Boehner: GOPers Should Vote No on Stimulus
ABC News’ Rick Klein and Viviana Hurtado Report: With President Obama headed to Capitol Hill Tuesday to court congressional Republicans, House leaders asked rank-and-file Republicans Tuesday morning to oppose the massive stimulus package when it comes up for a vote Wednesday.
On his way into the caucus meeting, Boehner called on the president to lobby his fellow Democrats to agree to changes in the package.
"We’re looking forward to the president coming today and having a dialogue with us about how we can have an economic recovery package that works for America," he told reporters. "We have concerns that the plan House Democrats are going to bring to the floor will not work. And at the end of the day, I think what our big moves will be today are to ask the president to help us. Help us make this plan better so that it will put Americans back to work.
House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, told Republicans that the $825 billion House version of the bill should not be supported by Republicans, unless major changes are made.
A Boehner press aide told ABC News: “While we certainly appreciate the willingness of the President to come to Capitol Hill, the problem remains with Congressional Democrats who are moving forward with little regard toward improving the bill. Unless the Speaker agrees to make changes, then congressional Democrats should not count on our support.”
House Minority Whip Eric Cantor, R-Va., joined Boehner in urging Republicans to vote "no" on the stimulus package.
This is not unexpected, given the wide Republican opposition to the House version of the bill. And it leaves open the possibility of Republicans supporting the final package, if negotiations with the Senate and the Obama administration produce a different mix of tax cuts and spending.
But it’s a harsh welcome to partisan politics for a president who is making a dramatic gesture in coming to the Hill to meet with Republicans Tuesday.
A House Republican lawmaker tells ABC News GOP legislators prepared part of their talking points in opposition to the Economic Stimulus bill at today’s morning Conference, before their scheduled afternoon meeting with President Obama.
Writing to ABC News from inside the caucus that just wrapped up, this lawmaker says, "The question Republicans are asking is this: "Does the President support everything in the House bill? Contraceptives to ‘stimulate’? Re-sodding the National Mall? NEA [National Endowment for the Arts] funding to lift economy?"
This legislator says the wide spread belief is that Republican support for this bill dwindled after Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s exclusive appearance on "This Week with George Stephanopoulos". On Sunday, she defended some of the bill’s spending measures such as hundreds of millions of dollars on contraception, or coupons to help people convert to digital television.
At the meeting, Republicans discussed President Obama’s options to win back GOP House support, with a stimulus bill focused on infrastructure investment and tax relief at the top of their list. If Mr.. Obama can’t convince House Democrats to cut spending, this lawmakers says, "then the President will have less credibility on fiscal responsibility in the future. If he cuts this back, he will have a huge win."
Almost three quarters of House Republicans, plus staff, attended this morning’s Conference. The bill is to set to be debated in the House today, and voted on tomorrow.
ABC’s Teddy Davis contributed to this report.
UPDATE: House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., criticized GOP leaders for putting out marching orders before their meeting with the president.
“They’ve issued that [request that members vote against the bill] before even discussing that with the president of the United States,” Hoyer said. “They’ve taken a political stance.”
Hoyer said Republicans will have an opportunity to offer amendments — as well as a complete substitute measure — on the House floor.
He also questioned whether Republican leaders want to find a package they can support, saying they have set an unrealistic bar by insisting that their ideas carry the day.
“Being bipartisan does not mean having to lay down and say, ‘We’ll do whatever you want,’ ” Hoyer said. “Being bipartisan is saying, ‘We’ll talk, we’ll figure it out. If we can agree, we’ll agree.’ ”
“It takes two people to tango, and it takes two parties and two groups to be bipartisan,” he added.
He said he is hopeful that a “significant number” of Republicans buck their party leadership and support the bill.
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Republican leadership in both houses has decided that it’s in their political interest to oppose the Stimulus Bill NO MATTER WHAT.
Boehner’s constituents need to show him the door when he comes up for reelection. We don’t want Republicans to roll-over, but they need to be part of the solution – not part of the problem.
Posted by: Paige | January 27, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am
While I applaud President Obama’a attempt at bipartisanship, it is clear that there is no bogus study or made-up fact that this group will not embrace for political purpose. 5t is clear that Boehner and his group are willing to put party over politics, regardless of the results for the country. President Obama is going o have to face the fact that the Republican party is no longer the party of Lincoln or Eisenhower or Goldwater but the party of Limbaugh and Coulter. Politics of personal destruction is all they know and it is sad for the country.
Posted by: Holly | January 27, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am
Of course they will vote “No”. The Repugs don’t want Obama or his administration, or the Democrats, to propose anything that may help this Country. Only they can take the credit for anything positive happening. Same old partisan politics. Same old gridlock. “I won’t vote for it unless I propose it and my Party gets credit for it.” No wonder we get nothing accomplished in this Country. Too many Republicans, too many Democrats, and not enough Americans in Congress!!!
Posted by: geecee | January 27, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am
A House Republican lawmaker tells ABC News GOP legislators prepared part of their talking points in opposition to the Economic Stimulus bill at today’s morning Conference, before their scheduled afternoon meeting with President Obama.
Posted by: huh?.. | January 27, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am
given the fact that republicans have taken the brunt of the blame for the current “fix” we are in, even though we know that for 2 years the senate and house have been in charge of the democrats, I can’t say that I blame them for using caution. The President seems as if he is willing to talk but it seems Nancy is hell bent on rough shodding the republicans as well as the President.
Posted by: david | January 27, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am
Dont these Republican respect the voice of the people. The majority voted for Obama & his plans. It is sad when a party puts politics before the good of the country,sepcially during these dire economic times. Shame on them!
Doesnt seem much point in Obama trying to bring some semblance of bipartisanship to the process if the Republicans will oppose no matter what. Hopefully the media and the voters will show their disaproval of their tactics.
Posted by: Dee | January 27, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am
“I can’t say that I blame them for using caution.”
________________________________
The Republicans are not using “caution” – they are being obstinate. We voted obstinate out this past election.
Posted by: Paige | January 27, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am
There were some great responses to Bob Herbert’s wonderful editorial in the NY Times today. “This proves you’ll never take the Con out of conservative”.
“The Citizens for Tax Justice have published a report comparing the effects of the proposed Democratic and Republican tax cut plans, first for the whole country and then state by state.
http://www.ctj.org...
Under the Democratic proposal about 55% of the tax cuts go to those in the lower 60% of the income distribution. Under the Republican proposal only 5% (that’s not a typo) goes to the bottom 60% of incomes. For the top 5% of incomes (above $244,200) under the Democratic proposal they get 1.5% of the tax cuts, but under the Republican proposal they get 43.5%.
With millions already unemployed and millions more fearing layoffs it’s a no brainer about which plan makes more economic sense, to say nothing of which is fairer. The Republicans support money and the Democrats support people.”
It is important to not let a small group of people whose real beliefs cannot stand bright sunshine stop our country from action. If these guys had ever shown one bit of interest for the common people or any insight into where their policies have gotten us today, I would have some grain of sympathy. This, from my perspective, looks like a group of white men with character disorders, no disrespect intended.
Posted by: Mom | January 27, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am
The Republicans are refusing to give cover to the Democrats for a plan that will not improve anything and will simply add a trillion dollars to the debt. If the Democrats knew the stimulus would work they would be more than willing to pass it on their own. The Republicans are wise to avoid being smeared by this failure.
Who knows, maybe Republicans will show some backbone for a change.
Posted by: James | January 27, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am
The Republicons care nothing about the country and everything about holding on to power.
Same as they have been for the past 15 years.
Posted by: Truth Matters | January 27, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
The libs here seem to forget that nearly 50% of the nation voted against Obama. 59% in a recent Rasmussen poll said they feared Obama would spend too much money. Obama’s approval rating has also fallen nearly 20% (80-60). There is no ground swell for irresponsbile spending and no amount of whining by the Barry bots is going to change that. This is not the change that he promised, it is the same old politics as usual. Obama is simply using the economic crisis to push his ideological agenda.
Posted by: Jade | January 27, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am
James – Having a “backbone” does not involve complaining, it involves solutions. What solutions have the Republicans put forward?
Their Economist are on the side of Obama.
Posted by: Paige | January 27, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Well the GOP lost so who cares what they have to say.
Posted by: Amoreena | January 27, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am
It’s time for Boehner to go. The country needs help and jobs, not rhetoric and old political games. He needs to feel the pinch, and be voted out of office.
Posted by: Jeanne021556 | January 27, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am
What economist? No doubt the Keynesians, who think that increasing government is a pursuit of god.
The Republicans have offered an alternative plan that includes tax cuts and a reduction in capital gains to entice investors back into the economy. Obama’s plan only spreads wealth with no chance to increase growth.
Posted by: James | January 27, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am
So much for Bi-partisanship and reaching across he aisle. President Obama should reach across next time with a fist. Boehner, Pence are playing politics with this issue and the fate of our economy. Watched Pence on CNN talk about stimulus to create jobs. You should see what he’s done in his district Anderson and Muncie Indiana they have lost tens of thousands of jobs on his watch.
I really don’t know why he keeps getting elected other than he’s got a silver tongue, couldn’t make it a s lawyer, so he went on radio as a talk show host.
Now he’s risen to a leadership role, if that’s the best the GOP can do, what a pity.
Posted by: Tom. Tescher | January 27, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am
If he truly meant that he wants bi-partisanship this is a moment of reckoning. It’s time for him to reach out to Pelosi and company as well as the right wing and demand compromise. Otherwise, by his inaction he is endorsing partisan politics.
Posted by: mmonroeliveson | January 27, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am
Now that the rich country club banker pigs have there fill of tax dollars and Lil Bush has left with his pockets full of money to be the house boy of the House of Saud, this pig,whats his name Bohner or Boner lol, stanhds up and says, oh no this is wrong, where was this a** clown when his rich buddies were given 850 billion and put us on the hook for 8.5 trillion.
Ex Republican
Posted by: RGeier | January 27, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Republicans screwed things up the last 8 years. They need to step aside and let the Dems fix the mess.
Inviting them to work together, is at the same time inviting the burden!
Posted by: Rosie | January 27, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am
Heck, I hope the Republicans vote against everything that comes up for the next 4 years. Let them prove they are the obstructionist party to those few that don’t believe it.
another ex republican
Posted by: Clint | January 27, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am
Hey Bohner, I mean Boner, get back in the mens room with the other gay Republicans and tap your toe.
Ex Republican
Posted by: RGeier | January 27, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am
The Republicans have offered an alternative plan that includes tax cuts and a reduction in capital gains to entice investors back into the economy.
______________________________________
Where did they compromise? The Republicans didn’t and had no intention of working with the Dems as evident by the fact they sent word to reject it before Obama even got to the Hill for further discussion.
Posted by: Paige | January 27, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am
I see the obstructionists are at it again…THE VERY ONES WHO CAUSED THIS PROBLEM TO BEGIN WITH. I wonder how many of these Republican morons thought it was okay to vote for BUSH’S stimulus package given to the banks WITH ABSOLUTELY NO OVERSIGHT. Now WITH OVERSIGHT, they are determined to follow their leader, Rush Limbaugh, and attempt to derail Obama’s plans to get this country moving again….this time in the RIGHT DIRECTION!
Posted by: leftyintexas | January 27, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Oh those Republicans are at it Again They could care less about the State our Country is in They know they and Their President Bush got us in this Mess and now they dont want to Work with The Democrats to Help! MEMO TO THE GOP– DID YOU NOT SEE WHAT HAPPENED ON NOV4 2008 PEOPLE ARE FED UP WITH THE GOP POLICIES THEY HAVE NOT I REPEAT HAVE NOT WORKED NOW EITHER BE BIPARTISAN WORK WITH THE DEMS AND OUR PRESIDENT OR STEP THE HELL ASIDE AND LET THE DEMS CLEAN UP YOUR AND YOUR PATHETIC PRESIDENT BUSHES MESS!!! OR IM AFRAID IT WILL BE A LONG TIME COMING BEFORE REPUBLICANS COME BACK GOP DO SOMETHING OR SIT DOWN AND SHUT THE H– UP!!
Posted by: Angie | January 27, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
Boner needs to go he is way too far right Trickle down Sh–t has not worked hello are there any Moderate Republicans out there that we can replace the far right idealouge boner with
Posted by: Angie | January 27, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
Hang tight to your principals GOP!!!! 1/2 of the country DID NOT vote for “the one” and don’t want to see him destroy our nation, which is exactly what will happen if the government “nationalizes” everything like NObama is trying to do.
Posted by: bho | January 27, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
david: “even though we know that for 2 years the senate and house have been in charge of the democrats, I can’t say that I blame them for using caution.”
And I suppose the historic record of filibusters the Senate Republicans used to block any change had no impact? 2008 showed that the majority of Americans believe that it’s time Republicans quit obstructing to protect failed policies and actually work constructively for the good of the nation. Remember, even in 2001 (before 9/11) Democrats in Congress gave President Bush both his signature tax cuts (the “Bush tax cuts”) and his signature No Child Left Behind (hated by the Dem’s teacher union base), and Bush had nothing like the mandate Obama received. Republicans should question the new administration, but they are breathtakingly hypocritical if they don’t listen to the will of the people and allow it to put in place the new path demanded by the voters.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 27, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Here is the plain simple truth. The republicans know that no stimulus/bailout package or legislation is going to help our economy. So they are playing the odds.
No republicans are going to vote for it, and when it fails and we all know that it will, just look at how well the first bailout package did, the republicans will be able say the democrats passed partisan legislation and it failed.
And the sad thing is, they will be right.
Posted by: Angelo | January 27, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
It’s funny to see the GOP lecturing on what Obama needs to do to bring about fiscal responsibility, get the economic going and get people into jobs – they had 8 years and left things in shambles. But they know how to fix it. Yeah, right!
Posted by: hopesprings52 | January 27, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
We’re going to have to do it without most of the Republicans. They are the problem, not the solution. Yesterday 78,000 people lost their jobs while bailed out Citibank negotiated to buy a fifty million dollar corporate jet. I understand now Citibank has backed out on the airplane. But the problem is still the same. The Republicans are the party of the rich. If you are among those who lost jobs, homes, health care or retirement (or are about to), the Republilcans don’t care about you. What happened happened because of the neglect and encouragement of a Republican president and a Republican congress (six years Republican controlled and two years which could uphold George W. “Herbert Hoover” Bush’s vetoes). The most positive thing ordinary working people can do to dig ourselves out of this is to vote against the naysayers every time we get a chance. Otherwise workers and their families will be stabbed in the back again and again so the rich CEOs can get their redecorated offices, huge bonuses, many houses (i.e. John McCain) and corporate jets.
Posted by: JAB | January 27, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
THE REPUBLICAN’S WILL ALWAYS TRY TO BLOCK EVERYTHING A DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT DOES NO MATTER WHAT . THEY ARE MAD THAT OBAMA WON THE ELECTION AND ACT LIKE A BUNCH OF BABIES IN PAMPERS.I WISH THAT OBAMA WOULD STOP KISSING THE REPUBLICAN’S ASS AND SIMPLY TELL THEM TO TAKE A HIKE
Posted by: laurie | January 27, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
bho: “1/2 of the country DID NOT vote for “the one” ”
This is an easily verified lie, just look at the election returns. It wasn’t close in the popular vote or electoral vote. Obama won by a historic margin only matched once – by the incumbent Reagan in 1984.
Far more than 50% of the country voted for Obama, and unless you’re a child left behind that is much more than half.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 27, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
BHO
LOL HAHA WHAT PRINCIPALS DOES THE GOP HAVE?? LOL HAHAH last I knew their party is so screwed up they dont even know what they stand for GOP PRINCIPALS HAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAH I cant stop laughing hahahahahahah Principals hahahahahahahahahaha
Posted by: Angie | January 27, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
One of you Obamamaniacs please explain how you believe that billions going to ACORN would stimulate the economy. As far as I am concerned, Obama is merely trying to “pay back” ACORN for getting him elected.
Posted by: bho | January 27, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
James: “The Republicans have offered an alternative plan that includes tax cuts and a reduction in capital gains to entice investors back into the economy. Obama’s plan only spreads wealth with no chance to increase growth.”
Only spreads wealth? Obama’s plan has so many tax cuts Pelosi almost opposes it. The 2008 election shows the Republican Big Lie approach no works, and statements like yours merely serve to reinforce the idea that the Republican party has, as one conservative magazine suggested, become “the party of stupid,” actively pursuing ignorance.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 27, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Posted by: jhw539 | Jan 27, 2009 12:27:14 PM
Let me rephrase…..nearly 1/2 the country DID NOT vote for Obama. You can’t deny that many millions of people their representation.
Posted by: bho | January 27, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
I like how the GOP keeps using the nonexistent CBO ‘report’ to back up their claims. Of course, now that the real CBO report has come out, saying that 2/3 of the stimulus will affect the economy in the next 18 months, I hope someone in the MSM calls them on it.
The Republican party is desperate, and if it continues to use lies to support its “policies” (in this case obstructionsim) then it will continue to lose.
Posted by: teacheng | January 27, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
bho: “please explain how you believe that billions going to ACORN would stimulate the economy.”
Why would we bother debating a strawman bumpersticker that is so far from reality? Perhaps you want to debate why the Republicans want to give billions to the Easter Bunny.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 27, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Hopefully the Republicans will call Obama on the carpet for all the “pork” and UNNECESSARY spending in a susposed stimulus bill. We do not need to fund contraceptives but cut taxes to create jobs!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Obama needs to get a grip on reality.
Posted by: HH | January 27, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
Boehner has to go!! He is at the old stale-mate politics again. The Republicans had nothing to offer this country for eight years, except how to make their rich friends richer. So, its time to shut them up for good. Go with the plan
Posted by: Terry | January 27, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
President Obama I know you are trying to work in a Bi-Partisan way with the do nothing greedy selfish I dont care Republicans, But President Obama the country Elected you because of Change,Change meaning WE DONT WANT THE COUNTRY BEING RAN ON THE FAILED IDEALOGY OF THE GOP Obama if they dont want to work with you to h–l with them you got half the countries support YOU DONT NEED THE PATHETIC GOP AND FRANKLIY NEITHER DO WE!
Posted by: Angie | January 27, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
The Republicans don’t want Obama to succeed. They also don’t care about middle class Americans or anyone because even the rich are taking a hit. It’s pathetic that to hurt Obama they are willing to hurt this country.
Posted by: Hege! | January 27, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
“R”epublican: party of the Road Block
lead by Mr. Road Block (Boehner), and the “B” in his name also reminds me of the “B” of the arrongant idiot Bush.
Good luck America.
Posted by: moeen | January 27, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Obama has gone way beyond what any president has done to reach out to the Republicans. Bush met with Democrats (twice in eight years).
Obama is going to Capital Hill, not waiting for them to come to the White House. He is being humble, although his HUGE landslide victory doesn’t require he do this. But the Republicans just don’t want to work with the president.
Obama could play hardball and steam roll the Republicans, but they just haven’t learned.
Posted by: Missy | January 27, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Almost three quarters of House Republicans, plus staff, attended this morning’s Conference. I guess the other 25% were busy pandering to their lobbyists trying to tack on another 150 billion for rum makers and toy makers.
Posted by: Hege! | January 27, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
I voted for Obama and I agree with the Republican leadership on this one. Now is NOT the time for the Dems to pad important bills with their liberal pet causes. Digital tv coupons, contraceptives and resodding the national mall are NOT worth risking the economic security of our nation right now. This, to me, is a perfect example of why we need checks and balances in our government. For 6 years the Republicans were able to do basically whatever they wanted because the Democrats in Congress were not only a minority but a WEAK minority. Many of the problems we have today are a result of that imbalance of power. The Democrats cannot please their entire liberal base all at once. We need to FOCUS on the main problems and once our country starts heading in the right direction we can look at the Arts, contraception and the rights of all Americans to have television and green lawns. FOCUS people.
Posted by: allie08 | January 27, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
Dear “Huh?”… your moniker fits you well.
I get so sick of comments like “given the fact that republicans have taken the brunt of the blame for the current “fix” we are in, even though we know that for 2 years the senate and house have been in charge of the democrats,”
FYI Huh?, the Dems barely had a majority and it was far from being enough of one to override a presidential veto. So, yeah, we know the Dems have been in charge, but the Self-righteous Right has been blocking any chance of progress. Just get your facts straight, and then change your nickname.
Posted by: gumball2 | January 27, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
bho: “Let me rephrase…..nearly 1/2 the country DID NOT vote for Obama. You can’t deny that many millions of people their representation.”
They have their representation, but this is a majority rules country. And perhaps you are actually ignorant of reality:
Barack Obama received more votes than any presidential candidate in the history of America.
Taking into account population growth, you can look at the percentage. There, only the incumbent Reagan has ever had a higher percentage of the population vote for him (Reagan had nowhere near the support of Obama in 1980).
“Those people” have their representation, but they do not have the right to hold the vast majority hostage to their failed ideology.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 27, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
And why would the Party of Stupids want to be smarter? AND THE NEANDERTHALS HISSED AND SHOOK THEIR SPEARS WHEN THE HOMO SAPIENS INVENTED THE WHEEL!
Posted by: couplewords | January 27, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
allie08: “Now is NOT the time for the Dems to pad important bills with their liberal pet causes. Digital tv coupons, contraceptives and resodding the national mall are NOT worth risking the economic security of our nation right now.”
You seem to be ignorant of what an economic incentive is. The government needs to spend money to as broad a range of industries as possible to stop job losses and get people solvent enough to start spending again. Resodding the lawn is NOT risking the economic security of our nation, it is directly in line with well accepted stimulus principles.
This is why we have representative, full time leader in Congress. These are not simple questions, but they have simple, catastrophically wrong, bumpersticker ‘answers.’
Posted by: jhw539 | January 27, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
He won, they lost — screw ‘em.
Posted by: RJ -- Texas | January 27, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
they voted for Obama not this bail out. they will debate endlessly for a fuel tanker, but 850 billion they want in a week?
Posted by: cid | January 27, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Having read the Proposed Stimulus package.. I for one say; “Stand Tough GOP” !
There is a lot of BULL$#!+ spending in that bill that WILL NOT do anything to help the Economy. That needs to be taken out. Repaying people that got you elected DOES NOT HELP Americans.
Plus, why are the Deomocrats bitching?? It is like the first BAILOUT that got passed. THEY HAVE ENOUGH VOTES TO PASS IT. If they feel so damned good about it, PASS IT and shut the crap up!
Then we will let time tell us if it works or not. I think they are scared it won’t work. If the Republicans help to pass it, then they can point fingers.. saying, they voted for it also.
A TAX HOLIDAY for 6 Months will stimulate the economy. Americans get a paycheck and see all the extra money, you bet your @$$ they are going to spend it. That will cause more production and in the end create more jobs. But, WE Americans think the Government knows how to spend our money better then we do. Look at the mess we are in if you want proof that they DO NOT!
Posted by: ajax | January 27, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
It sounds like Rep Pelosi needs an anvil back on her head.
Posted by: Neal | January 27, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Mr. President you have the vote of the people and their confidence so do your business. Don’t except the Repubicans to truly support you so carry on with what you know is best for this country.Remember the people are behind you 100 %.
Posted by: Benicez | January 27, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Boehner….the new Dr. No.
Posted by: prohb | January 27, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
“Remember the people are behind you 100 %.”
Where did you get that Number?? LOL
Posted by: ajax | January 27, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
The only things the Republicans should request for approval is the removal of Palosi. As a Ind. that voted for Obama this year I will second that motion. Palosi is one of the problems, not one of the solutions.
Posted by: CW | January 27, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
NO MORE BAILOUTS! ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
Posted by: Adriana | January 27, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
Another way to look at supporting contraceptives is planned pregnancy/parenthood verses unplanned pregnancy that can potentially keep young women from pursuing college, a job, and possibly utilizing medical facilities supported by tax payers money. This is more true in low income areas. Note how low income usually correlates with a low education level. Not calling any one stupid, just not informed.
In other words, spending money on contrceptives may seem unwise but it could be a wise investment. Future dividends could mean less young women on welfare besides healhtier babies.
The re-sodding of the National Mall, well, it creates jobs to improve a national landmark. The Tennesse congress woman said its jobs that are needed to help stimulate the economy, well, fixing the National Mall will create many jobs. Again, an investment that MAY pay off in the future.
Just a thought republicans.
Posted by: CitizenAJ | January 27, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
If they want to pass a bill that stimulates the economy, why are there monies for contraceptives, sodding of the mall etc. in the plan. Drop the pork and then ask for help….the American tax payers don’t need to be putting in grass or paying for condoms for the next 100 years.
Posted by: sea | January 27, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
Let’s remember that the Demo’s are the one’s that pushed the last package to financial institutions who were allowed to do anything except help the consumer with the money. The Demo’s snd Comrade Pelosi still can’t follow the money. The Rep’s want something that will protect “TAXPAYERS”. tHOSE THAT PAY NO TAXES SHOULD RECEIVE ANY PART OF THE STIMULUS PACKAGE. This Democratic idea of giving stimulus money to those that didn’t pay taxes is stupid. If any stimulus money or tax breaks are given, they should go to those that pay those taxes and not those that don’t.
Posted by: JoeB | January 27, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Two wars, our country in control by the oil companies and the Middle East, our economy on the edge of disaster and this Boehner wants to delay this help to the American people for what reason? Send this guy, Rush Limbaugh and their ilk to another country.
Posted by: wonderofitall | January 27, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
The republicans are right to do this. This spending spree will not work. I admire the way the party is getting back to their economic libertarian view. Hopefully, they won’t get drunk with corruption like they did under GWB.
Posted by: mm | January 27, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
JoeB: “Let’s remember that the Demo’s are the one’s that pushed the last package to financial institution”
Another Big Lie from Republicans – do you think we can’t remember just a few months ago? The last package was demanded by the REPUBLICAN administration. And it was the REPUBLICAN administration that (true to form I think everyone now agrees) displayed singular incompetence implementing it.
The administration was responsible for the disposition of the funds.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 27, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
wonderofitall: “Our country controlled by oil companies.” Please explain, in detail, how the oil companies control the United States of America. We’re waiting…
Posted by: mm | January 27, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Just imagine if they decide to stop the supply; and/or reduce production and oil goes back to $150 a barrel.
Posted by: wonderofitall | January 27, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Yes drop the pork monies and then submit for approval. I, as a tax payer do not want to pay for Nascar or any other pork such as contraceptives. Right now it is a emergancy economic crisis and that is all it should address. Go away Palosi and Reid and quit harming your country.
Posted by: CW | January 27, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
They did such a good job on the last 750 billion dollar corporate welfare scheme, I can’t wait to see how they do with the new 800 billion dollar scheme. All citizens should be skeptical, because these politicians already dropped the ball on the last package. And before someone chimes in with “it was Bush’s fault”, the previous package would not have passed without Pelosi and Obama supporting it. We should hold all politician’s feet to the fire, Dem or Repub, to get a good plan.
Posted by: Dunkin Bleak | January 27, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Interesting how Boner and his buddies are suddenly so concerned. For eight years they shouted “Heil Bush” every time Dub’ya asked for money. Funny how that works.
Posted by: Likfeet | January 27, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Bushies… I read your bumbling attempts to belittle President Obama’s plans to get this country moving in the RIGHT DIRECTION after eight years of NO LEADERSHIP in the White House. WHO REALLY CARES WHAT YOU THINK ANYMORE??? No one in their right mind wants to hear your dim-witted ideas on how to fix the country’s economy after what you and your RepubliCON leaders did when they controlled this government. We don’t need you around anymore. Get lost!
Posted by: leftyintexas | January 27, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
CW:”Yes drop the pork monies and then submit for approval. I, as a tax payer do not want to pay for Nascar or any other pork such as contraceptives.”
Do you understand what the stimulus really is? It IS spending on Nascar, resodding lawns, repairing bridges, offering scholarships to hair dresser schools, building a health clinic in the Appalachians, etc.
Please define ‘pork’ and then define ‘stimulus’ in specific, non-soundbite terms. Otherwise you’re just adding noise to the discussion.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 27, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
ah, the poor and stupid, whiny, wailing liberals are upset at the Republicans… so what….Boehner for president 2012…
Posted by: henry | January 27, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
jhw539 – I am most certainly NOT ignorant of what an economic stimulus package is…perhaps you are ignorant about congessional compromise. Republicans are not going to agree to a bill that is PADDED with contraceptive funding. (as proven by the fact that it has already been dropped from the bill since my last post). I have no problem with resodding the Mall (which could create a few short term jobs) or contraceptives. (Not sure how I feel about the tv thing.) Personally, I voted for Obama because he seemed more likely than McCain to work both sides of the aisle. I don’t want a president that is going to agree to every liberal demand just like I never wanted a president who agreed to every conservative demand. As a moderate, I want common sense answers that will WORK.
Posted by: allie08 | January 27, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
At the end of the day Congress must pass a bill and Republicans need to get on board and stop grandstanding….And Pelosi ought to shut up and start negotiating….Too much talk, too little action…Doing nothing is not an alternative….
Posted by: indy_voter | January 27, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Like the PRESIDENT said- He won. Like Bush has said “I am the decider.” The Republicans are being brats!!! They are like kids having their candy taken away!! They need to grow up, work towards getting this economy together not say NO because we can. At least Obama gave them a voice. No closed door CEO meetings…..etc..
Posted by: thatswhatuget | January 27, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Remember bush jr. saying that he earned capital with the election and the slim victory he had over Kerry. Well, Obama won by a wide margin and if the republicans continue to be jerks, they will pay dearly in 2010.
Posted by: pt | January 27, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Republicans have spent almost 10 trillion dollars over the past 8 years. The people are cleaning house on them as fast as the election process will allow. If I were a republican I would be independent now. The republican “party” is over.
Posted by: rightbehind | January 27, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Nothing scares me more for America than the huge number of “lemmings” here with knee-jerk reactions to those who oppose this astonishingly HUGE spending proposal and who invest TOTAL trust in Obama on FAITH rather than rationality. The implication that there is a hidden agenda by Republicans, or that it is somehow “unpatriotic” to be against Obama’s proposal is scary because it blindly assumes that throwing this fortune at the problem is not a debatable issue. Do you realize how many people (esp. Democrats) have jumped on board this proposal to cover their political butts?? People: Perhaps you should read yesterday’s CNN article by Stiglitz of Columbia Univ., a Nobel winner…who is skeptical about the very foundations of this “bailout” Obama plan. And, who presents alternatives. Obama seems to have been anointed the new “Emperor” who MUST be followed..let me remind you all that “Change” may be what “you can believe in,” but it also can move DOWNHILL as well. The banks have already been handed a fortune of our money and the public is not seeing any loosening of credit, which is partly what this “gift” was about. Accountability is fundamental to any release of public money of this extraordinary magnitude.
Posted by: marat | January 27, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
CitizenAJ – good post, but don’t try common sense and rational thought. The Republicans want to appear as the party of “opposition” to run-away spending. Looking over their shoulder at the trillion dollar deficit and their handling of the economy for 8 years is not required now. More tax cuts for trickle down is as fixated in their mind as their hands on their zippers.
Posted by: OnTheGloryRoad | January 27, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
The truth is the Republicans are afraid that THIS money might go to people who need it. If money goes to filthy rich bankers, CEOs and oil corps., with no accountability, they’re all for it. If it might go to someone who actually works for a living and makes under $200,000 a year, they’re appalled.
Posted by: Truth | January 27, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
The Democrats did not allow any GOP adjustments to this stimulus bill.
LET me quote Nancy Pelosi……..
“We (Dems) wrote the bill”
“We (Dems) won the election.”
It’s really ashame the most corrupt institution in America, our mostly liberal MSM wolfpack press, can’t remind folks of this HARD LINE approach by Queen Lying Nancy.
Dems………..YOU own the economy, since taking over our Do Nothing Democrat Congress over two years ago now.
Thanks for the recession……..
This stimulus bill = an IOU gift to all the thousands of Dem special interest groups…….and that’s the facts folks…….
Posted by: perceptions | January 27, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Boy sounds like alot of you need to go look at history, ah but that history shows that you are wrong, Obama won by the highest majority and more votes than any other president in history, This is wrong, We have had a president that won 100% of the vote, now you Obamabots might want to look into things before you run off at the mouth, look at the Tax rates, look at what Pork Bellies the Demo want, only 25% of this stimulus actually goes to help the economy, planting sod to make their areas look good, giving condoms to high school students, doesn’t sound like a good plan to me, You want to help the economy, give the money to those that SPEND money, Take the $850,000,000,000 and give it back to the tax payers, not those on welfare but those that actually work for a living, We know what to do with it, Pay off our houses, stimulate the housing market, buy a new car, put the automotive industry workers back in the factories, so on and so on,….No I didn’t vote for him, and I do not support him, lets try interviewing with American not Muslums!!!
Posted by: Sonny | January 27, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
I think you are right, Truth. It maybe due to pay to play or quid pro quo.
Posted by: wonderofitall | January 27, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
jhw539———–I do not need to pass your answer and question test and I can post like you or anyone else on this site. What may be “noise” to you may not be to me or others. Im sorry you feel like you are above everybody and you determine who post what.
Posted by: CW | January 27, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Just a thought, but why not give the money to hardworking homeowners, let them pay off their homes, be debt free in terms of housing and then they can spend more money. I could certainly spend my money better than Wall Street and all of these crooks that are going to use it get out of the fixes they are in and not take care of those of us that have worked hard and honestly for our money.
Posted by: monty | January 27, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
allie08: “I don’t want a president that is going to agree to every liberal demand just like I never wanted a president who agreed to every conservative demand. As a moderate, I want common sense answers that will WORK. ”
Obama has already taken fire from the Democrats for all the tax cuts he included in the bill. How much does he need to compromise?
Posted by: jhw539 | January 27, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Bushie Jr. and the repubs are the ones responsible for getting the country into the mess it is in and now, to make things worse, since they don’t want Obama to look good trying to solve the problems they have created, like little children they are taking their bat and ball and refusing to play. I say vote out all the obstinate repubs in 2010 so that something can get done in this country. The repubs are a bunch of obstructionist jerkoffs.
Posted by: Agnostic Free Thinker | January 27, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Benicez please remember, he has the support of SOME of THE PEOPLE, Not all of the people. Just like Bush never had the support of the liberals, BHO will NEVER jabe the support of the GOP. You people need to remeber that liberals DO NOT represent ALL of the people, just the lower class of people.
Posted by: bo | January 27, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
TRUTH
100 PERCENT CORRECT!
Posted by: Angie | January 27, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
the John ” Dewey ” Boehner republicans are just rephrasing their tired old trickle-down philosophy that got us into this disaster in the first place. they, evidently, haven’t heard the election returns, which show that America is done with their greed and lies. It’s time for America and Americans to make itself whole again, and take back what has been stolen from us.
Posted by: unclebigboots | January 27, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Sonny: “This is wrong, We have had a president that won 100% of the vote, now you Obamabots might want to look into things before you run off at the mouth”
Quit lying. We have never had a president that won 100% of the population. Most people understand what it means when it is said, “highest percentage of the American population” (100% of the population isn’t even eligible to vote!).
Posted by: jhw539 | January 27, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
When the House tried to pass the LAST bailout bill, they blamed it on Republicans that it did not pass WHEN all the Democratic votes they needed to pass it VOTED NO, ALSO!
THEY DID NOT NEED REPUBLICANS TO PASS THE LAST BAILOUT, THEY DO NOT NEED THEM NOW.
Like I said before, if the DEMOCRATS are SO SURE it will work, PASS THE damned thing and shut the HELL UP! You do not NEED the Republicans to pass it anyways.
Hey Honey, we need $3,000 a month to pay our bills, but we only make $2,000. What are we going to do? Oh, don’t worry, I will go to the bank and borrow somemore, we will be ok just the way we are going.
Posted by: ajax | January 27, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Some of posts are laughable and some are just pathetic. Boehner is trying to put some sort of governance on what is becoming another pork barrel spending bill. Come on, are contraceptives going to stimulate the economy (perhaps something else)? These non-job spending requests should be part of separate bills to avoid this sort of politics as usual.
As a father of 5, I don’t want to see my kids struggle to provide for themselves which is exactly what will happen when the tax bills start to come due. All of you should be equally concerned, especially since these 5 kids will be struggling to help pay for YOUR social security (or what’s left of it).
Posted by: jtom58 | January 27, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
JoeB…You got your “facts” wrong friend. Your buddies Bush and Paulson were the ones who screamed the ecomony would collapse unless the money was given to the banks immediately. Paulson never provided ANY OVERSIGHT on how the money was to be used. Bush, being Bush, never once opened his mouth either. So quit your whinning. We all know who is to blame here.
Posted by: leftyintexas | January 27, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
BO
Sorry to disapoint you but alot of Republicans voted for Obama because they are fed up with the GOP
Posted by: Angie | January 27, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
ajax: “Like I said before, if the DEMOCRATS are SO SURE it will work, PASS THE damned thing and shut the HELL UP! You do not NEED the Republicans to pass it anyways.”
I think this really clearly defines the values of, and value to the country, of the modern Republican party. Talk about hyperpartisan, obstructionist and just flat out useless.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 27, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
Obama the Gop Are the minority now Please do remind them!
Posted by: Angie | January 27, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Vote NO. Democrats have enough votes to pass this legislation, so let them be responsible for the mess they are about to create.
Posted by: Vote No | January 27, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
When the House tried to pass the LAST bailout bill, they blamed it on Republicans that it did not pass WHEN all the Democratic votes they needed to pass it VOTED NO, ALSO!
THEY DID NOT NEED REPUBLICANS TO PASS THE LAST BAILOUT, THEY DO NOT NEED THEM NOW.
Like I said before, if the DEMOCRATS are SO SURE it will work, PASS THE damned thing and shut the HELL UP! You do not NEED the Republicans to pass it anyways.
=================================
RIGHT ON !!!
The Democras JUST can’t make a HARD decision………just the FACTS.
Look Bush had to put together a plan and money for the US auto companies because Nancy and Harry left town on vacation before doing their JOB.
What a sad Party, the Dems….really sad
Posted by: perceptions | January 27, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
jtom58: “pork barrel spending”
Is that today’s talking point? THE TERM ‘PORK BARREL’ IS MEANINGLESS. No one defines it beyond the classic “I know it when I see it, heh heh.” No one can define it – both sides are using it to rile up base on both sides who don’t care about actually thinking about the reality of the issues.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 27, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Vote No…..mess they are about to create? Are we not already in a mess, and trying to get out of it before it becomes another Great Depression?
Posted by: wonderofitall | January 27, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Angie, and a lot of liberals voted for the GOP because they saw Obama for what he truly is, so what’s your point?
Posted by: bo | January 27, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
jhw – hyperpartisanship comes from the likes of Pelosi and company, who won’t even consider other options. “Our way or no way” I agree with ajax – Dems have the majority – vote it through. But no, they won’t do that. They need to have the Reps vote for it to so when it doesn’t work, and it certainly won’t, they can blame the Reps as well (or totally, as has been the case for the last 20 years).
Posted by: GladTheyCanSaveUs | January 27, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
I understand the Republican Guard is upset…they are not getting the big tax cuts for their rich buddies for trickle down economics or more deregulation for their corporate friends, raiders and traders. President Obama needs to take the Bush approach…sorry I won…kiss my…you know what. And good luck Repubs in the next election. You’re just obstructionist.
Posted by: Tax Breaks for The Rich Please | January 27, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
I do believe Obama will reach an agreement with all concerned parties. He is not a hip shooter like Bush and believes in open communication. The republicans are living in the same economy as the Dem’s and we are all hurting. Did anyone acually expect the bill would just pass without some bending on both sides of the isle? It can not be just one way or another any longer. As Obama as said this is bigger than a just a Rep problem or Dem problem but its an America problem. I have faith that they will come to an agreement on the least of the evils they will have to choose.
Posted by: CW | January 27, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
Dems a sad party -laughable
Seems to me The Dems did a whoop a$$ on the Gop on Nov 4 2008, Half the country dont think there a sad party too bad I cant say that for the GOP
Posted by: Angie | January 27, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Been watchin these guys (republican’ts) for 60 years. It’s all about the game. Never about us. We can’t wait for them to die so they must be voted out. Everybody needs to be awake… send the message. It’s about our country not whether the suits win or lose.
Posted by: Charles Haynes | January 27, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
I will not vote for anyone who votes for this ‘bailout’ bill.
Posted by: NOSOCIALISM | January 27, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Good for the Repub’s! Don’t let the gov’t continue to run amuck with no controls!!
Posted by: bob | January 27, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
jhw539, I seem to remember a few months ago myself and I think it was the dems and Obama himself who pressed congress to pass and then prez Bush to sign the last stimulus package. Also, remember there is 300 some billion left for Obama and his crew to spend. As for the birth control, how about everyone keeps their pants on and zipped. That would lower the cases of stds and unplanned pregnancies by a huge margin!
Posted by: I remember | January 27, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
“hyperpartisanship comes from the likes of Pelosi and company,”
Then why are you attacking President Obama, who Pelosi has also criticized (for his pragmatic tax positions and inclusion of so many Republican ideas in the stimulous proposal)?
Posted by: jhw539 | January 27, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Democracy at its very best. Checks and balances in government have to be in place and the Republicans are doing their job in preventing the passage of a stimulus package as it stands. The confidence that the government can handle tax payer revenues has been lost and needs to be restored first. While the stimulus package is well meaning, government spending without responsible and drastic spending cuts of programs that are not going to stimulate the economy will not stimulate the economy. Right now tax cuts for struggling small businesses, middle class, people whose 401k plans have seen a reduction due to the excesses of wall street and certain seriously affected infrastructure will will be adequate to stimulate the economy. The Republicans are doing a favor to Obama and the country by obstructing a large stimulus package that will leave a massive deficit and no stimulus for the economy. Throwing money on creating a supply of goods and services for which there is or may not be a demand is not the best way to move forward. It is same old thinking from the past 8 years and the big 3 automaker mentality and failed economics. Trickle down from wall street to main street also has not worked and so no more bail out to wall street firms. Let them collapse or follow the example of Pfizer and Wyeth and merge or find new business models which does not require swindling of the public funds and erosion of the public trust.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | January 27, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
BO
My point is Obama has alot of Republican support out here unless of course you belong to the Hannity Oreily Limbaugh freak show!
Posted by: Angie | January 27, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
I do believe Obama will reach an agreement with all concerned parties. He is not a hip shooter like Bush and believes in open communication. The republicans are living in the same economy as the Dem’s and we are all hurting. Did anyone acually expect the bill would just pass without some bending on both sides of the isle? It can not be just one way or another any longer. As Obama as said this is bigger than a just a Rep problem or Dem problem but its an America problem. I have faith that they will come to an agreement on the least of the evils they will have to choose.
=============================
NOPE……..it’s a Democrat problem you’re running the country and lying queen Nancy doesn’t want any input from the GOP…………..
Have fun with that Dems………the anti-business party.
What business in their right mind would want to add new jobs with an anti-business party in power? sad
Posted by: perceptions | January 27, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
The last eight years of total or near total Republican rule have led us to financial disaster, and want to stand in the way of the attempts to fix the mess they have made. They are truly a one-trick pony – tax cuts for the wealthy…tax cuts for big business..tax cuts, tax cuts, tax cuts… Meanwhile our infrastructure rots, we’ve fallen from the envy of the world to 37th in healthcare, and fall behind other modern democracies on health indicators. — But the One-Trick Republicans still haven’t learned that tax cuts aren’t the cure-all, especially those targeted at the wealthy. They haven’t learned the wealth doesn’t trickle down, and that a society that doesn’t invest in itself rots.—How many times do they have to be wrong before we stop listening?
Posted by: TrishTN | January 27, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Know the details of the package??
Posted by: Stimulus | January 27, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Mr. Boehner likes to tinkle in the wind – but often that can come back to fly right in your face. Some do not and should not forget that he said in September “We don’t need more federal involvement in our markets,” Boehner told reporters. “We need this issue to resolve itself.” But within hours, Boehner was backing the $85 billion bailout of insurance giant AIG, and by the end of the week, he was standing foursquare behind Paulson and Bernanke in supporting what the largest bailout in American history. Boehner’s turnaround matched that of Presidential nominee Sen. John McCain (Ariz.), who said “the fundamentals of the economy are strong” but three days late spent the rest of the week scrambling to get ahead of the unfolding crisis, even saying he would like to fire fellow Republican and former Rep. Chris Cox (Calif.) as head of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Now along comes President Obama who rather than focused on AIG, Banks, Corporate America focuses on people, creating immediate jobs, folding in health care, energy and foresight and Mr. Boehner raises the flag of opposition – we can’t spend the taxpayer’s money this way. Well why not – obviously you got it wrong the first time.
Posted by: OnTheGloryRoad | January 27, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
I remember: “As for the birth control, how about everyone keeps their pants on and zipped. That would lower the cases of stds and unplanned pregnancies by a huge margin! ”
The Republican party of Ignorance: A simple, WRONG, answer for every complex problem. (If I were snide, I would note how well the above advice worked for Palin’s family.)
Posted by: jhw539 | January 27, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
stimulus worked last time ha ha ha ha
Posted by: natale from mass. | January 27, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
President Obama is trying to unite the nation with hope and opportunity. Unfortunately, it looks as though John Boehner is determined to continue the divisive Republican tactic of leading with fear. Good luck with that, John; we see how well that worked for your party in the last two elections. ;-)
Posted by: sawrad | January 27, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
jhw – I have not attacked Obama – perhaps others have. He still needs to prove to me his mettle, though. To get the conservatives in this country to believe that maybe, just maybe, there is bipartisanship, BO needs to stand up and make sure that the bogus spending in this bill goes away and to play bipartisan politics. For those who want to scream that the Reps did not make sure the banks were accountable – look back to the news of the day. The Reps were beat up for holding up the package because they wanted more accountability built in for the taxpayers. Alas, that didn’t happen because the majority Dems wouldn’t put it in there. You all need to get the facts straight.
Posted by: GladTheyCanSaveUs | January 27, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Let’s see our the Democrats and their Nazi-like pals in our mostly corrupt liberal press pull us out of the mess they own since taking responsibility for it after taking over Congress over two years ago now.
Democrats = Hate and divide
Posted by: perceptions | January 27, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Partisanship and passive-aggressive control by reluctance to work constructively together, Mr. Boehner. Those are the only things you’re about, and you might want to remember that this is precisely what got your red team trounced in this most recent election. It’ll jump up and bite you again next election cycle, too. This country wants to get past this sort of nonsense, and you can either be part of the problem like you clearly are now. Or part of the solution.
Posted by: Kellybelle22 | January 27, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
gjkotw01: “Checks and balances in government have to be in place and the Republicans are doing their job in preventing the passage of a stimulus package as it stands.”
They aren’t blocking it. The House has no power to do so. They could influence it’s direction by offering real compromise, but instead they are grandstanding to collect soundbites for the next election.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 27, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
jhw539: ‘Pork barrel’ is meaningless.
When it comes to politicians spending my money (remember it’s our money they are spending), then it is not meaningless. We are talking about hundreds of billions of our money and our kids money. You may not care, but I do. I have to live within my means and take care of my family.
I’m not sure about your situation, but everyday people just like me struggle to ensure that have a decent life and one for their family. I just want the government to act responsibly.
Posted by: jtom58 | January 27, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
“Good for the Repub’s! Don’t let the gov’t continue to run amuck with no controls!!” ——-LOL, where have you been, Bob? The gov’t ran more amuck with no controls in the last 8 years than ever in my long life. Good for Obama, for turning us around from the Neocon Nightmare. Maybe we can vote the rest of ‘em out next time!
Posted by: TG | January 27, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
Of course you right Angie, Obama and “his puppets” know all about “support” cause they’ve been on the recieving end for so long. Now it’s payback time. Obama wants to give billions to ACORN for getting him elected. Payback is hell, you know, problem is, it isn’t his money he wants to give them.
Posted by: bo | January 27, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
“Good for the Repub’s! Don’t let the gov’t continue to run amuck with no controls!!” ——-LOL, where have you been, Bob? The gov’t ran more amuck with no controls in the last 8 years than ever in my long life. Good for Obama, for turning us around from the Neocon Nightmare. Maybe we can vote the rest of ‘em out next time!
Posted by: TG | January 27, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
The Republicans just dont and wont get it THEIR FAILED IDEALS DO NOT WORK can then not see what their policies have done to us?? WE NEED MODERATE REPUBLICANS IN THERE not far righties like we have
Posted by: Angie | January 27, 2009, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
“Oh! My God!”, who said that? Is he a leader of Change or a ‘Obstructionist” Is he part of the solution or part of the problem? Is he “Open minded to a solution’ or “or just blind to any solution, hateful, jealous, mean or’ Wait a minute, let’s look into his eyes – do you see jealousy, do you see hate, do you see a man filled with rage, that he wants to explode on Obama, do I see a man that just wants to get in Obama’s face an damn the torpedos. Do you see a man so filled with hate that he can’t see straight. Christian? Nah! Happy? Nah! Team player? Nah! Obstructionist? Yeah. I don’t want a guy like that in my government, no sure ee. What do you think. (Who won anyway.) Ha, that will get a laugh out of him.
Posted by: Maxy51 | January 27, 2009, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
jhw and some others out there- why don’t you come out of the back 40 and stand at the fence for once, then we can talk. You folks are partisanship at it’s best.
Posted by: GladTheyCanSaveUs | January 27, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
bo: “Obama wants to give billions to ACORN for getting him elected.”
Are you hoping that repeating the lie enough will make people believe it?
Posted by: jhw539 | January 27, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
@jhw539,
Well, like I said, You all vote in it and we will see what history shows. If it works, then you all have more fuel for your fire… if it doesn’t……..
Posted by: ajax | January 27, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
Why all the hassle? The democrats do not need any republican votes so why don’t they just keep quiet and vote for the stimulus package that the president wants.
Posted by: Mae | January 27, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
BO
Stop just stop with your right wing lies!
Posted by: Angie | January 27, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Republicans no longer own the WH – they and bush pretty much destroyed this country. the party is over – they are no longer relevant. Obama is trying to give them a little room. But as a whole, anyone who votes republican is not dealing in the real world. I think Obama and the rest of us should just pat them on the head and go our own way.
Posted by: cjr | January 27, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Republicans no longer own the WH – they and bush pretty much destroyed this country. the party is over – they are no longer relevant. Obama is trying to give them a little room. But as a whole, anyone who votes republican is not dealing in the real world. I think Obama and the rest of us should just pat them on the head and go our own way.
Posted by: cjr | January 27, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
It seems as if the Republican party members have decided to fight oppose President Obama on every hand. However, I am reminded of an old saying that goes something like this, “Be careful the ditch you dig for someone, for more than likely it is the ditch you will fall in yourself.” A warning to the Republican party. The country is based on “One Nation Under God, Indivisible” It would be to their advantage to put aside their personal and party pride and work with the Democrats towards working for the USA citizens. Because their hardheartedness is becoming apparent to everyone, it seems they would jeaporidize this nation for their old customs, ideas, and false sense of superiority.
Posted by: gfmims | January 27, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Republicans have spent almost 10 trillion dollars over the past 8 years. The people are cleaning house on them as fast as the election process will allow. If I were a republican I would be independent now. The republican “party” is over.
Posted by: rightbehind | January 27, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
OK. Let’s break this down simply. The economic theory that President Obama is basing his recovery package on is one that supporters of a more free-market theory believe is fundamentally flawed, will not work, and will actually harm the economy. So they should compromise their foundational beliefs in the name of bipartisanship? If they refuse to compromise their foundational beliefs, then they are putting political interest first? Someone please explain that to me.
Hypothetical situation…what if President Obama came out and said he wanted to ban all ab0rt!ons, and the Republicans jumped right on board. Would you be asking the Democrats to compromise their foundational belief in the name of bipartisanship. Please note the word hypothetical…I’m trying to make a point here. I don’t want this to turn into a debate about ab0rt!on.
Posted by: MikeO | January 27, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
cjr:”I think Obama and the rest of us should just pat them on the head and go our own way.”
I agree… Go your own way. PASS THE THING and SHUT UP ABOUT IT!
Then in time, we will see what happens.
Posted by: ajax | January 27, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
The Republicans see their new job description as obstructionists hoping to make Obama fail. President Obama’s success is a Republicans worst nightmare. The Neo-Con radio will be totally destroyed by loss of credibility. Why do you think Limbaugh and Hannity are so venomous in their rhetoric? They are spinning propaganda to save their own jobs.
Posted by: dan | January 27, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
GladTheyCanSaveUs: “why don’t you come out of the back 40 and stand at the fence for once, ”
How? You’re not saying anything other than Pelosi, the Speaker of the House, is partisan and shrill. The sky’s blue, and water is wet.
“BO needs to stand up and make sure that the bogus spending in this bill goes away and to play bipartisan politics.”
“Bogus spending.” Yes, lets get out the pork and payoffs to supporters and maximize the synergy of the new paradigm…
You can talk at the fence all you want, but it doesn’t seem to be dealing with reality, just slogans. The stimulous bill is ALL ABOUT spending money to the widest breath of industry possible to get people working and businesses investing again. Pork is a meat, not a defined budgetary term or project – why doesn’t anyone talk in reality terms? Perhaps because then they can be shown wrong (for example, lawn resodding of a park is textbook definition of a stimulus).
Posted by: jhw539 | January 27, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
It is very clear that there are two economic views at work here. Repubs are trickle down and Dems are grow up. Its time to grow up. Trickle down economics started sometime with Nixon but was much more aggressive with Reagan and that’s when things started getting worse. Employees began to make less or be outsourced to other contries and their health and financial benefits were run by for profit corporations with little federal oversight because of a belief in letting the markets govern themselves. Trickle Down doesn’t work!!!! People at the top don’t create jobs, they hoard money and possessions so they can sit back and admire what they have accumulated, take vacations in distant lands, buy $80,000 carpets for their offices and give themselves 25 million dollar salaries for 6 months work while their employees can barely afford to pay their mortgages. It creates an inequity that is unsustainable!!! Eventually people at the top can no longer sell things because the majority can no longer afford their goods and their house of cards tumbles down. Its time to GROW UP.It is time to give up childish things. It is time to reclaim the american dream for WE the people.
Posted by: GENE | January 27, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
The Gop had no Problem with Bushie’s spending habits all the Billions of our money wasted in his lying Iraq war no problems there and now all of a sudden they want to tell President Obama how to be fiscially Responsible pleeeeeeeeeze
Posted by: Angie | January 27, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
I don’t see what all the fuss is about, Obama has done said he would do what ever it takes to get his hands on this money and what Bama says Bama gets. But I really don’t understand all of you that are defending him. This is tax payers money,yours and mine and it doen’t seem to bother alot of you that they are just going to blow it. Do you see anyone up there suffering, no, and you won’t because they care nothing about the little man except our tax dollars!!!!I would be happy with 1/4th of what these people get paid. Do you seeing them worring about their house, lights, cars, jets, etc……………..
Posted by: countrygirl_74 | January 27, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
ajax: “If it works, then you all have more fuel for your fire… if it doesn’t……..”
Exactly. Although by that rationale I’m puzzled how you can support the Republicans, who history has shown to be utter failures.
Anyhow, back to work for me. Have fun.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 27, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
As a Obama suppoter I truly think Palosi is also one of the problems and not much of lending to a solution. It always seems to be her way or no way. This isnt the time for that right now. While these overpaid and under worked politicians just gave themselves a 4k pay raise and while they have no finacial issues we are hurting. I would have loved to see Obama with a Rep led congress. Check and balances like the Clinton years.
Posted by: CW | January 27, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Point #2…the actual quote from Boehner was “While we certainly appreciate the willingness of the President to come to Capitol Hill, the problem remains with Congressional Democrats who are moving forward with little regard toward improving the bill. Unless the Speaker agrees to make changes, then congressional Democrats should not count on our support.”
There was no talk of not supporting President Obama, but there is an unwillingness to have it shoved down their throats by Democrats without any discussion, debate, or compromise. Remember, it was Pelosi who said that they have the opportunity to make it bipartisan if they just vote for it. In other words, shut up and do what we want. At least President Obama is making an effort to talk to the Republicans about their concerns and listen to their ideas. More than the Congressional Democrats appear ready to do. The headline is MISLEADING!
Posted by: MikeO | January 27, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
@gfmims,
Did you NOT LISTEN to anything that Nancy Palosi Said on SUNDAY?
The republicans have ideas they want to submit, but Nancy won’t let them!
Posted by: ajax | January 27, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
GENE
RIGHT ON the Economy does not start from the top down it starts from the bottom up!The same thing when you build a house you build it from the ground up!
Posted by: Angie | January 27, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
America remember when your child cries …. no food remember Boehner and the other GOP members who opposed and you lose your homes, work and ability to substain your family… tell them that because of party poli-tick we punished the country and the world….you see why i left and voted for the other party, this party needs help if not they will not be around much longer as they do no listen to the people. Abandon the GOP
Posted by: pooh | January 27, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
I am an obama supporter And I think Pelosi has to go, I see him having alot of problems with her shes too partisan and Obama is not!
Posted by: Angie | January 27, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
GENE…you misrepresent the issue. The Republicans are not proposing “trickle-down” and the Democrats proposing “trickle-up.” The Republicans are saying “give the money to the individuals in the market (tax cuts for EVERYONE, not just selected folks) and let the market (both consumers and producers) make things happen.” The Democrats are saying “give the money to the government, and let US decide which industries and individuals are blessed, and which ones are not.” Try studying the issue in a little more detail. You do your position a disservice.
Posted by: MikeO | January 27, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
RE: Contraceptives and the Economy
It is much more difficult making personal economic progress, especially as a single parent. Raising a child is expensive. It takes young women out of the work force so they can be responsible for their infant. So even if a young woman wants to work, having a child complicates this immensely. Did you know that most day care facilities only accept 1 year olds?
Family planning (and the use of contraceptives) helps families prepare to be responsible parents and members of society.
Posted by: ekb | January 27, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
ekb…the purpose of the bill is to stimulate the economy, not to further a social policy. Some of the bill does both; the family planning portion does NOT.
Posted by: MikeO | January 27, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
pooh…this bill can pass without the Republican support. If the plan doesn’t work (and this is what the Republicans believe), will you blame the Democrats? Or will you try to find some way to still pin it on the Republicans and/or the Bush adminstration?
The Republicans want to help the American family, by giving them more money in their pockets to take care of their needs (and wants), and more money in the businesses’ pockets to expand, hire more workers, and increase demand that way. They believe that the government spending is just a change in the composition of demand (pulling money out of the private sector that would have been spent/invested elsewhere and putting it in the public sector where the government decides where it goes), rather than increasing demand. They want to put the money directly into your pocket, not indirectly through the government spending plans (where, unless you are one of their “chosen” industries, you are scr*wed).
I repeat, this is NOT a trickle-down vs. trickle-up debate. It is a free-market vs. government-controlled market debate.
Posted by: MikeO | January 27, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
This recession is the product of Socialism. The root caused has been and will continue to be traced back to the Community Reinvestment Act. You can’t force a bank to “loan” money to 1 under qualified group and expect that to be the only group that qualifies for the loans. That is called discrimination.
You also can’t expect banks to “hold” bad loans, which they were forced to take, and go under.
Pile on top of that the D’s have been in control of the purse strings for 2 years, with enough votes to pass legislation without R’s. This is the D’s mess.
“Oh but Bush would have vetoed it”. They didn’t bother to try anyhow. To throw one back at you, if McCain would have won the recession would be over. My hingsight wishful thinking works just likes yours.
Get a clue and a grip. Government = WASTED MONEY. They need to reduce the size of the Fed by about 50%.
Posted by: Red | January 27, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Question for all…whatever money lands in your pockets from this recovery package (either through tax cut/rebate, job “created or saved” through government spending), what will you do with the money? Buy American-made goods, or cheap, foreigh goods? You can be part of the problem or part of the solution to the economic woes of the US.
Posted by: MikeO | January 27, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Boehner did not say:
GOPers should vote No on Stimulus!
He said they should vote No on this
Specific Stimulus Bill which is loaded
with “pork”. Dems claim it will take
years to have an effect on the economy!
We need a stimulus bill that will have
an effect on the economy Now and also
in future years! This bill is Not it!
Why do all of you Obama cheerleaders
need Republican votes anyway?
You have enough votes to pass it on
your own. Pass it!
You guys wanted control of the Congress
and Presidency and you have it!
Now you get the Blame or the Glory!
This has nothing to do with
bi-partisanship it has to do with
responsibility!
It is yours, Dems, have at it!
Posted by: reaganfan | January 27, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
“Politics of personal destruction is all they know and it is sad for the country.”
—————————
Holly,
You mean like the way liberals treated Palin? Seems to me that was the pure definition of personal destruction.
Posted by: Mike_C | January 27, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
“Of course they will vote “No”. The Repugs don’t want Obama or his administration, or the Democrats, to propose anything that may help this Country.”
——————————-
Geecee,
You mean like the way Barney Frank blocked Republican attempts to regulate Fannie/Freddie?
Yeah, He had the best interests of the country at heart on that one didn’t he???
Posted by: Mike_C | January 27, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
“Dont these Republican respect the voice of the people.”
———————————–
Dee,
You mean the same way liberals just got out of the way for Bush after he was elected?
Come On People….Grow Up!
Stop acting like 1st graders who are whining because someone is making fun of your new clothes! NONE of you gave Bush what you seem to demand the rest of us MUST give Obama.
EVERYONE needs to listen to Colin Powell’s views of how partisanship is something we need in our government.
Posted by: Mike_C | January 27, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
MIKE O
I would for one love to Buy American Goods but seems these days NOTHING IS MADE IN AMERICA! CANT FIND IT
Posted by: Angie | January 27, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
MIKE C
Oh pleeze dont go blaming the Liberals for brainless Palin she brought her own Misery on herself Its not the Democrats fault the woman is a Brainless Airhead!
Posted by: Angie | January 27, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
Mike, you have a selective-news issue. The Democrats did filibuster a number of bills when the Republicans were in power, but the Republicans hit record highs in the past 2 years, when they had the White House and the Senate.
I don’t suppose words in a blog are ever going to change your mind. Too bad. That’s a big part of the problem, as I see it. And the discussion is not as simple as free market (which has been shown not to work because of greed) and government-control (which has many dimensions, and, for some sectors, would be a decent temporary solution).
But, knee jerk away. I know it is hard for Conservatives to realize that the slogans they loved no longer blind most people in our country, thank God.
Posted by: Mom | January 27, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Angie…so true. Seems like the American public has been at it for a while. Well, everyone got their cheap toys, cheap electronics, and cheap goods from overseas markets where the wages are tiny compared to US wages. I guess if we would have had a more protectionist tariff and quota policy, we might not be able to say that, but we would have hurt the export markets we do have. Most folks would also not have the standard of living (if measured by the amount & variety of stuff they have) they currently enjoy. There are pros and cons to a global marketplace. It seems like we want all of the pros but none of the cons. It seems like a much more complex issue, doesn’t it?
Posted by: MikeO | January 27, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Mike,
I seem to remember a lot of people questioning Sarah Palin’s qualifications for President, including a lot of conservatives like, Brooks, Parker, Powell, Buckley and Scowcraft. Questioning a person’s qualifications to run the country is not personal destruction. Saying I hope the president fails, regardless of what happens to the economy, for political purpose is and it has to stop. There is too much on the line for all Americans.
Posted by: Holly | January 27, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
Mom…Greed is not the fault of the free market (besides, there is greed in government-controlled spending, which is why we have so much “pork” in spending bills). Ah, but the root of greed is the subject of a different discussion.
The government will never be able to fully control greed (it is a human condition); at best, they will just control who gets to take advantage of their greedy nature. Free markets can work if they are given the freedom to work (i.e. the CRA telling banks to loan to applicants who would not otherwise qualify for a loan because they are too risky is NOT free market). They may even be able to limit some of the ability of the greedy to take full advantage of situations (like oversight of financial institutions and financial instruments, or not allowing folks to stay on the dole indefinitely). But government is NOT the answer to our ills, and their ability to oversee things diminshes as their size grows. Case in point, perfectly healthy individuals collecting disability and other benefits rather than going back to work. If you look to government to solve all of the ills of society, you will be sadly disappointed.
Posted by: MikeO | January 27, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
OPEN YOUR EYES PEOPLE!!! The government is going into more debt by borrowing money from other countries to pay for the debts of private corporations. Debt to pay off debt, THIS IS INSANITY.
We are all going to be in very big trouble when other countries stop financing our national debt.
This is the fault of democrats and republicans alike who insist that the government spend money on programs it cannot afford.
Posted by: someguysomewhere | January 27, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Holly,
The attacks on her policies & political beliefs are by all means fair game!
You KNOW what I meant. Attacking her family, husband, & her children was the LIBERAL politics of personal destruction!
All the BS from the feminists who now when it was a Republican woman reaching these heights suddenly dropped their 35 yr old stance that a woman surely can have a career and a family. Those who never once said its a bad thing for a woman to work while having young children suddenly were “so concerned” for her youngest one.
Then there was all the crap flying from the left about her teenage daughter who got pregnant. All of a sudden that was because Palin was a terrible mother and because of that she could not possibly claim to have family values. That was followed up by ugly rumors floated by democratic operatives that palin’s autistic child was really the daughter’s,…etc
All that was way way past the line.
On top of that, add the NY times reporter who was stalking teens on facebook to try to gather “dirt” on Cindy McCain!
Yeah, all these things were done by liberals in the name politics.
Yet, when the shoe went to other foot, everything in Obama’s past was off limits,…he never had a “real relationship” with any of the shady people in his past.
Yes, it was indeed a very lovely comparison!
Posted by: Mike_C | January 27, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Republicans are incapable of compromise. All they know is the “old way of doing things.” These people who don’t even look like “Americans” aren’t interested in helping our country. It’s about their own agendas…..Self-serving interest. Kick these old tired, lost in space out of office quick, and move America into a new time. The proof is in the pudding. They know “dodo scotch” about nothing, but perhaps how much money they have in their own bank accounts to continue to buy their blond haired wives more botox, and those “stiff suits” that they wear. Kick em out.
Posted by: sara wilson | January 27, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Ok the nation is watching, if the “space cadets” don’t want to work together with our president then…..steam roll em Prez. They still don’t get it!
Posted by: sara wilson | January 27, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
sara wilson…wow, how many tired old stereotypes can you throw into one statement? Your comments are partisan, untrue, and do not offer anything constructive to the discussion. You offer no support to any of the “points” you make in your post. Try again.
Posted by: MikeO | January 27, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
sara wilson…if “working with” the President is bowing to whatever he wants with not discussion, no objections, nothing but turning their backs on a foundational belief concerning how this economy works, then I guess your version of “bipartisanship” won’t happen.
Posted by: MikeO | January 27, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Mike, do you remember what the subject is? Palin is so done…..she was a fake and her family values too. Cindy McCain is a nobody…she never worked a day in her life. Her time is spent at the Botox clinic and her bathroom getting high. The topic…..The Stimulus!
Posted by: sara wilson | January 27, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
These same old tired republicans that sat on their tails and allowed the first 350 billion go unchecked, should sit and work across the aisle, instead of pretending that’s what they do. No they can punch a hole, but why punch one if they can’t fill it.
Posted by: sara wilson | January 27, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Mike you have not an intelligent bone in your body. You’re not talking substance, so I just check the bull….
Posted by: sara wilson | January 27, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Mike,
As a feminist, my problem with Sarah Palin had nothing to do with her party or family and everything to do with the fact that she could not name a supreme court decision, identify the Bush Doctrine or a magazine that she reads regularly. She could not discuss economic issues and repeated ugly rhetoric at her rallies. I don’t know of any reputable liberal blogs that talked about the garbage that you are posting. But Sara is right, Sarah Palin is not what this board is discussing. Try to move beyond name calling.
Posted by: Holly | January 27, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
sara wilson…same tired Democrats who sat on their tails and allowed the first $350 billion to go unchecked. Knife cuts both ways. I do seem to remember that the Republicans went against the President and voted against the bailout (which is what 3 out of 4 Americans wanted). I also remember seeing conservative commentators cautioning against the bailout as it was written because there was no oversight or accountability. The Democratic House and Senate both had the opportunity to write oversight and accountability into the bill but chose not to. And don’t try to pin that on the Republicans, either. They could have added language into the bill that required it, but chose not to take the time.
Posted by: MikeO | January 27, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
The Dems like hearings but not for their own. Barny Frank, Chris Dobb, and Chuckie Schumer should all be investigated for putting us in this fix. They are the ones that pushed mortgage loans to the ones who shouldn’t get them for lack of funds. Why arn’t the Dems investing why we are in this fix? Also why are the ones that caused this problem still in office and trying to fix it. A good example is B Frank giving all that money to his favorite bank.
Posted by: political junky4 | January 27, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Read John Boehner’s first line on his website BEFORE the meeting with the President: “While some leaders in Washington are PLOTTING (emphasis added) how best to spend your hard earned tax money on bloated government, the Republicans…” Yes, I love the open mind and bi-partisan tone. This is why we voted for change.
Posted by: Joe the Pummeler | January 28, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am
When I look at all these prior posts, I wonder if this blog will even allow a position that isn’t overwhelmingly for the current stimulus package, but I shall try nonetheless. I don’t consider myself a Republican or a Democrat, I consider myself an American first and foremost and that is where my focus lies when I analyze these difficult times before our great country. We need a package that is well thought out and not hastily thrown together will ridiculous spending that has no benefit to the economy. Our Congress has failed us repeatedly; I pray to God that they do the right thing for the American people this time.
Posted by: The Pro | February 5, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
Xanax 2mg.
Xanax no prescription. Buy xanax online. Xanax. No prescription needed purchasing xanax.
Posted by: Xanax prescription. | September 1, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
Percocet.
Percocet 10mg side effects. Fun with percocet. Percocet vs vicodon. Long term percocet withdrawal symptoms.
Posted by: Percocet. | September 2, 2009, 5:56 am 5:56 am
Enjoyed the 2010 House elections? We did.
Posted by: GOP | November 22, 2010, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm