Palin Assails Media Classism
In an interview with conservative filmmaker John Ziegler for his pending documentary "Media Malpractice… How Obama Got Elected and Palin Was Smeared," Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin takes more shots at the media.
“I’ve been interested to see how Caroline Kennedy will be handled and if she will be handled with kid gloves or if she will be under such a microscope,” Palin says in the film. “It’s going to be interesting to see how that plays out, and I think that as we watch that, we will perhaps be able to prove that there is a class issue here. Also, that was such a factor in the scrutiny of my candidacy versus, say, the scrutiny of what her candidacy may be.”
On why she didn’t answer Katie Couric’s question about what she reads, Palin said that was because, "Katie, you’re not the center of everyone’s universe. … To me the question was more ‘Do you read? What do you guys do up there?’"
- jpt

Email
Rick Santorum Encircled in Prayer
Boehner Slams Obama on Contraception Controversy
Jake don’t you know when you and the media are being used.This crap keeps her in the lime light ….Let her go>>>>>>>>
Posted by: me | January 9, 2009, 9:29 am 9:29 am
It’s mind-boggling Palin’s skewed interpretation of questions. Katie Couric’s question inquired as to what kinds of materials did she read to stay informed about world events. Katie didn’t ask her as an Alaskan resident what she read as though it was an insult. If a basic question like this irked Palin, then what would she think of really difficult questions/issues if she were to be asked them if she ever becam VP of the US? (God Forbid) How pathetic she blames everyone for her flubs except herself. She said she knew the first interview with Couric didn’t go well but the campaign still wanted her to do the next one since it was already scheduled. She couldn’t understand this. The interview didn’t go badly because Katie asked the ‘wrong’ questions, it went badly because Palin was so inexperienced and uninformed and was completely out of here element. That interview showed just how ‘not ready’ she was for this national role. But she still blamed everyone else. Very, very pathetic.
Posted by: Sandra Johanson | January 9, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am
Yes, class is the issue.
Mrs. Palin has none.
She and her family, although claiming to be “normal” in this day and age, are the equivolent of yesteryear’s circus side show.
It is better to be silent and be thought a fool, then to open one’s mouth and erase all doubt.
Mrs. Palin, please shut up.
Posted by: MM | January 9, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am
I’m embarrassed for her. She’s so pathetic.
Posted by: Paltick | January 9, 2009, 9:37 am 9:37 am
After reading the entire interview on the ADN, I wonder if she really graduated with a degree in Journalism. Her sentences run 55, 54 and 77 words long which could be a paragraph alone. Has anyone ever seen her diploma or degree? Can you even imagine reading an an article or listening to a daily reporter that writes and speaks this way? Not me.
Posted by: Grammy11 | January 9, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am
I think people should ‘watch’ the video and pay attention before commenting. Otherwise you just look like a sexist a-hole in need of a better education.
Posted by: Dan | January 9, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am
About time she unloaded. It was disgusting how her and her family were treated. I was more embarassed for Biden, but somehow that was always brushed off. The media is biased and all the ignorant fools writing here are proof. keep drinking the Kool Aid!
Posted by: DD | January 9, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am
A question to all of you posters: what do you think about Caroline Kennedy and her bid for the NY Senate Seat?
Posted by: Dan | January 9, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am
I am SO thankful that we have a carbon copy of Jimmy Carter to “save” us from ourselves with even more government spending and programs than the last administration. So much vitriol for so little. Looks like the Demoncrats have chosen their messiah and decided to destroy anyone who dares to not tow the party line and think for themself. After all what would these people think about any issue if somebody hadn’t bothered to do their thinking for them in rags such as this or the New York Times? Dr. Phil has alot of work to do with you folks. After all wasn’t it the Democrats who pushed the bailouts, capitulated and rolled over on the war, acquiesced into spying on the American people, forced banks to len to subprime morgagers who had no means to pay back thier loans, etc., etc. You are entitled to your opinion but NOT your own facts!
Posted by: please! | January 9, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am
It’s worth pointing out that she was asked these questions in an interview. The press coverage I heard on the radio and on this page makes it look more like she just put out a press release to complain.
Posted by: Ed | January 9, 2009, 9:49 am 9:49 am
She wants to see how Caroline Kennedy will be handled? If she’ll be under the microscope? Honey, the media already knows everything about Caroline Kennedy. She’s a Kennedy! There’s no dirt to dig up because it’s already out there. And the media have already stated that she’s not qualified for the job of Senator.
Posted by: Lee | January 9, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am
Im no supporter of Palin but it is clear to any fair minded person that the media has been all over themselves to put Caroline in the best possible light. Her interviews have been horrible too, despite not being asked tough questions like Palin was.
She is clearly in over her head like Palin was, but no Tina Fey lambasting her. No vile commentary on her kids…….nothing…….
Posted by: opedanderson | January 9, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am
I thought that Palin thought that the McCain campaign kept her from the media too much, yet in this interview, she complains that she went back to Couric after the first session didn’t “go well.”
And whose responsibility is it that Palin couldn’t explain how Alaska’s proximity to Russia gave her foreign policy creds or how the bailout yielded certain public outcomes? For someone who is in a party that has preached personal responsibility, she sure doesn’t take any of it.
The country ducked a bullet not having her as vp.
Posted by: debbie | January 9, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Seems to me that Ms. Palin has a tremendous chip on her shoulder. If she doesn’t like the scrutiny, stay out of the public eye! After all she has whined and griped about her treatment this time, how does she think she will fair in future campaigns? She’s just setting herself up for more controversy and scrutiny.
Posted by: Sheri_in_CA | January 9, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am
I fail to understand how asking Palin what she likes to read is scrutinizing her and her family? This big claim of media bias is such a joke. Palin was a poor choice as a candidate, she is obviously less intelligent than other cnadidates and it’s good for our country if she never gets into another office again.
Posted by: Evan | January 9, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Classism Schmashism. Sarah Palin has no one to blame but herself. She tried to BS her way thru Charlie’s Bush doctrine question when all she had to dp was saysomething like” Charlie I do not know about the Bush doctrine but let me tell you what John McCain will do.” Nope she had to try to BS her way thru it. SHe could not even handle Katie Couric’s inspid and stupid questions. Yeah they were stupid but her dismissing them just made her look stupid not Katie or the questions. Quit whinning Sarah and take care of your grandson.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | January 9, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am
Will she just never go away? She is an self-absorbed cry-baby. Get over yourself Mrs. Palin.
Posted by: missjane2 | January 9, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am
When with the bozo realize that it was her ineptitudes and not the media that ruined her campaign.
Palin did not even get half of what was dished to Hillary Clinton.
Palin, just stop being a cry baby and retire to Alaska, shoot moose and take care of your grand children, OK.
Posted by: Steve_NJ | January 9, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am
I thought Palin came across in the media as exactly who she was. A person completely over her head in national politics and a person of moderate intelligence at best. Keep blaming the media Sarah…and then expect the press to love you in 2012!
Posted by: indy_voter | January 9, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Way to go Sarah. I don’t think you should run for Prez, but I’m thrilled to hear someone finally call the media out on their shameful bias. The media can dish it out. Let’s see if they can take it. Good for you.
Posted by: jbjm13 | January 9, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Palin – you were running for VP, Kennedy is running for a vacant Senate seat… BIG difference.
Posted by: Chris | January 9, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am
This woman is such a whiner. Get real Sarah. She blames everyone else for her shortcomings and thinks she’s owed something by the media and anyone else. The fact is, she’s the one that cost her the vice presidency with her negativity on the campaign trail. I would vote for another bush before i would vote for her. She’s a joke.
Posted by: B-man | January 9, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am
OMG, OMG, OMG!! I’m so embarrassed for her. Just as we were putting the Couric interview and all of Palin’s flubs aside, she brings them all back up. Stupid is as stupid does. LMAO!
Posted by: hang | January 9, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am
I think it’s a great point, let’s see how the media deals with Caroline Kennedy. The world does not know everything about her, as you know, she has stayed out of the limelight as much as she could. Just becuase she’s a Kennedy, means nothing.
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Palin says she wishes people would examine her record in Alaska. Her record is excellent. That’s what Obama was so afraid of (when he asked the press not to focus on his family, but then had his people attack Palin’s family). She’s an extraordinary politician, and that is why she is still in the news.
Some people think that having a degree from Harvard or Yale means you’re a better person, but it is not true. It means that you bought your way into college, or got in through affirmative action programs. These ivy league colleges have turned out people like George W. Bush (Harvard and Yale graduate); don’t let these credentials fool you.
Posted by: tina | January 9, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am
PLEASE JUST GO AWAY
Posted by: swede | January 9, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am
What a little manipulating loser. Her first appearance on the national stage was her convention speech…attacking Obama with a wink here, and a smirk there…making her the darling of the right wingnuts. Awfully strong to come out attacking like that as an unknown. McShame camp held her behind closed doors in a carefully controlled environment because she couldn’t understand basic civics structure (their words) or geography. When finally let out and lobbed softballs by Couric and Gibson she displayed ignorance to basic concepts,,i.e which way would you fly from Moscow to Washington…east or west? Name a Supreme Court case other than Roe V Wade….How about Gore V Bush or perhaps Brown V Board of Education or the Dred Scott Case???? Most eighth graders can name at least one. All of this was done with a wink and a smirk…as she tried to tap dance through the interviews. Once the public saw the lack of knowledge her numbers slid…Tina Fey became more and more hilarious….quoting her word for word….and everyone joined in on the laugh…She continued to whip up the wingnuts at here rallies…”pallin around with terrorists” etc…and her numbers with the center kept slippin…the election ends and now she wants to re-write history….boo hoo. Please God make her the repub nominee in 2012…This airhead will ensure a democratic victory! Her basic problem regardless of the spinning…she still doesn’t know anything…regardless of what talking points anyone puts in front of her in the future…and people are not dumb!
Posted by: Greg Williams | January 9, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am
I agree that there is a lot of classism, but Sarah Palin needs to realize that she is not the answer. She is a big, wanting, question mark. (We know the answer, though…)
Posted by: Erlinda | January 9, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am
please: read your own press. me thinks thou doth protest too much.
Posted by: jrod | January 9, 2009, 10:02 am 10:02 am
This is why I like her. She zeros in on the target and gets to the tumor. She doesn’t hem or haw about bandaids or diagnosis. America, we are a class system. We have been told if you work hard you can get ahead. We tell a ghetto child he can grow up to be a billion dollar basketball player. It doesn’t happen. We are born into a class and we live and die in that class. It is no different than India’s ancient caste system. I was born into the poverty class system. I was tormented by the middle class all through school. I was singled out to be the whipping girl by my middle class teachers. I will die in poverty. Tell it like it is, Sarah. You know, um, ah, like you know Caroline Kennedy will be treated with kid gloves and America worships the royal blood line and elitists. Caroline can not put a sentence together and no she did not write those books, she put her name on those books. Sarah is middle class but has fought and won against government corruption. She is an example of how to make America right again. But no one will let her succeed because she comes from a working middle class family. Caroline is handed everything because she is the bloodline. Obama came from a working middle class, he cannot put a sentence together without a prompter. He sold his soul to the elitist and now they think they can control him. I am certain if you look in Obama’s white blood line you might find a royal blood line. Just using big words from a teleprompter isn’t going to impress me. Action is what I want to see.
Posted by: clancy49 | January 9, 2009, 10:02 am 10:02 am
Whine, whine, whine. If Obama had a teenager who was pregnant that would have killed his effort to become president, because it would have been tied to race, blah, blah, blah. If you have a lifestyle that isn’t perfect you have to expect that public life would be…public. And she and Caroline K. are completely different (thank God) and in completely different circumstances. Caroline is a Constitutional lawyer. She is NOT without experience in public life. Any of the nominees to replace a senator are without ‘senatorial’ experience. And Palin would be a heartbeat away from being president… THAT’s very important. Nobody’s wildest imagination has Caroline showing up on Tuesday and possibly running the country on Wednesday…. Stop whining Palin.
Posted by: sevresblue | January 9, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am
You’re mistaken about Obama’s past: He was NOT middle class. His grandparents were wealthy. His mother attended high school in the fanciest Seattle suburb: Mercer Island. Obama attended private schools exclusively, from kindergarten through college. Obama’s grandmother was a Vice President at a bank. That is “upper class” in my book.
Posted by: tina | January 9, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am
And remind me??? Has anyone studied the history of the Kennedy clan? Talk about corruption…. it’s despicable.
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am
The issue here is LACK of class. Even though I’m not a republican, I really admire the way John Mccain has handled himself and the media after the election. I can’t for the life of me understand why he paired up with that winking hick.
Posted by: 2009 | January 9, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am
Obama has proven he has no answers other than to spend money and grow government.
Palin will be our president in 2013. She will lead many states in taking back power from the federal government and returning it to the states where it belongs according to the constitution. She will also contrast her fiscal conservatism with Obama’s outrageous spending. Governor Palin has run a surplus in Alaska that will help them weather the economic storm we are now in. This responsible governance will also be contrasted with Obama’s mismangement of our finances in the election of 2012.
America needs better leadership – Governor Palin will provide it.
Posted by: James | January 9, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Palin: go away. The election is over but you, and Joe the Deadbeat Plumber keep hanging around. It’s over. Give it up. Go back to work. Take a hike. We got bigger and better things to worry about right now.
Posted by: Steve from Danville | January 9, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am
Palin is not explaining why she didn’t answer Couric’s question. She is responding to a clip of Couric saying she was surprised no other interviewer pushed Palin on the reading question.
Palin is actually saying nobody else asked the question Couric found so important because Couric isn’t the center of everyone’s universe.
====
Palin was bad in those interviews, but she does have some very valid points about how she was treated by the press in general. The press never wants to be introspective when criticized, though. Instead, they use their ink and video to defend themselves and punish their critics.
Posted by: MayBee | January 9, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am
Why can’t the media totally ignore this pathetic person? Why keep giving her the attention she craves and that we don’t want to hear or see any more of? I blame the media for continuing to let her blab to the public, not for asking fair questions about the Bush doctrine, what her preferred reading materials are, etc. The campaign is over. I don’t want to know about her children’s problems, they are personal and let them stay that way. She was a big mistake to the McCain campaign. Let the mistake rest in peace.
Posted by: Lynn | January 9, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am
U know what other NH at least my vote counted hahahaha He will fix this country and you will eat crow …..
Posted by: me | January 9, 2009, 10:12 am 10:12 am
It’s not a class thing…it’s an intelligence thing. She actually said this, and I’m paraphrasing “If you want something bad enough and you have faith, you’ll get it”. I don’t know anyone that’s wanted to win the lottery more than me… I guess I just don’t have enough faith. What a moron…
Posted by: Chuck S | January 9, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am
OBAMA is going to cut the social security for people already reciving it at 63, 64, 65, 66. How cruel is this for these people cannot collect unemployment and cannot pay their mortgages. Go ahead democrats and follow Obama and you will all be out of Congress, I assure you in 210. Obama gives the auto workers $75/hr but wants to take away the meager social security that people have earned-how cruel is this elitist attitude. Go ahead, progressives and hurt the people depending on their retirement and give it to the unions and you will pay big time at the polls!!!!!
Posted by: rockychance | January 9, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
I wasn’t happy with either candidates this year, but I paid close attention to the way the candidates and their VPs were treated. Anyone with any sense would have seen the obvious media bias against McCain and Palin and the free passes given to Obama and Biden.
And Mrs. Palin is dead on when she said that the media respected Obama’s warning to leave his family out of it. What the media did to Palin’s family was absolutely disgusting and shameful. What a sick bunch of vultures the media are to attack her family like that- and the people who lapped it up are just as bad. Common decency should be applied to ALL candidates, not just the ones the media is pushing to win. It really saddens me to read these comments like “she’s stupid” “go take care of your grandchildren” on here.
This country still has a long way to go, obviously.
Posted by: MikeCAL | January 9, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
Sarah Palin needs to get out of the media and stay out. She embarrasses herself every time she opens her mouth. She has no clue and she allows her family to pal around with drug dealers. Her daughter’s boyfriend’s mother was making and selling Meth. Why would she allow her daughter date and have a baby with a guy who’s mom is a drug dealer and will be going to jail. Sarah Palin wants her daughter to marry this guy. I don’t think we need anyone like Sarah Palin running for VP or President of the US. Sarah Palin is an airhead and she never thinks before she speaks. She can’t even answer easy questions posed to her by the press. For example, name a supreme court case you disagree with, what magazines do you read, why do they call John McCain a maverick. She has confused running for political office with a beauty pagent.
Posted by: Detour4 | January 9, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
The extreme response from the liberal nuts to Sarah Palin shows that they understand she will be a formidable candidate and will liekly unseat their messiah in the 2012 elections if they cannot destroy her. So far they ahve failed completely. Sarah Palin continues to maintain a 49% approval rating nationally, even after all of the atatcks. Clearly, the American people see a different person than the liberal haters.
The derangement that is demonstrated by the left toward Sarah Palin and her middle American values will be a great campaign issue. Obama can be tarred by the hate that is eminating from the left, as he should be.
Posted by: Nikki | January 9, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am
I was reluctant to post however here goes. Why is Sarah Palin mad?
Katie Coric did not ask her “When the cure for Polio was discovered” nor did she ask her “What year did the Japanese bomb Pearl Harbor.” She asked her “What Newspapers do you read?” And like a 5th grader caught lying about reading the summer reading list she responds “all Of them” What’s astonishing is that even after the interview she is still unable to come up with names of newspapers she reads.. AS if mentioning USA Today and New York TImes are suppose to make it all go away.
Sarah Palin is mad at her self and the campaign that threw her under the bus shortly after the election. And thats the truth.
The media can only do so much to paint someone in a negative light. She must understand that the content of her speech is what makes her lack credibility. She has a lot of learning to do and a whole lot of humility to gain in the process.
Ms. Palin should take the advice of an analyst who suggested that she lay low for a while so that the people could forget her as the natinal joke/punch line.
Posted by: Geri | January 9, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am
despite Mrs Palin havng a few valid points about the media, it still does not hide the fact that she has no shame, morals, or self awareness…as far a she is concerned she did nothing wrong during the campaign – just as she insisted in troopergate despite being found guitly of ethics violaton (by a Republican committee no less)…how vain and deluded is that?
Posted by: indithinker | January 9, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Isn’t her family worth more than a few million? seems like she is in that elite class hey?
Go away
Posted by: huh | January 9, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am
she hurt herself with her kooky kwirky backwards idea,s and ideals, and the fact her party is responsible for now two massive depressions. and for a war that was a huge mistake…thats what hurt her
Posted by: T | January 9, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
.Classy is Ms. Kennedy Palin on the other hand is slum and for her running this country that will never happen.Palin CRIES all the time just to keep her puss in the news .Her daughter is an example of how she will run this country>>>>>>Bad news.
Posted by: NH voter | January 9, 2009, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Me: I’m pretty sure every vote counts. I will not eat crow, I never even said who I voted for. I hope for the best for our new president. Eating crow, is not an option, wishing the best for our new President and our country is the option. This is not an NFL playoff shove it in your face game, sorry that you see it that way.
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 10:18 am 10:18 am
Nikki wrote: “The extreme response from the liberal nuts to Sarah Palin shows that they understand she will be a formidable candidate and will liekly unseat their messiah in the 2012 elections if they cannot destroy her.”
Actually, those of us on the left are really pulling for Palin to be the GOP candidate in 2012. It will assure a veritable landslide for Obama!
Posted by: SearamblerOne | January 9, 2009, 10:18 am 10:18 am
John McCain made a mistake picking Sarah Palin as the Vice President candidate because she is simply not qualified for this high level position.
If she were really sharp, she would have been able to handle her interview with Katie with ease. It was a simple question – “What do you read?” By not providing a direct response it seemed she didn’t read much of anything. At this time, I think she should concentrate on her family. I don’t think anyone really wants to hear about her now. Caroline Kennedy has written books so I am sure she could tell us about several publications she enjoys and reads on a regular basis. She’s a very polished young lady who had an acceptional mother and father.
Posted by: Cokey | January 9, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Geri posted “she will be a formidable candidate and will liekly unseat their messiah in the 2012 elections” — you have to be joking — bring her on — those of us that supported change and inclusiveness (as opposed to her corruption and divisiveness) relish the idea of her being the nominee — it will insure a Dem majority for a generation or more….the GOP are still in denial
Posted by: indithinker | January 9, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am
The whining tour continues…Sarah Palin has to let it go. Even the Sooners last night had more class than this woman.
Posted by: skerryred | January 9, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am
So Sarah! You are too Right-wing for me, but you are so right.
I’m curious to see why the media does to Kennedy too. She has not experience except for being a Kennedy & a woman.
Posted by: Rochelle | January 9, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Thus she proves
1. she is low class.
2. she doesn’t read, or she would see how Caroline has been dragged around in the media.
You lost, go away, your party and its policies are a disaster.
Posted by: Emily | January 9, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am
Sarah Palin was a hit with the Republican base, and so her challenge was to appeal to a broader segment of the electorate. She tried to do that by presenting herself as a symbol of middle America, but instead made herself into a caricature. I’d have respected her way more if she’d said, “look, John McCain has enough foreign policy experience for two presidents, so I’d guess he is looking for my help in some other area” instead of “Alaska is close to Russia;” told Katie Couric that she liked reading People at the hairdresser’s but otherwise didn’t read magazines much; or told Charlie Gibson that she didn’t know what he meant by the Bush Doctrine but would be happy to talk about McCain’s foreign policy approach. She’d have come across as inexperienced but earnest, rather than uninformed but arrogant. The former is endearing; the latter is insulting, especially when you’re claiming to represent the “average Joe.”
Posted by: Hil | January 9, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Media has done nothing against Palin but discussions on her reality i.e. low IQ and very clear lack of knowledge and understanding of the world. She has to keep looking at Putin and Medvedev from her the window of her bedroom and take care of the tundra.
Posted by: Panama Canal | January 9, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Really? Can you imagine the field day the conservative media would have had if Palin had been a Democrat? “Had to get married! Couldn’t keep her immoral daughter from getting pregnant UNWED. Showed poor judgment in getting pregnant at her advanced age.” I could go on, and on.
Posted by: wolfie33 | January 9, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
She blames the interviews cost her the election – she’s right.
When you can’t answer a question, as simple as what you read, what does she expect. Charlie Gibson asked about foreign policy – she talks about energy. He asked her a yes or no question and she rattled on for 10 minutes and never answered the question, sad.
It wasn’t the press or interviewers who so called lost the election – it was her inability to answer questions regarding issues.
As for her family, why weren’t these children in school? At one time she said they were being tutored – then in Alaska, they were catching up on their schoolwork. Which is correct?? It seems that her daughter was taking care of the baby, more than her mother. I only saw her hold the baby a couple of times for a few seconds. To me the most important thing would be the baby and her pregnant daughter. Maybe I am wrong in my thinking, but that’s the way I feel.
She had better take a look at the things that caused her LOSING, her inability to answer questions, her knowledge of policies and the issues of the US.
Posted by: smt | January 9, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Palin is a typical conservative who ALWAYS make excuses for their own stupidity and lack of knowledge of the job they were elected to do. George W. Bush is another shinning example. The press always gets the blame when these inadequacies are exposed for everyone to see. The press does a wonderful job of exposing these frauds to the public. My hat’s off to them !
Posted by: leftyintexas | January 9, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
OOO-WE!!!! BABYDOLL NEWS!!!!!!
I just love her! I REALLY REALLY do! No other politician can make me smile so much!!!! It is just amazing that HoneyCakes just don’t get this! I mean can we all say narcissim together?
A couple of things don’t make sense here;
-A couple of weeks ago she said that she should have spoken more with the press but was restricted by the McCain campaign. Now, she says they should not have spoken more with Couric? (that actually WOULD have been the smart thing to do–and she couldnt say “NO”?)
-She complains that the media got it wrong about her kids dropping out. Well…they left High School, no? Therefore they dropped out of High School and are studying for their GED’s. Sounds as if the media got that one right to me.
-I find it hard to believe that she NEVER viewed the Couric interviews. If true, that is VERY telling in and of itself.
-She was exploited? (LOL!!!!!) and she doesn’t think she had a hand in that? What about now and these interviews? I’m telling you! …our Lamb is a money making machine right now!!!! I just hope she gets her fair share!
Seriously though (I know, its hard) BabyCakes may be onto something with the Caroline Kennedy issue. I have not seen the CK interviews but I understand that they are awful. However, CK was indeed raked over the coals because of her performance. It’s my understanding that they have now brought in top-notch consultants to help her. Not enough!!! If CK cannot convey her desire (or the fire-in-the belly)of why she wants the position… then she should not be “awarded” such an honor. There are many people in NY who have the desire and yearn to work and make changes for the betterment of NY.
Posted by: FS | January 9, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Nh Voter: I am not one of those people that think that about myself. I am however an educated, independant 34 yr old single woman, supporting myself. Worked hard for everything that I have and I am able to post intelligent posts. Sorry you don’t see it that way.
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
James: You’re complimenting Palin’s leadership for Alaska’s surplus? That would be the state that, when she took office, had $40 billion dollars of oil cash in their Permanent Fund and a Constitutional Budget Reserve since 1980. Yet you credit Palin for both of these windfalls that were put in place while she was a teenager.
It is not classism that ‘the media’ (and a historic majority of voters) have against Palin and her supporters, it is a rejection of bumpersticker reasoning such as yours that is entirely unconnected from documented reality.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
Run, Sarah, Run. You can contribute mightily to Obama’s reelection effort in 1012.
Posted by: kseyetie | January 9, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Mike ‘And Mrs. Palin is dead on when she said that the media respected Obama’s warning to leave his family out of it.” Calling Michelle every name in the book. The characture on the front of the conservative magine depicting her as Angela Daivs no less. Questing the man religious beliefs and even his place of birth. (Are any of you idiots out there still trying to prove he was not born in the USA) YEs he may have had a middle class life style but do not think for a minute that he was not a victim of classism especially if he attended private schools in Hawaii. I thought he attended public ones in Indonesia because his mom could not afford to send him to a private English speaking school. That is why she had him up at 5:00 am studying English or so I have heard. I attended priavte Schools and I never experienced such classism and inequality in my life. I had two parents and lived in a nice neighborhood. So imagine what these kids said and did to Obama being biracial and not living with his mom but his grandparents. Geeze.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | January 9, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am
Whew! And I thought ABC would go a day without a report on the Sarah.
Posted by: Momatwork | January 9, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am
SearamblerOne, your words say one thing but your actions say another. The reason liberals attack Governor Palin is because they see her as a strong candidate. If they really thoght she was unqualified or unelectable they would be pushing for her so their party could maintain power.
In four years Obama will be as hated as George Bush. The Republican will be able to nominate anyone and have a great chance of winning back the White House – Fortuantely for America, they will nominate a tough, successful, intelligent, and capable leader; Governor Palin.
If you liberals fear President Palin so much then you should be working to make Obama successful. It is only that success that will keep Governor Palin out of the White House. Since you are here attacking Sarah Palin you have shown that you believe Obama will be a failure as I do. But carry on, we in the loyal opposition will be here to expose Obama’s failures and to talk about a politician who actually has a record of success.
Posted by: Nikki | January 9, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am
smt: I have no problem with her treatment of her family. It is common older siblings help out in large families and I doubt schooling missed causes any problem for her children. I think she’s a fine mother – leave her family life out of it. She should be judged on her displayed ability to do the job of a politician, and in that she clearly fails woefully.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am
Get over it, Sarah. Tina Fey quoted you almost word for word and the Couric interviews showed you struggling, in real time, in context, to answer a really simple question about where you get your news. Cry media bias all you want, but it’s your own fault for coming across so ignorant!
Posted by: Meg | January 9, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am
So true DD! No wonder the media manipulates thought – it is so easy for them to do. Just read some of these comments – these are just like sheep being led to the slaughter. They have no clue.
Posted by: DD2 | January 9, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Weather or not Gov. Palin was right to be V.P. is debatable, But as far as the press treating Caroline Kennedy with kid gloves she is dead on, you already see the press can’t wait for her coronation.
Posted by: hkdakota | January 9, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am
i hope palin runs for pres in 2012 what a landslide taht wil be for obama. lol she is so stupid and out of touch with a modern world.
Posted by: T | January 9, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Nikki: “The reason liberals attack Governor Palin is because they see her as a strong candidate. If they really thoght she was unqualified or unelectable they would be pushing for her so their party could maintain power.”
Wow, that is extraordinarily telling. You appear unable to even comprehend that a person would want TWO strong candidates in 2012 because they want the best for the country. This isn’t a football match – once the election is over it’s a single nation that wins or loses alone.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am
The new word “conrushinism” a word that describes the conning of america by rush
Posted by: van | January 9, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am
QUIT TALKING TO THIS WOMAN!!!!!
NOW!!!
Posted by: Baal | January 9, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
Oh Nikki, keep believing that Palin is a “strong candidate”. Tell everyone you know! The more her loyal right-wing neo-con fundamentalist base keeps propping her up, the less the left will have to do to ensure she is still around in 2012. Believe me, we would rather have her running in 2012 than any of the qualified GOP candidates…..
Posted by: SearamblerOne | January 9, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Evidently Palin’s dimished capacity for information analysis, and the ever enthusiastic effort of finding an instant answer in place of any thought, make her popular in certain sections of population. I hope she never gets over it. Let her crank out the same staff. They will call her birthday a holiday in the South.
Posted by: notfree | January 9, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Sarah won’t be available to run for POTUS in 2012. She will be far too busy supervising highschool corrospondence courses for Bristol and her baby daddy (predict they will drop out of that too), attempting to brush up on her own poor education, and taking baby Tripp to visit his other gramma in the pokey. Each time she attempts to defend or explain herself she looks even a bigger fool than before. There is absolutely to comparision between VP of the United States and holding a senate seat. Caroline my sink or swim, but Palin should leave that alone and stop trying reaching for ways to make herself look better. Sarah, accept your defeat and go away. People will eventually stop laughing and forget about you if you just SHUT UP!
Posted by: MsLyn | January 9, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Media bias is just one more hurdle for Governor Palin to overcome. Her record in Alaska shows that once she takes on a fight she will never, ever quit. Just look at her in this interview. She is happy, she is confident, and she is starting to engage in the good fight to take on media bias.
Name one candidate of either party that has been attacked as relentelssly as Sarah Palin. Yet, she is unbowed, she is enthsiastic, and she is HAPPY. She is an inspiration for how to deal with challenges. Any other politician subjected to the hate that this woman has endured would have capitualted long ago. Governor Palin never will; she is a Margaret Thatcher in temperment and willingness to fight.
Posted by: Ted | January 9, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am
Well at least when asked what she reads she didn’t say carl marx or other commie authors like the pres you elected.
Posted by: sam | January 9, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am
She’s right, she has no class.
Posted by: MIguy | January 9, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am
The wolves she advocates shooting from heliocopters have more of a chance than she does of ever vindicating herself after her scatterbrained performances in the campaign. Being president is a tough job. If you can’t take the heat stay out of the kitchen.
Posted by: Rick | January 9, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am
Maybe Katie could ask Caroline Kennedy,
you know, you know, you know, what books
are you reading
Posted by: blaze | January 9, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am
“You liberals”. “You conservatives”… what happened to US AMERICANS??? The lady, Sarah Palin, did not have what it takes, period. Next….
Posted by: Bill A. | January 9, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Ted, I agree. Sarah Palin has endured so much hate and yet she is gracious, warm, and still maintains her happiness. She is an inspiration to me. I doubt I could put up with that and still be that unaffected.
Posted by: Lynn | January 9, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am
The fact that poeple keep posting negatively about her says that they are not spending their time supporting the cause of the new President. You keep saying..”get over it Palin” I think you should take your own advice. She is not going anywhere.
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Ted wrote: “Name one candidate of either party that has been attacked as relentelssly as Sarah Palin…..Any other politician subjected to the hate that this woman has endured would have capitualted long ago.”
How about Obama, by the GOP? By the Rush Robots and the Hannity clan?
Posted by: SearamblerOne | January 9, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Caroline Kennedy is not running for the number 2 job in the country – a heartbeat away from the Presidency. Palin received her continuously increasing level of scrutiny due to both the high ranking position and the fact that she wasn’t even remotely qualified for it – a fact of which became more and more glaringly obvious with every single interview.
So although I myself do not believe Caroline Kennedy is even remotely qualified to be Senator of New York, these are two very separate issues and are subject to very different levels of scrutiny.
Posted by: Jake | January 9, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am
Ted: “she is a Margaret Thatcher in temperment and willingness to fight.”
Personally, I want Margaret Thatcher in COMPETENCE and ABILITY TO GOVERN. That’s what politicians should be elected for, not temperament. Governor Palins actual record does not show those abilities, her supporters give no examples (being upbeat and selling the state jet do not cut it), and she has not even shown the ability to handle Katie “Cutthroat” Couric – who wants her protecting our nation’s interests while sitting across the table from Putin?
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am
Sam . do you really think Obamas a Commie? Do you hope that he fails and that the country goes into a depression so you can say TOLD YOU HE WAS A COMMIE? You better hope hes effective cuz this country is in bad shape. You can just sit on the sidelines and criticize. Us REAL Americans will fix the REPUB MESS. How…..unmavericky of you….Bet you think silly Sarah P is a genius
Posted by: Cenrtal Scrutinizer | January 9, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am
sam – huh when did Obama ever say he read Karl MArx? Even if he had read Mein Kumph (spelling?) at least he is knowledgable of the many ideas out there. However crazy , evil and wrong they may be.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | January 9, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am
It’s just like a megalomaniac, or others seeking power and position, to blame her failure on the media…what cost her was her ignorance…blind, dumb, ignorance.
Posted by: Monty51 | January 9, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am
There is a reason the media attacks Sarah Palin, a reason she is so irresistable to these sharks….she is truely an idiot. She is correct, for once, there is a class media bias. I expect the president and the vice president of the United States to have a lot of class and to be high class. I want this person to be elite and not an average joe. I want the best!!
Posted by: K | January 9, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am
The last time I saw the left this energized in their opposition to a political candidate was with Ronald Reagan. Governor Palin will have another chance in 2012 to take her message to the people. If she learns to talk past the media bias that exists in the press she, like Reagan, she will get the opportunity to lead.
Posted by: Kent | January 9, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Why do stupid people never take responsiblity for their own actions? “It is always someone else’s fault”.
Posted by: JT | January 9, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am
It is amazing how many delusional posters are out here who somehow cling to the ideal that Sarah Palin is some sort of savior when she is nothing but a robocall soundbite who takes no responsibility for her clueless comments, but typically blames others. Of course these are same delusional posters who think that PE Obama can only read from a teleprompter, or came from wealthy circumstances because his tutu worked her way up to a VP position in a bank but somehow lived in the same middle class neighborhood apartment until she died. Or that his mother tutored The President Elect so he could qualify for entrance and scholarships at Punahou School. These are the 25% of the population who like lemmings will listen to and follow Rush, BillO, Coulter and Bush off a cliff.
Posted by: Hilodave | January 9, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am
Jenny Rome Ga: “sam – huh when did Obama ever say he read Karl MArx? ”
I’m sure he did read it. Any competent college education include reading Marx right along with Hobbs, Toqueville, The Federalist Papers and Adam Smith. I’m an engineer and still had to slog through a reading list including that at my public university. Blinding ignorance of your opposition is not something to be proud of and has been recognized as a strategic weakness since the days of Sun Tzu. The Republican party used to know this before their Gump-like religious wing took over.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Blame everyone else for your failures. This kind of mentality will never improve a person. So if you expect a new improved Palin in 2012 or 2016 or 2020 you are mistaken. She will be the same person who was rejected by a majority of Americans. Having said that I predict that in 2016 there could be a woman president.
Posted by: gjkotw01 | January 9, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
K – you honestly think she is an “idiot”? Realistically she is not, although she is not the elitist that you hope to have…. question: How have the past elitists helped our country? I guess we should keep on hiring “Elitists” and get more of the same…
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am
Palin was simply not ready for the position and it showed. As far as Tina Fey and Katie Couric, they were doing their jobs and they did it well.
Palin is going to fade from the limelight as it is very clear she is not ready for an international stage, she is far too retro.
She gives professional women a bad name with all her whining. Thats what happens when you are power hungry and over reach. It’s everyone elses fault but hers for the answers “she gave”.
I can’t wiat until she fades into the sunset.
Posted by: lndlouis | January 9, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am
“Kent: The last time I saw the left this energized in their opposition to a political candidate was with Ronald Reagan.”
Ronald Reagan took his chance to talk directly to the people in the first debate and pretty much won overnight. Palin had the same platform and… well, she proved that she is certainly no heir to Reagan.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am
Dan, you’re right. I watched it. She’s still a “B.” Katie didn’t make her look bad, she did it on her own. Here she is whining about attacks on her family, after running as “average hocky mom.” As far as comparing herself to Caroline Kennedy? Excuse me – but we’re talking VP vs. a jr. congressional seat here? This documentary is completely one sided as well.
Posted by: Susan | January 9, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am
There is no one to blame but herself. My advice is – keep working harder as she once preached. Then she can transform herself out of current public image. Gov has her unique charm to large audience. She can deliver much effective speech better than Hillary can. That is one good asset of a leader seeking public office.
Posted by: gpfgp49 | January 9, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am
I see the rabid dogs are out again, the name Palin brings out the crazies on both sides. You just don’t get it. This woman is not going anywhere and the more you hate on her the more she will succeed, take a look at your own lives and try and figure out what you have done to move this country or your own community forward, what have you done in your life that matters? what is your purpose? are you just sucking up oxygen? are you happy just sitting on these blogs bashing others? do you realize that every time your spew hate and nastiness it only comes back to you and your family in triplicate? You people just never learn. You don’t have to agree with the woman, you don’t even have to like her but the nasty, mean disgusting comments are unwarranted and unnecessary this is why we are so hated around the world because we are not open to the thoughts and ideas of others.
Posted by: Kim | January 9, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am
Gov Palin has got valid issue,while she had to “working her butts off” to survive in the VP race,Carolene Kennedy is being treated with ‘kid gloves’ by the media.
Posted by: Arun Mehta | January 9, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am
I am a long-time Republican and we’re in a bad state of affairs if she was our best candidate for one of the top positions in the world.
The Republican message is a good one – the people conveying them are not.
It’s people like Rush and Hannity that poison the minds of our young and leave a lousy impression on the party to the independents, the same way Sharpton and JJ give bad impressions on the Dems.
Posted by: thomas | January 9, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am
I think she was over managed by the McCain campaign. I didn’t support her ticket in this election because of George Bush but I will listen to her if she runs again in 2012. I have many doubt about whether PEBO will really chage Washington but he too deserves a chance. If he fails then we will look for another approach. Maybe that will be Governor Palin or another Republican – Maybe that will be a different Democrat. Either way, I will not attack anyone who is willing to step up and take on this responsibility. I think many of the posters on this board are just plain idiots. They attack the other side simply to attack. They are part of the problem we have today.
Posted by: Mary | January 9, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am
The closest Sarah Palin should come to the White House is a tour. For crying out loud, she didn’t even understand the job duties of the office she was running for!
Posted by: Doug | January 9, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Tina Fey is my idol for coming up with “Caribou Barbie”
Posted by: Lava | January 9, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am
Freein NH: “How have the past elitists helped our country? ”
Well, they wrote the Declaration of Independence, implemented the Constitution, took us to the moon, damned the Colorado river, built the SR-71 that watched the USSR, invented the computer, direct the drilling of the North Slope, invented electricity, discovered how to distill gasoline, operate the unchallenged best University system in the world (Oxford and Cambridge are equaled a dozen times over in the States), created the Internet, eliminated smallpox, -
Obviously I could go one, but such a question only deserves a half minute answer.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am
OMG, OMG, OMG!! I am SO tired of this. Sarah Palin is pathetic. She is all about blaming EVERYONE for EVERYTHING! Take a long look at yourself, honey.
Posted by: Lily Bell | January 9, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am
It is now obvious why the McCain camp shrouded Palin from the media. She has since cemented her legacy as a laughingstock. What she lacks is shame and accountability. As Jackie Kennedy said “People who use the word ‘class’ usually don’t have any.” So true.
Posted by: Cynda P. | January 9, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am
i think all school kids should read mien kamph and karl marx. because it shows why we can not let either of those things in thsi nation for the last 8 years we had a president taht must have been reading only mien kampf because he walked all over everybody but teh rich elite. and obama is far from a communist and the democrat party is also far from communist.
Posted by: T | January 9, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am
To everone calling her “stupid” and an “idiot”: Clearly you have no level of education. Say something with some thought put into it, something more than “she screwed up the Katie interview”….
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am
You go, girl! Sarah, we liberals LOVE you! May you stay on the scene for many, many years! May you be the future of the GOP! May you keep popping up your pretty little face and spouting your wisdom! Nobody, and I mean NOBODY embodies the conservative movement like you, doll-babe!
Posted by: Eric Schuurman | January 9, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Media elitism! Bah humbug on that@ better to blame one of the traditional GOP base villians than to face the truth that she could not handle it. She was one of the reasons that moderats, already disechanted with the evangelicals, moved to the Democrats.
Look at the mess we are in from 8 years of blundering, pandering to the base and special interests have done to the country.
Palin will have her hands full on how to pay Alaskans their oil money when revenues are falling rapidly.
Posted by: scott jeffries | January 9, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am
At least Palin provides some comic relief and plenty of material for late night TV along with SNL. She claims she’s a victim of the media yet keeps putting herself out there, providing more fodder.
Posted by: kat | January 9, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Didn’t the civil war determine the powers of the federal government…..
Palin was a gimmick by a desperate old man trying to win the presidency for the 3rd or 4th time.
Posted by: Bradley | January 9, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am
The more Sarah speaks the deeper she digs the hole for herself. Stop belly aching and focus on Alaska. Let everyone rest from you and your family for a year. We all have Palin fatigue. I’m so glad she is not vice- president.
Posted by: richard warren | January 9, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am
What on earth does she know about class. When you have none you should SHUT UP.
Posted by: Rysgam | January 9, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Freein, Well, the Canadian radio show faking her out comes to mind if you’d really like to go over her many moments of blowing it . . . .
Posted by: Susan | January 9, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Lookie, lookie HERE! Postings coming with rapid fire! The technology might fail due to overload! Its as if people were just WAITING and salivating for a BabyDoll …err Governor Palin story!
…Gloria! Get me Spielberg on the line! This is a HOT property we must secure!!!!!
Posted by: FS | January 9, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am
jhw539 : Excellent answers, now how about the folks that have been Presidents most recently? Bush (both) Clinton, Carter… as it pertains to this blog. If I wanted to talk about the Great Inventors, I wouldn’t be on this site.
Posted by: freein NH | January 9, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am
jhw- my personal favorites will always be the entire Tolkan trilogy I had to read along with Chuacer (in olde English) in highschool. Anything I had to read in college pales beside these bookd. I was the kid who read an English translation of Mein Kumph too. Never finished it though way to crazy, sick and scary. Perfered Stephen King.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | January 9, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am
like so many (and not just women) she doesn’t know when to shut up—and she can’t see that its about her –not the media…
Posted by: tom | January 9, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am
Palin is delusional if she thinks that she was prepared and ready for the job of VP. As a person, she’s certainly charismatic and I was a little scared after her speech at the convention. She definitely had the crowd on her side and seemed to be a capable opponent…until the interviews and her slams on the opposing ticket. Then it was quite clear that she was nowhere near ready. Her answer to John McCain when he asked her to run with him should have been “it’s an honor to be asked but I have to say no because I’m not qualified at this point”. Will she ever be qualified? I don’t think so. The other posters are so right…if she had been a Democrat with that baggage…or if Obama’s daughter was pregnant and unmarried…god help us all. BUT…she’s over and done with. Let’s move forward to a hopeful future with Obama/Biden in the White House.
Posted by: JudyB | January 9, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Sarah Palin? Who is sarah Palin? I don’t understand why she is putting down the very people who made her what she is. Is she really that stupid a person? If you don’t like what they’re saying about you, keep your stupid mouth shut. She have no one to blame but herself.
Posted by: chris ash | January 9, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Susan: Oh ya the radio show…..another strong point! (sarcasm) Please keep inpressing me with your intelligence.
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am
I remember when Palin made the comment that Hillary was a whiner. I thought at that time that this gal had no clue what she had gotten herself into. Now that she has had a very little taste of the spotlight…she goes into WHINING OVERLOAD. Are we supposed to feel sorry for her now? NOT!
Posted by: Dee White | January 9, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am
If u really did read mein Kampf (which I did) you really should remember how to spell it……
Posted by: tom | January 9, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am
I would say her lack of knowledge on the key issues did her in. She didn’t know the Bush Doctrine of Preemptive War. That is what did it for me.
Posted by: Huh | January 9, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Wow. What a total prima donna Sarah Palin is. She thinks she’s too good to answer a simple question like “what newspaper do yo read.” Well, we all have a right to know about the people who want us to hire them for high elected office.
And she’s ignorant to misunderstand the question. You can find out a lot about what papers a person reads — do they read only “conservative” or only “liberal” papers? Do they like to hear both sides? Do they read papers with a particular emphasis, like the Financial Times or the Wall Street Journal?
The fact that she comes out against Katie Couric for asking — SP is just proving how unprofessional she is. What a piece of work. Ugh.
Posted by: John A. | January 9, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Why do you people hate Palin so much? And I do mean hate. I just can’t see it. She’s a public figure, so if you don’t care for her, fine. But these nasty, spiteful comments are way out of line.
What is it about her that you hate with such passion? That she ran for VP? This amount of hate wasn’t directed at Kwame Kilpatrick, Elliot Spitzer, John Edwards, Blago, etc… and those people are the most deserving of critisism. What’s the difference? Oh, right- she’s a woman. She’s attractive. She can’t possibly be taken seriously. You people forget she is a governor and makes exectuive decisions every day.
Posted by: Dan | January 9, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Yes, it is a class issue….Palin has none!
Posted by: Alan Hill | January 9, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am
Time after time the media (including the late night pundits) twisted things Palin said. They were really said by Tina Fay who portrayed Palin as a “dumb brunette” on SNL. That got so much coverage that the “average Joe” who watches TV formed their opinion of her by how they played her. The media and news organizations know that they can tell Americans who they think they should vote for and who the eventual winner ahead of time should be by the way they portray them. People want to be on the winning team. That is just human nature. If you want to win the next election, you need to figure out how to pander to the media. Nobody attacked Obama like they did Palin.
Wake up America and think for yourself and leave the following to the sheep.
Posted by: D | January 9, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Sarah is lickin’ her chops for the 2012 run. She needs to disappear for say a good four years and then appear with some knowledge of what it takes to SERVE one’s country. Not just borrowing clothes, a wink, hillybilly lingo and talking ‘stuff’ she knows very little about. That goes just so far. And did anyone but me see Levi with that look of ‘what am I doing on this stage with Sarah the clown trashing our new president and her supporters takin’ in every word. What a sorry bunch. Sad but true.
Posted by: Chuck | January 9, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am
Dan – well stated…..
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Free – And the Gipson interview, the debate, the interview on radio where she was punked by a guy pretending to be the French President I believe. AT least Caroline knows when to shut up. Also as JUNIOR SENATOR from NY her influnece will be very little if any. Unlike Sarah who would have been God forbid a heartbeat away from the Presidency.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | January 9, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am
In case no one was paying attention- there are SEVERAL Bush doctrines. The interviewer didn’t even know that. He was misinformed, thinking there was one specific one, so when she asked “which one” it was actually Charlie that was the one who got it wrong. No one seems to care about that, though!
Posted by: Marnie | January 9, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Biden, is better than Palin, come on, I saw the debates. 6 Months from now the media will turn on Obama and he’ll be the new Bush. Americans, especially the liberal media, are spoiled rotten kids with no stomach for tough times. We’ll all be voting Independant next time.
Posted by: Sven | January 9, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am
“media classism” or Palin “classlessness”
Posted by: JR | January 9, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am
The phrase “The Bush Doctrine” refers to Bush’s doctrine of pre-emptive war. That is what it means, that is what anyone who is paying attention understands it to mean. Nice of you to try to defend Sarah Palin,
Posted by: Cara | January 9, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Dan, I don’t think people hate Palin, i think they find her distasteful because her whole political persona is based on some ill-founded ntoion that she is has a divinely-inspired, if not -ordained, mission. She can never be wrong, and she never takes responsibility. She operates with a double-standard, and of course her position is always right. It’s hypocracy at its most repugnant.
Posted by: Jay | January 9, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Dan: ” You people forget she is a governor and makes exectuive decisions every day. ”
I asked many, many times (as did the few interviewers who spoke to Governor Palin) for concrete examples of these executive decisions. I never received a response that convinced me she had the competence to lead the country. Could you give two concrete, documented examples of good executive decisions she made (selling a jet on Ebay doesn’t count – I could have done that and I want my VP to be a much better leader than I am!)?
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Jay- I’m not clear on who you describing here, Palin or the Messiah Obama, think you got things a bit mixed up.
Posted by: Sharon | January 9, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am
D – SNL took one whole skit almost word for word from the Couric interview. SHe has no one to blame but herself for her disgrace. That is what she is. Hillary haes her faults but atleast she has the brains to back up that masssive ego of hers.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | January 9, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Jenny Rome GA: Do you know what any of her stances are on the issues? It seems that you obliterate her just from what you read on the media sites. Interviews and punks?? Really, is that how you vote for putting people in office?
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am
Wow she’s actually admiting she was out classed? Does she think that this is to her benefit to admit this? Does she also think that saying Tina Fey, a person who has a VERY successful TV series on right now (30 rock), is where she is today because of this past election?
What I think Sarah needs to do, in order to make herself look classier don’ cha’ know, is get that there Matthew Scully to write more speeches for her. He’s been doing it for Bush for how long? I think we can all agree he’s an idiot and he’s managed to stay in office for 8 years! Once again she can use four syllable words like “scintillating, transformational and electrifying” like she did on the campaign trail. Once agian she will seem like a strong woman, full of education and expertise. Once again she can hold her head high and not flounder for answers she has never know.
Maybe Matthew well help her properly articulate her feelings against the Republican party for subjecting a popular female gov, with little to no worldly political experience/education, to the gambit of the worlds media. Maybe she will realize she was used by her own party way more than these two women.
Lastly, seriously, don’t vicitimize others by playing down their strengths when you are doning the helm of the victimized. It makes you seem kind of, what’s the word, devious, manipulative or ignorant? Our celebrity and media are not known for being gentle. Why whine about them being who we have made them? Unless, of course, you are going to change them.
Posted by: RJ | January 9, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Sarah Palin is right on the money. Katie Couric relished trying to show up Sarah just by the questions in her interview. Asking her what newspapers she reads was never before asked on any other candidate. Who cares which newspapers they read. If they don’t read the far liberal NY Times, is that a disgrace somehow? Katie’s expressions showed off her dislike for Sarah Palin. Clearly they do not have the same value system. Katie Couric has lost all of my respect for her.
Charles Gibson was not mush better.
Posted by: Fran | January 9, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am
Oh Poor poor Palin. She’s not ready for any office higher, including being govenor of Alaska.
Put the blame where it belongs – SARAH PALIN. The media, Katie Couric nor Charles Gibson are not the blame.
Posted by: smt | January 9, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am
PALIN 2012. It has to be awful to be a dumbocrat right now after all the promises Obama made and now is backing out of almost all of them. He does want to make the government bigger though. Well you all have fun the next 4 years because it is going to take centuries to get out of the mess he is going to put us in. Just like the other Democrat Jimmy Carter did to us. Of course the Repulicans will have to bail out the country again but this time it will take longer then it did when Jimmy Carter was in office. Oh and by the way to someone who said that Kennedy was just running for Jr. Senator I think that is pretty much all Obama has been and we the people elected him. I hope and pray that I am wrong and I will support Obama because he is going to be our next Pres. but time will tell.
Posted by: Illinois | January 9, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am
I “hate” Palin because from the very moment she made the speech at the RNC I knew then she was a “#.” There is just something about her that brings back some memory of mean girls in high school. Her speech put down half the country. And then there’s that whole problem with the fact I’m pretty sure I have a higher IQ than she does.
Posted by: Susan | January 9, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am
This woman doesn’t have a shred of humility. She’s all me, me, me.
This isn’t the time to whine about how you were treated by the media. Take some responsibility for the asinine remarks you made — and they were asinine, just put on your big girl panties and admit it. And then got on with the business of governing Alaska, for as long as they’ll tolerate you. It’s not all about you, Sarah Palin.
Posted by: TJ | January 9, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am
Palin is the gift that keeps on giving- GOD PLEASE let her run in 2012….
Posted by: mrnac | January 9, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am
Caroline Kennedy is well educated. Sarah Palin is well trained.
Posted by: Skip | January 9, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am
I HAVE NEVER IN MY LIFE SEEN SUCH RABID DOGS AS I HAVE SEEN ON THESE BLOGS WHEN PALIN’S NAME IS MENTIONED, BUT THAT SAYS A LOT. SHE IS DEFINITELY HERE TO STAY CONTINUE TO SPEW YOUR VENOM IT WILL INCREASE HER PROSPERITY.
Posted by: Tasha | January 9, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am
Dan: ” You people forget she is a governor and makes exectuive decisions every day. ”
I asked many, many times (as did the few interviewers who spoke to Governor Palin) for concrete examples of these executive decisions. I never received a response that convinced me she had the competence to lead the country. Could you give two concrete, documented examples of good executive decisions she made (selling a jet on Ebay doesn’t count – I could have done that and I want my VP to be a much better leader than I am!)?
Posted by: jhw539 | Jan 9, 2009 11:15:35 AM
Hey jhw539– And I ask of you to please provide me with two concrete examples of good executive decisions that Barack Obama has made, and how that qualifies him to lead this nation…..I will wait here for your detailed response if you have one, or are you just all smoke and mirrors??
Posted by: ESEAU | January 9, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am
tom – Sorry I could not remember how to spell Kumph I tried to forget everthing I read in that hateful book. Besides I never finished it. So I cannot spell, itsn’t that what spell check is for?
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | January 9, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Yes, yes…blame the media for your own foibles. Sarah you are one big joke. Do the work and get some smarts, then try again. You betcha.
Posted by: brave brick | January 9, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Dan- I’m not sexist, this has nothing to do with Palin’s gender and everything to do with her lack of experience. I disagree with her on the issues and that is why I don’t like her. As for Caroline Kennedy, I haven’t heard her say a thing about her stance on the issues, she merely says she’s in line with other people’s stance on the issues. That’s not good enough for me but I don’t live in New York.
Posted by: Momof3 | January 9, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am
I wish political candidates would stop blaming everyone else for their shortcomings. If they spent as much energy fixing the crap that is going on, things would run smoother.
I would never vote for someone who cannot take responsibility for their lack of understanding. Just once I would like to hear one of them say, “I don’t know, I will find out, though!!”
Posted by: Dawn | January 9, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am
freein NH: “Excellent answers, now how about the folks that have been Presidents most recently? ”
You asked, “How have the past elitists helped our country?” not “How have the past elitist Presidents helped our country?”
Personally, I think FDR did a pretty good job with WWII. George Bush Sr did too, although his party made him pay for responsibly laying the fiscal foundation for Bill Clinton’s (Oxford) economic boom and historic welfare reform (goaded by elitist Newt Gingrich, who taught at the University of West Virgina, the welfare reform arguably could have only been achieved during the economic expansion Bush Sr primed).
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am
jhw539…..I am still waiting for my answer?????
Posted by: ESEU | January 9, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
Dan I don’t think most people here hate her–but she doesn’t offer alot to like-that’s the point–Jenny–that’s totally cool with me–the book was an eye opener–but in the end- Hitler showed he was just a two-bit writer with little appeal–I think Sarah may have more in common with him than with most of the American public….LOL…..
Posted by: tom | January 9, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am
I’m not worried about ever having SP in national office. She’s inelectable. People can’t stand her. People don’t respect her. Sure, she has her supporters, but there aren’t enough of them to make a difference. She just can’t play in the big leagues.
Posted by: WR in PA | January 9, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am
As a fledgling stand-up comedian I hope she sticks around. It’s also why I vote Republican — guaranteed job security!!!
Nate
Posted by: Nate | January 9, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
Why do the media keep extending her 15 minutes of fame? Shut the Hillbilly up and get on with “important” news.
Posted by: Jeanne021556 | January 9, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
However, Caroline K is educated beyond her intelligence. SP is intelligent beyond her education.
Posted by: jasper | January 9, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am
jhw -”(goaded by elitist Newt Gingrich, who taught at the University of West Virgina,)” I know for a fact he tought at the University of West Goergia. I HAd a class under him. I did not know about the Univ of West VA.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | January 9, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am
FreeinNH I felt the same revulsion as you did when I listened to her speech at the REPUB convention. That was the night I made my first ever donation to a campaign. Sarah was probably Obamas greatest fundraiser. So she read a speech from a teleprompter and now shes a SUPERSTAR!!!! Hope she runs in the next 6 elections. She is comedy GOLD!@!!!
Posted by: Central Scruitinizer Orlando | January 9, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
jhw539: “Bill Clinton’s economic boom?” Clearly you do not know too much about the economy and the markets to simply give Clinton that reward. Have you studied the history of the markets at all? Do you know anything about Market Cycles?
And of course we were talking about presidents, that’s what this whole blog is about.
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
is she ever going to go away?
She lost. Time for her to stop whining about it and finding excuses for it.
Who cares?
Posted by: Mary | January 9, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
Dan: What kind of “exectuive decisions” does Palin make?
Posted by: dano | January 9, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am
Mrs. Palin before the mainstream public ever shows any serious interest in you you have to run for senator in Alaska because being governor of a state with less than a million people doesn’t cut it, especially now.
Posted by: Martin | January 9, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am
I don’t hate Sarah Palin. She just reminds me time and time again why I am not a republican and won’t be for the foreseeable future until they change and not pick folks like Sarah Palin to lead them. She is so clueless.
Posted by: spiritchild..64 | January 9, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Palin needs to get a life and go shoot a moose of something. Her 15 minutes are over and I for one am tired of listing to her voice. If she feels she wants to run for President in 2012 she should go away and bone up on world affairs, get current on the issues, and stop trying to stay in the lime light. This woman is about to wear me out. She represents everyting I dislike about conservatives.
Posted by: spredbury | January 9, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am
Why even report on the drivel? She is so done!!!
Posted by: karen | January 9, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Susan, you said Palin’s speech in RNC was “B”. So many American would not agree with you, because the speech made Sarah Palin as a game changer.
I’ll never forget how Sarah Palins 30 minutes speech before the RNC had impacted me and most Americans no matter if they loved or hated her. I have clicked linked the ABC provided. I was still having butterflies in my stomack while I was listening it again. I’ve been a long time resident of NY. Caroline who has no experience at all, wants to the Hillary senete seat. The Caroline’s lack of experience and delusional lifestyle reminds me of exactly what NY needs now. Sarah Palin has proven herself by cutting taxes, budgetting to increase revinue through the implementation of the gas pipeline. In addition to she created jobs
for residents in Alasak. Palin has also coined the phrase “drill baby drill”– an energy policy that America needs now.
GO SARAH 2012, 2016
Posted by: Janet-NY | January 9, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am
ESEAU: “Hey jhw539– And I ask of you to please provide me with two concrete examples of good executive decisions that Barack Obama has made, and how that qualifies him to lead this nation”
Obama did NOT run on his executive experience. Palin and her supporters, repeatedly, have cited hers. I am STILL waiting for two examples.
Obama ran on his LEADERSHIP and vision experience. For concrete examples of that, I was impressed by his work in writing and getting passed into law, over an initial veto promise and bipartisan opposition, the law requiring mandatory videotaping of interrogations and confessions – now liked by civil rights proponents and prosecutors alike. That was good leadership at a time he was out of the spotlight.
His early and spot-on opposition to the Iraq war was impressive.
His leadership of his campaign against Senator Clinton showed incredible political acumen.
I admire his educational history, working his way up into Harvard on the basis of merit and paying his way through on college loans like so many of my generation.
These are the things Obama ran on – and they are easily judged based on the concrete examples (and others) I gave again.
And once again, NO ONE CAN GIVE EVEN TWO CONCRETE EXAMPLES OF PALIN’S MUCH-BRAGGED-ABOUT “EXECUTIVE DECISIONS.”
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am
Central scrutinizer: I atually enjoyed her speech at the convention.
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am
She should have never been on the big stage and couldn’t handle it when she was. Case closed, move along. The Republican powers that be need to get her back to Alaska and off the national scene as quickly as possible. She has no chance to be anything but a footnote in history. All of this nonsense about her in the 2012 presidential race is beyond laughable.
Posted by: Zinglesloff | January 9, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am
She called herself a pitbull and said Obama “paled around with terrorists.”
She had a grand time taking shots at Biden and telling us only Real Americans show up at Republican rallies…and she’s complaining that people took personal shots at her? She was never on the high road.
Posted by: Amy | January 9, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
The Camelot thing was pretty disgusting if you could see it from here. I think Sarah Palin is correct about tacky media coverage. I viewed plenty of it when she was up for the Vice-Presidency of our country. From bad Alaskan politicians to how much her clothing cost (we give more to clothing $ to rock stars) I felt that the sloppy media cost her the election.
Posted by: Suzannaquanashawn | January 9, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
Jenny Rome Ga: You’re probably correct – my point stands: Newt provided a valuable service to this country and by traditional measures (education, profession, bearing, message, etc) he should be considered “an elite.”
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
I hope Palin never shuts up. She is a perfect representative and example of the Lunatic Far Right Frange. She also is a perfect example of how it is possible to be a Good Christian but a deplorable person. She is the best weapon the Left has against the Right. Palin was very, very helpful in getting Obama elected. Good Job, Sarah!
Posted by: Sammy | January 9, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am
I’m still waiting for Palin to say something really informative, something insightful that will help some of the pressing problems we are facing today. Like for example, what to do about the Hamas-Israeli conflict? Or maybe how can we still encourage alternative energy production when price of crude oil has already dropped drastically? I don’t want to hear any more about Palin’s personal problems, which seems to be the only thing that she cares about. When Reagan lost his bid to be nominated in 1976, he didn’t dwell on personal grievances. He got on a radio show and talked about real solutions that matter to the rest of us. I’ve never heard of any real solution coming from Palin.
Posted by: Michael M | January 9, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am
ESEAU: So are you going to give me some concrete examples of Palin’s executive decisions that you and her are always talking about?
What’s that favorite saying, “All hat and no cattle” or something?
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am
“I asked many, many times (as did the few interviewers who spoke to Governor Palin) for concrete examples of these executive decisions. I never received a response that convinced me she had the competence to lead the country. Could you give two concrete, documented examples of good executive decisions she made (selling a jet on Ebay doesn’t count – I could have done that and I want my VP to be a much better leader than I am!)?” — posted by: jhw539
Why would you ask for the information (or wait for the media to feed it to you)when you can easily get it yourself?
Go to the state of Alaska’s Website, or the town of Wasilla’s website. Most official documents that demonstrate her decision-making history are online. You only have to look. The newspaper in Anchorage also follows its state politics and is also a great source of information.
It’s this mentality, that you demonstrate in your question – wanting someone else to give you information rather then you finding the answers yourself – that gives the media so much power in this country. The fact is, governmental meetings are open to the public, yet most don’t attend (even their own town council meetings!). Most official documents are open and many are on the web – yet most people wait for the media (or even worse – other bloggers) to give them the info that can answer their questions.
It’s good to ask questions, but it’s also good to discover the answers on your own so that your opinion is truly your own. |
Posted by: Anonymous | January 9, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am
Janet – Evidently a record number did agree with me. That is the night I logged over to Obama and donated a wad against her. It was his biggest night on record. I will never understand how Palin speaking would make anybody chill, beyond anger maybe. Her speech impacted me alright. In a negative way. Her “smug” took things entirely too far. As far as Caroline goes? Get real. Those two jobs don’t compare. I can’t imagine what she’s going for trying to put herself and Caroline on the same level here to begin with. Frankly I could care less if she’s in congress. I just don’t want her as VP.
Posted by: Susan | January 9, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am
I have yet to meet anyone with a college degree -democrat or republican – who supports Palin. How can anyone favor a candidate for high office who demonstrates such mind numbing ignorance? My teenagers have more knowledge of the world than Palin.(also more international travel experience). This woman did not realize that Africa was a continent – she thought it was a country! Surely we must demand leaders with superior intellect.
Posted by: dano | January 9, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am
Question to Palin defenders and those who have turned “elite” into a bad word: Is there anyone out there who would hire a less-qualified person over a more-qualified person to run a company they had just bought? Of course not–that’s lunacy. And yet people are comfortable putting the fate of our country in the hands of a woman who is CLEARLY not up to the job?
Posted by: Patriotic American | January 9, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am
MY VOTE COUNTED
Ladies and Gentlemen,
I just talked with this fine gentleman who voted in the American Presidential Election.
The gentleman had a button attached to his shirt’s pocket which read: “My vote counted.”
I read the writings on the button and, I asked the gentleman: “Did you vote for the winner?”
He looked at me sadly and said: “Not necessarily.”
This gentleman was a smart hard working public servant and, I was thinking this smart man voted for the loser in the American Presidential Election.
What a shamein America!
Posted by: John Smith | January 9, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am
OMG- are you kidding me?? “Classism”? Caroline Kennedy is not running for Vice President of the United States. Its not even close to the same comparison. How about, unqualified to run for VP? How about, how are you a “Hockey Mom” with 3 daughters, that do not play hockey? How about taking advantage of the media? And seriously, she goes from LL Bean to crocs, to Valentino and Manolos? And she expects us to beleive that she was a victim of Classism? What a hypocrite!!
Posted by: Kristy | January 9, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am
Of course snobby liberal media reporters gave her the shaft. This woman is everything that the liberal journalist at my college were not. She’s attractive, successful, personable, conservative, and Christian.
The very sight of her makes them cringe. They reacted to her just as they did with Ronald Reagan, the “hick” from the small, midwestern college.
Posted by: dave | January 9, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Is Mrs. Palin auditioning for a reality show? Well she got it, just please put it on E! channel because I don’t watch that channel, otherwise she would continue to shout out in the airway for anyone who wants to listen to her or not.
Posted by: T VA | January 9, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am
I have no doubt John McCain curses out loud when Palins name is mentioned. You betcha!
Posted by: AJ | January 9, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Michael M, I can relate to what you’re saying. I’m still waiting for Barack Obama to say something informative on exactly those same subjects.
Posted by: Dave | January 9, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am
I Love Love Love Sarah Palin!!!
Palin 2012!!!
Posted by: Linda | January 9, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am
Palins faults, to mainstreeam America, was that she was not a lawyer and she and Mccain never really got on the same page (her play book was better). For some reason we have grown to think that to be a good leader you must be this highly educated, slick talking, know- it -all but we forget that being educated isn’t that great if one lacks common sense. With all the waste and blunders our Governments make and continue to make, this “crisis” that only Government can solve has thouroughly convinced me that we have elected some of the biggest dimwits that have ever walked the earth.
My thoughts to anyone here are that we as Americans are hard working, honest good managers of our resources, live our lives with dignity and respect for each other and should trust each other to solve problems and more importantly be absolutely on guard from problems, real or imagined, created by Governemt that only they can “solve”.
Posted by: david | January 9, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am
jhw539…I understand your points and I like you have some sort of admiration for the man for “his” accomplishments, but it seems a double standard to smear this lady for lack of inexperience when our soon to be Commander-in-Chief has just a little as she does. The people on here blasting Sarah Palin are very short sighted on the real issues and fall back on insults to make them feel better. Sarah has done alot for Alaska and it just burns me that people can sit back in the comfort of their own homes out of the media specticle and pass judgement on someone who has to make decisions that affects thousands of lives daily. It must be nice and I’m sure that if anyone of us here had that kinda job, we would be hated by some group. Take it easy on Sarah she is young in the political “game” she was picked to run as VP that must say something, people who voted for her, voted for her character and her down to earth sentiment; atleast we would know she would stand up to corruption and trust me Im all in favor for that. Good resonse jhw539…..
Posted by: ESEAU | January 9, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am
Please – no more unqualified woman running for office.
We didn’t want Palin – and we don’t want Caroline Kennedy.
What Palin is not saying is how Caroline is trying to exact revenge on Andrew Cuomo for his taking his wife’s shameless extramarital affair. Cuomo’s wife is Caroline’s cousin Kerry Kennedy Cuomo. Now Caroline has dropped her “Schlossberg” and decided to be a senator. Forget it!
Posted by: SMegmer | January 9, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am
“I’m still waiting for Palin to say something really informative, something insightful that will help some of the pressing problems we are facing today.”
That will happen this month. On the 32nd.
Posted by: kat | January 9, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am
I can’t believe this big crybaby compiled a whine list then issued it as a press release. It’s posted right on the governor’s office section of the official State of Alaska web site. Does she really think this is a good career move?
Posted by: WWW | January 9, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am
I honestly never want to hear about sexism again in this country. Women are always viscous to eachother, but the treatment of Palin took it to an entirely new level.
The feminazis of the this country, who claim to fight for women’s rights, need to clarify from now on that they are strictly fighting for LIBERAL women.
Conservative women not only don’t count as worthy of feminazis’ support, they are considered threats and must be taken down by any means necessary.
Posted by: dave | January 9, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am
Yea its everybodie elses fault but my own for sounding stupid in interviews.
Palin—Oh and someone tell me what a Hamas is? Not sure what to look for from my back yard.
Posted by: CW | January 9, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am
Anybody who feels threatened by being asked what MAGAZINES and NEWSPAPERS she reads, should not hold any political office at all. The Republicans really didn’t do their homework when they picked her. What a bonehead.
Posted by: Charles | January 9, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am
ESEAU – I’m sorry but did you compare the two of them speaking? There is a huge difference. Not to mention his education vs. hers? Or are you one of those republicans wanting to demonize education now? The only reason she’s got such a high approval rating was money flowing freely, and when you have no tough decisions to make you should run about a 99% approval rating. She is not remotely in the same league.
Posted by: Susan | January 9, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Patriotic American: I would not hire Palin or Obama to run my company. Fortunately, in the Presidency (as in any situation), you are only as good as the people that surround you. I believe Obama has made some great choices.
I just find it completely ignorant to say hateful things about a woman that came out, tried and gave it her all. I am a Republican,but more so a patriotic American and want nothing better than Obama to lead us to better times. God Bless him and God Bless America.
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Kennedy has more class then Palin! Also Palin called the media piranhas!
If Kennedy wins this non campaign campaign she has the respect of the Senators in DC and this will work in Schumer and Patterson favor when bills that NY needs are presented in DC. Palin has no respect!!!
Posted by: Vinnie | January 9, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am
Yes yes, you lost because of everyone else. It had *nothing* to do with you at all, Sarah.
What’s amusing to me here, is that if McCain/Palin had won the election, they would have thanked God and Jesus, etc., all over national television.
When they lost, they didn’t bother to consider that maybe their God didn’t want them to win.
I thought Xtians were all supposed to like, follow the will of their God, at all times, etc? Or is that only for when ‘God’ does something in their favor?
So maybe… Sarah should blame her God next for her failings?
She would probably get about the same results as blaming everyone else she thinks was responsible, and it’d make for more entertaining news content, imho.
-c
Posted by: chuck | January 9, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
“It says a lot about our society”, Palin says.
It says much more about your inability to accept fault for your own missteps.
Posted by: JR | January 9, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am
How sad that so many in this country label the highly educated as “elite.” Would you truly prefer the ignorant to take the helm? (Actually, we have just lived through 8 years of just that)
Posted by: dano | January 9, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am
“Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin says CBS News anchor Katie Couric and comic actress Tina Fey have been “exploiting” her.” she certainly gave them the ammunition although she brought this on herself. Is she ever going to just fade away or isn’t there a photo op or interview she won’t use to stay in the spotlight? She should work on improving her abysmal record on the Environment, Native Rights and Tribal Sovereignty, and Domestic Violence since she has served as governor of Alaska.
Posted by: andie | January 9, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Question to Palin defenders and those who have turned “elite” into a bad word: Is there anyone out there who would hire a less-qualified person over a more-qualified person to run a company they had just bought? Of course not–that’s lunacy. And yet people are comfortable putting the fate of our country in the hands of a woman who is CLEARLY not up to the job?
———-
Reality check–This country just elected a person who four years ago was a State Senator with NO prior executive experience to run the whole country. NONE of the other three candidates for the top two jobs (McCain, Biden, Obama) had any executive experience prior to the election at any level. There can be no honest talk about qualifications for a top level executive job without executive experience being a factor. And only Governor Palin had that expeirence prior to the election.
Posted by: MNResident | January 9, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am
God, please let the Republiecans nominate Palin in 2012. Talk about a slam dunk for Obama, running against that whack-job.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | January 9, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
By any measure of character and intelligence, Sarah Palin is a miserable failure. She is the perfect embodiment of the “Peter Principle,” a woman who has risen to her level of incompetence. She will no doubt go on plaguing us with her interminable thirteen year old vocabulary and reasoning powers, but don’t look for her in 2012. The Republican Party is working feverishly to repair the damage she has done. Their better angels don’t want her back, except, perhaps to rouse the sleepy-headed riff-raff of the Republican electorate to vote for yet another pathetic example of bigotry and incompetence. May the Democrats rule forever!
Posted by: bardon88 | January 9, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am
LOL Sarah did’t get voted in ,because she is an idiot! America needs hope at this time,not some hockey mom that slanders others.Blame ourself for your loss!
Posted by: Paul | January 9, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
1st it was Bush derangement syndrome, now they have replaced it with Palin, what is it about this woman that threatens so many women and those who would be women? Oh right, she’s isn’t for the victimhood, government gravy train that steals from the many to subsidize the few. Right give me the free love, drug taking, std infected, children out of wedlock, welfare, big brother spying police state, hyper interventionst foreign policy spoiled brats any day of the week for the highest office of the land. Let these fools use the force of government at the barrell of a gun, to make us subsidize their lifestyle and the substitute values and immerse everybody else in their culture of no responsibility, theft by force, and ultimate mob rule. Somewhere people forgot that America was designed to PROTECT minority (read unpopular) views. Now that is no longer the case. Your are to either get in line or “shut up and go away!” wether you are a Republican OR a Democrat you are to follow the Bill O’Reilly method of critical thinking. This country will fall and end under the weight of it’s own hubris. And when Bush, Pelosi, and the rest of the usual suspects who brought you to this mess are safely ferried away to live lavishly in foreign lands, tell me… Who are YOU going to blame then??? I’m waiting… Nevermind! I’m sure there still will be an industry still kicking that will outsource your views and do your critical thinking FOR YOU, like always! God forbid any of you babies be seperated from your bottle! The only people responsible for this mess are yourselves for allowing others to ignore your best interests for their own gain, and fleece you in the process, while you blindly cheer them on because they have a D or R next to their name, or are dense enough to read prompt, or a press release in front of a camera. Pastor Wright was right! Damn, the truth hurts, doesn’t it?
Posted by: please! | January 9, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
SMegmer: OH PLEASE with the Sarah Palin is qualified crap and Obama is inexperienced. Sarah Palin wanted a free ride just as she’s accustomed to and when she found out she actually had to have a brain and a decent education to even consider running for VP she got exactly what everyone else did, interviewed! People want to know where her head is and if she can acutally put a decent sentense together! Katie Couric was only doing her job and went easy on the woman. Sarah knows little to nothing about what is going on in the world and we are supposed to turn our back again? You guys did that with Bush and look at the shambles he has left the country in. Sarah found out that outside of Alaska the world does not revolve around her so she needs to stop whining! It’s over, they lost and it’s time to move forward but small minds can never move forward. She’s an idiot and the whole world saw how much of an idiot she is and she can’t handle it! Too bad! Move on!
Posted by: TYG | January 9, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am
dave, Why is it I suspect if this woman were less attractive you and many others would not be taking up for her so much? We women get that what they offer matters and it’s not just about sharing a sex here. She took herself down. I guess you guys will finally understand this in 2012 if you try to make her run.
Posted by: Susan | January 9, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am
ESEAU: She’s done a lot for the people of Alaska? You mean like the millions of dollars in debt she left the people of Wasilla? Now she claims “classism.” Oh really? Is that what got Barack Obama elected?
Posted by: Kitty Wilberforce | January 9, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Media classism? Give me a break. So if you want her to explain her point of view on something, you’re an elitist? I’m tired of everyone oversimplifying things and the ultra right “taking up” for her when she gave absolutely no evidence of the intellectual capacity to be seated in the second highest office in the land. I don’t think it’s elitist to want the best and brightest in that position. I don’t want an average joe, a hockey mom, a man on the street, an everyman or a soccer mom in line for the highest office in the land and I’m offended by the idea that by saying that I’m being accused of “malpractice” or ignorance by some narrow-minded film maker.
Posted by: CaffeineHat | January 9, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Martin so being a Gov. does cut it but being a Jr. Senator does? Where is your logic. Please expand on this.
Posted by: Illinois | January 9, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am
Sarah created her image as the minimal educated pitbull soccer mom who slings beer with Joe six pack. The media only reports what she puts out. Her accomplishments are great considering, but she does lack in many attributes that one expects of those in her position and the positions that she seeks. Look at the internet bio’s of Sarah and Caroline Kennedy. Not even close on who is qualified from an educational standpoint. Its not social class but personal class. Sahrah has very little while Caroline has abundance. The People of Alsaka and US deserve better.
Posted by: Don | January 9, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am
OH MY GOODNESS!!!! I just read the Press Release on BabyDoll’s … err Governor Palin’s, Alaska Governor’s site. Who in the world is her Communications Director??? Just fascinating! Just… utterly fascinating….
Posted by: FS | January 9, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am
v/s the Trillion or so we owe as a county?? a few million is a drop in the bucket…
Posted by: ESEAU | January 9, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Does it not seem that because Ms Palin could run for VP it only seems natural that all women no matter how long they have stayed at home and been mothers could likely run and possibly be elected to any office? Why does Ms Palin make light of another women wanting to get out there and give service to her country? Just wondering!
Posted by: Bonnie Kimberly | January 9, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Is Sarah Palin REALLY that stupid? Caroline Kennedy has lived under a media microscope her WHOLE FRIGGIN’ LIFE. Additionally, she’s running for a Senate seat, not the Vice Presidency. Nobody had ever HEARD of Sarah Palin before John McCain selected her as his running mate. So in the short time between that announcement and the election, of course she’s going to be under a microscope. At least Caroline Kennedy will be able to conduct interviews and debates without “boot camp” preparation and constant supervision. Sarah Palin is a fake, and Thank GOD McCain didn’t win. Now, she’s seeing to it that her time in the Political Stage will be brief, as well, because she’s behaving like a spoiled little girl. “Everybody picked on me.” Well, if you can’t answer a simple question or two from a reporter without “coaching”, then you don’t deserve the job. Simple as that.
Posted by: Scott | January 9, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Scott – 1)politically educated people had heard of Sarah Palin before McCain picked her. 2) Yes Caroline has been in the media for her entire life, but never treated the same way that Palin was, the name might have something to do with that.
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm
Sarah Kennedy desevres nothing….just family tie
Posted by: Tom Powers | January 9, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
PALIN…PLEASE RUN…WE WANT OBAMA RE-ELECTED!! THANKS GIRL (WINK)
Posted by: Shelley | January 9, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Given that journalists are, for the most part, well-educated (far more now than they were in the past), and necessarily well-informed, it was a given that someone like Palin wasn’t going to impress them. She’s right that a certain “classism” prevailed in their treatment of her, but she needs to ask herself seriously what qualities and qualifications she lacks that caused the media to view her with such classist disdain.
The reality is that our public servants can afford to be “ordinary Joes” only up to a certain level. Beyond it, we need and expect more from them in terms of education, knowledge, and intellectual sophistication. Even the successful politicians who affect a certain populist persona tend to be far sharper and better-informed than the average man or woman, and when push comes to shove, they let us know that. Palin didn’t — and couldn’t — and she still seems to be clueless about the matter. She might manage a run for the Senate at some point in the future, but she’ll need to grow up politically and intellectually first. And that means not blaming the media for her own shortcomings.
Posted by: Eleonora27 | January 9, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
I think the majority of people on this blog are naive. Regardless of whether or not you personally like Gov. Palin does not change the fact that “YES” the media was VERY unfair to her. They didn’t even touch on President Elect Obama’s background in fear that they would be facing the NAACP and other African American arguments of discrimination against him. The media didn’t like that Governor Palin because she pretty much snubbed them at the RNC and didn’t seek their approval. Look at the comments on the blog, people calling her uneducated, a hillbilly etc… I would love to know what makes everyone on this blog so exceptional smart to criticize her? I bet most of you are middle class and graduated from Non-IVL colleges. Do you consider yourselves uneducated or a hillbilly? I hope she runs again. I am a middle class female, prior Military, currently work for the Federal Government, have a Master’s degree from a Non- IVL University and believe that maybe, just maybe “WE” need someone in office who is just a little more like the majority vs. the select few (Rich). If the “select few” are so SMART then why is this country in such a mess right now?
Posted by: dfesta | January 9, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
Palin is so self-deceived that it’s sickening to me. Does she honestly think that the media is to blame for her intellectual shortcomings? It sounds like she’s only doing this pity party because, if she just closes up shop and goes back to Alaska, no one will give two you-know-whats about her in four years.
Posted by: Jason | January 9, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Her own party was slamming her but I don’t here her whining about that. If she runs in 2012 her own party will have a good time slamming her again. Wait till the Rove slander machines take their toll on her. When McCain ran against Bush they had robo-calls that said McCain had fathered a black child, referring to the child John and Cindy adopted. Why is it that repubs can’t run on their own merit and have to slander everyone including people in their own party even if it’s not true?
Posted by: rickyt1234 | January 9, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
There’s a word for Palin, it’s called narcissist. She’s stuck on herself and aquiring power and to hell with the rest. Hardly the humble hard working regular joe six-pack she likes to think that she is. Stuck up snob is more fitting a term.
Posted by: Scotti | January 9, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
If Palin were fat, short, ugly, and had acne, people wouldn’t treat her badly. She has plenty of company, Dan Quayle, Al Gore, Mitt Romney. They are all just to good looking to be liked. They are hated because of their looks. Caroline might be sweet, but she is ugly.
Posted by: Poncha | January 9, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Dfesta: Excellent! Nice to see someone with some decency and some common sense! Also, thank you for serving in our military.
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
Class? Uh … Caroline Kennedy has it, Sarah Palin doesn’t. Brains? Caroline Kennedy has ‘em, Sarah Palin doesn’t. Don’t know about y’all, but I want someone with more class and brains than me to lead.
As for the book reading question – anyone that reads on a regular basis can spit out names of authors.
So … what DO they do up there??? Other than making babies that is.
Posted by: crazycatlady | January 9, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
WOW…SHE’S STILL DUMB!!! GO BACK TO YOUR IGLOO!!!! PLEASE…PRETTY PLEASE!!! YOUR’RE VOICE IS ANNOYING!!
Posted by: James | January 9, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
She’s dumb as a box of rocks. That’s why she lost. The media just latched on to her because of the level of her ignorance and the amazing poor choice of Sen. McCain to make her his VP. I mean, all you had to do was listen to her talk for a few minutes to understand that she’s not the sharpest knife in the drawer. The Republican puppet masters knew this too. That’s why she wasn’t allowed to talk to the press.
Posted by: steve9337 | January 9, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm
dfesta, Upper middle class and you would think you’d see the difference between Obama with Columbia and Harvard Law, and her with her 5 year, 4 colleges communications major? What I find totally astonishing is her run on sentences after such a degree. Let us not forget Bush was a little bit more like the majority. I want high IQ.
Posted by: Susan | January 9, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
Oh please! Sarah Palin would do justice to herself just by keeping her mouth shut. A perfect example of why is her statement about “Caroline Kennedy being under the microscope by the media” – is she kidding? Caroline Kennedy has been under the “microscope” since she was born. Once again, Sarah Palin doesn’t know what she is talking and I thank the heavens she and McCain DID NOT get elected.
Posted by: sueinnlr | January 9, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm
dfesta: Is IVL a league of hospital patients sporting intravenous drips?
Posted by: rimshot | January 9, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Obama a junior senator, and Palin, the Governor of Alaska. Why is he qualified, and not she? Caroline Kennedy, no experience, never worked, and some years didn’t even bother to vote, and in every sentence, she says “You know”. This is about Palins pretty face, great shape, healthy skin, and five children, and being a govenor.
Posted by: Poncha | January 9, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
SO POOR CBS and KATIE COURIC !!
Where is your creative methods to raise rating of CBS’s programs ???
That’s too bad and shame on CBS & KATIE COURIC, BOTH have depended on only the interview with Sarah Palin. Why don’t you interview with Caroline K. Schlossberg who used the phrase “YOU KNOW” 142 times in that interview with the NY Times means she is NOT READY to be the Senate seat, at all.
Posted by: DNC must be changed. | January 9, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm
Yes, there is a class issue. Those like Palin with no class get treated with less respect by the media because everything they do or say is comical or head-scratch worthy. I saw her interview, and clearly she didn’t know any news magazine names to state. The campaign was like watching “Ernest goes to Washington with Lipstick” I greatly want to see a woman in the White House, but Palin doesn’t have the knowledge, sophistication, or ability to compromise that is needed. For her, it’s all about power and limelight, not making things better for others. She needs to get out of politics before doing irreparable harm to her Party. She’s done nothing but complain about other people since we laid eyes on her. Enough already. The People have spoken. Palin should disappear for a good long time. May I suggest College?
Posted by: Lyn | January 9, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Please…not 4 years of Palin-Spin. Are we going to forget the blank looks and utter ignorance somehow??? I suppose being bombarded by Palin-Spin is the price we’re going to have to pay to ensure the GOP remains fractured. Fortunately, only core conservative Christians and 3-year-old children kept in a box since birth would consider it noteworthy or believable. The rest of us just watch, expecting another Tina Fey moment.
Posted by: Chris in VA | January 9, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Dan: What do I think about Caroline Kennedy and her bid for the NY Senate Seat? Gee, the LAST thing we need in the United States Senate is someone well versed in constitutional law who has co-authored two books on civil liberties. Can’t have that!
Posted by: Kitty Wilberforce | January 9, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
dfesta: Please cite specific examples to support your allegation that the media was”VERY unfair” to Gov. Palin
Posted by: dano | January 9, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
MNResident: ESEAU gave up on offering SPECIFIC and CONCRETE examples of Governor Palin’s executive experience. As you have now cited it, perhaps you could provide a few specific examples? Media bias can be tamped down pretty quickly by reality (just like Reagan destroyed his media caricature with his excellent debate performance). If Palin wants to have a chance running on executive experience she needs a list of specific accomplishments, not just a bumpersticker (and even then… Guiliani had a decent executive list of accomplishments but…).
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Just what we need another politician blaming everone else for their down falls. “Im a woman,” “its the media’s fault,” “Im white or Im black.” These type of politicians are never responsible for their own actions and always try to blame the other guy as to thie mess ups. She is, was an idiot that answered questions like a 2nd grader and she cant blame anyone but herself. They lost the election because people are tired of the Rep idea that you can will by installing fear and just tearing down the other guy.
Posted by: CW | January 9, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
I am a Progressive Secular Liberal and I will be donating to any campaign that Sarah Palin is a part of!! She’s just what the doctor ordered for the Democratic Party! In her own way, she actually will have helped this country get back on it’s feet by helping to get Obama elected. Thank you, thank you Sarah, thank you.
Posted by: Atheist 1 | January 9, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
What a total complainer. I guess she wanted “Tee Ball” questions instead of all those softball questions Couric and others were asked. I’m surprised she isn’t accusing that 5th grader of “gotcha politics” when he asked her what the vice president’s job is and she gave a wrong answer!!!
Posted by: Brent | January 9, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Latest Poll Kennedy 51 percent vs King at 33 percent
Kennedy vs. King Polling in New York By JAZZ SHAW, Assistant Editor (The Moderate Voice)
If Caroline Kennedy is appointed to the U.S. Senate, she is favored to win re-election against her likeliest Republican opponent in 2010.
The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of New York voters finds Kennedy would attract 51% of the vote in a match-up with Republican Peter King, a longtime congressman form Long Island. King, who has made his interest in such a race clear, earns 33% of the vote at this time. Nine percent (9%) say they would vote for a third-party candidate, and seven percent (7%) are not sure.
Posted by: Cooday | January 9, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Let’think, I am sure that with a name like “Barrack Huessien Obama” Harvard probably begged him to come there. They are just so open-minded and politicaly correct.
Palin rose to power fighting corruptio. Barry rose to power by lying in bed with it.
Posted by: Notaliberallemming | January 9, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
I think if Palin had come across as an intelligent and well informed politician, the media wouldn’t have been so hard on her. If I remember correctly, no one made her stick her foot in her mouth in the Charlie Gibson interview. There’s a reason why Saturday Night Live had so much to play on her… in my opinion, Sarah Palin is 100% to blame for what the media did to her… they had an open shot and they took it. Maybe if she ever runs again, she’ll do her homework to be better prepared, and she’ll also know when to keep her mouth shut.
Posted by: CCM | January 9, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
I personally hope that Sara Palin runs for President in 2012. She won’t make it past the first three primaries–the other Republicans will eat her alive. She’ll be outmanned, outfinanced, and outperformed. And who will she have to blame then?
Posted by: dakota65 | January 9, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Poncha: “Obama a junior senator, and Palin, the Governor of Alaska. Why is he qualified, and not she?”
Please see my post of Jan 9, 2009 11:35:39 AM for a few concrete, verifiable examples of why I believe Obama is qualified. I have never seen a similar list provided for Governor Palin – perhaps you could cite a few of the qualifications that influence you to support her for President?
I have actually looked and have failed to find any impressive accomplishments in her record of running essentially a trust-fund state awash in oil tax money and federal earmarks.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm
Atheist 1 : Amen! (heh, heh)
Posted by: dano | January 9, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Rimshot ha ha. Ivy league for you.
Posted by: dfesta | January 9, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Man, she’s even more out of touch than we thought. Palin must not have received the memo about major changes to the Republican Party playbook. The “Blame Liberal Media” and “Create Divisiveness” sections were eliminated after they completely failed on November 4.
Posted by: CaliRules | January 9, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Freein NH : I am so ashamed…just so very ashamed. I will pray for forgiveness. Feel better now?
Posted by: dano | January 9, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm
why on earth, if she is so fed up with how the press treat her (and I agree to acertain extent, they pile on her) – does she continually tee herself up for ridicule…and whay does she not acknowledge at least some of the criticism is fair. She IS hypocritical (her teenage mother, daughterand abstinence only ed.) She IS relatively uninformed (cant name any Supreme Court decisions – she is in Govt for chrissakes) – living next to Russia without never being there is NOT foreign policy experience, and lastly, if you are going to play rough (calling Pres Elect a terrorist sympathizer) you have to expect blowback.
Posted by: indithinker | January 9, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
Poncha – you forgot “and being an idiot”
She lost because she is an idiot. McCain lost because he was an idiot for picking her.
IDIOT.
Posted by: MM | January 9, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
Why did the press criticize Palin and not McCain for failing to vet his choice. No, there is something else going on here. Caroline missed voting for several years,has never had a job, hates politics, and values her privacy. She wrote a book titled “Right to Privacy.”
Posted by: Poncha | January 9, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm
How can all of you liberal lemmings just drink up whatever the media serves you?
They set out to make Palin look dumb, and guess what, they were able to make her look dumb. When you interview someone for 6-8 hours or so, the person being interviewed is bound to say something less than intelligent (like when barry said there were 57 states. Or when Biden said Roosevelt was president when the stock market crashed and Roosevelt came on a magical tv set that was not yet invented to talk to the American people. Or when Barry said my “muslim faith”. Or when Biden said he goes to katie’s restaurant all of the time (it closed 21 years ago).
Posted by: Notaliberallemming | January 9, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Dano: You call yourself american?
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
For the record, Caroline Kennedy has an overabundance of class, unlike Palin, and does not seek the spotlight, but seeks to improve our world for others. Major difference, and the difference in media treatment will reflect that respect she has earned. Palin needs to stop complaining about everyone. And to even suggest a comparison to Caroline is ridiculous. Of course they won’t be treated the same. Palin was incoherent and had a bad attitude, which makes her fodder. She’s loud and obnoxious compared to quiet and steady Caroline who will do great things in the Senate without grandstanding or seeking to be worshipped. Please never let Palin anywhere that she could affect policy for America. Alaska is close enough. She truly gives Republicans a bad name and harms her Party every time she opens her caustic mouth. Does she STILL not realize the negativity is what LOST her her biggest break of all?
Posted by: Lyn | January 9, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
Dano, one quick example would be the Trooper gate scandal. She was acquitted of any wrongdoings however the media and the public would not let it go.
Posted by: dfesta | January 9, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
Geez, can Gov. Caribou Barbie be impeached for whining all the time and ignoring States’ business? This is ridiculous. She’s sunken to a new all time low. She’s not happy unless she has her mug in front of a camera. What a media junky. The Nation is moving on to try to tackle some serious problems as she’s acting like the class clown. How embarassing for Alaska.
Posted by: Joe Dante | January 9, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm
I’m not really bashing Palin but she has this view that others are to blame for how she is perceived. SHE DIDN’T KNOW WHAT THE VICE PRESIDENT’S JOB ENTAILED!! On three separate occasions she gave her answers to the VP’s duties and much of it had nothing permitted by the Constitution. Part of me wanted to see McCain elected so I could see her twiddle her thumbs being “president” of the senate in an empty room while the senators are in caucus.
Posted by: Brent | January 9, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Dano: Honestly though, you really don’t believe that the media is geared towards liberal agenda?
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm
Well, so much for someone who called Hillary a whiner. How does it feel Mrs. Palin?
Posted by: Blue | January 9, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
Clearly Palin never played sports, or didn’t learn the lesson she should have: when you LOSE, NOBODY wants to hear you whining about the refs, ESPECIALLY when it WASN’T the refs fault that you were such an incompetent competitor. Ugh, not only is she grossly incompetent, she can’t see how incompetent she is. Exactly the problem we’ve had to endure with Bush. Pretty soon Sarah’s going to start using the line that “well, history will judge my Katie Couric interview much more favorably than people presently do…”
Posted by: She is a National Laughingstock | January 9, 2009, 12:29 pm 12:29 pm
I am sick of Mrs. Palin trying to stay in the media. I admit the media drags things out the extreme BUT, you knew what it was like? The same media to which you used during the campain you are know blasting. What did you think would happen when you went forward with your quest to be vice-president. I am sure you were not expecting it to the extreme but you must have had some sence of what it would be like. The media will look into you, your family, your job etc. You can blame Katic Couric all you want but YOU AND YOU alone showed how little you knew. Even if you felt it was a non-issue question you should have answered the question but you chose to give the most idiotic answer….. How ironic that before this you were so into the media as you put it wanting to get out there to do interviews. Well I got a full scope of who and what you are and I won’t be voting for you in 2012 or anytime soon. You can say the media cost you the election we all know it was yourself.
Posted by: SICKOF PALIN | January 9, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
If McCain would’ve picked Olympia Snowe for VP, he may have had my vote. Now that is a strong and accomplished woman! But Palin didn’t even know what the VP was supposed to do!!!! With her wacky idea of “expanded powers of the vice president!”
Posted by: Brent | January 9, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
Freein NH: Setting aside the fact that your question is insipid – and without any merit in this discussion – I do not “call ” myself an American. I am an American. As a reminder, we live in a country that allows diversity of opinion. If you desire further illumination, let me know.
Posted by: dano | January 9, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
The only reason Couric was able to make Palin look like an idiot is because Palin IS an idiot. A class issue? Has she forgotten that her former running mate is married to a woman worth hundreds of millions? I sincerely hope she continues to talk about this nonsense because it proves that she is incapable of insight, education and change. Keep talking Sarah!
Posted by: allie08 | January 9, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
The media didn’t have to even try to make Palin look bad. She does it all by herself. How did that last one get arranged? “Here Sarah, you stand over here and answer the questions while you stand back there and strangle some turkeys”.
Posted by: Skip | January 9, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Freein NH: “Dano: Honestly though, you really don’t believe that the media is geared towards liberal agenda?”
The media is geared to give the market what it wants. And if you define Obama as liberal, the last election proved that a historic majority of the population want “liberalism.” So yes, the few big corporation and billionaires who own the media appear to be liberal from your position. Candidates can get through this; Reagan is the oft cited example.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
“Clearly Palin never played sports, or didn’t learn the lesson she should have: when you LOSE, NOBODY wants to hear you whining about the refs, ESPECIALLY when it WASN’T the refs fault that you were such an incompetent competitor.” Posted by: She is a National Laughingstock
– Actually, she did play basketball in high school and as for “nobody wants to hear you whining” Palin didn’t seek out this interview, the journalist sought her out and asked her a question. She answered it. End of story. And if you really don’t want to hear her “whining” why are you on this website, watching the video?
Posted by: Turn Right | January 9, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
Troopergate: The Alaska Senate Investigation (8 repubs- 4 dems) found that Palin and her husband had broken ethical limits using the Office of the Gov to lobby the Troopers to have thier ex-brother in law fired. But they also found taht she did not break any law on the books. The Personnel Board which is a part of The Gov’s Office (she’s thier boss) found her not guilty. So if you like a lady who willing to act unethical “work in the shadows if you will” and stab people in the political back with a smile on her face: Palin’s your lady.
Posted by: Joe Dante | January 9, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
dfesta, NO, she was NOT acquitted. The bi-partisan panel found that there were significant questions surrounding the issue. Then HER self-appointed “inquiry” said that nothing was wrong (what a surprise). Get it right.
Posted by: The Facts | January 9, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Dano: True, we do. I just really don’t understand how you can claim the media had noting to do with her demise. It certainly played a part…. Illuminate me
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm
Turn Right, just my point. She played and didn’t learn the lesson. When you lose, ESPECIALLY when it was in large part your fault (she cost McCain dearly in the suburbs, whether Fox will tell you that or not), you man up and shut up. As far as her “answering questions,” are you kidding? She didn’t have any problem NOT answering them in the past, as ANYBODY who watched the VP debate will remember. So please, try that line on somebody who hasn’t paid attention (or somebody who only listens to Rush).
Posted by: She's still a National Laughingstock | January 9, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Free in NH, when the media reports the fact that she has very little understanding of any of the major issues that a US President would have to wrestle with, is that the media’s fault or is that HER fault? The insidious “oh, it’s left the left-wing liberal media bias” line is an amazing cure-all for some people who don’t want to confront the facts.
Posted by: I'm Baffled | January 9, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm
FreeinNH – the media had a hand in sinking her as a candidate because she talked.
Any monkey could have done their job…just press record and then press play.
Posted by: MM | January 9, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm
“The reality is that our public servants can afford to be “ordinary Joes” only up to a certain level. Beyond it, we need and expect more from them in terms of education, knowledge, and intellectual sophistication. Even the successful politicians who affect a certain populist persona tend to be far sharper and better-informed than the average man or woman, and when push comes to shove, they let us know that.”
This comment shows that classism is alive and well in the US. The person who wrote this seems to believe that politicians are a superior class then those who elect them. Truth is, our system is designed so that our elected officials reflect who we, as voters, are. Those serving aren’t superior to us – they ARE us! They work for us and they darned well better remember that!
Posted by: OMG! | January 9, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
Notaliberallemming:
The “my Muslim faith” quote came from an interview in which the subject being discussed was Obama being accused of being a Muslim. The full quote was “John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith.” Obama was not saying that he is Muslim; he was saying that McCain hasn’t said that he (Obama) was Muslim.
Example:
Let’s assume that you are not a moron, but everyone here, except me, is saying that you are. You could then say “Rudy has not talked about my being a moron.” You would not (necessarily) be saying that you are a moron, only that I haven’t said it.
Posted by: Rudy | January 9, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Hey listen, I didn’t think she was “the” candidate for VP, however we all know that the media (except Fox News which is way right) shoots for liberal agenda.
I suppose you all think Hamas is the victim and Israel is the bad guy too?
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Skip – Did you eat turkey for Thanksgiving?
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm
Caribou Barbie (aka Bible Spice) is a hoot! May she never be smart enough to shut up.
Posted by: Sammy | January 9, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
She’s still a National Laughingstock | -
No, when you lose, you learn your lesson and get right back up and keep on fighting. As for FOX and Rush – sorry, I’ve never listened to Rush and FOX is one of many of my news sources.
Posted by: Turn Right | January 9, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Sarah Palin should have simply went back north and kept quiet. Everyone knows Katie Couric is little more than a koffee klatch hostess playing anchorwoman so when Palin whines about Couric, who looks worse?
Palin was never the right person for the job but it’s true the MSM took great pains to help make her look bad.
Posted by: Ed | January 9, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
MM – unfortunately it isn’t, but great creative use of your imagination. Cheers!
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
How Obama Got Elected (he deserved it) and How Palin Got Smeared (she deserved it). The title makes perfect sense, it’s the content that’s completely ridiculous. Do you remember William Hung from American Idol (She bangs)? Palin was the William Hung of this election. Entertaining to watch how incompetent she was BECAUSE she had no chance to win. She’s delusional to think the Media manufactured her incompetence or that the would or should treat Caroline Kennedy the same way. Caroline HAS class and abundant competence, experience, education, and everything else Palin doesn’t have, including Respect from the Media. She needs to up her public speaking game (too many ‘ums’), but that will come. The content of what she says is solid. She’ll be a great, respected Senator. Palin needs to stop complaining and go to a self-help class to learn modesty, integrity, humbleness, and humanitarianism. She can’t be compared to Caroline even in jest. Palin needs to just go away for a long time until people forget what a disappointment she was in the political arena. The Media isn’t LIBERAL, CONSERVATIVES are just more ridiculous, making their antics easier to make fun of. Think-it’s true.
Posted by: Election's Over | January 9, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm
FreeinNH – right back at you.
Posted by: MM | January 9, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
It’s too bad no one in the Republican Party wants to practice chivalry with her.
Posted by: kat | January 9, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
The media did not manufacture her words. She – and she alone – sank her own ship. Her responses (and inability to respond) to basic questions demonstrated stunning ignorance. She is simply unqualified for high office. Her words worked their magic on all ears – whether tuned to FOX or some “elistist, liberal” network.
Posted by: dano | January 9, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
Freein NH: Could please define what you consider ‘liberal’? The media has always been strongly against government regulation (they want freedom to consolidate the market) and against government censorship (they want to show what the public wants to see so they can sell ads). Is that liberal?
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
Apparently the big, bad media put words in her mouth and made her say stupid things. Somebody please tell her that her 15 minutes are up.
Posted by: T | January 9, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Rudy
Let’s assume for one second that you are not a mindless liberal lemming that probably goes to bed thinking “Bush lied kids died!
The point I was making is that when Barry said “my muslim faith” the interviewer quickly interjected and gave barry the chance to correct himself. The interviewer continued with more tough questions like “how did you meet michelle”? “how did you know she was the one”?
I also notice you said nothing about barry claiming that there were 57 states in the Union. Can you please imagine if Palin had said that? Or if she was unaware who was president during the 29′ stock market crash?
In reality, barry and biden not only got a pass from the media, they got protection. Palin on the other hand, was crushed at every opportunity.
Posted by: Notaliberallemming | January 9, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Uh-oh, Sarah must be taking speech lessons from Caroline, you know? Check out this Palin quote from the new video:
I still would have gone on SNL, because, I, you know, you’ve gotta show that, one: you know, you have to be able to laugh at yourself also.
LOL, I laugh at her also.
Posted by: WWW | January 9, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
Turn Right, precisely. I agree with you 100%. That’s what all good parents teach their kids. Get up, dust yourself off and learn from your lesson. And DON”T criticize the refs or the other team when it was YOUR fault. Listen, I would respect her a great deal if she recognized she had a TON of work to do in learning important issues, put her head down, and didn’t spend her time stoking the idiotic “it’s the liberal media’s fault that I have no clue.” I’m on board with you 100%, but that’s not what she’s doing. And this “well a journalist asked her,” again, that’s nonsense. There’s a very simple and classy answer she could give: “Americans made a choice in the last election. I’m going to learn from what we went through and hope to have future opportunities to serve the American people.” Period. End of sentence. Instead, she shows she’s in denial and has no class.
Posted by: Laughingstock | January 9, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm
I guess I shouldn’t believe CNN or any other major news media since they all report selective journalism.
On November 3, 2008, CNN reported that the Alaska Personnel Board had concluded its probe and determined that Palin had not violated ethics laws, contradicting the earlier investigations. Tim Petumenos, the lawyer hired by the Board to conduct the probe, was quoted as stating in his final report, “There is no probable cause to believe that the governor, or any other state official, violated the Alaska Executive Ethics Act in connection with these matters.”[4]
Posted by: dfesta | January 9, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
OMG!: Class was used as a description for having some decorum, manners, intellectual stimulus, and grace, not as a means to describe one’s financial or employment status. Of course we expect our elected officials to have some class and dignity! That’s not putting them ABOVE anyone, just putting the best players among us on the team. You wouldn’t put Bill Gates on the 7 yard line in the SuperBowl, so why would you put an inept person in the White House? We want our politicians to have class and integrity and the skills to do a great job – no doubt! It would also be nice if they knew that when they lose, they need to go shut up for awhile. Anyone hear a peep out of McCain lately?
Posted by: Lyn | January 9, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
jwh – Dano: (1)Did you see ALL of Sarah Palin, even the good interviews/speeches? No, you had to search high and low to find them because the media simply blasted off on Couric and Gibsons….NON STOP! It was very biased, are those the only two interviews she did? Was the RNC speech the only she delivered. Most people on this blog think so.
(2) Example with the media, specifically ABC – on this site, this morning there was a piece on The CIA taking out 2 top Al-Qaeda leaders on the FBI most wanted list. It was on there for about 25 minutes TOPS! 25 posted remarks, most of which was about how this was unjustified. Then…poof! Gone from the page all together. God forbid anyone leaves a good news story on here for that long that gives our current administration and our military any kind of credit!!!!
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
Would you like some cheese with that whine Sarah?
Posted by: beakerless | January 9, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
She has no one to blame but herself and possibly the McCain camp for her sounding like a 2nd grader that should have never got past 1st grade. Its everybodies fault but her own.Yea Right.
Posted by: CAW | January 9, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
For those of you pretending that the media wasn’t biased toward Palin – are you serious? You really feel that when the media ran with a stories about her infant son being her grandson – (based on rumors started by bloggers!) that wasn’t biased? When they ran with a story about her banning books (which she never did) that wasn’t biased? When they perpetuated the belief that being a popular governor, mayor and long-time public servant doesn’t count as vice presidential material that wasn’t biased? Running stories about her income titled, “Palin, not so middle class after all” is not biased??
There are so many cases of media bias that only the truly misguided can’t see it.
Posted by: Me Again | January 9, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
The media was very biased against the Governor.
Posted by: dfesta | January 9, 2009, 1:08 pm 1:08 pm
Palin has both feet, legs, arms, and hands lodged in her mouth. She is in an irreparable condition or position. But she’ll still find something to exploit again and a willing media eager to display her contortions.
Posted by: kat | January 9, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
I have a feeling the liberals will have the same luck in holding back Palin as they did in holding back the “hick” from the small, Christian, college Ronald Reagan.
Please liberal loons, please keep attacking her just like you did when Ronald Reagan ran for prez.
McCain lost this election because he is not a conservative. He also refused to look at barry and say people like you are the reason the housing market collapsed (barry sued banks in chicago who refused to give out risky loans to minorities).
Posted by: Dave | January 9, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm
Freein NH: I saw as many Palin interviews as I did Obama speeches. I tried to select a candidate primarily on their documented record of achievement. In that regard, I found Obama looked pretty good to me and his supporters could offer additional concrete examples that also looked good. I could find few concrete examples of Palin’s achievements that appealed to me and her supporters to this day have failed to offer any. (I was hoping for a few from the folks on this board – perhaps you could give a couple verifiable examples, like I did for Obama earlier?)
I could find no examples – not from anyone – of Obama looking as bad as Palin did in the portions of her interviews I did catch. Obama has certainly looked tired, stumbled over words, and stuttered about, but I have not seen a single interview where he looked comprehensively uninformed. Every candidate will have their infomercial interviews, be it on FoxNews or MSNBC, it’s their bad interviews that are far more telling.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm
Wish Silly Sarah would take a que… from McCain, “nobody likes a sore loser”.
Geez, what a whiner…McCain wanted to be the next President as much as Palin wanted vp, and he is not still focused on what went wrong…He gave it his best, lost, felt bad about it and is now committed to the incoming Pres. Bravo John! I have nothing against McCain but, would not have voted for him just because of Palin. Experience or not, I thought that everything that came out of her mouth was silly, rehearsed and unbelievable…
Furthermore, Caroline Kennedy is all class where Palin is not. Complete opposites. Although, Silly Sarah does dress up nicely.
Posted by: braith morgan | January 9, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Freein NH,
There aren’t many interviews Sarah has made it through completely unscathed, just by virtue of her speech and grammar problems. She’s spoken gibberish during a few Fox interviews. She stuck her foot in her mouth with evangelical theocrat James Dobson when she said:
“I’m going to know at the end of the day, putting this in God’s hands, that the right thing for America will be done, the end of the day on November 4th.”
Posted by: WWW | January 9, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
BabyDoll needs a major Public Relations advisor! Howard Rubenstein should take her own as a mission of mercy. I just read the funniest thing by Liz Smith:
“…As for Katie, Palin has simply never gotten over the “what do you read?” question. But in this latest interview she proves Katie’s point – or at least the point made by Palin’s uncomfortable answer. Gov. Palin seems to be under the impression that Caroline Kennedy, seeking the New York Senate seat, is getting better treatment than she did, because of “class issues.”
See, this is where reading helps. Caroline Kennedy, the last living member of JFK’s “Camelot,” has been savaged from day one. Anybody who has bothered to pick up a newspaper – The New York Times, for instance – would have seen just how badly Caroline has been mocked and questioned and made fun of for her “you knows”!…”
LOL!!!!!!!!
Posted by: FS | January 9, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Me Again,
Sarah Palin did ask the librarian about the PROCEDURE for banning books. She in fact fired the librarian, then re-hired her.
Posted by: WWW | January 9, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
The way the media (news/entertainment) flayed and is still flaying, Palin showed America first-hand what real left-wing media bias is all about.
Posted by: DonG | January 9, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
jhw539
Here is how the interviews are done. They tape usually anywhere from 4-10 hours and then edit them for the public to see (there is usually only an hour to show the public).
Just as when barry said there are 57 states and Biden said an unfathomable amount of ludacris comments, Palin said some off-the-wall stuff too. It was just obvious that her’s got WAY more air time.
Liberal Journalist vote 90% democrat. It isn’t any wonder why one side is usually made to look better.
I just saw the part of Couric on Dave Letterman mocking Palin about her interview, but strangley enough, Couric didn’t think it was equally as histarical that biden didn’t know who was president during the 1929 crash or that tv’s had been invented yet when she interviewed him. She went on to denegrate Palin and talk-up Biden.
As for Palin’s record vs. barry’s,
here is how I see it…
Palin rose to power without hanging on the nuts of people like rev wright, bill ayers, rezko. Rather, she rose to power by fighting these kinds of people. After she became gov many were fired and/or went to jail. She even sold the private jet and the private chef to relieve Alaskan tax payers.
Barry can not give us one instance of ever battling corruption in Chicago. God knows he had PLENTY of opportunity there! He obviously just used corrupt politics to his advantage.
Posted by: Dave | January 9, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm
jhw539 Palin: She has been the Governor of Alaska for two years and Mayor of Wasilla Alaska for ten years. She also served as President of Alaska Conference of Mayors and was also a City Council member (1992-1996).
**AGIA License bill signed (pipeline)
**Energy Package signed August 25, 2008.(gives money back to taxpayers)
**Special Needs Education (tripled funding)
*** Also jet was NOT sold on Ebay
So besides voting “present” in Washington and writing a few memoirs and being a community organizer, what did Obama do?
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
They didn’t even have to write Tina Fey’s lines on SNL. She was hilarious just quoting Palin word for word!
Posted by: Skip | January 9, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
jhw539: And yes I know he won, and god bless him, I wish him the best.
No comment on my other point about The CIA story this morning? Understandably, there is no way to justify that the liberal media took something off line that looks favorably on the current admin. SHOCKER!
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
True! Tina Fey was funny:) I never even heard of Tina Fey until she mocked Governor Palin so frequently. I hope Tina Fey sends the Governor a thank-you note, she owes her.
Posted by: dfesta | January 9, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
I listened to Palin’s interview; and I can understand her desire to express herself….
What concerns me is when she refers to the Democratic Party as the Democrat Party….
What is that about? If she wants the American public to take her seriously, then she, along with all others, should at least respectfully refer to the Democratic Party correctly….
Posted by: t | January 9, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Look, everyone knows the republican party was not a “favorite” going into the elcetion. So when McCain chooses an unknown (we all know there were many more qualified candidates) she is going to be met with scrutiny.
Caroline Kennedy is not running for vice president and the people have no choice (vote) in the matter so you really cant compare.
As for her credentials? She doesnt have a law degree. Which she should. Thats why she couldnt name supreme court decesion except for Roe v Wade. The Bush Docortine question? Well I think she should have known that. Her choice to keep interviewing with Couric also shows her ill judgement.
Shes got noone to blame but herself.
Posted by: North Park | January 9, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
“There is an issue of class”.. Gov. Palin is correct. She has NO CLASS.
Witless from Wasilla strikes again.
Posted by: B. Bear | January 9, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
oh and Brian Higgins is going to win the senate seat anyway.
Posted by: North Park | January 9, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Freein NH, Are you serious? You really don’t know Obama’s experience? Did you do any research at all?
Here is Obama’s resume;
Education
Undergraduate
Occidental College, Los Angeles, CA
Undergraduate, 1981-1983
Columbia University
B.A. Political Science with specialization in international relations
Thesis topic: Soviet nuclear disarmament
Graduate
Harvard Law School
J.D. magna cum laude 1988-1991
President, Harvard Law Review
Organizing and other work experience
1983-1984 Writer/Researcher for Business International Corporation. Helped companies understand overseas markets in the “Financing Foreign Operations” service and wrote for the “Business International Money Report”
1984-1985 Community Organizer for New York Public Interest Research Group (PIRG), promoting personal, community, and government reform at City College in Harlem.
1985-1988 Director of the Developing Communities Project (DCP), a church-based community organization originally comprising eight Catholic parishes in Greater Roseland on Chicago’s South Side. While director grew the DCP staff from 1 to 13 and their budget from $70,000 to $400,000.
1992 Led Chicago’s Project Vote! push. This effort resulted in a record number of voter registrations, over 600,000 in Chicago. 1)
2008 Elected President of the United States of America.
Teaching
1993-2004 Visiting Law and Government Fellow, then Senior Lecturer, in Constitutional Law at the University of Chicago Law School. Taught courses on the due process and equal protection areas of constitutional law, on voting rights, and on racism and law. Helped develop a casebook on voting rights.
Law Practice
1993-2002 Worked as an associate attorney with Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland. Represented non-profits and private individuals in urban development projects, voting rights cases, and wrongful firings. Filed major suit that forced the state of Illinois to enforce the Motor Voter Law and successfully argued a wrongful firing case before the U.S. 7th Circuit Court of Appeals.
Posted by: steve9337 | January 9, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
It is naive of her to still be complaining about how she was treated in the election. Every candidate is attacked and made fun of. They are attacked about mistakes in the past and fabricated events. Obama is a Moslem that does not have an American birth certificate. McCain fathered a black child and killed a bunch of naval personel on an aircraft carrier. If she can’t take the truth and the lies, then she should not be running for such high profile offices. She dished it out to Obama, but she doesn’t want anyone pointing out her weaknesses.
Posted by: MikeMo1947 | January 9, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Steve….clearly I am not an idiot.
Education…impressing
Community involvement, writing, lecturing……
What qualified him as pres?
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Her continued hypocrisy is just shocking: together onstage with Arizona Gov. Janet Napolitano, Palin talked about what women expect from women leaders; how she took charge in Alaska during a political scandal that threatened to unseat the state’s entire Republican power structure, and her feelings about Sen. Hillary Clinton…..Gov Palin said she “felt kind’a bad I couldn’t support a woman, because I didn’t like Clinton’s whining.”
Posted by: indithinker | January 9, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
steve: and somoene asked me to list her accomplishments……
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
WWW – You’re absolutely right. She did ask the librarian about the procedure for banning books and asked about specific titles, as did several other mayors before her. She was following the procedure posted on the Wasilla town website – if a library patron expresses concern about a title on the shelves, the mayor is obligated to follow it through and ask the librarian about it (that was left out of media stories).
Palin asked and the titles were left on the shelves. End of story. And you’re right about the librarian. She did fire the librarian along with other city officials during a staff reorganization (not uncommon when a new mayor, governor or other official comes in power) then rehired her, after her constituents expressed concern.
The problem with the media reporting was that it left out many of the key details – details that were on the city’s website for all the world to see and showed that these events were ordinary, business as usual. The omissions were intentional.
Posted by: Me Again | January 9, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Sarah Palin is the real deal. She doesn’t put on a show or pretend to be something she’s not. That seems to bother a lot of people in this world of pretentious politicians.
Posted by: Okie dokie | January 9, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Freein NH: “jhw539 Palin: She has been the Governor of Alaska for two years and Mayor of Wasilla Alaska for ten years. She also served as President of Alaska Conference of Mayors and was also a City Council member (1992-1996).
**AGIA License bill signed (pipeline)
**Energy Package signed August 25, 2008.(gives money back to taxpayers)
**Special Needs Education (tripled funding)”
The AGIA has not resulted in a pipeline, construction MIGHT start in 5 or 6 years, and I frankly was dismayed at how the governor ended up disqualifying four of the five bidders and awarding it to TransCanada. Not to mention the folks who would use the pipeline (Exxon, Conoc, and BP) are going to kill the project dead if they don’t get a tasty payoff (tax breaks) to cooperate. Overall, researching this achievement reduced my opinion of her leadership ability.
Giving a one time payout to the taxpayers from the state’s oil slush fund is hardly impressive. Technically, such redistribution of oil company taxes is socialism (state control of industry profits).
The special needs funding improvement is indeed an achievement. She has been an effective advocate for special needs children.
“So besides voting “present” in Washington and writing a few memoirs and being a community organizer, what did Obama do? ”
Please see my post of Jan 9, 2009 11:35:39 AM on this page. And Obama never voted present in Washington – Federal Senators cannot vote present, they simply do not vote at all (as Senator McCain was famous for, missing far more votes than Obama during the last couple years). Obama voted present about 130 times in IL out of 3000+ votes, and researching a few of those votes I’m satisfied with the rationale (political strategy, esoteric constitutional opposition to laws where he agreed with the intent, party request, etc.).
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
JWH – Thanks I will read your previous posts:
Obama is our President and for that I am happy. I wish luck to him to deal with this mess.
Any answer to my other question?
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Steve9337
All this portion of barry’s resume below shows that he was extremely instrumental in getting record #’s of home loans for people who could never pay them back (and we all know where that crap got us). He helped stage sit-ins at some of chicago’s largest banks which were not handing out loans as fast as barry thought they should be.
He also “organized” with ACORN, which is absolutely nothing to brag about. ACORN has been indicted in countless election schemes over the years. They are a terrible organization that needs to be shut down, and wouldn’t you know barry is right in the middle of it all!
As for the “church” based organizing, was that done along side his spiritual mentor reverend? Did barry and rev pass out pamphlets together to impressionable black youth explaining how the US gov’t created AIDS to kill them?
1984-1985 Community Organizer for New York Public Interest Research Group (PIRG), promoting personal, community, and government reform at City College in Harlem.
1985-1988 Director of the Developing Communities Project (DCP), a church-based community organization originally comprising eight Catholic parishes in Greater Roseland on Chicago’s South Side. While director grew the DCP staff from 1 to 13 and their budget from $70,000 to $400,000.
1992 Led Chicago’s Project Vote! push. This effort resulted in a record number of voter registrations, over 600,000 in Chicago.
Posted by: wakeupobamabots | January 9, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
“Freein NH: What qualified him as pres?”
He won the support of a larger percentage of the US population than any other non-incumbent candidate – only the incumbent Reagan in 1984 had more support. (And the largest vote margin of any non-incumbent, but that could simply be because McCain/Palin was a weak ticket).
That, ultimately, is the only qualification that matters.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
Freein NH: “No comment on my other point about The CIA story this morning? Understandably, there is no way to justify that the liberal media took something off line that looks favorably on the current admin.”
The current administration is dirt regardless of how many more corners they turn in Iraq (according to quotes over the years Iraq is at least a Pentagon or we’re going in circles) or how many 2nd in commands we kill. Capturing a couple of Al Quaida wanted’s just isn’t really news. Catching Bin Laden would be big, but the public is no longer getting excited about stepping on a couple cockroaches when we know there’s more where they came from.
And I can’t find any mention of that story on FoxNews – more liberal media, or just a boring piece of non-news? I notice we don’t get much play about how many of our kids have died in Iraq anymore. Doesn’t mean the press is trying to make Bush look good by hiding the on-going cost of the war (slowing down, but still too high), it’s just sadly old news.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
jhw:
Way to minimalize what’s going on over there. I’m sure members of our military, or in this case, CIA, would be happy to hear your take on that.
Also Being “qualified” and getting “elected” are two different things.
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Me Again,
According to the Anchorage Daily News, Snopes, and Factcheck, Palin did NOT ask about specific titles, but asked “rhetorical” questions about book banning. And, according to Snopes, records on the Wasilla web site do not show that any books were challenged in the 10 years before Palin took office.
Posted by: WWW | January 9, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Freein NH I agree completely. Let’s just hope when the Bush administration leaves office and Obama takes office the media won’t turn on Obama like pitbulls to keep the negative press going.
Posted by: dfesta | January 9, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Many of the books that were mentioned in the rumor weren’t even published yet. The librarian said that Palin asked a what if question. The original rumor also stated that the librarian was fired, but she in fact worked at the same library through most of Palins first term.
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Palin should have taken a one way trip to Israel with her sidekick, Joe The Moron…..
Posted by: Denise | January 9, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
JHW: The story of Al-Qaeda is under “most read” on Fox.
Old news?
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
The list of books was bogus. But Palin did ask the librarian rhetorical or hypothetical questions about banning books on at least two occasions.
Posted by: WWW | January 9, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Are right wingers naturally more paranoid than normal people?
The blog does not allow any links.
If you want someone to find something tell than to google it and give an article name.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
According to Factcheck:
In January 1997, Palin fired Emmons, along with the police chief. Palin did not list censorship as a reason for Emmons’ firing, but said she didn’t feel she had Emmons’ support. The decision caused “a stir” in the small town, according to a newspaper account at the time. According to a widely circulated e-mail, “city residents rallied to the defense of the City Librarian and against Palin’s attempt at out-and-out censorship, so Palin backed down and withdrew her termination letter.”
Posted by: WWW | January 9, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Freein NH: “JHW: The story of Al-Qaeda is under “most read” on Fox.
Old news?”
Not front page in my browser (“most read” is under a clickable tab). Just like ABCNews, FoxNews seem to have moved the story off the front page pretty quickly too. It’s currently just above “Hoarder Dies After Becoming Lost in Maze of His Own Trash.”
I’m glad they’re dead, but unfortunately there’s a lot more where they came from.
Posted by: jhw539 | January 9, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
“Gov Palin said she “felt kind’a bad I couldn’t support a woman, because I didn’t like Clinton’s whining.”
Is anyone surprised that this woman is a narcisistic hypocrite?
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Ryan – woooah! Ok, didnt know about the link thing….
Thanks for the heads up….
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm
“Ryan – woooah! Ok, didnt know about the link thing…. no need for an attack…”
Apologize for the attack, I mixed you up with another poster as I was reading.
But yeah no links here.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
jwh…. who cares anyway, have some respect for what is still happening over there.
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
I am a progressive liberal and I did not vote for Mccain/Palin, I voted Nader/Gonzalez. But I feel she was treated very bad by the media and progressives. I was very disappointed with liberal women.
Posted by: Tina | January 9, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
No worries Ryan, it’s all good! ;)
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Obama, his allies in the press, and libs will continue to attack Governor Palin but that will only make her more determined. The American people never support personal attacks for long and sooner or later they will judge the liberal haters for their over the top attacks. This is just the opening Governor Palin needs to win the presidency in 2012.
Same mistake they made with Reagan.
Posted by: James | January 9, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Governor Palin will have four years to build her political coalition based on her success in Alaska. Obama will have four years of defending failure stemming from his relentless pursuit of big government. I like President Palin’s chances in 2012.
Posted by: Kimberly | January 9, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
“The American people never support personal attacks for long and sooner or later they will judge the liberal haters for their over the top attacks. This is just the opening Governor Palin needs to win the presidency in 2012.”
ROFLMAO.
Must be why Tina Fey is entertainer of the year and her making fun of Palin was must see TV.
“Same mistake they made with Reagan”
Reagan was light years ahead of Palin in both his political instincts and intelligence.
People who love Reagan should be outraged that Palin is being mentioned in the same sentence as he is.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Let’s face it, The Republican ticket dropped the ball by not prepping her and the media ran with it. She looked foolish in every interview she gave and at the debate. Winks, “you betcha’s” and the “folksie”- ness was not going to win unless it was backed by intelligent, knowledgeable answers. She doesn’t get it.
Posted by: Kay | January 9, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
“Marriage should be a sacred institution between two unwilling teenagers.” – Tina Fey as Sarah Palin
When the interviewer in the new video asked Sarah if she had seen that joke before going on SNL, she very quietly and victim-like said “No.”
Anyone buying it?
Posted by: Rudy | January 9, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Rudy
Palin could be busy raising 5 children and governing a state. Is it possible she might just have a little too much going on to realize her innocent children have yet again been the victims of “tolerant liberals”?
Posted by: wakeupobamabots | January 9, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
“Let’s face it, The Republican ticket dropped the ball by not prepping her and the media ran with it.”
How do you prep someone for basic history and having a working knowledge of both the world and our country?
I would say they prepped her fairly well on the talking points but its not easy to “prep” someone on what is supposed to be a lifetime of knowledge. That showed up when she would just repeat talking points or get them wrong because she did not understand their meaning.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Sammy
I guess you forgot that it was the republicans who opposed slavery. It was the republicans who were for desegregation. It was the republicans who have been champions of civil rights all these years (MLK was a republican). Actually, the democratic party began to ensure the survival of slavery.
And it was the democrats who have a former KKK member (Byrd) as a senator and a segregationist (Wallace) as their presidential nominee. They also have an admitted socialist from VT as a senator who more to the right then barry on voting records.
The democrats only got on board with the whole civil right thing in the 60′s when they realized entitlements=votes. The democrats have figured the new form of slavery is a welfare check. Ever since the 60′s, the dems have enjoyed the black vote, and blacks in this country have seen their quality of life consisently fall relative to whites.
As I said, welfare checks are the new form of slavery, and good ol’ democrats have been shoving those down voters throats for years.
Posted by: wakeupobamabots | January 9, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Sarah Palin made a few mistakes during the campaign, yet we heard nothing of the countless speaking and intellectual errors of Joe Biden and Obama (57states). Biden is gaffe-prone and Obama daily makes speaking errors, let alone his continuous “ums” and “uhs”. Any sane and reasonable person would know there is an obvious bias in the media and anyone who doesn’t see this is blind. It’s that simple.
Posted by: Charlie | January 9, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
wakeup,
Bristol and Levi didn’t come up with little Tripp by being “innocent children.”
And I’m fairly certain the McCain/Palin camp were watching Tina Fey like hawks during the campaign.
Posted by: Rudy | January 9, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
“As for the fat cat rumor, are you aware who the most wealthy members of congress are? Boasting net worths in the hundreds of millions, the top 10 are DEMOCRATS.”
Numbers 3, 5, 6 & 10 are actually Republicans.
But who needs facts.
“You just wait and see, barry (aka messiah of the poor) will be worth ATLEAST 200 million in 10 years.”
I imagine he will enjoy a quite lucrative speaking career.
Bush of course will not have that problem but he can rely on Daddy’s money. Republican capitalism at its finest.
“Liberalism/socialism has been tried many times and it has FAILED.”
ROFLMAO, most of the Western world is in fact liberal and have hybrid economies with elements of socialism and capitalism…even our own.
“American citizens enjoy a standard of living that is second to none.”
12th on the UN Human development scale and 16th on the poverty scale. We’re not even number 1 in per capita GDP.
But we are a country of fantastic opportunity. I just prefer a little oversight vs the rob them blind capitalism advocated by right wingers.
“Either get on board or go to Cuba, I hear over there that they are just loving all of the change! change! change! castro promised them 50 years ago.”
Classic black and white fascist thinking.
Because I disagree with the GOP party I must hate my country.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Sammy
I guess you forgot that it was the republicans who opposed slavery. It was the republicans who were for desegregation. It was the republicans who have been champions of civil rights all these years (MLK was a republican). Actually, the democratic party began to ensure the survival of slavery.
And it was the democrats who have a former KKK member (Byrd) as a senator and a segregationist (Wallace) as their presidential nominee. They also have an admitted socialist from VT as a senator who more to the right then barry on voting records.
The democrats only got on board with the whole civil right thing in the 60′s when they realized entitlements=votes. The democrats have figured the new form of slavery is a welfare check. Ever since the 60′s, the dems have enjoyed the black vote, and blacks in this country have seen their quality of life consisently fall relative to whites.
As I said, welfare checks are the new form of slavery, and good ol’ democrats have been shoving those down voters throats for years.
Posted by: wakeupobamabots | January 9, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Imagine the difference or deference given to Caroline Kennedy who seemingly can’t give a coherent answer (you know) to any question without a cue card, to the Palin interviews or attacks. It so demonstrates Media Bias. There is no room for any opinion other than the left’s opinions. They know what is right and wrong for themselves and everyone else who lives and breathes. So, now, everyone in lock step with the Chris Matthews and Olbermans.
Posted by: Joe | January 9, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
“Sarah Palin made a few mistakes during the campaign,”
Few? She made dozens of mistakes on the biggest stages.
“yet we heard nothing of the countless speaking and intellectual errors of Joe Biden”
Two things,
First, Joe Biden had his gaffes covered, most notably by this blog which had a tongue in cheek running series on them.
2nd, Biden was a known quantity and a respected Senator. Joe is a yarn spinner in the great tradition of the Irish NE politician.
“and Obama (57states).”
That would be someone misspeaking vs saying they were keeping an eye on Putin or staring blankly when asked about foreign policy or even what they read.
No one believes that Obama thinks there are 57 states. But Palin gave the impression of being utterly clueless when she did not understand questions or was unable to answer them.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
I have watched every Sarah Palin interview. At no time did she ever make the kind of mistakes attributed to her. She hesitated a few times but her answers were not bad. She didn’t answer every question fully or perhaps she was evasive. I find it amazing that everyone who discusses what a bad job she did interviewing is so biased that their own opinion is worthless. She simply did not do what so many people believe. Watch the interviews with a non-bias eye and it is apparent that she wasn’t bad at all.
The real reason Sarah Palin is not liked by the media is due to liberal bias and primarily due to Sarah’s belief in taking a baby to term. Most women care more for their abortion rights than they do for the safety and well being of our nation. They will not compromise and they will attempt to take down anyone who doesn’t support abortion in every form.
This is the reason Sarah Palin will continue to have her detractors.
Posted by: Laura | January 9, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
I congratulate you on your excellent interview of Govenor Palin, John!! You are the first I’ve seen who had no biased agenda, and allowed the Govenor to fully express her answers without editing that slanted toward the negative side that would have cast her in a negative way. Those who have learned of Ms. Palin and heard her presentations about her beliefs know better than to take what the main stream media say about her seriously. This woman is a definite reincarnation of Ronald Reagan, and I will be first in line to support her future political endeavors if she ever decides to cast herself into the maelstrom. It’s amazing that a person of her obvious intellect, communication skills, and pure charisma is also so very very beautiful at the same time!!
I wish Governor and YOU the very best of luck and good wishes, and thank you very much for sharing your interview with Ms. Palin on the internet.
Posted by: John | January 9, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
“Imagine the difference or deference given to Caroline Kennedy who seemingly can’t give a coherent answer (you know) to any question without a cue card, to the Palin interviews or attacks”
The coverage of Caroline Kennedy has been that she is not qualified and is running on her name only.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Sarah Palin is a human being and humans have flaws (unless you are talking about barack obama…he’s the messiah) She has a high approval rating because, so far, she has done what she said she was going to do when she ran. She took on her own party and got rid of the immense corruption that has plagued Alaska. There hasn’t been any sort of scandal while she has been governor. People have tried to force scandals on her and after everyone she comes out clean. Seems to me that the Dems in Alaska are trying very hard to make it look like she is corrupt……so far it’s not working.
Posted by: Razor | January 9, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
“I find it amazing that everyone who discusses what a bad job she did interviewing is so biased that their own opinion is worthless.”
So anyone who thinks Palin did a bad job is biased and therefore has a worthless opinion?
That’s bad news for Palin then since the last poll before the election nearly 60% of the people thought she was unqualified for the job.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
I am truly disturbed by the hateful comments here. Sarah Palin has worked hard for everything she has accomplished. She doesn’t owe her success to a famous husband, famous family, a rich bank account or a Political party. She has had to work twice as hard for double the success of most politicians.
Love her or hate her, you must respect her accomplishments. She is a smart leader.
Posted by: ruku | January 9, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
“She has a high approval rating because, so far, she has done what she said she was going to do when she ran.”
Its slid 20pts since she was picked to run and it will go down further as she seeks higher office leaving the business of Alaska to others.
“She took on her own party and got rid of the immense corruption that has plagued Alaska”
She took the corrupt machine and appropriated it for herself offering up a political rival as a sacrificial lamb.
Why does she use private email accounts to conduct public business?
Why does he husband sit in on public business meetings with her?
Why did she collect a per diem for living at home?
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
Tino
I could not have said it better myself!
Liberals and feminazis are all about free speech until someone says something that they do not agree with (which is generally anything positive towards America, our troops or citizen self-reliance).
Posted by: wakeupobamabots | January 9, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
I like many who have written here ususlly do not respond to the blogs after articles but this constant bashing of Sarah Palin, who did not seek the position but was asked to accept it, proves to me only one thing. America is quickly sinking because of a complete lack of respect for people, acceptance of lies and distortion over the truth, immoral and crooked leaders who they chose to re-elect time and again which proves that they must also be unmoral and crooked because birds of a feather do flock together. One only need to look at the results of who voted for Obama and accepted the MSM garbage as fact to see that my assumptions are correct
Posted by: Tim | January 9, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
McCain is a liberal republican (is there even such a thing?)
McCain never had a chance. The media promoted McCain from the start, just as they did with Clinton, only to butcher them both once the socialist from Chicago stepped onto the stage. They have been in love ever since and slaughtered anyone in his path.
Posted by: wakeupobamabots | January 9, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
“Liberals and feminazis are all about free speech until someone says something that they do not agree with (which is generally anything positive towards America, our troops or citizen self-reliance).”
Right wingers seem to often confuse free speech with their bizarre assertion that they have a right to speak unchallenged and that countering their speech with more speech is censorship.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Congrats on a great interview. I am neither a Republican or a Democrat but an Independent. I thought the media attacks on Palin were venomous and unwarranted while every effort was made to paint the Obama/biden ticket as the second coming even though there was not a bit of substance to be shown. Even the comments by regular folks was out of line due to what was being fed to these lemmings, the fawning and leg tingling excitement was way over the top. I do hope that Obama can deliver but I will be very curious to see how the media handles things if he is completely ineffective. (GWB will not be around to blame)This term should be interesting to say the least
Posted by: Missy | January 9, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
The media dislikes Palin because she is anything but the achieving female image they have tried to shove down our throats. This would be the image of a butch loud mouthed feminist. I certainly do not agree with all of her views; however, she was crucified simply for being an intelligent conservative woman with a funny accent. This is unacceptable by the media, but she handled herself well considering the circumstances.
Posted by: Joe | January 9, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
Anyone who knows the real record and story of Sarah Palin , as a mayor and as a Governor will be impressed ; precisely the reason the main stream media did not talk about this , and only talked about gossip and lies stories about her and her family.
Sarah Palin always worked in her political career with independs and democrats to get things done (and she got many things done!!); the reason for her high approval ratings.
Posted by: Aka | January 9, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
From the Seattle Post Intelligencer:
Poll – Palin popularity waning in Alaska?
A poll of Alaskans suggests that people in the Last Frontier may be souring on Sarah Palin.
The survey of 505 adults showed that 57 percent prefer Lisa Murkowski in the 2010 Republican Senate primary. Only 33 percent would vote for Palin, John McCain’s vice presidential running mate.
The margin of error is 4.4 percent.
Posted by: Rudy | January 9, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
I find it most revealing that with a quick search I only found 2 comments condemning “The View’s” and SNL’s absolutely horrendous comments and skit about Palin’s kids, comments and a skit that are not definitely not examples that define principles. Obama’s kids were off base but not Palin’s. That anyone could not be totally repulsed by such a double standard is beyond comprehension. But then perhaps that inclination is the most revealing characteristic of a left culture that is disinclined to the intellectual disciplines required to deliberate all facts and thus they are persuaded to not consider this interview.
Posted by: Jim | January 9, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
“The real reason Sarah Palin is not liked by the media is due to liberal bias and primarily due to Sarah’s belief in taking a baby to term.”
That is what the right wing propagandists have said.
“Most women care more for their abortion rights than they do for the safety and well being of our nation. They will not compromise and they will attempt to take down anyone who doesn’t support abortion in every for”
McCain Palin lost because of the economy, the legacy of Bush admin. and how they ran their campaign.
Exit polling showed abortion as a important issue didn’t break 10%.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
I think it’s a great point, let’s see how the media deals with Caroline Kennedy. The world does not know everything about her, as you know, she has stayed out of the limelight as much as she could. Just because she’s a Kennedy, means nothing.
Posted by: Jan | January 9, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
“The media dislikes Palin because she is anything but the achieving female image they have tried to shove down our throats. This would be the image of a loud mouthed feminist.”
ROLFMAO.
Palin’s appeal seems a direct correlation to the right wing male’s impotence!
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
I am continually baffled by all of the negative remarks about Sarah Palin. As far as I see it, she has pretty much done everything that the elite liberal women have wanted to do since the women’s movement: have a family and a career (and she is beautiful). I am sick and tired of hearing all of the hate- I really don’t understand how anyone can actually hate someone so much… I think she would do a much better job than half of the crooked/dumb politicians we have right now.
Posted by: Bear | January 9, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
“I find it most revealing that with a quick search I only found 2 comments condemning “The View’s” and SNL’s absolutely horrendous comments and skit about Palin’s kids, comments and a skit that are not definitely not examples that define principles.”
Umm the SNL skit was making fun of the press for digging into Palin’s private life while being clueless about Alaska.
But hey some right wing mouthhpiece probably told you to be outraged so you obeyed.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Bear: Please illuminate us…describe what an “elite, liberal woman” is.
Posted by: dano | January 9, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
“How can an educated individual see this interview, feel the strength and honesty of this incredible woman and still write even one hateful, vile, repugnant remark.”
This is hilarious.
Right winger acts more fawning and cultish about Palin than Oprah about Obama, chastises the rest of us for not recognizing her greatness then offers up an Obama tin foil hat theory.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
Ryan C
Our next prez is a socialist. Allow me to quote the great BO…
“I just wanna spread it around a bit”
-Discussion with the liberals’ latest victim, Joe the Plumber.
“It’s a tragedy that the courts in the 60′s didn’t get involved with wealth redistribution”-Radio interview in Chicago 2002
“In college, I sought out the Marxist professors”-Audacity of Hope
Without the unwavering protection and support of the media, BO would have been exposed for the anti-American, socialist that he is.
That is not “right wing propaganda”. Propaganda is calling him a muslim, which i never have.
Posted by: dave | January 9, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
“Why is there an incredible fear for such an honest, hard working, role model?”
Honest & hard working is collecting a per diem for staying at home?
Must be the same rationalization that having a pregnant teenage daughter who has dropped out of HS as an example of excellent family values.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
Sarah Palin….speaking truth to power! Keep beaten on ‘em girl, they can’t take it.
Posted by: DonG | January 9, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
dave: One can merely look at Obama’s cabinet appointments so far to see he is a raging socialist, right? I just marvel at all the evil socialists he has named, don’t you? By the way, dave, how did you develop such sharp political acumen?
Posted by: dano | January 9, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
“That is not “right wing propaganda”. Propaganda is calling him a muslim, which i never have.”
When you are repeating debunked lies it certainly is.
Wapo factchecker gave the McCain campaign 2 Pinnochios for that one.
With very few exceptions, all American politicians, including both presidential candidates, are in favor of a progressive income tax system and welfare policies (such as Medicare and Social Security) that “redistribute wealth.” Barack Obama is more enthusiastic about “spreading the wealth around” than his Republican rival. But that does not make him a “Socialist.” The McCain camp is wrong to suggest that the Illinois senator advocated an “wealth redistribution” role for the Supreme Court in his 2001 interview.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
“dave: One can merely look at Obama’s cabinet appointments so far to see he is a raging socialist, right? I just marvel at all the evil socialists he has named, don’t you? By the way, dave, how did you develop such sharp political acumen? ”
Be nice to dave he is still working from the campaign talking points.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Dano
Barry has made some good appt’s. However, Barry is, and probably always will be, a socialist. In addition to that, he has used every corrupt person in Chicago it seems to climb to the top, without EVER challenging these people until he must do so for political survival (rezko, reverend racist, ayers, blago, rashid khalidi).
With that being said, I hope barry continues to listen to those around him who are urging him to go center, rather than far-left, which is his impulse no doubt. I only want what is best for the country, and so I hope barry does well.
But when he says things like gov’t is the answer, as he did yesterday in his speech, I get very worried.
Our founding fathers built this incredible nation on basic principles….
-Small taxes for everyone
-Small efficient gov’t
-Large military
-Citizen self-reliance
BO stands for the opposite of what I just listed.
Posted by: dave | January 9, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
So let me get this straight. It’s ok to say Obama is the Messiah but you can’t say Palin is the Ms.siah?
Posted by: testing 1, 2, 3 | January 9, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Dano
Allow me to elaborate on what constitutes an “elite liberal”. These can also be called “limosuine liberals”.
As I stated earlier, 9/10 of the WEALTHIEST members of congress are- you guessed it- liberals!
These are people who have usually amassed great wealth that is often done through inheritance (kennedy/ vanderbilts/rockefellers), marriage(pelosi/clinton/huffington/kerry), speaking on ridiculous topics like global warming (gore) or bad-mouthing America (mike moore), ect.
They like to fill up their time by deciding how the common folk should live. They usually call themselves environmentalists, too. A term they came up with while traveling in their private yachts, traveling in between their 3 and 4 homes, ect.
Barbara streisand and steven spielberg were in battles with the CA courts for the fences they put up on their beach front vacation homes- they don’t want any of them common folk dirtying up their ocean views!
Al Gore has monthly utility bill that have reached $30,000+. That is one heck of a carbon foot print.
Posted by: dave | January 9, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
Palin needs to keep her personal vendettas confined to the state of Alaska.
Posted by: kat | January 9, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
“As I stated earlier, 9/10 of the WEALTHIEST members of congress are- you guessed it- liberals!”
From Roll Call’s review of disclosure forms.
4 of the top 10 richest members of Congress are Republicans.
10 of the top 20 are Republicans.
27 of the top 50 richest members of Congress are Republicans.
The lesson as always?
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
“Our founding fathers built this incredible nation on basic principles….
-Small taxes for everyone
-Small efficient gov’t
-Large military
-Citizen self-reliance”
Do right wingers know history?
The principle was taxation without representation not taxes are too high.
The government structure was not about size or efficiency but rather its respect for what the founders felt were inalienable rights. In fact you could argue that the government was purposefully designed as inefficient to allow for gradual change vs upheaval.
America did not have a standing army at its founding and indeed for decades afterwards. It had militias.
Citizen self reliance while an eventually emerging national character (best described but Teddy Roosevelt) was not a principle for the founding fathers for this government.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
“Barbara streisand and steven spielberg were in battles with the CA courts for the fences they put up on their beach front vacation homes- they don’t want any of them common folk dirtying up their ocean views!”
While David Geffen pulled a move similar, those two have not.
Streisand talked about drying one’s clothes on the line which was as silly a Lady de Rothschild saying she thought Obama was too elitist.
Not sure why Spielberg was included unless you were simply looking to blame Hollywood Jews.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
Priceless. We have people bashing Palin and calling her “stupid” for things she never said.
That’s what happens when you get your news from “The Daily Show” and/or form your political opinions by watching SNL
BTW, Palin didn’t blame the media for losing, but she was asked if they treated her fairly, and she gave her answer, which was obvious.
Anyone can see that the media gave preferential treatment not only to Obama, but John Edwards, as they refused to report about his “love child” when he was still on the list of VP candidates.
The only hypocrisy displayed was by the media.
Attack Palin on her policies if you want, but be sure you know what you are actually talking about before doing so, and not parroting falsehoods.
Posted by: Joe | January 9, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
Movie stars and fences??? Has this what this blog has turned into? hahahaha
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Governor Sarah Palin…..still more qualified as an executive decision maker than PEBO!
Posted by: Neil | January 9, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
I’ve never in my 40 years of paying close attention to media coverage, being a news reporter for an NPR affiliate, have I ever seen a figure so viciously attacked. From the “US” magazine cover suggesting “scandal” in Alaska (The investigation was promptly dropped on troopergate the week of the election, no faul – which of you Obamorons knew that?) To the venomous SNL portrayals that are tantamount to the post prop-8 backlash and hate crimes that have resulted from the same. Sounds like ol’ time Chicago politics have moved in to DC, and we’re treading on Capone’s turf here.
Posted by: Riko | January 9, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
Sarah Palin is a human being and humans have flaws (unless you are talking about barack obama…he’s the messiah) She has a high approval rating because, so far, she has done what she said she was going to do when she ran. She took on her own party and got rid of the immense corruption that has plagued Alaska. There hasn’t been any sort of scandal while she has been governor. People have tried to force scandals on her and after everyone she comes out clean. Seems to me that the Dems in Alaska are trying very hard to make it look like she is corrupt……so far it’s not working.
Posted by: Laura | January 9, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
Sarah Palin was blasted because she was a threat. A threat to BO’s campaign that the MSM was working so hard for, a threat to so-called feminist’s for actually being feminine and a threat to pro-abortionists because not once, but twice, she showed what respecting life means; first with her special needs son and then with her teenage daughter’s pregnancy. I believe the pure hatred that came at her was people’s own guilty feelings they had towards themselves for not being strong enough and not moral enough to do the right thing when they found themselves (or their partner) PG and instead ended a life.
Posted by: Daniel | January 9, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Ryan C
Thank you for giving me hardcore #’s to go off of (the 9/10 was what I had come up with in my head).
Your #’s will be much more helpful in my attempts at dispelling the myth that republicans are the party of fat cats.
More then half of the wealthiest 50 members of congress are democrats, and yet republicans get called greedy because they don’t like to give out welfare checks to every lazy person in America.
As I said, democrats have lined their pockets and secured re-elections for themselves by contstantly forcing welfare checks down people’s throats.
Liberals methods are nothing more than a modern form of slavery. They keep the blacks, and other minorities down, by claiming to be “advocates” for them.
27/50, that is hilarious.
Thank you Ryan C- you have been very helpful!
Posted by: dave | January 9, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
“but John Edwards, as they refused to report about his “love child” when he was still on the list of VP candidates.”
John Edwards was not considered for the VP spot.
And the only one who reported his love child was the National Enquirer until his admission (in august). It was then covered quite in depth.
The same magazine later stated Palin had an affair.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
“More then half of the wealthiest 50 members of congress are democrats, and yet republicans get called greedy because they don’t like to give out welfare checks to every lazy person in America.”
27 out of 50 = half to a right winger.
“They keep the blacks, and other minorities down, by claiming to be “advocates” for them.”
Hmmm who was blaming minorities for the financial meltdown?
Oh yeah…the right wing!
Who has alienated the Hispanic community with racist rhetoric under the guise of being against illegal immigration?
Oh yeah….the right wing!
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 5:45 pm 5:45 pm
“I believe the pure hatred that came at her was people’s own guilty feelings they had towards themselves for not being strong enough and not moral enough to do the right thing when they found themselves (or their partner) PG and instead ended a life.”
ROFLMAO!
Now one dislikes Palin is because one had an abortion and feels guilty!
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
“On why she didn’t answer Katie Couric’s question about what she reads, Palin said that was because, “Katie, you’re not the center of everyone’s universe…”
I think you’ve got your context wrong on that part, Jake. On that part Palin was responding to Couric’s statement on Letterman that she wondered why Palin’s post election interviewers (Lauer, Van Susteren, etc) hadn’t asked about/followed up on Palin’s statements on the reading question. Palin was saying that the interviewers obviously wanted to ask about other things, and that Couric’s preferences for what their questions should be weren’t important.
The second part of her answer explains why she didn’t answer the question in the original interview. From a personal standpoint, I thought that Couric asked an insulting question undeserving of an answer. And I thought that it was obvious that Palin had taken umbrage with the question and was insulted by it when the interview originally aired. Therefore, my only problem with her answer was that she didn’t tell Couric where to get off for asking such an insulting question.
Posted by: red | January 9, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Ryan – You offer a plethora of facts and figures…. what are your “feelings”?? It sounds like you are sitting around a mountain of encyclopedias, newspapers and magazines…….. does it matter that there may be more rich Dems than Reps or vice versa? Either way, we know that none of them are living in a van down by the river…..
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
“More then half of the wealthiest 50 members of congress are democrats, and yet republicans get called greedy because they don’t like to give out welfare checks to every lazy person in America.”
My previous statement was a little confusing so I will clarify.
27 out of the 50 richest members of Congress are Republicans.
The right wing response is to thank me for proving Democrats are more than half the 50 richest members of Congress.
Years from now when historians are attempting to explain how this country elected Bush not once, but twice they will hopefully show statements like the above.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
“Ryan – You offer a plethora of facts and figures…. what are your “feelings”?? It sounds like you are sitting around a mountain of encyclopedias, newspapers and magazines”
A good memory + education + research skills + search engine.
I don’t do anything special
“…….. does it matter that there may be more rich Dems than Reps or vice versa?”
Not really. All members of Congress are rich compared to the average American.
But right wing lies should not be allowed to pass.
“Either way, we know that none of them are living in a van down by the river…..”
Ahhhh Farley. The man who hated himself but loved to make us laugh.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm
When you go to a small town in W. Virginia that has a few thousand people and tell them that they are the ‘real’ Americans like Palin did, not the people in huge cities like NY or LA that have millions of real Americans in them, it’s not very smart, or at least lacks strategic sense.
Posted by: Skip | January 9, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Right wing lies and Liberal lies are all we will hear for the rest of our lives…. now more importantly…. Tennessee or Baltimore?
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
“To the venomous SNL portrayals that are tantamount to the post prop-8 backlash and hate crimes that have resulted from the same.”
Its like Sean Hannity’s rants of the past 2 months put in a blender.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 9, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
Palin is the “best and brightest” the Republicans have to offer. Please, oh please, keep trotting her out, so we never forget what Republicans are really like.
Posted by: Sammy | January 9, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm
Maybe Katie asked the “tough” questions because her ratings were in the tank? She should have kept her hair long and got some Botox, didn’t have to unleash on Palin.
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Great debates here today! Happy Friday to everyone! Cheers!
Posted by: Freein NH | January 9, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm
To Joe Dante: The trooper was never fired.
The trooper threatened her father’s life so if she HAD fired him she had every RIGHT!
All in a days work for a governor, firing a bad cop.
We applaud her for this.
You can’t find any real scandals so you have to make one up.
Posted by: NH | January 9, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
I have to laugh.. the Democrats talk about circus side shows? The Palin family is beautiful and blessed to have such a wonderful mother and Alaska is blessed to have such a great governor, the most popular in the USA!
Posted by: NH | January 9, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
yes sarah-if we are a classed based society-why do you suppose we elected a president who came from among the middle class-and got where he is because he is smarter and more articulate than most-and instead of trying to appeal to the worst of ourselves-appealed to our better self-I was still on the fence until you came on board-You sarah were the last straw-another 4 years of listening to someone butcher the english language-no thanks
Posted by: cowgirlblues | January 9, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
Tina Fey hit the nail on the head with her joke about marriage should be between two unwilling teenagers. Right wing bigots, like Palin, can never accept their reflection in a mirror when you hold one up to them.
Posted by: Flex | January 9, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
There IS a class issue here – Sarah didn’t pay close enough attention during it; that’s why she thinks Africa is a country.
Posted by: rimshot | January 9, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
As a New Yorker, I understand what Gov. Palin is talking about. She was (and still is) scrutinized for not having enough experience; yet Caroline Kennedy hasn’t been hammered in the press for her inexperience…Barrack Obama was barely touched during the campaign about his lack of experience…but Governor Palin was treated differently and no one can honestly explain the reasons why. The fact is, there are no reasons, except maybe political bias. The media no longer reports the news, they are now in the business of influencing it. Neither Barack Obama or Caroline Kennedy have had to make decisions that impacted so many, where as Sarah Palin has. Her detractors can make excuses, but reality exposes their bias. I can see how things will go for the next 6-12 months…things that go well, President Obama and the Democratically-controlled Congress will accept credit; but when things go bad, they will blame President Bush. After a few months, the excuses will lose their relevance and the media, public and key supporters, will stop listening to them and lay the blame where it belongs. Nancy Pelosi blames President Bush for the economic problems, but she forgets that her party has controlled Congress for the past two years and she has been at the head. I wonder if she will share blame with Obama, or turn on him, too! The worst is yet to come…and it isn’t because of President Bush or Republicans. When you’re in total control, you are 100% responsible…and Republicans can’t wait to add insult to injury.
Posted by: Gary | January 9, 2009, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
Steve9337, “thanks” for listing Obama’s Resume for everyone to view. However, no one can change the fact that OB is a beneficiary of affirmative action policy. Without affirmative action policy, OB may just be one of tens and thousands of ordinary Columbia-Harvard-educated graduates and community organizers around the world. Without the affirmative action policy, OB would not have been selected as the 2004 Democratic keynote Speaker. Without affirmative action policy, OB would not have been the Illinois junior senator. Likewise, without affirmative action policy, OB would lose nomination contest to Hillary Clinton. If Clinton won the nomination instead of OB, then she would have easily become the President-Elect rather OB now.
Steve9337, to be faired and balanced, please also list any meaningful paid-job experience OB had, any refereed published legal opinions or articles by OB as the Harvard Law Review President or Constitutional Law Professor at U. Chicago throughout his career, any corner shop, moderate corporation or local government executive responsibilities.
Sarah Palin and her family is no doubt a victim of extreme libeals and democrat-biased media and democratic machine.
Posted by: Jospeh | January 9, 2009, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
Freein NH: To answer your “more important question,” I think Baltimore will surprise the Titans, but not football fans. Their offense isn’t half bad, and we know what their defense can do. We also know what Kerry Collins is like and against such pressure, he makes mistakes. The Titans running game has to be able to run on the Ravens, or this one will be over quick. I say they won’t be able to gain much on the ground and their passing game will create a lot of “3-and-Outs”…Ravens win, 20-6.
Posted by: Gary | January 9, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
Sarah actually has what she wants a whole lot of attention, maybe this will keep her in the mix, even bad attention is somethig!
Posted by: Liz | January 9, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
Joseph, you just cannot see this as it is, he is the President and will be for the next 4-8 yrs, I know 79% of us support him and will con’t to do so, you are in the minority, need a little affirmative action?
Posted by: Liz | January 9, 2009, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
“Jospeh,” you sound delusional. Millions of people all over the world are inspired by this guy, but little you, sitting at home typing away, have figured out that he is where he is because of “affirmative action”???? Yeah. Right.
Posted by: PK | January 9, 2009, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
Palin was disliked and laughed at by a lot of people because of her own words and actions.
When most of us first “met” her, it was at the Republican convention. She came out like a pitbull, very aggressive and negative, no grace at all. Then she went on to make a long string of silly remarks, and it was those remarks that were laughed at, not the media’s analysis of them. She hadn’t heard of the Bush doctrine. She couldn’t name a newspaper that she’d read. She rambled incoherently about one thing after another. She talked about a “real” America, implying that much of the country doesn’t consist of real Americans.
She should grow up and take responsibility for her own words and actions. She seems to have no humility, no ability to acknowledge even the slightest fault of her own. She is just always pointing the finger at someone else. Blame, blame, blame.
Posted by: Chris H. | January 9, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
Sarah, you just can’t have it both ways. First, you said the McCain camp held you back from interviews, and now you are saying they pushed you unwillingly into them. Which is it today? And my question to you is, “Why is education so unimportant to you when it comes to your children? As a state governor, don’t you know and understand the value of higher education?”
Posted by: Linden | January 9, 2009, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
On the State of Alaska web site, at the Governor’s office news section is a whine list disguised as a press release. Found among the selections is the following:
In another [false story], an irresponsible talk show host in Anchorage alleged in a newspaper column that the governor must have intervened to get a job for her future son-in-law, circumventing eligibility rules for the position. Again, the allegation was immediately discredited by proof that the governor did not influence Levi’s employment.
Whoa, there she goes with the lies again. The talk show host did not allege that the governor MUST have intervened. What he wrote was: “We don’t know the governor’s involvement. Eventually she will have to address the controversy.”
And what “proof” was it that discredited the allegation? Denials aren’t “proof” of anything – and denials are all that I’ve heard thus far.
Something smells rotten in the state of Alaska.
Posted by: WWW | January 10, 2009, 4:41 am 4:41 am
Sarah Palin is a human being and humans have flaws (unless you are talking about barack obama…he’s the messiah) She has a high approval rating because, so far, she has done what she said she was going to do when she ran. She took on her own party and got rid of the immense corruption that has plagued Alaska. There hasn’t been any sort of scandal while she has been governor. People have tried to force scandals on her and after everyone she comes out clean. Seems to me that the Dems in Alaska are trying very hard to make it look like she is corrupt……so far it’s not working.
Posted by: Jim | January 10, 2009, 5:05 am 5:05 am
I count 8 years of being an executive for Palin and zero for Obama.
Looking at the numbers I would say Palin has more experiences than Obama.
More than 50% of people say she isn’t qualified. And I had to ask my self why and did some research on the subject. It seams that the national press kept reporting that she was unqualified and got her with gotcha questions. The press also reported that Obama was qualified while never telling us why he was more qualified than Palin. The only gotcha question that Obama received was from Joe the plummer.
Lets take Biden, How is he qualified to be vice president if Palin isn’t qualified. How many people hear of all the goofy statements he made. Not many I bet, because the press doesn’t harp on them as much as they went after Palin.
We can argue all day long who would be a better president/vice president and that is ok. But why are some people on here attacking her family. I haven’t seen anyone attack bidens or Obama’s family.
Posted by: Laura | January 10, 2009, 5:07 am 5:07 am
The entire interview with that Katie Couric was ridiculous… I don’t consider Miss Katie a proper reporter…she is so far left to be neutral when it comes to politics. I also believe that because her night time news show was fading fast, she had to do something to get back into the media.
I also see that Caroline Kennedy is being treated with kid gloves. What the heck is that all about???? How come she isn’t being treated the way they all treated Sarah palin?
All I see is unfair journalism….and very biased media.
Posted by: Aka | January 10, 2009, 5:14 am 5:14 am
I think that the 2008 was the dirtiest election ever I have seen in this history of this country. I am ashamed of it. Leftist trash the innocents. Gov. Palin was honest and clean, and that is the most important. It is better to lose being honest, than to win being dishonest. The media has gone wild and out of ethics.
Posted by: Jan | January 10, 2009, 5:16 am 5:16 am
Journalism is dead in America.
The media don’t do any reporting anymore ,but are promoting their favorite.
You can not trust the mains stream media
anymore.
Posted by: Jack | January 10, 2009, 5:19 am 5:19 am
There is no question that the main stream media ran this election. Shame on the people for not picking up on it more and demanding justice.
Posted by: SAR | January 10, 2009, 5:21 am 5:21 am
Sarah Palin is a normal red blooded AMERICAN and proud to be American! I think like most of us she wants what is best for America, Not what the Government thinks is best for America. I do not watch and will not watch the regular media. They are so one sided they couldn’t walk a straight line.
Posted by: Maris | January 10, 2009, 5:22 am 5:22 am
Not only were they were unfair to Mrs. Gov.Palin it stems from them being petrified of her! Because she is a good and truly strong woman! She showed that she is strong without being the dreaded “B” word. She is GENUINE!
Posted by: Greg | January 10, 2009, 5:25 am 5:25 am
You do not hear squat about C Kennedy about her lack of expierience in life and job, I do not think she has even ever had a job yet being considered as a Senator.
Disgustingly a double standard to which one day the side the media is so protecting will pounce on them.
Posted by: Caty | January 10, 2009, 5:27 am 5:27 am
If Barack Obama is the messiah then Sarah Palin is the Ms.siah. However, her approval rating has dropped substantially. A recent survey of 500+ Alaskans shows 57 percent prefer Lisa Murkowski in the 2010 Republican Senate primary. Only 33 percent would vote for Palin.
Sarah Palin is not clean nor is she honest. She took per diem dollars even though she stayed in Wasilla, doing her guv stuff from home. And although the appointed panel from the personnel board let her off, the legislative Troopergate report found her guilty of an ethics violation. When that report came out, she outrageously lied about it, claiming that it cleared her of “any hint of wrongdoing.”
Sarah Palin is not genuine. She’s a proven actress, with the betchas and the winkin’ and the droppin’ of every G. She didn’t do it BEFORE the campaign, and she stopped doing it when she went back to work as governor. Now, in front of the cameras again for this documentary, she has started back up. Palin has the only accent that changes with the wind direction.
She pretends to be the poor, exploited victim of the big, bad MSM monster, and her fans blindly buy her brand of Palin Pink Koolaid.
Posted by: testing 1, 2, 3 | January 10, 2009, 5:58 am 5:58 am
I am amazed at the blind following of too many Americans. The American media is an absolute joke. They don’t report the news they make it up to fit their agenda which is to support the fringes of our society. If you are anything but what the average person would call normal they support the cause. As far a Governor Palin the media kept blasting her for “NO” experience while never once acknowledging that their sweet heart “Obama” hasn’t done anything in the real world except work with a bunch of corrupt business people, unethical politicians and radicals. In fact he spent most of his time in the Senate running for President. So was she treated fair? Not by even a reasonable standard!!!!
Posted by: Larry | January 10, 2009, 6:31 am 6:31 am
I will admit she may not have been as prepared as she could or should have, considering the time she had, wonder who could have been any better, but that certainly doesn’t take away from her intelligence and common sense. I personally believe she would have been the best thing this country hasseen decades. A fresh, honest, down to earth individual who wasn’t willing to play ball just to secure a job.
Posted by: Tim | January 10, 2009, 6:32 am 6:32 am
I think the media was wrong on the way they did Palin during her campaign. Anymore it seems the media doesn’t really report the truth, it seems they want to dig dirt and make fasle statements on officals that make sense on some topics.
Posted by: M | January 10, 2009, 6:37 am 6:37 am
The treatment of Sara Palin was one of the most one sided and biased peices of journalism I have ever seen in my life. The treatment of her and her family was dispicable. The bottom line was she was obiviously such a threat to the liberal establishment they pulled out all of the stops to destroy her. It also appears they are still afraid of her since they will not miss any chance to tarnish her to this day.
Posted by: Catty | January 10, 2009, 6:38 am 6:38 am
I can’t believe that there’s actually any reason for serious debate about this question. The mainstream media didn’t even try to hide their bias in favor of Barack Obama. It was as blatant and over-the-top as I’ve ever seen in my nearly 40 years of following American politics. The hatchet job that was launched on Sarah Palin once she became the GOP VP nominee was disgraceful.
I’m no rock-ribbed conservative by any means, and I think that Gov. Palin’s subsequent TV interviews showed pretty clearly that she wasn’t yet ready to be president if needed. But what she and her family had to endure at the hands of the press is enough to make any sane person never want to run for high public office.
Posted by: Bob | January 10, 2009, 6:39 am 6:39 am
yes, the main stream media were not fair to sarah palin. despite she is the alaska governor still they said she is not qualified but what about the too rich caroline kennedy? why are they too quiet?
Posted by: dlr | January 10, 2009, 6:41 am 6:41 am
I am sorry if I offend some liberals on here or confuse you with facts and not feelings on Palin and our new president. First the easy topic media and liberals still havent come to reality that Barack is not first black president he is the first inter-racial president and the election of a multi racial president I think was a good thing for America only in sense of race in America but I dont agree with his policies. If Sarah Palin was running for the Senate and had given the same interview that Caroline Kennedy gave last week the media would have this on every show and on every newspaper running it 24/7. Notice we don’t see Kennedy in the media anymore because they had to make her disappear because she made those liberals and democrats look stupid who were supporting her. Also it would show how liberals think popularity is what should get someone elected or appointed nothing to do with their past record or associations so the media had to stop showing or talking about her immediately. If Caroline would have given a great interview she would be on the media 24/7. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see the biased but you do have to look at it with factual eyes not with how you feel.
Posted by: Haywood | January 10, 2009, 6:42 am 6:42 am
Definitely, the media was terrible to Sarah Palin during the campaign and continues to be
that way. I also agree with her that they handle Democrats and certain people like the
Kennedys, for example, with kid gloves.
Posted by: Donna | January 10, 2009, 6:44 am 6:44 am
The most dangerous institution in the US is the media. Watch a story on one channel and then watch the coverage of the same story on another and you see the bias. The factual, trustworthy information available to people in third world countries is about the same as what we have here. The coverage of the past election was shockingly biased.
Governor Palin was perceived as a threat to the media plan for the past election and therefore had to be attacked. Her children, her religous beliefs, her non-ivy league education, her clothes, on and on attacks.
Posted by: ED | January 10, 2009, 6:46 am 6:46 am
Sarah Palin has been caught in yet another lie right on her own government web site. The latest governor’s “press release” (lol) states:
“In another [false story], an irresponsible talk show host in Anchorage alleged in a newspaper column that the governor must have intervened to get a job for her future son-in-law, circumventing eligibility rules for the position. Again, the allegation was immediately discredited by proof that the governor did not influence Levi’s employment.”
The talk show host did not allege that the governor MUST have intervened. What he wrote was: “We don’t know the governor’s involvement. Eventually she will have to address the controversy.”
And what “proof” was it that discredited the allegation? Denials aren’t “proof” of anything.
Something smells rotten in the state of Alaska. It stinks more and more as time goes by.
Posted by: WWW | January 10, 2009, 7:11 am 7:11 am
I hope that Palin maintains her popularity among the right wing, she is just the kind of Republican we need for 2012. The kind that will continue to show the how out of touch Republican are. The kind will continue to fill up the grave of the Republican party.
Posted by: Rich | January 10, 2009, 8:33 am 8:33 am
I liken Palin to a horrific car accident seen on the freeway. It’s very bad, you really want to just look away and get past it, but somehow you can’t tear your eyes away from it. That same accident leads to traffic jams and often causes other accidents, just like a Palin vice-presidency would have done. In the end you simply end up feeling sorry for everyone who was impacted by it…..
Posted by: SearamblerOne | January 10, 2009, 8:42 am 8:42 am
The main stream media has the ear of the population so much so that most people I talk with Dem and Rep can’t say anything but what they have heard on some main stream media evening news. I am an unabashedly and unapologetically Republican but that doesn’t mean I agree with every Rep position. I, also, read the NY Times daily. I cried listening to McCain’s concession speech and I cried listening to Obama’s acceptance speech. So, what would Katie do with me? I would just like the news to get back to reporting the news and not interpreting/thinking for us. Problem seems to be that the top people reporting believe they are the “news; are the stars.” I’ve got news for them. Palin is the star!!
Posted by: tom | January 10, 2009, 8:54 am 8:54 am
Sarah’s handlers kept her of the campaign trail for some time, their excuse, they did not want to throw her to the liberal wolves. However Sarah was more capable at handling liberal the wolves than McCains management staff. Obama is a one term president, the liberal media claim that he is brilliant and he may be. However he lacks good old common horse sense. Common sense is what made this country great. There is very little common sense in Washington.
Posted by: John | January 10, 2009, 9:04 am 9:04 am
For those you wish to think for yourself, I cheer you, but the question is if that is the way you feel, do you watch Fox News? If you do not, I cheer you again, if you do watch Fox, then the stop and experience what it is like to “think” for yourself.
Posted by: Rich | January 10, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am
Palin has executive experience, is a wife, mother, Governor, hunter, fisherman, and best of all the left hates her. When the MSM and the left is so threatened by someone with values, morals, and integrity…that is a GREAT thing!
Posted by: Rob | January 10, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am
Sarah Palin has been caught in yet another lie right on her own government web site. The latest governor’s “press release” (lol) states:
“In another [false story], an irresponsible talk show host in Anchorage alleged in a newspaper column that the governor must have intervened to get a job for her future son-in-law, circumventing eligibility rules for the position. Again, the allegation was immediately discredited by proof that the governor did not influence Levi’s employment.”
The talk show host did not allege that the governor MUST have intervened. What he wrote was: “We don’t know the governor’s involvement. Eventually she will have to address the controversy.”
And what “proof” was it that discredited the allegation? Denials aren’t “proof” of anything.
Something smells rotten in the state of Alaska. It stinks more and more as time goes by.
Posted by: Re: Pete (for Lucy & Laura) | January 10, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am
WOW! Talk about sour grapes. Sarah, if you want to see who was responsble for the walloping you took at the polls last November I suggest you look in the mirror. Gawd, accept some responsiblity for once in your life.
Posted by: Drew Hoffman | January 10, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am
The MSM is a joke, most of them are more concerned with the doings of Brangelina or which star is in rehab than serious news (present company excluded) of course. Sarah is more accomplished, trustworthy, than either PEBO or JB!
Posted by: Todd | January 10, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Palin is right; children are of limit and is dirt to attack her children and tell lies about her children.
It is like Palin said; attack her but not her children.
Posted by: Jack | January 10, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
WOW; THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA REALLY SCREWED UP ON THIS ONE. I WATCH THE NEWS AND SEE BLAGOJEVICH IMPEACHED,SHEILA DIXON INDICTED FOR FRAUD,GOV SPITZER RUN OUT OF OFFICE,AND THEN THERE IS JOHN EDWARDS. WE COULD HAVE REALLY GOOD PEOPLE RUNNING OUR COUNTRY IF THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA WOULD REPORT FAIR AND BALANCED. HOW ABOUT BARNY FRANK AND CHRIS DODD WHO ACTUALLY CAUSED THE HOUSING MELTDOWN. AND NOW LOOK WHAT WE GOT EVEN THE DEMOCRATS ARE GETTING NERVOUS. I HOPE IT ALL WORKS OUT FOR OUR OUR KIDS SAKE.
Posted by: Joe | January 10, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
I find it quite telling how our friends on the left are still going on and on about Sarah Palin. You can rant all you want but there is nothing stupid about the woman. She was badly managed by the Mccain campaign however. A little contrast is that Sarah Palin was a mayor of a small town and a regular citizen before that. She then became Governor and went after Republican corruption. Now on the other hand, Obama was a community organizer (Activist) for a good portion of his adult life that we have seen was around the activist group Acorn. He then went on to political office Not by winning on the merits. He had all of his opponents thrown off the ballot. So in conclusion we have a Governor who may be in Political office But, She is no Politician. On the other hand, We have Obama that was involved in the swamp of Chicago politics. This contrast is shown in Sarah Palins “Regular speech” Against Obamas “Political speech” listen how they speak off the teleprompters and you will see that Sarah Palin is indeed the better speaker. Also the media’s perception of her was very one sided and unfair. When treated the same way, Hillary Clinton cried if you remember. Why were these two women treated like this by the media? They were both against Obama. Sarah Palin has no campaign leash anymore. It will be vwery interesting to see what she chooses to do. The Nonsense about Palin continues because the Left fear her.
Posted by: Kitty | January 10, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
A prime example. Seeing Russia from her house never happened. She said you can see Russia from certain areas in Alaska. I know the place she means. From the shoreline you see two small islands. They are Big Diomede and Little Diomede. Big Diomede is part of Russia and you can see the mainland in the distance in the summer.
The “House” remark was Tina Fey of Saturday night live” fame. More proof that the Zogby poll showed that most Obama voters are ill informed.
Posted by: Bt | January 10, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
Later in in the campaign Palin did well in interviews and the debate with Biden went also well.
Only the Couric interview( some part) went bad; and those part got massive media attention.
The interviews that went well got almost no media attention.
Also the main stream media took over much gossip and lies of anonymous bloggers and presented this information about Palin and her family as facts.
In this manner the main stream media created deliberate, a distorted image of Sarah Palin.
Look how Caroline is treated in the media.
Caroline did a very bad interview a time ago, but no mockery and you almost not read about this poor interview in the newspapers.
The media are staying very nice and soft towards Caroline.
If Sarah Palin would do this , she would be finished in the media and mocked in SNL; but not Caroline.
Double standard!.
The main stream media constantly hammered to the people that Palin was unqualified and that Obama was qualified.
Posted by: Charlie | January 10, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
We don’t see David Spade portraying Joe Biden(not a stretch for him to do so) or Chris Rock portraying Barack Obama. Honestly seeing those 2 quoting Biden and Obama would have been much funnier than Tina Fey accuratlely portraying Mrs. Palin. I saw more gaffs from Obama or Biden. Admit it liberals, ya had a few chuckles watching them.
Posted by: Rob | January 10, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Sarah Palin took on the corruption in her own party!!
Obama had (has?) for many year connections with dubious persons; Wright, Ayers, Rezko, and in 2002 Obama supported Blago.
Posted by: Laura | January 10, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm
Poor little ol innocent Sarah Palin. Let’s see if we can add up all her problems.
First, the bridge to no where comment of “thanks but no thanks”. Right, she didn’t build it but still took the money from the feds and used it for other projects including a study for understanding the mating habits of the Alaskan Sea Crab. All this while claiming she is a reformer and fiscally responsible. Amazing.
Next, she and her husband are members/supporters of the Alaska Independent Party which calls for Alaska to secede from the United States. Sad, and yet she stands next to the American flag at all her campaign rallies. She’s no patriot.
$200,000 in illegal wardrobe expenses from the RNC.
Promotes abstinence as a method of birth control for all young Americans yet her 16 year old daughter becomes pregnant. Hypocite!
Troopergate!
Now we learn she thwarted the investigation of her daughters potential mother-in-law for drug charges (meth).
The list go’ on and on and on. Sarah Palin is a train wreck waiting to happen.
Fortunately for America she only represents a small but vocal fringe group of the Republican party. Hopefully, they will get the message and move on and create their own political party and let the rest of us ‘real’ Republicans get back to respectibility. McCain is a good and decent man whose only mistake was picking Sarah Palin as his running mate.
Posted by: PhilBgood | January 10, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
I find Palin’s comments laughable and her snide remark to Katie Couric — “Cat–tee”. As a former republican for many years, switching before the 2004 election — I have never seen anyone so unsuited for a position she thought she could win, nor the one she holds presently.
I was mostly disturbed that a mother would put her daughter in front of the national spotlight when she was so vunerable, that truly outraged me being a mother of two girls who each have a daughter. And her total partisan potshots and ability to enrage people during the campaigning — maybe Alaska deserves what they voted for but the rest of the 49 states should not be subjected to it.
Posted by: paulet | January 10, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Can we please stop hearing about this stupid, lying, whining woman and her family?
Posted by: capwife | January 10, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
For the followers who believe your Ms.siah speaks so eloquently off the teleprompter, here’s just one little reality check for you.
With Matt Lauer on the subject of the Couric interview:
“No, no, because, you know I’m sure that some of my impatience showed through in that, in that interview, I think it also showed though that certainly as a Washington outsider and as somebody not, not, one to just, I guess kinda play even the, the campaigning media game that is played in, in, in just repeating perhaps memorized lines in a, in an interview. That’s not me.”
Posted by: testing 1, 2, 3 | January 10, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Caroline did a very bad interview a couple days ago.
She refused to answer some questions and her talk was not nice. You know,you know.
And the main stream media stayed very nice and soft to her; no mocking , no ridiculing as they did to Sarah Palin.
Double standard!!!!
Posted by: Razor | January 10, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Sarah Palin is a human being and humans have flaws (unless you are talking about barack obama…he’s the messiah) She has a high approval rating because, so far, she has done what she said she was going to do when she ran. She took on her own party and got rid of the immense corruption that has plagued Alaska.
There hasn’t been any sort of scandal while she has been governor. People have tried to force scandals on her and after everyone she comes out clean. Seems to me that the Dems in Alaska are trying very hard to make it look like she is corrupt……so far it’s not working.
Posted by: Razor | January 10, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Your Ms.siah’s approval rating has slipped. So much so that, in a recently survey, 57% said they would vote for Lisa Murkowski in the 2010 Republican Senate primary as compared to 33% for Sarah Palin.
Posted by: testing 1, 2, 3 | January 10, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
When richy-rich Caroline Kennedy let the “you know” bomb slip more than 100 times, the press was all over it. Yet when upper middle-class Sarah Palin used “also” 48 times in the debate as compared to Biden’s 3 times, the press never said a word.
Classic classism double standard!
Posted by: WWW | January 10, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
Those who do not like Palin are jealous and immature.
She is not afraid of anyone, does not run in a corner and cry, when UNFOUNDED remarks are made of her. She is herself and is not trying to win man’s praise. Boy isn’t that refreshing.
Palin does not ride on her name like Caroline Kennedy. Kennedy has no experience to be in the Senate. Look at her record she is a good fund raiser and a good PTA chairman. What other experience is there? Only a name that does not make one capable.
But then again America did vote Obama in so we might as well continue in the downward spiral.
Posted by: Jack | January 10, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm
As for the early withholding of Palin from the media between the convention and the Couric interview, by the time of the Couric interview, the damage was done because the press was furious that McCain’s campaign had denied them the chance to interview Palin—and the cascade of attacks was on from there, thanks to the campaign.
Shielding Palin for 3 weeks was the big mistake.
Posted by: Tim | January 10, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
No one ever has the experience to be President of the US unless you are running for a second term.
Sarah Palin is a setting governor and has had to make decision where the buck stops with her.
You are as good as the people you surround yourself with. So far she has listened to all different views from her advisers and made the right decisions.
We will see how capable Obama is in that area. We already know that he has never gone against his party.
Posted by: Lucy | January 10, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
So many comments on this forum refer to Governor Palin as unintelligent. So where’s the proof? I haven’t seen any IQ tests results or transcripts for her, or Obama and Biden for that matter. They all seem plenty intelligent to me. Politicians need to be strong communicators and I think all three are. Not perfect, but good. We all make mistakes, and those who expect perfection from Palin will be just as dissapointed by Obama and Biden at the end of the day.
Posted by: Can | January 10, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
When Gov. Sarah Palin worked out a new Natural Gas Pipeline deal in favor of the Alaskans the Bush
administration tried several times to intervene on behalf of Big Oil. Sarah Palin went against the Bush
administration and put the people of Alaska first. Sarah Palin will always put the people before any party.
That could be her down fall but it scares the hate out of the left.
Posted by: AK | January 10, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
I will say this again for all of the so called liberal minded idiots on this blog.
The media had all the right in the world to go after Gov Palin (as Palin also said in the interview; attack me ,but not my children) and her husband but not her children or the fact that one of them were handicapped. Low life scum take children on and slim them because they can not defend themselves.
Posted by: John | January 10, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
Do Biden & Obama say PUN-dint for Pundit? No, Can. Do Biden & Obama say NOO-kyoo-ler for Nuclear? No, Can. Do Biden & Obama say VURB-ij for Verbiage? No, Can. Do Biden & Obama say HEE-nee-us for Heinous? No, Can. Do Biden & Obama constantly use the word “progress” as a transitive verb? No, Can. Do Biden & Obama speak in run-on sentences that are 25, 50, 75 words long? No, Can. Do Biden & Obama speak gibberish? No, Can. Do reconsider your position.
Posted by: WWW | January 10, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
What a non-story. If the news media had any sense of fairness, Palin would never have a chance to spout her self serving nonsense about other people and would not cover such a non-story. I recall that towards the end of the GE campaign Palin constantly demonstrated she is not a team player and critisism from inside the McCain campaign demonstrated that she is all about number one.
We should remember that Palin talked trash, ridiculing and decrying Hillary’s charge of sexism in the campaign until it became useful to her political prospects. Comparing the media coverage of Palin’s ineptitude to the media coverage of the daughter of a loved, respected and slain former president is disengenous at best given that:
1. Palin failed to answer Couric’s most basic questions intellegently, coherently or–in my opinion (which I acknowledge to be baised unlike others on this site)–honestly. I would have had enormous respect for her had she just have said, I don’t know what the Bush docrine is rather than giving an obviouly B.S. answer.
2. We should remember the way in which she exploited and capitalized on the open prejudice of many against marginalized peoples. In this case, Arabs and Muslims Americans. If Palin had any shred of decency she would not have incited public sentiment against “others”. She should remedy this by apologizing to Arab & Muslim Americans for her behavior before her arguement and critique of the media being a “classist” institution any degree of seriousness.
Posted by: Steve | January 10, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
Sarah Palin made her children an issue when she made ‘family values’ an issue. BTW, if Palin is leading by example she is doing a mighty poor job of it.
Posted by: Audrey E. | January 10, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Palin is the best canidate for 2012. The media can only hold her down for so long. The media tried to hold another “small town hick” down, Ronald Reagan, and look how that turned out.
Posted by: liberalsaresocialists | January 10, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Democrats are chomping at the bit to see Sarah Palin as the GOP nominee in 2012. It will be a cakewalk. And, anybody that compares Sarah Palin to Ronald Reagan needs to have their head examined. lol
Posted by: Former Republican | January 10, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
No one had ever heard of this moose hunting female until McCain drug her out of Alaska!NOW..she refuses to quietly go AWAY!GET LOST PALIN!
Posted by: orangecat | January 10, 2009, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
sarah the gift that keeps on giving, look i am sorry, i am not one to be calling names but if you live in a glass house you’d better not be throwing stones and guess what Queen Sarah did when she was introduced on the national stage she wasn’t even throwing stones but she was throwing LARGE ROCKS!!!!, little did we know behind that wink and smirk and $150K gucci glasses and amarni suits and expensive jewellery, she was an EMPTY HEAD!! she was a COMPLETE FAILURE as a student, morally she as DECADENT as they come, the classic “trying to remove the speck out of someone’s eye when a big rock was in hers”, then followed the disastrous interviews, softballs lobbed in her way yet she flunked it like when she flunked her courses in 4 colleges or whatever, what a complete JOKE!!!
if you republicans are stupid again to bring her near the national stage, good for you, we will reject her again.
Look at the way she talks, geez, my classic one was when she was punked by the canadian djs posing as Pres Sarkozy, her response” AAAAW NOOOOOO …W WE’VE BEEN PUNKED” talking out of hear nose, what a JOKE.
Posted by: mynameispaaalin | January 11, 2009, 12:27 am 12:27 am
She’s right! I agree with everything she is saying!
Posted by: Sooner | January 11, 2009, 1:46 am 1:46 am
The prank call was more enlightening than any of her interviews. It gave us a glimpse into how Sarah Palin REALLY carries herself around foreign leaders. Her lack of decorum was appalling. She giggled and brown-nosed and was completely inappropriate from the start: “Hell-OH… Ohhhhh, so good, it’s so good to hear you! Thank you [giggle] for calling us. Thank you sir, we have such great respect for you, John McCain and I. We love you…”
Imagine a meeting with Queen Elizabeth: Oh my goodness, your majesty, [giggle] it’s sooooo darn good to meet ya! Todd and I, we just love you! [giggle] May I call you Liz? I heard you like huntin’ also – tallyho ya know. [giggle]
Posted by: Rudy | January 11, 2009, 2:07 am 2:07 am
WWW: In case you don’t know it but MANY people pronounce certain words differently or incorrectly! It depends on the area or the country that you come from! For instance people from the south or from my area pronounce nuclear as nookler. And that includes educated people, too! It doesn’t bother me. I don’t know why it bothers you so much!
Posted by: Sooner | January 11, 2009, 2:19 am 2:19 am
WWW: If you want to talk about accents and the way people say certain words, what about Bill Clinton and his southern accent and the way he pronounces his words? Also what about the New England accent? Have you ever listened to Caroline Kennedy speak? There’s an accent for you!
Posted by: Sooner | January 11, 2009, 2:25 am 2:25 am
There are accents and then there are mispronunciations. They are two very different animals. For example, there are no accents or regional dialects anywhere in the world in which it is correct to say HEE-nee-us for heinous. Heck, she doesn’t even know how many syllables it has!
Face it, she doesn’t have a very good grasp of the language, especially for a politician, and one who allegedly earned a degree in journalism.
Posted by: Later | January 11, 2009, 2:40 am 2:40 am
Later: You have no idea what you are talking about! IF what you are saying is true what about people from other countries who don’t speak certain words the way we do? Are you saying that they’re not bright or intelligent? If you are, you are showing you’re lack of intelligence!
Posted by: Sooner | January 11, 2009, 2:53 am 2:53 am
lol, Sooner, you had me going there. I thought for a while you were actually serious!
Posted by: Later | January 11, 2009, 3:35 am 3:35 am
I am serious!
Posted by: Sooner | January 11, 2009, 3:48 am 3:48 am
Then you and yours have my sympathies.
Posted by: Later | January 11, 2009, 3:49 am 3:49 am
“I think they would have loved me as a candidate, and I’ve already lived through that more on a local level. There have been times where, here in Alaska, I’ve taken on my own republican party when there has been corruption, and I’ve been one to say ‘Nope, enough is enough, we’re gonna clean up this party and the leader’s got to go and we’ve gotta start anew.’ Well, the mainstream media here in Alaska, they’ve loved me through those episodes and then, though, the minute that it is that I have done something that is, you know, back to the conservative roots and we’re gonna not grow government here in Alaska and we’re gonna develop our resources and that’s when even the mainstream media here in Alaska, they turn on ya, so there’s so much hypocrisy in it all, it’s, it’s, it’s pretty baffling. But, yeah, had I been chosen perhaps to run as a reformer on the democrat ticket, you would have seen an absolutely different and um, I think a, if you will, a much prettier profile of Sarah Palin and the Palin family and my administration.”
Translation (best said while looking in a mirror): I’m Good Enough, I’m Smart Enough, and Doggone It, People Love Me… sometimes
Posted by: Stuart Smalley | January 11, 2009, 3:56 am 3:56 am
But my understanding is that so many other topics that were brought up certainly weren’t portrayed as accurately perhaps as they could have, should have been after that interview.”
“There were a lot of things that I think it could have, should have said that could have, would have helped John McCain.”
How much wood could a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
Posted by: Coulda Woulda Shoulda | January 11, 2009, 4:12 am 4:12 am
Now Sarah Palin is trying to pretend that Couric asked her, “Do you read?” and “What do you do up there?”
Here is the REAL question straight from the interview: “And when it comes to establishing your worldview, I was curious, what newspapers and magazines did you regularly read before you were tapped for this to stay informed and to understand the world?”
Sarah Palin is not only a big crybaby; she’s a big DISHONEST crybaby.
Posted by: Geddit Straight | January 11, 2009, 4:42 am 4:42 am
The lib/democrat media is biased – always have been and always will be.
Period.
Posted by: John | January 11, 2009, 5:05 am 5:05 am
Sarah Pailin continues to do an exemplary job as chief executive of the state of Alaska. What’s really sad is that the American people were “done in” by the main stream media. Obama is the president. Perhaps the liberals missed that. We’ll see how Chicago machine politics will do for our country. By the way, there is no “change” in Obama’s future administration. It’s a repeat of the Clinton years. Let the liberal lies continue.
Posted by: Jean | January 11, 2009, 5:07 am 5:07 am
I fear for America, the last best hope for mankind. Here is an exceptional person willing enough to go up against MSM, DNC/ABC/NBC/CBS/CNN/Hollywood because she happens to love her country.
Words like respect, honor, fairness and integrity are used when it sounds good and its convenient, but the actions from our so called leaders is far from it. Gov. Palin seems sincere, she has a decent history of accomplishments.
Posted by: zeke | January 11, 2009, 5:15 am 5:15 am
As a liberal feminist woman, I am ashamed of how my friends and associates treated Palin. I do not agree with her on certain policy positions, but I will fight for her right to speak freely and to be treated with respect. I admire her self-sufficiency, strength, and obvious courage in taking on special interests at the risk of her own career. Palin used the right word: hypocrisy. We now see that many women only support other women who are exactly like them. It was both partisan and a class issue. Palin is not from the “insider’s club” of the Ivy League, so the arrogant elitists felt so smug about ridiculing her, ignoring her impressive record as governor.
Posted by: Jane | January 11, 2009, 5:17 am 5:17 am
I have seen liberal smears and blind hatred before, but usually directed at minorities who dare to have a different(and therefore unacceptable) opinions. Condi Rice, Clarence Thomas come to mind. Sarah being professional & strong willed, yet conservative scares them. It was mentioned in an article in jest, however, I believe liberals hate her for NOT aborting Trig. Remember Obama said he would NEVER PUNISH his daughters with a child for the mistake of having an unwanted pregnancy.
Posted by: JK | January 11, 2009, 5:20 am 5:20 am
An interesting video interview and if Sarah had kept this sort of candor with her other interviews and the VP debate pre-election day, she could have won more fans and supporters. She’s new to the national stage and how things are done in the other states, Alaska is a whole different ball game than what is played here and I don’t think she was quite prepared for it all. If she can get tough and brush up a bit more on the basic politics in Washington, I may be open more to her in the future; however, right now she is not ready to be VP let alone president like some wish her to be.
Posted by: Sweat | January 11, 2009, 5:24 am 5:24 am
As the skewed reporting and many of the comments on this page are a testament to.. it still amazes me how much hatred people on the left have for Gov. Palin. It goes beyond disagreeing with her and into every personal attack they can think of. Whats funny is, most of them probably had no idea who she was prior to 2008. Now, in their minds, she’s the most dangerous woman in America.
Conservatives were no fan of Hillary.. but I’ve never seen Conservatives (even Limbaugh!) spew the same kind of hatred towards her. I know many Conservatives that really like Hillary in fact – even if they do disagree with her on a lot of things.
Posted by: AJ | January 11, 2009, 5:31 am 5:31 am
The main stream medias need to back off. Sarah is the real deal! She is my kind of folk!
Go Sarah 2012!
Posted by: Jimbo Billy Bob Bubba Joe Darrell Earl John Boy McCoy | January 11, 2009, 5:56 am 5:56 am
Sarah Pailin has done a wonderful job as governor of Alaska. It’s terrble what the main stream media have done to her. The liberals love their messiah and do everything they can to attack Sarah and her family. But the more they attack, the more she will end up ahead in the long run.
Posted by: Bozo the Clown | January 11, 2009, 6:03 am 6:03 am
The bias main stream media is to blame for everything!
Posted by: Ratzo Rizzo | January 11, 2009, 6:06 am 6:06 am
I do not love Sarah but I sure do admire her. I always admired people who rose from the bottom because of their hard work.
I am well aware of some of Sarah Palin gaffs as they were wallpapered on every network channel 7 days a week to insure that her every fumble was magnified 7X over.
Biden who teaches law but can’t tell you what branch of government is responsible for what.
The same Biden that told us that when the great depression began president Franklin Roosevelt got on the TV and told everyone it would be okay ( even though Roosevelt wasn’t the president at that time and there was no TV at that time either ) Biden is a lawyer and a senator you don’t expect that kind of gaff from someone with his experience and those weren’t his only goofs.
Posted by: BT | January 11, 2009, 6:08 am 6:08 am
Hey, wanna see what a 75 word sentence looks like?
“Well, the mainstream media here in Alaska, they’ve loved me through those episodes and then, though, the minute that it is that I have done something that is, you know, back to the conservative roots and we’re gonna not grow government here in Alaska and we’re gonna develop our resources and that’s when even the mainstream media here in Alaska, they turn on ya, so there’s so much hypocrisy in it all, it’s, it’s, it’s pretty baffling.”
Posted by: Shucks | January 11, 2009, 6:12 am 6:12 am
For seven years, Sarah Palin slept with a card-carrying member of an Alaskan secessionist group. “Good luck on a successful and inspiring convention – keep up the good work and God bless you,” she told the group last year.
Posted by: uncomplicated | January 11, 2009, 8:12 am 8:12 am
For 30 years Obama has been mentored by, and befriended communist/marxist,socialist ideologues.
I would take Palins AIP which only wants to secede because of mass government intrusion into our lives, over Obamas socialistic big government dicatorship any day of the week.
Posted by: Badger | January 11, 2009, 8:42 am 8:42 am
Today is Sunday, Badger. You better high-tail it out of here or you’ll miss the next flight out to Alaskaland.
Posted by: Bandicoot | January 11, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Sarah Palin does not even know what “Classism” is! She has an ego so great that she belives she can do anything and belives everyone else is wrong. What comes out of a person’s mouth first, is usually the truth, its when they try to change it, they get in trouble. She is very star crazed and quite enept to even lead her state. Hope she climbs that mountain to Russia.
Posted by: SUNMAKER777 | January 11, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am
Its just fascinating to see and witness the emotions that Governor Palin can elicit! I think that we all have to agree that HoneyCakes (DARN!) Sarah, has “something.”
To the Palinites, I really don’t think anyone hates our Lamb. I think people are just astonished and astounded that someone of her calibre was able to come within a heartbeat of the Presidency of the United States. It IS and was quite scary! I am having a hard time forgiving the Republican honchos for this scam/farce they tried to foist upon the American people. After all, she is who she is. Which leads me to comment;
Our SweetiePie, is woefully inept, (at least at this time), and she only underlines that ineptness each and everytime she performs interviews as such. She would do herself a world of good politically and personally, to “go under the radar screen” and concentrate on building her base and intellect about most things ( I do mean that in the kindest of ways!) Also, given that she does not evaluate her interviews (very unwise!)she may want to get in the habit of doing that and becoming aware of the sarcasm that she spews and tone it down a lot. Its her really nasty sarcasm which have sparked the viscious posts and comments that you see–even exhibited here. “If you live by the sword, surely you will die by it.”
IMHO, If she engages a capable PR firm and they were to design a compelling campaign for her, …well? Also, if it proves out that she can fundraise–watch out! Anyway, in just doing these things, I believe she has a real future in the international arena.
But, who are we kidding? We all know that shewould never even consider such strategy! Why? …Because everyone else is at fault–not her, and she feels its all about her. Shame….
Posted by: FS | January 11, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
God bless Sarah Palin and her beautiful family. BTW, she’s still the better VP choice as far as leadership background goes!
Posted by: Todd | January 11, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
For those who justify Sarah and Todd Palins belief that Alaska should secede from the United States I only have one thing to say. “America, Love It or Leave It”. Please move to Alaska and stay there with the rest of the morons who blindly follow the Palins.
Posted by: Drew Hoffman | January 11, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm
FS: You are reading Sarah all wrong! She is not and never has been sarcastic! She does laugh and smile and, yes, wink a lot but that’s just part of her friendly personality. There is nothing sarcastic about her! Beneath the laugh and smile and the winks is a very serious person! Also beneath the smile is also, I think, a intelligent person who is not at all the idiot that some people are saying she is! Yes, she has a lot to learn about politics and our foreign policies. She also has to learn to think on her feet and to think before she answers questions and to not allow comments about her family. She has and still is learning some hard lessons about that! I think, though, if she continues in politics she’ll learn everything that she needs to learn and she’ll be prepared when she runs for election again, for whatever office that might be. Next time no one will be able to say that she’s not ready!
Posted by: Sooner | January 11, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Jane I agree with you!
Posted by: Sooner | January 11, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
Since when does Sarah Palin wink a lot? Has she ever done that except during the debate? Winking was just a condescending ploy to ratchet up the phony folksiness a notch and appeal to people who like to vote for a candidate they think is just like them. Y’know, a hockey mom type or a Joe Sixpack, y’betcha. –wink-
Posted by: Wynken | January 11, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
My favorite media for the main stream I keep in my blue tackle box. For fishin’ the lower fork of the stream, I just use the junk in my red tackle box.
Posted by: fisher man | January 11, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm
“I would say they prepped her fairly well on the talking points but its not easy to ‘prep’ someone on what is supposed to be a lifetime of knowledge.”
I agree, Ryan C.
Posted by: Wynken | January 11, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
I’m a secessionist and I’m okay,
I sleep all night and I work all day.
I cut all ties with government.
I write up a decree.
On Thursdays I go shoppin’
And charge to the RNC.
Posted by: Take two | January 11, 2009, 9:16 pm 9:16 pm
Gee, I thought the fact that she was a moron hurt her chances. I actually thought about voting for McCain before she entered the picture. This chick is so dumb, she just doesn’t know when to shut up.
Posted by: snooch | January 11, 2009, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
If she really had any common sense, she would shut the heck up. The more she blabs her mouth, the more the media will be down on her. She apparently hasn’t figured that out yet.
Posted by: Marcia | January 11, 2009, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
Sooner,
You may not know this, but people from Alaska generally use hard Rs in their speech while people from Boston don’t.
So let’s imagine a little exchange between Sarah Palin and Caroline Kennedy.
“Should I parrk the carr in Boston yarrd?” asks Sarah. “Yes, pahk the cah in Boston yahd,” replies Caroline. An addlebrained Bostonian drunk who was passing by says, “Yesh, puke da cud in Bustem yawn.”
You’re saying that all three people are equally correct in their pronunciations? And equally intelligent?
Posted by: WWW | January 12, 2009, 2:28 am 2:28 am
Classism
Does she understand what this word means? How does Classism enter this debate?
Posted by: James | January 12, 2009, 5:50 am 5:50 am
Sarah Palin is so dumb she makes Dan Quayle look smart.
Posted by: Audrey E | January 12, 2009, 8:07 am 8:07 am
500+ comments here, to bash the Gov of AK, yet only 200+ comments on Obama’s interview regarding how he plans to govern the U.S. for the next four years.
Wake up people! Get the memo? Palin was VP on the losing ticket. Yet people are still churning out tired, repetitive jokes about her instead of paying attention to the looming ineptness of the president-elect.
Palin is from AK? Let’s make funny jokes!
Meanwhile, anyone actually paying attention to the next administration being formed on the Potomac?
Focus on what’s important….why is this so hard for people to do?
Posted by: Interested08 | January 12, 2009, 8:22 am 8:22 am
Marcia: You’re right – the media does keep focusing on her. This is really odd when you think about it – when in the past 30+ years has so much continual attention been paid to the VP from the losing ticket?? 500+ comments on this site alone!
The media gets more attention when they talk to Palin than they do when they talk to Obama. That’s just a ratings fact, across all levels of media.
Question for everyone to consider: why is that? It’s January…you’d think by now Palin would be old news and the focus would be on Obama.
Posted by: Interested08 | January 12, 2009, 8:27 am 8:27 am
I think the difference in the number of comments between a story about Obama’s policies and Palin playing the victim is understandable.
McCain choosing Palin made a lot of people angry because she was so obviously not qualified for the job. And with each interview she did her lack of knowledge and logic was more apparent. Our country has numerous major problems. That the Republicans could run her as a viable candidate at a time like this was unforgivable.
On the other hand, when I read an article on Obama’s good policy ideas I don’t frequently comment, because I agree.
Don’t confuse high numbers of comments with the success of an article. An article should educate and perhaps entertain occasionally. That’s why I read all the articles on Obama’s policies while seldom commenting. So far his ideas to get us out of this mess are logical and cohesive. Thank goodness!
Posted by: Lydia | January 12, 2009, 8:45 am 8:45 am
Palin is an empty headed “Stepford Wife”. She only got as far as she has because of her physical beauty. Without that she’s nothing but hot air.
Posted by: leftyintexas | January 12, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am
I still have to go with the factor that something about Palin annoys people, and it’s not what they say it is.
I think there’s a lot of people out there who are still ticked off they didn’t make the cheer squad.
Get over it people – the VP on the losing ticket isn’t what needs the focus right now. The fact that she can still generate so much buzz, in terms of commentary, shows that she still gets to people – one way or another. There’s a lot of power in that.
Posted by: Interested08 | January 12, 2009, 10:02 am 10:02 am
According to the State of Alaska web site, “An irresponsible talk show host in Anchorage alleged in a newspaper column that the governor must have intervened to get a job for her future son-in-law, circumventing eligibility rules for the position. Again, the allegation was immediately discredited by proof that the governor did not influence Levi’s employment.”
It’s been a week since the newspaper column was published and I still haven’t seen or heard about any proof to the contrary. Does anyone know what and where the proof is? Why are the media not reporting on this proof? Show us the proof!
Posted by: WWW | January 12, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am
Sarah Palin torpedoed McCain’s chances…accept it REPUBS!!
Posted by: AwNawWhat | January 12, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Sarah Palin does not even know what “Classism” is! She has an ego so great that she belives she can do anything and belives everyone else is wrong. What comes out of a person’s mouth first, is usually the truth, its when they try to change it, they get in trouble. She is very star crazed and quite enept to even lead her state. Hope she climbs that mountain to Russia.
Posted by: SUNMAKER777
————————
You confusing Palin with barrack hussein obama.
What else does the liberal bias media tells you?
Posted by: Reality2009 | January 12, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am
With all due respect WWW, I feel most of that stuff is irrelevant. Quite frankly, I would not have a problem if she used some sort of influence to help her (remains to be seen) future son-in-law get a job. It just points a bit to her charcter. What bothers me is that she says that that these kids are not drop-outs when, in actuality they are. Palin creates her own realiy (demonstrated even in this interview) I do so hope her kids obtain their GED’s for their sakes and that of their baby. In any event, Palin’s family only faces similar problems that many in this country deal with on a daily basis. Except they’re (the Palins) are more fortunate.
That’s why some of her positions just absolutely boggles my mind. Also, as one Palinite supporter posted; “… Yes, she has a lot to learn about politics and our foreign policies. She also has to learn to think on her feet and to think before she answers questions and to not allow comments about her family. She has and still is learning some hard lessons about that! I think, though, if she continues in politics she’ll learn everything that she needs to learn and she’ll be prepared when she runs for election again, for whatever office that might be….”
My reaction–…and this is a candidte that one should have felt comfortable with literally being a heart beat away from the Presidency at the time of the election?
Given the problems of our country (even before the financial melt down) some Republican honchos should be hanged for treason because they presented such an inept candidate! It was all about the win” instead of the well-being of our country. As I posted earlier; it isn’t BabyDoll’s (DARN!), Sarah’s fault. She is who she is. However, if she wants some longevity in politics, she needs to put her nose to the grind stone and study really hard. Quite frankly, I don’t think she can do it. How does one compensate for knowledge and experiences that should have been obtained over a life time?
Anyway… she has one helluva public relations mountain to climb! She really needs to engage good advisors.
Who ever posted that Palin is not sarcastic….. LOL!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: FS | January 12, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am
FS: I’m the one who said that Sarah is not sarcastic. I’m also the one who said that she has a lot to learn and that she’ll learn it and that she’ll be ready the next time she runs for office. I still stand by those statements!
Posted by: Sooner | January 12, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
Yes, FS, it remains to be seen whether Sarah used influence beyond the reference letter she wrote for Levi. But what amazes me is that she’s now stamping her whining and untruths with the official State Seal of approval. In the past when she whined and lied into the microphones, it was more on a personal level.
Levi’s apprenticeship story will likely fade away into oblivion and what will the public be left with? The official governor’s whine list of how she was so victimized at the hands of the media – including the “false” story about influencing Levi’s employer. The Palinesque alternate reality that you mention will have become official truth. The author of the newspaper column didn’t say Sarah MUST have used undue influence in getting Levi hired, but the official Alaska government web site will still say he did. There is no “proof” that’s been proffered, but the public will be left with the official Alaska government web site saying there was, AND that it was offered up right away. To me, this use of the state web site takes the Palinesque reality to a whole new level.
Posted by: WWW | January 12, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Isn’t this crying and complaining exactly what she said Hillary was doing? And if Hillary couldn’t take the heat to get out of the Kitchen? LOL what a Bimbo…
Posted by: HappyNewYear | January 12, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
Next she’ll be suing her Witch Doctor who’s Black Magic Spell to Grant the Alaskan Bimbo Riches didn’t work…
Posted by: HappyNewYear | January 12, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Her claim that she could see Alask-ah from her out house was the last nail in the Bimbo Coffin! Her claim that she shot Deer riding shotgun atop a Helicopter was a close second.
Posted by: HappyNewYear | January 12, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
HappyNewYear, I say let’s be fair. Just as it is WRONG for “the other side” to spread untruths, it is just as WRONG for you to do so too. HoneyLamb NEVER said such a thing. To paraphrase; she said that you can see Russia from land in Alaska. She is absolutely correct with that fact. What is at issue is that she felt that given that fact and that “Putin flies over Alaska”, this some how qualified her as having foreign policy experience. ???? LOL!!!!! I just LOVE her!!!! I REALLY REALLY DO!!!!
I am critical of Baby… (DARN IT!) Governor Palin but one thing I do give her credit for, is that I DO really think that she has/will have a positive affect regarding tourism in Alaska. I have friends who have traveled there…AND (this is only because of Sarah Palin), I am going to Nome Alaska in September to see the bears and the trout. It seems to be a really beautiful state!
Posted by: FS | January 12, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Also HappyNewYear, I don’t think its fair to criticize her religion. That was something that was completely overblown IMHO. Many people ask for prayers from their church elders and congregation regarding well-being and health et alia. If you haven’t done it, you ought to give it a try!
My problem is when one allows their personal religion to influence/determine legislation and restrict the freedoms of others who may not agree with that religion.
Posted by: FS | January 12, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
My oh my, listen to everyone. Sarah sure has you folks all tied up in knots. Everyone is spending a lot of energy lobbing stones at someone who doesn’t even affect national policy. Now why is that?
Posted by: Interested08 | January 12, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Because she wouldn’t leave well enough alone, everybody must throw stones.
Posted by: Dylan | January 12, 2009, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
Question for everyone to consider: why is that? It’s January…you’d think by now Palin would be old news and the focus would be on Obama.
Posted by: Interested08 | Jan 12, 2009 8:27:23 AM
**********************************************
Same reason we spent 2 years hearing about Paris and Britney. The press writes about what they are interested in. Period.
Posted by: Truth Matters | January 12, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
JL: Everything she’s saying is true! Yes, she made a lot of mistakes but she has had to endure the worst smear campaign from the liberal media for the last four months that this country has ever witnessed! Nothing has been off limits for them to say about her! She has even had to endure unfair attacks on her children! It’s time she spoke out! She would have been much better off if she had spoke out and started fighting back four months ago! I know the media didn’t start them but there have been rumors and comments about her baby Trig and her daughter Bristol that no one should have to put up with and that she should have put a stop to long ago! Trig has been called an idiot and a retard and Bristol has been called names that should not even be allowed in print! No mother should have to put up with comments like that about her children, not even Sarah Palin! Nothing that she ever said about Barack Obama even begins to compare with the things that have been said about her and her children!
Posted by: Sooner | January 13, 2009, 3:56 am 3:56 am
carlyonsue, the Secret Service blamed Sarah Palin’s “pallin’ around with terrorists” comments for a spike in the number of death threats against Obama. Nothing that anyone said about Sarah or Bristol or Trig, no matter how hateful or idiotic, ever caused any death threats against the Palins.
Posted by: WWW | January 13, 2009, 4:16 am 4:16 am
From an interview on Saturday:
What did [anonymous bloggers] get wrong that you would like to have them correct? Anything in particular?
Palin: Oh, where do I begin? I can’t even begin. There are too many.
Hey, wait a second. Wasn’t that the same answer she gave when asked which newspapers and magazines she reads?
Posted by: moose | January 13, 2009, 6:03 am 6:03 am
Don’t blamed Palin a bit for fighting back at the bias media. The bottom feeders went after her childrens and that’s a no no in anyone book with a right mind. Maybe in a lefties household, you can come in and smacked the family around a bit and it’s OK but we Republicans won’t stand for that.
Posted by: USA-No1 | January 13, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am
WWW: She didn’t make those threats! People in the crowd who attended the rally did! She neither agreed nor disagreed with them! I admit she should have spoke up and said that she wasn’t going to allow those kind of comments but then so should have John McCain! Their only mistake was not putting a stop to it! Also their security people weren’t doing their doing their jobs or they would have thrown those people out!
Posted by: Sooner | January 13, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm
USA-No1: You are right! Going after her children was just about the lowest thing they could do! I daresay that there are not any parents in the world, whether they are republican, democrat, independent or whatever that are going to allow attacks on their family for very long! She put up with a lot longer than I would have! She should have spoke out over four months ago but she has every right to speak out now!
Posted by: Sooner | January 13, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
WWW: Obama and Biden and democrat party should have put a stop to the ridiculous and downright hateful comments that their fans have been making about Sarah and her family in these comment boards, too, but they haven’t. In fact they haven’t said one word about them!
Posted by: Sooner | January 13, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
Nobody said Sarah made death threats, “and you know it.” But she INCITED hatred. That’s why the Secret Service blamed her.
Excerpts from a Telegraph article:
Palin “attracted criticism for accusing Mr Obama of ‘palling around with terrorists.’”
“The attacks provoked a near lynch mob atmosphere at her rallies.”
“But it has now emerged that her demagogic tone may have unintentionally encouraged white supremacists to go even further.”
“The Secret Service warned the Obama family in mid October that they had seen a dramatic increase in the number of threats against the Democratic candidate, coinciding with Mrs Palin’s attacks.”
Posted by: WWW | January 13, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
carlyonsue wrote, “Obama and Biden and democrat party should have put a stop to the ridiculous and downright hateful comments that their fans have been making about Sarah and her family in these comment boards, too, but they haven’t. In fact they haven’t said one word about them!”
Obama and Biden have no control over bloggers “and you know it.” If that were possible, Sarah should have put a stop to her fans calling Obama the N word, and making racist commentary on these boards.
Posted by: WWW | January 13, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
carlyonsue, Obama did try to stop attacks on the Palin family. Sarah has never acknowledged this.
“I have said before and I will repeat again, I think people’s families are off limits, and people’s children are especially off limits. This shouldn’t be part of our politics. It has no relevance to Governor Palin’s performance as governor, or her potential performance as a VP. And so I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories,” he said.
Posted by: WWW | January 13, 2009, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
WWW: If that is true then he should have put it in a lot stronger language than that because they weren’t listening! And he DID associate with terrorist Bill Ayers and convicted developer Tony Rezko!
Posted by: Sooner | January 13, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
WWW: I’m going to respectfully say that I think any further comments between us are pointless because you and I don’t agree and we will never agree!
Posted by: Sooner | January 13, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm
Sarah Palin, in a new Esquire interview:
You have to let it go. Even hard news sources, credible news sources — the comment about, you can see Russia from Alaska. You can! You can see Russia from Alaska. Something like that — a factual statement that was taken out of context and mocked — what you have to do is let that go.
——————
She is so dishonest. She wasn’t taken out of context and mocked. She was mocked for saying it IN the context of giving her better insight into foreign affairs.
No, many of us are not going to let it go. It’s one of America’s favorite Palin gaffes.
Posted by: Rudy | January 13, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Rudy: And you have the gall to call Sarah dishonest! You are the skillet calling the pot black! You know that is NOT what she said! She said that you can see Russia from an island off the coast of Alaska in the Bering Sea. THAT IS TRUE!
Posted by: Sooner | January 13, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
What the heck are you talking about? She DID say you can see Russia from a Alaska! Now she is saying that her comment was taken out of context and mocked. It was NOT. It was mocked IN context because it was such a stupid answer.
PALIN: They are our next door neighbors. We need to have a good relationship with them. They’re very, very important to us and they are our next door neighbor.
GIBSON: What insight into Russian actions, particularly in the last couple of weeks, does the proximity of the state give you?
PALIN: They’re our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.
Posted by: Rucy | January 13, 2009, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
Sarah the hatemonger roused the rabble at her rallies. She uttered not a single word against the racist slurs and comments made by her fans. But Obama, who says of attacks on Sarah’s family “I would strongly urge people to back off these kinds of stories,” is wrong for not putting it in stronger language? lol, carlyonsue. Buh-bye!
Posted by: WWW | January 13, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Rucy: Being able to see Russia from Alaska is NOT the same as being able to see it from her house! What she said is absolutely true because the island in the Bering Sea from which Russia is visible is part of Alaska! If you don’t believe me then just get a map or a globe and look it up! BUT SARAH PALIN DID NOT SAY THAT SHE COULD SEE RUSSIA FROM HER HOUSE! THAT IS A LIE THAT BEEN TOLD ON HER!
Posted by: Sooner | January 14, 2009, 4:52 am 4:52 am
WWW: His answer was too weak! He should have been much more direct even if he made some people mad! He should have told them point blank and in no uncertain terms to STOP IT! AND STOP NOW! AND THAT HE WOULD HAVE NO PART OF IT AND WOULD NOT TOLERATE SUCH ATTACKS COMING FROM HIS PEOPLE! And he shouldn’t have cared if it cost him votes or even cost him the presidency!
Posted by: Sooner | January 14, 2009, 5:09 am 5:09 am
Sarah’s answer wasn’t weak; it was nonexistent! She should have said something – anything – even if she made some people mad! She should have told them point blank and in no uncertain terms to STOP IT! AND STOP NOW! AND THAT SHE WOULD HAVE NO PART OF IT AND WOULD NOT TOLERATE SUCH ATTACKS COMING FROM HER PEOPLE! And she shouldn’t have cared if it cost her votes or even cost her the vice presidency!
Posted by: WWW | January 14, 2009, 6:28 am 6:28 am
Sooner, you’re confusing Tina Fey with Sarah Palin. Nobody was talking about Tina’s “I can see Russia from my house” joke from SNL! The subject was Sarah Palin saying “You can see Russia from Alaska” during the Charlie Gibson interview. Charlie asked what insight into Russian actions the proximity of Alaska gives her. Sarah apparently thought insight meant ‘in sight’ as ‘within eyeshot.” and replied “They’re our next door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska.” Nobody is saying the comment isn’t factual. It was just a marvelously dumb answer that earned Sarah some well-deserved ribbing. Now she’s trying to shift blame for her silly response by claiming it was taken out of context. But it wasn’t taken out of context. In fact, the context is what makes the remark so funny in the first place!
Posted by: Rudy | January 14, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am
Uh, isn’t Alaska the 57th state or something like that?
Posted by: RS Sten | April 17, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm