By Dotcomabc

Jan 3, 2009 9:52am

Prez-Elect Makes New Pitch, Promises on Job Creation — Including 600,000 New Government Employees

In his radio address today, President-elect Obama uses some new language when discussing what he wants the stimulus package to achieve in terms of jobs. First off, he has a name for the package — the "American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan."

The president-elect says he wants to "create three million new jobs" — this is a change from a few weeks ago, when he said he wanted the plan to create OR SAVE two million jobs.

He says the "No. 1 goal of my plan … is to create three million new jobs, more than 80 percent of them in the private sector.”

If you do the math: 20 percent of three million means 600,000 new government employees.

Watch the address above or read the text HERE.

- jpt

User Comments

Good start.
Now we need the DETAILS of the bill.
The key to this will be TRANSPARENCY, TRANSPARENCY, TRANSPARENCY.

Posted by: Cameron | January 3, 2009, 10:18 am 10:18 am

This is a good start.
JOBS is going to be KEY to create in 2009.

Posted by: Cameron | January 3, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am

good talk, he was being kind and a politician. we all know how we got here.
we were bushed, we were told to shut up, like it or be called unpatriotic.
we were bushed.

Posted by: bush the usa | January 3, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am

Yea! Just what we need…more government suits telling us what we can and can not do! This is great…and the infrastructure projects should keep illegal immigration alive since these are considered “non skilled” jobs. I guess this is what Socialism is all about…keep people dumb and working for the government. When I am President, I guarantee you the government will be cut by 40% and those people now working in the government can go learn and teach history, math and science to kids and tell them the failed experiment of Constitutional Socialism was a failed idea. Wake up America, time to strap on your boots and kick these people out of OUR government

Posted by: John | January 3, 2009, 10:30 am 10:30 am

we put on our boots, and kicked the ones out that needed kicking.

Posted by: bush the usa | January 3, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am

600,000 New Government Employees???
Yes this will really help out the private sector. TAXATION of the private industry and working people to support all 600,000 New Government jobs.

Posted by: dee dee doo | January 3, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am

600,000 new government jobs? No discussion of helping small businesses with tax cuts? No incentive for private industry?
Mr. Obama will be a one term president if he believes big government is the answer. We have spent our way to a 12 trillion dollar debt based on the belief that governemnt should do more. This has left our nation on the brink of bankruptcy; yet, Mr. Obama is promising even more of the same.
Our nation is in peril and we need real leadership, not a continuation of the same failed approaches of the past.

Posted by: James | January 3, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am

he changed his background again???
BTW, how can he create 2 million jobs without corporate tax rate???

Posted by: frieda | January 3, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am

More government, oh boy! (and I thought excessive spending caused our current crisis)It would be ok if the government were efficient and honest but we all know that the term “corruption” was a trait created by the Governemt not to mention the term “productivity”is an evil word and seldom used by Governemt officials, except when describing corporate America.
3/4 of a trillion dollars should net us a few billion in actual benefits to the working men and women, the rest will be divided up for payback to this politician or group of supporters or for fighting myths such as global warming.
Sad days for America.

Posted by: david | January 3, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

The last thing we need is an additional 600,000 federal government employees. The most expensive part of any business is the employee. Government IS HUGE business. Hire an additional 600,000 and you create a massive continuing expense. We need to be cutting in most departments. How about a top down review of every government agency and a mandatroy reduction of 10 percent in spending accross the board?

Posted by: Dave | January 3, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Has everyone forgot that the Federal agencies like the US Forest Service provides family wage jobs in remote rural areas? Even Republicans in eastern Oregon, for example, want to see more Federal employees because it increases their economic base. These are not “expenses”, they are family wage jobs supporting the economy.

Posted by: Roberto in Oregon | January 3, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am

The sad thing is the Democrats in congress are in a position to approve this trillion dollar waste without debate. They will also approve another trillion dollar for the Democratic governors who can’t manage their own finances. The US automakers will be back in Washington in January to ask for another 100-200 billion; again, who believes the Democrats in congress will say no. The steel industry is also looking for several hundred billion dollars. Heck, there is even talk that the newspapers and other media are going to ask for a bailout now that the party they supported in the election is in power. Add all of this up and you get to well over 2.5 TRILLION dollars. Not one Democrat has raised a concern at these staggering numbers.
An out of control Democratic congress will be the biggest danger to Mr. Obama. He has shown no interest in stopping any of this. The Republicans will not have the votes to stop it.
This truly is a sad day for America as David has stated previously. Do we no longer care what kind of country we will leave our children?

Posted by: Nikki | January 3, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am

Roberto. I do not think anyone is saying there are zero needs for government employees. Obviously we have to have some. But, 600k people/jobs is an awful lot of money. So while in your area, additional jobs may be a net plus, the dollars have to come from somewhere to support those folks. So, in terms of the government, it is an expense. Same as driving a hybred over a hummer. In actual ecological impact including gas used, the hummer actually leaves a smaller footprint due to the nature of the construction process and materials used and potential for recycling. But, one can feel good about using a hybrid because the ecological cost was incurred elsewhere. Same thing w/ the jobs. It is a net expense to the taxpayer while it is a significant gain to the area where the job is.

Posted by: dave | January 3, 2009, 11:40 am 11:40 am

Roberto in Oregon,
Your comments are truly frightening. How can anyone fail to understand that government jobs are paid for by our taxes. Government jobs do not create any real wealth. These jobs will be paid for by higher taxes on citizens, which will reduce spending. These jobs will also be paid for by higher taxes and fees on businesses. This too will have a corrosive affect on business – the real wealth creation engine. If government jobs could create wealth then communism would be the greatest economic system available. It is not, communism and socialism bring stagnation and rob people of their freedoms.
Governments do not create wealth.

Posted by: James | January 3, 2009, 11:42 am 11:42 am

I believe we need to reduce spending and that the recession is punishment for living beyond our means for so long. This spending plan will probably be a bust.

Posted by: Huh | January 3, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am

The alternative to government jobs is privatization with tax dollars going into such companies as KBR and Blackwater.

Posted by: kat | January 3, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm

Huh, you are correct. We now have a 12 trillion dollar debt. To service this debt we pay interest; even at a low 3% this still amounts to 360 billin dollars. If we had simply been financially responsible we would have this money to fund government services.
Unfortunately, the politicians have realized that they can get elected by promising more and more even though we cannot afford it.
I am very pessimistic about our future. If the politicans cannot see or simply don’t care about the financial mess we are in then our economy will ultimately collapse. This might come when Asian investors redeem their government bonds enmasse. It might come just under the extreme weight of this crushing debt. Either way, if our politicians do not act responsibly we will hand our children a nation that is no longer functional.

Posted by: James | January 3, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Kat, if all you have to offer is Democratic party talking points then you add no value. Both parties need to be held accountable.
We need leadership from both parties to end the cycle of overspending and ineffective government.

Posted by: James | January 3, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

James – Thanks, I voted for Ron Paul and ran for a delegate position on his behalf. He has been more right on the economy than most people will admit. He has been right for a long, long time.

Posted by: Huh | January 3, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm

James- I wasn’t offering a Democratic talking point, just a couple of examples of privatizing government services. Of course we need effective leadership from both sides on the economic challenges we face. And hopefully, the Republicans won’t attempt to undermine a badly needed stimulus plan by evoking stereotypical points like government should be sized down.

Posted by: kat | January 3, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Kat, The left tends to feel money spent by the government is Holy, Good and other similar terms while money paid to or earned by corporations is Evil, Sinful etc. The truth is, some government spending is good, some is necessary, but, the government (any government) is incapable of efficient operation. The bigger it gets, the less efficient it gets. Likewise, when the government outsources, it tends to spread its inefficiencies to the companies it hires, such as KBR and Haliburton. If you cannot provide functional oversight to that which you own, how are you going to do it to that which you rent? I would hazard a guess part of the reason it outsources is because of “plausible deniability” in things like bribery which, like it or not, are going to happen in parts of the world where that is the norm, like Chicago. But, at least the profits earned by these companies go to the shareholders and there is some accountability where we taxpayers do not seem to have any control over what these guys do when they get to congress (either party. My wallet was closed to my party this year because of their inefficiency and corruptness and failure to do their job and because they did what the Democrats say they will do–waste the taxpayer money.)
Having said all that, I like the idea of outsourcing with clear overall cost cutting. At a minimum, you get rid of the retirement costs of the employees. Entitlements are currently close to 50 peercent of the budget. (I say that as a military retiree.) Keep in mind, federal government administrative costs run close to or over 60 cents on the dollar for any program they run.. Many charities run on 10-20 percent by way of comparison.

Posted by: DAVE | January 3, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

kat – I believe government does need to be sized down. Spending needs to be greatly reduced. Check out the national debt if you don’t believe me. No more silly wars would help too. Go to the GAO website and look at what is going to happen in about 2030 when Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security dwarf our GDP. You think it is bad now, just wait.

Posted by: Huh | January 3, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

What happens when the dollar loses its purchasing power because of the insane amounts of borrowing?

Posted by: Huh | January 3, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

DAVE: “Kat, The left tends to feel money spent by the government is Holy, Good and other similar terms while money paid to or earned by corporations is Evil, Sinful etc.”
Creating a false strawman as a way of ignoring legitimate debate is not useful in finding a solution. Remember that many of Obama’s strongest supporters – from Warren Buffet to Larry Page – know a thing or two about earning billions in the private sector AND still support a “left” government.
The government can do some things very well, better than the private sector has ever proven capable of – universal education (and vouchers would still be a government program), common defense, common infrastructure, business law (enforcement of contracts a fundamental requirement for a capitalist society), etc.
Many on the ‘left’ simply want government to achieve it’s core requirements competently and feel that respect for competence and science has been sorely lacking in the past few years.
I would like to get past meaningless bumperstickers like “downsize government” and start to talk specifics. What program, exactly, do you want to eliminate or privatize? Beneath the talking points, lets find what we agree on first, cut it (I’d love to see the TSA farce gutted), and then get to arguing over our actual differences.

Posted by: jhw539 | January 3, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

There are still high paying jobs on certain job sites
good luck to those looking.

Posted by: richard | January 3, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

Doing a little investigating instead of jumping to conclusions is often quite helpful.
Then you would know “new government employees” means: “a lot of the government jobs would be state and local workers whom the plan saves from layoffs.” per Obama aides. e.g. police, fire, etc.

Posted by: Paige | January 3, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

Does anybody else remember Obama promising to go through the budget, “line by line” and eliminate programs that don’t work? That’s how he was going to pay for all of his spending
I don’t see how he creates 600,000 new government jobs (and the future pensions that come with them) and still cut government programs.

Posted by: MayBee | January 3, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

Paige- so “new government jobs” means old government jobs?

Posted by: MayBee | January 3, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

“kat – I believe government does need to be sized down. ”
Huh- I stated that as a possible Republican talking point against Obama’s stimulus plan. It wouldn’t hurt to size government down, but that doesn’t justify privatizing schools (through the encouragement of charter ones), prisons, juvenile systems, and social services.

Posted by: kat | January 3, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

Kat – ok, agreed. Need arguments from both sides. I believe that the market forces will be dominate no matter what the government tries to do, but it will be interesting to watch nonetheless.

Posted by: Huh | January 3, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

@jhw539 – “I would like to get past meaningless bumperstickers like “downsize government” and start to talk specifics.”
Specifics? How about adhering to what the constitution says? Our founding fathers laid out what the federal government should do. Some of those duties include maintaining a military, administering a federal court system, foreign policy (treaties and foreign trade), and others. The constitution clearly says that anything not enumerated as a domain of the federal government should be the domain of the states. Our founding fathers were wise. They saw our states as the laboratories of democracy. They also saw value in the states handling governance issues because it eliminated a one size fits all mentality that creeps into a strong central government. Not to mention the greed and corruption associated with a strong federal government.
Specifically, we should devolve all power not expressly granted to the federal government in the constitution back to the states. This means social welfare programs, taxes, medicare, social security, social issues such as abortion and marriage, and others should be given back to the states. If this happens you will have more responsive and responsible government. You will eliminate the greed and partisanship that has seeped into Washington. You will also eliminate a single vision for America, that if wrong, can destroy our entire country.
Bottom line – we must remove the federal government from the role that rightly blongs to the states. The federal governemnt has run up a 12 trillion dollar debt in the pursuit of maintaing their own political power. If a single state acts irresponsibly we can survive; if the federal government acts irresponsibly and mandate their failed vision to all 50 states we are doomed.

Posted by: James | January 3, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm

richard said “There are still high paying jobs on certain job sites”
Absolutely right. Here in Texas we see a steady stream of people moving in to escape the mess in California, which improves our economy. We have no state income tax and our state government does not overreach with misguided social programs to the point of damaging our economy. We also have state leadership that sees the value in fostering a healthy business environment through low taxes. If your state economy is in trouble and your state government has destroyed the business climate in your state you still have a choice. Moving might not be the first option to consider but it is there if there simply is no other options.
All I ask if you do come to Texas is that you leave the failed notion of government as the solution behind. Bring your work ethic with you and you will see that your success in Texas will not be punished. Sorry for the plug for my state but I am truly proud of where we are as a state. There are other states that have similar success stories and they too represent an opportunity for anyone who is struggling to provide for their families.
Wish y’all the best – wherever that pursuit takes you.

Posted by: James | January 3, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

MayBee-Tapper’s reporting is poor. He did the math, but apparently didn’t bother with any back story.
Aides to Obama elaborated even further that they thought the 80% figure for the private sector would end up being higher.
For the most part it does mean “old Government jobs” – all in how you view it. We have had a lot of Police and Fire lay-Offs in my city and across the country. To being those people back in to the fold and prevent others from lay-offs due to state budget deficits would have to be part of the new bail-out plan.
I’m sure their will be some new jobs too, but only in areas Obama has discussed broadly that will give a return to America. Renewable Energy, Education, etc.

Posted by: Paige | January 3, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

PEOPLE!!!!
START CLEANING OUT THE OLD HOUSE AND SENATE TO MAKE WAY FOR THE NEW GENERATION OF POLITICIANS THAT IS FOR THE PEOPLE!!!!!!
NEW VISION, YOUNGER IDEAS!!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | January 3, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Get a clue Obama, the last thing we need is more govt. Govt. increased by 40% under Bush, did this help one single person, no.

Posted by: pennsylvaniavoter | January 3, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

Paige:Aides to Obama elaborated even further that they thought the 80% figure for the private sector would end up being higher.

I would suggest it is Obama’s presentation that is poor, if aides have to come around and explain that “creating new jobs” actually means counting old jobs.

Posted by: MayBee | January 3, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm

James – I love the state of Texas too, but it is not without it’s problems. Texas leads the nation with roughly 25% of their population UNinsured. This is 10% above the National average.
As a result, many hospital ER waiting rooms are running over and people are waiting 11+ hours to get care.
Texas looks after business, but not its people.

Posted by: Paige | January 3, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

I believe sisterdearest09 has drunk the kool aide. Do you not realize what the huge deficits that Obama is talking about will do to the “PEOPLE!!!”. He is talking about a TRILLION!!! dollars for a stimulus plan. Another TRILLION!!! dollars is being requested by the Democratic governors who have failed to act fiscally responsible. The US automakers will be back in Washington to ask for another 200-300 BILLION!!! dollars. The steel industry is also asking for another TRILLION!!! dollars. And to add insult to injury, the media is asking for several hundred BILLION!!! dollars to help them limp along for another few months. It is very likely that the congress that you are so excited about today will approve all of these.
This spending will bring waves of inflation that will hurt senior citizens living on fixed income. It will also hurt people searching for jobs because businesses will refuse to take the risk of hiring new employees when they know that money the government is about to spend will translate into higher taxes for them.
If Obama does not stop this madness YOU will be hurt.

Posted by: ned | January 3, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

I would suggest it is Obama’s presentation that is poor, if aides have to come around and explain that “creating new jobs” actually means counting old jobs.
__________________________________________
It is called a RECOVERY AND REINVESTMENT PLAN” – These types of addresses are usually general with follow-up by good reporters for specifics. That is lacking here.

Posted by: Paige | January 3, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

Paige:These types of addresses are usually general with follow-up by good reporters for specifics. That is lacking here.

“These types of addresses”? It is a self-produced PR spot for the man waiting to take office. He wants to make it sound like he is really going to do something- like create 3 million new jobs– 600,000 of which would be new government jobs.
A good reporter pokes holes in a politician’s PR-based promises. That’s what Jake Tapper did.

Posted by: MayBee | January 3, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

“Texas looks after business, but not its people.”
Statistics bear that out. Texas ranks 49th in SAT scores with a 36th ranking for high school graduations- only 68% graduate. In health rankings, it’s 46. In child poverty it’s 42nd in the nation.

Posted by: kat | January 3, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm

Thank heavens we have someone intelligent at the helm. For all those commenting here who voted for Bush–we saw how your guy worked out so please be quiet.

Posted by: Bryan | January 3, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm

If Mr. Obama creates 3 millions jobs, but loses 4 millions jobs in the process, he might still duck and wiggle out saying that see, he did what he said he was going to do.

Posted by: young_voter | January 3, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

600,000 new GOVERNMENT jobs??? is this for real?? this IDIOT wants to add 600,000 new government jobs???? wow, i guess all you mindless liberals were right: THIS IS CHANGE.

Posted by: tim | January 3, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

MayBee – Tapper made an assumption while other journalist reported facts. I go with the facts.
As far as the “self-produced PR spot” – Is that what you call the Presidential Radio Address that Bush does each week and has been part of our history since FDR? The “PR Spot” is the Democratic Weekly Address being utilized to inform those truly interested in what the plan of action is for the new administration. The fact that Obama brought that weekly address into the 21st Century offering it on video is a tremendous improvement.
I get the feeling it doesn’t matter what Obama does or says, you will disagree even if it is against your own self-interest.

Posted by: Paige | January 3, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm

What you’re not used to is honesty and openness.
Bush and the Republicans came in promising smaller government and ended up setting RECORD levels of overspending for basically 8 years straight. They were HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of dollars over budget EVERY year
Bush and the Republicans also grossly increased the size of government, while having promised exactly the opposite.
Obama is being open and out front about what he intends to do in terms of spending. He was open and out front about what he intended to do during the election.
These are extraordinary circumstances the previous government’s term has left things in.
I’m willing to bet Obama does a much better job than Bush and the Republicans – we all know the great financial health the Republicans restored to the government and the country. At least some of the money will get to regular Americans, not just the elite buddies of the Republicans.

Posted by: pefros | January 3, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

600,000 public sector jobs doesn´t mean that they will all be in the Federal Government. There are state governments, county govs, city, town. The police force is public sector. Fire departments. Your spin is too transparent, Jack. Relax. 600,000 jobs could be very useful.

Posted by: Andy DR | January 3, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

PEOPLE ACROSS AMERICA NEED TO STAND UP AND TAKE BACK OUR GOVERNMENT!!!!!!
WE NEED TO CLEAN HOUSE!!!!
GET RID OF THE REPUBLICAN AND DEMOCRATIC PARTY!!!!!
THEY HAVE NOT DONE ANYTHING FOR THE PEOPLE BUT PREACHED HATE AND RACISM!!!!!
ENOUGH!!!!

Posted by: sisterdearest09 | January 3, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

JHW, tried to respond. Nothing wierd in the post but they would not publish it. Said it might be spam and had to be reviewed. So, I do not have the energy to fight it or re write it tonight. Dave

Posted by: dave | January 4, 2009, 3:28 am 3:28 am

The Gubbamint can’t even run its own house. You think this sits well with the 3/4 of America that can balance its check book? New “G” jobs? Does that come with biscuits and gravy? This set of elected officals should be impeached and new people elected because this group doesn’t know jack about running a government for the people. They think they know it all and we are stupid peons with our heads in the sand. Lets quit the political sides bickering and join together and take back our Nation before these Bozos give us away for their own profit!!

Posted by: commrat72 | January 4, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am

600,000 jobs with a population of perhaps 300 million… it is not going to do much…and then you will have all that government to support…… ie HIGHER TAXES…. brilliant strategy. I REGRET VOTING THIS BUNCH IN!!!!!!

Posted by: Diane | January 4, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am

600,000 new government jobs doesn’t sound like too much especially if they start with filling in needed posts. The Border Guards have been requesting more people for years. The EPA as well as the FDA can’t do the required number of inspections because they lack manpower. Just think about it for a minute. And then take into account each state’s manpower needs for bridge inspectors, repairers, or their health inspectors or health care workers. It would add up pretty quickly.
As to whether this will help the economy, I think it would. 3 million more jobs doesn’t just create more taxpayers but the money they spend in their communities creates a ripple effect. That combined with Obama’s plan to lessen taxes for working people will expand this ripple effect even more. It is the opposite of the failed ‘trickle down’ theory, which gave short term gains to the rich and helped the economy spiral down. ‘Trickle up’ works much more efficiently and for the long haul.

Posted by: Lydia | January 4, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

Obama is not what I call a competent leader.

Posted by: Peace Train | January 4, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

good talk, he was being kind and a politician. we all know how we got here.
we were bushed, we were told to shut up, like it or be called unpatriotic.
we were bushed.
Hey bushed,
Obama is using THE SAME VAGUE TACTICS evry president uses. Keep your Obama worship to yourself.

Posted by: Rachel | January 4, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm

As far as the “self-produced PR spot” – Is that what you call the Presidential Radio Address that Bush does each week and has been part of our history since FDR? The “PR Spot” is the Democratic Weekly Address being utilized to inform those truly interested in what the plan of action is for the new administration. The fact that Obama brought that weekly address into the 21st Century offering it on video is a tremendous improvement.
No it’s not, Paige. You’re just happy there’s a new voice saying it.

Posted by: Rachel | January 4, 2009, 12:45 pm 12:45 pm

Rachel – LMAO – Putting the Presidential address on video is a tremendous improvement as few people listen to the Presidential Radio Address anymore. This gives people access via computer video and other means.
It’s great for all Americans no matter if the President is a Republican or Democrat.
It’s really sad when you can’t even give Obama credit for bringing the weekly radio address into the 21st Century.

Posted by: Paige | January 4, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm

He’s gonna need all those gov’t employees:
Dept of Love
Dept of Truth
Dept of Peace
Dept of Plenty

Posted by: Laughing Cynic | January 4, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm

Government employees add NOTHING to the economy except the additional taxes required to pay their salaries. They produce NOTHING. What are they thinking????

Posted by: Mike | January 4, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm

Well is this the change that we voted in? More taxes, you betcha. Bigger government, you betcha.. Don’t worry the Alinsky method of take over from the bottom up is coming.
BO is everything you thought he was and more…
The times and the country are a changin.

Posted by: joan | January 4, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Maybe all employees should be government employees. That seemed to work well for the Soviet Union. Who is advising him on this matter…Bill Ayers?

Posted by: Evan | January 4, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Obama ran on jobs creation for alternative energies and blasted the Republicans for having no energy solution… therefore, one must ask, “where did the alternative energy focus go”?

Posted by: Don Hue | January 4, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm

Everyone needs to start thinking and stop feeling – no part of government can ‘create’ anything without first ‘taking’ from someone else i.e. tax dollars – the only way to improve our economy is to REDUCE the size of government and go back to the FREE MARKET principles that built this country, the greatest ever on earth!

Posted by: Mark | January 4, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

The first new government jog will be to replace Bill Richardson. That leaves 599,000 new employees for the 57 states to divide.

Posted by: Sigmonde | January 4, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

Legalize drugs, prostitution and gambling. tax the hell of that. Problem solved.

Posted by: John | January 4, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

hahahahaaaaa…..

Posted by: torabora | January 4, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm

Throwing money at the problem will not solve the problem. The term “infrastructure”, when used in a stimulus bill, means boondoggle or pork. It also means nicer landscaping for government buildings.
Government stimulus bills are based on the idea that feeding new money into the economy will increase demand, and thus production. But where does government get this money? Congress doesn’t have its own stash. Every dollar it injects into the economy must first be taxed or borrowed out of the economy. No new spending power is created. It’s merely redistributed.
Economic growth can be accomplished only by making American workers more productive. The best measure of a policy’s impact on economic growth is through productivity rates. Lower marginal tax rates encourage working, saving and investment, all of which increase productivity. Reforming — rather than merely throwing money at — education and infrastructure will raise future productivity.

Posted by: Sigmonde | January 4, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

More socialism. Soon the world will end.
=-)

Posted by: Joe | January 4, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

It’s funny how everything started going REAL bad when the Dems took over the House and Senate. Research Barney Frank regarding Fannie and Freddie regulations. All the names have (D)’s behind them.
Lets do the Math:
Bailouts for Banks: 750 Billion
New stimulus package: 750 Billion
infastructure: 1 Trillion
states bailout: 1 Trillion
Government budget: 650 billion
Total spending: 4.15 trillion!!!!
Where does this money come from?????????
Next will healthcare
51% of Americans are just plain STUPID!!!

Posted by: socialist-2B | January 4, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm

we are DOOMED. if this guy was the best we could do for President, again, we are DOOMED.

Posted by: c. moore | January 4, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Seems there are more immediate issues, namely that BHO is not yet President Elect (WHY NO MEDIA COVERAGE OF THIS?) –
MESSAGE TO EVERY MEMBER OF CONGRESS:
When counting the electoral votes, either Congress finds by 1/8/09 that Obama — not being an Article II “natural born citizen” (father Kenyan/British, not American, citizen) — fails to qualify as President whereupon Biden becomes the full fledged President under 3 USC 19 (free to pick his own VP such as Hillary) or thereafter defers to the Supreme Court to enjoin Obama’s inauguration with Biden becoming only Acting President under the 20th Amendment until a new President is duly determined.
The preferable choice, at least for the Democrats, would seem obvious.

Posted by: Ted | January 4, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm

600,000 GOVT JOBS….HMMM…there are far too may already that cant do or dont know how to do their jobs and make too much for what they do. Maybe this is where the “CIVILIAN HOMELAND SECURITY FORCE” (the quasi-miltary) to supplement POLICE forces which he vowed to implement will get manned from.

Posted by: BILL | January 4, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

BILL, you are right, if BHO were to become President, as not being qualified under Article II of the Constitution, he would be an unconstitutional usurper/imposter as Pres, and would need all those new federal domestic military police to keep his coup d’etat in power.

Posted by: Ted | January 4, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Please don’t create more civil servants. They can not be fired. Government needs to shrink. Make them all contractors. Pay them a little more now to save a lot in the future.

Posted by: JJ | January 4, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm

600,000 Stasi

Posted by: Ace | January 4, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

These people always talk about freedom, well, what about my freedom to not have to pay for all these things? Do I have any right to the money that I earn?

Posted by: Paul | January 4, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Hmmm–600,000 new gvt jobs = 1,200,000 new Democrat voters in 2010–2012. Obama and the Dems must be feeling the coming backlash already. Next time, they may not be able to launder all the tens of millions of dollars of illegal foreign and domestic campaign donations that helped the scumbag media get Obama elected.

Posted by: Elron Hubbard | January 4, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

JJ, but all those new civil servants would be paid supporters and defenders of the new Obama outlaw (unconstitutional) regime, so those arguments won’t work to dissuade him.

Posted by: Ted | January 4, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

The government does not CREATE jobs in the true sense of the word. Only the private sector can do this. The government can aid the private sector with smart laws. Unfortunately, as Mr. Reid and Ms. Pelosi have clearly demonstrated, Washington is bereft of the ability to make smart laws. As Mr. Dodd and Mr. Frank have shown, the Washington patricians are only out for themselves and to hell with the rest of us plebeians.

Posted by: Jeff | January 4, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Welcome to the world of Socialism people. More and more and more goverment jobs with the fancy entitlements. Biggest employer in the EU is the “National Health System” of Britain.
When they lose more and more money each year they keep cutting patient benefits.

Posted by: John W | January 4, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm

600,000 new unionized govt. jobs,think of all the union dues donated to the dems, sounds just like the bail out of UAW, keep them dues units coming,the dems have an uninterupted flow of political donations. When they vote in card check off there will be even more dues coming in.Anyone out there who think this will benefit workers never belonged to a union!!

Posted by: Bill | January 4, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm

Paul, as it would stand if Obama became the Usurper in Chief, all laws enacted under him (including federal tax laws) would be invalid and unenforceable (or at least in all cases that would be a valid defense), so I wouldn’t yet worry about paying for all those new federal employees.

Posted by: Ted | January 4, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Consider also that those new government employees will probably be unionized, so not only will the American People pay for the salary and healthcare of 600,00 civil servants, we will also pay for their pension plans and other union demands. That is working out swell in California!

Posted by: Andrea | January 4, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

Get prepared for hyper-inflation and depression!!! Seriously, I mean it , get ready…

Posted by: as if | January 4, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

I admire the fact that he was willing to give this address from his Marxist Ivory tower office. That’s a bold move.

Posted by: Willis | January 4, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm

Time for a new political party, the Democrats are Corruption Inc and Republicans are corrupt spineless losers.
Neither party has any true leadership qualities, it’s all ideology with Democrats and loser appeasement and accomodation with Republicans.

Posted by: John W | January 4, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Everybody cuts spending in hard times. How about the government cutting spending? With them it’s always more.

Posted by: RODOM | January 4, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

He’s just doing what FDR did: turning a 1-2 year recession into a 12 year depression…..

Posted by: Millenium | January 4, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm

from what I can see by reading the comments — the biggest ever-lovin’ idiots are:
JJ, BILL, c.moore and paige. Good god, people…get a life and get over it.
I totally agree with pennsylvaniavoter
“PEOPLE!!!!
START CLEANING OUT THE OLD HOUSE AND SENATE TO MAKE WAY FOR THE NEW GENERATION OF POLITICIANS THAT IS FOR THE PEOPLE!!!!!!
NEW VISION, YOUNGER IDEAS!!!!”

Posted by: BJ | January 4, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm

Welcome to USM United States of Mexico. A huge wasteful govt structure. Obama is still fighting the election. He wants as many people as possible dependent on the govt. He feels this is the way to control the next election and to control America.
What a sick little fella!

Posted by: John | January 4, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Do not worry, so long as taxes are up, and there are no incentives to the rich, the rich will hold onto their money and not invest it. No business venture, no employment. Oh, BTW, if you think the gov’t is going to hire everybody, and everybody will be employed, and taxing the rich will solve everything by taking away the opportunity of the American Dream, you are in for something else.
It will leave a lot of people sleeping hungry and stealing.

Posted by: Simeon Patestas | January 4, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Everyone is harping on the wrong thing. Our entire economy is based on debt. Every dollar in circulation is there because it was given to someone through a loan whether it was a mortgage, car loan, student loan or government debt. Think of it as the overall money supply.
The problem though is that the banks are collecting interest on that money including the money the bankers (FED) have loaned to our government.
As the interest payments are sucked out of the available money supply you and I are left struggling to get our share to pay our own bills. Unless someone takes out more loans to replenish the money supply people go bankrupt.
You also have the currency that goes overseas to pay for our imports like oil and lead tainted toys. That money sits in central banks accumulating for the day those countries decide to dump it in our country by buying up whatever they can whether it is land, buildings or businesses. We will be left with hyperinflation.
Our government needs to:
1. Print UNITED STATES NOTES like JFK did.
2. Declare the UNITED STATES NOTES as legal for all debts public and private.
3. Congress assume it’s constitutional responsibility of controlling the currency.
4. Abolish the Federal Reserve.
5. Regulate the hell out of the banks.
6. Do something about usury. As long as banks can charge interest they will eventually get all of the money.

Posted by: Scott | January 4, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Roll out the printing presses and change the cut from $100 to $1000 bills – also invest your money in wheelbarrow manufacuerers because you’ll need one for each member of the family when they go shopping with bundled greenbacks.

Posted by: Hilew | January 4, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Again, I don’t see how he can become President since his website states his dad was Kenyan/British, not American, citizen, so BHO would not be a “natural born citizen” under Article II of the Constitution. That’s as clear as day; the Supreme Court knows this. (BTW, Article II “natural born citizen” as uniquely required to be President is NOT the same thing as “citizen” as under the 14th Amendment or “native born citizen” which could apply to someone born on American soil but whose parent(s) was/were not a citizen at the time of junior’s birth.)
So, Obama’s speech about 600,000 new federal jobs is certainly putting the cart before the horse. He can never become the President unless, that is, the Supreme Court were willing to throw away our Constitutional Republic — and I simply can’t see Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, Alito et al doing that.

Posted by: Ted | January 4, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Hey I know. Why don’t we just change the flag. Maybe red with a hammer and sickle, it’s not being used anymore.

Posted by: bigdoglv | January 4, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

and tax cuts for all — the rich are now poor or leaving soon. Do we really need a trillion dollars of more spending after Paulson, Bernanke and Congress stunt. At some point sanity needs to prevail. Mr Obama you ‘ll get another chance at stardom in the first 4 years or the probable second four years but we have no need for an ealry crach at now. Show some prudence

Posted by: Another trillion | January 4, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

Increasing the budget ( creating greater tax burden on the people ) by creating make-work jobs for the semi-employable is hardly adding to the productivity of the people. This bailout requires more than a symbolic thimble.
The Democrats need to take another look at the Preamble to the Constitution.. it is We The People not We The Government that is the first cause of this country.

Posted by: IOpian | January 4, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

This guy should be called BO Plenty, like the old comic strip character – because his policies stink to high heaven. It is hard to believe that there were enough suckers in the country to elect this socialist!

Posted by: Patrick | January 4, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm

PEOPLE need to wake up and figure out who this man really is. Why didn’t he ever show his legal birth certificate? All we get is silence from him and he has hired 3 law firms to fight the over 20 lawsuits that continue to grow. If he were really qualified he would have coughed a real one up by now to prove he is eligible to serve. Well guess what? He ISN’t!
Join the grassfire group if you can, we are growing in numbers and are organizing a conservative front.

Posted by: swimkin | January 4, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm

Patrick, to say that all or most of the Obama voters were “suckers” is not quite fair. They were lied to by the mainstream media, including ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, MSNBC — which media outlets covered up for Obama. How else can someone get elected who won’t even release his long form birth certificate or any of his college records etc. (likely showing he was a foreign, Indonesian, student on admission.)

Posted by: Ted | January 4, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

I just cannot believe we elected someone that has no clue what they are doing. I just don’t get it!!!

Posted by: Olga | January 4, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

Gimme a government job!

Posted by: Karl Marx | January 4, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Who is John Gault?

Posted by: jeremy | January 4, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

Obama is a fraud. This cretin was elected simply because he’s black. His lack of experience will destroy the US. Iran, Russia, Syria, Taliban, and Cuba are counting on this.

Posted by: Swami Poobah | January 4, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

how about this? no new laws being signed in until all the current laws are enforced?
once that is done, then maybe we could tackle things like swiss and cayman island bank accounts hiding assets.
after that, how about we get together with the fed, all the banks they bailed out, freddie/fannie, and such, and tell them either they say exactly how much do they actually owe in these derivatives, or they go into the general population of the local jails with no protection from the other prisoners until they do disclose everything? and if they aren’t disclosed within say 120 days in jail, then all derivative papers are considered null and void?

Posted by: Jim | January 4, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

David, to call Obama a “liberal”, is a gross understatement. He is a marxist who is conspiring to overthrow our constitutional republic. And his manipulators have cleverly used his “blackness” to fend of any attacks.

Posted by: Ted | January 4, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

And the buyers’ remorse starts in 3-2-1…

Posted by: Joanne600 | January 4, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm

Specifics? How about adhering to what the constitution says? Our founding fathers laid out what the federal government should do. Some of those duties include maintaining a military, administering a federal court system, foreign policy (treaties and foreign trade), and others. The constitution clearly says that anything not enumerated as a domain of the federal government should be the domain of the states. Our founding fathers were wise. They saw our states as the laboratories of democracy. They also saw value in the states handling governance issues because it eliminated a one size fits all mentality that creeps into a strong central government. Not to mention the greed and corruption associated with a strong federal government.
Specifically, we should devolve all power not expressly granted to the federal government in the constitution back to the states. This means social welfare programs, taxes, medicare, social security, social issues such as abortion and marriage, and others should be given back to the states. If this happens you will have more responsive and responsible government. You will eliminate the greed and partisanship that has seeped into Washington. You will also eliminate a single vision for America, that if wrong, can destroy our entire country”.
Posted by: James | Jan 3, 2009 2:35:19 PM
James is absolutely correct. The Federal Govt.
is completely out of hand. We must get back
to the original idea of what government is, and
should do, before it’s too late.
“The government can do some things very well, better than the private sector has ever proven capable of – ”
Totally wrong. When government gets outside
it’s original parameters, we lose.

Posted by: lulu Jones | January 4, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

Once my main man gits in I’s gonna finully git ma raparashuns that yuse whities be owin us. We be ownin dis here cuntry.

Posted by: Leroy | January 4, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

I gotta hand it to BO Plenty. He has the best free life insurance money can buy – foot in the mouth Joe as VP and the Head Witch of the House of Representatives as the 3rd in line. Nobody in their right mind would want either of these 2 as President, so BO is not as stupid in his choice of VP as he is in most others. Why he may even be as sneaky as Slick Willie.

Posted by: Patrick | January 4, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm

the chickens are coming home to roost….. The rabid masses of bush haters elected this guy…… Thanks a lot for getting us into this new and exciting mess. Who are you all going to blame now??????

Posted by: Roxy | January 4, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

this is absolutely nauseating. Under Obama, we can say goodbye to the middle class and hello to the working class, ‘ruled’ by upper class democratic elites. Our illiterate electorate that voted him in is living proof that unions kill societies. Government cannot run itself, let alone industry. Sickening, just sickening.

Posted by: Lee | January 4, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm

There is enough money sitting on the sidelines that all Obama has to do is to lower (and keep them there!) the taxes on capital gains. I have a bunch of money, but I don’t intend to invest it in anything that will be heavily taxed by the incompetent government.

Posted by: William | January 4, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

lulu, your discussion of government actions unlawfully in excess of the constitution misses the point. IF OBAMA BECOMES ‘PRESIDENT’ WE HAVE NO CONSTITUTION! (or we have a Civil War to endeavor to defend it)

Posted by: Ted | January 4, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

The last thing we need is to add govt. jobs! 600k? What the heck is he thinking! Hey Obama! It’s called a deficit!

Posted by: dave | January 4, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Patrick, it is hard to believe that there were enough suckers in the country to elect this socialist! Unfortunately, these people are just like a herd of sheep.

Posted by: Olga | January 4, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Dave on the Lake! Absolutely brilliant! Unfortunately, a waste or your time writing it and my time reading it. This insanity will continue until the people revolt because they are starving to death or China and/or Russia attack and end it for all life on the planet. I luckily am in my sixties and will probably die of old age before either happens but it’s coming just as sure as the sun will rise tomorrow. It’s already over for the United States the socialists have control of education and each year that goes by brings forth a dumber group of lambs. Obama is going to get his global warming crap passed in Congress and then they will be able to tax you for heavy breathing. They have already demonized the corporations that feed us and the morons look upon big business as the enemy and government as the solution. To use a soon to be illegal phrase “GOD HELP US ALL!”

Posted by: dave | January 4, 2009, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm

BHO is the second coming of Carter, which means four years of doing stupid better than even Bush.

Posted by: Thron | January 4, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

Hmm… Wonder if this is that internal security force Obama spoke of?

Posted by: Ttav | January 4, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm

A fool and our money is soon parted.

Posted by: Sigmonde | January 4, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm

Ted, I can only hope that the left wing media network nerds will some day wake up, see that they helped elect Alfred E. Newman President, and bite themselves in their own rear ends. However, this is about as likely as a red and green polka dotted snow storm.
Rush Limbaugh was right again.

Posted by: Patrick | January 4, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

or maybe we should just let things continue as they have been going the past 8 years under our Republican president. Obama hasn’t even officially taken office yet and he’s already a failure to you morons. At least he’s trying to come up with a plan. All you Republican idiots did was put a guy that couldn’t even run his own private company successfully in charge of the whole country. You should all take some responsibility in that and shut up until Obama gets his opportunity to fix the problems you morons and your president created.

Posted by: George B. | January 4, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm

Holy Cow! THAT’S THE ANSWER!!! Just spend more money, create new jobs, create new subsidies, cut more taxes, provide more services, wage more wars, elect more polititians for longer terms, legalize drugs, legalize prostitution, legalize everything, spend, spend spend, spend, and it ALL gets better! Finally, a President that knows what he is doing……

Posted by: Martin | January 4, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Roxy, the chickens coming home to roost, if anything, is the result of 40+ years of liberal/union run education in the USA tearing down this nation, western civilization values and promoting hate America and cultural relativism. This is all part of the marxist planning and/or philosophy, to de-educate the masses so they can lose the constitution and a government of men, not of laws, can then be installed, enabling tyranny to prevail.

Posted by: Ted | January 4, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

You know I’m kidding right?!?

Posted by: Martin | January 4, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Why are these comments posted in reverse order? Bottom up? why>

Posted by: bob | January 4, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

600,000 more mouths to feed…
Dear god, I can’t afford the mouths I paying for already. Just what will this new army do? Will the be used to insure I “render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s”. or will they be employed as bankers?
Americans, how long will you play the fool?

Posted by: Randall, USA | January 4, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm

Hmmm, well, apparently some people still believe there ARE NO CONSEQUENCES to printing up as much money as you want, borrowing as much money as you want, spending as much money as you want, and taxing productive people until they leave the country or quit their jobs.
If wealth could successfully be created from a printing press, imagine how rich Zimbabwe would be right now.
During the late 70s, early 80s, when tax rates were so high, more and more people found they could make more money only working 4 months out of the year, instead of 12. The other 8 months was for the government.
So far, from the stimulus package to Dodd’s mortgage bill to the bailouts, to all the Fed Bank interventions and money pumping, to Obama’s plans, the USA is doing absolutely everything wrong. Amazingly wrong.
Think about this: Why did the depression last from 1929 to 1946 when the boom that created it only last from about 1921 to Sept of 29? A bust that was twice as long as the boom? And we’re suppose to believe FDR stopped the Great Depression?
Folks, not to be doom and gloom, but it’s bad. Really bad. Sick in my stomach kind of bad. – And I’ve been predicting this would happen since 2004.

Posted by: Jason | January 4, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Is the government to big to fail ?

Posted by: Tom | January 4, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

I think George B. needs to educate himself.

Posted by: Olga | January 4, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

We dont need 600,000 new government employees nearly as badly as we need the 10 trillion American dollars now resting in off-shore banks all over the world. The have been driven away by our tax policies. The FAIRTAX would bring it all back, along with millions of new REAL jobs from companies all over the world.
One survey of the CEOs of the top 500 corporations showed that, if the FAIRTAX were passed, about 65% would open a facility here ASAP. The other 35% said they would move their world headquarters to the USA immediately. And that is JUST the 500 companies that were interviewed. There would be THOUSANDS of companies to come here with MILLIONS of new high paying jobs in the USA. You would have to HIDE to not have a good job. We would need more new citizens to fill the demand for jobs.
Tax policy is the single most powerful tool in building (or destroying) jobs and real abundance.
Take some time and look at how Ireland has turned themselves around for a small example. FAIRTAX would be MUCH larger than that.
I ask all who read this to not believe what you have heard about the FAIRTAX, but instead get educated on the topic. ( “The FAIRTAX BOOK”.)
Or, go to Bermuda, Belize, Switzerland or any other offshore haven and look at all the banks full of American dollars. And do some research about how many American companies operate out of foreign offices because of more favorable tax laws there.
Of course there are many other benefits to the FAIRTAX, but when talk turns to how to repair our failing economy, it is a mistake to leave The FAIRTAX out of the discussion.
With over 20 million invested in research, The FAIRTAX is the MOST RESEARCHED BILL ever introduced to Congress.
It is the real, and perhaps the only, way out of the problems we face in this country. With 55 Trillion in un-funded debts, we must GET REAL very soon and implement this solution or we will become extinct like the old USSR.
The FAIRTAX. I hated it when I first heard about it.
Then I got myself educated. I hope you do too.
or “The FairTax Book” by Boortz and Linder.

Posted by: GET REAL NOW | January 4, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Obama supporters are the real “morons”. Gonna LOL if/when they wake up and suddenly realize they’ve been betrayed.

Posted by: Mai Johnson | January 4, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Wow, its a sitcom. Bottom line, the next four years are going to be a really poorly written Reality Show.
Smoke and mirrors, thats what we’ll get.

Posted by: Showdown | January 4, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Can anyone say: “National Police Force” of those 600,000 “new” government jobs will be a well armed and trained national police force to control unrest after an economic depression. The feds tried this is the 30′s and it was resisted based on states rights. Well, the states rights such as they are will become a lost to history old system.

Posted by: Beabout | January 4, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

600,000 are to run on gerbil wheels to generate electricity. Great energy plan!

Posted by: Davo | January 4, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

Tom, if Obama were to be inaugurated ‘President’ on 1/20/09, OUR NATIONAL GOVERNMENT AS A CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT has already failed. The Supreme Court knows that BHO is NOT an Article II “natural born citizen”.

Posted by: Ted | January 4, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

All people who are interested in doing something to support what is left of our Democratic Republic by supporting our Constitution AS IT IS WRITTEN need to join the grassfire resistance network. We are organizing on line to take peaceful action.

Posted by: swimkin | January 4, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

With all these government employees + the old ones, who is going to be doing all of the actual wealth-creating work to keep paying them? (Ask Arnold how that works in California.) Sooner or later the productive American workers who support all this excessive government are going to shrug their shoulders and move to a country that still has a real economy so they can get paid real money. Then all those gov’t employees can go discover the meaning of a real job instead of sucking the life out of those of us who actually create new things to improve people’s lives.

Posted by: Ron | January 4, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

WHILE THE USA IS DIVIDED, WHO OWNS THE FEDERAL RESERVE.
WHY DID OBAMA HIRE THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION, OOPS THERE GOES BILL RICHARDSON,

Posted by: RGTexas | January 4, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Yeah, more government, thats the solution. What a joke.

Posted by: yoodles | January 4, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

For twelve years you’ve been asking “Who is John Galt?” This is John Galt speaking. I’m the man who’s taken away your victims and thus destroyed your world. You’ve heard it said that this is an age of moral crisis and that Man’s sins are destroying the world. But your chief virtue has been sacrifice, and you’ve demanded more sacrifices at every disaster. You’ve sacrificed justice to mercy and happiness to duty. So why should you be afraid of the world around you?
Your world is only the product of your sacrifices. While you were dragging the men who made your happiness possible to your sacrificial altars, I beat you to it. I reached them first and told them about the game you were playing and where it would take them. I explained the consequences of your ‘brother-love’ morality, which they had been too innocently generous to understand. You won’t find them now, when you need them more than ever.
We’re on strike against your creed of unearned rewards and unrewarded duties. If you want to know how I made them quit, I told them exactly what I’m telling you tonight. I taught them the morality of Reason — that it was right to pursue one’s own happiness as one’s principal goal in life. I don’t consider the pleasure of others my goal in life, nor do I consider my pleasure the goal of anyone else’s life.

Posted by: Scott | January 4, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

OMG…… He’s a economic MORON !!!

Posted by: Superfly | January 4, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

oh what a beautiful day! lol Very tongue in cheek he says. Obama’s not a socialist they say! You’re correct. He’s a full fledged Marxist and he’s probably not even a citizen. But hey…. American’s are smart arent’ they? Oh…. Jan 20th will be such a sad day.
There is good news today though. Bill Richardson stepped down because he got caught with his hands in the cookie jar!
Maybe more good news will flow from Blago at some point too!

Posted by: lew | January 4, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm

Why do I get the feeling that this guy has no clue? This is going to be a disaster. Time to stop posing and deal with this mess. This is not like the Senate where you can just talk about stuff. Good luck with Reid, Dodd, Schumer, Leahy, Pelosi, Frank….

Posted by: doodsnapul | January 4, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Beabout, the 600,000+ national police force would be used to keep the Obama coup d’etat in power, by supressing (jailing, killing, etc.) those who would favor keeping our constituion.
This is no joke. We’re on the verge of losing our constitutional republic to a usurper. (Watch out for the double-deck shackle equipped FEMA prison trains and new FEMA concentration camps. This is no joke either.)

Posted by: Ted | January 4, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

600,000 more non producer parasites. Just what the country needs. The one thing you can do for yourself is buy gold for the comming hyper inflation. It will come and it will be brutal and nothing Obama or the FEd can do will stop it. The more th government tries to do things to prevent the economy from deteriorating the worse the results will be.

Posted by: Peter Courtenay Stephens | January 4, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

I’m with you Ted……scarey

Posted by: Roxy | January 4, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

We are SCREWED !!!!!!!!

Posted by: Superfly | January 4, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

Excellent Mr. Tapper for once in noting the 600,000 Soviet style work force added to police the public in keeping tabs on all the Obama voters just like Penny Pritzker kept tabs on all Obama voters in finance to when they opened emails.
If one adds the $1 trillion the socialists in Pelosi and Reid with the Marxist in Obama for select union payoffs along with internet and construction kickbacks, this is pure Hugo Chavez. I’m surprised Prime Minister Obama has not offered a confiscation of oil wealth funds to be given away to his voters.
Mr. Obama fully intends with Pelosi to bribe the public to get him past his first 90 days. I doubt though Pat Robertson heard it correctly from God that America is going to willingly embrace a deeper socialism.
I do hope that Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Greens and whoever else work together as the people in leadership positions are not doing what you sent them to DC for. Everyone needs to step back and stop following Mr. Obama or Mr. Bush and stop the trend of this socialist state and implement a production society where all people will be rewarded greatly for their work.
Happy New Year

Posted by: Lame Cherry | January 4, 2009, 5:01 pm 5:01 pm

All Right!! I can close up my small business and work for BO!!!
My worries are over and I don’t have to pay for gas or my mortgage anymore!!!
I knew I loved this guy!!!

Posted by: mike | January 4, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

600,000 MORE ON TAXPAYERS DOLE..TO TAKE MORE (FROM NOW YOUR GRANDCHILDREN’S TAX RESPONSIBILITY) FROM YOU TO CONTROL MORE OF YOU SO YOU CAN HAVE LESS.
AND MEDIA IS SO HELPFUL TO GOV’T.

Posted by: migtex1234 | January 4, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

After paying out $600,000 plus per year in property taxes which mostly go to teachers unions and govt employees and pensions, I’ve decided to close my business and get a gov’t job. That is, summer’s off, life long health insurance, defined benefit pension plans, don’t have to answer the phone if I don’t want to, etc. Where do I sign up and can I choose my job title for my business card? But . . . if I quit, who’s going to pay for it? Oh heck, what do I care! Sign me up.

Posted by: Rick McGinty | January 4, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

and where do I apply?

Posted by: tny | January 4, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm

The Constitution says we must form a militia to stop any unconstitutional action,
We must draw the line and defeat the socialist/Marxist

Posted by: RGTexas | January 4, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm

Why wont people place the blame for the financial crisis where it belongs:
1) Initially Bill Clinton for lowering mortgage requirements.
2) Everyone in Congress (Democrat and Republican) for allowing this to continue.
When looking at the numbers in the 90s they decided that lending practices were discriminatory (minorities, statistically, have lower credit scores) so they made it easier to get loans. Unintended consequence — Burst of lending to people who could not afford it. After the floodgates were opened race/income was no longer an issue, everyone could get loans with inadequate income.
All of the weird packaging that the investment banks did was secondary. If there hadn’t been all these bad loans in the first place, there would never have been a market need/want/desire for questionable packaging.
In the last 9 years, Congress has done nothing. Greenspan did nothing. Anyone with half a brain knows that after a period of extreme leveraging you eventually have deleveraging.
I will say that it appears that more Democrats in oversight roles took more money then their Republican equivalents (Obama is #2 all time recipient of Fannie/Freddie funds having only been in office a couple of years behind people in office decades). That doesn’t excuse the Republicans because they still got nothing done when they were in control.
Whats the difference between Democrats and Republicans. I really cant say in a public forum without getting banned.

Posted by: Joe | January 4, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Please help me understand… in today’s highly sophisticated technological information system, WHY some bright person can not produce some evidence to BHO US citizenship and put and end to this madness!
HELP US ALL.

Posted by: gaspare | January 4, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

First how can he give or make any kind of decisions? Has he been elected by the people yes he has .. Has he provided his documents to prove he can remain in the office to which he presumes is his? NO!
There is still no answer to that question. How can he spend over 800,000.00 dollars of we the taxpayers money to prevent the truth from being told ? He is not a Natural BORN citizen.
Natural born: Born in the USA from parents who are both US citizens in the following way: either (a) naturalized citizens, or (b) native born citizens, or (c) natural born citizens. Acquire US citizenship by birth.
WHY do not any of you BIG MOUTHED news people talk about that on your next report where OBAMA is the topic …
Because if you hand over the oval office to a man who is a “FRAUD” we the people will surly stand against this action.
This country was built on one small piece of paper, called the CONSTITUTION and that paper has worked for us the “people” for over 200 years.
This country’s men & women have have been Disenfranchised by lies told to the public from news persons on your channel. Start telling the TRUTH to AMERICAN, BEFORE, ITS TO LATE …
Also if you persons are reading this comment join GRASSFIRE.COM for the reall news and truth about AMERICA.
CandyO

Posted by: Candyo | January 4, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

Let’s swell the govt employee’s ranks. Now that is change I can belive in!!!

Posted by: Ross | January 4, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

How pitiful is it that three new Senators will be Al Franken, Caroline Kennedy and a school system bureaucrat from Colorado? We are sinking lower and lower.

Posted by: doodsnapul | January 4, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Yes, the surplus did vanish under Bush, largely because unlike Slick Willie, he didn’t have the luxury of COMPLETELY ignoring national security & defense for 8 years. Anyway, in case no one was paying attention, the 3 million violent felons Bill Ayers wants released when we close all the prisons will be the Obamanation’s newly-hired unionized, DNC-dues paying Gestapo, just to make sure nobody “hatefully” objects to being imprisoned & killed for their dissenting views.

Posted by: Frank Drebin | January 4, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

Typical Obama voter using the “racist” card. I have heard that so many times, it does not mean anything to me anymore.

Posted by: Olga | January 4, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm

This will be nothing but a disaster for economy in general. More government jobs = fewer private sector jobs combined with much higher taxes for the remaining people who have jobs.

Posted by: GuyInCT | January 4, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Bring on Balkanization!

Posted by: Johnny Reb | January 4, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

I still question, “Who’s the puppet master”?

Posted by: Lee | January 4, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

There is plenty for the government to do to make everyday life in America better. For example, how about refurbishing and maintaining schools? Or, fixing roads? Repair of broken and outdated water pipes, etc.
Then… with all that money people will make working on these projects, my guess is they will pay their mortgages, rent, buy food, etc.
I am all for that.

Posted by: karvictho | January 4, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

DW, there is one thing (really 5 people) who now stand between the end of our constitutional republic and freedom as we have come to know, and that is the US Supreme Court, which now has two conference dates set on the Berg v. Obama etc. case, 1/9/09 (coming one day after Congress completes opening and certifying the electoral votes) and 1/16/09, the Friday before the inauguration.
If the Congress does not oust Obama, or he does not voluntarily step down, I’m betting that the Supreme Court WILL save this nation by staying BHO’s inauguration in what will be the most important action of the Supreme Court in our nation’s history. I have to believe that, or, my friends, it’s all over!

Posted by: Ted | January 4, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

puppetmaster = person with hand up someones a$$

Posted by: meat whistle | January 4, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm

There will be more Race Cards used in the next four years than in a Las Vegas deck. I am going to change my first name to Tyrell for my resume.

Posted by: Steve | January 4, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

That’s right, and guess who gave Bush the surplus, the Republican Congress, they are the ones that balanced the budget.

Posted by: Olga | January 4, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

I still question, WHO”S THE PUPPET MASTER?

Posted by: Lee | January 4, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

I LOVE THE PEOPLE WHO SAY CRITICIZING THIS NEW CLOWN FOR A PRESIDENT IS BEING RACIST
NO, MY FRIENDS IT’S CALLED KNOWING YOUR ASS FROM A HOLE IN THE GROUND.
THIS GUY DOESN’T HAVE A CLUE HOW TO RUN A COUNTRY
HE IS A COMMUNITY ORGANIZER! BUT YOU GUYS WOULDN’T KNOW THAT
ALL YOU HEARD WAS “WELFARE FOR EVERYONE”

Posted by: MIKE | January 4, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

Were in trouble… big trouble. 600,000. Oh – no problem – we’ll just print money!

Posted by: Mike | January 4, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

600,000 in the National Civilian Security Force.

Posted by: DMJ | January 4, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Real high class clientele here. Sorry, Jake. You don’t deserve this.

Posted by: longtimewatcher | January 4, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Karvictho, Who do you think will pay for all of those projects and salaries? Fool.

Posted by: Johnny Reb | January 4, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Imagine if your email were run by the government. Or the grocery store (have you ever been to an army commissary? I have). Think of all of those lovely high-energy folks who run airport security. We can easily destroy America by simply having more government employees than private sector employees.
Controlled economies simply don’t work and the “change” that Obama had the hysterical moronic crowds dancing around for was a controlled economy. None of his devoted fans had the common sense to demand, “Change to what?”

Posted by: jo in california | January 4, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

Isn’t the puppet master Rick Moranis? Oh, sorry, he was the Keymaster…..

Posted by: meat whistle | January 4, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm

With 600,000 new government jobs, that will mean trillions in wages and benefits. Oh, what a mess. A democrat’s dream. Every hard working American will pay dearly every payday for all those wages and benefits. Hard working people won’t be able to retire until they are 95 years old to pay for all that, not to mention the next generation. Government employees are the laziest employees in this country because there is no accountability. Talk about a crisis. When is enough, enough? And to think that the ones in power making these decisions are all millionaires or billionaires. They don’t have a clue what they are doing to the average worker. They just don’t care, because they don’t feel the crunch on payday. All democrats want is every dime every American worker earns.

Posted by: debbie | January 4, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Olga said: “Typical Obama voter using the ‘racist’ card. I have heard that so many times, it does not mean anything to me anymore.”

Posted by: Appanage | January 4, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm

Obama, like most other politicians fails to either understand or admit that a government cannot “create” jobs. They can only redirect funding from the productive sector of the economy (private industry) into the unproductive sector (government make-work schemes.)
The key difference between now and the roosevelt administration however, is that in the 1930s mass communication was one-way, and FDR could simply pretend that his disasters were helping us.
-jcr

Posted by: John C. Randolph | January 4, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

3 points..
I’m getting too old to kneel. Wasn’t it Al Franken that was accusing Bush of stealing the election in Florida? Now as we stink lower into socialism, who’s gonna pay for these 600,000 new government jobs?

Posted by: Jerry | January 4, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Ha! Latte-sucking followers hits the Marxist nail right on the head. Will they have to shave their goatees too?

Posted by: meat popscicle | January 4, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Ahh, so we continue to see the politics of “shuck and jive”…
You sensed it was coming and low and behold, “thar she blows!”.
Hold on to your chairs and remember, four years will go by fairly quickly providing the Republicans keep this guy in check…then we’ll get some real leadership in there.
Heaven help us!

Posted by: SensibleFella | January 4, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

Just be good workers for our dear leader.
Obama will take care of us. Just build his roads and monuments to him and we can all live in gov housing. I saw a commercial the other day for Obama coins. Resistance is futile.

Posted by: GREGG | January 4, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

The media got him elected, so, don’t expect them to talk about what is going on. Their hate for Bush has produced a socialist in the White house. And to correct one post, the educational level of the folks who voted for Obama was far lower than McCain… and personally, I wasn’t a fan of McCain all that much.

Posted by: Darek | January 4, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Crazy how many racists come out of the woodworth when they anonymous on the internet!! All you nerd ass white boys gettin put in your place and you don’t like it?????? lol awwww thats so sad!
But at least your women know how to appreciate the brothas, know what im sayin’ ;-) Blondes are da bomb baby, and they love a real african man. look who all voted for Obama. It’s OVA!!! lol you lose

Posted by: G Money 43 | January 4, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

Yo, Appanage.
I didn’t lose one dime until Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid took over the Congress.
The economy was FINE until then. Live with it.
To those of you calling people who don’t worship Obama racists, you’re gonna eat your words; he is our first affirmative action present-dent; when he’s done, people will be screaming for equal treatment of ALL people, not just blacks.
Empty suit, that’s all he is.

Posted by: lweaton | January 4, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

We’re doomed. There is no escaping this economic disaster. Hyperinflation will eventually catch up with us for printing money out of thin air. More government employees will do absolutely nothing to help, but will make it worse. When are people going to realize that it doesn’t matter who we elect anymore. Washington insiders are all in it for the same reasons…greed and power. Ther Federal Reserve should be dismantled. The fiat currency “experiment” was not an experiment at all. it was a way for rich banking concerns, some foreign, to drain the treasury of the United States. They own everything. Between debt and taxes the American people own absolutely nothing. Think about it. Time to roll things over.

Posted by: Rich | January 4, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

Boy oh boy!!!
Here it comes……
The Messiah’s first plan, and it’s a DOOZY!!! Spent yet MORE taxpayer money on more GOVERNMENT jobs, we DO NOT need./
This is ONLY to boost his “unemployment rating” right off the bat so it looks like he’s getting something done, besides spending taxpayer money.
Hell, ANY moron can do that, Bush did it.

Posted by: George | January 4, 2009, 5:20 pm 5:20 pm

G Money 43, thanks for making my point for me!
Such class.

Posted by: lweaton | January 4, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

He better make those bogus Obama coins legal tender. He’s going to need them.

Posted by: doodsnapul | January 4, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Bring back slavery…put more people to work!

Posted by: Spooky | January 4, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm

The American Nation State is toast.

Posted by: Paul | January 4, 2009, 5:24 pm 5:24 pm

So, if I want a government job from Obama, how much do I have to give to his re-election campaign?
Rezko. Blagojevich. BILL RICHARDSON. Rahm Emanuel. Barack Hussein al-Corrupto al-Pay-for-Playo Obama III.
Time to impeach Obama.

Posted by: Odrama | January 4, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

BHO is NOT President yet; he’s not even President-Elect yet.
MESSAGE TO EVERY MEMBER OF CONGRESS:
When counting the electoral votes, either Congress finds by 1/8/09 that Obama — not being an Article II “natural born citizen” (father Kenyan/British, not American, citizen) — fails to qualify as President whereupon Biden becomes the full fledged President under 3 USC 19 (free to pick his own VP such as Hillary) or thereafter defers to the Supreme Court to enjoin Obama’s inauguration with Biden becoming only Acting President under the 20th Amendment until a new President is duly determined.
The preferable choice, at least for the Democrats, would seem obvious.

Posted by: Ted | January 4, 2009, 5:27 pm 5:27 pm

lwheaton said: “I didn’t lose one dime until Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid took over the Congress.”

Posted by: Appanage | January 4, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

Sounds like Hugo Obama.
Why not nationalize everything?

Posted by: drjohn | January 4, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm

“as pertaining to ted’s assertions that we are about to lose our civil liberties see bush, et al and the patriot act.”
Right.
And Hugo Obama is going to do exactly WHAT about that?

Posted by: drjohn | January 4, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Appanage, I just don’t understand why some people use that when they debate others. I wish people that use that could somehow use their brain to think of something of substance to debate about, like what is your argument for all of these List of Obama’s Broken Promises:
I promise to use federal campaign funds………………………………Broken
I will change Washington with new faces……………………………..Broken
I will not hire lobbyists, hires lobbyist Daschle……………………..Broken
I will be bi-partisan. Hires highly partisan Emanual………………Broken
I will eliminate Bush tax cuts…………………………………………….Breaking
I will get US troops out of Iraq in 16 month………………………..Breaking
I will dump Patriot Act wire tapping………………………………….Breaking
I will eliminate tax breaks for wealthy………………………………..Breaking
Also, Obama told voters during the presidential election that he wanted to work with both sides of the abortion debate to reduce the number of abortions. Yet, he picked a top staffer for one of the biggest pro-abortion groups to become his communications director.
What is your argument for Bill Richardson “pay-to-play” Investigation? Are you just going to keep calling everyone “racist”?

Posted by: Olga | January 4, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Lets see, 600,000 workers with 100% healthcare and a pension like the UAW. Jesus, Fasten your seatbelts folks, you aint seen nothing yet! Lolipops for everyone. Watch em stream across the boarder then. Another question – what happens when the government runs out of money?

Posted by: Mister Bill | January 4, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Bush didn’t make this mess, and it dwarfs Iraq.
Find us a single Republican who swore there was nothing wrong at Fannie and Freddie.
One.
Find one Democrat who, between 1999 and 2007, wanted reform of Fannie and Freddie.
Dodd wanted more DEregulation as recently as August 2007.

Posted by: drjohn | January 4, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

you’re deducing from what obama said that 600,000 government jobs will be created … don’t state it in the article headline as though it is assuredly going to happen. doing so is sloppy journalism.

Posted by: gimmeabreak | January 4, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Short the market with alacrity. I missed out 15K > 8K. I sure am not missing out 8K > 5K.
Rob

Posted by: Rob | January 4, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Screw Obama and his communist ideas/ideals. This piece of bovine scatia is going to screw what’s left of the country after the Reid/Pelosi raping are done next month.

Posted by: Frank | January 4, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Marianne – For gosh sakes, get over it. Florida is OVER you lame excuse for an American. If any of you libs had even tried to give GWB a chance, as we conservatives will do for Obama, this country would be in alot better shape internationally than it is today. I am soooo sick of you whiners. How long will you continue to invoke the GWB name as your excuse for anything that goes wrong. God I’m so sick of you people.

Posted by: Carol | January 4, 2009, 5:33 pm 5:33 pm

For those who think Obama can’t make this worse??? Get real. The congress, Dumocrats and Republicants, the past 3 Presidents played a major role, but Obama exploiting this crisis for political gain (socialist agenda) will lite the final fuse on the culture war already underway. National police force? Ha ha…wait to see what happens when he floats that balloon…

Posted by: Rich | January 4, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Before his first term is up, Obama will have ratings lower than Bush.
Everyone who voted for him and promoted him including the left wing media will be slapping their own foreheads.
Obama is an impressive speaker and an attractive black man, but that about all. I think his suit is empty but his closet if full of crooks.
We will find out pretty soon.
And hey, all you Americans, Enjoy your 600,000 new pains in the butt.
John West,
(a Canadian who tries really hard to love America)

Posted by: John West | January 4, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Appanage, it does cost a large amount of money to run a war in Iraq, and thank God, we are doing it, what else would you want to spend our money on, Global Warming? I think protecting our Freedom comes first.

Posted by: Olga | January 4, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

America has been destroyed by the courts, greed, power, corruption and more corruption. Politicians buying votes by promising moon and stars. Giving away free this and that to everybody (except for normal people). More of the same will result in more destruction. More destruction will result in more of the same. America hasn’t had an ethical, honest, statesman in the whitehouse since God knows when. Certainly none in the past 100 years.

Posted by: Bill Catz | January 4, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Obama made the economy the issue upon which he got elected. He had all the answers right up to the day he was elected, and then the day afterward Obama suddenly recognized the magnitude of the situation and he no longer has all those answers.
When you seek to catch a bear, you best be prepared to catch a bear.
Schadenfreude, baby!

Posted by: drjohn | January 4, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

John Gault was a character from one of Ayn Rand’s plays. She was from Russia and despised socialism. I believe most liberals who know anything (academic types)like to float the idea that she was a fascist to discourage young minds from reading her. This is not true and like topics of this sort one has to read the work to decide for oneself. She warned her readers about where she thought this country was going a few years back.

Posted by: allen antrim | January 4, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

usurper… don’t confuse my stating the facts as whining.
as for NOT blaming bush for this chaos … who would you suggest is to blame?

Posted by: marianne thompson | January 4, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm

Another $100,000.00 gazebo!!!
When Obama was Illinois State Senator in 2000, he promised to build a $1.1 million botanical garden to revitalize the Englewood neighborhood of Chicago. He PROMISD that construction would begin by early 2001.
It was NEVER built.
Obama did manage to give $100,000.00 in state money to build a gazebo on the site of the promosed botanical garden. he gave the $100,000.00 to a campaign donor, ths gazebo looks like it was the blue-light special from K-Mart.
Obama was a TOTAL FAILURE as a community organizer, a total failure as a State Senator, a TOTAL FAILURE as US SEnator, and will be a TOTAL FAILURE as president.

Posted by: Work with Obama | January 4, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

I can’t believe the simple mindedness of most bloggers here. LISTEN…THERE IS NO ONE PERSON TO BLAME FOR OUR MESS. NOT BUSH, NOT CLINTON…granted each contributed in their own way, bit you can’t leave out the courts, congress AND the elite private sector. Don’t be so naive. Time to apply the chemo. It’s cancerous. We are the right doctors, not more gov’t

Posted by: Rich | January 4, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin to slit throats.
– H. L. Mencken

Posted by: Nevli | January 4, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm

“as for NOT blaming bush for this chaos … who would you suggest is to blame?”
This is totally a Democrat mess. They shielded every effort to rein in the out of control socialization of housing. They enabled the corruption.

Posted by: drjohn | January 4, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

It’s all OK. Once I lose my current job, Barack will get me a job digging ditches in his New New Deal’s New Civilian Conservation Corps.

Posted by: JeffS | January 4, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm

RICHARDSON RESIGNS!!!!!!!!!
The wheels are coming off the Obama transition. It is mired in corruption and incompetence

Posted by: franklin | January 4, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

To all who comment, especially those who
throw darts, flame other posters, get your own blog and state your wisdom there. This is why so many forums fold, because of the small minded who continue to name call and belittle. Comment on the subject at hand as an adult or say nothing. Yes, I do have my own blog where I will comment about “PEBO”.

Posted by: Brian | January 4, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

“THERE IS NO ONE PERSON TO BLAME FOR OUR MESS. NOT BUSH, NOT CLINTON…”
Find one Democrat who wanted reform of GSE’s between 1999 and 2007.
ONE!
Who testified over and over and over that nothing was wrong at the GSE’s?
DEMOCRATS.
Who made insane profits from this corruption?
DEMOCRATS.

Posted by: drjohn | January 4, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

And another thing …
As you print billions of fiat dollars backed by … well, nothing, your currency will diminish in value driving up the Canadian dollar. For that I thank you.
Our idiots in Ottawa (Canada’s national capital) are not much smarter than your idiots, but our banks and our citizens seem to be a bit smarter in that, most of us don’t buy stuff we can’t pay for and banks don’t lend money to people who can’t pay it back.
Canada will continue to prosper while you folks hover around the event horizon of your black hole economy. You get closer to be being sucked in with every new bail-out package.
If you don’t get some sanity in your leadership soon, I think you are headed for another civil war.
I think you people should have voted in Ron Paul. He is the only one who isn’t exactly like the others.

Posted by: John West | January 4, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Bush low-taxed us out of the Clinton tech bubble bust that destroyed all the forecasted surplus five years later and then Keynesianed us out of the 9/11 crash but he and a watered down congress had no brakes to apply when needed. Now, Bush and the classic Democrat Keynesian approach of Obama is the medicine to fix the last Keynesian bubble bust. It’s a sad time for free market economics as the USA creeps to a government dominated job market. The whipsaw of boom-bust using Keynesian tools will take many decades to settle down. Just hope the country survives with some semblance of the original constitution.

Posted by: me3tv | January 4, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

Obama comments on the economy, he commented on the Mumbai terror attacks, but he has no comment on Hamas’ terrorist attacks against Israel? Is his teleprompter broken? When is sissy Obama going to comment on Gaza? he can’t keep voting “present” forever as he did as an Illinois Senator!!!!

Posted by: Speak up | January 4, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm

drjohn: While I agree that the dems bear the responsibility for the mortgage mess, that’s not all we have to worry about. Corruption exists througout our society, the Constitution has been trampled (somewhat by Bush!) Consumer credit will be the next shoe to drop…all of this debt is unsecured! The militia movements are gaining much ground, waiting for Obama to take his turn going potty on the Constitution or Bill of Rights..gonna get worse

Posted by: Rich | January 4, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

Marianne Thompson, wow, I cannot believe you just asked that question. Maybe you need to learn about Andrew Cuomo.

Posted by: Olga | January 4, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

what i will NEVER understand is why we can not put the country first and politics aside when we are in dire straits.
we are either all ‘on board’ or we drown.
the an has not even taken the oath of office and ad hominem attacks are rampant.
a chain is only as strong as it’s weakest link.
seems to me we have an inordinate amount of weak links.

Posted by: marianne thompson | January 4, 2009, 5:49 pm 5:49 pm

So far I’ve tried to give Obama the benefit of the doubt. Sure I’ve been harsh, but his supporters were no less harsh of the opposition.
But. This is stupid in the extreme. Adding 600,000 new employees does absolutely nothing but increase the size of peons and thralls beholden to government for their very lives. And who, do you suppose, these witless thralls will vote for next election.
This is pure Marx. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Posted by: Gregg | January 4, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Olga, here are the top 15 most corrupt in Congress. I’m equal opportunity but since you pointed out one Dem I thought you’d be surprised to see the most corrupt list actually contains many more Republicans:
Vern Buchanan (R-FL)
Ken Calvert (R-CA)
John Doolittle (R-CA)
Tom Feeney (R-FL)
Vito Fossella (R-NY)
William Jefferson (D-LA)
Jerry Lewis (R-CA)
Dan Lipinski (D-IL)
Gary Miller (R-CA)
Alan Mollohan (D-WV)
Tim Murphy (R-PA)
John Murtha (D-PA)
Steve Pearce (R-NM)
Charles Rangel (D-NY)
Rick Renzi (R-AZ)
Harold Rogers (R-KY)
Don Young (R-AK)
Not enough space here to detail what all these folks did but I am sure your memory is rapidly refreshing on several.
It’s really convenient to marry corruption to one party. Both parties play the game – it’s up to us which poison we choose. Despite being a lifelong righty myself I’ve watched giant businesses with close ties to the current administration and the GOP crush me in my efforts to make a bigger splash as a small businessman. I love reading the diatribe from people on here about how they’re going to shut down their small business when Obama takes over. Maybe that’s the way it plays out for some, but not for me. I don’t have a lobbyist on my payroll and that often counts more in my business than having the best solution.
As for promises kept / not kept, refer you to the Letterman skit about W’s promises kept the other night. Funny and sad at the same time.

Posted by: Appanage | January 4, 2009, 5:51 pm 5:51 pm

Jimmy said:
“what i will NEVER understand is why we can not put the country first and politics aside when we are in dire straits.”
Have you been on board the last eight years? “Bipartisanship” at its finest my man. As long as we do what you want you’ll play nice. Otherwise the long knives come out.

Posted by: Gregg | January 4, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

I voted for him, but he seems to be meandering. I think the economic problem is bigger than what he expected. I wish he wouldn’t promise this and promise that and keep changing from 2.5Mil to 3 mil. I also don’t believe we should do anymore bailouts. Let the recession clear out naturally.

Posted by: Sally in Chicago | January 4, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

I hate to say it but, even if the agencies got the money tomorrow, the federal government’s process to HIRE federal employees takes forever, if they hire at all. And, like the bailout, there’s no effective Congressional oversight.
The FDA was called on the carpet by Congress just last year for that very thing – they’d received the money long before, but still hadn’t hired. Of course, the FDA immediately began an (outsourced) and supposedly expedited hiring effort – AND STILL DIDN’T END UP HIRING, despite receiving applications from numerous qualified employees.
The hiring process is terribly complex and convoluted – check one box wrong, and even an extremely qualified candidate is automatically eliminated. If this is going to work, the process has to be SERIOUSLY re-evaluated, although it will probably be good for felons getting out of the service who will now have hiring preference.

Posted by: GPM | January 4, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

I work for the federal government. Put in half a days work and you are a superstar. Don’t do anything and you are fully successful. So another 600,000 of these feather-bedders? Righhhhhhhhht.

Posted by: oracle2world | January 4, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Not being an Obama supporter, but yet wishing him the best for all of us in the next 4 years, I had hoped that he would “cut” 600,000 government jobs. This would be while on his way to having the FBI investigate the likes of Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Maxine Waters and the rest of those who got us all in the Freddie/Fannie debacle.

Posted by: gaverill | January 4, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

This man child will suffer a huge MELTDOWN within a YEAR in this job. He hasn’t ONE CLUE how the world works, and laboring under cliched COLLEGE FRESHMEN SOCIALIST *ideals* anyone with half a brain outgrows by their senior year.

Posted by: Patrick Henry | January 4, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm

appanage … we also have a small business; 26 employees. surviving under the republicans the last 8 years has been a real challenge and that is putting it lightly.
health care costs are thru the roof. unlike the big corps we actually ‘care’ about our employees.

Posted by: marianne thompson | January 4, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Partrick Henry! great post! and so true…

Posted by: Rich | January 4, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

GREAT. Another $74 an hour “factory” workers with full bennies. Yup, we’ll be paying thru our taxes for a veddy veddy long time!

Posted by: Heidi B | January 4, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm

Obama – “The First Black Jimmy Carter” on economic policy and “The First Black George W. Bush” on national security?
Or maybe he’ll just vote present?
This maybe the road we must to travel to get another conservative president in the Ronald Wilson Reagan mold.
Obama is so conflicted, I feel a malaise coming on that will produce greatness within four years!
I pray so!

Posted by: Brainpower | January 4, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

franklin: “The wheels are coming off the Obama transition. It is mired in corruption and incompetence.”

Posted by: Appanage | January 4, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

And by the way, for anyone paying attention to the wallet, if anyone is left, 600,000 new government psychophants is $60 billion in increased government spending for employees alone, let alone whatever programs these employees are tasked to work at. Thats $550 per taxpayer in new spending for government payroll (I.E. voters indebted to the democrats for their livelihood). UR paying for the oppositions vote1or’s to live.
Sweet deal. Hired voter’s.
Or paid thugs? What will they be doing?

Posted by: Gregg | January 4, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

Are all these jobs going to be in Washington, D.C., California and Texas?
I like the idea of cutting payroll taxes a lot more. At least that way the benefits will be spread throughout all the states and won’t just be a boon to certain geographic areas, leaving other areas of the country to carry the economic weight.

Posted by: GPM | January 4, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm

no gregg, it was not ‘jimmy.’ i said that and i started out as a bush supporter.
i just happened to realize the error of my ways and did not stubbornly adhere to a flawed policy.

Posted by: marianne thompson | January 4, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

600,000 more, may I suggest increasing the Army’s Size with that! With the world the way it is today that might be a good start on what is needed……

Posted by: Pete | January 4, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

I fill sorry for all the haters on this blog. Obama is the president elect and will be president in few weeks deal with it,and stop showing your inner stupid GWB

Posted by: jay | January 4, 2009, 6:02 pm 6:02 pm

So our taxes will go to hire 600,000 gov’t employees who are rarely supervised, unionize themselves and then we are stuck with all their benefits and pensions. With all the talk about overpaid private company CEO’s and corruption on Wall Street – someone should look at the corruption of union leaders who destroy companies and squander millions on themselves, not there for the benefit of the workers. Workers in America should wake up and demand union leadership that is honest or opt out. Same with Congress and their perks and benefits/pensions. American workers can only be taxed so much to support these people!

Posted by: krystal | January 4, 2009, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

And since media outlets are reporting on Burris/Harry Reid, Senate Democrats and Constitutional qualifications, seems there are more immediate issues than Burris, namely BHO himself (WHY NO MEDIA COVERAGE OF THIS?) –
MESSAGE TO EVERY MEMBER OF CONGRESS:
When counting the electoral votes, either Congress finds by 1/8/09 that Obama — not being an Article II “natural born citizen” (father Kenyan/British, not American, citizen) — fails to qualify as President whereupon Biden becomes the full fledged President under 3 USC 19 (free to pick his own VP such as Hillary) or thereafter defers to the Supreme Court to enjoin Obama’s inauguration with Biden becoming only Acting President under the 20th Amendment until a new President is duly determined.
The preferable choice, at least for the Democrats, would seem obvious.

Posted by: Ted | January 4, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

when one builds a county highway or interstate bridge, is that not a government job?
are you saying that our infrastructure is sound and needs no repair?

Posted by: marianne thompson | January 4, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

Just give me my keys and tell me which number trailer I’m given to live in Mr. Obama sir.

Posted by: ziggrl | January 4, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

I would like to say something, please don’t use the word “all” as in “all women whatever” or “all government workers are lazy.” Let’s start using the word “some” more.
I’m a government employee I’m also retired military. When I walk in to my workplace, I’m there for one reason, to work. I work on military aircraft engines, I give you the taxpayer and the military the very best product that I can. My co-workers also give the best. Government employees are not all lazy scum suckers.

Posted by: Nancy | January 4, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

It is great to see and listen to a very well educated and confident President elect. For the last eight years we were presented with a complete idiot and an international embarrassment as President of the US with Vice President making all the moves. President Clinton was our image on the international stage which barely acceptable to most civilised people around the world. To give him his due we were reasonably OK when he left office (financially that is) morally is a different issue. We elected for change Senator Barack Obama as President of our country and we have to get behind him and his team and try collectively to straighten out this country of ours.
I am glad for one thing that has happened in the past few months,that is we have finally woken up from this silly deluded American dream. We have to work towards trying to make America more like the Cuban model, where basic human needs like health care, care for the elderly, free education for all, proper holidays and less working hours. If President elect Obama and his cabinet achieve only one of these objectives then there is hope for America. Instead of dropping bombs on other peoples sons and daughters from a cowardly 6 miles high, we could be sending Doctors and nurses into these so called rogue states, we must reach out to our enemies the palm of our hand and not the back of our hand as has to often been the case.
If America is to survive as an example of hope and a beacon of light to the world then we must hold accountable the criminals who lied and squandered the lives of over 4000.00 American lives and countless Iraqi men woman and CHILDRENS lives the later are meaningless because they are only muslims. We have a long way to go before we are acceptable as decent human beings. We have blatantly disrespected all of the efforts that our soldiers fought and died for in WW11 all the recent wars were based only on greed and feeding the war machine.
Every time I recall the Reverend Wright calling on God to damn America, I feel that God damned and left America a long time ago maybe around the time that religious right sprang. Sadly the incumbent President and Cheney left America like Sodom and Gomorrah. However I see in President elect Obama the signs of hope for a bright future but it is not going to come cheap some of us will have to grow up and start living the life and not the American dream.
Regards Wacker.

Posted by: Wacker | January 4, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm

I can’t believe everyone on here. Is the guy even sworn in yet?

Posted by: Marci | January 4, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm

Appanage, I did not know any of them were running for President? I believe McCain would have reformed our Government. I believe what he said, unlike Obama, he is just another liar. I don’t really watch Letterman. I am glad you were able to debate instead of saying I am racist, thanks.

Posted by: Olga | January 4, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm

Lord help us! How are we going to pay for it all? Elections have consequences, we must all bear the brunt now. The Pied Piper is coming to town and bringing with him rats that will infest every corner of Americana (freedoms, capitalism, pursuit of happiness).

Posted by: Mark in NJ | January 4, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

marianne thompson,
Sorry to hear things have gotten worse for you guys and definitely feel your pain. There’s got to be a balance struck between handing everything to a few oligarchs and handing everything to anyone who has a pulse, and I’ve always believed that (and our country’s innovation and strength) come through small business.
I was a senior officer in a Fortune 25 company once and left because I didn’t see a culture that drove individual responsibility and creativity. We only acquired these attributes from small businesses and drove them into the ground afterward. In a small business you have to figure out how to make your payroll and get customers, and that is way more complicated than taxes alone. If you aren’t even allowed to show your abilities to begin with as a company, something’s wrong. If it’s because lobbyists have driven giant companies and industries (like the pharmaceuticals) to record profits and control while the rest of us foot the bill, that’s a problem.

Posted by: Appanage | January 4, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm

This has nothing to do with hate, Jay. Everyone knows that Obama will soon be president.
The concern is that his transition team is working to develop a plan while he’s on vacation and, while the team selected by Obama might be great friends of his, really good pols and generally well-educated people, they probably don’t have nearly the economic chops to dig America out of this mess.
And with the House of Representatives and the Senate indicating they intend to virtually abdicate their oversight responsibility role in order to speedily pass whatever plan the transition team comes up with, there’s a serious concern that money that belongs to OUR GRANDCHILDREN will be misspent – as the $700 billion bailout was misspent due to Congress’ incompetence, combined, perhaps, with political and monetary influences – and, more likely, ineffectively spent.
The concern is a legitimate one, and it has nothing whatsoever to do with being “a hater.”

Posted by: GPM | January 4, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

Olga,
Bill Richardson isn’t running for President either. That’s like saying W is corrupt because of Libby or Gonzales.

Posted by: Appanage | January 4, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

If Obama seeks a massive increase in the size of the federal work force, his approval ratings will dive because he will lose the American Middle. The American people, by substantial majorities, detest more government spending.
They will feel betrayed by Obama in the same way they felt Clinton had misled them on health-care, and it will hand the 2010 (and probably 2012) election to the GOP.
I await Obama’s inauguration. We’ll see if, for the first time in his public life, he can succeed at anything besides elections. Given stories like this one, if true, there is reason to be skeptical that he can.

Posted by: SARileyMan | January 4, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm

This will be the illegal alien employment act. Whom do you think will be hired on all of the infrastructure project construction crews? We will be stimulating Mexico’s economy.

Posted by: skepticmedia | January 4, 2009, 6:13 pm 6:13 pm

Wacker said: “We have to work towards trying to make America more like the Cuban model, where basic human needs like health care, care for the elderly, free education for all, proper holidays and less working hours.”
You’re joking, right?

Posted by: GPM | January 4, 2009, 6:15 pm 6:15 pm

“when one builds a county highway or interstate bridge, is that not a government job?”
No, it’s not. It’s usually and should be a private job contracted by the government.

Posted by: rick | January 4, 2009, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

no marci, he is not. the majority here are of the opinion we are doomed before the man even tries.
instead of ad hominem attacks, ebonics imitations, and political slurs perhaps it would be much more constructive if those same individuals formulated a plan that would get us out of the mess that we are in.
i’m waiting.

Posted by: marianne thompson | January 4, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Appanage, your right, he is not running for President, however, Obama has shown us how he uses his judgment. I am not impressed with Clinton, Richardson or Emanuel, but at least he is making decisions, I should give him credit for that since he is used to voting “present”.

Posted by: Olga | January 4, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

ah yes, how quickly comes the socialist coup by the cabal of leftists pulling the strings of the clueless neophyte freshman senator that they used as an empty suit/votegetter to fill the chair in the Oval Office.
First came the fall of heavily Soros influenced Lehman, second the push to create a major depression by scaring the economic sector with the Paulson/Benanke October Surprise bailout (the ‘emergency’ bank/lending collapse that the Dems had been nurturing for two years). Now is the time for the lefties to complete their power grab by pushing their long-term agenda of government control as the only solution to the problems they created. Their votes in perpetuity are assured.
God help the U.S., at least the U.S. as the founders envisioned it.

Posted by: rightorfightfred | January 4, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

wacker are u posting from Cuba?

Posted by: john | January 4, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm

Great. 600,000 more federal pigs sucking on the taxpayer teat.

Posted by: gone gulchin' | January 4, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Government does not create jobs, only the private sector can create. All the money the government has is from the private sector, therefore they are thieves.

Posted by: larryesperando | January 4, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

Well, let’s see 600,000 new government jobs…ah, also 600,000 likely new union enrollees; ah, I also envision an average starting salary of about $35,000, plus tax payer supported benefits, including retirement…well, hell, this looks like a union payback and about $21,000,000,000 in annual tax payer supported salaries. Now, of course, this does not include potentially billons in supplies. Well, hell, why not let the private sector hire perform these tasks and when the work is finished everyone goes home. Nay, that approach makes too much sense. The American tax payer is again on the hook and the parasitic Keynesian economic policy is again in play.

Posted by: Tommy Richards | January 4, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

You can tell who did all the losing
by who is doing all the whining

Posted by: Matt | January 4, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm

Olga,
I’m with you: it is about judgment. We already know W used poor judgment in telling us the mission was accomplished while undermining General Shinseki and our troops in Iraq by underestimating the force needed and sticking to it. We already know W exhibited poor judgment in allowing Powell to get thrown under a bus while allowing Cheney to push flimsy intel on WMDs as a central raison d’etre behind the war.
Bad judgments are sometimes made. I’m not so sure that choosing a highly successful, proven guy with a completely clean record to run Commerce is bad judgment, however, but the President-elect has proven (along with the nominee) that they’re not going to let even the appearance of potential wrong obstruct the effort.
Wouldn’t it have been great to have just one person in power do the same at so many important decision points over the last 8 years that resulted in complete failure to lead?

Posted by: Appanage | January 4, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

I am so sick of supporting these parasites (Government employees)I own a business with 12 employees maybe when I have to lay them all of because I cant afford to pay my taxes they will all go to the Messiah and apply for a new job. But who are they going to rob then? I will be out of business as will many others who are feeling the same as me!!

Posted by: Paul | January 4, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

What is the plan for Obama and Congress use government money to create job incentives? It’s best to ensure that the dollars go to companies who employ a majority of Americans, rather than those companies who have continued to outsource jobs and their company revenues offshore. Many Fortune 500 companies laid off workers in the 4th quarter, despite having available work, simply to position for Obama’s new incentives. Let’s get the jobs to the US workers without rewarding the corporate behaviors that added to the financial distress on the economy.

Posted by: Johne | January 4, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

Perfect 600,000 jobs to carry out and enforce the new BHO think like I think or else world order :-) Can’t wait for him to get in office so I can collect my check.

Posted by: Triple A | January 4, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

marianne, there is no simple answer. This problem is far too complex to solve in a sound bite.
If there was, Congress would have come up with it during the last bailout.
And frankly, Obama’s transition team isn’t going to be able to come up with a plan solve it in a few weeks, either. particularly since they are not largely experienced in federal government and do not have established histories of successful management and/or turnaround efforts.
Some of the concerns are very legitimate. Building a road is very hard physical labor that causes workers to largely become transients, living away from their families in travel trailers and motels for extended periods of time. And seasonality concerns mean that they’ll go unemployment during those periods. By its very nature, many employees in the industry are transitory workers from other countries, here both legally and not, and the money does not stay in this country.
And 600,000 more presumably permanent federal jobs is a continuing monetary obligation of extreme proportion. And again, I must ask – will those jobs be dispersed throughout the country, or targeted to certain areas like Washington, D.C., California, Illinois, Texas, and Nevada?
Investment in alternative energy alternatives must likewise help a wide variety of geographic areas (which will be looking to an equally wide variety of alternative energy solutions) and not just solar and wind or those based in California.
If you’re looking for the simplest solution and an equitable one, it’s probably the sales tax holiday (with the federal government reimbursing the states and municipalities for the revenue they will lose) or a reduction in payroll taxes for both employers and employees. Either or both of these would have either an extremely low or no implementation cost, yet have an immediate, even-handed impact throughout the nation.
Add to that tax credits for alternative energy development, health insurance and medical costs, etc., and you could have a truly FEDERAL plan with wide-ranging impact.
Is this simple enough for you?

Posted by: GPM | January 4, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm

This is scary. Who will pay for the 600,000 new jobs. The taxpayer will. I can’t afford for my taxes to go up anymore. What is the modivation to work hard. Lets face it. I worked for the government, most government employees are lazy. It will takes 2 government workers to do the job that 1 would normally do.

Posted by: Lynn | January 4, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm

Oh great!
600,000 more gummint bureaucrats feeding at the trough.
Who’s going to pay for this?
Answer: Us middle class Americans now on the way to being wiped out.
Cheers,
b

Posted by: bruski | January 4, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm

Can you say Jimmy Carter 2.

Posted by: Trisha | January 4, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Well, let’s see 600,000 new government jobs…ah, also 600,000 likely new union enrollees; ah, I also envision an average starting salary of about $35,000, plus tax payer supported benefits, including retirement…well, hell, this looks like a union payback and about $21,000,000,000 in annual tax payer supported salaries. Now, of course, this does not include potentially billons in supplies. Well, hell, why not let the private sector hire and perform these tasks and when the work is finished everyone goes home. Nay, that approach makes too much sense. The American tax payer is again on the hook and the parasitic Keynesian economic policy is again in play.

Posted by: Tommy Richards | January 4, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

instead of ad hominem attacks, ebonics imitations, and political slurs perhaps it would be much more constructive if those same individuals formulated a plan that would get us out of the mess that we are in.
i’m waiting.
what? no responses from all of the nay sayers?
i was sure that there would be plenty of informed, credible suggestions on exactly what should be done to stabilize our economy, extricate us from 2 wars and help us regain credibility on the world stage.
one of the criteria i use in hiring is how many ways a potential employee can come up with solutions.
most of those who fail are good at telling you what can NOT be accomplished.

Posted by: marianne thompson | January 4, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

Lynn: it generally takes 2 corporate employees to do what 1 small business employee does as well, since we’re keeping score. I hope we all realize who really drives this economy.
If the government wants to be in the business of creating jobs, let’s hope it sets its sights strictly on new businesses and small businesses.

Posted by: Appanage | January 4, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm

Matt said, “You can tell who did all the losing by who is doing all the whining.”
Everybody who works and pays taxes will be doing all the losing if Obama’s plan is a poor one. People who don’t care don’t pay taxes.
And by refusing him the benefit of bipartisan Congressional hearings and oversight, our leaders in the House and Senate certainly aren’t doing anything to give the President-elect a hand with a problem that they, over decades, have participated in making!

Posted by: GPM | January 4, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm

For you idiot drones that voted for Obama, your tax money is going into more bureaucracy and more wasteful spending.
This bill he is proposing (because he thinks he is Roosevelt, Kennedy, Lincoln, and Jesus rolled into one) is going to be a waste.
Who do you think is going to benefit from this? Illegal aliens and The unions! We know the fabulous work they’ve done with the UAW. Also, it’s cheaper for illegals to work than an American.
So Obama could cut the crap about “American jobs.”
Let’s have more debt!! More taxes and more corruption!! Goody!!

Posted by: Jenny C. | January 4, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

marianne said: “instead of ad hominem attacks, ebonics imitations, and political slurs perhaps it would be much more constructive if those same individuals formulated a plan that would get us out of the mess that we are in.
i’m waiting.
what? no responses from all of the nay sayers?
i was sure that there would be plenty of informed, credible suggestions on exactly what should be done to stabilize our economy, extricate us from 2 wars and help us regain credibility on the world stage.
one of the criteria i use in hiring is how many ways a potential employee can come up with solutions.
most of those who fail are good at telling you what can NOT be accomplished.”
_________________________________
marianne, you must have missed my post. I’ll reprise it for you:
“marianne, there is no simple answer. This problem is far too complex to solve in a sound bite.
If there was, Congress would have come up with it during the last bailout.
And frankly, Obama’s transition team isn’t going to be able to come up with a plan solve it in a few weeks, either. particularly since they are not largely experienced in federal government and do not have established histories of successful management and/or turnaround efforts.
Some of the concerns are very legitimate. Building a road is very hard physical labor that causes workers to largely become transients, living away from their families in travel trailers and motels for extended periods of time. And seasonality concerns mean that they’ll go unemployment during those periods. By its very nature, many employees in the industry are transitory workers from other countries, here both legally and not, and the money does not stay in this country.
And 600,000 more presumably permanent federal jobs is a continuing monetary obligation of extreme proportion. And again, I must ask – will those jobs be dispersed throughout the country, or targeted to certain areas like Washington, D.C., California, Illinois, Texas, and Nevada?
Investment in alternative energy alternatives must likewise help a wide variety of geographic areas (which will be looking to an equally wide variety of alternative energy solutions) and not just solar and wind or those based in California.
If you’re looking for the simplest solution and an equitable one, it’s probably the sales tax holiday (with the federal government reimbursing the states and municipalities for the revenue they will lose) or a reduction in payroll taxes for both employers and employees. Either or both of these would have either an extremely low or no implementation cost, yet have an immediate, even-handed impact throughout the nation.
Add to that tax credits for alternative energy development, health insurance and medical costs, etc., and you could have a truly FEDERAL plan with wide-ranging impact.
Is this simple enough for you?”

Posted by: GPM | January 4, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

Appanage, I will have to disagree that W used poor judgment, unless you have access to classified information, unlike the rest of us. I am proud of his decisions in the last 8 years because we are all safe. I am forever grateful for our military fighting for our Freedom and proud of their strategic ability to keep us safe.

Posted by: Olga | January 4, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

20% govt employees
80% private employees
that’s a 1 to 4 ratio.
Can 4 private workers support 1 Govt worker? No.
Obama has failed.

Posted by: dennis | January 4, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

Maybe we should let all of those who got us in this mess bail us out instead of the Government. That would mean the CEO’s who trashed their companies and walked out with millions in severence pay, and the Congressmen that enabled the bank failures (such as Barney Frank and Christopher Dodd who tool sweetheart deals from Countrywide while allowing Freddie and Fannie to go bankrupt while touting how stable they were above GOP attempts to reform those two giants several years ago which lead to the housing bubble.)
As for Obama’s attempt to spend us out of this, that has failed everywhere it has been tried. Japan tried it and has had a decade long recession.
The best plan for the auto industry, would be allow them to declare backruptcy so that they can be released from their union contracts. Ditto the steel industry. The union packages of higher wages and compensation that no one else enjoys due to the cost, need to come to an end! That is part of what has made US good uncompetitive.

Posted by: David | January 4, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm

gpm … we now have our own business. i’ve worked for big corps[ran operations for 5 states in mid level management] and then went out on my own as a troubleshooter-now referred to as a turn around artist.
i know what it takes to turn around a business in trouble. i also know what will not work.
i would not hire 90% of the people that have responded to this sight just based on their negativity … they do not get it.
if we do not all pull together we will fail.
we cannot reach the top of the mountain if we are fighting each other on the way up.

Posted by: marianne thompson | January 4, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

600K more on the federal payroll, on top of a $1 trillion (maybe one helluva lot more) “bailout”. And we taxpayers, that is, those of us who actually work, are supposed to pay for all this? Are these people insane? This is a clear case of taxation, without representation. Hmmm…where have I heard that phrase before?

Posted by: rkeyo | January 4, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm

Appanage, I’m out of here. I am getting blocked for Spam now. It was nice debating with you.

Posted by: Olga | January 4, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm

I have a government job, I work for the US Army Corps of Engineers, before that I was in the USAF. I guess I’m one of these parasites though. I would like to see everyone of you hang with me on the river and risk your life, I will be waiting. I’m qualified and have worked in private doing several different types of work all for big money…most of you are barely capable of driving your suv much less three for four different jobs that pay extremely well, But hey I’m just a lazy government parasite right…see ya in out-draft conditions this spring..wink,wink:-)

Posted by: shawn | January 4, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm

“it would be much more constructive if those same individuals formulated a plan that would get us out of the mess that we are in.
i’m waiting.
what? no responses from all of the nay sayers?”
I’ll field this one, marianne.
1.) STOP ALL GOVERNMENT BAILOUTS. NOW.
2.) CONTINUE THE BUSH TAX CUTS INDEFINITELY
3.) DE-REGULATE BUSINESSES SO THAT THEY CAN FUNCTION PROPERLY AND ACTUALLY TURN A PROFIT.
4.) DECREASE BUSINESS TAXES SO THAT THEY CAN AFFORD TO RUN THEIR BUSINESSES AND HIRE MORE EMPLOYEES.
5.) ELIMINATE INCOME TAX FOR ALL WORKING EMPLOYEES FOR ONE YEAR, SO THAT THE ECONOMY WILL BE STIMULATED.
6.) LIFT TRADE RESTRICTIONS AND DECREASE TARIFFS SO THAT UNLIMITED GOODS CAN FLOW MORE FREELY.
7.) STOP WELFARE PAYMENTS UNLESS ITS RECIPIENTS DO SOMETHING TO EARN IT. THERE’S PLENTY OF TRASH TO BE CLEANED-UP AND GRAFITTI TO BE REMOVED. GET BUSY.
8.) LIFT THE BAN ON DOMESTIC OIL DRILLING SO THAT OUR NATION CAN PUT OUR OWN PEOPLE TO WORK, DRILLING OUR OWN OIL, WHICH WILL BENEFIT OUR OWN ECONOMY.
Barfy Obomb-out won’t even CONSIDER any of the above steps. He’s a moron.

Posted by: BlofeldBuildings | January 4, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Very interesting…when the Democrats provide tax incentives to business, they are “creating private sector jobs” but when the Republicans do the same, they are giving tax breaks to the wealthy.
If Obama’s plan works and incremental revenue more than offsets increased short term debt, then we will once again have confirmation that the private sector truly does know how best to spent its own money and lift the economy.
The big question would then be, what are we to make of the Republican Party? Obama is pulling some key moves right out of McCain’s campaign and Republican doctrine. Were both candidates selling the same product?? We certainly know who wins THAT contest.
Maybe the Reagan era is still alive and its torch is being carried by a most unexpected believer! After all, Obama did say the following on January 16, 2008: “I think Ronald Reagan changed the trajectory of America, in a way that Richard Nixon did not, and in a way that Bill Clinton did not. He put us on a fundamentally different path because the country was ready for it. I think they felt like with all the excesses of the 1960s and 1970s and government had grown and grown but there wasn’t much sense of accountability in terms of how it was operating. . . . He just tapped into what people were already feeling, which was, ‘We want clarity, we want optimism.’”

Posted by: Ted | January 4, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

david: the oft touted $75. per hour wage in the auto industry includes legacy costs. you know what that is … that is the company taking care of their retirees.
NO ONE does that anymore.the reason other countries are able to be more competitive is they have socialized medicine and do not have to carry health insurance for retirees.
also, the big 3 auto industries gave 10′s of millions towards the rebuilding of new orleans .. much more caring/help than our govt appeared to display.
i am not defending their lack of creativity in the small and middle range car market. they played to their audience-suv’s trucks, etc.
but, i guess what i am saying is that everything is not always as it is portrayed.

Posted by: marianne thompson | January 4, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm

Hey Marianne Thompson – you don’t get it. You, like most, fail to see the correct path – the efficiency path. The American tax payer is already burdened with high taxes and inefficiency and we do not need 600,000 retreads, including 15 layers of bureaucratic incompetence. FYI – I wouldn’t hire you!

Posted by: Tommy Richards | January 4, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

inasmuch as taxes are disproporionately paid by the rich, didn’t the fat cats that got bailed out just get some of THEIR money back??

Posted by: joe | January 4, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

marianne, I also own my own business. Within the last few years, I have also been at the top level of management of an enterprise with a $60 million annual budget. I also have two degrees in fields pertinent to turnarounds, have worked as a consultant and have lectured on the subject.
You say you know what will not work and that you “would not hire 90% of the people that have responded to this sight just based on their negativity … they do not get it.”
Anyone wanting to successfully put THIS plan into action shouldn’t hire them, marianne – but that doesn’t resolve the fact that most of the plan options floated so far are … stupid.
And for you and others to blindly support an ill-conceived plan isn’t going to help either the country or Obama.
Come up with a good plan, and people will “all pull together.”
But come up with a stupid plan and you’re naturally going to get legitimate resistance from intelligent people who can see how – and why – the plan, if not modified, is going to fail.

Posted by: GPM | January 4, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

where is all the money going to come from ? as if we did not know..hide your wallets..big daddy coming for your money.

Posted by: vladimir | January 4, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

… And not one word out of him about the middle east, except, “We only have one president at a time.”
It seems Mr. Obama wants to be in command right now on things liberals claim moral authority on (economic “justice” and health care are classics), and has to stay totally silent about the political pandora’s box of Israel and Gaza (where liberals typically have no moral authority, as most have thrown Israel under the truck for decades).
The man already reeks of doublespeak. I wonder where that magical dollar amount will finally end up where he decides to start taxing “the rich”?

Posted by: Jeremy | January 4, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

Naturally, we will need some $150,000 new federal employees to manage the logistics of hiring and managing the 600,000. Harvard MBA’s? No! …buddies from dysfunctional intercity hoods.(Executives must have I.Q.s over 85…but a rap sheet will qualify.)

Posted by: Boris | January 4, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

For all you thinking O’ is SMART, then why did he think there were 58 states and that Japan dropped an atomic bomb on Hawaii?
Why won’t he release any college data? Because he’s an idiot, a purge Marxist at that.
Keep on believing he has any brains. Miracles happen!

Posted by: BBBBub | January 4, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

The time for a flat tax is now. This would do more for the economy than any of Obama’s spending plans.

Posted by: T B | January 4, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm

I love the big mouths on the left that call the right haters when all then have done for the last eight years was to degrade and insult our President, yes OUR President. When a person becomes President, they represent all of us not just their groupies. Every time Bush was insulted over seas, the American people were insulted, not just the left. The left is so psychotic even after they got their ONE elected they still bash Bush, look how they continue to insult Palin.
Well friends, you now reap the crap you sowed.
You’ve elected a cigarette smoking, cocaine narcissistic con artist, with a ‘yes we can’ mantra, with no one having any idea what that means.
We are in for change alright, pennies, nickels and dimes.

Posted by: Dukas | January 4, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Olga,
I can’t share my clearance status and I couldn’t share anything I knew if I were cleared.
The information’s out there for you to read though, and here’s just some:
- It is poor judgment to use someone’s college thesis as your primary discussion point at the UN for war (see “yellowcake”).
- It is poor judgment to start a war on a second front and try to tie it to the first front with zero supporting intelligence
- It is poor judgment to out a CIA agent for political purposes
- It is poor judgment to underman or underequip our troops
- It is poor judgment to allow the VP to strongarm Congress into giving him a congressional office when he isn’t part of the legislative branch
- It is poor judgment to enact executive signing statements that completely cut out the legislative branch’s role in our system
That’s just a primer. Can you call all of these ‘good judgment’?
Now, are we safer today? All we can do is judge what’s happened and there have been no new attacks on us here in America.
That’s awesome. Now imagine the resources we’d have if we didn’t open up a new front in Iraq?
By the way, the “I support our wonderful troops” argument works like the “I support our wonderful God” or “I support our wonderful children” arguments. These are not the exclusive property of one political party, regardless of what Karl Rove has done to convince otherwise. Being a Reagan guy myself, it was incredibly disappointing to see how deep his gutter measures.

Posted by: Appanage | January 4, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

BlofeldBuildings is absolutely correct. But these solutions don’t serve the obama agenda. He has to pay back unions and this will be through creating government jobs.

Posted by: Tommy Richards | January 4, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

Great, just we need. 600,000 new government employees. To do what, may I ask?

Posted by: KJo | January 4, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

600,000 thousand permanent government jobs. Never heard that in BO’s campaign.
It’s union payback time.
BO’s is going to trash the dollar. That a tax increase for 100% of all citizens.

Posted by: Tom | January 4, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

blofeld …
1.) STOP ALL GOVERNMENT BAILOUTS. NOW.
2.) CONTINUE THE BUSH TAX CUTS INDEFINITELY
3.) DE-REGULATE BUSINESSES SO THAT THEY CAN FUNCTION PROPERLY AND ACTUALLY TURN A PROFIT.
4.) DECREASE BUSINESS TAXES SO THAT THEY CAN AFFORD TO RUN THEIR BUSINESSES AND HIRE MORE EMPLOYEES.
5.) ELIMINATE INCOME TAX FOR ALL WORKING EMPLOYEES FOR ONE YEAR, SO THAT THE ECONOMY WILL BE STIMULATED.
6.) LIFT TRADE RESTRICTIONS AND DECREASE TARIFFS SO THAT UNLIMITED GOODS CAN FLOW MORE FREELY.
7.) STOP WELFARE PAYMENTS UNLESS ITS RECIPIENTS DO SOMETHING TO EARN IT. THERE’S PLENTY OF TRASH TO BE CLEANED-UP AND GRAFITTI TO BE REMOVED. GET BUSY.
8.) LIFT THE BAN ON DOMESTIC OIL DRILLING SO THAT OUR NATION CAN PUT OUR OWN PEOPLE TO WORK, DRILLING OUR OWN OIL, WHICH WILL BENEFIT OUR OWN ECONOMY.
in response:
1] that’s great if a depression is acceptable in your future. but i think that perhaps you might find 30% unemployment unacceptable. that is what we had before the wpa and the ccc got rolling.
2] and perpetuate the ‘trickle down’ economy that was a non event? wealthy individuals don’t spend disposable income-they invest it. the poor will always spend it-they always need something.
3] deregulation is exactly what was done in the financial industry and look where that got us.
4] better to cut taxes for the middle class- they are the engine that keeps the economy running. this is a demand side economy NOT a supply side economy.
5] and the government will run how? perhaps you do not feel we need police, firemen, road workers?
6] and somehow in spite of all these trade restrictions we have a trade deficit? how does that work? are we not already making it easier for foreign goods to enter this country?
7] clinton already did that … in the main. basically, the only ones getting welfare are the women with kids. any ideas on how to handle that one?
8]that really isn’t that much available. as i care abut the planet, i am more interested in green jobs and research.

Posted by: marianne thompson | January 4, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm

Just what this country needs, 600,000 more unneeded beaurocratics stoking the AFGE leftist political machine. Our government will go tits up for the same reasons G.M. and Chrysler ultimatly will. This needs to stop right now.

Posted by: william | January 4, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

O is a fool if he thinks that adding 600K or “any” new governement employees will help the economy. Their salaries will be drawn out of the private market economy and draw down the number of private jobs —- jacking up taxes for governement salaries and benefits and pensions. It was O himself who stated that he gravitated immediately toward his Marxist socialist college professors and nothing has “cahnged” [get it?] since then.

Posted by: Osamas Pajamas | January 4, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Basketball, Hawaiian vacations, paparazzi pec shots, and a lack of self discipline to even quit smoking? Oh, and remember, he worships every Sunday at the gym.
600,000 new jobs that will require tax dollars to fund? Blago, Richardson, Rahm all even before he steps foot in the White House?
He lacks even the mentality of appearing presidential. First, the election is done; the time for populist rhetoric is over. Quit the idealist socialist Keysenian nonsense and get the job done for our economy. Once we’re all rolling in our newfound wealth, THEN tax us to death and fund every liberal pet project.
I already see in this guy a failed presidency, and that terrifies me.
While I didn’t vote for him, the country can’t afford to have him fail.
Hillary was right – the presidency isn’t a place for on-the-job training.

Posted by: Jeremy | January 4, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

BO should freeze new hires, no replacement for those that leave or retire either.
End all public pensions for employees that do not, by the nature of their jobs, put their lives on the line to keep us safe. I don’t include IRS thugs that carry guns.
All other public employees contribute to defined contribution plans like the 401Ks we have, that includes congress.
Another thing. Make all contributors to political campaigns ineligible to bid on any government contracts or applying for any government jobs. These contributions give an implied pay to play conflict of interest.
End all income taxes. Personal and business. Go to a consumption tax. That way even the mob and other criminal enterprises will have to pay taxes. The current system penalizes the honest, productive and law abiding.
End all public “welfare” programs. Return to private charity. Remember, Christian charity is giving to those who can not help themselves or those are trying but need a hand up while they get back on their feet.
People who are poor because of their own decisions and then do nothing to change do not deserve anything from me or you.

Posted by: fishydude | January 4, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm

600,000 do no good loafers to feed off the public trough making more than those of us that actually sell and produce the goods that are needed to keep the USA productive and an economic powerhouse in the world. I have never met a government employee that was needed or wanted except by those on the public dole in the first place. UPS/FED EX prove the USPS is un-needed and not a necessity for the government to provide even though the US Constitution names “Postal Roads” as a needed government funding necessity.
Why do I pay taxes on my 20,000 job a year to give gov employees 150K a year to do nothing?????????????????

Posted by: Christopher Carman | January 4, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm

Olga, I work building roads. If standing around holding a shovel 5 hours a day, 1 hour lunch, 1 hour in breaks and putting out and picking up cones for 2 hours, then sweeping at the end of the day is hard physical labor then you are on our side. We need to double our hourly pay to $50/hr to start. Machines build roads. Do you believe we dig up, put down and compact by hand?

Posted by: Roader | January 4, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

What a dufus he is…he is going to send this nation in a downwards spiral that will take 16 years to get out of once he is thrown out of office…good riddance you fool Obama…you have no right to call yourself President and can’t wait for history to tell the tale of the most failed Presidency of Obama who knew nothing, said nothing and did nothing but take taxpayers money and throw it out the window (with all of his cronies catching it in their hats and running for the bank that is)

Posted by: lwatt | January 4, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

This president is already spinning us right into a Depression. He’s going to enact the EXACT SAME ill-conceived programs that FDR did when he took office in 1933. For those of you who either don’t know your history (Joe Biden) or have been brainwashed by the public school you attended, let me remind you that FDR took an economy already decimated by the idiot practices of Herbert Hoover, and made it WORSE, prolonging the stagnation, the poverty and the unemployment from 1933 until well into the WWII years, when at least war machinery was needed to fight. His policies managed the dubious feat of causing a Depression within a Depression (1937-1938), expanded government and government programs so large that we’re STILL dealing with the fallout 70 years later, and brought about the labor unions to the auto industry, which ruined them as well as the once-wealthy, once-safe city of Detroit.
Mark my words, Obama is leading this country on a path to ruin. Most people will be too stupid to even know what’s going on until we’re in a Depression (end of 2009), we’re at 25% unemployment (mid-2010), and finally, a civil revolt (mid-2011). Meanwhile, the Islmamic fundamentalists whom we continue to fund with oil revenues, are licking their lips and getting an itchy trigger finger.

Posted by: BlofeldBuildings | January 4, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Is anyone surprised? Socialists think that Government, and more of it, is the answer to our woes. Hang on everybody. The sucking sound you hear is coming from your wallet. This man is gonna destroy this country.

Posted by: Bobby | January 4, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

“The mentality of a bureaucrat is: if it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. When it stops moving, subsidize it.”
- Ronald Reagan

Posted by: Jeremy | January 4, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

gpm says:
Anyone wanting to successfully put THIS plan into action shouldn’t hire them, marianne – but that doesn’t resolve the fact that most of the plan options floated so far are … stupid.
And for you and others to blindly support an ill-conceived plan isn’t going to help either the country or Obama.
GPM
why do you assume blindly?
i am not sure what will work globally right now are you? but there are many steps that i agree should be taken.
job creation, we need, somehow , to pump money back into the economy. can not do that if people can’t buy. people can’t buy if they have no money. can’t get money if they do not have jobs.
availability of credit, if the banks will not loan who will be able to purchase a car or a home?
energy independence-do you want to be held hostage to those who would do us harm?
what exactly do you fell is ‘stupid?’

Posted by: marianne thompson | January 4, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

1) Make the Bush tax cuts permanent;
2) Stop driving companies overseas and out of the stock market by suspending Sabranes-Oxley, which assumes corporate guilt and amounts to a multi-billion dollar unfunded mandate.
3) Eliminate CAFE standards and let US car makers figure out the best way to make their own energy efficient vehicles
4) Cut the capital gains tax to 10%
5) Plan on cutting 10% of all federal jobs in the next 3 years
There are tons of ways to save this economy, the problem is, none of them will increase Beltway control of every facet of our lives. Those are the only ones our new FDR is interested in.
Keynesian economics only made the Great Depression WORSE, what makes these geniuses think it will do anything different this time?
Bush completely mishandled this thing – and we need someone in charge now that understands economics. I’m not convinced ANYONE elected has a handle. It was government intervention into the housing markets that got us into this mess, how could increased government intervention fix ANYTHING?

Posted by: Rich | January 4, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

In reference to the new 600,000 government jobs:
“He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.”
Let’s see if any of y’all can tell us the author of the quote and where it is referenced.

Posted by: David in San Diego | January 4, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

uh, carol …
did you read the post where i was a bush supporter? i bailed when i saw the result of my error.
when things started going south … i jumped ship.
i see you plan to go down with the captain.

Posted by: marianne thompson | January 4, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

I didn’t even need to read this article to see what is really being stated here. You are all ididots if you think this is good for America. 600,000 NEW GOVERNMENT JOBS MEANS TAX INCREASES TO COVER PAYROLL FOR 600,000 NEW GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES. How incredibly stupid, considering Americans are already having a tough time with their take-home pay from non-government employment. What if the whole country worked for the government – who would pay the salaries then???

Posted by: Angela | January 4, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

Old Barry wants to take America to Liberal Oz: socialism, government knows best, everyone drives the same electric car…..did you think you were getting something different when you voted for this idiot?

Posted by: steve | January 4, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Hey David, that quote would be from our own Declaration of Independence.

Posted by: David from North County San Diego | January 4, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

John ; At least I am not the only one that thinks this whole financial debacle with mae & mac were orchestrated by demoslobik bigwigs. It’s been known for a couple years that what they were doing and whom they were politically laying the cash on was flat out wrong. Oblahma is at the tip of the heap in cash secured from these once bouyant institutions. Barney & Dodd are also into this chicanery deep. Rahm also has a hand in this mess , let alone a couple other messes. Too much coincedence on how this whole thing broke right at a pinnacle moment in the presidential election.And the Coincedence that the pres elect and all the major demoslobs are the guys steering the commitees and funds that went south.
Further enlargement of the government dole by 600k “employees” doing what that would lead to more tax revune I can’t fathom….. the math does not add up. I’m all for the long overdue flat tax , and general tax relief across the board. The degraded urban centers in this country milk the available money for all manner of social services , and like a hungry monster want more and can never be satisfied. Too many lazy uneducated people want somethign for nothing and government rhetoric ever more sounds like it’s gonna give you what you need baby… only it’s gonna cost you freedom at the very least…all in fine print that the politicians gladly obfuscate in legalese and squirrel away in say a 20K page document to hide it further. There is no free ride at the big goovernment trough unless you are one of the politicians handing it out. Otherwise we will all be giving up our freedoms to get that cradle to grave socialism the lazy liberal crowd so wants to stuff down our throats.
The states are being run like mini versions of the federal gov’t…overspending , corruption on grand scales and more and more petty taxes that add up to huge numbers to put toward their handout schemes they structure to get them the votes of the paid off sheeple.

Posted by: baldfrog | January 4, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

blofeld …
our country is in trouble and the people you praise, who must have crystal balls, have predicted failure and the man has not even been sworn in.
he is not the one that created this crisis/fiasco/chaos.

Posted by: marianne thompson | January 4, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

I have been laid off since Oct.3, 2008. If ya can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em! Where do I sign up for my national forest raking leaves job?

Posted by: ManBearPig | January 4, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

O will not lead.
Q will follow events.
O is oratorical.

Posted by: Scotswork | January 4, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Hey Chris,
IRS thugs that carry guns. VERY few IRS employees carry guns. About 2500 Special Agents work for the IRS. IRS Special Agents work dope, pimp, and terrorism cases and numerous other low lifes of society. Of course tax crimes are the bread and butter of IRS-CI but you have to understand if it wasn’t for taxes the U.S. would be fighting Iraq with bows and arrows. So, give the SA a break at IRS-CI.

Posted by: Lee68 | January 4, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm

Let Socialism ring! More Govt jobs – that is just what we need. Hopefully, the salaries will be competitive with the greedy corporations like GM, Microsoft, and Boeing.

Posted by: SuzyTheLiberal | January 4, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

600,000 New J-O-B-S (3 letter word) means 600,000 new Dem votes and more taxes for all of us poor people paying them. We almost have more people getting money than people paying money.

Posted by: Tate | January 4, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

When will the public wake up? Government does not create jobs, business does. Adding government workers means more taxes must be raised from the citizens and businesses to pay them. Raising taxes brings unemployment and business failures.

Posted by: Lew Waters | January 4, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

Let Socialism Ring! More Govt Jobs is just what the doctor ordered.

Posted by: SuzyTheLiberal | January 4, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm

the income tax is unconstitutional. it says in the constitution that taxes have to be a set number across the board, not depending on how much money you make. AND there is NO Law that says that you HAVE to pay taxes…

Posted by: ####### off | January 4, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

why we are where we are today:
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, also known as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act, Pub.L. 106-102, 113 Stat. 1338, enacted November 12, 1999, is an Act of the United States Congress which repealed part of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933, opening up competition among banks, securities companies and insurance companies. The Glass-Steagall Act prohibited a bank from offering investment, commercial banking, and insurance services.

Posted by: marianne thompson | January 4, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm

I wonder how much revenue would be gained to pay for these new GOV jobs if illegal immigrants paid taxes…hmmmmmm

Posted by: Dan | January 4, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

When will the public wake up? Government does not create jobs, business does.
——————————-
Of course the Govt creates jobs – both my parents are Berkeley professors and do quite well. Me and my friends are getting law degrees and will eventually go into politics – like Obama. We need low level Govt jobs – this will provide higher salaries at the top of the Govt food chain.
I don’t believe the “myth” that we have to build things to have a robust economy – we just need to tax the greedy corporations and send the money to people who need it. That is what works.

Posted by: SuzyTheLiberal | January 4, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

We already have more than 600k people on the government payroll, but don’t do squat… it’s called welfare!
So now he wants more than 600k people working for the government? doing what? Opening up another inefficiennt bureaucracy full of red tape and incompetence?
If the democrats have it their way, they’ll just bring the 600k people in from India anyway and we’ll be in the same mess.
For the bulk of the blame look no further than congress.. and we just elected the same bull ******** all over again PLUS some new ones! That added in to a socialist president and we have a recipe for disaster… maybe not while he is president, but definately a disaster that someone else is going to get blamed for. Probably some other idiot just like Bush.

Posted by: Common Sense | January 4, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Republicans, and ALL of their supporters, have NO CREDIBILITY for the next 8 years!

Posted by: WE GOT THIS | January 4, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

The saliant real points are these:
1. government employees vote around what… 90% Democratic as do their families. The elections where how close recently?
2. A government stimulus program again is the creature of the “Federal Reserve” which will loan the People’s future work and sell the loans back to us after inflated the currency.. there is NO CONSTITUTIONAL government as long as a NYC/International banking cartel runs the finances of the USA!
3. The more people are made dependent upon the State, the more levers our Fabian Bilderberger Group Banking friends and whores have to pull.
4. The Depression very likely started like this… Wall Street Leftist… Bankers creating an emotional space for programs that zapped American will and Liberty and that are still with us.
5. Any idiot knows that the “infrastructure crisis” is complete bull and that the use of current events including the recent “October Surprise” of the market crash was and is a lie.
6. America has been conditioned for this moment for a generation… state schools and colleges mold minds that can not think and are dependent in their core mindset deeply apologetic about their country’s unique history and ignorant about he very word Liberty and dull as hell about basic economics.
7. There is now a real chance of Civil War 11 and if so it will be fought not over making humans farm animals… but over socialism/free speech/2nd Amendment.
8. Instead of tearing down the Fed, lowering taxes drastically on business and contracting government and if investment is made by government making that in technology… as was done after James E, Carter… we now have Cuban style socialists for real… in charge!
9. Israel makes its move between Presidents! Read “Supermob” to find the connection of mobsters and Israel and unions including the teachers union.
10. The Glorious Group “Single Mothers” vote for their surrogate fathers, brothers and husbands in effect when they vote Democratic. The Marxist tenant to tear down the family and to cut woman away from men is largely now successful and look at the results of feminizing our culture. This is not a problem with woman primarily but with the gutless generation… of men… WASPs really who gave up there core political beliefs and power for leisure time and some free sex here and there. Sex and drugs is always the result of Leftist government programs because adult maturity and activities are never really possible.
11. Say goodbye to America and the promise of individual Liberty and its primary gift: Human Creativity, meaning, America leading the world may soon be over unless we all do a U turn very soon.
12. Broke. THE USA! All of the above was right before our eyes.

Posted by: KF | January 4, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

If the 2,400,000 new jobs he “creates” are in infrastructure construction, what will those 2,400,000 do when the construction is finished? Expanding the Internet to all rural areas? Are you going to give computers and access to those who can’t afford it?

Posted by: Parnell | January 4, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm

I want to check air preesure of county cars for 75,000 a year.

Posted by: Biggie Nickie | January 4, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

did anyone notice the upcoming pres is centered toward the left on this broadcast? Which would be your right?

Posted by: observer | January 4, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

That added in to a socialist president and we have a recipe for disaster…
———————————–
Wake-up America – we are entering a new and improved Socialist phase and our Great Leader will get us there:
“Socialism starts with nationalization of the main means of production – the plants, factories, agri-business farms and everything necessary to produce what society needs. The large monopoly corporations and banks come under public ownership, that is, under the collective ownership of the entire working class and people, who have the leading role in building socialism.”

Posted by: SuzyTheLiberal | January 4, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

This is EXACTLY what they do in Chicago, it is called a BUY-A-Vote program.

Posted by: JOHN | January 4, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

300k to dig all the holes we need, the other 300k can fill them in.

Posted by: meesterbig | January 4, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

mariane wrote:
“why do you assume blindly?
i am not sure what will work globally right now are you? but there are many steps that i agree should be taken.
job creation, we need, somehow , to pump money back into the economy. can not do that if people can’t buy. people can’t buy if they have no money. can’t get money if they do not have jobs.
availability of credit, if the banks will not loan who will be able to purchase a car or a home?
energy independence-do you want to be held hostage to those who would do us harm?
what exactly do you fell is ‘stupid?’”
___________________________
marianne, you’ve indicating you support the proposals of the Obama transition team and think all should come “together” to support it.
Because I simply cannot imagine that any thinking person would support the proposals as currently outlined, I must assume you’re supporting it “blindly,” because it was proposed by the President-elect since, otherwise, I would have to assume you are either unintelligent or uninformed.
You state, “job creation we need somehow to pump money back into the economy.”
Cutting payroll and/or sales taxes would also pump money back into the economy – and it would do it immediately, at far lower administrative cost, and with a guaranteed result that would be spread throughout all industries and all states.
Federal jobs, by contrast, are likely to take at least 18 months to fill, if not longer, simply because the federal government’s hiring process is so slow. The bureaucratic cost to implement the hiring program would be high, and there would be an obvious obligation to keep those people on the federal government’s payroll indefinitely or face the effects of massive unemployment.
You also mention availability of credit, and I agree that that’s obviously an issue.
If Congress and Paulson HAD NOT BEEN SO WOEFULLY INCOMPETENT, they would quite obviously have required the first $700 billion of bailout funds to have such strings tied to them.
Some of the money has yet to be allocated, however, and could still be constrained. Yet even now Congress remains on a four-month vacation.
In addition, Pelosi and Reid could also have called a special session prior to December to impose a heavy tax surcharge on year-end bonuses exceeding a certain amount paid to executives of bailed out companies.
That Congress has done neither of these things is appalling – and the fact that now Congress is proposing to do exactly the same thing with respect to the proposals of Obama’s transition team (hustle it through without thoughtful consideration) shows that they learned nothing from the previous fiasco and thus making their actions now even more appalling, if that’s possible.
With respect to energy independence, of course do you want to be held hostage to those who would do us harm. But I likewise think energy should be affordable to all and soon.
I’m shocked that I haven’t heard of support for construction of new nuclear power plants. Such construction projects are not only a boon to their local economies, but they create excess energy that can be serve citizens in a number of states at a reasonable cost. And since the construction is place specific, construction workers can have their families with them, making them far superior to road programs.
I likewise think that development of alternative energy should be supported financially, but my research indicates that such programs are not going to generate affordable energy in significant quantities anytime in the near future. I would start the work now, then, but I wouldn’t put the inordinate amount of money there that the Obama transition team is proposing.
In addition, I would cover a broad range of energy alternatives and would emphasize renewable-based fuels (which can vary depending on which part of the country you’re in) over solar and wind.
I would also provide tax credit support to both employers and employees for health insurance and tax credit support for medical treatment as well, until a comprehensive plan can be developed to address the cost problems in that industry.
I would also seriously consider cutting way back on international aid since, quite frankly, we borrowing money to give away and we simply can no longer afford to do so. Again, I think it is important to recognize that the money we are giving away today doesn’t even belong to us – it belongs to our grandchildren.
I would also either quickly withdraw troops from Iraq and Afghanistan (as Obama originally promised, but has subsequently seemed to have re-though) or ask the governments of those countries, neighboring states and/or other countries in the world to share substantially in the current and future cost of our efforts.
Again, the economic problem is multifaceted and complex and, as you note, I’m certainly no expert. But my non-expert status only makes the simplistic proposals of the Obama transition team (who, in their defense, are clearly not experts in all of these – or perhaps any of these – areas either) shocking in their naivete and lack of thoughtfulness.

Posted by: GPM | January 4, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm

I WANT one of thoes Federal Jobs, so I can be like my Uncle. He works in the Post Office, good pay, great benifits and works 25 hours per week and gets paid a full 40 hours!!

Posted by: Francisco Pinon | January 4, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

With 600,000 new government jobs coming, what job would you like to have? I’m hoping to get the job waxing the mayor’s new government issued SUV – an Escalade. You laugh but it pays $45,000 a year plus $10k in benefits, and free golf at the Mayor’s club.

Posted by: Sigmonde | January 4, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

Challenge, can anyone prove this wrong?:–
1. Constitution Article II requires USA President to be “natural born citizen”.
2. BHO’s website admits his dad was Kenyan/British, not American, citizen when BHO was born.
3. BHO is therefore not a “natural born citizen” (irrespective of Hawaiian birth or whether he may be a 14th Amendment “citizen” of USA) — as confirmed in the Senate’s own McCain qualification resolution agreed to by BHO.
4. Supreme Court has already docketed two upcoming conferences, 1/9/09 and 1/16/09 — between dates Congress counts electoral votes (1/8/09) and Presidential inauguration (1/20/09) — to address Berg Case and fashion relief on BHO’s eligibility to be President.
5. Since no facts are in dispute, Supreme Court rules on Summary Judgment to enjoin BHO’s inauguration as President.
6. Therefore, BHO is not inaugurated as President.
7. Vice President Elect Biden is inaugurated Acting President under the 20th Amendment to serve until new President is determined — the procedure for which determination to be set out by Congress and/or the Supreme Court so long as in conformance with the Constitution.

Posted by: Ted | January 4, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm

This is EXACTLY what they do in Chicago, it is called a BUY-A-Vote program.
——————————-
Of course we continue to “stack the vote” – it is pretty simple:
- Hispanics: Paint the Reps as mean spirited and let more illegals in (worth 4M new votes a year)
- Women: Paint conservative women like Palin as buffoons even if they have real jobs – the media is complicit in this (worth 4M votes)
- Young People: Talk up “free education” and “environment” (worth 5M votes)
- Govt Workers: Add more and more.
- Unions: Prevent school choice and stop jobs moving to the South.
- Social Spending: More and more. 40% don’t pay any income taxes – increase it to 50%. Dependency is good.
As you can see from the elections results, America is shifting left due to the above strategy. It is really quite simple.

Posted by: SuzyTheLiberal | January 4, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Jobs, baby, Jobs. After going back to school to get a 2-year medical degree, only to be downsized right before christmas, bring on the public jobs. The private companies offer zero security, little if any benefits, and constant worry each day about being downsized. It’s pretty sick.

Posted by: John | January 4, 2009, 8:08 pm 8:08 pm

You wanted change? You got it!
600,000 government jobs.
Pure socialism is on the march.

Posted by: Charlie O | January 4, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Roader, I don’t know what you are talking about, but I don’t think I can afford your $50/hr to start salary, sorry. And, I don’t think you build them by hand.

Posted by: Olga | January 4, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Do we need 600,000 more mailmen?

Posted by: Joe | January 4, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

Obama supporters: Thanks for nothing.

Posted by: Anais | January 4, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

What would happen if a bill showed up in the mail for your fat smoker neighbor’s pills to keep her alive for a couple more miserable years? Think about that the next time you decide you want to help out with 300 million people’s healthcare

Posted by: Jim Beam | January 4, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Do we need 600,000 more mailmen?
Of course we do. Companies like Fedex and UPS are cutting into their market share by doing it better and faster. If we don’t hire thousands more to compete, the Post Office will be out of business. And that means a government bailout, which means a stimulus to employ another 600,000 people.

Posted by: Sigmonde | January 4, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

The answer to our problems is less government not more. I would like to see 600,000 existing government jobs cut to fund real tax cuts.
I never voted for Reagan even though I should have; it took going into business for myself for me to understand how right he was about government being the problem and not the solution.

Posted by: Rdsesc | January 4, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

The last thing this country needs is more government employees. What a waste of taxpayer money!! My husband works in a government job after retiring from the private sector and my son worked in a government job during college, and is now in business for himself. While both say there are good government employees, they agree that the government is extremely inefficient; therefore encouraging inefficient workers.

Posted by: Patty | January 4, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

Which of our 57 states will get the most new guv employees, ya think?

Posted by: Sigmonde | January 4, 2009, 8:27 pm 8:27 pm

i hope everyone realizes the gov’t has to pay for those 600K new jobs with taxes. aside from personal taxes paid by gov’t employees, the vast majority of the revenue for the united states’ treasury comes from the jobs created in the private sector. eventually, the american businesses needs to succeed or the revenues will fall, as they are dramatically now. there is no self-licking ice cream cone.
btw, 600K jobs is probably another $60B/year.

Posted by: Mark | January 4, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm

All you have to do is print the money. You don’t need to raise taxes. Look – Taxes are being cut for 95% of us anyways. Duh!

Posted by: Jim Beam | January 4, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

More government employees, sounds like socialism it me.

Posted by: Bob | January 4, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

It’s time for everyone here to read and UNDERSTAND “Atlas Shrugged”.
Directive 10-289 is just around the corner.

Posted by: Danny | January 4, 2009, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

I don’t know why I bother posting on these sites. I know I will never change any of your minds in here. The conservatives look at public jobs like it is socialism and not a public service. The Democrats–always tarred and feathered with the label of liberal–try to show their side of the matter. But, pig-heads never will listen to anything but their own species oinking loudly.

Posted by: John | January 4, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

Does that include the new job as FIRST LADY with a $ 200,000 yr salary? And First NANNY his Mother-in-law at $ 100,000 yr salary?
I think I will put in for a Gov bailout and have my wife put in as the first lady of household and nanny, that way she can be also paid a salary from the feds.

Posted by: Jerry | January 4, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

600,000 more Democrat parasites leeching off those who work for a living.

Posted by: Patrick C. | January 4, 2009, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

The 600,000 new jobs will all be white house attorneys to handle “corruption eruptions” on the obama watch.

Posted by: taxed_to_death | January 4, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

That’s right. More unaccountable government bureaucrats and laws and red tape and restrictions is going to liberate everyone and fix all, problems. As they always have in the past.
Good luck with that. I agree with the poster above warning of the imminent arrival of Directive 10-289.
Brace yourselves.

Posted by: Good Lt | January 4, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm

All of Obama’s’ “grand government tax payer financed plans” are nothing short of depressing.
Heaven help us all.

Posted by: A free American | January 4, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

Directive 10-289: Coming soon to a government near you:
Directive 10-289
“In the name of the general welfare,” read Wesley Mouch, “to protect the people’s security, to achieve full equality and total stability, it is decreed for the duration of the national emergency that–
“Point One. All workers, wage earners and employees of any kind whatsoever shall henceforth be attached to their jobs and shall not leave nor be dismissed nor change employment, under penalty of a term in jail. The penalty shall be determined by the Unification Board, such Board to be appointed by the Bureau of Economic Planning and National Resources. All persons reaching the age of twenty-one shall report to the Unification Board, which shall assign them to where, in its opinion, their services will best serve the interests of the nation.
“Point Two. All industrial, commercial, manufacturing and business establishments of any nature whatsoever shall henceforth remain in operation, and the owners of such establishments shall not quit nor leave nor retire, nor close, sell or transfer their business, under pentalty of the nationalization of their establishment and of any and all of their property.
“Point Three. All patents and copyrights, pertaining to any devices, inventions, formulas, processes and works of any nature whatsoever, shall be turned over to the nation as a patriotic emergency gift by means of Gift Certificates to be signed voluntarily by the owners of all such patents and copyrights. The Unification Board shall then license the use of such patents and copyrights to all applicants, equally and without discrimination, for the purpose of eliminating monopolistic practices, discarding obsolete products and making the best available to the whole nation. No trademarks, brand names or copyrighted titles shall be used. Every formerly patented product shall be known by a new name and sold by all manufacturers under the same name, such name to be selected by the Unification Board. All private trademarks and brand names are hereby abolished.
“Point Four. No new devices, inventions, products, or goods of any nature whatsoever, not now on the market, shall be produced, invented, manufacturerd or sold afer the date of this directive. The Office of Patents and Copyrights is hereby suspended.
“Point Five. Every establishment, concern, corporation or person engaged in production of any nature whatsoever shall henceforth produce the same amount of goods per year as it, they or he produced during the Basic Year, no more and no less. The year to be known as the Basic or Yardstick Year is to be the year ending on the date of this directive. Over or under production shall be fined, such fines to be determined by the Unification Barod.
“Point Six. Every person of any age, sex, class or income, shall henceforth spend the same amount of money on the purchase of goods per year as he or she spent during the Basic Year, no more and no less. Over or under purchasing shall be fined, such fines to be determined by the Unification Board.
“Point Seven. All wages, prices, salaries, dividends, profits, interest rates and forms of income of any nature whatsoever, shall be frozen at their present figures, as of the date of this directive.
“Point Eight. All cases arising from and rules not specifically provided for in this directive, shall be settled and determined by the Unification Board, whose decisionswill be final.”

Posted by: Good Lt | January 4, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

When FDR started handing out cash, ie, jobs, the Federal was nil.
When FDR create make work projects nearly every one worked at a private job.
Today, both of those are just the reverse.
And along come BO with his plan, change.
What he wants to do is not change, it is more of the same with much bigger numbers.
What we need is more folks pulling the wagon, not more folks RIDING in the wagon.
We will get more bloat, more layers of government, more intrusion, more obstruction, more waste, more corruption, etc. More of we don’t want, don’t need, didn’t ask for.
Let me say it again to those who voted for BO, “You’ll be sorry!”

Posted by: Les Moore | January 4, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm

He sounds as smooth as bill clinton with his teleprompter,where can I sign up for my spoon to dig these ditches?

Posted by: Jake | January 4, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Well, David, interesting quote:
“He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.”
I believe that was written by Tommy Jefferson, to King George III, in a document called the ‘Declaration of Independence.’ Of course, the threats to our freedom and wallets today is much greater than those that precipitated the War of Independence. Taxation was much lower then than now.

Posted by: ~~Robert | January 4, 2009, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

our dictator from his hotel room in chicago…I can’t wait for my first horse and carriage ride

Posted by: Jim Beam | January 4, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

maybe the govt jobs will be at gas stations and will make sure that lady who expects that BHO will help her out with her gas & mortg. remember her? poor soul…
Would you check the oil while you are at it buddy?

Posted by: fill'er up | January 4, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

600,000 new Democrat votes guaranteed every election. Isn’t it wonderful? How about a law prohibiting Federal Employees from voting? It’s an obvious conflict of interest that prevents our democracy from functioning in the interest of the average citizen and slants the vote to the interest of government bureaucracy and dictatorship.

Posted by: Richard Z | January 4, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

George W. Bush and John McCain would never have bloated government or deficits like this! Right? Who cares anyway… the country is being busted out. You are an idiot if you pay your credit card bills – BAIL YOURSELF OUT the same as the government and the rich folks. “folks” – sounds common, you like that?

Posted by: DO IT NOW! | January 4, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

Can I hurl now?

Posted by: billc | January 4, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

How do you spell “Union Payback”? 600,000 jobs each paying an average of $500 annual dues equals $300,000,000 a year for the unions; who will turn around and reinvest $100,000,000 of that each year to elect Democrats. Better yet, how do you spell “Circle Jerk”?

Posted by: Jimmy Hoffa | January 4, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

I’m sure borrowing more money will solve our problems… good plan. Print and borrow money, I do it all the time when I get in over my head. I just bowrrow my way out of debt….

Posted by: ynot | January 4, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

“God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion.
The people cannot be all, and always, well informed. The part which is
wrong will be discontented, in proportion to the importance of the facts
they misconceive. If they remain quiet under such misconceptions,
it is lethargy, the forerunner of death to the public liberty. …
And what country can preserve its liberties, if it’s rulers are not
warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of
resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as
to the facts, pardon and pacify them. What signify a few lives lost
in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from
time to time, with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
It is its natural manure.”
- Thomas Jefferson

Posted by: Fen | January 4, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm

This is the end of American prosperity. Just what we need 600,000 new government jobs & next year they can go on strike! Obama’s going to make so many people dependent on a government pay check that he signs that he’ll be able to seize power permanently. Once his followers are all on welfare or employed by the government (same thing) they’ll vote the Democrats in forever.

Posted by: steve spelling | January 4, 2009, 9:21 pm 9:21 pm

Is this money for a Citizen Militia or repirations

Posted by: TOM | January 4, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm

More government workers? Oh great. More people getting paid with my taxes to do nothing at their own speed.

Posted by: mrskorn | January 4, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

marianne, you’ve indicating you support the proposals of the Obama transition team and think all should come “together” to support it.
not necessarily. i was responding to the vitriolic responses on this site. obama has requested ideas and responses on a myriad of issues. there are open forums and requests for comments and suggestions and has, so far, lots of participation.
i am saying we must work together and brainstorm. “a house divided yada yada.’
Because I simply cannot imagine that any thinking person would support the proposals as currently outlined, I must assume you’re supporting it “blindly,” because it was proposed by the President-elect since, otherwise, I would have to assume you are either unintelligent or uninformed.
no, i am not supporting it blindly … i have reservations on certain proposals. we have a dme company. we genuinely want to make a difference; we care about our customers– the elderly, the disabled, the vets, etc. i could go one for hours re: the evisceration of programs designed to help the least of us. these are men and women who worked all their lives, good work ethic just not ‘high’ achievers, there are the vets coming home without limbs or bowels … would you care to here some of these horror stories? they are left out to dry. i am not a socialist but we do have a responsibility to treat these people as human beings, ones deserving of our care.
You state, “job creation we need somehow to pump money back into the economy.”
Cutting payroll and/or sales taxes would also pump money back into the economy – and it would do it immediately, at far lower administrative cost, and with a guaranteed result that would be spread throughout all industries and all states.
cutting payroll taxes is an option but certainly not enough … also, it reduces revenue to the feds and the states; what does that affect? revenue. should we borrow more from the fed reserve, china?!?!? don’t start me on the fed nor on greenspan. also, the states are in great difficulty– they need money. cutting taxes will only exacerbate the situation.
Federal jobs, by contrast, are likely to take at least 18 months to fill, if not longer, simply because the federal government’s hiring process is so slow. The bureaucratic cost to implement the hiring program would be high, and there would be an obvious obligation to keep those people on the federal government’s payroll indefinitely or face the effects of massive unemployment.
red tape is easily cut. desperate times call for desperate measures. remember ww11 when we refitted factories, sent the men overseas and women were recruited to the factories?
You also mention availability of credit, and I agree that that’s obviously an issue.
If Congress and Paulson HAD NOT BEEN SO WOEFULLY INCOMPETENT, they would quite obviously have required the first $700 billion of bailout funds to have such strings tied to them.
i agree, but what could obama have done about that?
Some of the money has yet to be allocated, however, and could still be constrained. Yet even now Congress remains on a four-month vacation.
i agree.
In addition, Pelosi and Reid could also have called a special session prior to December to impose a heavy tax surcharge on year-end bonuses exceeding a certain amount paid to executives of bailed out companies.
forget tax surcharge. eliminate the bonus … period. in my world only success and accomplishment should be rewarded.
That Congress has done neither of these things is appalling – and the fact that now Congress is proposing to do exactly the same thing with respect to the proposals of Obama’s transition team (hustle it through without thoughtful consideration) shows that they learned nothing from the previous fiasco and thus making their actions now even more appalling, if that’s possible.
i agree. but, we are at critical mass. i just read that the stimulus plan will NOT be ready to go on day 1. this is a good sign, they are starting to pull back and, hopefully, think this through.
With respect to energy independence, of course do you want to be held hostage to those who would do us harm. But I likewise think energy should be affordable to all and soon.
I’m shocked that I haven’t heard of support for construction of new nuclear power plants. Such construction projects are not only a boon to their local economies, but they create excess energy that can be serve citizens in a number of states at a reasonable cost. And since the construction is place specific, construction workers can have their families with them, making them far superior to road programs.
i am from pennsylvania; i lived through tmi. don’t even go there-i lived approximately 12 miles from the plant. you would not believe me if i told you what really went on there. it is not the technology that i fault but our inability to handle it with respect.
and if you want to discuss cost benefit ratio … the costs far out way the benefits.
I likewise think that development of alternative energy should be supported financially, but my research indicates that such programs are not going to generate affordable energy in significant quantities anytime in the near future. I would start the work now, then, but I wouldn’t put the inordinate amount of money there that the Obama transition team is proposing.
this is an unknown, but we must start somewhere. steve jobs worked out of a garage.
In addition, I would cover a broad range of energy alternatives and would emphasize renewable-based fuels (which can vary depending on which part of the country you’re in) over solar and wind.
i agree.
I would also provide tax credit support to both employers and employees for health insurance and tax credit support for medical treatment as well, until a comprehensive plan can be developed to address the cost problems in that industry.
medicine is on its knees in this country. i see it everyday — first hand.
I would also seriously consider cutting way back on international aid since, quite frankly, we borrowing money to give away and we simply can no longer afford to do so. Again, I think it is important to recognize that the money we are giving away today doesn’t even belong to us – it belongs to our grandchildren.
i agree, with reservations. we should not stop it entirely but it should be doled out in a thoughtful and judicious manner.
I would also either quickly withdraw troops from Iraq and Afghanistan (as Obama originally promised, but has subsequently seemed to have re-though) or ask the governments of those countries, neighboring states and/or other countries in the world to share substantially in the current and future cost of our efforts.
whereas i opposed the war, i feel that your latter suggestion is more appropriate. we should never have gone in but now how do we get out in a responsible manner? neighboring states are the answer.
Again, the economic problem is multifaceted and complex and, as you note, I’m certainly no expert. But my non-expert status only makes the simplistic proposals of the Obama transition team (who, in their defense, are clearly not experts in all of these – or perhaps any of these – areas either) shocking in their naivete and lack of thoughtfulness.
most of obama’s campaign was run under the assumption that we were in difficult times but it was only in the september that it was realized how dire the situation actually was.
we are in quicksand and sinking fast, we are in uncharted waters, obama has to think on his feet. would you want to be in his position at this point in time?
all i am saying is — let’s work together. stop the straw man and ad hominem attacks ad brainstorm. this country is great when we all come together.

Posted by: marianne thompson | January 4, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Less, not more, government intervention and spending is the way to grow the economy. The United States of America was born as a nation of entrepeneurs, and the way to secure our future is to remain such a nation. Who is going to pay for the 600,000 new jobs? Did not the failed experiment of communism remind us that made work is not productive?

Posted by: Pooh | January 4, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

It is amazing how many people have swallowed the right-wing BS that somehow government is bad. Government is of, by and for the people, remember? Of course government can be too large. But it can also be too small as well. And, government can be good or bad, depending on what we demand of it (us). Right now we are in serious need of MORE pro-active quality government. We badly need programs that stimulate employment and re-regulate out of control sectors (banking, environment protection, occupational safety and health etc.)
So we in fact badly need government jobs as well as those in the private sector. I am thrilled to see these jobs being planned.

Posted by: Jim Puckett | January 4, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm

and no one has commented on the 2,400,000 jobs in the private sector because?!?!?

Posted by: marianne thompson | January 4, 2009, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm

600,000 new federal employees. Now, how do we pay their salaries, health insurance, thrift savings, and their pensions? I’ll tell you how: raise taxes on “the rich”, alter and reduce govt retirement benefits, and mandate that govt employees partake in Obama’s social medicine exprirament. And yes, everyone, I’m one of the regretfuls who voted this mistake into office. Sorry, folks, I truly am.

Posted by: David | January 4, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm

Prepare to be Bernie Madoffed. The money doesnt exist. The whole system is a giant pyramid scheme. We all know that we cant all go withdraw all of our cash out of the bank at once. Do you really think the government can just print money. Do you really think you can escape the lessons of history. The biggest pyramid scheme the world has ever known. I would not want to be in BO’s shoes right now. BO better have ice water running through his veins. I hope he doesnt have a nervous breakdown. Do you understand these jobs will consist of HARD labor. Do you think building roads and bridges is easy. These are going to be “shovel ready” jobs. Has BO ever worked a day of hard physical labor in his life? This country of lazy fat slobs waiting for a the government to take care of everything will never be up for the task ahead. It’s called slavery!

Posted by: Bernie Madoff | January 4, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

How many comments on here have been along the lines of Bush/McCain would never have spent/printed so much money – they already have!
Those in power will always use it to buy the people that will vote for them in the future – Republicans will finance the military and Democrats the bureaucracy.
Don’t be so naive to think the Republicans would be any better, over the last two terms they have proven otherwise with the huge expansion of the deficit and national debt.
All we know is that there is a huge debt to be paid off and both sides seem to be intent on trying to pay for it by turning on the printing presses, which is how we ended up in this mess in the first place.

Posted by: Tom | January 4, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

“We badly need programs that stimulate employment and re-regulate out of control sectors (banking, environment protection, occupational safety and health etc.) ”
Give us an example of a government program that stimulates employment.

Posted by: Sigmonde | January 4, 2009, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

That’s what we need. More REMF’s! Government employees have better retirement benefits than the UAW. If private industry had the same contracts with labor that government does, there would not be one business afloat. How would the average Joe like to retire at age 59 after 25 years work with health and RX drug coverage for themselves and their spouse for life at a cost of 4% of their final salary; and 63% of their final salary for an annual pension for life? How would you like to be able to sell back your unused sick and annual time and walk away with tens of thousands of dollars? Multiply that by another 600,000….and the rest of us better pick up the slack………..

Posted by: Patrick Henry | January 4, 2009, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm

sounds like barry is pandering for another 600000 votes for the next election. i guess this is what america has come to since 1964 and the dumbing down state!

Posted by: larry | January 4, 2009, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

None of it matters, anyway. America has already been destroyed by the Republicans. It will take decades or more to fix it.

Posted by: Johnny2 | January 4, 2009, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

Mr. Pucket,
I respect your ideals, but learn from Jefferson’s teachings, “A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.” Giving a government with too much power can seem like a great thing until that power works against you.
If you depend solely on the government, don’t be surprise when they dictate all your allowed to do.

Posted by: Jim | January 4, 2009, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

John Henry wrote:
“Give us an example of a government program that stimulates employment”
How about the military? Run by the government and stimulates employment not only from an enrollment standpoint, but from all the industries that support it (weapons, vehicles, fuel, food, contracting, etc). I’m not supporting the growth of government, however think before you speak (or post)

Posted by: fltmdc | January 4, 2009, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

“How about the military?’
The military is not a government program.

Posted by: Sigmonde | January 4, 2009, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

fltmdc,
I see your point; however, it is free market capitalism that is filling a need, not the government. Yes, the govt is the one employing the military members, but it is the free enterprise that is providing the jobs (and economic stimulus) which you cite

Posted by: Jim | January 4, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

Don’t wory, be happy. Bernie Madoff is replacing Guillermo Richardson as Secretary of Commerece.

Posted by: Bobby McFerrin | January 4, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm

Obama and the Democrats will totally destroy free enterprise in America. Be prepared for bigger government, less freedoms, higher taxes, class envy, class warfare, less free enterprise, less accountability, and more ‘victimization’. Obama and his so called ‘advisors’ need to take an economics 101 class to find out that less government intrusion is the best and fastest way out of a recession. LET THE FREE MARKET SYSTEM WORK!! Hold people and businesses accountable for their actions….NO BAILOUTS!! Bankrupcy = restructuring…it does not equal a total shut down of a business. Lord help us from Obama, Pelosi, and Reid!!

Posted by: Democrats Hosing Us | January 4, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

OK, let me get this straight. We don’t need 600,000 new government jobs. (In fact we could probably do with fewer than we have now.)
But we are going to have them anyway?

Posted by: Alana | January 4, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

“We badly need programs that stimulate employment…”
Well, what are these badly needed programs?

Posted by: Sigmonde | January 4, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

So let me see. We borrowed too much, spent too much. Now we are going to borrow more and spend more and thats going to fix it! Great work Barry!

Posted by: What me worry? | January 4, 2009, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

So how many of those 2.4 million workers that I assume will be building schools and bridges will actually have the skill set to do it properly? Some homes that Habitat for Humanity built in Jacksonville, FL are already falling apart and they are only 7 years old. Great that they build new homes for the poor but shame on them for not doing it correctly.

Posted by: CDR M | January 4, 2009, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm

I’ve got a better idea, rather than employing 600.000 new gov’t employees, that will buy new cars, houses, etc, give this money to Madoff, Trump, Haliburton’s Cheney…then they’ll trickle some of it down & give the balance to Israel. Then we can watch them pound Gaza. Oh right. We already did that. Well, elect Jeb Bush & try it again, it’s bound to stimulate the economy, sooner or later. What’s more community health care workers or teachers going to do for the bloated American economy. Really.

Posted by: Moesha@Work | January 4, 2009, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm

If everyone else in Government was paid at the same hourly rate the Military is paid, we would have both a blanaced budget and a hell of a lot fewer crooks in DC!

Posted by: Chesty Puler | January 4, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm

They have NO business accume, no sense of reality. When Congress can not run their in house restaurants without coming to the point of bankrupt – their ability at running anything else is utterly ridiculous. Congress deals in deficits – in fact they seem to thrive on it. Obama, who has NEVER had any real business experience, coming out of a corrupt Chicago now thinks he can save the country and produce all sorts of things like Houdini – out of thin air! For this country’s sake I sure hope he is productive but the jury is going to be out for a while on this one. He has appointed Richardson who is under investigation for money dealings and now has withdrawn himself and Hillary who has had in the neighborhood of $400,000 in contributions from a developer who has gotten favorable legislation through her. Really great folks there Obama!!! With those credentials I know I would have trouble getting a job much less security clearance!!!

Posted by: sarajo | January 4, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm

LOL @ Chesty Puler
How true, but as a retired Army NCO, I can also say there would be more on welfare and food stamps

Posted by: Jim | January 4, 2009, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

Government deserves credit for creating programs that stimulate employment. I have no idea what those government programs are but somebody here says we need these programs badly.
If anyone knows where to find these government programs that stimulate employment, please inform the forum. These programs are badly needed. Thanks for your attention. Please continue.

Posted by: Sigmonde | January 4, 2009, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm

(Watches as the lemmings from the Drudge Report race wildly off the “Cliff of Conclusions.)
Oh, the Humanity!

Posted by: Johnny2 | January 4, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm

Johnny2,
‘K – now how ’bout some substance. As a member of the “Drudge” group (I guess) I have put forth a couple arguments, care to counter? Or are you just averse to people actually looking upon what your buddies are trying to do?

Posted by: Jim | January 4, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

How did we ever manage without these 600,000 jobs before? No wonder the government is broken, it’s understaffed! You can be sure these will be shuffle foot postions filled by people only capable of shuffle footing it but, nevertheless getting good UNION wages for their shuffling! That’s the damn change “WE NEED”. Not only is Hussein mystical he’s creative too!

Posted by: Jerry in Tampa | January 4, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm

Oh, and as an editorial note, your first line should have been in “square brackets”

Posted by: Jim | January 4, 2009, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

600000 new unions members- that is going to be costly forever. Another govt entitlement we will have to pay for.

Posted by: jschmidt | January 4, 2009, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

jschmidt,
Don’t worry too much, the fed union (AFSME) isn’t as powerful as the UAW

Posted by: Jim | January 4, 2009, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm

[Sips a beer.]

Posted by: Johnny2 | January 4, 2009, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm

Thank you for scoping out Obama’s job plan. Wonderful article on your part.

Posted by: Drew | January 4, 2009, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

Ok so basically we are going to replace the 600,000 contractors with 600000 government employees. There is not a net gain. However, a lot of waste is not what we government employees want to see or even try to control spending, but rather what your local government and politicians want to see. Hey, Army corps why aren’t you approving our project? Then whine to their congressman who tells us that regardless of economic or environmental sense to approve it. That is how we got the New Orleans fiasco.
What worries me more is that instead of finding good projects or trimming the pork so we can do more projects we will be told to pork laden the projects we have. Yeah, I know you can cut 2 million dollars off the project, but we have to spend the economic stimulus so build this worthless addition that looks pretty with federal funds.

Posted by: Ronald | January 4, 2009, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

Moaning about where all this money is going to come from to,of course its going to come from all our pockets. Where do you think all the money came from to promote our illegal excuse for wars on the innocent Iraqi people and supporting the Israeli SS invasion into Palestine’s Gaza strip. it reminds me of the German slaughter in Warsaw, maybe the Palestinian Gazan’s should paint Warsaw ghetto on there walls and roofs, and perhaps the Jews may take a glancing look before they slaughter more innocent victims. The death ratio is 100 to 1. Guess what you paid for thia and eagerly support this genocide, that’s why President Bush gave the wealthy a well deserved tax break for the mess they left this country in while all the poor scabyheads paid for the war. Here is the sad truth 600,000 more jobs will be created and nobody will be killed as a result of this intellegent move by President elect Obama, and we will all pay for this. When God hears this he may consider returning to America, we live in hope.
PS, I am not posting Cuba.
Regards
Wacker.

Posted by: wacker | January 4, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm

living in an hallucinatory state can’t be any weirder than the emerging Obama Reality.
And those 600,000 new Federal jobs? Yeah, right…most will be doozies, that’s for sure…probably GS-3 or Wage Grade-2: barely above poverty level wages…that will be some special economic stimulus.

Posted by: Cole Younger | January 4, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm

Wacker,
thanks for your imput, now please an hero

Posted by: Jim | January 4, 2009, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

Meanwhile…across the street at the KGB…

Posted by: Bama's Comrade | January 4, 2009, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

In the market place of ideas, Truth is for sale to the highest bidder. Poor Socrates! And, poor you and me!

Posted by: johnny2 | January 4, 2009, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm

Look 600,000 Federal Union Jobs that all vote Democrat. Thats all this country needs, more beaurocrats. Nice.

Posted by: kmpk | January 4, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm

Let’s see… $1 trillion stimulus divided by 3 million “new” jobs
equals $333,333 per “new” job created. What a bargain!

Posted by: Asylum Aleikum | January 4, 2009, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm

Well the new jobs are only for government, not for any private jobs. I knew this – I can read between the lines. He is creating a new class of people who are only employed by the government. This is very very scary.

Posted by: Dawn | January 4, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

My friends, this is reparations by another name (gov’t jobs). The latest attempt at reparations was the forced-loan scheme through Freddie Mac & Fannie Mae. This failed. Obama, Clinton and the Dems backed that scheme totally. We are paying for it. Now we will pay for the next scheme. The grievance crowd is in power and there is no end to their grievances. No matter what happens, they have political cover; they will blame all failures on Bush. The 50% of Americans who actually pay taxes will pay for all of this, not Obama. He is the great re-distributor or OUR money. The nitwits who voted for Obama will someday realize he is not the Messiah they have made him out to be, but it will be too late.

Posted by: gman | January 4, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm

Government jobs are not cheep. I remember when Clinton was going to hire 100,000 cops. We got $1.2 million. That hired one cop and one jail matron for one year.They were let go after the Fed money dried up. Any final totals on those 100,000? Bet it is close to zero.

Posted by: Jalama | January 4, 2009, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

The days of using Bush and Israel as scapegoats are over!

Posted by: JJ | January 4, 2009, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm

Lets just take control of everything and make all jobs government

Posted by: greg | January 4, 2009, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Wants to puke already! the only thing that embarasses me more than Al Franken possibly winning in Mn is that this bafoon is out next President. Highest repesct for the office…zero respect for the man.

Posted by: Bill | January 4, 2009, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm

Wake up people — the government is the problem, not the solution. Reagan was so wise when he said “The 9 most frightening words in the English language are “I’m from the government and I’m here to help.” And I am not even a Republican.
For God’s sake, stop getting in over your head people! Save up 20% DP, make sure you have gainful employment, and THEN buy a home on a fixed rate loan, like anyone who has any sense of respect and responsibility did. Otherwise, we surely wouldn’t be in this mess. If you don’t learn from the past you are bound to repeat it. LEARN!

Posted by: Patricia | January 4, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

marianne states: “all i am saying is — let’s work together. stop the straw man and ad hominem attacks ad brainstorm. this country is great when we all come together.”
___________________
I haven’t criticized Obama, marianne, only the proposals his transition team has floated and only because they are inefficient, largely ineffectual, and any benefit they might result in (advances in alternative energy investments, for example) will take way too long.
Nonetheless, you feel compelled to defend him personally. You mention credit availability and then you state, “What could obama have done about that?”
Your inability to separate loyalty to the man and the utter nonsense that are the proposals being posited by his transition team is what causes you to misperceive any criticisms OF THOSE PROPOSALS as “straw man and ad hominem attacks.”
As I said before, if Obama and his transition would make sensible proposals, the country would “come together” behind them.
Unfortunately, to date all of the proposals offered to date are, as I said before, simplistic, naive, ineffectual and … stupid.
The $500/$1000 tax credit for Social Security and Medicare taxes is a perfect example.
Only wage earners who have to pay $500/$1000 in INCOME taxes will benefit from the reduction (and thus have their Social Security and Medicare taxes reduced).
So, while households earning up to $200,000 will get such a benefit, wage earners who do not have an INCOME tax liability (either because they don’t make enough money or because they have a lot of children or a lot of medical bills, etc.) but are still having Social Security and Medicare taxes withheld from their pay will see no reduction – and no benefit – at all.
And if that’s not bad enough, under this little gem of a proposal the money won’t even begin to flow into the economy until January, 2010 at the earliest (when the very first tax returns for 2009 can be filed).
Stupid, stupid, stupid.
Really, cutting the amount being WITHHELD should be a no-brainer, shouldn’t it?
It’s ridiculous for you to expect people to “come together” behind such stupidity.

Posted by: GPM | January 4, 2009, 11:12 pm 11:12 pm

Does anyone else get the feeling that the lemming are marching into the sea now?

Posted by: greg | January 4, 2009, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm

Vote for me, [pause and suspended smile] . . . Al Franken!
Minnesota born and brewed with Yankee pride.

Posted by: YouCanCallMeAl | January 4, 2009, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Can’t wait for the fairness doctrine to be pushed through so the repubs can’t report on the new con

Posted by: greg | January 4, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm

Re: Does anyone else get the feeling that the lemming are marching into the sea now?
Oh when the lemmings . . . Oh when the lemings . . . When the lemmings go marching home.

Posted by: JohnnyDos | January 4, 2009, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm

the man is a ‘community organizer’ – what did you expect? a plan that would work?
Jeeeeze, never thought I would say this – I MISS BUSH ALREADY (I just threw up a little as I typed that)

Posted by: Slavko | January 4, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

Barack new job creation should consist of a large number of lawyers to defend his pals

Posted by: greg | January 4, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

The incompetent or socialist Obama voters have ushered in a new era – Amerika will build less, produce less but “transfer” more with their army of Ivy League lawyers turned politician (socialist).
This should not be surprising, Obama’s bozo team has no concept of economics or industry – just look at their leader – he has never managed a business, city, state or military unit.
Cuba, France, USSR – here we come!

Posted by: Joe | January 4, 2009, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm

You all should have listened to Ron Paul.
The ONLY candidate that made any sense.
We will all have to live with this “change”.
It is going to be an interesting 4 years.
That is if we make it that far.

Posted by: DBF | January 4, 2009, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm

Lock the door george. maybe barack will get tired of knocking and go back to illinois

Posted by: greg | January 4, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Obama was a Below Average US Senator with a No Show Job. Why would anyone expect more from him now?

Posted by: Dennis D | January 4, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

Typical non-news story. He never said he’d create 600,000 new government jobs. Mr. Tapper only assumes that’s what Obama meant “by doing the math”. Secondly, why should government employees have to reduce their pensions? Is that because YOU aren’t one? The pensions are already crappy. However, if you want to be a government employee, feel free to apply. They’re hiring when no one else is….

Posted by: Larry | January 5, 2009, 12:02 am 12:02 am

Creating government jobs is not the same as providing jobs. We’ll soon be totally dependent on the government.
These jobs will be paid for by taxpayers and the money will funnel out of the private sector into the government.
The math looks like this
+ Government
- Private sector
——————
= Socialism

Posted by: Mike | January 5, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Hey larry gov pensions are 85% of wages thats not crap

Posted by: greg | January 5, 2009, 12:06 am 12:06 am

Mikes using fuzzy math

Posted by: greg | January 5, 2009, 12:08 am 12:08 am

Crappy senator makes for a good president…Not

Posted by: greg | January 5, 2009, 12:10 am 12:10 am

Hey, people, let’s not quickly pull down a salvageable ship to rock bottom by jumping to wild conclusions and emotional political diatribes at someone we have yet to swear in as President. The American people did not elect him to kill the American economy and I don’t think Obama would wanted that as his legacy.

Posted by: Bobby's Brain | January 5, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

Hey people Bobbys right

Posted by: greg | January 5, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

Bobby what shall we think now?

Posted by: greg | January 5, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am

Bobby wrote: “Hey, people, let’s not quickly pull down a salvageable ship to rock bottom by jumping to wild conclusions and emotional political diatribes at someone we have yet to swear in as President. The American people did not elect him to kill the American economy and I don’t think Obama would wanted that as his legacy.”
____________________________
People questioning the proposals of Obama’s transition team are not capable of “pulling down a salvageable ship.” But the proposals to date can.
I agree with you that “The American people did not elect him to kill the American economy.”
And I also agree that “I don’t think Obama would wanted that as his legacy.”
But if that’s the case, he better come up with some more logical proposals. The ideas his transition team have come up with to date are ridiculous.

Posted by: GPM | January 5, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am

‘I don’t think Obama would wanted that as his legacy. ‘
Carter didn’t either.

Posted by: Sigmonde | January 5, 2009, 12:25 am 12:25 am

I wish I had nickel starting tomorrow every time I hear O say “…as I have repeatedly said” and “my plan”

Posted by: zekethewonderdog | January 5, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Come on People – what did you expect from Barrry Obama Super Socialist (BOSS).
His entire career has been rewarded by “transferring wealth” – Alinski disciple, “community organizer”, lawyer for Rezko, Educational “board” with Ayers, State Senator, US Senator with nearly $1B in earmarks.
The Presidency is simply his next step in “wealth transfer” – this will lead him to global ventures including the UN, Global Poverty Tax…
Capitalism is dead for four years.

Posted by: Scott | January 5, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am

Now I only have am MBA so I am not quite an expert but last time I checked government jobs are paid for by private sector taxes. He should create 3 million jobs by stimulating the economy to create 3.6 million and cutting 600,000 government jobs. Raise revenue and cut expense….novel concept.

Posted by: SoWhat | January 5, 2009, 12:34 am 12:34 am

Obama courted government “union” workers and they responded by voting for him. Now, its payback time – Obama will give them more jobs, money, benefits, teleworking… while private sector workers get stuck with the bill.

Posted by: Joe | January 5, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am

Alot of you people on here scare the hell out of me. It truly frightens me that some of you guys have become so paranoid about the government that you can’t wait to jump on the local blog and tell everyone your wacko opinions on any Obama headline that comes out. I thank you guys that are the true whistle blowers out there who help to put the spotlight on those corrupt politicians, but some of you have just gone completely overboard/insane. I’m a young, college educated woman ( who has no children, has been steadily employed since 18, has no criminal record, has never had to rely on government assistance (food stamps/medicaid, etc in my adult life and is African American) with a local government job and, I can tell you, we NEED more government jobs. And I’m not talking ALL FEDERAL- I mean state and MOSTLY local government jobs. The public demands it- even you. Although you may not think about it this way, some of these jobs are going to places they are severely needed- for instance: basic city services. My job enables me to speak to and help citizens from all of the city in which I reside and they all want these basic things: to be heard, respected, to have open dialogue and contact with their government, and they want to see progress. They do NOT want to hear an Interactive Voice Response System on the other end of the line every time they call for a city service! They want to be treated like an individual, not just another number/case in the system. They want to be considered and included in decisions that are made around the city and they want to know that the city is available when they need to have something done, whether its to report a code enforcement violation, to have a dead dog picked up from the side of the road, or to even know when a community event would take place. I work with several city departments as well and I can also tell you that, we need help. Some citizens feel entitled to prompt, friendly service while other people are grateful and were previously unaware of the services our department offered and sometimes the pressure and frustrations really gets to me, but I’m eager to assist them, I love what I do everyday and I feel proud that I have a job where I provide such a service. With my modest paycheck, I’m able to take care of my dogs and to pay for my crafting hobby as well. I feel stable at my job and I one day I hope to be able to afford to finish college, advance my career, own a home and to get married and have a kid or two. This is supposed to be the American dream right? I wish I could say so much more because there’s more to be said but I’m tired of speaking on deaf ears. Well, if this is something the next president wants to contribute to then I’m all for it. BTW, most of you negative/paranoid people in here are NOT even thinking of the other jobs in the private sector that Obamas is wanting to create/fund/ bring back nor are you thinking of the fact that he’s wanting to steer us in the right direction because this country’s heads been in the sand for too long. Good Luck Obama, some of us are rootin for ya!

Posted by: Kit Kat | January 5, 2009, 12:50 am 12:50 am

Kit Kat,
You are a breath of fresh air given all the Neocons on this board.
Of course we need more Govt Jobs – this is what has made America great.

Posted by: SuzyTheLiberal | January 5, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am

Suzy the liberal has it right. There were 27% of all jobs in the govt when I was born after WWII. Currently, local, state and federal employees comprise OVER 43% of workers.
No wonder we need two income families. A family of four is really 7 1/2 people. The health care, pensions, offices, daycare, $4,700 raises are not producing any wealth.
This is not a partisan issue. This is every worker in the private sector’s issue and soon we will be out numbered, as the ‘Rich’ now are, and the country will collapse under the burden of do-gooders ‘working’ for us. I do not denigrate the effort of anyone – it is simply wrong!

Posted by: duelles | January 5, 2009, 12:58 am 12:58 am

THINK OF IT THIS WAY:
The private sector creates jobs and pays taxes …
The government sector eats up those taxes.
C’mon people … the private sector generates PROFIT. The government sector is OVERHEAD. (An expense item, if you will) … why is that so hard to understand?

Posted by: RodMiller | January 5, 2009, 12:59 am 12:59 am

Obama is in way over his head. He is economically illiterate and positioned to do major,structural damage to the economy. If you think job losses are bad now wait until he rolls out his global warming hoax program to cut carbon emissions. Obama is headed for a collision course with reality. This is change his naive supporters weren’t counting on.

Posted by: Robert | January 5, 2009, 1:06 am 1:06 am

It’s already too late. Any country that spends 64.4% of every dollar on welfare programs is a socialist country.
Good by Capitalism. Hello Socialism. See you soon Communism.

Posted by: Dave | January 5, 2009, 1:08 am 1:08 am

Kit Kat, the American Dream is ownership. I do not say what you do is not worthy, What I say is that wealth is created by enhancing goods and services that others are willing to buy. The profit one makes off that transaction is a basic way in which money is created. You live off of my created wealth. As do your dogs and I support your hobbies.
When governments are short of [my] money the send home all ” non essential workers” .
Take offense if you wish, but I create wealth and ONLY because of that do you have a job. AND there are too many of you. IT is out of balance. EOM

Posted by: duelles | January 5, 2009, 1:11 am 1:11 am

If you think job losses are bad now wait until he rolls out his global warming hoax program to cut carbon emissions.
—————————-
There you guys go again.
I have an Engineer friend who says that global warming is a hoax – he has many points including:
- solar activity correlates with temperature (sunspot chart)
- CO2 lags temperature changes (ice core data)
- Earth was warmer in the Roman and Medieval period
- CO2 affect is logarithmic – doubling the current rate will have a minor impact
- Man-made C02 is only .25% of all Greenhouse gases (5% is CO02 – 5% generated by man)

Although Gore’s movie does not answer the mail on these “facts”, we all know the alarmists have an agenda – besides, the science is already settled.
-

Posted by: Kevin J | January 5, 2009, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Democrats love big government, and denigrate big business to justify raising taxes to pay for big government.
Only a fool is afraid of big business, as they can’t hurt you.
Big government has the force of law behind it and is the only threat to freedom and personal liberty. Big government is the only reason do defend the 2nd amendment.

Posted by: Dave | January 5, 2009, 1:14 am 1:14 am

Defeat the Marxist/socialist I agree with. Government creates jobs they meannothing and are often a waste of time and the dwindling Secure Lock box Clinton Gore talked about having. Keep ing money safe for the American people. Well, boys you lied. Most of us will eat dog food before the year ends if we can afford it. You remember that when you look out of the windows and closed doors of government.
Thanx “Mr Bill? that little tweeking of Banking Law in your first term has created a World of misery. The NY Times neednt wring their hands over poor Cambodian brothel worker and satart worrying about what’s gonna happenhere. Your hipocracy is asstounding and your guilt should send you to public penance, but that won’t happen. You don’t see the harm you have done.

Posted by: john smith | January 5, 2009, 1:21 am 1:21 am

UHMMMMMMM… And how many Jobs has GW created in the past 8 years???
…..Last I heard we lost 3.5 million good paying manufacturing jobs that went overseas. Add-in the tech and service-sector jobs that have been outsourced and the picture gets pretty ugly. (No wonder theres so many foreclosures)
….And John McCain has informed us that those jobs are gone and never coming back. Gee Thanks John!
QUOTE: Everyone needs to start thinking and stop feeling – no part of government can ‘create’ anything without first ‘taking’ from someone else i.e. tax dollars – the only way to improve our economy is to REDUCE the size of government and go back to the FREE MARKET principles that built this country, the greatest ever on earth……
Well the FREE MARKET didnt work this time, they forgot about the GREED factor
The main REASON were in this mess is due to THE LACK OF GOVERNMENT OVERSIGHT IN THE FREE MARKET BANKING SECTOR! Thanks to Congress and GW!
QUOTE: Please don’t create more civil servants. They can not be fired. Government needs to shrink. Make them all contractors. Pay them a little more now to save a lot in the future…..
Oh, you mean like Halliburton and Blackwater, how much have they cost us in the past 6 years? Have you seen the bill????Those Blackwater guys get like 2500/week compared to our military people who get 18,000/year.
QUOTE: I just cannot believe we elected someone that has no clue what they are doing. I just don’t get it!!!…….
Yeah I know how you feel, I voted for GW too!
Look I’m no big fan of BHO either, but after 8 years of GWB, the country is bankrupt, both morally and finacially, our military is thinly spread all over the world, these wars are costing us a fortune, and most of the world hates us. Hopefully BHO wont follow that path, the middleclass is disappearing, you cant make mortage payments if your working at WALMART making minimum wage. Look at the bright side… at least the 600k govt workers will be able to make their monthly mortage payments……

Posted by: Jackson | January 5, 2009, 1:21 am 1:21 am

The math isn’t adding up. Obama and the Democrats want to use up to $1 TRILLION more “stimulate” the economy…and yet now they’re talking a $310 billion tax cut package…all the while (at least for 16 months until our full, immediate, and unconditional surrender in Iraq – assuming that’s not another “change” and Obama stick to his campaign promise) funding 2 wars…and add 600,000 new government employees (all whose pay comes from the yearly budget)…and still somehow manage to CUT the deficit during his first (and hopefully only!) term in office!? You can’t even balance a budget when you’re proposing more spending on less income! This is like 1st grade math! There is no logic and it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. Congratulations Democrats / liberals…you pulled one over on the fat, lazy, ignorant Americans. I’m sure you’ll somehow find a way to blame all the problems you’re about to cause on the Republicans…

Posted by: timr1271 | January 5, 2009, 1:26 am 1:26 am

Team Barry’s Goal: “USSA” – United Socialist States of Amerika
Step 1: With media cheerleading, convince the drones that we are in a “Great Depression”
Step 2: Tax and redistribute to the “right” programs that (a) generate no wealth and (b) ensure Democratic victories
Step 3: See Step 1

Posted by: Joe | January 5, 2009, 1:27 am 1:27 am

The problem with even the current flock of government bureaucrats (let alone adding more) is that these UNELECTED paperpushers have control over the day to day lives of American citizens. And if we don’t agree with what they do or how they do it – we can’t vote them out of office, we’re stuck with them! And if you think this is trivial, wait until one of these pencil pushing geeks is the one deciding whether or not you or your loved one is going to get a life-saving treatment or drug as part of the proposed “new and improved” National Healthcare program.
Hey, you elected him…
Good luck with all of that.

Posted by: Jeff Roe | January 5, 2009, 1:33 am 1:33 am

UHMMMMMMM… And how many Jobs has GW created in the past 8 years???
——————————
Hmmm – 3 flaws:
a) Presidents don’t “create jobs” – they help set government and economic policy that typically does not kick-in until after they leave.
b) Since 75% of Govt spending is “mandatory” (social programs created by liberals – FDR, LBJ), there is not a lot of presidential influence
c) The business cycle affects jobs much more than any other factor
d) Our current financial mess was generated through risky loans forced onto Fannie and Freddie by the Libs – these were bundled into Wall Street “deriviatives”. Both Fannie and Wall Street sent more cash to Obama than any other candidate.
Connect the dots.

Posted by: Joe | January 5, 2009, 1:34 am 1:34 am

The problem is not how money is moved around inside the US. The problem is all the money draining out of the US day after day, month after month, year after year going back to Nixon. The US trade deficit is about $60B a month. Of that, over $40B is oil.
Economically, only 1 thing matters for the US. Get off the oil.
Security wise it’s the same thing. Terrorists get their money from oil states. Stop buying their oil and they will starve.

Posted by: Ugly American | January 5, 2009, 1:39 am 1:39 am

Joe:
amazing isn’t it, how all of America’s problems are always caused by Dem’s & Lib’s..
we’re lucky that GW Bush was president… right?
if you believe what you post you are foolish

Posted by: US of A | January 5, 2009, 1:47 am 1:47 am

It all starts local! The government especially. Why do you think so many politicians have gone corrupt? It’s the fact that no one, especially the public, isn’t really paying attention to/caring about because they have their own issues to deal with. We trust them with their title and some of them believe them when they promise something. But you have to keep an eye on them- you have to communicate with them and make sure they remember who they are they for and whose interests they are supposed to represent. There’s barely any accountability in a lot of govt jobs and believe me, there’s a major reconstruction that has to take place in order to make it right. I think/hope that Obama, as a smart man unlike a certain soon to be ex president that I would rather not mention right now, will know that and will start there and work his way up. Fix the parts that are broken and add to the parts that need it. It’s gonna take a lot of man power for that kinda work and I hope he funds it to the fullest. I know it’s hard to get fired when you work for the govt, but that’s not why I work for the govt, I work to improve it for the people it’s supposed to work for. I had the option to join a union, but chose not too because I don’t believe it’s needed- I’m satisfied with the way I’m treated at work. I do my part, everyday and when I get that paycheck, I put it right back into the local economy and don’t try to live beyond my means. The government needs to change it’s policy on firing it’s employees who violate and make questionable ethical calls because I know that’s a problem too, but there’s so many issues involved, that have been built on and made more complex over time that, the governments gonna need a whole lot of help getting it back in order. I believe Obama can at least START this process and our future citizens, activists, and politicians can build on it. It wouldn’t disappoint me that he won’t be able to make all of his campaign promises come true, but I have the feeling that at least he’s gonna try. And since we all know how slow the govt moves when actually doing something, it’s gonna take time to do. Be patient but voice your concerns and be heard as well if you think something your govt. representative is questionable.

Posted by: Kit Kat | January 5, 2009, 2:04 am 2:04 am

Oh, yes! 600,000 new jobs. I believe, I’ve heard something about Obama discussing the prospects of starting the C.N.A. Known as the Civilian National Army. Once this is done, I’m sure we’ll see gestapo type tactics to disarming the people. Watch out 2nd Amendment… This is the next step to taking down whats left of our freedom in this great country. Once this is done, good bye socialism. Hello Communism.

Posted by: Geebers | January 5, 2009, 2:12 am 2:12 am

I have the plan that will put all Americans back to work.
Obama can start a new incarnation of the CCC. There could be one in every area.
They would split into four teams that would work 3 days a week each. Two teams to dig holes (with shovels of course, that way it won’t contribute to Glowball Warming) and another two teams to fill them in.
Every city or country should be able to locate suitable areas to do this. Some farmers might even allow their land to be used, in return for a tax deduction or something.
Think of the thousands of people that could be put to work, many for the first time!
The salaries would have to be such that a family could survive on it. But it would still probably work out to be less than what they’re talking about.
It may not accomplish anything, but on the other hand, it doesn’t hurt anything either. Which is more than you can say for most government programs.

Posted by: John D | January 5, 2009, 2:20 am 2:20 am

There is no magic!! The numbers don’t add up, this proposed plan will fail. This is too bad as well, because America used to be a nice place to live. History will not be kind to those who have led this great nation down the path of destruction. Make a list and don’t forget those who have sold you into slavery. If you don’t think debit is slavery then you are greater fool than anyone thought. Too many people have live from the public trough for too long now, and now everyone will have to pay. Forget the lifestyle you want, try not to lose everything in the downward spiral. I am getting prepared, are you? If not don’t then don’t expect me or the government to take care of you because there is nothing left to give. Don’t think I am a pessimist, I am not, I am a realist, anyone with their eyes open can see, if they care to look, at where we are going. We all are at fault a little bit because we believed the “advertizing”, we wanted it to be true, after all look at how well our neighbors were doing it must be OK. As it turns out it was all smoke and mirrors. What do you need to do? Cut your overheads, cut your expenses, dump the debit and become mobile, get off the grid. This is not a one year situation, better plan on at least six plus years, maybe more depending upon how much more the government screws it up.

Posted by: Ken | January 5, 2009, 2:59 am 2:59 am

20% of 3 million is 60,000, not 600,000.
God, what kind of idiot wrote this article?

Posted by: jackfuller79 | January 5, 2009, 4:37 am 4:37 am

seriously?

Posted by: is the guy below me serous? | January 5, 2009, 4:48 am 4:48 am

For the person who thinks 20% of 3 million is only 60,000. Dude, you need to go back and study 6 grade math. Let me help you out. 20% of 10 is 2. 20% of 100 is 20. 20% of 100,000 is 20,000. HMMMMM, that means that 60,000 is 20% of 300,000. You see my friend 20% is 1/5. Enjoy

Posted by: RTP | January 5, 2009, 5:10 am 5:10 am

“20% of 3 million is 60,000, not 600,000. God, what kind of idiot wrote this article?” Well, 20% of 3 million IS 600,000. Put this commentator on the fast track to a federal job, they would be perfect. Can’t do math worth ****, don’t know it, and insulting to boot. Maybe at NASA, you know, the ones that didn’t think Columbia would be damaged by a foam strike? Didn’t register with the bureaucratic geniuses that 1/2 mv^2 gets really really big really really fast with that squared term. Then blame it all on “computer error”!

Posted by: oracle2world | January 5, 2009, 5:20 am 5:20 am

If you want the economy to improve then:
1) get US back on the gold standard – this puts brakes on inflation
2) get rid of the Federal Reserve System – since 1913, they’ve been the problem, not the solution to our economy
3) stop governing outside the limits of the Constitution – it creates government waste, fraud, abuse, and corruption -besides it’s illegal
4) stop worrying about “infrastructure” – it’s irrelevant on the Federal level – if New
Orleans, for example, needs levees around the city, let them build it. Why should taxpayers in Dallas be forced to pay for that.
5) stop foreign aid – the US pumps billions of dollars every year into other countries to perpetuate their corruption, poverty, arms purchases, etc.
6) get us out of the UN -see comment #5…if US wants to have relations with a country then have a treaty
7) get government out of the energy arena – collectively, these incompetent fools have no educational or practical experience in oil, gas, nuclear, or coal industries. They can’t manage the economy, or even a war, so why should they be allowed to screw up the one necessary area we all depend on…energy fuels our civilization
8) stop loans and bailouts to businesses – see comment #7 – if these companies are having problems then maybe that’s what is supposed to happen – it’s business right?
9) purge the military of senior officers who can’t follow their oath – swearing to uphold the Constitution means no involving their soldiers, sailors, airmen, or marines in needless foreign “adventures” and get them killed over whichever political parties’ “war de jour” is popular…Balkans = Democrats…Iraq = Republicans…they’re both bad and too many of our military just say “yes sir” without thinking.
10) simplify the tax code – it’s unweildy and hopeless – the reading level in the US is on the 7th grade level, so a 7th grader should be able to figure out the tax system. Following 1-9 will do a lot to cut government spending, reduce waste,
and increase productivity…if I’m working Jan-Jun to pay taxes then that’s a lot of MY money I’m can’t use to purchase a car, computer, food, a TV, ot whatever… …business, buying, trading, selling is what makes an economy
11) It’s time to start a discussion on doing votes of recall on these people. By the time the next election comes up, it’ll be too late. If they screw up in the Congressional Cafeteria that’s one thing, shoving our country down the memory hole is criminal.
What a convoluted mess…thanks to Clinton, Bush, Pelosi, Reid, Feinstein, Kennedy, Schumer, Obama, Gore, this idiot Franken (and he’s not even in yet), Boxer, Waters, Jefferson, etc.,etc.

Posted by: MiBu | January 5, 2009, 5:26 am 5:26 am

1. Bold plan, no money.
2. Inflation/hyper-inflation will result
3. Printing press will run 24×7
4. Your children will pay
Good day.

Posted by: Debt Kills | January 5, 2009, 5:33 am 5:33 am

We do not need any more government employees. They don’t have to pay Social Security. This is not HOPE! This is ambushing our hope and piling on. Obama has cobwebs on the brain and finally the media and socialists are seeing it. His “new” hope leadership has produced a combination of the Clinton and Carter teams being brought back as Washington insiders. I guess you might call this hope is you are an extreme Washington insider yourself. The President elect will not create jobs we need and we certainly do not need 1 more government employee. We need less government and we need it now!

Posted by: thinkerray | January 5, 2009, 5:36 am 5:36 am

Now, everyone who is already sorry that they voted for Obama, raise your hand.

Posted by: Freesia | January 5, 2009, 5:39 am 5:39 am

Woohoo. More than half a million new taxpayer funded jobs! I’d bet most will be related to social services.
What kind of country we are leaving are kids may not be the issue. How about, are we leaving them a country at all?

Posted by: Derek | January 5, 2009, 5:50 am 5:50 am

I think that Obama is a great person to come in and clean up all the mess that was left by the Bush Administration. Hello everyone, Pray for Obama that he makes wise decisions while being the President. I am glad he has a chance to run this country, about time the a real African American gets a chance to run this country out of all those white presidents. Let us have our chance to prove that blacks are intelligent and can run the United States of America. Stop complaining and be a person of change. Stop hating and start congratulating.

Posted by: Denise | January 5, 2009, 6:21 am 6:21 am

“Creating a false strawman as a way of ignoring legitimate debate is not useful in finding a solution. Remember that many of Obama’s strongest supporters – from Warren Buffet to Larry Page – know a thing or two about earning billions in the private sector AND still support a “left” government.”
Richard, do you really thing either of these two pay taxes? They know how to work around the system and have the lawers and accounts to make sure they get money back from the fed.

Posted by: Karl | January 5, 2009, 6:28 am 6:28 am

Obviously, we will need 600,000 new gvernment employees to control the movements across state and local boundaries and to monitor the thoughts of Americans.
This is going to be worse than I thought.

Posted by: Rockmelon | January 5, 2009, 6:30 am 6:30 am

600,000 more government employees means a bigger constituency for Democrats. That´s how we turned Virginia blue!
Market failure? We need more government.
Government failure? We need more government.
No jobs? We will buy them for you. With your money.
The result of all this? Face it, we will never see unemployment as low as 2003-2007 again. Ever.

Posted by: el gordo | January 5, 2009, 6:38 am 6:38 am

Isn´t it interesting that everyone talks about sustainability regarding the environment, but never regarding the economy?
In eco-language, bigger and bigger government is not a sustainable development. Never was. They fail at more than enough tasks as it is. They don´t need more.

Posted by: el gordo | January 5, 2009, 6:44 am 6:44 am

Debt Kills – You are Not a Team Player! (And of course you are 100% Correct. Thank you for stating it so eloquently.

Posted by: Caif | January 5, 2009, 6:46 am 6:46 am

Someone is this long list of weird comments says that government employees don’t have to the pay social security tax…WRONG…I’m one of the government employees, working for the Department of the Army, you all seem to hate so much…and the social security tax is taken out every stinking pay day…so there!

Posted by: Tim | January 5, 2009, 6:48 am 6:48 am

Great, 600,000 more ineffectual government workers giving us all grief whenever we are FORCED to use a government service. Hundred of thousands of more “workers” that cannot be fired no matter how poorly they perform the jobs.
This is a change from ‘political as usual?’

Posted by: cj | January 5, 2009, 6:56 am 6:56 am

Taxpayer funded jobs are bad, but giving corporations tax breaks to move jobs overseas is good. At least the tax money will be kept and spent in the U.S., not China. They privatized low income services in Indiana(Mitch Daniels, GOP knucklehead), and kids were going without food because the company was too busy beancounting. DO NOT PUNISH CHILDREN. As long as the money stays in the U.S., it is a good thing.

Posted by: blackkid | January 5, 2009, 7:04 am 7:04 am

I don’t this talk about creating jobs. I do just fine on my welfare and don’t expcets me to do anymore. I just had my 5th baby and gots my checks where it needs to be.

Posted by: Cameron | January 5, 2009, 7:09 am 7:09 am

hmmmm…create jobs that don’t exist; pay with non-existent money; call it change…is this buffoon related to ray “chocolate city” nagin?

Posted by: nanc | January 5, 2009, 7:18 am 7:18 am

Obama and the Democrats will totally destroy free enterprise in America. Be prepared for bigger government, less freedoms, higher taxes, class envy, class warfare, less free enterprise, less accountability, and more ‘victimization’. Obama and his so called ‘advisors’ need to take an economics 101 class to find out that less government intrusion is the best and fastest way out of a recession. LET THE FREE MARKET SYSTEM WORK!! Hold people and businesses accountable for their actions….NO BAILOUTS!! Bankrupcy = restructuring…it does not equal a total shut down of a business. Lord help us from Obama, Pelosi, and Reid!!

Posted by: Democrats Hosing USA | January 5, 2009, 7:25 am 7:25 am

It is not 600,000 federal jobs – it is 3 million federal jobs! The fact that only 20% of them are going to be full-time permanent is irrelevant! There will still be 3 million people working on government projects and not doing anything productive. I don’t see how this makes our country any more competitive.
Does anybody actually believe that the private sector is going (or is even able) to come up with 20+ million new jobs needed to pay for all this?
All any government jobs “creation” program ever does is transfer wealth from the politically unconnected to the politically connected.
I would have expected that all the Blackwater and Haliburton haters would have figured this out, but they are apparently stupid enough to believe that their guy will deliver a better type of corruption…..

Posted by: FLcracka | January 5, 2009, 7:29 am 7:29 am

I am a small manufacturer with about 100 employees. If the government would give me a tax credit against every American worker I hired, i would probably hire more as long as the credit was enough. Keep the credit open for 5 years and watch the country recover. I will not be keeping my employees if they try to unionize. Throw me in jail if they want.
Obama is an idiot. In no other country has the development of infrastructure led to an economic recovery. How much money does a road or sewer pipe give back to the government? Infrastructure does not stimulate wealth creation. Morons take some economics classes. And if you are a liberal, then you are no economist.

Posted by: Unreal | January 5, 2009, 7:39 am 7:39 am

Great! Trillion+ to bailout companies who the Dems think should be saved, bigger government by adding 600,000+ new government jobs, corruption swilling around Democrats… God help us all.

Posted by: dianeremarx | January 5, 2009, 7:41 am 7:41 am

To blackkid:
You repeated the manta that Obama said all thru his campaign….giving tax breaks to companies that move jobs overseas. Please forgive my ignorance, but can you give me some examples of this? Can you name 5 companies that were given tax breaks to move their companies overseas?

Posted by: Andy | January 5, 2009, 7:49 am 7:49 am

Ask not, what you can do for your country; Ask what your country can do for you.
Obama is exactly like Kennedy, except opposite.
I love double talk – Everyone, get ready for a bumpy ride – and read 1984 to understand what is on the nearing horizon.

Posted by: none | January 5, 2009, 7:51 am 7:51 am

What a train wreck!!
All this would make a good drama story, if it wern’t all real.
We are all so screwed.

Posted by: kalo | January 5, 2009, 7:52 am 7:52 am

geebers:
‘I’m sure we’ll see gestapo type tactics’…
your casual usage and lack of understanding of what the gestapo really was is astonishing, too bad you weren’t around to personally experience it..
if you want an example of what a police state is sort of like you only need to examine the arrests of american citizens during the republican convention.

Posted by: US of A | January 5, 2009, 7:59 am 7:59 am

It is very apparent reading over this message board, that the majority understand exactly where this country is moving —> A massive depression.
It is very disturbing that so many Obama supporters are now backpedaling and claiming that everyone is expecting to much from Obama – Well, most are expecting him to make good on his promises, which he made so liberaly during his campaign.
Many will find out, he is just a big impotent fool, with no experience that would equip him or anyone on his team to make this happen. Increasing federal employees by this degree is only trying to create further allegiance to a failing backsliding government – What is required is real change. Out with the old and in with the new. Repubs and Dems are exactly the same – following the same marching orders (Look at the campaign contributors, they are the same for both parties.)

Posted by: none | January 5, 2009, 8:01 am 8:01 am

none
‘read 1984 to understand ….
have you read it?
doesn’t sound like you have..

Posted by: US of A | January 5, 2009, 8:01 am 8:01 am

unreal
‘How much money does a road or sewer pipe give back to the government?
this comment by you, shows a complete lack of understanding of economics on even a basic level,

Posted by: US of A | January 5, 2009, 8:05 am 8:05 am

Hundreds of thousands of new government jobs. Brilliant tactic. It will…
1. Generate a bajillion voters beholden to the Democrats, to help them maintain the political power they lust after.
2. Help Pres-elect Obama create his civilian national force (or army, or whatever it is). You can bet part of its job will be to seek out and prosecute “hate speech”–as defined by the libs, of course.
3. Worsen the economic state of the country (those jobs need to be paid for somehow), so that the government will have an excuse to step in and “nationalize” industry. (Hey, it worked in the Soviet Union, right?)

Posted by: JKing | January 5, 2009, 8:07 am 8:07 am

So what are they going to do flip the script on the A76 process? What about all the money that was saved by outsourcing government jobs to the civilian contractor sector? The government employee if a cost burden with its medical and retirement costs.
Also if you cut all those contractor jobs just to create Government replacement jobs what is the net gain… REALLY?
Obama’s plan is the BIG DIG on a national scale. The country will surly be bankrupt after his term thats when they drop the Socialist hammer…

Posted by: Tom | January 5, 2009, 8:07 am 8:07 am

Talk about buying votes. Oh well, that is the Chicago way.

Posted by: Kathy | January 5, 2009, 8:08 am 8:08 am

U S of A – Yes I did read 1984 and I believe the blatant disregard for true journalism OR the control of the press during this past election, is indicative of the path we are on.
For example, why many of Obama’s questionable associates were ignored or dropped by the pressed.
US of A, I would venture to say that you are a government employee and vested in the continuation of this out of control orgie of money printing.

Posted by: none | January 5, 2009, 8:08 am 8:08 am

kit kat
‘most of you negative/paranoid people in here are NOT even thinking ‘….
you got that right !!

Posted by: US of A | January 5, 2009, 8:09 am 8:09 am

none
‘For example, why many of Obama’s questionable associates were ignored or dropped by the pressed.’
such as?….. and…. your wrong…
I do not work for the government

Posted by: US of A | January 5, 2009, 8:12 am 8:12 am

The Big Crap Shoot
We will soon be rolling the dice with our new president. With his credentials of having zero experiece runnning a business will soon start his on the job training for running America and being chief CEO of the world. High stake poker…let the games begin.

Posted by: 1ifbyland2ifbysea | January 5, 2009, 8:16 am 8:16 am

none
‘I believe the blatant disregard for true journalism OR the control of the press during this past election, is indicative of the path we are on..’
you mean ‘true’ journalists like Rush?.. who agree with your political views….

Posted by: US of A | January 5, 2009, 8:16 am 8:16 am

US of A
You want some names:
Blago, Wright, Rezko, Ayers
I’m sure it will be a growing list as time progresses AND I’m sure you won’t lose sleep since you are blind for Obama.

Posted by: none | January 5, 2009, 8:16 am 8:16 am

1ifbyland2ifbysea
‘having zero experiece runnning a business ‘..
you mean like all those ‘savvy’, ‘compassionate’, ‘adult’ republicans who were running things from 2000?

Posted by: US of A | January 5, 2009, 8:19 am 8:19 am

oracle2world: PLEASE GET A CALCULATOR, you obviously graduated from a US public school.
3,000,000 * 20% = 600,000 not 60,000.
My goodness!

Posted by: cj | January 5, 2009, 8:21 am 8:21 am

none
‘Blago, Wright, Rezko, Ayers…..’
if you truly believe there has been no press coverage or investigations into the men you mentioned, you are either foolish or not sincere in your postings…….
your statement reflects a bias and total lack of current events awareness

Posted by: US of A | January 5, 2009, 8:22 am 8:22 am

Let’s get jackfuller79 hired into the IRS solely responsible for calculate our tax returns. Based on his ‘record’ with calculations, I want him to calculating 30% of my income that I need to pay in taxes. We all would save 10% of our hard earned money, and our so-called ‘elected representatives’ would have that much less to give bail outs to failing businesses.
PS: sorry for incorrectly associating oracle2world with “his” posting.

Posted by: cj | January 5, 2009, 8:28 am 8:28 am

wow, jake knows how to do percentages

Posted by: duhhhh | January 5, 2009, 8:33 am 8:33 am

First it is not OUR money (taxes) they are spending. It is our grandchildren’s. Our taxes and our children’s was spent quite a while ago.
Second, in actuality, none of our taxes pays for any of these things–our taxes pay the interest on the money DC borrowed to pay for previous things.

Posted by: kurt | January 5, 2009, 8:34 am 8:34 am

Hey we let Bush be president. The only thing he did was run every company he ever ran in the ground, and dodge the draft? Oh wait he was Gov of Texas because of his name.

Posted by: Broadcasttheworld | January 5, 2009, 8:41 am 8:41 am

When will Democrats and other idiots understand that the government DOES NOT CREATE JOBS!!!!!! Obama talks of new roads & bridges, but since those kinds of projects don’t create tax revenue. What the most inexperienced president needs to do is whatever it takes to give the private sector the ability to create jobs, even if it means lowering the corporate tax rate to 1% !!!!!!!!!!!! All governments who have “created” jobs have been….well….do your history….socialist, communist, etc.

Posted by: DPJ | January 5, 2009, 8:49 am 8:49 am

Perhaps we might want to consider investing money in sucessful businesses rather than unsuccessful ones.
“Billions for buggywhips!” is not a receipe for future financial success. Nor is expanding the DMV and its incompetence by adding more government employees.

Posted by: Big Jim Slade | January 5, 2009, 9:04 am 9:04 am

600,000?? That couldn’t be the number of jobs Obama tell us, “We need a Civilian National Security force that is just a powerful, just as strong, just as well funded.”
His own Red Guard to enforce all the new tax legislation, legislation on global “myth” warming, and all the other Marxist policies.

Posted by: Dave | January 5, 2009, 9:07 am 9:07 am

There are so many stupid posts on this board it truly shows how dumb most of the O nation is. The Government is the answer to all problems and wheres my check generation. You can’t spend your way out of this mess that government created in the 1st place. This has been coming for years and anyone who tried to stop it got steamrolled mostly by people like Pelosi, Reed, Frank, Waters etc. and now you think their going to fix everything with vote buying and more spending of money we do not have. Right!!!

Posted by: who cares | January 5, 2009, 9:08 am 9:08 am

Rewarding success has never been the democrat way.

Posted by: Kathy | January 5, 2009, 9:09 am 9:09 am

US of A: “amazing isn’t it, how all of America’s problems are always caused by Dem’s & Lib’s..”
———————————–
US of A,
I did not say all problems were caused by libs – I did say the following problems, however, were caused by you libs:
a) Mortgage Mess – Libs pushed risky loans that were then bundled into deriviatives – both came to a crashing halt. Libs – Obama, Frank, Dodd… – received unprecedented cash from Wall Street and Fannie (get the picture?)
b) Libs “tax and spend” solutions have created a crushing debt that our children will have to pay. The total unfunded liability is about $58T. But hey, you want to add even more social spending programs.
Yes – Libs are ruining America.

Posted by: Joe | January 5, 2009, 9:16 am 9:16 am

There are two kinds of people: those who create tax revenue and those who live off of it.
If you are running a deficit and you increase the number of people who are living off of the country’s tax revenue, you cannot possibly lower anyone’s tax burden or relieve the previously existing deficit.
Government is the problem, particularly government spending. And if government is the problem how is any solution that revolves around increasing the size of government a real solution?

Posted by: Soylent Red | January 5, 2009, 9:17 am 9:17 am

My question is, who has ever had what they would describe as a satisfactory relationship with any government service provider? (Spouses not necessarily excepted.)
Seriously. I don’t think I’ve ever heard anyone say “geez, the folks down at the Post Office sure made my day today”. And the Post Office should be good at customer service by now, considering they have actual competition and all. But they aren’t.
So why, oh why, does the promise of making government a bigger part of our lives appeal to some people? Even people who think they want a job in government. (Have you ever heard the phrase, “oh my gosh, he went totally FedEx on that poor lady”? No. And what word do we replace “FedEx” with in that phrase to make it work?)

Posted by: Mark | January 5, 2009, 9:19 am 9:19 am

MY PLAN FOR 29.4 MILLION NEW JOBS THE EASY WAY:
Put the 600,000 new gubment employees into building the fence along mexico and processing the deportation papers on the 30+ million illegals. Bingo, we just created 29.4 million jobs. Will someone please pass this on to Obama? Oh I just realized he won’t like this. They are his voting block that got him elected.

Posted by: illegal_alien | January 5, 2009, 9:19 am 9:19 am

US of A says:
“What is required is real change. Out with the old and in with the new. Repubs and Dems are exactly the same – following the same marching orders (Look at the campaign contributors, they are the same for both parties.)”
US of A YOU HAVE IT 100% CORRECT. Wake up America and get rid of the bozos that are playing you like a fiddle.

Posted by: Tom from Florida | January 5, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am

The government HAS NO MONEY of its own. As such, it never creates ANYTHING. Why don’t people understand this simple concept?
In order to “create” something, the government must first “destroy” something inadvertently–by taking money from someone else. This is the classic “Broken Window Fallacy.”
When a window on your house is broken, you don’t celebrate the fact that you’re now going to be giving work to the window repair guy, who will spend his money to buy new tools, etc. You complain that your window got broken–because now YOU don’t have the money you would have spent on something else!
The same applies to government intervention in the economy. The only thing that is ever accomplished is the TRANSFERENCE of money, most of it to the government itself. Nothing is ever created; only the illusion of creation occurs. Having 600,000 new government jobs is great–until you realize those 600,000 jobs were essentially stolen from the private sector.
Government intervention in the economy is about as successful as government intervention (via the military) around the world. Just as the government cannot “create” democracy abroad, it cannot “create” prosperity here at home. The notion that it can derives from debunked Keynsian economic theory, which argues the government spent our way out of the Great Depression (as if people with bad credit obviously SPEND their way out of the problem).
A cursory examination of the facts shows just the opposite: government meddling actually PROLONGED the Great Depression by years, and we’re setting ourselves on the same path.

Posted by: gb8898 | January 5, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am

NEOCONS,
I am getting tired of your tripe:
- So what if Liberals added social programs which today consume about 75% of the budget and has a $58T total debt. Social programs are smart – social security may provide a negative return on investment, however it is “safe” – just ask Harry Reid. Yea, I know he has a sweetheart retirement package, but he deserves it.
- So what if Obama has a radical past with Rezko, Ayers, Daley, Dhorn, Hamas advisors on his staff, ACORN and so what if he never ran anything. He gives great speeches, has a great image and shares our liberal ideals.
Get over it.

Posted by: SuzyTheLiberal | January 5, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

We’ve had a steady decline of intelligence and true leadership in this country. We’re now feeding off the successes of prior generations whose hard work has sustained us thus far. When you can have a President Clinton, who had no vision independent of Congress, a President Bush, who had no vision independent of Cheney, and soon a President Obama, who has no true experience other than broadly grinning, working a crowd, competing for the next job up the ladder, well, we are seeing the sun setting on this nation as we know it. The next President will be handed the keys with little fanfare, while the locksmith says, “Don’t forget to turn off the lights at the end of your term.”

Posted by: LouAnn | January 5, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Soylent Red says…
“US of A,
I did not say all problems were caused by libs – I did say the following problems, however, were caused by you libs:
a) Mortgage Mess – Libs pushed risky loans that were then bundled into deriviatives – both came to a crashing halt. Libs – Obama, Frank, Dodd… – received unprecedented cash from Wall Street and Fannie (get the picture?)
b) Libs “tax and spend” solutions have created a crushing debt that our children will have to pay. The total unfunded liability is about $58T. But hey, you want to add even more social spending programs.
Yes – Libs are ruining America.”
Now, just “saying it” doesn’t make it so.
1. It wasn’t Frank et al who made the mortgage mess. It was leveraging and packaging by unregulated investors. No more than 25% of bad mortgages are due to the lending program to which you refer.
2. Clinton left a budget surplus and starting paying on the deficit. Bush and the Republican Congress went spending crazy, rubberstamping every pork project that came along. THEY created the nations biggest deficit….
So how in the world you can pin those things on Democrats is beyond common sense and the FACTS!
Get your mantra right if that’s all you got.

Posted by: libber | January 5, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am

For those that haven’t figured it out yet, the Republican Party is on the same socialist road as the Democrat Party. It’s amazing the number of Republicans that still believe their party represents any form of limited government. By the way, President Bush just put America’s financial institutions under the “arbitrary rule” of European Union regulators at the G20 economic summit. Bush’s legacy – European socialism. Obama, as was Bush, is just another Presidential figurehead that’s been purchased all the way up the political ladder.

Posted by: Kevin | January 5, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am

1) Cut salaries of all Senators/Representatives by 60%
2) 7% flat tax……everyone pays, dissolve IRS, sell off buildings/real estate.
3) reduce size of Fed. Gvt by 50%, Government cannot continue to grow with an ERODING tax base.
4) quit giving Billion$ of aid to other countries, take care of USA FIRST.
5) Eliminate “ALL” pork barrel projects that WASTE Million$/Billion$ of taxpayers money
6)Pay off National Debt, NOT increase it
7) Our present Government is on the road to a Monumental “MELTDOWN”…….Total collapse ! ! !
Yes……It “CAN” happen.
8) time to FIRE all the Congress reps that have been in office TOO LONG….put TERM LIMITS on them
If I have to live within my “means” ……then so should the Federal Government ! ! ! !
9) No bailouts for anyone, You got yourself/company in the mess. Get smart & figure a way out.

Posted by: Less Government | January 5, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am

Thats all we need is more gov. jobs. What we need is tax cuts/breaks for small business & all business so they hire instead of putting 600,000 people on the gov. payroll.
Obama is an idiot and a pure socialist. We will regret the day he was elected. He along with the Dems will ruin this country.
By the way did you know the DemocRATS want to add 10 cents tax to ONE gallon of gas?

Posted by: Colorado | January 5, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am

Kevin: Thank you! At least someone seems to understand that Republicans nowadays are virtually indistinguishable from Democrats when it comes to spending.
Folks, our economy has to grow at a rate of over 10% EVERY YEAR FOR THE NEXT 75 YEARS just to pay for social security and Medicare. How often does it even grow at over 5%?
This fact, however, won’t stop Democrats for clamoring for more spending and Republicans screaming for more pointless wars. Why? Because, quite frankly, they are stupid and selfish. They don’t know the first thing about economics, and they’d rather put our children and grandchildren’s future up as collateral for their reckless spending today.
A lot of stuff put forward by Republicans and Democrats sounds good and noble to people, and that’s nice. But please remember what paves the road to hell. Our economic policy will be the ruin of this nation.

Posted by: gb8898 | January 5, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am

It turns out that what everyone thought initially about Barry is now fact, he is not only a lightweight but sadly, an intentional lightweight with nothing behind those eyes except empty space devoid of any ideas. He’s somebody’s puppet (George Soros most likely) and you can see his hand Obama’s suit as his lips move!

Posted by: WallyG | January 5, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

Only liberals think you can reduce debt by spending more. Sorry, can’t happen! Once no one has any money then they have all the power.

Posted by: Darlene, PA | January 5, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

I’m one Republican that has become very disappointed in my party and thinking that I must learn more about the Libertarians. Can anyone suggest a good site?

Posted by: Kathy | January 5, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Kevin said, “2. Clinton left a budget surplus and starting paying on the deficit. Bush and the Republican Congress went spending crazy, rubberstamping every pork project that came along. THEY created the nations biggest deficit….”
This is a patent load of bovine excrement! There was NEVER a surplus! In fact a simple check of the budgets for the Clinton years shows that the surpluses were “projected” not actual! Get your mantra straight before you try to change histpry with more lib BS!

Posted by: WallyG | January 5, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Liberals – all you need to know about them is Pelosi, Reid and Frank. All 3 are idiots and yet they keep getting elected. And that does not mention Murtha – who call his constituents rednecks and racists and he gets re-elected.
600,000 government jobs – I guess we need jobs for all those people coming here illegally. Most likely they will get jobs in Homeland Security as that is about how intelligent the US government is.

Posted by: Anna | January 5, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am

My fellow Americans: do you not see the government is winning? While we bicker amongst ourselves, “it’s the GOP’s fault, it’s the Dems fault!” we take our eyes off the real problem here: Washington D.C. politicians and it is OUR FAULT! The Hill is full of lifelong politicians whose only concern is getting reelected and happily waste money that doesn’t belong to them to do so These politicians have been out of the loop so long they have no clue what it’s like to actually live in the real world, find and hold a real job, put real food on the table, plan for retirement. To me politician is just another way of saying hustlers and thieves. Until we stop pointing fingers at each other, wise up and fire these politicians and replace them with Statesmen we will continue full throttle down this road to destruction.

Posted by: Desert Dweller | January 5, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Kathy: Good information suggestions from Mike. Also try the Libertarian Party website and the Campaign for Liberty, an organization that sprung up as a result of Ron Paul’s campaign.
You might also enjoy Ron Paul’s recent book, “The Revolution: A Manifesto.” He basically reiterates exactly what the Republican party used to represent. As such, I’m sure most “conservatives” today would hate it.
The Republican party’s been a mess for years, and I can’t decide whether we should try to reform it, head for the LP, or start something new.

Posted by: gb8898 | January 5, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am

How long before the U.S. defaults on its debt and the dollar becomes worthless? Projections?

Posted by: Clint | January 5, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am

Clint: Because of the debt, we’ll probably be screwed by 2020. Maybe 2030 if we’re lucky!
But hey! I’m sure we can spend our way out of it (or go to war).

Posted by: gb8898 | January 5, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

Step-by-step plan to fix the economy and the Country.
1) Abolish the federal reserve, allow interest rates to be market determined. Simultaneously, drop the capital gains tax on gold, and allow gold to be considered legal tender. Let the market decide whether we should be holding paper or gold as currency.
2) Lower the corporate tax rate by at least 5%, we have the 2nd highest corporate tax rate amongst all developed countries
3) Stop subsidizing corn-based ethanol. Drop protectionism and start trading with Brazil who produces sugar-based ethanol which is cheaper and more efficient.
4) Start an energy project innovation campaign which brings together current thought leaders to award individuals/teams grants for energy related research and programs.
5) Legalize and tax all plants which grow from the ground which are currently schedule I drugs. An entire new industry will be built up around this.
6) Start immediately dismantling our own nuclear weapons and give countries economic incentives for doing so.
7)Withdraw troops and close bases in countries/situations that no longer qualify as national security interests
8)Institute some sort of flat tax rather than our current federal tax system
9) Allow young workers to opt out of social security
10) Statistically evaluate all New-Deal-esque programs to see if they are effective, cut the ones that don’t make the grade
11) Cut entire government departments (Dept of Education and Energy seem like good candidates to go first)
12) Adopt a national foreign policy of non-premption unless an immediate threat is evident and specific targets can be identified
12) Become a world-leader in giving to charity in terms of % of GDP
13) Phase down troop volume in Iraq and Afghanistan immediately
14) Start following the Constitution
15) Acknowledge the fact that the War on Iraq was a mistake, some sort of apology should be given for displacing and killing (total #) over a million people
16) America needs to lose its collective ego problem; if we are the best country, the stats should prove it, and based on literacy, freedom of the press, infant mortality, life expectancy, and other measures, we are not the best.
17) The government should give an income statement to each tax payer saying what percentage of each dollar paid went to, that would raise accountability really quick.
A couple of ideas to start with …

Posted by: Mike | January 5, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am

Posted by: Kathy | Jan 5, 2009 9:59:11 AM
The Libertarian Party has a website. Reason Magazine and Cato are both good, too.

Posted by: gone gulchin' | January 5, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am

I spent a great deal of time in 2008 as a contract employee for a firm hired to work in government offices, including VA hospitals. Holy God! There is absolutely NO OVERSIGHT of federal employees now. It was shocking to hear staff say “I get paid . . .regardless” Meaning REGARDLESS if they did their work or not. And you know what? they’re right. They have more slackers and lazy workers than the unions do. God help us all if there are 600,000 more jobs like this added.

Posted by: Flabbergasted | January 5, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am

To all the die hard free market purists trashing the Obama plan, we only have to look at the last 8 years to see how well Bush did. People made money based on a credit bubble which burst. Tax cuts benefitted the rich and did not trickle down and he created a huge deficit. And then we see how the free marketers needed the govt. to bail out the banks. We need the government to help prime the pump and create jobs. Take the money out of the war and give it to the people for a stronger country.

Posted by: larrh | January 5, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

To Flabbergasted – You’d be amazed at the lack of oversight on contractors look at the war. All studies have shown government employees to be much more efficient than outside contractors.

Posted by: larrh | January 5, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am

We began to enact dysfunctional policies, programs and laws back in the late 1960s and we’re continuting to do so. We’ve become so dysfunctional that we both deserve to and will likely see our systems continue to collapse into disarray. On a proportional basis, we were the greatest nation on the face of the earth and due to our own dysfunctional decisions that ignore the consequences of those decisions, we are degrading at an alraming rate.

Posted by: Susan Cooper | January 5, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am

libber: You brought up the mortgage mess that pushed us into the economic crisis. It was indeed a “Perfect Storm.” The crisis was due to a combination of factors, all publicly reported by 2006:
- Deregulation and short-sighted policymaking — Community Reinvestment Act (1977); repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act and replaced by the Gramm-Leach Act (1999)
- Increasing consumer “survival” debt due to (1) higher cost of living, (2) stagnant salaries, (3) higher cost of college (more debt for families), and (4) higher cost of medical expenses.
- Due to higher cost of living (noted above), people removed their equity out of their homes in the form of lines of credit.
- Deregulation of credit card companies in the early ’80s (retroactive rate hikes, Universal Default, abusive fees = billions in company profits) effectively ballooning consumer debt overnight. The indebted consumer rolled this debt into home debt — a short-term fix, but far costlier move.
- The introduction of adjustable rate loans for mortgages and HELOCs. When the rate adjusts, the monthly bill can rapidly rise, as much as 25%.
- Consumers being financially ILLITERATE
(on an epic scale), setting themselves up for scams, unsound contracts, more debt
- Subprime loans that should have never been issued and would have been denied if they had been properly vetted
- Securitization of risks, the reason why lenders didn’t vet
- Appraisal fraud (same sort of fraud that caused the S&L crisis)
- Speculation and house flipping
- Failure of Congress to offset impending crisis in 2006 — not sure how much they could have done to avert the full blunt of the crisis, but inaction is unforgivable.

Posted by: LouAnn | January 5, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am

larrh: We haven’t had a “free market” in years. All the regulations people seem to love so much are practically hand-crafted by big businesses so as to limit competition with smaller businesses. Corporations love regulations because they’re expensive–too expensive for small businesses. So how is that a free market? It encourages consolidation and the emergence of monopolies!
The credit bubble is the direct result of the Fed’s monetary policy of lowering interest rates over and over. Credit became cheap and readily available, even for those who never should have had it–hence the credit bubble. It’s called “moral hazard.” The government encouraged risky behavior because of an implicit guarantee (via Fanny and Freddie) that bad outcomes would be insured by the government.
Businesses are just as likely as people to take advantage of the system. Why are people so surprised by this?
What’s so funny (not “funny ha ha” but funny in an ironic way) about the mortgage mess is how the government relaxed lending standards to help poor people get mortgages. A noble idea, but what happened?
Banks lent more to risky UPPER INCOME folks because they could make more money that way. That’s right! Most of the “sub-prime” loans went to wealthy people with bad credit–the exact OPPOSITE of what the government intended.
So forgive me if I don’t think government can solve our every problem. The list of failures stretching from here to the moon and back again has convinced me the government is nothing but inept when it comes to managing anything, both here at home and abroad.
This is what I don’t understand: Sensible Democrats know government can’t “fix” things overseas, and sensible Republicans know government can’t “fix” things domestically. Yet both sides flip when it comes to intervention they like. Republicans think the government can “fix” the world, and Democrats think the government can “fix” America.
The government can’t fix anything, no matter how much some people may wish it to be the case.

Posted by: gb8898 | January 5, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

Posted by: gb8898 | Jan 5, 2009 10:54:51 AM:
Your post was positively brilliant.
Just one thing: I don’t fault posters who praise free market capitalism. But I do pity how our parties have duped them. Your post helps them come around to the truth of the matter.
So, when are we going to start a new party — or is that futile as well? What’s the proper course of action for thinking people?

Posted by: LouAnn | January 5, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am

The plan, “American Recovery and Reinvestment Plan” will be known as “ARRIP” in government language. We will get to know it better as “ARRIPOFF”

Posted by: Dahli Bama | January 5, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am

For Goodness sake, after reading a majority of this BLOG crap, no wonder our Country and Government is so screwed up. Everyone thinks they know everything, but is really just full of Crap! And to think, this is a sample of the pool we try to create our leaders from……

Posted by: Nelson | January 5, 2009, 11:08 am 11:08 am

Signs, signs, everywhere signs! I am so tired of people placing labels on other people. Thinking you know how people think or feel because they are a democrat or they are a republican shows just how ignorant you are. We live in a melting pot society filled with conservative democrats and leberal republicans, and visa-versa. If you don’t beleive that it just shows how narrow minded you are. I am an American who can overcome any problem or situation given the opportunity and means, despite the many republicans who want to sit on their hands and do nothing. Burying your head in the sand does not make problems go away. Saying things are fine when there not does not work – hey George W.

Posted by: aeedwards | January 5, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am

LouAnn: A new party would be great. Any third party getting national attention would be amazing. I’m pretty libertarian, but I’d love to see even a Green Party candidate make a legitimate run for national office because it would mean we’d be having a legitimate exchange of ideas.
But it’s next to impossible. The two main parties have crafted legislation in nearly every state making it incredibly hard for third party candidates to get on ballots or receive any coverage by the media (which is complicit in wanting to create a two-sided tug of war).
It just illustrates the way the two parties aren’t really looking out for what’s best for the country, they’re just in it for power. It’s funny (again, not “funny ha ha” but funny in an ironic way) how Democrats and Republicans can come together in the high-minded pursuit of limiting political debate.

Posted by: gb8898 | January 5, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am

Posted by: Nelson | Jan 5, 2009 11:08:25 AM:
Without specifics, it’s hard to understand what you’re ranting about. There are plenty of illuminating posts. Just disregard the vague ones with no specifics and you’ll do just fine.

Posted by: LouAnn | January 5, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am

Posted by: gb8898 | Jan 5, 2009 11:14:02 AM:
I agree with your point about the seemingly insurmountable barriers for third-party candidates.
I did hear a report the other day, how Google is tweaking plans to create a better “feedback loop,” from voter to politician. The idea is to knit the voter back into the process.
Sounded interesting on the surface, but I think the real answer is less government (a leaner, frugal govt). Something about politics is naturally corrupting. Something about having the power to raise taxes without accountability draws a certain person to that power.
I’m very familiar with Libertarians and Cato. You mentioned the Green Party, so I assume you have the environment on your radar — at least more than most people. What’s your take on Obama’s energy policy? His plan for “green jobs” (a worker stamping out SUVs is not green, whereas a worker stamping out hybrids is green)? Do you think Obama will roll out price targets so that traditional forms of energy will become expensive so that alternative forms (solar, wind, etc.) will become more attractive?
I just don’t know how we can grow our way out of a recession without consuming energy. Increased productivity, by nature, requires more energy consumption. And the alternative forms are not yet up to the task (I’ve read the private sector reports, which are hopeful, but long-long term on the matter; I’ve run the numbers to go off the grid with solar).

Posted by: LouAnn | January 5, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

Meet the new boss.
Same as the old boss.

Posted by: Tyler | January 5, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

Oh, and speaking of all this “free market” stuff, I just read that the EPA is thinking of levying taxes AGAINST COWS as a way to regulate greenhouse gases.
A noble enough intention, yet again, but what will be the outcome?
Small dairy farms will not be able to afford this and will be driven out of business; large corporate farms who can afford it will be empowered. Control over the food supply will be consolidated into fewer and fewer hands.
And that’s just great, right?

Posted by: gb8898 | January 5, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am

LouAnn: I do have the environment on my radar, but I’m not affiliated with the Green Party. I recycle practically everything, and I grow a lot of my own food. I’m sure I do far more than most people on the Left who even claim to be “environmentalists,” but that’s just how I am.
However, I don’t think the government should force others to do as I do. As I said, I’m pretty libertarian, and it annoys me every time I hear people say the government should make it harder for people to live their lives a certain way.
That said, we need a radical shift in energy policy in this country. But it doesn’t need to be “incentivized” by the government. We don’t need to be supporting alternative forms of energy with tax dollars; we need to STOP supporting our current archaic forms of energy with subsidies and targeted tax breaks.
Government has propped up oil/coal/gas for years. This is what has kept true alternatives from becoming feasible from a market perspective. If we start down the road of subsidizing today’s alternative energies, that’s what we’ll be stuck with for years–even after better technologies come along.
That’s what makes the free market work. Look at the computer market. It isn’t dictated to or propped up by the government, and it has progressed at an astonishing pace. The same thing is possible with energy.

Posted by: gb8898 | January 5, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am

DC takes in about 3 trillion in taxes, fees etc (let’s call that: the federal income)
Our debt is about 10 trillion, but the more important number is what that costs us in interest. The answer? 400 billion per year, or about 1.1 Billion dollars PER DAY.
So if it costs us 400B/yr to float 10T of debt, how much could we float with our entire income of 3T? A: about 75 Trillion dollars. Or just about what we will owe for Social Security and Medicare in the coming years. So the house of cards could really collapse any day.
Unless we make some changes to delay it:
we can refi our debt (which is what the housing crash was really about
also, about the debt; to pay it off would be suicide. There would be no money left, under our system, there is NO money without debt.
We have lived with debased currency longer than anyone in history, but I have been unable to find any instance in history of fiat money doing anything but collapsing.
Or we could print our own interest free money, like it says in that quaint old document the Constitution. A few Presidents tried this approach, none of them lived to see it though. Just one of those odd curiosities of history I suppose.

Posted by: kurt | January 5, 2009, 11:49 am 11:49 am

The amount of ignorance and hate in these blogs is mind-boggling. Obama might have a slim resume, but he is surrounding himself with the best and brightest minds available in a bold attempt to overcome the sorry situation created by his predecessors, Bushes and Reagan, who sacked out the Country to benefit themselves and their rich cronies. He has a website to which anyone can submit comments and suggestions. I did so and now regularly am solicited by his staff for my input on issues. Recently, he motivated thousands of people all over America to participate in house meetings to contribute their ideas on healthcare. He is attempting to engage all Americans in the governing of our nation. I’m an old lady, and have never before seen a movement that more exemplified democracy in action.

Posted by: grannybunny | January 5, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Just what we need, 600,000 more people sitting around on their rear ends collecting tax payer money. The private sector can always get twice as much done with half as many employees.

Posted by: greg | January 5, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Posted by: gb8898 | Jan 5, 2009 11:46:02 AM:
Duly noted. Thanks!
The private sector has been working on alternative forms of energy for eons, with marked progress. I had to laugh when many politicians spin it like the govt is the one to make things happen. People have been making things happen. Just like you’re doing all you can (within reason) for the environment. You don’t need to be hit with a cudgel to do the right thing.

Posted by: LouAnn | January 5, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

What did you expect? We elected “community organizer” as president – in translation that name indicates a revolutionary marxist

Posted by: Marc Jeric | January 5, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

Grannybunny,
Climb back up on your rocker! Hopefully you can do so without government assistance. Check back in four years to see what your Obamademocracy has become, what with all the Democrooks in it. Remember, Granny, we live in a republic, not a democracy. The Constitution, a flawed document according to BHO, is the basis for it. I am a grandfather of 13, soon to be 15, and I hate to think of how much debt the Obamanites are going to pass on to them!

Posted by: Chuckster | January 5, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

And how, pray tell, is the federal government going to pay for 600,000 new jobs (along with the benefits that come with a government job) when they are already over extended to the point of near-bankruptcy? The better plan would be to lift some restrictions and lessen the tax burden on businesses so that the private sector can provide 100 percent of the new jobs – not 80 Percent.

Posted by: Say What!? | January 5, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Sorry, grannybunny, but I am not sold. It doesn’t impress me that Obama is gathering together the brightest minds if all that they are doing is brainstorming new ways to spend money that we just don’t have.
We are heading towards a default on all of the government’s unfunded liabilities, and Obama’s solution is to increase the size of the federal government. Let’s spend our way out of our debt problem. Good plan.
The government doesn’t create anything. It can only give what it has first taken from someone else. These trillions of dollars of bailouts simply amount to dumping the problem on our children. We mortgage their future so that we can avoid the consequences of our own actions. Really weak sauce, if you ask me.

Posted by: Geoff | January 5, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

Awesome. I can’t wait to work for the government pushing paper and telling people how to live their lives. Who needs a career anymore? We need that money for government jobs!

Posted by: NT | January 5, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

since Helicopter Ben is at the ready, I say the government should just hire us all. then our healthcare crisis, pension crisis, unemployment crisis, (insert crisis here), will all be solved.

Posted by: kurt | January 5, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Create more government jobs? At a time when the U.S. Border Patrol can’t even fill the openings it currently has? When the HB1 visa worker force is at an all-time high? When the growing sector of private, for-profit prisons are taking on more and more state and federal contracts and can’t fill positions fast enough? This is just a thought, but maybe more government jobs isn’t really the answer. Could be there’s another solution staring us in the face.

Posted by: Me | January 5, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Granybunny – you are disillusion if you think there is an open mind to all ideas. The Democratic party is doing everything possible to shut down any apposing viewpoint. These blogs are not full of hate but people are impassioned to see government functioning for the people as set forth by the constitution and as long as we have individuals such as Harry Reid, Barney Frank, Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer spewing their discontent our government will be crippled and the people in this great country will be made to suffer under their RULE.

Posted by: Mark | January 5, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm

Yeah, more civil servants. That’s the way to save the Republic.
What can I say – buy gold.

Posted by: Mister Snitch | January 5, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm

This is not a problem. We will be getting tax cuts–except you rich folks–and then many new carbon taxes too (also cow and pig taxes passed on to us as well)–for all of us. So I am sure that the taxes will more than offset the cut and pay the new government workers to monitor, collect and punish non-compliance of the new taxes.

Posted by: allen antrim | January 5, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm

Who is John Galt?

Posted by: Eric Stratton | January 5, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

I guess ignorance is bliss. Have any of you ever read a history book? All presidents, Republican and Democrat, have spent money. If you think OB will be the downfall of this country because he is creating gov. jobs, then what do you think Bush did the last 4 years? He must have saved us from a true depression.

Posted by: james | January 5, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm

Everyone that voted for Obama is a fool. Germany had a Democratic Govt. too, before Hitler.
Right now, the US Govt. basically owns the banks, soon the auto industry, and later the steel industry – all in an effort to “stabalize” the economy. Think about it – that combined with stealing the Minnisota election by “re-counting” 10 times until Franken pulled ahead tells me that soon, the Senate and Obama will declare themselves our rulers and since they own your house now – you’ll be powerless to stand up to them. The “civilian” force he proposed is just more “stormtroopers”. You wiat and see….there’ll probably be another terrorist attack to get us to assign him even more power……

Posted by: Bill | January 5, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Barack “Bizzaro” Ombama

Posted by: Rob | January 5, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

John Galt was a character in one of Ayn Rand’s plays. She was Russian and hated socialism–she was not a fascist as some claim. She was an objectivist and thought reason should guide man,oops-humankind, peoplekind or dumbkind whatever you want. Liberals hate her (if they read philosophy) and I imagine modern conservatives don’t like her either (if they read philosophy).

Posted by: allen antrim | January 5, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

I did not hear anywhere in Obama’s speech where he said he was going to creat 600,000 new government jobs.
A little slippery slope journalism going on here wouldn’t you say Jake.

Posted by: Richard J. | January 5, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

grannybunny – We are not a Democracy, we are a Democratic Republic, and for good reason. People like you, who are obviously oblivious and probably incapable of producing or inventing anything, shouldn’t be setting policy for the rest of us. I know your type by what you posted and I’m not impressed. You are the kind of person who probably calls AAA to change out a flat tire.

Posted by: That Guy | January 5, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

“I did not hear anywhere in Obama’s speech where he said he was going to creat 600,000 new government jobs.
A little slippery slope journalism going on here wouldn’t you say Jake.”

OK, Einstein, if 80% are in the private sector, then pray tell, where do you THINK the other 20% will be? The opposite of private = public.
‘Gosh, I didn’t hear it. Uhhhh, duh. Uhhhh…I dunno’
WAKE UP, pretty pleeeeeease.

Posted by: Blue | January 5, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

THINK OF IT THIS WAY:
The private sector creates jobs and pays taxes …
The government sector eats up those taxes.
C’mon people … the private sector generates PROFIT. The government sector is OVERHEAD. (An expense item, if you will) … why is that so hard to understand?

Posted by: RodMiller | January 5, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Does anyone out there other then myeself believe that Goldman Sachs and Hank Paulson conspired to create a global creedit crisis?

Posted by: patrick the painter | January 5, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

THINK OF IT THIS WAY:
The private sector creates jobs and pays taxes …
The government sector eats up those taxes.
C’mon people … the private sector generates PROFIT. The government sector is OVERHEAD. (An expense item, if you will) … why is that so hard to understand?

Posted by: RodMiller | January 5, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

Gov jobs do help. None of those people are unemployed collecting unemployment insurance. Also, if they have jobs, they spend money in the ‘private sector’ via Walmart etc. This spending keeps the world going around. FDR proved it during the depression. Maybe you should learn a little about economics before you spew ignorance.

Posted by: james | January 5, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

Patrick the Painter,
Just a little lesson in logic for you. The public and the private sector both have thier place. I’m happy to let the private sector make my IPOD, computer, and other gadgets for my fun and conveniance. When it comes to life and death issues and things that are for the common good of society (military, schools, caring for mentally ill and eldery people for example)thats better left up to an entity that is not purely profit driven. It’s basically the way every industrialzed country does it. A good example for this is here in Massachusetts where the job of plowing the roads during snowstorms was contracted out to private companies. Well, guess what happens when you get a company that can save $5,000 by not laying down as much salt as they should or not sending out as many trucks as they should? They cut corners to save money! That makes the roads more dangerous for everyone! Oh and last time I checked government employees paid taxes on thier income also. Plus, don’t they also spend thier disposable income, thereby benefiting the whole economy and the private sector?
I’m personally a happy member of the private sector workforce, but that doesn’t mean I’m so closeminded that I can’t see that both public and private have an important place in a society.

Posted by: Craig | January 5, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm

To the comment about what FDR proved during the Depression — He proved that massive government spending and all his alphabet soup federal programs COULD NOT revive the economy, as we remained in the Depression for 12 years — or until WWII began.FDR taxed those who WERE working and businesses that were still operating to pay for the New Deal programs,thus sucking money and potential capital out of the economy,diminishing investment and prolonging the Depression.

Posted by: William Siems | January 5, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm

Hiring more government employees will be more disaster, out of the 600,000 only 20% will give an honest days work. There is not any oversight, supervisors are a joke, and the brown nosing contractors that will eventually be awarded these positions are only slightly better.
Obama said in his stump speeches he was going to cut out the waste, way to go Obama!!!!

Posted by: Chenoah | January 5, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm

“Obama might have a slim resume, but he is surrounding himself with the best and brightest minds available…”
Sorry grannybunny – you lose. One of his best and brightest, Mr. Bill Richardson, is no longer in that “bright” cabinet. He’s under investigation.
NEXT!

Posted by: KCR | January 5, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

“Gov jobs do help. None of those people are unemployed collecting unemployment insurance.”
WRONG (buzzer goes off). Been to the post office lately?
http://www.federaltimes.com/index.php?S=3798464

Posted by: Oh PuhLease | January 5, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

Great, lets create more lazy Federal employess like my mom’s uncle!! Good pay, good Beneis and work 20 hours per week and get paid 40 hours. Don’t believe me, go to your local Post Office, then go to a Federal Express Office. Becarefull, you might starting crying!@####

Posted by: Francisco | January 5, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm

Why is Obama cutting taxes? he should be raising all taxes to improve the economy. The economy is faltering because taxes are too low, and people are worried that the government is underfunded. With higher taxes, people will have confidence that the government is properly funded and has their backs, and this will take risks to raise their income.

Posted by: Frank | January 5, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

We need abut 1.5 million new jobs every year for new workers just out of school. So, why the big deal about three million jobs?

Posted by: Max | January 5, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

For the fifty bazillionth time, the government has NO MONEY. As such, it cannot CREATE anything.
Government re-directs money–that’s it. When it “creates” jobs in the public sector, it uses private sector money. That ELIMINATES private sector jobs because there is less money to spend by the private sector.
I’ll use the Broken Window Fallacy again to explain this better (use Google if you’ve never heard of this economic rule).
If some punk throws a rock at your window and breaks it, someone will undoubtedly point out that having to repair the window can also be viewed as a “good thing” in that the window repair guy will get some money. Then he’ll spend that money at the hardware store, and the hardware store will use that money to pay employees and buy more tools to sell. Pretty cool, huh?
The person who follows this line of thinking fails to realize you–the person with the broken window–would have also been spending money on something. Maybe on new tires, maybe as an investment, maybe on… charity! Whatever.
The same rule applies to government “creating” jobs. People continually cite FDR as some kind of hero, when all he did was exacerbate the problem by sucking money out of the private sector. His policies caused the Great Depression to drag on for years, and unemployment never went down until we entered WWII.
It would be nice and simple if government could solve all our problems, but reality is seldom nice and never simple.

Posted by: gb8898 | January 5, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm

//With higher taxes, people will have confidence that the government is properly funded and has their backs, and this will take risks to raise their income//
If this isn’t sarcasm, this is probably the most baseless, asinine thing I have ever heard in my short life (I’m 23) and is indicative of the economic ignorance of the general public as demonstrated through my daily interactions. Whether you are a classicalist, austrian, keynsian, neo-classicalist, really any school of economic thought – this makes absolutely no sense. I wish people would become economically literate; until this happens, I fear the government of wolves will continue to advance. Pick up Economics in One lesson by Hazlitt, please!
“The art of economics consists in looking not merely at the immediate but at the longer effects of any act or policy; it consists in tracing the consequences of that policy not merely for one group but for all groups.”
“The first requisite of a sound monetary system is that it put the least possible power over the quantity or quality of money in the hands of the politicians.”
“The ideas which now pass for brilliant innovations and advances are in fact mere revivals of ancient errors, and a further proof of the dictum that those who are ignorant of the past are condemned to repeat it.”

Posted by: mike | January 5, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm

It makes perfect sense. Your business is going under, so what do you do? You hire 600,000 new employees that you can’t afford to pay.
This why Democrat politicians rarely have any experience with running a profitable business.

Posted by: Larry | January 5, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm

gb8898, you are a breath of fresh air on here, keep on fighting the good fight.
The government doesn’t create, it transfers. Much like mass or energy, when the government “creates wealth” it either transfers it or destroys it, but usually both – it isn’t created – it’s either printed or borrowed which simply puts the burden of payment off to a further point. It transfers with the assumption that it has better market information than the market, which in and of itself, is a ridiculous notion.
Government spending used to double in decades, now it does in about ten years. 40% of your federal income taxes go to paying off the interest on only the military portion of national debt. What have we, the people, who fund the government (and theoretically give it its power) got to show for it? The government always grows at the expense of your liberty, and that is a bipartisan promise!

Posted by: mike | January 5, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Higher Taxes equals higher risks to earn more income. This is the future for our econmony and why Obama was elected President. The founding fathers had it right when they said the citizens were not inteligent enough to elect a president therefore they compromised with the Electoral college.
Frank here is a lesson on economics. If you rasie the taxes on those who inject money into the economy they will not have the money and therefore the economy weakens. All lessons show Gov’t should have minimal influence controlling the econmoy outside of the Federal Reserve and taxing as can be seen with Fannie Mae. If the Gov’t had stayed out of the business in creating home loans for those who could not afford a home we would not be were we are today.
If I have less to spend I will not be able to take the risk to earn more as I could be in a worse situation after the fact. As was seen with the mortgage crisis in mortgages that have gone upside down and inside out.
The only safe risk is work hard and stay proud doing what is right. That is were true success is.

Posted by: Mark | January 5, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

600,000 new fed employees? Oh yeah, that’s Obama’s proposed citizen army which the press won’t talk about but which scares the potatoes out of me.

Posted by: finlandia | January 5, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

Some of you people call this a good start? Are you crazy! just what we need, bigger government. Now 600,000 more useless people will be sponging off of us taxpayers to get health benefits and pay that is 1000 times better than what we have (the people who pay thier salaries). I dont like calling people stupid but I cannot think of a more suiting word. Way to go all you idiots who voted this nut into office. Now we can just sit back and watch the US be destroyed from within. Thanks all u DemocRATS!

Posted by: George | January 5, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

How about you do the math Jake and tell us how many will be teachers and how many will be hired at universities using government grant money to develop alternative energy and technology?

Posted by: Commentator | January 5, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

mike: The irony in excessive government spending is that it most hurts… THE POOR.
When the government does what it’s doing right now, printing money out of thin air, it dilutes the value of the dollar. Money is like any other commodity–oil, corn, metals, etc.–in that the more of it there is, the less value gets placed upon it.
If the market were suddenly flooded with millions of additional Honus Wagner baseball cards, the value of the cards would go down. Each card would be worth less. When the government floods the system with money, it decreases the spending potential of each dollar. Every dollar can now buy less. This obviously hurts the poor and middle class the most.
But no one in power says a thing about it because they think it’s better to just keep living with the illusion that we can print, borrow, and spend our way into prosperity.

Posted by: gb8898 | January 5, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

I hope the 2.4 million jobs generate enough taxes to pay for the .6 million government jobs along with the $310 billion in tax cuts. Maybe the government jobs will be unpaid volunteer government organizers. I hope they organize better than Jimmy Carter builds homes.

Posted by: Michael W | January 5, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Government jobs? Don’t be so quick to take offense. These new employees will become tax payers and purchasers of goods and services. Thats a good thing.

Posted by: Rudylee | January 5, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Our Govt is a pure sleaze charade of a duopoly that works hardest at making us think either party is any real choice at all.
That GHWB & WJC are such great buddies is what prompted my own exit from the masses of propagandized zombies created by our compulsory self interested educrats.
I got a REAL education at mises where one can easily escape one’s own govt inculcated dupedom.

Posted by: marxbites | January 5, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

//Government jobs? Don’t be so quick to take offense. These new employees will become tax payers and purchasers of goods and services. Thats a good thing.//
Who is paying the salaries and cushy benefits of the government employers? Since the government doesn’t operate on a surplus, they have to transfer from elsewhere (transfer is a nice way of putting it, realistically it’s coercion). This simply takes it from individuals hands and puts it into the governments hands (the almighty, omniscent government knows best, remember that)!
Central planning was destroyed in “A Road to Serfdom” – we are well down that road.
Although somewhat a tangent, a relevant quote from “Civil Disobedience”…
I HEARTILY ACCEPT the motto, — “That government is best which governs least”; and I should like to see it acted up to more rapidly and systematically. Carried out, it finally amounts to this, which also I believe, — “That government is best which governs not at all”; and when men are prepared for it, that will be the kind of government which they will have. Government is at best but an expedient; but most governments are usually, and all governments are sometimes, inexpedient. The objections which have been brought against a standing army, and they are many and weighty, and deserve to prevail, may also at last be brought against a standing government. The standing army is only an arm of the standing government. The government itself, which is only the mode which the people have chosen to execute their will, is equally liable to be abused and perverted before the people can act through it.

Posted by: mike | January 5, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm

What you will have is 600,000 people on the payroll that do nothing except tell you what they cannot do. We do not need 600,000 new government welfare bodies.

Posted by: Bill | January 5, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

HEY NO ONE IS TO CRITICIZE THE GREAT OBAMA! WHATEVER MY MESSIAH SAYS IS THE LAW!!!
I DON’T CARE IF HE PROMISED HIRER TAXES FOR THE RICH, UNIVERSAL HEALTHCARE, MORE PRIVATE SECTOR JOBS, WORLD PEACE
IF HE CHANGED HIS MIND AND DOESN’T DO ANY OF THOSE THINGS YOU JUST KEEP YOUR BIG MOUTHS SHUT, OTHERWISE SOME PEOPLE MAY REALIZE HE IS NOT REALLY GOD’S SAVIOR

Posted by: ObamaApostle | January 5, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

Ok, for those of you that refuse to take off those rose colored glasses.
It was the DEMOCRATS with ACORNs help that forced the lowering of the housing lending restrictions. It didn’t matter if the buyer had good credit, or even had a job, and if a particular lender turned them down (because they were risky, and probably wouldn’t be able to pay), ACORN would picket in their lobbies. The banks then created bundling to cover their @sses. This was the beginning of our finacial fall dominoe effect. The Dems should have stayed out of it. The banks would have been fine had they not been forced to give loans to people that could in no way pay them back! Fannie and Freddy were started by the dems and have been lining the pockets of many Dems since the beginning, and yes, Obama’s pockets as well. Now, don’t tell me it wasn’t the dems fault for our financial crisis. They were the cause of the beginning of this mess.
This is a perfect example of what happens when the government get’s too power hungry, and interfere where they shouldn’t. Would you loan Thousands of dollars to someone that you know could never pay it back?
As for the 600,000 new government jobs… Government jobs are paid for by the government. The government is BROKE!
Now, stop living in a fantasy world, and take off those ROSE COLORED GLASSES!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Proud Soldeirs Mom | January 5, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

One quick point. The Wright Bros invented the airplane – privately. At the same time the US Congress funded research and construction of an aerial vehicle that did little more than crash when it departed the banks of the Potomac – publicly.

Posted by: Adun | January 5, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

Another quick point or two:
600,000 is a unique number. This is also the estimated number of Pres Wilson’s “APL”…look that up if you really want a terrifying look at how close America once came to totalitarianism.
Secondly, do we need 600,000 public sector jobs? The question is best answered this way. What do government jobs do versus what do private sector jobs do? Answer the latter part and you also provide an answer for the former.

Posted by: Adunn | January 5, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

I could even put it this way…
- My most recent “public” experience was a trip to the DMV. 3 hours, 5 separate DMV “technicians”, and $80 later I recieved a sticker for my license plate about the size of a postage stamp.
- My most recent “private experience? A trip to the local supermarket where I purchased what I wanted in quantities I preferred and within a timeline acceptable to my schedule.

Posted by: Adun | January 5, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm

Well, since union numbers in the private sector are dwindling, and the Democrats are owned by the unions. This is the payback. If unions won’t grow in the private sector the government will be their savior and grow them in that sector.

Posted by: Timmeh | January 5, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm

600,000 community organizers organizing Americans. That’s 12,000 per state. Organizers coming soon to your community to help organize your political views. Didnt this stuff go away with the fall of East Germany and Soviet Union.
It is really sad. This country is becoming a welfare state (France of North America) as so many peope want their “free” government stuff – houses, jobs, health care, retirement, education and the big kahuna “the bailout” because they darn well deserve all that free stuff. Pretty soon we will have non-citizens demanding their “free” vacations, bonuses, cars, etc. and the US government is stupid enough to give it to them….for a while.

Posted by: Anna | January 5, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm

Private security jobs for his children to attend a private school.

Posted by: beebop and rocksteady | January 5, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

To Adunn:
Yeah, can you image 50% of Americans want to go to a place like the DMV when they are sick and need help…help and the government is an oxymoron but that is another story.
Take a number, stand in line, wait while the receptionist closes for her 15 minute smoke break and 1 hour lunch…all to be told to go home and die because we have to ration healthcare because we can only spend 11% (or whatever the % is in Canada ) on healthcare…

Posted by: Anna | January 5, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm

Anna, you may be on to something…jobs = instant and long-term constituency.

Posted by: Adun | January 5, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

Create govt. jobs and give them to your worker ants to keep them happy, well paid and well covered until the next election rolls around and you need to get out the vote for your guys. Welfare jobs for the worker ants, it’s the way the Machine works.
Good-bye Chitown, hello DC!
OBAMA, the Savior!

Posted by: Crook County | January 5, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

Looks like my fed job is safe for the next 4 years.
Jason the Fed

Posted by: Jason | January 5, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm

How will 600,000 gov employees be paid?
Borrowed money, foreign leases on our bridges and roads? Will foreigners be able to bid on American infrastructure jobs?
What about NAFTA..is he still going to renegotiate trade deals?

Posted by: jj | January 5, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm

If this is such a good idea, why stop at 1 trillion? Why not 2, 3, 4 trillion.
We could save every comany in America and pay-off all of the public’s debt. This should really stimulate the economy.

Posted by: bb | January 5, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

Brilliant. The Republicans, who have been wrong on basically every issue, now want to dictate how the Democratic President recovers from their mess? Suddenly Republicans want to control spending again after supporting year after year of record high Bush budget deficits. Suddenly they care about whether the President consults with Congress? The same Republicans who supported endless war in Iraq which is costing tens of billions each month found their “fiscal conservatism”. What a joke.
Obama has even altered his plan to include major tax cuts for both individuals and businesses, yet the Republicans will not be happy. They’ll find the one area they don’t like (more government jobs) and only focus on that. Republicans won’t offer a single idea or solution of their own.

Posted by: Arnie | January 5, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm

get scared. for real. july 2 speech. Civilian National Security Force equal in size & funding to our current Dept of Defense budget for ALL BRANCHES! He quotes our current military isn’t capable of handling our national defense needs? really? I’d like to see him say that to the face of a SEAL Team Operator, or an Army Ranger! What would these ‘civilian sucurity’ force purpose be served at home here? The answer is none. And it’s a New World Order plot to start a race/civil war here so the UN can take over our country, divide it in 5 sections: China takes CA, Russia reclaims Alaska, Venezula retakes Texas & midwest, Canada takes north west & Europe take Northeast: bye bye to the dollar as UK has done a fabulous job sabotaging our financial markets…….get scared now….

Posted by: scared | January 5, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

600,000 = census population for blacks within the United States as per wikipedia

Posted by: docdave | January 5, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm

I remember when working for the government was a social service.
But the democrats have turned it into
A bananna republic.
Only if you VOTE for obama will you be GRANTED a NICE WELL paying job with the us government.
Otherwise you will be left out in the cold.
Now call me pessimistic
But i wonder How who will get those nice paying government jobs?
I guarantee it wont be hard working real americans as only the poor , disenfranchised (and illigals) will be granted that right..
May God help us all

Posted by: jcila | January 5, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

That’s all we need is more gov’t.

Posted by: AB | January 5, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

To get you off to a good start Arnie:
#1 Bush is not a Conservative so let’s not confuse that part of the discussion.
#2 Several true Conservatives have offered some really nice economic solutions that GASP don’t involve bailing anyone out or stimulating someone at the expense of another. Think Jim DeMint for example.

Posted by: Adun | January 5, 2009, 4:13 pm 4:13 pm

I can’t believe how ignorant so many of these comments are.
The Myth:
Federal workers making a thousand times as much as private industry.
The Truth:
How about 30% less. I work in federal IT contracting and the rule of thumb is expect a 30% DROP in your pay as a trade-off for the job security.
The Myth:
Don’t work as hard.
The Truth:
I’ve worked in both and I have seen lazy people in both places and hard-working people in both places.
The Myth:
We spend huge amounts on foreign aid.
Surveys have shown that people think that we spend 20% of our budget on foreign aid.
The Truth:
Less than 1% of the national budget. What’s more in the survey, people thought FIVE PERCENT would be more appropriate. So, we are spending only 20% of what people think we should be spending.
The Myth:
What do we need more federal employees for?
The Truth:
Last year, China sent 199,000 food shipments to the US, of which less than 2 percent were sampled.
The F.D.A. employs only about 1,750 food inspectors. There are so few inspectors that most domestic plants get a visit from an F.D.A. inspector only once five to 10 years, Mr. Hubbard said. Unlike meat-processing plants overseen by the Agriculture Department, foreign food-production plants are not regularly monitored by the F.D.A.

Posted by: Alex20850 | January 5, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Let’s honestly look at the economic issue we face shall we. Did anyone read any news articles say….oh I dunno, about 10 years ago? I recall reporting – scarce mind you – about deflation. Yes, deflation. That’s at the core of our problem today. It’s the 800 pound tiger we’re trying to lure under the sofa with a piece of raw meat. The tiger might go under that sofa for a little while but he’ll be back…whether there are three million new jobs or not. Until we address deflation we’re addressing nothing at all but touchy feel good’isms that get us through each day.

Posted by: Adun | January 5, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Wait a minute… let me get this straight…. Obama wants $1 trillion to bailout the economy, wants to add 600,000 government jobs and give a $310 billion tax break to the middle and lower clases, right? Where is all this money coming from? If we are spending $1 tillion to stimulate the economy then why does the government need to give 600,000 jobs to people? If taxpayers are spending $1 tillion plus the $310 billion tax break plus the salaries of 600,000 new gov’t workers (which equals around $20 billion to $50,000 billion) should puts the total at around $1 trillion, 400 billion we (taxpayers) are in the hole for. Now, can someone please explain where we’re getting this money and how is this going to stimulate the economy?

Posted by: dianeremarx | January 5, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm

So Alex20850 — if we’re all so stupid, please explain where you get your info.

Posted by: Nosesomuch | January 5, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Hit the nail on the head dianeremarx! All these “plans” are designed just to make folks feel better. Just to make them feel as though action is actually taking place on their part. Obama knows he doesn’t actually have to do anything until 2011 anyway…that’s when he starts running for re-election. He’s got sufficient lead in the Congress to allow 2010 to be a throw away election. All he has to do right now is surf shirtless in Hawaii so the reporters will oooh and aaah a lot.

Posted by: Adun | January 5, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm

Let’s keep in mind folks Obama’s team worked for 3 months to “create” this thing they’re talking about…the 3 million jobs with 20% public. That’s what they’ve come up with in 3 months time. What do you think a small business owner might be able to produce in say…3 months time?

Posted by: Adun | January 5, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm

Hmmm, 600,000 new jobs? I wonder if someone made an “underestimation” regarding the proposed possibilities reported on in the following link? This could be nothing more than hype (or paranoia?)– but I think we might want to keep our eyes wide open…”just in case.”

Posted by: just_observing | January 5, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

Is this the change we can believe in? Is this what the huddled masses in Grant Park melodically sang “Ba-rack O-ba-ah-ma” for? Folks this is Jimmy Carter Lite. All we need is a malaise speech and we’ve got Jimmy Carter Supersized here.

Posted by: Adun | January 5, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

dianeremarx – you made some very astute comments. Let me add that the financial geniuses in congress along with the O man are not recognizing that the intrinsic value of your dollars are at this time is approximately $.03 per dollar. Maybe a smart feller like Arnie can extrapolate the impact of the mega bucks being discussed on the current value of our money supply.

Posted by: Jenny | January 5, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm

That’s all we need. More people on the government payroll. What a stupid move!

Posted by: Russ | January 5, 2009, 4:48 pm 4:48 pm

Jesse Jackson shed tears for this! CNN told me so!

Posted by: Adun | January 5, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Well, these responses prove one thing. The people who educate themselves on Obama and his “plans of action” actually disagree and see through his tripe. But a majority of those who voted for him have no idea who this man is, what his plans mean, or the implications of them. Nor do they care.

Posted by: TXgal | January 5, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

Yep, everything is coming together nicely. 600,000 government jobs times an average of $60,000 per year with benefits. That’s 600,000 x 60,000. My calculator cannot handle that number nor can my aching head. Think of the retirement benefits we’ll owe them all one day. That helps make a nice Democratic voting block in any case.
Pray with me all of you the unwashed and unclean:

Posted by: John Dean | January 5, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm

600,000 new government jobs in a short period of time. i like the idea although the only way i can see of growing those jobs in government is to initiate the draft. 600,000 would be easy if he did that.

Posted by: Stephen | January 5, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

Some of you get it. It really is pretty simple, government creates nothing, it can only tax (I like to think of it as legal robbery) and spend.
Those of you who don’t get this are morons who need to pull your heads out and get a real education, not one shoved down your throat by some professor who spent their life obtaining tenure.

Posted by: That Guy | January 5, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

Everything these political fuqwads do in the next 4 years will be for their own self serving purposes. Obama will spend 4 years campaigning for a second term, cause that is really all he is good at. The rest of the Dems will promote policies such as am-nasty, universalduochecare, gubmint jobs, and worthlessfare to create a base of spineless, needy indoctrinated morons who will vote for them in perpetuity.

Posted by: That Guy | January 5, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

The joke is on us though. Even traditionally liberal France thinks Obama is naive while here in America the media treat him as the second coming.

Posted by: Adun | January 5, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

Bigger government is all that is being made. Cornerstone of socialism. Let Big Daddy take care of you. More government power and less citizen rights. Big Daddy owns eveything. Manufacturing/ Banking/Insurance/Energy/Medical care/news media (and yes that is coming). There is your change foks. Sweet stuff huh? I just want all the free stuff Obama promised me.

Posted by: zanne | January 5, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

Now how much of the $1 Trillion will be creamed off as payment for being elected to the many hangers on .Clyde

Posted by: Clyde Guthrie | January 5, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

This 20% is a scam! 80% jobs in the private sector doesn’t mean “free market”! All jobs created by the government is an act of “Socialism”. If these jobs were needed, they would be created by the free market. There is no free lunch. 3 million jobs created by Obama, will destroy 3 million “productive” jobs created by the free market, that is, jobs created by consumer demand, and not by a dictator!
His Tax cuts are also a scam. It is nothing more then transfering wealth from more productive individuals and businesses to less productive ones. These Tax cuts economically amount to the “productive” subsidizing the “unproductive”. Great plan to save the economy. He must have taken “Economics for Socialists 101″. I’m sure he got an ‘A’

Posted by: DD | January 5, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm

Who does he think he is to create more government —- Bush with the Homeland Insecurity guys???? Hey, how about a ‘car czar’? After all, it rhymes and if it don’t fit we must acquit ‘cuz we’r too legit 2 quit (turn cap sideways for this)….
Here in the U.S. of Idiots, we need some real generic platitudes. ch-ch-ch-change=change no matter how bad…..a very sick and twisted way to think…
reminds me of john lennon – love is all you need, right?
ONE MORE THING — notice the ARMIES of people who supposedly hate government intrusion on personal ‘choice’ (RvW) — yet who will line up to support MASSIVE ENTITLEMENTS (which limit choice and freedom). Somehow THAT is ok.
But we know all that we need to know about Osama, I mean Obama. I mean when Katie Couric asked him ‘what songs are in your ipod ?’ I basically understood what is happening with the Manchurian Candidate. He was totally vetted; any further questions are racist, you know. You Know All That You Need To Know.
Love is all you need,
Schmoe

Posted by: Schmoe | January 5, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm

The saddest part about this thread is how many people are defending the idea that 600,000 more government workers are a good thing, or that they will add anything to the economy.
-And that all they care about is that jobs are going to be created. That’s pretty sad how selfish people have become.
600,000 new votes for Democrats. Ugh.

Posted by: John Abbott | January 5, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

I am personally ashamed of the 52% of the voters that elected the upcoming president, but will not be left out on the party though. I am unemployed and apparently as long as one supports “government saves all mentality”, then I should at least be able to get a secure job in some government created department. Thanks for destroying capitalism liberals!

Posted by: chad | January 5, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

600k public jobs are one thing, but who is gonna pay for the 2.4m private sector jobs? if these private sector jobs consist of hiring workers for infrastructure work then who is footing the bill to pay for these contracts? sounds more like the taxpayer and corporate taxes will be paying for 3m new jobs regardless …

Posted by: slordax | January 5, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Here is my list of projects:
1. Planetary Defense System against Asteroids and Comets.
PROJECT ASTROSHIELD – space based defense system (space stations, platforms in the YEAR-LONG orbits of the planets NOT around each.)
space probes with cameras to watch for moving objects.
IMPACT MITIGATION – ground based defenses, shielded windows and other measures to lessen debris impact.
PROJECT SPECIES SURVIVAL
So that human, animal and plant species will not disappear no matter which
Extinction level event occurs we (animals, humans and plants) will have a
chance to come back.
Level 1 = total destruction of the planet
Level 2 = when the surface of a planet is destroyed but underground
Cities are safe. (and hopefully the surface will be livable again).
WE WILL PUT THESE IN EARTH ORBIT, ON THE MOON, EVERY SPACE STATION (MANNED), PLATFORM (UNMANNED) AND SPACE PROBE SO THAT AT SOME POINT IN TIME WE CAN START LIFE ON EARTH AGAIN OR THE SPACE PROBES WILL CRASH AND LIFE WILL START ON OTHER PLANETS.
2. Create the the “UNITED STATES OF THE AMERICAS” north, central, south.
so that in case of a disaster requiring migration (THINK “THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW”, AN ASTEROID / COMET STRIKE ((WITH ENOUGH TIME TO MOVE)) ) PEOPLE WILL BE COMFORTABLE IN THE NEW PLACE.
2A. In the movie THE DAY AFTER TOMORROW the U.S. moved to Mexico. Mexico and Central America needs more land.
I have 2 ideas using the same basics, build a wall from the ocean floor to AT LEAST 50 feet above sea level with locks running from point A TO B.
Pump out out the water. Make seawater drinkable. build a pipeline to Africa the American Southwest Central / South America. FILL IN THIS AREA WITH EARTH CREATED BY
VERMICULTURE (EARTHWORM EAT GARBAGE AND HUMAN / ANIMAL WASTE THEIR “WASTE” IS EARTH).
WE WOULD BE PUMPING AND FILLING AT THE SAME TIME. It will be a worldwide multi-decade / century effort.
The points are:
WALL 1. CANCUN, MEXICO AND MIAMI, FLORIDA USA.
WALL 2. Virginia Beach, Virgina USA TO NATAL, BRAZIL, SOUTH AMERICA
Artificial continent walls CONNECTING / SURROUNDING:
1. great pacific garbage patch.
2. Canada – U. S. (alphabetical) to end of Aleutian Island chain (ATTU ISLAND)
3. Federated States of Micronesia
4. Indonesia AND Philippines
5. Koryak RUSSIA to Singapore

Posted by: Steven | January 5, 2009, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

There are many here CLEARLY ###### about this UNPRECENDENTED turn of events. Action is being taken…patriots are uniting in a common cause and standing against this tyrannical system of government.

Posted by: live_free | January 6, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am

G o o g l e:
“Continental Congress 2009″
The People are finally not taking it anymore!

Posted by: fed_up | January 6, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am

600,000 new government jobs should scare every single one of us. 600,000 voters whose jobs depend on a continuation of whatever program this is, will be forced to vote democrat if they hope to keep them. This is just a stunt to control the next election and must be fought tooth and nail. Pelosi just shut down the House by eliminating fairness rules instituted by Gingrich, so now it will be up to the Senate to lock down the process until the House gets its fairness back. I hope and pray the conservatives in the Senate are wise enough to take that action and block all attempts to increase government by 600,000 jobs.

Posted by: Joe S. | January 6, 2009, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

It does not matter if we are will soon be the UNITED STATES OF IRAN.

Posted by: Carey | January 7, 2009, 9:07 am 9:07 am

just what we needed, more do nothing government employees!

Posted by: Annie | January 7, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Wow. 600,000 new goverernment jobs by obama. That is over 60 billion dollars of our taxpayers dollars for their salaries.
I just hope the ones losing their jobs today are the fools that voted for Obama

Posted by: Len | January 7, 2009, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

Whatever man creates is lesser than its creator. The US government was created by men. Therefore the US government is lesser than those who created it. Solutions lie within the private sector. The government has created nothing productive or profitable ever. The government is nothing but a liability to America’s private sector workforce. Bigger government means more liability. All the government can do is make, enforce and interpret the laws they’ve made. Laws always restrict our freedom. We need more productivity not more laws. We need smaller government not bigger. We need more freedom not less.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | January 8, 2009, 8:25 am 8:25 am

This to Oh puhleze….My husband is a federal worker, he is a postman. Because of the job cuts, my husband is doing the work of three people on one route, that was subsequently increased in volume. They eliminated postman only to increase the salaries of the pencil-pushing managers that do vertually no work. Ask any postman, and they will say the same. The hard working, blue collar worker is being worked harder, for less money only to line the pockets of the rich corrupt beauracrats and politicians in this country. Now, it is only going to get worse. We have just seen the first steps to a socialized government in the United States. We are screwed!

Posted by: hollycrap | January 8, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

We have only been told small highlights of the “Save the U.S.” plan. Glenn Beck said it so well. This was unprecidented that a President-Elect is giving out such a speech today. What is the left hand doing while the right hand is grasping the attention of our nation? The U.N. is discussing “new world order”, thats what. Be very wary of all the events that are occuring today and ask yourself why? Please people, look around, don’t be as dumb as out government thinks we are. Ask questions and demand answers and accountability. I teach my own children that a quick fix, usually isn’t. Someone should teach Obama that same lesson. If it sounds too good to be true (keeping in mind we’re talking about our government)then it probably isn’t true!

Posted by: hollycrap | January 8, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

Great. All America needs is 600,000 new Federal Workers who don’t do crap. Think about it; what does the average taxpayer get from all those federal workers? What services (think quality here) do we get? I think Obama should follow what he said that private sector (especially Small Business) is the back bone. We should all be tired of the Government taking care of us when they cannot even manage themselves.

Posted by: JSB | January 8, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

We must be above 600,000 gov’t jobs now – in the past 2 hours, Hussein O’s plan to save us has gone from 3M jobs to 3.5M and most recently 4.1M jobs. Which if 20% are government, then it is up to 820,000 government jobs.
Perhaps the number of carefully vetted BHO stealth bloggers needed to quiet dissenting opinion? Perhaps it is 16,400 BHO storm-troopers per state (assuming my count of 50 states is correct instead of 57).
Of course, not all states will need that many, Hawaii is small and blue. Texas is Big and red . . . so the distribution of the new brown shirts and BHO Gestapo will not be evenly distributed.
Tax cuts? Really? 40 to 44% pay no taxes already . . . so I guess the threshold to pay taxes will raise to accommodate 310M, then repeal the Bush tax cut so everyone else can be patriotic for Joe “foot-in-mouth” bin-Biden and be re-distribute what they have earned to those that have not.
BTW, Trillion dollar deficits for the next ‘few year’s?!? Beware the craft Kenyan lawyer, Trillion does NOT mean only one trillion linguistically . . .
Has anyone stopped to think that once again, a damn lawyer, with no ECONOMIC experience is claiming to be able to save us? Lawyers are fantastic at not answering yes/no questions with yes or no since they charge in 6 minute chunks . . .
He ain’t the saviour folks, he would not give an ounce of sweat for anyone unless it got him a mansion or an election. Judge him by his acts, not his purdy talkin’ – con artists always know how to say exactly what you want to hear, what you want to believe is true to make you buy it – even when you know better . . .

Posted by: Coming Revolution | January 11, 2009, 7:02 am 7:02 am

Small business tax cuts, why, so small business can hire more people at minimum wage with no benefits. Great idea. So small business owners can make loads of money while paying labor minimum wage, and getting tax breaks to do it. How about some good jobs that pay decent wages for work and have decent benefits.
Any of you commenting on federal employment ever been a federal employee? I am one. I work hard. I get paid almost exactly what I made in the private sector doing the same job. Benefits are actually less. If you think it is so great go apply and get a federal job. If not stop complaining.

Posted by: my2cents | January 21, 2009, 8:09 am 8:09 am

I hope the president can really hold on his dreams to complete the furture everyone need and put us into a golden age. With Barack Obama we can get to the united States peak and progress beyond ever imagined

Posted by: joshua | January 26, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm

WOW 600,000 new gov employees? I work at a family owned small business (wood shop) & am sick of the current number of gov employees. Every year a new gov agency stops by & fines (or steals, whichever) us for not being in compliance with some new regulation. I have literally been told by a local fire marshal “don’t worry, it will ONLY cost 40k to become compliant!” We have operated for thirty years but have only been non-compliant for the last year because of massive gov over-regulation! Sadly, I believe this attitude is too common throughout gov work & have witnessed idiotic wasting first hand with while serving in the military. I also believe that the only “change” the new president wants is the change in my pocket, my sofa, wherever…

Posted by: PlainTired | January 27, 2009, 9:30 pm 9:30 pm

I live in Hawaii, a state that has more state workers per capita than any state in the US. Also, until just recently there was a budget surplus. Our roads and infrastructive is crumbling, brigdes and overpasses in Oahu have been in a state of disrepair for a decades. State workers make good money and the jobs are highly prized. Rumor has it that you can’t get a state job unless you know someone or are related to someone. It took over 14 months to build a simple new firehouse where I live, with workers starting at 10 and packing up at 2. I really don’t think creating 600,000 more government jobs is the answer. Unless of course I change my birth certificate and say I am a long lost relative of Obama.

Posted by: Deborah | January 28, 2009, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm

Unfortunately as you may have since discovered..
No transparency and it will be mostly government jobs since the stimilus is not a stimulus but a ‘politicians ‘wanna’ have bill.
um…the only people to call others unpatriotic was demos calling repubs that for not paying more taxes or not supporting obamaa.

Posted by: Paul | February 15, 2009, 12:16 am 12:16 am

We are being led to financial ruin, both as a nation and individually by an incompetent fool and liberal drones that support the green horn. Most cannot understand the damage being done to this great nation that is crumbling by the day.

Posted by: C. Yahn | February 20, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.