By Nitya

Jan 2, 2009 11:08am

Rice Pushes for Gaza Cease-Fire That Is ‘Durable and Sustainable’

ABC News’ Rachel Martin Reports: Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice spoke to reporters at the White House after briefing President Bush this morning about the situation in the Middle East. It’s not often that Rice stops to talk to the press during trips to the White House, so while her statement didn’t provide any new revelations, her appearance underscored the urgency of the current crisis of the Middle East. She didn’t take any questions but she did take the opportunity to castigate Hamas. "I want to begin by noting that Hamas has held the people of Gaza hostage every since their illegal coup against the forces of President Mahmoud Abbas, the legitimate president of the Palestinian people," Rice said. She went on to talk about the deteriorating humanitarian situation in Gaza, blaming Hamas for making like very difficult for the people of Gaza. During the White House briefing minutes later, deputy press secretary Gordon Johndroe would not label the situation in Gaza a "humanitarian crisis" per se. He said that although the administration "…is concerned about the humanitarian situation on the ground in Gaza", he said Israel is accusing Hamas of hoarding Israeli-supplied humanitarian aid in order to politicize the humanitarian crisis. Secretary Rice said she has been in constant contact with the Israeli government and European allies to try to come up with a ceasefire that would bring about the cessation of Hamas rocket attacks into Israel. "It is obvious that that cease-fire should take place as soon as possible, but we need a cease-fire that is durable and sustainable." Rice said the President has also been on the phone with the Israeli government and Arab heads of state. Rice ignored a question about the possibility of an Israeli ground offensive into Gaza. And in the White House briefing Johndroe refused to speculate on a possible ground incursion. When a reporter shouted a question to Rice about whether she would fly to the Middle East to try to broker a peace deal she said, "I have no plans at this point." And when pressed in the briefing on the subject of a final Rice trip to the Middle East, Johndroe said, the Secretary has been on the phones constantly for a week "so, we don’t see a particular need for her to travel to the region when she can do her work from here."

User Comments

Rice never had “plans” at any point during her present postion. What a sorry excuse for a secretary of state she is. It goes along with the incompetence of the rest the Bush administration, especially Bush himself.

Posted by: leftyintexas | January 2, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am

Does Rice mean that the “durable and sustainable” cease-fire should come after the impending ground invasion? The bombardment of the past week has been on a swath of a heavily populated area 25 miles long and 3 to 7 miles wide, making the incursions comparable to shock and awe and apparently primed enough for a ground assault. The timing has certainly been most peculiar – not only has it been on the eve of Israeli elections, but also in the midst of a presidential transition.

Posted by: kat | January 2, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am

What? Hamas’ overwhelming democratic election victory over Abbas is an “illegal coup”?
What? Has Rice cracked up?
Both the President and President-Elect are missing in action (holidaying) while hundreds die and we have to listen to this person having a delusional breakdown as our US spokesperson?
Time to clean out the Stygian Stables.
Shame on this Administration and shame on the silent President-Elect.
Blaming the victim. Disgusting.
Palestinians and Muslims around the world will now flock to support Hamas.
And these idiots we have elected will achieve the opposite of their stupid calculations.

Posted by: susan | January 2, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Where is Abbas? He should be preparing to move security and civil service personnel into Gaza when a cease fire is established.

Posted by: MBell_TX | January 2, 2009, 12:48 pm 12:48 pm

The article is titled wrong. It should read:
“Rice supports killing women and children for a durable and sustainable period”

Posted by: Lou NYC | January 2, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Israel has a right to defend itself and its citizens. Israel did everything in its power to avoid taking any military action. But Hamas keeps on firing Rockets into Israeli cities and shooting at innocent people. These attacks have been going on since 2001! Would any country allow this to go on for such a long time? Hell NO! Would the US accept rockets being fired at San Diego from the Mexican Border? Would Spain allow rockets to fly on its citizens from France? Of course NOT! We are dealing with Terrorists who are holding the poor people of Gaza hostage. The Hamas so cynically uses its own people as human shields. These people have no mercy and should be treated the same way! It is time for to uproot this evil once and for all!

Posted by: lbentzur Boston | January 2, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Hamas is a terror organization. It did indeed win the election in Gaza and took over power. So basically the people of Gaza ousted Abbas and the Fattah party and voted to put into power a terror organization. They clearly supported Hamas’ agenda to wipe Israel. They support Hamas’ terror activities. By doing so they abandoned the path of peace and negotiation led by Abbas and adopted so warmly the deadly goals of Hamas. Now they are surprised that Israel is retaliating to the terror action of Hamas? What did they think? That Hamas will smuggle rockets and missiles from Iran, constantly fire rockets into Israeli cities and that nothing will happen?? They must be kidding! When the Gazans will choose LIFE over Death, maybe then their lives will look a bit better. Until they allow Hamas to keep them hostage they will continue to suffer!

Posted by: lauren | January 2, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

When a reporter shouted a question to Rice about whether she would fly to the Middle East to try to broker a peace deal she said, “I have no plans at this point.” And when pressed in the briefing on the subject of a final Rice trip to the Middle East, Johndroe said, the Secretary has been on the phones constantly for a week “so, we don’t see a particular need for her to travel to the region when she can do her work from here.”
——————————-
Translation: Rice is wasting her time. None of the combatants will listen to her.
This is true trying to influence without any authority. The only tool would be credibility. Rice has very little with Israel and none with Hamas.
In the case of Hamas, distasteful as it is, Hamas is a real viable force in this conflict. Bush/Rice made a terrible tragic mistake when they excluded Hamas from the peace negotiations starting with the Anapolis Conference.

Posted by: beto | January 2, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

What good is yet another cease-fire when one side repeatedly breaks them? How many treaties, truces and cease-fires have been broken?

Posted by: Just following along | January 2, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm

As Bill Clinton has said. “This is all a big fairytale.” Obama will have to deal with Israel and Hamas then find that peace with Hamas is a big fairytale. Hamas has a blood oath to destroy Israel and will not stop its effort until Israel is wiped off the map or Hamas is permanently defeated in death and principle. Peace with Hamas and a lasting ceasefire with Hamas is a big fairytale.

Posted by: MBell_TX | January 2, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

Apparently her bloodlust has been satisfied. Come on Rice, condemn those settlements and checkpoints and then we might get somewhere.

Posted by: Huh | January 2, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

Condi is correct, and Hillary will follow her lead! :)

Posted by: aware2u | January 2, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

Condi, we’ll let you leave before Jan 20th, no need to finish out – just leave.
You’re the picture of incompetence.

Posted by: Jilli | January 2, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

? “..if we had not stole away the region after world war two from its rightful occupants the whole muslim worldwould not hate us.” That is so naive. Their doctrine is world dominance and the west is getting in the way of that. Just see how Europe, Russia, and China are fairing. Anyone up to date on the cultural conflicts brewing with the influx of the Muslim influence? i.e. France, Spain, etc..

Posted by: MBell_TX | January 2, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm

Condoleezza Rice, having observed that more than 300 Gazans were dead, said: “We are deeply concerned about the escalating violence. We strongly condemn the attacks on Israel and hold Hamas responsible.”
Someone should ask her to comment on teenage knife-crime, to see if she’d say: “I strongly condemn the people who’ve been stabbed, and until they abandon their practice of wandering around clutching their sides and bleeding, there is no hope for peace.”

Posted by: Jeff | January 2, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

As Condoleezza Rice is in the last lap of her term as Secretary of State, the situation in the Middle East merits answering if Ms. Rice ever had a clear-cut plan to further the American interests of stabilising the situation in the region surrounding the volatile Iraq? Or was all this just a part of treadmill diplomacy where you jog at one place without covering any distances at all? Has Secretary Condoleezza Rice been running in a rut as a regular feature of her diplomacy tourism during her periodic trips to the Middle East?
This question become even more pertinent on the heels of the third anniversary since she launched her “transformational diplomacy” on 18 January 2006 declaring:
“America needs equally bold diplomacy, a diplomacy that not only reports about the world as it is, but seeks to change the world itself. I and others have called this mission “transformational diplomacy.” http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2006/59306.htm
The above pronouncement begs another question: In seeking to change the whole world, how well did the State Department adapts itself to keep pace with the dynamics of change? In retrospective, was all those dashes to the Middle East a diplomacy tourism road show featuring?

Posted by: Lockman | January 2, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

mbelltx—–no your ideas are naive… how would you feel if at every turn over aperiod of 1000 years or more white man had been comeing to yoru land and takeing it and telling you what to do. you would be pissed off also…if we just let themalone let them be muslim let them destroy the evil nation of israel then they wouldnt hate us so much.

Posted by: T | January 2, 2009, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm

T – At some point the world needs to decide how to reconcile the diversity in ideologies or accept the genocide one inflicts upon the other. So when is enough enough? When all are toothless and blind from a terminal cycle of vengeance or when everyone is willing to listen to a small child begging their elders to give peace a chance? I hear children begging but Hamas has already made its blood oath to wipe Israel off the map and Israel is doing what it can to counter that. Stop the rockets if you truly want peace and reasonable people will find mutually beneficial solutions.

Posted by: MBell_TX | January 2, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

I wonder why would anyone please throw a sandal at her! This woman joined the criminal triad of Bush, Cheney and Rumsfield in cheating and lying to americans about WMD and war in Iraq!! Now she got the guts to speak up about middle east after all her failed promises!! And even predicted that historians would comment kindly on Bush and Rice!! Waht a DISGRACE!!

Posted by: Al | January 3, 2009, 3:24 am 3:24 am

sustainable cease-fire is nothing less than “we’re going to sit back and allow our ally to bomb the hell out of some people that we care nothing about.” i can hardly wait until the incompetent and embarrassing bush and his administration are out of office. he’s the worst ever.

Posted by: henry | January 3, 2009, 6:19 am 6:19 am

By “durable and sustainable” she means the Israelis get to continue starving a million Palestinians to death, but the Palestinians won’t be allowed to fight back!
Now we see what it would have been like if the USA had defended Hitler!

Posted by: Thomas Mc | January 3, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am

It is too bad the Palestinians are suffering thru this – but they chose to do it this way. Should they give up Hamas – it all goes away. If you have’nt been there it is best you just keep quiet. Hamas is only furthering the cause of Iran, not the Palestinian people. The Hamas leadership, as usual, is in “hiding”. They are really getting good at it. It is really, really, too sad.

Posted by: ray sparks | January 3, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Hamas does not recognize Israel’s right to exist and vows to destroy it.
Hamas launches it’s missiles from densely populated areas, cynically using the palestinian people as human sheilds.
Hamas aims at city centers in order to hurt as many civilians as possible.
That is what makes Hamas a terrorist faction.
That is why all the free world must support Israel in it’s fight against Hamas as part of the worldwide fight against terror

Posted by: Yoel | January 3, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

Yoel – Israel needs to stop stealing Palestinian lands for settlement construction. If it happened here we would resist with more than rockets.

Posted by: Huh | January 3, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm

Israel was willing to go very far to reach a peaceful resolution to a suffering it have not chosen to inflict in the first place. Yet Hamas and the other Refusal organization worked hard to sabotage any “compromise” which will involve recognition of the right of Jews to rule of Islamic land. This is a terror organization with fundamental ideologies. I have very little faith in their ability to accept any peaceful co-existence plan with Israel.

Posted by: David Cohen | January 3, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm

“The timing has certainly been most peculiar – not only has it been on the eve of Israeli elections, but also in the midst of a presidential transition.”
kat | Jan 2, 2009 11:58:55 AM
Ever in search of conspiracy theories, even though the obvious explanation serves well enough?
Hamas suspended the six month cease fire, and has began firing rockets into Israel – more than 80 rockets landed in Israel on Christmas alone!
The Israeli incursion is a direct response to Hamas firing rockets into Israel – that’s all.
If, as so many have argued here, Hamas has “the right to defend itself”. the same must also apply to Israel.
More’s the pity for innocent Palestinians that they must suffer under political leadership that is willing to sacrifice their safety so that Hamas can exercise its “right” to fire rockets indiscriminately at Israeli civilian targets.
However, the citizens of Gaza DID elect these miserable gangsters to lead them.

Posted by: m@chiavelli | January 3, 2009, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm

It is very simple, Israel said back when it left Gaza: “We dismantled our settlements in Gaza – we are out – but if you shoot at us from the area we vacated, we shall hit back with all our might” but never made true on its promise – until now.
Would Rice ask for Cease-Fire if rockets were falling on US land?!

Posted by: NJ | January 3, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm

NJ – When do they dismantle the 1000+ settlements in the West Bank? When do they stop adding more settlements in the West Bank? Israel left Gaza because it was too costly, not because they are trying to do the right thing.

Posted by: Huh | January 4, 2009, 2:54 am 2:54 am

Isn’t it about time Palestinians take responsibility for their government and economy? They outnumber Jews at exorbitant ratios, have received billions in aid, but still can’t manage to become sustainable. They need to stop playing the blame game.

Posted by: dee | January 4, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am

“as part of the worldwide fight against terror”, Israel can show good faith by returning these men to the US for trial as suspects in the 9/11 attacks:

Posted by: ghost | January 4, 2009, 11:43 am 11:43 am

There will be no sustainable solution until the combatants stop drinking the wine of pride. ………….

Posted by: Ohg Rea Tone | January 4, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

See ya Rice. Don’t let the door hit you on the way out.

Posted by: Huh | January 4, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm

Hamas has a blood oath to destroy Israel and will not stop its effort until Israel is wiped off the map or Hamas is permanently defeated in death and principle. Both the President and President-Elect are missing in action (holidaying) while hundreds die and we have to listen to this person having a delusional breakdown as our US spokesperson?
Time to clean out the Stygian Stables.
Shame on this Administration and shame on the silent President-Elect.

Posted by: sd | January 5, 2009, 4:18 am 4:18 am

Although Hammas was elected in a public and supposedly free elections, we can see their tolerance for internal opponents (filmed on video: Hammas guys pushed to their death 3 Fatah leaders, from the 11th floor of Gaza buldings).
Not to mention their “martyres” and bombs aimed at innocent israelies (according to hammas – all Israelies, including babies and seniors, are NOT innocent – a horrible concept).
I will raise both hands for Israel and against Hammas.
May god be with you.

Posted by: EliR | January 5, 2009, 5:21 am 5:21 am

Hammas is a virus not only on Israel but also on Egypt and other more moderate middle-east countries. It is true Israel is its prime target for now, but believe you me, if Israel won’t stop this radical terrorist regime in a divisive battle, their next targets will be against US population and the rest of the free world. You can’t talk to radicals who’s sole will is to suicide and kill with them children and innocent people! This war is not only Israel’s war! Be strong, we are with you, Israel.

Posted by: Er | January 5, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Er – Nice fearmongering. They are coming here eh? Actually they resist occupation and rightfully so.

Posted by: Ben Straub | January 5, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am

“I never felt more SAFE than when I walked UNARMED in the Indian villages”. ~ William Penn (Quaker) French-Indian War

Posted by: Virginia Cornue | January 5, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Hamas is guilty of firing rockets at Israel, but the cause of the issue is not being argued. Israel is an occupier of palestinian land and Hamas chose the violent approach to enforce Israel to back down. Take a look at the map and you will be able to see how Israel broke up Gaza from the west bank. Food supplies and the most basic sources of life that go into Gaza are controlled by Israel on a daily basis. Palestinians are living under Israel’s mercy, so would you hold them responsible if they retaliate for their life?
I am not arguing if Hamas is a terrorist group or not, but if it is, does that make Israel a terrorist country by reacting in a more vicious way? Terrorist groups should be eliminated, should Israel be eliminated too?
Israel on the other hand has moved its war to the streets of Gaza killing children and demolishing civilian buildings.
Israel is committing a war crime as we speak, and the world should hold them responsible for the genocide.

Posted by: Zaid | January 5, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

Dear Virginia
using so many inaccurate facts wouldn’t make your argument stronger.
Israel didn’t occupy any land unless it was for its defense.
The Israel state was formed in the current territory as a result of the United Nations’ resolution since 1948. most of the world supported this resolution by the way, including GB that was Palestine occupier, the USA and even the Soviet Union. The Arab world didn’t. They declared immediate war.
Since then, Israel formed peace with Egypt and Jordan. Peace talks were also commenced with Syria. Only the Palestinian Arabs didn’t show up to the table, and formed the deadliest Terror organizations ever.
Under its own resolution, Israel left Gaza.For 7 years southern Israel suffered rockets bombardment from Gaza’s terrorists.
People were actually killed. A new generation of children grew up to the reality of sirens, alerts and death.
Do you suggest they should have waited for a miracle or try to defend themselves?
Saying all that I am also concerned with the Gaza population suffering their share, but putting Israel in the criminal position is the easy way out for someone who do not want to see things clearly – The world is threatened by terrorism, and instead of getting rid of them and the ones that finance them it accuses nations, like Israel and USA, who try to defend themselves, and as a result innocent people get hurt.
Ittai

Posted by: Ittai | January 6, 2009, 2:43 am 2:43 am

Ittai is correct. Israel left Gaza a few years ago and left all its occupation settlements in Gaza. The Palestinians could have stopped the circle of violence there, but instead the Hammas (in a very bloody war on the Fattah) took Gaza and turned it into a rocket launcher deep into Israel.
If someone would have fired rockets on my hometown for 8 years, I promise you I would have expected my government to take action…
The main problem is that Hammas is using the poor population of Gaza as a human shield. They are launching their rockets from heavily populated areas, using their own holly places as storerooms for weapons, ext.

Posted by: Er | January 6, 2009, 3:38 am 3:38 am

Israel is a sovereign state. No other sovereign state would have waited so long to hit back; no other sovereign state would be providing its sworn enemies with humanitarian aid; no other sovereign state would be so careful not to harm civilians.
Israel is a Jewish state. Could that be the problem?

Posted by: Judith Even | January 6, 2009, 4:05 am 4:05 am

Er
Actually the number of settlements and settlers in the occupied territories has increased. Israel did leave Gaza because it was too costly in lives and money. Israel has a lot to answer for. Keeping Gaza in a constant state of confinement is also an obstacle to peace.

Posted by: Joe | January 6, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am

let’s not be hypocrates! Israel has been sufferring since it was established. The Israeli people and nation aspire for peace, and the palestinian people had dozens of opportunities to make peace, however they didn’t use any of them. Israel is surrounded by Arab countries. how come no country wants to give shelter to their “brothers”? because they are a menace to every country and to the whole region. Why doesn;t anybody say anything about the rockets being exploaded in Israel’s territory since 2001 for no reason? Israel gave them everything they wanted, they have the chance to build their own country but they don’t want to flourish. the only lanuage they know is violence, and this is what they teach their children. The victim here is Israel that has to deal with such lowlife people.

Posted by: Jacob | January 6, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Jacob – Both sides are guilty of crimes. Israel needs to get all settlements out of the West Bank immediately and end all chenckpoints so that the Palestinians no longer are fenced into small blocks in their own land. Israel also needs to stop cutting vital power and food and water from Gaza whenever they feel like it. Hamas needs to change tactics away from violence to more peaceful means of protest. Israel does not give the Palestinians everything they want, hardly. I believe the greater victims are the Palestinians and I am tired of my tax dollars paying for this nonsense.

Posted by: Ben Straub | January 6, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Gaza is getting what it deserves. Support Hamas terror get terror.
The Arabs have choosen the path of war since 48.

Posted by: Mike | January 6, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm

“Actually the number of settlements and settlers in the occupied territories has increased.”
Posted by: Joe | Jan 6, 2009 10:07:18 AM
Indeed, the number of settlements has increased.
That fact is not relevant to “ER”‘s basic point that Israel has withdrawn from certain settlements AS A FIRST STEP towards final status negotiations. And that in response, rather than answering with an equivalent gesture, Hamas has sends ever more and ever more accurate, and ever more deadly rockets into Israel proper.
Hamas – as the more radical Palestianian leadership always has in the past – responds to an opening for negotiating a two state solution by taking any peaceful gesture made by Israel as a victory, and an opportunity to ramp of the violence in the hopes of achieving even more concessions, and no doubt eventually their real goal – the total destruction of Israel.

Posted by: m@chiavelli | January 6, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

m@chiavelli – Israel pulled out of Gaza because it wasn’t worth holding onto. It was not worth the costs. Israel did not pull out because they cared about true peace with the Palestinians. The expansion of settlement activity is a testament to that fact.

Posted by: Ben Straub | January 6, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

I agree 100 per cent with leftyintexas. Rice is an abysmal failure as Secretary of State. A great reflection of the Administration she works for.

Posted by: gae | January 7, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm

“We would like an immediate ceasefire, absolutely, an immediate ceasefire that is durable and sustainable and non-time-limited,” State Department spokesman Sean McCormack told reporters at his daily briefing.
————————–
dayanajessy
MLS

Posted by: dayanajessy | January 18, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Cialis.

Cialis online. Cialis st. Cialis best price buy online. Online pharmacy cialis on line. Cialis.

Posted by: Cialis. | August 10, 2009, 8:41 am 8:41 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.