President Obama Today: Gitmo & Torture Executive Orders, Special Envoys
Later this morning President Obama will sign new executive orders that will, among other tasks shut down the detainee center at Guantanamo Bay by January 22, 2010; shut down the CIA detention centers around the world; establish a process with Defense Secretary Gates and the Attorney General through which the Obama administration will decide what to do with the detainees going forward; and require all US interrogators to adhere to rules in the Army Field Manual.
Then in the afternoon, before an audience of State Department employees, President Obama and Secretary Clinton will announce new envoys, former Senate Majority Leader George Mitchell as special envoy to the Middle East, and Richard Holbrooke as special envoy to Pakistan and Afghanistan.
We do not anticipate the President will be sworn in again today, but one never knows.
– jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
So now we are adopting the softer gentler please don’t hurt me approach. I’m sure the terrorist will say “Oh, now we can tone it down, America likes us now”.
These places are the “head on the post” warning to terrorist. Look forward now to even bolder infiltrating, murder and mayhem by the relentless be-headers who prey on our every weakness. This is a total insult to every person and the family’s of every person who have been KILLED by the jihad that will not rest.
Posted by: sam | January 22, 2009, 8:50 am 8:50 am
America has honor, and you don’t have honor if you torture. That is what makes us different from the rest of the world.
Posted by: Reason | January 22, 2009, 9:16 am 9:16 am
Promises made during the campaign, promises now kept.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | January 22, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Sam: I hope you recall that these are actions which John McCain, a person who was tortured, supported as well.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | January 22, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am
Now Obama is endangering American lives at home by dismantling CIA intelligence methods. This is extremely dangerous and shows that Obama will yield to left wing loons in place of doing what it takes to protect us.
Posted by: brian | January 22, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am
We live in complex times. Should the Obama administration investigate the former administration for war crimes? Would this give the GOP a rallying point? Should politics even be considered in the decision to investigate or not? ……….
Posted by: Ohg Rea Tone | January 22, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am
Where have all those voices been when the terrorists be-headed innocent people and showed them on TV.
God help us all.
Posted by: Lizzie | January 22, 2009, 10:18 am 10:18 am
william..why do you assume sam voted for mccain..I agree with him/her and I didn’t vote mccain..it’s just not logical to close down intelligence venues in the present day that have kept us safe since 911 if it’s not broken don’t fix it..I feel no remorse againist people who want to do us severe harm..
Posted by: ThanksGuys | January 22, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am
No, this should be viewed as honouring those that have be killed by such terrorist groups. A president that says we are above the bullying, and we are above dismantling another countries right that our country may keep ours is a president we all should look up to. The old saying, 2 wrongs don’t make a right applies here.
Posted by: Andrea | January 22, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am
I think…I hope, that the ideal that emerges is one that is clear, transparent. A criminal prosecution system is not faultless…innocent people have been convited of crimes. At the same time, the same system allow killers to be set free.
It is also wrong to throw someone in jail for having a bad thought. On the other hand, raising a bad thought to the level of bad action deserves punishment…and I beleive that bad acts are committed by groups who have leaders and subordinates; planners, those who carry out bad acts and those who act as support should all be prosecuted in the same fashion. But the only way to present ourselves ethically is to make sure that we follow rules and perform our work flawlessly. The system becomes supect if it prosecute innocent people. It is hard to work within a frame work of rules when some of the folks on this planet have none…our decision to rise above this ethic says we see the difference
Posted by: michael | January 22, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am
obaba is so kind, he says he will sit down with our enemys and talk to them.
He is so “out-of-touch”. We aren’t talking to the kids on the playground fighting…..we are talking to KILLERS of Americans and the more they can kill the better they like it. Wasn’t this what his friend Ayers said???
Posted by: Mildred | January 22, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am
Where have all those voices been when the terrorists be-headed innocent people and showed them on TV.
God help us all.
Posted by: Lizzie | Jan 22, 2009 10:18:21 AM
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Well, I will try again to post…guess the “truth hurts”. No one cared.
God help us!!!!
Posted by: Mildred | January 22, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am
William, to which actions do you refer? Handcuffing our intelligence agencies and putting us all at higher risk to lose our head in front of mom & dad or committing torturous acts? I don’t advocate torture, but shutting down our holding areas is a disaster waiting to happen.
Posted by: sam | January 22, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Nobody in the Obama administration or it’s supporters has ever said they support releasing a single terrorist. What the right-wing fear machine wants to avoid in its hysterics is the point that we don’t even know if all the people in Gitmo really are terrorists. Are you asking us to trust the Bush administration that they are? -Don’t make me laugh.
Posted by: Skip | January 22, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am
Reason – “America has honor…”?
Where is America’s honor in severing the life line of the unborn while they sleep in their mothers womb? This is not honorable…this is torture. Over 1 million tortures a year. Whom out there can say they are not sickened by this?
Posted by: Children | January 22, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
I hope the terrorist practice the same Human Rights restraint that Obama wants when they are considering whether to blow up a school or a daycare…
Posted by: jeremy | January 22, 2009, 12:23 pm 12:23 pm
I think some people posting on this blog have been watching too much 24 on Fox.
Posted by: Mike C | January 22, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
I think some other people on this blog have been drinking too much Liberal Media Kool-aid.
Posted by: jeremy | January 22, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm
“William, to which actions do you refer? Handcuffing our intelligence agencies and putting us all at higher risk to lose our head in front of mom & dad or committing torturous acts?”
Sam is afraid of being personally beheaded by terrorists.
Could there be a starker example of availability bias?
Or is it just run of the mill right wing cowardice?
Posted by: Ryan C | January 22, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
Its the same question in realty, Should one life be forsaked to save One hundred? Indeed evil sorrounds places like Guantanamo Bay and tortures occur there that are by no standards humane, but torture methods in the past have saved american lives. When Lincoln saved the union he said he did not care if slavery were allowed or not, the preservation of the union was of the utmost importance, if the Bay is closed and some of the torture methods taken away putting americans in more harms way, is that preserving the union or going to destroy it? Sometimes fire must fight fire and i highly doubt terrorists are going to care that we are not torturing them anymore, if anything they now have more incentive.
Posted by: Liberty09 | January 22, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm
“These places are the “head on the post” warning to terrorist.”
Actually those places are perfect recruiting tools for terrorists.
All we did is give the nutjobs proclamations about how evil the Great Satan some meat.
“This is a total insult to every person and the family’s of every person who have been KILLED by the jihad that will not rest.”
You know what’s a total insult to victims of terror?
Cowardly right wing keyboard warriors.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 22, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
What do the families of 9/11 think? This is the beginning of the end for this country. End Times.
Posted by: roman | January 22, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
“but torture methods in the past have saved american lives.”
No, they did not.
Torture gave us nothing and put trying some of these terrorist in jeopardy.
Do right wingers know that 24 is a fictional TV show?
I realize your brain dead leaders cite the show as a example of the glory of torture but you guys do know its just a TV show right?
Posted by: Ryan C | January 22, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
CHILDREN!! No one likes abortion…even people who have had one. That is not the point. The point is…let people decide and follow their own morale code. If I want to cut off my arm…I will.
Posted by: James | January 22, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm
“What do the families of 9/11 think? This is the beginning of the end for this country. End Times.”
The Bush admin gave the middle finger to the families of 9/11.
First by refusing to even hold hearings on it.
Then when shamed into holding a special commission the Bush admin promptly ignore the commission’s recommendations.
But looky what I found from last month, Thirty-three relatives of people killed in the 9/11 attacks on the US have denounced the Guantanamo war crimes trials as illegitimate and unfair.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 22, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
Yes, the terrorists will see this as a sign of weakness, and it will encourage them to attack us here in the states. We are much less safe now.
But then after the next inevitable attack, just watch Obama become even more harsh than Bush was.
Posted by: Fred | January 22, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
“First by refusing to even hold hearings on it. ”
Scratch an Obaite and find a Truther.
“But looky what I found from last month, Thirty-three relatives of people killed in the 9/11 attacks on the US have denounced the Guantanamo war crimes trials as illegitimate and unfair.”
From 1/21: “9/11 Families Outraged by Obama Call to Suspend Guantanamo War Crimes Trials”
Posted by: BertieW | January 22, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
James: Who’s moral code is representing those who would rather see you and I beheaded than walking free to write or speak our thoughts? Is not our government to protect and serve it’s citizens? Who is being protected and served by the closing of Gitmo? How are the unborn protected and served when our President, in his first day of office, repeals an executive order allowing Federal Funds to be used abroad for abortion? Your point of moral freedom is self serving and foolish. Yet it illustrates well the misguided “progressives” of our nation. God help us all.
Posted by: Children | January 22, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
“From 1/21: “9/11 Families Outraged by Obama Call to Suspend Guantanamo War Crimes Trials”"
From where else but FoxNews war’s biggest cheerleader!
And they quote all of three people.
One of who is afraid of trials of terrorist occurring on US soil apparently unaware that such trials have taken place.
And one who is upset by the delay, not the trial process.
“I’m constantly doing my part — I want my government to do its part for me. I want those people who participated in my son’s death and the death of some 3,000 others, I want to see them punished, if found guilty, in a court of law,” he said.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 22, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
“Who’s moral code is representing those who would rather see you and I beheaded than walking free to write or speak our thoughts?”
Right wingers have a strange moral code where they are just as eager to kill those born as they are to protect those who are have yet to be.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 22, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
You leftist have a difficult moral code.
Given them a news story and its not the right news story.
Given them quotes from 9/11 families and they arent the right families.
Posted by: BertieW | January 22, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
It’s great to see President Obama doing exactly what he committed to do during the election … and fast.
Posted by: pefros | January 22, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
“It’s great to see President Obama doing exactly what he committed to do during the election … and fast.”
What? Pander?
You do realize that he has actually committed to next to nothing? The order is vague enough to be construed to move all these lovable scamps to Bagram.
You’ll have to delay your beatification for some months to see if it all works out.
Posted by: BertieW | January 22, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
“Given them a news story and its not the right news story.”
Contrast the headline of FoxNoise which implies many families are outraged with the actual article which has 1 guy angry, 1 woman who is ignorant of the facts and a 3rd whose upset is at the delay.
“Given them quotes from 9/11 families and they arent the right families.”
Its a numbers game 33 families directly petitioning the government beats 3 people found by FoxNoise everytime.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 22, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Close Gitmo? “We hold these truths to be self evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” Impeach Obama!
Posted by: WakeUpAmerica | January 22, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm
Mike C – I suspect you didn’t intend to label every one who has ever served our military and those currently serving our military as having strange morals. Could it be that those who volunteer to protect and serve our county do so not only to protect America, but to also protect the unborn children of America? Who is protecting America and her children with the closure of Gitmo? God help us all.
Posted by: Children | January 22, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
“Who is protecting America and her children with the closure of Gitmo?”
Huh?
Posted by: pefros | January 22, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
“Contrast the headline of FoxNoise which implies many families are outraged with the actual article which has 1 guy angry, 1 woman who is ignorant of the facts and a 3rd whose upset is at the delay. ”
Peter Gadiel- “Its beyond comprehension”
Jefferson Crowther- “I see no reason why we should delay these proceedings.”
Cmdr. Kirk Lippold (USS Cole)-”It demeans their deaths because we seem to be more concerned with the rights of detainees than we are with the justice that is being denied to my sailors that were killed”
Lorraine Arias Believeau- “If they were to move to the homeland it would endanger all of us”
From JapanToday “Plans to close Gitmo anger 9/11 victim families ”
Andrew Arias- “Though the wheels are grinding, they are turning here and this place must remain open and justice must be served”
Jim Riches “If they’re guilty … then let’s give them the death penalty that they deserve”
Posted by: BertieW | January 22, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Listen, Bush and his administration had about 5 years to bring some of these ‘obviously guilty’ people to trial – and failed miserably.
Give credit where credit is due.
My guess is that President Obama will get it done a lot faster, and with better values applied doing it.
Posted by: pefros | January 22, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
“Give credit where credit is due.
My guess is that President Obama will get it done a lot faster, and with better values applied doing it.”
He just STOPPED a trial.
You can try to spin this a lot of different ways, but it is not credible to say that he is speeding up justice.
“GUANTANAMO BAY NAVAL BASE, Cuba —
Plans to close Guantanamo are not sitting well with one group: Relatives of people killed in the Sept 11 attacks who sat in stunned silence as two alleged terrorists said they were proud of their role in the plot.
The U.S. military brought relatives of three Sept 11 victims to Guantanamo to observe pretrial hearings in the case of five men charged in the plot who could get the death penalty if convicted.
The five invited relatives of 9/11 victims oppose such a move.
…
The victims’ relatives were in the courtroom audience as two Sept 11 defendants, Ramzi Binalshibh and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, proclaimed their role in the worst terrorist attack on U.S. soil.”
and
“The military tribunal is also holding pretrial hearings this week in the case of Omar Khadr, a Canadian who was 15 when he allegedly killed a U.S. soldier, Sgt 1st Class Christopher Speer of Albuquerque, New Mexico, with a grenade during a battle in Afghanistan in 2002.”
Posted by: BertieW | January 22, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
prefos -
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
And if I recall correctly, President Oboma promised to defend and uphold this sacred document.
Now tell me prefos, how does closing Gitmo provide the common defense of this nation?
Posted by: Children | January 22, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
It’s more than a little unnerving that one of the first things President Obama does is give US rights to international terrorists. I’m quite certain that the families of the victims of Islamic terrorists are a bit ticked off right now…
I’m getting a bad feeling about this .
Posted by: Roxie | January 22, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
Now tell me prefos, how does closing Gitmo provide the common defense of this nation?
*****************************************
I’m not Pefros, but I’ll be happy to answer your question. Despite all the weaponry which could blow up the planet twenty times over, we can’t defend ourselves against terrorism by might alone. Nor should we. It is a shared responsibility among nations. The closing of Gitmo shows not only our potential allies, but also the world, that both principles and international law matter, which will encourage more participation with security operations and could help to put a significant dampening on terrorist recruitment. After all, they’ll be unable to use the torture of Muslims and Middle Eastern individuals as a recruitment poster. Some would call it an evolution, badly needed and unavoidable.
Posted by: kathy | January 22, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Well said Kathy.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 22, 2009, 5:44 pm 5:44 pm
“Despite all the weaponry which could blow up the planet twenty times over, we can’t defend ourselves against terrorism by might alone.”
Apparently we can.
“After all, they’ll be unable to use the torture of Muslims and Middle Eastern individuals as a recruitment poster.”
But they will be able to use craven capitulation. Which is probably better.
Besides they didnt need alleged torture of these ‘individuals’ to get their little bomb fest underway in the 90′s and 2001 so what makes you think its critical to their success?
Posted by: BertieW | January 22, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
kathy you are missing an “r” consonant in front of evolution..
Posted by: ThanksGuys | January 22, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
Thanks Guys- Nope, it’s evolution- something which occurs to enhance and insure the survival of the human race. The revolution has already happened and was unsuccessful. I’m speaking of the one against the Constitution and the founding principles of our nation. Good Day.
Posted by: kathy | January 22, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
Listen, Bush and his administration had about 5 years to bring some of these ‘obviously guilty’ people to trial – and failed miserably.
Give credit where credit is due. The Bush administration couldn’t get it done.
My guess is that President Obama will get it done a lot faster, and with better values applied doing it.
Posted by: pefros | January 22, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
Obama we agree that torture is not a great expression of justice it is fueled by anger and resentment. Torture is rarely justified with liberty, by truth, or justice for all.
Posted by: M+C | January 22, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm
well, you people asked for him and you got him. now i guess he is going to let them go so they can go plan another 9-11.
Posted by: chris obaugh | January 22, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
Once again I feel compelled to say that in keeping with our nation’s self-proclaimed title of ‘Home of the Brave’, we Democrats have the courage to support Obama’s efforts to uphold our principles before the rest of the world despite the right-wing fear-mongers attempts to scare us into policies and behavior that we ourselves would condemn if done by others.
Posted by: Skip | January 22, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
“Listen, Bush and his administration had about 5 years to bring some of these ‘obviously guilty’ people to trial – and failed miserably.”
Did you get the part where the trials were underway, like right now, and they had to be STOPPED because of the Lord High Arugula and his panderfest?
Seeing as there was a trial underway and he stopped it, its game, set and match that he will not bring bringing justice any quicker.
Posted by: BertieW | January 22, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm
bert, again you miss the point due to your bias.
Bush and his administration had about 5 years to bring some of these ‘obviously guilty’ people to trial – and failed miserably.
A couple of ‘military’ trials finally got under way. Big deal . .. what an accomplishment in 5 years.
Give credit where credit is due. The Bush administration couldn’t get it done.
My guess is that President Obama will get it done a lot faster, and with better values applied doing it.
Posted by: pefros | January 22, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
It’s all fear and smear with the ‘right wing’ and such a failure to acknowledge the terrible missteps and ineptitude of the Bush administration.
You lost the election for very good reasons. And your fear and smear campaign failed miserably during the election.
By continuing the fear and smear, you’re only digging the ‘right wing’ grave deeper … . keep at it.
Posted by: pefros | January 22, 2009, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
“Give credit where credit is due.”
What am I supposed to be giving credit for?
I am not giving Obama credit for getting any speedy convictions which you seem to want to award him with.
1. He hasnt.
2. He has moved in the opposite direction.
There were 9/11 Families in the courtroom finally seeing justice administered and Obama pulls the plug because Code Pink gave him money for his campaign.
“You lost the election for very good reasons.”
Yeah, America was voting for releasing terrorists. You are so right! That was the winning platform.
Or could it be the BILLION dollars Crystal Pepsi was marketed with? Like maybe a BILLION dollars helped Obama get 7 million more votes Kerry.
Because when you spend a BILLION dollars you can get a lot of people to do stuff. Thats why if you are in marketing and you are rolling out a new product, its nice to have a BILLION dollars.
Soooo two possibilities. Maybe people were convinced that convinced that having terrorists safely tucked away for a whole 5 mean years was a bad idea … or it could have been the BILLION dollars.
Could go either way.
Posted by: BertieW | January 22, 2009, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
DUHHHHHHH!!!!
Obama said he was going to do this in almost EVERY campaign speech he gave. That would be hmmmmmm FOR OVER A YEAR
Posted by: pefros | January 22, 2009, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm
And seriously bert, as much as you would like to make President Obama look bad, you’re failing miserably.
And as much as you seem to want to ignore how Bush handled the situation – Bush had about 5 full years to bring some of these ‘obviously guilty’ people to trial – and he also failed at this.
Had he and his administration been even slightly less inept, this would not even be an issue now.
Posted by: pefros | January 22, 2009, 11:56 pm 11:56 pm
It will take 1 attack. Then reports like this will wonder why it happened, voters like the Obama worshippers will crap themselves, and it will be done…
Democratic foreign policy is a kin to the crash position.
Posted by: Joe | January 23, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am
Yeah Joe, too bad Bush wasn’t able to get Osama Bin Laden despite all his posturing and overblown bravado.
Posted by: pefros | January 23, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am
It seems some Americans were accustomed to living in fear and trepidation under Bush; therefore, suggesting anything to the contrary seems unatural to them. Bush, himself, was very creative in using his terror color codes to stoke them at will for fun. You see, the best way to control human beings is to keep them in perpetual fear of the unknown. That way, they will acquiese to anything that you do. That is the secret of dictatorship.
Posted by: what667 | January 23, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Joe: “It will take 1 attack. Then reports like this will wonder why it happened, voters like the Obama worshippers will crap themselves, and it will be done…”
Just like 9/11, nine months after Bush took office? Let me guess: If we’re attacked in 9 months time it’s Obama’s fault, but when we were attacked after 9 months under Bush it was Clinton’s fault?
Posted by: jhw539 | January 23, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Obama and his administration terrifies me. I do not feel that he is a true American and will not do what is best for our country. Look at one of the 1st things he did…stopped the trial of the terrorists that materminded the 911 attack. I am so fearful that he is wanting a more horrific attack on the USA that will make 911 seem like a small event in comparison.
I do, however, believe that God is in charge and He has Obama in for a reason. We have to wait and see.
And, the disgusting lyrics that I heard on the radio yesterday that was sung by one of Obama’s favorite musical groups…That was beyond disgusting; and tells a lot about this president’s thug mentality. I will not even allow his face on my TV at home, I turn it off whenever they out up a picture of him…just can’t take looking at him.
I respect President Bush and he has been a very good President. I did not always agree with everything he did; but he did protect us and this great country. I always felt confident that he would always do what is right for the United States of America. Obama will NEVER achieve great things for our country as President Bush has, and his constant disrespect for Bush is sickening. Obama is NOTHING in my eyes.
Posted by: Shirley Barber | January 23, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
“I respect President Bush and he has been a very good President. I did not always agree with everything he did; but he did protect us and this great country.”
Where was Bush on 9/11?
Oh yeah, frozen solid reading My Pet Goat.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 23, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
“Obama will NEVER achieve great things for our country as President Bush has,”
Bush’s “great things” include:
4000+ dead American service men and women killed in Iraq, a war based on a lie.
100,000 dead Iraqi civilians, innocents killed as collateral damage in a war based on lies.
3300+ dead Americans from not just 9/11, but terrorist attacks across the globe as terrorist attacks leaped in both their veracity and frequency during the Bush admin.
The Economic crisis from its early warning signs to the thick of the crisis, Bush has been as absent a leader as one could imagine.
Bush has done one great thing:
And that is his commitment to stopping the spread of HIV and other horrible communicable diseases in Africa.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 23, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
shame on all of you whom criticize Obama, he didnt get this country in this mess, 8 years of Busch did, Obama is for the people of this nation as we are the nation, he hasnt taken a cent from lobbyist. what you dont understand and what you cannot understand is a movement of the people of this nation to take our country back and make its decrees, constitution and government work for all people of this nation. he is on the right track to save our nation and country. God bless him and his administration.
Posted by: Bonita Houmita | January 26, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
jhw539, you might have a point, but you see, Bush was not doing away with policies in an effort to protect non-existent rights of terrorists. PEBO is doing just that and looking like a naive wimp to our enemies.
Posted by: Cee | January 26, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm
mrpresident mynames am matovu from uganda how is usa and your famiry first ledy +two sons in ather hand how is estermonday l want to think you for abig worker your doing for exmple to close gwatam bee prison ecnomy criss smeent for g20 cauntries but dot forget afican let mesay to my nation uganda no jobs no medicine in hospital feeder roads craption inuganda is first deases mr president my adream is to be USA citizen shipe my GOD bless your leader ship amen good day mr president
Posted by: matovu patrick ssensamba | April 13, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am