By Teddy Davis

Jan 27, 2009 3:51pm

Contraceptive Measure Dropped from Stimulus

ABC News’ Teddy Davis Reports:

House Democrats have agreed to drop family planning funds for the low-income from an $825 billion economic stimulus bill.

The contraceptive provision was dropped after President Barack Obama placed a call to Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., on Monday. Waxman is the chairman of the committee that inserted the contraception provision into the stimulus package last week.

Obama asked him to remove the measure from the bill, according to a Democratic congressional aide familiar with the call, and the decision was made by House Democrats on Tuesday to do so.   

Under the scuttled contraceptive provision, states would have been able to offer family planning services — including contraceptives — under Medicaid, the government health program for the poor, without having to obtain federal permission.

Now that the provision has been dropped, states will need to seek a federal waiver before being allowed to use Medicaid to provide family planning services and supplies to low income women.

Controversy over the contraception provision was sparked over the weekend when George Stephanopoulos asked House Speaker Nancy Pelosi about it on ABC’s "This Week."

"Hundreds of millions of dollars to expand family planning services. How is that stimulus?" asked Stephanopoulos.

"Well, the family planning services reduce cost," said Pelosi. "They reduce cost. The states are in terrible fiscal budget crises now and part of what we do for children’s health, education and some of those elements are to help the states meet their financial needs. One of those — one of the initiatives you mentioned, the contraception, will reduce costs to the states and to the federal government."

"So no apologies for that?" asked Stephanopoulos.

"No apologies," said Pelosi. "No. We have to deal with the consequences of the downturn in our economy. . . ."

Read the full transcript here.

UPDATE:

During Tuesday’s briefing with reporters, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs said that President Barack Obama approves of the contraceptive measure but conveyed to Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., by phone on Monday
that the stimulus package was not the right place for it.

"The president called Chairman Waxman yesterday and said that while he believed that the policy of increased funding for family planning was the right one, that he didn’t believe this bill was the vehicle to make that happen," said Gibbs.

ABC News’ David Chalian contributed to this report.

User Comments

At least we don’t have a rubber stamp Congress anymore.

Posted by: Reason | January 27, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

If Obama put “Paying for Abortions in Foreign country’s in the stimulus package”
Wonder what other hidden things Obama put in it.

Posted by: wolf cry | January 27, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

President Obama is ANNOYING ME beyond belief, i voted for him he does have a mandate to go out and get things done .
president Obama if you have the VOTES just go out and get the BILLS pass , who cares what person or party didn’t get involve.. time is wasting.
The GOP is playing games as usual with politics and thats expected, you look weak just following them around SIR, you have the majority start acting like it.

Posted by: mary | January 27, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

They need to send the contraceptives to Africa instead of hundreds of millions of tax dollars. When are we going to get something for our money? Bush told us to tighten our belts and at the same time gave away 100′s of billions of aid to Africa with no strings.The birth rate is 8 children per woman.
Ex Republican

Posted by: RGeier | January 27, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Has anyone brought up the automatic raise that Congress now gets?? Should they vote to rescind their increase in view of the fact that all their constituents are losing their jobs wouldn’t that save some money?? And shouldn’t this be made transparent again, congress voting on their own raises instead of it being automatic??

Posted by: Paulet | January 27, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

I still don’t understand why entitlement payments are made to people who never contributed to Social Security. That would definitely add to the bottom line PLUS send a message to play by the rules.

Posted by: Anelon | January 27, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Paulet… Has anyone brought up the automatic raise that Congress now gets??
They would never do that. And you better believe it they always throw a raise in every bill that gets put in front of them.

Posted by: animal cracker | January 27, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Anelon…. I still don’t understand why entitlement payments are made to people who never contributed to Social Security
Obama has his African Grandmother over here illegally collecting welfare and free housing and food. ANd she does not work just like Obama.

Posted by: animal cracker | January 27, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm

Mary, ever heard of a “filibuster”, just because the republicans are in the minority doesn’t mean they can’t disrupt everything. Remember, they place the country last in any decisions they make and would rather have Obama and the democrats fail, even if it takes down the US with them.

Posted by: JR | January 27, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

animal cracker, the only people that can get Social Security are people that qualify, as in having worked and paid into it for a least 40 quarters, you bonehead neo-con git.

Posted by: JR | January 27, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm

nancy pelosi thinks u can eat condoms i guess
now remove the money for acorn or no package dude

Posted by: ABC-n-the -tank-4-obama | January 27, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

ABC may as well join the ranks of big mouths like Limbaugh

Posted by: ABC-way-too-critical-of-Obama | January 27, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

JR,
Nice to know that Democrats “ALWAYS” put country first!. Just like when Barney Frank led opposition to regulating Freddie/fannie!…We all know he wqs really just looking out for the country! Thatone worked out Real Well…Didn’t it !!!

Posted by: Mike_C | January 27, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Mary,
Milions to give away condoms is stilulus alright! – Just NOT the stimulus we need right now!
Also 200 million to groom up the Nation Mall is not helping those 75,000 who lost their jobs yesterday!
I could be wrong though, Maybe thats part of the money that Robert Reich wants earmarked for everyone except while construction workers! Someone go look under a table and find Reich and ask him!

Posted by: Mike_C | January 27, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

JR.. as in having worked and paid into it for a least 40 quarters, you bonehead neo-con git.
You need to check up on Obama’s grandmother who is over here illegally not working and never worked in this country collecting welfare

Posted by: animal cracker | January 27, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

JR:”Mary, ever heard of a “filibuster”, just because the republicans are in the minority doesn’t mean they can’t disrupt everything.” — No problemo. We just use the nuclear (or new-que-ler) option and get rid of the filibuster. The white-wingers were itching to do it when they were in power and will not hesitate to do so if they have the chance again. Just get rid of it now and the he11 with what the conservocrappers want.

Posted by: Mangey1 | January 27, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

Good for Mr. Obama!!! What does a contraceptive measure have to do with the stimulus?

Posted by: Dan Kolich | January 27, 2009, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Those libs. Ya gotta love em’ They make killing babies seem like selecting what ice cream to buy.

Posted by: Ace Cool | January 27, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

“Those libs. Ya gotta love em’ They make killing babies seem like selecting what ice cream to buy.” — As opposed to the cons who love to save the fetus so they can enjoy murdering it in once it’s a living, breathing, human being. For conservatives of any religion, torture and godliness go hand in hand. Amen!

Posted by: Mangey1 | January 27, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

Well all wanted this change change change.. and what you landed up is worse then what was in there… as my forthher said I rather face the SS and Kastopo then what is being elected in now.. this is a price we all will pay because all have forgotten about self responsibility and want others to fix the mess they got into…. wealth is great but the ones that was yipping bout money where told shut up.. all the way back to 02 and those that told them to sutup are in charge..

Posted by: ed | January 27, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

No that the Dems have convinced a good majority of people that the govt will feed them their baba, what do you think the odds are that these same people will get the country moving again. I have never seen more adults act like absolute children in my life.

Posted by: Matt | January 27, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

my guess is pelosi gets contributions or money from big business or big money people,to push this bill on the stimulus. Yea, get what you can out of the citizens to benefit their greedy needs! Freaking politicians.

Posted by: Lou | January 27, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Too bad Pelosiwitch’s mom did not use contraception. Oh what a wonderful world this would be!

Posted by: PUMABOPEEU | January 27, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

The democrats have eliminated 1.2 million potential democrat voters per year since 1970. Glad to see they can’t add to their count.

Posted by: Bob | January 27, 2009, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

Mangey, Moonbats such as you are the reason this county is going to hell. Take your pro abortion President with you. torture my a$$, How about we send all the detainees to tree huggers like you. Then you can watch them. Would that be more “humane”???? Tree hugging, bed wetting Moonbat!

Posted by: Beth | January 27, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

Sounds like the dems were on the take with big rubber!!

Posted by: Steve L | January 27, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

I wish Pelosi’s parents had used birth control.

Posted by: Steve | January 27, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

I don’t get it. They are against sticking a terrorist’s head under water, but ok with sucking a babies brain out of its head as it exists the womb. Can anyone explain this to me?

Posted by: Steve | January 27, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

“Well, the family planning services reduce cost,” said Pelosi.
————————————
What a joke! Try firing the US Congress. That would reduce costs. And save poor people a great deal of money.

Posted by: John | January 27, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Pardon the error:
“as it exits the womb”.

Posted by: Steve | January 27, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

ok ok enough back and forth andtake a look at the most libral state in the country???????oh its california were pelosi is????lol lol and there sending there ppl IOU lol lol lol who gives the most to charities ???????oh that would be repulicans because dems think the gov should do it i think it was almost 70% of all donations are repubs????? i have a question the repubs made it were all bills come to the floor to be voted on and to be talked about and pollosie:) now wants it all done behind closed doors and voting not telivesed and done in the back room had a repub done that the comies would have gone crazy.we as repubs let them get in with our stupidity so its our fault and the good news is they put all the same idiots they had befor in there so just sit back and enjoy the ride and no dems if i c things get better ill give u guys credit and wont wish and hope for the worst like u guys did with every thing from iraq{u guys were wrong there too}to abortion{and she wishes now she had never went to the suprem court with that because the stacks of babies that sit in garbage bags at hospitals}i pray im wrong but after what ive seen in the first week were in big trouble.u dems do relize obama did the first lawsuite against a bank to get it deregulated so u didnt have to prove income or money down and u c what that got us where were at today.good job dems way to go and repubs we jumped on the band wagon for the money and didnt do what was right and stope it because we saw money sighns too.why cant they pass a bill with out any pork in it and why as dems or repubs let them do it whenwill we stand as americans and say no to the crap like the mofia musem,mall renovations,contraceptives, why would any body say “oh thats ok ill pay for it and we have to borrow the money from another country we dont have it sitting around.pls ppl lets pull together to stop the crimanls from stealing from us wether ur dem or repub u shouldnt want them to spend money on crap and whean bucs was in i sent many a msg saying dont do the farm bill and all the other stupid bills he let go through that wasted money u dems wanted.he was one of a few pres that let u guys have every bill u wanted go through with NO VETO???? and u guys are complaimning.lol lol lol dummies

Posted by: mikeyb | January 27, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

By all means, lets breed more and more and more. Liberals have bitching about global warming forever, and now it’s chic and the ‘in thing’ to do, but no one wants to discuss the enormous carbon footprint one person brings in their lifetime. By all means, let’s keep populating the world with unwanted pregnancies because the means and education weren’t there to sidestep them. This is not about abortion alone. This includes education, birth control and even counseling for those want to know their options. There are enough of us on this planet, regardless of race, class, income level or education.

Posted by: ctsf | January 27, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

KILL THE TAXPAYERS!
That’s what she is advocating.
Abortion and contraception is estimated to have cost this country 3 trillion dollars of revenue. More IMPORTANTLY IT IS KILLING FELLOW HUMAN BEINGS WHICH IS WRONG.

Posted by: Maureen | January 27, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

I didn’t vote for Obama. I think his action on removing this was right on, though. The concept of family planning should be debated and voted on in its own right and not tagged onto another bill! So far, I think Obama is trying to do what’s best for the country. Now, 850 Billion? I’m not sure the stimulus plan will really have much affect on years of Wall Street/Government inbred greed.

Posted by: Chesapeake | January 27, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm

JR, in case you’re still around, Social Security funds are paid to individuals who never paid any $$ into the system. Prior to the LBJ administration, it was called welfare and was paid from the general income tax fund. Pres. Johnson came up with the bright idea of calling it Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and taking it directly from Social Security funds. They pay nothing in, but it comes from the monies that working people were “forced” to pay.

Posted by: Marty | January 27, 2009, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

This article is quite misleading about the nature of the Medicaid program and family planning services. Since its inception, the Medicaid program has provided family planning services to Medicaid clients. States are required to do so. What states currently need federal permission to do is to provide Medicaid family planning services to woman who do not otherwise qualify for Medicaid health coverage, a group which includes mothers with incomes above the eligibility thresholds and childless women, who do not qualify categorically. Research has demonstrated that doing so, in fact, leads to reductions in birth rates. For that reason, it is probably good policy. Whether it constitutes economic stimulus is another matter.

Posted by: MSK, Washington, DC | January 27, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

I don’t get it. They are against sticking a terrorist’s head under water, but ok with sucking a babies brain out of its head as it exists the womb. Can anyone explain this to me?
Posted by: Steve | Jan 27, 2009 8:45:31 PM
Yes, Steve, I can explain it. They like terrorists more than they like babies.

Posted by: FuzzyWuzzy | January 27, 2009, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Is this woman totally nuts or what? Which way does she want it?
Taxpayers are already paying for low-income people to HAVE babies – as long as the father doesn’t marry the mother and live in the home.
Now she wants taxpayers to pay for contraception as well? Or is she just promoting a racist agenda in which she wants only those who are low-income and Democrat supporters to reproduce to ensure the vicious welfare, depend on government handouts forever cycle continues? She wants contraception for those who won’t be democrat supporters, the ones who are out making a living and trying to achieve the American dream.
You can’t have it both ways, Wicked Witch of the West.
Now that this has been shut down, why don’t you cut the AFDC, welfare and food stamp programs? They don’t seem to be working (obama said he’d cut programs that don’t move people up and out) so, if they’re not working after forty years, they need to be axed.
Get a grip Pelosi.

Posted by: Short Stop | January 27, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Nancy Pelosi is very funny. She represents a posh congressional district in the SF Bay Area that has one of the LOWEST children per capita rates in the nation. They prefer their chablis over having kids… I know the type. Nancy hates kids and is not pro-family.

Posted by: Republican | January 27, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

All the pork has to go. The American people don’t want it, need it, or support it. Somebody better find out how much stock Pelosi has in condom companies or in her lobbyists to find out her true colors. The American people know where to find condoms and don’t need $200 million of them in a simulus pkg. Something VERY wrong here. Again, the American people are FED UP WITH THIS! WITH YOU, THE GOVERNMENT! When WE THE PEOPLE have no $ for food, shelter or clothing, not to mention medical, college for our children, or retirement, there is SOMETHING VERY WRONG with our government. We see what you are trying to do and WE DON’T LIKE IT. You might be fine for another 2-3 years, but WE THE PEOPLE ARE FED UP. BELIEVE IT!!!!!

Posted by: findingitinsane | January 27, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm

America is finished under this administration, Comrades.

Posted by: Vink | January 27, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Democrats don’t want people to have any more babies, because congress doesn’t want to put any money to support them? Did I hear her right?
Well, its a good thing Pelosi and Obama deny their socialist tendencies, because that sounds to much like China to be true!
What is next, a mandate on how many children we can have? Good bye democracy, it was nice meeting you!

Posted by: Ixt | January 27, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

MY GOOD FRIEND BILL O’REILLY SHOULD BE THANKED FOR THIS. HIS SHOW REACHES MUCH MORE AUDIENCE THAN DUMB-ASS STEPHONOPOLOUS’ SHOW. THANKS BILL! -NANCY P.

Posted by: Nancy Pelosi | January 27, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

Hey Pelosi – want to help? How about starting by stopping the 1.5 million H1B work visas. How about repealing the new H1C work visas importing nurses.
All the politicans that are supposed to represent us are selling us out. Just look at Zoe Lofgren (D-Ca) and the increase in technincal and now nursing visas that they hand out. Restoring over 2 million tech jobs and closing the door on the new “carze”, importing nurses, would be a start to stimulating our economy.

Posted by: throwthepoliticiansout | January 27, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

When Obama gets his Comprehensive Immigration Reform it will immediately add 7 to 20 million new SS recipients.

Posted by: Dale | January 27, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

When Obama gets his Comprehensive Immigration Reform it will immediately add 7 to 20 million new SS recipients.

Posted by: Dale | January 27, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

This gov’t is out of control. It cares not what the country wants, the citizens. It’s become a corporation or two, run by heady folks who have paved their way with auto raises and indifference to the PEOPLE.
One of the FIRST things WE THE PEOPLE need to do is shut down their auto raises. If the President can make a directive to change previous Presidential edits, then maybe he can make one to SHUT DOWN THESE RAISES.
It’s a pathetic situation when HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF AMERICAN CITIZENS ARE LOSING THEIR JOBS, HOMES, RETIREMENT AND DIGNITY, yet the gov’t in charge KEEP LIVING THEIR LUXURIOUS LIFESTYLES AND GET THEIR AUTO RAISES BECAUSE OF THE WAY THEY SET IT UP.
What can I do to help???

Posted by: findingitinsane | January 27, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

It’s so funny that Obama already has a failure at the hands of his own party and the republicans get blamed for it.
So what do the dems do? go after rush limbaugh.
What a joke.

Posted by: Pistol Pete | January 27, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

It’s a shame that Nancy’s parents were not using “birth control” when she was conceived. This woman is an embarrassment, and is certainly not fit to lead the Congress. I CAN NOT WAIT FOR THE MID TERM ELECTIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: outofworkrose | January 27, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

In the end contraception has NOTHING to do with a stimulus plan. More politics as usual.
Can’t the liberal agenda wait just a few months until after work is done to save the country?
Clinton’s first move as president was gays in the military. Democrats see social engineering as more important than anything else. I think I have cast my last vote for a democrat. This time I have learned my lesson.

Posted by: Shane | January 27, 2009, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Pelosi is a joke, BHO walking the halls of Congress, Calling Dems in California to remove contraceptives from bill. It all sounds like a setup to make BHO look like he is a Bipartisan hero. Just wait for the final act we haven’t seen nothing yet!!!!!!

Posted by: dotherightthing | January 27, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm

Pelosi is doing what any good puppet does…what her puppetmasters tell her to do.
How does contraception help state budgets Nancy? Explain that one in detailed specifics. Can’t do it? Won’t do it because the truth will not be acceptable to the voters/taxpayers?

Posted by: Jimbo | January 27, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

Kill future constituents to save money? You’re such a good Catholic, Bela Pelosi. If the Church had any moral authority left, you, Biden and all the Kennedys would be excommunicated.

Posted by: bitterclinger | January 27, 2009, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Kill future constituents to save money? You’re such a good Catholic, Bela Pelosi. If the Church had any moral authority left, you, Biden and all the Kennedys would be excommunicated.

Posted by: bitterclinger | January 27, 2009, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm

Lets see the rational of her argument; if we don’t have as many children they wont have to spend all that money brainwashing them in schools to be good Liberals, all they have to do is open our Mexican border and they have made to order voters.Isn’t this a brilliant non-partisan politician ?

Posted by: sonofsammie | January 27, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

Actually reducing unwanted pregnancies especially by unwed mothers is an excellent common sense way to reduce costs to the taxpayer. I’m all for it.

Posted by: Dave | January 27, 2009, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Each time Nancy Pelosi speaks, the accumulated total of humanities’ collective knowledge, decrements.

Posted by: Mr. Tom | January 27, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

I would just like to mention that, as a conservative, I do not hope Mr. Obama fails. I do, however, hope that his socialist agenda fails. Allowing the kinds of programs that he and the left has proposed would ruin life in America as we know it. Despite the woes we are currently going through, America is still the best country in the world. I know, because I’ve been and worked in more than 40 of them.
Warm regards to all.
Bob

Posted by: Bob | January 27, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

Funny how the article never uses the word abortion. I guess queen Nancy wants all those funds used on contraception and education. Being a mother and grand mother she understands the value of human life.

Posted by: charlie miles | January 27, 2009, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm

Can someone please ABORT Nancy? Send her home. She has to be the crazyest speaker of the house in history. George Steph. was imbarrased I’m sure to be a democrat sitting there listing to Nancy defend how planned parenthood should be in the stimulas package. Nancy is a lost cause.

Posted by: Ronald | January 27, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

If the contraception bill is so great and is needed so much, why not bring it up as a stand-alone bill and let it pass or fail on its own merits instead of sneaking it into the back end of a stimulus bill that really may be needed (which is another whole debate)?

Posted by: Matt | January 27, 2009, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm

Its about time the chicken sh!! repubs found some spine. Now go out and kick some democrap a!! ABC News Stick your spam filter in your A!!

Posted by: Mark | January 27, 2009, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm

Thank you Matt Drudge for doing this. Without his frontpage exposure on the Drudge Report this would’ve never been removed from the bill.

Posted by: nc | January 27, 2009, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

I wonder how Ms. Pelosi’s parents feel about abortion. Things would be much different if they had aborted her. How does Nancy feel about their choice? She is a lucky one, she has been born. It’s interesting, everyone who is for abortion has already been born. The dead can’t speak.

Posted by: George | January 27, 2009, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm

She no doubt thinks that her perfect, clipped diction will hide the fact that she does NOT face up to the content and substance of the questions she is being asked.
Don’t forget that Obama also lifted the ban on funding organizations that offer non-theraputic abortions and advertise for abortion. So what is that? Keeping everybody happy, I guess; but that’s business as usual nicht var? So Bush is out, “change” is in. When is Obama out?

Posted by: redbandana | January 27, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

“Family planning” what for ? This is NO time for people to make or have babies !!!!!!!!!!!!! The only money that should be given to “family planning” is for reduced birth control pill prescriptions for ALL WOMEN ! Wake up people ! we dont need any more babies in this country ! ENOUGH ALREADY !

Posted by: whateverfor | January 27, 2009, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

The Left’s Culture of Death and its Values – “OK”
- Family Planning = Abortion = (killing the unborn)– OK.
- Infanticide (killing living children who have survived late term abortions).– OK
- Saving baby seals – OK
- Saving baby humans – Not OK
- Against protecting life by killing people who have taken a life by murder. – No death penalty – OK
- Against protecting life by giving rights to battlefield terrorists who have killed people – OK
- Bill Clinton doing nothing about the genocide in Rwanda – OK
- No world wide protests against the genocide in Rwanda – OK
- Protesting the killing of Jewish children by Palestinian terrorists – not OK
- Protesting the deaths of Palestinian children as a tragic consequence of war. – OK
- Protesting the Palestinian children being used as human shields – not OK
- Massive protests when Palestinian terrorists are killed because of their acts of terrorism. – OK
- No protests when Palestinian terrorists fire 6500 rockets into Israel – OK
- Terrorists killing Jews – OK
- Jews killing terrorists in self defense – not OK
- Protecting the lives of American’s by allow them to protect themselves from death and danger with firearms – not OK
- Intervening in Sudan to save millions of Christians – not OK
- Intervening in Bosnia to save thousands of Muslims – OK
- Giving rights to terrorists in Gitmo – OK
- Giving rights to unborn children – not OK
- Allowing Al Qaeda to blow up 2 American Embassies and a ship with no response – OK
- Bush not allowing Al Qaeda to blow up any more American’s in America – Not OK
- More Planned Parenthood abortion places in black neighborhoods than anywhere else – OK
- Eugenics by Planned Parenthood – OK
Single Women with children – OK
Programs to encourage Fathers to be faithful and raise their own children – not OK
Obama – kills thousands of children per day with an executive order funding international abortions during Sanctity of Human Life Week. – OK

Posted by: Gary James | January 27, 2009, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm

Well you say you want a revolution ?
count me in!

Posted by: dave | January 27, 2009, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm

The best birth control of all – look at a picture of Pelosi, or listen to the beast speak. No sex after that.

Posted by: Darrel | January 27, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Mandated vasectomies and cut the tubes of all members of congress. THAT is public funded birth control I could support.

Posted by: Darrel | January 27, 2009, 11:02 pm 11:02 pm

Both Majority Leader Senator Harry Reid (appointment of Roland Burris by Gov. Blagojevich), and now House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (big rubbers in bad bill) have both suffered public setbacks in the past couple of weeks. President Obama has without question gained even more power in D.C., just by letting the other leaders flounder.

Posted by: Larry from Tampa | January 27, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

JR, are you crazy! There are millions that are getting OUR Social Security money without putting a dime in the fund. Check the facts.

Posted by: Nobama | January 27, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm

Do enjoy this bander on Nancy Pelosi & the liberal Dems; unfortunetly she represents another world, SF, a privledged, liberal enclave. She does not understand the world and wants to remake it in her vision. Be prepared for the ride. We elected them and now are going to get their vision good and hard.

Posted by: john135 | January 27, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Too bad Nancy Pelosi’s parents didn’t use birth control. She is an unadulterated idiot!

Posted by: Des | January 27, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

Hey Nancy,
Stay out of my Uterus!

Posted by: Kim | January 27, 2009, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm

Where are you Dorothy and Toto? The wicked witch of the west has been reincarnated and needs a house dropped on her! Oh yea, drop one on that sleazy Harry Reid too!

Posted by: gunsforhire | January 27, 2009, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm

As much as I don’t care for Nancy Pelosi’s policies, we cannot wish she wasn’t born. The contraception stimulis is rediculous. I fear for our great country; our forefathers would never approve of what is going on here. President Lincoln would never approve of the killing of the unborn. We need prayers for our leaders to change.

Posted by: Pat | January 27, 2009, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

The Republicans and Democrats are still pushing issues that ensure we are going to have a Depression to rival the Great Depression.
Private Capital spending ( construction ) is in a death spiral.
Now Obama is refusing to give the states money to fund state capital projects that have already been through a multi-year environmental and regulatory review process.
Instead he wants to go through 18 months to 3 years of review on new, different, construction projects.
States are required to balance their budgets and all construction projects at the state level that would have started this year are going to get cut.
This is not a stimulus package it is a Great Depression package. We can not afford a 18 month to 3 year delay in starting state construction projects. State construction spending is going to go from hundreds of billions per year to zero because of Obama.
And Republicans are arguing about a hundred million of grass planting and contraceptive purchases and cutting government spending.
A plague on all politicians. They are making the same mistakes Hoover and Roosevelt made in the first seven years of the Great Depression. Too little money and not enough stimulus to the private sector.

Posted by: Reality Check | January 27, 2009, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Too bad we cant start the contraceptive program retroactive with Nancy P

Posted by: Screamindemon | January 27, 2009, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

Why birth control to control spending? How about tossing millions of illegals out of our country who are sucking us dry??? Just that alone would save states millions.

Posted by: dgleon | January 27, 2009, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm

If you are a state employee working as a teacher or giving out welfare, subsidized medical care or other government money to former middle class families who are going to lose their jobs over the next 18 months – you will really, really like this bill – because you will still have a job a year from now.
If you are one of those working men and women who need stimulative state construction spending THIS YEAR to keep YOUR job – you are going to get screwed big time – along with our economy which will continue the death spiral caused by rapidly growing unemployment – both are being screwed big time by Obama.
If you are a small business in the construction industry – start reading up on the bankruptcy laws – by the time Obama’s politically correct environmental folks get around to approving ANY construction projects your business will be a long gone bad dream

Posted by: Reality Check | January 27, 2009, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm

Interesting Statistics
Professor Joseph Olson of Hemline University School of Law, St. Paul,
Minnesota, points out some interesting facts concerning the Presidential
election.
Number of States won by:
Democrats: 19
Republicans: 29
Square miles of land won by:
Democrats: 580,000
Republicans: 2,427,000
Population of counties won by:
Democrats: 127 million
Republicans: 143 million
Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won by:
Democrats: 13.2
Republicans: 2.1
Professor Olson adds: “In aggregate, the map of the territory Republican won
by Republicans was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the
country. Democrat territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in
government-owned tenements and living off various forms of government
welfare.
Professor Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the
complacency and apathy” phase of Professor Tyler’s definition of democracy,with some forty percent of the nation’s population already having reachedthe “governmental dependency” phase.
If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million illegals and they vote, then we can say goodbye to the USA in fewer than five years.

Posted by: coffeelover | January 27, 2009, 11:52 pm 11:52 pm

I’m sorry that Nancy Pelosi lost her “rubbers for recession” funding. But giving contraceptives to poor women is not going to lift the country out of recession. Cutting taxes for all those poor working stiffs who pay taxes will end the recession and get the country back on track. I’d like to ask all of you a question: “Are you better off now than you were four years ago?” Just answer it truthfully and save the Democrat spin for those who need to hear it.

Posted by: Patrick C. | January 27, 2009, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

Pelosi’s parents should have been using condoms.

Posted by: diane | January 28, 2009, 12:02 am 12:02 am

the thought of Nancy Pelosi having sex is what scares me. her, Harry Reid and Barney Frank, who of course would be with the lisping Senator from Oregon.
there’s a movie in there.. a horror movie.

Posted by: Matt- Illinois | January 28, 2009, 12:04 am 12:04 am

There is some good news though.
If you are one of those TENS OF MILLIONS who loose their job over the next 18 months, there will be plenty of government workers to “give” you small government voucher for medical insurance that you cannot even take advantage of because you have no money for the co-pays.
And by the time you get a low paying job the taxes on owning a car – let alone driving it – will be thousands a year to fight global warming. Cut the economy by seventy percent, Cut driving by seventy percent, Cut wages by seventy percent, then we will have change, a drastic reduction in energy use and evil humans will be punished for exhaling carbon dioxide. Good News: Obama can claim he kept his campaign promises.

Posted by: Reality Check | January 28, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am

This is in response to Whateverfor’s states: Wake up people ! we dont need any more babies in this country ! ENOUGH ALREADY !
What an idiot! You better be glad there are American people out there having babies, because they are your future workers and the ones who will be paying for your social security benefits. We don’t want to be like Europe which will have 100 million less people in fifty years because of their contracepting and abortion policies are taking them to extinction!
The more babies the better! I’d wish the educated and folks with money would have more children — their in the position to make a difference in their children and their community. But no, selfishness gets in the way–having a McMansion or taking a wasteful vacation (instead of giving life to another beautiful child) is all these self centered people can do. They say they care, but all they care about is what resource they will next indulge themselves in, forget about self-sacrifice for another –especially their children that they readily abort, and to relieve their guilt they encourge others to jump on their bloody bandwagon in the name of population control. Hypocrites!

Posted by: Family of 14 | January 28, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

wolf cry does not understand Obama courting Republicans, he complains:
“President Obama is ANNOYING ME beyond belief, i voted for him he does have a mandate to go out and get things done .
president Obama if you have the VOTES just go out and get the BILLS pass , who cares what person or party didn’t get involve.. time is wasting.
The GOP is playing games as usual with politics and thats expected, you look weak just following them around SIR, you have the majority start acting like it.”
Why does Obama not trust Democrats???
If Obama must rely on just Democrats each state delegation will have the power to affect how the bill comes out.
Obama’s plan shifts control of construction projects from the states to his employees in Washington DC. Without the Republicans several states working together could force Obama to leave most of this power with the states.
A broad coalition of Republicans and Democrats reaching broad compromise with Obama dilute the power of all states to block a power grab by Obama.

Posted by: Reality Check | January 28, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

Pelosi still wins the Trojan-Enz “Boner-of-the-Year” award (or bonehead in her case).

Posted by: The Unquiet American | January 28, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

I saw a funny cartoon yesterday.
It had 2 newspaper covers.
One said “Bush wins with 51% of the vote, country divided.”
The second said, “Oboma wins with 52% of the vote, country united”.
oboma doesn’t have a mandate…..he recieved more votes against him and his liberal wacko plans then any presidential candidate in the history of the USA.
If a women doesn’t want a baby….her choice is abstinence. Now she wants yet another choice and that is to kill an innocent baby??!! What is wrong with the USA!

Posted by: tommy g | January 28, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am

Nations which follow negative economic growth policies – or negative population growth policies – for Global Warming reasons – for Religious reasons – for Politically Correct reasons, or for whatever reason.
End up being taken over by emigrants, or invaders, who do not believe in such “Negative” policies.
That is not an opinion, that is the story told by all recorded histories of this world.

Posted by: Reality Check | January 28, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am

Too bad MORE liberal mothers don’t practice MORE birth control. Less liberals being born would “reduce” cost all right, by having less STUPID people in this country to educate, and less liberals destroying it. Honestly, you liberals should be truer to your principles and abort ALL of your children.

Posted by: Lizzie | January 28, 2009, 12:31 am 12:31 am

A Chinese Curse: “May you live in interesting times.”
We are all going to live in interesting times for the next three years.
The question is will we make the same mistakes both a Republican and a Democrat did in the 1930s and extend those “interesting times” out for 12 years???
If Obama reaches passes this bill the answer will be yes.

Posted by: Reality Check | January 28, 2009, 12:34 am 12:34 am

JR says “the only people that can get Social Security are people that qualify, as in having worked and paid into it for a least 40 quarters, you bonehead neo-con git”. It’s obvious you’re another Libetard whose only working part on there body is your mouth. SS is used for numerous things besides retirement nimrod. My mother died at a very young age, didn’t work 40 years, and myself and 3 siblings received SS until we were 18 or if we went to college 21. Didn’t your parents tell you to keep your mouth shut when adults are having a conversation?

Posted by: Randy | January 28, 2009, 12:39 am 12:39 am

is it too late to abort Nancy Pelosi? Funny how Congress has approval ratings in the toilet, yet, people keep re-electing them and talking about how stupid Bush is. No, you libs and republicans as well, who keep voting for these useless retards are stupid. And now we are stuck with the Chosen One for 4 years who couldn’t tell his ass from a hole in the wall. Good job Americans! geez!!

Posted by: realist | January 28, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am

YES, I SURE OF IT. THIS COUNTRY IS BEING LED BY A BUNCH OF MORONIC IDIOTS. IT’S FRIGGIN SCARY KNOWING THAT THESE DUMBASSES ARE IN WASHINGTON. NO WONDER THIS COUNTRY IS SINKING INTO A DEPRESSION.

Posted by: STEVE | January 28, 2009, 12:51 am 12:51 am

Ever notice that the only people for abortion weren’t aborted?
There just might be a revolution in this country if the Democrats pass legislation that will force government pay for abortions. Let the abortion lovers pay for their own murders.

Posted by: MadJayhawk | January 28, 2009, 1:01 am 1:01 am

There is some good news though.
If you are one of those TENS OF MILLIONS who loose their job over the next 18 months, there will be plenty of government workers to “give” you a small government voucher for medical insurance that you cannot even take advantage of because you have no money for the co-pays.
And by the time you get a low paying job the taxes on owning a car – let alone driving it – will be thousands a year to fight global warming. Cut the economy by seventy percent, Cut driving by seventy percent, Cut wages by seventy percent, then we will have change, a drastic reduction in energy use and evil humans will be punished for exhaling carbon dioxide. Good News: Obama can claim he kept his campaign promises.

Posted by: Reality Check | January 28, 2009, 1:09 am 1:09 am

We had 4% unemployment. We now have 7% unemployment. Go look up and see what the unemployment rate was during the Great Depression. It wasn’t even close to 7%. And people act like we are in another Great Depression. “People are hurting” we hear over and over again. 93% of the work force is employed, paying their bills, and buying stuff. Wal-mart parking lots are still full. Gasoline costs have been cut in half. House prices have plummeted and are affordable again. Things will turn around. They always do. We do not need a bunch of government programs that will bankrupt us. The Democrats are just paying off all their supporters and lining the pockets of their contributors. Payback time!!!!! This is the biggest robbery of all time. The sad thing is that most intelligent Democrats know it and are just going to sit back and let it happen. We won’t forget it and blaming Bush for one more thing won’t help you at all in the future. It is your monkey and it is on your back now.

Posted by: MadJayhawk | January 28, 2009, 1:10 am 1:10 am

so how does funding “family planning” (abortions) in foreign nations stimulate our economy? the stimulus plan = congressional program wish list

Posted by: eric in NJ | January 28, 2009, 1:12 am 1:12 am

Just wanted to say Gary James is right one

Posted by: seu jorge | January 28, 2009, 1:23 am 1:23 am

Just wanted to say Gary James is right one

Posted by: seu jorge | January 28, 2009, 1:23 am 1:23 am

right on, that is

Posted by: seu jorge | January 28, 2009, 1:23 am 1:23 am

We need term limits in all Government offices.
A stop to Lobbyist.
The end of the Party System of Government.
Stop pointing fingers at one side or another and take back OUR country.
Dark days are comming indeed, but most of America will just “blog” about it and take no real action.

Posted by: Shade O'Grey | January 28, 2009, 1:27 am 1:27 am

Nancy should abort her kids and then kill her self. We don’t need any more freaks like her in this world.

Posted by: Mack | January 28, 2009, 1:28 am 1:28 am

Yes, we need hundreds of millions of dollars for contraceptives because many Americans are too poor to go to 7-11 and pick up a pack of condoms.

Posted by: Michael in Long Island, NY | January 28, 2009, 1:32 am 1:32 am

Nancy, you are a bad seed…go away!

Posted by: Hector | January 28, 2009, 1:36 am 1:36 am

As far as Pelosi is concern…where is Lee Harvey when we need him.

Posted by: bill granberry | January 28, 2009, 1:48 am 1:48 am

How dare ABC ask tough questions to a liberal!!!

Posted by: Bob | January 28, 2009, 1:48 am 1:48 am

I think your statement “More bang for the buck” when talking about using MY money to support spending for contraceptives Ms. Pelosi(even if it might have been a fraudian) was very insensitive and ridiculous! I wish your parents had used protection…what a drain to society and even a major dissappointment you’ve been, Ms. Pelosi!

Posted by: Makinda | January 28, 2009, 2:00 am 2:00 am

Nancy Pelosi is unethical.
Read following:
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA): House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who promised a new era of ethics enforcement in the House of Representatives, snuck a $25 million gift to her husband, Paul Pelosi, in a $15 billion Water Resources Development Act recently passed by Congress. The pet project involved renovating ports in Speaker Pelosi’s home base of San Francisco. Pelosi just happens to own apartment buildings near the areas targeted for improvement, and will almost certainly experience a significant boost in property value as a result of Pelosi’s earmark. Earlier in the year, Pelosi found herself in hot water for demanding access to a luxury Air Force jet to ferry the Speaker and her entourage back and forth from San Francisco non-stop, in unprecedented request which was wisely rejected by the Pentagon. And under Pelosi’s leadership, the House ethics process remains essentially shut down – which protects members in both parties from accountability.

Posted by: Sally | January 28, 2009, 2:06 am 2:06 am

This is not the way to begin a presidency. To push, push, push, and then say “I really want bipartisan support”. And also, “I will eliminate all pork…”
Well Barack, it’s evident you’d rather be a kiss-ass president than a kick-ass president. You call that leadership? I suppose it’s good enough for liberals but you sincerely lost me.

Posted by: picomanning | January 28, 2009, 2:21 am 2:21 am

Let’s just kill poor people. Take em all off the dole!

Posted by: picomanning | January 28, 2009, 2:27 am 2:27 am

Real Americans are screwed with corrupt hussein obama

Posted by: Jack Kennedy | January 28, 2009, 2:43 am 2:43 am

you people are just so fcuking dumb. you talk about liberals and conservatives when it doesnt make a difference, if you read what the constitution was about you would know that it was LIBERAL to start with you dumb fcuks. THE GOVERNMENT works for the people, yet we have some idiot neocons that think the government should be able to whatever it wants, and dont care what happens to them, as long as Liberals aren’t happy. It reminds me of the people of Afghanistan, they dont want to move forward in life, just like people in the South, ignorant, like their guns, and hicks. But at least the local Afghan population has some better hospitality. -7TH Group 1st Battalion Alpha Company SFC T.

Posted by: SFC T. | January 28, 2009, 3:02 am 3:02 am

The money for contraceptives will show up again somewhere else, just like the $4.19 million for ACORN is showing up here again. ACORN funding originally was in the TARP bill, then taken out when the Dems were publically embarassed by it. Now they are not embarassed as ACORN’s fraud helped them win. Of course, so did ABC’s biased reporting.

Posted by: JoeCollins | January 28, 2009, 3:15 am 3:15 am

** meant to type $4.19 Billion. That is Billion with a B for Acorn.

Posted by: Joe Collins | January 28, 2009, 3:15 am 3:15 am

There is a problem here. Abortions happen because of lack of family planning. If you are pro-life, you really have to be pro-family planning. Or you are just mindlessly repeating a slogan.
I hope the Dems reintroduce this measure as a separate bill so that we can have a straight up or down vote and see who really is pro-life.

Posted by: MMM | January 28, 2009, 3:29 am 3:29 am

It’s sad to me, that this country has so much and we are pissing it away by giving it to other countries. Take care of your own first. Nancy Pelosi will sepnd us to death along with every other politician. American you were duped again.

Posted by: Lorie | January 28, 2009, 3:34 am 3:34 am

So now the government is not paying for abortions with money it doesn’t have.

Posted by: Rick O'Shea | January 28, 2009, 4:50 am 4:50 am

nancy pelosi god bless her… bless her heart… speaker of the house… a total failure…

Posted by: knowoneuno | January 28, 2009, 5:17 am 5:17 am

Maybe Social Security wouldn’t be going broke if we hadn’t murdered millions of babies since 1973. Had they been allowed to live, they could have contributed to Social Security and made sure it remained stable. But now we have less and less people and Social Security is in trouble. Evidently Nancy Pelosi is unable to connect the dots and thinks that killing even more babies is the answer. Why do we keep electing these stupid people?

Posted by: Jennie | January 28, 2009, 5:20 am 5:20 am

If you want to know what a complete and comprehensive stimulus bill looks like…check out Governor Palin’s energy plan which includes green jobs, infrastruture, etc. Sarah is on the move in the right direction. Too bad that nationally we’re back to the same ole’, same ole’. Obama just wanted to change the $ flow to all of his constituents.

Posted by: Justice for all | January 28, 2009, 5:21 am 5:21 am

I totally disagree with the condoning and support of infanticide in other countries on our dime unless there’s no chance at the infant’s survival and there’s a chance the mother could die as a result of a difficult pregnancy. But since Obama campaigned on the fact that he supports it himself, it really doesn’t surprise me at all. I really wouldn’t have been offended me if they left the contraception issue on the bill for poor folks. The last thing this country needs right now is a bunch of ghetto and trailer court hos to be with out birth control, free or not. All they do is exhaust welfare programs since they are too lazy to get jobs, regardless of how menial the task is. Besides, we won’t have to worry about the welfare system here going bankrupt with these examples. When Obama opens the border flood gates with his amnesty, we’ll be in deeper sh*it economically than we are now. Good thing is, Obama won’t have anyone to blame but his own ignorant self and his democratic ilk. Last but not least, there are some admireable intelligent folks commenting here with buyer’s remorse as far as their vote for Obama. All I can say is ha-ha, told you so!

Posted by: Machod | January 28, 2009, 5:39 am 5:39 am

One of the dumbest ideas I have ever heard of? And which economist is telling you food stamps helps more than tax cuts? Cleary that economist needs math lessons.

Posted by: Myro | January 28, 2009, 6:14 am 6:14 am

President Obama is keeping with his part to reach out in bi-partisan effort…like the President I too approve of the contraceptive measure as anyone with foresight would.
But it is a thing in which he can afford to compromise on, especially right now.
If the Republicans are going to throw a tantrum over it, let them have it.

Posted by: braith morgan | January 28, 2009, 6:27 am 6:27 am

Pelosi, if you REALLY want fewer babies being born, the first thing you should do is close the ANCHOR BABY provisions so that illegals have one less incentive to break into our country.
That’s where you could save mega millions – we’re providing free services to illegals who have no business being here. Check out Texas and California and their medical costs that are DICTATED by bone-headed rulings by federal judges – mostly your democrat judges, Pelosi. Paying for the costs of illegals and their dependents is bankrupting states and blowing their budgets.
If you’re really serious about costs, go after the illegals who’re costing us more than anyone.
Rescind the Anchor Baby legislation and illegals have one more reason to stay on their side of the border.

Posted by: midge | January 28, 2009, 6:30 am 6:30 am

Why are the democrats so eager to kill innocent babies and coddle genocidal terrorists?

Posted by: tttr88 | January 28, 2009, 6:45 am 6:45 am

This bill is nothing but pork, pure unadulterated pork. It is full of political paybacks for the ‘election’ of King BO. Pelosi is a rubber stamp for anything that BO wants, so is Reed. I know what the theme for the 2000 elections will be…’Take back America’.

Posted by: Pedro_64 | January 28, 2009, 7:05 am 7:05 am

This lady is a total idiot have no idea how they selected her for the speaker position what a moran when she talks she get,s entangled in a web of nonsence .You coulod tell she has no idea what the fk shes talking about.

Posted by: Edwin | January 28, 2009, 7:13 am 7:13 am

OK – that is one thing out of this bill – now they need to get rid of everything else that does not DIRECTLY stimulate jobs. For example, as much as I want to see more money for student loans, this bill is not the place for it. This bill should ONLY be for creating & preserving jobs…PERIOD. Everything else needs to be brought separately in individual bills so they can be voted on a case-by-case basis.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 28, 2009, 7:16 am 7:16 am

I wish Nancy’s parents had practiced birth control, or aborted her.

Posted by: Darrel | January 28, 2009, 7:49 am 7:49 am

Stimulus Payment Info. “This year, taxpayers will receive an EconomicStimulus Payment. This is a very exciting new program thatI will explain using the Q and A format:
Q. What is an Economic Stimulus Payment?
A. It is money that the federal government will send to taxpayers.
Q. Where will the government get this money?
A. From taxpayers.
Q. So the government is givingme back my own money?
A. Only a smidgen.
Q. What is the purpose of this payment?
A. The plan is that you will use the money to purchase a high-definition TV set, thus stimulating the economy.
Q. But isn’t that stimulating the economy of China?
A. Shut up.
Below is some helpful advice on how to best help the US economy by spending your stimulus check wisely:
If you spend that money at Wal-Mart, all the money will go to China.
If you spend it on gasoline it will go to the Arabs.
If you purchase a computer it will go to India.
If you purchase fruit and vegetables it will go to Mexico, Honduras, Chile, and Guatemala (unless you buy organic).
If you buy a car, it will go to Japan.
If you purchase useless crap, it will go to Taiwan.
And none of it will help the American economy. We need to keep that money here in America. You can keep the money in America by spending it at yard sales, going to a baseball game, or spend it on prostitutes, beer and wine(domestic ONLY), or tattoos, since those are the only businesses still in the US.

Posted by: Zoom | January 28, 2009, 8:15 am 8:15 am

Anything Pelosi wants is a bad idea.

Posted by: robert | January 28, 2009, 8:19 am 8:19 am

This country would be so much better off had Pelosi’s parents used a condom. Regardless of your party affiliation, this woman is a raving lunatic. We can talk about “Dirty” Harry Reid next time.

Posted by: Gizfob | January 28, 2009, 8:23 am 8:23 am

Again we never address the problem! Let’s educate rather than fix the problem after the fact. Or, how about making adoption easier in American and less costly. We live in America and should still have rights. You want us to have the right to choose abortion, but what about the right not to choose abortion?

Posted by: sunshine | January 28, 2009, 8:26 am 8:26 am

As mentioned already, there are many reasons Pelosi looks foolish for her ridiculous comments. I’m ashamed she has a vowel at the end of her name. We of Italian heritage don’t support someone only because they are from similar heritage. If they are fools, we admit it and vote for someone else…..even if they are waspish and their family did something evil hundreds of years ago.

Posted by: goombah | January 28, 2009, 8:35 am 8:35 am

Every defeat for Polosi is a victory for America!

Posted by: ALL-AMERICAN | January 28, 2009, 8:47 am 8:47 am

In my view the Democratic Party is the party of Baby Killers. Over 40 million abortions have been performed in this country alone since 1973 when Roe V Wade came along.
Ponder this “RAT” Party members.
You can put lipstick on a pig but it is still a pig!
In this case, you can dress up the murder of 40 million babies in the name of Family Planning but your party is the party of mass infanticide.

Posted by: Steve P | January 28, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am

Step back and look at the big picture. The liberal Democrats welcome into our country, neighborhoods, and service facilities all the illegal immigrants they can. They can’t wait to drain public budgets for the care and support of non-Americans. They now have suggested we step up the slaughter of real Americans for the sake of saving money from those same budgets. The liberal Democrats are either incredibly stupid, or dangerously un-American.

Posted by: Arthur | January 28, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am

Let Congress give back their pay raises, remove their perks, Pelosi should sell her personal jet (“personal” though the taxpayers pay for it) and end all the limos and expense accounts for their fancy restaurants. She has to be absolutely the stupidest person alive, next to Harry Reid of course.

Posted by: Ziggy | January 28, 2009, 9:31 am 9:31 am

I have to laugh at all of these fools who voted for Obama and are now regretting it!
It reminds me of that Toyota commercial from several years ago…YOU asked for it, YOU got it!

Posted by: Ghost Rider | January 28, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Stop The Stimulus Bill:

They are debating the “stimulus” package in the house today. (R) Michelle Bachmann was on Glenn Beck last night literally Begging for our help. Lets show Obama that this bill is going to have to change completely. Taking out contraceptives…

Posted by: Conservative Cadre | January 28, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Wow, it’s scary how some of these people think. Federal money for contraceptives during a recession, how ignorant. These people don’t understand money

Posted by: MDOC | January 28, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Next, they should cut the Walfare program or at the very lest, modify the qualifications for those who apply.
For instance, anyone who have more than one child will not qualify for pubic assistance. I guarantee you, that the baby making machines will stop making babies. Second, modify the program so that a parent can only stay on the program not longer than five years. Third, give the parent one year to find a job, if not, the program will end.
Finally, modify the program to include a age cut off, such as twenty-one. If you are twenty-one and older you cannot qualify for the Welfare program. I guarantee you, that this country will save billions of dollar if they would just implement stricker qualifications.
Is that asking too much.

Posted by: Correct247 | January 28, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Who needs contraception? Just looking at Nancy Pelosi’s face can cause abortions.

Posted by: Fromunda | January 28, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am

EVERY SINGLE one of you losers that voted for this Ungodly, country-trashing circus monkey is/are among the ultimate losers this country has to offer

Posted by: aj | January 28, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am

It was reversed because the public found out about it.
If it was not made public it would have been passed.

Posted by: Russell | January 28, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Pelosi and Reid makes me wish birth control was retroactive.

Posted by: Robert | January 28, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Nobody is against population growth more than I am. However, I can go along with Obama’s view that the stimulus package may not be the right place for this funding to be “tacked on”. I am also very against riders that get attached to completely un-related bills. There are probably thousands of examples where rules, laws, and pork get sort of brought along on the coattails of legitimate legislation. It’s an example of politics as usual which most of us would like to see ended. Anyway, there are too damned many people on planet earth and this problem will be dealt with either by stupid humans or mother nature and father time.

Posted by: Sam Sharp | January 28, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am

It seems to me that too much stimulus is what’s causing all these women to need this stuff in the first place. Just back off being stimulated, girls, and that will take care of things quite nicely

Posted by: KPRO | January 28, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am

What we need is to communicate that there is a NEW social contract in the USA which makes 16 year old mothers, 32 year old grandmothers and 48 year old great grandmothers relying on government support a little uncomfortable having children they can’t afford and that dropping out of school is socially unacceptable.

Posted by: lawanda | January 28, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

What a shame. One of the best things for the economy is for people to refrain from having children they can’t support.
Providing contraception would have prevented who knows how many abortions and unwanted births.
I can’t get too upset about the contraceptive measure being a rider — people opposed to contraception are making it an issue. I wonder how many laws they support that also were passed as riders to other legislation?

Posted by: Alex | January 28, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

I am all for contraceptives and even abortions for liberals.

Posted by: Rose | January 28, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Ahh, The first week of the Obamanation turns sour and they initiate an attack on Limbaugh. Typical dumbocrat diversion. Get out your large tubes of Failure Cream. The next four years will be a rough ride.

Posted by: Republiker | January 28, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Think about this. The government is the cause of the bad economy we are now in due to their incompetence/greed/Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac. Now the government wants to take OUR MONEY to fix the problem they caused. AND, they want to be viewed as the big heroes for saving us. Isn’t there something horribly wrong with this picture? And we keep electing these same people. What’s wrong with us?

Posted by: K | January 28, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Boy, you stupid Democrat liberal sheep! You read what has been spun by the stupid Democrat liberal sheep media and never think for yourselves. Do you really think that getting rid of those who are less fortunate than you by providing “women’s health services” to them is the right way to go? Could you be more stupid! By not creating more people, we are eliminating our future. That’s what Pelosi meant. It’s going to cost less because there will be fewer people to feed. But what happens twenty or thirty years from now when there are no people left in that generation to take care of your pathetic geriatric butts? Then where will you be? I guess you could then go for more population control by offing yourself to save more money. Makes sense to me. In the meantime, I will take my family, raise them to believe that children are a blessing – which they are – and have grandchildren and great grandchildren who will be some of those people who will, unfortunately, have to take care of your sorry geriatric butts because you haven’t had children of your own to take care of you. You can thank me then.

Posted by: Mary Anne | January 28, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am

Oh my gosh… finally something that makes sense in the stimulus plan!Taking money out! Contraceptives? Controlling births? What gives? That is not is where I want my government spedning our money or their time. Cut some more from programs that exist before porking our country.
We need leaders!
P.S. Has Pelosi been checked recently by a doctor? I cannot imagine her in power much longer. She is a DISGRACE to our country. I feel sorry for her.

Posted by: forestforthetrees | January 28, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am

We should all go out and buy a box of condoms and send them to the Speaker.

Posted by: buttons | January 28, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am

The economic stimulus plan ALSO demands that every American submit to a government program for electronic medical records without a choice to opt out–news breaking at WorldNetDaily.
None of this stuff is ‘stimulus.’ We would be better off if Congress just went home.

Posted by: GoHomePelosi | January 28, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

To All My Valued Employees
There have been some rumblings around the office about the future of this company–and more specifically–your job.
As you know, the economy has changed for the worse and presents many challenges. However, the good news is this: the economy doesn’t pose a threat to your job. What DOES threaten your job is the changing political landscape in this country. Therefore, let me relay some facts which might help you decide what is in your best interest.
First, while it is easy to spew rhetoric that casts employers against employees, you have to understand that for every business owner, there is a “back story.” This back story is often neglected and overshadowed by what you see and hear. Sure, you see me park my Mercedes outside. You’ve seen my big home at last year’s Christmas party. I’m sure all these flashy items of luxury conjure up some idealized thoughts about my life. What you don’t see is the BACK STORY:
I started this company 28 years ago. At that time, I lived in a 300 square-foot studio apartment for 3 years. My entire living space was converted into an office so I could put forth 100% effort into building a company, which, by the way, would eventually employ you.
My diet consisted of Ramen Pride noodles because every dollar I saved went back into this company. I drove a rusty Toyota Corolla with a defective transmission. I didn’t have time to date. Often times, I stayed home on weekends, while my friends went out drinking and partying. In fact, I was married to my business– hard work, discipline and sacrifice.
Meanwhile, my friends got jobs. They worked 40 hours-a-week and made a modest $20K-$50K a year and spent every dime they earned. They drove flashy cars and lived in expensive homes and wore fancy designer clothes. Instead of hitting the Nordstrom’s for the latest hot fashion item, I was trolling through the discount store extracting any clothing item that didn’t look like it was birthed in the 70′s. My friends refinanced their mortgages and lived a life of luxury. I, however, did not. I put my time, my money and my life into a business with a vision that eventually, some day, I too, will be able to afford these luxuries my friends supposedly had.
So, while you physically arrive at the office at 9:00am, mentally check in at about noon and then leave at 5pm, I don’t. There is no “off” button for me. When you leave the office, you are done and you have a week-end all to yourself. I, unfortunately do not have the freedom. I eat and breathe this company every minute of the day. There is no rest. There is no week-end. There is no happy hour. Every day this business is attached to my hip like a 1 year-old special needs child. You, of course, only see the fruits of that garden–the nice house, the Mercedes, the vacations…you never realize the Back Story and the sacrifices I’ve made.
Now the economy is falling apart and I, the guy that made all the right decisions and saved his money, have to bail-out all the people who didn’t. The people who overspent their paychecks suddenly feel entitled to the same luxuries that I earned and sacrificed more than a decade of my life for.
Yes, business ownership has its benefits but the price I’ve paid is steep and not without wounds.
Unfortunately, the cost of running this business–and employing you–is starting to eclipse the threshold of marginal benefit and let me tell you why:
I am being taxed to death and the government thinks I don’t pay enough. I have state taxes; federal taxes; property taxes; sales and use taxes; payroll taxes; workers compensation taxes; unemployment taxes. Taxes on taxes. I have to hire a tax man to manage all these taxes and then, guess what? I have to pay taxes for employing him! Government mandates and regulations–and all the accounting that goes with it–now occupy most of my time. On Oct 15th, I wrote a check to the U.S. Treasury for $288,000.00 for quarterly taxes. You know what my “stimulus” check was?
Zero. Nada. Zilch.
The question I have is this: Who is stimulating the economy? Me, the guy who has provided 14 people good paying jobs and serves over 2,200,000 people per year with a flourishing business? Or the single mother, sitting at home pregnant with her fourth child waiting for her next welfare check? Obviously, government feels the latter is the real economic stimulus of this country.
The fact is, if I deducted (read, “stole”) 50% of your paycheck you’d quit and you wouldn’t work here. I mean, why should you? That’s nuts. Who wants to get rewarded for only 50% of their hard work? Well, I agree, which is why your job is in jeopardy.
Here is what many of you don’t understand … to stimulate the economy you need to stimulate what runs the economy. Had the government suddenly mandated to me that I didn’t need to pay taxes, guess what? Instead of depositing that $288,000.00 into the Washington black-hole, I would have spent it, hired more employees and generated substantial economic growth. My employees would have enjoyed the wealth of that tax cut in the form of promotions and better salaries. But you can forget it now.
When you have a comatose man on the verge of death, you don’t defibrillate and shock his thumb, thinking that will bring him back to life, do you? Or do you defibrillate his heart? Business is at the heart of America and always has been. To restart it, you must stimulate it, not kill it. Suddenly, the power brokers in Washington believe the poor of America are the essential drivers of the American economic engine. Nothing could be further from the truth; this is the type of change YOU can keep.
So where am I going with all this?
It’s quite simple.
If any new taxes are levied on me, or my company, my reaction will be swift and simple. I’ll fire you. I’ll fire your co-workers. You can then plead with the government to pay for your mortgage, your SUV, and your child’s future. Frankly, it isn’t my problem any more.
Then, I will close this company down, move to another country, and retire. You see, I’m done. I’m done with a country that penalizes the productive and gives to the unproductive. My motivation to work, and to provide jobs, will be destroyed and, with it, will be my citizenship.
So, if you lose your job, it won’t be at the hands of the economy; it will be at the hands of a political hurricane that swept through this country, steam-rolled the constitution, and will have changed its landscape forever. If that happens, you can find me sitting on a beach, retired, and with no employees to worry about….
Signed, THE BOSS

Posted by: The Boss | January 28, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am

ABORT PELOSI!

Posted by: twitchie | January 28, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am

So, the Queen of Northern California didn’t get the consent of the Republicans to send condoms etc around the world on the U.S. taxpayer’s dime, eh?
Well, since she has the Democratic votes to do whatever she wants, she doesn’t really need the Republicans for anything other than POLITICAL COVER!
What she’s really upset about is that the Republicans are smart enough not to play – they don’t want to be used as the whipping boys if this (or any other) dumbass Democratic idea goes south, and they know EXACTLY who will be blamed should that happen!
As far as I am concerned, the Republicans would do well just to submit ideas, watch the Democrats “listen” and then ignore them, and then follow obama’s example of voting “present” on all of this garbage.
That will rob the Democrats of ANY ability to blame Republicans for either “opposing”, “stone-walling”, etc.
And Republicans should CONSTANTLY reiterate the fact that the Democrats have the NUMBERS to do whatever they want, so GUESS WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL OF THIS!!!!

Posted by: Chisco3 | January 28, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Prevented unwanted pregnancies would be far more impactful on folks teetering on the edge of bankruptcy, than another unwarranted tax cut for the well-heeled.
If affordable birth control is available, especially for folks barely making ends meet now, it will go a long way to preventing their free-fall into dire poverty. Desperate people do desperate things. It helps not only those struggling individuals and families, but our entire society, to allow everyone to raise children responsibly – after they have had a chance to complete their education and had an opportunity to stabilize their financial situation. Do we really want to turn the US into another Third World country? That’s where the unethical self-serving Bush/Cheney policies have directed us. And the remaining Republicans need to abandon that philosphy if any of us are to survive.

Posted by: HV Clair | January 28, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Keep your eyes open. In the not-so-distant future, the baby boomers will die off en masse. Then the liberals will whine that there aren’t any more warm bodies to produce their Social Security checks. What a sad day that will be. The only thing that gets through to them is their selfish, use-it-or-lose-it mentality – which is why they murdered their children to start with.

Posted by: ann | January 28, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Sorry, but some of these comments are unbelievable, absolute garbage, and based on ignorance. Hope $$ is included in education. Perhaps future generations will benefit, learning the realities of how the world works, and how to make true progress. Obama is making headway.

Posted by: hh | January 28, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Want to save money? Mandate regular drug tests for anyone who wants to receive a welfare check. Those of us who WORK have to take drug tests to provide for those who DON’T WORK — does this make sense to anyone else?

Posted by: cstock | January 28, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Wow. So many excellent and not so excellent posts. What to comment on…hmmm.
First, to JR who posted to Animal Cracker about SS. Illegals ARE getting SS, and SSI, and SSDI. YOU tell me why? Illegals are also getting free hospitalization, free medical care, free medicine, free housing, free child care, free education, free baby care, etc., etc., etc.
I have to agree with Pelosi, partially. I think all teen girls who are unwed, will not name their “baby daddy” so he can take responsibility for his child(ren) should be forced to get the 5 year contraception injection. They should not get welfare beyond the first child AND should be forced to finish school and afterward graduating, continue their education either through vocational or academic education.
I also think that if we are helping 3rd world nations whose women have had more than one child, that THEY should be forced to have the 5 year contraception injection as well…if they are going to receive our aid.
Should a woman be able to feed, clothe and care for one or more children, she should be allowed to determine how many children she desires to have, AS LONG AS she can support them without aid.
No more anchor babies either, period. Not a single one.
As for the males who think it is macho to see how many women they can knock up in a year, hold them accountable. Women do their children a disservice when they do not name their child’s father on the birth certificate. I don’t care if the guy was just with her for one night, if he wasn’t responsible enough to wear a condom for whatever reason, he should be held accountable…whether the woman says she is on the pill or patch or anything else. The man bears responsibility too when he is spreading his pollen.

Posted by: nixc | January 28, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

This stimulus package is pure Democratic pork, nothing more nothing less. Over 50% of it goes to ‘creating jobs” in sectors of the economy where unemployment is below 4%. Only 12% of it is going to have any stimulus effect at all according the CBO. It is a total waste and nothing more than a political payoff to Democratic contributors. Democratic politics is Blago politcs. Just on a bigger scale. What Blago said about selling a Senate seat is just what the Democrats are doing. They are selling out our government. Why? Just like Blago, because they can. If one Republican or Blue Dog Democrat votes for this BS they should be run out of office. We will hold them accountable.

Posted by: MadJayhawk | January 28, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

If there’s anything that Medicaid should pay for, contraception should be at the top of the list. It should be mandatory in order to receive welfare or medicaid. If you can’t support them, don’t have them.
Nixc said what we all think. Problem is that our elected leaders don’t listen to us. Last year’s amnesty bill almost passed and the vote was pretty much along party lines with the Democrats voting for amnesty. Given the size of their majority this time, it will pass regardless of what the American proletariat wants.

Posted by: Oonogil | January 28, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Birth control IS a stimulus. It’s well-known that many men and women discontinue their education because of unplanned pregnancies. Uneducated people earn statistically less, and the children of the uneducated do as well. The more people earn, they better they contribute to society and tax revenues!

Posted by: Christian | January 28, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

I’ve lost All Hope in the “Change You Can Believe In” Obama hasn’t done anything to help the middle class & poor workers. Jobs & Healthcare are the bottom line. He campagined saying he would stop jobs from going over seas And bring jobs back! He said the uninsured would get healthcare as good as congress! All I see is Congress got a 5,ooo dollar raise & he closes Gitmo & doesn’t have a plan on what to do with the Gitmo prisioners! It will be a Very Long Hard 4 years!

Posted by: disgusted in Ohio | January 28, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

The only good thing is at least the people for abortion and believe having children are a burden aren’t producing any.

Posted by: onegoodthin | January 29, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am

It seems that everyone writing on this blog is bitter because President Obama is now your leader. Get over it!! Your boy McCain and the rest of the republicans lost(LOSERS).
Now it’s time to approach the difficult choices that this counrty has to make. Of course we all are not going to agree with everything the president proposes, but that is when you look to the elected officials and hold them accountable. These are the folks you put in office to represent you and your interests. Get out there and exercise your rights and call/email your elected officials and express your concerns. Because honestly, I doubt the president or Speaker Pelosi reads this blog.
Regarding the contraception issue, there are so many unwanted children already in the foster care system in the US. To those who feel that a woman should not have the right to choose why dont you go and adopt some of these children that are already here. Encouraging people to have children they can afford is STUPID, point blank. The interesting thing is that the men on this blog have the nerve to be so adament about this issue.
Interesting……

Posted by: mypresidentisblack | January 29, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

I see folks talking about they lost hope in President Obama already. Ladies and gentlemen he has only been in office 9 days. To you Disgusted in Ohio, faith and hope tests your patience and its obvious that your are not secure in that faith or you will realize nothing happens over night (in this case in a week and two days).
The jobs of old are not coming back, you as a worker have to arm yourself with more education to go out there and compete for the jobs of the future. If you choose to do nothing but sit around and blog about what the government is not doing you are gonna be left behind. You better get on the change bandwagon or get left.

Posted by: GiveHimTime | January 29, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm

Here is a way to control the population of low income people. Instead of contraceptives, just sterilize them. If you can’t feed’em, don’t breed’em. And don’t expect responsible people to pay for your mistakes. Buy your own damn condoms. People like this are trash.

Posted by: ScorpRedhead | January 29, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

JR-> JR-> YOU ARE SOOOO WRONG JR.
Animal Cracker is CORRECT!
SSI-Supplemental Security Income, which IS Included in the Economic Stimulus Package Bill, has a 1 Month Extra Payment in it for ONLY, ONLY, SSI’s.
SSI-Supplemental Security Income is for people that May Own a Home of Any Size or Any Value WHATSOEVER. And, Still Collect $907 an Individual OR $1,569 Per Couple Per Month, TAX FREE, ZERO TAXES…….SSI is paid to Illegal Aliens that are age 65+. They can come here from say, China at age 65 and go to the Social Security Office in ANY City in the US and Apply & Qualify for Tax Free SSI. In California, and several Other States, the SSI Recipient Gets SSP also. Supplemental Security Payments. So that’s where you get 2 checks per month. Sometimes it’s all in one check but it still comes out to the same amount in California with the SSI & SSP combined. $907 per Individual or $1,569…They also get Free, MediCAL, MediCAID, MediCARE (age 65+ unless Blind, Developmentally Disabled), Food Vouchers for Farmer’s Markets & Commodities, Unlimited Food Bank Assistance, IHSS-In Home Supportive Services where a low wage worker comes to their Section 8 HUD Apartment or House and cleans, cooks, serves them, drives them to the store, doctors office, movie theater, casino, where ever they want to go. They also get that EXPENSIVE $680 Million Dollar CONVERTER BOX VOUCHER/COUPON to get their FREE Converter Box if they don’t have Cable TV, and most SSI’s DO have Cable TV, they get Free Medi Trans, Vouchers for Taxi Cabs, Low-Income Heating & Air Conditioning Assistance, and will also receive Free new Windows, Free new Insulation, Free new Furnaces, Free new Air Conditioners, Free new Energy Star Appliances from the Part in this Stimulus Bill alloted for the Energy Efficient and the Upgrading of their Apartment, Condo, Townhouse, Trailer House, Manufactured home, House, Houseboat or where the SSI lives to have an Up-To-Date insulation, appliances, windows, heating furnace & air conditioner all from the tax payer, included in this Stimulus Bill.
Also they receive Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers to BUY a home with NO MONEY DOWN, NO CLOSING COSTS and in MOST Cases a 1% Interest Rate, that is Included in This Stimulus Bill. They also Get HUD/Section 8 Housing Choice Vouchers & MOBILITY Grants to move from Inner Cities or wherever, with Moving Assistance to move into Section 8 homes or Apartments and the Tax Payer pays 60% of their Rent, and/or House Payments.
An SSI NEVER HAS TO WORK A SINGLE DAY IN THEIR LIFE.
SSI is NOT Social Security.
SSI is only controled by Social Security to do Intake, Payments, Physicians to decide who can and cannot collect SSI.
When the SSI is turned down when they Apply for SSI, they will receive FREE LEGAL AID for Attorney’s that Specialize in Getting SSI’s Onto Benefits thru Court Appeals.
They almost are Always Allowed to Collect SSI for the Rest of their Entire Life when they Get their Free Pro-Bono GRATIS Legal Aid Attorney’s to endlessly go to Court and bug the judge to get them onto SSI checks.
The LARGEST GROWING Part of SSI is ——–>>> ‘MENTAL-OTHER’.
This means that the MOST people collecting SSI are Catagorically Classified as ‘MENTAL OTHER’.
That can be ADD, ADHD, Agoraphobia, Anxiety OR Depression from being Addicted to Methamphetamine or Alcohol, Dislexic, Bi-Polar Disorder, MORBID OBESITY, Diabetes, Fibromialgia, Bad-Back, Violent Outbursts for unknown reasons is a big one as Bad Back. It goes on and on. Fear of Spiders is probably one of them.
Although Prisoners In Prison cannot collect SSI checks while they are incarcerated, they are qualified by Social Workers and Physicians that go into the Prisons to Pre-Qualify the Prisoners so when they come out, they can start getting their Section 8 Housing and MediCAL and Checks, same goes for Registered Sex Offenders, they collect checks from SSI too, as long as they are say, Depressed from being unable to bother little children, they get paid for that.
SSI has not been reviewed for efficiency and fraud since 1994.
It is full of fraud. Mainly from people that NEVER WANT TO GET OFF SSI.
They have become better and they don’t want to get off this Tax Free lifestyle and they can own a home of any size or value, free and clear if they want.
I did the US Census 2000 as my 1st job in my tiny town in California. Out of 256 residents, 240 were on LIFETIME SSI checks.
A person CAN collect SSI at ANY AGE.
Probably 90% of the SSI recipients I screened during the Census 2000 were on SSI because of MENTAL OTHER. I.E., Addicted to Meth #1 and #2 Chronic Alcoholics. I noticed the Chronic Alcoholics were mostly MORBIDLY OBESE and MOST had Transfered from CalWORKS that used to be AFDC Welfare to SSI, and NEVER WORKED A SINGLE DAY.
And, When the ‘Head of Household’ collects an SSI & SSP check, the ENTIRE FAMILY living in that household, ALL gets SSI checks too.
The kids get SSI until age 18. Many, many times they have found out all about SSI during those years and get a LIFETIME SSI to keep coming for the rest of their life after age 18. I found it was mainly because of Depression & Anxiety.
An Individual can have $2,000 in the Bank and a Couple can have $3,000 in the Bank, but no more than that.
SSI NEVER CHECKS TO SEE IF THE SSI Recipient has money other than what’s in the Bank in their house stashed.
Most work Under-The-Table if they want more cash, like Flea Marketing Stalls.
Wood Cutter to sell Wood for Heating.
Tree Trimmers, Gardners, Baby Sitters, House Cleaners or taking care of an Elderly person in their home. But, the most popular SSI under-the-table job was ‘hands down’ Meth Manufacturing, Sales & Distribution amd om Second place, Pot growing, hydroponically in their homes, sales & distribution and RE-SALE of Prescription Medicines they get FREE from Tax Payers Dollars.
I know a thing or 2 about SSI.
You cannot fool me about SSI. I have to live around these SSI people.
Almost ALL of them own their own homes. Valued at between $250,000 and $450,000 on an average of 5 to 25 acres of land.
They drive really nice cars too, Suburbans, Trucks, have campers, boats.
Because once their qualified for SSI, anything goes. Nobody ever checks them out.
There is only a 3 sheet check-the-box questionaire every 10 years that the Recipient fills out themselves, and they can say whatever they want, SSI does not care, they just keep sending the checks.
And SSI is in 3rd place gaining on CalWORKS/TANF what used to be AFDC.
Look in this Stimulus Bill, the Government is going to send the SSI’s 1 Free/Extra SSI check and it is costing $78.5 Million dollars.

Posted by: StimulusPiggie | January 30, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

And Remember JR, Dad’s, Fathers that are on SSI, don’t have to pay Child Support.
If you have an SSI run into you, they have NO license, they own a home free and clear worth $500,000 bucks, they have NO insurance, they will NOT have to pay you a penny even if they Cripple You For LIfe.
Why? Because YOU CANNOT ATTACH AN SSI CHECK.
Only the Federal Government can attach an SSI check, and that’s usually only for Overpayments.
So, you won’t get a penny in any law suit even if you win against an SSI.
House in their name?
Doesn’t matter.
They can use ‘Hardship’ clause as their Plea and will be allowed to NOT HAVE TO SELL THEIR HOME, as long is it’s their Primary Residence.
Go ahead, Attach it with a ‘Abstract of Judgement’ you cannot touch an SSI’s home however.
Not unless they Sell it, or are Foreclosed on, and that would be rare because the GubMent & State’s have ton’s of Assistance thru HUD/Section 8, that’s in HR-3221 & this Stimulus Bill and HR-1851 that helps these POOR SSI’s!

Posted by: StimulusPiggie | January 30, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

SSI’s get 95% of their Property Taxes Reimbursed to them at the end of the Fiscal Year, around October each year.
These are those people that on the 1st of the month are all over the place, stores, gas stations, movie theaters, video rental stores, Malls, everywhere spending their Never Worked For it Tax Free Dollars.
They almost ALWAYS have a Handicapped Placard hanging from their rear view mirror or on their license plate.
SSDI is for those who have worked and accumilated enough CREDITS by paying into Social Security to collect checks when/if they become disabled while still working.
SSDI pays Taxes.
Social Security Retiree’s Pay Taxes.
SSI pays ZERO TAXES, and get’s their Prop. Taxes returned but for 5% at the end of the year.
Illegal aliens once they become Legal, will all of a sudden qualify to apply for SSI.
Watch this and see what happens at SSA Offices in your town/city.
You will see hundreds of newly legalized persons going to SSA and trying to get on SSI.
Because that way the Mother that was on Welfare from her Anchor babies will be able to transfer to SSI without having to work.
She can just say, the Father of her children showed up and he needs to collect SSI to take care of them.
They will qualify, you’ll see.
And all those children will qualify too.
If their relatives in another country are part of their household, they can BRING THEM TO THE US, and they too will qualify for an SSI check as well.
A nice thick stack of SSI checks per household each month is alot of money.
ALL TAX FREE.
SSI was supposed to be for extremely poor Elderly people. Blind people and especially for severly handicapped poor children.
But, sadly SSI has turned into a ‘Deadbeat’s’ way of life.
It is the Income of choice for Druggies, Drunkards and Father’s wanting to excape Child Support.

Posted by: StimulusPiggie | January 30, 2009, 12:53 am 12:53 am

Beth: “Moonbats such as you are the reason this county is going to hell. Tree hugging, bed wetting Moonbat!” — Nice touch – intelligent argument. You’re obviously need more adult conversation in your life. Or you’ll end up voting for another retard like GW or Palin. That would hand Washington over to the dems on a silver platter for the next few decades. The supremes will all be dems then and roe v wade will be enshrined in our constitution in perpetuity. The civilized world thanks you.

Posted by: CryRepubLosersCry | February 3, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

I cannot believe you people dropping the Contercepction part of the stimulus package, why can’t anyone see the importance of this bill. You take away contraception from people who can’t afford it and then they have children, WHICH IS CHEAPER A PRESCRIPTION AND PREGNANCY, DELIVERING A CHILD AND MEDICAL TREATMENT FOR THE CHILD. DUH

Posted by: Linda Ogan | February 5, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Darn, Pelosi’s baby preventing/killing $millions to Planned Barrenhood to save $millions more in state and federal “bailouts” for “unwanted” babies got deleted per The Messiah’s directive. Better luck next time, you “Catholic” babe, you!

Posted by: Lex | February 10, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

Zolpidem.

Cheap zolpidem. Zolpidem overnight. Zolpidem and sleepwalking. Cheapest zolpidem. Cheap zolpidem persriptions. Buy zolpidem. Zolpidem.

Posted by: Zolpidem. | August 30, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Zolpidem.

Zolpidem online. Cheap zolpidem persriptions. Zolpidem overdose. Zolpidem.

Posted by: Zolpidem online. | September 1, 2009, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm

Nice post over contraceptives, I would like to share some information about tubal reversal, it is a procedure by which a woman has a chance to pregnant again.

Posted by: tubal reversal | March 19, 2010, 8:06 am 8:06 am

I would appreciate the post and would like to say that no doubt contraceptive measures prevents a woman from pregnancy in which tubal ligation is included but tubal reversal is a procedure by which a woman has a chance to pregnant again.

Posted by: watch ufc online | March 24, 2010, 8:10 am 8:10 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.