How Could They?
How could they? Here's how.
"They" are the House Republicans, zero of whom voted for President Obama's economic stimulus package yesterday. What makes them – depending on your perspective – courageous or foolish enough to stand against a popular new president facing a vast economic crisis on which the public demands action?
In fact it's no mystery. I blogged back on Inauguration Day about the deep unlikelihood of post-partisanship, given the broad and substantive ideological and partisan differences that exist in this country; and again Monday on the way these play out particularly in terms of views of the stimulus. GOP leaders apparently got the memo.
The simple fact is that the stimulus package is far less than broadly popular among Republicans. They are deficit-shy, skeptical of large government programs and untrusting of Democrats, the president included. That is simply part of the shape of our politics.
Consider the table below. The numbers speak for themselves; these are enormous differences. What they mean is what yesterday's House vote displayed: that even in the opening days of the Obama era, partisanship is alive and well.
Dem Rep Ind D-R diffObama: Good start on economy 82% 42 60 40 pts Support $800b stimulus 84 52 69 32Support it "strongly" 58 22 44 36 More important: Stimulus spending 62 38 50 24Controlling deficit 34 58 46 -24 Confident:In Obama's economic program 92 43 74 49That it'll have adequate controls 66 27 39 39 Prefer:Larger govt, more services 62 21 41 41Smaller govt, fewer services 33 77 55 -44
Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Where was the resistance in the first portion that was distributed to the careless Wall Street Bankers and etc.
Posted by: momof4boys | January 29, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
I agree that this wasn’t surprising – most Moderate districts have gone Blue after the last two elections and the Republicans that survive come from such deep-Red districts that the general opinion of the country at large is irrelevant to their political futures. What is fascinating about the numbers you post is how consistently closer Independent voters are to Democratic ones. Republicans increasingly foster a base that supports them at odds with the rest of the country.
Posted by: TRBoston | January 29, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
momof4boys – The Republicans only got their fiscally conservative conscience back when they lost power.
Posted by: Paige | January 29, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
TRBoston – Go to Gallup and look at the latest poll they did on state party identification. Only 5 states were Republican. It was shocking.
Posted by: Paige | January 29, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Why should republicans vote on a stimulas bill full of “pork”, where the money does not benefit America nor create jobs, until it does it shouldn’t pass. Typical Democrat bill, SPEND SPEND SPEND. With more and more americans out of a job where is this money going to come from??????????????
Posted by: HH | January 29, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
The GOP wants Obama to fail and thus the economy to fail. It’s simple as that.
They are the Herbert Hoover Republicans.
Posted by: Amoreena | January 29, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Why would Republicans be afraid of Obama – give me a break – we don’t have to be afraid of anyone – we know what we believe and who we believe in and not once has Obama mentioned God. He has mentined Muslims. We are Republicans and we will hang in there. It is kinda sad to see Hillary Clinton standing behind Obama, you almost wish it was Bill back – at least he did not try to hide and he was a person people liked. ABC wants you to believe anythig, everything, stop watching them. We have.
Posted by: Jane | January 29, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm
Republicans haven’t been able to be fiscally responsible for fear of going against Bush. It’s a shame. They should have had the backbone to force Bush to behave like a Republican.
I do not want my Grandchildren saddled with $1 Trillion in Democratic Pork spending.
Does anybody in America remember how bad inflation was in Carter’s years? That is where we are headed if we keep printing money at the rate they are.
Posted by: Mac | January 29, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
ABC wants you to believe anythig, everything, stop watching them. We have.
_______________________________________
so why are you posting on the ABC news site?
Posted by: Paige | January 29, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
It is absurd that any party vote in a bloc like this. This BS is exactly the problem that happened in the Bush era when all the lemmings lined up behind their idiotic leaders rather than think for themselves. It is an absolute joke that there is no dissent in the Republican party and that these representatives are too cowardly to think for themselves.
I don’t care for all the spending in the bill, but it is just ridiculous to think that an entire party has no people willing to question their leaders.
Posted by: MIguy | January 29, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
They are deficit-shy, skeptical of large government programs and untrusting of Democrats, the president included. That is simply part of the shape of our politics.
***************************************
Be a fiscal conservative period, and leave your dislike of another party out of it.
Posted by: Mavsreader | January 29, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
None of us know if a stimulus package will work or not. Even the experts say they’re not sure, but the vast majority say it’s our only hope. If it’s our only hope, we have to do it. I don’t think the politicians should be guided by ideals or philosophy on their vote for or against this. They should be guided by facts, or best expert opinion, which says we must have a stimulus package or we risk going into a great depression which we may not get out of.
We should also be guided by them in deciding what the stimulus package should consist of. Both the Dems and the Pubs need to listen up and follow the experts’ advice here.
They also need to include stringent controls and substantial transparency like we have never seen before!
Posted by: Marilyn | January 29, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
The issue is that President Obama changed the plan based on what the republicans said they didn’t like about it. He took out some things, added more tax cuts etc. And then they still voted against it. What I see is a president who met them half way and left him standing there. At least he is trying to find common ground – which is more than we can say for the house republicans.
Posted by: ann | January 29, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
Perhaps a better question to ask, is how any democrat could have voted “NO” to the stimulus bill…that’s what should have you thinking.
Posted by: samhiguchi | January 29, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
What happened to Obama’s promise to cut the pork out of these bills? I believe that was only a smoke screen. No it was an outright lie to the American people. The majority in control of Congress believe that most Americans are not too bright. This election proved they are right. We are going to have to suffer with what the ignorant majority has elected – an enormous debt for our children, grandchildren, and probably our great grandchildren. This is only the beginning.
Posted by: mj | January 29, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Being unemployed is NO JOKE!!!
Thank you, Mr. President for helping the little people that are STRUGGLING!!!!
A little help is better than NO HELP AT ALL!!!!
PEACE!!!!
Posted by: sisterdearest09 | January 29, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
Bush and his Republican pals totally broke our economy and now they have the gull to act like they know what is best?
It’s laughable.
Posted by: gus | January 29, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Paige: I just blog on here to make you mad. No, I don’t watch ABC and yes, I watch Fox because they are the only fair people on tV today and in my part of the world that is what we need to hear. Not ab out some rck star or one that thinks he is and can go whatever he pleases. Well, he can’t, so he got a dose of his own medicine as did you.
Posted by: Jane | January 29, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
“I watch Fox because they are the only fair people on tV today…….”
I truly thought you were being snarky. Please, tell me you’re joking.
Posted by: D | January 29, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
At least when the economy totally implodes because no jobs were created, welfare programs were expanded, and people were generally screwed over by the dem.s by passage of the bill, the dem.s will have a hard time blaming the coming depression on the GOP.
But I don’t really understand the Democrat belly-aching anyway: the bill they wanted passed, even without the GOP, and still they’re whining. What’s the matter? Can’t the Dem.s handle being in control and taking full responsibility for their actions?
Posted by: sitting back and waiting | January 29, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
The media fail to mention that even Obama’s GAO office says it will take more than 2 yrs to get these “rescues” to the people. I haven’t seen any polls that determine what % the public want to see this bill passed.
Posted by: Eric | January 29, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Latest Rasmussen poll says 42% favor and 34% oppose. So not even a majority of likely voters favor the bill. It looks like Reps are looking out for the people
Posted by: eric | January 29, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Gary: Nice analysis of polling data to show the underlying reasons for the vote. Most of the time the story goes beyond the topline results and this situation is no different. Keep up the great work.
Posted by: John Nienstedt | January 29, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
The GOP stood by and gave everything to Bush for a WAR.
They stand by and flip the bird to the American People.
They have historically, never been good with someone else’s checkbook. Now, all of a sudden, They believe they know whats best! Laughable.
In 2010, we will see more of them DOA!!
Their districts will remember that they cared nothing for them.
Posted by: Lynda | January 29, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Obama and the Dems are leading this country into an economic armegeddon. See you at the soup line.
Posted by: steve | January 29, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
I hope someone in Washington is looking out for where all thie money is going.
The shape we are in is like that old adage, about buying a boat, “might as well throw your money into the water and get it over with”
No matter how much is “given away” it wont be enough. Some will always want more.
Posted by: mary | January 29, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Let me see if I have this straight. We need to give big business tax cuts to promote new jobs. Haven’t they had those tax cuts for the last 8 years? Ummm so what happened to the jobs?
Republicans are deficit-shy? (curled up in fetal position laughing) Excuse me -but wasn’t there a surplus when Bill Clinton left office? Skeptical of large government programs, would this include the wall street bailout under Bush?
I read complaints about who is overseeing/accounting for the spending of bailout funds — umm? Who do you think is going to do that if there aren’t regulations?
Personally I think the Republican Cronies are lined up behind McCain just like they were during the campaign, and just like the Wall Street Mongers they could care less how their behaviors affect this country.
Its time for the republican party to climb out of the box of group think, and start contributing to solutions instead of turning everything into a political finger pointing debate making noise to drown out common sense. Our country is in trouble, its time to brainstorm for workable solutions. Pick up the fight after we are on our feet. This country needs the input from both parties to resolve this problem.
Posted by: Daisy | January 29, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Come on! Open your eyes..The Stimuls Package is FULLY LODAD with PORK! I have always leaned towards democratic philosophy but this package is outrageously deterimental to us the taxpayers.
Posted by: TD | January 29, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
All you need to know about “post-partisanship”: El Rushbo actually admitted that, if Obama’s plan is too “socialistic” he wants it to fail and the economy to break entirely.
Sort of like the patient with a potentially fatal disease who want to die because he doesn’t like the name of the medicine.
PATHETIC.
Posted by: Nat Ehrlich | January 29, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
Obama and the Dems are leading this country into an economic armegeddon. See you at the soup line.
News Flash!!!!! I’ve been in the soup line for the past eight years thanks to Bush and the republicans!
Posted by: Rhonda | January 29, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
While not surprising,it almost gladdens me. I hope this makes people aware of how little the Republican think of the average American and how much they want President Obama to fail. He will not!! We will not. The Power Of One is a strong incentive and when you start and maintain a grassroots campaign the way we have it will only lead to a better time for us all. When Sarah Palin forms a PAC, I rejoice..this and Rush is what they have? Good
Posted by: clorinda sheridan | January 29, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
This is a terrible pork filled stimulus bill, we will rue the day it passes. Just make the banks loan money and leave everybody alone. Acorn receiving billions is NOT what we voted Obama in for and certainly did not vote in Nancy to have all her dreams come true on our backs in one whack.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Posted by: Jan | January 29, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
When is it going to become popular to “try thinking?” There is enough blame for this economic meltdown and tragic unemployment situation to be shared by everyone. As should any attempt at a solution. To debate what news source you “believe in” is laughable … try watching, reading and listening to several instead of the “one” that tells the “truth” as you see it … what’s up with that? I too, as one earlier person mentioned, am very close to being a “soup line” victim of this economy. But I’m not giving up – or picking sides. I’m going to continue to hold on to pride, a hard work ethic and yes, the hope that the politicians, corporations, and financial institutions will remember how powerful a voice the American people have. If they do not lead soon, our voices will get louder.
Posted by: ams | January 29, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Obama’s “stimulus” package is the biggest bait and switch boondoggle in the history of this country! It’s NOT a stimulus, it’s a spending spree for liberals! After the House Republicans were flooded with hundreds of thousands of phone calls, faxes and emails from their irate constituents, they finally grew some ##### and voted NO! The Senate Dems had better follow suit or they will be history on their next election. They were all scared into voting for Bush’s bail-out but now that they know our taxpayers money was literally flushed down the toilet they are wiser and won’t make that mistake again. The liberal Dum0crats, however, will print money and spend it until our dollar is not worth 5 cents! Nancy and her ilk can go straight to Hades! They will not get bi-partisan support for this massive pork-laden bill.
Posted by: Peggy | January 29, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
Its about time the Republicans stand up in opposition to the out of control spending of our government. I say “Way to go”!
Posted by: Barbara | January 29, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
The only thing “bipartisen” about this was that 11 democrats heard their constituants who can read and write enlish and voted “NO”…. if any of you pay taxes, hold on to your wallet…The Nation is going the way New York has over it’s last 50 years… and we’ve lost more taxpayers than almost every other state…(The gov.t workers and those on public assistance stay)Where will everyone go when the Fed is as socialist as New York State??? How many of the spending items DON’t pay back a group that supported Obama?? isn’t that the definition of PORK???
Posted by: marde | January 29, 2009, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
Why can’t the people in the senate forget what party they represent when they are supposed to be voting for what is best for our country? It shouldn’t be about, you represent a different party than I do, so I am not voting with you. Aren’t they all supposed to do what is best for our country regardless of what party they represent? President Obama tried to give them all the option of understanding better the plans he outlined. He was even willing to change some of what they didn’t agree with. They passed it up. When an American citizen refuses to cooperate with our PRESIDENT, what does that say to other countries? We can’t afford to let party differences divide us or our economy will never recover.
Posted by: B_Strickland | January 29, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
you know what, there are some things in there that could be cut out. Most of the “pork” does not take up a huge portion of that fund. The funds will provide money for alternative resources, health care, tax cuts, education, infrastructure, etc. These are all valuable investments that will create jobs that will also improve the future. Now, it is true that there are some things in there that could be cut out but I do not think that those small concerns would make me oppose this bill. The first bill was just stupid because it simply handed money to the banks who just gave it to their CEOs who got them into the situation in the first place. This bill, puts a little more power to the people rather than the banks.
Posted by: Andrew | January 29, 2009, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
If we the people are furnishing the money to all the “Bail Outs”, then we the people should be able to vote on the future of the CEO that are becoming “Phat Cats” from our money. I think they should all be fired immediately!!! They have failed miserably at their jobs. If I made costly mistakes again and again, I would be on the street tomorrow…
Posted by: Mike Billingsley | January 30, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am
The Republicans don’t care about the economy, they don’t care about being non-partisan, all they care about is keeping taxes low for the priviliged view and to Hell with everyone else.
President Obama is sincere in trying to reach out across the aisle to Republicans but Republicans only know how to be obstructionists.
People on this board talk about the “pork” in the bill but none of them have read the bill or know exactly what is in it. They only know what they are told by Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.
Today, thanks to Bush and Cheney, they are only represented in the Old South.
Posted by: Findlay Way | January 30, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Tax cuts are coming from Social Security (from individuals), small and big business. Cutting SS taxes will be the final straw in killing SS for coming generations. Business has had the tax cuts for years; it has not helped in the last tow years so I do not understand how they will help now.
The stimulus must help immediately. Construction and IT modernization are two ways to put money into the pockets of currently unemployed people now (30 to 90 days) not 12 to 18 months.
Both sides have good ideas and bad, they need to combine them instead of taking all of one or the other.
Who will pay for this? We will sooner or later. I have heard some economists say the recession will end by the end of 2009 with or without the package, maybe but no one knows. All we know is that SOLID controls must be in place to stop the bleeding of money to those that do not need it (wall street bankers). These people have no place to go, every bank is cutting staff so who will hire these “valuable’ people? 18 billion dollars would save a lot of mortgages.
The Senate will have a better bill, we can only hope it is a combination of all the good ideas and controls that both parties have presented.
Posted by: Joe Scheible | January 30, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am
People can disagree until the end of time but they will still miss the moral of the story. The system is setup in a way that as long as you keep paying tax dollars it does not matter what party you support or what news source you support, you are not going to get ahead unless you know the right people. The only thing separating today’s society and the ice age society is you have a keyboard in front of you. People need to stop the finger pointing and get off their computers and do something constructive for the economy. You see I just united all of you in anger for me, now go enjoy your free country.
Posted by: unemployed carpenter | January 30, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
I’m a single woman that lost her job in early October. I send out 200 resumes a month and network but still I’ve had only 2 interviews. My skills and work experience are top notch so I’ve never had issues like this. Now I’m down to no savings, hardly anything in checking and no one able to assist me.
BUT I don’t want this package pushed through congress! I want the package to be able to help the US and the people. Things that aren’t going to stimulate the economy should be taken out. I would rather be in a box under the bridge waiting for a true stimulus package to be put together than to see this one go out.
Most of the jobs I see being created by the package are for construction, maintenance or scientific jobs. Where are the jobs for female workers? Sure science jobs are unisex but you need a specific degree. You can argue that the other jobs are unisex, but really…if a man and a woman are both applying who do you think they will pick? What about a woman that has a degree in office management?
Or what about funds to help people like me start their own businesses?
I know that I could latch onto a man that I’m really not interested in to help through these times, but that’s never been my style and won’t be now. When I’m in a relationship it’s that we are the right fit, not baby looking for a sugar daddy.
Posted by: MsCole1031 | January 30, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
How dare the republicans vote against a package with all that pork.
Posted by: Lizzie | January 30, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
The Republicans don’t care about the economy, they don’t care about being non-partisan, all they care about is keeping taxes low for the priviliged view and to Hell with everyone else.
President Obama is sincere in trying to reach out across the aisle to Republicans but Republicans only know how to be obstructionists.
People on this board talk about the “pork” in the bill but none of them have read the bill or know exactly what is in it. They only know what they are told by Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity.
Today, thanks to Bush and Cheney, they are only represented in the Old South.
——————————–
Findlay Way,
Wow….You sure are the King/Queen of the stereotypes aren’t you !!!!
First of all, the bill is posted online, it is over 600 pages, and obviously NOONE including the representatives in the house read every single line of it!!! Therein lies the trick of how things get done in Washington. This how “pork” get through the process, create a document big enough so noone can easily find all the little nuggets you hide in it.
Most people do not even completely read most of the legal documents they sign in life!
When I read it, I was amazed at how many millions upon millions of dollars are allocated for oversight. Of course there is no mention of the HOW oversight will be implemented, just big bucket after big bucket of money left laying all around for this function.
Example :
“DEPARTMENTAL MANAGEMENT SALARIES AND EXPENSES (INCLUDING TRANSFER OF FUNDS) For an additional amount for ‘‘Departmental Management’’, $80,000,000, for the enforcement of worker protection laws and regulations, oversight, and coordination activities related to the infrastructure and unemployment insurance investments in this Act: Provided, That the Secretary of Labor may transfer such sums as necessary to ‘‘Employment and Standards Administration’’, ‘‘Occupational Safety and Health Administration’’, and ‘‘Employment and Training Administration—Program Administration’’ for enforcement, oversight, and coordina
tion activities: Provided further, That the provisions of section 1106 of this Act shall not apply to this appropriation.”
That is 80 Million dollars “for the enforcement of worker protection laws and regulations, oversight, and coordination activities related to the infrastructure and unemployment insurance investments in this Act”
another one…
“For the costs of State administrative expenses associated with carrying out this section, the Secretary shall make available $150,000,000 in each of fiscal years 2009 and 2010, to remain available through September 30, 2012, of which $4,500,000 is for necessary expenses of the Food and Nutrition Service for management and oversight of the program and for monitoring the integrity and evaluating the effects of the payments made under this section”
Does anyone have any idea exactly where these millions & millions of dollars are going to go ? Will these agencies hire people do the oversight, or will it just be pouring money into the pockets of beaucrats?
These were just a couple of examples, that thing is laced with billions of dollars set aside like this.
Oversight is needed, that is a given! The question is how will it be implemented? How much of the money will have already been handed out before an oversight system is debated, approved & implemented?
Are we LEARNING ANYTHING YET Findlay Way?
This is the EXACT same road we just walked down with TARP and everyone agrees that it was a mistake to dump the big amounts of money with no idea on how to do the oversight!!!!
Oh yes, and I did not even get to that stupid idea of bith control stimulating the economy!!!
But by all means, lets just trust Nancy Pelosi, Barney Frank & Charlie Rangel to do “the right thing”!
There is no reason to doubt their integrity……LOL
Posted by: Mike_C | January 30, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
I believe whomever wants this stimulus bill should also pay for it. That would be through higher taxes. When I go to the store to make a purchase that “I” want I do not ask everyone in the store on that day to help me pay for it. Nor would I find even ONE person that would step up and say “sure let me give you the money I earned at my job this week so YOU can have what you want” you do have the right to make this decision. Therefore, you should pay the federal taxes that are going to go sky high. I on the other hand, should have the same right to not pay federal taxes because I don’t want to use the money I work to earn for things I don’t want. So if that was how it would work YOU WANT IT YOU PAY FOR IT. . .I DON’T WANT I DON’T PAY FOR IT. It would be interesting to know how many people would support this stimulus package on those terms.
I bet that is why several of Obama’s cabinet members didn’t think they had to pay federal taxes because what was being sold they did didn’t want to pay for. Not because of an HONEST MISTAKE.
OMG . . . . . . . . LOL
Posted by: Bonnie | January 31, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am
Eight years of Bush has done so much damage to the economy that it will take MANY YEARS to recover. Good luck America! Blame yourself if you have contributed to this mess. Enjoy while you may.
Posted by: Al | January 31, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am
i want to know when the new President is going work on these gas prices, and fuel prices, i feel they sould been taken care of to. I live in a little town in up state new york, and people want here wants something do here about
these prices. The white house and the our governor here in Albany wants us to change our ways, how far can we all go and change our ways. You guys talking about food prices going up, i wish the governor and the president would go to these stores and small stores, like all the stwarts stores and see how much food is THOWEN out becasue the date has expired, thats threwing way money. The only way the President is going to fix this emony is do something about these gas and fuel prices, they have to come down, so people can start buying stuff again.
Posted by: christine m | January 31, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
If these CEO’s are so valuable, how did they let the institutions they represent get into such a MESS. I suggest that all bonuses for any institution getting tax payer dollars be limited to $l00,00. This is TOO much considering the MESS they have created.
Posted by: betty w | January 31, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
gus “I watch Fox because they are the only fair people on tV today and in my part of the world that is what we need to hear”
THIS silly mindset is one of the reasons that the republicans can cling to their outdated,racist and exclusionary ways!!
As long as they have followers who are happy being “willfully ignorant” they move further away from the “thinking people” and drift away into oblivion:Sarah Palin and her crazy fringe group, and Michael Steele,being used as the “face” to criticize Barack Obama,are the gasoline that they use, and it further signals the end of this GoodOlePunk party of spineless leaders!
Where were their voices in the eight years that it took to create this massive mess?
They had no backbone when the country needed them to speak for the people,and now that dubya’s gone,the weaklings want to blame this mess on the Democratic party…,and now, we can’t shut them the HELL up!!
Posted by: Deb in Pennsylvania | February 2, 2009, 8:09 am 8:09 am
The Democrats passed the Bush package. While Bush may have come from the Republican Party, he spent money like us Democrats. We Democrats (I’m not one of the Democrats supporting this terrible package) are looking to use the fear and anxiety to push through spending that would not survive the light of day if proposed separately. Everyone needs to take a deep breath, wait a few months and then see what needs to be done. Spending in the past has not worked and will not work today. It will ruin the future for my grandchildren and great granddaughter. Your children, grandchildren and descendants as well. This is where the country and its citizens need to come before the power hungry politicians.
Posted by: Jay | February 2, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
DEB in Penn — NO backbone.. Do a little research. 2 years ago, at leat a dozen republicans appeared before congressional hearing regarding the looming mortgage crisis to be heard. Democrats like Franks, Reid and Dodd shut them donw and derided them for sounding the alarm on people Like franklin rains (who made 90 million while Fannie went under) the event was covered on Cspan and shows republican after republican trying to do something BEFORE this became the crisis that it as and Democrat after Democrat shot them down for it.. Now we have apresident that want to introduce a “stimulus” package that is 900 billion dollars worth of PORK.. 4 bil for ACORN, 30 bil for the teachers union, anothetr 8 billion on various intities like the endowment for the arts and the digital TV converter program, STD research, .. NONE of which will create a single job… Less then 2 months ago Obama siad that he would not sign any bill that had pork in it, yet he sponsors a bill that is 90% pork… the Kinsington institue on economics studied this bill and reported that less the 12 cents of every dollar spent would do ANYTHING to create jobs.. What it does do is pay back all the special interests that got him elected… Change we need?? I don’t think so…
Posted by: arkie vet | February 2, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Sigh, same song different verse a little bit louder and a little bit worse. Our President has stated he is willing to work with the Republicans to get a stimulus package together that will help the WORKING PEOPLE of America. He’s had meetings, he’s listened, he’s responded to some of their concerns. In my book, the only economic stimulus we need is to give some of that money back to the TAXPAYERS. What would I do with my share of 900 Billion? Pay off my mortgage, pay off my car, save some money in the bank. Oh, that takes care of the credit crisis and the auto industry issues if they gave us our own money back. Even the knot-heads who would go out and buy a new car and a lot of clothes (and not save a dime!) still have the same net effect on the economy…stimulation via circulation of money!!!!!!
Posted by: NatFrankie | February 2, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
This ‘economic’ package is anything but it was supposed to be. It was supposed to be plan to stimulate the economy. It was turned into a plan to waste money.
But, here’s a thought: Let the FDIC take the banks as they fail–FDIC always resells, often making money–and stop bailing out the top 0.1% of American Fat Cats.
Here’s another thought: CEO and Board Member Accountability–no bills for that yet. Instead of stimulus, how about a bill that says if you run a company into the ground you can’t be employed at that level again?
Posted by: Rob | February 5, 2009, 11:13 pm 11:13 pm
Finally. It’s about time the republicans got one right. I can’t believe that Obama asked for this. A TRILLION DOLLARS?!
Was Obama high or something? If he admitted to that, it’s forgivable. But if not I want to know what he was thinking. We were all furious when Bush wanted $700 Billion. That’s one huge reason we were all glad to see Bush go. Now with Obama, it’s looking worse.
Posted by: Bill | February 5, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
Reid publically stated “he had the votes to pass the stimulus” why all the fuss about Republicans? Is he afraid to go it alone? Sure seems like it to me.
Posted by: Mike Jones | February 6, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm
We need this stimulus package passed ASAP. Signed the ACP. American Communist Party.
Posted by: Lmichaeljones@yahoo.com | February 6, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
I at times read this Bs on line and need to voice my deep honest opinion being 70 years ols . This Punk OBAMA AS PRESIDENT WILL DRIVE THIS COUNTRY TO DYASTER ,COMMUNISM . I do not trust this young punk who knows nothing watch and see America.
Posted by: Raymond | February 6, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
Young though he is, limited though his experience is, Obama has shown FAR greater competency than the President he replaced.
Don’t ever forget that! The rest of the country DOES remember it!
And no, he is NOT interested in “driving this country to communism”. Not even close. You and all the rest of the dittoheads on the Far Right have completely forgotten what ‘communism’ even means — if you ever knew.
Besides: aren’t you following the new? 42% of the ‘spending’ in the bill is in EXACTLY the form the Repubs SAID they wanted: tax cuts!
So you see, your Repub friends on the hill have been lying to us all along: they SAID they wanted tax cuts, and then when they got it, they STILL refused to support the bill.
You have chosen your ‘friends’ very badly. The rest of the country has not: that is why we voted Democrat.
Now I have to admit: in recent years, when I voted Democrat, I had to hold my nose while I did it;) But any Democrat is a HUGE improvement over Bush!
Posted by: MattJ | February 6, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
When Bush wanted 700 Billion dollars, we all hated him. How could Obama ask for 1 Trillion? Is Obama even dumber than Bush?
This bill goes against the core of America, which is democracy and capitalism–America is not a socialist country and a bill like this will hurt the economy. And it will cost America $7000 per taxpayer.
Obama is proving himself to be nothing but the same old politics with this bill. And worse, it seems the hard left biased news media is trying to cram this bill down American’s throats, as if they’re aftaid to admit the guy they backed is making a mistake.
Posted by: Bob H | February 7, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
How stupid do you think the Republicans are? Democrat’s have the votes to pass this pork proposal, but they want to blame the Republican’s if it fails.
Posted by: Mike Jones | February 9, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am
Not enough time to do the stimulus right is ridiculous! Americans would rather the time is taken to do the job “right” vs passing a stimulus that will someday create jobs, will someday help the economy. We’ve already seen there isn’t total transparency, ethics has been thrown out the window with some of the people he is placing in positions, Where’s the change?
Posted by: Carrie | February 9, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Mr. Presdent, PORK, PORK, PORK, do you think ALL of the American people are stupid? This stimulus package is FULL of BILLS that have nothing to do with helping the economy. The change was to make things better not fill the White House with CROOKS and non taxpapers. This mess started with Fannie Mae
& Freddie Mac. Lets investigate who took millions from there, ILLEGAL!!
Posted by: Frank Burkman | February 9, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Has everyone forgotton about the Bush debt that Obama has been left? 700 Billion to the Banks without any restrictions? Obama did not do that. Bush turned his eye, to let the banks make took advantage of low income and misinformed Americans. They knew they were making loans to people who would not be able to pay them. No proof income? Interest only notes? No down payment? Where was the Banking regulation? Obama did not do this. The Republican Majority Senate and Congress did. This is the man that should do to jail for being “the leader of the free world” from 2000- 2008. Personally, I think he stole the election in 2004. Didnt think it could happen until this year with all the hanky panky with the voting….
Posted by: Lauren | February 9, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
just remembered yesterdays ROUND TABLE with George…Republican Senators BOTH said that US states coffers were bloated and did not need the stimulus cash. What planet are they on? States cant meet their unemployment demands today. There are 60,000 people in the state of Michigan who have to wait 6 weeks before they can get any unemployment benefits.
Posted by: Lauren | February 9, 2009, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm
what pork?
Posted by: Lauren | February 9, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
one more thing. Paul Krugman the Nobel Winner last year in Economics, agrees that checks dont work. Jobs do. JOBS JOBS JOBS. He has studied the great theories of economies and they all seem to agree that creating jobs is the best use of our money. It builds a future job market in our changing world. We cannot sustain the way we live. We are at the mercy of foreign oil. We just dont need that. They need us, not the other way around. Solar jobs, wind jobs, making public buildings independant of foreign oil. We CAN do this. It will be creative, and thrilling for Americans to be leaders once again. Initiating good things for our neighbors and our kids.
Posted by: Lauren | February 9, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
We all know the Republicans acted like a bunch of Democrats the 6 years they were in charge, however things really didn’t start going wrong until the Democrats took over the House and Senate. For those 2 years was when they change all the rules on financing and Bank loans. The rules they made permitted everyone to purchase homes without Qualifing. No wonder they are losing them. Change REED and PELOSI with good leaders and things could change.Let’s AUDIT the books on Freddie & FANNIE to see WHO took out the MILLIONS? WHY are the WHITE HOUSE new Cabinet Members all LOBBYIST? Mr. President, did not you say NO LOBBYIST
would be in YOUR CABINET? Is your CHANGE,CHANGE full of non-taxpapers?
So lets NOT keep telling everyone all of this is the Republicans fault! Don’t forget Demo’s 2 years of MESS.
Posted by: Theodore | February 9, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
Gee, it’s funny how much negative commentary this is getting–it’s as if the majority of Americans really don’t think wasting $7000 per taxpayer is such a hot idea. It’s also funny how little coverage the general public opinion is getting…can you say biased?
Posted by: rob | February 9, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
This so-called “Stimulus Package” will bankrupt America. Obama says there is no pork in it. That is a lie! It is full of Pork! If he had a fiscally responsible stimulus package, I would be all for it; However, his is full of corrupt polititians bying power with your tax money! What a disaster!!! It makes me sick to my stomach.
Posted by: Evelyne | February 10, 2009, 12:07 am 12:07 am
This independent voter from Oregon thought that TARP was horrible, and this Stimulus bill is the worst Partisian bill I have ever seen. Because of DeFazio’s and Wyden’s votes, I will vote for any person that runs against them in 2010.
Posted by: Chip Bradley | February 10, 2009, 2:14 am 2:14 am
I hope those Republicans that fighting this bill loose their seats in the next senate election – Further Pelosi needs to forego her own agenda and work with this president.
Posted by: confidential416 | February 10, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
I think to stimulate the economy we need to use some of the stimulus package to provide loans to companies that are in danger of closing and to reopen the companies by giving them the money that the banks could not give them rather than waiting for the banks to do it. This would save jobs now and working people will spend money and pay house notes to stimulate the economy.
Posted by: Flecia Martin | February 11, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am
waste of our wealth. by the time the small amount of money hits the street we will be on our way out of this correction brought on by stupid democrats and thier dumb give away the world ideas. capitalism is based on greed. that is why very little money will trikle down untill the world ends someone some where will being taking advantage of someone or some thing
Posted by: charles | February 11, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am
The only thing benefiting trom this bailout is the government. Our children and grandchildren will be saddled with this bill. The only things that will straighten out this mess is to cut government spending, tax cuts to taxpayers and holding those government, financial and industrial management folks who created this fiasco to account. Unfortunately this probably will not happen as our government folks don’t have the intestinal fortitude to accomplish this important feat. Cutting government spending and helping the consumer through tax cuts is the best way to jump start our ailing economy.
Sadly our government and liberal media will never let that truth come out in public.
Posted by: Jay Williams | February 11, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am
Stimulus or not this country will continue producing and purchasing, working and caring, living, improving everything and succeeding as we have done for more than 300 years.
If we have to go back to basics we can. And we can start all over again if we must, only to be the stronger and wiser for our experience. But we will still be here.
Though some try to frighten us with gloom and doom, this country will NEVER vaporize.
Posted by: G. Goodman | February 11, 2009, 3:49 am 3:49 am
Instead of giving billions to companies that have already proven they are incompetent… divide that money up amoung the taxpayers and see how much that would stimulate the economy. With a million dollars, we could pay off our mortgages, buy new cars, new furniture, send our kids to school; isn’t THAT stimulating?
Posted by: Sherry Ramos | February 11, 2009, 8:17 am 8:17 am
Wake-up…smell the coffee!! The CEO’s “carte blanche” and spending got us into this mess. Shocked? Of course.
Why should taxpayers flip the bill?
CEO’s or are Con artists? Shouldn’t they be held accountable? CEO’s bonuses itself can create a tax-free Stimulus Package. I’m sure this package will stimulate them and the country.
Posted by: evee | February 11, 2009, 8:17 am 8:17 am
“How could they?” How could they not? This bill brings socialized medicine and every other leftis agenda, won’t stimulate the economy and will cause more harm in the long run than doing nothing at all (according to the congressional budget office).
Posted by: UScitizenlover | February 11, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am
I would like to see GMA be the network news staff to have the integrity to actually show the American people where the money proposed in this stimulus package will be going. I don’t hear anyone on your program mentioning that it provides sod on the mall in Washington, D.C., a person to oversee the medical procedures your doctor orders for you, and many other items that do nothing to stimulate our economy. Let all of us know the truth about where our money would potentially go, and then we won’t have to rely on partisan blogs to get our information.
Posted by: Lynne Curran | February 11, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
I believe that if the money went to the working people in America and not just another hand out to the banking and other big businesses, it would stimulate the economy. I do NOT think that any money should go to the teacher’s union, Acorn or any of those people. Obama said we would have change and we will have if he has his way. Even more money will be thrown away on useless and wrong entities.
Posted by: LCox | February 11, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Ok so we let all are jobs go overseas, did any one wonder what will happen to us in 30 or 40 years ago, we would not have been here now we have more people coming to the USA then there are jobs for us. I think the big company that get the money should be use for the business and not to give raise to the company, we should not take away from our kids and young adults and senior. What if the people didn’t have to pay any bills for 3 to 6 months, until the big company get there self together..so we the poor people can catch up eating and buying gas and getting insurance for are family..I have more.. I belive Obama is doing the best he can with what he was left with, it time for a change we can’t be scare to change the pass has not work, cut the higher goverment worker and higher people job so they can understand how we feel.
Posted by: Stephanie Brown | February 11, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
At this point I don’t care if they are Dems or Pubs. Everything is riding on the backs of the american taxpayer, who are losing their homes, jobs, pensions & livelihoods! Is there a way that the money could be given directly to taxpayers to spend? More specifically the bailout money. I’d rather have some of that money instead of the stimulus money that right now is going to be about $400 dollars. I have medical bills that cost more than that and a mortgage, student loans etc. Fortunately I have a job but co has implemented a day off w/o pay one of many. A RIF plan is being put into place so that will be next.
Americans/taxpayers need help now!
Posted by: CJ Albright | February 12, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am
I am confused by all of the people who say how pork filled this stimulus package is and how they do not want to carry a trillion dollar debt. We are already in the highest deficit ever thanks to Mr. Bush, and every other spending bill passed has had loads, and loads of pork, yet the Republicans passed it if it had something in it for them or their party. I own a small business and am slowly dying on the vine because of the banking mess. There was no fiscal conscience when giving the banks millions that we are now saddled to pay back, with no strings attached for the banks. They put in their vaults and said “thank you very much”. That didn’t help this country one bit, and it certainly didn’t help me. We need this country to work together to fix the mess that was made and I agree that we need our leaders to listen to our voices, not our party affiliations. We are all Americans, and we should all want what is best for our country. If they don’t stop the bickering, blaming, and prioritizing of party over people, then we must speak louder and stronger and force them to hear us, force them to act in our best interests.
Posted by: Amy | February 12, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
It seems to me that a lot of the good stuff that was in the bill got cut out, and now it’s got a higher percentage of pork. It got ramrodded through and folks were encouraged NOT TO EVEN READ IT. We are told that the only thing that mattered was the immense size of the bill supposedly being applied to the economy. But in truth, there’s a lot of stuff in it that has nothing to do with the economy. In fact, they took out the tax cuts from it. So it’s not like the lower middle class will have any money to spend to help the economy. Oh well, at least Obama’s buddies will get a boat load of money…
Posted by: Bob H | February 12, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
The block voting obstructionism of the GOP in the Congress is as suicidal as lemmings leaping off a cliff, or drinking the kool-aid Jim Jones gave his people. The DNC must be delighted, anticipating the 2010 election cycle with relish. Send the whips out for coffee and let the GOP elected vote the way their districts want.
Posted by: faucon24 | February 13, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
OINK OINK OINK This PORK bill is going to squander your money on a high-speed train from Disneyland in California to Las Vegas Nv so Sen. Reid’s buddies get their political pay-back. Illegal Aliens will continue to take jobs Americans are fired from since the E-Verify provision was eliminated in the conference bill to pay back criminal employers of Illegal Aliens. Your health care now will be dictated by a D.C “Tsar” It appears there is about 2/3rds PORK in the bill, but since NO ONE HAS BEEN ALLOWED TO READ IT let alone understand the major points there is likely to be even more PORK than first detected. It is for sure the only jobs to be created are going to be in an additionally bloated bureaucracy in D.C. The stampede to vote on this PIG IN A POKE bill is so that no one gets a handle on what it really is prior to a vote meaning the fools in D.C. will vote for it ’cause they’ll go along to get along. What a bunch of phonies, fools, and anti-Americans they are. Call and or email your Senators right now to express your outrage at this swindle, this theft of the American dream.
Posted by: Tucano Fulano | February 13, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
What Pork? That is funny.
Posted by: Texas | February 13, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
Bush Sr., Clinton, Bush Jr, Obama – Wow, boys doing a man’s job. But this last one looks like he is finally going to do us in, the nail in the coffer.
Reagan, a hero doing a man’s job, thank you Ronald Reagan. Sorry they all betrayed what you started. Your the best!
Posted by: Texas | February 13, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
“The American dream is not that every
man must be level with every other man.
The American dream is that every man
must be free to become what God
intends he should become.”
Thank you – Ronald Reagan!!!!
Reagan Carter Debate.
Oct. 28, 1980
Posted by: Texas | February 13, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
The is the begining and end of the Pelosi/obama administration
Posted by: Garth Webster | February 14, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am
You Americans have only complained and criticised. Those who voted for Republicans and Bush, you deserve to be where you are right now. Don’t complain that you are in an economic mess and in debt. May God help you!
Posted by: Al | February 14, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Yes indeed. They will long for the days of bush after obamanism has destroyed this country
Posted by: patriot | February 14, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Interesting. If you really blame one guy for the condition of the economy, consider this: Nobody talks about the fact that the economy was actually worse when Carter (dem) left office and Reagan (rep) came in. Reagan didn’t need a Trillion dollars of pork to fix it, and it stayed fixed for quite a while…
Posted by: rob | February 15, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am
I am praying for our country because the Bible says that if we come back to God and pray, He will heal our land…not Obama. The very things that have made this country strong and free are the very things that are going to be its downfall. My prayer is that Obama is struck with the Holy Spirit in a mighty way – then we will truly see change!
Posted by: Cathy | February 15, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
“United” is even a part of our name as a country, yet I am seeing a division that could ultimately threaten our very existence. I am not 100% thrilled with the details of this bill, but I will be supporting it 100% because we have to believe we have better times ahead. I appreciate the tax cuts as well as the direct cash injection – call me a centrist who is not a fan of waste. However, I am frightened to death that we have a party that currently has a vested interest in seeing this package fail. This juvenile urge to scream out “I told you so” is undermining our ability to see a decent future. The GOP is currently out of power on the heels of 8 years of failure. (please, that argument is OVER!) Step aside and give the plan a chance to work. Wishing for an even greater disaster to gain political capital is downright treasonous. I applaud any and all sources of constructive criticism as that is an American strength, but taking action to deny Obama a chance to succeed is spitefully ANTI-AMERICAN! He is OUR President, unless you wish to opt-out by removing yourself as a citizen (buh-bye now). It’s all-or-nothing time and failure is not an option. It is my honor as a Citizen to be a part of this experiment. We are bound by a common American experience and I respect our ability to succeed when we are united, and I am downright disgusted when we are not. United We Stand, Divided We Fall. I choose to Stand.
Posted by: Geoff | February 16, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Geoff; So you’ve chosen to support this experiment with our children’s reality?
We had an economy that prospered overall for over 200 years, through recessions and The Great Depression. Now as part of a social experiment our leaders have chosen to conduct a coincidental economic experiment. As a citizen who will feel the full affects of whatever happens, having no choice short of revolution, I accept the fact that I have to accept the facts. That doesn’t mean I’ll be involved beyond kicking and screaming every inch along the way. It’s not the party, it’s not the man or his color I despise. It’s his policy that chafes me.
Posted by: mmonroeliveson | February 16, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Can all the laid off workers afford to purchase a new vehicle? Lets keep paying the union to pay their people because they are the only ones that can purchase these vehicles. Nice strategy
Posted by: sharon | February 18, 2009, 8:04 am 8:04 am
Obama is turning this country into a socialist nation. Everything will be owned and run by the government. Why do American’s want that? I believe they want all the free handouts and “everyone is equal” thinking that Liberals and Democrats bring to the table. Stimulus is not the answer. Stopping white collar crime from these executives is – but who gives all the big campaign contributions!? And yes – there is no form of mass media that’s gives us the true and real story. People need to think for themselves. You need both sides of the story. And ABC is very bias – they love Obama and could have ripped him to shreds and chose not to. Why do we want someone associated with Acorn as our President?
Posted by: djohnson | February 18, 2009, 9:37 am 9:37 am
I find this to be very interesting. I think that I can agree with some of the posters that the only time the GOP could find “fiscal discipline” was when they lost power, became Congressional minorities and a Dem became president. Let’s put it very bluntly, it isn’t fiscal discipline or fiscal responsibility, it is partisan politics. As a Republican, let me inform you dudes of this, the GOP favored special interests. So much so in the name of Reaganomics that we literally saw a financial collapse start occurring as happened the last time Reaganomics was employed. Just because you repeat an ideological mistake, doesn’t mean that you will get it right the second time.
Posted by: Joan E. Harman | February 19, 2009, 3:46 am 3:46 am
Put me in the smaller government, less taxes, and pro-business/market forces column.
This president wants, and is, leading this country to become a unilateral debter nation. By giving/selling the farm, Americans and other countries will become more beholding to “him”. Our taxes will significantly increase despite his promise of lower taxes.
WE will pay the piper: User fees (highway, FCC, FAA, etc.) gasoline taxes, utility {electricity, natural gas and water usage}fees/taxes, less Social Security and older retirement ages, etc.
So will the stimulus help or hurt? No question, the increased debt’s purpose is the threshold to D.C. control over our lives, and an effort to diminish state’s rights and individual state’s sovereignty.
Posted by: Citizen1 | February 19, 2009, 9:34 am 9:34 am
Is it me? Or did we seem to learn nothing from the banking industry? The banking industries questionable lending practices (Loaning money to clients who obviously could not pay it back…)have led to the problems we are now seeing.
Now the nation spends money it does not have to cover loans that should have never been given out, and keep people in houses they should never have bought and can not afford…..
…and this is supposed to lead us to prosperity???? The light at the end of the tunnel is a train!
Posted by: Chuck | February 19, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
Not being for or against any particular party, I voted for Obama and was hopeful for change. I have a small grooming business; I help out my customers by keeping my prices low enough so that they can afford to keep their pets maintained in these tough times. I literally just make my mortgage payment every month. I live on wheat thins, I never buy extras of any kind, I wear hand me down clothes and I am careful with every dollar. When I changed careers a few years ago from the big money job, I made sure I changed my lifestyle to fit my new income (2/3 less). I paid down my bills, traded in my sports car for a cheapie so my biggest responsibility was my mortgage. Yes it is tragic for any one to lose the one asset they might own like their home. Yes I am very aware that life isn’t fair and I would be the last one to be against trying to help those in need. But people being bailed out for living beyond their means, taking chances with flexible mortgage rates and not thinking about “what if.” What do they learn if someone else fixes their mistakes. Nieve or ignorant, we as responsible adults should know there is no “too good to be true” and if we are willing gamble – that is a risk we decide to take. Putting your signature on any documentation like a mortgage and not understanding or knowing the consequences is stupidity. Meantime, people like me will keep struggling to make my payments and at some point perhaps lose my battle. When that happens, who is going to help me. I really wanted to believe in and rely on President Obama to fix this enormous mess. There is no easy answer, but the best way to learn a lesson is to suffer the consequences and fix your own mess. Helping these people by lowering the interest rates and monthly payment I am willing to agree with. But paying them a yearly incentive for making their payments – ARE YOU KIDDING ME! How about giving those who have not contributed to the mess and paid their mortgage a yearly incentive – because God knows we could also use it!
Posted by: Candia | February 19, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
ABC –when are you going to start reporting the real news, i.e Putin telling the US not to go to Socialism…they have tried it and it DOESN’T work. Why aren’t you reporting on Putin saying this????
Posted by: Snevrag | February 19, 2009, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm
I think the president is giving money to the wrong people. the banker and outo companyies are just another form of greed that has brought this country down.
well he is planning on helping people get out dept with there mortgages, why help just the people in forcloser, what about the people who pay there mortgages but struggle with health care.
this what I thing should be done
With the Trillions of dollars spent on bailing out these big conglomerates, give every family house hold $250,000 dollars and make sure they pay off there dept first. Then they can start spending again to boost the economy. Maybe even buy cars to help the auto industry. This would also make is more easy to afford health care.
My point is every one could get out of dept and that would Trickle up. Instead of hoping wall streets money will trickle down.
Then the banks would get there money back on loans , mortgages, and so on. People would be able to stay in there homes, and the banks could start lending again, and people would start speninging and investing again.
Posted by: Gina | February 20, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am
Don’t take the simulus package Republicans!!!!!! How could they do their people like this. How could they play politics with these people lives that live in their states. How can they want this country on it’s feet if they are “bucking” for politics only. How can these “Scrubs” say anything different. “These, they” are Jokers.
Posted by: sngeorgia | February 23, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
This president has no clue what-so-ever.I give him an A+ for passing political BS 101, and a F+ for failing to develope a plan that will help the AMERICAN CITIZENS survive through this crappy age that all of us hard working CITIZENS are funding with our taxes and our GHILDREN’S taxes. Stop spinning your political wheels and get it right, or maybe that’s asking to0 much…….
Posted by: SAM ASH | February 25, 2009, 1:45 am 1:45 am
Yes, Obama means well but he is short on leadership. The Dem House and Senate ran wild with the Pelosi/Reid Pork Bill and Obama rubber stamped a bill no one read.
Kudus to the Republicans that tried to bring some sanity to an extra $875 billion in debt.
Posted by: Jay in PA | February 25, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am
What we have is a bill that no one could read, let alone digest and intelligently comment on given the time frame that the President and his administration set. What we needed was a well thought out bill that did not have any pork (don’t confuse it with earmarks). No one is saying that the stimulus as passed will work. Everyone is choosing their words carefully. We are being told that we might have to spend even more! President Obama failedin his first big test. He should have spent more time developing the stimulus rather than trying to push through a bill that no one can say was the best one possible. We needed this to be the best possible because we might not be able to do this again. He taqlks about sacrifice, bu ti don’t see any sacrifice, just a shotgun spending approach.
Posted by: JIm | February 26, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
If you don’t like the new leaderships ideas MOVE TO ANOTHER COUNTRY!!!!
Posted by: ron | February 28, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
I think the stimulus is a great idea but there’s another problem with the government. They wonder why we don’t have a lot of money well why don’t we stop giving government officials a whole bunch of expensive vacation time. They spend a lot of money on just luxury when they should be thinking about economy and how their actions effect it.
Posted by: Miranda | February 28, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
Dear President,
Great job on the economy. I lost my ### in the stock market. Everything was fine until you and your tax cheats got in to office.
Thanks Pres,
Zinnie
Posted by: Natz | March 4, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
SHUT UP!! do something possitive , any one can complain… WE I mean all of us, in this country need to get up and take controll of our own crap, then we can start to change this country..we are the problem.. we have forgot that this country was build on the beliefs of the bible., thats where all the answers are.. PRAY
Posted by: paul | March 4, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
To continue to allow last years or this years or years to come pork in our bills is not good government. In todays economy we will do will to fund necessities and no more. Please!
Posted by: Deb Avery | March 4, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
President Obama, You are like a teenager who found someone elses wallet. Instead of seeking its rightful owner, you are spending it thinking the owner will appreciate your selections. STOP, LOOK, AND LISTEN to the rightful owners. Eliminate those earmarks you promised to cut when you were campaining. Do not increase taxes either. We are sickened at the thought of your flagrant proposals!
Posted by: Edith Gibbons | March 4, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
If the president signs this bill with all th pork in it then he is a disgrace to ou country, just another liar, not a leader
Pat
Posted by: pat | March 4, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
I am ashamed of our polticians that they are using our money, not theirs, for programs that our country can not afford at this time. Most of the hard working responsible people in this country manage their money and do not go into dept. They save their money until they can buy the things they need. I hope the president comes to his senses and vetos the bill.
Posted by: David Salzburger | March 4, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
All of the earmarks going into this bill is despicable. This bailout could be the biggest American scam ever. It makes the brazen ceo’s look mild. We want to trust and be hopeful,but not stupid. MVK
Posted by: MKV | March 4, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm