Jan 21, 2009 7:58am

President Obama: Suspend Gitmo Trials

ABC News has learned that soon after being sworn in as 44th President of the United States on Tuesday, President Obama instructed his advisers to move to suspend the military commission trials for suspected terrorists being detained at Guantanamo Bay.

The Obama administration filed papers seeking a 120-day continuance in all cases so his administration can review the individual prosecutions and more generally to review the policy for detainees and determine how best to handle the cases.

From Guantanamo, the Washington Post’s Peter Finn reports that the motion called for "a continuance of the proceedings" until May 20 so that "the newly inaugurated president and his administration [can] review the military commissions process, generally, and the cases currently pending before military commissions, specifically."

Aides say the president will this week issue an executive order giving the command to close the detainee center at Guantanamo Bay, though the process could take as long as a year to implement.

– jpt

User Comments

Let’s let all the prisoners out so they can kill us. We are the only nation that allows it’s detainees to play Xbox, for God’s sake, and yet we are treating them so bad because we ask how many innocent Americans they are planning to kill today! Wow. Unbelievable.
On a completely different note, I would just like to say that MSNBC should be apologizing today for the way Chris Matthews went off on President Bush. Love them or hate them, and I understand both attitudes, you have to admit that the Bush family showed such class in leaving the office. No one had to check under Laura’s coat to make sure she didn’t have any silver, like our future Secretary of State. Chris Matthews is a loud mouthed idiot who should be taken off the air. He embarassed himself and if it’s possible, he even embarassed NBC. What a bunch of butt kissing tools. What happens when Obama screws up? The last network you will turn to will be NBC…the anchors were so turned on yesterday it was disgusting.
Keep up the great work Jake…you are always truthful, no matter who’s at fault.

Posted by: Jackie | January 21, 2009, 8:08 am 8:08 am

I agree with Jackie. MSNBC most definitely should apologize for the moron Chris Matthews and the other suckups at NBC.
It sickens me how the MSM falls at Obama’s feet. You people are stupid beyond belief! He is not a superhero nor is he is a “messiah”. You think he can do no wrong and when he does, you sweep it under every rug you can find.. When in fact on his historic train ride, he likens himself to President Lincoln. That is arrogant no matter how you slice it. Obama has NO track record to back himself up. He is arrogant and self centered. Certainly and clearly positioning himself for a huge meltdown.
I am disgusted with the Obama’s and their obsession with themselves, the media’s obsession over Obama, and the fiasco in general. I have tuned out and turned you all off.

Posted by: mjl | January 21, 2009, 8:21 am 8:21 am

Lay off Chris Mathews a bit. He said on election night what we(media) ought to do. “To do everything in our power to make this president a success”.
How’s that for the media? As opposed to doing everything in their power to make the last president a failure.

Posted by: They are hacks | January 21, 2009, 8:26 am 8:26 am

Now I see how Hitler controlled the country of Germany.
The media better cut it out or we’re heading in the wrong direction.

Posted by: al from nj | January 21, 2009, 8:32 am 8:32 am

He’s President. Get used to it!

Posted by: Tom | January 21, 2009, 8:33 am 8:33 am

I believe the positive rating for the media is about 5%.

Posted by: SAM | January 21, 2009, 8:33 am 8:33 am

I understand the political desire to solve the GITMO problem differently than in the past.
I hope that the solution will be better or at least no worse.

Posted by: smith | January 21, 2009, 8:38 am 8:38 am

The moaning and groaning of neocons is music to my ears.

Posted by: Byron Alexander | January 21, 2009, 8:38 am 8:38 am

There is so much for a President to deal with that the general public will never see or know nothing about. the security of a nation cannot be discussed in the news. There are movements affot to destroy America and sometimes it seems they have the support of the media. I hope Obama is very successful. Every President we have ever had has had good and bad days but they all have had America at heart. I dislike Presitential bashing.

Posted by: sam | January 21, 2009, 8:39 am 8:39 am

Release the Gotmo terrorists !!! I already feel so much safer with Obama at the helm. I can’t wait for him to raise MY taxes to pay for the increased dependency on government. I might vote for him for a second term – by then I’ll need the monthly government check.

Posted by: oblidoblido | January 21, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am

What would you expect from a community organizer? Seriously.
My bar of expectations are very low for him based on his resume’.
His supporters are drunk with Utopian hope. They are incapable of any logicical thought.
Carl below is the cheerleader of free speech I see. The higher you put him on the pedistal, the harder he will fall. He will fall Carl, it is the federal government.

Posted by: Vick | January 21, 2009, 8:47 am 8:47 am

They are hacks: I suppose you are excluding the following from your characterization of the media: Rush Limbaugh, Anne Coulter, Bill O’Reilly, Sean Hannity, Bob Novak, Pat Buchanan, Tucker Carlson, Matt Drudge. Not a biased bone in their bodies, right?

Posted by: William J. LePetomane | January 21, 2009, 8:48 am 8:48 am

oblidooblidoodoo: guess you have not been paying attention much. Taxes will be lowered for 90% of us. No surprise. You right-wing haters only hear and see what you want.

Posted by: William J. LePetomane | January 21, 2009, 8:50 am 8:50 am

Washington DC makes laws, they don’t abide by them. Once you get out of there you will find that we are still a still a nation that respects the law and our judicial system. We still elect our judges and expect them to preside with fairness regardless of the circumstance of a person’s birthplace. We still want the guilty punished and the innocent set free. Don’t blame the media for what we get from them, we are to blame for letting them get away with it. Demand truth and settle for no other.

Posted by: Robert Heffren | January 21, 2009, 8:53 am 8:53 am

“guess you have not been paying attention much. Taxes will be lowered for 90%”
I have worked very hard all my life; thus, I am among the 10% that pay 90% of the taxes so you can buy a computer with your refund check

Posted by: oblidoblido | January 21, 2009, 8:53 am 8:53 am

thanks, oblidoodoo. Did not realize that you were the ONE who worked hard all your life.

Posted by: William J. LePetomane | January 21, 2009, 9:07 am 9:07 am

Does Obama or anyone at the White House truly know what they will do with the detainees without Gitmo and without military trials?

Posted by: matt | January 21, 2009, 9:08 am 9:08 am

Chris Matthews has a man crush on Obama and has stated he gets a “tingling” feeling running up his leg when Obama speaks. Matthews is pathetic and I cannot believe he is allowed to spew his leftist propaganda on the airways.

Posted by: Scott | January 21, 2009, 9:12 am 9:12 am

Scott: somebody like Matthews needs to counter the right-wing haters like Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, Matt Drudge, Anne Coulter, Mary Matalan, Bob Novak, Pat Buchanan and other nasty spewers of hate.

Posted by: William J. LePetomane | January 21, 2009, 9:17 am 9:17 am

Substitute Bush for Obama and you have Headlines for the MSM.
Obama Stumbles Through Oath of Office.
Obama Stands Behind Tax Evader for Secretary of The Treasury.
Despite Conflict of Interest Obama Stands Behind Secretary of State Nomniee.
Obama Attorney General Nominee Defends Amnesty for Terrorist.

Posted by: Rasputin3.14 | January 21, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am

Where is he going to put these detainees? I have no problem with Gitmo, but I do have a problem with these guys being brought to the United States.
Yech. Our court systems are completely screwed up with no recognition of a difference between citizens and non-citizens. And very little appropriate concern for victims as opposed to criminals.

Posted by: Chas | January 21, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am

120 days for the new President and his people to look at the situation for themselves, as they are in charge now. Is that too much to ask? Really people, he’s been President for less then 24 hrs.

Posted by: gravy | January 21, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am

LePetomane,
Strange how when its someone from the opposite side of the discussion you liberals always have to throw in the hate word.
Perhaps you should listen to Colin Powell’s view of how partisanship works in our political system. He has it right! It would do every liberal in the country some good to really listen and understand what he is saying!

Posted by: Mike_C | January 21, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am

did none of you neocons even read the article? *no where* does it say the prisoners will be turned loose. maybe you should go back to third grade. at least *some* third graders can read.

Posted by: bajacalla | January 21, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am

I agree, for the most part on the Chris Mathews opinions here. He’s a blow hard that needs to be erased from teh MSNBC lineup. I surfed all the channels last night, and everytime I’d come round to MSNBC, Mathews was talking over whoever was trying to speak, and seemed he was about to cry. I thought Olberman was gonna punch him at one point. Sory ABC, their coverage is just better. But, you have a better web site! :)

Posted by: gravy | January 21, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Chas,
That is the problem that the liberals seem to miss. They do not have aplan or a method ready to go. They just want “stop the torture”.
As I have said, everyone one who thinks we have so badly mistreated these people, should be a host family for one of them for one year and be legally responsible for their actions!

Posted by: Mike_C | January 21, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

William J:
I’m all for freedom of speech, free exchange of ideas and viewpoints. Please read about the “fairness doctrine” democrats are trying to pass. This would shut down talk radio -which is mostly conservative. The result would be the complete domination of liberal, leftist news as the only news source.
I do not support any socialistic or communist-like solutions to our problems. I believe in free market solutions, and limited govt intervention in our lives. Matthews and other socialists believe large controlling govts, income redistribution (like Robin Hood), political correctness, and removing “values” from our society (ACLU)

Posted by: Scott | January 21, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am

“host family”…That’s funny. Oh, you’re serious? So, you don’t think waterboarding is bad treatment? Or being held, without being charged with a crime…for years? And Mike, you throw the word liberal around too much. Not everyone who may disagree with you is a liberal. Although, I do apply sun screen liberally…

Posted by: gravy | January 21, 2009, 9:37 am 9:37 am

bajacalla,
See here is the typical liberal double-standard in effect again. For years you guys beat the hell out of Bush for no Exit strategy in Iraq.
Yet, You are doing the exact same thing here in this circumstance. You want to close GITMO, but you have NO viable plan to move forward after you close it!
The same thing with Afgahnistan, I have not heard one person from the media ask Obama or any of his team, what the EXIT STRATEGY FOR AFGAHNISTAN is.
I have not read on ANY blogs where a liberal is asking that question of our new administration.
So apparently what is good for the goose, does not apply to the gander!

Posted by: Mike_C | January 21, 2009, 9:37 am 9:37 am

To ‘they are hacks’- Bush made a very GOOD job of making himself a failure (if you consider him to be one). The media just reported as they saw it.
Chris Matthews is NOT a reporter. He is a TALKSHOW HOST who is ALLOWED to have his own opinion.
Finally, by imprisoning those men in Guantanamo Bay WITHOUT TRIAL or DUE PROCESS, Bush may have inadvertently created terrorists to those who may not have already been. You cannot have a democratic country without respecting democracy – even with respect to your enemies.
Good luck Mr. President

Posted by: Shamaedene | January 21, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am

gravy,
When the word fits, I use it. As far as “torture” goes, perhaps you should understand the concept of fighting this kind of enemy. I have given these examples many times here.
Are you willing to sacrifice your life for your child’s life or the life of your spouse ?

Posted by: Mike_C | January 21, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Shamaedene,
I love all you fools who actually think that a whole new legion of terroists are being created by how we treated these detainees.
It makes me wonder how the millions of these kinds of terrorists have been created over the past 2000-plus years.
You do realize that the fighting in this part of the world goes back well past that time dont you?

Posted by: Mike_C | January 21, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Mike…You haven’t heard about an exit strategy in Afganistan because the work hasn’t even begun there. Bush abandoned that front, to go into Iraq. You won’t hear about the Afganistan war ending any time soon. And as far as Gitmo goes, let’s see what the new President has in store, MMk? President for a day, and you accuse him of having no strategy? As if, as the President elect he’d have any business discussing that…get a grip…

Posted by: gravy | January 21, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am

==120 days for the new President and his people to look at the situation for themselves, as they are in charge now. Is that too much to ask?==
Was it too much to ask in 2001?
== Really people, he’s been President for less then 24 hrs.==
In January, ’01, we said the same thing.
==He’s President. Get used to it!==
Our sentiments, exactly, in January ’01.
==The moaning and groaning of neocons is music to my ears.==
That’s how we felt in January, ’01, and after.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 21, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Mike…I’m NOT willing to sacrifice the principles that this country was founded on. My family aren’t the issue here, my country, and it’s good name are. My country has been torturing people in MY name. And to what end? My safety? Where is the proof? You’ll say,”have we had another 9/11?”. To that, I say of course not. But, how do I know? I need more than color coded alerts and a wink from the Pres/assurances from the Vice Pres. that what’s been done to these people has been neccessary. It’s called accountabilty, Mike. And right now, in the wake of GW’s 8 years, the U.S. has very little.

Posted by: gravy | January 21, 2009, 9:49 am 9:49 am

I was on the Mall yesterday. There was a chorus of boooooos everytime Bush flashed on the jumbo-trons.
There is a reason why folks. No hail and farewell for him yesterday. It was “good riddens” and don’t let the doorknob smack you in the arse on the way out.
There is a reason why folks. He was the absolute WORST president in the history of earth.
As soon as he got back to Texas he said to a welcoming crowd, he had been waiting for a long time to say six words
It is nice to be home.
For that Dubya we can surely agree.

Posted by: Omentum | January 21, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am

==I’m NOT willing to sacrifice the principles that this country was founded on. ==
You people don’t get the idea that criminal and wartime military are two different things, do you.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 21, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am

gravy,
I accuse him of that, because he ran a campaign talking about it, and the media was blasting the adminstration for going into Iraq WITHOUT one. Hence, my friend, the idea that liberals have been running with for years now was they should have had one in place BEFORE they went in.
SOOOOOOOO…..again, Obama talked during the campaign at rally after rally after rally about going into Afghanistan and whining about that 10 billion a month we were spending there. Yet he never once mentioned how much a month he was preapred to spend in Afghanistan.
Again I say…If its fair to criticize Bush on these points, then it sure is fair to go after Obama on the same points!

Posted by: Mike_C | January 21, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am

==There was a chorus of boooooos everytime Bush flashed on the jumbo-trons.
There is a reason why folks. No hail and farewell for him yesterday. It was “good riddens” and don’t let the doorknob smack you in the arse on the way out.==
You people just can’t let it go in peace, can you.
There is a reason why folks. He was the absolute WORST president in the history of earth.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | January 21, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am

It’s astonishing to me how the libs want to permit terrorists to walk the planet after what this country, and others as well, went through just over seven years ago. 9/11 is still fresh in my mind as it was one of the more catastrophic events to happen in my lifetime. Thousands died that day and some of the people responsible are being held at Gitmo. I don’t think we’re treating these people badly at all. I don’t think we’ve done enough to get more information out of them. I know we as a country are better than them but they hate us more than we can imagine and to let them live to fight another day is naive and infantile. The best I can say at this point is, get ready for another attack or two or three on American soil. Be careful when you fly… These people WILL strike again and we’ll have B. Hussein Obama to thank for it.

Posted by: Nancy | January 21, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Mr Incredible,”You people don’t get the idea that criminal and wartime military are two different things, do you.”
There are laws. I know, it’s a shock to you that, even in a time of war, there are laws, rules of engagement. And stop with the,”you people”, crap. I made the statement you quoted, address me.

Posted by: gravy | January 21, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am

Mr Incredible.
You are incredible you can say….
“It’s party time! The terrorists in the world are dancin’ in the streets!”
it’s ok
But when I say how much of a dufus W was… you freak out.
you are incredible.

Posted by: Omentum | January 21, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am

All the detainees at Gitmo should be released, immediately. NYC is a good place to find them homes.

Posted by: who says what | January 21, 2009, 10:02 am 10:02 am

gravy,
Are you really that naive? Of course your not going to know how many attacks were prevented or where they were. Whatever channels that the intel came from would then be compromised.
The family analogy is to get you to think. Most of us would indeed sacrifice our lives for our family, but would you willing walk away from a person who you were absolutely certain had information that could save your family? You would not do EVERYTHING possible to save their lives?
The funny thing is most of you liberals would have cut Bush to pieces if the US had been attacked again, and you discovered we had detained people who knew the plan, but we did not “push” them to get the information.
High standing morals are great when your sititng back here, with zero responsibilty and zero knowledge of the impact of doing nothing.
By the way, ask a foot soldier from Korea or Vietnam how easy a choice it was not to shoot at women & children that were sometimes the enemy. It is not such an easy thing after you witness a 10 yr old approach you and then pull a gun and fire it. How do you know when the enemy does not wear a uniform all the time. When the enemy hides his forces and weapons in schools and hospitals. How exactly do you cope with an enemy who would willing stand in a village of innocents and fire all kinds of weapons at you, safe in the knowledge that your moral standards would prevent you from firing back?

Posted by: Mike_C | January 21, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Where is he going to put these detainees? I have no problem with Gitmo, but I do have a problem with these guys being brought to the United States.
Posted by: Chas | Jan 21, 2009 9:23:19 AM
======================================
A ranch out in Crawford Texas would be a nice place for them. ole dubya can be the warden. he’s unemployed now.

Posted by: Omentum | January 21, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am

gravy,
have you ever held a weapon & manned a post ?

Posted by: Mike_C | January 21, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am

Mike…You’re comparing words by one man, as to what he intended to do, if elected…To the actions of another, who was in office…for 8 years? Really, isn’t that a bit extreme? Can we give Obama a day, two even, before we compare his Presidency to Bush’s?
As far as Iraq goes, Bush had no real strategy. He didn’t follow the advice of Powell. He, and Rumsfeld thought they could find the success in Iraq that they’d found early in Afganistan. We had no business being in Iraq, and they had no REAL plan once there. In the meantime, the people who DID attack us on 9/11 have re-grouped in Afganistan and Pakistan.

Posted by: gravy | January 21, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am

No, Mike. What difference does that make? Let me guess, you have, so you know SO much more than anyone else? Is your next comment going to be disparaging about those who can’t/don’t serve in the U.S. military?

Posted by: gravy | January 21, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am

Lets not forget that the current GITMO situation and Military Tribunal system has been hammered out by Congress, The Courts and the Executive over the past 7 years. Any undoing of the current system will involve all 3 branches.
But first we need to have a plan that goes beyond “on hold”

Posted by: smith | January 21, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am

The funny thing is most of you liberals would have cut Bush to pieces if the US had been attacked again, and you discovered we had detained people who knew the plan, but we did not “push” them to get the information.
Posted by: Mike_C | Jan 21, 2009 10:05:45 AM
=================================
Mike C,
America was attacked everytime a flag draped coffin came back from overseas.
so wake up and smell the coffee. Bush did not keep America safe. Go to one the families house and sit at the empty seat at the dinner table and ask that family how safe they are now. Ask them was it really worth it losing their loved one to see our President ducking shoes after “liberating” their country.

Posted by: Omentum | January 21, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

“Where is he going to put these detainees?”
Perhaps he can post their names and pictures on a pull board and some nice family can adopt one of these “charming” gentlemen.

Posted by: david | January 21, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am

“Lets not forget that the current GITMO situation and Military Tribunal system has been hammered out by Congress, The Courts and the Executive over the past 7 years. Any undoing of the current system will involve all 3 branches.”
That involves more than a few word slogan. Their attention drifted off.
I for one will enjoy that fact that down that Obama is The Man that he can get dumped on for everything.
Its too cold here! Why didnt Obama do something!

Posted by: BertieW | January 21, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Yes, good thought out move. I appreciate him standing by the rules of the game. I feel like an American today!

Posted by: becky (the real one) | January 21, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Jackie
God helped us yesterday.
He sent dubya back to texas
He gave us a President with a brain and a heart.

Posted by: Omentum | January 21, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Jackie…I never said Obama was going to let terrorists go. I said that he’s going to assess the situation. Why are the only choices keeping Gitmo open, or letting them go? You do know, there are Military prisons in the U.S., don’t you? As well as several thousand Federal and contract facilities? I’m not saying let anyone go, I’m saying bring them here for appropriate processing.

Posted by: gravy | January 21, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Gitmo is a SHAM operation. Out of 1000 prisoners held at Gitmo in the last 6 years, 800 of these “worst of the worst terrorists” (in the words of that genius Rumsfeld) have been released, because the US was too embarrassed to admit that there was not even a shred of reliable evidence on these people. If you were the SHERIFF of a County and rounded up dozens of “SUSPECTS” held them 7 years, and then had to let them go because you didn’t have an ant’s fannys worth of evidence on them, you’d be fired and charged with a crime. Gitmo was established and filled with prisoners as a macho way of showing how “tough” the Bushies were on “terrorists”, a lot like how the white sheriff rounds up a passle of black folks after a crime – to show he’s on the ball. Gitmo will go down in history as a serious crime against human rights.

Posted by: AlChemist | January 21, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am

“just maybe some the guys took up arms when their village was carpet bombed.”
Post a news story showing a village was ever carpet bombed.

Posted by: BertieW | January 21, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am

Omentum,
First off son, DO NOT even attempt to lecture me on military deaths. I have lost 2 cousins and 2 uncles durng my lifetime.
Second, If you were military or had ever sat down with anyone who chose the military life, you would never talk that way about it. I had a cousin in special forces, he knew exactly what he was doing. He was one of those me who not only took that call at 3AM, but willing put his life on the line for this country EVERY time that call came.
I not only sit at those tables, I visit those graves quite a few times each year. Those who came to the funerals of my relatives will tell you that until you are the one standing there with a weapon in your hand looking at anther person who wants to fire at you, you have no clue, no clue at all.
I for one thank and honor every single soldier who has served. Those whom I have had the priviledge of sitting down and talking to are amazing people with incredible conviction about the task they chose. I realize not every single soldier feels like those I have met, but I am pretty sure they will tell those of us who have not been there, that you cannot trivialize the choices they have to make.
gravy,
no I have not, but I have many family members that have. Some who are no longer here to refute people such as yourselves who down play what they do and want to think it is a simple game of black & white choices. It is not and if you get the chance to talk with someone who has had to fight in these kinds of conditions, then you might just stop and rethink your positon about all this.

Posted by: Mike_C | January 21, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am

Gitmo has been and continues to be used as a recruiting tool by these butchers and it has created many more terrorists than are currently held there.

Posted by: TSnow27604 | January 21, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am

“just maybe some the guys took up arms when their village was carpet bombed.”
Post a news story showing a village was ever carpet bombed.
Posted by: BertieW | Jan 21, 2009 10:31:15 AM
=============================
http://www.chris-floyd.com/march/
You asked for it you got it.

Posted by: Omentum | January 21, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Want more Bertie W.
enjoy!!!
guardian.co.uk/world/2005/jan/10/iraq.rorymccarthy

Posted by: Omentum | January 21, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am

“Gitmo has been and continues to be used as a recruiting tool by these butchers and it has created many more terrorists than are currently held there.”
Interesting, and the stats that back that statement up came from where ?

Posted by: Mike_C | January 21, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Mike_C,
You’re the bigger fool if you feel that keeping these people and TORTURING them is doing the USA any favours. How much international support does the govt have when it behaves this way? It gives the ‘enemy’ more reason to say “See? This is what they do to us..so your reason for doing these acts are justified” So technically the govt may just have played into the terrorists hands.
America needs to protect itself, but there are ways to do it that does not belittle peoples rights. How sure are you that they have the right people in there? More importantly WHERE IS OSAMA BIN LADEN?

Posted by: Shamaedene | January 21, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Omentum,
One bomb ….
You do understand what the term “carpet bombing” means..right?

Posted by: Mike_C | January 21, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am

Omentum,
First off son, DO NOT even attempt to lecture me on military deaths. I have lost 2 cousins and 2 uncles durng my lifetime.
Second, If you were military or had ever sat down with anyone who chose the military life, you would never talk that way about it. I had a cousin in special forces, he knew exactly what he was doing. He was one of those me who not only took that call at 3AM, but willing put his life on the line for this country EVERY time that call came.
I not only sit at those tables, I visit those graves quite a few times each year. Those who came to the funerals of my relatives will tell you that until you are the one standing there with a weapon in your hand looking at anther person who wants to fire at you, you have no clue, no clue at all.
I for one thank and honor every single soldier who has served. Those whom I have had the priviledge of sitting down and talking to are amazing people with incredible conviction about the task they chose. I realize not every single soldier feels like those I have met, but I am pretty sure they will tell those of us who have not been there, that you cannot trivialize the choices they have to make.
gravy,
no I have not, but I have many family members that have. Some who are no longer here to refute people such as yourselves who down play what they do and want to think it is a simple game of black & white choices. It is not and if you get the chance to talk with someone who has had to fight in these kinds of conditions, then you might just stop and rethink your positon about all this.
Posted by: Mike_C | Jan 21, 2009 10:34:56 AM
=========================
22years Marine Corps/Navy and now presently serving awaiting that call to be loyal to the commander in cheif and carry out the orders mandated to me
BUT WHEN YOU ARE MISLEAD @#$@ LIKE THIS HAPPENS. and the blood of 4000+ and many other iraqi’s is on dubyas hands.
Not lecturing you. Asking you to take a minute to look at reality and ask yourself a few questions HARD QUESTIONS.
If ignorance is bliss for you….. I say continue your blissful life.
But if you are not…. Realize a change had to be made and that YOU can be a part of it by simply
FACING REALITY

Posted by: Omentum | January 21, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am

Omentum,
One bomb ….
You do understand what the term “carpet bombing” means..right?
Posted by: Mike_C | Jan 21, 2009 10:43:34 AM
=================================
NOTICE HOW IGNORANT YOU ARE!?!?!?!??!?
Do you really have to categorize a bomb to realize that ANY bomb can cause a man who just lost his family to rise up and fight.
WILL THE BLINDERS EVERY COME OFF YOUR BRAIN

Posted by: Omentum | January 21, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am

no I have not, but I have many family Mike…”members that have. Some who are no longer here to refute people such as yourselves who down play what they do and want to think it is a simple game of black & white choices. It is not and if you get the chance to talk with someone who has had to fight in these kinds of conditions, then you might just stop and rethink your positon about all this.” How did I EVER downplay what our military does, has done or will do? You are ASSuming so much, and using that as filler in your comments, instead of actually taking part in the conversation.

Posted by: gravy | January 21, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Shamaedene,
I do not claim to have all the answers, I simply state that when you are fighting an enemy that enjoys dismembering hostages on video, and a majority of their “foot soldiers” beleive the greatest thing they can do with their own lkives is to die fo rthe cause and take as many of the “infidels” with them, you cannot approach it as if you fighting a uniformed army from a country.
Fighting terrorism is a completely different war. I am saying that we need to “torture” everyone, merely that you cannot say you will NEVER, EVER under any circumstances “torture.
There are indeed situations that would warrant it. I have used the family scenario here many times to show that under the right circumstances, you would indeed do it yourself to save your own child or spouse.
If your wife or child were taken by terrorists, and a video was released showing them, bruised and beaten, your telling me that you would NOT want the government to use EVERY means available to them to extract information from a source in order to save them ?
Omentum -> Go ask those families whose lovced ones were abducted in the middle east and beheaded on camera. Sit at their tables and ask them if they think extreme measures are sometimes justified!

Posted by: Mike_C | January 21, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am

Mike C – Okay, you lost two cousins and two uncles and for that I’m sorry for their families.
However, I am a mother to two soldiers who were in the initial invasion to Iraq. My husband is retired military and he was in Bahrain for the month leading up to the war training Naval personnel on the use and maintenance of the satellite communications equipment that was to be used during the invasion. I was also in the military, though I had gotten out when I was pregnant with out first child. You’ve spent your life living on the fringes of the military and have no real understanding of walking the walk. I visit the grave of a true veteran every time I go to my dad’s gravesite. My father’s grave marker, provided by the VA, states he served in WWII, Korea and Vietnam. He succumbed to an incurable cancer due to being exposed to over 600 kilotons of radiation in the 50′s in the deserts of Nevada and New Mexico. My second son, once active duty, now with the guard, was notified yesterday he leaves in September for the sandbox that is Baghdad.
I thought Obama was withdrawing troops? Why is my son going if they are withdrawing? This will be my son’s second tour there, after having already been there for six months when it was new as he was part of the invading force, attached to the 3rd ID as a Combat Engineer. My oldest son was shot at on his 21st birthday. My second son was shot and wounded while he was in Baghdad. Why does he have to go? Neither of my sons have been the same since initially invading Baghdad nor will they ever be. If Obama is pulling out of Iraq, then why is there another rotation planned? Sounds to me as though someone is lying to the American people and on his first day, no less.
None of my family has died as a result of this or any war (I take that back, I had a GGG Uncle die at Gettysburg) but we are still giving. And as a person in the midst of this I can say, resoundingly, after many discussions with my sons about Iraq, that YES, we support that which we are trying to do over there. I know parents who have lost a son and they, too, say what we are doing is a good thing. Granting freedom to a group of people is never a bad thing.
Obama, as president, is going to undo any good we have achieved in the five plus years we have been in Iraq. He is going to give free reign to all terrorists in the interest of trying to please “the masses”. (Change the spacing a bit and read what it is I’m really trying to say.)
The common man or woman has no real clus as to what is really going on in the Middle East, believing only what they read in the newspaper, news written by a liberal and biased media who thinks it’s “cool” they can sway public opinion so completely. Sheep are also easily led, which is why I refer to the general public as such.
The people who post anti-Bush, anti-military and anti-war make me sick to the core of my being and I can’t help but wonder how they would respond were their country to call on them in the manner it has called upon nearly 2 million men and woman around the globe to serve? I would imagine the yellow streak down their backs would me too much of a burden to carry. The detractors of the war would be the first ones to run North to the Canadian border were they called to serve.
Perhaps they need to remember the words of another Democrat: Ask not what your country can do for you, but ask what you can do for your country.

Posted by: Nancy | January 21, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Omentum -> Go ask those families whose lovced ones were abducted in the middle east and beheaded on camera. Sit at their tables and ask them if they think extreme measures are sometimes justified!
Posted by: Mike_C | Jan 21, 2009 10:53:21 AM
================================
Mike C
We are debating a circular questions
eye for an eye
tooth for a tooth
who took the first eye
who took the first tooth
who invaded who first
who bombed who first
who drew first blood
again the debate we are in circular but the circle begins at a singular point.
where do you see the point beginning?

Posted by: Omentum | January 21, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Nancy…”Obama, as president, is going to undo any good we have achieved in the five plus years we have been in Iraq. He is going to give free reign to all terrorists in the interest of trying to please “the masses”. (Change the spacing a bit and read what it is I’m really trying to say.)”
How? And please don’t tell me I wouldn’t understand, or it’s above my head because I’ve never been there, Nancy.

Posted by: gravy | January 21, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am

This needs to be said:
Knowing, now, that Omemtum is a 22 year member of the Marines gives me immeasurable respect for him. The Marine Corps is and always has been our first line of offense/defense in any engagement. When an LZ needs to be secured, it’s the Marine’s that step up and do it. In both Afghanistan AND Iraq, when my sons were part of any kind of invasion (yes, they’ve been to both places) the Marines have led the charge.
I can assure any and all of you, as a 22 year member of the Marine Corps (which would make him either a high ranking NCO or officer. Either way, he’s leading men and women and loves every single one of them), this poster has probably witnessed more death and dying than any one person should have to realize in one lifetime.
No one, and I mean NO ONE has the right to give this poster any grief at all. He’s been on the front lines for 22 years and counting, serving his Commander in Chief, whether he agreed with them or not. That’s the role of the military, to answer the call, no matter what, because their primary function is to defend their country and their Constitution from all enemies, both foreign and domestic.
Semper Fi, Marine. I support you all the way.
***Side Note to Omemtum*** My husband is one of the primaries on the Fire Scout UAV, of which the Navy will be the first branch to use, which means the Marines will see action with it. If this UAV saves just one life, I am proud of the work my husband does. I am proud, too, that you could be one of the people he saves.

Posted by: Nancy | January 21, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

Gravy, you obviously won’t understand if you’re asking why.
We are leaving Iraq with the job not done. There are still insurgents there causing problems. There are still people there who would like to see the Bath party back in control as the government flourished under the reign of So-damn Insane.
If we pull out before the job is done, allowing the insurgents to continue, it makes the more than 4000 deaths in vain. Were I to have lost a son/husband/brother there and then stand back and watch as the bad guys win, I’d be furious.

Posted by: Nancy | January 21, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am

“You’ve spent your life living on the fringes of the military and have no real understanding of walking the walk”
Nancy,
YOU ARE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT!..I DO NOT!
No one can possibly fully understand it unless they are in your shoes. I just get tired of liberals like Omentum trying to speak for military families in such general terms.
That is the point I am trying to make to all these liberal couch potatoes who seem to think its just a matter of saying we play by these rules, always and forever.
It is like getting into a boxing ring knowing your opponent will hit you below the belt, kick you & hit you when your down…all the time your going to fight by the rules of the ring.
These people think that if they were ones in that ring, they would never ever break any rules, no matter what the enemy did.
I just want to say to you and all your family members that have served, THANK YOU!!!

Posted by: Mike_C | January 21, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Omentum,
Nice rhetoric, but strange you did not answer the question.
You post a story about an accidental bombing. Tragic, YES
OBVIOUSLY, noone wants innocent civilans killed, but again I ask you WHY do these people hide and operate near these places?
Even more to the point, In Afghanistan, these exact same tatics will be implemented by the enemy. Will you be so high and mighty about the innocent deaths there under a Commander-in-Chief named Obama ?
Even deeper…..would you condone water-boarding to get intel that pin-point the location of a group in Afghanistan so that a special forces strike can take them out instead of using an air attack or larger ground forces where innocent civilian casualties would most likely occur?

Posted by: Mike_C | January 21, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Nancy…Funny, you begin your non-answer by saying I don’t understand. I’ll ask you again…How will Obama undo what has been done? You say by pulling out before the job is done? What is the job, babysitting the Iraqi’s for the duration of time? The REAL,”job”, awaits us in Afganistan. While our troops have been in Iraq, the taliban, and Al Quieda have strengthened their ranks in Afganistan and Pakistan. You know Pakistan, the country with the nukes, and unstable Govt.? Now tell me, again, how I just can’t understand…

Posted by: gravy | January 21, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Omentum,
If indeed you are serving, you also have my THANKS!
The fact it took you this long to mention it however, does indeed lead one to wonder if your telling the truth, or just a troll. I guees the obvious question here is why did you join up? If your currently 22, that means you would have joined up AFTER the war in Iraq started! If you did not believe in the war or what we were doing there, why would you join?
Let’s assume for a moment your telling the truth, You STILL have not answered the question. If your are there, on the ground, surely you would have some insight, I have an in-law serving in Northen Iraq who certainly has an opinion on why these kinds of enemy fighters do what they do in the these towns & villages.

Posted by: Mike_C | January 21, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

“22years Marine Corps/Navy and now presently serving awaiting that call to be loyal to the commander in cheif and carry out the orders mandated to me”
I kind of doubt it if you dont know what ‘carpet bomb’ means.

Posted by: BertieW | January 21, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Omentum,
My appolgies, i may have misread your post….are you 22 yrs old ?…or a 22 yr veteran ?

Posted by: Mike_C | January 21, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am

Mike C
My apologies for being a little irate but this is a very sensitive button for me.
I serve because I LOVE MY COUNTRY, MY COMMUNITY, MY FAMILY. I have taken an oath to carry out the order of the commander in chief – no matter my opinion or logic or religion or etc.
This country has issues but it is worth fighting for.
This is not a political thing. It is about seeing my children growing up in a safe country.
If Iraq struck us. I would say let their heads roll. But they didn’t sir …. they didn’t…..
The country that struck us has went under the radar for so long….. too long….. is that justice.
My loyalty to the Commander in Chief and this country is paramount here.
With chaos in the military, we would fail before we begin. That the reason why it is set up that way. But by no means are we a group of minions brainwashed to believe one thing.
We fight first and ask questions later. I have an opportunity every four years to decide who should lead me.
Success.

Posted by: Omentum | January 21, 2009, 11:47 am 11:47 am

“22years Marine Corps/Navy and now presently serving awaiting that call to be loyal to the commander in cheif and carry out the orders mandated to me”
I kind of doubt it if you dont know what ‘carpet bomb’ means.
Posted by: BertieW | Jan 21, 2009 11:44:09 AM
==============================
1. I know what carpet bomb means….
2. I have no reason to lie. This just a blog of folks giving their opinions.

Posted by: Omentum | January 21, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Omentum,
No problem…I have worked for many defense companies in my career, and do my best to provide the best technology possible for the defense of this great country.
The best words spkoen yesterday came from Colin Powell about the need for partisan politics and the need for heavy debate over the issues of the day.
It is the best thing about our country…we can have spirited debate over the issues, without fear of being killed by the government for speaking out.
Again, You have my THANKS!

Posted by: Mike_C | January 21, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Omentum,
My appolgies, i may have misread your post….are you 22 yrs old ?…or a 22 yr veteran ?
Posted by: Mike_C | Jan 21, 2009 11:46:26 AM
=======================
22 yr veteran …. 40 years old … signed up when i was 17 years old.

Posted by: Omentum | January 21, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am

“just maybe some the guys took up arms when their village was carpet bombed.”
So where is this carpet bombing? You posted stories of non-carpet bombing but claim to know the difference.
If you want us to release these guys on your say so, because MAYBE they were motivated by some carpet bombing is it too much to ask WHICH carpet bombing?

Posted by: BertieW | January 21, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

How does a 4 month delay do anything but make things worse for the detainees?
4 more months of gourmet halal meals, xbox, hand washed prayer rugs, soccer, massages and 5 PFC’s waiting on them hand & foot?
The horror! What has 0bama done!?!
Posted by: Concerned in OH | Jan 21, 2009 12:05:07 PM
==================================
hilarious. but don’t quit your day job. your stand-up comedian act needs a little work.

Posted by: Omentum | January 21, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

“just maybe some the guys took up arms when their village was carpet bombed.”
So where is this carpet bombing? You posted stories of non-carpet bombing but claim to know the difference.
If you want us to release these guys on your say so, because MAYBE they were motivated by some carpet bombing is it too much to ask WHICH carpet bombing?
Posted by: BertieW | Jan 21, 2009 12:17:49 PM
==================
ok BertieW UNCLE
Your ignorance has forced me to retract the word “carpet”
now there
but the significance of my statement still stands. way to try and take eyes of the real issue.

Posted by: Omentum | January 21, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Lets see who Obama protects, so far doesnt look promising

Posted by: Mike S | January 21, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

“but the significance of my statement still stands. way to try and take eyes of the real issue. ”
This is why I doubt that you are in the military.
Carpet bombing assumes that everything in the subject area is an acceptable target.
The distinction that I would expect someone in the military would make is for a targeted strike like Aaytha is:
- was the target invalidly cleared
- was there a mistake in weapon deployment against the wrong target
- was the intelligence that cleared the target was flawed in the first place
If you knew what happened in the Aaytha case you wouldnt say “this is an exampled of the the US military going in willy nilly blowing everything in its path up”.

Posted by: BertieW | January 21, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

So now detainees will sit for four months without a trial …but without freedom.

Posted by: damitajo1 | January 21, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

“but the significance of my statement still stands. way to try and take eyes of the real issue. ”
This is why I doubt that you are in the military.
Carpet bombing assumes that everything in the subject area is an acceptable target.
The distinction that I would expect someone in the military would make is for a targeted strike like Aaytha is:
- was the target invalidly cleared
- was there a mistake in weapon deployment against the wrong target
- was the intelligence that cleared the target was flawed in the first place
If you knew what happened in the Aaytha case you wouldnt say “this is an exampled of the the US military going in willy nilly blowing everything in its path up”.
Posted by: BertieW | Jan 21, 2009 1:10:45 PM
==========================
I serve to preserve your right to voice your opinion.
Thank me.

Posted by: Omentum | January 21, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Don’t want them on my backyard. I don’t feel safe now.

Posted by: anonymous | January 21, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

“I serve to preserve your right to voice your opinion. ”
Dont military guys usually say “Sir” when they are being high hat with civilians?

Posted by: BertieW | January 21, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

What the hell is Obama going to do with all the People in Gitmo no country will take them and the minute they are released begin striking the
United States. also they are receving a fair military trial there.

Posted by: Nathan | January 21, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

I say set them free ROR!
Free Khalid!
No justice no peace!
(just not near me, ok?)

Posted by: drjohn | January 21, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm

Isn’t there a nice big ranch somewhere in Texas that we could send them to?

Posted by: Skip | January 21, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

I’ve been following these so-called trials and all I hear about is the torture. America is supposed to be better than that. I really don’t know if these people are guilty or innocent and I am just glad that I do not have to judge. I do not believe they are going to get a fair trial here and I’m not sure where they would get a fair trial. We just cannot let them all go though because we just don’t know what crimes they have committed. This is a very difficult situation for the new President. Let’s just see what he can come up with. I’ll be waiting for his resolution to the issue.

Posted by: Lyn | January 21, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

What a mess Bush has left for Obama. He created Guantanamo, but yet didn’t know what to do with it. I sure hope that Bush has all the time to take the vacations he couldn’t take while he was president

Posted by: what667 | January 22, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Well Guess What Americans have believed a lie, there is nothing unusual about that. This Obama is not african american, he is half white,raised by a white grandmother, his biological mother is white, his dad is Kenya,what ever that is. This man has many faces. I believe we are in for a ride. What do you consider african america?

Posted by: ettadawnn7th | January 22, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

He just can’t do this to the USA. It makes me so mad. He can not just let them go.They have to pay for the lives that they took. Okay people that voted him in office do you see where he is heading with all of this. He is not on the side of the American people. and I can not believe that you voted him in office. God be with all of us Americans. God bless America more now than ever before.

Posted by: Kathy in Houston | January 22, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm

What is fair and just treatment in the time of war and to the people that do the things like the people in Gitmo. I mean like how do they or would they treat a prisoner. Okay people they just cut off their heads and pull their dead bodies through the streets.I think they have received decent treatment in Gitmo.
I am just beside myself about all of this.
Obama is half white and half African. Not AfricanAmerican. To answer the question what is AfricanAmerican. To me I think of an AfricanAmerican to be some one who comes from a heritage of slavery. And Obama can not relate to that because he does not have that sort of heritage.He should have never been able to run for office much less be in office.
Hitler did have the same charm as Obama and look at what Hitler got away with. We just need to make sure our voices are heard by our senators in Washington. Keep their emails full and keep their phones ringing so our voices can be heard.
Have any of you seen the comments that Donna Brazile made to Charles Gibson about the blanket she took from the inaguration that belonged to Obama. It is on the ABC news site somewhere. I think this womana owes all the American people an apology.. God help us all. God help us and bless America..

Posted by: Kathy in Houston | January 22, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

I want to say thank you for anyone of you reading these post for serving in any branch of the armed serivces that gives me the freedom to speak my mind. Thank you for giving to our country. God bless all of you that has served and are serving in the armed forces.

Posted by: Kathy in Houston | January 22, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Wow, the number of people who comment without reading an article is amazing.
Nowhere does it say Obama is releasing the prisoners at Gitmo by closing it down. Read.
Did you know according to our Defense Department that 86% of detainees at Gitmo were not arrested by our troops but by Pakistani and others when they were offered a huge bounty for suspected terrorists? Great idea for accuracy, offer poor people money to turn in anyone they didn’t like. No wonder more than 700 of the original 1000 have been released because there was no proof of crimes.
And of those 700 released how many terrorists did Bush’s policies create by unjustly imprisoning them for years and torturing them. How about their families back home, deprived of their husband’s income and protection at a very dangerous time, how would they feel after losing their innocent loved one for years to prison life?
The U.S. is supposed to stand for justice, innocent until proven guilty.
Thank goodness our current President understands this.

Posted by: Lydia | January 23, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

Anyone who works in law enforcement knows ya’ can’t violate the law to enforce it. Someone should have told Bush and Cheney. In the process of prosecuting the “bad guys”, Bush and Cheney became criminals, too. Alas, Bush and Cheney have become State Terrorists in order to deal w/ the Islamic Terrorists. With Bush and Cheney’s cooperation, the Islamic Terrorists are getting their wish of changing America. The Terrorists could not succeed without Bush and Cheney’s cooperation. What a couple of craven cowards and impotent fools!

Posted by: Sammy | January 23, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm

“Anyone who works in law enforcement knows ya’ can’t violate the law to enforce it. Someone should have told Bush and Cheney. In the process of prosecuting the “bad guys”, Bush and Cheney became criminals, too.”
Posted by: Sammy
——————————
Lets say I got the drop on bin laden but the gun permit that I have expired yesteday.
Do I break the law to bring him to justice or let him go to committ more atrocities.
I think I’ll go with Bush and Cheney on using common sense to fight, not adhered to some law that doesn’t make sense in that situation.

Posted by: Reality2009 | January 24, 2009, 2:51 am 2:51 am

It’s a mistery what could have gone on inside the heads of the majority of the people for electing such a guy. They were certainly under the spell of malign forces

Posted by: Silver | January 24, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.