PEBO: Stimulus Package Won’t Be As Big As Some Economists Want Because of Concerns About Deficits
"Today the Congressional Budget Office announced that the deficit we are inheriting for this budget year will be $1.2 trillion," President-elect Obama said today, noting that the stimulus package "will necessarily add more."
Even after our economy "pulls out of its slide," the President-elect warned, "trillion dollar deficits will be a reality for years to come. But as I said yesterday, our problem is not just a deficit of dollars. It’s a deficit of accountability… a deficit of trust. So change and reform can’t just be election-year slogans. They must become fundamental principles of government."
With that the President-elect introduced his choice to head a new position in the White House, the Chief Performance Officer. Former Treasury Department official Nancy Killefer, currently Senior Director in McKinsey & Company’s Washington, D.C. office, will work with Obama’s Cabinet and others "to discuss how they can run their agencies with greater efficiency, transparency and accountability."
With that, the President-elect took a few questions. One, from the Wall Street Journal, noted that "the real key to controlling federal spending lies with the entitlement programs. How early do you plan on addressing Medicare and Social Security? And what will your approach be?" The President-elect said that "we are beginning consultations with members of Congress around how we expect to approach the deficit. We expect that discussion around entitlements will be a part, a central part, of those plans."
Mr. Obama was asked if his silence about Gaza because of his "one president at a time" mantra. "We can’t have two administrations running foreign policy at the same time," Mr. Obama said. "We cannot be sending a message to the world that there are two different administrations conducting foreign policy. That is not safe for the American people." Asked if he was worried that the Palestinians are interpreting his silence negatively, Mr. Obama said, "I can’t control how people interpret what I’m saying."
Asked whether Roland Burris should be seated in the Senate as the junior Senator from Illinois, the President-elect said, "that is a Senate matter. But I know Roland Burris. … I think he’s a fine public servant. If he gets seated, then I’m going to work with Roland Burris just like I worked with all the other senators to make sure that the people of Illinois and the people of the country are served."
I got a chance to ask him about the stimulus package. Here’s that exchange:
TAPPER: Thank you, Mr. President-elect. Welcome to Washington.
OBAMA: Oh, yeah. It’s great to be here. (LAUGHTER)
TAPPER: Your team has talked about the stimulus package being $675 billion to $775 billion. But at the same time, you have distributed a memo — your team has distributed a memo in which economists say it should be between $8 billion — I’m sorry — $800 billion and $1.3 trillion.
OBAMA: Right.
TAPPER: How do you reconcile that difference? And, also, could you explain what you consider to be truly stimulative? I mean, any project will create jobs in the short term.
OBAMA: Well, we are still in consultation with members of Congress about the final size of the package. We expect that it will be on the high end of our estimates, but will not — will not be as high as some economists have recommended, because of the constraints and concerns we have about the existing deficit.
In terms of the components of the package, as I’ve made clear over the last several days, we’re going to have a (sic) investment component designed to create or save 3 million new jobs. Part of what the charge of my team has been is to figure out how can we make sure that even as we’re creating short-term jobs and spurring demand in the economy that we’re also laying the groundwork for long-term economic growth, which is why a lot of the stimulative — a lot of the investments are going to be around things like energy, health care, education, things that we need to be doing anyway.
Part of the stimulus package will be to provide tax relief to middle-income families, and, where it makes sense and is going to work, to provide some tax relief to businesses to spur on investment in the private sector. And part of the package is going to be to help states who are under extraordinary budget pressures to prevent them from laying off more workers in vital service areas like teaching, law enforcement and so forth, so that not only are we saving jobs, we’re also making sure that states are able to provide basic services to their citizens at a time of critical need. In terms of what I consider appropriate stimulus, you know, the criteria that we’ve tried to lay out is, are we able to use this money wisely, effectively, in a two-year time span so that we’re not creating long-term obligations that would add to the structural deficit that exists, but would provide an immediate boost to the economy?
And as I indicated yesterday, one of the things that I think is important is that we do not have earmarks in this package. You know, I’ve said before I think it’s entirely appropriate for members of Congress to want to have some say in terms of projects that take place in their district. Many of the projects that they might advocate for are worthy. But isn’t the place to do it. And so I think it’s important for us not to have earmarks here. It’s important for us to have transparency in how the money is spent. I intend to make sure that we have unprecedented measures to ensure that taxpayers can keep track of how this money is spent.
So if, you know, we can get this done quickly, then I’ve — I have confidence that not only are we going to be able to create jobs, but we’re also going to be making a down payment on some critical areas that, as the economy recovers and the private sector starts investing again, we’re going to see some long-term benefits and long- term savings.
I’ll just take one example. Part of our stimulus package is going to involve revamping all federal buildings so that they’re energy efficient. If we — if we do that effectively then over the long-term we are going to save billions of dollars in energy costs for the federal government and for taxpayers. That’s the kind of charge that Nancy’s going to have, is identifying where are areas where we can make big change that lasts beyond the economic recovery plan and will save taxpayer money over the long term.
– jpt

Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
BLAGO to Harry Reid and Obama UP YOURS I win lmao
The George Wallace of the Democrat party DEFEATED
Posted by: MSN exposed | January 7, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Oh, yeah,,it’s great to be here…ha..ha..ha.
Posted by: catleya | January 7, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm
Dear God, help us. Just another Democrat at the helm. Pity us all, and thank you, all of you, who put this menace in office.
Posted by: Lisa Again | January 7, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm
“”Today the Congressional Budget Office announced that the deficit we are inheriting for this budget year will be $1.2 trillion,”…
Even after our economy “pulls out of its slide,” the President-elect warned, “trillion dollar deficits will be a reality for years to come.”
Ok I am trying to follow this. the current FY deficit includes $700B of TARP most of which hasnt been spent and what has been spent will mostly likely be repaid.
Yes TARP will incur some additional debt service but why would $700B in ’08 result in similar expenditures in ’09 and ’10? It wouldnt.
The base deficit is in the 300B range. If Obama is planning on having trillion dollar deficits (not Debt) the next few years then he must be planning on spending at least $2-3T for his stimulus. Right?
“Part of our stimulus package is going to involve revamping all federal buildings so that they’re energy efficient. ”
This is an example of a project that is not “shovel ready”. There is no way that this is happening in ’09, so any stimulating effect would be years away. Its an open question what the payback period would be on this investment but I am reminded of the Simpsons episode where Marge wants to spend a windfall on vinyl windows because then they can save 4% on heating bills.
Posted by: BertieW | January 7, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
jpt writes:
Mr. Obama said, “I can’t control how people interpret what I’m saying.”
Actually, His organization does its damnedest to do JUST that, mainly but not entirely through the captive corporate media.
If He takes office, His ability to “control how people interpret” the ever-changing baloney du jour will be even more substantial … along with the ability to hide the organization’s misdeeds-to-date, and those to come, in executive privilege.
(Remember the police-and-prosecutors intimidation of the media during the Missouri campaign?)
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 7, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
Does anybody have a problem with the fact that the TARP bailout bill is more money than the cost of EVERY war our country has EVER fought since 1776!!! Anybody else get a little pause and wonder why we are doing that on top of the current wars we are waging overseas… Oh and don’t forget, Obama won’t raise taxes! Yeah Surre!!!
Posted by: please! | January 7, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Ok, “Lisa Again”, since you sound like such an expert, what would your approach be in Obama’s situation? You call him a “menace” before he’s even been in office for 1 day. I personally think that both parties are equally economically irresponsible and the cause for the current crisis.
So, you’ve demonstrated how “all-seeing” you are to use such big talk. Now, let’s hear your solutions! Don’t make a point unless you have a better idea!
Posted by: Who's the expert? | January 7, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
Why was he not pressed about how he runs around being president in terms of fiscal matters, but hides behind the “one president at a time” when it comes to foreign policy? Where’ the followup?
Good god reporters, do your damn jobs!
Posted by: beth | January 7, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm
thoughtful,understandable,and an answer we can follow….how refreshing
Posted by: nice | January 7, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
Maybe Mr. Go-along-get-along shouldn’t have voted for the bank “bailout” giveaway …
So … businesses, the cops and teachers, and “the middle class”. Nothing about the, uh, POOR there, STILL.
Nothing about National Health for those who are dying or wishing to because all the politicians have “socialized medicine” for themselves.
Nothing about calling off the escalation in Afghanistan because it costs too freaking much.
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 7, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
This is scary stuff. Government infrastructure projects are doomed to be be riddled with inefficiencies, under the table pay to play schemes, fraud, budget overruns, etc. They will worsen the recession not end it.
This guy talks about “trillions” of dollars like its monopoly money. This is going to fail and fail big. There may be some jobs “saved or created” in the short run. When you spend a trillion dollars there has to be. But in the long run we are all screwed big time. You cannot change the laws of econcomics.
We are about to witness first hand why big government and “spread the wealth around” are a failure. Poor guy, he has no idea what he’s talking about. I do think he means well, but his philosophy is totally ill-advised.
Go ahead tell me how smart he is because he went to Harvard. I went to state college and I’ve worked with plenty of people from Ivy League schools that I wouldn’t trust to shine my shoes. Often its much more about who you know and where you came from than how smart you are.
I just pray that enough sensible people in government are brave and smart enough to speak up and fight this nonsense, but unfortunately I doubt it.
Posted by: Marx My Words | January 7, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm
Why was he not pressed about how he runs around being president in terms of fiscal matters, but hides behind the “one president at a time” when it comes to foreign policy? Where’ the followup?
Good god reporters, do your damn jobs!
Posted by: beth | Jan 7, 2009 1:00:48 PM
\\\\\\
I think he may have answered that. One thing I think I realize he still hasn’t been able to do is unfreeze the brains that have been frozen for a long time. It’s probably going to take a while for that to happen by itself. That’s what happens when you’ve had your head in the sand for a certain period of time.
Posted by: D | January 7, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
WOW! I cannot believe the level of animosity you folks have about the new Pesident! I do not see many comments here about the most terrible president in history, George W Bush!! He is the one who pulled off the biggest heist in history, he raided each and every one of our wallets in his last year and before that, he got us into unjustified wars, lied to us, is responsible for more deaths than anyone will own up to and likes to use torture, illegal wiretapping, illegal arrests, cronyism is rampant with him, his appointments show that, he has done nothing but damage to us all and the rest of the world is also paying a price for his horrible leadership. I am proud to say I never voted for him EVER and I did vote for Barack Obama and Bill Clinton, and I am not sorry for those votes. We will be better off the DAY Obama is sworn in. We will be told what he is going to try and do to remedy this HORRIBLE mess this current administration has left us all with. Thank God for Barack Obama and Joe Biden that they are willing to try and get a plan together to dig us out of this hole we are in. Thank God he has Hillary and the others to help and I bet Bill Clinton will work and Jimmy Carter will work as they always have to try and serve the public. George and Laura will go to texas and start on thier lying book that laura is getting 8 mill for, they won’t miss a meal or a party you can be sure.
Posted by: Liz diess | January 7, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm
I cannot, for the life of me, understand how repubs can complain about an administration that technically doesn’t exist while completely ignoring the last 8 years of cover-ups, mediocrity, failures, misdeeds and corruption. Open your eyes and minds leave the rhetoric to the spin room. Thank you.
Posted by: Kyle | January 7, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm
“So if, you know, we can get this done quickly, then I’ve — I have confidence that not only are we going to be able to create jobs, but we’re also going to be making a down payment on some critical areas that, as the economy recovers and the private sector starts investing again, we’re going to see some long-term benefits and long- term savings. ”
I get that there is a long term component which is different from the stimulus.
There is no reason these long term savings projects should be ram rodded through as emergencies. There needs to be an examination of these investments to see if they are sound. Perhaps it would make more sense to move some government workers to work from home rather than do an enormous multi-year conversion project on every Federal building.
Posted by: BertieW | January 7, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
The only change coming from Obama is even bigger deficits. I didn’t think it was possible that a new president would be even more fiscally irresponsible than Bush. Obama has proven me wrong.
Posted by: Lynn | January 7, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
If the proposed stimulus is targeted to the middleclass, how many jobs will be created? If Obama anticipates an extended period of trillion $ deficits, then is he admitting that his administration’s plans will not create the number of jobs necessary to significantly reduce the deficits?
Posted by: deanbob | January 7, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
For the first time in history we have an incoming president appointing members of both parties to his cabinet. Republicans are sooo jealous they spew half truths.
And as Benjamin Franklin said, “A Half Truth Is A Big Lie.”
Posted by: Angeles | January 7, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
I beleive that once Obama goes thru the budget line by line as promised he will find a mass amount of waste and corruption to be delt with, he will have his experts begin this long grueling process and clean it up” that’s right just purge and clean then see what we have to work with. I myself about 20 yrs ago had a bankrupcy due to no health insurance and once you begin to dig yourself out of a financial hole you have a long memory of the pain and the process to get solvent again and you look at every new expenditure much more carefully, This is a long needed purging in our government and it won’t be easy but it can be done.
Posted by: Liz diess | January 7, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
I do not understand how anyone would want the job of President of the United States. Especially now.
Posted by: Angelo | January 7, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm
Yep, Lets RAM through yet another huge montain of money with no time to properly put oversight in place!
For all of you outside of New England, Infrastructure projects do not always work out so well. two words -> BIG DIG!
Also, with all all these geniuses Obama is supposed to have on his team, why hasn’t anyone provided the American people with a very important piece of information? What percentage of those currently unemployed are from the construction industry?
Those are really the only people who will benefit from all this infrastructure talk.
Posted by: Mike_C | January 7, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
Lynn, Obama is not the President yet, he is NOT responsible for this mess and Bush is, Bush came into office in the black and went straight to work putting us into the RED as far as he could before leaving, he is insane and it is unbeleivable that anyone would or could make any excuses for him. He should be JAILED along with Cheney, well his whole gang of thugs and idiots.
Posted by: Liz diess | January 7, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Kyle | Jan 7, 2009 1:14:54 PM …. Just because the Bush administration did a horrible ‘spending’ job, should we (all Americans) roll over and ignore the potential continuity of irressponsible spending?
Posted by: deanbob | January 7, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
If Republicans and Democrats are complaining about a 1.2 trillion dollar deficit that President Bush accumulated over 8 years, it seems hardly consistent with their frame of thought to propose a 1.3 trillion dollar stimulus plan to more than double that debt in the first part of this year. Both of these administrations are creating more deficit and as anyone who balances a budget knows, the bigger the deficit, the less money you actually have. I’m afraid of what is to come from this.
Posted by: Ben | January 7, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
“I just pray that enough sensible people in government are brave and smart enough to speak up and fight this nonsense … ”
They have two weeks to bring down His organization’s plan to preside over the third-worlding of the US into a society of rich and poor, segregated and controlled by police power.
“Black” leaders outSIDE the government may ALSO be reading the writing on the wall … that The CHANGEling’s self-hyped blackness doesn’t extend to concern about “changing” the catastrophe coming down on the poor/disabled, etc., including the black masses stuck in urban deprivation.
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 7, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
“thoughtful,understandable,and an answer we can follow….how refreshing”
Not really. What was the answer to Tapper’s question- was it the high side of $775B or 1.3T? Thats pretty big spread.
And whats going on that we will have “years” of deficits in excess of $1T? That implies that there is going to be a $700B stimulus in each of the next three years? Is that what you were expecting?
Posted by: BertieW | January 7, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm
Hey Liz,
Nice to know that the entire democratic party was sleeping for the last 8 years. Only a moron such as yourself would make the statement you made.
Barney Frank alone has done more damage to the economy in this country than Bush could do in a 100 yrs!
We got in this mess because because of the stupidity of liberals who think they are social engineers. Then idiots like Frank who pushed & pushed for everything that led to this mess. And he blocked every attempt Republicans tried to place more regulation on the mortgage industry.
You should watch the video ABC has on their site right now. An interview done yesterday where that clown now claims it was all OUR fault for making “bad investments”! INCREDIBLE.
If the Democrats allow this fool to stay in control of that commitee he has, he will take us right into a depression.
Posted by: Mike_C | January 7, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
One thing is for certain we cannot continue to see jobs lost at this rate we have homes,families and work that needs doing. All the experts say a stimulus package is needed, we must at times spend money to make money. I wish that if someone has a better idea they would step forward and show us how it would work and I bet Obama would consider it. A plan of action is needed and to just say Oh no we are in 1.3 trillion debt, we will just sit back and hoard our money and watch everyone around us sink? We must get this economic machine running smoothly and work on all these problems even if it costs money or our way of life may go away.
Posted by: Liz diess | January 7, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
The Tax Poem
At first I thought this was funny…then I realized the awful truth of it.
Be sure to read all the way to the end.
Tax his land,
Tax his bed,
Tax the table
At which he’s fed.
Tax his tractor,
Tax his mule,
Teach him taxes
Are the rule.
Tax his work,
Tax his pay,
He works for peanuts
Anyway!
Posted by: Welostintegrity | January 7, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm
“If the proposed stimulus is targeted to the middleclass, how many jobs will be created?”
Uh, don’t the “middle class” HAVE jobs?
Or does the Obama organization mean “the middle class” is the dwindling pool of merely-”displaced” people in the MIDDLE of the utterly-destitute underclass and the corporate rich uber-lords who installed Him?
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 7, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Liz read: Why the Mortgage Crisis Happened
By M. Jay Wells
Posted by: Respectfulcitizen | January 7, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
The Perfect Stimulus Package-The government simply absorbs the remaining $350 billion from the stimulus bill and suspends the collection of all income and payroll taxes for two months. Even trade. This means that for two months you get your entire paycheck (well … less any State withholding). The government ends up with the same amount of money in its coffers, and the income earners in this country have some extra money to spend – an average about $2,000 per taxpayer – over the following two months. This plan puts the economic stimulus money right into the hands of the people who actually earned it in the first place. Can you imagine that? by: Neal Boortz Let’s start writing our congressman and senators now! Could something like this actually make its way through our Congress? Sure it could … if the voters demanded it. But hey …let’s get serious.
Posted by: welostintegrity | January 7, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm
Obama always has cute little sayings. Worthless, but cute.
Posted by: Lee | January 7, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Tax his cow,
Tax his goat,
Tax his pants,
Tax his coat.
Tax his ties,
Tax his shirt,
Tax his work,
Tax his dirt.
Tax his tobacco,
Tax his drink,
Tax him if he
Tries to think.
Tax his cigars,
Tax his beers,
If he cries
Tax his tears.
Tax his car,
Tax his gas,
Find other ways
To tax this lass.
Posted by: welostintegrity | January 7, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm
Here’s the deal. The Imperial Federal Government of the United States collects about $167 billion a month in income and withholding taxes. The Congress has already passed a $700 billion stimulus bill, and about a half of that is gone, leaving $350 billion of your money in the pot. Some have suggested that this $350 billion be left as some sort of a bailout/stimulus slush fund for the incoming Obama Administration. In other words … let the politicians figure out how to spend it. Gohmert thinks it might be a better idea to allow the people who actually earned this $350 billion to spend it as they see fit. OK, if you have any appreciation at all for the concept of economic freedom that sounds like a good idea; but how do you make it work in this instance.
Posted by: Welostintegrity | January 7, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
In addition to the election of a megalomaniac empty suit-one Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama, about whom we, the people are permitted to know little (no access to school records, medical records, birth records) other than his anti-American friends, Marxist beliefs, win at all costs strategy–ACORN fraud, massive amounts of campaign contributions that are “untraceable,” among other such unsavory behaviors and involvements which reduce our nation to a banana republicesque laughing stock, we do know that he has severed a major artery within this country by his continual use of the “race card.”
Posted by: RBarley | January 7, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Mike_C, you are very myopic in your views.
Building the infrastructure doesn’t necessarily mean put on a hard hat and dig roads. But let’s say that it does…well there are suppliers for various materials, the accounting of those materials, the computer systems that support the supply chain and accounting, the payroll, the sandwich trucks for the workers, the clothing manufacturer for construction clothing…I could go on.
It’s time for Americans to start to open our eyes and become part of solution. I have more whine than I need with my cheese and crackers.
Posted by: Art in Chicago | January 7, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Obama will play the RACE card and the BLAME game long as possible
Posted by: Dog Luv | January 7, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
Liz learn the truth– agagin read Why the mortgage crisis happened. –July 2003
Sens. Chuck Hagel (R-Nebraska), Elizabeth Dole (R-North Carolina) and John Sununu (R-New Hampshire) introduced legislation to address Regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The bill was blocked by Democrats.
Posted by: Welostintegrity | January 7, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
I am a nurse and not an economic expert, but I know that the goal is to live within your means and try to be prepared for any crisis that comes along. I know also that the mortgage crisis is a result of making loans to people without strict guidelines for debt to ratio review and income that can support the cost of the home you are trying to buy. The experts in banking saw a way to let anyone in a home whether they could afford it or not and then sell that loan in pieces to anyone they could find to buy it and to hell with the outcome. These are the people who should be prosecuted, and Bush made sure there were no regulations in thier way and is trying everyday to get rid of as many regulations as he can so these predators can continue thier evil deeds.
Posted by: Liz diess | January 7, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Franklin Raines, Fannie Mae CEO: “These assets are so riskless that their capital for holding them should be under 2%.”
Posted by: Welostintegrity | January 7, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
You’re right BertieW – Infrastructure spending may be highly effective, but it most likely won’t stimulate the economy until late-2009, early 2010. That doesn’t mean it won’t benefit the country though. So how far are we into this recession that has already lasted longer than the previous two (1990 and 2001 recessions lasted 8 months each.)? Economist Nouriel Roubini believes the US economy is only half way through a recession that will be the longest and most severe since WWII. Even with the $750 billion stimulus (including 40% of the stimulus package in tax cuts for households and businesses) that amount will fall short of the pull-back in consumer spending. Personal consumption will sharply drop as a result of market losses, the disappearance of home equity, job losses, and tighter credit conditions. But Roubini believes in the economy that will eventually rebalance and restore the pre-Bush era saving rate.
Posted by: idahogirl | January 7, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
It won’t matter what kind of stimulus package is in place. One in ten American citizens jailed, millions more ordered to pay “fines”. Federal law that prevents those who pay and recieve “child sypport”, from finding out where the money is going (federal, state, and local public assistance programs). Only about one third of the latest stimulus package ever got to the citizen, the rest was “intercepted” by federal, state, and local “entities” or it was deemed that the citizen did not “qualify” for the full amount. This is only the tip of the iceberg, we can expect more of the same. This all occured at the hand of “the rule of law”. By the way did not the people in the examples I gave, have mortgages?
Posted by: Reflect08 | January 7, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
“The bill prohibited the GSEs from holding portfolios, and gave their regulator prudential authority (such as setting capital requirements) roughly equivalent to a bank regulator. In light of the current financial crisis, this bill was probably the most important piece of financial regulation before Congress in 2005 and 2006,” reports the Wall Street Journal.
Greenspan testified that the size of GSE portfolios “poses a risk to the global financial system. It would be difficult, if not impossible, to bail out the lenders [GSEs] . . . should one get into financial trouble.” He added, “If we fail to strengthen GSE regulation, we increase the possibility of insolvency and crisis . . . We put at risk our ability to preserve safe and sound financial markets in the United States, a key ingredient of support for homeownership.”
Greenspan warned that if the GSEs “continue to grow, continue to have the low capital that they have, continue to engage in the dynamic hedging of their portfolios, which they need to do for interest rate risk aversion, they potentially create ever-growing potential systemic risk down the road . . . We are placing the total financial system of the future at a substantial risk.”
Bloomberg writes, “If that bill had become law, then the world today would be different. . . . But the bill didn’t become law, for a simple reason: Democrats opposed it on a party-line vote in the committee, signaling that this would be a partisan issue. Republicans, tied in knots by the tight Democratic opposition, couldn’t even get the Senate to vote on the matter. That such a reckless political stand could have been taken by the Democrats was obscene even then.”
Posted by: Welostintegrity | January 7, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Lisa and Belle Starr – you may not have received the memo. The Republican play book has removed the section “Create Divisiveness” since it clearly failed during the recent Presidential election.
Posted by: CaliRules | January 7, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
After a little bit of research I found out it was really Democrats mainly Obama who was responsible for the financial crisis the banks are in now dragging the rest of the financial market with it.
Posted by: Liz diess Thanks Liz! I too was snowed by the main stream media, until I looked at other sources information. I have come to learn during this election so many were manipulated by editing and the suppression of the truth. The puntive liberals (with the help of the msm) destroyed and distorted any possibility of a fair election. The facts and associations were suppressed and spun. The election of pebo was nothing more than a whole country being manipulated by Saul Alinsky’s Best Student! For many of these Americans, the explanation was rather simple… the news media, completely enamored with Obama, simply refused to do their job. Americans were shocked that a man of Barack Obama’s limited experience, extreme liberal positions and radical political alliances could be elected President of the United States. But what is even more frightening than the sinister schemes of liberal politicians to silence and criminalize political opposition is the apparent eagerness of rank-and-file liberals to go along with them.
Posted by: Welostintegrity | January 7, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
I did not post that comment at 1:55.57 some else used my name so stop it, because obama is not to fault
Posted by: Liz diess | January 7, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
IDEA FOR THE ECONOMIC SOLUTION
New idea to create demand in residential real estate and solve the economic crises
1) Have a monthly lottery, where any home bought gets that buyer’s name entered.
2) On the 20Th of the following month on national television draw names per state based on the number of U.S. representatives that state has. The first name drawn in each state gets their purchase price paid back and 1 million dollars. The other names drawn will each get 100k
3) This should be retroactive to the first day that it is announced nationally so that those intending to buy property do not hold off until it begins.
4) Some TARP funds could be used for this and it can begin tomorrow.
5) This would mean that there would be 435 winners per month. Times 12 months equals 5220 winners per year. If 7 million homes are sold a year this gives you a 1/1340 chance of winning. This will help motivate people to buy houses, prices will stabilize and the economy will recover.
6) This is cheaper and wiser then throwing $ at the banks and it has a better chance of achieving results. Giving Banks money does not encourage them to lend. How can anyone blame them? Who would lend someone money against an asset that is falling in value? WE MUST STABILIZE HOME PRICES OR THIS ECONOMY WILL NOT RECOVER.
7) Putting the drawing on TV will give this idea incredible exposure. Companies will eagerly want to sponsor it and also throw in free prizes such as free cars, cruises, airline tickets, vacation packages etc. They have just as much to gain as consumers. This can actually become a national phenomenon and be a great deal of fun for the country.
Try to get Hollywood and Sports athletes involved in some fashion.
8) Also, there should be a zero % capital gains tax on any property purchased during the next year no matter when you sell it. This should only be on new purchases to help absorb some of the high housing inventory. Investors will snap up some properties and make things happen. This is a win win situation because no homes are selling anyway so there is no capital gains tax lost.
9) The situation is not really as complicated as people like Henry Paulson try to make it sound. In fact it is not Harvard economics it is simple 5th grade economics of supply and demand. We could eliminate supply by tearing down the excess inventory or we can stimulate demand with the ideas above, some variation of them or entirely new ones. Or we can wait until it happens on its own causing mass unemployment and foreclosures in the process.
ACTUAL COST OF PRIZE MONEY =1.062 BILLION (may be less with corporate sponsors)
ACTUAL POTENTIAL BENEFIT TO THE U.S. ……..PRICELESS.
We have nothing to lose. The money invested will stay in the economy and we are sure to gain back at least what was invested.
We need to get people involved, Television, Hollywood, Sports athletes. World War II was won by getting people involved, volunteerism, purchasing of war bonds etc. That is why we won.
Obama won the presidency by getting people involved. He is the person that can make this happen. He can make progress in 30 days if he announces this plan. Please pass this on to President Elect Obama.
Posted by: matthew | January 7, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Welo you are hallucinating and I do not beleive that the election was any thing but fair for the first time in years because of republican manipulation not the other way around,Obaa won and “yes we can” so there!
Posted by: Liz diess | January 7, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
The most unnerving aspects about the punitive liberals, is their intolerance for dissent and their willingness to censor and otherwise suppress their opponents.–
The democrats are prejudice. The only good thing about the hippie punitive liberals is- they are a dying breed! -Libertarians will win in the end. Long live Ayn Rand!
Posted by: RBarley | January 7, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
WITH THE MESS OBAMA IS WALKING INTO- WHAT ADO YOU THAT WHO ARE OPPOSED TO OBAMA’S FINANCIAL PLAN THINK HE SHOULD DO. PUT HIS HEAD IN THE SAND AND CRY. THAT SURE WHAT I WOULD WANT TO DO. THIS IS AMERICA FOR HEAVENS SAKE. WE HAVE TO COME OUT OF THIS THING TOGETHER AND IN A MORE POSITIVE LIGHT. BUSH AND CHENEY LEGACY(OF DREAD) CANNOT RULE.
Posted by: lowes4321 | January 7, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm
Liz,
I realize you want to be a good liberal, but your DEAD WRONG on the history of the this stuff.
Pres. Carter created the Community Reinvestment Act with a Democratic Congress.
Then in 1995, during the Clinton administration, the Democrats added new provisions that forced banks to issue $1 trillion in “sub-prime” loans.
To be fair, Phil Gramm, a republican, was also instrumental in this with the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. Which by the way had a major promoter in Larry Summers, then Clinton’s Sec. of the treasury. Now one of Obama’s “brilliant advisors”.
And NEVER EVER forget the MAJOR contribution of BARNEY FRANK! He pushed and pushed Freddie/Fannie to make bilions & billions of loans to people who had no way of paying them back. All in the good name of liberalism. It was Frank that led oppositon to many attempts of Bush & the Republicans to place more regulation on the mortgages industry.
Please, blame all those involved, not just those you disagree with due to partisan politics!
Posted by: Mike_C | January 7, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
In addition to the election of a megalomaniac empty suit-one Barry Soetoro aka Barack Hussein Obama, about whom we, the people are permitted to know little (no access to school records, medical records, birth records) other than his anti-American friends, Marxist beliefs, win at all costs strategy–ACORN fraud, massive amounts of campaign contributions that are “untraceable,” among other such unsavory behaviors and involvements which reduce our nation to a banana republicesque laughing stock, we do know that he has severed a major artery within this country by his continual use of the “race card.”
Posted by: RBarley | January 7, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Thanks Mathew! I am so glad to see on this site a few Obama suppoters. I must sign out and get busy.
Posted by: Liz diess | January 7, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
total US nat deficent tending towards 10% of GNP? Say goodbye to the American Empire-its gointg bust like the Uk and Spain.
Posted by: Paul | January 7, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
I am embarrassed to be an American. Democrats and Obama have made us the laughing stock of the world
Posted by: Liz diess | January 7, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Is this guy backpedaling from his multitude of promises even before he takes the oath of office?
Remember, the election was about fixing the problems. He must be held accountable by the media/press and the public and be judged by his performance, good or bad.
Posted by: benvictor | January 7, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Get over it: he’s a stammering figurehead, and fading fast. You’ve been had, Oprah’s been had (again), numerous celebrities in the glitter seats have been had. Get ready for a failed-state nightmare the pundits can’t spin, followed by untidy revolution. – President-elect Barack Obama, relatively young and inexperienced.* Now the media is finally concerned and asking Questions? ‘And I suspect, at the end of the day, we will pay an equally high price for Obama’s concealment of truth.
Posted by: RBarley | January 7, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Whats wrong with Obama? Is he trying to capitolize on the problems and fear about the economy? You betcha. Why else would Obama deliver such doom and gloom messaged when this country has gone through worse?
You people that voted for this administration of gloom and gloom that cant wait to say the US is the worst place in the world.. Well… You just might get your wish. Welcome to the Obama years.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | January 7, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
The comments on this blog are down right disgusting!!!! People are ALWAYS COMPLAINING with no solutions! Complain about the bailouts because Americans where not getting the money. Now there is a plan to provide jobs and give some tax relief. By the compainer standards…that is not enough or our deficit is getting bigger. To get money you have to spend/invest in it. That is what corporations/business/alike do it is call risking or investing. SOMEONE has to invision or invest in us Americas..HELL BUSH invest in banks why not invest in AMERICANS and it’s land. COMPLAINERS/WHINERS never get anywhere in live because everything ugly comes out and their thoughts are all dried up. THIS is a land of opportunity, visions, and investment. EITHER you get on board and make a difference or SHUT UP and ride the train and enjoy the benefits!!!!!
Posted by: stop whinning | January 7, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
But you may want to consider how the following list of Obama advisors, contributors, mentors, teachers, associates, confidants and benefactors may have significant influence on Obama’s personal and political views. If you study, in detail, how and where these people have been involved with Obama throughout is life and political career, you may be more than a little concerned about where we may be headed! 1. Rod Blagojevich 2. Tony Resko 3. Franklin Raines 4. Norman Hsu 5. Jim Johnson 6. William Ayers 7. Bernadine Dohrn 8. Rashid Khalidi 9. Jeremiah Wright 10, Father Michael Pfleger 11. Frank Marshall Davis 12. Saul Alinsky 13. Imad Husain 14. Mohammed Hasan Chandoo 15. Wahid Hamid 16. Vinai Thummalapally 17. Sohale Siddiqi 18. Louis Farrakhan 19. Nadhmi Auchi. Do you see a pattern developing anywhere?
Posted by: RBarley | January 7, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
To Lisa Again(blogger)-saying dear God help us ,that Obama is just another Democrat at the helm. Since you used God’s name; in the bible( book of Esther), it did not look good-All the Jews were going to be killed – her uncle told Queen Esther “who knows maybe she had come to the kingdom for such a time as this.” Maybe Obama has come to position for such a time as this. If God is with him he will be sucessful like Esther was.
Posted by: lowes4321 | January 7, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
GET ready for FOUR years of Obama most often used quote.
” THATS NOT WHAT I MEANT “
Posted by: Liz diess | January 7, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
“WHAT ADO YOU THAT WHO ARE OPPOSED TO OBAMA’S FINANCIAL PLAN THINK HE SHOULD DO. PUT HIS HEAD IN THE SAND”
————————————–
No, he has Barney Frank doing that right now!
The first thing Obama needs to do is use the “bully pulpit” and be truely honest with the country and layout the history of the Community Reinvestment Act and all the events since then. Point out those who enabled this mess and those who did attept to fight it.
THEN, we can move forward with solutions that address the real issues with some confidence that we understand what we are doing. If we try to approach this as Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi & Harry reid have done, the end result will be more bilions wasted on solutions that had no chance of working in the first place.
ALSO, he need to be upfront with people about this stimulus package. All this yapping about infrastructure is only going to help unemployed people from the construction industry. Right now, no one on either side of the aisle can tell us just how many people from the unemployment rolls could expect a job from that portion of his package.
In the spirit of openness and transparency that he promised, he should disclose to the Ameriucan people his expected cost per month in Afganistan and his EXIT STRATEGY so we know how much moeny we are expecting to spend there. (Remember he made a big deal all through the campaign about 10B/month in Iraq!)
He needs to pressure Reid/Pelosi to get the oversight of ALL the bailouts monies that Congress has appropriated so far on a web site so every American can see for themselves where all THEIR money is going!
Posted by: Mike_C | January 7, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
IdahoGirl:
“Personal consumption will sharply drop as a result of market losses, the disappearance of home equity, job losses, and tighter credit conditions”
OK, but you havent given a reason why those conditions will be changed by the Obama stimulus.
If you hand out free money (since they werent paying taxes in the first place) to the poor they will either save it or blow it on cheap junk from China. If you give it to the middle class they will mostly save it (Greg Manwik has some charts on the effect of the last stimulus). Neither results in any real GDP growth.
Infrastructure projects either wont be ready in 2008 or were so dubious that they couldnt be funded on their own merits in the first place. So no help there.
What would be helpful is encouraging investment by the private sector by lowering tax rates since they are the ones to make jobs (I have never been employed by a poor person). Obama seems reluctant to totally come around to this view.
Further I think you have to be careful in overselling the recession. There were quarters of 2% GDP growth in there. Undoubtedly crude oil at $150 a barrel was a *huge* headwind to the economy in the summer since those costs squeeze almost every business. The fact that oil costs have ameliorated is a major positive factor.
So I am left wondering what are the specific portions of this package that are supposed to provide short term stimulus?
Posted by: BertieW | January 7, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm
Some of these comments are absolutely amazing! You would think Obama has been in office for years. But as usual the GOP and it propoganda sidekicks are doing damage control for a dying party that has to rethink and rebuild. How can anyone whom claims to be Republican possibly say with a straight face they have followed Barry Goldwater’s lead of less government and FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY? The problem with American History is that few Americans actually know Americam History. These issues were essentially the same when several months before the stock market crash of 29 that Republican genius Hoover said the economy was in great shape. Although alot of us were Reagan fans despite party affiliation people forget that after 8 years of Reaganomics and trickle down that we had the worst Savings and Loan crisis in history and left H.W. Bush holding the bag and ssaying ” Read My Lips No New Taxes” when he knew like the rest of us there was no way to address the issues without rasing taxes. When you present me with somene who can actually make tricle down economics work I will follow. The problem is that if the people in power who are supposed to trickle don’t, then nothing filters down. It goes into their private piggy banks. At least give Obama a chance to try. If things do not get better in fours years, the Dems will have no place to hide since they are in control. Meanwhile the GOP should spend more time addressing it’s own future rather than relying on old tactics from a platform that no longer fits America’s daily needs.
Posted by: Tom | January 7, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
–As if being linked to one high-profile criminal case weren’t enough, President-elect Barack Obama’s name may soon pop up in another federal prosecution, this one involving a massive Ponzi scheme (no, the other massive Ponzi scheme). In addition to the Rod Blagojevich pay-for-play probe, Obama could figure in the upcoming fraud trial of Norman Hsu, the disgraced Democratic fundraiser who was charged last year with operating a $60 million pyramid scheme. According to investigators, Hsu, a major Hillary Clinton fundraiser, pressured investors to donate money to political candidates with whom he was aligned. In a letter last week to U.S. District Court Judge Victor Marrero, Hsu’s lawyer, Martin Cohen, requested a 60-day delay in the start of Hsu’s trial, scheduled to open January 12 (Cohen cited the “extraordinary level of negative publicity” generated by the recent arrest of alleged Ponzi schemer Bernard Madoff). –or the Inauguration Jan 20?
Posted by: RBarley | January 7, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
I am embarrassed to be an American. Democrats and Obama have made us the laughing stock of the world
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
HA.. The voters should be embarrassed of how they vote like sheep. They have the power to change this in two years.
Not by voting republican or democrat but by listening to policy wonks and voting for policy and not personality.
Stop voting for the guy that would be good to have a beer with and vote for the guy thats able and willing. STOP voting for anyone with big ad campaigns. ENOUGH.. before we all go down the tubes.
Posted by: ChicagoBob | January 7, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
lmao at neo-con republicans
what part of the last 8 years actually made you think that a republican would get re-elected. Seriously mcCain and Palin followinf Bush Cheney and you still lquestion why Obama was elected…
Bush was and will always be a huge embarassment, if he isn’t an embarassment to you then maybe you are the problem..
I don’t know hwat the answer to the economy is, but I will take tax breaks for the workers and job creation over anything I have heard from any republican… In fact McCain was very weak on the economy during the campaign trail.
I really beleive you sour graped republicans just want Obama to fail just ot have an “I told you so” moment. And you would gladly sacrifice this country just to be able ot say that for personal pride reasons… and that is sad, but I find it to be extremely true even though the majority of you would never search your own souls to find out.
I know why Obama won the election… because he is intelligent and he obviously tells it like it is, unlike what republicnas do which is to find data that supports there ideaologies or contort what data they have to support what they want… Seriously were any of you republicans actually paying attention the last 8 years and the fact that Bush’s approval rating nation wide was in the 20′s . Or why congress has more dems in there now after tis last election???
hate us that voted for Obama… but you definitely didn’t leave us with much of choice. MCSenile and “You betcha” Palin were HORRIBLE choices for America
Posted by: Daryl | January 7, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
CDL license Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Excise Taxes
Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Gasoline Tax (currently 44.75 cents per gallon)
Gross Receipts Tax
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Inventory Tax
IRS Interest Charges IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Taxes
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Personal Property Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service Charge Tax
Social Security Tax
Road Usage Tax
Sales Tax
Recreational Vehicle Tax
School Tax
State Income Tax
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
Telephone Federal Excise Tax
Telephone Federal Universal Service FeeTax
T elephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes
Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
Telephone Recurring and Non-recurring Charges Tax
Telephone State and Local Tax
Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Utility Taxes
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax
Well Permit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax
STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?
Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, and our nation
was the most prosperous in the world.
We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle
class in the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.
What happened? Can you spell ‘politicians?’
And I still have to ‘press 1′ for English!?
I hope this goes around THE USA at least 100 times!!! YOU can
help it get there!!! GO AHEAD – - – BE AN AMERICAN!
Posted by: welostintegrity | January 7, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
The economy is bad and I will love to see Obama poor more investment/money into our economy. AMerica is worth every penny!
Posted by: stop whinning | January 7, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
Backpedal, backpedal, backpedal.
Posted by: Publius | January 7, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
The Perfect Stimulus Package-The government simply absorbs the remaining $350 billion from the stimulus bill and suspends the collection of all income and payroll taxes for two months. Even trade. This means that for two months you get your entire paycheck (well … less any State withholding). The government ends up with the same amount of money in its coffers, and the income earners in this country have some extra money to spend – an average about $2,000 per taxpayer – over the following two months. This plan puts the economic stimulus money right into the hands of the people who actually earned it in the first place. Can you imagine that? by: Neal Boortz Let’s start writing our congressman and senators now! Could something like this actually make its way through our Congress? Sure it could … if the voters demanded it. But hey …let’s get serious.
Posted by: welostintegrity | January 7, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
Democrats are like the crazy uncle you want to hide from. Where did i get that from. OH Obama said that about his racist Rev Wright that he later threw under the bus when he said Obama is a typical politician
Posted by: Liz diess | January 7, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
History will vindicate President Bush.
Remember “Bush lied, thousands died!!”?
If he knew that there would be no WMD found why would he invade Iraq?
And how many of you read this little gem:
Source A.P.
“The last major remnant of Saddam Hussein’s nuclear program, a huge stockpile (550 metric tons) of concentrated natural uranium reached a Canadian port Saturday to complete a secret U.S. operation that included a two-week airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing two oceans.”
American troops found the 550 metric tons of uranium in 2003 after invading Iraq. They had to sit on this information and the uranium itself for fear of terrorists attempting to steal it. It was guarded and kept safe by our military in a 23,000 acre site with large sand beams surrounding the site.
‘Country first’ – what a concept
Posted by: Welostintegrity | January 7, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Obama lowered GASOLINE prices.
Vote Obama
Posted by: anonymous | January 7, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
“You would think Obama has been in office for years.”
He HAS been in office for years, doing NOTHING all the while but serving time, voting “present”, taking credit for bogus books about His legend, and selling out His gullible supporters in favor of corporations … while His mob-friendly organization has moved him up the ladder to First Figure-head for His money-masters.
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 7, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm
Welostintegrity: That’s right! The evil Liberal Media pulled the wool over the eyes of all those citizens who thought the country was on the wrong track. Otherwise voters surely would have demanded we continue the conservative free-market theology: middle class jobs outsourced, tax cuts for the rich, hand over Social Security to Wall Street, and growing the people living under the poverty line by 5.7 million.
Posted by: CaliRules | January 7, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
President Lincoln LIED about the reason of the war and the CIVIL war had the biggest anti-war protest of any war in history but now Lincoln is a hero
Posted by: Welostintegrity | January 7, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
During this election so many were manipulated by editing and the suppression of the truth. The puntive liberals (with the help of the msm) destroyed and distorted any possibility of a fair election. The facts and associations were suppressed and spun. The election of pebo was nothing more than a whole country being manipulated by Saul Alinsky’s Best Student!
intelligent vote? LOL-On November 4th, 2008 millions of Americans were shocked that a man of Barack Obama’s limited experience, extreme liberal positions and radical political alliances could be elected President of the United States. For many of these Americans, the explanation was rather simple… the news media, completely enamored with Obama, simply refused to do their job.
Posted by: Welostintegrity | January 7, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
Hey Belle – do you know Ann Coulter? LOL
Posted by: CaliRules | January 7, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
westlin…Although that is true….this is how cities/states/ and Americans are able to survive. The taxes goes from one hand to the next and it keeps busines moving in the USA.
Posted by: stop whinning | January 7, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Now THAT’s funny. A repubilcan lecturing on tax breaks for the wealthy.
Posted by: Tom | January 7, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
“Welcome to the Obama years.”
The Obama WEEKS is more like it.
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 7, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Boy, is this going to be fun for the next 4 years, >INFLATION >INFLATION >INFLATION. Thank you democrats. Maybe Hugo Chavez can save our heating oil costs?
Posted by: Heavenislikethis | January 7, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Sorry no one was duped in this election. The information for voters was online, in your face, news media, etc. No one was mis-inform. If so it was only by choice. People wanted someone different in office with a plan and MCGrumpy and Crazy Palin did not make the cut!
Posted by: stop whinning | January 7, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
Yea, there is a deficit of trust. People dont trust the media, politicians in both parties,or the house and senate. I agree that people lack trust in any politicians ability to do what they promise including the new president and congress!!!!
Posted by: yea right | January 7, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
“President Lincoln LIED about the reason of the war and the CIVIL war had the biggest anti-war protest of any war in history but now Lincoln is a hero”
Yeah, that’s the way it usually goes: assassinate ‘em, wait a while, reinvent ‘em, put ‘em in the history books as “heros”: JFK, Martin Luther King, etc.
If nothing else, it sells a lot of textbooks, which is profitable for the publishers who manage what passes for mass “culture”.
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 7, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
Goooolllly! Lots of comments! But, I’ve been looking for info. regarding the subject/possibility of “individual stimulus checks such as those allowed a year or so ago. Can anyone enlighten me on this subject? I, by the way was “skipped over” the first time around. “A technicality”! I was told something like, eeehh, maybe next year ‘we’ll send it to you’. Anyone heard about this subject?? By the way, lighten up on Mr. Obama huh? I didn’t vote for him but, well, .. just, give him a break/lighten up?
Posted by: jana2 | January 7, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Seems like no matter what Obama is asked, he is just beginning to formulate a study that will create a committee to figure out how we can solve the problem and at the same time save money for the taxpayers and when that is completed, they’ll get back to us with the plan in a timely manner — most like by posting it on a web site. More and more, it’s becoming evident that he’s nothing more than a lot of hot air with no substance.
Posted by: MadeInUSA | January 7, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
belle star…MartinLuther King made a difference…no one had to reinvent him.
Posted by: stop whinning | January 7, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
we do know that he has severed a major artery within this country by his continual use of the “race card.”
He’s done with the “race card”, apparently — unless he needs it for Holder. Now He’s channeling crypto-Mormon Harry Reid. No wonder Oprah gained all that weight.
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 7, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
The only good thing about Martin Luther King MLK was that he was a Republican
Posted by: stop whinning | January 7, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
Seems like no matter what Obama is asked, he is just beginning to formulate a study that will create a committee to figure out how we can solve the problem and at the same time save money for the taxpayers and when that is completed, they’ll get back to us with the plan in a timely manner — most like by posting it on a web site. More and more, it’s becoming evident that he’s nothing more than a lot of hot air with no substance.
Posted by: MadeInUSA
Made- He is the consummate politician. He chimes in on issues where he can gain credibility or political points and says “there’s only one president at a time” on the controversial ones. Sort of like voting “present”.
Posted by: RBarley | January 7, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
It will pass! They want to create confidence in the market so it will pass one way or the other.
Posted by: stop whinning | January 7, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
Jana, 500 a person, 1000 a couple, welfare for those that don’t pay taxes anyway. It’s not going to work. The only thing that will work is Fair Tax, google that.
Posted by: RBarley | January 7, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
BertieW: I agree tax cuts in general will be less effective in stimulating spending (given Roubini’s projected increase in Middle Class savings), however, the expansion of unemployment benefits, food stamps, and other “handing out free money to the poor” will have a high bang-for-buck effect in 2009. Historically this money is not used to buy “Chinese junk”, but on food and local spending. It’s my understanding the stimulus will also include up to $100 Billion for state and local governments to meet severe budget shortfalls including grants, Medicaid and unemployment insurance funds, preventing cutbacks in public services, investment and jobs in hard hit states.
And as far as spending on infrastructure, the American Society of Civil Engineers says we are 1.5 Trillion in arrears on needed infrastructure repairs – that does not even count the cost of bringing our nation’s internet and phone service up to the superior standard of Japan or Europe. I don’t buy off on your presumption that these projects “have not been funded on their own merits”. (For example, pre-Katrina Army Corps requests for levee improvement funds and the recent TVA pond breach.)
Posted by: idahogirl | January 7, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Interesting story. BO is actually telling people to trust him . . . because he will be spending more money and running bigger deficits!
I thought trust was equal to not spending more money and not running large deficits?
Lemmings of the world (that’s you Democrats)- see if you can’t get in touch with your comrade, BO and tell him not to run this country over a cliff.
Posted by: Election09 | January 7, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
I didn’t write the post about “natural born Americans”! My name is on it…but, I didn’t write it!!??
Posted by: Jana2 | January 7, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
“Sorry no one was duped in this election. The information for voters was online, in your face, news media, etc. No one was mis-inform. ”
Of course they were. The media has already admitted that they were massively slated. The Washington Post ombudman admitted that made a mistake in sending reporters to Alaska to cover Palin’s tanning bed bt not asking questions of Obama to get him past his Hope and Change puffery. Stories on the broadcast networks were 70% favorable to Obama and 39% favorable to McCain. Chris Mathrews admitted he was in teh tank for Obama. The Today show producer just said that they dont want to be seen having guest criticizing Obama at this time.
Polls taken of Obama voters after the election show that huge percentages dont know basic information about him.
The free media was majorly in the tank for the guy and he blanketed everything else with his billion dollar ad buy.
Posted by: BertieW | January 7, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
No one was DUPED. Did you ever watch MSN. Chris Matthews and the rest of them drooling over Obama
Posted by: stop whinning | January 7, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
Does anyone think this amount of spending will help this or any economy?
I don’t.
Any economists on this blog? Join in if you’re here.
It’s my understanding that when government spends money it doesn’t create more wealth – it just spends more money, correct?
Posted by: Election09 | January 7, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
Obama makes me sick already trying to weasel his way out of every promise he made. Like the Public Funding of his Campaign. THe media still will not investigate where all his money really came from. Its all undocumented Internet donations. At least Obama can release all the IP address of the Donations. Remember his open government promise
Posted by: jana2 | January 7, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
Rbarley ..there is only one president at a time. Otherwise if he did step in to resolve a problem YOU would be saying HE IS NOT THE PRESIDENT he should wait his turn. President Bush could handle the situation/crisis BEFORE obama takes office.
EITHER way it goes he can’t make complainer/whiners happy.
Posted by: stop whinning | January 7, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
RBarley: FYI, I DO pay taxes. Don’t be so smug.
Posted by: Jana2 | January 7, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
I hope BO can do some uniting but I don’t think so.
I remember back to his one major speech where where he used “typical white person.” Did anyone ever ask him what a typical white person is? Also, isn’t calling a member of your own family an example of racial profiling? I hope he’s really not like that. I still wish him luck.
Posted by: Election09 | January 7, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
The reality is, republicans are going to complain about Obama no matter what he does. You watch. If peace on earth breaks out in the next 4 years, these people will blame Obama for making the world a duller place. They’re ridiculous, and they should be as marginalized in discussions about what should be done about the myriad problems this administration is inheriting as their choices for leaders were. You got exactly what you deserved when you and your leaders chose to value party loyalty over actual competence. People like this will never admit they were wrong. The rest of us should just ignore them.
Posted by: sskrab | January 7, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Maybe their is time to save this country if we IMPEACH this scum Obama now
Posted by: Election09 | January 7, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Bertie W…FAUX was in the tank for Mccain!! As a voter it is your responsibility to FIND information on your choices. PUT the blame where it is suppose to be..look in the mirror…stop looking for other people to place blame.
For example, someone wanted to blame HOUSING CRISIS on politicans….the majority of this mess is the people/AMERICANS who made this happen!!! When I bought my house, I inform myself. Education is empowerment…
Posted by: stop whinning/complain | January 7, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Yes Democrats want a free pass on all the corruption. They want Chicago style thug style politics through out the country.
Posted by: sskrab | January 7, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
HEY!!!!! WHAT’S GOING ON!!! TWO OR THREE COMMENTS HERE HAVE MY NAME ON THEM AND I DID’T WRITE THEM!! WHAT’S GOING ON HERE!! I DID NOT WRITE COMMENTS CRITICAL OF MR. OBAMA OR BLACKS. AND I HAVEN’T ADDRESSED RACISM, ETC. DAMN IT. PLEASE STOP IT WHOEVER IS DOING THIS!
Posted by: jana2 | January 7, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Election09 impeachment…wow What about solutions?
Posted by: stop whinning/complain | January 7, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Bush and the Republicans burned up all the money needed for fixing the country with the “war on terror” and the Iraq war. Now, Obama’s hands will be tied and he will be unable to borrow the money necessary to fix the mess the Republicans made. Then the hypocrite Republicans will try to blame Obama for “spending too much”. I can see it all now.
Posted by: JL | January 7, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
That’s right Bertie! The press single handedly turned voters into zombies by not exposing “basic information” about Obama’s Birth Certificate and his secret membership in the Weather Underground. If it wasn’t for the evil Liberal Media no sane moral Caucasian would have voted for Obama. Well, except for the 90% who already thought the country was heading in the wrong direction.
Posted by: CaliRules | January 7, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
What the media actually found with their survey was that McCain’s campaign was so poorly run in terms of focus and message that simply reporting on the campaign produced many negative stories.
Posted by: pefros | January 7, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
“Bertie W…FAUX was in the tank for Mccain!!”
You are wrong as you can see by consulting the Pew Report “The Color of News”.
” * MSNBC stood out for having less negative coverage of Obama than the press generally (14% of stories vs. 29% in the press overall) and for having more negative stories about McCain (73% of its coverage vs. 57% in the press overall).
* On Fox News, in contrast, coverage of Obama was more negative than the norm (40% of stories vs. 29% overall) and less positive (25% of stories vs. 36% generally). For McCain, the news channel was somewhat more positive (22% vs. 14% in the press overall) and substantially less negative (40% vs. 57% in the press overall). Yet even here, his negative stories outweighed positive ones by almost 2 to 1.
”
Contrary to your claim Fox did more negative stories on McCain than positive. That hardly ‘in the tank’.
Posted by: BertieW | January 7, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
WHy doesn’t anyone blame Bush? He’s the one who brought the country down..not Obama
Posted by: ugh | January 7, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
“And part of the package is going to be to help states who are under extraordinary budget pressures to prevent them from laying off more workers in vital service areas like teaching, law enforcement and so forth, so that not only are we saving jobs, we’re also making sure that states are able to provide basic services to their citizens at a time of critical need.”
Posted by: pefros | January 7, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
What the media actually found with their survey was that McCain’s campaign was so poorly run in terms of focus and message that simply reporting on the campaign produced many negative stories.
Posted by: pefros | January 7, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
“a lot of the investments are going to be around things like energy, health care, education, things that we need to be doing anyway.”
Posted by: pefros | January 7, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
jpt quotes The CHANGEling:
“I think it’s important for us not to have earmarks here.”
Aside from the fact that this is total horse-puckey, The One would do well to avoid discussion of “ear-” ANYthing. On the other hand, not saying “pork” may come naturally to Him. The zillion dollars of slop in His figures makes the uh “party favors” kind of unnecessary ANYway …
But Lord knows mobs of the food- and housing- and health care-desperate masses have been chanting and clamoring for federal buildings that are more ecologically-correct!
Can’t He just get Gupta to diagnose Him with something dangerous, and resign, arready?
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 7, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
“I’ve said before I think it’s entirely appropriate for members of Congress to want to have some say in terms of projects that take place in their district. Many of the projects that they might advocate for are worthy. But isn’t the place to do it. And so I think it’s important for us not to have earmarks here. It’s important for us to have transparency in how the money is spent. I intend to make sure that we have unprecedented measures to ensure that taxpayers can keep track of how this money is spent.”
Posted by: pefros | January 7, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
jpt writes:
“investment component designed to create or save 3 million new jobs”
“Save” 3 million new jobs? Huh?
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 7, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
For McCain, the news channel was somewhat more positive (22% vs. 14% in the ….shows like HANNITY AMERICA. Thanks for proving my point. Fox news was in the TANK!
Posted by: stop whinning/complain/2 | January 7, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
Pefros. Help me to understand something here.
If this “fiscal stimulus package” is going to help states to: create jobs, improve education, hire more police, etc – and the US is a collection of 50 states – doesn’t that mean some states will receive a negative share? (That’s a rhetorical (sp) question)
* You see dumbo democrats – all the US government has in the treasury is equal to the money that exists between all of now, divided by the total number of people in the us. That’s allllll we have. This “fiscal stimulus package” doesn’t create new wealth – it just redistributes existing wealth.
*Pefros, your move.
Posted by: Election09 | January 7, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Thank goodness Bush and the Republicans will soon be finished. The country is in such pitiful shape I don’t think it could take any more.
And who benefited during the Bush administration? Who had record profits?
Big oil (isn’t the Bush family involved with big oil?); the military/industrial empire (wasn’t Cheney a CEO at Halliburton who came directly to VP?) and big banks (who got the big bail out?).
Talk about pork and corruption, these clowns deserve to be in jail.
Posted by: pefros | January 7, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
I guess addressing Medicare and SS solvency is out the window.
Posted by: Election09 | January 7, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
CNN had an article Monday where the FBI was going to hire 800 new agents? I can see them for terrorism or kidnapping or major crimes, but in my town, 175 FBI agents were involved in string of massage parlor busts. They said agents had been dumpster diving for condom wrappers for 18 months prior to the bust. Seems like we have too many agents on the payroll already if we have trillon dollar shortfalls and all they can do is chase prostitutes. The operators have been in jail for 18 months without trial or bond….meanwhile Wall Street bandits run free on thier tax-funded performance bonuses earned for running thier companies into the ground. I guess this is just more Washington logic.
Posted by: People are Dumb | January 7, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Unfortunately, the Obama plan of increasing spending to stimulate the economy is a short term answer that has very dangerous implications down the road. But what else should we expect from a man who has exercised poor personal and professional judgement his entire life.
Posted by: SouthTexan | January 7, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
BO also said he was going to create millions of Green jobs from this stimulus package. Really?
What is a green job? Where would one go right now to apply for one? What’s the name of the company that hiring for these “green positions?”
Answer: there aren’t things such as green jobs. For a democrat – a green job is soemthing like turning down the thermostat in your office and recylcing. “Creating green jobs” is a catch-all. Liberal politicians use it on their audiences b/c they know it works the same way large chunks of unprocessed meat works when zookeepers throw it into the carnivore pen in the Big Cat exhibit at the —— zoo.
Posted by: Election09 | January 7, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
How much is the “Chief Performance Officer” going to cost taxpayers..???
Posted by: CW | January 7, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
Here’s how the Republicans ran the government when they held Presidency and Congress.
REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT
$421 Billion OVER BUDGET (2002)
$555 Billion OVER BUDGET (2003)
$596 Billion OVER BUDGET (2004)
$554 Billion OVER BUDGET (2005)
$574 Billion OVER BUDGET (2006)
They left the country with massive debts, a severely damaged economy and a terrible international reputation.
Even with the brightest and best minds working with Obama, recovering from this will not be easy.
Posted by: pefros | January 7, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
We no longer have a First Amendment , What is even more frightening than the sinister schemes of liberal politicians to silence and criminalize political opposition is the apparent eagerness of rank-and-file liberals and our mainstream media to go along with them. The most unnerving aspects about the Democrats’ victory Nov. 4 are their intolerance for dissent and their willingness to censor and otherwise suppress their opponents.–Talk about suppressing our opponents Posted by R Barley I have posted this and it is always removed:U.S.S.C. Case No. 08-570, in the U.S. Supreme Court has been scheduled for two [2] Conferences [January 9th and 16th, 2009]. Regarding whether or not it is constitutional for BHO to become President. Our First Amendment rights have been jeopardized. We have no Freedom of speech.
Posted by: Respectfulcitizen | January 7, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Blame it on the Bush administration respectfulcitizen, they’ve been in power for 8 years and made major appointments to the courts, including the Supreme Court.
Posted by: pefros | January 7, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
GUESS WHAT FOLKS? Obama’s new ‘Chief Performance Officer”
Nancy Killefer was a Treassury Department official under BILL CLINTON…
That’s right.!! Another Clinton administration official…
Posted by: CW | January 7, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Regarding the increase in deficit spending since 2002, remember we have been in a war involving two major theaters of operation. As a matter of record, the years that the U.S. Goverment has “record” deficit spending have occured when the Democrats controlled Congress.
Unfortunately, for the future, in less than a single year, with military operations winding down, the Obamaites will more than double and most probably triple the highest deficit spendingever seen under the Bush Administration.
Posted by: South Texan | January 7, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm
jpt writes:
“investment component designed to create or save 3 million new jobs”
“Save” 3 million new jobs? Huh?
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 7, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
He HAS been in office for years, doing NOTHING all the while but serving time, voting “present”, taking credit for bogus books about His legend, and selling out His gullible supporters in favor of corporations posted by Belle
good point may I add:
… while His mob-friendly organization has moved him up the ladder to First Figure-head for His money-masters.During this election so many were manipulated by editing and the suppression of the truth. The puntive liberals (with the help of the msm) destroyed and distorted any possibility of a fair election. The facts and associations were suppressed and spun. The election of pebo was nothing more than a whole country being manipulated by Saul Alinsky’s Best Student! For many of these Americans, the explanation was rather simple… the news media, completely enamored with Obama, simply refused to do their job. Americans were shocked that a man of Barack Obama’s limited experience, extreme liberal positions and radical political alliances could be elected President of the United States.
Posted by: RBarley | January 7, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
South Texan, economist Nouriel Roubini disagrees with you. He states the U.S. economy is only half way through a recession that will be the longest and most severe since WWII, and short term spending on food stamps and unemployment will provide some balance during 2009. It’s my understanding the stimulus will also include up to $100 Billion for state and local governments to meet severe budget shortfalls including grants, Medicaid and unemployment insurance funds, preventing cutbacks in public services, investment and jobs in hard hit states. Why do you think this is dangerous?
Posted by: idahogirl | January 7, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
The Republicans held both the Presidency and the Congress through all those years where massive deficits were rung up.
Bush and the neo-cons pet war against Iraq killed and maimed tens of thousands of people on their own homeland and rang up these deficits.
$421 Billion OVER BUDGET (2002)
$555 Billion OVER BUDGET (2003)
$596 Billion OVER BUDGET (2004)
$554 Billion OVER BUDGET (2005)
$574 Billion OVER BUDGET (2006)
Make your excuses as you may.
Posted by: pefros | January 7, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Pefros, I know better, I read more than the tabloid MSM, The democrats are to blame- Starting with President Carter, pressed by grassroots organizations — though opposed by the banking industry, signed into law the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA). July 1994 Represented by Obama and others, Plaintiffs filed a class action lawsuit alleging that Citibank had “intentionally discriminated against the Plaintiffs on the basis of race with respect to a credit transaction,” calling their action “racial discrimination and discriminatory redlining practices.”Republicans had won control of Congress and planned CRA reforms. The Clinton Administration, however, allied with Rep. Frank, Sen. Kennedy (D-Massachusetts) and Rep. Waters (D-California), did an end-around by directing HUD Secretary Andrew Cuomo to inject GSEs into the subprime mortgage market. After years of Democrats blocking the legislation, Sens. Hagel, Sununu, Dole and McCain write a letter to Majority Leader William Frist and Chairman Richard Shelby
expressing demanding that GSE regulatory reform be “enacted this year” to avoid “the enormous risk that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac pose to the Housing market, the overall financial system, and the economy as a whole.”
Posted by: welostintegrity | January 7, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
“That’s right.!! Another Clinton administration official…”
Clearly the Clintons (or whoever) have coerced the “Obama” organization to let THEM be the government, with Barack as the media figure-head. Otherwise, it’s inconceivable He’d reconstitute the whole sorry shooting-match, after having promised “change”, and railed against the 90s, 60s and so on. ESPECIALLY Eric Holder … THAT’s just inconceivable, otherwise.
If some of those who KNOW what went down will just out Him NOW, we can skip months or years of embarrassing hassle, riots in the streets, etc.
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 7, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
After a little bit of research I found out it was really Democrats mainly Obama who was responsible for the financial crisis the banks are in now dragging the rest of the financial market with it.
- Bush has supported Fannie/Freddie reform since 2003. Here is an article from the NEW YORK TIMES. Note the Date! “September 11, 2003– The Bush Administration today recommended the most significant regulatory overhaul in the housing finance industry since the savings and loan crisis a decade ago. Under the plan, disclosed at a Congressional hearing today, a new agency would be created within the Treasury Department to assume supervision of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the government-sponsored companies that are the two largest players in the mortgage lending industry, The new agency would have the authority, which now rests with Congress, to set one of the two capital-reserve requirements for the companies. It would exercise authority over any new lines of business. And it would determine whether the two are adequately managing the risks of their ballooning portfolios. The plan is an acknowledgment by the administration that
oversight of Fannie
Mae and Freddie Mac — which together have issued more than $1.5 trillion in outstanding debt — is broken. A report by outside investigators in July concluded that Freddie Mac manipulated its accounting to mislead investors, and critics have said Fannie Mae does not adequately hedge against rising interest rates. Among the groups denouncing the proposal today were the National Association of Home Builders and Congressional Democrats who fear that tighter regulation of the companies could sharply reduce their commitment to financing low-income and affordable housing.”
Posted by: Welostintegrity | January 7, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
SUNDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 2008 (AP)
Bush Called For Reform of Fannie Mae & Freddie Mac 17 Times in 2008 Alone…
Dems Ignored Warnings
For many years the President and his Administration have not only warned of the systemic consequences of financial turmoil at a housing government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) but also put forward thoughtful plans to reduce the risk that either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac would encounter such difficulties. President Bush publicly called for GSE reform 17 times in 2008 alone before Congress acted.
Unfortunately, these warnings went unheeded, as the President’s repeated attempts to reform the supervision of these entities were thwarted by the legislative maneuvering of those who emphatically denied there were problems.
Posted by: welostintegrity | January 7, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
So we can attribute Reagen’s debt to the fall of the Soviet Union, Bush’s debt to the ending of a genocidal regime and liberating Afghanistan from the Taliban, and we attribute Clinton’s debt to…to….weird, nothing seems to come to mind. Clinton adopted the best economy the country has ever seen. The GDP was steadily increasing. Tax revenues were up 80%! (Trinkle down effect, anyone? ) How did he balance the budget? He didn’t balance the budget, he just couldn’t spend the people’s money fast enough! You would think he would reward the people for their surplus with tax refunds, but no, he instead dumps it into a non existent social security fund (One of the largest scams in the US history, thank you FDR!)
Posted by: Welostintegrity | January 7, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
“Regarding the increase in deficit spending since 2002, remember we have been in a war involving two major theaters of operation.”…..Yes and the absolute mis management of the wars as admitted by Bush, Powell and any number of WH officials, military analysts, etal contributed greatly to those huge deficits. A blundering administration tolerated by both parties in Congress coupled with an unbelievable number of business morons and crooks and goofball consumers who thought they could have everything for nothing down put most of us in the soup. We’re probably going to be there for a long time if not forever.
Posted by: Mark | January 7, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Bush had 8 years to fix any inadequacies his administration perceived in mortgage and loan situation – and accomplished nothing. They controlled Congress for the first 6 of those years.
Who benefited during the Bush regime? Massive profits for big oil (isn’t the Bush family in big oil?), military/industrial empire (didn’t Cheney go directly from Halliburton to VP?) and big banks (who benefited from the big bail out?).
Of course, the Republicans hands are clean. It was all the Democrats.
Posted by: pefros | January 7, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
The short term benefits are far outweighed by the transitioning of the U.S. to the U.S.S.A. as we replace our market economy with a command economy controlled by the government. Throughout history, command economies have NEVER benefited the people they serve. The economist you cite should understand that increasing government bailouts or “economic stimulus” plans will bankrupt the country long before we could recover from a recession. If we let the market function as it should, we would see positive growth within 18 months. Supporters of Obama ignored his socialist characteristics during the election, but as he exacerbates the economic problems we face our people will hopefully demand true change -not just a catchy marketing gimmick.
Posted by: South Texan | January 7, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
It sounds like most everyone writing comments has forgotten what being an American is all about. The majority voted for Mr. Obama. That’s how it works here in America. Now we should all support our new president. He hasn’t even taken office yet and he is being ridiculed for what he has/has not yet done in office. Freedom of speech is important, but so is supporting our President and our country. Show some respect!
Posted by: an american | January 7, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
How does going into debt more stimulate the economy? Are Obama and the Democrats serious about this spend your way to prosperity philosophy that has never worked in the past and won’t work this time? Why not cut budgets and start living within means like the rest of us have to?
Posted by: Jon | January 7, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Hey Obama bashers-we, the majority, WON. You and your LOST. Chew on nails for 8 years, have hissy fits but you LOST!!!!
Posted by: Mark | January 7, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
“The Clinton Administration, however, allied with Rep. Frank, Sen. Kennedy (D-Massachusetts) and Rep. Waters (D-California), did an end-around by directing HUD … ”
HUD should be ABOLISHED, its EVERY past employee put out to pasture and barred from further public “service” employment (a good argument there for “guaranteed income” as envisioned by none other than Richard Nixon, and for National Health — if loss of position weren’t so ruinous, these hacks and crooks might embrace leisure), its victims compensated, and other arrangements made.
Some entities are so foul they can’t BE fixed, and HUD — as millions of people both in and out of government know — is one of them.
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 7, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
The Republicans are leaving office in disgrace – good riddance.
Posted by: pefros | January 7, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
RBarley – Whoo boy those leftist radicals for social justice have teamed with the Lizard People to take over the elitist Liberal media owned by the socialist Illuminati to pull the wool over the eyes of the voters.
Posted by: CaliRules | January 7, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Let’s see the line-up for the Democrats so far: Richardson had to drop out as commerce sec’y because of corruption charges. Obama took big money from the same guy (Rubin) that Richardson is involved with at a fancy Hollywood fundraiser. We have foul-mouthed Blago, who has absolutely no sense of shame or wrong-doing. We have his senate appointee Burris refused entrance into senate chamber. We have the charming Al Franken about to be declared the senator from Minnesota, after literally stealing the elction, no doubt with help from Acorn, that honest get-out-the-vote group. Remember Acorn? Found guilty in the past of fraud and corruption? We have the ever-articulate and knowledgeable Barney Franks (remember in 1989 was found running a gay prostitution ring out of his DC house? Google it.) telling us how to spend the trillion dollar bailout plan money. Of course this wasn’t as serious as what Mark Foley did last year, Foley who was crucified in the press for playing footsie in an airport rest room. And don’t forget Chris Dodd, who somehow missed the signs of the Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac collapse. Good ol’ Chris, always has something to say that means absolutely nothing. Google anything in this posting-it’s all factual. I am honestly frightened for our country.
Posted by: welostintegrity | January 7, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
It’s not just a problem with government it is prevalent in our businesses and business practices. Let’s do it guy’s, lets just do it
Posted by: Steve W | January 7, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
“After a little bit of research I found out it was really Democrats mainly Obama who was responsible for the financial crisis the banks are in now dragging the rest of the financial market with it.”
The banks aren’t IN a crisis: they have an open-ended draw on the US Treasury. It’s the POOR who are in a CRISIS — in Gaza, in Chicago, everywhere.
Obama’s last Senate vote was for the Bush “bailout”. Except for the conveniently-timed “crisis”, meanwhile, the “Obama” organization might have managed, even with its lopsided media-support and monetary advantages, to LOSE the voting event.
The “crisis” is also coming in handy as a rationale for nooo pie in the sky, more t-t-terror talk and military adventures, “austerity” and police-state oversight for the masses.
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 7, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Many of the citizens of this country have become weak, dependent and cowardly. Their repulsive hedonistic nature is causing them to relinquish their liberties for a convenient but false security. I never thought I’d see this in a country that takes pride in its individual freedoms and pioneer spirit, but I am witnessing it now and it is very sad. Unfortunately, the left is eager to assume control of their lives and their behavior. Wake up people before you have reached the point of no return.
Posted by: rplat | January 7, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
Obama’s supporters appear to be using — and abusing — a tool allowing them to “flag” questions as “inappropriate” to remove all questions- The most unnerving aspects about the punitive liberals is their intolerance for dissent and their willingness to censor and otherwise suppress their opponents.
Posted by: Respectfulcitizen | January 7, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
“We have the ever-articulate and knowledgeable Barney Franks (remember in 1989 was found running a gay prostitution ring out of his DC house? Google it.) telling us how to spend the trillion dollar bailout plan money.”
Obama’s tossed His base, except for the “gay” movement organized by “post-partisan” corporados (Mary Cheney et al.) ahead of his supposed “grassroots” organizing.
The idea that anybody’d PAY to be intimate with Frank, however, is what’s TRULY frightening. Or was he the madam?
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 7, 2009, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
South Texan – surely you must be aware that not all economists believe in continuing Republican Supply Side economic policies. That does not mean implementing an alternative solution will turn our country into the USSR. Back in 2001, the Republican solution for the dot.com bubble bust was a huge tax break for the richest + an interest rate cut in hopes it would promote investment and jobs. Unfortunately, “Trickle Down” economics did not. Well, at least in the US; companies were encouraged to send their jobs overseas instead.
Along with other economists, Nouriel Roubini believes it’s time for a shot in the arm to prevent the looming 4-year recession from turning into a systemic meltdown and a decade long global economic Depression. Remember from your history class how programs like the WPA and the GI Bill gave America financial returns by building good jobs and optimism?
Posted by: idahogirl | January 7, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
Incredible, The MSM is not reporting about the fact there are more ballots than registered voters in Minnesota
Posted by: welostintegrity | January 7, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
“The most unnerving aspects about the punitive liberals is their intolerance for dissent and their willingness to censor and otherwise suppress their opponents.”
This was completely apparent during the primaries and the election. However, actual “liberals” don’t DO that. The “Obama” organization is NOT liberal, but authoritarian. They’re soft authoritarians, though: can’t stand conflict, because they can’t debate or think on their feet. So give ‘em LOTs of talk-back and debate, kiddies.
But DON’T do it at the organization’s own website, unless you want to change your residence and phone in an attempt to elude online unpleasantness AND administrative/bureaucratic retaliation. Do it ANYwhere but there (or huffingtonpost, which is almost the same thing).
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 7, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Pump up that scary hate! Oooooo police state! Ooooo gays! OOOooo riots in the streets! There HAS to be a conspiracy theory for why Obama was elected because NO WAY he’d have been elected otherwise after 8 glorious debt free happy years under George Bush. LOL
Posted by: CaliRules | January 7, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm
It was widely reported yesterday that George W. Bush added more to the national deficit during his administration THAN ALL PREVIOUS PRESIDENTS COMBINED! Great. Thanks, George. Don’t let the door hit you on your way out.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | January 7, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
I love how Obama is already lowering expectations. What a fraud.
Posted by: Ryan | January 7, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
Ryan: that is called being responsible and adjusting to a very fluid situation. Unlike Bush who was never wrong about anything.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | January 7, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
George W. Bush added more to the deficit than ALL 42 PRESIDENTS BEFORE HIM COMBINED. You cannot hide from this fact.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | January 7, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
Belle Starr says, “Some entities are so foul they can’t BE fixed, and HUD is one of them”. Interesting – some say the same about the CIA – it should be dismantled and its parts assigned to functioning organizations. For example the clandestine service should be placed under the control of the U.S. military, domestic CIA activities under the FBI, and embassy functions under the State Department. Word is that’s why Obama has nominated Panetta – he has no espionage experience, but he has the only qualification he needs: the ability to bring the power of the presidency to bear. Damn those liberals for planning to reduce the size of government.
Posted by: idahogirl | January 7, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
I don’t want to hear this crap about this huge stimulus being Bush’s fault. This is Obama and his responsibility. This economy has been coming on for decades but each one takes responsibility for his reaction to it.The causes are at least 4 decades old and brought on by a host of decisions, the chief one being good old American Greed. This Stimulus along with previous bailouts is staggering. I’m thinking we are going to far on this one judging by how little positve effect the other programs have had.
Posted by: richard warren | January 7, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
Welostintegrity: Although W has warned about fannie and freddie, it was probably too late to save it from collapse. The fact is : W endorsed home ownership by pressing fannie to fund by means of subprime mortgage. During the Clinton administration, at least two of his cabinet members, Bob Ruben and Henry Cisneros have relaxed the restrictions on the subprime lending, thus increasing the scale of crisis today.
Posted by: austin | January 7, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
A 1.2 trillion dollar budget deficit, 3 wars, companies folding up right and left, and millions out of work. Thank you Mr. Bush. You did a fine job. We sure will miss you….NOT! ONLY 13 DAYS LEFT! What else can you screw up during that time you have left?
Posted by: leftyintexas | January 7, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm
So during the election why didn’t he talk down do much Will? It was all hope and change and Bush and change. You guys are pathetic. Enjoy the power why you have it. By 2012 you’ll be long gone.
Posted by: Ryan | January 7, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
My bad with the grammar.
Posted by: Ryan | January 7, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
LEFTY IN TEXAS, three wars??? Iraq was his fault but Afgahnistan??? Give me a break, and do you count “The war on terror as a war?? We should just lie down and do nothing right?? Kind of like you dem run congress.
Posted by: Ryan | January 7, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Obama supporters did you know you were actually voting for the Clintons.???
It is hard to give Obama credibility when all his appointments have been people who served under bill Clinton. today he announced the Chief Performance Officer. Nancy killefed. She was a Treassury dept. official under Clinton. Dr.Gupta was an advisor to Hillary Clinton 1997-1998. Leon Panetta, Bill Clinton’s Chief of Staff. CHANGE??…WHAT CHANGE..??
Posted by: CW | January 7, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm
Congress approval rating WORSE than BUSH..
Pelosi, Harry Reid, Barney Frank and company GO HOME…!!!!
Posted by: CW | January 7, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
I just read a report on another network that says that THE PORN INDUSTRY WILL ASK
CONGRESS FOR A BAILOUT..!!!! No joke here. Look it up.!!!!
Posted by: CW | January 7, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Get over it CW. Obama isn’t appointing the same people John McCain would have appointed if he had won. Remember how huffy you were about Obama’s “lack of experience” – now he hires people with experience from the previous Democratic administration and you’re all indignant.
Posted by: CaliRules | January 7, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
Mark–
Look forward to your comments in a year
or so….
Posted by: lvh | January 7, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
Even after our economy “pulls out of its slide,” the President-elect warned, “trillion dollar deficits will be a reality for years to come.”
———
Oh my goodness no wonder everyone is so concerned. We are not used to having a president that can be quite so honest!
Doesn’t it go pretty much with out saying, we are coming in to this inheriting a 9 trillion dollar deficit, that is going to be with us for awhile?
What amazes me the most is amount of intolerance that is so quickly being aimed at probably the only man in the world that can even concieve of getting us out of this mess. 18+ months from now when we are solidly recovering and showing to be back on the path to physcal reponsibility, will these same intolerant people appologize and show the proper amount of respect.
Don’t count on it. Respect is just not something these folks are made of.
Posted by: David Williams | January 7, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Chief of Staff. CHANGE??…WHAT CHANGE..??
CW just what kind of change were you wanting? More George Bush?
I see us going from pretty far to the right to just a little left of the center. To me that is a
PRETTY BIG CHANGE !!
Posted by: Right man | January 7, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
I Could care less, both parties destroyed this country, especially this useless fascist adminstration who took this country to hell and nobama will not be much bettet.
Thank goodness ron paul is better than those two clowns combined.
Posted by: Afi K. James | January 7, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
PAY THE DEFICIT FIRST!
1.2 trillion dollar? pay the damn deficit
and jumpstart the remains
Posted by: Abiodun | January 7, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
Yes the deficit, and who was in charge of Congress that passed the budget that poor whittle Barry is complaining about? Who passed the stupid TARP bailout? And who passed the past failed stimulus package?
Why yes, that was all done by the Pelosi Congress. Yes the very same Democrats who are now saying the deficit is too big. Well duhhh.
Might also note that the last two stimulus packages, one for the people, the other for Wallstreet didn’t work. So why will the next crap sandwich do better? Pork by the dump truck full.
And then the presses quit.
Posted by: bill-tb | January 7, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
“Doesn’t it go pretty much with out saying, we are coming in to this inheriting a 9 trillion dollar deficit, that is going to be with us for awhile? ”
No. 9T or 10T is the debt.
$1.2T is the new deficit. But even that number is funny since it contains a number of one time charges such as TARP and the Fannie Mae buyout. Those one times are non-reoccuring charges and in the case of TARP the actual cost is projected to be nothing like $700B. The deficit for 2008 had been projected at around $400B but need for TARP and Fannie Mae has driven it to 1.2T according to the CBO web site.
But there is no reason why the baseline for 2009 and 2010 should be over a trillion. You arent going to do TARP again. So the only way you get to a trillion dollar deficit each year is if Obama plans on a 600-700B stimulus each year. Maybe even more since you would have an offset of recovered TARP monies.
Those are enormous numbers- it would be like building a entire new Department of Defense each year.
Posted by: BertieW | January 7, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Interesting to see the anti-Obama types in here trying to scratch up the tiniest bit of dirt they can find on Obama . . . and coming up with so little.
Propagandists.
Now they’re trying to excuse the astronomical Bush deficits and his atrocious handling of government, when Republicans had control of Congress and the Presidency in 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and rang up half a TRILLION in deficits each of those years.
Crawl back in your holes; thank goodness Bush and the Republicans are gone. Let’s hope the situation can be recovered from; it ain’t gonna be easy, but the brightest and best are going to be working with Obama so there’s a chance.
Posted by: pefros | January 7, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Oh don’t be silly. The budget deficit is now so large that they’re going to have difficulty finding other countries to fund it. Time to live within our means, make the eligibility age for social security higher than average life expectancy like when it was invented, stop keeping troops in 130 countries, etc… It’s all do-able.
Posted by: Skeptic | January 7, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
“Now they’re trying to excuse the astronomical Bush deficits and his atrocious handling of government, when Republicans had control of Congress and the Presidency in 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and rang up half a TRILLION in deficits each of those years.”
Where do you get your numbers from? I’m not saying they are wrong, but I when I look on the CBO web site xls for Historical Data I see different figures:
2000 105 2.5
2001 102 1.3
2002 -131 -1.5
2003 -288 -3.4
2004 -294 -3.6
2005 -239 -2.6
2006 -229 -1.9
2007 -152 -1.2
The first number is the “standarized” constant dollar deficit. The second is the % of GDP. Since the GDP has been going up enormously the % deficit has been going down.
And after this I think you *still* have a problem rationalizing that there was no need for a stimulus after the enormous financial impact of 9/11.
Posted by: BertieW | January 7, 2009, 10:48 pm 10:48 pm
It is undeniable Bush ran up record deficits 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006 with Republican control of Congress, any way you want to rejig the numbers.
Bush and the Republicans dug the hole and it will be a long time before the country can climb back out of it.
As Bush said after 9/11, the big secret . … go out and spend. Good advice.
Posted by: pefros | January 7, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
U.S. Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Public Debt
Posted by: pefros | January 7, 2009, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
Oh great Obama, oh great Obama, will you now kiss and make up with Osama?
Posted by: TEO | January 8, 2009, 2:46 am 2:46 am
trying to be positive. obama has great rhetoric, doesn’t he? no, really. doesn’t he? at least, we are all in for a good show if nothing else.
Posted by: Lawrence | January 8, 2009, 6:55 am 6:55 am
Of course the entitlement programs are going to be scrutinized, which means the seniors are at risk–the age group who basically have little say in their behalf. Social Security & Medicare are perhaps the most costly of the govt. budget, but there is a lot of “pork” for states from Congressmen. Why aren’t these reviewed instead of being “sacred cows” not to be touched?
Posted by: Senior | January 8, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am
What about Tax Cuts for Senior Citizens??? Were DUPED???….It was on his transition website !
Posted by: William C. | January 8, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
Senior,
Like I said, we were DUPED into voting for Obama, if what you say are the facts, referring to entitlements. NO ONE campaigned harder for him than I. I will be totally disgusted if he does not keep this promise.
Posted by: william C. | January 8, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
SSI is for anyone of any age.
SSI is NOT Social Security and YOU NEVER HAVE TO WORK A SINGLE DAY IN YOUR LIFE.
SSI will get another increase, not a decrease and SSI pays ZERO taxes.
SSI can own a HOME OF ANY VALUE WHATSOEVER.
SSI is $579 in all States but California where SSI pays $907!
SSI is given to anyone over 65 no matter what country they come from, no matter if they are here legally or not.
Chinese and Hispanics over 65 are dumped off at Social Security Offices and told to go and Apply & Qualify for SSI, and they get it and they also get MediCal & Section 8 Housing and Low-Income Heating and air-conditioning assistance.
MAKE NO MISTAKE, OBAMA AND THE DEMOGRANTS WILL PASS THE CUT, CUT, CUT TO SENIOR CITIZEN SOCIAL SECURITY & MEDICARE, BUT NOT, AGAIN, NOT TO SSI-SUPPLEMENTAL SECURITY INCOME.
Most All SSI’s own their own homes Free & Clear, they can. They get 95% of their Property Taxes BACK at the end of each year in a Check.
In California, SSI has an additional check called SSP adding up the Tax Free checks on the 1st of the Month to Tweekers and Drunkards and Gluttons to $907 a Month per Individual.
IF that Induvidual is ‘Head of Household’, then the ENTIRE family get’s an SSI & SSP check on the 1st of the month, TAX FREE,
If you think for one second that Obama OR the Demogrants CARE, your WRONG, they ONLY CARE ABOUT THE SSI’s & SSP’s, and Welfare Mommies & TANF’s.
Watch, what happens, it will Pass FAST.
YOU WILL BE CUT, and CUT AGAIN AND AGAIN.
But, SSI will Swell.
YOU should All Transfer your Assets and Get to Social Security Offices that process SSI Applications and get on it!
It pays almost As Mush As Senior Citizen Social Security BUT pays ZERO Taxes & Get’s a Cola each year!
In States other than California a couple on SSI that NEVER WORKED A SINGLE DAY IN THEIR LIVES GET-> $889.
In California, $1,560!
They never worked for it, yet they get more than YOU do.
This is where the problem lies.
And, remember when you see fatso’s waddling into stores on the 1st of the month with handicapped placards on their cars, THEY ARE ON SSI AND NEVER WORKED NOR’ PAID A PENNY OF TAX FOR THAT FREE MONEY!
Yet, since most minorities and illegals are on SSI, the Demogrants will pass this cut to YOU FAST!
Tried to tell Seniors before you went and voted for him, now it’s too late.
He is NOT worried about gray haired old people protesting!
He’s more worried about Young, able-bodied liers that collect SSI, getting angry, that’s why he’s Rolling out the Red Carpet to make sure SSI’s will continue to get FREE EVERYTHING NOT YOU.
Posted by: SSIwillgetanincrease | January 8, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Regular readers have probably noticed that whenever an ABC story tends to be controversial,their editors always opt for this goofy, unreadable ‘online chat’ format. It ensures that comments will be as tedious to follow as a Federal Reserve meeting. Speaking of, if Obama truly wants to save what’s left of this country, he has a simple option– start by abolishing the Federal Reserve and their criminal banking cartel. There’s even a bill waiting for this purpose- HR 2577 ‘A Bill to Abolish the Federal Reserve’. Yet another “stimulus” will do nothing but hand our leaders a bigger shovel with which to bury us.
Posted by: h5mind | January 8, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
why is the goverment so damn dumb
Posted by: kelly massey | January 13, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm