Momentum for Gas-Tax Hike?
ABC News’ Rick Klein Reports: Raising taxes ranks among the last things smart Democrats want to do with their newfound control of Washington. Raising taxes on gasoline — where low prices constitute one of the few perceived bright spots for a struggling nation — is a surefire political loser.
Right?
Don’t look now — but momentum is starting to build from influential corners for an increase to the federal tax on gasoline.
The rationale: With a crumbling road-and-bridge infrastructure, and widespread interest in investing in renewable energy initiatives, widening a reliable revenue stream is tempting.
The thinking is that drivers can afford to pay more than the current 18.4 cents a gallon federal tax on gasoline (the tax is 24.4 cents a gallon on diesel), now that gas prices are well beneath $2 a gallon again.
According to the Associated Press, the National Commission on Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing — created by Congress to analyze ways to pay for federal transportation initiatives — will recommend this month an increase in the federal gas tax of about 10 cents a gallon, and slightly more for diesel.
Environmental groups have long called for a higher gas tax as well, though they would direct the money toward renewable energy initiatives.
Last week, New York Times columnist Tom Friedman called on President-elect Barack Obama to endorse a higher gas tax — something he has shown no indication of doing so far.
“I believe the second biggest decision Barack Obama has to make — the first is deciding the size of the stimulus — is whether to increase the federal gasoline tax or impose an economy-wide carbon tax,” Friedman wrote.
“Best I can tell, the Obama team has no intention of doing either at this time. I understand why. Raising taxes in a recession is a no-no. But I’ve racked my brain trying to think of ways to retool America around clean-power technologies without a price signal — i.e., a tax — and there are no effective ones. Without a higher gas tax or carbon tax, Obama will lack the leverage to drive critical pieces of his foreign and domestic agendas.”
The question for Obama: Will he want to risk political capital on an initiative that figures to be widely unpopular — and one that feeds Republican perceptions of tax-and-spend Democrats?
Obama has expressed concern about raising taxes during a time of economic duress, though the issue of a higher gas tax wasn’t front-and-center in the campaign.
Obama did, however, split with Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., (and Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.) during the Democratic primaries, on the issue of a gas-tax holiday. Clinton wanted to suspend the federal tax when gas prices were soaring last spring, but Obama derided the idea as a “gimmick.”
“People are more concerned about looking good for the cameras and for politics than they are at actually solving problems,” Obama said in May.
UPDATE: I spoke Friday afternoon with Adrian Moore, one of the commissioners whose report recommends an increase in the gas tax.
He provided some interesting perspective: First, the commission sees the gas tax as the best way to fund infrastructure projects only in the short term, until technological innovations can allow a more fair way to charge drivers based on the mileage they drive (and wear down roads) and when and where they’re driving.
Second, the commission is also recommending a major revamping in how projects get funded, based on actual need instead of political horse-trading. And third, the recommendation for a higher gas tax was developed over the summer — back when drivers were routinely paying $4 a gallon for gasoline.
“I have a lot of trouble with raising the gas tax, because the way we spend the money is so messed up,” said Moore, who is vice president of research at the Reason Foundation, a libertarian think-tank.
“The political reality is that it’s going to be difficult, because people don’t trust the system [of funding infrastructure projects],” Moore said. “Raising the gas tax would be a big mistake if we don’t change the system, to get rid of the waste, the silliness, and the politicization of the funding process.”
Email
Santorum Clarifies Concerns on Women in Combat
Gulf of Mexico to Become Gulf of America?
Sure, it’s a smart thing to do.
Didn’t Tom Friedman write about this very issue just a few weeks ago?
Posted by: Bill in NC | January 2, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am
I hope the Democrats do raise taxes on fuel. The American people will be outraged and kick them out in 2010. I see this as just the beginning of many taxes to come from Obama and his Dem buddies in congress.
We may not have the transparency Obama promised in government but taxes are always transparent when people have to pay them.
Posted by: James | January 2, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
I sincerely doubt that the Obama and/or the Democrats will raise gasoline taxes… after all, these are the same people that recognized middle class America is disappearing and only the RICH Republicans are left. Perhaps, the rich Republicans are pushing for this because they don’t know what to do with their money! There is a Republicans State Rep here in Illinois suggesting the state should raise the gas tax… You would think Republicans would be smarter now. They have lost big time – yet continue to be for the RICH!
Posted by: Sandi | January 2, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
Politicians see gas prices lowering, thus helping the average American, and now want to raise the taxes on them. How about not giving hundreds of billions of dollars to their corporate buddies? That would help pay for infastructure projects. But no, the average American will get to foot yet another bill.
Posted by: i just love him soooo much | January 2, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
Where are those true leaders who know that raising taxes does not solve problems!!?? For goodness sake! Can’t we start electing creative thinkers who will make the tough choices and cut spending rather then have people cough up more money in taxes.
Just a reminder, if the gas taxes are raised, you can expect the price of gas to rise as well and this time, the federal government will have even more reason to not fight the higher cost. Their bottom line will depend on high gas prices (the tax is a percentage of the amount paid at the pump).
Posted by: Angry taxpayer | January 2, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
This is one of those academic elitest ideas that does not work with the voters.
You mess with the voters gas prices and you are a short lived politician.
Sounds like elections of ’94 are getting ready to happen again.
Posted by: donbl1 | January 2, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am
It is quite proper to use taxes to control behavior. If the gasoline tax were higher then maybe people would drive more fuel efficient cars and our dependency on foreign oil would decrease. Seems simple to me. Much like raising the tax on tobacco to discourage smoking.
Posted by: Jim | January 2, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
Sandi: could you not manage to make your argument with real points, or maybe some facts? Really, what happened to you? Did a republican divorce you or something?
Posted by: steven | January 2, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
On a related note, I am hoping that the Democrats have a filibuster proof Senate so they have no one to keep them from theirselves……
It is time to have to come through with the silliness of higher gas prices, card check for the unions and free health care for the 42% of Americans who already pay NO federal income taxes.
Please, give the Democrats complete reign.
Posted by: donbl1 | January 2, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Sandi – Stop with the fantasy that the Republicans are for the rich – it was a Republican administration that cut taxes for 95 percent of taxpayers (lowered them to pre-Clinton levels) and started funneling more money to neighborhood charities throughout the country. Take a look at Bush’s faith-based initiatives spending – that money went straight to helping the poor – not the rich.
By the way, supporting businesses and helping them thrive is not the same as “being for the rich.” When businesses are strong, people work. When businesses falter, people are forced out of work. Unless you want to see the US become a welfare state with more then 20 percent of the population on some type of federal assistance (very expensive by the way, it takes a lot of your tax dollars to support those people) the businesses must thrive so that people can work. That’s just reality.
Posted by: Get over it | January 2, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
There is a time for everything. A time to raise a gas tax and a time to have your brain re-installed. Lower gas prices are THE ONLY bright spot tax payers see. Lower gas means lower business costs for those small operators who relay on transportation.
Try to see it this way, instead of an opportunity to raise taxes it is a stimulus that just fell from heaven. Don’t worry OPEC is sworn to take that small blessing away. A swift tax raise will be the gravy stain on Obama’s tie that remains for the next 4 years.
Posted by: Thomas Delaney | January 2, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
i will bet anyone here big $$ that there wont be a significant federal gas tax increase,at least not anytime soon . it could happen ,in a year or three perhaps but not until some rich peoples tax rates get increased ,which IS going to happen pdq ,thank god.
the whole idea of an increase in fuel taxes is just some republicans looking for some way/any way to deflect attention away from where the needed tax revenues REALLY need to come from,i.e. rich peoples overstuffed swiss bank accounts. the democrats arent stupid or greedy enough to play ball though so the whole republican bred idea is a perfect lead balloon from the start.
a gas tax affects the lower /middle class directly ,who were the big slice demographic that got obama (and the democrats) elected in the first place; any significant federal fuel tax increase would be seen by those voters as a stab in the back ,sure political suicide.
you really think obama and his staff are that naive? cmon…
Posted by: hah | January 2, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Jim – taxes are a way of controlling behavior? Since when is the government meant to control behavior? My politicians represent me – they are elected to work on behalf of their constituents and achieve the goals of their districts – they are not elected to find ways to control the behavior of the voters!.
by the way, if politicians really wanted to encourage people to drive less or use less gasoline, they would find ways to make it easier to avoid driving, not finding ways to make it harder for them to drive. Invest in trails, sidewalks, buses and trains, not roads. Educate people how they can convert their vehicles to alternative fuels or provide tax breaks or grants to fuel station owners to allow them to convert some of their tanks to alternative fuels (very expensive). Raising taxes is the easy way out and will not solve any problem or control behavior.
Posted by: Me | January 2, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Americans oppose tax increases at any time and for any reason. It doesn’t matter if it’s gas taxes, school millages or federal income taxes. This is because elected officials spend 100+% of their revenue, no matter how low or high it is. So raising taxes at any time for anything is a pointless exercise. If Congress would adopt real fiscal discipline, you’d get more willingness on the part of the American People for a tax increase, because they’d know it’d be used for something meaningful, not just endless pork.
Posted by: Will | January 2, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
“It is quite proper to use taxes to control behavior.”
Exactly, and this is why the founders made war with the British aristocracy; it seems that King George III was doing a lackluster job of “controlling our behavior”.
The problem was contained while we still had cotton plantation slave masters to “control behavior”. Then somehow, some right ring idiot started prating on about “human freedom” and from that point onward it’s been all downhill.
We need goverment to control us lest government of the government; by the government; for the government shall perish from the earth.
Now how can we get the government to control our voting behavior lest we err in that regard too?
Posted by: Bruce Frykman, Elk River MN | January 2, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
What a bunch of idiots…Raise gasoline tax and and watch the SEVERE ressesion prolong its self. Besides, theoryetically less auto’s on the roads means less maintenance.
Posted by: cjcanu01 | January 2, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
And so it begins….No one has ever taxed themselves to prosperity. If we want change, let’s change back to Reagan’s ideals of low taxes and less governmental interference. That worked before and will work again for us now. If we follow the high tax crowd, a whole lot of people will not be working very soon.
Posted by: Bubbler Dad | January 2, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Try taxing the heck out of big giant gas guzzlers instead of cutting middle class americans in two by charging us more money to drive our 10+-year-old fuel efficient Camrys et. al.
Posted by: Nianya | January 2, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm
Bubbler Dad: “No one has ever taxed themselves to prosperity. ”
The gas tax – which is the same as a decade and a half ago while cement and steel costs have risen even faster than vehicle miles driven – does not bring in enough money to pay for maintenance of the roads. Do Republicans propose:
1. Tax income to pay for roads.
2. Tax some other non-related field to divert money to roads.
3. Allow the current road infrastructure to continue to decay.
4. Increase the gas tax to allow for continued maintenance of the US’s road infrastructure.
Those are the choices. You can whine and pontificate about taxes, but I hope the adults in government deal with reality.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 2, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
I am so glad Tom Friedman – and his ilk – are now here to save us all. You people who voted for “The One” are about to get what you asked for.
Posted by: TaxU | January 2, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
“Since when is the government meant to control behavior?”
Since it’s creation – never mind reading a bit about the Founding Fathers, you should probably start with Hobbes and Rousseau.
“Raising taxes is the easy way out and will not solve any problem or control behavior.”
It’s success at doing everything from providing for the common defense to creating the interstate highway infrastructure to even cutting teen smoking (the typical allowance is sensitive to an extra $1 per pack) is well documented. Providing bumpersticker opinions that are firmly and widely refuted by reality adds little to the discussion beyond noise.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 2, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Taxu: After eight years of getting what Republicans and ‘their ilk’ who elected Bush and a Republican House and Senate voted fore, I’m more than ready to get what I voted for in Obama (higher taxes on me personally, but a return of competence and a pragmatic respect for reality to the executive branch).
Posted by: jhw539 | January 2, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
Well, either way, they’re going to loose.
If you increase the tax to pay for the roads, you will make Americans drive even less, buy even more fuel-efficient vehicles, etc. In one way, this is good, for it will curb gas consumtion even more. The other way is that the Feds will have even less money from taxes to fix the roads. So in the long term, they’re going to end up taxing something else to get the money.
The other side of the coin is that if they do not increase the gas tax and do not find another source of revenue, roads and bridges will decay and Americans will be stuck with fewer and fewer good roads to drive on.
So either way, it looks like a no win scenerio.
Posted by: GWP | January 2, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
GWP: “So either way, it looks like a no win scenerio. ”
One of your scenarios includes the US buying much less oil, which is sure to reduce the money going to the Middle East. While I realize the Saudis and our president are best friends for life, I personally see less money for Bin Laden’s homeland (and a return to reality for oil-money-drunk Iran/Russia/Venezuela/etc.) a Win.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 2, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
neither a borrower nor a lender be…
Posted by: hah | January 2, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
Raising the gas tax in a recession when automakers and other businesses are lining up for a handout? Is there not a better way to convince people to drive less and use less fuel? Are the American people now deemed so stupid that the only way to curb their excessive driving habits (even in areas with no public transportation, no sidewalks and no alternative to driving) that the only way to solve a problem is to tax them more? I sure do miss the innovative American spirit – you know, the one where we tried to solve problems rather then learn to find ways to profit from them.
Posted by: Miss S | January 2, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Didn’t Obama promise not to raise taxes on the middle class/ working class? Wouldn’t gas tax indeed by a tax on the working middle class since we need our cars to work. Even worse, part of it again is to go to REDISTRIBUTE wealth from those that work to those that really don’t in the form of EIC. Obama lied….he is so going to tax us that are members of the working class. But hey, with fewer of us able to afford to drive to work, Obama will be able to have less crowded roads for his gas gozzling limos and Suvs.
Posted by: chattyway | January 2, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
The most important line in this story is buried in the ninth paragraph:
“…the Obama team has no intention of doing either [raising federal gas taxes or imposing an economy-wide carbon tax] at this time.”
It MIGHT make sense to raise taxes on fossil fuels IF there was a low-cost, cleaner alternative already available. Currently there is not–like it or not, we’re stuck running gasoline-powered cars and heating our homes with fossil fuels or electricity produced in fossil-fuel-burning power plants. I’d love to see this change, but I don’t think changing it by making it more expensive for everybody (via a tax). I expect Mr. Obama understands the issue enough to realize this, which explains why he hasn’t said anything about imposing these new taxes.
Posted by: Enough | January 2, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
Miss S: “Is there not a better way to convince people to drive less and use less fuel? Are the American people now deemed so stupid that the only way to curb their excessive driving habits ”
Speaking of so stupid, you do realize that there is data from just the last year showing, in big 10′ high letters with flashing lights, that a $0.10 increase in the price of gas has negligible effect on miles driven (or the price of groceries, mail service, etc)?
Law making by whining that has no basis in reality has to stop.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 2, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
As far as decaying roads and such….even today, every gallon of gas nets the government $.47 that is supposed to go improve roads, bridges and such. AS usual though, every time the government gets involved fraud, waste, and abuse occur. The government has wasted this money as they will any new tax money. BTW, Obama is scam artist and like he did with Rezko, he has worked with “builders” (think road construction now) to increase taxes only so his buddies can scam the government. The Rezko scam included Obama arranging for millions $$$$ of tax payer money to be used to “build” low housing projects and renovate others….most of these homes were condemned at total waste to the low income and tax payers. Obama involved in roads almost certainly means roads/bridges made subpar that will prove dangerous and be condemned later. History repeats itself often and Obama has a history of this.
Posted by: chattyway | January 2, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
jhw539 “It’s success at doing everything from providing for the common defense to creating the interstate highway infrastructure to even cutting teen smoking (the typical allowance is sensitive to an extra $1 per pack) is well documented.”
– I beg to differ with you that it was the tax money that makes the difference in solving problems, like smoking – education tends to make the biggest difference.
Those expensive anti-smoking, anti-drinking, anti-drug ads paid for by higher taxes actually do very little to curb behavior. The tax itself also has done little to change smoking or drinking behavior – people quit when they are ready to quit, not when a government tax instructs them to do so.
It’s when the non-profit anti-tobacco, anti-drug, anti-drinking groups (like MADD) began going into the schools (for free – no tax dollars involved) and began working to prevent these problems early in a child’s life (first and second grade) that the declines started happening.
A gas tax would make life very hard on a big part of the population – some people drive to work because they have no other option. Many poor people watch their pennies and even a slight raise in tax could cause them significant hardship, as we’ve seen in the past – when gas prices inch up even by a few cents poor people start to make difficult choices. I suggest you visit a soup kitchen or food bank to hear some of the stories about how people are really affected by these tax increases. The solutions don’t come from raising taxes, they come from analyzing the problem and finding real solutions.
Posted by: C'est la vie | January 2, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
The man isn’t even in office yet, and already he’s reneging on promises not to raise taxes. Frankly, with all the empty promises he made during the campaign, there’s no way fund any of it without raising taxes. Sadly, truthfulness doesn’t seem to register on the scale of qualifications to be POTUS. Sincerity, yes; truthfulness, not so much…
Posted by: V Van V | January 2, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
Miss S ,that is NOT sop (standard operating procedure) these days.
the new american spirit is to CREATE a problem/problems where none existed previously,(or exacerbate current problems ) to throw taxpayer money at ,”providing much-needed new job growth…”
(with the accompanying increase in tax revenues ready and waiting to be duly misappropriated and gleaned ,eg T.A.R.P. = G.S.T.L = GOVERNMENT SANCTIONED TAXPAYER LOOTING )
Posted by: hah | January 2, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
Raising gas taxes doesn’t hurt?
http://www.lunsfordgastax.com/
It most certainly does…and when the price of fuel goes up, so does the price of everything else.
Posted by: chattyway | January 2, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
jhw539 – Rarely do numbers tell the whole story and often studies and data are sadly misleading. Talk to some people who are struggling, you might find that there is another side to the story. Although ten cents per gallon might mean very little to you and the majority, I assure you, it would be a hardship on some people. Not all can just turn over additional pennies to the government. You may not have noticed, but times are tough right now and lots of people are struggling.
Posted by: Miss S | January 2, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Obama doesn’t plan on a gas tax or carbon taxing us to death? Don’t you Obamabots read or ever admit the truth?
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122445812003548473.html
Obama must certainly does. Politiicans like Gore stand to make millions $$$$ off these increases.
Posted by: chattyway | January 2, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
Now that gas is resonably priced again, lets have Obama and the Dems raise it back up again. Brilliamt idea , especially since the same people(Democrats) said that high fuel prices were ruining the economy a year ago. Keep It Up Democrats….. Obama/Biden, Pelosi, Reid, Frank, Dodd, Etc.
Posted by: ynot | January 2, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
It’s in their blood. The Democrats have to raise taxes. They can’t stop. Tax and spend. Tax and spend.
Posted by: Lee | January 2, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
*******The Obama Count*******
That will make 5 campain promises Obama has gone back on before his swearing in!!!
Posted by: yea right | January 2, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Angry Taxpayer said: “Just a reminder, if the gas taxes are raised, you can expect the price of gas to rise as well and this time, the federal government will have even more reason to not fight the higher cost. Their bottom line will depend on high gas prices (the tax is a percentage of the amount paid at the pump).”
Actually the tax is a flat tax per gallon, so the price of gas at the pump would have no effect on the tax amount.
Maybe we should just borrow more $$$ from the Chinese to pay for our road repairs. That seems to be the GOP way to avoid higher taxes: rather than tax and spend, they borrow and spend. Problem is, someday, someone will have to pay it all back…..
Posted by: SearamblerOne | January 2, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
I hope the demoncrats raise taxes. It furthers the belief that this is an area they know how to lead. The GOP, if they are not too stupid, will take this issue and run with it as a tax on the middle class. Of course, throughout all of this rhetoric, no one thinks about cutting spending in areas that are bloated and transferring that revenue to the roads. That type of thinking is “change”, but it’s too much to ask.
Posted by: Gina | January 2, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
oh, gee, what a surprise. as if this was not expected. the democrats mismanage money & want us, the payday to payday people to pay. all they have to do is take all teh money on wasted programs added to bills & use that. i am so tired of paying & paying for our so called govt leaders mistakes & misspendings because they thiunk they always know better
Posted by: nancy | January 2, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
The gas tax really doesn’t need to be raised. A rise in the price at the pump (one or two dollars) would easily net the government the extra tax dollars they need as the tax is based on the sale price.
Of course, the government doesn’t set the price for a gallon of gas, but when prices rise, like they did last year, the government doesn’t really try to stop it either. Sure, the well-publicized hearings were a good show, but it was the government that was laughing all the way to the bank – they profited nicely from those high prices.
Posted by: Just following along | January 2, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
What are these guys thinking? How is this going to help the auto industry? I’m really getting tired of the tax payers getting kicked in the behind. Congress can afford to pay the extra costs as they just gave themselves a raise. Most of us had to take paycuts to keep our business’ going.
Posted by: grams09 | January 2, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
yea right, go back and actually read the article, then tell us how Obama has already ‘gone back’ on his campaign promise…..
Posted by: SearamblerOne | January 2, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Here’s the deal. When gas was over $4 a gallon we in the US were sending about two billion dollars a DAY to people who do not like us much. All we heard about was how they were so great and building indoor ski slopes in the desert and luxury everything else PLUS a lot of kill the infidels even if you have to blow yourself up. If you want to fight the war on radical islamic idiocy, tax gas to drive the price of oil down and these places will self destruct from internal strife.
Posted by: reprvrbaby | January 2, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Scrambler One – “Maybe we should just borrow more $$$ from the Chinese to pay for our road repairs. That seems to be the GOP way to avoid higher taxes: rather than tax and spend, they borrow and spend. Problem is, someday, someone will have to pay it all back…..” —
Sure, or we could just find ways to make it easier for people to drive less (more public transportation, trails, sidewalks, etc.) … or maybe we could find ways to encourage more gas station owners to carry alternative fuels (greater availability of alt fuels, like E85 throughout the infrastructure would make it easier for more people to use those fuels). These things could be done without putting extra burden on those who can’t afford to pay higher taxes.
But, raising taxes to fix roads so people can drive more is easier isn’t it?
Posted by: angry taxpayer | January 2, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Obama, his administration officials, and members of Congress need to read Tom Friedman’s “Hot, Flat and Crowded”. It should be required reading for the US public as well. I am really disgusted at the knee-jerk reaction to the raising of the Federal gas tax. People seem to have already forgotten the dramatic effects on SUV sales and travel when gas rose to over $4.00. The price of gas is about double in many other countries. At what point is the US public going to wake up to the horrendous situation this country and the world faces in climate change and environmental pollution. The incompetently written $700B bailout for the greedy financial idiots has nothing to do with it. That system also requires major overhaul (e.g. NO more derivatives and hedge funds). Anyway, instead of carping about the sins of others, the American public needs to look at itself in the mirror and think of the incredible waste (not just the efficient use) of all types of resources. I am slowly coming to the realization that Obama is not going to have the guts to effect really radical reform on any front. Finally, don’t complain about Congress. You voted for them.
Posted by: F Benson | January 2, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
I knew lower gas prices were only temporary. People got a little comfortable and started buying gas hog SUVs again.
One of the reasons gas prices went down is people started buying small cars, lowering the demand for gas. But the boneheads had to have the big SUVs.
Posted by: Barbara Wright | January 2, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
People, the tax rate does NOT go up with the price of gas! If gas is $2.00 per gallon, the (current) tax is $.184 per gallon. If gas is $4.00 per gallon, the (current) tax rate is still $.184 per gallon.
I don’t want to pay more at the pump, just like most everyone else. What are the alternatives, to continue funding our road system?
Posted by: SearamblerOne | January 2, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Obama’s takin my change.
Posted by: bpercival | January 2, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
This is what is wrong with politicians, they have no clue the impact of decisions like this. Go ahead keep raising taxes on everything, you dumb A$$$$!!!!! NO MORE TAXES WITHOUT REPRESENTATION! NO MORE!
Posted by: Lynette | January 2, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
If Congress could actually come up with a plan (remember the Big 3 bailout, anyone? They were told they had to have a “plan”….) then maybe the middle class could get behind a gas tax increase.
I’ve always felt that as soon as the price of petroleum goes down, everyone gets amnesia and won’t support public transportation alternatives, or they buy another gas guzzler.
At this point, I don’t trust anyone–no CEO’s, no senators, no one.
But, alas, if America wants to get serious about alternatives for transportation, then cutting existing costs isn’t the answer. We’re already to the point of cutting funding for agendas that most of us don’t want cut. Just wait until we have another bridge fiasco, and then remember that we can’t build a new one, because Congress can’t figure out how to plan their budgets intelligently to use those extra taxes for what they were intended.
Posted by: Debbie | January 2, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
SearamblerOne ,dont bother responding to the republican troglodytes ,they have shown pretty clearly to every thinking person on the globe that they are incapable of having a discussion without trying to grossly distort the truth or having to resort to just plain old lying .
republicans are , in general ,either patently and tacitly ignorant of “facts” or egocentrically indifferent to them and ,unfortunately for the rest of the citizens of this great country usually they are both …,blissfully (and hatefully) so to boot.
note: remember “obama dollars” ? and then again just this week it was “barak the magic negro”? it just goes to show that republicans, bigots/racists that they are , just cannot help themselves it seems. keep it up republicans ,the whole world is seeing and making/taking long-term note of you .
Posted by: haha | January 2, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
This could be a problem, since with the bailout of the auto industry, we soon will be driving true alternative energy vehicles…won’t we? No more of Americans being held hostage by the auto industry to the oil industry…right?
Posted by: mojo | January 2, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
Just the first of many tax increases to pay for the change we can believe in boys and girls.
Posted by: buckaroobonsai | January 2, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
What if we raised the gas tax and used the money to improve public transportation? Americans are too much in love with our cars. Travel somewhere like the UK where gas taxes are much higher and you find smaller cars, more compact cities (maybe its a little late for the US) and much better public transportation.
Posted by: Jim | January 2, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Scrambler one, gas taxes don’t end with the 18-cent fixed excise tax that you’re referring to, and yes, some state taxes are based on the price at the pump and some of those taxes funnel to the federal government too.
http://www.eia.doe.gov/bookshelf/brochures/gasolinepricesprimer/index.html
Posted by: Not so fast | January 2, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
Jim – of course you are right, there are certain behaviors that should and must be influenced. Raising gas tax for the right reason and using the revenues correctly is an excellent approach. Just like smoking, high gas use has far reaching consequences far beyond the individual. I would opt for $5/gallon with a $4 tax, with a fixed profit for the oil guys and use the revenue to drive real energy independence. Americans have shown that “we” are stupid and very selfish. Unfortunately, it is the human condition of all peoples. Make bad habits (like a 100lb female driving a 3 ton “subdivision SUV” alone or one guy driving a 3 ton truck with the bed empty 99.9% of time) pay for their lack of vision. The problem is that we don’t learn without siginificant consequences. Gas is being held low on purpose by the oil folks until we “forget” and start buying those big dumb autos again. You don’t think that the big-3 and oil and unions are not in deep together on this? Do some carefull research and read behind what is “not said”. Also, 90% of use americans have cars that work just fiine, we don’t need new cars every 3 years. But if there was a REAL reason to buy a new one – give me 50+ MPG, or PHEV at ZERO gallons on my daily commute, that I would invest in for my family. As Forest Gump loosely said “stupid is as stupid does”
Posted by: california girl | January 2, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Why would anyone object to paying more taxes? With Obama in charge, we know the money will be spent well. Bring on the higher tax! While we’re at it, let’s bring back the tax on food and medical services too! It was silly to do away with those taxes, especially since our government so badly needs more money.
Posted by: Bring it on | January 2, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Angry Taxpayer said:
“Scrambler One – “Maybe we should just borrow more $$$ from the Chinese to pay for our road repairs. That seems to be the GOP way to avoid higher taxes: rather than tax and spend, they borrow and spend. Problem is, someday, someone will have to pay it all back…..” —
Sure, or we could just find ways to make it easier for people to drive less (more public transportation, trails, sidewalks, etc.) … or maybe we could find ways to encourage more gas station owners to carry alternative fuels (greater availability of alt fuels, like E85 throughout the infrastructure would make it easier for more people to use those fuels). These things could be done without putting extra burden on those who can’t afford to pay higher taxes.
But, raising taxes to fix roads so people can drive more is easier isn’t it?”
Making it ‘easier for people to drive less’ will still cost a lot of $$$. Public transportation simply is not feasible in many parts of the country, and would cost a boat load to start up. Trails and sidewalks will not get people to work. Maybe we should mandate that everyone lives within X miles of their job? And if you live far enough from your job that you have to drive to it, you pay extra. (OK, even I don’t really think that makes sense). E85 gas is less efficient than ‘regular’ gas, so one has to fill up more often using it. The gas companies would certainly like that. But at least you’re thinking of alternatives to a higher gas tax, which is definitely a step in the right direction.
One more thing. The article raises the POSSIBILITY that we MAY have to increase the gas tax IF we don’t find an alternative funding source for road and infrastructure repairs. Some people here seem to think that it is a foregone conclusion under Obama. It’s not. “Don’t look now — but momentum is starting to build from influential corners for an increase to the federal tax on gasoline.” A government commission, some environmental groups, and Tom Friedman seem to make up the ‘influential corners’…..
Posted by: SearamblerOne | January 2, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
C’est la vie: “– I beg to differ with you that it was the tax money that makes the difference in solving problems, like smoking – education tends to make the biggest difference. ”
Beg all you want, but please provide some data to contradict the reputable studies I am basing my opinion on. Underage smokers appear to be sensitive to price pressures. This is not a cherished opinion, just an observation of the collected data. I’m guessing that they’d rather have a new iPod than a month of smokes, and $6 a pack prices make this trade off obvious.
I agree with most of your rant about the stupid ads (which have gone so over the top in some cases, like marijuana, that kids assume they’re lying equally when dealing with serious drugs, like meth), but increasing the cost of cigs – which tax does – has clearly been shown to reduce the people picking up the habit. The higher cost of a pack appears to have a stronger deterrent effect than all the ads and warning labels put together.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 2, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
california girl – so what will happen to the price of food when farmers pay $5 per gallon to run their tractors? Or how about the family that lives in a rural community with no public transportation and can barely afford $2-per gallon gas to drive to work? What happens to them? Well, the family I guess can either cut back on food, which is OK, since it won’t be cost-effective for the farmer to run his tractors anyway. You’re right. It’s a win-win for everyone.
Posted by: Farmer Jo | January 2, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
haha,
I also remember “GD America” (Wright) ” I’d like to cut his nuts off” (Jackson) etc. it seems as if there is stupidity and bigiotry and racism in both parties. What do you call the troglodytes on your side of the fence?
Posted by: buckaroobonsai | January 2, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Miss S: “jhw539 – Rarely do numbers tell the whole story and often studies and data are sadly misleading. Talk to some people who are struggling, you might find that there is another side to the story. ”
So we are to set policy by talking to a few random people as opposed to looking at studies that talked to thousands? A struggling unemployed worker will be in far worse straights if the road money needed comes from taxes on businesses.
There is no free ride – where should the money to maintain and fix our neglected infrastructure come from? Or should we continue down our current path to a second-world infrastructure (and all the economic growth penalty that entails)?
Posted by: jhw539 | January 2, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
jhw539 – I’ve spent the past few minutes reading over these comments and wonder why you always throw snide, insulting remarks into every one of your replies to people who don’t agree with you? Most of these comments, people are simply not agreeing with you, not insulting you. Do you think that calling someone’s comment a “stupid rant” makes you sound somehow smarter or superior? (hint – it doesn’t)
Posted by: Oy Vey | January 2, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
See Item #4.
Thanks to ACORN fraud, hussein succeeded in hijacking the presidency – as he did with his nomination. Add this disgrace to the d-crat Congress and here is what you get:
1. AMNESTY for all 20+ million illegals
2. A federal mandate that states must issue drivers licenses to illegals.
3. An end to ALL off-shore US drilling (which the d-crats just allowed to go forward- Buffoon Barney Frank has already indicated it will be stopped if the d-crats win).
4. TAX INCREASES and MORE TAX INCREASES and MORE TAX INCREASES and MORE TAX INCREASES because “RAISING TAXES IS PATRIOTIC”, says plagiarist-joe.
5. A MARXIAN RE-DISTRIBUTION OF YOUR WEALTH (i.e., giving your hard-earned tax dollars to non-tax-paying slugs and slackers via the biggest welfare program in history)
6. The biggest expansion of the federal government in history
7. The loony-left radicalization of US education as hussein tried to do in Illinois with his pal, Weatherman terrorist Bill Ayers.
8. Elimination of FREE SPEECH via a government mandate banning conservative talk radio.
9. Government controlled healthcare.
10. Mandatory s*x education in KINDERGARTEN (as hussein enacted in Illinois)
11. Enactment of the d-crats’ “The Employee Free Choice Act” – which will force millions and millions of Americans to join unions – with union dues going to the d-crat party, like-it-or-not.
12. Tax cheat d-crat Rangle allowed to continue heading the House Ways & Means Tax Panel with full authority over YOUR taxes. (His motto is: “You pay taxes so I don’t have to”.)
….and even more disgusting actions too numerous to mention.
Posted by: ALEX H | January 2, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Those of you who think higher prices will force people to change their habbits haven’t been paying attention the last 6 months. People in the US have to drive, they have no choice. Sure we’ve cut down, but do you see everyone in a hybrid? Nope.
Posted by: Jerry | January 2, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
jhw539, Tobacco does not run a tractor during planting or harvesting, nor does it transport crops to market or goods or services, increasing these costs hurts the poor most of all, no one needs to smoke, but people need to eat so I look at your logic as being flawed.
Posted by: buckaroobonsai | January 2, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
SearamblerOne – Actually, trails and sidewalks DO make it easier for people to get to work, school, the store, appointments, and most are designed for biking and walking and connect with public transportation. (think of a trail that connects an outlying subdivision to a bus stop – people walk or ride their bike to the bus stop then hop on the bus to get to their destination). And, they’re cheap to build – people love to volunteer on trail-blazing projects – which is why most forward-thinking states and municipalities are increasing what they call “walkability” within their communities. These things are being done mostly without tax dollars and do much more to change behavior then a tax. Take a look at your town’s 10-year plan. I don’t know where you live, but I would wager a bet that the plan includes hopes to increase walkability.
Posted by: Angry taxpayer | January 2, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
Thanks, Alex, for the funniest silly rant I’ve read today!
Posted by: SearamblerOne | January 2, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
This is very very concerning. We have government continually being controlled by DEMOCRATS (House, Senate, and now Presidency), they increase taxes instead of looking to cut fat out of budgets. This will place more financial burden on ALL citizens and hamper any type of financial recovery. Think about this – how many people living in poverty – create jobs? This tax is just what our country doesn’t need.
Posted by: very concerned | January 2, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
If the government wants a renewable and releable reveneu stream they should legalize marijuana and tax it.
Posted by: magoo2u | January 2, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
So, do all you Obama supporters still think he won’t raise taxes on the middle and lower class? Yes, he is currently saying he won’t raise the gas tax. But when he changes his mind, the middle and lower class will then get taxed just as the upper class will. He WILL find a way to tax the middle and lower class. When he does, do not complain because you are the ones that voted him in.
Posted by: Big Al | January 2, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
The cost of fuel is ridiculously low in the US. Just try to live in Europe for a few years. I recommed jacking up the fuel tax and put the money in better green technology and deficit reduction programs.
Posted by: MovieWatcher3000 | January 2, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Barack – gas is now $1.35 and you want to put a higher tax on gas? Not a good time dude
Posted by: Bob | January 2, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Gas prices have only gone down recently and I do not trust that they will stay down. At one point during the past year we were paying over $400 a MONTH on gasoline for our cars and I do NOT drive a Hummer! When prices on gasoline go up EVERYTHING goes up as well – food prices, airline rates, etc. I voted for Obama but as a moderate I can promise him and every other liberal dem supporting tax hikes that I will NOT vote for him again if he starts messing with taxes. Get out of Iraq – use the $$ to rebuild their infrastructure to rebuild ours and leave our taxes alone.
Posted by: allie08 | January 2, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
very concerned: “This is very very concerning. We have government continually being controlled by DEMOCRATS (House, Senate, and now Presidency), they increase taxes instead of looking to cut fat out of budgets.”
For those of use in reality, we see that it is documented that REPUBLICANS were in control of the Senate and House for the majority of the last decade. And how did that turn out? I suppose you consider the prescription drugs giveaway to drug companies (the government not only picks up the tab, it promises not to ask for a discount!) an example of spending restraint?
(And yes, I know I’m wasting time replying to a cliche’ Concerned Troll.)
Posted by: jhw539 | January 2, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
Oy Vey: ” Most of these comments, people are simply not agreeing with you, not insulting you. Do you think that calling someone’s comment a “stupid rant” makes you sound somehow smarter or superior? (hint – it doesn’t) ”
People should be called out on being ignorant out of laziness and embarrassed when they say something silly (I certainly have been in the past by the strong pro-gun rights crowd – they had facts and strong reasoning and I was suitably embarrassed to have barreled in ignorant). I suppose I grew up in a time when there was such a thing as a stupid question and people worked to keep up and listened so they never needed to ask one.
(I would argue that I am actually insulting the comment, not the person, but I don’t feel that important but fine detail is even necessary to defend myself.)
Posted by: jhw539 | January 2, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
I think it is a great idea. In fact I was thinking about it a few weeks back myself. Here are a few pros:
1)It will reduce demand little more.. further reducing the price of a barrel.
2) It will give more money to American govt rather than oil producinig nations who will otherwise try to raise prices and cut production.
3)It can be reduced in future when gas prices are high thus proving some relief when the prices are high.
I would vote for a 10 cent per gallon increase.
Posted by: Smart | January 2, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
buckaroobonsai: “Tobacco does not run a tractor during planting or harvesting, nor does it transport crops to market or goods or services, increasing these costs hurts the poor most of all, no one needs to smoke, but people need to eat so I look at your logic as being flawed.”
The need for infrastructure improvement had absolutely nothing to do with my mention of the cigarette tax, rather that was a side illustration of the proven and documented ability of taxes to shape societal behavior with a minimum infringement on freedom. I apologize for going badly off topic, I know it makes it tough for people just doing a quick scan.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 2, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
allie08: ” When prices on gasoline go up EVERYTHING goes up as well – food prices, airline rates, etc. ”
The price of gas has halved in, what, the last year or so? I have noticed airfares are down a good 20% or so, but have not noticed any changed in the supermarket.
The impact of fuel prices on consumer goods is real, but it is pretty minor outside of the direct transportation (trains, planes, and buses) market.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 2, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
I seem to remember Senator Obama saying that there would be absolutely no increase in taxes for the middle class, but a tax cut instead. We’ll see if he keeps his word.
Posted by: jjsmith | January 2, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
NO MORE TAXES !!! AMERICANS ARE SICK OF IT. ESPECIALLY TAXES THAT EFFECT THE POOREST. OH, BUT IT IS FOR A GOOD CAUSE, YEA THEIR POCKET BOOKS.
Posted by: drwfll | January 2, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
i am a obama supporter but i hopehe doesnt raise gas tax. raise taxes on the filthy rich have been rapeing the economy for the last 8 years. if we need money take it from those that are responsiblefor this mess and that is most republicans and the rich—-duh one in the same lol
Posted by: T | January 2, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Either a gas tax hike or strict government regulations on emissions – we must change demand before we can affect change in supply. ……………
http://thefiresidepost.com/2008/12/10/why-government-management-of-auto-companies-will-not-work/
Posted by: Ohg Rea Tone | January 2, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
What the F***?
Posted by: rich | January 2, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
@Not so fast:
“Scrambler one, gas taxes don’t end with the 18-cent fixed excise tax that you’re referring to, and yes, some state taxes are based on the price at the pump and some of those taxes funnel to the federal government too.
http://www.eia.doe.gov/bookshelf/brochures/gasolinepricesprimer/index.html”
Please reread the article. The state and local taxes applied to a gallon of gas are sometimes also applied to the federal tax. In other words, they are a tax on the federal tax. Nowhere does it say that any of this state and local tax revenue goes back to the federal government.
Posted by: Ernie Mercer | January 2, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Just another federal government money grab. They want to take the money, waste 1/2 of it and then fund some WPA program which will be totally ineffective. This is just one of the many completely fouled up programs Obama is going to try and invent.
Posted by: Brian | January 2, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Listen, I hate to be a buzz kill here, but an increase in the gas tax isn’t a bad idea. What IS a bad idea is what we Americans have historically always done…which is to forget the lesson and repeat history over and over again. Gas prices soared and, for the first time in decades, people actually became consciously aware of their driving habits. They moved to hybrids if they could afford one, others started carpools to help share the costs, still others got creative with their schedule or telecommuted a cpl days/week. And collectively, we all agreed that we needed to stop the cycle and move quickly on alternative fuels and more fuel-efficient vehicles. Now, the cost is down (for now) and to listen to some of you, it’s like it never happened or will happen again. I know Obama is focusing on things to help the middle class, and increasing the gax tax doesn’t change that. The fact is that he told us change would be difficult and it would take sacrifices from everyone (yes, incl the middle class). As far as I’m concerned, a modest increase in the gas tax is a small price to pay for the country’s and planet’s future. And I’m just a little tired of the whole “sacrifice is fine as long as I’m not the one who has to do it” kind of attitude. We ALL got ourselves into this mess, and it’s going to take all of us to get out of it.
Posted by: nancy miller | January 2, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
T- the really rich are Democrats. including Kennedy, Kerry, Soros and most of Hollywood.
Posted by: Brian | January 2, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
THE Chickens are coming home to roost. Obama supporters > Your dear leader, is about to stick it to you. Congress pasted legislation to increase CORPERATE WELFARE, Ie, bailouts. IT’s about time you idiots start listening carefully to someone other than John Stewart, or Travis Smiley. You been hoodwinked. Super inflation is the next problem on the horizon.
Posted by: heavenislikethis | January 2, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
IS ANYONE WONDERING WHAT HAPPENED TO THE 350 BILLION DOLLARS THAT WENT TO BAIL OUT THE BANKS —SO THE ECONOMY WOULD BE GIVEN A BIG BOOST…SEEMS THE ECONOMY IS WORSE NOW THAN BEFOR ALL THAT MONEY WAS GIVEN TO THE BANKS? HOW COME NO ONE IS TALIKING ABOUT THIS ANYMORE–WAIT TILL WE GET THE BILL ON THAT ONE–
Posted by: silverlady | January 2, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
How else can Obama pay for his welfare programs but by raising taxes. Yes he will lower taxes in one area so he can preach to the MEDIA that he lowered taxes and the GULLIBLE MEDIA will be awestruck again. But then Obama will have massive tax increases everywhere else
Posted by: pug | January 2, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
1. High fuel prices were killing the airline and auto industries. It is unhelpful to send things where they were.
2. The assumption is always that somehow the government will spend the money wisely. It’s funny because usually the government taxes and then figures out how to waste the money later. If there is a specific necessary infrastructure project, then the project should be well-outlined and a time-limited increase in spending to cover the cost should be implemented.
3. There are some in the US (and on this blog) whose agenda is for us to all drive fart-driven small-car deathtraps. Real people still need trucks to do real work. Yes, we need a sound energy policy, but taxation is not a sound policy!
Posted by: 1percenter | January 2, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
I am sure Obama worked out all this in mock theory in one of his college classes
Posted by: dee dee doo | January 2, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE read the Tom Friedman article by clicking on the “Friedman wrote” link. There is so much at stake here. We cannot continue to finance terrorists and autocratic regimes that wish to do us and the American wway of life harm. And Mr. Friedman also said that we can offset the increased tax by decreasing payroll taxes. More money in your pocket and then consumers decide if they want to keep it there (decrease individual fuel consumption) or spend it (buy/keep a gas guzzler.) As the problems facing us mount many of us have come to believe that we can get something for no sacrifice. Our leaders trying to do that is how we find ourselves with a $11 trillion debt and none of those problems are fixed.
Posted by: TSnow27604 | January 2, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Again, this sounds like a juicy story, but Obama has no plans to enact this tax. That minor detail buried in the ninth paragraph.
So please stop calling Obama supporters idiots as though he’s about to single-handedly bring gas back up to $4.50 a gallon. I prefer to let him actually take office before criticizing his presidency.
Posted by: Enough | January 2, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
Raise taxes on gas. So what now I am sppose to quit my job, stay home and walk to the nearest welfare line. Take the money for roads from some of those bailouts. The Feds have billions stashed away. In the meantime I still work at 72 to pay my mortgage. So do I stop working and go for foreclosure. Who is ever going to help the average person. The whole world is crazy, so glad I am getting close to leaving it.
Posted by: Elen | January 2, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
There should be a price floor of at least $3 on gas. We have to get off the stuff. Islamic terrorists, Iran, Russia, Venezuela, etc. International freedom and the price of oil are inversely related. Look it up. As demand and prices rise, authoritarianism increases. And then there is climate change. And there is the fact that we borrow hundreds of billions from China (again, not our friend) to send to the Middle East for oil. US companies cannot invest money until their is a hard target as far as energy costs. You can’t try for $4 energy when the price drops to $1.50. We have spent decades letting other coutries dictate our energy plan/costs/solutions and it has to end.
Posted by: TSnow27604 | January 2, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Let them raise our taxes. The end result will be a Republican in the White house in 2012….guarnteed.
Posted by: boxcar | January 2, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Oh yea as if gas prices weren’t high in August 2008….let’s raise the tax on it. It seems lack of common sense still plagues Washington. What makes sense is ignored so that a reality can be created from a fabricated perception.
Posted by: People are Dumb | January 2, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Elen – fear not. The One will see to your needs.
Posted by: Hold onto your wallets | January 2, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
Typical.
Gas prices are the one bright spot in this economy and Obama is proposing to increase the tax on it. Can’t say I’m surprised. How about this? Let everyone who voted for this guy and the Dems pay for it. Stop funding your pet projects “on the backs of republicans.
Posted by: NoGasTax | January 2, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
Stop complaining! The gas tax is the cheapest on planet earth. $0.18 cents per gallon. Europerans have been paying $3.00 or more per gallon on tax alone. Will a couple of cents brake your bank account? We are in winter, look at the roads and bridges, pot holes. We need the gas tax to pay for therepairs of our infrastructure. It is the fairest tax, only those who actually drive on the road, pay for it. If you don’t drive, you don’t pay.
Posted by: omar | January 2, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Here we go everyone! The problem with any tax is they never seem to go away.
Posted by: LongT | January 2, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm
The ole Bait and Switch scam….. …. yup…. BO and Democrats’ say they’re going to lower middle income taxes… then they raise or create other “HIDDEN” taxes to get our money for their PORK Barrel projects…………. Americans who actually work for a living just can’t win…………
Posted by: Vet1973 | January 2, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
They need to start charging and collecting back pay on all the oil pumped on Federal land that hasn’t been collected in years.
Posted by: rightbehind | January 2, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
Everyone on this site who thought BHO was on your side (stupid liberals) – raise your hands. Now that we know who you are – do these three things: ball up your fist. now look at your balled up fist. now thrust your face forward and tell yourself that you are stupid.
There is no “Gas Tax.” No “Carbon-Tax.” It’s just another way to send more money to Washington and then they parcel it out in 100 different directions. (ie Your SS tax of 12.5% doesn’t go to the SS Trust Fund – it goes into the General Fund.)Liberals, keep punching yourselves.
Posted by: NoGasTax | January 2, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Tax hikes, and things like them, always start like this, with an odd article here and another there along with the “what if” idle talk. Of course, there’s a paragraph telling the reader that lawmakers are only considering doing this, nothing has been decided. Next thing you know, the tax hike is passed and in place.
Posted by: Mary | January 2, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
You liberals will hopefully wake up after this and see that 50% of America was right that the dems would just raise taxes. That is so smart to do with the economy in termoil. WOW!! What a bunch of smart people. How about we keep tax cuts and offer larger companies a tax break if they will come back to America and help create jobs instead of going to other countries and leaving Americans jobless. The next thing to do is regulate the union criminals. A person on an assembly line does not need 18 dollars an hour for assembling a part. If they want to make more money then go to college and get a degree. Not everyone can have that great job and that is understandable but dont complain about where you work and what you do. Get off your but and do it.
Posted by: mike | January 2, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Did anyone consider that your Government might already have the money? They take approximately 20% of GDP. That sounds like enough money to me. (However- I am reasonable. Give us a consumption tax and no income tax and -I might support the bill.)
Posted by: NoGasTax | January 2, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
One more.
These people in Washington have given us a 10-12 Trillion National Debt. The programs they created and fund – Medicare and SS – will soon be running deficits in the next 10-15 years and then officially go bankrupt . . .and we shoud give them more money to manage.
-(Hand to foreheads) Why didn’t we think of that?
Posted by: NoGasTax | January 2, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
brian—yes and they all are willing to pay more because they realize at hard times we must all work together and not get greedy like most republicans are. i make good money i own a small business and i am willing to pay a little more if it helps others. but i forget republicans hate anybody taht isnt rich and they could care less about the poor and workingclass.
Posted by: T | January 2, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
Wanting to raise the gas tax is further proof that there are those in Congress and state legislatures are not the smartest people in the world. If the incoming president goes along with them, he ain’t so bright either. High fuel costs are the reason we are where we are economically at the present time. People spending more on fuel means people spending less on food, clothing, medicine, appliances, automobiles, homes, etc.
They pushed and ordered the automotive industry to build more fuel efficient vehicles. They complied and less fuel caused the coffers to have less money so, they raised fuel taxes. Fuel costs went up, as the envirowackos hoped it would, people drove less. Less money in the coffers. Their solution, raise taxes and drive the costs up again. People drive less and guess what? Less money in the coffers.
The same thing with other things the government thinks it has the right to control. Tobacco is taxed and people use less so, they raise taxes on tobacco to attempt to gain more money, they get less.
Posted by: yeoldgrump | January 2, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Why stop at taxing gas? Why not place levies and taxes on all petroleum products including plastic water bottles, plastic bags and plastic food packages/wrappers, plastic-based shoes, furniture, anything made from plastic? We really need to curb society’s dependence on plastic.
Posted by: hola | January 2, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
I really hope our new government will look to cutting wasteful spending, eliminating unnecessary government jobs and offices, and reduce tax burdens on all of us so we can turn this economy around and create jobs here in the U.S.
Posted by: beepositive | January 2, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
I don’t think an additional gas tax will serve the unemployed and financially distressed at this time. It may become necessary in the near future, but people have been suffering through this serious recession. It would be best to hold off on any gas tax at this point.
Posted by: jmb | January 2, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
No problems for the bailouts, but when it comes time to pay for them, “not I said the little red hen….”
Posted by: think-long-term | January 2, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
yeoldgrump: “Tobacco is taxed and people use less so, they raise taxes on tobacco to attempt to gain more money, they get less.”
Tobacco is taxed to reduce consumption, which is a major social health problem. And it works.
Gas usage, which funnels money to the Middle East, is a major national defense problem. We would only be so lucky if a gas tax worked as well as a cigarette tax.
And do you seriously think high gas prices are to blame for the current economic mess? I haven’t heard any economist on either side of the aisle even suggest that in jest – it’s a bit absurd.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 2, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
Good grief you republican paranoids. You talk like Obama has already raised the federal gas tax. GET OVER IT!!!! Bush is still in charge. If, after Obama takes over and then does raise the federal gas tax, THEN raise heck. Good grief man, chill out and quit acting like it’s all his fault even before he’s in office.
Posted by: LOfromMO | January 2, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
I, and many other Americans, can not afford to pay another 10 cents per gallon of regular gasoline. Any politician who votes to raise the gas tax forfeits any chance of getting my vote in 2010.
Posted by: Taylor | January 2, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
Here’s your extra gas taxes, property taxes, consumption taxes, State, local taxes, breathing taxes, going to the bathroom taxes, looking at a cute baby taxes….
Born free – taxed to damn death!
Posted by: My perogative | January 2, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
The government is always looking for ways to raise taxes or should I say sneak a tax in. Raising fuel taxes is one way to sneak one in on the working,poor, and middle class——but hey it gives politicians more money to waste somewhere to repay their friends.
Posted by: chattyway | January 2, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Obama promised not to raise taxes on the middle working class………….but a gas tax targets and hits this class the hardest. Welcome to the world of how politicians lie. Carbon tax likewise that obama wants to give the power to the UN to tax Americans will also hurt the working middle class the hardest. Brace yourselves, its coming……..
Posted by: chattyway | January 2, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
High fuel prices were partly to blame for the economic slowdown. Obviously there’s more to it than just that, but it doesn’t help.
Look, to those of you who are yelping for higher taxes: make a donation to the Federal government. Or even better, stop buying gas yourself. There is this idiotic belief of government as in loco parentis; that government needs us to ‘tax us to do the right thing’. As if we even know what the “right thing” is to do.
The same folks that want this are the same who will be crying for a tax on meat to make us all vegetarians and a tax on this, that or the other as it suits their whim. The irony is that many of the libs are no different than the neo-cons: they’ve made up their mind on the end result and will do or say whatever to justify the means.
Posted by: 1percenter | January 2, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
Correct me if I’m wrong but O wouldn’t be breaking a promise, he promised to cut taxes to 95% of people, payroll taxes, he didn’t promise to cut any other taxes. So the way you get around tax cut for payroll is raise taxes on everything else…no promises broken. Simple really.
As for that 10cents, it means the cost of everything that you use and consume will go up in price, from the basics to the luxury, increased due to the cost of gas. So I wonder…will it be worth it to those of you who voted the dems a free ride, when you get your payroll tax cut (if you still have a job) but pay extra EVERY time you go to the store?
Posted by: samhiguchi | January 2, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
What is absurd is the argument that we need to raise the gas tax to reduce the amount of money going to the Middle East. We have more than enough oil offshore to eliminate our dependency to the Middle East. Why not drill? But BHO doesn’t want to drill, he wants us to inflate our tires – what a frickin’ genius!
Posted by: taxed2death | January 2, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
Hey samhiguchi – Correct me if I’m wrong but O wouldn’t be breaking a promise, he promised to cut taxes to 95% of people, payroll taxes, he didn’t promise to cut any other taxes. So the way you get around tax cut for payroll is raise taxes on everything else…no promises broken. Simple really.
So this is another “Read my lips! No NEW taxes” right? The Demy’s crucified Bush one for that remark – can the GOP now do the same to ‘The One’?
Posted by: taxed2death | January 2, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
i had to stop driving so much and so did most of us working class we can get by. when bush and his family were making trillions off us when gas was high now all there rich buddies that will still drive alot can pay for it.
Posted by: T | January 2, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm
Well, I don’t know about anyone else, but I don’t need a tobacco tax to tell me I shouldn’t smoke, or a soda tax to tell be I shouldn’t consume carbonated drinks. I don’t need a tax on plastic bags to tell me I should use reusable bags and not litter. I don’t need a gas tax to tell me I should either drive less or use alternative fuels. Why should I, a frugal and reasonable person, have to pay even a nickel more in gas just because my SUV-driving neighbor refuses to change her own driving habits?
Posted by: The way I see it | January 2, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
Obama just keeps breaking campain promises and he’s not even sworn in yet!!!! 95% of Americans will get a tax break… unless you drive a car. I’ll withdraw troops from Irac in 16 weeks after taking office, Oh I guess not and I’m keeping Gates too. Also I’m escallating the war in Afganistan and sending in another 30,000 troops. I would like Afganistan refered to from now on as OBAMA’S WAR… It doesnt look like change to me… or maybe I’m missing some thing???
Posted by: yea right | January 2, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm
T – Just how did Bush and his family make ‘TRILLIONS’ off of gas when prices were so high?
Posted by: taxed2death | January 2, 2009, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
Isn’t it amazing how immediately after we allow drilling for oil right along our coasts and in formerly protected areas, the price of gas dips to $1.60/gallon? You know the oil companies were just holding us hostage till they got what they wanted, and THAT was Bush’s ‘magic wand’. NOW that everyone knows people can ‘handle’ higher gas prices, they’re going to raise the tax? I don’t think that’s very nice, either.
Posted by: sevresblue | January 2, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm
If they actually use the money to FIX the roads I’m all for it. I drive up to a thousand miles a week chasing the almighty dollar,
I’ll gladly pay an extra 30/40 cents a day to get the potholes filled. Its much cheaper than tires and alignments!
Posted by: oldwhiteguy | January 2, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
” …. the commission sees the gas tax as the best way to fund infrastructure projects only in the short term, until technological innovations can allow a more fair way to charge drivers based on the mileage they drive (and wear down roads) and when and where they’re driving.”
Now they want to tax my mileage and tax me for using the road!>? People in Washington must stay up late brainstorming ways to suck more and more money from people!
Posted by: Say What!? | January 2, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Sevresblue – since when did we start allowing drilling along our coasts and formerly protected areas? Didn’t you know that the Wall Street bailout bill pushed the drilling offshore out to 100 miles thanks to the Demy’s?
It helps to verify your facts THEN post.
Posted by: taxed2death | January 2, 2009, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
taxedtodeath—-go on wikeiapedia and look up zapata corp. the bush family has made billions off you and mei mis-spoke on trillions but billions is veruy true just like cheneny made billions of haliburton.
Posted by: T | January 2, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
Perhaps its time for the States and the Feds to come clean and tell us how much of our gas taxes go into the general fund and not to fix roads and bridges. We might just find out that the reason the roads and bridges are so far behind is that they have used the money collected somewhere else.
Posted by: Bruce | January 2, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
T- I went to wiki and still don’t see your proof that George W. Bush (or any Bush) made ANY money from the high price of oil this past year. I’d ask for proof that Cheney made BILLIONS from Haliburton, but I’m afraid you’d send me to some site that discusses JFK’s death – oh wait that was the wiki site you just sent me to!!!
Posted by: taxed2death | January 2, 2009, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
taxedtodeath—um the bush family owns zapata corp.and they are a huge oil company so guess what idiot they make money on oil…..duh! and everybody knows cheneny has mad emilliona dna billions from haliburton.if the proof was so easy had him and bush would have been impeached already the truth will coem out and bush and cheney will do time in rpison and for sure in hell when they die
Posted by: T | January 2, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
A “temporary” tax from Washington? What a load! To my knowledge every tax that has been put on gasoline is still there. The only way I’d support this is if the law expired in a year unless renewed (for another year), rather than continue indefinitey unless repealed like every other funding bill the policrats pass.
Posted by: Publius | January 2, 2009, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
T- Dude, you really need to get your facts straight…just how the hell does the Bush family ‘own’ Zapata Corp? It’s a publicly traded company? Zapata Corporation is a holding company whose primary asset is its 98% stake in Zap.Com whose principal activity is developing a global network of independently owned websites to provide a platform for advertising. (All this is from NYSE filings and the company’s website).
So I’ll ask you again, how does GW Bush or ANY Bush, make BILLIONS from oil via Zapata? Like you said, if the proof was so easy he’d already have been impeached.
Anyone who knows anything about the US GOV knows the US President has no way of influencing the price of oil the way in which it increased this past year.
Verify your facts THEN post!
Posted by: taxed2death | January 2, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
taxedtodeath—-you must learn how to read zapata was started and is owned by the bush family…..and that is fact…… take time stop listening to rush limburger and teh hannity report and think,so funny when bush said he was releaseing off shore oil ban how prices have continued to drop since then….hmmmm wonder why oh yes he thinks he can use that as s stepping stone to show that just saying makes prices go down so him and his rich oil baron buddies can make billions more destroying our pristine wilderness and off shore water ecosystem…. dont be fooled by bush or any of the evil republicans its all a lie.
Posted by: T | January 2, 2009, 10:58 pm 10:58 pm
samhiguchi : “As for that 10cents, it means the cost of everything that you use and consume will go up in price, from the basics to the luxury, increased due to the cost of gas. So I wonder…will it be worth it to those of you who voted the dems a free ride, when you get your payroll tax cut (if you still have a job) but pay extra EVERY time you go to the store?”
The price of gas has almost halved over the past year with no discernible impact on prices at my local grocery store. Do you ever check your bumpersticker logic against the reality we live in? The one where the price of a six pack really doesn’t follow the price of gas? When I have to chose between believing my own lying eyes and a partisan rant on the internet, well…
Posted by: jhw539 | January 3, 2009, 12:52 am 12:52 am
Bruce: “Perhaps its time for the States and the Feds to come clean and tell us how much of our gas taxes go into the general fund and not to fix roads and bridges.”
This is all a matter of public record. Perhaps some research is in order – if you want to waste your time. The federal gas tax (and a portion of income tax) is fully sucked up slowing the delay of our national infrastructure. It has not been raised in 15 years, and the cost of cement and steel sure as hell has skyrocketed in that time (even with the last half-year of steel price drops). But if you really care, do the research and prove it to yourself. Just as Rush, Hannity, etc have had been told by their staffs, the federal gas tax goes to roads so if they want to demagogue they’ll need to harp on the Big Dig and Bridges to Nowhere or just flat out lie.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 3, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am
Bruce: “Perhaps its time for the States and the Feds to come clean and tell us how much of our gas taxes go into the general fund and not to fix roads and bridges.”
This is all a matter of public record. Perhaps some research is in order – if you want to waste your time. The federal gas tax (and a portion of income tax) is fully sucked up slowing the delay of our national infrastructure. It has not been raised in 15 years, and the cost of cement and steel sure as hell has skyrocketed in that time (even with the last half-year of steel price drops). But if you really care, do the research and prove it to yourself. Just as Rush, Hannity, etc have had been told by their staffs, the federal gas tax goes to roads so if they want to demagogue they’ll need to harp on the Big Dig and Bridges to Nowhere or just flat out lie.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 3, 2009, 12:59 am 12:59 am
jhw539 – This isn’t a communist society, so NO ONE should be trying to control our behavior. And I’m sure I’m not alone in my reaction to someone trying to control my behavior. I push back.
Then you say, ”
1. Tax income to pay for roads.
2. Tax some other non-related field to divert money to roads.
3. Allow the current road infrastructure to continue to decay.
4. Increase the gas tax to allow for continued maintenance of the US’s road infrastructure.
Those are the choices.”
Those are NOT the only choices. How about cutting out wasteful spending of our tax dollars and allocating that money toward infrastructure? Stop subsidizing toy bow & arrows. Stop ridiculous studies like the flow rate of ketchup. Stop paying farmers to NOT grow crops. Stop all of the special interest funding.
Posted by: jhw539 | Jan
Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 3, 2009, 1:10 am 1:10 am
ellsbells930: “Those are NOT the only choices. How about cutting out wasteful spending of our tax dollars and allocating that money toward infrastructure? Stop subsidizing toy bow & arrows. Stop ridiculous studies like the flow rate of ketchup. Stop paying farmers to NOT grow crops. Stop all of the special interest funding. ”
So you want to spend income tax to fund roads. That is option 1. The federal gas tax DOES NOT PROVIDE ENOUGH MONEY TO MAINTAIN OUR CURRENT ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE. Read that again. All the gas tax is used to fund roads – not a penny goes to crops, ketchup, or toy arrows.
You want to cut from the general budget* so my income taxes can subsidize the cost of road maintenance not paid by users via gas taxes. I prefer a capitalist approach where the users pay the true cost of the infrastructure so the market can optimize resource allocation.
*You should look up some of the actual numbers – you’re suggesting cutting pennies to pay a bill of a hundred dollars.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 3, 2009, 1:28 am 1:28 am
why tax common auto drivers for problems which are mostly caused by 18 wheelers? Put a giant hike on the tax on diesel fuel and let those destroying the roads pay to fix them.
I have a better idea, seeing as how the railroad is equipped to transport truck trailers why not get all the long hauls on the trains and get the things off the road. Then there won’t be such a need to constantly be fixing them.
Posted by: dk | January 3, 2009, 3:21 am 3:21 am
This tax is just the start of the “change you can believe in”. So if you voted for Obama don’t cry foul, just enjoy this first tax as more will follow.
Posted by: atlanta3430 | January 3, 2009, 5:56 am 5:56 am
this will only be the beginning of the “new Deal” from the Barry O show. If this country wants change the voters will have to come to realization that change will only come when this lameass do nothing but talk congress is voted out.
Posted by: formerdem | January 3, 2009, 7:38 am 7:38 am
All of the rhetoric and discussion above would be totally unnecessary if all of you people posting here would instead put your blogging efforts into e-mailing your Congressmen and Senators, and urging them to support the “Fair Tax Act of 2007″. Passing this legislation would not only raise needed capital for infrastructure improvements, but would also spread the burden equitably across all income spectrum’s. E-mail President Obama as well by going to change.gov and urge him to support this legislation.
Posted by: devilkev | January 3, 2009, 9:10 am 9:10 am
jhw539 – Those were just SOME examples of the wasteful spending in Washington. It was not intended to be an all-inclusive list. Do you really want me to go line by line of the federal budget & give you a complete list? If the answer is ‘yes’ – too bad – you can look at it yourself. And yes, I am suggesting to spend money WE ALREADY PAY to accomplish this. If they would really cut out all non-essential spending, they could fund infrastructure repair. It doesn’t all have to be funded at once, because they can’t possibly fix everything at once.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 3, 2009, 9:37 am 9:37 am
Raise taxes? People drove less because gasoline was too high, people are driving somewhat less now, even though gasoline is cheap because there are many who are becoming unemployed. Less fuel bought=less tax revenues. If our congress had not stood and allowed fannie and freddie to help kill what would have been a decent economy then a tax increase could have been handled ok. Right now, even suggesting an increase, is pure stupidity. I would suggest congress get off their rears and not only investigate who fell asleep at the fannie and freddie “switch” but look at how highway transportation funds are funneled to other projects, non road and infrastructure projects, in each state.
Corruption is not exclusive to the jeckles on wall street but is a trait that is increasingly shared by politicians from both political parties and until this mess is corrected no amount of money will solve our problems.
Posted by: david | January 3, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am
ellsbells930: ” If they would really cut out all non-essential spending, they could fund infrastructure repair. ”
This is just not true. Half a dozen years with a Republican Congress and President has not left a lot of non-essential spending, unless you’re talking about cutting entitlements (Bush’s prescription drug benefits would be a good start) or military. You’re living in a fantasy land unconnected to reality, but it sure does sound good I guess.
I think I’m going to change the lightbulb in the bathroom to a CFL – I’m sure that will save enough to pay this month’s mortgage.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 3, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am
You don’t honestly believe that there is NO waste in the federal budget? Who is the one living in a fantasy land? It certainly isn’t me. And I would have no problem cutting ALL entitlements. Medicare is the reason this country’s healthcare system is such a mess – but that is a subject for another day & far too complicated to discuss here. (Too bad you still have a mortgage…. we paid ours off years ago.)
Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 3, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Oh- and since when did not having the money to spend stop the Federal government from spending it anyway? It’s a bit hypocritical for them to say they don’t have the money to rebuild our infrastructure & then give billions away to financial institutions & the auto industry…. billions that only exist on paper.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 3, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am
I propose congress and and other top level government worker making over $75,000 a year take a 10% pay cut.
Posted by: Tonya | January 3, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am
It begins, increase the tax on gas just the first step. our government is out of control. our leaders are thieves in the night, out t steal the soul of this country… They wont be happy till we ordinary citizen are on foot. the elite never have to worry about where their next paycheck is coming from, never have to wrry about the mortgage.
those in power do not lead they rule, not what America is supposed to be. I dream of the day the people will awaken and decide to take back their country from the scum that lead us now…..
Posted by: RANDY BROWN | January 3, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Great way to stimulate the economy, make sure we pay more for fuel! This kind of “change” we don’t need.
Posted by: obama=socialism | January 3, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Why would we tax people on the miles they drive instead of the gas they consume. This will penalize cars that get good gas milage. That is the opposite of what we were told the goal was last month.
Fools have taken over the government. They are all fools.
Posted by: Jpack | January 3, 2009, 1:47 pm 1:47 pm
Tom Friedman – A New York Times Collumnist – Who is not on the new incoming Cabinet – Who is not a member of the soon to be administration – is the one who in his own New York Times collumn called on Obama to raise a tax.
Now where is the beef? Just how much ‘say so’ with the new incoming administration will Tom Friedman have? Oh, yeah that’s right, NONE!
Nothing begins yet! At least not from someone who is not a member of the ‘Soon-to-be-Administration’.
Get a life.
Posted by: Angie | January 3, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
As already mentioned, I think they should just tax the stuffing out of those giant SUV’s.
Posted by: Scorpredhead | January 3, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
ellsbells930: “You don’t honestly believe that there is NO waste in the federal budget?”
No I do not believe there is no waste in government, I never said there was none. I will say it once more before giving up: The amount of waste that can be easily cut will not save enough money to even start paying our infrastructure backlog.
It hardly matters – you want to use income tax to fund roads, while I want road users to fund them through a gas tax. Your approach is the ‘government knows best what to subsidize’ while I favor ‘make the market pay the true cost.” Beyond your refusal to accept that saving a few hundred million will not pay a bill of tens of billions, you just fundamentally do not trust (or understand) the market to support a national road system through a users-pay approach (the gas tax).
Posted by: jhw539 | January 3, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
tonya: “I propose congress and and other top level government worker making over $75,000 a year take a 10% pay cut. ”
Great idea. I know I want minimum wage employees and trust fund babies to lead our country!
Posted by: jhw539 | January 3, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
i hate taxes but king george put us 10 trillion in debt and stuck us with a 10 billion a month war. so guess what we all have to kick in a little more i dont like it but someone has to pay for all the debt teh republicans stuck us with.
Posted by: T | January 3, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
jhw539- You have me ALL wrong. I personally don’t trust the government to do anything correctly. And I never said it would be all EASILY cut. I’m not talking about saving a few hundred million. I’m talking about cutting BILLIONS of dollars of waste out of the Federal budget. I think where our outlooks differ is what we consider waste. I think almost everything the Federal government spends money on is waste, better left to a free market. About the only things the federal goverment should be involved in is our military. They need to stay out of education, healthcare, etc. Any Federal tax is NOT market based. It’s still Federal tax & no matter what it is originally allocated for, doesn’t mean that is where it ends up.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 3, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
Who would you all rather receive our hard earned money….an ignorant/impotent government…..or our oil-money drunk enemies??
Irrational as it may be, broaden your scope a bit and then maybe you might change your tunes
Posted by: Ben | January 3, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Ben -I would prefer that neither group have my hard-earned money.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 3, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
an additional .10 tax on gasoline is not as bad for the economy as the crumbling road infrastructure. if the people in minnesota had the choice of paying an additional $.10 on their gas or having a bridge collapse which would they prefer? You can also think about the time wasted in traffic and the additional fuel consumed.
Posted by: 7 | January 3, 2009, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
No higher taxes. Tax only the people making over $250,000. But let’s increase the gas tax. That impacts even the lowest wage earner because they have less income to cover the increased cost of transportation. Maybe the better suggestion would be, get the highway workers to do a better job, make the contractors who built the roads and bridges warranty their work and repair it themselves, put a luxury tax on auto and private aircraft that would be earmarked for road and airports. A increase in gas tax will not impact the upper crust which includes the big buck democrats who promised no taxes to us poor folk.
Posted by: s63m | January 4, 2009, 9:14 am 9:14 am
Birds fly, fish swim, politicians lie and Democrats raise taxes. Is this where we are suppose to act surprised? This is only the first of many tax increases on the agenda. Of course it’s only a tax on the rich. The poor and middle class won’t be able to afford cars much longer.
Posted by: Oonogil | January 4, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
7
Infrastructure can be rebuilt without a tax increase by cutting expenses that we really don’t need. Federal, State and Local governments throw away billions for projects that aren’t necessary. We need to establish priorities in this country and cut the fat out of our economic diet.
Posted by: Oonogil | January 4, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
He’s my issue. When the oil companies made a killing during the oil crisis our government made a killing as well. Where’s that money? Shouldn’t it be earmark for roads? We have had an ever increasing traffic load, more cars, trucks, planes and buses. That means we have not had a decrease in gas revenue as this article suggest but a significant increase. Obama has promised 221 billion dollars to states for road improvements. That money will be made available in 2009. So why do we need to pay even more money? It just comes across to me as gouging. Nickel-ling and dime-ing
Posted by: truth-serum | January 4, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
T – Well it looks like I’m going to have to school you on reality. First, stop drinking the kool-aid of Sirius LEFT and Keith OwhatafoolIam!! The Bush family STARTED Zapata yes – back in the 1950′s, but don’t ‘OWN’ it. No individual can ‘OWN’ a publicly traded company – AND Zapata has NOTHING to do with oil – didn’t you read and understand my last post!?
As for Bush releasing the offshore oil ban. First, he didn’t and thanks to Nazi Pelosi and your Demy’s the TARP bailout moved the ban out to 100 miles – 88 miles into international waters.
Secondly, if Bush wanted to make ‘Billions’ from high oil prices why would he make a statement releasing the ban and have the prices drop?
Thirdly, the gas tax increase recommendation is being offered by a committe appointed by – are you sitting down – the LIBERAL controlled Congress! And I’m the one being fooled by Bush and the Republicans? Dude, clean your monitor – I think you have kool-aid stains on your screen!
Take your head out of the sand (and wherever else it might be) and understand that this gas tax will hurt EVERYONE! Even the liberal, Bush-hating sheep like you!
Posted by: taxed2death | January 4, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Oonogil – YES!! You are absolutely correct! But the problem is it will never happen with the LIBERAL leaders we have now and for the next 2 years. Nazi Pelosi, Harry ‘The Body’ Reed, and that idiot Barney Frank will tax and spend this country into depression.
Posted by: taxed2death | January 4, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
taxed2death—-shut the f-up!!! i would rather have tax and spend then borrow and war war war. and the bush family still makes billions from oil, that is fact fact fact. so go back keep listening to rush(drug addict limburger) and the hannity insanity. you republicans have destroyed this nation and i hope you all burn in h***.
Posted by: T | January 4, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm
T – I’d say you are a little bitter & angry…. that’s not too good for your health & it’s very mean spirited to wish ALL Republicans to burn in Hell. With a wish like that, I’m afraid that is where you will end up. I’ll pray for you.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 4, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm
T – are you speaking about the Republicans who’ve run the Congress for the past 2 years and appointed the committee that’s making this recommendation? The Congress that has the lowest approval rating ever of 8%? Those Republicans? Just an FYI – their DEMOCRATS!!!
Show me the facts that the Bush family made ‘BILLIONS’ from the recent increase cost of oil?
Either back it up or shut up!
Posted by: taxed2death | January 4, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Is there anyone who can honestly say they are surprised by a proposed tax increase?
Obama proposed a tax increase on those making $300k and above then lowered it to $250k. That was lowered to $200k then $120K, $97 was the last figure before Obama repeated the $250k figure. Now they talk about an additional fuel tax which will hurt poor and middle class Americans much more than it will hit the wealthy elite.
Plan on more tax increases where you never expected it. Some will be used to circumvent the Constitution. Military spending will be cut to dangerously low level which has always led to attack by some foreign power. Taxes will continue to increase to pay for social programs and welfare. The rich will continue to employ lawyers to avoid taxes.
Feds will continue to spend money on worthwhile projects like a Woodstock Concert Museum. Local governments will build stadiums for entertainment while ignoring roads and schools.
I’ll sit up on the mountain monitoring the computer news and hoping you people will just leave me alone.
I’m not a prophet, I just pay attention.
Posted by: Oonogil | January 4, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
Oonogil: Go to your mountain now! Your wish has been granted. We will leave you alone.
Posted by: Al-obama | January 5, 2009, 1:00 am 1:00 am
taxed2death—-i am done with idiots like you…oh and the dems that last 2 years couldnt do anything they had nothing to do with this collapse,bush blocked them at every turn… just like i hear republicans say the do nothing congress and thats right they have done nothing absolutely nothing. and any smart person would see that the kind of h*** this nation is suffering couldnt have been done in two short years it was something done over a 6 year period in which the republicans had complete control. so to all republicans go to h***————–ellsbells—–if you support any republican or there ideals then you will be in hell. i dont really wish you there or any evil republican there i hope you see the light and become a democrat.
Posted by: T | January 5, 2009, 9:05 am 9:05 am
T – Thanks for the discussion sparring! I enjoy hearing different points of view, but I would ask you to verify your facts. The collapse has enough blame to go around for both parties – Chris Cox, Barney Frank etc. But my overall point is that we don’t need anymore taxes – PERIOD. I’d be for eliminating the ones we currently also. We could go on and on with this, but be assured I will NEVER vote DEMO and would rather vote CONSERVATIVE than republican.
Posted by: taxed2death | January 5, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
dear al-obama,
i’m glad to find out that you are God and can decide that all Republicans go to hell. Now that I’ve found you do you have a few moments to discuss the creation of the universe with me?
Posted by: resist | January 7, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm