Jan 23, 2009 7:40am

President Obama to Overturn Ban on Funding International Family Planning Groups That Provide Abortion

ABC News has learned that later today President Obama will sign an executive order overturning the "Mexico City policy," which prohibits nongovernmental organizations that receive international family planning assistance through the U.S. Agency for International Development from providing or actively promoting abortion as a method of family planning in other countries.

The policy — called the "Global Gag rule" by supporters of abortion rights — was first instituted by President Reagan in 1984, was overturned by President Clinton in 1993, and was reinstituted by President Bush  in 2001.

Past presidents have instituted or revoked the ban on Jan. 22, the anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision, but President Obama held off on that move, thinking it too combative.

- jpt

User Comments

how about providing some prevention as well, like the injection to stop you getting pregnant, iud’s the pill, the day after pill, don’t leave abortion as a last resort

Posted by: rob | January 23, 2009, 8:12 am 8:12 am

I go to the doctor for family planning and never does that include abortion.
But this morning’s broad brush strokes, family planning and abortion are one in the same.

Posted by: Mavsreader | January 23, 2009, 8:26 am 8:26 am

HEy what about ADOPTION. It is a win win situation. Couple gets a child and birth mom is able to complete her education etal. ADOPTION is a love thing.

Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga | January 23, 2009, 8:31 am 8:31 am

So the new president is on a systematic mission to erase any and all of Bush’s executive orders? Is this unprecedented, or did Clinton, etc., do this after taking office, too?

Posted by: matt | January 23, 2009, 8:32 am 8:32 am

did Clinton, etc., do this after taking office, too?
_____________________________________
Yes, CIinton signed this same order.

Posted by: Paige | January 23, 2009, 8:37 am 8:37 am

One of the few areas I disagree with pres Obama on. right to life precedes our convenience ever time. not even close. May his conviction change on this.

Posted by: richard warren | January 23, 2009, 8:40 am 8:40 am

Yes, signing the order yesterday would have been too combative. Waiting 24 hours to allow out taxes to be used to fund abortions worldwide is perfectly reasonable. I applaud President Obama’s foresight in this. By waiting one more day, he has ensured that anti-abortion advocates will support him 100%.

Posted by: Theo | January 23, 2009, 8:41 am 8:41 am

I don’t know why republicans have this thing against family planning.
You would think in an economic downturn that folks would support prevention… it is also the best measure to reduce abortion.

Posted by: TrueBlue | January 23, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Thank you President Obama for keeping the government away from my wombat.

Posted by: zookeeper | January 23, 2009, 8:48 am 8:48 am

How about covering birth control by insurance companys or distrubuting it to those who are willing to take it but can’t afford it.birth control is certenly easy enough to take.

Posted by: Nikki | January 23, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am

TrueBlue – the ONLY opposition I have to this is ABORTION (the MURDER of children). There is no other word for obortion except murder. This murdered child could have been a great scientist, a great author, a great painter, etc. etc. Abortion is murder no matter how you try to play it.

Posted by: M. Smith | January 23, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Let the killing begin.

Posted by: Lee | January 23, 2009, 9:02 am 9:02 am

I’m impressed. Bush is such an idiot that his first act in office – THE VERY FIRST ONE – Was to cut funding to clinics who mentioned anything other than Abstinence. Not even condom distribution was okay. How many people around the world suffered HIV and other infections due to lack of education under that tyrannical dictator?

Posted by: Laura | January 23, 2009, 9:10 am 9:10 am

Its Not Murder

Posted by: jo jo | January 23, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am

abortion is horrible i agree…..i made very sure by me behaviors that i never found myself in the position of an unwanted pregnancy BUT for all those up in arms about those who do need to be able to have an abortion: are you offering any way to help support a child saved from being aborted ? do you not realize that forcing an an ill equipped parent to raise a child for 18 years is no small task ? or is it just the fetus you care so passionately for but not the child ? anyone offering up free medical care for the child free diapers free day care ? no that’s right i didn’t think so

Posted by: scathinglybrilliant | January 23, 2009, 9:12 am 9:12 am

Some call abortion “murder”. On the other hand, this is less of a “murder” than deaths of adults thru diseases and sufferings caused by embargoes, by unnecessary wars, poverty, etc. These unborn children “could be doctors, scientists… ect.”. But that is a pipe dream if policies and actions of world leaders are not conducive to promote peace, justice, and decent livelihood by all. He who opposes pro-choice should back it up with adoptions.

Posted by: jbrownski | January 23, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am

Wonderful, not only will the number of innocent lives killed every year increase-but I have the comfort of knowing I’M PAYING FOR IT! A very sad day indeed.

Posted by: Shannon | January 23, 2009, 9:16 am 9:16 am

Well…these “choose lifer’s” need to do one thing above all else…choose to mind their own business…if they’re against family planning and abortion…then it is their choice….but they have no right to interfere in the lives of others…i’m so sick of their nonsense…

Posted by: Phil | January 23, 2009, 9:16 am 9:16 am

You should call it what it is .When a doctor practically carves out your stomach ,and calls it a tummy tuck.This goes the same as the ones calling murder ,family planing.If they were really planing a family they wouldn’t ,Catie bar the door and we will worry about the consequences later when they are pleasing themselves.
What if we found a island somewhere that was inhabited by very small (4oz to 5 lb) people .They were living off their environment and growing up to be very small productive members of their society.If we went in and stomped them we most likely would be tried for genocide.

Posted by: Sean Denny | January 23, 2009, 9:18 am 9:18 am

So if you were raped would you go through with having a child, or would you want a choice not to have it?

Posted by: sara | January 23, 2009, 9:18 am 9:18 am

There are alternatives to abortion that and their are many pro-life organizations that help women. Pro-life folks have put their money where their mouth is. The pain and guilt of abortion haunt many women for the rest of their lives, but thankfully there are better alternatives available for those who seek it.

Posted by: neal | January 23, 2009, 9:20 am 9:20 am

Lets see, the logic is that since no one can guarantee each child will have a good life, and it is possible they could meet with disease, war, poverty, we should just go ahead and murder them now. As for the comment that pro-lifers love the fetus more than the child, do you not agree if you don’t love the fetus there will be no child?

Posted by: Kelly | January 23, 2009, 9:20 am 9:20 am

Whether your pro choice, or pro life, the fact is that our taxes should not be going for this. I would rather have it paying our nat’l debt, or to food banks…anything except paying for foreigner to get abortions!

Posted by: Angela | January 23, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am

How is moving from not funding abortion to government funding of abortion less intrusive toward women? What about the millions of Americans who do not want their tax money funding abortion, but believe it is morally wrong?

Posted by: neal | January 23, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am

Soooo…I thought we were going to stop all the wasteful spending? But we are going to fund foreign abortions? And you guys worship at this guy’s alter?

Posted by: J.R. | January 23, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am

Keep abortion legal. I want less people who believe abortion is ok,
in the world.
Think about that one.

Posted by: Angelo | January 23, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am

Gee…we are broke in this county, but hey we can now start to give money for this. I am not talking the family planning or abortion as those are two different things not one in the same. I am purely talking…we have small resources right now and we are going to do this…..

Posted by: Sue | January 23, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am

RIGHT ON, PREZ OBAMA!!!

Posted by: gdguynbalt | January 23, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am

Well Done Mr. President. Sanity makes a comeback!
Please issue another EO that federal funding be returned to US programs that promote real sex ed too, not just abstinence! It is sad that our current teenagers that grew up in the past 8 years did not have crucial education like this, and more access to condoms and birth control.
Pro-lifers should agree on this one, if you want to reduce the amount of abortions, common sense tells us we must offer the pills and condoms.

Posted by: scrappy | January 23, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am

So if you were raped would you go through with having a child, or would you want a choice not to have it?
By current law you CAN use public funding in cases of rape, incest or endangerment to the mothers life. Stop using tired arguments and learn the facts. Bottom line, I will continue to “stick my nose” in this business as long as I’m paying for it.

Posted by: Shannon | January 23, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am

Hey True Blue, you start family planning before conceiving. You don’t conceive and then say, I need to do family planning and abort this baby. Abortion is not family planning, dummy, it is murder of an innocent child.

Posted by: Warrior | January 23, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am

This money isn’t going “towards abortion”, it’s going to free birth control and sex-ed programs in organizations that also provide or acknowledge the existence of abortion at the patient’s expense. The old admin’s policy of trying to choke-out these organizations is about the same as trying to shut down soup kitchens that offer a red meat option on Fridays.

Posted by: wolf | January 23, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am

People – please recogonise the difference. We already send funding to these programs overseas, just not the ones that offer abortion. Now those places (which offer family planning and abortion) can apply for aid as well.

Posted by: scrappy | January 23, 2009, 9:29 am 9:29 am

I love how all of you that want to get rid of welfare, don’t support family planning. I have my own views about abortion, and I know for myself personally I have not provided opportunities for unwanted pregnancy. That being said, I don’t have a right to judge or rule on what someone else does. It does not concern me. Its a personal choice. And quite frankly, I’m with the other posters that preach about prevention, that would led to less abortion. Anyway, to each his own, I can’t say what is right and wrong for others to do. I just know that I’m sick of my tax dollars going towards these women who have 5 kids, and no job.

Posted by: It makes Sense | January 23, 2009, 9:29 am 9:29 am

I’m not “pro-abortion” (the term anti-choicers insist on) but no method of birth control is 100% effective, and women who simply don’t want to carry a pregnancy to term should have safe, legal options. Adoption is fine, but again, only if the woman WANTS to go through with the pregnancy.

Posted by: Christine | January 23, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am

Abortion is MURDER…
There are a lot of families out there who have infertility problems, and those who don’t that would be happy to raise that child if you don’t want it. It is not the childs fault, and what gives you the right to take the life of another!

Posted by: Brooke | January 23, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am

I feel that everyone should have a choice. Now people will say you are not giving a fetus a choice. My question to those people is a fetus able survive without its host? At this time I do not know of a procedure that will allow you to take a fetus and put it in another persons body for survival. There for the only way it can survive is with the original person. I do not think we are doing anyone any good even talking about a fetus as a person unless we have the ability to have it survive on its own or by changing the person it can live off until it can survive on its own.

Posted by: Sarah | January 23, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am

No matter your stance on abortion morally, and yes, I’m against it~ why should taxpayers be paying for this sort of thing anyway? It boggles the mind!

Posted by: Paula | January 23, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am

Look at it this way guys. I’m pro choice. For the past 8 years I’ve had to pay for something I didn’t believe in as well. See how this works?

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

It is none of anyone’s business if someone has a baby or an abortion. They are not paying the bills. They do not have to raise the child for 18+ years. To say they an aborted child may have been a great President or whatever, also means they could be the next serial killer as well. Consider that most abortions are related to age and financial situations, my bet is the child will not reach their positive potential as if they were born to families that wants the child and has the means to properly nurture them.
There are parent less children in foster care and other places, that will never get the proper parenting. Why don’t you anti-abortionists go to them and spend you money to get them proper homes? Why; I’ll tell you why. This is a moral mission so YOU can feel better about yourselves. This has nothing to do with the mothers and children.

Posted by: MG | January 23, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Finally we get a president with intelligence and understanding. This is so long overdue. The right is just concerned because once we get back on track with responsible leadership there will be less idiots out there (hopefully). If this had been an option all those decades ago maybe we wouldn’t have had a moron in charge for the past eight years. For those of you who oppose it, stay out of a woman’s bedroom, bathroom, medical records, etc. It is no one’s business but a woman’s and whatever higher power she believes in – no matter what!

Posted by: durrs | January 23, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

yeah…adoption is the best choice…until the court gives the kid back to the birth mother. “oh boo hoo, I was young, I’m better now and want to raise my kid, who is 4 or 5 now”
No thanks. I hate abortion. Absolutely hate it and would stop talking to anyone I know who got one. I am STILL pro choice.

Posted by: hahawrong | January 23, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Actually I’ve had to pay for tons of things I didn’t believe in for the past 8 years. A huge war comes to mind as well. Where we killed children. But nobody seems to care about them.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am

I got pregnant at the age of 16. Did I ever once think about KILLING my baby? NOT ONCE. My baby girl is now 9 1/2 y/o healthy and beautiful. My boyfriend (at the time) is now my husband of 10 yrs. and we have a son also. Abortion is killing innocent children, while there are tons of women who can’t have children. It’s terrible!! Want God to bless America, again? Then AMERICA BLESS GOD. This country WAS founded on CHRISTIAN principles and NEEDS to return to them if you want to see REAL change you can BELIEVE in!!!!

Posted by: Stacie | January 23, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am

I Have to responce to the what if they were raped .Because this sineiro keeps coming raising its ugly head.How many baby producing rapes are there annually.We are not talking about a couple of hundred abortions we are talking about THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of innocent lives lost because of the, I gotta get me some, butt shaking, at any cost nowadays sex morality and I’ll get me another abortion if I get pregnant mentality.

Posted by: Sean Denny | January 23, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Hey, “Warior” in response to your comment “abortion is not family planning”, neither is rape or incest. I wish that you and your type ilk would crawl back to your pre-historic rock and quit judging others and quit acting like you know more about their situation than they do. MYOB – is what I’m trying so say. God knows why anyone does the things that they do and at the end, everyone is accountable for their actions. Just watch yourself and what you do. Don’t worry so much about what other people do.

Posted by: maicde | January 23, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Abortion is MURDER! I’m leaving my Federal job so I wouldn’t have to pay taxes.

Posted by: Lara | January 23, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am

If President Obama thought signing the policy yesterday was combative, how is it not so today? If he thinks it’s right today, he should have thought it right yesterday. If he wants to reduce abortions as he has said, he shouldn’t sign this. If he wants to stop wasteful spending, he shouldn’t sign this. And if he has any respect for people–of any age, including the unborn through his daughters’ ages to his own age to the elderly–he shouldn’t sign this. We need a culture that respects all life to get our culture back on track.

Posted by: SadCitizen | January 23, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am

The people who run these agencies have been doing without my taxpayer dollars for 8 (count ‘em 8 years.) At a time when the government is “bailing out the economy,” our infrastructure has to be rebuilt, and all of the other necessities that we have to pay for, this seems a fiscally irresponsible use of taxpayer dollars. They’ve done without our money for this long – where is the substantiating evidence that they suddenly need it now?

Posted by: Heritage | January 23, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am

The panderfest continues.
I am sure killing off their babies will improve the US’s standing in the world.

Posted by: BertieW | January 23, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am

NOTE , THAT ALL PRO-ABORTION BELIEVERS HAVE ALREADY BEEN “BORN”. SO WHAT’S UP WITH THAT ??

Posted by: Mary Lou Raab | January 23, 2009, 9:37 am 9:37 am

Stacie – glad it worked for you. You still have no buisness determining the fate of the lives of other women. That is what Pro-Choice is all about.

Posted by: scrappy | January 23, 2009, 9:37 am 9:37 am

PERHAPS if mostly MEN didn’t owe approximately 70 BILLION in back child support in the US we’d have fewer abortions?

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 9:37 am 9:37 am

Actually I agree, I have had to pay for things I was totally against for the last 8 years thanks to the previous “Moron in Chief”. How can you be against abortion and for a senseless unnecessary war?

Posted by: Jane | January 23, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am

SadCitizen – Actually yes, the way to reduce the amount of abortions is to provide family planniing – which is condoms, pills, day after, etc. Which is what these places offer – they just also happen to provide access to a Dr for an abortion – not even pay for the abortion.

Posted by: scrappster | January 23, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am

I did not see any coverage from your station on the March fo Life?? When did the news media become so bias.
Praying for you
Dorothy

Posted by: Dorothy | January 23, 2009, 9:41 am 9:41 am

Save the terrorists – kill the unborn. Why is it only a “baby” when it’s wanted? I resent MY tax money being used for this! Great first week in office. NOT!

Posted by: southern_conservative | January 23, 2009, 9:42 am 9:42 am

Would I get an abortion? No. Do I want others to get them? No. Does everyone else need to do what I want them to do? Absolutely NOT!
People need to get their damn noses out of everyone else’s business. If you don’t want one, then don’t get one. Your rights do not include limiting the rights of others to do what they want with their own body. Worry about yourself and leave everyone else alone and the world will be a much happier place.

Posted by: 1-Human | January 23, 2009, 9:42 am 9:42 am

“You still have no business determining the fate of the lives of other women. That is what Pro-Choice is all about.”
WHAT????!!!!????????????
This is how evil and twisted these so-called human beings are! Does she have the right to determine the fate of the child she wants to SLAUGHTER! And it is NOT a choice! If it were, than what is the choice of the baby to live or die? And choice is a word used by these satanic souls blinded by the devil instead of what it really is, MURDER! In the end, you and your leader, the devil, LOSE!

Posted by: Tony | January 23, 2009, 9:42 am 9:42 am

This is disappointing. Abortion is supposed to alleviate the effects of poverty by leaving the woman free to earn money without another mouth to feed. This never quite pans out as advertised. The countries that receive monies from USAID don’t need more abortions. They need more respect for life. This is a purely political decision, and it is disappointing.

Posted by: Sean O'Brien | January 23, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Well…these “choose lifer’s” need to do one thing above all else…choose to mind their own business…if they’re against family planning and abortion…then it is their choice….but they have no right to interfere in the lives of others…i’m so sick of their nonsense…
Take your own advice. Pro-Lifers don’t want their money paying for other people’s choices, that is the ‘ultimate not interfering in other peoples business’ and it’s called freedom and self determination.

Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | January 23, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Hey Tony, the day you grow a womb get back to me. Like I said – men owe 70 BILLION in back child support. This whole argument is stacked on women. Therefore you guys need to stay out of it. Obviously you don’t take care of the ones you already help bring into the world?

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Tony – Yep – how did you know? The devil personally told me this in our secret conversations.
WHAT????????????
I don’t think it is me that needs help.

Posted by: scrappy | January 23, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Sean O’Brien, abortion has absolutely nothing to do with politics what-so-ever. It has everything to do with Civil Rights. Learn the difference.

Posted by: 1-Human | January 23, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Thank you Mr. President.

Posted by: Lexi | January 23, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am

Maybe it’s something ” personal ” with Mr. Obama . I’m beginning to wonder “WHY” he’s sooo pro-abortion ! Has there been abortion/abortions in his past personal life since he has to feel so adamant in protecting a woman’s right to choose “OVER” a persons “right” to be allowed to be born ?? Since when is pregnancy (9 months) a chronic/terminal disease ?? Who are we to say who can be born or not born ? This SOUNDS like a “know -it -all” mentality to me !!

Posted by: Mary Lou | January 23, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am

I am always amazed how the same group that wants to save the unborn is more likely to defend the death penalty for adults. If you are pro-life as you claim, spend your energy supporting adults on death row.

Posted by: Anthony | January 23, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am

“So help me GOD”…what a hypocrisy!
Did you notice that there was no Bible at the second-time oath taking?
But life has a tendency to correct people’s arrogance.
So embrace Mr.President, CHANGE is coming!

Posted by: logic301 | January 23, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am

I love all these murderer supporters who make up all these names to hide what is the killing of a baby. They bring all kinds of ridiculous arguments, paying for other things, etc etc. It comes down to the truth. Good vs. Evil. Right vs. wrong. Light vs. darkness. God vs. the devil. God gives you the right to choose to slaughter your own children or not. Obviously, a lot are deceived by the darkness and will use any argument to justify their evil ways. Just as the gays and their supporters do. Choose God and eternal life or the devil and eternal death but just do not keep asking why so many disasters, the economy stinks, the world seems at a crossroads etc, and wonder why. The ignorant do not see.

Posted by: Tony | January 23, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am

All this does is ALLOW an agency to at least give information without losing funding! How do you have a medical facility for women and not give out all of the information on medical procedures?!

Posted by: try the truth | January 23, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am

Mary Lou – It is not a person it is a fetus, one that is not capable to surviving on its own.
It is not a disease, but women can still die during childbirth. If a women is forced to have the baby when she wanted an abortion and then dies in the process, can the other party then be charged with murder?

Posted by: scrappster | January 23, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Well, the terrorists have rights but the unborn has no rights with this administration. It is not right to punish those terrorists but it is absolutely right to kill, murder, and eliminate a defenseless human being. Wake up people this administration and president has it all upside down. The blood of the unborn would be crying out in this land for revenge.

Posted by: David | January 23, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Heh. Reading this stuff … same old screams, same old lies. … A recent story had researchers asking family planning protesters the question “If abortion was illegal, how much prison time should be given to women who have one?” Few of them had an answer. They’d never thought about it in that way.

Posted by: Hank Fox | January 23, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

I was in d. c. at the march. Some 3-4 hundred thousand were there!! the tide is turning on the life issue. It will be the men and women in this country who have had abortions affect their life; who come forward ; that will change hearts.

Posted by: JOE OTT | January 23, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am

Tony, The bible speaks on poverty (which lends to more abortions I might add) over 2000 times. How many verses on abortion? Oldest abortion? 500 BC. A feel good law won’t stop them anyway. If you think that the only reason the US is currently doing badly is abortion? Using your theory it seems to me that you are missing MANY sins taking place in the US. MANY.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am

Tony – Not all people share your beliefs, but you feel it is ok to impose them on others, sort of like the Taliban. In all honesty, until men can have babies, stop trying to dictate what a woman should do!

Posted by: try the truth | January 23, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Here’s another thought Tony. Isn’t it just as much a sin to turn your back on your child by not paying child support as say the other woman that chose to abort? So, wouldn’t you say men area equally as sinful here? I see no difference. But then again, I was taught all sins are equal. I don’t cherry pick.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

If you are a man, of course you should get some sort of opinion, does it matter in this situation, NO! You are not the woman! Having had an abortion in college because I got pregnant by someone who I didnt think who be a great father, was the best decision I could make at the time. I would have had to drop out of college, to support this child, and be another struggling mom on welfare.
Well its been almost 7 years, and I now have 2 beautiful sons with my husband, and I am able to provide for them, without your federal tax dollars to help to support them.
Let all women, make this decision for themselves, and help promote better sex education in schools, not just abstinence, because it just doesnt work.

Posted by: michelle | January 23, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am

I am a medical doctor who has been working for around a year for Save The Children, US on a project in Pakistan called FALAH (Family Advancement for Life and Health). This is a USAID funded project and several NGOs as well as Health and Population Department are consortium partners in this project. This project basically aims to decrease population rate by introducing birth spacing as a health care intervention. The New Mexico Policy which has obviously been followed has been considered a serious hindrance in the success of the project. Because on the whole the population is very poor. Whether it is the public or the healthcare staff, all of them would be satisfied if given some kind of compensation. By overturning this law, I think a smooth way to the success of our project, as well as other similar projects around the globe has been paved.
Every passing day, I become a more staunch fan of Mr. Obama. And I am optimistic about his promise to steer the US out of the debacle it is today in.

Posted by: Dr. Abdul Waheed Khan | January 23, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am

You know, I just can’t say it is my business if somebody else decides to have an abortion. All we can do is try and convince them not to. We may not agree with it but we can’t make their decisions. I don’t believe our tax dollars should go to this. I actually have my own ideas…I think that before an abortion is performed, and ultrasound should be done with the “mother” able to see the screen, and I think that at least 3 counseling sessions should be done with the mother prior to making an abortion decision (in which she can hear from other people who chose not to have their child, and see how it affected them, and talk to people who want to be mthers that cannot be, and to discuss other options). I don’t think abortion should be a Burger King Drive-thru…you can have it your way, and get it fast. Abortion, in my eyes, is wrong…but that isn’t what we are judging here people. It’s the fact that yet another president, within days of hitting office, wants to spend more of our tax dollars towards somethng we shouldn’t have to pay for. I don’t mind paying for a program that helps kids get birth control (be safe, put in the implant!) but I don’t want to pay for the removal of their child. Put a check box on my tax form to pay for the funding for these clinics (soon-to-be including those that actively offer abortions), and I will proudly not check that box.

Posted by: Sue | January 23, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am

I miss George Bush already. When is the revolution? Heck, the Founding Fathers revolted over taxes on tea. Surely forcing us to pay taxes to murder innocent human beings is worth a revolt.

Posted by: Pamela | January 23, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am

God despises the hands that shed inoccent blood. The united stated will fall if we allow things like this to happen.

Posted by: Christopher | January 23, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am

It amazes me how those against abortion are not as proactive in there own right. How many of you have signed up to adopt a kid who is without parents? Or a child who’s mother is contemplating abortion! Where are your efforts to take on that responsibility personally?

Posted by: Rigo | January 23, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am

Sarah…what your saying is correct, a fetus cannot survive on its own, but neither can a new born baby. So should we just let parents decide after their child is born if after a couple of weeks it isn’t “working out” that they can just get rid of their kid because it can’t survive without them anyways? What about elderly who depend on others to take of them, they should be “aborted” too. The mentally and physically challenged? That would be a pretty cruel world to live in hey?

Posted by: Aaron | January 23, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Is it me, or do we now have a group of people convinced that due to abortion it is the single reason the US will now fall from grace?

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Just keep your pants on.

Posted by: Liz | January 23, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am

If you can look at this story, and this ultrasound picture of a baby in the womb, and still deny that it is a life and it is ok to go in and pour in a solution that burns the baby, or to go in and tear its head and limbs off and suck it out with a vacuum and throw in the garbage as if it was nothing more than trash, and still try and pass off all these insane arguments for it when it comes down to either kill it or not, then God help you and this barbaric, immoral society. One woman who saw these pictures who was going to kill her baby said:
“She looked at them individually again and she said, ‘I can’t abort this baby.’ ” Bobbie said. “She said, ‘I was thinking about aborting this baby. I thought it was just a tissue. And, look at this.’ She was pointing to the fingers and the eyes.”
Then, the woman began to cry and the print shop fell silent. In this unpredicted, uncontrolled, unbelievable encounter, a frightened pregnant woman saw the truth about abortion and the truth about life. And, without any type of a sermon being uttered.”
As Bible says, there will come a time when what is considered right is wrong and vice versa. Boy is that ever true today. Peace and have a nice week-end!

Posted by: Tony | January 23, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am

“God despises the hands that shed inoccent blood.” Exactly. I hope Bush is arrested for all the innocent people he killed in Iraq. Human life is sacred.

Posted by: Jim | January 23, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Tony. The largest group of poor in the US? Single moms.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am

Scrappy, I’m NOT determining the “fate” of women, it’s the “fate” of INNOCENT BABIES. All the women have to do is have the child then put it up for adoption. Did you know there are waiting lists for newborn babies? OR, MOST women can choose birth control or JUST CLOSE THEIR LEGS IF THEY DON’T WANT TO CREATE LIFE!! (I say most women because of the ones who are raped)

Posted by: Stacie | January 23, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am

Pamela – We should revolt over innocent lives lost? There is a certain war going on I am thinking of….hum, your buddy George started that one. How I wish we had enough courage as a nation to revolt against him sooner.

Posted by: scrappy | January 23, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am

Thank you P-BO. I’m seeing more return to rationality and normalcy with each passing day now.

Posted by: Jaylah | January 23, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am

how about abstinence! or how about thinking about your consequences before you act! it is not the unborn childs fault that their mother is irresponsible. birth control is not that expensive and using abstinece is FREE. and to MG–who are you to say what an unborn child can or cannot become? it seems funny that people can always afford what luxuries and vices they want to indulge in. sorry you think having children is a burden. there are plenty of people who can afford to take those burdens of your hands. these are all God’s children and he does not make mistakes. we make the mistakes by the choices we make.

Posted by: pam | January 23, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Stacie – Do tell where the responsibility is ever about the man? Nothing angers me more than some woman saying women should close their legs. I’m telling you guys – if you want the numbers to go down it’s past time to hold the men more accountable here. Stop heaping it all on the female.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Has anybody noticed that all these pro-abortion believers have been “allowed” to be “BORN”!! What’s UP with that ?? It “IS” definitely our business when an “injustice” is committed against our fellow human beings , IN THIS CASE THE PRE-BORN / the THIRD PARTIES’ introduced into a couples private relationship . It is no longer the couples “life” – alone !! It’s that forming babies’ “life” that must be protected !

Posted by: Mary Lou | January 23, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am

Judge Not, So You Will Not Be Judged!
It is quite apparent, “Those who have MONEY and MODERN CONVIENCES to solve their problems are more out of touch and self righteous of those who are less fortunate than themselves.”

Posted by: Human Rights | January 23, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am

For a President who chose to to include God in his speech he sure is in a hurry to allow people to dump inconvient babies. That is following the word of God? I see this as another example of speaking one thing and doing another. This is easy leadership. Its easy to say yes. Its much harder to say no. Obama so far as said yes to all the things that his faith should have said no to. Its harder to choose life because then you have to figure out how to deal with the life you said yes to. Its hard but its the right thing to do.
So we have another jelley spined President.. Oh well.

Posted by: ChicagoBob | January 23, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am

5 executive orders in 3 days. How may did Bush have in his first 3 days — 0. Can you say dictatorship. And how many of these orders have helped the average family. They haven’t.

Posted by: James Bowen | January 23, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Human Rights – VERY well said.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

“Is it me, or do we now have a group of people convinced that due to abortion it is the single reason the US will now fall from grace?”
Well, common sense tells those not blinded and with faith that that is the major reason. Plus, the attack on God by trying to take him out of everthing for the last 40 years and the gay movement also help. A nation without God who rejects him is doomed.
Peace!

Posted by: Tony | January 23, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

IM NOT A MURDERER, HAVE YOU EVER HAD AN ABORTION? WELL I HAVE & ITS NOT THE HAPPIEST THING TO WITNESS & HAVE DONE, SO SHUT UP PEOPLE WHO HAVE NO CLUE!
I WAS 15 YRS OLD & GOT PREGNANT THE FIRST TIME I HAD SEX! SURE, I WISH I KNEW WHAT I KNOW NOW, BUT THINGS DONT TURN OUT THAT WAY, WHEN YOUR A TEENAGER!
IT WAS AN AWFUL EXPIERENCE, BUT IF I HAD TO DO IT ALL OVER AGAIN, I WOULD DO IT AGAIN!
THE FATHER WOULDNT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THE CHILD THEN OR NOW!
I WAS ON BIRTHCONTROL AFTER THAT FOR ALMOST 28 YRS, WHICH WAS LATER FOUND OUT THAT IT WASNT THE BEST THING TO DO EITHER. I HAD MY FIRST CHILD AT AGE 18 YRS & RAISED HER ALL BY MYSELF, WHICH WAS A VERY HARD THING TO DO, WITH NO HELP! I AM NOT COMPLAINING, BUT I DID THE BEST I COULD WITH MORALS & VALUES! I HAD MY SECOND CHILD AT AGE 28 YRS, I WAM & STILL MARRIED & FOUND IT EASIER TO HAVE A FATHER INVOLVED IN OUR SONS LIFE! SITUATIONS ARISE & WOMAN HAVE TO DEAL WITH THEM & THEY DO! NOT EVERYONE IS AN AWFUL PERSON, BECAUSE THEY CHOOSE TO HAVE A CHOICE IN THIER LIFE!
WHAT ABOUT THE MEN THAT NEVER PAY CHILD SUPPORT, LIKE MY DAUGHTERS FATHER? HE HAS NEVER PAID A DIME & NEVER WILL! YELL AT HIM, HE DESERVES IT MORE!
A FETUS IS A FETUS, WHICH IS DEVELOPING & NOT YET DEVOLPED. OH MY GOSH, I WAS BAPTISED CATHOLIC, & GOD TELLS ME THAT I AM GOING TO HEAVEN, NOT HELL!
I LOVE & BELIEVE IN GOD!
IF YOU HAVE NEVER HAD AN ABORTION, THEN YOU REALLY NEED TO SHUT YOUR MOUTH, CAUSE YOU REALLY DONT KNOW HOW IT FEELS OR WHAT ITS LIKE!
QUIT BEETING UP & CALLING NEWS PEOPLE NAMES CAUSE THEY ARE REPORTING THE NEWS!
NON EDUCATED & EDUCATED PEOPLE SAY VERY STUPID THINGS, BUT WE ALL HAVE OPIONIONS, NOW DONT WE!

Posted by: NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS | January 23, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Murder is the intentional killing of a PERSON. In spite of the religious beliefs of many, it is nearly impossible to maintain the argument that an embryo is a person.
You can split embryos to make multiple viable embryos (twins). Are you saying you can split people to make multiple people?
Conversely, you can combine multiple viable embryos to make one viable embryo (chimeras). Are you saying you can combine two people into one? That’s just nuts.
Plus, embryos have no nerve cells, let alone a brain, etc.
Considering all that, only a religious fanatic would maintain that embryos are people, unless they’re willing to stretch the notion of person beyond all recognizable bounds.
Whether you admit it or not, your beliefs are entirely religious, ungrounded in factual reality, and the U.S. government is not and should not be in the business of imposing arbitrary religious beliefs on people.

Posted by: JimCA | January 23, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am

The people who oppose abortion show great concern for a fetus (that is not yet a child!!) but little or no concern for the real undernourished and starving children in this world. They seem to want to add to the numbers of starving, dying children.

Posted by: Herb Gray | January 23, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am

Has anybody noticed how these anti-abortion people call fetuses and embryos “pre-born children”? Oh, look at the cute little pre-born child doing his division in the petri dish. How sweet!

Posted by: Euphemisms R Us | January 23, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am

I would like to remind all of you guys highly against this that any woman doing invitro has several abortions at a time. You might want to hurry up to get that procedure outlawed.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 10:18 am 10:18 am

It’s funny that people are comparing Pres. Obama’s decision to close Guanto Bay and that of a fetus.
Bush sure did brainwash a few of you into thinking Guanto Bay was a great thing and that it was holding terrorists… it wasn’t and was holding people who were charged with no evidence…
Pres. Obama wants to change the world for the better- to help the world recover from Bush. It’s a good thing to overtrun the ban. This will mean more people will get more education on birth control oversees and will have the option to have an abortion if needed. Imagine if a 12 year old girl was pregnant and couldn’t have an abortion because it was illegal?? You would be complaining that you were paying for her lifestyle with your taxes. Obama cannot win regardless of what he chooses to do.

Posted by: katie | January 23, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Susan, I don’t beleive that “abortion is the single reason why the US is falling from Grace”. I beleive it is a HUGE reason because GOD created that baby and with him the women could have it and take care of it I did! But no it’s not the only reason a few others would be… homosexuality, murder, idols, adultery, etc. the list goes on and on. But we can only fight one battle at a time!!

Posted by: Stacie | January 23, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am

I should have added as a life long follower of Jesus, that those who oppose abortion (even at any point after impregnation), I personally believe that they are anything but Christian. They are fanatic fundamentalists, as bad as the Islamacists.

Posted by: Herb Gray | January 23, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Stop crying because you lost the election 3-1! At least have the courage to admit you want President Obama to fail as Rush Limbaugh does. Now there’s a winner!

Posted by: Rigo | January 23, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Based on his voting record, Obama’s position on abortion and the life of a new born are extreme. He voted “present” on a late term abortion ban passed in Illinois. He twice voted “present” on the IL live born bill that was passed overwhelming by both parties. He believes minors have the right to a medical procedure (abortion) without parental notification; even though the same minor cannot have a cavity filled by a dentist without parental consent. Now he has approved U.S. tax dollars to fund abortions oversees. A huge majority of Americans have moderate views on the abortion issue. Obama does not.

Posted by: Barbara | January 23, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am

THIS IA AMERICA, LAND OF CHOICE!

Posted by: NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS | January 23, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am

Again it’s your narrow view of what is against God that I have the issue with. You’re completely glossing over love of money, idol worship, greed, dishonesty, cheating on the spouse, and sooooooo many other things I see on a daily basis in this country. What I see is demonization on gays, women that might abort, etc. I see a boatload of judgment as well. Jesus was far more tolerant to so many of you.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am

No Stacie – Again, the bible mentions poverty over 2000 times. OBVIOUSLY it’s the huge message? Yes that one is never at the top of the heap here? Again, poverty means more abortion. Now, are you guys serious about lowering the number or just on a soapbox? It appears to be a soapbox.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am

wow, I thought it took TWO people to make a baby! People need to start considering actual birth control, not just abstinence, realistically we know that doesn’t work – or do people still believe that if you say the word condom to a kid you are really telling them that you want them to have sex? Abortion doesn’t have to be the only solution, there are other methods of control…unless you like having 5 kids you can’t afford, living on welfare.

Posted by: Courtney | January 23, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am

be responsible of what we do,that is a solution to the problem, we just have to be more realistic and contraceptive pill/condom abd ABSTAIN are available option so it won’t go beyond abortion which i am sure is very painful emotionally and physically…more so psychologically….

Posted by: jenn | January 23, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am

I PLEDGE, DO YOU? WATCH THE VIDEO!!!
I LOVE OUR PRESIDENT, MR. OBAMA!!!!

Posted by: NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS | January 23, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Scientifically and empirically a human person is a human being at fertilization. We all began that way. The only difference between you and an embryo is size, level of development, environment and dependency. It’s discrimination of the worst kind because these little ones (fetus means little one in Latin) are completely vulnerable and should be protected by their mothers, fathers and the society around them. What kind of hope is it to tell a woman that she has to kill her own child to get on with her own life? It’s no hope at all and no change. So we will be the hope and we will be the change, those of us who love life.

Posted by: Living Large | January 23, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am

It’s easy to be pro choice when you’re the one not being killed.

Posted by: PK | January 23, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am

I’m pro-choice… you have the CHOICE to have sex in the first place so you DON’T get pregnant when you don’t want to so you don’t NEED to have an abortion (and in cases other than rape it works 100%! What a concept!) Family planning does NOT include abortion – family planning happens BEFORE intercourse and conception – so it should not be used in that context in this article. I don’t personally agree with contraception but it’s a much better alternative than abortion. Go ahead and use my tax dollars to fund that, but PLEASE do not let MY tax dollars be used to kill innocent children, regardless of whether you think it’s your “right” to do what you want with “your” (but also the unborn child’s) body. This is disgusting.

Posted by: Samantha | January 23, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am

killing of any kind is Murder … whether it be by the state (executions), by a person’s hand (murder), or a doctor’s scalpel (abortion) … NO ONE on this earth has the right to take life … Only God has the right to give life & take it away.
God help us & our country.

Posted by: lifesense | January 23, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am

We don’t have enough food to feed our families, but the President will lift federal funding (our tax dollars) to support killing kids in other countries? Someone please explain!!!

Posted by: Joe | January 23, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Susan, you ask about the man? Well yes it’s the man’s fault too. But we women have to think for ourselves and our unborn children, we are the one’s who will have this burden of to kill or not to kill laid on our shoulders. So we need to think BEFORE WE DO!!

Posted by: Stacie | January 23, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am

Barbara, please learn a little about politics before your decide you know something.
The “present” vote is in effect a “no” vote, but it is a “no” vote that sends a message. The “present” vote is used by lawmakers in situations where they agree with a bill in spirit, however the current version of the bill is not good enough to vote “yes;” either it is too expensive, it is inadequately planned or funded, or it has riders or earmarks attached that are entirely inappropriate.
A “present” vote is taking a stand. In fact the “present” vote says more than if the Senator had just voted “no.”

Posted by: 1-Human | January 23, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am

No Stacie I’m sick of that stacked argument. Single moms are the largest group of poor in the US. In this argument is poverty, equal pay, health care issues and many other things. The period on the argument is 70 BILLION owed in back child support. The bottom line is men (and obviously some of you woman agree) are given a complete pass in this and I’m tired of it. I’m sorry but it has got to be just as big a sin for a man to ignore a child (either money or of themselves) as it is to murder. Because ALL SINS ARE EQUAL. If you truly wish to help this you will examine what leads to it. Outlawing them won’t do it anyway. P.S. Where is the male “pill” in 2009 as well? It’s all stacked.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am

is this the HOPE for america?

Posted by: fel | January 23, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am

I AM ALSO ADOPTED, THANK GOD, TO A GREAT FAMILY! RAISED ROMAN CATHOLIC. I HAVE MET MY BIRTH MOTHER & BIRTH FATHER WHO DONT WANT ANYTHING TO DO WITH ME! I HAVE NO REGRETS IN LIFE, DO YOU?
I LOVE HAVING A CHOICE AND BEING A WOMAN!
THANKS MR. PRESIDENT OBAMA!
I PLEDGE!

Posted by: NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS | January 23, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

We don’t have enough food to feed our families, but the President will lift federal funding (our tax dollars) to support killing kids in other countries? Someone please explain!!!

Posted by: Joe | January 23, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

1-Human: Obama voted present because Planned Parenthood advised him that was the way he should vote. It was thought that there wouldn’t be the political backlash voting “present” for these bills as there would have been if he voted “no”. You are the one that needs to learn your facts

Posted by: Barbara | January 23, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

I didn’t vote for Obama but this IS the right move. People need to be free to make ALL of their choices. I am a Goldwater Conservative that believes the government needs to have as little as possible role in American’s lives (Fiscally and within their own bodies).
All of these people who try to force a woman to have some kid she does not want (and would probably resent if she did) need to back off. There are enough children already in this world that they could be trying to support through adoption and other programs. Instead they ignore these unwanted kids that WERE brought into the world, and focus on trying to bring MORE unwanted children into the world.
I support Obama on this & hope that I get to keep saying this in the future.

Posted by: Michelle | January 23, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Obama voted “present” because the dang bill failed to consider “health of the mother.” And I agree with him.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am

So then “Joe” I take it that you are a vegetarian?

Posted by: ratnabhusana | January 23, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Living Large said: “What kind of hope is it to tell a woman that she has to kill her own child to get on with her own life?”
First you need to start living with a brain because you are sorely confused.
If anyone was forcing a woman to have an abortion then I would be 100% against it just as I am 100% against creating a law that denies a woman’s right to have one if she wants one.

Posted by: 1-Human | January 23, 2009, 10:38 am 10:38 am

Day after pill.
No one knows if conception happened.
Also if it did no one knows if the body would flush it out or accept it naturally anyway.
This way the pro-choice people can accuse the pro-lifers of trying to play God if they don’t approve of this method. Only God knows if the conception happened or if it would have attached to the wall. Not the pro-lifers.

Posted by: texas outlaw | January 23, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am

I predict that those who are so strongly supportive of murdering unborn children will have a change of heart in their old age when they are about to be
‘put to sleep’ with compassion of course, that, they will call murder. Ironically they will be as weak as babes with no children of their own by their to hear their silent screams.

Posted by: Francis | January 23, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Look people…first of all….ABORTION IS NOT MURDER. In case you people haven’t noticed….. lately more and more women are actually committing murder agaisnt their newborn babies because of all these Pro-Life jerks standing outside the womens clinics talking them out or the abortions that they want. I feel that all women…in every country…should have access to information regarding abortion…..then THEY should be able to make the choice….not some fool with a picket sign screaming bible verses.

Posted by: MrsH7181 | January 23, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Michelle, this decision has no impact on what kinds of abortions are allowed, only on what the government will fund – so now our tax dollars are funding abortions in other countries. If you think that the government should have a small role fiscally in our lives, then why do you think it’s all right for them to pay for abortions abroad? Isn’t that a pretty big role in our lives?

Posted by: Samantha | January 23, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Living large, you’re just factually wrong, and no, you don’t get to make up your own just to suit your argument. If you’re going to make pronouncements about science, at least take the time to learn some. Take a course in embryology, or least read a text on it.
For starters, not all of us began life as an embryo (see my post below). Also note that lack of a functioning brain is ample reason in all states to terminate all life support, because without a brain THERE IS NO PERSON. Also note that by your argument, the molecules in the food your parents ate is different from you only in its “size, level of development, environment and dependency.”

Posted by: jimCA | January 23, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am

sorry joe that was lifesense that said any killing is murder, my mistake on who wrote that

Posted by: ratnabhusana | January 23, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Last time I checked…it takes a male sperm and a female egg to make a baby. If men do not want the responsibility of taking care of a child, maybe they should reconsider engaging in intercourse.

Posted by: Blah | January 23, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am

Susan, first off are you trying to argue about whether abortion is a sin or not? Because wouldn’t you agree that God gave Moses the 10 commandments because they were the most important rules? If so isn’t one of them ” Thou shalt not kill”.

Posted by: Stacie | January 23, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am

Abortions actually declined in the US under Clinton. The began to go up under Bush.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am

HEy what about ADOPTION. It is a win win situation. Couple gets a child and birth mom is able to complete her education etal. ADOPTION is a love thing.
Posted by: Jenny Rome Ga
*******************************
Do you really think adoption really fixes the problem? These cute babies become children and pre-teens that no one wants to adopt. Who do you think these children on the streets are?!?
Do you think there are people lining around the block to adopt crack babies? Babies with Fetal Alcohol system? Black babies?
Give me a break. Maybe that would work in your Marry Poppins world, but not in what we like to call the Real world.
Also, a woman who accidently gets pregnant may not WANT to bring a child into the world. She is not some surrogate for another couple that wants a child. Why doesn’t that couple adopt one of the millions of children already out there?!? You know why, because they don’t want them…Hypocrites…they want a new healthy baby…not one of the millions of unwanted children ALREDY out there.
Worry about adopting those children…not bringing more into the world to join them.

Posted by: Megan | January 23, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am

I’ve never understood calling the killing of a being that is non-sentient, non-feeling, non-thinking, non-emotional, etc, murder.
It may be a human in the sense of having human genes, but it is not yet a human or person in the sense of having the qualities that we cherish in humans (which I listed above). A baby, OTOH, does have these qualities, and that’s the difference between killing a baby and killing an embryo.

Posted by: goodusername | January 23, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am

Barbara, just because you state what you think is the reason why Obama voted present doesn’t make it true or factual.
Proof Barbara, proof.

Posted by: 1-Human | January 23, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Joe, just a brief explanation. Countries such as Africa have pandemics from Aids to Ebola, and extreme poverty. Now, if a woman becomes pregnant, (which I agree shouldn’t have happened to begin with), and is poverty stricken, ill, her life is in danger if she delivers, and/or this baby will not survive if born for more that a couple years due to malnutrition, then as a member of the human race we need to help. Unless, you are willing to give up some of your income to feed and take care of the child.

Posted by: totallyopposite | January 23, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am

how about providing some prevention as well, like the injection to stop you getting pregnant, iud’s the pill, the day after pill, don’t leave abortion as a last resort
Posted by: rob
**************
These same groups want to ban birth control, and the day after pill as “murder” too.

Posted by: Michelle | January 23, 2009, 10:44 am 10:44 am

Its time that we work together to reduce unwanted preganices and STD’s through proper education of birth control, abstinence and other family plannint methods.
having a child is very personal family decision that does not need government involved in making for them. This has been one of the GOP’s biggest contradictions in their policies and platforms.

Posted by: scott jeffries | January 23, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Stacie, I can see why you view it a sin. I am not arguing if it is or is not. It’s fine if that is how you see it. However, after a point I believe it’s between God and the woman. And you need to stay out of it and mind your own business. Especially if you’re not remotely concerned with what leads women to feel the need to get them when it’s so obviously all heaped on the female. You are more familiar with the bible than I probably am. How many verses can you apply to this? Do they out number “poverty” mentioned over 2000 times?

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am

I have studied embryology. You can’t be serious. It’s only your desire that the embryo NOT be human that clouds your thinking. Every textbook on embryology and biology marks the beginning of life at fertilization. That’s when the DNA combine to make a unique individual and the cell begins replicating that DNA at an incredible rate. That was you, that was me. Don’t dissemble about the facts.

Posted by: Living Large | January 23, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am

Well, that’s one good decision that’s long overdue. Before you scream at me, I do not believe in abortion as a means of birth control, but I do believe there are occasions when it is necessary and should be an available option. As a male, I will never have one, nor will I tell any woman to not consider one, which includes my daughter. As for others, “If you don’t believe in abortions, don’t have one”, but do take responsible care of your baby or babies. And to randy males, self-restraint is a good option; try a cold shower, alone.
Now, if the President will only abolish “Faith-based funding”, “school vouchers”, and “home-schooling”, maybe this country will start getting back on the right track.

Posted by: Zoron | January 23, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am

Hey Mike, are you feeling frustrated? Because America just keeps getting worse and worse…wanna know why? Because we are getting further and further from the TRUTH. But all this was told about in the Bible. Read it, it might interest you on how much of it is REALLY coming true.

Posted by: Stacie | January 23, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am

****Also, a woman who accidently gets pregnant may not WANT to bring a child into the world. ****
Maybe try birth control. And btw if it has a heart than life has begun…..

Posted by: Katwoman | January 23, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am

The Pill = abortion,
How do you know the egg is going to attach to the wall?
If you can’t tell me that, then you don’t know the women is pregnant.
If you think so then God is the bigest baby killer of them all. Fertile eggs flow from women everyday naturally because the body rejects it.
Are these women baby killers?
Are all the women that miscarrie baby killers?

Posted by: texas outlaw | January 23, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am

If God knows when everyone will be born and when they will die, then it is part of his plan for some to be aborted. Get out of God’s business and quit messing with his plan.

Posted by: 1-Human | January 23, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am

The issue is not whether you see abortion as right or wrong. (As far as I’m concerned, that decision lies squarely between a woman and her God.) The issue is whether or not a government, the US government or any other, has a right to pass laws regarding my reproductive organs.
Men, how would you feel about federally mandated vasectomies?
This is NOT up to the government to decide.

Posted by: Jaylah | January 23, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am

So, Katwoman, you believe that abortion is ok in the first 3 weeks?

Posted by: just asking | January 23, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am

The Christians should adopt more children and have less of them then. Like the Christian state senator from Arkansas, Bob Duggar and his wife who had 17 kids. Yes, the world is over populated and children are starving, so why add 17 more kids when you could have save 17 from abortion instead.

Posted by: ratnabhusana | January 23, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am

the first comment on this article makes me sick…that’s a child…its a sad day

Posted by: Aaron | January 23, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Jaylah, well said! Great analogy!!

Posted by: 1-Human | January 23, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am

If men would not act as animals and try and “get” as many women as they can we would not have to be concerned with this. Also, if they were not so selfish, they would use protection. I am so sick of everyone blaming women!!

Posted by: lgee | January 23, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am

Abortion is murder. This guy named Peter posted he wanted to celebrate an abortion his girlfriend is having. Either this is bs or he is too evil and low IQed to know any better. Sad. Wow. Someday after he is dead, he will see his own son or daughter that he had murdered.

Posted by: Dave | January 23, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am

Jaylah – If men could give birth it would already be an amendment in the Constitution that they have a right to them.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am

1-Human:Why can’t you do your own research. Do a websearch. Planned Parenthood has publicly indicated as such. And as far as a “present” vote means taking a stand, that is nonsense like most of the things you have been posting

Posted by: Barbara | January 23, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am

So if one of his daughters wants to have an abortion…. I wonder if he will approve, of them killing his grandchild?????

Posted by: Katrina | January 23, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am

I don’t want my money going oversees for something like this!
Majority, over 90%, of abortions are not from health and rape anyway…

Posted by: What's Up! | January 23, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Nope….I think if God puts it there then leave it be!

Posted by: Katwoman | January 23, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

You can argue this til the cows come home…truth is gov should neither fund nor interfere with this very personal matter…PERIOD.

Posted by: jonathan | January 23, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

That’s your opinion Dave.

Posted by: 1-Human | January 23, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Susan said; “Jesus was far more tolerant to so many of you.”
Check your bible Jesus: is not tolerant at all! Christianity=AWFUL!
Matthew 10:34-36;”Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not to send peace, but a sword.” (Jesus says that he has come to destroy families by making family members hate each other)
Luke 19:22-27; “But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me.” In the parable of the talents, Jesus says that God takes what is not rightly his, and reaps what he didn’t sow. The parable ends with the words: “bring them [those who preferred not to be ruled by him] hither, and slay them before me.”

Posted by: Marjoe4U | January 23, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Barbara, Do your research. Human-1 is correct. In IL it is common to use a “present” vote and they are considered a nay vote of protest. So yes, actually they’re more of a stand than a regular vote. Occasionally they are used if the voter feels he/she has a conflict of interest and should perhaps not be voting.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Stop spending my money fool in the wrong places!

Posted by: Joe | January 23, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am

Abortion is murder. This is what you call moral decay. This country will not prosper if we keep this up. This goes against God, who knew you before you were born. To kill the most helpless of all is EVIL.

Posted by: Anna | January 23, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am

Susan, I don’t know how many times it’s mentioned. And I totally agree that it is between the women and God, and she will have to answer to God at the pearly gates of Heaven. Just as I will for my sins. But I still have to take a stance against it, because I don’t think it’s right and it’s against my beliefs. And yes poverty is a huge issue that God cares DEEPLY about, but I’m not sure how that applies here. By the way to everyone reading this…I am NOT casting judgement if you have had an abortion, God Loves you anyway!!! My mother had an abortion at 17, she is now allmost 60 and it still haunts her in her dreams. She now longs to meet that baby in Heaven.

Posted by: Stacie | January 23, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am

Thank God this order has been reversed. In the U.S. I view the abortion debate as a valid and meaningful debate, and I myself would only ever get an abortion if the resulting child was guaranteed to have severe health problems that would result in a lifetime of pain that no sane adult would choose to suffer through. HOWEVER, in Third-World countries medical care is horrendous. Women sometimes have more than a 10% chance of dying in childbirth. How many people would choose to undergo a medical procedure that would not improve their health but offers them a one-in-ten chance of death? If someone told you you had a threat to your health that stood a one-in-10 chance of killing you, you’d do something about it. Additionally, the health problems that come with childbirth can offer devastating consequences for these women. Fistula, anyone? Women who suffer that become automatic outcasts in many Third World countries, doomed to a lifetime of suffering.
In addition, women in such places are often subject to rape, sometimes within the bounds of marriage. Often an extra child means resources taken from older children or loss of income that further degrades their already fragile quality of life.
The abortion debate in this country is a legitimate and multi-faceted debate. In the Third World it is an option that saves lives. If you want to ban funding for it, fine. But then you are morally obligated to make sure that the health care and social support is in place to make sure the resulting babies and their mothers can actually survive.

Posted by: JrzWrld | January 23, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am

I feel it is a womens choice but at the same time do not feel that the tax payers should have to put up money for this plus to get to the point the woman who originally was part of roe verse wade wanted it to be reversed . also we have a new president get off the band wagon and put up with it quit blaming bush for everything remember blame should also be placed on our congressmen and our senators now I would be in favor of them not being allowed to give themselves raises and for them to start paying into social security.

Posted by: sarah | January 23, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am

As a fairly conservative yet tolerant person, this is a choice of the people who must live with it. Faced with this same decision at a young age, we decided to go the adoption route and now have been reunited and have a granddaughter too. This choice however is not without trauma for all concerned. Before finding each other and even afterwards, the emotional strain was at times almost too much to bear. If you’ve not lived it, you cannot begin to fathom.
It is clear to me that most of you doing the arguing have not faced and had to make such tough choices. You should in my opinion, speak a bit softer and look at the issue with a bit more of an open mind. Quit trying to push your value set and superstitions even onto others.
Now to the point of the US funding abortions overseas… I think we should investigate all such funding and determine if the money can be better spent at home first.

Posted by: Dave | January 23, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am

All of you, pro-choice dudes, should thank your mothers for NOT looking at you as just fetuses and inconvenience in life. It’s because of their appreciation for HUMAN LIFE, you still exist today!

Posted by: logic301 | January 23, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am

I as a taxpayer do NOT want my money spent on the murder of innocent babies-yes it is MURDER, I don not care how you try to pretty up your wording- murder is murder and there is no getting around it!! If they want to use my money to teach morals then go for it but not for murder!

Posted by: Ellen RN | January 23, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Let us not put our own thoughts of right and wrong above GOD.To do good and to save life rather than do evil or to destroy life. Light and darkness cannot be equal.Abortion Kills and this is darkness. Post

Posted by: flora | January 23, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am

Marjoe – If Jesus had sounded like so many demonizing far righters do today? Religion would never have gotten off the ground. Of course at times the man got upset. But basically he hung out with the town rejects – so he must have been more tolerant than the town? The thiefs, whores, etc. I personally don’t think Christianity is awful. I happen to believe. However, there have been many bad things done in the name of religion – but that is people getting it wrong. Just as there have been bad things done not in the name of religion.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 11:00 am 11:00 am

CHANGE????
Looks like Obama is just doing the same thing all the last presidents did since Regan. Real change would be to stand up and say “I THINK THIS MONEY CAN BE BETTER SPENT ON OUR OWN CITIZENS”

Posted by: jonathan | January 23, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am

I am not trying to push my values on anyone- I care about how my tax dollars are spent! Murder is murder- If you were on the line for the next “convenient” murder just because you are inconvenient to someone I bet you would be fighting against it.

Posted by: Ellen RN | January 23, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am

Effective family planning reduces the number of abortions and saves lives. The Global Gag Rule created a culture of fear among family planning organizations receiving U.S. funding, a chilling effect that went far beyond the letter of this misguided rule. I am reminded of the story of the African woman who was bleeding to death from a botched abortion and was turned away by a family planning clinic afraid that even directing her to life saving medical care would be a violation of the rule and cause them to be defunded. She likely died within a mile of the clinic. They were wrong, of course. The rule wasn’t intended to prohibit that sort of help, but they were paralyzed by fear. Unfortunately, the thread of comments here underscores why this issue is so difficult – the anti-abortion absolutists won’t bring themselves to admit that family planning reduces the need for abortion. We might disagree on the issue of abortion, but we should all be able to agree that reducing unwanted pregnancies will reduce abortions. And make no mistake, this rule was never about directly funding abortions with U.S. international assistance – that is prohibited with or without this rule – it’s about hurting the organizations that provide abortions or even mention abortion as an option even if 90% of their work is counseling on child spacing, birth control methods and positive prenatal and postnatal nutrition and behavior. Learn the facts before just default to your hackneyed talking points.

Posted by: MattyNJ | January 23, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am

I always have to ask myself why would I be concerned with someone else’s decision to have or not have an abortion and I keep coming up with one answer… I’m bored with my own#### and I have nothing going on in my life so I need to torment someone else’s life-decision-making process to validate my existence.

Posted by: Jax | January 23, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am

After reading a lot of these comments, I feel like I am in church. Anytime there is a story that has the word abortion in it, people go crazy on both sides.

Posted by: vr | January 23, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am

I hope women will empower themselves to “choose” before the pregnancy not after..Taking into consideration birth defects & all consequences…My objection is a moral one… but do I not have the right to choose NOT to pay for someone elses abortion?? Come on..You have the right to “choose” an abortion & you can “choose” to pay for it.. It’s none of my business, Right??? None of my taxpayer dollars business either. Right?? I hope the next generation of women will make abortions a thing of the past..

Posted by: Lucy | January 23, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am

I am neither for nor against abortion. I consider the issue a private matter left to the woman and her conscience. But, one thing I find puzzling is why the baby in the womb never cries. Only when the baby comes out of the womb before it utters that shrill, loud cry. Does aytbody have an answer?

Posted by: what667 | January 23, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am

All of you, pro-choice dudes……So what if she chose to abort, I wouldnt have to worry about it, now would I? It would be her choice.

Posted by: Robert C. | January 23, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am

One woman facing the prospect of a child she can’t support or abortion is an individual who must make that difficult choice and suffer the memory and any lingering doubts for a lifetime afterwards.
A population in which a large number of teen pregnancies and other unintended pregnancies happen and in which back-alley abortions could occur is a public health issue, for which leaders must provide social services for a diversity of circumstances. Public leaders cannot prevent these abortions of desperation, so even if they disapprove of them, it is their obligation to allow safe abortions and counseling for alternatives to protect the health of these women, who are often teenagers, poor women, and women in other dire circumstances. Simply to ban abortion ignores the reality of what will happen to large numbers of people. Prohibition ignored the reality that people will drink alcohol, so it was better to make it legal and regulate it.
There is a difference between individual moral choice versus the responsibilities of leaders to the public health of a whole population.

Posted by: Nkirv | January 23, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am

I thought Obama said the US will not use torture anymore? Abortion is torture to the unborn.
Second abortion sexually liberates a man not a woman. Same old song and dance of abandonment. The man says I can’t tell you what to do with your body unless I want to sexually.
Women need to wake-up!

Posted by: Theunbornhavenovoice | January 23, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am

Stacie – Poverty is one of the biggest reasons there are so many abortions. Most middle class and up choose to have their babies. So it’s huge. Basically many women get if they “choose” to have that baby they’ll likely join the ranks of the poor for years (as everybody demonizes all entitlement?). So it affects it. Combine that with a lackluster attempt to get men to pony up what they owe? It all fuels it. BTW, I can’t name a soul that would not say “Sure, let’s see if we can get these numbers way down.”

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

Mr. President, are you killing your own race? “Just as Margaret Sanger envisioned, Planned Parenthood operates 80 percent of its clinics in minority neighborhoods. Almost as many African American children are aborted as are born. A black baby is three times more likely to be killed in the womb as a white baby. Since Roe vs Wade, abortion has reduced the black population by 25 percent of what it would have been. Twice as many African Americans have died from abortion as have died from violent crimes, heart disease, accidents and AIDS combined. Every three days more African Americans are killed by abortion than have been killed by the Ku Klux Klan in all its history.”

Posted by: GK_1970 | January 23, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

Obama says the US will not torture?? What do you think woman that have abortions are doing to those poor help less babies……TORTURE!!!!

Posted by: kc | January 23, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

I am prochoice becuase even though I believe abortion is murder and wrong- I also believe that choice is a part of america. People have a choice to pick up a gun and kill someone else, they should also have the opportunity to make a horrible decision and have an abortion, or to keep the baby. What really makes me want to turn prolife is those out there who are capable of supporting a fetus who is healthy and able and killing them because they feel they will be an “inconvenience”. These people make me sick, however I know that the consequences will catch up to them someday. It just makes me mourn for their unborn and murdered children.

Posted by: Michelle | January 23, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am

I also do not appreciate people bashing my Lord Jesus Christ- You people are so good at picking out pieces of scripture to try and make a point, however it just goes to show how ignorant you are. The Bible is a book, not a collection of catch phrases! You have to read the whole thing to really understand what has been said. Jesus did not mean that everyone is to hate their family members, what He was trying to get across is that to truly be a child of God then you may have to turn against any evil being purported by a loved one.
He also said to love one another – so we never hate anyone-even murderers, we may hate their actions but not the pperson.

Posted by: Ellen RN | January 23, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Of course the decision to terminate a child is a “personal” one. But that’s not the issue. It’s also a “personal” decision to kill oneself or another person. The issue is whether what’s in the womb is life. If it is, it must be human life (what other life form would it be?). And if it’s human life, it’s murder to kill it. How can anyone rationally analyze it any other way?

Posted by: Len | January 23, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am

thank God. As a tax payer I am stuck paying for Bush’s war, I’m stuck paying for his programs that push abstinence only, which i do NOT support, not only do I think it’s not effective, it has been proven to INCREASE teen pregnancy rates, so really, shut up already about not wanting your taxes to go to clinics that provides abortions. It’s has been economic blackmail to say we’ll ONLY help you pay for birthcontrol if you dont perform abortiosn. It is not money TO pay for abortoins, it is money going to clinics that also PROVIDE abortions. IT was a way to financially try to eliminate access to abortions. I’m surprise such a ruling wasn’t illegal. One thing (the funding) had nothing to do with the other (abortions)

Posted by: susan | January 23, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am

It is true that the human race will surely distort truth, morals, and ethics for their own temporal safety. I belive a baby is last remaining thing on earth that closest represents the image of something divine….it’s a shame the leader of our nation is not willing to protect their defensless rights.
The broad masses of a population are more amenable to the appeal of rhetoric than to any other force. – Adolf Hitler

Posted by: jonathan | January 23, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am

Thanks Obama…first 2 orders of business are as follows 1) Make possible terrorists lives a little easier and 2) Make sure our money is going to aid in promoting abortion overseas. Sounds like he has personal agendas before public ones. Way to go Obama!!! I bet next he will sign on a provision to have “Obama Day”!! Most people claim Christians are self rightous…this guy is #1 in his world. I’m moving to the moon.

Posted by: Eddie | January 23, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am

Susan, i would agree sometimes poverty has something to do with it and alot of times it’s just convience. As I stated before I was 16 when I got pregnant and married. POOR? my husband made $7.00 and hour but God blessed us we ALWAYS paid our bills and yes we lived alone (not w/parents) from the time i was about 2 months along. And now we make about $34,000 a year still under poverty level for a family of 4 and still able to provide our children with everything they need and then some and a private Christian education. God blesses those who seek Him!!

Posted by: Stacie | January 23, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Obama is endorsing a RACIST policy advocated by his handlers here. USA should not be advocating abortion for nonwhite children in third world countries under the disguise that it is “humane” to do so. How disgusting that American taxpayers are funding such practices under Obama!!

Posted by: Call it what it is | January 23, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am

goodusername–
When I was younger, my mother was pregnant with what would be her 2nd child and there were complications with the delivery and the baby was still born. That would have been my little brother. For you to say that unborn babies dont have feelings is absolutely ridiculous. And people get attached to them too. Try telling a mother who loses her child during giving birth that its ok because it was a “person” yet. Heartless…

Posted by: Aaron | January 23, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Friends: A human life begins from the very moment conception takes place. This fact cannot be disputed. Therefore the conclusion of the whole matter is abortion is murder and the shedding of innocent blood. The cries of the unborn go unheard.
Solution > stop living promiscuous lives in fornication and adultery because 98% of abortions take place with unwed women.Man & women want the sweetness but dont want to face the consequences.

Posted by: David | January 23, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am

Do you realize how many jobs will be lost due to the possible passing of F.O.C.A.? Approximately 30% of all hospitals in America are Catholic. If they are “forced to perform murder on babies then they WILL close their doors. This means that all those employees will lose their jobs and then not only will we taxpayers be footing the murder costs but also be paying unemployment fees etc etc and even more loss of tax money from their checks each week.

Posted by: Ellen RN | January 23, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Stacie, What you call “convenience” I call “walking in another man’s shoes” and I refuse to go there in judgement. You have been a pleasure to debate this with, and it’s amazing how two sides can differ and have a good conversation without calling names if they try! :)

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am

“to terminate a child “…is simply an inaccurate statement. It’s is an UNDEVELOPED human being. The following is the accurate analysis of abortion: A sperm is alive, has a unique protien sequence that is half the DNA blueprint. An egg is alive, and each egg has a unqiue protein sequence that is half the DNA blueprint. They too, are undeveloped human beings. After they meet, they develope into two cells, then four, again, undeveloped human being. You are calling this “a human child”. It is an UNDEVELOPED human and the question is, is the host body obligated to develope it? Second: are you entitled to try to force her to develope and then birth it because you believe your religion says yes to the latter question.

Posted by: frank | January 23, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am

If a woman chooses to abort the baby in her womb, she will face the emotional and possibly physical consequences of that decision on her own. I don’t think she should go to prison for her decision (unless it is a late term abortion), but I do wish fewer woman made that decision. What really concerns me is that we are in the middle of an economic melt down in this country and our president wants to send money to foreign countries to fund these acts? That is irresponsible in the extreme.

Posted by: Michele | January 23, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am

You can be pro-choice and believe that abortion is wrong/murder. There are people out there who will get an abortion whether it is legal or not, I believe its better to have a safe way for them to do this than to hurt not only their babys but also seriously hurt themselves. Also you can believe abortion is wrong/murder- but also believe that people should have the freedom to choose for themselves. Freedom of choice is given to us by God-he wants us to be strong enough to make the right decision.

Posted by: Michelle | January 23, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Mr. President, are you killing your own race? Posted by: GK_1970 | Jan 23, 2009 11:06:16 AM
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -
GK, you’re going to have to be a bit more specific here. Since P-BO is half white and half black, which race are you asking him if he’s killing?

Posted by: Jaylah | January 23, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

“A human life begins from the very moment conception takes place. This fact cannot be disputed.”…..Yeah, from all those dead sperm and dead eggs, huh? Not only can it be ‘disputed’, it bodes to be CORRECTED. The statement is just plain inaccurate. The egg was alive, the sperm was alive. No life ‘began’. It met. Development began.

Posted by: frank | January 23, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

what667, the reason babies don’t cry in utero is because they are receiving all life sustaining functions through the mother, via the placenta.
Prior to the delivery of the baby, its lungs contain no air. No air in the lungs means no air to expel from the mouth…which makes it physicially impossible to cry.

Posted by: Jaylah | January 23, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am

Think of it this way. If your daughter had a 10% chance of dying in childbirth, would you want her to have an abortion or not?

Posted by: JrzWrld | January 23, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am

LOL, Michelle, send that woman to prison, but you go right on believing that you’re pro-choice if it makes you feel special.

Posted by: just saying | January 23, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am

I wont debate abortion here.
But, in the middle of this critical economic siutation, within his first week in office, President Obama is going to go spend our money on THIS??
I have charities and things I would want at home that I am not spending money on because of these economic times- and THIS is his priority?

Posted by: FiscalAl | January 23, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am

IT’S A “HUMAN”- ZYGOTE/FETUS/EMBRYO NOT A VEGETABLE OR MINERAL !!! WHAT WERE WE ALL IN THE “BEGINNING” OF OUR LIVES – HUMAN – ZYGOTES/EMBRYOS/FETUSES & up to 9 mos.in Utero ?? NICE that our parent’s decided to give us “former HUMAN – zygotes/fetuses”/”embryos’& up to 9 mos. in Utero – that GIFT of being born. Thank God ??? THAT you were born so that you could defend the RIGHT of future human zygotes/ fetuses/embryos’& up to 9 mos. in- Utero – to be destroyed ?? Aren’t we fortunate to have your “COMPASIONATE” mentality towards the pre-born beings ?? Women dying from pregnancy is not a “common” reality . Pregnancy is a “natural” biological condition otherwise you wouldn’t be here to argue the killing of living “human” zygotes/fetuses / embryos & up to 9 mos. in – Utero. Don’t think we are being unconcerned about problem pregnancies. Hence our skilled dedicated OB /GYN medical doctors’ practices’ and moral medical decisions with rare but “extremely” difficult pregnancies . Quote some stastistics concerning a “hypothetical” case of a woman dying after being “forced” to carry her baby (fetus/embryo) to full term ! Don’t just create an “imagined” situation which would give surgical- abortion some sort of justification. I’m positive a doctor would allow such a choice and not FORCE any woman to carry her pregnancy to full term IF his professional opinion was to terminate the pregnancy to protect the life of the mother. BUT there have been many cases where women have not died – going against the doctors professional advice and the outcome was good for both mom and baby. There are also cases where the mother has decided to carry the baby to full term knowing positively she will die but willing to give her life up for the child. it

Posted by: Mary Lou | January 23, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am

“but I do wish fewer woman made that decision”…why? what does an embryo know of itself? Why is it better to just fill up the earth with more poor unwanted babies? Why? Do you think every women shoudl make as many babies as her body possibly can??? these are teh frontier days, folks. We do not need more bodies in this country. far from. We have enough. We are straining our resources already. our welfare roles are already too high. The embryo knows nothign of it’s existence no more than an egg or a sperm. Let married couples have wanted children. That’s what I’d like to see. Every child be wanted, planned and in a home with two parents. That’s what i’d like to see.

Posted by: frank | January 23, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Obamas is just like every democratic president before him…thought he was going to be “different.” A President for “everyone.” This does set the tone of what is to come. It is sad that abortion is used as a form of everyday contraception. If it was your “choice” to have sex, why does the baby pay? There are consequences to your actions. Think ahead before you spread!!!! Sorry, just angers me when people are reckless and take a cowards way out…step up to the plate and be responsible…for your own self-worth and for the baby that you decided wasn’t worthy enough to see the light of day.

Posted by: Kasie | January 23, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am

“Twice as many African Americans have died from abortion as have died from violent crimes, heart disease, accidents and AIDS combined.”
WHAT?! WhatEVER one thinks about abortion, this appears to be BEYOND absurd …

Posted by: Belle Starr | January 23, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am

I have seen a number of deliveries in my life and believe me it is the most beautiful sight one could see as that new life emerges. How could one even think of destroying this life, this great gift. We do need to offer assistance to women who cannot afford to support a child or give an opportunity for a family to adopt one of these little ones. We do not have the right to take a human life.

Posted by: Bob & Pat | January 23, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Bravo Obama. Abortion is not murder, it is not manslaughter. Don’t be simple minded. Its human life,yes (not fish life) and the later in term the more questionable but no early fetus is a human being. Get real. When women,as they often do spontaneously abort in the first few weeks-nobody holds a funeral. or investigation.

Posted by: Paul | January 23, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am

What do all you “pro-lifers” do once these babies are born that you so passionately protect in utero. Are you volunteering in countries where these unwanted babies are born into horrid conditions? What about here in the US, do you support programs that help teenage moms or social services to help poverty stricken, abused kids? If not, until you have walked a mile in someone else’s shoes, keep your religion and opinions to yourself or get active and help those “fetuses” once they are here!!!!

Posted by: aa77 | January 23, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Psalm 139 – read it. Why is it only a life when it’s wanted? Tell a woman who wants her baby it’s not a life inside of her & see how she reacts. And we are worrying about the rights of terrorists?

Posted by: southern_conservative | January 23, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am

This is not an increase in money being spent. It is simply changing the rules on money already spent or promised. Which they have done for years and will continue to do.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am

I had high hopes for this Prez,,,,,but quickly dashed. Try helping them get depro type shots, immuninazations against STD’s and pregnancies……..I see we’re headed the wrong way already………didn’t take long…..Can you say LEFT!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: kab4usa | January 23, 2009, 11:22 am 11:22 am

Call it what it is……Almost everything is underdeveloped before it becomes what it is intended to be. Whether you are Christian or not, you have to think that things don’t happen by chance. You said only a small part of a long sequence oof events that have to happen for this “underdeveloped human” to get to the stage where they are being terminated. Plus, isn’t an “underdeveloped human” still a human? Is a kid with down sydrome an “underdeveloped human”? Is kid born with no legs not human because they are “underdeveloped”? My two children were born early with undeveloped lungs…are you telling me they aren’t human because they didn’t reach full human status? At what point is a human a human to you? Heartbeat? There is a heartbeat at 3 weeks.

Posted by: Eddie | January 23, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Republican and neocon conservatives are opposed to family planning because it goes against their ultra religious mantra of life …which of course doesn’t take into account the cost of over-population, the raising of the unwanted child, etc…They just love to get into other people’s lives and control it through their dogmatic religious crap. God who? God what? Please, get a life and stay out of my business !!

Posted by: Jax | January 23, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am

I will listen to the voices that oppose a woman’s right to control her own body when those same voices adopt all unwanted children and work for more funding for the abandoned and abused.

Posted by: dano | January 23, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Mr. Obama is a hypocrite! He wants to free dangerous, murderous, terrorists who wish to decapitate us. Now he wants to execute innocent unborn babies worldwide. This man has his priorities all out of order. What is the matter with him…can’t waterboard criminals to save American lives, but you can kill babies in the womb??? BTW, that photo with his nose up in the air…what’s that all about? Does this man have a messiah complex?

Posted by: Angelo | January 23, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am

I don’t think anyone should go to prison for having an abortion- they will have to deal with the consequences someday anyways.

Posted by: Michelle | January 23, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Keeping the pro-life & pro-choice debate aside, I think we should not send US tax dollars overseas, we are not in condition to do it. Elections has consequences, here you have your “change”. Now enjoy it.

Posted by: erbis | January 23, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am

“NICE that our parent’s decided to give us “former HUMAN – zygotes/fetuses”/”embryos’& up to 9 mos. in Utero – that GIFT of being born”……actually, had I never been born, i’d never know. Had my brain never matured to cognizance, i’d never be aware of any of this. To me, my mom came first. it was her life first. Had she chosen not to develope me, well, she gets to choose that. Would i Think that woudl be Ok? How can i not? She doesn’t owe me anything. It was her life first. She owes me no more than all those eggs she never developed who will die with her, or die each month she never developed them. Do they cry that thye were never developed? They know no better. They have no cognizance. they are just part of her body. Why do act as though thank GOD you were born?? why? If you weren’t born, you’d never know. Life for everyone else would go on just fine. They’d never miss you because they never knew you. It would be a shame my kids would not exist, they are wonderful people. But because i had my kids does nto mean my wife and i are obligated to keep developing every egg she has every month. Those potential kids die every month. She has thousands of eggs. Two will live. That’s it. Tough cookies for the rest. I dont see that as much different to tell you the truth. drama. it’s all drama. you people dont even think logically about this stuff. eggs are alive. sperm are alive. I actually feel a little bad we kill them. You say life ‘begins’. Oh shut up. it does not. Development does.

Posted by: frank | January 23, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

“Past presidents have instituted or revoked the ban on Jan. 22, the anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision, but President Obama held off on that move, thinking it too combative.”
Gak. “Too combative”? Sissy.

Posted by: Belle Starr | January 23, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

I am with Dano,
Put up or shut up pro-lifers.
If you not helping the unwanted kids that are here, then you should not be advocating getting more of them.

Posted by: texas outlaw | January 23, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am

I am a Christian and I am pro-choice. I do not believe that I am to judge what one person chooses to do over another. I also feel that this is a choice between you and God and you will always have to deal with that. I also know several people who have had abortions for various reasons: babies health, mothers health, not the right time, and because the girl was 12 years old. Overseas several of these groups help provide abortions for women who were raped (often by their father or brother), who were child brides now child parents, and for women who have aids and other health disorders. The media never tells you all the facts.

Posted by: unknown | January 23, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am

One of my biggest problems with the so-called “pro-lifers” out there is that they continue to show — by their actions — that they believe life begins at conception, AND ENDS AT DELIVERY.
They scream in protest at using tax dollars to fund abortions, but they also scream in protest at tax dollars spent on programs to help support the resulting children. They think Medicaid is too expensive. They look down their noses at the food stamp program. They shop at BabyGap, not Goodwill, thank you very much.
This country already HAS thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of children just waiting (and desperately hoping) for homes. But they aren’t BABIES, you see. They’re children. Toddlers or grade-schoolers or teen-agers. Nobody wants to adopt them, everybody wants a newborn.
So I thing you could make an honest suggestion that pro-lifers actually just don’t want to lose their baby black market. If they manage to get the government to pass laws against abortion, it allows them to continue the increased newborn production. If those newborns are born crack-addicted, or with birth defects, and don’t get snapped up in their first couple of months, and end up living out their childhoods being passed from one foster home to the next, they are willing to turn a totally blind eye to that.
The fact of the matter is that there are FAR more babies born in this world than there are homes for those babies.

Posted by: Jaylah | January 23, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Hey pro-lifers, worry about yourselves and leave everyone else to worry about themselves.

Posted by: 1-Human | January 23, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am

USA should not advocate abortion for NONWHITES in third world countries. This is simply wrong. Period.

Posted by: Karen | January 23, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

My son has a horrible toothache. The dentist said his molar has a slight crack that has caused a severe infection in the root. Out of pocket cost (WITH INSURANCE) will be $722. I’ve spent the morning trying to figure out which bills will have to go unpaid this month. Should we go without electricity or gas? Should I just pay part of the morgage? The fact that money is taken from me to pay for ABORTIONS in another country makes me angry! How about keeping the money here—for the people that actually work and pay taxes and still can’t afford to take their own child to the dentist! I know that we should give support and try to help countries in need—but you can only take so much before the well runs dry. I’m so tired of struggling. How about a free medical/dental clinic in my town for working families that do not qualify for medicare? Lets do that before we pay for abortions somewhere else!

Posted by: hurting at home | January 23, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Mary Lou, you are discussing pregnancy in a developed country. It doesn’t work that way for women in the Third World where pregancy can just as often mean death or chronic health problems as it can mean a new baby.

Posted by: JrzWrld | January 23, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am

The pill = abortion, how can you tell if the egg is going to attach to the wall?
You are assuming it will as you say life begins at conception.

Posted by: texas outlaw | January 23, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

…..”.Almost everything is underdeveloped before it becomes what it is intended to be.”…UNDEVELOPED. The sperm and eggs are undeveloped as well. Undeveloped as in, you look at it, someone asks you “what is it?” and you can’t answer. You can’t even indentify what it is. THAT is undeveloped. A human embryo, a chicken embryo and a frog embryo are all put in front of you. Which one is human???? you will only be correct 33% of the time. put a frog, a chicken and a human baby in front of you, ask you, which one is the human, you will correct 100% of the time.

Posted by: frank | January 23, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

To the person who said removing the international gag rule is a racist policy, because it is taking place in non-US family planning programs: Eliminating the “global gag rule” brings international family planning programs in line with what has been offered in the US for the past 16 years. Clinton eliminated both the domestic gag rule and the international gag rule through Executive Order when he came into office, and Bush II reinstated ONLY the international gag rule when he came into office. American women who receive services through US family planning programs have been able to get information about all of their options throughout the Bush administartion, and it is only women outside the US who have been receiving partial information. Obama now ensures that women both inside and outside the US receive the same information. Which policy is racist?

Posted by: debbia | January 23, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Susan, just what the heck does race of pregnancies have to do with this discussion? If this discussion was related to a comparison of out of wed pregnancies, then maybe your comment would have been warranted. After 8 years of expanded racial, social, and economic divisions created in this country, I think it is time to bury the BS and start thinking on point for once.
Now to the subject of this article: While I am opposed to abortion, I support a person’s right to choose it if it is in their and the unborn child’s best interest. And not knowing everyone’s situation we can not say what is or is not in their best interest. So, if a family planning organization can prevent such situations by providing education and contraceptives (even if they are not 100%), then we should financially support them. It is the right thing to do and so much is at stake.

Posted by: Demetris | January 23, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am

This is not about race at all! I am so sick of everyone making it out to be that! Third world countries have few health options. Why do you tink they try and fly here to get major surgery done if they need it?

Posted by: Unknow | January 23, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am

“When women,as they often do spontaneously abort in the first few weeks-nobody holds a funeral. or investigation.”
Again…do not be ignorant. There is a HUGE difference in a woman’s body naturally rejecting a fertilized egg versus a woman who chooses to reject her fertilized egg. I am not taking a stand as to whether abortion is right or wrong here…I have my views and that is that, but that comment is just grasping straws. No need for it.

Posted by: blah | January 23, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am

Over nine years ago I walked into what I thought was an abortion clinic. Racked with emotional and physical illness, I wanted the abortion. As fate would have it the pro and anti abortion clinics were next door to each other. God saw further than I did, I now have a beautiful 9 year old daughter. I didn’t realize a fetus was a real person until I went through the process of abortion. It is MURDER. I know that President Obama can’t legislate morals, therefore CHRUCH wake up and do your job. PRAY!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Theresa | January 23, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am

There is no question that minorities get more abortions in the USA than whites. Also now we want to export it to other poor countries and advocate it for nonwhites. Colonialism in disguise and Obama is falling for it. This is wrong.

Posted by: Jill | January 23, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Demetris – I was responding to the first that brought race into it and accused Obama of trying to get rid of black people.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am

*Fight to outlaw the largest source of abortions first, the pill and IUDs!*— one flaw… they are not the same as abortion… the pill and iuds prevent an egg, a cell, from attaching to the wall.. where as abortion destroyes the fertalized egg, a cell.

Posted by: unknown | January 23, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am

“fact that money is taken from me to pay for ABORTIONS in another country “…the money does not pay for abortions. Get it straight. the money is going to family planning clinics. Clinics that provide birthcontrol, pap smears, breast exams. Some of these places also provide abortions. Bush said, if you provide abortion services you can get no money. The amount of money being put for places like this (which is intended to STOP some illegal immigration by the way, which IS a huge problem and takes jobs away from americans – it’s an investment) is not changing. obama is not giving anymore money to these places, he is simply saying that you can qualify to get it even if you provide abortion services, and, mindyou, droves of unwanted poor children is NOT helping this country. WE haev HUGE problems with welfare, crime and illegal immigration. Getting families to only have teh children they want and can take of is a good investment.

Posted by: frank | January 23, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am

The pill = abortion, how can you tell if the egg is going to attach to the wall?
You are assuming it will as you say life begins at conception.
Posted by: texas outlaw
——-one flaw… they are not the same as abortion… the pill prevents an egg, a cell, from attaching to the wall.. where as abortion destroyes the fertalized egg, a cell.

Posted by: unknown | January 23, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Thanks for using my hard earned money to fund abortions. This is one of the many reasons I didn’t vote for him and one of the reasons I want be voting for a Democrat anytime soon.
I thought he was going to cut spending? This is a program that is not needed and the little things add up after a while.

Posted by: Adam | January 23, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am

I don’t think she should go to prison for her decision (unless it is a late term abortion)
I don’t think anyone should go to prison for having an abortion
Which is it, Michelle: prison or no prison for late term abortions?

Posted by: just asking | January 23, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am

If men would not act as animals and try and “get” as many women as they can we would not have to be concerned with this. Also, if they were not so selfish, they would use protection. I am so sick of everyone blaming women!!
Posted by: lgee
========================================
But, Igee, men AND women ARE animals and have the same drives as all other animals. The big problem is that almost all other animals have a “mating season”, but the female human animal is sexually available year round. Perhaps the putative “deity” should have provided a “rutting season” for humans, too, say for three weeks in a year. That way everyone could have there “action” at once, and then get back to work with a clear mind and no sex drive. I think such a situation would have constituted “Intelligent Design”, but alas, I guess someone goofed, or left it out intentionally, in which case, that person is responsible for an awful lot of grief, harm and death, wouldn’t you say?
By the way, speaking of men “getting” as many women as they can, is it not true that there are at least two major religions that specifically encourage this practice? Here I am thinking of Islam (which allows at least 4 “wives” per male, and encourages “arranged marriages” at a very young age) and Christianity (“Go forth and multiply”). Unfortunately, neither of the deities in charge of these religions apparently gave a fig for the “carrying capacity” of the Earth, which has long ago been exceeded. Reading Malthus (“An Essay of the Principle of Population”) was the spark for Darwin’s idea for the “survival of the most fit”, and it is a struggle, indeed.
So, to my mind, it is not that MEN are just “selfish”. No, many or most of them are ignorant, misinformed, or misled, as are many women, especially in the poorer parts of the world. Sexual education and contraceptive methods can and do work, but we are fast reaching the point-of-no-return. Seriously, it is the biggest problem facing humankind today and it needs an immediate solution, or nature will provide a solution, through disease, famine or war.

Posted by: Zoron | January 23, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am

I am very disappointed in President Obama. I feel that we as a country have bigger issues to fix than having our tax payer dollars fund abortion. Abortion is MURDER and for all you people on here who try to say it isn’t well you are simple wrong. All of you oppose the war in IRAQ and the deaths associated with the war need to look at the numbers of lives lost daily to abortion. In one day abortion kills more babies than the amount of lives lost in Iraq. This by no means diminishes the lives lost in Iraq however to kill over 4,000 babies A DAY! IN THIS COUNTRY! Is APPAULING and reckless!!! You want choice???? THEN TRY Abstinence or protection! Two choices that PRO-choice supporters fail to PUSH or mention.

Posted by: dfesta | January 23, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am

The pill = abortion
One more time. Tell me how you know the egg is going to attacht to the wall?

Posted by: texas outlaw | January 23, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am

ThePill Equals – You should add invitro as “mass abortion” as well? They fertalize several eggs, implant them, and most often none take.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am

MAY GOD HAVE MERCY ON THE USA

Posted by: kathy | January 23, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am

It’s pretty much plain and simple in my mind. What my wife does with her body is between her and her doctor and is NONE OF THE GOVERNMENTS BUSINESS.

Posted by: steven | January 23, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Being a mother was the best thing that ever happened to me. I had a Bachelors Degree, a good job, not alot of debt. I had an unplanned pregnancy at 25. My boyfriend, age 32, was pressuring me to have an abortion for weeks and weeks. Thank God I made the right decision. We now have 5 beautiful children, go to church every Sunday, teach abstinence (chastity) until marriage to our children, care deeply about the environment and community, and I am able to sleep at night. Oh, by the way, I gave a baby up for adoption when I was 18. I was date raped. She just turned 20 on Jan 21. I don’t have any guilt or remorse hanging over my head like the women I care about that have had abortions. So please think about what you are doing to yourself and your life before you choose to kill your own child!

Posted by: carrie | January 23, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am

I intended to support him a 100 percent, but this one I can’t do. It’s one thing to support a woman’s choice but it’s entirely another to expect us to finance abortions in another country. I am very disappointed in his decision.

Posted by: Sharonkatheen | January 23, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am

texas outlaw:
One more time. Tell me how you know the egg is going to attacht to the wall?
***
As I said, it’s a false argument. Same as saying:
‘Tell me how you know he wasn’t going to have a heart attack?’ after you shoot someone.

Posted by: ThePill_Equals_Abortion | January 23, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Here’s how I see it:
Until both the heart and brain start functioning together in an unborn child, the child is nothing more than a part of the mother’s body.
If there is a God, the soul is almost definitely thrust into the unborn child upon the first firing of brain cells and cardiac muscles.
I’m of a scientific nature, but this seems to me the best compromise. In other words, any abortions after both the brain and heart work may be better off banned, but any abortions prior to this point are fine, including the pill (which isn’t actually an abortion. It’s forcing the body rejecting the embryo, which is perfectly fine since the human body does that all the time).

Posted by: Anonymous | January 23, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Suaan:
ThePill Equals – You should add invitro as “mass abortion” as well? They fertalize several eggs, implant them, and most often none take.
***
I don’t see it that way. Fertilized eggs that are implanted are an honest attempt to save a human life. Now if you want to talk about the ‘extra’ fertilized eggs that are tossed in the bin, I agree.

Posted by: ThePill_Equals_Abortion | January 23, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am

A person that is going to have a hart attack actually attached to the wall.
What your saying is you don’t know if the egg is going to attach. Since you don’t know then how can you call the person a murderer.
I firing squad had several guns and one bullet so we don’t know who actualy fired the fatel shot. Are all the shooters killers. What if the person had a hart attack before the shots where fired. You just don’t know.
That is called reasonable doubt. I our system of laws you have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt a murder was committed.

Posted by: texas outlaw | January 23, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Obama wants to close Gitmo because he does not want the poor terror suspects upset.Now he wants every new life to hang in the balance on an agenda driven mentality.All through “rule of law”, such a humanitarian is he.

Posted by: Reflect08 | January 23, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Wow, some of these comments are really outrageous.
Family planning is never foolproof. There is at least a 3% failure rate for all birth control methods. I know 5 responsible women who had abortions after birth control failed. So to say all women who get abortions are irresponsible is not accurate. A 3 % failure rate is a lot of unplanned pregnancies.
I firmly believe having a child should be a choice entered into after careful consideration. Only an individual can judge their personal energy, health, finances, etc. There are some people who can have six children and do a wonderful job raising them, others can only handle one child and do a good job. There are some teen moms who do a good job, others are too immature and neglect their children.
Bottom line, this is a very personal choice. Very few women are flippant about it as some here have suggested.
And I don’t buy the argument that abortions being legal results in less children. Teens that have an abortion end up marrying and having kids later. College girls who have an abortion end up marrying and having kids later.
When women all over the world were questioned about how many children they wanted, whether poor or rich the average was 2 to 3 children. The birth rate doesn’t change in countries where birth control is available.
The important thing is to make birth control and abortions safe, affordable and legal so when a woman is ready emotionally, financially and hopefully with a willing dad for the child, she is able to have one.
It takes a tremendous amount of energy, love, money and time to grow a child into a responsible human being. Unless you have a child you have no idea of the commitment necessary. Having a child is a responsibility that should not be dictated by the government but should be a choice gladly made. Glad parents = glad children and then adults.

Posted by: Lydia | January 23, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Living large, you claim that “every textbook on embryology and biology markes the beginning of life at fertilization.”
That’s absurd as stated since life began at least hundreds of millions of years ago. So presumably you mean the beginning of “each human life”. But that’s also nonsense, since cloned cell lines are certainly human life. So maybe you mean “each person”. But even that isn’t true, but I tire of trying to guess what on Earth you were trying to say there. If you conflate terms willy-nilly no one can understand you.
Since you claim knowledge of all texts, how about quoting five or six? If you don’t know any, I’ll provide a list.
Then you say the “DNA combine to make a unique individual…” Do you know the meaning of the word “individual”? Since an embryo can DIVIDE to form twins it is BY DEFINITION not individual.
Then you say “that was you, that was me”. Why don’t you tell that to the chimeras who derive from multiple zygotes, hence did not have a moment of conception.
So I repeat my admonition: go learn some biology before posting nonsense. You can get away with gobbledygook in religious circles, but not here.
Sorry to be so obnoxious, but it bugs me when non-scientists try to make absurd pronouncements about science I’ve done experiments in (with sea urchins in the case of twins and chimeras, but the same principles hold with humans). I’ve seen the facts with my own eyes. Have you?

Posted by: jimCA | January 23, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am

Anonymous here ya go! As you can see many abortions occur after these dates. Many people do not even realize they are pregnant until after these dates. Abortion is Murder.
Day 22: heart begins to beat with the child’s own blood, often a different type than the mothers’.
Week 6: Brain waves are detectable; mouth and lips are present; fingernails are forming.

Posted by: dfesta | January 23, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am

What I decide to do with my body is entirely up to me. It is no one else’s business. It is between me and my beliefs. All you activists get a life! No pun intended.

Posted by: CFO | January 23, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am

What do you mean it’s part of the woman’s body until the heart beats and the brain functions? The embryo has its own unique DNA, distinct from the mother’s.
Even the most radical pro-choice scientist acknowledges that those cells are alive uniquely. (They’ll argue on other grounds that abortion is permissible.)

Posted by: Somebody | January 23, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am

Hey Anonymous, you’re making far too much sense there. The pro-lifers are never going to listen to your logical and well thought out ideas.

Posted by: 1-Human | January 23, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am

ThePill_Equals_Abortion wrote “The pill is a chemical attack on fetus, same as poisoning.” Well Doctor, that was an amazing disertation on the Birth Control Pill. But let me enlighten you, “Doctor.”
Birth control pills contain a combination of estrogen and progesterone to prevent ovulation – the release of an egg for fertilization. Hence no egg (ovulation), nothing to fertilize. It also thickens the mucus (that’s vaginal lining in laymen’s terms)making it difficult for sperm to to enter the uterus. That debunks your theory of abortion as “life begins at conception” saying. Possibly you are thinking of the so-called “morning after pill?” But then, me thinks you are a ultral-liberal and probably either have alot of kids or you abstained from sex. Or maybe you just an ill-informed male!!

Posted by: Nabi, MD | January 23, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Uh, wow, some interesting comments here. You guys do realize this has nothing to do with whether abortion is legal/illegal here in the US, right? And that Bush did in fact keep abortion legal here… I don’t get the idea that we’re all going to hell in a handbasket now that Obama’s signing this EO. It’s simply allowing USAID to distribute family planning funding as they see fit, instead of cutting off organizations that dare to breathe the word abortion. After Bush reinstated the Mexico City policy, many family planning orgs had to shut down, some of which were excellent and crucial health care/family planning providers for women in developing countries. This left women with less options to access health care or to get education about family planning/birth control, so it had a much greater effect than just “preventing” abortions.
I put “preventing” in quotes because this kind of gag-order policy does no such thing. Do you really think that making abortion illegal, or not providing safe access to it, makes abortion go away? Of course it doesn’t. Even here in the US, before Roe v. Wade, as many abortions were going on each year as they are now. The difference was that most of them took place in a back alley somewhere (except rich women who could pay off a doctor to perform the procedure safely), and more women and girls suffered terrible complications and even died. This still happens an incredible amount in countries that deny their people access to safe abortions. In Africa this problem is on the rise among teenage girls. I think a lot of the pro-lifers in this thread don’t realize the difference in situation between these girls and what we have in the US. A teenage girl in some parts of Africa may not have the decision-making power to say no to sex or to use a condom/other kind of birth control, or the ability to feed this child once she has it. Adoption is probably not an option either. She is likely to still be growing herself, and may suffer pregnancy complications or have a low birth weight baby, which is problematic in itself. She might be ostracized by her family once they find out she’s pregnant. Her only means of controlling her own fate might be to visit the local back-alley butcher, who promises her it won’t hurt and that nobody has to know. And then she winds up suffering some complication, and if she manages to make it to a hospital in time to get treated and pull through (which might not happen, since not everyone enjoys such immediate access to health care that we enjoy in the US), she may wind up badly scarred only to die of an ectopic pregnancy sometime later on. All of this incurs a whole lot of wasted money and health care resources that could have been used on some more urgent, less preventable problem. We do have the means to provide very safe abortions, and denying them has been proven ad nauseum to do nothing to prevent abortions from happening. In this country, girls and women fortunately have options that will keep them safe no matter what they choose, and you can bicker all you want without hurting anyone about whether they’re killing babies. But it’s a human rights problem if our policies cause these very important health centers in developing countries who were depending on USAID money to shut down.

Posted by: Kilgore Trout | January 23, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am

How about ADOPTION over abortion? You pro-choicers act like every baby that isn’t aborted will end up on the streets. First off, not every mother that would have an abortion now since it is legal now, would necessarily dump their kid if abortion was illegal. They may decide after the birth, that they want to keep it. Then there is also a long waiting list for adoptive parents currently. My brother and his wife are adopting internationally because of the waiting list in this country for adoption. I have a friend had to wait 3 years to adopt! So all you pro-choicers can go stick it with your pathetic arguments regarding these “unwanted” children.

Posted by: GK_1970 | January 23, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Somebody, then take it off the wall and it will flush out the body. It will not grow unless it is attached to the womens body. To me when something is attached to me it becomes part of my body.

Posted by: texas outlaw | January 23, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Susan:
Wow. I’ve been reading your posts and couldn’t agree with you more. You’re not going to win in trying to reason with the religious right, but pointing out the inherent sexism in the abortion debate is extremely important.
We must have been separated at birth.

Posted by: jen 1234 | January 23, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Oh yes Frank….thanks so much for setting me straight! I hope my family can use the warm fuzzy feeling of providing free care to other countries to keep us warm when our heat is cut off next month. I guess taking money out of my paycheck every month and sending a portion of it to another country makes sense as long as it is going to provide free ” birthcontrol, pap smears, breast exams”. Oh, and by the way, it WILL also now be used to pay for abortions. So—you get it striaght!! Americans are suffering and need help here at home. I don’t need you to help me understand the situation -thank -you -very- much!

Posted by: hurting at home | January 23, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

If abortion is indeed a sin (which many question) then the sin falls on the one who caused the problem…the man who caused the pregnancy in the first place…and not the woman. Pregnancies in the world too often fall on the poor who have no intelligent access to knowledge of prevention. The US ends up forced to feed excessive populations who live lives of suffering anyhow and survive only to see their own children endure the same sort of suffering. Why would an intelligent God agree to such stupidity? An aborted soul can undoubtedly be born another time in another place.

Posted by: jeanned'arc | January 23, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Releasing taxpayer dollars from the United States to foreign countries (which will inevitably be used to fund a certain amount of population control and gender selection abortions) by eliminating the control imposed by the “Mexico City Policy” is just one of the promises made by President Obama to his supporters, prior to his election.
He owes them.

Posted by: One Dove | January 23, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Typical. This administration will bend over backwards to make terrorists feel right at home while using MY tax money to kill unborn children. This country is seriously lacking in morals. A baby is a gift, it is a life that grows inside you and it has a heart that beats long before it takes its first breath. How can anyone consider it anything other than murder? When I got pregnant with my son, I was actually asked if I was going to keep it. It! I’m married and this person actually asked me if I was considering an abortion because I was recently promoted. I felt sick then – I feel sick now.

Posted by: nancy | January 23, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

That is right you pro life people. I work in the Social Services field and let me tell you that this business is full of the caring adults that you say wont drop off their kids. I bet you would be right there in line to adopt all the kids that are in the system right now and go unwanted. Wait, there you go, here in Michigan we have thousands of unwanted children in the agency waiting for adoption. Why don’t you step up and take them in before you run your mouth off about abortion.

Posted by: Sheldon | January 23, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

texas outlaw:
A person that is going to have a hart attack actually attached to the wall.
**
Agreed. Should be protected under the law.
What your saying is you don’t know if the egg is going to attach. Since you don’t know then how can you call the person a murderer.
**
So you would let someone who shot a person having a heart attack go go because there is a reasonable ‘doubt’ he would have survived the attack? I hope not!
I firing squad had several guns and one bullet so we don’t know who actualy fired the fatel shot. Are all the shooters killers. What if the person had a hart attack before the shots where fired. You just don’t know.
That is called reasonable doubt. I our system of laws you have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt a murder was committed.
**
I see. You’re arguing that if someone intentionally give a man that is having a heart attack a drug that induces a fatal heart attack, it can’t be proved anyone killed him.
Sounds like pretty shaky legal ground to me. Then again, I’m no lawyer. On the other hand, I think you would agree the act should be illegal. No?

Posted by: ThePill_Equals_Abortion | January 23, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

War is looming between Obama and the Vatican.
Obama’s pro-abortion will soon get the attention of the Pope. Stalin once dismissed the pope: “How many divisions does he have?”
…The answer: More than he needs. I might add. It’s bigger than the U.S. Army.

Posted by: Rajska | January 23, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Taxpayer dollars should NOT be used to fund abortions.
If this is the route society wishes to take, then at the same time the abortion is done the doctor should also neuter the irresponsible woman to save future taxpayer dollars!

Posted by: TampaGuy | January 23, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

THIS IA AMERICA, LAND OF CHOICE!
Posted by: NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS | Jan 23, 2009 10:21:42 AM ****************** I concur. Just don’t ask the baby. He/she might disagree.

Posted by: WhatChange? | January 23, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Gosh, Obama. You’re humanity’s BFF for waiting a day to rescind this act.
I’ll admit it stings a little less than rescinding it on March for Life day. But most see through the politically savvy popularity stunt. We’re bracing ourselves for your administration.

Posted by: warm fuzzies | January 23, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

As a woman I have the right to have an abortion if I want to and you religious fanatics should mind your own business your religion isn’t my religion and you dictating your beliefs are unconstitutional. If a woman or young girl has been raped by a family member or a stranger she has that right to abort the fetus just because you think life begins at conception does not mean I believe that. Keep your religious beliefs out of it. I for one have never had an abortion but if my daughter needed one I would support her one hundred percent. Religious beliefs and government are separate don’t bring the two together.

Posted by: RJ | January 23, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

TrueBlue…..U.S. tax dollars used for Abortions for women in other countries could hardly be called “family planning”.

Posted by: bo | January 23, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

For 7 consecutive years, the Bush administration withheld money from the UN Population Fund (UNFPA), an organization dedicated to global work on issues such as increasing access to contraception and family planning, HIV prevention, and improving obstetric care. Why? Because UNFPA talked to women about abortion. UNFPA did NOT encourage women to have abortions – it in fact convinced China in 1992 to switch to a more effective but more expensive IUD, averting 5 million abortions a decade. But for religious/political reasons, Bush withheld funding for a wide range of UNFPA programs, including life-saving support to pregnant women displaced by conflicts and natural disasters.

Posted by: Idahogirl | January 23, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

If it wasn’t enough that we’ve “freely” self-induced the death of nearly 50,000,000 of our own children in this nation since 1973, now we’re going to reinstate a policy that makes us accomplices to the rest of the world. We will never be a great nation, until we stop harming the smallest, unseen among us. Freedom and dignity for all human life, now.

Posted by: LoveThemBoth | January 23, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

finally, a rational policy back in place!

Posted by: earthisnotflat | January 23, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

RJ…. yes, you have the right to an abortion, but WE as TAXPAYERS should not have to pay for it. You play, you pay!!

Posted by: bo | January 23, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Try to understand what it is like to live in a third-world country where the difficulty of providing your family with enough food to eat is difficult, let alone having the money for medicine and educating your children.
If a family is barely able to survive, having another child is a guarantee of more hunger, no medicine when needed,
not enough food for the mom to grow a healthy baby.
Picture those moms, living where there is no daycare, where they must watch their children while attempting to earn money. Then add a new baby to the mix.
And to those who say adoption is the answer, look at how many children in this country grow up in foster homes and orphanages. All those who think abortion is wrong should go adopt a child languishing in an orphanage if they believe all life is precious.

Posted by: Lydia | January 23, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm

Anonymous,lets conduct an experiment with your “science”.We will have a male and female human, mate.Then you can get some ghost busters to watch the womans belly and tell us all when the baby has a soul.Your science argument is weak, very weak. Go back to school.

Posted by: Reflect08 | January 23, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

many of you pro-lifers are equally pro capital punishment. what’s the difference if life is so sacred? One argument was made here the fetus might have been a great scientist. The truth is the unwanted often grow up to perpetuate violent crimes on a world it feels has been unfair to it. I do wish y’all would make up your mind

Posted by: Ted | January 23, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

When a woman wants a child, it’s a “baby.” When she doesn’t, it’s a “fetus.” Deception is the devil’s energy.

Posted by: Ivana | January 23, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

He’s looking more “smug” all the time.

Posted by: LongT | January 23, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

LoveThemBoth (Freedom and dignity for all human life, now.) Does that also hold true to our American Soldiers sent to Die for a war based on lies (Iraq)?
U.S. Confirmed Deaths
Reported Deaths: 4230
Confirmed Deaths: 4227
Pending Confirmation: 3
This does not include the Soldiers killed because of Halliburton’s Spin off company KBR shoddy work.
A congressional report released yesterday blames faulty electrical work by contractor KBR for the deaths of at least 16 American troops in Iraq:

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | January 23, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Abortion is sad. Late-term abortion is an abomination, IMHO. But refusing to help family planning groups in third-world and developing nations just because they also offer abortion? That is near the height of arrogance.

Posted by: Jordan | January 23, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Do any of your pro-lifers actually know how to read???
“the “Mexico City policy,” which prohibits nongovernmental organizations that receive international family planning assistance through the U.S. Agency for International Development from providing or actively promoting abortion as a method of family planning in other countries.”
It says that these agencies ALREADY RECEIVE MONEY FROM THE UNITED STATES. It says that what Obama is doing is lifting a ban so the agencies will be allowed to tell people that abortion is ALSO and option.
It does not say that the money they receive is used for or will be used for paying for abortions OR that any more money will be provided than is ALREADY sent to them.
Please people, quit showing the world just how ignorant you really are.

Posted by: 1-Human | January 23, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

I wonder when being concerned about human life became a soley religious matter? It is a matter of right and wrong in strictly human and humane terms. Murder is wrong and I don’t need a religious person to tell me that.

Posted by: Lisa Again | January 23, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

bo wrote “RJ…. yes, you have the right to an abortion, but WE as TAXPAYERS should not have to pay for it. You play, you pay!!”
—————-
bo, I agree 100%!
If a woman wants to use an abortion as an after-thought contraceptive then she (and daddy) should be flipping the bill.
I like how all these pro-baby killers bring up rape example when debating abortion. What is the actual number of abortions done as a result of a rape in comparison to a drunken night of partying by an irresponsible woman? I’d imagine about 1 for every 10,000.

Posted by: TampaGuy | January 23, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Great Obama the Democrats what to expand abortion to the world. Kill these fetuses to poor third world women. We do not want them to be born and take our resources from us. The population of these countries will be limited if the Democrats have their way, out of kindness but its still killing. Killing is easier than trying to raise their life standards.

Posted by: pohcd | January 23, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Reflect08…
Simply put, a human being has all the DNA that is UNIQUELY theirs at the moment of conception. The very stuff that is their IDENTITY as a physical human being. Regardless of the discussion of soul, HUMAN LIFE is there. To discriminate against the personhood of that human being due to development is tragic. Every unique human life has inherent dignity and value from conception that requires protection under the law. What is so difficult about loving mother, father and child?

Posted by: LoveThemBoth | January 23, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

Lydia said….Try to understand what it is like to live in a third-world country where the difficulty of providing your family with enough food to eat is difficult, let alone having the money for medicine and educating your children.
If a family is barely able to survive, having another child is a guarantee of more hunger, no medicine when needed,
not enough food for the mom to grow a healthy baby.
Picture those moms, living where there is no daycare, where they must watch their children while attempting to earn money. Then add a new baby to the mix.
And to those who say adoption is the answer, look at how many children in this country grow up in foster homes and orphanages. All those who think abortion is wrong should go adopt a child languishing in an orphanage if they believe all life is precious.
Well, surely they know how babies are made, don’t they? I can’t imagine a woman that can’t feed the kids she has, and watches them starving to death, doesn’t have the sense or integrity to PREVENT have any more, even if it means keeping her legs together.

Posted by: anonymous2 | January 23, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Quit playing the unsubstantiated race card. I don’t care about obama’s skin color….it could be orange for all I care. I think he is off to a shaky start. He coddles terrorists and kills innocent unborn children. I think his judgment is poor and his actions reprehensible. Period!

Posted by: Angelo | January 23, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

How does one prevent the following situations from happening? I recently spoke with a young white mother from Alabama, 24 years old, single, didn’t finish high school, working part time, with five kids. The U.S. Dept. of Agriculture did a study concluding in 2004, which tracked 5,000 households four times a year. Families earning $70M per year, it was estimated it would take approximately $269,000.00 to raise one child from birth to age 17. And that’s from 2004, not today.

Posted by: devilkev | January 23, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Nabe, MD:
ThePill_Equals_Abortion wrote “The pill is a chemical attack on fetus, same as poisoning.” Well Doctor, that was an amazing disertation on the Birth Control Pill. But let me enlighten you, “Doctor.”
**
I do not claim to be a doctor.
Birth control pills contain a combination of estrogen and progesterone to prevent ovulation – the release of an egg for fertilization. Hence no egg (ovulation), nothing to fertilize.
**
If this was all the pill did, I would not consider it an abortion.
It also thickens the mucus (that’s vaginal lining in laymen’s terms)making it difficult for sperm to to enter the uterus.
**
Again, no problem. Preventing fertilization is not abortion.
That debunks your theory of abortion as “life begins at conception” saying.
** ??
Possibly you are thinking of the so-called “morning after pill?”
**
There is a third function of the estrogen/progesterone cocktail. It makes the lining of the uterus ‘less receptive to implantation’. This is where I have a problem with the pill and IUDs. A fertilized egg (human life) is actively being prevented from attaching to area it needs to survive.
But then, me thinks you are a ultral-liberal and probably either have alot of kids or you abstained from sex. Or maybe you just an ill-informed male!!
**
Ultra-liberal?? Don’t think so. Kids? Three. Ill-informed? Perhaps.
How about you?

Posted by: ThePill_Equals_Abortion | January 23, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

Get it right, leftie! Rush did not say he wants obama to fail. He said he hopes obama’s socialist agenda fails. Sheesh! Listen to the radio program before you spout nonsense here!!!!!!

Posted by: Angelo | January 23, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

1-Human….it says PROVIDING. as well as actively Promoting abortion. Please read the story.

Posted by: anonymous2 | January 23, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

Aaron:
I was referring to early pregnancy (I did mention the embryo). This is when virtually all abortions are performed, and is the only time they are completely legal. It is not heartless to mention that without a brain there is no feeling or consciousness. And even when the brain does begin to develop, it takes a long time before it is functioning to a level that any type of feeling can be sensed (about the 28th week).

Posted by: goodusername | January 23, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

It’s funny how all you “Right To Lifers” change your tune when it comes to the death penalty. Is it because you think that an unborn baby is an :innocent” life and a convicted criminal is not? Who the hell are you to judge? It’s either pro-abortion/pro-death penalty, or pro-life/anti-death penalty. Make your choice.

Posted by: Atheist 1 | January 23, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

The dems/libs are going to loose millions of voters, as they already have. Since abortion takes place, mostly among the poor and uneducated, millions of future democrats are the ones being aborted. I’m beginning to think we anti-abortionist are wrong to try to stop the dems from killing future dems/libs.

Posted by: mojo | January 23, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Just the fact you don’t know the egg is going to attach to the wall is reasonable doubt. You can’t say if it is or isn’t, that sounds like doubt to me. If I flip a coin, can you tell me if it is going to land on heads or tales every time. That is what your saying to these women who decide what pill to put into their own body.

Posted by: texas outlaw | January 23, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

All the negative comments about President Obama are clearly racially driven. He will never get a fair break in the President’s seat if all you Whitey racists can help it. Boy, this country has a long way to go….
Posted by: Clive | Jan 23, 2009 12:12:38 PM
***************************************
I voted for Obama. I do not want to hear for the next several years that people that argue his policy are being racist with no basis to that argument. If he’s going to be president then the people have a right to discuss things without this being thrown out there every time somebody might not agree with another person.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

For all you pro-abortion people out there…what if you’re parents decided to abort you?? Why don’t you think of that before judging us anti-abortion folks?? To think that if he signs this, our taxpaying money is going to be funding abortions!! Close your legs or wear protection if you don’t want to bring up an innocent baby into this world and take its life away!!

Posted by: disgusted | January 23, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

texas outlaw; is that the best you can do? who made you judge of which lives are sacred? are you god?

Posted by: Angelo | January 23, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm

So instead it’s OK to spend “taxpayers money” to the tune of $1 BILLION over the past 8 years for abstinence-only programs? According to health officials who testified before Congress in April 2008, these programs “had NO positive effect on high school students, and may be a factor in the high rates of sexually-transmitted disease in teens.”

Posted by: Calirules | January 23, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

stop generalizing, lefties. I am pro-life and anti-capital punishment. I can speak for myself, thank you. Unlike you libs who need talking points handed to you by the media and obama.

Posted by: Angelo | January 23, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

I have an idea. How bout you guys that are so anti abortion start opening your homes tomorrow to unwed mother’s and helping them out?

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

“many of you pro-lifers are equally pro capital punishment. what’s the difference if life is so sacred?”.
Answer:
Due Process – 6th and 14th Amendments.

Posted by: Keith | January 23, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

texas outlaw:
Just the fact you don’t know the egg is going to attach to the wall is reasonable doubt. You can’t say if it is or isn’t, that sounds like doubt to me. If I flip a coin, can you tell me if it is going to land on heads or tales every time. That is what your saying to these women who decide what pill to put into their own body.
**
Putting the pill into their body is ‘fixing’ the toss. It’s no longer up to ‘chance’ (or God some would say). This is not a neutral action in terms of the fertized egg. It is an intention effort to make sure the coin comes up ‘tails’ 99% of the time.

Posted by: ThePill_Equals_Abortion | January 23, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

As a taxpayer, I have to say if you want an abortion or 10 abortions, whatever, that’s your perogative…but don’t make me pay for it. It is going to be a long expensive 4 years for the taxpayers of this country.

Posted by: samhiguchi | January 23, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Susan. Here’s an idea. Since you are a bleeding heart lib, why don’t you open your home? How about that?

Posted by: mojo | January 23, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm

LoveThemBoth,I agree with you 100%.I believe my point was not recognized.

Posted by: Reflect08 | January 23, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Well, surely they know how babies are made, don’t they? I can’t imagine a woman that can’t feed the kids she has, and watches them starving to death, doesn’t have the sense or integrity to PREVENT have any more, even if it means keeping her legs together.Posted by: anonymous2 | Jan 23, 2009 12:20:12 PM
- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -
Oh, now THAT’s a good idea! Then her husband can divorce her and marry a woman that WILL “open her legs.” Now we have a single mother with 5 hungry children, no bread-winner in the house at all, and he’s off making more babies with another woman!
That surely solves the whole problem right there. Your wisdom astounds me.

Posted by: Jaylah | January 23, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Angelo – Are you kidding me? I open my mouth and am called a traitor, a commie (hardly), and told I am all sorts of things I am not. This goes both ways. If we fussed about that war? Well we were all stupid enough to think we could chitty chat a terorist into behaving? I guess I’m saying “thanks for the laugh.”

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 12:35 pm 12:35 pm

So now abortion gets a bailout.
The government now owns our banks, owns our mortgages and owns our auto industry. Why stop here? Let’s just let the government pay for everything. Let them take over the media, the farms, the hospitals, the retail stores and restaurants, the computer makers, the oil companies, the video game makers…. every bite you eat, every game you play, every show you watch, every mile you drive, every child you have will be government financed, owned and operated.
In fact, let’s make it easy on everyone. Just have our paychecks diverted directly to the government, and they will dole out the goods and services you require, as needed. Resistance is futile, they will get your money one way or another. You have no choice in the matter. But the upside is that you will be covered with sweet, sweet government nectar throughout your entire, utopia-filled life. Fist-bumper-in-Chief Obama, Blinky Pelosi, Dingy Harry and their Clown Congress have got it all figured out. Everyone will benefit. Everyone will be happy. You will have no money and no rights, but you won’t need them – they will take care of everything.
Relax, everyone. The shuck and jive minstrel show has got your back.

Posted by: BlofeldBuildings | January 23, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

I don’t want my tax $ going to pay for abortions or promoting abortion!

Posted by: bob | January 23, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

No I am not God, I never said I know if the egg will attach to the wall. I said I dont’t know. Your the ones acting like you know wheather or not it will.
Only God knows, not you. So stop the persecution like you know.

Posted by: texas outlaw | January 23, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

mojo – I’m not a “bleeding heart lib.” I’m a centrist. I simply get that you can’t push no abortion and then neglect those that are born. I’m completely sexist about this topic as well. Men should not have a say. Right now they aren’t earning it.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

prm: I vote for L – level of development. The food eaten by a man and a woman is clearly less developed than a person that later develops from the molecules in that food.
I say that we can disperse that food without committing murder precisely because it is less developed.
Do you disagree?

Posted by: jimCA | January 23, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

Ok anti-abortion people, how about this deal: We outlaw abortion but then you have to help cough up all the money to make sure that all unwanted children have a good free education, full medical coverage, free shelter or foster parents if needed, and all other necessities until they reach adulthood.
My bet is that this deal will never be taken. Right-wingers may be ‘pro-life’, but they are ‘pro-checkbook’ even more.

Posted by: Skip | January 23, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Susan. Your 100% correct. Men have no say. There we agree.

Posted by: mojo | January 23, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Most Mothers believes a baby is a gift from God. If you don’t believe this, just ask your Mother if she thinks you were a gift from God at birth or if she wished she would have killed you. Babies are created in the image of God, a sign of Heaven on earth. It is time for our nation’s leaders to protect the defenseless life in the womb.
President Obama, has opened the door for the first human clinic trials of human embryonic stem-cell research. Isn’t this the way Hitler started with medical research on humans leading to the killing of millions of innocent humans later? Maybe the US can do it with compassion by choosing to kill humans using the lies of abortion and euthanasia.

Posted by: lcj | January 23, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

disgusted:
“For all you pro-abortion people out there…what if you’re parents decided to abort you??”
I wouldn’t have cared. Because at the time of a legal abortion, I wouldn’t have had the ability to care – or to feel, or to think anything. And so really *I* didn’t exist yet. The qualities that make me who I am didn’t form yet. True, I wouldn’t exist now if my mother had an abortion, but I also wouldn’t exist if she didn’t have sex at the time she did, or if she killed the egg, but no one would consider not having sex or killing an egg “murder”.

Posted by: goodusername | January 23, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Skip. A better deal. Why don’t you pro-abortionists pay for abortions out of your own pockets?

Posted by: mojo | January 23, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Jaylah, I posed that question to draw attention to the fact that some people have no clue of what they are talking about when the issue of abortion is raised. You have answered the question partly, but I am not so sure if you are aware of the reason why you gave that explanation—which, by the way, I think is plausible. Here is a clue that might help you: Supposing you are traveling to another country to reside in a house that is specifically built for you; but, while on your way, you are told that the house that was built for you has been destroyed, what would you do?

Posted by: what667 | January 23, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

mojo – If they’d like to step up and do more right by this subject then we could meet at the table for a real discussion. You can begin with the 70 billion in back child support please.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

War is looming between Obama and the Vatican.
Obama’s pro-abortion will soon get the attention of the Pope. Stalin once dismissed the pope: “How many divisions does he have?”
…The answer: More than he needs. I might add. It’s bigger than the U.S. Army.
Posted by: Rajska |
========================================
Oh no, the Pope! Now there’s a BIG DEAL. What is he, who has never been married or, as far as we know, fathered a child, going to do? Send the Swiss Guard, or the Tenth Panzer Division to attack the U.S.?
The Pope is one of the major problems, but let me say that many, many Catholics do not follow his bombastic pontifications and imprecations. It is one of the saddest things to note that while the Catholic Church encourages its members to have large families, it does precious little to alleviate the poverty into which these “souls” are born, wanted or not, loved or not. Just how much of the treasure of St. Peter’s in Rome, and other Catholic treasure houses, has been put to use feeding, clothing and otherwise caring for their suffering millions? And some see the Pope as some kind of avenging “hero”???
Please, most of my family is Catholic; some have used the “rhythm method” (better know as “Vatican roulette”) only to discover that it doesn’t work, while others have had abortions, and others have (gasp!) indulged in sex for the pure pleasure of it, using contraceptives, with no intention of providing the Pope with more “souls”.
I would laugh at your post if it wasn’t so sad and pathetic.

Posted by: Zoron | January 23, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

I’m not totally up to date on this issue, so please correct me if I am wrong…
Does this mean that we are going to be pushing millions (or billions) of dollars to other countries to support people’s abilities to have abortions?
I’m not sure I want my money going to something like this until the US is more financially stable. That would be more tax dollars thrown away or that will need repaced by some means…
Help me out here.

Posted by: Buddy | January 23, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

I have the answer to the abortion issue. I oppose abortion and did not vote for Barack Obama, He is however my president now and I respect that America voted for him. I believe we need to put the issue of abortion to a vote once and for all. It is such a heated issue with so many, I don’t think we can let the ruling of the supreme court decide. We should put it to a national vote and then everyone will be able to decide.

Posted by: Stockboy | January 23, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Pill= abortion
Just like abstinence right. Are people baby killers because they don’t have sex. With the morning after pill you don’t even know if the egg was fertilized. The reason we have reasonable doubt is that we are not God and pretend like we know.
But I guess you are God and do know when each and every egg is fertilized.

Posted by: texas outlaw | January 23, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

well, we can either pay for their abortions now, or pay for their welfare later. whats the difference? …and PLEASE stop talking about god. its so ridiculous. god has nothing to do with conception, sex does. which reminds me, im definitely looking forward to obama reinstating sexual education since clearly we forget that storks dont bring babies!

Posted by: lmk | January 23, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

Susan. Glad I do not owe support of any kind to anyone. Nor do I intend to sit silent as the government uses my tax dollars to abort children.

Posted by: mojo | January 23, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

I personally am against abortion. If it is rule out all together, we run the risk of many doing back alley, in home abortions as in the past.

Posted by: LC | January 23, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

You people are so uninformed! Abortions
are provided in the State of Kansas
through the 9th month – you can even be
in labor and have a partial birth abortion. Have any of you seen a baby
on ultra sound before 12 weeks?? They
look like a BABY only smaller. Good
grief – quite believing everything these
people put out to you. Did you know
that Margaret Sanger – started planned
parenthood because she hated seeing
poor black, hispanic, etc. children and
people messing up the looks of every-
thing. She wanted to eliminate the
drain they were on society and eventually eliminate all races but the
“white” race. More black babies are
killed everyday through abortion than
any other race – yet blacks promote
their “right” to kill their own. Don’t
you see? They are trying to eliminate
you and you are willingly going along
with it. My hard earned tax dollars
should NOT be spent on abortion – hey
don’t you remember – we got the pill!
and a million other ways to prevent
pregnancy. If your grown enough to
lay down with someone – be grown enough
to take the baby to term and give it
life and a chance with a family who
would be thrilled and love it forever.

Posted by: karabartee | January 23, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

mojo – And I can see your point and respect your feelings. However, as a man perhaps you could being a movement in “man world” that shames men to pony up more and tune into the children that are born? Or if it doesn’t personally affect you you’re not interested? Largest group of poor in the US are single moms. This clearly means men aren’t taking care of things? Proud of your sex in this?

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 12:46 pm 12:46 pm

Thank goodness sanity will prevail again!! There are already so many unwanted children in the world. And where family planning isn’t available, poor women are having many many children that they cannot even take care of. There was a study done showing that unwanted children often end up on the fringes of society. Read Freakanomics.

Posted by: lifesajourney | January 23, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

barrack, just imagined in a short time before your daugher is born, someone goes into michele and start the process of killing your baby.
If you can live with that, then you’re exactly the person we thought you are.

Posted by: Reality2009 | January 23, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

As much as I’m pro-choice? I do not like late term abortions and would be fine outlawing those except in cases of health of the mother (such as possible death).

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

Susan. No. A man that will not provide for his family, is not a man.

Posted by: mojo | January 23, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Well thanks all you yes we canners. We are all down on our knees surviving and now we have to pay for overseas abortions. Lets open Americas check book to the rest of the world. Hell lets give Iran and Hamas aide. Thanks again for prolonging our slow death as a nation.

Posted by: Jim Rod | January 23, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

I was raped and don’t give a rats ass what you think about my abortion. When you’ve walked a mile in mile shoes than your opinion will count until then you know what to do.

Posted by: Karen | January 23, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

Only God and give life, and only God can take life.
John the Baptist, while in his mother Elizabeth’s womb, lept for joy in the spirit when Mary arrived to visit her sister while she herself was carrying Christ.
Jeremiah 1:5 Before I knew you in the womb I formed you.
God knows us before we know us. We are a human in the womb, as the truth of God’s word says.
Pray for our country. We need it. We have elected a Saul.
I pray that those who read this are convicted by the Spirit, and that today is the day of your salvation.

Posted by: Bobby | January 23, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

It all comes down to choice doesn’t it? I for one do not believe abortion is the answer to reducing poverty, nor do I believe abortion is acceptable in God’s eyes. In the bible God gave all people a choice to make their own decisions, abortion is a sin, murder is a sin, lying is a sin, ect…. I also believe when we make bad choices, we pay consequences. I do therefor have a problem having use of my taxes to pay for them. I do not have an answer as to how we can rectify this delimma (my spelling is horrible). I am so happy that God is loving and forgiving. I guess what I wanted to say here is it all comes down to choice, we could encourage the best solution and then step back and let the women make her choice.

Posted by: Tigerpaw | January 23, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Jim Rod,
Why don’t you get back to your lawn mower racing!!!

Posted by: texas outlaw | January 23, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

lmk: “well, we can either pay for their abortions now, or pay for their welfare later. whats the difference?”
Or, they can PAY FOR the abortions THEMSELVES, or WORK and EARN their OWN MONEY later.
Why do you automatically assume that the hard-working taxpayer is automatically responsible for EVERYONE ELSE’S welfare? You Libs crack me up. The little brat hasn’t even been BORN yet, and already you’ve got him on the welfare rolls.
Here’s the solution:
-Make abortion legal, but the person having the abortion is financially responsible for it.
-Eliminate welfare and make people actually EARN their own living.
-Prisoners and/or their familises should have to pay for their prison sentences – - rent, food, etc.
-Make capital punishment legal, and make the criminal and/or his family finance his execution – NOT the taxpayer.
Tough solutions? Well, we live in tough times. TOUGH.

Posted by: BlofeldBuildings | January 23, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Just like abstinence right. Are people baby killers because they don’t have sex.
**
Not the same as abstinence at all.
- No sex, no fertilized egg, no baby, no killer.
- Sex, fertilized egg, pill/IUD aborts baby, killer.
Simple really.
With the morning after pill you don’t even know if the egg was fertilized.
**
Not the point. Taking the pill is an active attempt to prevent any fertilized egg from implanting.
The reason we have reasonable doubt is that we are not God and pretend like we know.
But I guess you are God and do know when each and every egg is fertilized.
**
Sigh… again, closing your eyes before you shoot doesn’t make the person you hit any less dead. Do you honestly believe the “I didn’t know” defense you keep leaning on? Because, now you do know. The pill equals abortion.

Posted by: ThePill_Equals_Abortion | January 23, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

mojo – Then GET MAD? See, the thing is this argument is still entirely too sexist? You guys still view it as a testosterone sporting event and then say women should close the legs? All the while you don’t argue for equal pay, nor get angry that so many are deserted and left with all of this responsibility? THAT is what most angers me about this argument. I do clearly understand though, how those of you that feel it’s wrong hate your tax money paying for it. Tho at the same time most that say this yell about entitlement as well. We can’t win here?

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

“Past presidents have instituted or revoked the ban on Jan. 22, the anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision, but President Obama held off on that move, thinking it too combative.”
If The Pup REALLY thought the Roe v. Wade anniversary was “too combative”, why’d He (also) issue pro-Roe, pro-abortion blabla ON the anniversary?
More likely: He wanted to stretch it to a TWO-day story. Meanwhile, He has only Bill Crosby blabla for “black” single mothers.

Posted by: Belle Starr | January 23, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

goodusername
You’re missing the point…everyone is entitled to their own opinion but the fact of the matter is that it’s MURDER to kill an unborn child. I’m glad your parents didn’t decide or think of aborting you.. In my eyes..abortion=murder

Posted by: disgusted | January 23, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

All that are against this should go to a third world country an help these people raise their 6 kids on 2 cups of rice a day.
Or better yet maybe you can cure AIDS and prevent the hellish life of a child born with it.
What I hear is many selfish people trying to impose their beliefs, instead of looking at the reality of the situation. Your idealism is not realism.

Posted by: texas outlaw | January 23, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

I never got an abortion, but I almost did. From a disfunctional overly strict home, starved for affection or caring of any kind, I was very attractive and sure enough boys were on me constantly, showering me with love, love?? what’s that??? never heard of it uttered to me at home! I was 18, soon over my head with a domineering boyfriend afraid i was pregnant. I was 100% sure I would abort if I was. I wasn’t. Here I am, 25 years later, that boy friends turned out to be a total loser, has been arrested for beating his wife, can’t keep a job. I however, finished college, earned a good degree, have two kids of my own with a WONDERFUL husband whom i met in school, after I grew up, grew beyond my poor town, my poor upbringing and my lousy home. what if I had that abortion? Would I regret it? dear God no! I would be saying Thank GOD! I am not forever entangled with the loser, my husband would not have never looked twice at some uneducated single mother, I would never have him, I would never have my kids. I would have never gotton my degree. My whole life would be have been a train wreck. I read this, and I remember where I was in life, and I understand why girls do it. My luck gave me my second chance, but if some girl needs to do what she has to do for HER to survive past a bad time, then she gets that call. selfish people. walk a mile in someone’s shoes. YOu dont care for poor girls trying to get out of poverty, who have never been said a kind word in their life, manipulated by overbearing boys, who cares about them! Cry for some bunch of cells that has no capacity for thought or feeling or pain. yeah, that makes sense. I think you’re all just holier than thou conceited idiots. Dont flatter yourselves. You’re not saving anyone, you’re actually actively trying to hurt girls. You’re not saviors. Your oppressors.

Posted by: mary | January 23, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

I am SO disappointed in President Obama for this action of murder! Already! I will support you as president, I will pray for you, I will teach my children to respect the office of president, but you have already lost my admiration!

Posted by: Glenn Taylor | January 23, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Susan. I’ll take your advice. However, my two brothers, who divorced, took care of their ex & their kids up until the kids turned 18. My brothers are still doing for their kids now, but not for their ex-wives. I am single, never married.

Posted by: mojo | January 23, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

texas outlaw – Well said. Many seem to think they have corner Walgreen’s for birth control. I learned this on the Hatian’s eat mud story where so many said they were bad people for having so many children. Like those people remotely thought like us? Or lived like us?

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Wow! Was his mind on this the whole time! Not even three days into his presidency and he does this?! This doesn’t make any sense at all. I would think that the economy should have his full attention. Oh well..don’t blame me..I voted for McCain!!!!!!!!

Posted by: HJay | January 23, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

If men had babies, there would be no discussions.

Posted by: Zoron | January 23, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

as far as i’m concerned:
yes, unplanned babies happen,
yes, rape and incest happens,
it’s still a human being who has been conceived through no fault of their own. they all deserve a chance at life. you did, i did. how many answers to world problems have been thrown away in garbage cans? if people would get back to family life, alot of this would end. men, be the fathers and husbands you should be, women, be the mothers and wives you should be. Love each other, take care of each other and be there for each other.
yes, i know that we have to work, but as i get older, i have found that “stuff” doesn’t matter.
when i was first married with 3 small children, my life was simple and happy. then we got into the swing of materialism. then i got seriously sick and almost died. guess what matters? my family. thats what it took for me to see that. I hope for you to see that.

Posted by: marie | January 23, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

mojo – To really begin to change this? All I ask is that in boy world the next time you see a friend doing a girl wrong in such a situation? Speak up. It’s past time to shame some of them. We need you good guys to do this. It’s going to have to come from their own sex? Always consider it as if it was your sister? I’m glad your brothers were so decent.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm

President Obama,
I believe that the right to human life supersedes that of a woman’s reproductive rights. I am fiercely against you using my money (tax dollars) to contribute to such immoral actions as the elimination of human lives. You must certainly know that all babies begin with the union of egg and sperm. There is no other human being who has the right to willfully terminate that innocent life.

Posted by: Kathleen Shaffer | January 23, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

I am Pro-choice, and couldn’t give a crap what the christian god or his minions think of me. I would rather the money be put to use here in the USA. With any luck, these third world countries will breed themselves out of existance or die at the hands of petty wars. The babies are born with aids and other untreatable diseases…if we just give them say another 50 years they won’t need any help from the rest of the world other than assistance in digging holes.
If you don’t like abortions, don’t get one! What someone else chooses to do is none of your business. BUT if you are a baby machine that won’t stop reproducing (welfare lifers), then you should be mandated to be sterilized (both men and women)and the children removed from your care…then placed into a home of a Pro-lifer.

Posted by: Andie | January 23, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

“the fact of the matter is that it’s MURDER to kill an unborn child. I’m glad your parents didn’t decide or think of aborting you.. In my eyes..abortion=murder”… the problem with you people is that you use emmotional conjecture as fact. Sperm and eggs are just as alive as a fertlized egg is, yet removing an egg from your body is perfectly legal. Killing sperm is perfectly legal. In fact, since slavery had been outlawed, it is not legal in this country for one person to try to force another person to do manual labor with their body against their will. When sperm and egg meet, it starts DEVELOPMENT. Put a frog, chicken and human embryo on a table in front ofyou and ask, which is the human, you will correct only 33% of the time. PUt a frog, chicken and a baby on a table, how often do you think you’ll hit which one is the baby? You equate a baby with an embryo and that is just incorrect. All drama aside, you literally could not identify the human. The human has NOT BEEN DEVELOPED YET> It does nto exist. Just like when you 8 years old, your children you will have later in life, they dont exist yet. They are not. The question is, should you, or anyone, be allowed to force to develope and birth a human against their will. Is any women obligated to develope every embryo? how about every egg? Eggs die every month. Is contraception murder too? Catholics say it is. These are religious questions. Conjecture. theory. Is stopping development the same as killing? Logically, I woudl say one has to ‘be’ in order to be killed, the definition of ‘be’ would be, to a logical person ,that the beign has selfawareness. Seeing that an embryo has no selfawareness, i’d say, it doesn’t even know it is, it has no sensation of pain, or even thought, then I’d say you cannto call stopping it’s development murder. but that’s me, and hey, dont let logic get in teh way of a good drama rant.

Posted by: frank | January 23, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

First I dont think any man should be commenting on abortion issues. It is so easy for them to cast judgement when they will never have to face that decision. Also, you people that are so concerned about abortion should focus on why is it that birthcontrol is not payed for by insurance but Viagra is. On that note although I am prochioce I dont agree with partial birth abortions. If you have not made up your mind by this point you should just have the child.

Posted by: fizzy74 | January 23, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

i do not want my tax dollers spent for someone who is exercising there legal right to end another human beings life. if President Obama won’t protect the smallest of Americans, what makes you think he’ll protect the rest of us?

Posted by: marie | January 23, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

“I believe that the right to human life supersedes that of a woman’s reproductive rights.”…well, I believe that is a pretty Draconian religious freak thing to believe and thank GOD your freak religious belief cannot be forced on all the females in this society. We are a free country ,and your ‘beliefs’ do not get to supercede anyone’s right. And, you call it “reproductive rights”. Again, people like you do not like to be accurate. What your belief supercedes is the right of a women to say whether or not her body will carry a pregnancy to term and whether or not she will birht a baby. So you are for forcing her to develope a baby against her will, and to birth it against her will. Essentially, you are for involuntary servitude. SO just say it, Dude. Stop with all the inaccurate bull. What you want to do is force girls to develope babies against their will. yeah, good luck with that.

Posted by: frank | January 23, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

fizzy – I still don’t get why in 2009 we don’t have a pill men can take. Well, yes I do get it. They don’t want the responsibility either. They should come up with one. And then deny insurance coverage for years to pay for it.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Karabartee, are you rewriting History or just twisting the truth so it will support your opinion. Sanger’s goal was to prevent women dying young and giving up on life the way her mother did from so many pregnancies. You need to get informed about Sanger. I was the first generation to have “the pill”, and while I would never get an abortion, I am eternally grateful to her for developing it and giving me choices.

Posted by: Sharonkatheen | January 23, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

One last thought. TV programs like FOX’s “Two and a Half Men” only serve to exacerbate the situation by ridiculing the idea of sexual responsibility. To my mind, the sooner that program, and some others on other channels, goes off the air, the better.

Posted by: Zoron | January 23, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

BlofeldBuildings
in a perfect world, where everyone has the money that you have, im sure people would be glad to pay for their own abortions, prison terms, and welfare. youre going to be the first to complain when federal funding is eliminated and people who were previously on welfare are barking at your mansion door for a handout. youre right, i shouldnt judge a fetus and assume its going to be on welfare one day… however, if the mother cant even afford her own abortion, id say the odds are pretty good.

Posted by: lmk | January 23, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

pretty soon your going to be hunting for rice to feed yourself ,when the dollar is a fire starter.you will blame some of the 29 year olds on wallstreet driving the sports cars or the FED but The same God that’s been sending the hurricanes ,tornados and fires,not to mention totally disproved global warming to MN residents, will be the cause…you could dig up all the presidents and it won’t help!

Posted by: ChristophorM | January 23, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

For 7 years the global gag rule cut funding to non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and cut off access to these NGOs for US Agency for International Development (USAID) condoms and other forms of contraception. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that about 80 million women face unwanted pregnancies each year, and that 1/4 of these pregnancies are terminated under unsafe conditions. More than 95% of these unsafe abortions occur in low-income countries. Every “pro-lifer” sitting in their warm home with food in the fridge and kids at school should receive a free trip to visit the overwhelming misery in slums worldwide to see firsthand why President Obama overturned this ban.

Posted by: idahogirl | January 23, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

People r so ignorant…Although I dnt agree with abortion..I think it shouls be upto the women..who r we to judge..ONLY GOD CAN JUDGE..All I have to say is i support my wonderful president and he whos never sin throw the first stone…
“I didnt think so”…..

Posted by: sari | January 23, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

The pendulum swings to and fro. As pointed out by this article, this is a policy that has varied with each administration. This is one of the strengths of a 2 party system.

Posted by: rigatoni | January 23, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

“I am fiercely against you using my money (tax dollars) to contribute to such immoral actions as the elimination of human lives”. I hate to be the bearer of bad news but your tax dollars also go to fight wars where, get this, innocent children are being killed daily.

Posted by: fizzy74 | January 23, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

OK…you want to talk realism? I know this may be a novel idea but what about teaching these people in other countries to say no, provide them with birth control,or use the money to provide tubals and vasectomies? Everyone says its a choice, well abortion is not giving that little baby a choice!!

Posted by: Katwoman | January 23, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

STOP TALKING ABOUT GOD!!!!!!!!!! WE’RE TALKING ABOUT TAXES!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: susie | January 23, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

6 billion people soon to be 7 billion people on the planet. Right to life? What right do you have when there is no food, water, resources? People, look around, take care of what you already have here!- you are not doning that very well. Right to life…whose life? Pro-lifers are tops in the category of hypocrite. I suppose this really does support the fact that humans (or at least some of them) are no ‘better’ than animals, even if those pro-lifers think so, because they do not exercise their right to think and plan according to what is right for the planet, the environment that feeds us, like our ancestors did… we can see that many have de-evolved and evolution does not take only one pre-determined trajectory. I actually do belive in God, and I believe in free will, and I believe in being a keeper of God’s creations, which means mediating our own life through technological advancements, and the creation of pro-life tech, not war- or in other words, feeding starving people, having clean water for life that is already here, ensuring human dignity for those who are already here…

Posted by: stellarsoulartist | January 23, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

Here’s a possible solution:
Since we as tax payers get to elect on our w-4′s our tax qualifications, why not add a separate box to check to specify ProLife or ProChoice. Box #1 for ProLifers and Box #2 for ProChoice. If you do not believe in abortions, then check Box #1 for ProLife, then nothing gets taken out of your paycheck and your taxes ARE NOT used to fund abortions. If you believe in abortions, then check Box #2 for ProChoice, and funds WILL be taken from your paycheck and your taxes will be used to SUPPORT the abortions you are in support of.

Posted by: JM | January 23, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

This is not about whether it’s a sin or not… it’s about choice, free will. For women that choose to become mothers, you do the best you can and what’s best for you at that moment in your life when you make that decision. For those that choose not to become mothers when faced with an unwanted pregnancy, who are you to force them with your judgments and bashing to have a child or give that child away? It’s a personal choice that woman will have to take up with her conscience and her God. Period. I’m a firm believer in family planning and prevention but providing all options for consideration for a woman to make an informed decision is a responsible approach to healthcare here and abroad.

Posted by: gimmeabreak | January 23, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

so why put parents in jail for the murder of thier children? whats the difference? a couple of weeks? why, they aren’t developed yet. they just have their fingers and toes, but hey, what the hell, i don’t want to take care of it. what is wrong wtih you pro choicers? all it boils down to is convienence and money

Posted by: marie | January 23, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

I was disappointed in the eradication of the so-caled ‘gag rule’ about funding for international organizations who support,practice, and provide for abortions.
Having worked in underdeveloped countries for over 25 years I have seen the results of poverty, poor medical care, etc. I truly believe that if we spent the money we will now use for abortions on reducing poverty and providing decent medical care there would not be the need for so many abortions. Pre-natal care is almost unheard of in many places. Abortion should NEVER be a substitute for this kind of care.Education is another element that is necessary here. This too is under-provided.
I certainly hope and serusly pray that this aid will n ot include late term abortions which really is murder, as a living child is pulled from the womd and crushed!
I speak of education and I truly believe that MEN should be educated in morality as it is in so many cases who pray upon women, impregnate them and then leave the to deal with the results of their so called machismo!!Perhaps if the men who are partners in tnis action were prosecuted both in underdeveloped countries as well as here in our country, the number of unwanted pregnancies would decease or, at least, be greatly reduced.
I pray for yo, Mr. President, along with all your Cabinet members. Don’t disappoint us with rushed, unthought -out decisions such as this one.

Posted by: helen | January 23, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

I can never understand how someone can be pro-murder. How can any sane, rational person possibly think it’s OK to kill a baby just because they don’t want it or it’s an inconvenience or whatever. Life is always precious. To destroy innocent young life for selfish reasons is particularly heinous. Rationalize all you want, it’s just wrong.

Posted by: challenger | January 23, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

Katwoman – These people you refer to live in a world unlike anything you have ever experienced. Extreme poverty and it’s a fight just to have enough food to survive. Rape. Lawlessness. This makes the theory of teaching them to say “no” just a bit silly. Considering they are forced to live in a more primal existence than we have ever considered. Bottom line? They’re not remotely like you. With good reason. What works for us will not work for them.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

susie….
I LOVE MY GOD. MY LORD AND MASTER!!!!! I LOVE GOD!!!!!
THERE HOW IS THAT FOR TALKING ABOUT gOD?

Posted by: Katwoman | January 23, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

The funding we are talking about here is often in developing countries and in the form of contraception. In many developing countries, an additional pregnancy in places where medical care is often distant or unavailable can often result in the mother’s death. The Bush administration knew this very well. But then again, this was a president who didn’t believe in the teaching of sex education. Check out the teenage pregnancy rates in some states with abstinence-only education in public schools.
Clinton ended the gag, Bush reintroduced it, now Obama has ended it again.

Posted by: mary | January 23, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

PRO Choice = You the Person make the Choice. Either to have an Abortion or not.
Pro Life = FORCES thier view on others no matter what. (Dictatorship)
Look what happened to Kids now a days since goverment stepped into our households and said you can not discipline your children or CPS will take them away. Government taught our children to disrespect authority, blackmail thier parents.
These same Pro-lifers sit on thier high horse and want to enforce thier will on others, all a while spouting how they hate the welfare system.
No body has a right to tell you what to do to your body, unless they are paying your way.
I do not believe in Abortion, but I will not tell someone they have to follow my view for IT is thier CHOICE!!!!!

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | January 23, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Although I believe it is a woman’s right to decide if she wants to have a child, I don’t believe taxpayers should help pay for her abortion.

Posted by: Katie | January 23, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Once again, everyone will have different beliefs, views, opinions about this topic. But, the fact of the matter is that to MAKE Taxpayers fund Abortion is downright inconceivable!
P.S Life begins at Conception
Abortion is still Murder doesn’t matter which way you look at it.

Posted by: disgusted | January 23, 2009, 1:25 pm 1:25 pm

susie – The subject of abortion will always be about “God.”

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

to uscitizen -
so whats the deal? us pro lifers have to be “forced” to pay for what we don’t belive in. where’s my “choice”

Posted by: marie | January 23, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

To all you complaining like you didn’t see this comming, I am Pro Choice so is the man the majority of Americans voted last November. Deal with it and Please keep your religious nonsense to yourself. The assult on womens’ reporductive rights is finaly over.

Posted by: Mike in WNY | January 23, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Ok Susan..sterilize the lot of them. No more silly than my tax dollars going for abortions!

Posted by: Katwoman | January 23, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

I’m glad Obama followed through on this promise. Thank you, Mr. President, for truely seeing the plight of women beyond our borders instead of conveniently denying the truth to the detriment of millions. I was ready to be dissapointed; but so far, so good.

Posted by: nina | January 23, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

marie – Your choice is the same place my choice was with the Iraq war I was against from the beginning. Along with many other things I don’t agree with either.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Plain and simple abortion is MURDER!!!

Posted by: Believer | January 23, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

God blessed everyone (even those who do not believe in Him) with life. Everyone has been granted natural life from a natural conception to a natural death. Human beings have abused life by killing each other: killing of spouses, parents killing their children (ex. Caylee Anthony), 9/11 Tragedy, lynchings of african americans, killings at high schools,colleges, and places of employment, just to name a few. All these killings are illegal, immoral, unjust, and disrespectful to the gift of life. How can abortion (genocide of innocent babies) be “ok” and remain legal?
Roe vs. Wade has only lasted for 36 years. Humanity has been on this earth a whole lot longer and has survived. Norma (Jane Roe) has NEVER had an abortion, but has three beautiful children. She was a young woman who was confused and pregnant with her 2nd child. Her name was used to legalize abortion. Her video can be seen on VirtueMedia.org under Ad Portfolio–Television–Norma(Jane Roe). Norma is a Pro-Life supporter.
Chastity is the only way to live until one marries and that does not involve abortion. Many people are chaste. If boys/men and girls/women are not ready to have a child, then they should not be having sex!! Educate your children!! No sex=No pregnancy. Contraception is also a form of abortion. It does not allow the Natural Conception of the baby to happen. Natural Family Planning is FREE and a natural way of planning your family size without abortion, nor contraception.
Adoption is the only way if the the birth parents are unable to raise the baby or if there was a rape. There are so many couples living in this world who cannot have babies and who would love to raise these babies. My parents were one of these couples. They adopted me and my sister. Now my husband and I have two beautiful sons that God blessed us with.
Think about the problems with social security. There are a lot of senior citizens and not enough of working people in our society to contribute to social securtiy. Most of our seniors grew up with many siblings (6+)in their families. Every generation since, there has been a dramatic decrease in family size (2 children or less). That is not enough people to work in order to support social security. Abortion and Contraception have contributed to our problems. Contraception has side effects. Look it up on the internet. You even hear the side effects listed on the TV commercials. Abortion and Contraception goes against Natural Life.
Today Dr. Alveda King, niece of Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr., and supporters will be leaving 1400 roses and praying at the White House to represent the 1400 African American children aborted daily. Dr. King is the daughter of the late slain civil rights activist Rev. A. D. King and Naomi Barber King. She is a Civil Rights Activist and Pro-Life Warrior. (kingforAmerica.com) Her whole family were and still are pro-lifers. That is MLK,Sr. and his wife; MLK, Jr.,and his wife; A.D. King and his wife.

Posted by: Pro-Lifer, formerly an ignorant Pro-Choice supporter | January 23, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

I saw it coming, thats why i voted for McCain

Posted by: marie | January 23, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

Marie commented….>i do not want my tax dollers spent for someone who is exercising there legal right to end another human beings life…..Marie, My tax dollars have gone to a war that I didn’t want that has ended several human lives… But,,, for the 7 years… there my tax dollars went along with with many other tax dollars…and is it just American lives or any human life…Cuz… then our tax dollars also have for years gone to other countries in the shape of weapons that again kill human life….
if you and people like you care so much about human life and helpless human life then why are there still so many children even here in American that are unwanted and suffer physical and sexual abuse.
No child should be born to a parent who does not want them…

Posted by: braith morgan | January 23, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

Can someone explain to me why is that the pro-lifers who are ok with invading a country ( where hundreds of kids/babies are killed daily) which is paid for with your tax dollars and oh are for capital punishment. Then they use religion as thier basis stating the thou shalt not kill commandment, so if we go off your commandment when is it ok to kill or who to kill, who makes this call.

Posted by: fizzy74 | January 23, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

That is right! God said ‘thou shall not kill’. So right-wingers: How does this relate to starting a mismanaged war in Iraq that killed thousands and thousands of civilians, -men, women and children?

Posted by: Skip | January 23, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

To marie my tax dollars were spent on a war in Iraq I don’t believe in and on faith based groups I don’t believe in so I guess I had the same choice as you

Posted by: Mike in WNY | January 23, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

Katwoman – There’s something equally just as “wrong” with mass steralization?? Kind of a slippery slope. I didn’t say I had all the answers. I just said they’re not remotely on our level. Actually I’m a firm believer that poverty is where you will trace back a whole boatload of problems. So, we need to teach them how to feed themselves, etc. Tho they have rogue governments that abuse them and keep them impoverished.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm

For those opposed to abortion – help women prevent unwanted conception, then the demand for abortion will be lower. Preventing only the abortion of unwanted babies does not address the root cause of the problem. The foreign women who receive assistance from America do not always have the choice whether or not to have sex. Is it better to prevent them from aborting an unwanted child in order to have that child born and then starve to death because the parents can not provide food? In our country, you might be able to force women to carry an unwanted baby to term, but you cannot force them to stop drinking for 9 months, stop using drugs, go to prenatal appointments… the result is damaged unwanted kids who will probably not be given for adoption until after they have suffered abuse and neglect for a few years and are removed by CPS. How is this a good result? If a woman does NOT want to have a baby, she is not going to do what is best for the child…go to adoptuskids.com and search for kids under 2 years old and you will see what horrible things parents have done to unwanted kids. (shaken baby syndrome, fetal alcohol syndrome, etc)
With that said, I recently lost my wanted, loved child after only 14 weeks of pregnancy. My child’s body was still in mine, and I needed, yes, an “abortion” in order to remove my dead baby’s body before I got a life-threatening infection. I was attacked by pro-life activists when I went to get my life-saving surgery…they did not stop even after I told them that my baby had already died…I had to find a different place where I could have it done in secret for more than 10 times the cost of the first place, putting me into debt. This event, the most horrible experience of my life, has shaped my views. Why would my loved, wanted baby die when teenage drug addicts who don’t want kids have several? Why would God kill my baby, and not theirs? If God exists, he is not a loving God. I have not been able to conceive again.

Posted by: Mallory | January 23, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm

In our country, we fortunately have, as part of our Constitution, the right to live and raise our families as we see fit within the realm of the law. I am sick of zealots trying to make everybody else live a zealots life style. Did you not learn anything from the Salem Witch Hunt fiasco? If your beliefs don’t permit you to have an abortion, then don’t do it. Don’t break all kinds of other commandments to control other people. What are those acts that have broken many commandments? Well let’s see. Anti-abortionist have: meddled in others affairs, judged their brother, committed murder, destroyed property, gotten involved in political affairs (separation between church and state), etc, etc. Mind your own business. Just make sure you are acceptable before your God. Leave everyone else alone to stand before him themselves. You zealots may be surprised to find who makes God’s ‘Good List’. God bless Obama for seeing this.

Posted by: Orwells_World | January 23, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

True. If men had babies there would be no discussion because he wouldn’t have to fight tooth and nail for control of his own body. A woman’s body is her own, and only God can judge her. It’s funny how the same people who argue for zygotes don’t give a d@mn about the 5-year-old girl who needs a better school or food in her mouth. After birth all are expected to fend for themselves–or else it’s socialism. I thought helping your neighbor was the Christian thing to do. But you can’t love anyone when you’re filled with so much hate. Get over yourself and mind your own business.

Posted by: Sense | January 23, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

‘If this is the route society wishes to take, then at the same time the abortion is done the doctor should also neuter the irresponsible woman to save future taxpayer dollars!’
TampaGuy, you are hilarious!
I’ve got a better idea though – let’s neuter the men instead. After all there’d be no pregnancy to worry about without their valuable contribution.
I’d be really interested to know how many of the pro-life posters are men. In my opinion, they don’t have the right to a say in the debate. Let the people who have to carry the babies to term and live with the consequences be the ones to make the decision over whether or not abortion should be allowed. I have a feeling the ruling would be pretty decisive.

Posted by: sarah | January 23, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

Of the 56 countries receiving US family planning assistance, 35 legally permit abortion without restriction as to reason, or on grounds such as fetal impairment, to protect a woman’s physical or mental health, or socio-economic hardship. The rest of the world does not live like Americans. These crowded, impoverished countries are home to more than 1.5 BILLION people, close to 1/4 of the world’s population. And sorry, lecturing about abstinence has not worked, even in the United States. Under the Bush era gag rule, funding was cut to local NGOs in countries desperately needing US family planning help, such as access to condoms. These were NGOs who provide abortion-related services using their own legally sanctioned, NON-US FUNDS, yet the gag rule restricted their access to other birth control programs provided by the US which would help PREVENT abortions. The gag rule has caused more misery, unsafe abortions, and suffering.

Posted by: idahogirl | January 23, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

one person cannot take care of all the unwanted, but many of us together could.
but you won’t. it gets left up to a small group of, what did they call us? “dogooders”. the missions, people who help there. where are you people? anyone out there at least trying to end some of this? if you are not trying, then you have no right to complain.

Posted by: marie | January 23, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

I say to all the people that have abortions to grow up! Take responcibility for your actions and choice not to murder a poor child. And if you do not think it is a child until it is viable to live outside you , go to a 18 week ultrasound and see that baby floating around and the heartbeat beating. Oh and my one year old can’t live without me right now! Is he not viable. That is what is wrong with our country today. To many people want the quick and easy solution if it is not convienent to them.. Take responcibilty for your actions. There are many options available for you that do not include death!

Posted by: Kell | January 23, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

I just don’t think I (my choice) should be required to pay for something that I don’t believe in.

Posted by: Katwoman | January 23, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

kat – I respect your feelings on that. But all of us feel this way regarding our tax money.

Posted by: Susan | January 23, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

If Obama’s mother decided to have an abortion 47 years ago, we wouldn’t have this discussion. Too bad she wasn’t successful in teaching him her belief system.

Posted by: logic301 | January 23, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

I’m just saying where is my choice in the matter?

Posted by: Katwoman | January 23, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

mary, I think your comment brings up a very valid point. I am glad life worked out well for you after your rocky start.
Of the two girls I knew in high school who kept their babies without the support of the father, they never married. They didn’t go on to college but were forced to get low-paying jobs. And the point you made that your husband would never have looked twice at an unwed uneducated mother as dating material, is unfortunately the attitude of most men. When I tried to introduce my single men friends to my unmarried friend with a baby, they were interested in meeting her until they found out there was a child. Most men want a long romantic period and to be the focus of the relationship and that just isn’t going to happen with a child.
Those who think teens should have children are showing they don’t care about the teens life at all. Or the children she would have had if she had a chance to marry.

Posted by: Lydia | January 23, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

I am personally against abortion, but I am against banning abortion completely. I think there are certain circumstances where the government should not be making the decision for the woman. I would like government to pay all expenses for prenatal care and the birth for women who are citizens. Also, I would have a federal tax of $500 on any abortion. This would reverse are current situation where it is much cheaper to abort than have a baby. However, I think Jenny Rome Ga said it best when she said “Hey what about ADOPTION. It is a win win situation. Couple gets a child and birth mom is able to complete her education etal. ADOPTION is a love thing.” Absolutely!!!

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | January 23, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

marie, my tax dollars are paying to kill innocents in other countries thanks to GW’s war in Iraq. Not of my choice. Hey Ideal flash here, if you do not like how your tax dollars are being spend by the USA why not move out. PRO-LIFER’S kill Doctors and anyone in the area when the bombs blow up. Or they shoot a Doctor has he is having dinner with his family right in front of his or her kids. So people of PRO-Choice, the PRO-LIFER’s are do as I say not as I do.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | January 23, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

katwoman-
I think our choice does not matter anymore. we have been out voted by the majority. so we don’t matter anymore. they got what they wanted. God help us.

Posted by: marie | January 23, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

To Kell… You think your 1 year old can’t live without you? Seriously? If you died today…that baby wouldn’t be cared for by a foster family or the government? You really think that your baby will be left to starve? And you think this country is backwards because of abortions…I say to you if you aren’t intelligent enough to know how our system works…maybe it’s you who shouldn’t have any more kids. If you don’t want an abortion….then don’t have one. I don’t believe that life begins at conception. You are forcing your beliefs on me. I’m not forcing my beliefs on you to have an abortion…so why should you be able to do that to me?

Posted by: Chuck S | January 23, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

@Katwoman: Your choice is not to have sex in first place.
People should take responsibility for their actions!

Posted by: logic301 | January 23, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

I have been reading what you all are saying but whether you believe in God or not, one day YOU will meet God and all he will see is the blood dripping off your hands from the sins of abortion. Whether you had one or not, if you voted for anyone that is pro-choice/pro abortion you will have helped in the killing of the innocent children. If so many of you are for abortion it is amazing that any of you had kids of your own.
We are going to bring down on us the JUSTICE of God for the sins of abortion and the babies being butchered are crying out to God.

Posted by: Mother | January 23, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

To Mallory,
I’m so sorry about your baby that died. It is a horrible thing that has happened. But I want you to know that even though we don’t understand why awful things are allowed to happen to us here on earth, there is a Loving God. I know he lives and loves us. I have had some gigantic trials in my life that can shake your faith. I have learned that we don’t understand all these things that go on here in life, but if we have hope and hang on and trust in God, we will make it. Then after this life things will become clearer and we will know that God is real, he loves us more than we can understand and we will know why this life was full of hard times. Keep doing good and trust in God though it is very dark and sad for you right now. All will be ok.
Some one who care,
R.

Posted by: R. | January 23, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

logic301 tell that to the women and young girls that are raped. What they asked for it?

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | January 23, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

I am a free-market, small government Republican and I applaud this! The Christian right and their loopy anti-abortion agenda have dominated the GOP and national debate for too long.
The cold, hard, rational fact is that there are simply far too many people on the planet already and that our planet’s resources may not be able to support much more.
Human population grows exponentially, and our resources do not. Abortions and family planning – especially in the third world – help aleviate poverty and reduce the strain on resources.
We need to get beyond feel-good Christian fairytales about little babies and start dealing with reality.
If we don’t take steps to curb our own population growth, nature will. And it won’t be pretty.

Posted by: James Swiecki | January 23, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

does “god” exist in third world countries or just in your middle-class suburban homes? you people talking about god have no clue about the real world. you hide behind god because youre all weak. youve probably never even left the country. get real… go out and see whats really out there. i did. its mind-blowing how people really suffer.

Posted by: lmk | January 23, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Mother go tell that to the child of 10 that was raped by her father, then go read the 10 commandments again, mother judge.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | January 23, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm

I see all these comments about wasting tax dollars on abortions… WAKE UP PEOPLE. It’s a lot less to have the government pay for an abortion that it is to care for that child after it’s born. Most or at least a large percentage of people who have abortions are underage, single, already on welfare or all three. Adding additional children to the mix only adds to the burden of tax payers. A teenage kid that doesn’t have an abortion is far more likely not to finish HS much less go on to college. Which means she’ll make even less. That means less taxes generated from her income. Regardless of your position on abortion…using the argument that it’s costing us tax dollars to fund this is an invalid one…

Posted by: Chuck S | January 23, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

Well, he isn’t wasting any time is he? And the Obama-bots that elected him are out spewing the hate and defending his every move. So much for “governing for the center” and the “Day of Unity” or whatever he called it. It’s only a day of Unity if you bow down and accept the choices he’s making. If not, too bad, you’re on the outside looking in. I’m not selling my soul in order to be in the “majority”. Last I checked, this is America. I have a right to be pro-life, same as you have the right to be pro-choice. I don’t think you’ll shut your mouths, so we’re certainly not going to be shouted down and shut ours. With our own country in such a perilous financial position, we shouldn’t be giving money to any other country, for any reason. Then, our own citizens would be able to be helped without countless bailouts at the expense of our children’s futures.

Posted by: findacure1991 | January 23, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

logic301,
you think that baby that is born at 25 weeks ( yes abortions are done that late) can not live? My nephew was born at 28 weeks premature and is a healthy 6 year old now!

Posted by: kell | January 23, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

I expect that to happen,i never belive in him and all his blaa,blaaaaaaa,and to wait for more bad news……

Posted by: margarita | January 23, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

marie-
at least we have the knowledge that He is a just and merciful God

Posted by: Katwoman | January 23, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

Mallory,,, My heart goes out to you… Life is a mystery and life sometimes puts us in what we feel are unfair situations. I don’t know about a God… My personal belief is that God should be personal to each of us…What do know and what I have seen is that…there seems to be a bigger plan than most of us can see.
Because of your experience, you have learned compassion… And not just for one side or the other… You have been blessed with knowing the beauty of life growing within you and also the miserable conditions that women go through to just to have an abortion.
I say to you, that if your heart yearns to have a child, adopt and if that doesn’t speak to you then there are many others ways to be helpful to children that will feed your heart and nourish you soul.
I tell my own children, not to have children of their own. They are many doing that already… I tell them that if they need to experience the maternal, to do something worthy for children. There is plenty of work to be done.
I do not understand, people wanting children to be born to a parent that doesn’t want them… they have no idea, but I do… as one of those children, I do…

Posted by: braith morgan | January 23, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

With a president who does not know when life begins because “It is above my pay grade”, so he says, what do you expect? Just look at the videos with his speeches addressing the “Planned Parenthood” orgs around the country and the promises he made to them. This is just another assault on family values. I repeat this is NOT the most pressing issue in our country? However, Hussein is running true to form….he wants to be all things to all people, so come 2012, he would have covered all constituencies………….it’s more of the fraudulent politics that got him elected. Open your eyes people, stop gulping down the koolaid.

Posted by: chotolal7 | January 23, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Here’s a thought, perhaps people who can’t afford birth control (which is often free) or can’t afford an abortion, maybe they should refrain from sex until they are mature enough to protect themselves. It’s just an idea …. seems like there is something fundamentally wrong with our tax dollars being used to pay for someone’s abortion. But hey, I’m just a taxpayer, and when it comes to taxpayer dollars – well there’s plenty more where that comes from.
Of course abortion should be safe and legal. Most people agree on that which is why abortion rights survived Reagan and two Bushes – but using taxpayer money to cover abortions is plain wrong.

Posted by: Sad Day | January 23, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

@USCITIZEN_04: Abortion should never be a solution! In the worst instances, “raped mothers” should give birth and give up their babies for adoption.
We, as a society, should provide them with the maximum support! Who knows, maybe during the 9 months period, they will learn to love their children and want to keep their babies! Let’s give mothers and children a chance to love each other!

Posted by: logic301 | January 23, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Katwoman- “at least we have the knowledge that He is a just and merciful God”
Please explain Gaza then…. Or for that matter Iraq. I was there in 04. No God around as far as I could see…yet that is what they are fighting for. We were fighting for a far more powerfull entity…Halliburton and oil revenue.

Posted by: Chuck S | January 23, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Chuck S: Maybe YOU should wake up! There are hundreds of thousands of American couples who are waiting YEARS to adopt a baby. If we encouraged women to give their baby up for adoption instead of just the “convenient solution” to their problems, everyone would win. The government wouldn’t have to pay for anything, as most of these couples are willing to pay the birth expenses and all legal expenses for the birth-mother. If I were you, I’d thank God your mother was pro-life. I was born to a teenage mother who married my father, and they have been happily married for more than 30 years and I had an idyllic childhood! Everyone at the time encouraged my mother to have an abortion. I, and my parents, thank God every day she didn’t make THAT “choice”!

Posted by: findacure1991 | January 23, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

To put Obama’s inaugural address into context, consider this proclamation at his kick-off celebration in Philadelphia: “What is required is a new declaration of independence, not just in our nation, but in our own lives…” While he spells out his vision for that “new declaration” for our nation in his inaugural speech, I can only presume that his reference to “in our own lives” means rehab for those of us who are “bitterly clinging to guns and religion.” This is also from a manifesto that started world war 2

Posted by: History Buff | January 23, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Hmm, My body my choice! Simple as that! BTW: For you christians and pro-lifers who think you shouldn’t have to pay taxes that support a womans right to choose. I made the choice not to have any kids, I haven’t had an abortion but I have used birth control, and condoms that my sister told me about so I wouldn’t! I was educated and made smart decisions! You idiots don’t want them to know how to prevent early pregnancy but you also don’t want them to have abortions, yet seeing a 15 year old in church on Sunday is despicable and worthy of your harsh words and staring eyes! Also, nine times out of ten it is your daughters that are too ashamed and scared to go home and tell mommy and daddy of the bundle of joy arriving and it is your daughters who seek abortions for fear you will find out! It is the daughters of every single one of you who used to seek back alley abortions and DIE from infection because mommy would die if she found out and daddy would kill her if she even told him she’d had sex! GET REAL PEOPLE! GET REAL! I pay taxes that help your brats go to school! (Why am I being punished for you being breeding machines!) I pay taxes that help your daughters get WIC and Welfare when you kick them out!

Posted by: Robin | January 23, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Chuck S-Well said!These people are the same religious freaks who complain about people having kids and being on welfare! Obama is a smart man and he knows what he is doing. People are so quick to judge him because just because he is black. No matter how hard is going to try to screw things up he will never be able to mess up America as much as stupid Bush did!! Yeah lets have as many kids as possible, because the economy is so great and people can afford them!!

Posted by: Ralph | January 23, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

Joe M.
Most people believe in God, so should that mean the rest of the people should have too because the majority does.
Many laws are made to protect the minority.

Posted by: texas outlaw | January 23, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

matt – actually, Bush did the same thing to Clinton. Obama is just correcting the last 8 years of mistakes.

Posted by: Freethinker | January 23, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

There sure is much mis-informaiton on this post. First, the BC Pill does not ALWAYS prevent ovulation. No pill is 100% effective at preventing ovulation. Therefore, an egg and sperm can unite and form a human being when a woman is on the Pill. The fetus will probably not live since the Pill also may prevent implantation. That is why the Pill is an abortifacient. For those who beleive life begins at conception, then using the Pill presents a problem. Yes, I do have a doctorate degree. You can also look up the information on the AMA or FDC websites too.

Posted by: LoveAlways | January 23, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

This President is smart.He’s appointing the smartest people on the planet to “FIX” this mess we’re in,and he and Pelosi and the rest of the dirty dozen are getting credit for doing the job

Posted by: amstaffbru | January 23, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Mallory, I am so sorry to hear of your sad experience. When those pro-life people didn’t leave you alone even when you told them your baby wasn’t alive is one of the stupidest, cruel things I’ve ever heard.
I don’t know if this will help you but most women have a few miscarriages, because their babies died. I felt so lost after mine. I hope you can have a child because you truly want one.
To me, blaming God for our triumphs or our tragedies is wrong. There is so much in life that is random like accidents, genetic defects, even why we fall in love. My belief is He doesn’t control each and every little thing but is there for each of us if we ask for guidance and strength.
Your point about a pregnant woman not taking care of herself if she doesn’t want the baby resulting in damaged children is another point that is ignored by the pro-life people. Just a few alcoholic drinks can severely damage the brain of a fetus, not to mention taking drugs. Having a child should be a choice, not made lightly, but one made joyously with the energy, finances and love to do the job well.
I wish you well Mallory. And if children are in your future, whether yours biologically or if you foster care and then adopt, I hope you enjoy the experience. And if children of your own don’t happen, remember how much a loving adult matters to every child, whether a relative or neighbors. Some of my favorite memories are of my aunt reading her encyclopedias together. And a neighbor lady who taught me to grow flowers after I admired hers.

Posted by: Lydia | January 23, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

findacure1991- Why is it that everyone who actually has a kid is pro-life. I have three kids and I’m pro choice. My mother is also pro choice and she had me. Also please present your source for “hundreds of thousands of Americans” wanting kids. Maybe tens of thousands….but hundreds of thousands suggest more than 200k. That’s simpky not true. Since we have 3mil in the country now…to suggest that 200k-300k people want to adopt is almsot 1 % of the population at any given time…

Posted by: Chuck S | January 23, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm

Chuck S – I disagree with 1:53:07 PM comment. My opinion is that making abortion the cheapest and easiest option means a person does not have to take responsibility for their actions. As I stated earlier, I don’t want to ban all abortions, but I do want to make it more difficult and expensive. There is very few excuses for becoming pregnant accidently repeatedly in a country with all the birth control that is available.

Posted by: MikeMo1947 | January 23, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

The Catholic Church, worldwide, does an excellent job at helping with adoption services, pre-natal care, care after the baby is born (including clothes and living quarters), and education about parenting. Please turn to the Catholic Church with your spiritual needs and for Christian truth.

Posted by: LoveAlways | January 23, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

Robin, just because someone is against abortion doesn’t mean that their views are strictly from a religious viewpoint. Abortion is murder plain and simple. Support it all you want!! obviously you have some sort of “dark” issue with religion. You don’t have to base all prolife individuals on being religious maybe some people just have a conscience.

Posted by: dfesta | January 23, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

logic301…you misunderstand. Where is my choice on whether I want to spend my tax dollars paying for abortions.

Posted by: Katwoman | January 23, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Anyone who disagrees with President Obama overturning this ban must realize that lecturing poor, uneducated women in other countries about abstinence does not prevent abortions. The concept is NOT to promote abortions, but provide education, health care and access to birth control. For example, in Zambia, the nation’s leading family planning organization lost 24% of its funding because of the Bush era gag rule and it had to reduce education programs, clinic-based health services and community outreach to poor rural areas. The Zambia program was not able to send much-needed contraceptive supplies to smaller NGOs and government health centers. Desperate women faced with an unwanted pregnancy turn to dangerous unsafe local abortions.

Posted by: Idahogirl | January 23, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Robin-I like your post, I am glad to see there are smart people in here too!
It is hard to make these Jesus freaks understand, they are all about condemning people but they are the biggest sinners of all! The proper way to handle teenage pregnancy according to them is to punish them make them feel ashamed of themselves and then send them away for a while and when the baby is born to come back and pretend the baby is a brother or a sister and always remind them that they were a mistake…Yeah that is the holy way to go!!

Posted by: Ralph | January 23, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm

Ok, I hear all the pro-lifers and Obama haters yacking about their ideals here.
What do you suggest. We do nothing for these people? Your all talking about how merceful your God is, but want to critisize the people that are trying to do something about this totally screwed up situation.

Posted by: texas outlaw | January 23, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

A woman in a developing country who is struggling to feed her children may decide another child will make it difficult for their family to survive. These clinics help these women (and their existing children) by providing birth control, information, and abortions.

Posted by: cal_chi | January 23, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Here’s food for thought!
Remember the Roman Empire? Remember how it went down? It was the corrupt politics of Herrod and his cronies. Their great love for their power and their riches.
When they heard of the birth of a new King they panicked and the decision was made to destroy the infant.When they didn’t succeed by trying to use the wisemen who saw through the evil of their plan, they took matters into their own hands. Remember the slaughter of the innocents? All the children in the land under 2 were destroyed in an attempt to muder the infant.
Remember what happened next?? God was so sick of the evil they perpeturated He withdrew His grace and allowed their enemies to take them down.The Roman Empire ceased to exist because of the innocent ones.
WAKE UP AMERICA!!! The parents of this world are killing their own children not even Rome did that.
Now what do you think we deserve? How long do YOU think it will be until our JUST PUNISHMENT comes.

Posted by: Mother | January 23, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Lost in all the pro-abortion rhetoric:
God commanded us “Do Not Kill”.
Whatsoever we do to the least of His people, we do unto Him.

Posted by: Michele | January 23, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Chuck S: Glad the only thing you found to argue with in my post was the numbers! According to the Census Bureau (www.census.gov) the US Population as of December 1, 2008 was estimated at 305,313,980, (more than 300 million, not 3 million) not including the US Armed Forces stationed outside the US. So, if it is 200,000 couples that is really 0.06%. . . .Not even close to the point, but nice try! The fact of the matter is, no matter how many couples are waiting, if there were more babies to adopt, it wouldn’t take YEARS (the only other option is to adopt internationally). AND it would still save taxpayer money!

Posted by: findacure1991 | January 23, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

Chuck S…..you should be thanking God that he let you make it back home. As for Gaza, what does that have to do with abortion and tax money? Man creates many of the situations they find themselves in.

Posted by: Katwoman | January 23, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Ralph, your statement about it is because President Obama is black is just plain “bs”. Obviously he was elected and guess what, he was black then too! The problem with his selection for his administration is it looks a lot like President Clinton’s….hmmmmm change yeah right! However I wish the new President the best I just wish he would stop with the decisions that really don’t need to be addressed such as this topic we are all responding to and the gays in the military. I believe there are more pressing matters.

Posted by: dfesta | January 23, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Susan, you did not read my post. I beleive in choice and do not force my views on others. PRO Choice is not pro abortion. But you must also beleive it is ok to kill doctors, how about innocents over seas. Not our enemy but children, pregnant mothers, elders, this is ok with you.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | January 23, 2009, 2:18 pm 2:18 pm

Well I must return to work. But before I leave just want all of you to know, believers and unbelievers, that I will be praying for you and may God have mercy on your souls! Not trying to be high and mighty just concerned for others. God bless!

Posted by: Katwoman | January 23, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

“Remember the Roman Empire? Remember how it went down? It was the corrupt politics of Herrod and his cronies. Their great love for their power and their riches.”
The Roman Empire existed for nearly another 500 years post Jesus and even embraced Christianity.
Indeed the Roman Empire reached the height of its power and glory in the 100 years after God supposedly withdrew his grace.

Posted by: Ryan C | January 23, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

Mr. Obama, You, Michelle AND THE PRO ABORT FANATICS ON HERE can foot the bills for these abortions. DO NOT tax me. I am not willing to pay for the slaughter of innocent babies. Give up your caviar and fancy dresses, Michelle, ms. pro-choic first lady..YOU PAY FOR PRO-ABORTION IDEAS.

Posted by: Angelo | January 23, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

You sound like an Atheist. You need to believe in something if even yourself. You sound like a very bitter person. The subject of babies being killed doesn’t phase you one bit. I understand choice but making the right choice is the real question. Supporting people who make poor choices isn’t planning or fixing the problem. For those of you saying “my body …my choice?” do you really believe it is ok to kill a child or are you trying to convince yourself? Thank goodness your parents wanted you.

Posted by: dfesta | January 23, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm

I wasn’t always a pro-life guy. I had listened to, and grew up the whole pro-choice thing. It wasn’t until I got older that I really thought things through. But here is my analysis.
I believe it is morally wrong and reprehensible. But it does not mean I want the government to regulate it. I believe the government should stay completely out of it. Some the pro-life crowd will disagree with me but that’s just the way I see it. It’s a cancer that has crept into our society and it can’t be fixed by government. It must be fixed by society. However, our society is also unwilling. But it is even worse that the government would support or promote abortion.
We can’t keep looking to government to fix things. We have to fix things ourselves. The government shouldn’t choose sides in a morality debate, its unethical. But activism on both sides has forced it. The best thing for both sides is to force the government out of it and bring morality back where it belongs, the family. Different families can choose their moral structures and pass it on to their kids.

Posted by: KR | January 23, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

Anyone who disagrees with President Obama overturning this ban must realize that lecturing poor, uneducated women in other countries about abstinence does not prevent abortions. The concept is NOT to promote abortions, but provide education, health care and access to birth control. For example, in Zambia, the nation’s leading family planning organization lost 24% of its funding because of the Bush era gag rule and it had to reduce education programs, clinic-based health services and community outreach to poor rural areas. The Zambia program was not able to send much-needed contraceptive supplies to smaller NGOs and government health centers. Desperate women faced with an unwanted pregnancy turn to dangerous unsafe local abortions.
Posted by: Idahogirl
__________________________________
The actual idea is to maximize the number of abortions to reduce population growth and give strength to a Democratic base, which is Planned Parenthood. Well, Idahogirl, induced abortions don’t reduce the population.
In the first place, I just don’t think the majority of women in other countries are so stupid that they have eight babies out of wedlock and just can’t control themselves. I think even THEY can be responsible.
Now all of you bellyache like there is no tomorrow if a conservative were to “force his religion” down your throats. By inducing abortions, all you’re doing is imposing YOUR morality, or lack of it, on another culture.

Posted by: marco | January 23, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm

obama claims we are in an “era of responsibility” well, let those who irresponsibly conceived babies pay for the destruction of said babies from their own pockets. Leave my tax dollar alone, obama.

Posted by: Angelo | January 23, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

What is wrong in being an atheist??At least atheism never killed innocent people just because they believed in something different!!Yeah all atheist are bitter, sinners and they kill babies at night!! I;d rather see someone have an abortion that seeing that unwanted baby abused, molested or killed later!!

Posted by: Ralph | January 23, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm

Planned Parenthood is a money-grubbing, profit-grabbing disgrace. They promoted GIFT CERTIFICATES FOR ABORTIONS as appropriate Christmas presents. These people are deranged!!!! Why should my taxes go to help this sick corporation spread baby killing throught the entire world–and profit from the blood of innocents? obama goofed.

Posted by: Angelo | January 23, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

“At least atheism never killed innocent people just because they believed in something different!!”
Please, you really should not believe the old worn out propaganda about religion being the berth of all wars crap. Man fights man because of being part of different group sets, religion is just a group set, doesn’t mean it is responsible for wars. Men have fought wars long before any organized religions based on race, tribal affiliations, even family squabbles. Those are just excuses to fight and attempt to eliminate those not like you. Its based on human nature, not religion.

Posted by: KR | January 23, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

PRO Choice = You the Person make the Choice. Either to have an Abortion or not.
Pro Life = FORCES thier view on others no matter what. (Dictatorship)They kill doctors and others near by – Proven
These same Pro-lifers sit on thier high horse and want to enforce thier will on others, all a while spouting how they hate the welfare system.
No body has a right to tell you what to do to your body, unless they are paying your way.
I do not believe in Abortion, but I will not tell someone they have to follow my view for IT is thier CHOICE!!!!!

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | January 23, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Whether born or unborn, it is the same child who will be abused and killed…abortion kills the child, whether that child resides in the world or in the womb. Your argument is flawed. Same child; different location for the slaughter.

Posted by: Angelo | January 23, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

Angelo, to add to your comment; Planned parenthood also is found in many of the poor neighborhoods which are predominantly minority….hmmm sounds like population control for minorities….pretty fishy.

Posted by: dfesta | January 23, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

wow maybe one abortionist doc was killed in thirty years; get over it …. I do not condone the killing of these abortionists, btw…that was an anomaly. forty four thousand babies are killed each day. get real!

Posted by: Angelo | January 23, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

Kathleen:
President Obama,
I believe that the right to human life supersedes that of a woman’s reproductive rights. I am fiercely against you using my money (tax dollars) to contribute to such immoral actions as the elimination of human lives. You must certainly know that all babies begin with the union of egg and sperm. There is no other human being who has the right to willfully terminate that innocent life.
**
Can I assume you are also as fiercely against the use of your tax dollars to support the use of the pill and IUD? The ‘other’ abortion methods.

Posted by: ThePill_Equals_Abortion | January 23, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Maternal death during childbirth is a significant risk in impoverished areas of developing countries. These same clinics may also save the lives of many mothers and babies by giving them birthing kits with simple, sterilized instruments which they can use during a home birth to avoid infection and death.

Posted by: cal_chi | January 23, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Well, Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, was an avowed eugenicist. She thought certain types of people were human weeds and should be exterminated.

Posted by: Angelo | January 23, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

I have the best idea why don’t women use birth control. And I mean all the choices the pill,Iud,the shot,ring,patch so on and so on or even good ole condoms. Instead of just heading to the abortion clinic. If you can’t take responsability you shouldn’t have sex. I am pro choice but make choices before you lay down. I can’t stand to see women having multiple abortions because they have no value for life it is sad. This isn’t the 50′s we have many open choices if you can pay for an abortion you can pay for a form of bith control……

Posted by: mommylove | January 23, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

cal chi you are naive…the profits PP seeks is in aborting these women’s children, not in helping bring them safely to birth. That’s why they want our tax dollars….big profits in abortions.

Posted by: Angelo | January 23, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

So the question may have been asked but too many comments to read them all.
To those who say “Adoption is the alternative” Have you visited the foster homes and orphanges throughout America? There are thousands of children waiting for a home….Where are all those couples claiming to be waiting to adopt. Oh yes they only want a newborn…anything beyond that is no good. Before you lobby for a solution please make sure that it is a workable one. I am not saying that Abortion is the answer, but as some of the pro-lifers have stated “get a new argument..we are tired of the old ones”

Posted by: Dylan | January 23, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

@Chucks S: You’ve itroduced yorself as a pro-choice father of 3… So tell us how do you decide which child deserves to live and which doesn’t? What is your criteria?

Posted by: logic301 | January 23, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

war is hell; innocent lives are lost…but abortion seeks out the most innocent, the most vulnerable for destruction. wars are usually fought to protect ones own country..big difference. who does the unborn child threaten?

Posted by: Angelo | January 23, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

obama’s mom, I hear, was a single mom abandoned by obama’s dad. she could have sought out the “humane” abortion solution, but she chose life.

Posted by: Angelo | January 23, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

“Yeah, religion had nothing to do with all those killings back in the days…how many people were tortured and killed by the good old church??If you were slighlty different they would burn on a cross!!And what about today, all those killings in the name of “god”!!Yeah, religion has nothing to do with wars!!”
Hate to point out ignorance here but Religion has been used as a motivational tool for wars for ages. As has greed for land and loot, corruption, jealousy, ego, just about anything you can think of. The most destructive wars in history were in the 20th century and were not based on religion. Germany had revenge on its mind, and Japan had a thirst for resources. In the middle ages, nobles sold their castles and all of their lands to conduct the pilgrimages (Crusade wasn’t a word in the middle ages, invented in the 18th century) to secure passage to the holy land for worshipers. The “crusades” were extremely complex, usually based on revenge for christians being enslaved and mistreated, or muslims being enslaved or mistreated etc. You cannot lump the dynamics of war into a simple neat package and call it religion. Its ignorant. You should really read history before making such remarks.

Posted by: KR | January 23, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

Well Angelo, my pocketbook for one!

Posted by: Robin | January 23, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

“I have the best idea why don’t women use birth control” Because that was in that bill Obama over turned. Bush wanted only abstinence preached, not birth-control. Plan Parenthood teaches and councils women on birth control, adoption and is not a green light for abortion, though they do perform these it is not the main priority like some think.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | January 23, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

LoveAlways:
There sure is much mis-informaiton on this post. First, the BC Pill does not ALWAYS prevent ovulation. …
**
Thanks you! Finally someone else that has thought this issue all the way through to it’s inevitable, ethical, conclusion!

Posted by: ThePill_Equals_Abortion | January 23, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Marco you are wrong. This program does not “force lack of morality” on other cultures. Have you ever been outside of the United States? It is ignorant to suggest women in third world countries have “8 babies out of wedlock” or “just can’t control themselves”. They are poor, uneducated, and desperate for health care for themselves and their families. For example, in Kenya, the Bush-era gag rule forced 2 leading family-planning NGOs to close 5 health care clinics, cut up to 1/3 of their medical staff, and reduce services overall. One of the closed clinics had served a crowded slum neighborhood of Nairobi since 1984, providing sexually transmissible infection (STI) screening and treatment, family planning, pre- and post-natal obstetric services, and well-baby care. President Obama gets it. He has experienced the world outside the United States and understands that few countries live in US style luxury. This Federal funding is designed to help educate women about health care, provide birth control and thereby reduce the need for abortions.

Posted by: Idahogirl | January 23, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

obama has done great things thus far: freed the bloodthirsty, hate America terrorists– and set the stage for international, tax funded free abortion executions. great guy. thanks, slobbering liberal media and starstruck obama voters. can’t wait to see what destructive acts he brings to light next week. yep, proud to be an American this week. Oh, how I miss President George W. Bush.

Posted by: Angelo | January 23, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Planned Parenthood did not promote giving gift certificates for abortion. They offered gift certificates which could be used for health care (Pap smears, breast exams) and preventative services such as birth control. Planned Parenthood knows that women who are young or financially strapped often postpone health services.

Posted by: cal_chi | January 23, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm

Ralph I never claimed to be religious on my prolife stance. I just believe killing babies is WRONG and basically an easy way out for an uneducated female who can’t make “good choices”. I can’t stand how “smart” people condone dumb choices which are made because of irresponsibility. You pro-choice people need to look at your choices prior to getting pregnant! Pretty dumb if you ask me.

Posted by: dfesta | January 23, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Obama cannot possibly fix the things in the economy, no more than Bush caused them. Some of you have been pushed into thinking Bush is responsible for all of these things. What is going to happen when Obama doesnt fix them? Who will be the kicking boy? The fact is the President has very little control over these factors. You have been convinced over the last 4 years that everything lays at the feet of the white house, all for political power grabs by democrats. Now the stage is set for utter failure for Obama. He can’t fix these things and I feel sorry for the guy walking into this trap that has been laid, unintentionally. The fervor to hate Bush was so extreme that even Castro blamed Bush for hurricanes?!?!? He claimed Bush had a hurricane machine!
Now when the realization sets in that Obama is powerless to control these economic forces, are any of you going to come to the realization that you were duped by political propaganda?

Posted by: KR | January 23, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

Logic301-
God and Bible probably has a multitude of meaning to our leader. Thank goodness we now have a leader who realizes that State and Church should be separate and can be a believer and yet support the rights of everyone in our country by not forcing Christians to get abortions but making them available for those who choose to have them.

Posted by: Robin | January 23, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

dfestai-the thing is that ignorant people keep getting pregnant over and over and over and don’t support their kids and expect others to help them. People should be more responsible regard sex, but in today’s society it seems that people are getting dumber and dumber and you see too many teenagers getting pregnant! And how are they supposed to get an education if they have to support a kid??How many time you hear about people killing their kids??If you feel you can take care of a baby and you can give him or her everything they need and deserve then go ahead, but if you can’t or wont take care of your baby then don’t expect others to do that for you!!Adoptions are not that easy as they seem and plus everyone wants a cute little baby and no one wants an older one, apparently at that age they are not so cute anymore!!

Posted by: Ralph | January 23, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

The Catholic Church, worldwide, does an excellent job at helping with adoption services, pre-natal care, care after the baby is born (including clothes and living quarters), and education about parenting. Please turn to the Catholic Church with your spiritual needs and for Christian truth.
Posted by: LoveAlways
========================================
If that is the case, then why are there so many South American “street urchins” in gangs, preying on tourists or combing through garbage dumps?
Why then does a Christian “Save the Children” type service run those heart-wrenching commercials showing poverty-stricken children wandering barefoot down “streets” littered with garbage and with a sewage stream running down the middle, as some kindly, white-haired gentleman, kneeling next to a cute little girl explains how for as little as 85 cents a day, one can “provide” for a child like this, who will write letters of progress, with pictures, to you, etc. Sorry, but I don’t believe you.
To my mind, when it comes to children, it is better to turn off the faucet than to drown in the resultant flood, and most of the world is drowning in the flood. Of course, the Pope, by means of an Edict, could help stem the flow, but no, no, no. I realize his concerns are not of this world, but surely those of the suffering children are. Better, to my mind, for them not to have been born at all, than to live in squalor and poverty, with little or no hope for the future. And before you jump all over me, I am not speaking of ABORTION, but rather of CONTRACEPTION. However, to most of you, there seems to be no difference. OK, so then YOU take the responsibility for this terrible burden on the earth and its very limited resources, and do something about it, like today. The President is doing so, and I am glad to support him in this measure, although I did not vote for him.
By the way, there is no Christian “truth”, nor is there a Muslim “truth”, nor a Jewish “truth”, nor a Hindu “truth”, nor a Buddhist “truth”, or any other religious “truth”. That is all hogwash and deadly dogma. The only truth there is, is that revealed in the study of nature and validated by duplicatable experimentation.

Posted by: Zoron | January 23, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

Isn’t it wonderful, how everyone wants to argue their OPINIONS and not the TRUTH. Many in our society have been so blinded by lies that they don’t recognize truth whatsoever. A baby, not fetus, is fully developed by 8 weeks. The majority of abortions in our country occur after 24 weeks. Call it what it is MURDER!!! Both Michelangelo and Bethoven’s parents DID NOT WANT their children and look at the impact these 2 individuals made on history. How many other Michelangelos and Beethovens have been and will continue to be MURDERED while some of you IDIOTS sit around shooting your uneducated mouths off? Educate yourself on the TRUTHS of abortion. Look up Bernard Nathanson, who used to perform abortions for several years. Look up Norma Rae McCorvey, who was the plaintiff in ROE v. WADE. Both of these people are now PRO-LIFE.

Posted by: Kim | January 23, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

Mother-when god actually does something then maybe people will pay attention to those words…

Posted by: Ralph | January 23, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Have you ever received services from Planned Parenthood? I have. During my college years, they counseled me as I tried to choose a reliable birth control method. I received caring advice, a breast exam, a pap smear, and an effective form of birth control. Trust me, nothing would make Planned Parenthood happier than for there to be no unplanned pregnancies and therefore no abortions.

Posted by: cal_chi | January 23, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

In this world, birth control and planned parenting makes sense.

Posted by: pefros | January 23, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

Ralph I agree it is all about responsibility but that should take place before the pregnancy not after.

Posted by: dfesta | January 23, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

“The only truth there is, is that revealed in the study of nature and validated by duplicatable experimentation.”
Isn’t that the basis of religion? Worshiping nature or science is a form of religion as well. Nature is an uncontrollable force that dictates your current state. By learning the laws of nature you can adjust your life to conform. How is that different than any other religion?
It is also important to separate the message from the words when it comes to religious texts. They are just guides to life, not literal life translations (in my belief anyway)

Posted by: KR | January 23, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

“.the profits PP seeks is in aborting these women’s children, not in helping bring them safely to birth”
Planned Parenthood operates on grants and private donations with a very small percentage of their services rendered being abortion.

Posted by: Ryan C | January 23, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm

USCITIZEN_04 I understand your statement however the percentage of rapes resulting in pregnancies are not what is dispute. That is definitely a horrible situation. I am referencing abortions which are used as a form of birth control. Pro-choice means being smart BEFORE you get pregnant. Abortion is murder pretty simple.

Posted by: dfesta | January 23, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

James Swiecki:
…If we don’t take steps to curb our own population growth, nature will. And it won’t be pretty.
**
The old “Too many people on the plane. Let’s push someone off.” argument for abortion.

Posted by: ThePill_Equals_Abortion | January 23, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Angelo & Others – Please educate yourselves on the role of Planned Parenthood. I used their services while in college because I didn’t have insurance. They provided me with pap smears and breast exams and the birth control pill at nearly free of charge. (condoms also available) This is basic health coverage that all women deserve but that not all can afford. In third world countries they also provide clean tools and advice for home births, which saves many lives.
Just because they also can assist in abortions as a last resort, does not mean that they do not provide a needed service and save many lives.

Posted by: scrappster | January 23, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

dfesta-As I said it before, I’d rather see someone have an abortion that seeing that kid being abused, molested or killed later..I didn’t say that if you get pregnant get an abortion, but people have the right to choose. I don’t condone people who use abortion as a contraceptive, and not all the people who get an abortion keep getting pregnant and then abort a again!!!
S0 because I don’t believe in god I have no morals or I am not compassionate? I’d rather help those kids that are already struggling through life than condemning abortion so more unwanted kids can be born and suffer for the rest of their lives!! Not all of them find a loving home as you can see and too many of them end up abused and killed.

Posted by: Ralph | January 23, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

I did not vote for President Obama, however I had made the decision to support him as our President out of my love and respect for The United States of America. I am very disappointed in him and his decision to repeal the law regarding abortion. It is a sad day in America when the unborn are not protected to the fullest extent possible.

Posted by: Louisianalady | January 23, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

This issue will go on forever. It gets revoked and reinstated depending on whether we have a dem or republican pres. So I don’t know why anyone would be surprised by this. It’ll be revoked when a repub is in office. Then reinstated and so on……..

Posted by: annie | January 23, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

Access to international family‐planning services is one of the most effective means of reducing the need for abortion. Most women everywhere, even in developing countries, don’t believe abortions are the best way to plan the number and spacing of their kids. Families need help. That’s what overturning this ban is about. There is no conspiracy theory, no eugenics at work when it comes to providing women education and health care.

Posted by: idahogirl | January 23, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

For all you pro-lifers who love to quote statistics about how many abortions are performed and how they are all murder… Have any of you experienced the anguish of hearing your OB tell you that your fetus has stopped growing and that the heartbeat is nearly nonexistent? And then have you had to make the decision whether to wait for things to take care of themselves or have surgery to pull out of you the very thing you had hoped for, prayed for and had maybe even named? Well guess what – chances are good that the surgery performed under those circumstances would be considered an abortion by a clinical definition, and probably reported that way.
Next time you want to rant and rave about lack of responsibility and ‘murder,’ keep in mind that there are plenty of other situations you simply do not understand. It’s not a one-size-fits-all issue here in the U.S., and it’s certainly not that way abroad.

Posted by: imamomlee | January 23, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Ok Robin, fair enough but I still feel abortion is murder and should be the last choice or not a choice. But the real problem is that abortion is the EASIEST choice not the best choice or the right choice (at least from the baby’s perspective). I am sure the baby would like the “choice” to live. Anyway, I have to go….

Posted by: dfesta | January 23, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

dfesta- Abortion is too ‘easy’ of a choice? It’s surgery, which means some level of anesthesia. Prep time. Recovery time. Pain. It’s not exactly like having your teeth whitened. I don’t think anyone who has experienced any kind of surgery would describe the process as easy, whether you are talking to someone here or in another country.

Posted by: imamomlee | January 23, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Kim:
Was your post meant to be facetious? Nothing you posted is true whatsoever. Fully developed by 8 wks? If that were true, we’d be born at that point. And over 90% of abortions are performed by the 12th week. Less than 0.01% of abortions are performed after the 24th weeks. And the stories floating around about Michelangelo and Beethoven are urban myths. And capitalizing TRUTH doesn’t change the truth.

Posted by: goodusername | January 23, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

It’s great we are all talking this through – it helps us all.
I would rather see us all help support Life then death.
I would rather see us strive to be responsible about are actions.
The murder of millions of babies through abortion is everybody’s business. If you killed your child that you delivered, would that too not be anybody’s business.
Rape is evil, why combat it with another evil–killing. Why not find strength to love and give love by giving the child by adoption to the many who want a child to love. We all need to help those that are in or have been in this situation.
We are not one but many and have the responsibility to all human beings and creations, giving the gift of SACRED Life, to help the poor, unwanted and misguided.
For all of those that believe in God, after considering all the thoughts shared, continue to pray to God for what His Will to be revealed. For those that don’t believe, you could try the same or
just go along with your beliefs.

Posted by: M Burger | January 23, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm

ABC is over-the-top with a picture of a fetus superimposed on the President. Shame on you.

Posted by: Mavsreader | January 23, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

The Catholic Church is trying to reach every person in the world who needs food, medicine, housing, etc. I did not state that it did reach every person – only that it is doing an excellent job. The church needs your help to reach every person.
As far as “truth” is concerned, you’ll learn. We all will. I know you feel hostile and angry because I can tell from your posts. Please know that I want you to feel love, peace and joy. I am praying for you and others (including myself) who, at times, feel hostile and angry.

Posted by: LoveAlways | January 23, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Hilary Fyfe, head of Zambia’s ‘Family Life Movement’ opposed abortion. But Fyfe said the Gag Rule killed women, “just as if they are pointing a gun and shooting.” Her organization lost approximately $30,000 in US funding for simply TALKING to adolescents and young adults that unsafe and potentially fatal abortions are one possible consequence of unprotected sex and unwanted pregnancies. To retain Federal funding, grantees had to certify that they would comply with the rule barring ANY discussion of abortion. The Gag Rule was a myopic law pandering to right wing Christian voters and promoting a lie that their “tax dollars” were killing millions of babies. In reality, it promoted dangerous back-street abortions when organizations could not reach poor, desperate women with education and birth control.

Posted by: idahogirl | January 23, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

M Burger, Iraq we the Americans are killing people, so our Enemy but some inocent. Some very old, and some very very young. So are your views on killing about all killing?

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | January 23, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

It’s amazing how everyone is saying, poor Obama – look what he’s walking in to and has to fix. Yet he chooses some of his first tasks as president to make sure that abortion can happen much easier.
Well, I hope that people who voted for him eventually see the mistake they’ve made,and how it will affect our country. You’ll get change, alright, but it’s not the kind of change we’re looking for. At least President Bush respected life. And I don’t want to hear that the war wasn’t respecting life. The men and women who fight for our country make the conscious choice to do so. Aborted babies don’t have that choice. I know I’ll never refer to Obama as president

Posted by: Rose | January 23, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

Why is it that everyone equates abortion with murder but no one is questioning the government’s right to interfere in personal reproductive decisions? I do not see the difference in my government telling me that I HAVE to have that baby that I didn’t want and the Chinese gov’t telling a woman that she CAN’T have the second baby she wants. In both cases, the government is interfering in reproductive rights and there is nothing that says that the gov’t has that right.

Posted by: Jennifer | January 23, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Louisianalady misinformed again. The bill that Bush passed would not teach anything other than abstinence. So we all know kids will not listen to us, so this bill did not inform people of the different choices for them to prevent pregnancies. I rather prevent then to abort, but Bush’s bill did not.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | January 23, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm

President Obama is starting off on the wrong course and God will not bless his leadership, nor this nation. He obviously does not understand God’s perspective on abortion. Like many people, he likely is a good moral person but does not understand God’s perspective. May God’s people pray to this end!

Posted by: jshcda | January 23, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

Okay, so I’m a little confused here. I know these two things aren’t the same at all, but how is it that ‘we the people’ are saying we don’t want the GOVERNMENT telling us whether or not we are allowed to kill a living human fetus inside a person when we just roll over and don’t say squat when the GOVERNMENT passes laws banning adults from being allowed to kill themselves with cigarettes in bars? Why is THIS not as big of an issues as ABORTION? I mean, c’mon, I should have the right to do these things if I want to, right? Furthermore, why is pot illegal? Or rather, if laws are being passed to ‘protect’ us, why is alcohol legal? It kills tons of folks each year from alcohol poison and alcohol-related accidents. Not to mention the violence perpetrated by intoxicated individuals. When is GOVERNMENT crossing the line? and why isn’t the SAME line being drawn for EVERY right that ‘we the people’ SHOULD have?
If the GOVERNMENT is going to regulate what we should and shouldn’t be allowed to do, then let’s let them do that COMPLETELY to make things fair for everyone. Dictate how many Big Macs I can have each year. Or how much coffee. How much I am allowed to drive. Sleep. Watch TV.
If, on the other hand, the GOVERNMENT is NOT going to regulate what we should and shouldn’t be allowed to do, then let’s not let them regulate ANYTHING to make things fair for everyone. Sure, have an abortion. Have 1000 Big Macs a day. Do cocaine. As long as you are doing it only to yourself, you should be allowed to do anything you want. Not until it starts to impact others should it become an issue (such as drunk driving, or drunk wife beating, or shooting guns in town, or blowing up candy stores because they contain sugar and you are an Atkins fanatic, or whatever).
Now, the only tricky part to this latter statement is the part about ONLY affecting yourself. The entire argument against abortion is that is affects the mother AND the fetus. Thus the impasse we see today.

Posted by: confuz-ed guy | January 23, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Everyday I pray for Barack Obama to have wisdom. It is very disappointing to me on this abortion issue but than his wife is pro-choice all the way. I have dealt with women who had abortions and they have to take what they call”happy pills” because they are so depressed. It’s not just about them. It has a cause and effect to all.
No argument will change people just to be a witness to love over violence in any form.

Posted by: Florence Jane | January 23, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

In Romania, due to decades of indoctrination by Soviet administrations, women had an average of 2.2 abortions. This is barbaric. They were left uneducated and suspicious about other viable birth control options, but family planning NCOs that signed the Bush-era Global Gag rule were not allowed to work with abortion providers. This meant NCOs were unable to reach these women who chose multiple abortions in the absence of education about other forms of birth control. President Obama is doing the right thing by overturning the misdirected Global Gag rule. Let the light of education and compassion shine upon us all.

Posted by: idahogirl | January 23, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

It’s a very sad day in the US.

Posted by: ctdaverep | January 23, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

We voted for a democratic pres and dems are prochoice. And abortion is legal whether you like it or not. So why are all your repubs acting so surpised that Obama did this.

Posted by: annie | January 23, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

There is no reason to think this is a sad day in the US. In fact, we should all be happy about President Obama’s overturning a law that extended disease, crushed family planning, promoted dangerous local abortions, and strangled pre-natal health care in developing countries. The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that about 80 million women face unwanted pregnancies each year, and that 1/4 of these pregnancies are terminated under unsafe conditions. Women worldwide need education and family planning to help prevent abortions. Unfortunately, by 2002, the Bush-era Global Gag rule had cut off shipments of USAID-donated birth control supplies to 16 developing countries, including condoms which prevent HIV/AIDS. This law was flat out pandering to religious conservative voters by creating fear we were using tax dollars to kill millions of babies.

Posted by: idahogirl | January 23, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

@Robin: You have said that: “State and Church should be separate”, so why did Obama chose to recite “…so help me God” at the inauguration? If Obama publicly acknowledges God’s presence, shouldn’t he respect God’s commandments also? What a hypocrisy!
Deeds speak lauder than words!

Posted by: logic301 | January 23, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

Obama’s mom could NOT have choson abortion–it was illegal then. Obama was two years old when his father left and went back to Kenya–not when his mom was pregnant.

Posted by: Loraine | January 23, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

Why do so many people insist on repeating that killing an early fetus or embryo is the same as killing a baby?
A baby is a thinking, feeling, emotional, human being.
An embryo or early fetus (when virtually all abortions are performed) has none of those qualities, and it is those qualites that we cherish in humans.
The only thing human about an embryo is its DNA – but it’s not the DNA that we cherish in people.
Very very few people who are pro-choice believe that 3rd trimester abortions should be legal (except when the mother’s life is at stake) precisely because by that point it has developed the qualities that we cherish in humans.

Posted by: goodusername | January 23, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

My question to all of the pro-choice individuals……..if your a parent, or a grandparent, which one of your children or grandchildren would you have chosen to abort since you believe that abortion is a women’s righ? When someone is murdered they stand trial and are judged by a court of law. Why when you kill and unborn child is this not murder…….it is. Call it whatever you want, IT IS STILL MURDER A LIFE HAS BEEN TAKEN DOESN’T MATTER WHERE IT RESIDES! Shame on the President’s decision to reverse this stance on funded abortions outside of the U.S.

Posted by: Barbara | January 23, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

So Barbara, how many children have you adopted to help out.

Posted by: Just Wondering | January 23, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

In this world, birth control and planned parenting makes sense.

Posted by: pefros | January 23, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm

imamomlee, I have been through that same situation. I got pregnant when I was 16 and soon after finding out the doctor told me that some hormone numbers were not increasing as they should have; my baby was dying. And the doc wanted to schedule surgery to have it removed. Even though I was 16 I WANTED that baby, when I left there I cried out to God for help. I decided to wait on surgery, they continued to run blood work and miraculously my numbers suddenly quadrupled. But I don’t think when you are told that the baby is NOT viable and you have it removed that it considered abortion; your NOT killing it it’s already dead.

Posted by: Stacie | January 23, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

It is funny the Pro-life people pick and choose who’s life they want to save. But it is ok with them to send troops to a country that had no involvement in 9-11 to kill people and they have no problem with the death penalty. But they still do not know what the bill was about. The Bill stopped funding to prevent these unwanted Pregnancies in the first place. Their panties are in a bunch and it cut off the air circulation.
I am pro-choice you choose what you want and no one should tell you different. Any parent that takes your child to school and is greeting by these wackos forcing thier will on them or thier children by showing doctored up picture for gore effect, get a law suit agaist them, as these pictures are offencive and make some children sick to thier stomachs. We have the choice what we teach our children, they do not want kids to learn sex education but will show these pictures to them.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | January 23, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

Mavsreader : Absolutely! But under the Bush plan, if abortion was even mentioned, then neither it nor anything else was supported or funded. Just like cutting off the nose to spite the face.

Posted by: Jordan | January 23, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

Here we go again. flip flop – back & forth. How important was this considering all that is going on? I do not believe this should take any priority over immigration let alone the economy and war issues at hand. As expected, let’s believe this is going for a “good cause”. Whether or not you are pro life or pro choice it just shows where the president’s heading. Sad part is abaout half this country is buying this as a “conditional” act. No, it’s a taxpayer’s $ given to another country for abortion. Why am I stuck with this tab everytime a Dem has to please the masses. And, I’m not seeing “Change” as the articles states, he’s just doing what all the other’s have done to appease their party. Change is not coming, it’s “meida polished” politics. What was Obama’s stand on immigration anyway? It changed like the weather or was sugar coated at best. Clean up this country before you start cutting checks to other countries, especially those that live here illegally.

Posted by: Kay | January 23, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Yeah Obama helps the economy by spending my tax dollars abroad on abortions.
How can anyone compare the murder of 50 million innocent babies to causalities of war. It’s a weak try at deflecting the issue.
No person is born pro-abortion you have to be talked into it.
Abortion is the civil rights issue of our time and will eventually go the way of slavery. Turning abortion into a religious issue is another way of changing the subject. It’s civil rights issue. Abortion is not a right its the violation of an innocent baby’s right to life.
Please finish the sentence… “I support a woman’s right to choose…to kill her baby”.
Don’t get defensive just try to really think about what we are doing here…

Posted by: John | January 23, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm

Seriously!!!! You people complain that we are interfering with other countries governments and politics by having our troops over seas…..so we shouldn’t give a crap about their government and the lively hood of the citizens, but what we should care about the women getting pregnant and being able to have abortions paid for by the US citizens? You people are QUACKS! I definately have no faith in Obama, especially after this decision. God help us, because Obama’s not.

Posted by: blessed | January 23, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

No matter what the mother is going to abort the child…the doctors just throw the aborted baby out…why not give the aborted baby a use…let the lack of their life save another…give them a chance to serve a purpose

Posted by: Andrea | January 23, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Barbara:
“My question to all of the pro-choice individuals……..if your a parent, or a grandparent, which one of your children or grandchildren would you have chosen to abort since you believe that abortion is a women’s righ?”
Umm, you do realize that abortion is legal, right? So if someone has children, they chose to have them.

Posted by: goodusername | January 23, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Abortion is murder plain and simple. It is never an option and partial birth abortions are barbaric, they wouldn’t let us do that to dog, much less want to do this to a human baby. Wake up people, and our military people know when they sign up that they always have a chance at going to war. Yes, it’s ugly put this is the facts.

Posted by: Julia | January 23, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

Saying abortion is legal is not a good argument. The legality of abortion is exactly the problem. It’s not law its the violation of law. Lets not let law determine whether something is right or wrong. After all Slavery and segregation were legal once.

Posted by: jgn | January 23, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

It’s ridiculous to argue that the only ones who bear responsibility for the deaths in a war are the soldiers themselves. Isn’t that the whole point of supporting the troops even if we all don’t agree on why they are there? Everyone is responsible so don’t try and wash your hands of it.

Posted by: Skip | January 23, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

In this world, birth control and planned parenting make sense.

Posted by: pefros | January 23, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Ok we all have lived with this one for so long now. And we all know there are two strong sides to this issue. On one side, women’s rights to her own person, on the other side, an additional person carried by a person.
I just wanted to write this one right, but, to no avail, this one is a mired complex entanglement that seems more enjoyed to leave it complex, or two sided, or multisided, as it is to compare it to the want of establishments of a Nation over Holy Lands, as is, the Isreal – Palestine conflict !!!!!!
Are we going to fight forever, or are we going to finally figure these things out, that is Justice, Truth, and Right??
Lets see, a Womans right to Choice, well, yhea, your choice is not taken away from you, A womans right to choice has never been violated, it has always been there. All women have the power of choice, as anyone has a power of choice, consequences of choice can be more victimization, or it can be accountable of choice. A woman, and a man have the power to choose not to create life in the first place, with Religious retribution as consequences. However, in todays current times, the choice of birth control in the first place, is in fact the choice that needs to be awarded, It seems religious dogma of birth control as a sin, and premarital sex as a sin, seems overwhelming controlling in a society that is idealistically founded on the intentions of Freedom for all man kind. In reality, no religion, no person, no law, no government, no company, no anything, has invaded your choice. Of course, there are re-actions, and justifications of recourse, and laws, and punishments, according to your choice, yet you still have choice.
So choose before conception.
Now, lets say, we all are of the right cause, and the good cause, and the do whats right cause, and we all choose, establish, police, and succeed in promoting and protecting every human life, and every living creatures life, and we all walk around with halos over our heads, knowing we are pro life, religiously correct, and angels walking on this earth, and we, the conservative right, who as no problem with rule by force, which means at times, the rational of the only politics that is good politics is strong might and military backing consequences, is peace assured through superior fire power, but, we the conservative right still have a problem with killing a potential life.
Ok, what ever that was….????
OK, well you just can’t rational the expiration of a potential new born on the way cause you got fears and you go into thinking of yourself only????
Rape?? Well whats the verdict on that one?? Its still a life??? Criminally conceived?? Still worth the death penalty for an innocent of guilt by association???
Life or Death?? Life or Death of the Mother or Life or Death of the child???
Gods right to choose life or death of human beings? I guess its always been idealized that man does not have the right to take a life of another man, but if so said person should take the life of another so said person, then it is only just to take the life of Murders, however, if the implantation of death for the cause of Nation Building, and or Nation Protection, then death by man upon man, is accepted by some, and also, rejected and repulsed by some, no agreement there, never will be either.
Really the only true answer is valuing life, honoring life, promoting life, letting life flourish and allowed to live, however, life isn’t always pretty and beautiful, its also volcanic, destructive, and absolute ending. And its beautiful, loving, relaxing, peaceful, its all and everything, and its not nothing.
The right thing is to take responsibility for your actions and work through the hardships to a better place than was yesterday.
However, too many people in too many places? Battle, fight, kill, destroy, curse, Flame, reprimand, mandate, rule, judge, justify, cause,
Case in point,…..The Internet…..too much, too little information very fast, and too many people on it, talking to too may people they don’t even know.
????
Hey! That’s an advancement in society! AAA religion, was it for a more peaceful world, or was it for more control over the masses???
What is the answer???
Live and let live, equilibrium will take place, because its always been hear, beyond the scope and control of man, and deregulate a whole lot more, and keep it a lot more simplified and try your hardest to work from what is good in life.
No right Answer.
So stop trying to be right.

Posted by: sean | January 23, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

In this world, birth control and planned parenting make sense.

Posted by: pefros | January 23, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Unreal. Here is the man who suppose to care so much about life; ending torture and making sure we let the criminals from “Gitmo” and yet, he can not wait to overturn any reasonable limitations on abortion. Unreal! He has effectively shot the first shot in the war concerning life issues. All Christians, Jews, and Muslims unnite. I say let the battles begin.

Posted by: louis Strasser | January 23, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Oh please Louis, do you even know what family planning groups do. Abortion is just a small part of it. Sometimes men don’t know anything but they like to think that they do.

Posted by: Just Wondering | January 23, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

President Bush’s ban on funding for family planning groups who didn’t tow his moral code was meant to punish to those who didn’t subscribe to Bush’s “Christian Talaban” ideology.
Seeing as how abortion is legal in the United States, the Presidents message was: If you want taxpayer money you have to subscribe to my moral code.
I’m sure Bush would have loved to deny federal education funds, medicare benefits,food stamps and tax deductions to people whose views on abortion differed from his.

Posted by: norris hall | January 23, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

Why is my previous comment not on here anymore?

Posted by: Captain Obvious | January 23, 2009, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm

Though I am on the side of life in these debates, I must say I don’t fear Obama’s stance on abortion so much as his utter disregard for the right of religious liberty. That disregard is evident in his support for FOCA and for public funding of abortions. Obama seems to care little for anyone’s conscience but his own. An attitude of this kind, backed by enormous power, is a recipe for the dissolution of a people. God helps us all.

Posted by: steve | January 23, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

I don’t understand why Pres. Obama felt he needed to sign this without press being present. And why didn’t ABC share this on the nightly news. Why is this disregard for human life and squandering of taxpayers money being swept under the carpet by ABC? I have always appreciated ABCs less bias than some other networks, but am becoming disillusioned with ABC. I may need to switch totally to FOX to be able to get fair and balanced reporting.

Posted by: Nancy | January 23, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm

All people, the world over, will benefit by the wise and compassionate decision to allow full access to knowledge and methodology regarding the decision to have a child.

Posted by: Beverly | January 23, 2009, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

All persons, throughout this world, will benefit from the wise and compassionate decision to allow full access to knowledge and methodology regarding the decision to have a child.

Posted by: Beverly | January 23, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm

First off, I’m christian. I study the bible. I’m an intelligent human being. Where does the bible equate a fetus in the 1st trimester to a baby (without completely taking things out of context)?
Secondly, the Global Gag Rule actually is thought to raise the amount of abortions. The clinics which loose funding also provide contraceptives and usually a number of services other than abortions (like prenatal care). When these clinics shut down from lack of funding, or do not have enough contraceptives to hand out… more women become pregnant. And then since the clinics are closed or underfunded, the women are left with less options for prenatal care or an abortion. If she chooses to keep the child she has less access to prenatal care! How horrible. And if she does get an abortion you can bet it isn’t as safe as it could be for her. So actually, this is causing less children to be conceived, and therefore, aborted.
Also, on a little bit of a side note, it takes funding away for condoms going to Africa. If you really care about babies, what about all the (postpartum) babies effected by AIDs in Africa?
On top of that this legislation got its nick name for a reason. It pulls funding from any NGO which even talks about the option of abortion. Freedom of speech is this country’s 1st Amendment, where as abortion is legal in every state (not to mention in all the countries which are affected by this). If this law were aimed at contributions to US NGOs it would be shot down for being unconstitutional in a second. How hypocritical.
Any one who is truly pro-life should want there to be less abortions, and therefore oppose the Mexico City Policy. I think the only good argument against for the Mexico City Policy is that US taxpayers simply dont want to pay for abortions in other countries. In which case it should be rewritten to reflect only that.

Posted by: Bre | January 23, 2009, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

It is not just enough to be a Christian and study the Bible, you have to open up your heart and listen to God’s word. The Bible may not equate a fetus in the first trimester as a life; it does not say that a fetus in the first trimester is not a life. As you know, it does not even mention trimesters.
What is clear if you read the entire Bible, and pray for God’s word to be revealed to you, is that you find the two most important elements of the Bible and that is LOVE your God with all your heart and soul and that Life is precious as we are creations of God’s and He has revealed His Will through Sacred Scripture. The commandment, “Thou shall not kill” is part of that sacred scripture.
As far as the implications to lifting the bands on abortions internationally, let’s fix that woman are being denied decent pre-natal healthcare, educate them on the reality that the primary intent of intercourse is to produce life; there is only a few days a month in which women can conceive, educate women help them be aware of prevention if they do in fact do not want to be pregnant. The bottom line is that taking the life of an unborn baby is NOT the answer to the challenges that we can overcome — where there is a will and courage, there is a WAY!
As for war, it stinks. Killing people is not the answer. However, when war does happen, our men and women are under obligation to defend and protect themselves and others. They are fighting against others that are equipped to fight back (unlike a uborn baby). I feel for our soldiers because I feel that they struggle with conscience to have to fulfill that obligation and I know it ways heavy on them. I am sure many of them are sorry. I am proud to say that I see and hear that our military people despite the conflicts of death and war are very compassionate and reach out to help civilians in the war zones in which they are placed.
If we would all learn to Love and to honor life and to deny selfishness, hate, pride and power the issue of abortion, war and a multiple of other sins would diminish.

Posted by: M | January 23, 2009, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

I have always believed in rights for women. I believe everyone considering an abortion, should look in the mirror and thank God or whoever you believe in, that your mother chose life. No one has the right to take the life of a child, born or unborn. You can fool yourself but the simple truth is the process of life begins at conception. A child unborn or born cannot survive unless nurtured. Again no human being has the right to take the life of a child.

Posted by: Pat L | January 23, 2009, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm

I am a Christian. A baby in the beginning of the first trimester is detected in ultrasound with a beating heart. The fastest a human grows is from conception to birth — no other growth period comes close. When abortion is used, it takes away the power of God. It puts creation solely in the hands of mortals. The Bible states right off the bat in Genesis that God created all things. If God did not want that “fetus” baby, it would not be there. How many people ask a pregnant woman when her “fetus” is due — it is always, when her baby is due. Where would we be if the people who are heroes, i.e. Jesus, Moses, David, Paul, George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Martin Luther King, Thomas Edison, our parents, policemen, firemen, pastors (the list is endless) were never born(without parents, we would not be here)? Anyone who claims to be a true Christian cannot justify abortion.

Posted by: Richy | January 24, 2009, 12:04 am 12:04 am

Folks think they are holier than thou
And tell biblical stories of how
Cells are a person
And abortion is worse than
What any of their commandments allow.

Posted by: Rick Limmer | January 24, 2009, 12:39 am 12:39 am

“Why is this disregard for human life and squandering of taxpayers money being swept under the carpet by ABC?”
Nancy – very good point. The fact is, the media elected Obama, so God forbid they would have to cover anything that sheds a negative light on him. It’s pretty hard to make him look like a god when he’s supporting murder, which is what abortion is. The media is to blame for this “messiah” image of Obama. I have a friend who attended the inauguration, and said it was like a big Obama love fest. I couldn’t even watch him being sworn in. I think everyone should have worn black for the national day of mourning. Unfortunately, the Obama worshipers prevailed in the election, and those of us with common sense will have to pay also. My only hope is impeachment. Thanks all you wonderful media for being so fair and impartial.

Posted by: Rose | January 24, 2009, 1:01 am 1:01 am

This message is to Rick Limmer and all those who think like him. It has nothing to do with being holier than thou, but has everything to do with protecting all humankind, born or unborn.

Posted by: Pat L. | January 24, 2009, 1:02 am 1:02 am

“Murder is the intentional killing of a PERSON. In spite of the religious beliefs of many, it is nearly impossible to maintain the argument that an embryo is a person.”
Jimca – Do you actually have any clue what a person is? Have you seen any pictures of a fetus only weeks old with a beating heart, or at 6 months? Or, do you know what a partial birth abortion involves – literally ripping the baby apart? If the answer is no, then don’t profess to know when a life becomes a person. Obama is supporting abortion,which is murder, with your money. If you don’t see a problem with that, there’s no hope for you. Let’s pray to the real God, and stop worshiping the false “messiah” that his supporters see him as

Posted by: Rose | January 24, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am

There once were some cells in a dish
That a lab tech stirred up with a swish
“Protect humankind”
Screamed some people inclined
To genuflecting at symbols of fish.

Posted by: Rick Limmer | January 24, 2009, 1:24 am 1:24 am

Rose – Sure, ok, Obama is supporting abortion with taxpayer money. But have you thought about how that taxpayer money might actually be preventing abortions? Plenty of people in this thread have given reasonable, well researched opinions about the good that organizations like USAID and UNFPA can do without the gag order restriction, in areas of standard women’s health care that have nothing to do with abortion. Like providing education and tools for family planning, so that less girls and women are in a situation where they might turn to an abortion (legal or illegal). Show us some evidence that preventing access to safe/legal abortions actually does prevent abortions and protect infants, and then we’ll talk. Reality might surprise you.

Posted by: Kilgore Trout | January 24, 2009, 1:50 am 1:50 am

BRAVO for Barack Obama!

Posted by: Jan | January 24, 2009, 7:51 am 7:51 am

Obama needs to determine the difference between serving the public and killing the public. Engage in slogans and terms like “fetus” all you wish. Those “christians” how are pro-abortion, you’d better think about how you will debate this with Christ when you meet him.

Posted by: John | January 24, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am

Kilgore – I know what reality is, and it does surprise me – that people can’t identify what murder is, and that’s abortion! Plain and simple, no excuses or rationalization, it’s MURDER. Knowledge might surprise you.
Jan – yours is the exact attitude that got Obama elected. At least I know the blood of millions of babies on my hands. Can you say the same??

Posted by: Rose | January 24, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am

If Mexico wants to inform and educate about Abortion then let them. Just don’t use my tax dollars to pay their bill!! Mexico needs to pay for Mexico!! It’s bad enough 20 million of their people are in our country illegally…I think we, the tax payer, are already paying too much.

Posted by: penney | January 24, 2009, 9:37 am 9:37 am

John wrote “Engage in slogans and terms like ‘fetus’ all you wish.”
The word “fetus” has been around for 600 years. The term “pre-born” isn’t even found in most dictionaries .

Posted by: Euphemisms R Us | January 24, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am

From between 25-50% of all conceptions are naturally aborted in the early stages of pregnancy, often due to some kind of genetic flaw or other mis-step in the process of embryonic development. These many spontaneous abortions are surely the will of God or Allah etc. So, does this mean that your particular God is the #1 “baby-killer”?
And if you are offended by that statement then don’t be because I note many of you “pro-life” zealots happily and self righteously attach the same epithet to President Obama.

Posted by: Tensai | January 24, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am

Euphemisms, not sure what your point is with the etymology lesson in how long a word has been around but let me clarify. My point is you can call it anything you like, “fetus”, “embryo” or “chocolate pudding”. The fact is, he/she is a unique life with their own unique DNA which science has proved. If it wasn’t, there would be no need to run down to the clinic and have his/her live ended. Look you and I where both in the same state at the start of our lives, then we were newborns, toddlers, young children, adolescents etc. Life is a constant path of growth. Take a look at these pictures of 1st trimester babies. They have the same 10 fingers and toes we have.
I honestly believe if more people saw this stuff, hearts would be changed…

Posted by: John | January 24, 2009, 10:48 am 10:48 am

“Why is it that everyone equates abortion with murder but no one is questioning the government’s right to interfere in personal reproductive decisions? I do not see the difference in my government telling me that I HAVE to have that baby that I didn’t want and the Chinese gov’t telling a woman that she CAN’T have the second baby she wants. In both cases, the government is interfering in reproductive rights and there is nothing that says that the gov’t has that right.” – Jennifer
Jennifer, the difference is one is murder and one preserves life!!

Posted by: Stacie | January 24, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am

The truth comes out now, people like Tensai think Obama is god. Frightening… BTW, God can create life and take it you cannot…

Posted by: jgn | January 24, 2009, 10:51 am 10:51 am

We are living in a culture of death, anti God’s laws,promote abortion,and allowing to kill the innocent babies in their mothers’ wombs.

Posted by: lu | January 24, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am

We are living in a culture of death:
“For all my friends who voted for Obama can you really look God in the face and say; Father based on your word, I voted for Obama even though I know he will continue the genocidal practice of partial birth abortion. He might have to nominate three or four Supreme Court justices, and I am sure he will be nominating liberal judges who will be making laws that are against you. I also know he will continue to push for homosexual rights, even though you destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah for this. I know I can look the other way because of the economy.
I could not see Jesus agreeing with many of Obama’s positions. Finally I have two questions for all my liberal friends.
Since we know someone’s value system has to be placed on the nation,
1. Whose value system should be placed on the nation?
2. Who should determine that this is the right value system for the nation?”
Blessings,
Huntley

Posted by: lu | January 24, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Jesus would agree with Obama on ending the war in Iraq, ending torture, and ending the rewarding of greed on a massive scale instead of caring for the sick and the poor, to name just a few.

Posted by: Skip | January 24, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Lu – The American people have already decided on the “value system”. It is to be a liberal, democratic system and one based more on a philsophy of secular humanism, but without rejecting those with religious beliefs. That is why we the American people chose Obama to be our President. We don’t want or need eight more years of Religious Right Republican stupidity, incompetence, corruption, greed and Christian Evangelical fundamentalism destroying our constitution and our country.

Posted by: Tensai | January 24, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am

You REALLY need to do your homework on our Founding Fathers and the Constitution. America was based on Christian beliefs. Do your homework!!

Posted by: Stacie | January 24, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Fortunately, GOD is on the side of those that believe life is HIS gift to mankind. Good luck to the rest of you atheists.

Posted by: Franklin | January 24, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Skip, As was said earlier, how can anyone compare the murder of 50 million innocent babies to causalities of war. Every argument I see for abortion always changes the subject away from the fact that we are dealing with living unborn people.

Posted by: jgn | January 24, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Lacie – Where in the American Constitution which is the founding document of our legal status as a nation does it mention the words – Christian, or Jesus, or Bible, or even God. Not a single instance! America is founded on a secular constitution not a religious one. That is ultimately what makes America a great country.

Posted by: Tensai | January 24, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Well it’s been great debating this with all of you!! I will continue to be a God fearing Christian unashamed. Forewarning the Lord is coming back, but before He does there will be tumoil and strife (read Revelation in the Bible). You have heloed me decide to go volunteer at my local care pregnancy center- NO they DON’T preform abortions!! I will continue praying for Obama and America.

Posted by: Stacie | January 24, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Tensai, Sorry didn’t see your comment. Actually it does say in the year of our Lord (who is Jesus).It is debatable whether our Founding Fathers were Christian. Some turn around things they said to make it sound like they weren’t, I beleive most of them were. Also, Notice our Pledge (One nation under God) and the money you use (In God we Trust). If America will ever be GREAT again we HAVE to return to a CHRISTIAN nation. God Bless!!

Posted by: Stacie | January 24, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

jgn I have to say although you are welcome and free to criticise my “truths”, how can you defend the book form Bible, Koran, Torah, etc which is a collection of delusional fantasies centered around some dimly remembered historical events and nothing more as “truth” when it is obvious and demonstrable pernicious nonsense of the lowest grade. Also, how can I think that President “Obama is god” as you state, when I made my position clear as an atheist. Do you not understand logic?

Posted by: Tensai | January 24, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

“Fortunately, GOD is on the side of those that believe life is HIS gift to mankind. Good luck to the rest of you atheists.”
Franklin, why does God give us gifts like Timothy McVeigh? And, if we come up with a receipt, can we return Osama Bin Laden for a full refund? Or are lives born into non-Christian faiths not “our” God’s problem?

Posted by: just asking | January 24, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

Stacie – The pledge of allegiance and the monetary motto are recent inventions that did not exist prior to WW2. These socially devisive phrases are in contravention of our constitution and are an illegal endorsement of religion. When I swore the oath to become an American citizen I made it very clear to the presiding officials that I would not say “so help me god”. They had no problem with that and that is why I love and support this great country with all my heart.

Posted by: Tensai | January 24, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Look, I’m sure a lot of you would like to see pro-choice people as heartless child-hating murderers, but that’s just not the case. We’re pragmatists, who recognize that the best way to combat this problem is through legal means and channeling funding in the most effective ways. All the data backs this up. Abortion is very, very sad and nobody wants it to happen (though calling it things like “genocide” is utterly unhelpful). Forcing young girls to use a coat hanger in a back alley somewhere, all too often resulting in the death of both the mother and the fetus, is even sadder. Abortion didn’t suddenly start happening when it was made legal; it’s been going on for thousands of years. It was made legal in the US at the urging of doctors who saw far too often how its criminalization was hurting girls and women. At the 1994 Cairo Convention legal abortion was recognized as crucial to achieving human rights for women. When abortion is illegal, wealthy women are able to get abortions safely, while poor women are not. Also, abortions are far fewer in countries with legal abortion – check out how many abortions happen in Chile, even though it is a heavily Christian nation where abortion is illegal – 200,000 a year, twice as many as in Canada even though they have half the population. So, if you want to actually prevent abortion instead of moaning that it’s “murder”, keeping it legal and letting USAID and UNFPA do their thing is the way to go.

Posted by: Kilgore Trout | January 24, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Tensai, I guess I’m not done quite yet. May I ask you a question? You say you are Atheist? So you believe in nothing (no higher power)? So when you are alone, scared, sick, etc. you have no one and when you die you beleive that you just go in the ground? What a sad life! See I know that when I’m scared, alone, sick, etc. I can pray. And yes I beleive when I die I will go to heaven. I’m so glad that at least I have hope for a better tomorrow.

Posted by: Stacie | January 24, 2009, 1:07 pm 1:07 pm

Tensai, does this sound familiar? “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” Note the word “Creator”. Also note the progression, “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness”. You cannot pursue happiness nor have liberty if you have no life. Every other human right and issue depends on the right to life. Sadly the fact that people even debate the topic of abortion just shows how far our society has disintegrated.

Posted by: ppl | January 24, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

Tensai, What is funny is that you may not say it but you support those quotes if you make/use money in the US.

Posted by: Stacie | January 24, 2009, 1:10 pm 1:10 pm

Why thanks Senior – appreciate it!

Posted by: Tensai | January 24, 2009, 1:11 pm 1:11 pm

Thanks Senior!!

Posted by: Stacie | January 24, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

To jgn:
This is one of my earlier posts:
Ok anti-abortion people, how about this deal: We outlaw abortion but then you have to help cough up all the money to make sure that all unwanted children have a good free education, full medical coverage, free shelter or foster parents if needed, and all other necessities until they reach adulthood.
My bet is that this deal will never be taken. Right-wingers may be ‘pro-life’, but they are ‘pro-checkbook’ even more.
If you want to help pay to raise the next 50 million children I will.

Posted by: Skip | January 24, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

No Stacie, an Atheist does NOT believe in nothing! We atheists leave that to you suffering from religious delusions.

Posted by: Tensai | January 24, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Atheism IS a religion. It has become the pulpit from which Christian-bashing has reached new heights. Wasn’t in Seattle recently that atheists felt so compelled to their “religion” that they placed some godless credo in the state house?

Posted by: Francine | January 24, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

Franklin, why does God give us gifts like Timothy McVeigh? And, if we come up with a receipt, can we return Osama Bin Laden for a full refund? Or are lives born into non-Christian faiths not “our” God’s problem? – Just Asking
Just Asking, God gives us the gift of life. Then he gives us the choice of what to do with it, live for him and have eternal life in heaven or not and burn in hell the choice is ours.

Posted by: Stacie | January 24, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm

I support President Obama’s plan to overturn the ban on funding for international family planning groups. While I know President Obama is opposed to abortion, I appreciate that fact that he doesn’t feel our government should take away personal freedoms for individuals, such as a woman’s right to choose.

Posted by: sawrad | January 24, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Tensai, don’t get so upset. I’m not putting you down for your beliefs or lack thereof. I just said it’s very sad to me that’s all.

Posted by: Stacie | January 24, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

Skip, you are making progress, at least you are calling them children, and yes I would be happy to have my tax dollars and more go to help raise these children rather than kill them. I would be willing to give everything I have including my life to end abortion. I never said I was a right winger or left winger I just feel terrible about these children…

Posted by: jgn | January 24, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm

Francine: Do you think the right to express a point of view should be limited to Christians? If Christians can express their belief in God and Jesus on T-Shirts, Bumper Stickers, and … at the Washington State Capital, why shouldn’t Atheists be allowed to do the same? For goodness sake, expressing a different point of view is not “Christian-bashing”!

Posted by: sawrad | January 24, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Stacie,
Franklin said that life is God’s gift to *mankind*, therefore Timothy McVeigh and Osama Bin Laden are God’s gift to you and me. I don’t want them, thank you. And what about those folks who were born into other faiths? Did the Christian God create them too?

Posted by: just asking | January 24, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

Kilgore Trout, with your rational anything where the law is broken should be made legal because, hey people are going to do it anyway so lets make it safe no matter how wrong it is…

Posted by: ppl | January 24, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

All you pro-lifers keep the faith… the pro-aborts are aborting themselves into extinction and we pro-lifers will get this turned around some day.

Posted by: ChooseLife | January 24, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

sawred, if all atheists did was put some stoopid poster bashing religious people in a State house, I’d have absolutely no problem with them. That’s their right. Now tell me, do you really believe that’s their only assault on Christianity? Rigggghhhht.

Posted by: Francine | January 24, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Jake Tapper, why don’t you report more on what the International Funding is for such as education, counseling on all birth control and access to it? These women are not “for” abotions in third world countries because of their culture.
Also, what about how many women who choose to have an abortion are dying from trying to have one and those that are seiously injured from trying to have one without medical assistance? Good family planning consists of placing a child in a home that is loving, where there is financial capability and a lack of an environment where there has been rape, incest, abuse, or too young of a mother having a child.
Let’s put some of this energy against a personal being about to make personal choices toward helping those born where there is great suffering such as Darfur and Zimbabwe – there is no purified drinking water and people are starving and suffering from contaminated food, water – dying long, torturous deaths.

Posted by: supportnonsufferinglives | January 24, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm

Just Asking, God created EVERYTHING and EVERYONE. Just as I said before he gives us life then he gives us the choice of what to do with it.

Posted by: Stacie | January 24, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm

ppl, that doesn’t make a lick of sense because while people will probably always murder each other, there’s no way to make murder safer. But yes, now that you mention it I don’t have a problem with making certain things legal like prostitution, so that you can regulate condom use and make the general population safer, and needle exchange programs for injection drug users. The first one is a bit of a gray area for me, but with abortion it’s a no-brainer. Laws are to protect people, no? So if you have a policy or law that is in fact harming your people, you might want to think about changing that, yes? Making abortion illegal = increasing abortion rates + unacceptable morbidity and mortality of women. How is that a good policy? Please, enlighten me.

Posted by: Kilgore Trout | January 24, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

Tensai, One more thing why do we still swear in the President and all other officials using the Bible?

Posted by: Stacie | January 24, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

Kilgore Trout, your first sentence makes my point, you cannot make murder safe. Abortion is murder by dismemberment. You mathematical equation is a little off. To think that if abortion in this country were illegal we would have more then 50 million dead babies is intellectually dishonest. Yes laws are made to protect people and we need a law to protect the unborn people of this country. It comes down to either you don’t believe these are people or you have not thought about it enough.

Posted by: ppl | January 24, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Francine, I read the story of the atheist sign in Seattle. It didn’t say they did anything wrong. What other acts do you believe they committed?
And Stacie, what happens to the Buddhists, Hindus, etc. that God created? When they die, does He turn His back on them because He didn’t create them to be Christians?
My head hurts.

Posted by: just asking | January 24, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Just asking, God did not make McVeigh or OBL into the murderers that they became. Just as God did force anyone to eat the forbidden apple. You do remember that one, don’t you?

Posted by: Franklin | January 24, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

Stacie, the bible is not required for the swearing in of the President. Most *choose* to use one.

Posted by: just saying | January 24, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

“Francine, I read the story of the atheist sign in Seattle. It didn’t say they did anything wrong.”
And I never said they did anything wrong. Atheism is a religion protected by the first amendment, just like any other.
“What other acts do you believe they committed?”
You can’t be serious. Like filing lawsuits to get rid of voluntary prayer? Like filing lawsuits to dictate what songs can be sung? Like prohibiting graduates from uttering anything about God? Like suing the Boy Scouts? It’s a long list, and it amazes me that you, an atheist, don’t realize these things.

Posted by: Francine | January 24, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

ppl wrote: “You mathematical equation is a little off. To think that if abortion in this country were illegal we would have more then 50 million dead babies is intellectually dishonest.”
Oh really? Did you know that in the years before Roe v. Wade, there are estimates that as many as 1.2 million abortions occurred each year? Oh, look, that’s the same number of abortions that happen now! That’s something, considering we had a smaller population back then. The difference is that maternal mortality from abortions has plummeted since Roe v. Wade (back in those days it caused a fifth of all maternal deaths, now it’s extremely rare), and the number of abortions in our country is still declining. And, the abortions that do occur generally happen much earlier than back in those days. I could go on and provide you with all kinds of data that show how often illegal abortion goes on. Intellectually dishonest, no, unless you want to accuse a whole bunch of international bodies of fabricating their data. What data can you show to back up your points?

Posted by: Kilgore Trout | January 24, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

“What data can you show to back up your points?”
The most authoritative one there is: God’s.

Posted by: Simon | January 24, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

You would think that God would like to prevent abortions too, instead of just punishing those who make a desperate choice.

Posted by: Kilgore Trout | January 24, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

All can be saved by the grace of God. It’s not appropriate to assume that God punishes everyone who makes a “desperate” choice. One would guess, however, it would be logical to conclude that God doesn’t look too favorably on those that would condone such actions…

Posted by: Simon | January 24, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

So the 66% of the world that is non-Christian is going to Hell? And what about those who never had exposure to the Christian faith? They never even had a chance! Why would God create them only to doom them to Hell? That’s downright cruel!

Posted by: just asking | January 24, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

I would think that He also would not look favorably on those who condone policies that add to the suffering of poor women who may not have any alternatives, or who make that difficult choice to be able to keep on feeding the children that she already has.

Posted by: Kilgore Trout | January 24, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

Francine,
Maybe the story I read was a short version because it didn’t say anything about lawsuits over prayer, songs, utterances, boy scouts etc. Those folks must have been busy! And no, I’m not an atheist, but I know a few and none ever filed any lawsuits.

Posted by: just asking | January 24, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

“So the 66% of the world that is non-Christian is going to Hell?”
Did someone say that? I thought the topic was abortion, funding, and such. I really don’t know of any true religions that promote abortions, but hey, I’m always willing to learn new stuff. I would also assert up-front that any cult (including atheism) that promotes abortions would probably fall into your 66%.

Posted by: Simon | January 24, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm

Simon,
If I read what Stace wrote correctly, she’s saying that all non-Christians go to Hell:
“God CREATED them then gave them the choice of what to do with their life. You choose whether to become a Christian, Atheist, Buddist, etc. And yes, if they are not saved by the grace of God when they die then he will turn his back on them and cast them into Hell.”

Posted by: just asking | January 24, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Ooops! Sorry for butting into your conversation, just asking. I apologize.
(However, I didn’t read Stace’s post the same way you did, but you could be correct in yours).

Posted by: Simon | January 24, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

It sure didn’t take long for Mr. Obama to start killing babies. He can parade his perfect family in front of the world as if he cares about children, but he is only fooling himself. How sad. I feel for the ones who voted for him, you cannot seperate yourself from the ugliness of it all. Every child that dies will be on your shoulders as well. God help us all!

Posted by: Momof7 | January 24, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

Just asking and simon, did you really think you would go to heaven if you don’t even beleive in such a place?

Posted by: Stacie | January 24, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

I can understand that those who favor abortion do so because of convenience – just get rid of the kid, no shame, no cost… But have any of you stopped to consider why those of us who oppose abortion do so?
It’s not to disagree with you. It is because we all believe ABSOLUTELY that the act of abortion KILLS a LIVING INFANT, and we believe that is murder.
If you were walking and saw another person lying at the side of the road, and you weren’t certain if that person was alive or dead, wouldn’t you assume it was alive? Would you try to save him? We’re not in this to argue with you. We’re trying to stop what we honestly believe is murder. Is that a crime?
As far as Hitler and others are concerned, it is not for us to judge. That is God’s decision. But please don’t make me pay to help murder take place.
Remember: Labor is painful for a short time; abortion hurts forever. Talk to anyone who has had one.

Posted by: baby | January 24, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

“did you really think you would go to heaven if you don’t even beleive in such a place?”
Forget Heaven for a moment. I’m more concerned about a God who would take an innocent person, who He created, a person who lived a good and moral life, and throw him into eternal hellfire just because that person was never exposed to Christianity. Is that really what you’re saying, Stacie?

Posted by: just asking | January 24, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

“We’re trying to stop what we honestly believe is murder. Is that a crime?”
Of course not – but how do you propose to stop it? I’m not trying to pick on you, I just want one person to give a concrete plan for eliminating abortion. Just declaring it to be illegal doesn’t seem to do it. So, what to do?

Posted by: Kilgore Trout | January 24, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

I recommend researching the effects of this policy before deciding what is the humanitarian thing for our government to do. I found a very informative article written by the BBC two years after Bush instituted this “gag rule”. I’ll quote parts of it:
[...Hundreds of women's health organizations in the poorest nations of the world - places where maternal mortality and infant death are high - faced a tough choice. Either sign the gag rule and be silenced on abortion, or refuse and lose millions of dollars in US aid. Most refused to sign. As a result, thousands of family planning clinics across the developing world have closed their doors, making access to vital contraceptives hard to come by. ...
I travelled to Ethiopia - a country where abortion is illegal but where a recent study at Addis Ababa hospital found half of all female deaths there were caused by botched back-street abortions. ...
Molu is living with nine children in one room. She has been told one more baby will kill her. But the clinic that gives her the pill for free is shutting. There is no other clinic. Molu says if she gets pregnant again, she will carry out her own abortion with wire. "Either way I will die," she says with chilling fatality. ...]

Posted by: cal_chi | January 24, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

God help us all!
I voted for Obama – I believe in change -however not this one – there are so many women and men killing women for their unborn child – maybe- this was an accidents – let’s send President Barack an urgent e-mail to re-think this move. believer

Posted by: t | January 24, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm

“T”. It is too late! We selected a wrong “guy” to run our great nation.

Posted by: lu | January 24, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Thankfully, at long last enough Americans had sufficient sense of self preservation to vote for a President with the wisdom and depth of intellect to understand the complex arguments that make imperative the existence of laws which guarantee a woman’s right to choose. The religious right have had their “day” (eight years of Hell) and may they never come back.
I thought Pastor Rick Warrens inauguration speech was awful.

Posted by: tensai | January 24, 2009, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

I have a question for the pro-choice people. You are living in the USA. Hopefully you are familiar with something called the constitution,and even though I know Obama is trying to change it, here is a direct quote from it. “right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”. I’ve searched everywhere, and no where in that constitution does it say you have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, “unless you are an unborn child”. Those who think that all pro-life people are also for the death penalty, you’re wrong. Even murderers have the right to life according to the constitution. So, why deny that to the unborn, even if they are “unwanted”? Tensai – The majority of Americans voted for Obama because they look at him as their “messiah”. How sad is that. We shall see what change we get. Personally, I think we’ve been “short changed”. If he’s not impeached by then, we’ll get him out of there in 4 years and stand a chance for survival

Posted by: Rose | January 24, 2009, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

They always like picking a fight
And quite frankly, they’re not very bright
They call Barack a Messiah
And make him a pariah
And they are the religious far right

Posted by: Rick Limmer | January 25, 2009, 12:11 am 12:11 am

Me too, Rose. I’ve searched everywhere, and nowhere in the constitution does it say you have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, “unless you are a brainless, featureless microscopic ball of cells.” Our founding fathers should have been far more specific!

Posted by: blastocyst | January 25, 2009, 12:36 am 12:36 am

Rose, you should actually read the Constitution sometime. Your quote is from the Declaration of Independence. (Which, by the way, asserts those rights for all “men”, which arguably does not include even women, let alone children, let alone a fetus or embryo, but that’s another argument.)
In general folks, if you’re going to take the effort to post in front of a large audience, please take the effort to avoid making bogus quotes–you just embarass yourself and waste everyone’s time correcting you. Posting gibberish doesn’t add anything to the discussion.

Posted by: jimCA | January 25, 2009, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Francine: You’re upset that atheists don’t want their children to have to do things like pray to Jesus in school or profess a belief in God to participate in the Boy Scouts. How would you feel if your child had to pray to Allah in school or profess a belief in Buddha to be a Scout? I suspect you might do what you could to have such requirements removed. It’s not an “assault on Christianity” … it’s more like trying to ensure freedom of religion.

Posted by: sawrad | January 25, 2009, 2:11 am 2:11 am

I a prolife, but I don’t see the genie going back in the bottle with regard to abortion. What I truly disagree with is federal funding for abortions either in the US or abroad. Personal responsibility is important – for abortion, birth control, paying your mortgage, whatever. Take responsibility for your life and if that includes taking the life of another, do it with your own dime.

Posted by: Joanne600 | January 25, 2009, 9:49 am 9:49 am

Kilgore Trout. Yes I’ve seen these stats before but found out later that they are incorrect. Here is a quote from Dr Bernard Nathanson one of the founders of NARAL who testified before the Supreme Court in ’73′s Row vs Wade.
“We aroused
enough sympathy to sell our program of permissive abortion by fabricating the number of
illegal abortions done annually in the U.S. The actual figure was approaching 100,000 but
the figure we gave to the media repeatedly was 1,000,000.”
It’s obvious you’ve put some thought into this, but lets not muddy the water with side issues like statistics anyway we always need to get back to the basic scientific fact that these unborn are human beings. The ultimate in innocence… We need to constantly keep this in mind, lest we get too used to this tragedy.

Posted by: ppl | January 26, 2009, 8:41 am 8:41 am

More from Dr. Bernard Nathanson, co-founder of NARAL in how the public was sold on abortion in ’73.
“Repeating the big lie often
enough convinces the public. The number of women dying from illegal abortions was around
200-250 annually. The figure we constantly fed to the media was 10,000. These false
figures took root in the consciousness of Americans convincing many that we needed to
crack the abortion law. Another myth we fed to the public through the media was that
legalising abortion would only mean that the abortions taking place illegally would then
be done legally. In fact, of course, abortion is now being used as a primary method of
birth control in the U.S. and the annual number of abortions has increased by 1500% since
legalisation.”

Posted by: ppl | January 26, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Dr. Bernard Nathanson is quite a character. He’s responsible for the anti-abortion propaganda film “The Silent Scream.” Here are some of the false or inaccurate claims that he’s made:
The 12-week fetus experiences pain.
The 12-week fetus makes purposeful movements.
A fetus is indistinguishable from any of the rest of us.
Fetal head at 12 weeks requires the use of “crushing instruments” for extraction.
“Brain waves have existed for six weeks” in the 12-week fetus.
Many women who have an abortion suffer severe and lasting psychological damage.
There were 100,000 illegal abortions annually in the US in 1963.
The crime syndicate is heavily involved in the abortion industry.
To see what a panel of experts had to say about Nathanson’s claims, Google the article “Facts speak louder than The Silent Scream.” They also address statistics regarding the number of illegal abortions.

Posted by: Say what? | January 26, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Say What? LOL, Come on now. This was a panel of so called “medical experts” convened by Planned Parenthood who are making millions upon millions of dollars on abortion, hardly an objective source. Dr. Nathanson on the other hand has been on both sides of the issue and was making lot and lots of money before he realized the truth and stopped.
Again we can never seem to focus on the true issue that these are innocent babies in the cross hairs. It’s always change the subject, re-divert the debate.

Posted by: ppl | January 26, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Come on now, ppl. Some of the claims made by Nathanson are so utterly false that ANY medical source can be used to refute them.
And the medical experts did not work for Planned Parenthood. Here are their credentials as clearly stated in the article:
Sally Faith Dorfman, MD
Assistant Professor, Albert Einstein College of Medicine,
Assistant Clinical Professor, Mount Sinai
Hart Peterson, MD
Chief of Pediatric Neurology, New York Hospital,
Clinical Professor of Neurology in Pediatrics, Cornell University Medical Center
William Rashbaum, MD
Assistant Clinical Professor, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Seymour L. Romney, MD
Professor, Ob/Gyn, Director, Gynecological Cancer Research, and former Chairman, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Allan Rosenfield, MD
Professor, Ob/Gyn and Public Health, Acting Chairman, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Director, Center for Population and Family Health, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University
Herbert G. Vaughan, Jr. MD
Professor of Neuroscience, Neurology and Pediatrics, Director, Rose F. Kennedy Center for Research in Mental Retardation and Human Development, Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Ming-Neng Yeh, MD
Associate Clinical Professor, Dept. of Ob/Gyn Ultrasound Laboratory, Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center.

Posted by: Say what? | January 26, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

To all you Pro-life people, tell us all do you support the death penalty? Do you support the wars?

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | January 26, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

Say What?. The issue isn’t whether they have degrees, the issue is they are hand picked opinions that fall in line with what Planned Parenthood wants. Not to mention the fact that this panel’s opinions are 24 years old and science has proven a lot since then for the cause of life. Look, we can both come up with “stats” and “medical experts” backing our arguments, such are statistics and opinions. It’s a waist of time and draw away from the real issue. I always hear the arguments about how the baby can’t feel pain, they do not have conscience thought or movement, etc. etc. To which I say “So what…” It’s still a human life at a particular stage of life just like we all are at.
People for abortion always divert the argument away from the fact that we are talking about innocent unborn babies.

Posted by: ppl | January 26, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

People for abortion always divert the argument away from the fact that we are talking about innocent unborn babies.
USCITIZEN_04 is a perfect example of this

Posted by: ppl | January 26, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm

its wrong, and makes me sick. I’ve seen an 12 week old fetus delivered because of miscarriage, and to me it looks like a baby. Killing your child because you don’t want the child is wrong and many people out there who can’t have children, why can’t we work on education here and make adoption the choice ..

Posted by: wrong | January 26, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

No, ppl, YOU, the pro-lifers are talking about “innocent unborn babies.” Some of US are talking about embryos and fetuses.
And it was YOU who brought up Dr. Nathanson, who is guilty of making many false and misleading claims. It was also YOU who described the refuting panel as “so called ‘medical experts’” implying that they weren’t medical experts. And in the 24 years that have passed since that article was written, what does science say?
A fetus is unlikely to feel pain before the 3rd trimester and not at 12 weeks as Nathanson said.
One look at a photograph of a 12-week fetus will show that it’s not fully formed as Nathanson claimed, nor is it indistinguishable from us, as he also claimed. That was obvious even in the 1980s and Nathanson was clearly being dishonest.
The head of a 12-week fetus did not require crushing even in the 1980s.
Brain waves measurable on a normal EEG do not occur until the second half of the pregnancy, not at 6 weeks as Nathanson claimed.
The size of a 12-week fetus has always been about 2 ½ to 3 inches, yet in his film, Nathanson used a model over half a foot long to represent one.
Nathanson also said in a magazine article in 1994 that he believed it was justifiable to kill someone to stop them from performing an abortion. Go figure.

Posted by: Say what? | January 26, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

So Pro Life supporters Pick and choose who is to die, if you are pro life it should be for all life and my question was valid. I beleive in Choice and I do not think Abortion is the answer to everything, but then again that is my choice. I do beleive in the death penalty BTW. And I also recall they ( Pro Life supporters) Have caused the death i.e.killed a few doctors and anyone else that was close to the doctor, all under the Pro Life umbrella.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | January 26, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

PPL would most likely make his/her child have a baby even though she might be 13 and was violently raped and still recovering from the emotional scars as well as physical.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | January 26, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Say What? Apparently you didn’t read the entire thread. Nathanson came up as a reply to another post claiming questionable statistics that’s the only reason. Nathanson was simple saying how he and the other NARAL founders fudged the stats to convince the Supreme Court.
Embryo, Fetus, Infant, young child, Adolescent all different stages of a human being.

Posted by: ppl | January 26, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

USCITIZEN_04, I would always choose that both should live. And you are correct I would not subject my daughter to the additional scarring of having to kill the child in her womb not matter what the reason. Women deserve better than the slavery of abortion.
BTW I know someone who adopted a child who was the product of rape and this child is a great kid. Could not imagine anyone thinking this child should not be alive. My greatest respect goes to the birth mother for her courage in giving this child life in this “me first” culture. Abortion is the exact opposite of love. Love sacrifices self for others. Abortions sacrifices others for self.

Posted by: ppl | January 26, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

ppl but what about the rape victim mental health? Maybe sometime down the line she wants the child back, even if that means stealing the child back. Mental health is such a touchy subject. But people will force thier own beleifs, wants and needs on to others. I wish the Abortion issue was taken care of at the start, with the Man. If men did not have the tool that got a woman or girl in trouble there would be no problem.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | January 26, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

No please… the question is “what about the innocent child?” What did he/she do to deserve death. Pure innocence. let’s save the child and do absolutely everything in our power to help the mother. She deserves all our help in every way, not the additional scars and guilt of abortion.

Posted by: ppl | January 26, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

what about the inocent person attacked and left for dead, thier voice should not be heard? For all you know they would have the child and put it up for adoption. You think Pro-Choice means pro abortion, which it does not. Besides the point this bill band all aide for preventing pregnancy just because the facility performed abortions. This means no protection for the woman or girl. You know safe sex and all that, prevent the spread of sexual transmitting disease and pregnancy. Would you rather prevent then destroy? I know I would, Bush did not see it that way he just wanted people not to have sex forced or not, and anyone knew that was not going to work.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | January 26, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

ppl what if you only had one to choose from? One was going to die? What would you choose, I mean it is what some women have to face. Have a the child and die or to terminate the pregnancy? Only one choice here you can not have it both ways.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | January 26, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

You know the ironic thing is, is that since contraception became globally acceptable unplanned pregnancies have skyrocketed. So it didn’t work, enter abortion the end all form of “contraception”. But that’s off the subject…
As for what if you could only choose one? Boy do I wish that where the only reason people had for desiring abortion. Abortion would be nonexistent. To answer the question because I know your sitting on the edge of your seat waiting :) Saving the mothers life is the first concern. If by trying to treat the mother the
pre-born baby dies, it is tragic, but intentional killing of the baby is never necessary.
Say What? I can google for stats upon stats and copy and paste them but its a waist of time and draws away from the real issue. I’d still say “so what…” That’s my point I don’t want to go off on a Nathanson debate but it is also ironic that his judgment was perfect when he brought his stats before the Supreme Court and then when he saw the truth his judgment was questionable. Very convenient.
We are talking about killing babies. Sorry to be redundant but it need to be repeated forever…
Again Embryo, Fetus, 8 weeks, Infant, young child, Adolescent all different stages of a human being just like we all are at.

Posted by: ppl | January 26, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

Yes, Kim was the first to bring up Nathanson. Kim also said, “Many in our society have been so blinded by lies that they don’t recognize truth whatsoever. A baby, not fetus, is fully developed by 8 weeks.”
The truth is the 8-week fetus is the size of a peanut with a partially developed brain, webbed toes and fingers, a transparent skull, no eyelids, a bump for a nose, nubs for ears located down near the neck, intestines located in the umbilical cord, no private parts, no hardened skeleton, but there is tail. Yes a tail.
Then you, ppl, brought up Nathanson again in response to some statistics you didn’t like. The trouble is, everything that Nathanson says is suspect because of his record of untruths and exaggerations. Here are some statistics from a different doctor that refute Nathanson’s claim.
EXPERT OPINION: 100,000 illegal abortions is considered by experts to be an underestimation. Although there are no accurate data on the number of illegal abortions prior to its legal performance, Dr. Christopher Tietze, a demographer who was known worldwide for the scientific quality of his work, estimated that in 1963, the numbers ranged between 200,000 and 1,200,000. It is generally believed that the figure was closer to the higher level, and has risen little since abortion was legalized (currently about 1,500,000). In 1963, only those botched abortions having serious complications requiring hospitalization could be counted. Without a legal requirement for reporting, there are no accurate estimations as to what percentage of the degrading, dangerous, illegal abortions was successful without such complications.

Posted by: Say what? | January 26, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

ppl, you can repeat and repeat forever, but not everyone agrees that as soon as egg gets fertilized, you get Instant Person.
And Nathanson’s judgment became questionable when he put together a litany of lies called The Silent Scream.

Posted by: Say what? | January 26, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

ohw! i appreciate President Obama ‘coz he will sign an executive order overturning the “Mexico City policy,” which prohibits nongovernmental organizations that receive international family planning assistance through the U.S.
If a woman chooses to abort the baby in her womb, she will face the emotional and possibly physical consequences of that decision on her own.and its so hard to face this kind of situation.

Posted by: maila14 | January 27, 2009, 5:31 am 5:31 am

If we could just get ride of all the noise and distractions and sit and think about it and ask what is the magical point where life begins? What would we come up with? At conception science has proven the he/she is a unique life with their own unique DNA. If life does not begin at conception, when does it begin and why?

Posted by: ppl | January 27, 2009, 7:37 am 7:37 am

ppl, we will always disagree. You’re convinced that even the most primitive cell clusters make a human being. Some of us are not convinced. I think a human being is much more than a few nondescript cells. And no, science has not proven that at conception there is unique life. Embryos split into twins all the time, so they are not unique or individual, although some anti-abortion ethicists will argue even this by comparing human embryos to flatworms. Go figure.
I don’t know exactly when the “magical point” of becoming a person occurs, but I do think it comes much further down the path of human development than you do.

Posted by: Say what? | January 27, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am

If we are unclear of when life begins, and many in science are convinced it’s at conception, then we must, must, must error on the side on caution. If we are knocking down a skyscraper and we are not sure all the people are out of the building, do we make sure it is evacuated first before destroying it? Of course we do…
It is more like “we don’t know when life begins and frankly we don’t care.
We are going to do what we want.” That is an honest assessment.
I am convinced that in the future humankind will look back at this time and say “what were they thinking?”, just as we look back at slavery today the same way.

Posted by: ppl | January 27, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

ppl, no one is denying that there is “life” from the moment of conception, but a microscopic cluster of nondescript living cells is not, not, not a person.
“‘We don’t know when life begins and frankly we don’t care. We are going to do what we want.’ That is an honest assessment.”
Yeah right, ppl.
I too am convinced that in the future, humankind will not look kindly on the pro-life movement’s attempts to enslave women by controlling their bodies.

Posted by: Say what? | January 27, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm

I wish the Abortion issue was taken care of at the start, with the Man. If men did not have the tool that got a woman or girl in trouble there would be no problem. So lets take care of the man, and stop putting it all on the woman.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | January 27, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

If no one is denying that there is “life” from the moment of conception, but that that life is not the beginning life of a person then what is it the beginning life of? If it is not the beginner of life for a person, and the blueprint is not in place, then why would we need to stop its growth via abortion? Those who do not believe it is a life know precisely that it is a life they don’t want to progress for whatever reason.

Posted by: ppl | January 27, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Yes, ppl. That clump of living cells, if left to continue multiplying would EVENTUALLY develop into a person. Women don’t give birth to dogs, frogs or amoebas, after all. The problem is you absolutely, positively believe that removing those cells is murder, while I most absolutely, positively do not.

Posted by: Say what? | January 27, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Say What?
We are all a clump of living cells and it is totally arbitrary to determine which clump is human and which is not in the progress of life. That is why I believe the start of life is the most logical place for this determination.
I guess I should be thankful that we have not yet decided that anyone prior to puberty are subject to “choice”. After all their clump of cells have not fully developed like the rest of us. I mean they don’t even have breasts or facial hair, how can we call them people?
Now you know what I’m getting at and I know what you are getting at and I’ve sensed some emotion in your replies. I am not trying to be a wise guy. These are honest questions I have and am not trying to belittle anyone or try to be more cleaver. Sometimes things can be misread when verbal inflections are missing, but I believe my argument is sound and consistent and I try to leave emotion out of it cause it does not help me.
You yourself said the you are not “convinced” which hopefully means you are open minded and maybe could be convinced. Look, people do not change their minds on this issue over night, but many do change their minds. You just need to keep seeking answers…
I’ll give you the last word…
Take care…

Posted by: ppl | January 27, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

There are no nonhuman cells in a human zygote, human blastocyst, human embryo, human fetus, human child, or human adult. Yet by your definition, ppl, every one of these is a person, and equally so. And why would you suddenly bring prepubescent children into the picture? Obviously infants and children are developed to the point of being people. We had been discussing when living cells become a person. But if you want to be a wise guy, hey, be my guest.
There is virtually no chance that I will ever consider zygotes, blastocysts and early embryos to be people. And there’s no current scientific evidence to convince me that early stage fetuses are people either. By the way, I’ve been following this stuff since the days of Roe v Wade.
Here’s hoping that YOU’LL keep an open mind and realize that you might just be mistaken about this murder business, especially with scientific advances. Better not scratch that itch; you might murder some skin cells which could potentially be used someday to clone a human being.

Posted by: Say what? | January 27, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

So how did all these – “human / people- cell” deny – ers get “THEIR” start ???? Nice that you are now fully/totally developed and can speak for these tiny human cells that aren’t as “ABLE” – as you – to make such grandeous decisions for their distruction . Aren’t you special !! Aren’t you fortunate to have “parents” that “decided” to allow you to develop into a fully developed / thinking PEOPLE/ PERSON or were your beginning -cells of a vegetable or mineral source ???

Posted by: Mary Lou | January 28, 2009, 6:32 am 6:32 am

Mary Lou,
See the comment posted by: goodusername | Jan 23, 2009 12:39:59 PM, which sums it up pretty well.

Posted by: just saying | January 28, 2009, 8:21 am 8:21 am

For goodness sake, can’t everyone see the real point of any abortion laws? The right or not to have an abortion will be voluntary! If you don’t agree for any reason, then don’t have one! But leave the rest of us to decide for ourselves please. It is no-ones business except the mother, father and Doctor.

Posted by: angelico | January 28, 2009, 9:04 am 9:04 am

Abortion is never for goodness sake. The point of all abortion laws basically is convenience, money and political power. Murder is everyone’s business especially the baby’s.

Posted by: again | January 28, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Interpret your bibles however you want; decide what’s good and what’s bad, and then impose whatever rules you like on your fellow parishioners. Just leave the rest of us out of it.

Posted by: don't cross that line | January 28, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm

Pro-Choice = a person choose the path they take, be it have and keep the baby, have the baby and adopt the baby out, or terminate the pregnancy. I agree Abortion is not the answer to birth control. But not one of you people has to carry it or support it when the child is born.
Pro-life = we are going to beat you, shoot you, or blow you up unless you agree with me.
Sperm Bank – potential Babies are thorn away.
Petri dishes with human embryo contaminated – potential Babies are thorn away.

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | January 28, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

It is so funny how all you pro life people pick and choose who is ok to be killed.
1. A soldier is ok to be killed
2. A Murder is ok to be killed
3. A Doctor that performs abortions are ok to be killed
4. people in the wrong place at the wrong time are ok to be killed even if they are children or pregnant women

Posted by: USCITIZEN_04 | January 28, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Why is it you pro-aborts are concern about everybody but innocent babies?
ppl said is correctly:
we can never seem to focus on the true issue that these are innocent babies in the cross hairs. It’s always change the subject, re-divert the debate.

Posted by: Frank | January 28, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Why do you pro-aborts keep pushing your values on us. Why should we have to pay for the abortions you cling so dearly to. How about we let every taxpayer decide which way they want there tax dollars to go, either to abortion mills or crisis pregnancy centers and we’ll see which side is virtually out of business. You are in the minority, in a poll recently taken, 60% of Americans disagree with all abortions except rape, incest and the life of the mother (these of which only made up about 3% of the abortions) so 60% disagree with 97% of the abortions. You wouldn’t know this because the pro-abortion media will not report it. Yet we are forced to have our dollars go to places like Planned Parenthood.

Posted by: Frank | January 28, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

Why is it you anti-aborts are convinced that even a microscopic ball of cells is an innocent baby? I dare you to coochy-coo tickle a formless zygote or blastocyst under the chin.

Posted by: Say what? | January 28, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm

Because it is a baby.

Posted by: Frank | January 28, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

“You wouldn’t know this because the pro-abortion media will not report it.”
So which poll do you choose to trust, Frank? One commissioned by CATHOLICS! LOL
Let’s look at some other polls to see what percentages think abortions should be legal all or most of the time.
NBC: 49% with 4% unsure
ABC: 54% with 3% unsure
Pew: 54% with 5% unsure
Quinnipiac: 57% with 5% unsure
LA Times/Bloomberg: 44% with 6% unsure
AP/Ipsos: 51% with 6% unsure

Posted by: just saying | January 28, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

Me: Why is it you anti-aborts are convinced that even a microscopic ball of cells is an innocent baby?
Frank: Because it is a baby.
Me: But what makes it a baby?
(The ball of cells is back in your court, Frank.)

Posted by: Say what? | January 28, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Now there’s some “unbiased” polls… Crack me up. BTW Your precious LA Times just conducted a poll and 54% say we should not fund abortions while only 37% said we should, which is really the point I’m making related to this article. Still haven’t answered the question why force you values on us? Let us put our taxes where we believe. No we couldn’t have that, that would be to fair.

Posted by: Frank | January 28, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

What makes a baby? Life at any point that is on it’s journey, with it’s human blueprint, towards natural death. You should change you Name to “Say something sarcastic and nonconstructive”.

Posted by: Frank | January 28, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

A few points for Frank.
The Catholic faith is against contraception, let alone abortion. Why would you think they would be an unbiased source for a poll on the subject?
It was you who answered the question “why do you think a ball of cells is a baby?” with “Because it is a baby.” Isn’t that rather unconstructive?
Pro-lifers don’t just complain about funding. Their main focus is on making abortion illegal.
A 90-year-old man has his human blueprint and is on his journey towards natural death. By your definition, an old man is a baby.

Posted by: Say what? | January 28, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

Saywhat – The 90 year old man you are referring to does indeed have everything that the unborn child has from the moment of conception. I’ll go slowly here for you…there are categories of age groups, infants, babies, children, adolescents, adults, older adults..get the idea?? Every falls into an age category. But EVERYONE of those categories, including the unborn child is a human being. Got the picture?????

Posted by: Rose | January 28, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Rose, Say What? is not that dumb, he/she is just pretending to be to avoid the question about funding and forcing there values on us. Don’t hold your breath waiting for an answer to explain the unfairness of it because there is none. That’s why I asked the question because it illustrates the way they try to project on us what they do, imposing there values. Just look for more of the same avoidance and diversion tactics. It’s all they got cause it’s tough to defend against common sense. It shouldn’t have taken this long to answer if there was consistency to their beliefs…

Posted by: Frank | January 28, 2009, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

I was talking about a blastocyst when I said “a microscopic ball of cells.” But let’s discuss an embryo 3 weeks after fertilization.
Rose, you are so very wrong. The embryo is the size of a pen tip and is shaped like a disk. The heart is starting to take shape and beats irregularly. The circulatory system is the only somewhat functional organ system at this point. The embryo has no face or even a head. There are no arms or legs. It does not yet have muscles, or a skeletal system. There is no nervous system; just a tube that will become the spinal cord. It has no skin. It has no intestines.
I got most of this information from the Mayo Clinic. Where did you get your info, Rose?
Please Google the words: carnegie stages of human development. Go to the first listed web site and look at the photographs of embryos at various stages. Learn the TRUTH.

Posted by: Say what? | January 28, 2009, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

Frank, that bit about “forcing there [sic] values on us” goes both ways. Those of us who feel the Mexico City policy harmed the people of developing countries and lowered world opinion of the US have long endured someone else forcing values on us. Fact is, the United States has obligations in the world of international law to provide funding for international development. And yes, family planning is an important component of that. Successful family planning, without the restrictions of the Mexico City policy, reduce the prevalence of abortions. Whether you like it or not, our taxpayer money goes toward that. When we meet our obligations toward foreign aid, our standing in the world is greatly enhanced and abortion rates drop. Yay! That’s a good thing! Isn’t that what we should be working toward?
Also – and I’m impressed this debate is still going on, I thought it died a week ago – just so you know, in the eyes of the law, an embryo in the first trimester is not considered to have reached full “personhood”, because it is not considered to be viable outside the mother’s womb (a nice way of saying that it is basically a parasite at that point, living off the mother’s resources and threatening to hurt or kill her during the course of the pregnancy). So, yes, it is morally difficult to choose between the mother and the unborn child (I’ve argued earlier here that legally protecting the unborn child over the mother would result in the demise of both, but that’s beside the point) – but the law sides with the mother until the fetus is considered to be viable on its own. Having an abortion (in the medical arena, that is) carries much less risk than carrying the baby to term, so therefore abortion must be legal. That’s not my personal moral view, but it is the view of the law that we live under. Like it or not.
But if you want to condemn women in developing countries to swallowing battery acid or puncturing their internal organs with wire, be my guest.

Posted by: Kilgore Trout | January 28, 2009, 11:47 pm 11:47 pm

And Frank, if you don’t your tax dollars to fund abortions, you have a perfect right to fight against that. But do not impose your religious beliefs on women and their bodies by trying to make abortion illegal.

Posted by: Say what? | January 28, 2009, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Well said ‘say what’! At the end of the day, no-one can ‘make’ s woman carry an unwanted pregnancy if they really don’t want to. Doesn’t any of the Gods people believe in cause miscarriages! Are we saying that is murder too? Abortion is legal and everyone needs to deal with that fact.

Posted by: angelico | January 29, 2009, 5:44 am 5:44 am

Saywhat – I didn’t pull that information out of my ear. Google Fetus – Stages of development. You can click on various sites that tell you what happens at each stage of development of a fetus, not a ball of cells. You are wrong, plain and simple,and Frank you are very right – these people are trying to divert the issue to suit their needs. I won’t even try to engage in intelligent conversation with them, because there is no such thing. They will rationalize to their death that abortion is not murder, and really believe that they are right. I am not imposing my religious beliefs – I am presenting the truth. Someday you will see that we are right, but then it will be too late for you. Rather than try to debate with people who obviously don’t get it, and don’t want to get it, I’ll pray that you see the light. Debate the issue with God and see where you get. Obviously you don’t converse much with Him or you would get it.

Posted by: Rose | January 29, 2009, 8:20 am 8:20 am

Kilgore Trout, my point was that the LA Times did a poll stating the majority of people do not want tax dollars going to funding abortion especially during this financial time. It was a purely political move on Obama’s part and he proved his is not really interested in “change” and in responsible spending in Washington.
I agree with you that we have responsibility to the rest of the world which is why we should not act irresponsibly. I disagree with you that this money cuts down on abortions and I don’t want to play statistics tag with you. The more you encourage contraception the more people have intercourse and the more unplanned pregnancies there are thus the more abortions there are as the final contraception. I know this is very unpopular but why not teach abstinence in these developing countries it works 100% of the time.
I understand it’s the “law” but just because something is the law does not mean it’s right. History has proven that.
I will never understand the argument of allowing the killing of unborn babies because if we don’t allow it people will do it anyway and they may hurt themselves doing it illegally. If these poor desperate woman had funds to help them have these babies then everyone wins except of course those who feel “choice” is a badge of honor.
BTW Say What? I never mentioned religion, just another diversion tactic of yours…

Posted by: Frank | January 29, 2009, 8:24 am 8:24 am

Rose you were simply wrong, wrong, wrong.
I did as you suggested and Googled: Fetus – Stages of development. The first site on the list describes the 3-week embryo as “a tiny ball of several hundred rapidly multiplying cells. The ball is called a blastocyst.”
LOL Rose, you got all up in arms when I called a blastocyst “a microscopic ball of cells.” But let’s move on to the next site since some of them start the timing of a pregnancy from the date of last menses rather than from time of fertilization.
“3 weeks: The embryo is now about 1/12 inch long, the size of a pencil point. It most closely resembles a worm – long and thin and with a segmented end. Its heart begins to beat about 18 to 21 days after conception.”
Hardly what you described, Rose. Let’s try the next web site on the list.
(This site doesn’t have a specific breakdown for week 3)
“Weeks One Through Four:
Ovulation occurs, Conception occurs, Gender is determined, Implantation
Neural tube forms – It will develop into the nervous system (Brain, spinal cord, hair, and skin). Already your baby has the foundation for thought, senses, feeling, and more!
Heart and primitive circulatory system rapidly form – While still in its beginning stages, this is the very life support system that will carry your child throughout his or her life.”
This site is highly suspect – hair and skin is not part of the nervous system!!! But anyway, again, not what you described, Rose. That’s three strikes, and you’re OUT.

Posted by: Say what? | January 29, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Frank, you brought religion into the picture with your Knights of Columbus poll. Nice picture of the Pope on their home page.
Besides, it takes a lot of faith to believe a ball of microscopic cells is the same thing as a baby.

Posted by: Say what? | January 29, 2009, 9:37 am 9:37 am

How come when a ” pregnant ” human – cell/fetus/embryo/unborn “baby”- carrying mother or is she not a “mother” at any STAGE of pregnancy ; is physically attacked and the attack results in her death as well as the distruction of the “human” – life in her womb it is LEGALLY considered a “double”-HOMICIDE ?? Please define – “mother” and “human” pregnancy !! Use to hear the term about a pregnant woman /girl “she is with child” !! Is that term outdated for the convenience of this “Culture of Death ” Society so that the conscience of the pro- abortion mentality is justified ??

Posted by: Mary Lou | January 29, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

But Frank, it’s not like now that the Mexico City policy is overturned we will suddenly start throwing billions of dollars to pay for all the world’s abortions. I believe someone earlier called this an “abortion bailout.” Not at all – it simply means that, out of the pool of money that is budgeted by Congress and allotted to foreign aid, our donors can provide funding to any NGO that they want. As was discussed earlier, some very excellent NGO’s had to shut down under the Mexico City policy because they felt that being unable to mention abortion in their counseling of young girls was very dangerous (especially being unable to counsel against the dangers of having an unafe/illegal abortion). So yes, each fiscal year Congress figures out a budget and yes, the financial crisis is taken into account. I believe some funding for HIV/AIDS has already been pushed back because of it, so I find it highly unlikely there will suddenly be a huge spending spree on international family planning.
“I disagree with you that this money cuts down on abortions and I don’t want to play statistics tag with you. The more you encourage contraception the more people have intercourse and the more unplanned pregnancies there are thus the more abortions there are as the final contraception. I know this is very unpopular but why not teach abstinence in these developing countries it works 100% of the time.”
I’m sorry, that is just patently false. Every bit of it. It would be wonderful if the world worked that way, but it doesn’t. More people have sex if they’re told that condoms exist? No. There is absolutely no evidence that abstinence and be faithful teaching works even 1% of the time in the absence of contraception counseling, and it only makes us look like a hypocritical nation when we try to demand that family planning agencies in other countries teach that way if they want money from us. I can give you numerous stats and charts if you like, from many diverse and reputable sources such as the World Health Organization, done by very excellent epidemiologists. You may find some quack here and there to back up your side of the argument, but the vast majority agree that increased access to contraceptives lowers the abortion rate, which is lowest in North America and especially Western Europe. Both of these regions have legal abortion and excellent access to contraceptives. Many governments are recognizing this and easing their abortion laws, even in places like Ethiopia and Pakistan. Romania tried to criminalize it for awhile, but quickly reversed that when they realized what it was doing.
I’ve spent some time working on the ground in women’s health care in the Horn of Africa, so I’ve seen with my own eyes what kind of suffering women can endure and how naive it is to think that this will get better with abstinence teaching. Just to highlight how different the circumstances there are for women, infibulation is widely practiced in that part of Africa – this is an extreme form of female genital cutting that is often done to women as a ritual rite of passage or even during early childhood. Basically, everything gets sewn up, if you know what I mean. This can cause severe trauma to the woman when she has sex for the first time, and other problems obviously. I don’t want to be culturally insensitive, but this practice does have its roots in a culture of male domination, as a method of controlling whether a woman has sex or not. Do you think that in this environment, that a health worker at a family planning clinic will do a bit of good telling a woman to just not have sex? That decision is very often not up to her. The only thing that might help her not wind up with 9 kids is if she can be offered something like birth control pills, which she can take without her husband’s knowing if needed. Anyway. Yeah, abortion’s bad, but it makes me sadder that people in this country would want to deny women and girls who live under conditions like that any kind of health care that we have at our disposal here.

Posted by: Kilgore Trout | January 29, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am

Kilgore Trout, I didn’t say it was a spending spree, just that it’s more spending that the majority of the public do not want. Americans have been pretty steady on this, they don’t want to pay for abortions here or abroad. To say you are pro-choice is one thing to say I have to pay for it is something else.
I disagree with you about the image it portrays of us overseas. It’s saying, We’ll help you to develop, but you must legalize abortion if you want our help. Your portrayal is very benign. The money is going to organizations that are pushing for, demanding in fact that countries that have some protection for the unborn change those policies. This aligns us with those efforts.
Unfortunately your whole argument is based on stats that you say come from reputable sources because they back you up. WHO in my view can hardly be viewed as impartial since they are an arm of the UN who definitely have a pro-abortion agenda. I do not trust stats from any source because every outfit and every individual in those outfits have their own agendas and you can do whatever you want with stats.
If you hand out contraception which is never 100%, people get a false sense of security and take the plunge much more often thinking they’re safe. People never jump out of airplanes without parachutes. I understand the horrors that some women endure around the world and can appreciate the compassion you have for them, but what we are doing in this country and what we are forcing on other countries is infanticide disguised as compassion. Creating 2 victims, the post-abortive mother and the dead child is not the solution.
We need to use funds to help both mother and child and to help educate the world that there is no shame in pregnancy and that we can give every child a chance, and that abstinence does work 100% of the time when tried. If we didn’t have such a sex crazed culture where abdication of responsibility is in vogue that would help immensely also. We need a total cultural cleanup. And it starts with education. You can trace all the ills of the world both in the past and now to the unwillingness of people to sacrifice. Right now we are going in the wrong direction. I believe people are basically good and fair and would do the right thing if given the option.
I see we both agree abortion is bad we just disagree which way to go to eliminate it.

Posted by: Frank | January 29, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Ok no, it will not be a spending spree, nor will it be any more money than we’re already paying for international development. It will likely be less than what we have been spending on foreign aid – the Kaiser network just had an article today about the US and many other countries delaying or cutting their assistance to the Global Fund, for instance. I get that you’re uncomfortable with the idea of “funding abortions” (I put that in quotes because most of this money does not directly fund abortions, especially in countries where it’s illegal – they can’t do that). But if I had my way, well, I wouldn’t pay taxes at all. I’m sure the LA Times could churn out a poll in no time that would show that most Americans support my feeling on that one. But I can’t stop paying taxes just because I don’t like it. Likewise, we can’t (or shouldn’t) stop meeting our foreign aid requirements. And, one major goal of international assistance is reducing maternal mortality, as outlined in the millennium development goals, and you can’t reduce maternal mortality very effectively until you address the issue of unsafe abortion. Maternal deaths negatively impact child health and economic development, etc. I would be tempted to tell you at this juncture that unsafe abortion causes up to 40% of all maternal mortality cases in some countries, but since you prefer newspaper polls to actual data, I’ll refrain.
And while we’re on the subject of stats – yes, it’s a common phrase that you can do anything with stats, and true at times, but it’s a matter of knowing how to interpret things and seeing through the common tricks that people do to manipulate their data. I’m not an epidemiologist or biostatistician, but I do have enough background in both subjects to be able to interpret raw data, and what the WHO is putting out on this matter has been solid, and if anything, the problem is underestimated (case reporting being tricky in things like this that involve something illegal or clandestine).
Anyway, we do agree that abortion is bad and education is one piece of the puzzle in fixing it. And cleaning up cultural problems is great too, but the problem is in actually doing that. If you know how to make an entire population not have sex, or only have sex with one partner, I’d love to hear about it. We could have fixed this years ago and stopped HIV with a wave of our hands. There was a really fascinating article in the New Yorker awhile back – I think it was called “Red Sex, Blue Sex” if you want to google it – that discussed how common sex and pregnancy are among evangelical teenagers. Yeah, the New Yorker is part of the liberal, pro-abortion establishment and all that, but it does criticize the behaviors of the children of social liberals too. The main point was that whether kids received abstinence only education or comprehensive sex ed, the average age of sexual debut was the same – around 16. The difference between them was that social liberals’ children may wind up having more partners and delaying marriage, so there might be more STI’s in that bunch. But teen pregnancy was much more common in the abstinence-only, evangelical crowd, because they were less likely to use or carry condoms, thinking it’s morally wrong to buy them. So – there’s a gap between sexual attitudes and actual practices, and people do have sex. Most of us, actually. That’s the difference between your example of jumping out of a plane sans parachute and using contraception. Skydiving is a fringe activity, sought out by thrill-seekers. Sex is one of the most normal activities that nearly everybody does at some point, and thus how we educate our kids about it should be handled carefully. That New Yorker article mentioned something about the “abstinence plus” movement – encouraging kids to delay sex, but also giving them the information they need about how to protect themselves.

Posted by: Kilgore Trout | January 29, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm

Say What? said: you brought religion into the picture with your Knights of Columbus poll.
It’s a A CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll, it’s 70% not 60%.
At conception: zygote
1-6 days: morula
6-12 day: blastocyst
It is considered a fetus at week 3 and is beginning development of the brain, spinal cord, and heart.
Your argument about the “ball of cells” is mute because no surgical abortions occur until after the 6th week of gestation (twice the time I’ve illustrated above) and it is not a “ball of cells” at that point.

Posted by: Frank | January 30, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Frank, you wrote, “It is considered a fetus at week 3 and is beginning development of the brain, spinal cord, and heart.”
Wrong, Frank. It is called an embryo until after the 8th week.
Then you wrote, “Your argument about the ‘ball of cells’ is mute because no surgical abortions occur until after the 6th week of gestation.”
My point is neither “mute” nor moot. In fact, my point has nothing to do with the timing of abortions. I have been talking about the pro-life stance that at the moment of conception, you get Instant Person.

Posted by: Say what? | January 30, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm

Frank, your comment posted Jan 28, 2009 5:39:58 PM contained numbers that coincided with a Knights of Columbus poll. Now you post a different figure. I couldn’t find a CNN/USA Today/Gallup Poll that seems to match up. Please provide more information about this poll, Frank.

Posted by: Say what? | January 30, 2009, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

The Pro – Life Stance – ” at the moment of conception THERE EXISTS living “human” cells albeit “LIFE” ; not vegetable or mineral LIFE !!! If left to nature these cells develop into a fully – developed baby !!HUMAN – Conception – cells are just the earliest stage of “LIFE” ! And if a “second” party decides to “destroy” those human cells they have “denied” the Right – to- LIFE , LIBERTY AND THE PERSUIT OF HAPPINESS since these early developing human cells cannot decide to continue developing for themselves. Does anybody have the answer to the question about – a “DOUBLE HOMICIDE” charge when a pregnant woman and her unborn “baby” are killed during an outside attack ??

Posted by: Mary Lou | February 1, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Exactly, Mary Lou, those human cells may develop into a FUTURE person, but at those early stages they are nothing but a bunch of cells.
I’m no legal scholar, so I can’t answer your questions on homocide cases.
And no word from Frank. It was fairly clear though the he used a poll commissioned by a religious organization to bolster his pro-life views.

Posted by: Say what? | February 1, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

I’m no lawyer either, but I believe it has to do with the fact that those cells that eventually become a person are considered to be part of the mother’s body, especially in early pregnancy. So the mother can decide to do what she wants with her own body, but somebody who wishes to harm her or her unborn child against her will does not have that right. There have also been cases where paramedics have been investigated for violating their scope of practice by performing an emergency caesarian on a dead full-term pregnant woman to save her unborn baby, so it would seem that the welfare of the fetus does not necessarily trump that of even a dead mother. But again, the true reasoning behind the legality of abortion is driven by epidemiological studies, and is to prevent it from becoming an underground practice performed by unskilled abortionists that leads to high maternal mortality. Women need to have the right to health care protected, and since abortion can be done very safely in a medical setting but is extremely dangerous outside of that setting (and often results in more late-term abortions), it is important to preserve this right.

Posted by: Kilgore Trout | February 1, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Why even call her a “MOTHER” if these are just a bunch of cells. Sorry ??those “human” cells ARE NOT part of the mothers body BUT are distinct and separate – depending on nourishment and using the mother’s womb as a medium – to continue to grow/develop fully. The blood type and sex can and will be very – “indivduallistic”- from the “mother’s” – if not destroyed. So when a “mother” decides she doesn’t want these ” human ” cells to use her womb to continue to develop , she is destroyng / killing the earliest stages of “human” life . Or does your definition of “killing” mean a “fully developed” human “person” ONLY. Sounds like discrimination to me !! There’s a legal presidence in our country’s history when African- Americans ( fully – developed ) were not considered human beings.So just because abortion is now legal in our country does not mean it is a moral/constitutional right!

Posted by: Mary Lou | February 2, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

So is abortion wrong? Is abortion right?
Let’s be honest here shall we?…The endless amounts of energy spent debating this issue has proven ineffective time and time again. What’s really at stake here is your ego. It makes you feel superior and useful to protest abortion and those who support it, but how’s that worked out for ya??
You may find it more efficient and rewarding using all of your “passionate issue energy” to visit an inner city school or donate your time with underprivileged teens. Or how about this….. pretend you’re a sexually abused and pregnant 13 yr old minority with a mother who works two jobs, a dad that isn’t around, and a society who sees no further than the political games of voter-exploitation at your expense.
I’m confident that if you stepped outside of your fairytale and exercised compassion, rather than pointless condemnation, your chances of saving a precious life may just improve.

Posted by: Erin | February 2, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

As long as there is “ANY” injustice in the world we are obliged to stand up and defend “ANY” cause . It’s not about OUR ego !! Whose ego is being fed by helping people that are struggling with various injustices ? As long as we keep silent and continue to do or say nothing the injustices will continue. It’s about helping – COMPASSION /CONCERN – FOR “ALL” Life born and pre- born !!! This abortion issue will not go away until the consciences of every individual “understands” why it is wron ! Maybe then if ever we will have a culture that is respectfull of ALL human life . If you can disrespect the preborn child why not the born – at any age – person ?

Posted by: Mary Lou | February 3, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am

“This abortion issue will not go away until the consciences of every individual “understands” why it is wron !”
Folks think they are holier than thou
And tell biblical stories of how
Cells are a person
And abortion is worse than
What any of their commandments allow.

Posted by: Rick Limmer | February 3, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am

Biological – science defines what ” human cells” are not holier than thou bible believers !!!

Posted by: Mary Lou | February 3, 2009, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm

Pro-lifers make up terminology
Like “pre-born” for human cytology.
It’s their sheer desperation
That a cellular formation
Have a soul, not just basic biology.

Posted by: Rick Limmer | February 3, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

God supports abortions. Read the bible and learn your religion before making false statements. Any REAL christian would know such a thing – any anti-abortion conservative is waving a flag of righteousness when they don’t even know a thing about what their subject is. God supports choice in several points in the Bible, and the American people do too – I’m sorry, but “Google Fetus” is not a viable source. Read the Bible and the Constitution, then come and try and talk. Until then, try to educate yourself. I truly pity your inadequate brain functions.

Posted by: Shepard | March 8, 2010, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.