, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
If Karl Rove was the great architect, David Axlerod was the great manipulator of suppressing the truth
Posted by: RBarley | December 23, 2008, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
Ms liberalsaresocialists—the names are real, you are correct. what they mean is what is at stake. the President-Elect has met many people and has many friends. what does it mean?
funny what you wrote about Bush. we welcome the hate. it doesn’t make me look foolish. and i’m more concerned about Cheney than i ever was about Bush.
really it’s just funny what you-neocon haters will write, the diatribe, innuendo. it’s quite entertaining. but quite sad and pathetic as well.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Yeah, self investigate. Corruption knows no bounds. The “president” of the union at a West Texas, VA in Big Spring, Texas. She manages to stay in office every time there is an election, because she always counts the votes herself behind closed doors. Kay Smith is as dubious as those in Washington, and somehow, just like those in Washington, she gets by with it, time after time.
Posted by: bo | December 23, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
One cannot help but wonder, does Obama know any good people? Here is his list, they’re all involved——–1. Rod Blagojevich 2. Tony Resko 3. Franklin Raines 4. Kwame Kilpatrick 5. Jim Johnson 6. William Ayers 7. Bernadine Dohrn 8. Rashid Khalidi 9. Jeremiah Wright 10, Father Michael Pfleger 11. Frank Marshall Davis 12. Saul Alinsky 13. Imad Husain 14. Mohammed Hasan Chandoo 15. Wahid Hamid 16.Vinai Thummalapally 17. Sohale Siddiqi 18. Emanuel
Posted by: Respectfulcitizen | December 23, 2008, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
Well, the Republican-voting types on this thread have learn how to copy and paste. Maybe one day, they’ll discover reason and point-counterpoint debate.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
It’s the emanate front.
Posted by: Joe Average | December 23, 2008, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
bo—if Obama counted the votes didn’t McCain and Palin have a right to a recount? they made no such request. also if you think Kay Smith is counting her own vote, turn her in, make a criminal complaint.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
This report is delayed because the demobrats are picking thru it with a fine tooth comb, and Obaba wouldn’t know the truth if it slapped him in the face. Caroline K.S. is also a JOKE, boy you demobrats will put anything in office.LOL !!!!!
Posted by: countrygirl_74 | December 23, 2008, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Liberals give far less of their time and money according to the New York Times in an article on a book that just came out. This is a Liberal author who is complaining that his own people don’t give like conservatives do. Silky, you don’t have a clue. You think you are a giving person because you are a liberal.
Posted by: chaos | December 23, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
bo—that would include McCain and Palin as well, right? or are only the republicans not corrupt?
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
I live in Illinois and he had to know about the
corruption (the Chicago machine) or he chose to look the other way.
I don’t know which is worse.
Posted by: Jane -There is no way he can come out of this in a clean suit. That’s the problem. He was not vetted by the media. He is corrupt as they come. The media in their “love-fest” shielded him from scrutiny. And the american public was so caught up in what they were spoon fed, they didn’t see the truth.
Posted by: Respectfulcitizen | December 23, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
- Your reference to President Elect Barack Obama; “In one magazine, he reads a story about a black man with an “uneven, ghostly hue,” who has been rendered grotesque by a chemical treatment. “There were thousands of people like him,” Obama learned, “black men and women back in America who’d undergone the same treatment in response to advertisements that promised happiness as a white person.”
“Obama’s attention to detail is a ruse. Life never ran such an article. When
challenged, Obama claimed it was Ebony. Ebony ran no such article either.
Besides, black was beautiful in 1970.”
Posted by: RBarley | Dec 23, 2008 10:52:16 AM
Barley, you spend an inordinate amount of time (and energy) attempting to discredit the President Elect. (Reads like a ‘Personal Thing’ to me.) You’re either a “passionate wanna’ be intellect” or a “shade tree literary critic” lacking intellectual substance. For-the-record, Ebony magazine HAS run “Skin Lightener” “Skin Bleach” and “Skin Whitener” advertisements going all the way back to the 1940′s. And I have personally read numerous articles regarding the negative dermatological effects of the chemicals in the products. Furthermore, there is NO “Subject Catalog” at Ebony Magazine, so where do you get your information from? Sounds like self-serving concoctions to me.
Posted by: bobj72 | December 23, 2008, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Paul wall
“a hand shake does not a conspiracy make”.
How about barry calling rev wright his “mentor, best friend, spiritual advisor, ect”.
Rev racist is the typical liberal- anti American, anti-capitalist, socialist- and it seems to me barry and he exchanged a little more then a handshake.
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
chaos—that may be true about liberals and contributions. i don’t consider myself a liberal but gave as much as i could to the campaign (i’m not a wealthy person). if you could would you post the newspaper article, hopefully with a link to the paper’s article. no need to quote a forthcoming book. i would like the actual quote in context, in the article, in the paper.
if any form of evidence was required at all to post here there wouldn’t be a single post. not one.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
Internal report? Why is it internal? Why isn’t he open and honest anymore. What happened to the Messiah? Time is not on his side. Same as Bush. Don’t trust government for anything.
Posted by: chaos | December 23, 2008, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
Seriously…given the US Attorney’s statements, what exactly are the “unanswered questions” regarding Obama’s connection to Gov. Blagojevich’s machinations?
And if an internal investigation is not enough, shall we appoint a Special Prosecutor a la Ken Starr once Obama is sworn in, as the Republicans insisted on doing regarding the non-issue of Whitewater once Bill Clinton was sworn in?
I’m not a big Obama fan (voted for him, but not part of The Movement), yet all I see in this is the media’s ginning up of overly-parsed statements by Obama.
I expect this from the right wing-nuts and Democratic dead-enders, but why is the media so lazy and so shallow as to be creating this narrative?
Oh..wait…it’s because the media is ALWAYS lazy and shallow, thus needing to create a narrative that can entertain The Village while truly newsworthy items are left to bloggers, some of whom actually do the important investigative work formerly done by old school journalists!
Posted by: mkevinf | December 23, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
“Silky, you don’t have a clue. You think you are a giving person because you are a liberal.”
Right, I don’t have a clue. Because YOU know to what degree I am a giving person. I swear to God, some of you have brain damage. Do you not think before you speak?
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
This self-blinding, superior mindset explains how liberals can accuse conservatives of racism for their legitimate political differences with Barack Obama while demeaning, with racist epithets, Condoleezza Rice or Clarence Thomas. It’s how they can mock conservatives for being close-minded while unilaterally declaring the end to the debate on global warming because of a mythical consensus they have decreed. It’s how they can demand every vote count and exclude military ballots. It’s how they can glamorize Jimmy Carter for gallivanting to foreign countries to supervise “fair elections” and pooh-pooh ACORN’s serial voter fraud in their own country. It’s how they can threaten the tax-exempt status of evangelical churches for preaching on values, even when the churches don’t endorse candidates, but fully support a liberal church’s direct electioneering for specific candidates. It’s how they can ludicrously depict President Bush as a dictator while
romanticizing brute thug tyrants Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro. It’s how they can falsely accuse President Bush of targeting innocent civilians in Iraq when he does everything possible to avoid civilian casualties but demand our withdrawal from South Vietnam, which resulted in the massacre of millions of innocents. It’s how they can advocate the banning of DDT in the name of environmental progress but be unconcerned about the untold malaria deaths that resulted.
Posted by: Respectfulcitizen | December 23, 2008, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
liberalsaresocialists “rev wright his “mentor, best friend, spiritual advisor, ect”. but did he not condemn the hate speech Rev. Wright made? please find a ccitation, if you could, that refers to Wright as “my best friend.”
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
Paul wall : Bleeding heart tightwads By kristoff
Posted by: chaos | December 23, 2008, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
RBarley – nice blend of facts, lies and false conclusions. “During the election we couldn’t question his associations, his voting record, or his judgement.” Where were you during the election? There were many groups, reporters, and candidates that were questioning these all through the campaign. Now look at some of the qualifiers used for RBarley evidence: “Now, it appears a cover-up is underway” “Circumstances strongly suggest” “might claim ” “does not seem to have”
Posted by: MikeMo1947 | December 23, 2008, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
liberalsaresocialists, Good Luck, I have to go to work now, so I can continue to support those who don’t.— I will leave you with this thought…….If you believe the left is tolerant, open-minded and democratic, you’re in for a rude awakening. By, David Limbaugh
Posted by: Respectfulcitizen | December 23, 2008, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Send
Posted by: IOOKEZE | December 23, 2008, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Paul
Barry sat in that pew for 20 freakin years, he brought his children to hear that crap. His book “audacity of hope” was titled after rev racist speech “audacity of hope”.
Can you honestly be that naive to think that barry condemned the hate speech for anything other than politcal gain? Are you waiting up for santa clause tomorrow night, too?
As I have stated before, i heard a pastor of mine equate gay people to 9/11 and how America was being punished for their behavior. I left that church and NEVER went back after that. Barry obviously stayed at Trinity because he agreed with what his pastor said.
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Respectfulcitizen -You don’t sound respectful. Seems to me that you are blaming liberals for our problems. Most leberal and conservatives are closer to a moderate than the statements you are making about them. It is the extremist at both ends that cause the division in this country and will not listen to the other half. When the radical right lets go of the republican party and the radical left lets go of the democratic party, the two parties could have a real discussion of solutions for everyone.
Posted by: MikeMo1947 | December 23, 2008, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Does Rush give you all extra Oxycontins for each time the word “liberal” is employed on a message board?
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
“Paul wall : Bleeding heart tightwads By kristoff”
Umm…liberals aren’t the ones known as tightwads, huckleberry.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
It’s funny. So many of you don’t even know your own party. Step off the farm once in a while, kids.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
‘Does Rush give you all extra Oxycontins for each time the word “liberal” is employed on a message board?’
Good point Silky. Don’t they that we want to be called Progressives now? (At least until that becomes a dirty word too) Keep up the good work!!
Posted by: dumbazzliberal | December 23, 2008, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
silky: Read the article! It’s at the New York TImes web site.
Posted by: chaos | December 23, 2008, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
I’ll read it when I get home.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Silky: read it now and tell me that I’m wrong. You can’t handle the truth can you.
Posted by: chaos | December 23, 2008, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
liberalsaresocialists—it’s respectable that you left a homophobic pastor. but i would have repsected youy just as much if you had stayed and differed with your pastor. we all have different views and politics. i think part of Obama’s word-view is inclusiveness and tolerance. you can see that in his cabinet appointments and having Rev. Warren read the invocation.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
“Silky: read it now and tell me that I’m wrong. You can’t handle the truth can you.”
You and “truth” are two things I’ve yet to see in close proximity to one another.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
great response. Read the article. It’s in your liberal paper.
Posted by: chaos | December 23, 2008, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
great response. Read the article. It’s in your liberal paper. Posted by: chaos
you mean Progressive paper don’t you?
Posted by: dumbazzliberal | December 23, 2008, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
Don’t worry guys, you always have the Washington Times to tell us how it REALLY is.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
Just a word of thanks to those of you who are sane and attempt to thwart the self-righteous hate mongers. I skim through these types of thread occassionaly and it’s scary to see the real nuts out there. It’s even scarier to think anyone that has not been brainwashed by Rush or O’riely might read and believe what they say! So, thanks to you folks who take the time to respond and speak up against their insantiy.
Posted by: observer | December 23, 2008, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
silky : google tightwads and new york times ,it’s a short article. It won’t take you more than 5 minutes to read and the writer starts out “we liberals”
Posted by: chaos | December 23, 2008, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Hey observer, we’d like to thank you for thanking us. Really. It just goes to show how right we really are.
Posted by: dumbazzliberal | December 23, 2008, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Oh cool!!!! Rbarley an Mariannpepitone are back. I do get a kick out of reading your crapola Rbarley..it does appear that your occassional delusional thinking has progressed to full blown paranoia. Suggestion: Haldol 10mg by mouth 2 X Daily–Ativan 2mg by mouth 2X Daily. The Haldol may not be good for long term use but it may snap you back into reality long enough for you to maybe read your own postings and help you realize how twisted you have become…..
Posted by: Central Scruitinizer | December 23, 2008, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
dumbazzlib: why aren’t they just a paper that reports everything. Maybe thats why they are broke and laying off alot of people.
Posted by: chaos | December 23, 2008, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
MariannPepitone hmmm….. you may need ECT, also know as shock therapy…
Posted by: Central Scruitinizer Orlando | December 23, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
chaos: Because they have political motivations. But hey, I read your article, it was a hoot. I guess it’s one thing to talk the talk and another to walk the walk. Thanks for mentioning it.
Posted by: dumbazzliberal | December 23, 2008, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
chaos, as somebody who not two hours ago cut a $250 check that I can’t afford right now to a local child-services non-profit, I’m the wrong guy to talk to. I’ve volunteered my time and money to an array of non-profits all my life.
And any study that includes donations to churches is inherently skewed.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
And any study that includes donations to churches is inherently skewed.
Posted by: Silky
But Silky, churches do more to help children and the poor than anybody. Why is it skewed?
Posted by: dumbazzliberal | December 23, 2008, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
It’s “Pay for Play”. Congress does this daily, why would we point the finger to one.
Posted by: Don | December 23, 2008, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
It’s depressing there are people who start with hatred and then work to find a target for their contempt. If these folks don’t hate Jews, Blacks, Women, Northerners, or the Red Sox, its the liberals, the Democrats, or the college educated, who earn their ire. They jump from character assasinations, to illogical theories about the inherent wrongness of the group they have decided to hate.
You can’t argue with them because they just love to hate.
Posted by: Amy | December 23, 2008, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
dumbazzliberal—”churches do more to help children and the poor than anybody. Why is it skewed?”—many churches do good works, there is no doubt. but i do not consider mega-churches preaching the prosperity gospel doing the Lord’s work. once a church starts using its money for political purposes that is not helping the children or the poor. it is advancing a political cause (i.e. proposition 8). those “churches” should be taxed as should non-profits supporting legislation.
separation of church and state needs to be more clearly defined. if you give to the church that’s fine. if you give to a political organization that’s not fine.
i know, for instance, that there are churches opposing Proposition 8 and using their funds to oppose it politically. so it is wrong both ways.
Churches that are homophobic or homophilic can teach as they want in their churches. once they want to “spread the love” outside of the church on political campaigns it’s time to call the tax-collector.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Wait a second, there is absolutely nothing wrong with unconditional hatred for the Red Sox.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Amy
Actually, it was barry’s pastor of 20 years who hated Jews, whites and hillary clinton. That man spread more hate than any political/religous figure that I have ever heard, and barry O never protested once. Instead, he just chilled in the pew with that cool look and on his face, sitting next to his chip on her shoulder wife.
His “church” also gave louie farrackan a lifetime achievement award. Louie is on par with ahkmadenijead when it comes to anti-semtitism and stupidity.
Please Amy, get you facts straight and spit out the barry flavored kool-aid.
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
And wrt churches…they are famous for money disappearing. Many INVEST the money. There’s an Episcopal church near me that owns the entire city block surrounding their building. They’re in real estate! But mostly it’s because often the sentiment is bogus. They’re doing it to buy their way into heaven. Just listen to the hatred here…you really think these guys fork over their money because they’re compassionate? Right.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
DUMBAZZ; Correct. Around my area churches are the only orgs. that feed the hungry and house the homelss. We also don’t brag aobut our giving much. I know I am here but it’s for the sake of arguement. Libs want credit for every 250.00 they give.
Posted by: chaos | December 23, 2008, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
“Actually, it was barry’s pastor of 20 years who hated Jews, whites and hillary clinton. That man spread more hate than any political/religous figure that I have ever heard, and barry O never protested once. Instead, he just chilled in the pew with that cool look and on his face, sitting next to his chip on her shoulder wife.”
First of all, you have no idea what was said in sermons Obama sat in on. Secondly, who f’ing cares? You really think he’s an anti-semite? A racist? You’re not paying very close attention if you think that. You’re just desperate to paint him negatively. And that’s just sad. Wait for him to paint himself negatively. It worked for us and W. Didn’t take long either!
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
silky: if it weren’t for churches of all faiths and all volunteers(conservatives and libs and middle) this country would be a mess. I know the rosie is a big givers and is mad at other celebs for not giving. She is due credit for that .
Posted by: chaos | December 23, 2008, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
“Libs want credit for every 250.00 they give.”
It was a make a point, you inbred. Besides, it’s pretty clear to anybody reading this thread that you don’t give jack squat. In fact, I’m beginning to question whether you’re even employable, your reasoning is so whacked. So quit piggy backing on your fellow Republicans and drop the charitable donations thing. And I couldn’t care less what I get “credit” for, otherwise I wouldn’t give it. Nobody comes around and pats me on the back for it and I don’t tell anybody about it. Well, accept in this case here where it clearly does me so much good to say so. I just like knowing that I’m contributing to helping others to the extent that I can. I was raised that way. I’m fortunate. But in the scope of this conversation it becamse relevant. But leave it to you to completely miss the point in effort to further make a fool of yourself.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
whoaaaaaaaa – Rahmbo going to Africa – O-bomb-a in Hawaii – could there be a connection ? There may be lots of trails to cover..
Posted by: lotzahair | December 23, 2008, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
“silky: if it weren’t for churches of all faiths and all volunteers(conservatives and libs and middle) this country would be a mess. I know the rosie is a big givers and is mad at other celebs for not giving. She is due credit for that .”
I figured it out. You’re a child. And churches are fine, but I’m just saying that the figure about Republicans donating more, in spite of having less, has to do with a select few charity uber-wealthy people and churches hustling people (for good cause, by and large) into thinking they can buy their way into heaven.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm
Amy—i agree with your post. what is most disturbing is the blatant anti-intellectualism. just on this thread alone college students are bad-mouthed. that’s because the greatest threat to the right is education. and they call intelligent people “elite.”
if racism, sexism, homophobia, anti-semitism, xenophobia appeal to the right it is for a reason. you could clearly see the tension in this past election where had it not been for the xenophobic, racist remarks the McCain/Palin ticket would have had a much closer finish.
what we’ll see in the next couple of years is the republican party move a little to the left and shake the haters off. let them start their own party, maybe the haters can get as many votes as Nader did.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Libs want credit for every 250.00 they give. Posted by: chaos
LMFAO!!
Posted by: dumbazzliberal | December 23, 2008, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
I am glad my father is not around to see what this Great Country has become because of slimy, corrupt liberals. I wonder what he was thinking at 24yrs old when he was a gunner during World War 2; putting his butt on the line everyday so that this country could prosper.And the rest of the world along with it.My whole family has served, because it was considered the honorable thing to do. It still is, but you can’t tell it by the bratty-assed libs! They make me sick. You are right Marianne, Obama is nothing more than a slick Chicago Politician that duped all of the brainless people of the U.S.
Posted by: blatzrox | December 23, 2008, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
BHO I have an electic bill of $235.00. Will you send me the money form Hawaii so I won’t be cold???
Posted by: Carol Alabama | December 23, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
“Wait a second, there is absolutely nothing wrong with unconditional hatred for the Red Sox.”
Ha ha. Yes, and I realized after I posted this that I hate the ignorant right wingers on this blog, so I guess I am a hater too!
Posted by: Amy | December 23, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
who cares where Emanuel and Obama spend the holidays? it’s none of anybody’s business. it doesn’t mean anything. but you can hear the little conspiracy- theory wheels squeeking away mightily. i would love to go to africa for the holidays. but, hey…i’m not a hater.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Obama was in the middle of this Chicago dirt.
For sure Obama knew what was going on: Obama was also a drug users in his early days.
He had dubious friends ( Wright, Ayers, Rezko and many others) .
And now this former drug user is becoming president of the US ; with the support of the main stream media; it is their beloved president.
Posted by: Tino | December 23, 2008, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Amy and Paul Wall
Get off you freakin high horses. I went to grad school and studied in London, i ain’t no hick.
If anything, my education has shown me the dangers of what teachers with agendas can do. Mizzou, for example, is highly regarded for its journalism program. The teachers there were some of the biggest anti-American/anti-capitalism snobs that I have ever seen (next to obama’s pastor, rev racist, of course).
We would supposed to be having class and I can remember on many occasions the professor discussing where the next anti-war rally would be, or how stupid George Bush was. The kids there just ate it up, and guess what, they all grow up to write for the main stream media!
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
liberalsaresocialists—we’re not worthy. please tell us what to think.
is hte preacher who teaches hatred towards homosexuals and blacks a good preacher? or do you apply that rule only to “rev. racist”?
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Tell em’, R Barley!! Stinking libs! The reason our Country has usually prospered is because , thank God, we haven’t had to tend to too many big government libs!We’ve had more conservatives as presidents.People will see what they’ve worsened in another year or so.
Posted by: blatzrox | December 23, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
The last three presidents were drug users when they were younger. I think it’s safe to say that’s not a deal-breaker for the American people.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Tino—don’t forget President Bush had a litle problem with substances before. Obama was honest when asked a question. he’s not a drug user and you know this. this is the kind of shallow yet viscious hate one sees from the (far) right.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
blatzrox—you tell ‘em blatzrox!!! you spread that ignorant foolish hate around! doesn’t it feel good? in Jesus name, yes God—people who voted for Obama are satanic heathons and we’re superior because we say God twenty times a days and Jesus forty times a day. we are so superior. thanks for giving our christmas blessing of hatred. God hates Obama and people we disagree with. can i get an amen? Praise the Lord, praise God, praise Jesus! for we are the righteous. ROFLMFAO
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
$FREE$ ON DEMAND TV SHOWS, MOVIES, MUSIC, GAMES, AND COLLEGE EDUCATIONS @ http://WWW.INTERNETSURFSHACK.COM
Posted by: G | December 23, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Paul
Everyone is worthy-even liberals.They just happen to be wrong on every social, economic and foreign policy for the past 60 or so years.
To answer your question, of course I apply that same standard to all idiotic preachers that use their status to promote hatred against anyone.
I got up and walked out, why didn’t barry?
I feel that I am completely justified in calling out barry as a liar and a racist for his 20 year career as a trinity member. He brought his children to listen to that crap.
Just think of what impressionable black youths must have thought when they heard their pastor, someone endorsed by the IL sentaor, say America created the AIDS virus to kill them??
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
I’m with Jesse James!! Libs aren’t welcome in my hood!! They tried to destroy the Country. But they won’t succeed.They are like Ayers & his bunch, cowardly planting bombs to hurt people.We need to take him to Pakistan & give him & his wife a pair of pajamas!!
Posted by: blatzrox | December 23, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
liberalsaresocialists—do you honestly think Obama hates white people and that’s what he teaches his daughters? and since Rev. Warren is giving the invocation at the inauguration that the President-Elect is a homophobe?
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
“Just think of what impressionable black youths must have thought when they heard their pastor, someone endorsed by the IL sentaor, say America created the AIDS virus to kill them??”
All six of them? They probably thought…Heyzeus H. Christo! That’s one crazy negro!
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
blatzrox—libs aren’t welcome in your hood? neither is the KKK till sundown right. In Jesus name we say we are superior.
well you wouldn’t last thirty seconds in my hood.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
“I’m with Jesse James!! Libs aren’t welcome in my hood!!”
Lol. Oh, yeah? Where’s that?
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Silky—it’s in mississippi where there are alot of trees and men in sheets that like to remain annonymous. you’ve got to admire his disrespect for the law. i live near where Jesse James roamed—and blatzrox is no Jesse James ROFLMFAO!!!
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Paul
Barry sought out a radical father figure and he found what he was looking for in rev racist. Just as barry said in his book “I sought out the marxist professors in college”, he sought out the nutjobs in America after college.
That fact, along with his wife’s famous comments, and his attendance at ayers house several times (that we know of) solidifies to me that he is racist and anti-American.
Do I think the obamas sit at home with their kids and throw darts at whitey, probably not, but do I think their views of this country are FAR more radical/dangerous then they will ever admit- absofreakinglutely.
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
liberalsaresocialists—fair enough. i had marxist professors in college, but hardly consider myself a marxist or a socialist. i love my country. i think there is just an honest disagreement about what constitutes a liberal. i don’t thin every conservative person is a radical neo-con who is racist and full of bile. it’s a case by case basis. what do you make of his inviting Rev. Warren to pray at the invocation? homophobia is all right then? which is worse in your mind a homosexual or a socialist. what do you think? should we infer Obama hates homosexuals. he was on Ellen for God’s sake.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Re:Paul Wall
What’s up , Paul? Hit a little guilt nerve or something? You must be one of the ” brainless ones ” that voted for Obama.
Posted by: blatzrox | December 23, 2008, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
You really sound like fools continuing on with this Ayers and Wright business. It is such a non-issue at this point. You’re just being manipulated by your talking heads on radio and Fox News. The people who matter brought it up because they thought they could get mileage out of it in the campaign. It backfired when they took it too far. Now nobody with any sense or stake in the game is giving it any thought whatsoever anymore. Just you guys peeing into the wind. But Fox and Rush and Hannity….it’s their job to keep you guys all foaming at the mouth, so they keep jumping up and down on utterly insignificant issues that you guys will continue to just eat right up.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
He’s racist, huh? You realize the woman who raised him and was the most influential person in his life was white, right? He went to Harvard. Harvard’s not exactly a place known for it’s anti-white movement.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Of course we conservatives aren’t racist. We are the party of slavery abolishment, Abe Lincoln and MLK.
As for Barry’s invitation to rev warren, I think it is purely political. I think barry would have attended a KKK rally if he thought it would have gotten him votes. This whole notion that barry is somehow different makes me sick. He is after power like all politicians, he just scares me more than others because I think he truly has dark views of this country, and so does his wife.
As for warren’s comments about gays, they are ridiculous and dangerous. Why didn’t barry pick one of the THOUSANDS of pastors who preach love instead of hate? Because he is a snake.
Basically, i think we just elected a man who has never, not once, shown he loves this country, so how am I supposed to believe he wants to protect it?
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
Silky,
you aren’t referring to barry’s racist white grandmother that he threw under the bus last year are you? I think it’s the same bus that dragged rev racist around for awhile.
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
“Of course we conservatives aren’t racist. We are the party of slavery abolishment, Abe Lincoln and MLK.”
Same name, vastly different contingency.
Anyway, I quit. This is absurd and a sad testiment to my productivity today. I don’t deserve to keep my job for spending my time humoring malcontents without the slightest sense of reason.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Actually I know nothing about Mississippi, I was born & raised in the great broke state of California.Thanks to the liberals!!
Posted by: blatzrox | December 23, 2008, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
The right wing posters on this blog remind me of Sarah Palin. I just love her’s assertion that if only we had heard MORE from her, she would have won. These folks don’t have a clue that the more gibberish they spout about Obama “paling around with terrorists” the less respect the rest of us have for them. It’s pretty apparent to most of us that Obama is what he is, highly intelligent, self disciplined, and on track to be a competent leader.
Posted by: Amy | December 23, 2008, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm
“It’s pretty apparent to most of us that Obama is what he is, highly intelligent, self disciplined, and on track to be a competent leader”
Thank God you didn’t live in san francisco during the 70′s, you just might have been equally impressed with another great speaker that eventually took his followers down to Guyana for a little revival action.
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | December 23, 2008, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
“Thank God you didn’t live in san francisco during the 70′s, you just might have been equally impressed with another great speaker that eventually took his followers down to Guyana for a little revival action.”
You are a complete freaking mess.
Posted by: Silky | December 23, 2008, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
SILKY YOU ARE SO SMART ACCORDING TO YOU.
Posted by: chaos | December 23, 2008, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
EVERYBODY IS WRONG TODAY EXCEPT SILKY.
Posted by: chaos | December 23, 2008, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
GOOD LUCK GETTING THAT BLOOD PRESSURE BACK TO NORMAL SILKY. WOW YOU HAD QUITE A DAY! YOUR BOSS MUST BE EASY.
WHERE I WORK I AM THE BOSS .
Posted by: chaos | December 23, 2008, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
I called the IRS today and told them they wouldn’t need to do the audit they planned because I did an internal audit of my taxes and everything looked good so they can stay home.
Posted by: chaos | December 23, 2008, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
blatzrox—can you make a statement or a comment that is beyond “hate liberals”…”no liberals in my hood.” i’m far from brainless. i proudly voted for Obama in the primaries, i caucused for him in texas. i gave what i could to his campaign and i’m proud of that. but it’s hard to have a conversation with someone who plays “nann-nany poo-poo.” say something of substance.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
blatzrox—california!!! i would never have guessed. i apologize. still if there are no liberals in your hood? at all? not one? do you hate all liberals? would you have one as a friend? someone you could be cool with but just disagree with. i apologize for the remark where i called you a racist. i wrote faster than my brain was working. i’m sorry for that. i live in texas and i bet if i sat down at a bar and watched a football game you wouldn’t know i was liberal…i don’t know maybe what you mean by “liberal” i’m not. i mean i just see the world different than you do. i don’t know whose right.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm
liberalsaresocialists—there has to be some common ground. i know there is a lot of hyperbole on blogs. i just can’t believe americans are so far apart. i don’t know what you think of me. you know i’m from the left, but honestly i love my country. and i don’t doubt for one moment that you love your country too. but i’m saying “my” and “your” country, but it’s the same country. i know we both feel strongly and want to be right. it’s just hard to know. i just see the world a different way. just curious about how people disagree. i know you went to graduate school and studied abroad. i did too. so how do we end up like this? i’m not trying to do group therapy on an abc blog, just curious about what you think of that. i’m sorry early about anti-intellectualism—i think on blogs especially people can so easily dehumanize the other. and that’s no good, not for conservatives or liberals.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
and i’d love to go to Guyana as an anthropologist, but i’ll skip on the preacher man and kool-aid. :)
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 23, 2008, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Silky– You are an idi0t, and a thief for spending you time here while you’re supposed to be on the job.
Posted by: Ubamo | December 23, 2008, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
I’ll be very happy when they impeach Obama and kick his shiny black @ss back to Kenya. He is incapable of telling the truth.
Posted by: Jeff Fish | December 24, 2008, 1:22 am 1:22 am
Jeff Fish—you are one vicious, hateful racist. i hope they send you back to where you came from. after what came out of your mouth i would never trust you. don’t hold your breath on the impeachment. post your racist filth somewhere else. there are alot of conservatives on here who don’t like Obama or agree with him, honest disagreements. but this racism belongs on another site. as KanYe would say “poof-poof be gone!”
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 24, 2008, 7:14 am 7:14 am
“I’ll be very happy when they impeach Obama and kick his shiny black @ss back to Kenya. He is incapable of telling the truth.” Posted by: Jeff Fish | Dec 24, 2008 1:22:05 AM
Well, at least you’re an upgrade from the run-of-the-mill “Card-Carrying Racist”, “Bigoted”, “Sleaze-Bag”, “Crap-Breathing-Pig Sty Bred-Slob”….. in that you can spell. I know, I know, I know….. all of us Black Folks (even the FEW Black People who dispise the President Elect) “all of us have shiny black @sses and should be sent back to Africa.” You Sir, are the ‘Infected-Pimple Pus’ that unfortunately represents the “Anti-American, Hard Rite Edged Radical, StormTrooper Revolutionaries” indoctrinated by the likes of The StormFront, Hannutty, Dim-baugh, O’really, et al. You are an inexcusable Embarassment to your family, your community, your race, your country and you’re a ‘waste of oxygen and space’ that’s available here in our country!
Posted by: bobj72 | December 24, 2008, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm