Top Democrat to Obama: Keep Bush’s Intel Chiefs
ABC News’ Jonathan Karl Reports: First Gates, Now Hayden?
The Democratic chairman of the House Intelligence Committee says President-elect Barack Obama should keep President Bush’s intelligence chiefs for at least six months to ensure a smooth transition.
It’s a move that would likely cause a revolt on the left.
Keeping Director of National Intelligence Mike McConnell and Director of the CIA Mike Hayden would be hugely controversial among many of Obama’s core supporters.
McConnell is disliked by many on the left because of his vocal support of the terrorist surveillance program that allowed some domestic wiretapping, and Hayden is controversial because he helped launch the program when he was head of the NSA and because of his steadfast support of the CIA’s detainee interrogation program.
"There’s got to be some continuity, and the leadership of both the CIA and the DNI is going to be pivotal to keeping us safe and secure," House Intelligence Committee chairman Rep. Silvestre Reyes, D-Texas, told Congress Daily. Reyes said that it is up to Obama to decide how long to keep them.
"It gets back to a world that is very dangerous," Reyes added. "There are many different aspects that deal with our national security and it’s critical that we have that overlap. … I know that they’re considering, they’re weighing the options," he said of Obama’s transition team.
McConnell has told colleagues that he intends to step down on Jan. 20. Hayden, however, has said that he would be willing to stay on the job for a while longer.
Though he has announced the bulk of his national security team, Obama has not yet announced plans to replace the intel chiefs.
ABC News was first to report that retired Adm. Dennis Blair had emerged as Obama’s top choice for national intelligence, but over the weekend ABC News’ Martha Raddatz learned that he was no longer in the running for the post.
A source familiar with the transition indicated that Blair would have faced "Hill problems" during his confirmation process.

Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Has has experience water boarding the scum of the Earth, I say keep’em!
Posted by: david | December 10, 2008, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Keep Hayden, Bush over time got rid of the deadweight like George Tenet, Rumsfeld, General Abizaid, General Casey, and General Sanchez and replaced them with some of the nations best and brightest like General Petraeus, General Odierno, and SoD Gates.
It took years for Bush to find the best and brightest for fighting modern wars and keeping the nation safe, they have done a good job in their current positions and they should stay where they are.
Posted by: jmc | December 10, 2008, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
I think it would be a terrible mistake to retain the two intelligence chiefs. They were just too happy to collaborate with the Bush teams’ illegal moves against our privacy. Also, I do not believe that the top political appointees are so critical to maintaining our national security, after all it is the agencies’ analysts that provide the value in intelligence, not the political appointees.
Posted by: Steve | December 10, 2008, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Steve,
You mean the same “moves against our privacy” that Obama “promised” to filibuster when it came up in the senate and then voted for it!!!
Posted by: Sean | December 10, 2008, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
It’s great to see that President-Elect Obama is living in reality. We were viciously attacked by the Jihadists on 9/11 and continue to plot against our country. Bush made some disasterous errors early on, but eventually brought a top-notch National Security team forward. Keeping Gates was a critically important move and appointing Hillary was the best possible choice (her realism and hawkishness when necessary are valuable). Keeping McConnell and Hayden would be key – and would demonstrate to the terrorists and other international criminals that a President Obama means business. 9/11 was a tragedy and there can be no fairy tales that we can negotiate or practice a very open diplomacy with terrorist organizations.
Posted by: JoeC | December 10, 2008, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
could I have my Mea Culpa in advance please…but all this guy needs is a monocle and he could go on HOGAN HERO’S,,,,saw him on Charlie Rose ….has got the mannerism’s down pat…..
Posted by: johnXdem | December 10, 2008, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Democrats are too friggin corrupt and busy taking money to protect this country..Obamas inaugual theme:”I AM NOT A CROOK”, hats and t-shirts will be handed out later
Posted by: obusha 09 | December 10, 2008, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
I hope the Senate Dems can see beyond their noses with Obama’s decisions.
Posted by: warrottjr | December 10, 2008, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
We need to remove all of the top Bush’s intelligence and law enforcement officials of every department and agency. We just had enough of the “good-old boy system” – Corruption is prevalent at the top, it is why we see too many low level federal law enforcement officers getting arrested for corruption. However, lately we are seeing some top level intelligence officials getting convicted such as former CIA Executive Director Kyle “Dusty” Foggo who pled guilty on September 29, 2008. Leaders must lead by example.
Posted by: 4Obama | December 10, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
So where are all the usual liberal bloggers out here to rant and rave about how anyone associated with the Bush administration is just a worst possible person on the planet. Especially anyone even remotely connect to the intel community!
Come On now boys & girls….looks like your PAL is figuring it out despite your rantings & Michael Moore Conspiracy Theories!
Keep The Country Safe !!!
Posted by: Mike_C | December 10, 2008, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
These men have done nothing but find new ways to violate your rights. They are THE LEAST TRUSTWORTHY, of the Bush bozos. I hope Barack remembers his days as a professor of Constitutional Law, and join Russ Feingold in expelling all the enemies of freedom that Bush employed.
Posted by: Xrucifer | December 10, 2008, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
“You mean the same “moves against our privacy” that Obama “promised” to filibuster when it came up in the senate and then voted for it!”
I’d self-identify as a liberal and I respect Obama for that vote. He’s not into worthless gestures, he’ll hold his nose and vote for a compromise when it is the best he can get. Better to settle for a compromise than get nothing but a reputation as a maverick – who never gets anything done.
Posted by: jhw539 | December 10, 2008, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
These men have done nothing but find new ways to violate your rights. They are THE LEAST TRUSTWORTHY, of the Bush bozos. I hope Barack remembers his days as a professor of Constitutional Law, and join Russ Feingold in expelling all the enemies of freedom that Bush employed.
Give me Liberty! I will gladly risk all any any terrorists attacks and retain my rights. “Give me Liberty of Give me Death” the man said.
Posted by: Xrucifer | December 10, 2008, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
It’s sweet to see democrats admitting Bush was right.
Posted by: Jo | December 10, 2008, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
These guys have kept our country safe since 9/11. THEY MUST BE GOTTEN RID OF!!
Posted by: Jo | December 10, 2008, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
OMG, Obama is Bush Lite!
Posted by: Dude, Where's My Change? | December 10, 2008, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
It is no new thing to keep a CIA Director.
Posted by: muklukmom | December 10, 2008, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
jhw539,
I’m not exactly sure he would have been labeled a “maverick” for voting against it…he would have voted with the 28 other democrats that also voted against it. That’s not “Mavericky”
The point being he vowed to the left wing to filibuster and then went back on his pledge.
It is a good idea to retain these two heads, we have been kept safe because of there, and the presidents actions, no matter how much you disagree with them, they have worked. and I sure don’t feel like my rights have been violated any I challenge someone to post a personal experience they had(not a “I’m sure they listened to me when I called my Grandmother”) but an actual personal experience they had where there rights were violated by the NSA Surveillance program
Posted by: Sean | December 10, 2008, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
Dude, Where’s My Change?—— Isn’t this what you were told all along during the campaign??? Were you sleeping, or what?
Posted by: roscoe02 | December 10, 2008, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
Replace them and hire them for consultants during the six month transition. During that time maybe the replacements will be able to present criminal charges against Hayden.
Posted by: Kenneth Pennington | December 10, 2008, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Mike_C
I couldn’t have said it better myself…
Posted by: Sean | December 10, 2008, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Dude, Where’s My Change?
Your “CHANGE” found out what the REAL WORLD is all about. Strange what happens after all those years of doing nothing but campaigning. Now you ACTUALLY have to govern, Easy to say – Not quite so easy to DO !
Posted by: Mike_C | December 10, 2008, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Remember – INTEL is big business with deep generational ties to the Bush family. Without a clean sweep you can be sure that INTEL industry types like Cheney and Oliver North will be still hanging around.
Posted by: a.e. | December 10, 2008, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
Obama = Change
Change of address.
Government stays the same. Corrupt and wasteful.
Posted by: James | December 10, 2008, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
For crying out loud- why doesn’t Obama talk to James Bamford or at least read ‘The Shadow Factory: The Ultra-Secret NSA from 9/11 to the Eavesdropping on America’ before he even thinks of retaining Hayden & McConnell.
Posted by: a.e. | December 10, 2008, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
A.E.,
So who would you put in charge of gathering intel to keep us all safe?
For some reason you liberals are scared to death of the concept that the Bush Administration kept us ALL…you & me & everyone else in this country safe!
All you people can do is whine and rant about “WMDs” and “violating my rights & freedoms”. You don’t have to agree with Bush’s policies, but grow up enough to admit the simple truth that his adminstration kept the USA safe at a time when we all thought for sure there be more attacks.
Posted by: Mike_C | December 10, 2008, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
gee I wonder can we give cheney and these intel guys a bit of “a dunk in water” as a parting gift. :-D
Posted by: rizvisa1 | December 10, 2008, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Liberals and complaints about surveillance….worked out well for “Blago” now didn’t it??
Oh, let me guess…would you rather not knowing he was selling Obama’s not so warm Senate seat to the highest bidder?
The “spy” game has been going on since the beginning of time people. Your jumping up on some moral pedestal now is not going to change it, or the fact that Obama is going to do eactly what every single leader in the history of man has done before him.
Get off the drugs libbies….come back to the REAL WORLD!!!
Posted by: Mike_C | December 10, 2008, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
It’s a real insult to the people who do the real work to suggest that they can’t do their jobs during a change in the top management.
Posted by: GreggW | December 10, 2008, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Did Bush keep us safe, or are terrorist attacks an anomaly? I could just as easily claim that Bill Clinton kept us safe after the 1993 WTC attack and that Bush let us down in 2001, but constant conjunction is not the same as cause and effect. Germany and Italy solved their terrorist problems in the 1970′s without turning into police states. As to what freedoms we have lost under Bush, the creation of the No Fly List is being used to prevent opponents of the president’s policies from traveling outside the country, in 2004 anti-Bush protesters were arrested by Mike Bloomberg’s police so the rest of the nation would not see how New Yorkers, who bore the brunt of the 9/11 attacks, felt about him, and the State of Virginia manual on terrorism lists among many groups propery rights advocates or anyone who questions the government’s authority. Why should I fear both my government and terrorists because America’s corporate world wants unlimited control of our economy and the world’s oil and because of the power of the Israel-firsters?
Posted by: Roland | December 10, 2008, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Mike_C, that surveillance was done with a warrant. The issue is not surveillance, the issue is warrantless surveillance. Big difference. In this case the judge authorized it. In the other case uncle sam can listed to any one without any reason. Just like when some people looked into Joe the plumber records in Ohio, that was not legal because there was no reason and no warrant.
Posted by: rizvisa1 | December 10, 2008, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
Did you know that Obama once wore a Che Guevarra T-Shirt to a Harvard Pep-Rally?
Posted by: Patricio | December 10, 2008, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
Mike_C,
1. We need good INTEL. If we had good INTEL, 9/11 never would have happened. Period.
2. I am not a liberal, far from it. INTEL decisions should be made based on our National Security interest regardless of politics.
3. Please do not confuse guarding our National Security interests with illegal warrantless surveillance.
Posted by: a.e. | December 10, 2008, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Of course, if 9/11 was, in fact, an inside job, that might explain why there haven’t been any repeats–among other things, too many non-conspirators within the intel agencies are now watching. Just replacing the top guys may not work either. JFK replaced Allen Dulles with McCone, but Angleton, Meyer, Hunt, Sturgis, Crowley et al. were still in-place and “operational.”
Posted by: Conspiracy Buff | December 10, 2008, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
Bush protected us? I thought 9/11 happened on his watch. Even bin-Laden said on one of his tapes that we were attacked because of Bush’s policies. Yeah, we’ll find those WMDs in Iraq someday!!! Wake up folks, we’re more vulnerable now than ever!
Posted by: bob | December 10, 2008, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
As for me I have seen enough from “president-Pretend Obama”!
What happened to that guy that “wasn’t going to let special-interest run his administration????
Mr. president-Pretend Obama is a “great pretender” and the tool of special interest as Mr. Bush was.
Mr. Obama will not be getting my vote again in 2012
For the reference, I am a registered Independent.
Mickey Mose for President!
Anything is better than these CLOWNS getting in the WH these days…. pfffft!
Posted by: John Jones | December 10, 2008, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
What possible difference does it make what kind of t-shirt Obama wore to a pep rally? If you wear a Budweieser t-shirt, are you an alcoholic? And A.E., we had good intel. We just didn’t know what to do with it. The 2 hijackers of flight 77 that flew into the Pentagon, were known to U.S. Intelligence services by name. In fact, one of them had been living in the U.S. with an FBI informant. We have the good intel, we just have bad people running these services.They can’t seem to get past the competitive, internecine bickering that causes them to miss the wolf in the hen house. Make a clean sweep and bring in some people that can get beyond the politics.
Posted by: steve | December 10, 2008, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
i think it’s important for there to be a smooth transition and if that means keeping some of Bush’s appointments temporarily that should be understandable. but regardless, torture must stop on day one and the facility in Guantanamo Bay must be closed soon thereafter. i think the President-Elect will keep those promises once he is sworn in.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 10, 2008, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
John Jones, LOL! like you ever voted for the President-Elect!
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 10, 2008, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
President-pretend Obama,
You’re so “Wet-Behind-The-Ear” it isn’t even funny.
Hope you, Michelle & the kids aren’t getting too, too comfortable living in the White House on the vote of the “average man”!
In 2012 hope to see you packing for Chicago again Mr President! :-) What a joke!!!
But you talk a great game!
Sure you weren’t a Baptist preacher from the south Mr. Obama???!
Posted by: John Jones | December 10, 2008, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
The best and the brightest??? General Petraeus and General Odierno?? McConnell and Hayden? Uninformed people usually call other people “Great” because they do not take the time to look below the surface of a person or the issue they are involved with. The institutions that they happened to be placed in charge of can carry on without them.
Posted by: Ray | December 10, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
Patricio—did you know Che Guevara is a hero to the third-world and is associated with anti-colonialism, anti-racism? Che is even popular in academics (i know, i know this is political and bashing). IF Obama wore a Che shirt, what’s the big deal?—that he opposes global domination? that he cares for the poor? that he prefers justice over tyranny?
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 10, 2008, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
John Jones, LOL! like you ever voted for the President-Elect!
Posted by: Paul Wall | Dec 10, 2008 7:33:28 PM
——————————
I have voted consistently including congressional races since 1996
Posted by: John Jones | December 10, 2008, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
John Jones—wow, voting since 1996. if you did vote for Obama, why such a visceral hatred toward him now?
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 10, 2008, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
to muklukmom: i would give 568 names of people whose rights have been violated, but I’m afraid you would just send the gestapo (oops, I mean the fbi) over to their house and have them arrested……
It’s unbelievable to me, how low the education level has fallen in my country. For people to actually believe this isn’t happening is un-comprehensable
Posted by: Jim Edgcomb | December 10, 2008, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm
geez, can he just get sworn in. there is so much hate for Obama! from conspiracy to conspiracy with hate (and often racism) to fuel it along. absolutely unbelievable. and quite sad.
Posted by: Paul Wall | December 10, 2008, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
The redeeming thing about the liberal nutcases who believe our CIA is more of a threat to us than Al Queda is, is that they disproportionately live in the target cities.
So far, the cities targeted have been New York (WTC bombing, 9/11), Washington DC (9/11), and Los Angeles [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ahmed_Ressam]Ahmed Ressam[/url].
With any luck at all, the cities that eventually get nuked will be those who have done their best to destroy the US intelligence community.
Posted by: George Hanshaw | December 10, 2008, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
Where is all this “CHANGE” I keep hearing about?
Posted by: hUGH | December 10, 2008, 11:14 pm 11:14 pm
When is the CIA IG report (full version) going to be declassified? Or the 28 pages of the JI report which detail Saudi support for alHazmi and alMihdhar? Or the details of the July 10 urgent CIA briefing for Rice? Or the closed session testimony by the heads of the CIA and FBI Bin Laden units (Rich B. and Rod Middleton) who have never explained their conduct to the American public?
We are asked to simply trust government officials when they claim that illegal tactics are required to prevent terrorist attacks. Their justification is 9/11 yet they don’t want the public to have a full understanding of 9/11.
Look at the lead up to 9/11. Tenet’s CTC didn’t tell the FBI that alHazmi and alMihdhar were in the US for almost 20 months! Even after the Cole attack in 10/2000 and a “system blinking red” threat period in the summer of 2001, Tenet’s CTC continued to withhold the intel!
At NSA Hayden failed to get FISA warrants and/or notify the FBI so they could get the warrants in order to track al Qaeda operatives inside the US. Author James Bamford has put forth the idea that Hayden was overly sensitive to civil liberty violations. This makes no sense. The FISA court was set up to protect civil liberties.
How does such inexcusable conduct in the lead up to 9/11 translate to giving the very same officials vast illegal powers? That is absurd!
Posted by: Mike | December 11, 2008, 2:46 am 2:46 am
“How does such inexcusable conduct in the lead up to 9/11 translate to giving the very same officials vast illegal powers? That is absurd!”
Indeed. And it will be a neat trick for Obama to investigate Bush/Cheney for “war crimes” if he keeps domestic spymaster/torture aficianado Hayden as DCI, won’t it?
Posted by: visor | December 11, 2008, 7:31 am 7:31 am
“I am not a target of this investigation.”
The official slogan of the Obama 2008 transition team.
Posted by: Mayor Daley's Minions | December 11, 2008, 9:39 am 9:39 am
Our intellegence people have been unable or unwilling to proclaim that the war on terror is a holy war. Our enemy is using the word of God in the Qur’an to recruit people to fight against people who do not want God in our government decisions,(USA). With all our technology we are unable to defeat lowly warriors willing to die for the cause of God.
The solution is simple if we want God in our decision-making. Lift up the word of God in the Qur’an that says to follow the whole Bible and realize Jesus said the same thing, live by every word of God. Correction is needed on all sides and that is good. It is the indecency and immorality of our USA youth and adults that fuels the war against us. We are fighting against God and God is fighting against us.
One God has one message: follow His word and be blessed with rain in due season and peace in the land. Disobey and be cursed with terror, destruction, loss of power etc. (Leviticus 26, Deuteronomy 28) Destructions are promised UNTIL we turn to obey God’s word in the holy books that we have, or we are destroyed from off the earth, whichever comes first.
We need to embrace the wisdom of God to have peace and true prosperity and there is no evidence that Barack Obama, Robert Gates, President Bush or Michael Hayden are willing to use God’s word for our defense.
Posted by: Marie Devine | December 11, 2008, 10:37 am 10:37 am
There is that “Change” again, right? What exactly were you guys voting for/against when you voted for Obama… Cause it’s funny, I see that SAME old faces in Obama’s cabinet. “Denial is not just a river in Egypt…” “Change” a slogan you can decieve with…
Posted by: please! | December 11, 2008, 11:40 am 11:40 am