President Obama’s Weekly Address: ‘I Know Some Are Skeptical’
President Obama’s first weekly address treaded familiar ground on his stimulus package, except for some new language addressing skeptics of the stimulus package.
"I know that some are skeptical about the size and scale of this recovery plan," Obama said. "I understand that skepticism, which is why this recovery plan must and will include unprecedented measures that will allow the American people to hold my administration accountable for these results. We won’t just throw money at our problems -– we’ll invest in what works. Instead of politicians doling out money behind a veil of secrecy, decisions about where we invest will be made public, and informed by independent experts whenever possible. We will launch an unprecedented effort to root out waste, inefficiency, and unnecessary spending in our government, and every American will be able to see how and where we spend taxpayer dollars by going to a new website called recovery.gov."
Also note that the Obama White House no longer calls this a "radio address."
It is simply an address, or on the whitehouse.gov website, a "video address."
- jpt
Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
I’m not skeptical. I am proud our President has surrounded himself with experts who have devised this plan to help our economy.
People go to the website and read the entire plan before you criticize it. It is a ‘big picture’ plan that is going to help the economy broadly and carefully.
Unlike the $350 billion dollars Bush gave to Paulson to spend, these dollars will have accountability, have specific areas the money must be spent on to actually stimulate the economy in many sectors. At the same time we are getting very necessary services and goods, such as better port security. (remember the 9/11 commission detailed the weak security at our ports as a major flaw in our defenses)
Compare it to a household’s economy. If you are borrowing money should you buy something frivolous like a 60 inch plasma tv and expensive sound system which will only raise your monthly electric bill or should you buy the new roof for your house, protecting your investment?
Obama’s plan makes sense.
Posted by: Lydia | January 24, 2009, 9:34 am 9:34 am
This isn’t a stimulus package, it is just a typical liberal spending package, that will do nothing to help the economy for years.
Posted by: progressive liberal | January 24, 2009, 9:49 am 9:49 am
Democrats were the ones who wrote the terms of the first $350 billion–not Bush. So they can take credit for its faliure and its lack of transparency.
This is nothing like a household’s finances. Households don’t print money. Borrowing money, even for something as important as a roof, increases your financial risk. That’s a fact. That’s why you’re supposed to have an emergency fund of at least 3 months of expenses at all times. What the government is doing is printing money, with no guarantee of return, bringing us closer and closer to default. We’ve saddled future generations with unbelievable amounts of debt for a plan presented by a man who’s never run anything in his life except a slick campaign. History has shown us repeatedly that no amount of government spending can create economic growth, yet people continue to believe the myth that it can. Only the private sector can create sustainable growth. A few months from now we’ll be told all the money spent did no good, and then what? The value of our money will be ravaged by inflation.
Accountability??? Hahaha. Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Jim Johnson, Frank Raines, and their Democratic cronies were largely responsible for getting this train wreck started. See any calls for accountability for their actions by Obama? Didn’t think so. On the contrary, they’ve been given the task of trying to “fix” the problem they created (and profiting from that as well). Washington is totally corrupt. And ignorant Americans look to these politicians for guidance instead of throwing them out of office. We deserve the pain we get.
Posted by: Jen | January 24, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am
Obama doesn’t tell and neither do the propaganda machines of ABC AND CBS AND NBC, that only 3.3% is dedicated to infastructure.. most is for people who PAY NO TAXES and is LOADED with PORK for the Democrat polticians./. this plan was discussed on the MC Glauflin Group and it is a sorry excuse of a stimlus package.. ABC still allows Obama to pull the the wool over people eyes
AMERICA..SAFE NO MORE
DOES this look like spam ABC? LOL
Posted by: who says what | January 24, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am
Jen, that I agree with your comments completely. Where is the accountability for Barney Franks?
This so called “stimulus” bill includes 1.5 billion dollars for abortion. It also includes billions of dollars for the arts. Where is the stimulus affect for our economy in these items? This bill is nothing more than an attempt by Obama to pay back the extremist on the left that supported him during the campaign.
America deserves better than the same old politics as usual. Mr. Obama promised that change and should be held accountable if he will not hold others in his party accountable.
Posted by: James | January 24, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
@Lydia,
As smart as it is to invest in the roof, instead of the tv, if you don’t have the money to repay the loan, you are still screwed.
Posted by: ajax | January 24, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Oh, by the way the stimulus bill also includes 21.8 billion dollars for California. You red states that have been responsible and have lived within your means you have just subsidized the out of control leftist utopia in la-la land.
Doesn’t that make you feel great about living within your means? This whole bill is nothing more than a thinly vailed attempt to bailout the failed liberal agenda.
Posted by: James | January 24, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am
Obama has become a joke since he took office. I thought he was going to hit the ground running? Instead, he spends our money for foreign abortions and sets up rules for lobbyist that he breaks 2 days later. This is not what I voted for!
Posted by: Glenn | January 24, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am
The stimulus also includes money for Amtrack (yes, the money loosing boondoggle). It includes money for office furniture, again does that stimulate the economy?
3% goes to infrastructure after all the hype that Obama gave to talking about that during the campaign.
Acorn will also receive money under this plan. Who in their right mind would support giving stimulus money to a group that is nothing more than political thugs? How does this help our economy?
Where is the media on all of this stuff? How will our government survive when this kind of crap can be pushed through with no media scrutiny? Sad day for America….
Posted by: James | January 24, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am
JEN
You need to get a clue the housing mess was caused by the We dont want big goverment free market no oversight Republicans, Funny you Republicans have the nerve to blame Dems when Republicans held power for 6 years and had a Republican President for 8,And your claiming the Democrats who have only been in office about 2 years have created this mess HAHA Laughable just Laughable.WAKE UP REPUBLICANS GET A CLUE YOUR PATHETIC PARTY HAS DESTROYED OUR ECONOMY WITH BIG SPENDING IN IRAQ!AND NO OVERSIGHT!
Posted by: Angie | January 24, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am
I’m outraged that the media is not outraged.
Posted by: SteveP | January 24, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am
The first few days of the Obama administration have been rocky. His first oreder of business is to agree to spend tax money, money we do not have, on foreign abortions. He picks a fight with Rush Limbaugh; now I do not like him, but how stupid is it for a president to publicly take on a commentator? He has decided that he will break his own rules pertaining to lobbying for cabinet members. His administration has ended the war on terror, according to his press secretary. Really, does anyone believe Al Queda will abide by that preemptive surrender?
I am beginning to think Obama is in over his head. The stimulus bill is a perfect example; he believes the press will continue to run interference for him as they did during the campaign. This has led him to do things in a way that will not server him well in the future. His “I won” comments demonstrate this as well.
Posted by: Nari | January 24, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am
Angie, the Republicans held hearings in both 2002 and again in 2005 to warn about the impending risk related to the derivative obscured home mortgages. In both cases it was people like Barney Franks and Chris Dodd that told everyone that it was ok and we didn’t need to do anything. The Republicans were essentially called racists because they dared to ask that the loans given for home mortgages meet EXISTING standards. The Democrats have used the Community Reinvestment Act as a way to give freebies to their low income supporters. They are responsible for the result of this attempt to win elections at any cost.
Angie, the videos of those meetings I spoke about are posted on the Internet. They are there for everyone to see who is not blinded by the media’s attempt to hide Democratic Party malfeasance. All I ask is that you view those before perpetuating a lie.
Unfortunately, we the American people will be paying for that failure of leadership for a long time.
Posted by: James | January 24, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
Republicans tried multiple times to regulate Fannie/Freddie but they were blocked by Democrats–particularly Barney Frank. In fact, Democrats personally attacked the regulator who dared to voice his concerns about the financial state of the company.
Fannie Mae corruption is legendary and documented by the New York Times (I suppose they’re a right wing rag now?)
In a nutshell, subprime lending by Fannie/Freddie was the catalyst for this mess. Both entities were run by powerful Democrats. They promised Wall Street they would back the loans, which eventually became toxic paper when borrowers defaulted. Now we’re dealing with the fallout.
Posted by: Jen | January 24, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am
I am skeptical because for one Ron Paul said it wouldn’t work and he has been right about everything.
Posted by: Huh | January 24, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am
If we think as “citizens and not partisans” as President Obama encourages, we will be able to move this country in a positive direction. We need to work together, not fight each other. Cooperative collaboration will be much more productive for America than partisan polarization.
After the mess the previous administration created for our Nation and the world, I suggest that skeptics at least give it a chance. This president consistently is taking into consideration the interests in all of our Nation’s citizens, not just a small percentage at the top of the income bracket.
Doesn’t everyone want things to improve in our country? It is obviously going to cost money, but I’d much rather have it going to rebuilding our aging infrastructure than the CEOs om the banking bailout. C’mon people – work together for the good of our Nation.
Posted by: PaizPlease | January 24, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Jen, James – Peter Schiff is running against Dodd in Conneticut next go around. Schiff was Paul’s economic advisor, and he predicted much of the mess we now find ourselves in years ago.
Posted by: Huh | January 24, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am
Jen, I am glad to see someone is paying attention.
The stimulus bill is just a continuation of the use of federal money to benefit specific special interests that we saw in the sub-prime mess. Much of the stimulus money will not be spent until 2011, concidently, close to the time when Barry has to prepare for reelection. The Democrats have learned how to use your tax dollars to insure their reelection and many are blindly accepting of this. The media is no where to be seen and in fact actively opposes the release of information that could be detrimental to the Democrats.
We really need a media that is not blinded by its own bias. If Republicans had done any thing like this the press would have been all over it.
Posted by: Cacy | January 24, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Just keep telling yourselves these things Republicans! The Republican President Bush As well as Republican congress BLEW UP GOVERMENT BLEW UP THE NATIONAL DEBT WITH SPENDING AND MORE SPENDING IN IRAQ no regulation, funny now the Republicans want to cry about Obama and his stimulis plan PLEEEZE.And all of a sudden they are Fiscial Conservitive WHAT A JOKE THE DO NOTHING I DONT CARE GREEDY REPUBLICAN PARTY HAS BECOME IF THEY CANT LEAD OR WORK IN A BI PARTISAN MANNER THEN PACK UP AND GET OUT LORD KNOWS THEY HAVE DONE NOTHING LEAD FOLLOW OR BE GONE GOP! FED UP WITH REPUBLICANS!
Posted by: Angie | January 24, 2009, 11:01 am 11:01 am
Looking forward to Recovery
Posted by: Debra | January 24, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am
PaizPlease, Obama does not appear to want to work together. He has childishly taunted Republicans by saying “I won” and has also told Republicans that they can only listen to certain people.
I for one will not “work together” to lead our nation into the misery and stench that emanates from socialism. America became great because our founding fathers created a system of government that encouraged self reliance and an entrepreneurial spirit. Why should we work together to bring the mediocrity of European style socialism to America?
Posted by: James | January 24, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am
Obama does not appear to want to work together. He has childishly taunted Republicans by saying “I won” and has also told Republicans that they can only listen to certain people.
______________________________________
Obama’s comment ‘I won” did not offend the people in the room and you did an amazing job of pulling it out of context.
What “certain people” did Obama say the Republicans must listen to? Obama did tell them not to listen to Limbaugh who is the poster child of mindless hate and divisive politics. If that is what you want the Republican party to be, you are going to be miserable as an overwhelming number of conservatives and liberals voted AGAINST that type of politics this past election.
Posted by: Paige | January 24, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am
James – I like what you have to say on the economic front, but you have to convince your fellow republicans to drop the love for killing people who disagree with Israel building settlements, erecting checkpoints, and blockading Gaza. I believe Obama is a disaster on spending and he has no problem with the unending slaughter of babies in the womb, but republicans love to spread fear about Muslims, and this for me is a big problem.
Posted by: Huh | January 24, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am
In a nutshell, subprime lending by Fannie/Freddie was the catalyst for this mess. Both entities were run by powerful Democrats. They promised Wall Street they would back the loans, which eventually became toxic paper when borrowers defaulted. Now we’re dealing with the fallout.
******************************************************
Jen- That’s simplistic, to say the least, to claim one entity, Fannie/Freddie, as being a catalyst for the dire economic situation we’re in. This country went from surplus under Clinton to massive debt in eight years. Any reasonable person who has stayed relatively in touch with events would not attribute the debt and a host of flagrant violations to a single cause. But then judging from the responses this morning, most of the respondents prefer their anger and soothsaying of further disaster to any light of reasoning.
Posted by: kathy | January 24, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am
“If we think as “citizens and not partisans” as President Obama encourages…………..
After the mess the previous administration created for our Nation and the world, I suggest that skeptics at least give it a chance.”
That is a way to get people to work together. Talk togetherness in the first sentence and point fingers in the second.
Posted by: ajax | January 24, 2009, 11:13 am 11:13 am
Yes Fannie and Freddie are a big part of it. So was the Community Reinvestment Act. SO is our negative personal savings rate. So is the trade imbalance. SO is the huge national debt eroding confidence in our ability to pay back our creditors. SO is our oversees spending on the empire. I believe Ron Paul has addressed all of these over the last several decades. Were you guys listening to the most honorable member of congress?
Posted by: Huh | January 24, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am
This country went from surplus under Clinton to massive debt in eight years.
——-
We had massive debt under Clinton, it was the budget deficit he managed to reduce/remove for a short time.
Obama is now facing a historic deficit, and says the only way to solve our problem is to make it bigger.
He may be right, but working together does not mean just doing what he and Congress want to do. Let’s be wise.
Posted by: MayBee | January 24, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Angie, I’m not a Republican. Congress approves all spending on Iraq and many Democrats voted for it as well. Their voting records are online if you don’t believe me. In 2007, Iraq was 20% of the federal budget and played no part in creating the current recession. The subprime loan fallout was the trigger and its effects will be WAY, WAY more costly than Iraq. But I do look forward to your loud criticisms of Obama as he requests billions of dollars in NEW military spending in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Posted by: Jen | January 24, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
“If we think as “citizens and not partisans” as President Obama encourages
======
Beware the politician that tells you the way to act as a “citizen and not as a partisan” is to do what he wants.
Posted by: MayBee | January 24, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am
“PaizPlease, Obama does not appear to want to work together. He has childishly taunted Republicans by saying “I won”"
*************************************
Please! He simply reminded the GOP that he is the at large politician in this matter, and that his platform is what the public voted for.
He was elected by the people not appointed by the GOP nad is doing the peoples work.
The GOP should try it, but no they are just not up to it.
Posted by: Thinking | January 24, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am
Well after 8 years of Republican economics I am convinced they have no clue what they are doing so its time to give Mr. Obama a chance.
Trickle down doesn’t work for the rest of us. Spending us into a black hole on needless wars and giving away tax cuts to the wealthy doesn’t help the rest of us. The mess we are in illustrates that sooner or later if the rest of us suffer we might even make the rich and powerful suffer as well.
Mr. Obama can’t begin to be as bad as his predecessor. I hope he will be great.
Posted by: Livvy | January 24, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am
Jen
First of all I highly think 10 Billion dollars a month on a senseless lying war doesnt have an Impact, As far as being a critic of President Obama for Pakistan and Afghanistan I belive hes right to send our troops there, In case you have forgotten thats were Bin Laden and the terriost networks are!As for the housing mess I do recall Alan Greenspan Testifying to congress The housing mess is related to the far right Idealogy of the Republicans way of NO OVERSIGHT!
Posted by: Angie | January 24, 2009, 11:54 am 11:54 am
“We had massive debt under Clinton, it was the budget deficit he managed to reduce/remove for a short time.”
*************************************************
Maybee- Actually, Clinton inherited a large trillion+ debt which he managed down into a surplus at the end of his term. Yes, a stimulus plan will increase the deficit; but this time, rather than 350 billion being released into the financial and banking coffers without oversight, the money will have safeguards in how it’s spent and visibility. If Obama enacts a good stimulus plan, then the increases in employment, consumer spending, and good and services will help offset the debt. I prefer to hoping it works to assuming it won’t.
Posted by: kathy | January 24, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am
Livvy – This goes way beyond trickle down or republican economics. This massive bubble has been caused by Keynesian economic inflationary policies adopted by both parties over the last 35 years. I encourage you to watch IOUSA on the web to understand our debt, but understanding monetary policy by the US populace is paramount to understanding why we are failing economically. Listening to Ron Paul also will enlighten.
Posted by: Ben Straub | January 24, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm
To all Obama Haters and Republicans out there: I have a question WHAT JOBS DID PRESIDENT BUSH CREATE UNDER HIS PRESIDENCY Last I checked Unemployment is about to hit an all time High!
Posted by: Angie | January 24, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Angie – Thanks to Bush, we now have tens of thousands of maimed troops to care for decades to come. There is one for starters.
Posted by: Ben Straub | January 24, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm
The problem with the Republicans are they dont want to get out of the stone ages and get in with the 21st Century. And President Obama Is a 21st Century President, cmon Republicans try things Diffrently for once instead of the old same Trickle down Idealogy WAKE UP SMEEL THE ROSES IT HAS NOT WORKED Get up with the times!
Posted by: Angie | January 24, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm
Obama Won.
Posted by: Question | January 24, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
Ben Straubb
Good point but its going to cost MONEY To care for them, And God forbid The Republicans will have a melt down to spend money to care for our troops But they had no Problem spending Money to get them killed or wounded you see thats why the Republicans are Pathetic selfish greedy Party!
Posted by: Angie | January 24, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Angie – Obama is going to get his chance. He has earned it, and I personally wish him well. I think he is wrong on a number of things, but he has said he is willing to listen to all viewpoints unlike Bush and company. Trickle down is not the issue at hand. The real problem is the massive bubble that is breaking thanks to a number of factors, the biggest being the easily available credit and low interest rates compliments of the Federal Reserve. The real focus needs to be on the vehicles that brought us to this point, not blaming democrat and republican politicians that merely pay to play….except for Ron Paul of course and maybe Kucinich.
Posted by: Ben Straub | January 24, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Concerned in Ohio
First of all I am not on welfare I work thank you very much, But the wealthy and the Rich have been getting Welfare for so long now The time has come For the Middleclass to stop giving Rich wealthy the welfare!
Posted by: Angie | January 24, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
Angie – My two congressmen from where I used to live on the southeast side of Houston were Tom Delay and Ron Paul. I know all about the corrupt politician and all about the one with integrity. I agree with much of what you say.
Posted by: Ben Straub | January 24, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm
WHEN BUSH WON TWICE I DID NOT HEAR THE DEMOCRATS SING WELL HE DID WIN!
First of all first time around he was selected not Elected he stole the Presidency
Second time around around he unfortunatley was Elected due to his fears and lies!
Posted by: Angie | January 24, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm
Concerned in OH – You need to convince the republicans to get back to their roots. I just became a republican during the primary season because one of your candidates represented the traditional party line, not this neoconservatism that is so dangerous.
Posted by: Ben Straub | January 24, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Concerned in Ohio
You really need to lay off Fox news Last I checked Obama wants to Invest in Infrastrature you know Our crumbiling Bridges and roads Bush Neglected for 8 Years.
Posted by: Angie | January 24, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
I guess some dont have a Problem with Corporate WELFARE Bailing out Wealthy Ceos
Posted by: Angie | January 24, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
The real focus needs to be on the vehicles that brought us to this point, not blaming democrat and republican politicians that merely pay to play
******************************************
Well said. When the economy becomes a bipartisan fighting point, then mistakes don’t get owned and corrected.
Posted by: kathy | January 24, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm
No matter how you look at it, It’s still a “buy now and pay later” life style. I may not be paying for it my our children surely will.
Posted by: mtr2311 | January 24, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
The stimulus needs to be more than twice what Obama is asking for, and it needs to last at least four years. Look what happened in the 30′s when FDR stopped spending and tried to balance the budget – the economy tanked again, until war spending brought it back.
The question is why is Obama being so nice to the GOP? There isn’t anything he can do to get their votes, and anything he does do to try to get their votes is just more damaging.
The conservatives lost. Their ideology suffered a humiliating defeat at the polls, and they need to get over it. Obama can help by giving them some tough love.
Posted by: Flash Override | January 24, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
man i wish they would tell me what is going on, becuase there is a big difference between spending and a stimulus, I wish somebody would Gimme $785 Billion
man i wish they would tell me what is going on, becuase there is a big difference between spending and a stimulus, I wish somebody would
Posted by: All Mi T | January 24, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm
Maybee- Actually, Clinton inherited a large trillion+ debt which he managed down into a surplus at the end of his term.
=========
Kathy- there is a difference between a budget deficit and debt.
Clinton did not eliminate debt and create a surplus. At the end of his term, we were about $6 trillion in DEBT. He eliminated deficit spending and had a surplus in the budget.
As for the current stimulus plan- I too hope it works. I’m not assuming it won’t. But the best way to make sure something works is to plan well and do it right.
Posted by: MayBee | January 24, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
@Angie “The problem with the Republicans are they dont want to get out of the stone ages and get in with the 21st Century”
Isn’t it Obama who is trying to recreate the New Deal. The new deal was a huge failure. UCLA economist (not exactly a conservative group)recently published a research paper that concluded that intrusive government programs enacted by FDR extended the great depression by 8 years. Without the war the depresssion would have likley gone on for several more years. Obama’s policies will have the same impact if they are not changed. Indeed, the statement that it cannot get worse is simply wrong.
You probably support Obama because of his views on social issues or because you support affirmative action as a handicapping ideal for choosing a president. I can understand those things; however, if Obama enacts failed economic policies or produces a government that is universally hated by those who produce wealth (IE: those who actually work and pay taxes) he will not get reelected. He may even become a target of street justice. In either case, you do your candidate a disservice by not holding him accountable and trying to move him toward more moderate approaches to governance.
Posted by: James | January 24, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Concerned in OH—ROFLMAO, Bush won once. Obama won in a popular and electoral landslide. Bush never won by such a large margin, not even against Kerry.
Posted by: Paul Wall | January 24, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
James—”IE: those who actually work and pay taxes” voted for Obama in a popular and electoral landslide. the majority of tax payers voted for Obama.
Posted by: Paul Wall | January 24, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
Hey Angie, educate yourself ok…. only 3.3% of the stimulus package goes to infastructure.. Obama is an idiot if he thinks this is going to help, and most of this spending happens AFTER 2010.
OBAMA NOT PREPARED TO LEAD
America ..Safe no more
Posted by: who says what | January 24, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
The conservatives lost. Their ideology suffered a humiliating defeat at the polls, and they need to get over it. Obama can help by giving them some tough love.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I hardly think 52% of the vote, for Obama, and 48% against is a humiliating defeat. Nowhere near landslide status. Not to mention, the questionable voting , and registration tactics involved.
As for the stimulus, the GOP’s plan is to actually add tax breaks for the middle class, and poor.
The dems have 300 million in this stimulus, earmarked for comdoms. Yup. That ought to bolster us out of this recession.
Posted by: Jeanie | January 24, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Kathy- there is a difference between a budget deficit and debt.
Clinton did not eliminate debt and create a surplus. At the end of his term, we were about $6 trillion in DEBT. He eliminated deficit spending and had a surplus in the budget.
************************************************
That’s right – a budget deficit is the difference between spending and revenue receive for a particular year, which in turn, is piled into the cumulative debt. I may have been using the two interchangeably.
Yes, he eliminated deficit spending through balancing the budget. I think Clinton inherited a 4 trillion dollar debt that expanded from around 900 billion in 1982. He revised the previous course of the last 12 years by raising the taxes for the wealthy and reducing them for the middle and working class. It produced a budgetary surplus to pay down the national debt, and yes, eliminate deficit spending. In 2000, there was no debt and a surplus of 236 billion. Needless to say, Obama has received relevant criticism for not repealing the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy as he is setting the course for deficit spending with his stimulus plan. But then it’s probably a calculation to insure passage of his economic plan.
Posted by: kathy | January 24, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
What do millions of dollars worth of birth control pills and government cars, among many other items have to do with the stimulus package. It is a transparent attempt to force certain expenditures on taxpayers who would not approve of measures like this. Obama is already proving that his word is not his honor. He pledged to the American people that he would severely limit lobbyists access to government… and yet he is already breaking that pledge. He has already boasted to lawmakers… I won! I will trump you on that.” What sheer arrogance and conceit. The media frenzy adulation has already gone to his head. He feels powerful and is saying no one can stop him now.
Posted by: Fran | January 24, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Obama has no moral center and no ethical code. He is like a reed blowing in the wind!
And he will fail because he is out of touch with the majority of Americans!
He is not a messiah or the one, and he is not a king. He is just an inexperienced guy trying to shove his ideology off on the USA! :(
He has no record of a walk thay matches his talk, and he is not gaining any ground now! :(
Posted by: aware2u | January 24, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
To: Concerned in Ohio
You really need to lay off Fox news Last I checked Obama wants to Invest in Infrastrature you know Our crumbiling Bridges and roads Bush Neglected for 8 Years.
Response: You need to do your homework. Money for these infrastructures go to the states and it is the state government that use it for other things. Roads and bridges have been crumbling long before Bush was elected into office.
Posted by: Fran | January 24, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
The Campaign for 2012 is already under way! :(
Right on Concerned in OH – Why do you think all the infrastructure spending is scheduled for 2011 and 2012?
It is too bad that Obama has no moral center and no code of ethics. Americans will not be fooled twice!
Obama will fail because he is out of touch with the majority of Americans!
He is not a messiah or the one, and he is not a king. He is just an inexperienced guy trying to shove his ideology off on the USA! :(
He has no record of a walk that matches his talk. Don’t expect that to change now!
Posted by: aware2u | January 24, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Kathy- In 2000, there was no debt and a surplus of 236 billion
———–
Please. There was a $6 trillion debt in 2000.
Posted by: MayBee | January 24, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Here’s how the Republicans ran the government when they had control of the Presidency and the Congress.
REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT
$421 Billion OVER BUDGET (2002)
$555 Billion OVER BUDGET (2003)
$596 Billion OVER BUDGET (2004)
$554 Billion OVER BUDGET (2005)
$574 Billion OVER BUDGET (2006)
All of this was RECORD overspending.
At least with this current Government the money will be spent on developing the country itself
(All figures from the Bureau of Public Debt, United States Department of the Treasury)
Posted by: pefros | January 24, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Yes. Lay off Fox by all means, and tune into the Obama network. ROFL
From above, even the seagulls must have been awed by the blanket of humanity.”
— ABC’s Bill Weir on World News, January 20.
The AP, who by all accounts, with their biased reporting, to exhault Obama into the White House, is now concerned. Perhaps rightfully so. Reminds me a lot of Hugo Chavez here.
Posted by: Jeanie | January 24, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
REPUBLICAN GOVERNMENT
$421 Billion OVER BUDGET (2002)
$555 Billion OVER BUDGET (2003)
$596 Billion OVER BUDGET (2004)
$554 Billion OVER BUDGET (2005)
$574 Billion OVER BUDGET (2006)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And from 2006 to the present, the Dems have had control, and tail spinned us into this recession, with their ideology that even if you can’t afford a home…you should buy one. We’ll force the banks to comply.
I will admit, that Republicans did their part in this, by lack of getting anything done, when they could have. Both parties have failed us. Big changes are needed, but not by anyone in either party.
Change will only come, when we as people pull our heads out of the clouds, and stop buying into the same ol same ol in political promises.
So long as we vote these clods into office, we have only ourselves to blame.
Posted by: Jeanie | January 24, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
if anyone would upload the Recovery Plan Report…
I really don’t know what else could be expected from any one man…
Compared to the last President…
If Obama can do even a third of what he has planned, it will be better than the last 8 years…
For anyone expecting more than Obama is already expecting of himself, Congress and this country,,,
Well,,,get real.
And to beat it all… we will be able to go to the recovery.org for the public to view any time we want…
I think he’ll be one of the best Presidents we’ve ever had.
Posted by: braith morgan | January 24, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
He is right about one thing and that some are skeptical, myself included. I understand that there is a need for action, what it is I am not sure of but one thing I do know and that is that printing money is bound to make it worth less and someones taxes are going to go into orbit one day in the future. We as a society have spent too much, ignored saving for our futures and allowed the government a free hand in our pockets.
A couple of years ago I thought what has happened would never come about. There were warnings from many and we as well as our representatives brushed these warnings aside. Matter of factly, it seemed Congress was asleep when it come to doing their jobs, especially oversite of freddie and fannie. As a citizen I appreciate the conditions the President faces but ask that he listen to all advice and warnings and make good choices. After all we were given 2 ears for a reason.
Posted by: david | January 24, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
There’s no hope for the Obama Kool-Aid drinkers who are afflicted with Bush Derangement Syndrome and refuse to take responsibility for their own lives. For everyone else, I suggest getting our own houses in order because there is no evidence that Obama, Pelosi, and Reid have the slightest idea of what they’re doing.
Obama was right about one thing: We’re all going to have to sacrifice. The recession is deepening. Prepare for the worst case scenario: a job loss or the collapse of our currency (which is now happening in England). Save as much cash as possible as fast as you can in a high-yield FDIC-insured money market fund (at least 3-6 months of expenses), pay down all your debt (except maybe the mortgage), and store at least 2-3 months of food if you have room. Even if the worst doesn’t happen, you’ll be much better prepared to ride out the recession. And do help your friends and neighbors if they’re struggling. The best kind of help is at the local level, person to person.
Posted by: Stacy | January 24, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Angie you wrote: “I have a question WHAT JOBS DID PRESIDENT BUSH CREATE UNDER HIS PRESIDENCY Last I checked Unemployment is about to hit an all time High!”
Between September 2003 and December 2007 there were 5 million jobs created (52 consecutive months of job growth). GDP was up 7.2% in the 3rd Quarter of 2003 and up 4.0% in the 4th Quarter of 2003; Up 3.1% for all of 2004; Up 4.4% for all of 2005; Up 3.2% for all of 2006 and Up 3.2% for all of 2007. Even in the first two Quarters of 2008 GDP was up 0.9% and 2.8%. All in spite of the War, in spite of the skyrocketing of energy costs and in spite of the downturn in the housing market. Had it not been for the bubble bursting on the subprime flexible mortgage rates, which caused the freezing up of loans, the housing market would already be rebounding. There are millions of individuals who are in the market to buy homes but they are just unable to get loans.
Now then, the latest unemployment figure (December 2008) is 7.2% We are no where near record unemployment. First of all during the Great Depression unemployment bottomed out at 24.9% unemployment. From January 1975 through December 1987, we had a rough period for unemployment.
Here are the yearly averages:
1975–8.5%
1976–7.7%
1977–7.1%
1978–6.1%
1979–5.9%
1980–7.2%
1981–7.6%
1982–9.7%
1983–9.6%
1984–7.5%
1985–7.2%
1986–7.0%
1987–6.2%
Posted by: James Danley | January 24, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
To: Braith Morgan You have been sipping to koolade. You really think using 300 million of the stimulus package for birth control methods is where you want your tax payer dollars to go?
Posted by: Fran | January 24, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
What about my Ford Explorer stacey?
Posted by: pefros | January 24, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
I have read that many of the jobs created in the past handful of years have been in the housing construction market, and various offspring of that money and its trickle out. And as we found out, something was terribly artificial about that housing boom – the money wasn’t there to pay for it? So the Bush jobs were created on borrowed money as well.
Posted by: pefros | January 24, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Well, besides the fact the Bush government ran up it’s own borrowing debt of a half a trillion dollars each year of his presidency.
Posted by: pefros | January 24, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
Ah…er….um….Mr President? Skeptical…..ah….NO!
Insulting….um…YES!
Posted by: American Infidel | January 24, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
I am beginning to think this country IS becoming the Old Soviet Union.
The Liberal Media in this country is using ‘Repetitious Media Indoctrinating’ to produce a CONTROLLED ELECTORIATE, just like The SOVIET UNION used to. The bias prior to the election was unprecedented and so far, since Obama has assumed office, it has actually gotten worse. The Liberal Media does not seem to be ashamed, they seem to be proud as they examine (and admit) their bias. One of CNN’s reporters actually said they had a “love fest” going on. They are NOT ashamed , they are Gloating as they INDOCTRINATE.
Posted by: Anon | January 24, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
James Danley, your numbers are screwed up because in 1994 the BLS redefined the U3 rate, so there is no way you can compare what you are calling “the unemployment rate” with the rate from the Seventies and Eighties. U3 is only the most widely quoted rate, the rate more comparable to the one used in the past is the U6 rate, which is now over 10%
If you want a better comparison with the past, the median weeks unemployed is probably what you want.
Posted by: Flash Override | January 24, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
The liberal media is evil. President Obama is evil. The Democrats are evil. Liberals are evil.
In fact everybody is evil except for the right wingers and the Republicans.
Posted by: pefros | January 24, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
Kathy- In 2000, there was no debt and a surplus of 236 billion
———–
Please. There was a $6 trillion debt in 2000.
Excuse me. There was no deficit with a surplus. Debt was at 4T in 1992 when Clinton was in office. The deficit spending was eliminated with the debt at 5.6T. The big contrast was Bush eliminating a sizable surplus, running up deficit spending, and increasing the debt to 9.6T.
Posted by: kathy | January 24, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
Mr. Obama and his sheep still believe that the government is what has made America great. They refuse to acknowledge that it is the people who have made this country great! So they will continue to interfere with the lives of the people, because they think they know what is good for you, and that you don’t know what is good for you. Goodbye to democracy, we loved you; hello socialism! I stopped giving to the United Way back in the early 80′s when I realized that some of the money went towards abortion. I wanted no part of baby killing then, and I want no part of it now. To be forced to give toward something so evil and vile is beyond comprehension. But that is exactly what Mr. Obama is doing with our tax dollars. Wake up America. Your life is not your own. God help us all!!!!!!
Posted by: Momof7 | January 24, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
How people can deny that the GOP ran up the debt after they told the nation that was their plan is beyond me. Their stated strategy was to choke the government because of their ideological dislike of social security and medicare. They intended to kill it, and they made no bones about it. They took the media along for the ride, since the talking heads didnt care about anyone elses retirement as long as they got paid like the running dogs they are.
There are only two types of Republican: Millionaires and suckers.
Posted by: Flash Override | January 24, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Correction: The deficit spending was eliminated with the debt at 5.6T *in 2000.* I forgot to add something.
Posted by: kathy | January 24, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
Here are the yearly averages:
1975–8.5%
1976–7.7%
1977–7.1%
1978–6.1%
1979–5.9%
1980–7.2%
1981–7.6%
1982–9.7%
1983–9.6%
1984–7.5%
1985–7.2%
1986–7.0%
1987–6.2%
***************************************8
Interesting to note that 4 yaers where Democrate and the rest republican.
Posted by: Thinking | January 24, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Mr. Obama and his sheep
*************************************
Hmm…. with well over a 70% approval rating. it would seem that you are out of touch with the rest of society, but so is the GOP
Posted by: Thinking | January 24, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
What is lacking in this country now is total absence of common sense. The next president will be a Chinese-American or Mexican-American or Indian-American. The days of republicans are numbered unless they stop corruption and deceiving people. It is easy to blame for our failure to vote in the elections to elect the right person to lead the Nation! We all share the result of our irresponsibility. Do not blame republicans or democrats. Wake up America! We are no more considered as a great nation around the world!
Posted by: Jack | January 24, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Isn’t the reality of it that:
Carter wanted what He called a “Peace Dividend” (which in reality seldom exists) so he severely cut military spending. This weakened us severely (especially against the Soviets) and many people knowledgeable about the military said so. Then Reagan cut spending on everything except the military, where he vastly out-spent his other cuts.
All this left a big deficit for Bush Senior. Bush Senior then broke his pledge not to raise taxes, by raising taxes to deal with the deficit military spending of Reagan. This substantially put the budget back on track but Clinton took (or was given) credit for it. Then the Tech Crass of 2000 happened where Clinton handed Bush II a recession and a moderately well off budget.
The wars have run the budget up to where they are now and it is still being debated about the necessity of the wars. The Afghan war would have run it up all by itself, but the Iraq war really ran it up. If democracy prevails in Iraq it will probably be considered worth it (by objective historians – but certainly not by the present day emotionalistic liberal crowd).
Another point: If Bush II is held responsible for this present recession by not demanding to see and inspect Fanny, Freddie & the Big Banks Books ,do we not also hold Clinton responsible for the Tech Crash by not demanding to inspect Enron’s, & MCI’s, & Solomon Smith’s, & Arthur Andi’s Books etc. etc ……………If Bush II is responsible for not ‘Predicting the Future’ is Clinton not responsible also !!!??
Posted by: Anon | January 24, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
Thinking, actually Gerald Ford (Rep) was president in 1975-76; Jimmy Carter (Dem) was president in 1977-80; and Ronald Reagan (Rep) in 1981-87. (Note: In President Reagan’s last year, 1988, the unemployment average was 5.5%)
HOWEVER, here is the Congressional break down for those years:
1975-77
(House) Dem 291 – Rep 144 – Ind 1
(Senate) Dem 60 – Rep 37 – Ind 3
1977-79
(House) Dem 292 – Rep 143
(Senate) Dem 61 – Rep 38 – Ind 1
1979-81
(House) Dem 276 – Rep 157
(Senate) Dem 58 – Rep 41 – Ind 1
1981-83
(House) Dem 243 – Rep 192
(Senate) Rep 53 – Dem 46 – Ind 1
1983-85
(House) Dem 267 – Rep 168
(Senate) Rep 55 – Dem 45
1985-87
(House) Dem 253 – Rep 182
(Senate) Rep 53 – Rep 47
So to say that the “rest” were Republican years is not quite accurate. Even with a Republican majority in the Senate, no bill can pass without both houses passing the bill.
Posted by: James Danley | January 24, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
Flash Override, what you stated may very well be accurate. I only reported the figures as reported by the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). If the figures are that dramatically different then it is up to the BLS to provide more comparable statistics.
Posted by: James Danley | January 24, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
Oh really. From what I’ve seen these ‘experts’ failed miserably at their past jobs, and these Democrats (with more than a little help from country club Republicans like Arnold) are running their states into the ground. And they’re going to ‘fix’ the national economy? Not only that, they’re some of the biggest crooks I’ve seen hanging around the White House since the Clinton years.
Posted by: Grand Old Party | January 24, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
The liberal media is corrupt. President Obama is corrupt. The Democrats are corrupt. Liberals are corrupt.
In fact everybody is corrupt except for the right wingers and the Republicans.
Posted by: pefros | January 24, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Conservatives win landslides, Republicans don’t. Neither do Dems. Unfortunately, this country is going straight to Socialist hell in a handbasket.
Posted by: David in Texas | January 24, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
Flash Overdrive…..newsflash pal!!!
Barney,Chris,Clintons,kennedys’ ect ect all millionaires! Criminals…..we shall soon see when we finally collect ourselves and demand a true hearing on the Fannie and Freddie give-away and splash!! Seems the Dems forced banks to give bad loans to deadbeats and people who could NEVER pay. All in the name of “You have a right to a home!” Someone school me here… where is it written in the Bill of Rights that you are entitled to a home? A job? Medical Care? Food? If you don’t earn it you don’t deserve it! Why give anything to anyone if they CANNOT AFFORD IT? This is the crap that got this nation where it is now and spending our way out of it is not the answer. Ask Japan!! Just look at ALL the hands out there right now after the government started backing companies. THIS IS FLAT OUT WRONG!!
Posted by: American Infidel | January 24, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
The liberal media is incompetent. President Obama is incompetent. The Democrats are incompetent. Liberals are incompetent.
In fact everybody is incompetent except for the right wingers and the Republicans.
Posted by: pefros | January 24, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Oh GOODIE! Another one-way website from the not-so-great dictator with the outsize grin.
Thanks for providing the text. MANY of Brock’s subjects — un-rich and/or rural millions without high-speed internet connections — can’t VIEW His princely puss on video (maybe that’s the idea, given the NO-”change” on robo-war and total surveillance).
Which is a relief, really: He’s over-exposed.
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 24, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm
Bush went on vacation immediately after being elected . . . that was the change we needed.
Posted by: pefros | January 24, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
I can’t believe the vitriol coming out of the 12% who disapprove of Obama. The corporate media and their right wing whine-a-thon is just too sickening to watch anymore.
Posted by: Flash Override | January 24, 2009, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
“I can’t believe the vitriol coming out of the 12% who disapprove of Obama.”
*******************************
They seem to be around here in disproportionate numbers. Though I’m in the vast majority of those approving so far, I feel like I’m in that 12% myself when I read the responses and fend off the contention. Oh yes, it does tend to get noxious around here.
Posted by: kathy | January 25, 2009, 12:51 am 12:51 am
Stimulus Package Bull…I say Bull..it’s Chicago PAY FOR PLAY..Obama wants to fulfill his campaign promises through his package…wrong…how does the following stimulate jobs.
1) 10,000 schools..No … Furnish the names of these schools…how much…what jobs will it create? BULL! Pay for play for whose neighborhoods?
2) The Arts…pay for play for Hollywood.
3) Washington Mall….grass.. please…that’s Bull.
4) Contraceptives….pay for play for the idealogy of the left.
5) Bailing out the states…
they should be balancing every year…poor management. They are paying for services for illegal aliens and now it becomes all the taxpayers problem. California is the number one example.
6)Pell grants…Bull. That won’t stimulate crap this year …another pay for play to college students and a campaign slogan in 4yrs.
7) Head start…Bull… campaign slogan in 4 yrs… won’t stimulate crap right now.
8)Contraceptives…Bull…
NO PORK…
NO GROUND WORK FOR THE NEXT ELECTION..
NO TO THE STIMULUS PACKAGE.
I HAVE FAITH IN THIS COUNTRY…WE WILL DO JUST FINE WITHOUT IT.
OBAMA NEEDS TO RUN THOSE UNDER SEPARATE …UNDER HIS NAME AND LET THEM PASS OR FAIL ON THEIR ON MERIT.
Posted by: Terry | January 25, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am
Concerned in Ohio, Oh we know real well why the press isn’t concerned. Obama got Lot’s of campaign bucks, remember? And he wasn’t transparent with where it all came from. And he wasn’t transparent with presenting his birth certificate either. And The press wasn’t concerned, cause there is an Agenda, & Obamabucks can pay for it! Now Obama says hold him accountable, hes transparent, Not! The press got their bail -out personally – No doubt!!!!
Posted by: disgusted in Ohio | January 25, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Why don’t all the old mindset republicans take a bus to the moon and stay there forever…? Is your absurd mentality that got us in this messy situation…Just to think that there are some idiots who give as…le Bush a percent of approval is sickening and prove of how disconnected you are from todays America.
America has changed already and we don’t have space or time to loose with your bull…We need to remake America and we are starting with the right foot with Obama, if you don’t see it just take the bus to the moon….and stay there, this is not your America anymore as you define it.
Posted by: jibarorock | January 26, 2009, 9:04 am 9:04 am
Okay–if you want to get your broken arm taken care of I want a vote on that too.
Re. Reid–there are no accidents in politics. This was Obama’s plan. It is not Lieberman or any of the others. This is what he wanted. You will wake up soon.
Posted by: NFL Draft | December 20, 2009, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm