Jan 29, 2009 4:10pm

Obama Calls Wall Street Bonuses ‘Shameful’ and the ‘Height of Irresponsibility’ — But Unclear How Stern He Was With CEO’s During Visit Earlier This Week

President Obama blasted Wall Street CEOs Thursday afternoon, calling it "shameful" that they had given themselves billions of dollars bonuses during a year when the financial sector had to beg for billions in taxpayer dollars or risk crashing.

Referring to a story in the New York Times today indicating that in 2008 Wall Street executives paid themselves $18.4 billion in bonuses — the sixth largest such raking in recorded history, according to the New York State Comptroller’s office, despite the financial sector’s abysmal year — the president, sitting at an Oval Office meeting with Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner and Vice President Joe Biden, did not hold back.

"When I saw an article today indicating that Wall Street bankers had given themselves $20 billion worth of bonuses — the same amount of bonuses as they gave themselves in 2004 — at a time when most of these institutions were teetering on collapse and they are asking for taxpayers to help sustain them, and when taxpayers find themselves in the difficult position that, if they don’t provide help, that the entire system could come down on top of our heads," the president said, "that is the height of irresponsibility. It is shameful."

"There will be time for them to make profits, and there will be time for them to get bonuses. Now is not that time. And that’s a message that I intend to send directly to them, I expect Secretary Geithner to send to them," Obama said sternly.

"Secretary Geithner already had to pull back one institution that had gone forward with a multimillion-dollar jet plane purchase at the same time as they’re receiving TARP money," Obama said, referring to Citigroup’s plans for a $50 million 12-seat luxury jet despite having received $45 billion in Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) funds to stabilize the financial sector. "We shouldn’t have to do that, because they should know better. And we will continue to send that message loud and clear."

The president said he intends to talk to Wall Street executives in the coming days.

"What we’re going to need is for the folks on Wall Street who are asking for help to show some restraint, and show some discipline, and show some sense of responsibility," he said.

Additionally White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs at his briefing announced that the president would address executive bonuses.

"It was the sixth-largest year of bonuses, and I don’t think anybody that’s opened their 401(k) statement has found out that this was the sixth best year for Wall Street," Gibbs said. "He’ll address that in some more rage … I will give you the one-word answer that he gave us this morning: outrageous."

Gibbs recalled that the president spoke during his inaugural of "an ethic of responsibility that we needed to see reinstituted in certain aspects of our country, particularly in our financial institutions. Whether it’s government or the financial system, we’re not going to be able to do what is needed to be done to stabilize our financial system if the American people read about this type of outrageous behavior."

Referring to the Citigroup corporate jet, Gibbs said, "I think the outrage on the Hill, and some phone calls, and some outrage here probably stopped that," adding that the president’s economic team — Geithner, National Economic Council director Larry Summers, and Council of Economic Advisers chair Christina Romer — are looking into what measures could be taken.

But it wasn’t clear how much the President delivered this message to the CEOs who came to the White House yesterday to support his stimulus package — CEOs who in many cases are laying off thousands of workers while raking in millions of dollars in compensation.

"The two gentlemen who introduced him yesterday, their combined five-year compensation package is $150 million," ABC News asked Gibbs, referring to Sam Palmisano, Chairman, CEO and President of IBM (five-year compensation package, according to Forbes, $86.12 million) and David M. Cote, Chairman and CEO of Honeywell (five-year compensation package: $60.23 million). "Did he turn to them and say, ‘You guys are cutting jobs, and yet you’re making $150 million?’"

Said Gibbs: "The president talked about responsibility with them yesterday. The president doesn’t meet with CEOs where he doesn’t talk about responsibility. They specifically talked about the jet purchase. Again, I think the president has been very clear on the notion that what has to be done will not be able to be done unless the American people have confidence, not just in the decisions that government is now forced to make to address these crises, but more importantly that they don’t see some of these actors behaving differently."

On another note, ABC News noted that in the Troubled Asset Recovery Program legislation to stabilize the financial sector in October, it was clear the steps that lawmakers were taking to prevent taxpayer dollars from going to executive compensation were minuscule at best, with those preventing from stricter curbs being Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Conn., and Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., the chairmen of the Senate Banking Committee and the House Financial Services Committee, because they thought whatever limits they put into place Wall Street would find a way around the law. And yet President Obama supported the legislation.

Responded Gibbs: "President Obama, or mere Senator Obama, and many others did in order to get the money we needed to get our financial system going again. I think it is fair that this president believes that the results of that first set of money have failed to live up to the expectation that all of the American people have for it. That’s why this administration and this economic team are taking the time to evaluate how we move forward. And, again, the principles that we outlined for the Senate before they approved a second batch of money to be used by this administration included reining in executive compensation and ensuring that excessive bonuses aren’t part of that. Again, part of the meeting that you’ll see the beginning of today is a continued discussion on moving forward and making some of those decisions as it relates to that next set of money.

"But understand … the president shares the American people’s outrage on this," Gibbs continued. "There are a lot of words that you can conjure up to describe that story. I think ‘outrageous’ was just the one that I can bring to you here today."

– Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller

User Comments

“The two gentlemen who introduced him yesterday, their combined five-year compensation package is $150 million,”
And their companies are a couple of bright spots in a bleak landscape. Both IBM and Honeywell are doing pretty well. Their layoffs are basically just taking advantage of the recession to try to lean down and become a bit more efficient. This entire blog entry seems a pathetic attempt to manufacture a conflict. Why don’t you dig up more specifics on the “pork” in the stimulus bill rather than creating rumors?

Posted by: jhw539 | January 29, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Yeah, but no talk so far of jail! Shame on you guys! Hold your hand out so I can smack it with my ruler!

Posted by: LongT | January 29, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

What a hypocrite…. BO had no problem taking an all expenses paid trip to Hawaii on the taxpayer dime.. HEY ABC… how much did the pres cost… ??

Posted by: Vet1973 | January 29, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

ironic that he calls wallstreet bonuses shameful( which it is and they should be locked up)while he oversees a pork bill with equal shame in it?

Posted by: catman | January 29, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Concerned in OH: “while forcing other Americans to go without heat and just telling them to suck it up.”
What Obama actually said:
“We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times…”
1. One of the fastest payback measures a homeowner can take is to install a programmable thermostat so the house is not conditioned ‘at all times’ to the occupied setpoint.
2. 72F is the ‘standard’ summer cooling setpoint and likely what he was referring to (CA mandates 68F heating, 78F cooling).
3. Regardless, please cite where Obama is “forcing other Americans to go without heat.” YOU ARE LYING.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 29, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

I sure am glad we elected Obama our President.

Posted by: Pam in Virginia | January 29, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

“0bama . . . forcing other Americans to go without heat”
_______________________________________
Oh sure . ..

Posted by: pefros | January 29, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

“Vet1973: BO had no problem taking an all expenses paid trip to Hawaii on the taxpayer dime.”
He grew up in Hawaii. I didn’t begrudge Bush flying home to his “ranch” (bought in 1999, up for sale now that his image-faking days are over) or to his real home in the Northeast, I don’t have a problem with Obama flying home to Hawaii.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 29, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

jhw …. what is the temperature in the white house…just curious,also the 170 million spent on the innaugaration could have paiod for alot of heating bills.it is so easy to be the minority party with these clowns in charge.

Posted by: catman | January 29, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

catman: “while he oversees a pork bill with equal shame in it?”
Nice meaningless statement. Would you care to cite specific portions of the bill that offend you? Or would you rather just whine and ready soundbites for the next election?

Posted by: jhw539 | January 29, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

jhw539 (4:39 PM); I appreciate your counterpoint argument. But I’m sure you don’t support companies that post record losses, layoff sometimes thousands, screw stockholders, and still hand out bonuses to themselves? Honeywell and IBM aside.

Posted by: LongT | January 29, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

So the gov gives a loan to help the companies, instead of reinvesting into the company … They give it to the execs. People are struggling but HEY it’s no me, right?! It’s probably going to come to a guy with a shotgun and a bank … But HEY it’s still not you right, your on the top floor. Only in America.

Posted by: Stingy | January 29, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

catman: “what is the temperature in the white house…just curious,also the 170 million spent on the innaugaration could have paiod for alot of heating bills.”
I don’t see why the temperature in the Whitehouse matters. And the $170 million spent on the inaguration (not all governemnt money either) DID pay a lot of heating bills and helped a lot of jobs. It went to small businesses to put on an event that pumped more money into the local economy than a Superbowl.
The Republican party is not going to last long if it chooses to take pride in being the ‘party of stupid’ rather than get back to it’s intellectual, think-tank roots.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 29, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Here is the situation. We are not a Socialist state as Obama wants us to be. Is it shameful that they pay themselves these bonuses? Yes. Is it bad customer relations? Yes. Is it illegal? No. The only recourse the government has in this situation is to reccommend that these companies paying out these bonuses do not get any governmental assistance in the bailout. There is only so much interference that our government can exert in the day to day running of the business community in this country. What we need to understand is that many of these executives have contracts with these companies that guarantee them the bonuses as part of their compensation package. If they performed to the companies’ specifications for receiving the bonus, the the company is bound by contract to pay it. Would it look nice to the general public for the recipient of the bonus to decline or defer it? Yes. Is he required by Obama’s decree or anyone else to do so? No. The world of business is often a very nasty and ugly place. Things are rarely fair. This is why the government should not be involved in it. If Congress and the Senate wants to make a stipulation in their bailout bill that the executives have to forego their bonuses for the company to receive assistance, they are within their rights to do so. That kicks the ball back to the companies, and then we will see how badly they need assistance.

Posted by: Melanie | January 29, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

jhw…read the bill. i understand that we republicans are no smarter than a fifth grader but even a third greater knows a pig when he sees one. the socialist pork is spewing out both ends of that bill and greater than 50% of AMERICANS know it and arent buying it.your man (our president ) had better get to real work and get us a bill that has bipartisian support.

Posted by: catman | January 29, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

shame on all of you, here we the little people are trying to keep you homes and job’s. i have two boys that have lost hteir jobs and are having a hard time getting unemployment. what is wrong with the state, were the rich get away with something like this. some of us would be greatfull just to have a job and keep your homes. SHAME SHAME ON YOU.

Posted by: debby | January 29, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

LongT: “But I’m sure you don’t support companies that post record losses, layoff sometimes thousands, screw stockholders, and still hand out bonuses to themselves?”
In general, no. But that doesn’t relate to the completely baseless slander this article is implying (Obama is chummy to deadbeat CEOs in private but scolds them in public!).

Posted by: jhw539 | January 29, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

When Joe citizen goes for a loan don’t they have to provide financial information before they get the loan? We should make these banks do the same. Disclose bonuses etc. Seems to me like no due diligence was done, our government just handed out our money. Let’s just rush into stupid decision while we are at it.

Posted by: nospin1600 | January 29, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

the fact that he’s talking to the heads of major corporations is progress to me. Great leaders are accountable. Obama is reminding these CEOs of that fact.

Posted by: North Park | January 29, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm

I still don’t get.If we are going to GIVE AWAY money in the name of stiumulus – then why isn’t the money given to the people directly?

Posted by: jamescbuilder | January 29, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Why is it that we are having salaries frozen, our 401ks are a disaster, we are told to turn down the heat and quit driving our SUV’s and these idiots get million dollar bonuses? Now they are getting them with our money. Get used to it; there’s no relief for the common folk.

Posted by: KC_1971 | January 29, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

catman, Concerned in OH:
I am still waiting for SPECIFIC examples of “pork” from the bill. They are in there and they’re fair game for debate For example, personally I thought renovating the National Mall including retaining walls, paths, paving, drainage, and other infrastructure was a reasonable item.
‘read the bill yourself’ only works if YOU DEFINE WHAT PORK IS. (And while you’re at it, look up the definition of stimulus.)

Posted by: jhw539 | January 29, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

jhw..temperature of the white house is relevant when you tell the masses to do something that you yourself dont subscribe to. at least jimmy carter dawned a sweater to demonstate his sacrifice. i am a afraid we really did elect an elitist.

Posted by: catman | January 29, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

Someone ought to talk to him about his $180M inauguration orgy and how shameful that is.
Or the height of irresponsibility of bill HR1 as infrastructure stimulus when there is almost no infrastructure or stimulus in the bill.

Posted by: BertieW | January 29, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

well i think that your increased and useless spending is ‘shameful’ Mr. Obama so get over it

Posted by: franhbg | January 29, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

catman: “temperature of the white house is relevant when you tell the masses to do something that you yourself dont subscribe to.”
READ MY PRIOR POST PLEASE. Please provide a cite where Obama told the masses to turn down their thermostat. I have not heard it. I don’t feel like debating something Obama never said.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 29, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

The bottom line is Corporate GREED. The executives in America are like the grave.. they can’t get enough (enough is never enough). They sunk the country w/ stealing and now they want the gov’t to fund their stealing. But God has created the Madoff’s of this time to get these GREEDY, ungodly people and this is only the beginning of their “Days of Trouble”. Shake them Jesus Shake them, until they are broken without a remedy!!!

Posted by: Ladelia Young | January 29, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

“What a hypocrite….BO had no problem taking an all expenses paid trip to Hawaii on the taxpayer dime”
_______________________________________
uhm . .. let me see, a 7-day vacation vs. MILLIONS in bonuses for participating in the collapse of the financial system – with a public bailout in the BILLIONS.
Hardly a fair comparison. Seems like you’re grasping at straws to try to demean the man.

Posted by: pefros | January 29, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

I hope Obama, Pelosi and all you democrats enjoy all that new pork in your bill.
Shame on you!

Posted by: bb | January 29, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Where did and who authorized the amount being paid for the largest US Embassy in the world for Iraq. Who is going to use it when we leave? A lot of people here could have used that money.

Posted by: Rosie Bell | January 29, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

REPORT: GOP Lawmakers Outnumber Democratic Lawmakers 2 To 1 In Stimulus Debate On Cable News»
As Media Matters has documented, during the Bush administration, the media consistently allowed conservatives to dominate their shows, booking them as guests far more often than progressives. The rationale was that Republicans were “in power.”
It appears that old habits die hard. Even though President Obama and his team are in control of the executive branch and Democrats are in the majority in Congress, the cable networks are still turning more often to Republicans and allowing them to set the agenda on major issues, most recently on the debate over the economic recovery package.
On Sunday, conservatives began an all-out assault on President Obama’s economic recovery plan, with House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-OH) and Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) both announcing that they would vote against the plan as it stood. Despite Obama’s efforts at good faith outreach, congressional conservatives have continued to attack the stimulus plan with a series of false and disingenuous arguments.
The media have been aiding their efforts. In a new analysis, ThinkProgress has found that the five cable news networks — CNN, MSNBC, Fox News, Fox Business and CNBC — have hosted more Republican lawmakers to discuss the plan than Democrats by a 2 to 1 ratio this week:
In total, from 6 AM on Monday to 4 PM on Wednesday, the networks have hosted Republican lawmakers 51 times and Democratic lawmakers only 24 times. Surprisingly, Fox News came the closest to offering balance, hosting 8 Republicans and 6 Democrats. CNN had only one Democrat compared to 7 Republicans.
The drastically imbalanced coverage isn’t the first time that the news networks have effectively supported attacks on the recovery plans. As ThinkProgress reported on Monday, the cable networks, the Sunday shows and the network newscasts promoted a controversial CBO non-report 81 times before the actual CBO analysis of the stimulus plan was released.

Posted by: BLUEJERSEY | January 29, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Some want instant results from a new President, altho the previous man running things, took 8 years to run everything into the ground. I’d like to see more harshness from Obama toward the robber barons, too. What might happen then, would they get mad and refuse to cooperate/work with the Obama administration? I’m don’t trust some Democrates that have been in on the Wall St befriending thing all along. But I do still trust Obama, no reason not to so far.

Posted by: good_faith | January 29, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

“I am still waiting for SPECIFIC examples of “pork” from the bill. They are in there and they’re fair game for debate For example, personally I thought renovating the National Mall including retaining walls, paths, paving, drainage, and other infrastructure was a reasonable item.”
____________________________________
I agree. Given that this bill is on line and completely open to public scrutiny, the examples of ‘pork’ provided by the anti-Obama types are pitifully small.
“Pork” is just name calling as talking point.

Posted by: pefros | January 29, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Get over yourselfs. The president paid for his vacation with his own money. Get a life!!!!!!

Posted by: truth | January 29, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Jake,
The CEOs that Obama met with did NOT get any taxpayer money for bailout so they can get ANY BONUS they want to get. However, any bank that gets taxpayers’ money should NOT be giving out any bonuses.

Posted by: Amoreena | January 29, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Let’s not forget the AIG executives who also got paid significant bonuses to retain talent. I guess it does take real talent to run the company into the ground, still get paid a sizeable salary and a huge bonus to boot. What arrogance!

Posted by: TKeating | January 29, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Yes, our nation has been one of lies, corruption, greed, and unaccountability in the past few years. The world watches.. We have gone from a once admired nation to one of disgust. This has got to change. We must all work together. Freedom is not free, it is earned and paid for. Please don’t take it for granted and let it go away… our future depends on how we live, act, and behave today for tomorrow it can be gone. God Bless America…

Posted by: a veteran | January 29, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

Obama pushed for the bailout with absolutely NO oversite, and NOW he’s complaining!?! What unmitigated GALL!!!

Posted by: hmn... | January 29, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

It is past time that the American people wake up and start doing something for themselves. Starting tomorrow each and every one of us should make a phone call to each of the companies who accepted TARP funds. WE should tell these self-serving fat cats that they are the scum of the earth. Giving themselves huge bonuses and salaries while laying off the actual people who perform the work. And while they are living like kings of the sweat of someone else’s brow…they are running the companies that they are supposed to be managing into the ground. And while we’re at it…we need to find out who the members of the various company boards of directors and start calling them, too. Because they are not doing their jobs either.

Posted by: Deb Carter | January 29, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

It sounds like President Obama means business. These Wall Street Jokers are in for it. If we poor folks or less than wealthy have to tighten our belts and spend responsibly then so should they.

Posted by: Lee-- Dallas, TX | January 29, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

This word ‘responsibility’ coming from a marxist is absolutely absurd. How is that when a conservative touts responsibility, he’s labeled heartless, but when a liberal does, he’s revered? Obama received millions from these financial institutions in campaign contributions, is he going to give that money back???

Posted by: Joe | January 29, 2009, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

specifics, global warming 400 m, volcanos 200 million,5.4 billion for community organiztions,50 miilion for the arts, 600 million for stds, tax rfunds for those who dont pay tax,2 billion for day care, 600 mill to educate us on universal heathcare…shall i go on?

Posted by: catman | January 29, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

WHO CARES ANYMORE Do you really think that the gov is going to have anything trickle down to the working person. So far what I have read I see no help for the working middle class, Which by the way keeps this country going. So some on please tell me why are We the people Working class everyday normal people not getting any relief from our burdons, It seems it’s always the Top Dog that gets away with such out ragous doing, No one not one of these people have been asked to resign yet. Why is that, If I had taken money for the company I work for and did’nt spend it wisley belive me you know who would have a job but again this is in the real world of the AMERICAN WORKING CLASS the upper crust seems to be out of touch with the real world reality, if you not a banker movie star muscian, hey well figure it out.

Posted by: DIZZYLIZZY | January 29, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

see unless you stand there and watch them ( like 2 year olds) they just dont and cant do the right thing

Posted by: judy | January 29, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

I didn’t think there was too much pork in the bill. Some, yes. Any money spent on improving the environment of humans or fish is reasonable. Marine life needs help. Looked like some of it was going to education as well. I don’t have a problem with that. But renovating a mall? This is probably one of the least pork filled bills in a long time to be honest. IF the stimulus plan is a failure…atleast it won’t be responsible for thousands of American lives…like the Iraq “war” (should just call it the middle east “war”). Now that was/is a failure.

Posted by: Independent Fighter | January 29, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

catman: “shall i go on”
If you want. I’m not going to waste my time debating with someone who clearly doesn’t have the vaguest clue of what the intent of the stimulus bill is.
An example of a stimulus would be funding research to keep the national labs working and hiring consultants and buying satellite parts, Boeing launch vehicles, and supporting highly skilled University programs. Another example would be subsidizing daycare to keep that large swath of low income folks off the unemployment rolls, while also helping those who employ them keep working.
And claiming that those who don’t pay federal income tax “don’t pay tax” just reinforces the image of Republicans being the proud “party of stupid.”

Posted by: jhw539 | January 29, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

Time for Obama to pay his boys back for getting him in office. Bail out for the rich!

Posted by: cc | January 29, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

I have a better choice of words than “outrageous”…..why aren’t these men in jail??

Posted by: rjl | January 29, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

Independent Fighter: “But renovating a mall?”
I think you are referring to the rebuilding of the infrastructure of one of the most heavily visited parks in the country – The National Mall. It included paving, renovating the reflecting pools, retaining walls, drainage, paths, roads, etc. And that has been pulled out due to the Republican’s tantrum.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 29, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Obama help to craft the last 750 BILLION bailout and they can’t even track where that went besides paying out expensive bonues and get-a-ways. Obama should go on TV and apologize to all of America for being instrumental in crafting the Wallstreet execs getting bonuses while the average American losses their jobs.

Posted by: WhatChange | January 29, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

I totally agree with the President; but on the other had this is Capitalism, the CEOs don’t have to hold restraint; they will just make us pay for it through their system or they will take it from the bailout, better yet if they get the TARP they will still get it out of us through their own means, are they not maximizing profits?

Posted by: Houston | January 29, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

Between 100,000 and 150,000 lost their jobs this week alone, and now we learn that rich corporate CEOs got $18.4 billion in bonuses last year. Obama is absolutely right except he didn’t say it strongly enough. The philosophy of the GOP is to encourage corporate greed while regular people are starving. Such bonuses are unpatriotic and irresponsible. Ignore the GOP, the party of the rich. If you don’t, the $18.4 billion to the very rich will be even higher in 2009.

Posted by: JAB | January 29, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

anyone on here during out debate about southerners having no sense of humor. You HAVE to look at these photos on BOSTON.COM today! Hysterical!!!! I’m sorry, but yanks have the best sense of humor! You have to look at these! And notice what the guy is wearing in freezing cold ice-everywhere weather. Only in Boston!

Posted by: matt | January 29, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm

The Princeton Country Day School Sign (1924-1965) is for sale on ebay Christopher Reeve attended this school as a child.
Title of Auction:
Princeton Country Day School Sign- CHRIS REEVE Alumnus
CHRISTOPHER REEVE Princeton University Professor’s Son
page address ( all one continuous line):
CHRIS REEVE Alumnus
CHRISTOPHER REEVE Princeton University Professor’s

Posted by: Richard Winthrop | January 29, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

These people do not think our country is in an economic crisis. So many people lost jobs and they collect bonuses. Where is RUSH complaining about this?

Posted by: John | January 29, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Can someone tell me please, why I should continue to pay my credit card bills with their 25-30% interest rates. I’ve been paying so far but its a struggle. So I’m paying extra, the govt is giving them billions and they’re giving themselves bonuses. Really, I would like to know why I should continue paying them. I would continue my house payments and the car payments and just stop paying the credit cards. Why should I let them steal from me? I know they will ruin my credit but what else can they do to me?

Posted by: Eric S, Clearwater, FL | January 29, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

everyone hear is correct in their own way. a simple fix would be to have any ceo who gets govt money as a loan should have to personally guarantee that loan as do small business owners. why is that so hard? the point is that these buffoons ( dems and repubs) dont listen to you and me because 20 of us here on the right and left could come up with much more efficient ideas that would actually benefit americans rather than political donors.

Posted by: catman | January 29, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

“The president talked about responsibility with them yesterday. The president doesn’t meet with CEOs where he doesn’t talk about responsibility.”
On what grounds does Obama talk to CEOs about responsibility? We are not a Marxist society, the government does not control the means of production (yet – making some solid progress in Detroit though).
Broadly speaking, companies have the responsibility to provide workers competitive pay, safe working conditions, and to do no harm to the communities in which they operate. They are not nannies. Companies offer perks such as health insurance, cafeterias, shiny office buildings, etc. in an effort to retain employees (they are expensive to recruit and train and companies lose money when experienced employees leave and are replaced by unexperienced employees). If employees are not happy with their pay or working conditions, they can choose to take their skills to another employer who will be more appreciative.
In addition to the responsibilities above, public companies are also held responsible to their shareholders. If CEOs do not perform and yet receive big bonuses, shareholders can put pressure on the company’s Board of Directors to restructure pay/bonuses or to oust CEO. Or, they can simply sell the stock and purchase stock in another company with compensation packages more to the investors liking.
Government needs to get out of the way of business. And while I’m expecting responses of outrage that “business can’t run itself, it needs more oversight and regulations” I ask that you take a look at California, one of our richest states in resources and talent. And also among the most regulated. The result is a state with very little heavy industry and manufacturing, an unemployment rate approaching 10%, and a bankrupt state government.
CA is a preview of where America is headed.

Posted by: tjp612 | January 29, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Yes, I know, Mr. Obama never knew that any CEO’s on Wall Street were getting large bonuses. The general public just reading articles over the past years—knew but I guess he never read anything that the general public read. If his friends were making bonuses it was news to him.

Posted by: Mike | January 29, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

tjp612: “Government needs to get out of the way of business.”
Yes, that worked so well under Bush and the Republican Congress these last 8 years. From Enron to Lehmans Brothers to Madoff – the less regulation the better they do!

Posted by: jhw539 | January 29, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

It’s not shocking, it’s expected and speaks of how they see themselves versus the “rest” of us. It’s okay, they can continue to build their earthly treasures but they can take none of it with them in the after life. God will judge.

Posted by: Alexandria | January 29, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

What strikes me here is the notion of “shareholder value”. Supposedly the CEO’s are all there to maximize and protect the value of their companies for their invenstors. What happens seems to be outlandish compensation for the select few with little or no regard to the shareholder or workers. What needs to change is the crazy ration of CEO’s making 10,000% more than their lowest paid workers. If the salaries at the top were tied to a sane ratio profit would be increased thereby maximizing return for the investor. Since many of those investors are the very employees holding 401k’s and often stock in their employer everyone would benefit.

Posted by: SFRussell1963 | January 29, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

Watching the History channel today. Story about Pirates of the Carribean. Lots of parallels. The ship was a democracy, i.e. the crew decided where to go and what to do next. But when the booty was deemed not enough to share, they would drop off junior pirates on a sand bar and sail off. Sound familiar?

Posted by: LongT | January 29, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

Businesses and our financial markets had been crowned king. Thank you Mr. President for taking a small step (just commenting) in restoring it to its rightful place.

Posted by: Mavsreader | January 29, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

cc: thinking that people who don’t pay federal income tax whould get money back is ridiculous. They pay other taxes, but they’re not to the federal gov’t. They’re to their respective states, counties, cities, Social Security/Medicare…why should get someone get something back from which they don’t pay into?
Anyways, the federal income tax is unconstitutional anyways, but since we live in a welfare state, the issue doesn’t even matter.

Posted by: Joe | January 29, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

tjp612 – OK, I’m with you on the “government needs to get out of business way” part. But we’re talking about goverment bailout money here and if its my money going for a bailout out then I have a right to know/say where it goes. If the banks don’t want the questions, don’t take the money. They can all fail as far as I’m concerned and take Detroit with them.

Posted by: Eric S, Clearwater, FL | January 29, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

jhw…using my tax dollars to conduct social engineering is irresponsible.how quickly you forget the mistakes of bush, namely assuming one has a mandate to push 100% of their own ideas. last time i checked 47% of this country ( america ) said no to obama. how about some bipartisian thinking. the 47% were not consulted in this process. if this keeps your looking at 4 and out, probanly 2 and out for the house.

Posted by: catman | January 29, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Just get tough on these guys when handing out future bailouts and maybe the American people can have some faith and confidence.

Posted by: t42 | January 29, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

Stop being so greedy you corporate big shots but keep sending your campaign dollars to Barney Frank And Chris Dodd.

Posted by: jim 234 | January 29, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

SFRussell1963: The interest of the shareholders has been abandoned in this cycle of greed. These CEO’s are grabbing the spoils while they can and to hell with the investors and the future. Started during the dot comm boom ’96 – 99′. Fuld of Lehmann Bros. is a glaring example and should have charges brought, but it won’t happen. His ill gotten gain is being used to pay lawyers while he sells his mansion in Florida to his wife for $100.

Posted by: LongT | January 29, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Banging my head against a wall again. I love the diversion tactics of our government. “You are bad boys, now go to your room and I’ll bring you supper if you be quiet.” These people robbed us. The Wall Street Crash was the greatest robbery ever pulled in history. We as Americans, all nationalities together, lost our investments, our savings, our retirements. Has anyone asked where that money went? Trillions of dollars or digits from Wall Street losses were dumped into the Federal Reserve who is now giving this money back to banks to make bigger banks and buy little banks so there is no competition. It is called a Cartel. Then once the Cartel is finalized all that stolen Wall Street money at a fixed rate of 0.025% will be loaned out to Americans at a 20% and higher rate. This is robbery and we are now borrowing our own stolen money. I don’t care at all for this reprimand. We should have some justice and legislators with guts to call for the arrests and trial of these criminals. We the people might consider forming a coalition to hire attorneys to prosecute these criminals, Citibank, J.P. Morgan, and Wells Fargo. Perhaps a case judgement in the trillions paid directly to the United States Citizen. That would be Change I could believe in. Are there any good attorneys out there?

Posted by: clancy49 | January 29, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

TJP612 you said:
“On what grounds does Obama talk to CEOs about responsibility? We are not a Marxist society, the government does not control the means of production.”
If these companies had not asked for taxpayer money to bail out their businesses I would agree with you. But the moment they took the money they had to know they had to be accountable for that money.
If someone asked you for money because they were in trouble, and you gave it to them, wouldn’t it upset you if they blew it on a beach vacation instead of paying bills? In the end, you can’t do anything about it (except never give this person money again) but you will say something to this person. I think it is the same thing here.

Posted by: slm | January 29, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

Alexandria, your understanding of the reasons why we’re in this mess is really dense. Have you not heard of the SEC which regulated Madoff? Did that work? No it didn’t. Have you heard of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, which are Government sponsored entities? Have you heard of the Federal Reserve, whom made money too cheap for too long? The gov’t had it’s hands in this mess from the start. Don’t blame capitalism for socialism’s failures.
The free market, which we haven’t had in a very long time in this country, regulates itself very well because fraudulent activity is punished by the market place and their activities are punishable under basic fraud laws. When a company makes poor choices, it goes out of business and the ones that make good choices buy up the assets.

Posted by: Joe | January 29, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

OK if they want it then tax it at 90% for any company that received bailout money.

Posted by: Hank Irelan | January 29, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

@ Eric S 5:30
I agree with you – The “stimulus” and “bailout” packages are both poorly designed and will neither “bailout” nor “stimulate” our financial system and economy respectively.
My point was addressing the statement by Gibbs that Obama “talks to CEOs about responsibility”. It is not his place to do so, IMHO, for companies who HAVE NOT accepted bailout money.
For those entities who have received bailout money from the government (e.g., Wall Street, Big 3, etc.), well, you get what you deserve. If the government says no jets, no bonuses, no fancy offices, well, I guess they’ll have to live with it – It’s a choice they made. I read an article today that 20+ local/regional banks who initially signed up for bailout $$$ have pulled their applications – They don’t want the strings attached and the government overseeing their every move. They’d prefer to go it alone. Bravo for them.

Posted by: tjp612 | January 29, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

SLM – Please see my post at 5:41 – I was referring to companies who had NOT received bailout money such as IBM and Honeywell (to whom Gibbs implied Obama lectured about responsibility during their meeting yesterday).
The CEO’s who accepted government bailout money? Well, however the government decides to deal with them is fine by me – They get the worst medicine they could ever hope for: Government intervention!

Posted by: tjp612 | January 29, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm

Obama is showboating…. Nothing more…. Like he didn’t already know about this or he’s going to ask them to return the bonus money…….
Showboating hosted by ABC……

Posted by: Lumberman_63 | January 29, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm

Any organization needing and accepting Federal bailout funds has absolutely no justifiable reason to be giving “PERFORMANCE BONUSES” to ANYONE in their organization! Nor do they have any reason to be paying anyone in their organization “RETENTION BONUSES”! Why would you need to retain someone who sold your business down the river??? Where could they possibly go, considering all those who are out here looking for work???

Posted by: Roscoe2400 | January 29, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Joe, with all due respect, YOUR understanding of what happened the past 8 years appears to be even more dense than Andrea’s. What created the mortgage mess we’re in was not free market capitalism. Free market capitalism is when those who enjoy the rewards are also on the hook for the risk. What created the mess we’re facing now is precisely that free market capitalism was NOT in play. CEOs, such as Stan O’Neil at Merrill for one, were taking down MASSIVE bonuses and their INCENTIVE was to push as many CDOs and derivatives as possible. However, they were not on the hook for the risk. As it turns out, you and I were. I love free market capitalism as much as anyone but it only works when risk and reward are linked.

Posted by: Fan of True Capitalism | January 29, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

What part of “shameful” was the Prez thinking when he gave Wall St. exec’s some of the best seats on the podium at the Inugaration????

Posted by: ck13 | January 29, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Lumberman_63
When has a President of the United States ever NOT been showboating?

Posted by: jock59801 | January 29, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

Obama & the Dems… thanks for the stimulus and let’s get it moving ASAP. Also the inflation rate is out of control can you get a cap put on the inflation? The money is gone and people are struggling as a result of Corporate GREED. We also need to freeze the accounts of the RICH theives of Corporate Amercia and Wall Street as they put the country in this dilemma and the Fed’s should start issuing warrants for their arrest. If common citizens rob banks they go to jail…Corporate America has become the “Stick-up kid”…The Feds need to do something useful & get on this right away. And don’t forget Bush & Cheney.. they owe us for Enron and all the pensions they stole.

Posted by: LY2 | January 29, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

The amount of the bonus seems to be in exact disproportion to their ability avoid making their companies bankrupt.
Asking the government to bail out a company means they are beggars. What a slap in the face.

Posted by: Debbie | January 29, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

“All you need to be a sucessful politicial is a good line of B.S.” A true quote from a congressman from the 50′s who was a close friend of my grandmother.

Posted by: LongT | January 29, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Did the CEOs eat $100 steaks like Obama did last night?
How much did these CEOs spend on a party when they were named CEO? Obama spend $150,000,000.00 on his coronation, the most expensive in history.
Did these CEOs hire tax dodgers? Obama hired Geithner to be Treasury Secretary.
Do these CEO’s dial up the thermostat like Obama does in our White House, then preach to the masses to turn their thermostats down and force people to freeze to death? David Axelrod complained to the NY Times that the White House is so hot you “could grow orchids in there”. Remember that Obama told us that the rest of the world wouldn’t like it if we kept our homes at 72 year-round.
Do these CEOs drive around in huge armored gas-guzzling limos like Obama does?
Obama has no business scolding these leaders when Obama is 1000 times worse than they are.
the arrogant elitist Obama should practice what he preaches. Or is “rules for thee but not for me”? Is this the change and hope we needed?

Posted by: Obama's arrogance | January 29, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm

President Obama hasn’t been in office a week and already many are blaming him for the failures of the Bush adminstration. I have seen what deregulation does for financial instutions and I for one hope that there are some govermental restraints put on these instutions. When the Presdient Obama has had at least a year in the presidency then maybe he can begin to shoulder some of the blame for this economy but until then, George Bush and his less government crew, (which by the way is a joke if you truly examine his policies and spending)
of Republicans were in charge for 6 of his 8 years.

Posted by: Helga | January 29, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

LY2 said; “Also the inflation rate is out of control can you get a cap put on the inflation?” Huh? Where did that come from?

Posted by: LongT | January 29, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

President Obama…with all due respect, this sounds like sweet flavored water being served, not outrage. Let’s stop and call this what it is…highway robbery, theft of the public trust. The first order of business is that I would immediately give them an ultimatum…return every penny in bonuses or return every bailout dollar with interest. Then I would get legislation done to make sure this doesn’t happen again by making all executive bonuses on Wall Street subject to review and approval by the Treasury Secretary. If a company or bank lost money, no bonus, plain and simple. As to the first round of bailout money that they got and are using for their benefit only or hoarding, I would include in this economic stimulus bill a provision that all mortgages must be reduced to 3%, and a 2 month (60 day) moritorium on mortgage payments without interest or penalties incurred, and cap all credit card interest rates at 10% maximum. All to take effect immediately upon signing of the legislation. Thus banks, financial houses, and credit card companies that declared themselves as banks to get bailout money will be forced to make that bailout money flow back to the people who they took it from under false pretense. That’s what you do…take the bull by the horns here. No more “don’t do it again”. It’s time to play hardball with these SOBs, not cuddle them. Are you listening, Mr. President?

Posted by: jake | January 29, 2009, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

jhw..obvious that you do not understand tax law.thats ok, but i do .spending money on national research labs and launch vehicles…really? i consider that elitist spending while rank and file go without a job? the last place we should be is in space…i think we have enough problems on this planet.global warming? thought big al had that one nailed already.it appears its better just to give everyone a big fat check to either pay down debt(liquidity) or spend ( job growth) than to allow elitist tell us where we should spend our money.

Posted by: catman | January 29, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

ck13, i was saying that free market capitalism wasn’t in play. We’re in agreement. But don’t you think that a bank who’s selling sub-prime and risky mortgages that are GUARANTEED by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, will make these loans because they know that they will get a bailout if things go south? This isn’t free-market capitalism. Free-market capitalism doesn’t give credit to people who can’t pay it back.

Posted by: Joe | January 29, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Obama is “Shamefull”!!! And Obama’s so called Stimulus plan is “The Height Of Irresponsibillity”

Posted by: as if | January 29, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

What is shameful is a $825 billion pork laden bill that was passed by a partisan House vote to satisfy partisan constituents. The interest on this pig of a bill is several times over any Wall Street bonuses. As a citizen, I am always wary when government tries to micro-manage the private sector. We are not a socialist or communist country … yet.

Posted by: Philphat | January 29, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Anyone who thinks that Bush was a man of small gov’t need merely look at the growth in the Federal Gov’t:
2001: $1,863,200,000
2002: $2,011,200,000
2003: $2,160,100,000
2004: $2,293,000,000
2005: $2,472,200,000
2006: $2,655,400,000
2007: $2,730,200,000
2008: $2,931,200,000
Public Debt:
2001: $5,807,500,000
2008: $10,024,700,000
Does this look like less government?
Numbers are great, they don’t lie like politicians.

Posted by: Joe | January 29, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm

If the bailout was truely a loan, then do as the bank are doing and recall or foreclose on the loan. The tax payer/voters are very upset too. We are watching for Obama to do something.

Posted by: Ray | January 29, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

“Do these CEOs drive around in huge armored gas-guzzling limos like Obama does?”
___________________________________
This is a pretty weak point. Shows a bit of a bias in operation vs. logic.

Posted by: pefros | January 29, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm

This is exactly why I wrote to every single one of my congressmen/women pleading with them for NO BAILOUT WHATSOEVER. The CEOs and execs at these companies could not care LESS about the common folks. They are going to get theirs regardless of who has to go without employment, without heat, without healthcare, etc. I am totally embarrassed to be an American over this. I will also do everything in my power to make sure that the companies these greedy thieves helm never get another red cent of my money!

Posted by: dlh | January 29, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

I see that ‘$100 steaks’ ‘thermostat turned up’ and ‘pork’ are the new buzz word talking points. Please repeat endlessly.

Posted by: pefros | January 29, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

At many banks and financial institutions, bonuses traditionally are not “rewards”. Instead of just paying a flat salary, let’s say around $250,000 a year, the bulk of their compensation, another $1 Million, is held to earn the float until year-end. The year-end bonus is simply a bloated salary in arrears. These people believe they are entitled to the “bonus” because it’s the true value of their work. Unless taxpayers and shareholders demand rules, financial institutions have no reason to change the status quo.

Posted by: Center One | January 29, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Those folks working in DC are the most lazy and idiotic people on Earth. They have no sense of logic. How dare they steal from us…all the time, every day, forever! We work everyday just to put a roof over our heads and provide enough food for our family, yet they take and take and take. Give us back our money, write each tax payer a check for $10,000 and see how fast this economy gets back on its feet. Thats the only stimulous plan that will work. OR…forget credit, lets just buy what we can affort with the cash we make and forget about taking loans or credit from these people. They can go to hell! Obama, read your stimulus packet and fix it immediately!!!!!

Posted by: Daud | January 29, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

catman: “i consider that elitist spending while rank and file go without a job?”
Elitist? You must be trolling to post something as absurd as that. Yes, the American scientists who invented everything from the computer to the internet to solar cells are just a bunch of elitists and are to be detested! And they certainly don’t employ thousands doing everything from building apparatuses to refining the alloys to technicians running the programs.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 29, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

catman: ” the 47% were not consulted in this process.”
Obama’s approval rating is over 70% on every current poll.
He consulted repeated with the Republicans and has clearly incorporated many of their ideas, from extensive tax cuts to eliminating a few controversial programs.
Repeating a lie – that 47% of people (ie, their representatives) – were not consulted in this process does not make it true and reflect poorly upon the quality of current Republican thought.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 29, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

OK. Obama os right. However, how do you justify how much he spent on his coming to power? We complained pres Bush cost $50 million but Obama was $150 million. And granted, believe in God or not you can’t tell me you don’t see the real picture here. Americans have to stop spending money like it’s an every day commodity… that is the lesson we need to learn-President, Governor, poor or middle class. Accountability is what is happening to America now and I’m happy. He who is with out sin cast the first stone and take the log out of your own eye before you go looking at the SPECK in your Brothers.
Amen!

Posted by: Terrie | January 29, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

It is manifestly NOT hard to ride herd on executive pay. Merely make the tax rate for income above a known point, like that of 2005 or 6, 100%. If caught trying to fiddle with taxes there is already a well known means of enforcement: the IRS.
But executives are not the only putative villans here, all members of all boards, especially compensation review and risk management boards, of all companies receiving TARP and TARP-like public money should resign if those companies have spent money in stupid ways. “Stupid” is defined by the ta payer.

Posted by: Seeker of the Center | January 29, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

“Anyone who thinks that Bush was a man of small gov’t need merely look at the growth in the Federal Gov’t:”
Yup, and I am personally ticked off about it. Still going to be ticked off about it when Obama does it. Whats the point?
Politicians have the mindset that they are playing with monopoly money. Pass it out when it feels good. The problem is, it feels bad when they don’t pass it out, so they keep shoveling it to avoid any guilt. How many times in the past 30 years have we cut spending on anything other than defense? Every time it happens, there is outrage by some group it affects. Politicians get scared because it may hurt their chances at the polls so they vote to keep the funds flowing. What we end up with is this bloated, gluttonous government that will always look for more ways to take our money and spend it to get votes.
It is the greatest weakness of Democracy. Even the Greeks knew this thousands of years ago. They realized democracy fails when people vote themselves state treasury funds. We haven’t learned.

Posted by: KR | January 29, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

At the current rate of unemployment, I figure by 2010 the only people who will have jobs are auto CEO’s; upper echalon on Wall Street & Banks; and a few heads of the Media.

Posted by: soose | January 29, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

Wow let’s bail out Wall Street but leave the taxpayers hanging! The Obama’s, the leader of the free world is being driven in a limo?? Sounds fishy to me! Get a grip people maybe he should ride a bike!!! NOT!!!! I am sure his limos rides will add up to the huge bonuses that these COO AND CEO’s recieved. GET REAL PEOPLE!

Posted by: momof4boys | January 29, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Almost as shameful as him spending $900 billion dollars of US Taxpayers money…money which we don’t have.

Posted by: Hyocrite | January 29, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

KR, great point. Our founding fathers knew the dangers of a democracy, that’s why we have a Republic. But, due to the strength of the central government, our republic is no longer one at all. Liberals and conservatives alike should be able, but probably won’t, unite in an effort to curb centralized power, gained by the endlessly catering to special groups.
How many thousands of years of history do we need to know that all governments become dictatorial? Government is a necessary evil, always has been. The citizenry and government should not be in partnership, but rather, the citizenry should be informed and able to confront tyranny of its own government. Repubs trusted Bush, now more people trust Obama, but they’re opposite sides to the very same coin.

Posted by: Joe | January 29, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

I want to wait and see if Obama is a truthful President or just a pathological liar as most politicians are. He said he would line item veto pork barrel programs that came across his desk. The American electorate remembers this campaigne promise he used to nell supporters of McCain and Palin. This stimulus package is full of pork barrel legislation. In a short time the pen will reveal Obama’s true loyalty. Is it to party or We the People? We will see his true character in short order. Corageous leader or Party puppy dog?

Posted by: WethePeople | January 29, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

The Borgen Project has some good info on the cost of addressing global poverty.
$30 billion: Annual shortfall to end world hunger.
$550 billion: U.S. Defense budget

Posted by: Abel Tsegga | January 29, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

6 million points President Obama. I’m fried! Fried!!

Posted by: Suzannaquanashawn | January 29, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

nobody here should be outraged AT ALL, we live in a capitalistic society, well what do you think that means? it means that if you’re the ceo of a company then you call the shots, you control the prices, if you run a business you charge what you want to be paid. If a greedy ceo runs a company into the ground then thats the company’s fault. I hate greed like many of you but you all sound like hypocrites when you say “give the money back”. There should be no bailouts what so ever of any capitalistic company PERIOD. All this is beyond oxy-moron.

Posted by: john | January 29, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

Quote from article: “Sam Palmisano, Chairman, CEO and President of IBM (five-year compensation package, according to Forbes, $86.12 million) and David M. Cote, Chairman and CEO of Honeywell (five-year compensation package: $60.23 million).”
—————–
Wow, that’s a lot of money. You’d think they played professional sports :)

Posted by: MikeO | January 29, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

WHAT DOES OBAMA CALL GIVING BILLIONS TO ACORN THE CROOKED LEFTIST ORGANIZATION
THAT IS UNDER INV. FOR VOTER FRAUD.????????????????? tHEY HAVE LIED AND CHEATED THE VOTERS OF THIS COUNTRY.

Posted by: rod | January 29, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

I don’t care if it’s pork or beef or poultry. The point is to create jobs and accomplish something beneficial to the country in the process. If pork creates jobs, then let’s have some pork!

Posted by: John | January 29, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

Dishonest and greedy CEO is what is getting me. I seen the CEO of IBM sitting at Obama right hand saying he is willing to help create jobs the same day he is laying off huge number (10 of thousands) of people in the USA and moving work over seas. IBM made record profits last year. IBM is willing pay for people to move to developing countries and take jobs there instead of being laid off. This is not creating jobs in the USA. We need to make CEO take pay cuts before they can lay people off. 50% pay cuts of CEO’s will create thousands of jobs and the CEO’s will not be living on the street.

Posted by: Unhappy | January 29, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

These corporate CEOs who are stuffing their pockets with bonuses while laying off employees should be cuffed up and sent to Gitmo. These CEOs who are laundering the citizens’ hard earned money should get nothing less than the “terrorist” treatment ! They are a threat to this country’s well being.

Posted by: SB | January 29, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm

How would Obama answer if he were asked–”Which is more shameful, Wall Street giving themselves bonuses or Gueithner lying and cheating on his taxes.

Posted by: rjm4511 | January 29, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

What is shameful, is that CEOs and executives that are worthless are paying themselves millions. The CEOs and executives that have had their companies beg the U.S. taxpayer for a handout are wasting the U.S. taxpayer money instead of using it to improve business for the shareholders and the American people.

Posted by: Paul | January 29, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

How many of these Wall Street people donated to Obama’s campaign or to the DNC for Obama?
He had a lot of Wall Street backers. Is he going to return the shameful, shameful money?

Posted by: MayBee | January 29, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

John 6:54 pm said: “If pork creates jobs, then let’s have some pork!”
—————
What if the pork DOESN’T create jobs? What if you REALLY have to be creative to even come up with a justification of how “pork” MIGHT create jobs? I think that is the opposition’s position on the things they want tossed out of this bill.

Posted by: MikeO | January 29, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

How many more times will it take to make our representatives in Washington to wake up? This “shameful” behavior is nothing new? It happens constantly. It is a matter of bailed-out banks/companies throwing parties that cost more than I make in two years, to Wall Street CEO’s collecting bonuses that I won’t make in a lifetime.
Wake up people, and wake up Washington. It is obvious to me that those companies and CEO’s can not be expected to conduct themselves in an appropriate manner. Thus, it is the responsibility of our national leaders to make it happen!
Those companies and those CEO’s do not react to rhetoric, they react to “action.” So, representatives and senators, you have to “hold their hands.” You do. It is so obvious.
Those adults that are supposed leaders of those oh-so-large and oh-so-greedy companies have to be put into “child care” and taught right from wrong. Don’t trust them with a dime, especially when I am the one paying the dime.
I am on of the thousands, probably millions, of Americans that are out of work. I would do anything for a job, and all I hear about are lavish parties and multi-million dollar bonuses. Hey, wake up!!!
This country is going to hell, and it is being allowed to do so by those that have been elected to “watch our backs.” I must admit that I have no confidence in those that are in Washington. They have done nothing to impress me in years.
I am held accountable for what I do, and what I don’t do. All I am asking is that everyone else have the same done to them. Everyone should be accountable….Senators, Representatives, CEO’s, everyone. No exceptions.
Unfortunately, I am sure I will hear about the same misconduct in another month or so.

Posted by: Woodrow Hunter | January 29, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

A lot of these Wall Street criminals should be in jail for stealing people’s hopes, dreams, and hard earned money. Obama seems like he’s working hard, but it’s not hard enough. Less talk, more action. If he lets this stimulus package pass with all this crap in it, I will lose all respect for him. Be a man and stick to your word. Read it “…line by line.”

Posted by: Daud | January 29, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

But he has NO Problem giving Billions to ACORN????

Posted by: Maggie | January 29, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

Pork never has and never will create sustainable jobs for our economy only the private sector can do that. We do need infratructure revitalization and government can help with this. The infrastructure is just the foundation on which allows us to grow jobs in the private sector. No wealth has ever been created by government programs only manufacturing can do that. We cannot spend our way to prosperity. The government should know this by now. They have been trying for years and all wees gonna get is more of what wees already got; a bankrupt country slaves to the whims of our creditors.We have now become the puppets and not the pupeteer.Sad but true.

Posted by: WethePeople | January 29, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

jhw…al gore invented the internet. i dont troll i just cant stop reading your posts as they always appear to have an elitist twang to them. i have hired and fired more 4.0 gpa’s than you can imagine. consequently i am not impressed by titles or credentials.i am impressed by deeds not words.
the private sector needs to fund that r & d, via the r and e tax credit. i dont want to go to the moon or mars, i want the 50 to 70 percent of americans who dont pay taxes to be employed. this bill doesnt get us there. to commit funds that wont be spent for years is not stimulus, its spending and commiting future budgets. thats pork that wont create a current job.
his( mr obama) approval rating is 70%, his cohoerts are in the bush cheney range. nonetheless 47% said nobama.nothing personal, just think its a bad bill given my experience on this planet in the us and globaly.i hope it is seriously reworked.

Posted by: catman | January 29, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

What is shameful is that Wall Street beggar executives are using the U.S. taxpayer money to enrich themselves while their shareholders and investors suffer huge losses.

Posted by: Paul | January 29, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Why again did we put a rookie in the white house? A rookie who has had no history in economics?

Posted by: Dan | January 29, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Here’s a stimulus package for the rest of us: No more federal student loan debt

Posted by: Daud | January 29, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Obama said: “show some restraint, and show some discipline, and show some sense of responsibility” . . .
Yet he throws an inaugural bash for himself that cost $ 1.7 million. He does this AFTER winning an election by bamboozling Americans with his campaign rhetoric of:
“an ethic of responsibility that we needed to see reinstituted in certain aspects of our country, particularly in our financial institutions. Whether it’s government or the financial system, we’re not going to be able to do what is needed to be done to stabilize our financial system if the American people read about this type of outrageous behavior”
Guess what, we read about this outrageous behavior during your 1.7 million dollar inaugural bash.

Posted by: Govt. Hypocrisy | January 29, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Who cares about Wall Street and big business! All of us “real people” are not in the market or have been screwed by the market. If big business fails, then small business will prevail, once again!

Posted by: Daud | January 29, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

Some CEOs and executives are actually doing a good job in a difficult environment caused by Wall Street corruption and greed. (Although, they too should not be greedy in difficult times.)
Wall Street execs should be paying back their previous years bonuses. Which they received for earning and profits that were bogus not giving themselves U.S. taxpayer money.

Posted by: Pual | January 29, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Bush had no clue. Obama has no clue.
Presidents are elected by $$$$. Much $$$$. Lets elect a new one each month to stimulate the ailing economy. It will be more effctive than the current stimulus package and a lot more fun.

Posted by: WethePeople | January 29, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

How much money does one get to make before he is “greedy”? I would say it is a relative thing but I have no rich relatives.

Posted by: WethePeople | January 29, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Wow, you all sure do whine a lot. My grandmother, who is still alive and still has all her faculties, was born in 1912. She lived through the Great Depression. Before you go saying that all these banks should just be allowed to go bust, maybe you should go visit someone who had the opportunity to live through the free market being allowed to function unfettered by government interference. Nobody had a job. No one could afford anything. She and her family ate because the raised their own vegetables, kept chickens and a sow. They had clothing because they sewed all their clothes or got them second hand. No car, no anything. My grandfather got paid $0.50 an hour to load dynamite onto trucks and my grandmother had a lesser paying job working for a factory in town. Yep, those were the “good ole days”!

Posted by: lycina | January 29, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

I think shameful is if the “stimulus” package gets passed, as it is… way way more shameful than some execs getting bucks!! 100′s billions of “stimulus” $ to wasteful gov’t agencies and programs (pet projects) and not to really encourage long lasting business growth is downright tragedy!

Posted by: bob | January 29, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm

“I don’t care if it’s pork or beef or poultry. The point is to create jobs and accomplish something beneficial to the country in the process. If pork creates jobs, then let’s have some pork!”
So what happened to all the jobs from the porktastic 2005 $286.4B Highway bill. That was supposed to fix all of the aging infrastructure then.
This time around we are only spending a fraction of the money in actual infrastructure spending. So where do we think all these jobs are coming from?
Economist Martin Fieldstein wrote today in the Washington Post:
“As a conservative economist, I might be expected to oppose a stimulus plan. In fact, on this page in October, I declared my support for a stimulus.
But the fiscal package now before Congress needs to be thoroughly revised. In its current form, it does too little to raise national spending and employment. It would be better for the Senate to delay legislation for a month, or even two, if that’s what it takes to produce a much better bill. We cannot afford an $800 billion mistake. “

Posted by: BertieW | January 29, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

It’s just about time that somebody told Frank Miller and his gang that they aren’t welcome in Hadleyville anymore!
Good Job, Mr. President!

Posted by: Jordan | January 29, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

The Wall Street execs are not only shameless, but they are thieves. They have used their positions of trust to defraud the American public. They need to be investigated, tried, and locked up in prison.
And now instead of returning their previous years ill gotten gains, they are asking for the U.S. taxpayer to fund their bonuses.
Why is Madoff still in his penthouse? If he is not the biggest thief ever, I don’t know who is.

Posted by: Paul | January 29, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Bravo, Clancy 49!! You said it all.
I can’t believe every citizen of this country isn’t rioting in the streets right now. It’s mind blowing how much we’ve all be robbed.
And Eric S. is also right, pointing out the biggest thieves of them all, the usurious men running the credit card industry. It won’t be long now before many, many more people realize paying back these outrageous loans to companies who are also getting tax payer money and themselves borrowing at .025% is beyond outrageous. Much more fecal matter is about to hit the oscillating device, make no mistake.
But I guess so long as the fat cats are paying themselves their 10s and 100s of millions of $, everything’s peachy, huh?

Posted by: Cat | January 29, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

All this stupid legislation is just what the American electorate voted for. Just look at who is running the congress. The circus has come to town and we might as well shut up and enjoy the show.

Posted by: WethePeople | January 29, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Obama advisor Franklin Raines ran Fannie Mae until he had to step down due to an accounting scandal (wait, didn’t I read something in the news about Fannie Mae relating to the economic crisis). He apparently made a huge pile of cash. Anyone calling for him to pay it back?

Posted by: MikeO | January 29, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Why can’t we get these companies who have moved their companies over seas move them back here. That will be money back into the economy. No bonuses given out to any company asking for a bailout. All Execs making more than 100K take a 20% pay cut 200K 25% and so on and so forth for the company. How many underpayed workers could stay employed then. Take those billions $ of bonus money and pay daycare for their employees or give them pay raises as Im sure they don’t get bonuses or anything else.

Posted by: cantwn4lusn | January 29, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Some of the posts on here are disgusting. This stuff about the white house heat is just gossip. Just because Obama appeared in short sleeves in the oval office the nuts out there are saying that he cracked up the heat to “tropical” levels in the white house. All it takes is one nut to start a story and all the other little nut cases fall in line behind. Obama is BY FAR the best man we have had in the white house in years. Everyone should be praying for him instead of knocking his every move. Leave that job to the screw balls at Fox.

Posted by: Olivia | January 29, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

What about senators who continue to give themselves raises in such difficult times? The whole system is broke……

Posted by: lawman | January 29, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

The private company I work for just purchased some manufacturing that a big company moved south of the border. He has move it back to the USA. I guess the timing was wrong for the big company. All their workers went north for jobs and they went belly up..

Posted by: WethePeople | January 29, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

cantwn4lusn said: “Why can’t we get these companies who have moved their companies over seas move them back here. That will be money back into the economy.”
————
Are YOU the consumer willing to pay the PRICE the company will need to charge in order to pay the workers US wages? If so, let your voice/desires be known to those companies. Consumers vote with their dollars. Buy from Made in the USA companies only. If those companies start to flourish at the expense of the companies that outsourced jobs overseas, those companies will rethink their outsourcing strategy. Just don’t do the spending with a bunch of CONSUMER CREDIT (high-ticket items like vehicles are, of course, the exception, but big-screen TVs and other luxuries are not).

Posted by: MikeO | January 29, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm

The stimulus plan is for the American taxpayer. It will help the economy, although the damage done in the previous 8 years of greed and fraud may not be fixed even in a decade.
The stimulus is a way of slowly fixing the damage and risk caused to the U.S. economy. The previous President and Congress failed the American people.
The American people need to hold their government officials accountable for the past decade of failure.
Obama has just started, so far so good, but the people will need to judge and decide again in 4 years. Now the President needs the support of the American people to help fix this mess.
Corrupt politicians and Wall Street execs need to be put in prison. CEOs and executives giving themselves bonuses for failure is shameful and un-American. Execs that have begged for U.S. taxpayer money need to give back their bogus bonuses from previous years.

Posted by: Paul | January 29, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

Olivia said: “This stuff about the white house heat is just gossip.”
———-
Just saw this on the ABC Evening News (last story before signing off). Still a rumor? Wait, what site am I on?

Posted by: MikeO | January 29, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

The story OB comments on does not show from where the money comes. Is it money they earned or money he said we need to give them (he, OB, did support the bailout). Until we know for sure, we should take note, but criticize?
Washington politicians that are made should take a look at the spending bill they are trying to pass. Companies earn money and should do what is best for their company. THEY EARNED IT!!! Government takes money and should provide services that are in the country’s best interest, not spend money that they don’t have for things they say we need. If we need them, then make a budget that includes those items. The government wants to provide the service first then give us the bill. Unfortunately, they are showing us the bill hoping we won’t realize we will have to pay it no matter. In the mean time how does this help create jobs? STOP THE BLEEDING, STARTING WITH CONGRESSIONAL SPENDING.

Posted by: Rodney | January 29, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

lawman- You are correct – the system is corrupt from greed. The solution is to make these greedy acts public like Obama did today. A complete list of all the names and companies should be posted on the internet for everyone to see. And the stockholders of these companies should DEMAND the money be paid back. Part of the problem is that this kind of thing went on in the past with little fan fare. It needs to be pointed out loudly and boldly when people act on their own behalf instead of for the public interest. Obama did the absolute right thing today by pointing it out.

Posted by: Olivia | January 29, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

More egregious than the bonuses is the fact that these wall street firms are spending the TARP funds to pay off Republicans and lobby against the Employee Free Choice Act. This is money that they stole from hard working Americans, and they are using it to screw the same hard working Americans.

Posted by: Flash Override | January 29, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

The sheep are being slaughter on this blog. Many of the people on Wall Street are not high paid executives but get a bonus based on certain criteria. If we want to be so dam open why not tell which firms and how far down the employment tree the bonus were rewarded. Public embarrassment can lead to some very bad results throughout a company. Go for the big dogs but do not destroy the small guy. How many people are going to lose their jobs when the administration get finished with private jets. I bet the highly skilled workers in Wichita Kansas are now worried more than before. This industry might just move out of the country.

Posted by: William | January 29, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

I agree with that comment by President Obama and have a few choice words myself. It is worse than shameful. I might not agree with everything President Obama does but am glad I voted for him. He is doing great!

Posted by: Steve | January 29, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

All this about tight credit is a farce. TOO lose of credit creates a false economy. One that is doomed from the start. We want to play now pay later. WHO CARES I will be long gone by then. As in the days of Noe were, eating, drinking and given in marriage. Pride cometh before the fall. You reap what you sow. Get my drift. The wages of sin is death maybe even this great nation I love. However if we repent and turn from our wicked ways we may here from God and HE will heal our land. It is probably beyond our means we will need help to get through this time of troubles for our nation.

Posted by: WethePeople | January 29, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

How can you justify any bonus when your company is loosing money and you’re begging the U.S. taxpayer for a bailout?
These execs have earned record bonuses in previous years. They’ve already scammed the shareholder and investors. Now they are scamming the U.S. tax payer.

Posted by: Paul | January 29, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

SHAMEFUL???? I tell you what is shameful and it is the OBAMA and PELOSI lies. Obama said no lobbyists and he even allowed his Treasury Sec to have a GOLDMAN SACHS lobbyist among others and Obama with Pelosi tried to ram down this socialist giveaway through Congress when Americans are hurting and out of work. This bill rewards liberal groups and does nothing for the economy. Shame on Bush for Iraq and the border but shame on Obama and Pelosi for their gigantic lies!!!!!The ones that ABC, CBS and NBC have no guts to point out!!!!

Posted by: rockychance | January 29, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Make all executives bums with bonuses larger than
$10,000.00 pay a whopping bonus tax! Make
sure you place a cost of living increase on it so we
don’t have another AMT fiasco. also make it
retroactive to 2007! That’s when things started
going south.
If the company earns a profit then lower the
percentage taken out, but if the company doesn’t
perform well, take a larger percentage out of the
bonus.

Posted by: spacerook1 | January 29, 2009, 8:12 pm 8:12 pm

hypocrite, what about the millions Gore is making spewing Global Warmer but yet using more CO2 himself then a small town!!

Posted by: spock | January 29, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

This word ‘responsibility’ coming from a marxist is absolutely absurd. How is that when a conservative touts responsibility, he’s labeled heartless, but when a liberal does, he’s revered? Obama received millions from these financial institutions in campaign contributions, is he going to give that money back???
Posted by: Joe | Jan 29, 2009 5:06:50 PM
*************************
Joe the Plumber … Is that you? LOL!

Posted by: Democrat | January 29, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Wow that didnt take long. Obama has been in office less than 2 weeks and the bashing begins. Granted I am not happy with this package being crammed down our throats either but I think that its got Palosi’s name all over it she is holding Obama hostage. This package offers no real short term help, full of pork and basically is just a Dem spending spree.

Posted by: CAW | January 29, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

Independent Fighter,
You’re entitled to your opinion and if you feel the plans supporting of fish study (or whatever) stimulates jobs then okay. What I find most disturbing is your comment that the war in Iraq is/was a failure. How do you think our troops feel when they read comments like that coming from Americans? When you make a statement like that it belittles our soldiers and implies they are also failures. It also renders the lives of our fallen heroes irrelevant. Do me a favor, the next time you see one of my brother Marines, why don’t you go up to him and tell him the war is a failure and so is he. Something tells me you don’t have the guts to do it–but you’ll sure hide behind your computer and degrade our military won’t you?

Posted by: rjm4511 | January 29, 2009, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

“What I find most disturbing is your comment that the war in Iraq is/was a failure…”
What? Are we supposed to say that Vietnam was a huge success just so we don’t insult the troops that fought there? We know Vietnam was a failure AND we don’t blame the troops for it.

Posted by: Skip | January 29, 2009, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

The bottom line that everyone seems to ignore is that is is none of Obama’s or the Federal Government’s business what business transactions happen in the PRIVATE sector. I am ashamed that the American public sits by idly and watches this administration take over the freedom upon which this country has endured and was founded upon. America has become lazy and wants a “bailout” for everything. For such a large group of people that fight for the theories of evolution to be taught in all schools and education systems, none of you seem to know the concept of suvival of the fittest. If you want to creat jobs and stimulate the economy, take every agency and department in the government that doesn’t deal with our sovereignty and national security and privatize it. Put our nation back into the hands of what truly ia our nation – the people. Maybe the politicians would think twice about making any decision when they truly had to be a public servant and truly represent the people. Do any of these people making these lofty decisions know what it feels like to worry about anything other than their sellf serving and self preserving their own interests? We would all be hard pressed to find any of them who really know what it is like to have “skin in this game”. Even when we speak, Americans no longer have a voice. Shameful.

Posted by: Metiyo | January 29, 2009, 8:55 pm 8:55 pm

Here is my own issue and doupt. I voted, campained for Obama. As a Ind that voted Rep in most elections over the last 35 years, moving to a Dem vote was hard for me. At this point I am not sorry I voted for Obama as he sure is better than McCain would have been. However I would have liked to see a Rep led Congress like the Clinton years. I think Palosi and her band of conceivers did a lot of the damage that we are seeing. A result of two years of purposly messing with peoples lives and finances just so the voting public would blame Bush and the Republicans. Well it worked. The seats were filled with Dems. Why I do not know. Why was a Senate with a single digit approval awarded with more Dems? Now we have Palosi and Reid running the country in a lot of ways. This package isnt going to stimulate anything in the short term.
It stimulates the big corps, it stimulates Palosi and her gang because they now can go on a spending spree. Sure some may help down the road, but right now as thousands and thousands are being laid off and more and more will follow we need a big short term fix. 500.00 a person will not do anything. Bush’s checks didnt either. The Dem Congress only cares about themselves and now they can spend spend and spend.

Posted by: CAW | January 29, 2009, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

” I am ashamed that the American public sits by idly and watches this administration take over the freedom upon which this country has endured”
___________________________________
This administration? Pal you’ve got some catching up to do.

Posted by: pefros | January 29, 2009, 9:00 pm 9:00 pm

Hmmmm!

Posted by: anonymous | January 29, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm

“Height of Irresponsibility” how about the 819 billion dollar Pelosi California job stimulus package. Call and email your senators…here’s the list so far from the different stations..can’t even get a draft of it…got this from the media outlets.
These should individually go through the regular way/appropriations and pass and fail on their own merit…no stimulus.
1)10,000 schools..No … Furnish the names of these schools…how much to each..what do they want to pay projectors? BULL! Pay for play for favored neighborhoods….and teachers union….you can’t cover all the schools in this country.
2)SCHIP/Medicaid…..increasing to family of 4 making $130,000…Medicaid raised to $120,000…illegal aliens covered…should be for low income children….this is not a stimulus for the economy….needs to be handled by itself.
3)Neighborhood Stabilization / Revitalization….pay for play for ACORN …who wrote that in…no economic stimulus there…just favored politicking and can’t cover all neighborhoods?
4)The Arts…pay for play ….Bull…nothing for the Arts.
5)Washington Mall-redecorating & grass.. please…that’s a different request form…that’s Bull. (Scrapped)
6) Contraceptives./Abortions…pay for play for ideology ….to reduce pregnancy …not a government problem. (Scrapped)
7)Bailing out the states…they should be balancing every year..poor management. They are paying for services for illegal aliens and previously high gasoline prices…..and now it becomes all the taxpayers problem. California is the number one example. Never a grant…. only loans….you make them pay it back and require and make it law they become balanced…set regulations…..not free money…the good states are being punished for their fiscal responsibilities.
8)Pell grants…Bull. That won’t stimulate crap this year …another pay for play to college students and a campaign slogan in 4yrs.
9)Head start…Bull… campaign slogan in 4 yrs… won’t stimulate crap right now.
10)Day Care for Military…not an economic stimulus….we do need it….but not under this.
11)Bike Trails….hello
12)Off Road Trails….hello
13)Hollywood…pay for play
14)Dept of Ag building…388 million of pork last year
15)Welfare and Food Stamps….what????
16)Tax Rebates to those who don’t pay taxes?
17)Amtrak..no profit in 40 years
18)TV coupons…..digital conversion….ludicrous
19)STD’S
20)Carbon Capture Conversion
21)Polishing a monument
22)Remodeling Federal Buildings
23)Global WarminG
24)Stop smoking program
25)Fish Barriers
26)Honey Bee Insurance
27)Waterpark if Florida
28)Smithsonian Museum Work

Posted by: Terry, TX | January 29, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Skip———–Being a retires Navy man myself your comment about the Iraq war being a failure doesnt bother me unless I take it out of context. The service men and women have not failed and have fought and performed fantastic. What failed was the policy to go there in the first place due to Bush and his close circle of friends. I and other while on deployment in the Middle East wondered mostly to ourselves why we were in Iraq instead of Afg. and going after the SOP that attack us on 9/11.
So just to say it again. The Iraq policy was a failure and I can say this now, we should have never gone atleast at the time we did. Afg should have been our focus all along. However the service personal fighting and obeying their Commander in Chief have been great I am most proud of them.

Posted by: CAW | January 29, 2009, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm

I never said that Iraq was a failure, I said Vietnam was. I object to blocking criticism of the war by attempting to divert it to the troops themselves. We must be able to have dissent.

Posted by: Skip | January 29, 2009, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

“This administration? Pal you’ve got some catching up to do.”
——————————–
Obviously a partisan reply. My statement was as an American and a Patriot. No one who can look beyond party politics would have responded as such. No administration in the past 100 years has been able to serve anything other than itself. The working American is the backbone which all politicians have assumed would always be there no matter what. The pervasive fact is that there are fewer and fewer Americans that don’t even know the true meaning of work. Let’s all put our hands out and say “I’m sorry Uncle Sam, I’ve done my best – but could you please do the rest for me?” Do me a favor Pal and prove that wrong. Start by telling me why unions and affirmative action still exist? Breeding ground for laziness, ineptitude and self aggrandizment. If your hand isn’t out, then you must be satisfied with your future generations paying off todays laziness (assuming that future generations have the choice).

Posted by: Metiyo | January 29, 2009, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

God I’m so sick and tired of Limbaugh sitting on his fat ass thinking he has more power then President Obama . When is someone going to get the balls to shut Rush up for good and get rid of him

Posted by: laurie | January 29, 2009, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm

Seeing people and politicians passing the ball on each other. I just lose all hopes. Everyone is for himself.

Posted by: pmp2008 | January 29, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

The big news today is the ex-FBI agents coming forward and reporting that the Bush administration was “thoroughly briefed on the mortgage fraud crisis and its potential to cascade out of control with devastating consequences”, and that the FBI had good information on corrupt attorneys and appraisers and insider schemes going back to 2002, but the Bush administration refused to give the FBI the resources they needed.
They seem to have skipped over the politicizing of the FBI and the willful ignorance of the Bush SEC though.

Posted by: Flash Override | January 29, 2009, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

The comments mean nothing if the executives and CEOs of the bailed out companies continue to be greedy and line their pockets and devalue the stocks and mutual funds due to their mismanagement. This looting of the main stream by wall street is going unpunished with not even a slap on the wrist and then some in high places wonder why the confidence in American Institutions like wall street and the federal government has been eroded.

Posted by: gjkotw01 | January 29, 2009, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

How many of you people have anything to say about the article posted???

Posted by: Roscoe2400 | January 29, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

Flash – let it go .. let it go! You’ll sleep better! Bush is gone now! Damn!

Posted by: Marcus | January 29, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

“The bottom line that everyone seems to ignore is that is is none of Obama’s or the Federal Government’s business what business transactions happen in the PRIVATE sector.” – Idiot – it becomes the Government’s businees when we give the PRIVATE sector billions of taxpayer’s $$$ because they can’t run their businesses properly. Basically, if they want $$ from the governent (I.E. taxpayer) they better damn well do what the President and Congress says. What is so hard to understand about that? If you gave me $100,000 to fix my house, I bet you would expect me not to buy a new car with the money, correct?

Posted by: CPTB | January 29, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

To Skip: No offense Skip – but I did offer at least an idea, as grand as it may be, while your prodding offered nothing other than an semi-antagonistic response. It seems that no system is working for you (the American) either. The parties love that we infight amongst ourselves online because it takes our time and attention away from pushing them to do what is right. Aren’t you sick of hearing “this is the solution, take it or leave it”, instead of having them actaully do some real public service and get it right?

Posted by: Metiyo | January 29, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Roscoe2400, the premise of the article is silly. Jake is trying to find a “gotcha” against Obama to undercut his legitimate criticism of the bonuses. Who cares?

Posted by: Flash Override | January 29, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Typical republican’s always saying no, no, no, no. If it were a Republican president that was elected it would be yes, yes, yes, yes ! Republican’s don’t like Democrats and the Democrats don’t like the Republican’s and it will never change with this divided country we all live in which I will never understand. I hope and pray that someday the United States will terminate both parties and be just one party and that is the United Party union

Posted by: laurie | January 29, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

“Idiot – it becomes the Government’s businees when we give the PRIVATE sector billions of taxpayer’s $$$ because they can’t run their businesses properly.”
Bigger Idiot – the federal government has no business giving that kind of money to these failing businesses. If you want to be a socialist then move to Canada.
Your statement embodied the problem with the country today.
Anyone with that kind of statement has “no skin in this game”, and must have a lot to gain from the government doling handouts. Afine example of the Free-thinkers of today.

Posted by: Metiyo | January 29, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm

Mr. President Obama has done more in a week then Bush did in 8 yrs

Posted by: mizit.turner | January 29, 2009, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

Typical republican’s always saying no, no, no, no. If it were a Republican president that was elected it would be yes, yes, yes, yes ! Republican’s don’t like Democrats and the Democrats don’t like the Republican’s and it will never change with this divided country we all live in which I will never understand. I hope and pray that someday the United States will terminate both parties and be just one party and that is the United Party union
Posted by: laurie————–And there lays the problem and you are right. Americans suffer more and more everyday because of polital stand offs and politicians playing party games. Both the Rep and Dem party has put themselves on top of what is best for the country and what is best for the working tax payer. Its a shame. We all know it and yet no is really upset enough to really do anything about it. If this had been happening 100-200 yrs ago Washington would have been marched on and taken back by the people. One day we will have enough. maybe in our life time, maybe not. But it cant keep going on like this.

Posted by: CAW | January 29, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

Politicians have the mindset that they are playing with monopoly money. Pass it out when it feels good. The problem is, it feels bad when they don’t pass it out, so they keep shoveling it to avoid any guilt. How many times in the past 30 years have we cut spending on anything other than defense? Every time it happens, there is outrage by some group it affects. Politicians get scared because it may hurt their chances at the polls so they vote to keep the funds flowing. What we end up with is this bloated, gluttonous government that will always look for more ways to take our money and spend it to get votes.
It is the greatest weakness of Democracy. Even the Greeks knew this thousands of years ago. They realized democracy fails when people vote themselves state treasury funds. We haven’t learned.

Posted by: KR | January 29, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

Does BO have to sit like he’s sitting on a toilet reading the paper??

Posted by: Sal | January 29, 2009, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

obama, DO AS I SAY, NOT WHAT I DO, that is his new motto, freaking looks stoned to me in that picture, and others, polosi held bush by the balls on that he didn;t want to do it, look it up links are a pain in the patoootie here

Posted by: pink stocks are a scam | January 29, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

Do as i say not what i do, that is obamas new motto, so suck it up, sheesh

Posted by: pink stocks are a scam | January 29, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm

There is already some quiet infighting within the dems camp as we speak. Obama did not get the big win he expected by getting Republican house members on board and insiders are starting to point fingers at Pelosi to blame for the blunder. There is even talk of her being asked to step aside and a new vote for a new speaker.

Posted by: Tomas | January 29, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Pres. Obama is outraged by the bonuses but not by the millions these same banks poured into his inauguration expenses? What hypocricy!
It was foolish of the government to 1) give the taxpayers hard earned monies to bail out anyone in the private sector, 2)give it out without penalties attached if it were squandered or abused, and 3)think that a new “stimulus” package that is exponentially larger isn’t going to be exponentially worse with it’s economic impotence and abuse.

Posted by: shavshu | January 29, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

You take it to them Obama. Let them know there is a new sheriff in town and you are not going to put up with the stuff George let go on.

Posted by: Lola | January 29, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

MikeO, 7:37 makes a good point about Franklin Raines. For those who do not know of Mr. Raines, here are highlights:
In 1991 he became Fannie’s Mae’s Vice Chairman, a post he left in 1996 in order to join the Clinton Administration as the Director of the U.S. Office of Management and Budget, where he served until 1998.
In 1999, he returned to Fannie Mae as CEO, “the first black man to head a Fortune 500 company.”
In 2003, Raines’s compensation was over $20 million
On December 21, 2004 Raines accepted what he called “early retirement” from his position as CEO while U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission investigators continued to investigate alleged accounting irregularities. He is accused by The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), the regulating body of Fannie Mae, of abetting widespread accounting errors, which included the shifting of losses so senior executives, such as himself, could earn LARGE BONUSES
In 2006, the OFHEO announced a suit against Raines in order to recover some or all of the $90 MILLION IN PAYMENTS (i.e., BONUSES) MADE TO RAINES BASED ON OVERSTATED EARNINGS initially estimated to be $9 billion but have been announced as 6.3 billion.
On April 18, 2008, the government announced a settlement with Raines together with J. Timothy Howard, Fannie’s former chief financial officer, and Leanne G. Spencer, Fannie’s former controller. The three executives agreed to pay fines totaling about $3 MILLION (CHUMP CHANGE!!!), WHICH WILL BE PAID BY FANNIE’S INSURANCE POLICIES. Raines also AGREED TO DONATE the proceeds from the sale of $1.8 million of his Fannie stock and to give up stock options. The stock options however HAVE NO VALUE.
In a settlement with OFHEO and the Securities and Exchange Commission, Fannie paid a record $400 million civil fine. (RAINES OFF THE HOOK, SHAREHOLDERS AND TAX PAYERS ON THE HOOK)
In 2008 RAINES BECOMES FINANCIAL ADVISOR TO PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE BARACK OBAMA
I wonder if President Obama would classify Franklin Raines receipt of ill-gotten (illegal?) bonuses the “the height of irresponsibility” and I wonder if he deems Mr. Raines behavior as “shameful”.
As has become a common theme, the standards and virues Mr. Obama preach do not apply to him and his cronies.

Posted by: tjp612 | January 29, 2009, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

Everyones got to return home. Cant really blame him though. I would if i could.

Posted by: Jane | January 29, 2009, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

These CEO’s are like people on crack. They’ll do anything to get that next fix, if you will. Otherwise how could they possibly in good conscience purchase a private jet with money they just got from the government or keep giving themselves bonuses in a year where business has fallen ?? (I thought people got bonuses when they did a GOOD job!) They are all pulling our leg. And they won’t stop being greedy until someone locks them up.

Posted by: AnnNewYork | January 29, 2009, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm

thomas that is brilliant if they get rid of pelosi, but more heads are going to roll because obama by his track record, if he doesn’t get his way he will get on the floor and kick his legs in the air, *smirk* and some one has to run in with a kleenex, roflmao

Posted by: pink stocks are a scam | January 29, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm

All Politicians = TRAITORS

Posted by: Terry Smith | January 29, 2009, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm

When financial houses went public the public took on all the risk and the executives took outrageous sums of money without any risk.
Let these banks and financial houses fail and give the bailout money directly to those depositors who are NOT executives of the company.

Posted by: Opal | January 29, 2009, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

stop making me freaking laugh, congress aproved the bail out last year, obama wouldn;t even make a deputy except he promised you free lollipops

Posted by: pink stocks are a scam | January 29, 2009, 10:15 pm 10:15 pm

This was a great story and shame on the executives of these companies for being so irresponsible. Does anyone have a list of the companies that participated in the bonuses? I would like to make a concious effort not do business with them. This is the only way we will have an impact on them.

Posted by: Dan | January 29, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Both optimists and pessimists contribute to our society. The optimist invents the airplane and the pessimist the parachute

Posted by: menik457 | January 29, 2009, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

The whole thing makes me sick. There will come a day when the unethical and immoral behavior of our corporate and government leaders, people we are suppose to look to as examples of what it means to be a “success”, will bring our great country to its knees.
It’s happened before in history. Many times. It can happen again. We are the new Rome, after all.
These people, rich as they have become during the Bush years, are fools of the highest order. They may think they’ve got one over on everyone because they get to walk away with all the money but, it is a child’s victory. A hollow victory; accomplished by late-night slight of hand.
These people are cheats and thieves. It’s that plan and that simple.

Posted by: Allen Bernard | January 29, 2009, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

menik457..cheers, you nailed it, they need each other, at our expense. If it is so shameful then pull the plug on their money, incarcerate them or throw them to the ones who they screwed. It’s all propaganda to make people unemployed so we have no choice but to join the military, George Bush’s dream has been fullfilled.

Posted by: Johnn_Truth | January 29, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

We need a president like Harry Truman;he was not there to impress anyone.He put country first.
MONEY IS THE ROOT OF ALL EVIL!
I feel for those families who are out of work, losing their homes and have to listen to what is going on with their tax money.

Posted by: Pat Mundy | January 29, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

The only thing that I find shameful is the billions in pork barrel spending in Barack Obama’s so called stimulus package.

Posted by: John | January 29, 2009, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm

This is almost comical, Americans have been fat, spoiled over-fed, using up 80% of the worlds resources while the rest of us have existed on a moderate silce of whats left. So this is how you react when faced with a situation the rest of us have been living under since the second world war.
You dont need your new TV’s, SUV’s & thermostat conrtolled cooling & heating all year round. Do like the rest of us & acclimatise.
Dont be consumers,Cows are consumers, the things you own will end up owning you. A simple life is a good life. There is no reason for some people to starve while a wealthy minority consumes all the resources.
Dont fight amongst yourselves over stupid ideology,that time has passed & those are the battles of antiquity. This is a new century, we must face the challenges as a united species or we wont make it.
Stop being afraid of Socialism, it’s not Communism. There must be some regulation from Governement, the private sector has proved time & time agian that it has no social responsibilty.
It acts from a purely Darwinian perspective, it will stupify & rape the masses for profit alone. There is no free market, simply cartels of the biggest multi nationals who regognise no flag or country.
The role of Government should be to take care of it’s citizens, not just the wealthy business sector. You should support more Government involvement & dont be afraid, you have the most protectionist constitution in the world, you have the power of the vote.
Use it.

Posted by: brian dillon | January 29, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

After what just happened with these bonuses,it woud be the height of stupidity,to give these people one more penny!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Eric | January 29, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

Obama is in the process of screwing the American public out of an additional trillion dollars, after assuring us we had to give away 900 billion last year to save ourselves. I suppose “shameful” is relative.

Posted by: despido | January 29, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm

ISN’T THIS THE POT CALLING THE KETTLE BLACK?

Posted by: Pat | January 29, 2009, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Wallstreet doesn’t care what Obama thinks as the joke is on the American tax payers as Obama dishes out billions of our tax dollars to wallstreet!

Posted by: Joke On Americans | January 29, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm

Didn’t Obama and the other politicians realize that this would happen when they gave money away for free? Many poor people do the same thing as the rich when they receive welfare–they blow it. This is poor leader ship by our politicians and ESPECIALLY poor leadership from Obama.

Posted by: BT | January 29, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm

The whole PROFIT system is a slave system. Unequal wealth is a slave system, & it makes a few filthy rich but leaves most poor & starving. The wage is a slave system (guaranteed income/Socialism will be freedom). Insurance is slavery. Loans are slavery. Taxation is slavery. Private property is slavery. Corporations are slave plantations so they’re actually illegal. Buying & selling is slavery (everything should be free). Needing a car is slavery. Sickness is slavery. Poverty is slavery. Homelessness is slavery. College degrees are slavery, & colleges teach slavery (wage). Only work part-time 10-hrs a week will be freedom, in Tower cities connected to Trains. Capitalism is slavery. Socialism & Communism is freedom. Read “Rogue State” by Bill Blum to see how evil USA really is.

Posted by: Sundiii4Socialism | January 29, 2009, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm

What happens when China stops buying US treasury bills?

Posted by: helvev | January 29, 2009, 11:58 pm 11:58 pm

Based upon just what I heard today, that Obama’s response was that the bonuses were “shameful”…quite frankly, I find that far too tempered a response considering the hypocrisy of the situation, and the outright complete apathy for the average US citizen. Instead of just chastizing these corporations, a full investigation should be done, and any bonuses given out say within 2 months before, or anytime after, a corporation received a handout or a promise of a handout…all those bonuses should be rescinded, or the receivers’ assets sold off, in order to pay ALL monies back to the taxpayers.
It’s time for the people to revolt!!!

Posted by: Lyn | January 30, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

I think the solution is simple. This was a government grant ment to pay employees and boost production and marketing. If it was used for any other purpose then the charge should be “defrauding the federal government”. For you and me that would mean prison for at least five years. Why not for them?

Posted by: a-do-nis | January 30, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am

why didn’t obama blast congress when they voted themselves a raise during this economic crisis? why doesn’t he impose a freeze on their salaries—furthermore, why did he allow a stimulus package to pass that included $25 million for atv trails—hell, if they sent that amount to the american people, then the economy would be stimulated!

Posted by: slikiniki | January 30, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

1. nationalize all the banks.Do what Sweden did.
2. fire ALL management.
3. Talk to Yves Smith for recommendations for new management.
4. begin FBI investigations of all the major players in the finance industry
5. based on 4, seize all assets of said major players.
5. get rid of Geithner

Posted by: vv111y | January 30, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Now President Barack Obama wants American taxpayers to believe that he is “outraged” at the greed of these Wall Street Bankers – yet, he still gives them billions of our hard-earned money. Gee, Barack, you really told them!

Posted by: PhillyPaul | January 30, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

Execs will continue with the perks and bonus’s until an example is made.
Unfortunatly, this is part of capitalism, bad captitalsim.
I hope the President can provide leadership such that this abuse is appropriatly curbed.

Posted by: dennis ********************** | January 30, 2009, 12:20 am 12:20 am

I am outraged about this. The very first condition of giving this bailout should have been a requirement that bonuses would not be paid, or a least reduced by more than half. These bonuses were obscene in good times, but to use tax payer money to reward irresponsibility and lack of ethics is criminal. A bill should be passed immediately requiring payback of those bonuses if not everything. They did not the money for the purpose it was intended. If credit isn’t loosened up, we’re paralyzed. This cannot be ignored or forgiven.

Posted by: CCook | January 30, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

The taxpayer bailout should end and also take back what was already given. The banks created their own problems and I want my tax money back. Here we, the taxpayer, is suppose to be helping banks and it is being done with no restrictions at all. How stupid was the Bush administration for letting this happen. Even though these banks have had a taxpayer bailout, they are going after each taxpayer for more by raising the APR of taxpayers credit cards to 20.99% because they want to remain profitable. This is literally BS and the government needs to stop this because the credit card companies are doing whatever they want in order to keep their bonuses coming in. I need a bail out just like the banks that are screwing everyone.

Posted by: rdvideo | January 30, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am

Easy solution. Tax tables in 2008 for all bonus money (actually any money, stock or deferred compensation receivedfor any banker employed by a bank that has received bailout money is taxed at 100% if the amount is more than 1% of the same employee’s total compensation in 2007. No deductions are available for any amount over their 2007 compensation either. And that table is raised to 110% for 2009 if the money is not paid back to the government by 12/31/2009. That figure raises 10% each year every year. That is right, their income is fixed at 2007 levels until the TOTAL is paid back with interest. And if they jump to another bank, they are still limited by the same amount they previously made, or the equivalent new position’s previous salary (whichever is less). Otherwise they will just start trading jobs back and forth.
Then the CEO’s and any other banker getting a large bonus is in fact working to get expenses cut, the profitiblity up, the bailout paid back, and that only happens with loans being made as planned-to creditworthy companies. They are out there, and they are laying off good talented workers by the thousand now.

Posted by: Listentoit | January 30, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

Boy, the repubs will do or say anything to push this mess on our newly (and honestly, I might add) president. It was their policies and ttactics that have allowed these CEOs and the like to get away with it for eight years! BaaaaaHHHaaa. Looks like the republican sheep factor lives on.

Posted by: lowpressure | January 30, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am

I think it is time for all Americans to stop paying their taxes until our government is using our money to better our lives.
First roll back and freeze interest at 6% or less on all credit card outstanding debt. Let people purchase at this same rate. This will free up money now to use for new purchases.
Help low and middle class purchase a new fuel efficient Auto that doesn’t burn oil. They must trade in the old beater and it must be cubed.
This way the Auto worker is put to work and the purchaser must buy American made auto with this tax payer money.
I think it is time for the tax payers to show a united front, or the government will suffer the same fate as the family or individual has been forced into with no money at all from us tax payers. We are the ones with the purse strings if the government wants to continue to misuse our hard earned money.
People earning minimum wages having to listen to these CEO’s raking in what most people will not make in multible life times, is very sad indeed, then they will ask for more I bet.

Posted by: Daniel E. Watton | January 30, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am

Right on Listentoit! It never bothers them to take our money. Let them see how it feels!

Posted by: lowpressure | January 30, 2009, 12:31 am 12:31 am

Jake is back in business. Manipulate the news so as it seems Obama already knew about these bonuses earlier in the week. Now, its time for the Republicans to cry out. Arise the GOP.Arise!Stupid! For the GOP, its time to start blaming Obama. Blame him for the Economy, blame him for all the sins of last year when he is barely eleven days in office. Blame him!

Posted by: vuzous | January 30, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am

I think that President Obama should rescind the bailout “Loan” that was extended to these corporations. If the received $30B and gave out $18.4B in bonus money then they should be made to immediately repay the government and the US Taxpayers the $18.4B the obviously DID NOT need.
Then President Obama should advise them that in 2009 and the coming years, bonus monies can only be paid out with Federal approval and with funds that were from their profit after all taxes and “Bailout” loans have be returned to the US Taxpayers.
Lest we not forget, these bonuses were paid to these CEO’s on another Commander In Cheifs watch!
As for the CEO’s he met with yesterday, the same rules apply. If they have received and “Bailout” loans, then there bonuses should require the same approval.
If no “Bailout” funds were given to these companies and they are paying them from their earnings; they should be allowed to receive a bonus if their shareholders and investors approve of them with their corporation profits.
When you actually EARN the money. A bonus is acceptable.
That’s just my two cents. I hope Mr. President reads this and institues a plan that oversees my tax dollars.

Posted by: TMichellB | January 30, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am

These are the guys that ran the companies in the ground in the first place. The executives who authorized the bonuses should be fired. They should have been fired but were left in place by whom? What they have done is not shameful but outright theft. It may be legal but it is surely immoral. They should be prosecuted for mis appropriation of government funds/theft if at all possible. There should also be charges filed in civil court to get the money back. You can be sent to jail for buying drugs with food stamp money right? The executives must be held accountable and the people who allowed them to remain in those positions must also be held accountable to the american people.

Posted by: Shermando | January 30, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am

wall street people and corporate leaders need to take a back seat with regard to their bonuses until the economy has rebounded (and it will). At this point, I feel that anyone who has received a bonus should repay those monies in a show of good faith to all of us during these very difficult times!

Posted by: Wendy | January 30, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am

The overpaid execs have demoralized the working class in this country. It is time for a change and Barak is finally doing something. Bush did nothing and now we are paying for it.

Posted by: Mark | January 30, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am

“The only thing that I find shameful is the billions in pork barrel spending”
____________________________________
Then you haven’t been paying attention.

Posted by: pefros | January 30, 2009, 1:00 am 1:00 am

The Bankers and Executives that have taken these outrageous bonus are nothing more than dressed up crooks. They may want to think about their bonus when they come back for more money and they will because it was so easy the first time. They don’t deserve another penny. Citibank show ther contempt for the tax payers when they held their vacations in that luxury resort in CA.

Posted by: Wimpynv | January 30, 2009, 1:02 am 1:02 am

Enough, is enough, is enough! It is more than shameful for 18 Billion dollars to be paid out for Wall Street Executives bonuses on the backs of hard working American people. It is even more shameful or even treasonous to see how our nation as been raped by our elected Congressman and Senators who have plunged our Nation into a 10 Trillion plus debt. To bankrupt this nation, is just as bad as selling military secrets to foreign powers. WHO DO WE OWE 10 TRILLION DOLLARS TO? The Federal Government hands out money like its candy to those who don’t need it. If you want to help the American people take the 700 Billion durning the Bush Administration and the 800 Billion plus Dollars they want to spend this time and pay off our mortgages from $300,000.00 and below to save people from becoming homeless especially the ones out of work. Get back the money that the rich CEO’s and Executives got for bonuses. There has to be accountability somewhere.
Sincerely,
Jim

Posted by: Jim | January 30, 2009, 1:19 am 1:19 am

“SHAMEFUL” 11 Trillon (with a “T”) dollars in debt. Out of control Government spending will bankrupt many generations to come. Don’t start whinning when the people you put in power over this country put us in the toilet. Unlike the past this time we will not recover. Can you say SOCIALIZM and new One World Order. “Beware” America the end to FREEDOM and GREATNESS is near. If we do not repent as a Nation from our “Wicked Ways” life will cease to exist as we know it today.

Posted by: Terry | January 30, 2009, 1:25 am 1:25 am

Formerly Republican US Secretary of State, James Baker is now an attorney representing Exxon-Mobil and the Saudi Arabian government.

Posted by: pefros | January 30, 2009, 1:47 am 1:47 am

My Opinion: Government Bailout Money is meant to relieve stress on the American people, the common working men and women, for food, shelter, fuel, electricity and medications. I am “OUTRAGED”, to put it mildly, that any congressman or President, no matter what his political affiliation, would allow this to take place under his watch! I also feel strongly that a detailed account of where this money goes and to whom it goes to,should be required as part of the package. When any other fellow American goes to his banker or leaning agent, they insist on this information BEFORE you get the loan.

Posted by: Keith Robbins | January 30, 2009, 1:50 am 1:50 am

Where did all of the satisfaction polls goe for us to rate Congress and the President. I’m sure the current rating 1 to 10 would be a -10.

Posted by: Terry | January 30, 2009, 2:51 am 2:51 am

“The only thing needed for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing”. Where are the good men that will stand up against the evil of the Government toward the American taxpayer. Tax and spent and tax again, where does it end?

Posted by: Terry | January 30, 2009, 2:55 am 2:55 am

Terry, actually it’s been cut taxes and spend. Bush administration cut taxes and ran up deficits of half a trillion dollars

Posted by: pefros | January 30, 2009, 3:26 am 3:26 am

each year of their administration.

Posted by: pefros | January 30, 2009, 3:27 am 3:27 am

Someone got a tad perseverating with a point.

Posted by: kathy | January 30, 2009, 4:25 am 4:25 am

sorry kathy, i actually got technologically baffled and tricked . ..

Posted by: pefros | January 30, 2009, 4:58 am 4:58 am

2.5 million people took to the streets of France today to protest the government’s handling of the financial crisis. (Bush’s friend Sarkosy). So please, don’t limit yourself to thinking the current problems with the financial crisis are somehow the fault of Obama or his approach. That would be very narrow, provincial, American thinking. Try to get beyond your ideological pigpen.

Posted by: pefros | January 30, 2009, 5:50 am 5:50 am

Just a reminder… The “Bail Out” or “Rescue” money that is talked about here is from the Bush administration. Which in my opinion should have been a loan and not just given to the Banks…especially with accountability at none.
Those responsible for the bonuses should be let go immediately…still clueless as they seem to the plight of the rest of the nation. They need to join in the ranks of the Jobless.
And for those comments telling Americans to do something for themselves…Yea and while I was busy as single Mom doing just that..
Bush’s lack of leadership for the country’s economic infrastructure was allowed to be terrorized by greed and corruption…
After the last eight years of short-sightedness from a blind eye President.
All your constant whining and complaining about pork, especially with the deficit left by the Bush administration, just has your creditability full of holes.

Posted by: braith morgan | January 30, 2009, 6:42 am 6:42 am

What would be,”shameful”, would be if President Obama didn’t go after these companies that took taxpayer money and gave it out as a bonus. It’s a crime, Mr. President, go get ‘em! And get that money back!

Posted by: gravy | January 30, 2009, 7:05 am 7:05 am

Citizens Call ACORN’s 5.2 Billion Dollar Bonus Shameful

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | January 30, 2009, 7:32 am 7:32 am

What we’re going to need is for the folks in congress who are determined to reward those who helped them get elected to show some restraint, and show some discipline and show some sense of responsibility.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | January 30, 2009, 7:39 am 7:39 am

“ACORN”? lmao

Posted by: gravy | January 30, 2009, 7:43 am 7:43 am

What we need is for the President to do his job, go after these criminals who took bail out money and gave it out as bonuses.
Not to mention the war criminals from the previous administration.

Posted by: gravy | January 30, 2009, 7:52 am 7:52 am

I distinctly recall Obama’s campaign promise that no “Christmas Tree” legislations would cross his desk. Will he put his signature on this Economic Stimulus Package with ornaments and bows and tinsel streaming from it? You can bet on it. Mr. President sir, stop beating up private business and focus on what the legislative body is doing. CEO pay pales in perspective to what our government is doing. Concentrate on the areas where you have complete control and culpability. The billing for all these presents will appear on the citizen’s next credit card statement.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | January 30, 2009, 7:59 am 7:59 am

“…heavily progressive taxation, the abolition of inheritance, the centralization of credit by a national bank, the extension of state ownership of the economy, and government-provided education.”
- Communist Manifesto, 1848

Posted by: KR | January 30, 2009, 8:08 am 8:08 am

Haven’t seen a single post about the $383 billion the Treasury Dept passed out to small banks earlier this week. Talk about transparent. Oh well, it’s not like we’re spending real money, US dollars. We’re just spending Chinese money.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | January 30, 2009, 8:18 am 8:18 am

“The illiterate and poor are rarely the target of Communist propaganda. They have the least access to propaganda media, exert little pressure on government policies, and usually are revolutionary force-Those groups typically targeted are youths and students, young and military officials, leaders of trade unions, and employees of information media.”
- CIA Office of Research and Reports, 1966

Posted by: KR | January 30, 2009, 8:19 am 8:19 am

obama has no room to talk and should shut it. obama hired two lobbyists, after he said they would not be in his administration, one for secretary of treasury and the other for the pentagon. geithner has already hired another lobbyist as his chief of staff. obama is setting the example to the nation that lying, corruption even the taint of corruption is acceptable. he lied when he said, if elected, he would repeal the bush tax cuts on the rich but now he refuses to do it. obama has no room to talk at all. obama is turning out to be one huge disappointment. there is no change, just flowery speeches.

Posted by: Lawrence | January 30, 2009, 8:20 am 8:20 am

On Communist Propaganda -
“Those groups typically targeted are youths and students, young and military officials, leaders of trade unions, and employees of information media.”
- CIA Office of Research and Reports, 1966

Posted by: KR | January 30, 2009, 8:26 am 8:26 am

On every thread, no matter the story there are Rt Wing crazies with conspiracy theories, lies, insults and name calling for the current President. No REAL ideas, no REAL contribution, just blind hatred and fear.
It continues to put a smile on my face…hehehe

Posted by: gravy | January 30, 2009, 8:33 am 8:33 am

Calm down people. Just remember these Wall Streeters are BETTER than you, SMARTER than you, and without them, the whole world would collapse. No bright person could be found to take their place, working for the mere pittance of say, $500,000 a year. Why you can hardly pay maids with that; and maids need JOBS, expecially now. The people at the top of the pyramid always desreve more, and if it needs to come out of your tax pcoket, well suck it up. There’s a good man. Now about those top bracket taxes – they’re much too high; they impede my productivity!

Posted by: sdr65 | January 30, 2009, 8:37 am 8:37 am

sdr65; Quess it’s a matter of perspective. The bonuses would not have been out of taxpayer money had the legislature not given the financial industry our tax dollars. Don’t blame the hens for the foxes indiscretions.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | January 30, 2009, 8:45 am 8:45 am

Gravy,
In 40 years of Cold War, do you honestly believe the US was immune to targeted influence operations from Russia? Khrushchev said they would take over the US without firing a shot. How do you think they planned on doing that? Research their influence ops around the world and learn for yourself.

Posted by: KR | January 30, 2009, 8:46 am 8:46 am

mmonrolivson writes, “CEO pay pales in perspective to what our government is doing.” Well, I say American workers pay pales in perspective to what Wall Street has DONE! Top 10 moneymakers in the hedge-fund industry in 2007:
1 $3.7 billion, John Paulson, Paulson & Co.
2 $2.9 billion, George Soros, Soros Fund Management
3 $2.8 billion, James Simons, Renaissance Technologies
Corp.
4 $1.7 billion, Philip Falcone, Harbinger Capital
Partners
5 $1.5 billion, Kenneth Griffin, Citadel Investment
Group
6 $900 million, Steven Cohen, SAC Capital Advisors
7 $750 million, Timothy Barakett, Atticus Capital
8 $710 million, Stephen Mandel Jr., Lone Pine Capital
9 $625 million, John Griffin, Blue Ridge Capital
10 $520 million, O. Andreas Halvorsen, Viking Global
Investors
Folks, that is not net profit their companies made, that is what they put in their pockets from the blood and sweat of all the investors in their funds. Paulson and many others made this obscene wealth hedging the collapse of the mortgage industry, then only pay a 15% capital gains tax on this wealth rather than normal income tax rates. Even worse, most of this capital they moved off-shore using tax loopholes that allow them to pay ZERO tax.

Posted by: devilkev | January 30, 2009, 8:52 am 8:52 am

I see flashes of the desired leadership from President Obama but continue to be flummoxed by the current larded up stimulus bill.
The corrupt and ineffective Congress needs to do a little self assessment along with the companies that are receiving taxpayer monies.

Posted by: smith | January 30, 2009, 8:54 am 8:54 am

Our brilliant legislators are spending at a near one trillion dollar per month clip since they won the election and control of the House. How much relief has man on the street seen from this unprecidented spending? How much less is our national economy in risk of collapse? How many jobs have been saved? How many foreclosures have been prevented? How many more 9 AM’s will pass without the libs smelling the coffee?

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | January 30, 2009, 8:55 am 8:55 am

mmonroeliveson: Out of the TARP bailout fund of 700 billion, half has already been doled out, and the authority has just been given to President Obama to utilize the remaining 350 billion. I would like to know from which treasury do you refer that passed out 383 billion last week to small banks?

Posted by: devilkev | January 30, 2009, 9:05 am 9:05 am

devilkev; I agree CEO pay is obscene on Wall Street. Focus your attention on the boards of directors that authorized the pay and bonuses. This is private business, business the government should not be rescuing. Blame the congress for trying. Can’t blame the CEOs for being greedy. Many of the posters here are waiting for their windfall income. The only difference is the relative level of greed. CEOs think in big numbers. Welfare recipients just want to survive.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | January 30, 2009, 9:05 am 9:05 am

its outragous that these fat cat(republican) wall streeters can just keep on rapeing america. i bet bush is down in texas getting phone calls from those taht got part of that money to say thanks”W” for the bonus. i hope obama will do something about this,punish them make them pay it all back and 300% interest for there crimes against teh american people.

Posted by: T | January 30, 2009, 9:09 am 9:09 am

While all you liberals whine and cry that this is ALL Bush’s fault, perhaps you should ask our new Sec. of the Treasury more about his role in orchestrating those bailouts!
Bush & Paulson were wrong! There was no need to for all that money to be dumped “immediately”! They both deserve their share of the blame for it!
ALSO, the Democratic-Controlled Congress DID NOT have to go along with the bailouts. They rushed to quickly, so quickly even the American public kicked them in the teeth and said SLOW DOWN. The TARP bill was passed by Democrats, with some republicans joining in, but more republicans voted nay than yay.
In the rush to pump out the desperately needed bill, CONGRESS FAILED to get the oversight in place.
By the way, Then Senator Obama voted yes for TARP. I do not recall him saying anything about the lack of oversight in the bill then! Oversight is the responsibility of the COngress!
Then you have the ongoing saga of Barney Frank and his incredible stupidity as he continues to play Social Scientist.
————
Troubled OneUnited Bank in Boston didn’t look much like a candidate for aid from the Treasury Department’s bank bailout fund last fall.
The Treasury had said it would give money only to healthy banks, to jump-start lending. But OneUnited had seen most of its capital evaporate. Moreover, it was under attack from its regulators for allegations of poor lending practices and executive-pay abuses, including owning a Porsche for its executives’ use.
Nonetheless, in December OneUnited got a $12 million injection from the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program, or TARP. One apparent factor: the intercession of Rep. Barney Frank, the powerful head of the House Financial Services Committee.
Mr. Frank, by his own account, wrote into the TARP bill a provision specifically aimed at helping this particular home-state bank. And later, he acknowledges, he spoke to regulators urging that OneUnited be considered for a cash injection.
Mr. Frank said he didn’t try to interfere with the regulatory process. “We have never told the regulators that they should ease up on them or not order them to do this or that,” he said.
He cites the bank’s status as the state’s only financial institution owned by African-Americans. “We did say, yes, I thought it would have been a social tragedy if the one minority bank in Massachusetts that has been working so hard and had been overextended into housing was to be wiped out by a federal action, the Fannie-Freddie preferred [shares] thing, and that’s why I think it was important to try to help them.”
On Oct. 27, the FDIC and Massachusetts bank regulatory officials, alleging poor lending practices and executive-compensation abuses by OneUnited, slapped it with a strong enforcement action, a cease-and-desist order. Among other things, the officials told the bank to get rid of a 2008 Porsche for executives.
—————-
Now I wonder what Bumbling Barney wrote into that stimulus Package???

Posted by: Mike_C | January 30, 2009, 9:18 am 9:18 am

“Well, I say American workers pay pales in perspective to what Wall Street has DONE!”
Going after wall street will accomplish absolutely nothing. However, if they want public funds for bailout, then they obviously have to suspend bonuses etc, and pay back the treasury. The vast majority of corporations follow the law and run themselves responsibly. I’d bet most of the posters on this board, work for a corporation, or a rich business owner. If you start clamoring for the government to start dropping the axe on the toes of corporations, be ready for it to come down your head.

Posted by: KR | January 30, 2009, 9:22 am 9:22 am

Why should the executives need to have the word directly from the President to stop what they know to be wrong? What is this – kindergarten?

Posted by: Publius | January 30, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am

oh yes mike-c ….shift the blame from teh party that had control of congress since 1994 and had congress and whitehouse for 6 and a half years. and blame the democrats….give it up deregulation and massive greed of wall street and the top 20% of wage earners in this nation is why we have crumbled..and the policies that are the base and foundation of the republican party have caused this. the only two small things the dems did was clinton went along with republicans and sign nafta(worst thing for working class since reagan destroyed unions) and carter should not have passed bill to allow loans for all basically.

Posted by: T | January 30, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am

devilkev; The breaking news headline here on ABC news read “Treasury Dept Gives $383 Billion to 23 Small Banks.”
Wording may not be exact. As I recall that message came to us on Tues. or maybe Wednesday. It wasn’t TARP money. There’s only $350 billion of that $700 billion left. That’s all I know. Was asking for more info. I suspect the money was given to them to head off another credit card crisis. Small banks invest the money they have on deposit from savings and checking accounts largely in the credit card funding pool at high interest and pay the depositor less than inflation rate interest. That’s how small banks make most of their money. When/if the credit card industry fails, so do the small banks. I’m sure the Treasury Dept would be one of the first to know if failure appeared imminent. More good news, huh? Remember the S&L failures in ’82? Worst recession since the great depression, but new records are being set even as we sit, read and type here. We’re in uncharted territory and don’t know which way to turn.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | January 30, 2009, 9:31 am 9:31 am

mmonroeliveson SAYS “…Our brilliant legislators are spending at a near one trillion dollar per month clip since they won the election and control of the House….”————————
This is close to the amount we spent per month on the war. The difference is Bush was oblivious to this financial crisis and borrowed most of the cost of the war from other countries so he could not be accused of raising taxes. Heaven forbid he should raise taxes and offend the Limbaugh’s of the world. The truth is that raising taxes to pay for the war would have been the intelligent thing to do. Common sense says when your expenses go up you either increase your income or cut your expenses. Since Bush had tunnel vision when it came to Iraq he should have raised taxes. And your reference to so called “welfare recipients” in your other post shows loud and clear who you are. I am a MODERATE – not a far right or left anything. But I know that people are hurting right now because I see them every day in my job. Most are regular, middle class people who lost their jobs and not the welfare recipient you refer too. The word “pompous” came to mind when I read your post. Some people are only one or two paychecks away from needing help while others, are more than that. But the truth is that everyone is vulnerable right now and we should be praying every day that Obama succeeds at shoring up this economny. Otherwise you too, my friend, may be one of those “recipients” you hold up for ridicule.

Posted by: Olivia | January 30, 2009, 9:31 am 9:31 am

devilkev; A basic rule of survival is when lost don’t try to find your way out by going deeper into the forest. Stay where you are and wait for rescuers to find you. How can our government not know this?

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | January 30, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am

“…one trillion dollar per month…
This is close to the amount we spent per month on the war.”
Not even close bud. Entire defense budget today is 570 Billion per YEAR, with roughly 80 billion per YEAR on added appropriations for Iraq. Defense Budget at the start of the war was around 420 Billion.

Posted by: KR | January 30, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am

T,
There is BLAME for both sides of the aisle leading up to TARP.
The most important question NOW is are we going to blindly allow people like Barney Frank to continue this. Bush is gone, guys like Frank will be there forever. He had a large role in pushing those banks to loan to people who could NEVER afford them, then when Bush & the Republicans did finally try to add some regulation on Freddie/Fannie, HE opposed it and helped to block it. Even this summer he was saying Freddie/Fannie were “fine”.
Then he blantly aims TARP money at a bank in Mass because its a minority bank. AGAIN showing he is more interested in social engineeering than what is best for the country.
I would love Obama to give us that “transparency” he keeps talking about , by DEMANDING that Congress identify who is respobnsible for each of the line items in the stimulus bill. That way Americans can see for themselves who (Democrat & Republican) is loading these bills up with pork that has nothing to do with the need for the bill!
That would be “change” we could ALL agree on !

Posted by: Mike_C | January 30, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am

Olivia; At the risk of attemting a battle of wits with an unarmed person, the national debt increased 4 trillion dollars, started at 6 trillion and ended at 10 trillion during the Bush administration, eight long years I’ll grant you. In his defense we only had one major enemy attack on US soil and we did form the Dept. of Homeland Defense. By the way, the economy wasn’t bad during those years. The stock market hit its all time high early last year and unemployment was very low. We are currently spending at the rate of 10-12 trillion dollars per year and accomplishing little to nothing with the money spent, our economy is on the verge of collapse, unemployment is at near record highs and the government continues to spend as if they have a huge surplus of money to spend.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | January 30, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am

If it is true we are spending 1 trillion a month, then our monthly cost of the Defense budget, war in Iraq and Afghanistan, is less than 60 Billion a month. Chump change by comparison.
Consider the stimulus being 800 Billion, that number would include our entire defense budget, war in Iraq and Afghanistan, the entire stimulus package of 1993 adjusted for inflation, and still have enough left over to buy 150 B-2 Stealth Bombers.

Posted by: KR | January 30, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Olivia;That trillion dollar/ month figure I threw out is additional spending over and above money appropriated for budget concerns.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | January 30, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am

I work for a Midwest bank who’s executives have “gone the extra mile” foregoing raises for themselves and telling all VPs or higher no raises also and letting the “little” people have a least a 1% increase. The bank also was the receipient of initial TARP money, which we think is going to be used help homeowners who are making a good faith effort to make payments, only after all other options offered are exhausted, i.e. make reduced payments for 6 month, 12 months, etc and possibly then re-fi at the current value, forgiving the “overage.” This will take time and patience and months, so no TARP money will “spent” right away. We haven’t been actually informed that this is what management plans to do, but from the actions and plans put into place and being executed, this scenerio seems the mostlikely. The bank has also gone on a hugh cost reduction course of action, getting rid of “deadwood” and duplication as well as reducing expenses. So not all banks are “bad.” I’m glad to have a job and proud to work for a company that is actually trying to help.
Give President Obama some tme – he walked into a nighmare and can’t fix it overnight. Quit complaining and figure out what you can do to be part of the solution. It’s going to take ALL of us working together, politics be d**med and forgotten. Now if we could only get out leaders to have the same outlook…… Wow, what could be accomplished?

Posted by: Speedikat | January 30, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am

the majority of so called fat cats on Wallstreet are Democrats. Cant keep blaiming Bush, I thought he was big Oil. What a miss conception the Republicans are the rich. Look at reallity the wealthy power hunger thefts that run government and corporate are DEMOCRATS.

Posted by: Gary | January 30, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am

And this coming from a guy whose treasury secretary received a pay raise and owes back taxes.

Posted by: James Bowen | January 30, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am

This “height of irresponsibility” is exactly what our dopes in Congress, including Obama, voted for last year. What do you think will happen if money is just thrown to corporations that have already displayed such bad judgement? The bailouts and stimulus packages all amount to the same thing: bad gov’t interventionist policy prompted by previous bad gov’t interventionist policy. We need to sent them all home to get a real job adn discover how the world outside the beltway works.

Posted by: Mike Miller | January 30, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am

Congress can’t add conditions to the bill after the money is given away. This is what happens when congress rushes to spend our money without properly thinking it through.

Posted by: Darren | January 30, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Obama is so stern and forceful.
But he doesn’t have the guts to stand up to Pelosi and Reid as they waste billions of our money on rediculous programs.
Everyone knows who wears the pants in the Obama administration–it’s not Obama.

Posted by: meggie | January 30, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am

The height of irresponsibility is putting a tax cheat in charge of the IRS, and voting for billions of pork in a recession.

Posted by: sammy | January 30, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am

The height of irresponsibilty:
“No lobbyist will have a job in my administration”
Except for the lobbyist Obama gives waivers to.

Posted by: bailey | January 30, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am

Meanwhile, about-to-be-laid-off teachers in LA are marching behind a big banner reading “New Leadership — Same Politics”.

Posted by: Blue Fairy | January 30, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Meanwhile, The Puppet’s keeping His campaign machine going, SEPARATE from the formerly-”Democratic” Party.
What we’re looking at here, birthday suit notwithstanding, is the new Mussolini. Flashy fascism. Whee.

Posted by: Blue Fairy | January 30, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

See “Obama retools campaign machine”, AFP.

Posted by: Blue Fairy | January 30, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Obama/shamefull/yeah right!

Posted by: LongT | January 30, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

This guy is obviously impressed with himself! Well, I am too.

Posted by: LongT | January 30, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

All you need to be a successful politician is have a long line of B.S.

Posted by: LongT | January 30, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Was it “shameful” when Obama got $4MM for writing his book while moonlighting as a Senator from Illinois? Was it shameful when Ms. Obama was paid $325k for being on the board of the University of chicago hospitals while spending most of her time campaigning for her husband? On Wall Street, we worked and got paid on a formula, a percentage of what you bring in revenues. Bonuses are taxed, (which pay teachers and politicians salaries), incomes are spent, which provide everyone from the people at starbucks to JC Penny jobs.

Posted by: AC | January 30, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

It is really amazing how blind we are. Give us a phrase like “change”, and a good orator (sp), and there we go.

Posted by: LongT | January 30, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

Well duh; If you don’t like the CEOs giving themselves big bonuses stop giving them money.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | January 30, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Is this a blog for republicans you are all so negative I don’t remember this BS when BUSH was in office. And AC you got to be kinding me your sticking up for the CEO’s who gave themselves millions and then turned around a laid off people you should be ashamed of yourself or are you a CEO making excuses for your bad judgement and behaviour to us ordinary americans. Shame on all you CEO’s that thinking nothing of giving yourselves millions in bonuses while you lay off people. Just one word for that UNBELIEVABLE.

Posted by: RJ | January 30, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Put a cap on the CEOs bonuses,freeze their assets and pay the taxpayers back until their companies make a profit! The maddness must stop!

Posted by: JohnH | January 30, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Obama call Walls Street’s bonuses shameful & irresponsible! And he is going to speak to them in the coming days. WOW!!! I am VERY disappointed in his response. I thought he would have a much stronger reaction. I sure hope he can get in touch with just how OUTRAGEOUS this is. This seems like a little-bitty slap on the wrist. Why should they get more bailout money?
In my opinion, Obama’s response is shameful & irresponsible. And I voted for him. I hope he has more guts than this.

Posted by: robin schmitt | January 30, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

How many company’s could forgo two “top” execs from their payroll to allow 15 or 20 people in lower level positions stay on — and how much more money gets circulated by these 20 kept on?? Any mathematicians out there who can figure this out.

Posted by: Paulet | January 30, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Senate Banking Chairman Chris Dodd has been in typically indignant form this week, opining on the financial crisis. Before his Tuesday hearing on Bernard Madoff, he demanded that regulators get to the bottom of any crime: “American investors deserve an explanation and the responsible parties must be held accountable!” And yesterday the Connecticut Senator denounced Wall Street bonuses and said, “I am urging — in fact, not urging, demanding — that the Treasury Department figures out some way to get the money back.”
Pardon us, Senator, but how about taking your own advice?
We refer to his promise to release mortgage documents for the two properties that he and his wife refinanced with Countrywide Financial in 2003. In June a former Countrywide loan officer charged that Mr. Dodd received preferential rates and had fees waived on those loans as part of a VIP program the company had for “friends” of the company’s then-CEO Angelo Mozilo. Mr. Dodd first issued a denial and then, days later, acknowledged that he was a “VIP” with Countrywide but said he thought it was “more of a courtesy.” In late June he pledged to make all pertinent documents public “at some point.” We’re still waiting.

Posted by: Lizzie | January 30, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

his presidency isn’t two weeks old, and already warning flags have gone up.
Obama is wallpapering his administration with lobbyists, installed a tax cheat to run the Treasury Department and is pushing Congress to pass a massive, wildly unaffordable “stimulus” bill loaded with pork and reckless spending that plunges Americans even deeper into debt.
Even worse, the bill every day looks more like 15 years of pent-up big-government liberalism than an economic “stimulus” plan.
Ever since his election, many Americans have wondered which Barack Obama would show up at the White House: the most liberal member of the Senate or the post-partisan bearer of change we could all believe in.
One thing is clear: His “stimulus” bill is not change we can believe in. It’s a return to big-government welfare that we will choke on.

Posted by: MLM411 | January 30, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Battery Park would adequately serve as La Place de la Concord redux

Posted by: blogdog | January 30, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

I have a friend who is reading “Dreams of My Father”. Her impression is that for the first time in our history, we have a president who actually hates his country. I’ll reserve opinion until I read it for myself. I hope she’s wrong.

Posted by: LongT | January 30, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

I have a suggestion that would help the economy. Look at the bonus records for the CEOs of the failing businesses. They can keep the bonuses for the years their company was actually in the black with no layoffs. The rest of their bonuses must be given back to the company and used to hire back the employees that have lost jobs. There we go.
And while we’re at it – how about Congress takes a paycut?? They get paid from taxes – which we pay. When a business can’t afford it -pay cuts happen – and taxpayers are definitely unable to afford it right now! I’m thinking that would be a hefty chunk of money to put toward unemployment benefits and helping people get back to work. Sooner or later they will have to realize that unemployed taxpayers mean no money coming in – so where are these billions coming from??
As for the mortgage industry – just reset the mortgage interest rates back to what they were when these people got the mortgage and could afford the payments. It’s not really fair to those of us who were smart enough to make sure we could PAY for the house before we bought it – but at least if you get the payments back down – they’ll be paying for the house and keeping it – and help our property values – instead of foreclosures and abandoning the homes. Yes, they should’ve realized that the rates would eventually go up – but since we can’t put the “stuff” back in the horse – at least we might be able to stop it from leaking out.

Posted by: Tina Johnson | January 30, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

“I have a friend who is reading “Dreams of My Father”. Her impression is that for the first time in our history, we have a president who actually hates his country.”
Right wingers love this country like an abusive husband “loves” his wife.
Sure there’s real emotion there but the way its expressed is horrifying.

Posted by: Ryan C | January 30, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm

I wonder if Obama will hold Barney Frank and Chris Dodd accountable for their negligence and incompetence resulting from the banking collapse? They’re still getting paid and have jobs. Hmmm… I smell a double standard here…

Posted by: Justanotherpeon | January 30, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

I think you’re spot on Tina!!!

Posted by: Justanotherpeon | January 30, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

These CEO’s/executives need to be taken to the woodshed! We need to take away all of their “toys” and priveleges plus jail time and pay back what they have stolen from the American people. These jerks will just keep on spending the money as long as it is there and being fed to them.

Posted by: Spazzy3 | January 30, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

brighteyes…just how much $$$ do you think you’re going to get in stimulus??
Many of us need jobs to pay our mortgages … not a silly “drop-in-the-bucket” stimulus check. And…if I did get a check, I’d have to use it to pay my utilities or buy food. That doesn’t stimulate anything.
If it’s just cash you’re after, then maybe Obamer should just divide the $1.3 trillion by the number of LEGAL Americans and everyone gets that amount. Probably $17K each….

Posted by: Justanotherpeon | January 30, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm

Spazzy3…you’re RIGHT! I bet if enough of us SCREAMED at our leaders and demanded that they fire Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and every other elected official who allowed this, then the CEOs of those companies would act muuuuch differently…. Heck, they might even pay some of it back. (hey, I can hope, right?) ;-)

Posted by: Justanotherpeon | January 30, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

Anybody know why ABC, CBS, and NBC aren’t fully covering the stimulus issues?? I haven’t heard any of them mention the “$150M on honey bee insurance” or the “$20M on Fish Barriers” etc. (I’m not kidding about those – they really are included in the “pork-ulus package”!) Anyone been seeing this on TV???

Posted by: Justanotherpeon | January 30, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

I’ll bet you dollars to donuts Obama made that statement AFTER he got his bonus!

Posted by: Machod | January 31, 2009, 8:59 am 8:59 am

These CEOs make me sick. Any company who took part in receiving any money from the stimulus package shouldn’t be allowed to buy “toys” and/or give/recieve massive bonuses. They took part in a socialist program, therefore the government should have some say what is going on inside their companies. I hate the fact that I am a recent college graduate busting my butt to find a job and trying to makes ends meet, yet our tax dollars are allowing these men to give themselves these huge bonuses. Not ok.

Posted by: what's wrong with society? | January 31, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Democrat Franklin Raines ran Fannie Mae and collected $50 million.
Democrat Jamie Gorelick worked for Fannie Mae and took home $26 million.
Democrat Jim Johnson hauled in millions from his Fannie Mae CEO job. From Wikipedia: “A 2006 OFHEO report found that Fannie Mae had substantially under-reported Johnson’s compensation. Originally reported as $6-7 million, Johnson actually received approximately $21 million.”
Notice a pattern here?
All contributed to the cooking of Fannie Mae’s books. All were protected by Barney Frank and Chris Dodd. They were all complicit in creating the subprime lending disaster, which kicked off the credit crisis.
If Obama were really “outraged” about corruption, he’d start with righting the wrongs at Fannie Mae. But he won’t because the corruption was caused by his own cronies (and even advisors in the case of Raines). So he misdirects the public and moves on to Wall Street. And the mainstream media goes along with it.

Posted by: Tony D | January 31, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Why do people on Wall Street need “over the top” bonus? What would happen to the billions in bonus’s if not given to those over paid Wall street types? Would it be filtered into the economy or what? How can one segment of society be soooooo rich and yet a policeman, firefighter, nurse, teacher, etc have to fight for for their wages that barely pay their bills?

Posted by: Deborah | January 31, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

President Obama;
Good on you! and the time has come for CEO’s to realise that companies and institutions need to show some form of responsibility if they want to practice and sustain economic, social and environmental accountabilities. CEO should not just preach cost cutting while they are irresponsible themselves and have “no shame” to pay themselves handsomely especially in times where the world tends to face financial crisis. Instead what CEO’s should be doing is helping the President to manage the financial crisis by contributing financial help to solve what their country is facing! Obama stating
“What we’re going to need is for the folks on Wall Street who are asking for help to show some restraint, and show some discipline, and show some sense of responsibility,” he said is correct and I strongly support this so should responsible citizens too!

Posted by: Vanaja K | January 31, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

the only solace is that “A FOOL AND HIS MONEY ARE SOON PARTED”
we can only hope!!!

Posted by: M.D.Baker | February 3, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

The Borgen Project has some good info on the cost of addressing global poverty.
$30 billion: Annual shortfall to end world hunger.
$550 billion: U.S. Defense budget

Posted by: Abel Tsegga | February 3, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Shameful? Height of Irresponsibility?
How can Robert Gibbs stand before the American people and push a stimulus that everyone knows will cripple this Nation for generations on one hand, and talk ‘outrage’ at Wall Street on the other?
The hypocrisy continues to compound — exponentially!

Posted by: Citizen_Alerted | February 3, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.