Steele: GOP Can Put Away Its “Scarlet Letter, ‘R’”
ABC News’ Teddy Davis Reports: Former Maryland Lt. Gov. and new RNC Chair Michael Steele speaks during the Republican National Committee’s winter meetings in Washington D.C.
Ferdous Al-Faruque/ ABC News Newly elected GOP chair Michael Steele said Friday that Republicans can put away the "scarlet letter, ‘R,’" that he thinks the party earned prior to the 2006 midterm elections. "The bottom line was the American people had lost faith in our leadership," said Steele. "We entered into a contract with them in 1994 and they expected us to honor it. In the way we would lead, in the way we would serve, in the way we would protect their interests. And we abrogated that contract. And that’s why that scarlet letter at that time was placed their by the people." "That was then and this is now," he continued. "And this is a new moment for our party. And we can take that scarlet badge off and wear a very proud ‘R’ on our chest." When Steele was running for the U.S. Senate from Maryland in July of 2006, he anonymously described his Republican affiliation as an "impediment" to his electoral prospects while speaking at an "on background" luncheon with reporters in Washington, D.C. Without identifying Steele by name, the Washington Post’s Dana Milbank wrote up the "Scarlett Letter" comments on July 25, 2006. Later that day, after Milbank’s column was published, ABCNEWS.com caught up with Steele in Takoma Park, Md., and confirmed that the future chair of the Republican National Committee was the anonymous Senate candidate who had criticized the GOP’s handling of the Iraq war and Hurricane Katrina. Read Dana Milbank’s 2006 Washington Post column here. Read the 2006 ABCNEWS.com story which identified Steele as the anonymous Republican Senate candidate who had criticized the GOP here. ABC News’ Ferdous Al-Faruque contributed to this report.
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
So that was then and this is now and this is a new moment for our party. And we can take that scarlet badge off and wear a very proud R on our chest.”
***************************************
Yea right. What has changed? Same Party Same Principles, Same platform, Same Ideas, Same insults, Same infexability.
Nothing!
Posted by: Thinking | January 30, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
What the GOP did by supporting Bush’s endless debacles was criminal. The American people are not done with weeding out the offenders as will be seen in upcoming congressional elections. Republicans are going to take a well deserved pounding in the voting booth.
Posted by: Crusher | January 30, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
it will take a long time to repair the “R”. moving far from Limbaugh, O’Reily, Hannity and Colter will be a requisite. if the party holds on to the views expressed by these individuals they can expect more loss. the GOP can change the way it looks on the outside, but it’s the inside that matters.
Posted by: Paul Wall | January 30, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
Steele is probably the best pick for the job. I am a dem, but this guys seems pretty good. I have to admit though that it would have been much more fun and comical if they selected Rush.
Posted by: Jim | January 30, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Who cares Michael Steel as long as narcotics addict, Limbaugh dictate the RNC.
Posted by: AZBY | January 30, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
Stand firm Republicans. Don’t let these left wing blogger zelots get to you. Stand by your conservative principles and you will win the next congressional election just as you did in 1994. Democrates have done nothing for Black America. Obama did all on his own without affrimative action.
Posted by: ricky ticky | January 30, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Gee, and I thought the Republicans were so darn racist — at least that’s what we hear all of time if we disagree with, or didn’t vote for, Obama. How very odd that they would elect Michael Steele.
Posted by: trish_in_texas | January 30, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
GO GOP…..you can do it. Let the Dems take the fall as they run this country into the ground.
Posted by: B | January 30, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm
Perhaps they should have nominated Daschle or Geithner? Oh, that’s right, they already have jobs in the Obama administration — where all tax cheats go to hang out.
Posted by: trish_in_texas | January 30, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
I thinks it hilarious when republicans imply that its the Dem that are racist.
Media is sure giving Rush a lot of attention. He got famous with Clinton. Secrety he must love when a Dem wins the white house. Makes his fat head fatter.
Posted by: CAW | January 30, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
B………….The country is already in the ground GW Bush left it that way !!!!
Posted by: jg5012 | January 30, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
two weeks of democrat control and the gop is on the rise once again. doesnt take much considering 47% did not vote for obama. two more weeks of nancy pulosi and who knows what will happen. i am proud of what the gop did today. go micheal steele.
Posted by: catman | January 30, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
B………….The country is already in the ground GW Bush left it that way !!!!
Posted by: jg5012 | January 30, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
The Republican Party only select African-Americans to be used as tokens. The moment they begin to think outside the box and forget their place the GOP throws them all under the bus the way they did Colin Powell. They can select all the token blacks they want, they would still come across as a bigoted and racially intolerant bunch. The GOP has stated their views and made them clear. A zebra can change their stripes. They can change their strategy and try to fool others, but they’ve shown themselves for what they truly represent. A racist, angry bunch.
Posted by: Hes_Just_Another_Token | January 30, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm
what’s the r stands for
retard
Posted by: Omentum | January 30, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
Steele is a good speaker and seems pretty intelligent. He also showed some love for Ron Paul in the meeting they had last month so maybe there is hope. Just stand for fiscal responsibility and no silly wars and maybe the republicans can make some headway.
Posted by: Huh | January 30, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm
hey token…it appears that you are angry and your argument fits your party as well. lets be happy, have a nice weekend and lets hope we all have jobs next week.
Posted by: catman | January 30, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Until Republicans are ready to embrace GLBT people and grant same-sex couples rights commesurate those given opposite-sex married couples, they’ll keep that Scarlet Letter as far as I’m concerned.
Posted by: ebfauvel | January 30, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm
ebfauvel – Ron Paul would have given them equal treatment.
Posted by: Huh | January 30, 2009, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
I just hope that Mr. Steele remembers the Republican Convention when he himself saw how many black people attended. It wasn’t too many.
Posted by: fun4leona | January 30, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
Yea the tried the woman token and that didnt work to well. Hopefully he wasnt picked for a token reason. I remember during the campaine when Hannidy was slamming Obama as a terrorist, Hannidy made it a point to have a black Rev on his show. Same guy over and over. This was at the RNC convention. I think there were only 4 or 5 blacks in the audiance so it was probably one of them. If the Republican party wants to fix itself it has very little to do with gender or race. Sure there are many many racist attracted to the all white bible waving republican party but their main problem was the way they campained and their media outlets campained for them. The Rep’s like to try to win on fear of the past. They like to campaine buy running the other guy in the ground but hardly ever sell themselves or talk about what they can do for the country. They love to show video clips of 9/11 to scare voters for their vote. They love to talk about the past but offer little hope for the future. If you want to hear a typical republican and why they lost. Listen to Hannidy. He still talks about Ayers. He still talks about the past and uses fear to try to gain support. Thats the old way, the Rove way of campaining and thought and people are over it and that way of thinking.
Posted by: CAW | January 30, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
it is so funny how you hear republicans say obama will run country in the ground…well got news for you republicans i know you only listen to rush limburger and teh hannity insannity but bush and the republicans already drove the country deep into the ground…and now us democrats have to dig out again just like we had too after reagan and bush sr… we are getting sick of fixing teh republicans mess.
Posted by: T | January 30, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
This is a Pyrrhic victory for Steele. I still remember him telling, in no uncertain terms, Sean Hannity in June ’08 that Ron Paul was “done” for opposing the Iraq police action (no declared war). Paul was the ONLY republican candidate who got it right. I believe the Republican Party is doomed. We need a new party to present the conservative view in America.
Posted by: savannah | January 30, 2009, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
History tells the best story. EVERY SINGLE RECESSION IN THE LAST 100 YEARS WAS STARTED DURING A REPUBLICAN ADMINISTRATION
Posted by: sciencerulesovertheology | January 30, 2009, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
Republicans are the most disgusting group of people on the planet. You guys are intolorant, bible-thumpers, ignorant and warmongers. You know nothing about the economy, seeing as all you do is spout bull about trickle down economics as the “save-all” for our financial crisis. You don’t seem to get that now over 25% of Americans have poor or no health insurance and that businesses cannot shoulder that responsibility anymore. You spent over 1 Trillion in Iraq, but complain about big spending on the Dem’s part. You forget that Clinton left you with a budget surplus that you destroyed by giving tax breaks to the wealthy.
Posted by: sciencerulesovertheology | January 30, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
The Republicans are a racist party, and the origin of their racism dates back to the late 1940′s migration of the segregationist and socially conservative Dixiecrats from the Democratic party to their subsequent merger into the GOP after their failed effort to establish the State’s Rights Democratic Party. The Republican party over the next couple of decades morphed from it’s moderate, Northern roots of the party of Lincoln to a party of social intolerance and endemic bigotry and ignorance. That’s the nutshell, check your history books, though the ignorance label is my own opinion. The GOP is steered by the same root inclinations it was 60 years ago, with the addition of greed, religious bigotry, and general fear of anything that isn’t wearing golf shorts. What are the last states to maintain solid GOP standing? Idaho, Wyoming, Nebraska, Utah, and Alaska–Crazy, Nuts, Actually a nice place, Crazy (but nice snowy mountains), and Crazy.
Posted by: Mark_from Dallas | January 30, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
Now if they could just move to the center on issues like abortion, gun control and gay rights . . . They used to be the fiscally conservative party, today, they’re no different than the Democrats.
Posted by: LagunaTriMom | January 30, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
The Republican party probably think this will bring a more deverse party. Its depend on substance not just color.
As long as the Rep party picks the likes of Palin that had a bridge to nowhere between her ears. As long as they pick mascots like Joe the Plumber. As long as they campaine on fear, hate, the past. They will go nowhere. If the Rep. party would seperate themselves from talk show host like Hannidy and Rush. If they could talk hope and campaine with the idea that America needs to work as a team. Most important is quit trying to make points by spending all your time slamming everyone else while not talking about why the Republican party is the best choice. They must of spent 90 percent of their time slamming Obama snd 10 percent of the time selling McCain. That is why Obama won. While the Rep McCain camp was spending tons of money and time just trying to smear Obama, Obama was spending the same time selling himself. Go figure it out yourself GOP.
Posted by: CAW | January 30, 2009, 8:43 pm 8:43 pm
Substance, not color, not gender but what you are made of. What you stand for. What your beliefs are. That is what matters to the American voter or majority of voters I should say. Its very simple.
Posted by: CAW | January 30, 2009, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
Michael Steele was a colleague of mine when we both attended Georgetown Law School in their night program. The thing I recall most about Michael was our graduation. When he walked up to receive his diploma, he brought up his wife and children, including his newborn son. Everyone in our section gave him and his family a huge applause, in recognition of how well he had balanced his commitment to his family while attending law school and working full time.
Posted by: Ed Meyer | January 30, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
WOW, seeing the GOP on display is like watching a bad magic show. What gimmick are they going to pull next?
THIS IS PATHETIC !!!!!
Posted by: John McNugget | January 30, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
What’s funny is that the same people now thumping their chests with “pride” because the RNC decided to add their own black guy are the same people who would cross the street when they see him walking towards them.
Posted by: Yeah Right | January 30, 2009, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
Soooooo…the repubs find Palin to counter the Hillary effect. Now they thing that copycatting again will save them. HOW SHALLOW!!! Will Repubs really accept a black leader? i doubt it!! Rush, what say you?
Posted by: lifesajourney | January 30, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
“put the scarlet letter “R” away.” it will take much work for that to happen. and move far away from the radical right (which is where the scarlet letter “R” came from to begin with.
Ed Meyer—thanks for sharing your experience. i wish Mr. Steele all the best. he has a herculean task before him. i sense little partisan rhetoric in him and i believe he sees the need to dsitance the party from Limbaugh et al.
Posted by: Paul Wall | January 30, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
I thought Limberger was new leader of the GOP pack.
Posted by: Oxy | January 30, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
This has got to be the biggest political gimmick I have seen in my 60 years on this earth. The white guy Christian Republican Church Party puts a black man in charge. Their true leader – Rush Limbaugh – must be foaming at the mouth.
Posted by: Mike-Wa | January 30, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm
Well, considering the likes of such morons as Alan Keyes, I don’t give much thought to the token black dude in the GOP anymore
Posted by: sciencerulesovertheology | January 30, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Crusher – What’s sad is that people like you keep blaming Republicans for supporting Bush when the Democrats kept funding his plans. Can’t you see the hypocrisy in that?
Posted by: BT | January 30, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
Lifesajourney thinks the Republicans are copycatting Obama? What a joke! Michael Steele has been a person of influence for a long time. When he ran for Senate, the liberals were throwing Oreos at him, but Barack they like… he’s okay since he’s a liberal. Republicans have been representing on the diversity front in a more meaningful way for a long, long time. The Dems only trot out their diversity when it gets them into the White House, then he turns around and nominates a Cabinet that’s less representative of the population than anyone in the last 30 years or so. You just can’t stand it when someone you think you should own is on the side of Right and Light!
Posted by: Conservative girl | January 30, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
Congratulations Michael Steele!
Those who founded this land wanted to forge a new nation – and somehow they believed that God was with them and that God was in it all.
That is our heritage in this country – to see ourselves by faith as partners with God working to build a better world. It is time for us to recapture the faith heritage which is so much a part of the American experience! :)
Posted by: aware2u | January 30, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Huh – Ron Paul is no friend of GLBT Americans or same-sex couples. Although he supports the rights of individual states to decide the issue of marriage for themselves, he voted FOR the federal Defense of Marriage act, which allows states to refuse to recognized same-sex marriages entered into legally in other states. Ron Paul is also critical of the USSC Lawrence vs. Texas ruling that overturned state sodomy statutes, and he supports “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” None of these positions treats LGBT Americans and same-sex couples equally to heterosexual Americans and opposite-sex married couples. The Republican Party is a good fit for bigot Ron Paul.
Posted by: ebfauvel | January 30, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
ebfauvel………………….enough already. Equal? you are equal to any other citizen. you can get a job, hold office, vote, and do everything every other American can do. This is about redifinig marriage, and many people don’t want that. Its that simple. this is not a civil rights issue because civil union provides the same benefits. Just stop. The whole world is not going to change their beliefs to make you feel comfortable. I do not condone any discrimination or mistreatment to any person, including gays, but stop trying to force people to accept your lifestyle.
Posted by: den | January 30, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
It’s sad, The republicans will continue to flounder because of their policies. The United States People no longer trust them after the looting of this Great Nation. This guy will end up being the blame by them.
Posted by: rightbehind | January 30, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
It is time for us to recapture the faith heritage which is so much a part of the American experience! :)
Posted by: aware2u | Jan 30, 2009 9:29:46 PM
——–
Ok, here’s the problem aware2u: Not everyone in this country is 1.Christian 2. Religious. Furthermore, there is such a thing called seperation of church and state, which your party seems to have forgotten.
Posted by: sciencerulesovertheology | January 30, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
Yeah its odd alright
Posted by: Bonita | January 30, 2009, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
I put up this poll to see people’s reactions: (linkback) A or B? Michael Steele A) best man for the job B) token black guy [VOTE] – http://www.thriveorfail.com/9466c
Posted by: Kevin k | January 30, 2009, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm
den: Until the GOP moves away from a bible-thumping, white, r-e-d-n-e-c-k group, they will continue to be marginalized.
How do 2 dudes or 2 gals marrying affect YOU????????? It doesn’t.
Posted by: sciencerulesovertheology | January 30, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
When the republican party fails miserably, guess who is going to be the fall guy?
Posted by: JoeKidd | January 30, 2009, 9:51 pm 9:51 pm
If this is the way that they want to reach out not going to work I think Mr Steele will do a good job still seems odd
Posted by: Bonita | January 30, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
It is ironic the Republicans wish to remove their ‘Scarlett Letter’ when in fact most modern day Republicans do nothing other than label others in shame that they do not believe are as morally ‘correct’ as them. The reverse-Karma the Republicans are now feeling is completely due to their idiotic mindset since 2001. Some type of evil neo-conservative movement somehow hijacked the Republican party these past 8 years. Hopefully they will be able to shake it off.
Posted by: Eric | January 30, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
kevin K: Cool. Checked it out. Pretty neat survey there……I voted yes, as he is clearly the token dude
Posted by: sciencerulesovertheology | January 30, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
I thought we are already run into the ground.
Posted by: Joe B | January 30, 2009, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
aware2u said, “Those who founded this land wanted to forge a new nation – and somehow they believed that God was with them and that God was in it all.”
No, DUDE. It is the holier-than-thou attitude that has destroyed the Republican party. That attitude has allowed the modern day, sick, neo-conservative Republican to ignore all common sense and compassion for fellow man. Today’s Republican thinks they are better than the rest of the world, and that they are allowed to attack any country they wish, and kill innocent people in the name of ‘God’. Does that mindset sound familiar to you? It is the mindset also shared by the right-wing Islamic radicals. The entire right-wing branch of humanity needs to disappear from the pages of time.
Posted by: Eric | January 30, 2009, 9:58 pm 9:58 pm
This man may be a good guy but he is overly optimistic. The Republican party is held hostage by wingnuts on the right and has its main sphere of influence from the likes of Coulter, Limbaugh and Hannity with Fox as supporting framework. They don’t just do commentary – they promoted nothing but negative unconstructive nonsense that gets us nowhere. These are the same people who tried to convince everyone Obama was a secret Muslim socialist terrorist who “might” be the anti-Christ. They are the same people who say with a straight face that Sarah Palin is the future of the Republican Party.
Good luck with that.
Posted by: Livvy | January 30, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
den – I cannot do everything that every other American can do because I am not allowed to marry the person I love. My partner and I are denied over 1,100 federal and 300 state benefits that come with a marriage license and are obtainable in no other way. Civil unions are not offered in most states, including the one in which I live, and there is no such thing as a federal civil union – so you are wrong about this not being a civil rights issue. I don’t care if you or anyone else “accepts” my “lifestyle,” but as a tax-paying citizen of this country I demand the same rights that everyone else has – and I won’t shut up until I get them. Ron Paul wants to deny me these rights, and that’s why I label him a bigot and state that his home is comfortably within the Republican party.
Posted by: ebfauvel | January 30, 2009, 10:03 pm 10:03 pm
Michael Steele Rocks. Thank you GOP, it is about time you moved closer to the political center. Now we have a fighting chance to save America from Socialism and despair.
.
Posted by: Alexandra | January 30, 2009, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Why is everything turning into black and white. He’s black, so what, I’m white, so what. This country is going to start dividing itself further and further if these “so IMPORTANT” political positions of “COLOR” mean so much. Just do the job.
Posted by: B | January 30, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
The GOP has yet to hit bottom. The choice of Steele as RNC leader was gimmick. The GOP think by electing a black man, they erase their racist behavior and their stance of intolerance. Hey GOP, it won’t work. Black people are not going to flock to the GOP just because of Steele. We are not as stupid as you GOP believe we are.
Posted by: Marlene | January 30, 2009, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
Funny, when Bill Clinton was elected the first term.. The dems did the Victory Dance saying the Republicans were done with. 2 Years later.. the dems lost the Senate and the House and guess what?? It stayed that way until Bush came into Office.
Do your dances now and enjoy yourself.
Posted by: ajax | January 30, 2009, 10:26 pm 10:26 pm
Like Palin was the Republican answer to try to capture disgruntled Hillary voters..so too is this the next and newest gimmick of the GOP.
fight fire with fire…
A Black President and now proudly the Republicans come up with a Black Chairman. Those rascally Republicans… what will they try to get us to believe next??? That they are not racist??? heh, heh, Do you have any Republican friends…??? then you know what I’m talking about. And did you notice that at the Palin rallies during the campaign, kinda looked like klan meetings,,,
I wish Mr. Steele the best of luck… but those old Republicans will not change easily…
Rush would have been more fun to watch… I am sure underneath surface, Rush’s gospels will still be the heartbeat of the GOP…
Posted by: braith morgan | January 30, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
Alexandra — you said, “Now we have a fighting chance to save America from Socialism and despair.”
So are you speaking of the same type of despair that we are currently facing from 40 years of badly run Capitalism? Socialism is not something anyone needs to be ‘saved’ from. Greedy and poorly managed Capitalism is a much more dangerous alternative. What the world needs is a new financial order that borrows from the best ideas of Socialism and Capitalism that will allow for growth and the rewarding of good ideas & hard work, but is balanced by the doctrines of equality and fairness that Socialism promises.
Posted by: Eric | January 30, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
Congratulations Michael Steele!
Those who founded this land wanted to forge a new nation – and somehow they believed that God was with them and that God was in it all.
That is our heritage in this country – to see ourselves by faith as partners with God working to build a better world. It is time for us to recapture the faith heritage which is so much a part of the American experience! :)
Posted by: aware2u | Jan 30, 2009 9:29:46 PM
===========================
LOL
you gotttttta be kiddddding me.
Not sure. Did you type that with a straight face?????
Those who founded this land didn’t even regard Steele’s ancestors as humans.
They believed that God was with them when they owned slaves and sanctioned slavery which the de-humanization of a person, the arbitrary breakup of a family, a mother/child, man/wife, for MONEY.
heritage…. what? are you kidding me. It took a civil war, a century of a race being battered still, and a determined lady not to give up her seat to jim crow and a baptist preacher to bring america kicking and screaming to this point. So please don’t think so highly of your American Experience and please do not think that God’s providence was so squarely in America’s corner.
You could have chose any other mind numming GOP speak but that was straight the book of BIZARRO WORLD.
Posted by: Omentum | January 30, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
One black man in a room full of old, white men, and the black guy “just happens” to get the chairmanship.
….yeah, that’s REAL racial harmony right there.
Posted by: Timothy | January 30, 2009, 10:46 pm 10:46 pm
Let’s not confuse any issues. Mr. Steele is qualified to do the job that the Republicans have entrusted him with. I congratulate him. The problem I have is with the Republican Party and its motivations. This is the same thing the Party did with Sarah Palin in order to attract when women’s vote once Hillary Clinton didn’t get the Democratic nomination.
Posted by: james | January 30, 2009, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
Omentum: You should have also pointed out that this country was founded as a capitalistic venture. Why did Columbus come in the first place? To find faster trade routes to Asia. The founding fathers were capitalists whose largest objections were paying taxes to the British crown. Most of them were landowners/slaveowners. Would partners of God have slaughtered the native people in order to take control of their lands? Heritage of faith? I don’t think so. Amen!
Posted by: james | January 30, 2009, 11:00 pm 11:00 pm
Can’t anyone in America have an opinion. All those conservative talk shows have a right to speak their mind.. You should really listen some time, I mean really listen!! What they say is spot on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1
Posted by: mary | January 30, 2009, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
How do you anger black men/women AND white men/women ALL at the same time??? Become a black Republican. Dare to leave the intellectual gulag of the liberal left and they howl and scream bloody murder and shill the most vile and hateful insults at you for leaving the bankrupt plantation and having the courage to think for yourself. God bless people like Mr. Steele who have the courage to serve no master, and dare to engage in critical thinking, and reject the morally bankrupt and vapid rantings of those who believe in the “tyranny of the majority”, and living off the fruits and labors and perpetuating their living status by stealing other people’s money by force of government and at the barrell of a gun. Force absent of government is considered violence? Why is not government subjected to that same standard? Worst of all, why do we accept this? Are we not adults? Do we not know better how to spend our own money and run our own lives? Do we need somebody to do our thinking for us, tell us how much money we earn, we can keep, what we can buy, or choose to put into our own bodies. Are we men, women, adults, or are we children who need somebody to shepherd us through life, living as though THEY know what is better for us, and just how correctly to live our lives, and in absence of our own free will. Far too many people would rather live life as a sheep, than as a free person. Why have a force of armies, when people are oh so willing to enslave themselves…
Posted by: hmn... | January 30, 2009, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
One black man in a room full of old, white men, and the black guy “just happens” to get the chairmanship.
….yeah, that’s REAL racial harmony right there.
Posted by: Timothy | Jan 30, 2009 10:46:10 PM
===========================
Let’s just hope this goes from what is now a strategic ploy to a genuine gesture from the GOP.
Lets also hope that his congratulatory gift is not a fiddle and some tattered clothes.
Posted by: Omentum | January 30, 2009, 11:11 pm 11:11 pm
How do you anger black men/women AND white men/women ALL at the same time??? Become a black Republican. Dare to leave the intellectual gulag of the liberal left and they howl and scream bloody murder and shill the most vile and hateful insults at you for leaving the bankrupt plantation and having the courage to think for yourself.
==============
You could not be further from the truth. If the GOP believed it could get away with what was the status quo – not including minority issues in their platform – do you for one second believe that Steele would have had a chance. NO….. Saltzman would have been the Chair …. hand’s down. He best exemplified the GOP party.
GOP has become the party of GIMMICKS
1. They have denounce the Republican names and now call themselves Conservatives
2. They went to wasilla to counter the Hillary voters – did not work
3. They are drumming up all this hoopla saying they lost their way. NOOOO YOU STAYED THE SAME. America Changed November 4th.
4. Now they bring in the counter to Barack Obama. Somewhat like the theme of Superman. Instead of kryptonite they are using Steele. – Won’t work. Steele could not win in MARYLAND. Do you think he will help the GOP?
HE has a good game TRUE but he is on the wrong TURF.
Posted by: Omentum | January 30, 2009, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
The smartest thing the Republicans can do is to stop being a surrogate for people who want to use the government as a way to impose their religious beliefs upon everyone else. Most of us don’t want America to essentially be a theocratic democracy – we want a real democracy. And for those of you who will only want to play semantic games, yeah, I know we are primarily a representative republic.
Posted by: B K | January 30, 2009, 11:26 pm 11:26 pm
hmn: I have just one thing to say to you: If you truely believe in freedom, than why do the Republicans want to limit women’s rights and rights of gays, while pushing their beliefs on everyone?
Posted by: sciencerulesovertheology | January 30, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm
How can Steele with a straight face represent the party that created Obama Bucks, the reprehensible waffle mix, spelled Osama instead of Obama on election ballot?
Since the majority of the Republicans are diversity xenophobes, we know this is a joke! The Republicans are now putting an African America up front as their leader?
Who can forget that monolithic crowd of delegates gathered at the RNC convention a few months ago? I sat at home and counted the minority faces on 1 hand. A majority of Republicans will never follow this black man. They are beyond desperate– totally hysterical.
This brother is being punked and enjoying every moment of it. Can somebody say, “Uncle Steele.” With Rush in the foreground…Let the games begin.
This is going to be more fun than the run for the White House.
Posted by: clarity | January 30, 2009, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
clarity, what do you mean “how”?
THAT’S WHAT UNCLE TOMS DO !!!!!
Posted by: Lucky | January 30, 2009, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
clarity……
go get you popcorn
its going to be an interesting couple of years. try not to laugh too hard
Posted by: Omentum | January 30, 2009, 11:41 pm 11:41 pm
ebfauvel – Oh wow. Bigot eh? As far as I am concerned Paul believes you can do whatever you want. He has personal beliefs, but those are secondary to the freedom of the individual. Why shouldn’t he defend the traditional definition of marriage? Why don’t you call whatever you got going on garriage.
Posted by: Huh | January 30, 2009, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
Isn’t this the party that sang “Barak the Magic Negroe”? And proclaims Rush Limbaugh the new GOP leader, and thought Sarah Palin was a good choice for vice president? I mean, come on!
Thank GOD these guys lost.
Posted by: keredte | January 30, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
The old way isn’t going to work anymore. Steele is a token used to attack Obama. If McCain/Palin had won Steele would still be in the back. It reminds me back in the 40′s when a person to prove they weren’t racist would say they had one black friend. America has moved pass those old times tricks and Steele will be kicked out when he’s not needed. I’m glad more Americans aren’t interested in color but more in the President working for the American people. It’s sad to see Republicans still don’t get it. Rush would have been a better choice as he’s already their spoke person and directing their mission.
Steele reminds me of Alderman Fred Davis of the TV Show Good Times. Watch and you’ll see their just alike.
Posted by: Jackie | January 30, 2009, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
Pure cynical gimmick. Palin was to Hillary as Steele is to Obama. Totally transparent – won’t work.
Posted by: Jenny | January 30, 2009, 11:55 pm 11:55 pm
Tokenism at it’s best. It’s like the Repubs are saying, “You’ve got your black president and, now, we’ve got ours.” If Steele can’t see this, he’s as much an idiot as Limberger, oops Limbaugh.
Posted by: ConserviTami | January 30, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
it’s so funny to hear people talk about Michael Steele being a token and about the republican party being racist, what the fools that don’t check their history seems to not know is that the Republican party was the party for all racist for many, many years and the Dems were not. Know your history before you start running your mouth, if Steele is a token what is Obama? and before you try to call me racist I am blacker than any of you on here so save it, bunch of idiots, you people do a disservice to the race by constantly race baiting and using the race card, the man is qualified period, he has more experience in is pinky than your current messiah.
Posted by: Kim | January 30, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
Different face same messed up bunch of OLD GUYS!
Posted by: CC | January 31, 2009, 12:03 am 12:03 am
The GOP just doesn’t get it. This move amounts to nothing more than a childish parlor trick. They thought Hillary Clinton was the force to be reckoned with so they pulled Sarah Palin out of her igloo as a counter measure. Now, they find a Black guy to prove what exactly? You just can’t shine crap. It’s just too messy. The so called Republican Party, which by the way none of the Bush sycophants were in truth or fact, has gone the way of the Dodo.
Posted by: Gough519 | January 31, 2009, 12:39 am 12:39 am
As a Black woman and a Democrat, the choice of Michael Steele rings as disingenuous. It also shows just how desperate the Republicans have become to maintain power at any costs.
To actually assume that Blacks and other minorities will desert the Democratic party in droves just because of this choice is laughable at best. At worst, it insults my intelligence. The simplistic assumption that I ,or other minorities will instantly identify with Mr. Steele and join forces with Republicans just because of 1 token election is laughable and pathetic. Here’s a brilliant suggestion for the Republican party – keep promoting the ideas of Rush Limbaugh, Anne Coulter, the late Storm Thurmond, and Karl Rove. They seem to strengthen and energize your base. Keep pathetic circus appointments such as this to a minimum. Sorry, the minority communities aren’t buying the swill you’re trying to sell !!!
BTW, why didn’t the Republican party just elect Rush Limbaugh or Sarah Palin as it’ s chairman, they seem to be the standard bearers of the Republican party’s ideas. When they speak, the Republican party’s primary base drools in anticipation. LOL!!!
Posted by: TLJ | January 31, 2009, 1:08 am 1:08 am
I have to go to bed… but as a side comment.
This has to be the funniest not-meant-to-be funny news story I have ever read. This is Comedy Gold. This is truly obtuse, absurd, and worthy of a deep lampooning.
Top Ten Incoming RNC Chairman Comedy Lines:
“Now we got our own Magic Negro”
“The only reason they elected a black man, is that they couldn’t find a black woman in the RNC”
“The color scheme we ripped off from the Obama web site only works with dark skin tones.”
“Hope- it’s not just for Marxist attorneys”
“Sarah Palin refused to go to Tan-O-Rama”
“White men can’t jump”
“Oprah is a democrat”
“It ain’t reparations…. but….”
“Did you expect a chinese guy?
And the number one comedy line:
“Immitation is the sincerest form of flattery!”
Posted by: Michael Cozzi | January 31, 2009, 2:34 am 2:34 am
THESE GUYS ARE SOOOOO FAKE !!!!!!
IT IS WAY TOO OBVIOUS WHAT MAGIC TRICK THEIR TRYING TO PLAY….. AS LONG AS RUSH LIMBAUGH HAS A REPUB. VOICE AND THE CONFEDERATE STATES GO REPUBLICAN AT THE NUMBER THEY DO…. THE REPUB. ANIMAL WILL CONTINUE TO DIE SLOWLY….. AND THOSE SCREAMS WILL BE MUSIC TO MY EARS !!!!
Posted by: Levi | January 31, 2009, 2:37 am 2:37 am
Trying to copy the Democratic Party by appointing a African American male!!!!
What a JOKE!!!!!
I’m African American and I can see right threw their B.S.!!!!!
Posted by: sisterdearest09 | January 31, 2009, 2:48 am 2:48 am
WHY NOT COLIN POWELL FOR THIS POSITION ???
OHH YEA…. HE BECAME A DEMOCRAT…I WONDER WHY HE DID THAT ??? HA HA HA
Posted by: Levi | January 31, 2009, 2:49 am 2:49 am
PEOPLE, PAY ATTENTION!!! THIS IS GOOD NEWS, BAD NEWS FOR RNC!!!
= THE GOOD NEWS:
The RNC election of Michael Steele is a great pick. Like Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal, Mr. Steele is smart, pragmatic, corporate friendly, and a real solution finder. Many people believe Mr. Steele won solely because he was Black. This is wrong, wrong, wrong.
Michael Steele won the position primarily for two reasons:
- (1.) – He is pragmatic, progressive, and not a Republican “extremist” like RNC candidate Chip Saltsman, Congresswoman Michele Bachmann, Gov. Sarah Palin, and former Congressman Tom Delay. It just happens the RNC is in the market for a progressive pragmatist and Mr. Steele fits the bill;
- (2.) – He also earned it. Mr. Steele has being working the political halls for quite some time, making all types of alliances and building political relations just for this moment. Mr. Steele worked the hardest and longest to win this RNC Chair.
= THE BAD NEWS * * * VERY IMPORTANT * * *:
With Michael Steele as Chairman of RNC, the battle lines are now officially drawn between:
(a.) – PRAGMATIC PROGRESSIVE REPUBLICANS (like Michael Steele, Newt Gingrich, John McCain, Chuck Hagel, Colin Powell, Tim Pawlenty, Arlen Specter),
- – - and the – - -
(b.) – FIERCELY RADICAL RELIGIOUS RIGHT (e.i. Sarah Palin, Chip Saltsman, Saxby Chambliss, Tom Delay, Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, Michele Bachmann, James Dobson, and the Tennessee Republican [Confederate] Party).
= THE SUMMATION:
The Pragmatic Progressive Republicans now have the helm with Michael Steele as RNC Chairman. But Mr. Steele and his Pragmatic Republicans will be forced to fight a ferocious political civil war with the “Sarah Palin / James Dobson / Rush Limbaugh” Christian-Evangelical wing of the Republican Party. The expected battle will either make the Republican Party stronger by 2010-2012, or it will tear the Republican Party apart, thereby forcing the final vestiges of moderate Republicans over to the Democratic and Libertarian Party.
Posted by: Perusing-Through | January 31, 2009, 3:10 am 3:10 am
ricky ticky – The Republicans stand firm on their conservative principles??? What conservative principles??? … The 3 pillars of Goldwater conservatism are more representative in the Democratic party … Fiscal Conservatism (yea, the dems balanced the budget under Clinton), isolationism (Ever hear of Iraq and nation building) and a sprinkling of social liberalism.
Posted by: frank | January 31, 2009, 4:04 am 4:04 am
Perusing-Thought: Excellent ! Put me in the A column. Hopefully the RNC and Mr. Steele can convince the American people, that not all who are “Conservative”, are “Radical-right” ( B column :”Rush”, “Hannity” and “Coulter). Of course column B wants the President to fail : RATINGS !!! Note: I do not want this “Stimulus Bill” to pass. Not because I want the President to fail(like “Rush-for-ratings”). I feel this “Stimulus Bill” is just a band-aid being applied to a compound fracture.
Posted by: Isabella | January 31, 2009, 4:05 am 4:05 am
If it wasn’t so funny, It’d be sad.
Posted by: Ted | January 31, 2009, 4:21 am 4:21 am
Care to explain what’s “so funny” Ted ?
Posted by: Isabella | January 31, 2009, 4:28 am 4:28 am
You want change? Give the party back to the moderates and tell the church they no longer own the party. The people in control now have lost their minds.
Posted by: jan | January 31, 2009, 4:34 am 4:34 am
Seeing the republican party is like watching a very bad magic act. First they pull that palin stunt, that DID NOT bring the Hillary supporters, and now they come with this Michael Steele garbage. There is no way, blacks are going to fall for this pathetic stunt.
The problem is that the GOP has wack-jobs like Rush, Hannity and Coulter on one side yelling making fools of themselves AND THE PARTY, and bringing in the Sarah Palin “he’s an Arab” group……and then you have the more moderate part of the party, which is trying to bring in new voters. Until the GOP has those clowns like coulter and rush, they will never win.
Posted by: Jacob | January 31, 2009, 4:47 am 4:47 am
Jee’s there’s some original thinking …not.
Dems almost choose female candidate, so Repubs go for female VP. Dems choose Black candidate, so Repubs suddenly choose black chair.
Mike-wa is right, talk about gimmick politics!
Posted by: Marcus | January 31, 2009, 4:52 am 4:52 am
For you media moguls out there..the ‘oe’ in Boehner cannot be pronounced like a “a’ in either English or German. In English it should be pronounced like a long “o” and have the same sound as “poem” “Joe” “oboe” or ‘toe’. So why do the media keep pronoucing it as ‘bayner’? You have no excuse for that pronunciation. If you pronounce it that way you should go back to school and learn English…it should be pronounced to rhyme with loner. Except with a ‘b’.
Posted by: JL | January 31, 2009, 6:03 am 6:03 am
“…Michael Steele, a black man (or as Rush would say; “Michael the magic negro”), is going to lead the party of Oxy-Contin, NASCAR, Hillbillies, Hockey-Moms, Rush, Palin, Nutjobs and little ole Repub ladies (the ones with silver-colored dishoveled hair who think Obama is Muslim)…out of the wilderness and into the promised land??….sure….just like I am the messiah…well not really…that’s Obama’s job….but seriously folks…as a hard core Demo, I like Steele, but I just think that he is leading a party that is too fractionalized and too racist…I do wish him luck and a powerball ticket…he’s gonna need it…”
Posted by: Larry | January 31, 2009, 6:51 am 6:51 am
Even a token black won’t help the disgraced and beleaguered republicon party. YOU WILL ALWAYS BE ASSOCIATED WITH BUSH AND CHEENEY – at least in this lifetime! You had your chance and blew it – good riddance!
Posted by: Mike | January 31, 2009, 7:13 am 7:13 am
Hooray. Finally some straight forward pragmatism and wisdom from the GOP. It’s way overdue. A wise and profound choice, Mr. Steele will help restore the Party of Reagan.
Posted by: Bubbler Dad | January 31, 2009, 7:20 am 7:20 am
Great choice for the job. Way to go Republicans..!!!!
Posted by: CW | January 31, 2009, 7:29 am 7:29 am
All of you who keep saying Sarah Palin was a gimmick and Michael Steele is a gimmick don’t have a CLUE! You are the biased ones… You can’t hear what they are SAYING because you’re too focused on how they look on the outside! We’re listening to what they are saying, and we like it!
Posted by: conservative girl | January 31, 2009, 7:35 am 7:35 am
What’s next the Republican Black Caucus? This is to funny
Posted by: Gates | January 31, 2009, 7:37 am 7:37 am
Liberals always call Republicans who are black, women, Latinos, etc. tokens because they want to marginalize them. It scares them because it’s so obvious that that they’re smarter and more capable than the Democrat counterparts!
Posted by: Conservative girl | January 31, 2009, 7:41 am 7:41 am
Liberals always call Republicans who are black, women, Latinos, etc. tokens because they want to marginalize them. It scares them because it’s so obvious that that they’re smarter and more capable than the Democrat counterparts!
Posted by: Conservative girl | January 31, 2009, 7:41 am 7:41 am
I thought it’s only democrats that were the “educated elite”. Thanks conservative girl for setting the record straight. NOT!!
Posted by: tinah | January 31, 2009, 8:10 am 8:10 am
Good he’s black. Now its PC to be a republican.
Posted by: jamesx | January 31, 2009, 8:19 am 8:19 am
Nobody voted for Steele because he is black, (unlike our current president) but rather his conservative principles. They realize this is the best man for the job, no one cares that he’s black.
Posted by: Spread The Wealth | January 31, 2009, 8:28 am 8:28 am
Name calling and half truths,if thats all the Dems have I’m not worried. In the long run substance will win out over a flash in the pan. So drink your Cool Aid and fall in lockstep Dems. Enjoy now the party won’t last long.
Posted by: hkdakota | January 31, 2009, 8:29 am 8:29 am
The first news story I heard this morning was about Mr. Steele being the new RNC Chair. My first thoughts were: Sec. Hillary Clinton (answer – Sarah Palin), President Obama (answer – Mr. Steele).
My next thoughts went to the Republican rallies where supporter yelled out horrific comments that are not worth repeating, or a co-worker who said that her loving husband walked out of the room that she was is in because Mr. Obama was on the TV, or the young man in Louisiana who was beaten because he was wearing an Obama t-shirt, or the woman in Forsyth County GA whose home was burned by arsonist with a racist graffiti death threat toward the President left on the charded remains as she traveled to the inauguration.
This is a representative example of the supporters of the GOP I am personally aware of. Change your hearts GOP. . .
If Mr. Steele is indeed your Chair – let him lead. I just pray that he does not face the degrading outcries and displays of hatred that has been perpetuated by your party just because of the color of his skin. I will wait to measure Mr. Steele by the content of his character.
Posted by: Ms. G | January 31, 2009, 8:33 am 8:33 am
“Name calling and half truths,if thats all the Dems have I’m not worried. In the long run substance will win out over a flash in the pan. So drink your Cool Aid and fall in lockstep Dems.”
MEOW!! Name calling happens on both sides as indicated by your post. A little self righteous perhaps?
Posted by: Tinah | January 31, 2009, 8:40 am 8:40 am
Reagan was the first in a string of radical GOPers. Returning to Reagan won’t help the GOP become moderate.
If the GOP wants to make a comeback they’re going to have to throw the psychos like Limbaugh and Coulter out. They’re going to have to push the religious faction who is currently leading the party out. One way to do that might be to start taxing churches since they have become political entities and no longer qualify solely as religious institutions. I don’t look for any of that to happen but that’s what they need to do.
Posted by: jan | January 31, 2009, 8:45 am 8:45 am
This will not work. I’m sure that Mr. Steele is a good man and legislature but his selection by the RNC only looks as if its a means to show that the GOP is inclusive. Unfortunately, the reputation and perception of the party is so the opposite. You would have thought they would have learned from the Palin disaster but clearly they have not. Just from these postings alone (although not scientific)most feel that this selection is just another ploy. In my opinion, the Republicans need to realize that it is not so much their platform which causes angst, but more that the general population of the United States just do no TRUST them.
Posted by: FS | January 31, 2009, 8:47 am 8:47 am
Nothing stated was a half truth. It was the whole truth. I agree with you that substance will win out over flash. He is in the White House.
Posted by: Ms. G | January 31, 2009, 8:47 am 8:47 am
Rush is busy right now trying to ram his hand up Steele’s rear. Rush is the man, Steele is just the puppet.
Posted by: Josh | January 31, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am
LOL, thanks now I’m even more confident.
Posted by: hkdakota | January 31, 2009, 9:08 am 9:08 am
Some of these comments about the Republican Party are astonishing to me. Let’s be clear – Obama is our President and won the election, hands down. But he won by 2 Million votes – not exactly a landslide in a country with 300 Million people. So, I realize the Democrats have the reigns of this country but this attitude that the Republicans are road kill is short sighted and vacuous. The politican tide in this country can change on a dime. Another thing that ya’ll need to realize is that the Democratics have been the majority in Congress since 2006 and have enjoyed a lower approval rating that Bush for pretty much the whole time. So if you think that the Democrats have the pulse of the people is delusional. Finally, Obama is ourt President and, though I did not vot for him I want him to be successful as President. (And, by the way, Rush said he wants Obama to be successful as well – he said that he does not want liberal policies to be successful. His comments have been misquoted and skewed. I am not a Rush fan but he has been misquoted and misinterprested repeatedly by the press and, frankly, some of the comments above.) Let’s be clear, Obama has not done anything of any real substance yet. His leadership has not been tested by events in the world. He has jumped in and working at it but the new has not worn off. This Nation is still awe struck by Obama. Let’s see how the Democratic brand does in six months or a year or three years. It all seems so perfect now but this Presidnet is hardly out of the starting gate and the left is already cannonizing him and his policies. It seems we might let him actually do something before we elevate him to Mount Olympus. In summary – some of this vistory lap attitude from some of you is laughable. You underestimate the Republicans and way over estimate the Democrats. More importantly, you aare caught up in the lype and not the reality of how this political process works.
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | January 31, 2009, 9:10 am 9:10 am
Hddakota,
Your welcome and thanks for boosting my self confidence. Have a nice day.
Posted by: Tinah | January 31, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am
Do you hear the cricket sounds? That’s the SILENCE from mainstream media.
It just exposes the hypocrisy of the in-the-tank-Obama-media, they were always less excited about him being black then the fact that he was a liberal…..
This is a HUGE event. All African Americans should be very proud. Imagine this situation just a few years ago…….
Posted by: opedanderson | January 31, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am
Seriously. I don’t want to hear the phrase “trickle down” any more. I don’t want to see money given to CEOs as the republican party is still demanding; without strings attached no less. I don’t want churches dictating birth control or abortion policies or any other “moral” issue to the country at large. Persuasion is one thing, dictating national public policy to those who don’t believe what they do is quite another.
Posted by: jan | January 31, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am
Rights come to you as an individual NOT AS A GROUP. You have rights and protections under law, you do NOT have rights because you are “black, a woman, or simply gay. This in a nutshell encapsulates the difference between statist Republicans and Democrats and rule of law, adovcates of personal freedom. You rights come from YOU, NOT GOVERNMENT!!! But as long as you are willing to give up those rights willing in the name of the straightjacket of empty political ideology instead of preserving those rights granted to you by that “archaic” Constitution no politician OR citizen even pretends to pay lip service TO, let alone read, you will be subjected to “majority rule by “elected” (and I use that term loosely” TYRANT!!! If you refuse to stand up for your individual rights, Government and all other positions of “authority” will happy take your power from you, and turn in against you. Then feeling powerless, you turn to somebody like McCain or Obama screaming and whelping about demanding “Change”, when the infrastructure of centralized control, in defiance of freedom and personal liberty expands even further. If you want to solve problems, you have to look in the mirror, and take responsibility for your own life, and action with like minded individuals. THAT’S how you “change the world, one community at a time. But if you cede your authority to the whims of a system of Government who steals the fruits of your labor, and exist solely to further perpetuate itself, WHY are you surprised that things continue to get progressively WORSE, be it a Democrat or Republican is in control of the House/Senate/White House? Government exists to serve ITSELF!!! Until you realize this, you will continue to not only pay the price of the problem, but the cost of subsidizing it, in the name of providing a “solution.”
Posted by: hmn... | January 31, 2009, 9:31 am 9:31 am
I bet Michael Steele paid his taxes and is not involved in a “PAY TO PLAY” scandle like Richardson and Blogo….
Posted by: neofred | January 31, 2009, 9:31 am 9:31 am
As a republican I will support our new President, however support dose not mean roll over and play dead.When I disagree I will try to let my voice known by contacting congressman and senators. I will not stoop to the type of discourse that move-on or acorn use. I firmly believe that we cannot spend our way out of this mess. Common sense says if I have debt creating more debt will not make it go away. I must ask the Democrats out there (and I’m sure for the main part you are all loyal Americans), do you honestly think the type of spending in this economic package is the right path for America?
Posted by: hkdakota | January 31, 2009, 9:36 am 9:36 am
The GOP is a sick sad joke. Now they’ve reached the point of hypocrisy where they are electing “token” leadership whom none of them actually respect or beleive in, just so they can kid themselves that they are, well, not racist. You hangers-on to this ailing elephant are mostly hard-core racists and religious zealots, and everyone knows it, no one is fooled except Fox.
Posted by: iamwomaninmi | January 31, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am
Can someone help me here… Mr. Obama ran and was subsequently elected because of his belief in the democratic platform and his plans for the country.
Now, how isn’t it not wishing somone to fail, if you are hoping that their plans (of which Mr Obama described when campaigning)fail?
I’m really confused by those who say that Rush Limbaugh was misquoted. I personally thought his comments were extremely unpatriotic. I have never heard such a condemnation before regarding any political leader! I know people who disliked Mr. Bush.. who disagreed with his decisions… and based on certain facts (right or wrong),determined that his action was a failure, BUT, I never heard anyone say that they hope he fails.
Posted by: FS | January 31, 2009, 9:42 am 9:42 am
The GOP is a sick sad joke. …Now that is funny,considering the tax evading pay to play corrupt picks in Obama’s cabinet. Thank God for Rush Limbaugh to expose these people and that socialist spending bill. goes to show some of you are content with being “subjects” no citizens. you drank the kool-aid
Posted by: neofred | January 31, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am
I thought Deemocrats were the party of seeing people from the inside out. From the looks of Democrats posting here, all I see is hate and judgment.
Judge a man based on character, not skin color. Michael Steele passes this test.
Liberals want to keep minorities down and impoverished so they can keep them dependant on government. How can any thinking person not see this?
Posted by: worker man | January 31, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am
You never heard anyone say that they hope Bush fails?????
Posted by: Spread The Wealth | January 31, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am
hkdakota, you are absolutely correct with your actions! You are supposed to speak up when you disagree! FYI,I now consider myself an independant and have no party loyalty (former registered republican.) I care for what is best for my country. Now, given that, I am against these bail-outs too. Please keep in mind they started under the Bush administration. In just throwing money at a problem and increasing debt (without thought), is just ridiculous and opens the door for so much corruption. Already, it is being shown that institutions who received these funds have no clue what to do with this money. I implore congress to put in place some strong restrictions and accountability clauses.
Posted by: FS | January 31, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am
Pelosi/Frank 2012!!!!
Posted by: enoughalready | January 31, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am
Fs…..why don’t you listen to what Rush said?????THE WHOLE BIT. He said he wants’ Obama’s POLICY’S to fail. Read this Bill, It will no help the private sector, it’s a grow government bill, a step towards socialism. your source of information is that of an Iranian media. is that where you want America to go?
Posted by: neofred | January 31, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am
Fs…..why don’t you listen to what Rush said?????THE WHOLE BIT. He said he wants’ Obama’s POLICY’S to fail if it leans toward a socialist spending bill. Read this Bill, It will not help the private sector, it’s a grow government bill, a step towards socialism. your source of information is that of an Iranian media. is that where you want America to go?
Posted by: neofred | January 31, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am
Rush wants BHO’s policies to fail.
I am no dittohead, but liberals are known for taking the low road when it comes to the opposition.
Anyone remember Sarah Palin’s treatment by these “open minded” people?
Paul/Palin 2012
Posted by: worker man | January 31, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Pelosi/Frank 2012????? your kidding…right?
Posted by: neofred | January 31, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Spread The Wealth, cross my heart and hope to die, NO! I have never heard anyone say; “I HOPE President Bush will fail.
I do know people who now say that they knew he (Mr. Bush)would be a failure (matter of opinion and Monday morning quarterbacking if you ask me), but no one who wished him failure at the beginning of his term.
Posted by: FS | January 31, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am
iamwoman….You don’t remember thed left wanting Bush to fail? Odd – there was this huge (make believe) exodus out of this country as soon as Bush was elected. Of course, that was all yammering but we heard all kinds of big time Hollywood/left spokes people making announcements that “they were leaving the country….” Of course, guys like me were happy to let them go. The bad news was that they never left.
On Rush’s comments I would like to hear the unpatriotic part you reference. He is a conservative, Obama is a liberal. Let’s see….my guess is they have political disagreements. The fact that Rush doesn’t want the liberal policies that Obama might forward is not patriotic – frankly, it is quite the contrary. That would be like saying that Obama is not patriotic because he disagreed with the Iraqi war and wanted our troops to come home. I actually listened to the entire interview with Rush. He has his point of view but I never heard a thing that was unpatriotic. I wish you would tell us the part that you think that he is anit American (or whatever your definition of unpatriotic is…I suppose that is debatable as well).
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | January 31, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am
neofred, I did listen to and read the transcript of his whole statement and entire interview. Thus my conclusion that his comment was very unpatriotic (IMHO.)
Posted by: FS | January 31, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am
They started under the Bush administration. with a Democrat senate in 2006 when it all started, they were warned about this Fanny Mae And Freddy Mac MELT DOWN by republican years ago, it’s an open form to the public, look it up, the hearing are available to all of you to see. that Melt down will be nothing compared to what’s in store for us after the MAKE SHIFT job expire from this spending bill.Just look at Chicago, Michigan, New Orleans, New York, California (Arnolds no conservitive). run by ALL democrats, form city counsel members to Mayos, to Governors…..complete Disastersbill.Just look at Chicago, Michigan, New Orlean, New York, Californa. run by ALL democrats, form city counsel members to Mayor, to Govenoers…..Disatasters
Posted by: neofred | January 31, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am
Does anyone else think that the Senate Majority leader saying “the war is lost” is more unpatriotic than a radio talk show host saying “I want BHO’s POLICIES to fail?”
Posted by: worker man | January 31, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Why did Air America radio fail?
Because liberals cannot pay attention to anything for more than a few minutes.
Why do left wing books fail?
Because liberals would rather read Harry Potter.
Posted by: enoughalready | January 31, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am
FS….you didn’t listen to the whole thing if you got out of it that Rush just want’s Obama fail as a president, you heard just a part of it, I listen to him evey day at work, I heard the whole bit…I agree, I want his socialist policy’s to FAIL..BIG TIME. I wrote My Rep. and urged him to vote NO. All the republicans voted no and that’s great!!!!!
Posted by: neofred | January 31, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am
lot of unpatriotic people during the Bush years. Maybe that’s why we are where were at today. To Much Bush bashing by our liberal Senate, and not enough work. You jobless liberals got you moneys worth out of your 2006 win. now you got the big package. HOLD YOUR BREATH
Posted by: neofred | January 31, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am
FS – since you read the whole transcript you should be able to give us a quote that proves Rush is unpatriotic. You say “you concluded” that he was unpatriotic. Invite us into your reasoning, your logic. Throw a quote or two from the transcipt that “you read” so we can see the line of thought that brought you to “your conclusion.” One has to imaine that if you “concluded” this based on a thorough reading of the “transcipt” then there must be a geninue reasoning process here. I don’t know about everyone else on this tread but I’m ready to be enlightened by the steel trap reasoning that you obviously employed in this case.
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | January 31, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am
Air America radio fail because Liberals talk show host don’t really do any homework, like Rush, Hannity, Beck and the rest of all those conservitive jocky’s are up till 11:00 at night cathering info. Liberals talk show host just spew hate like call Bush Hitler. Have you listen to Liberal talk???.LOL
Posted by: neofred | January 31, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
neofred: I readily admit that I do not listen to Rush Limbaugh daily. Therefore if there were any further elaboration and clarification regarding THIS interview in question, then I am not aware of it. In my mind, you do raise a thought. Rush Limbough is just as human as anyone else. Therefore, he certainly can mis-speak and should not be held to the fire over ONE interview–especially if he possibly expounded upon his comments further.
But in just concentrating on this one interview (answer to Lone Star Rules), here is one quote:
” If I wanted Obama to succeed, I’d be happy the Republicans have laid down. I don’t want this to work. So I’m thinking of replying to this guy, say ‘okay, I’ll send you a response, but I don’t need 400 words, I need four: ‘I hope he fails’.”
In an earlier post, I noted that Mr. Obama campaigned based upon a democratic platform and plans of which he believes in. In my mind, these plans are not socialist in nature but just represents a different direction of which he would like to take the country and feels would be beneficial. Thus far the country agrees and we are willing to give his programs an opportunity. This is no different than when Mr. Reagan felt that a smaller government and less regulation would be best for the country. As a whole the country agreed and gave his programs an opportunity.
IMHO, once the new guy takes the oath, he (one day she!) becomes OUR president. If they are successful then we all are! To wish someone failure (so early on and especially given our current environment), is only hoping and wishing for a further erosion of the current environment and overall more harm to the American people. To me, that is unpatriotic.
Posted by: FS | January 31, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am
FS – I think you have done exactly what the liberal media does; take a quote, abbreviate it and then draw a conclusion based on the abbrevatied (or sound bite) part. Here is the entire quote. There were a few blanks that you left that are, in this case, actually relevant to the whole message Rush was conveying.
“If I wanted Obama to succeed, I’d be happy the Republicans have laid down. And I would be encouraging Republicans to lay down and support him. Look, what he’s talking about is the absorption of as much of the private sector by the US government as possible, from the banking business, to the mortgage industry, the automobile business, to health care. I do not want the government in charge of all of these things. I don’t want this to work. So I’m thinking of replying to the guy, “Okay, I’ll send you a response, but I don’t need 400 words, I need four: I hope he fails.” (interruption) What are you laughing at? See, here’s the point. Everybody thinks it’s outrageous to say. Look, even my staff, “Oh, you can’t do that.” Why not? Why is it any different, what’s new, what is unfair about my saying I hope liberalism fails? Liberalism is our problem. Liberalism is what’s gotten us dangerously close to the precipice here. Why do I want more of it? I don’t care what the Drive-By story is. I would be honored if the Drive-By Media headlined me all day long: “Limbaugh: I Hope Obama Fails.” Somebody’s gotta say it. ”
So this is the steel trap reasoning in action.
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | January 31, 2009, 11:44 am 11:44 am
Not at all Lone Star Rules. You asked for a quote and I gave you one. Your more extensive posting of it only further illustrates the point. First of all the “absorbation” of the various sectors is not solely the wish of Mr. Obama but that of a bi-partianship effort to stabilize our economy (whether you agree or disagree is another issue) Remember Mr. Bush and Paulson every day begging for bail out funds and telling us how we are now shareholders of these companies? Remember the various CEO’s imploring Washington that they need government at this time or else we will see something like we have never seen before?
Rush has taken this very challenging period to configure it as some devisive “whatever” to attack what he defines as liberalism. To pit this one against the other! Its great for ratings! ..and its been great publicity for him. After all, he is an entertainer.
But realistically, Mr. Obama’s plans and what is being done now under his watch is far from that. What is being done is happening in order to benefit our country and its people who are REALLY hurting at this time. To wish and hope that he fails is only hoping and wishing for more pain for the American people. Even Rush admits that his own staff feels that he has gone over the line. I do believe (I’m not looking at it right now) that one of his staffers even said that his comment was not patriotic. This is not about who is winning the sports match but about governing and governing effectively.
…and, I guess you hope Mr. Obama fails too?
Posted by: FS | January 31, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm
Lol haha First they Pick Palin to try and Get Hillary voters! Now this to Gain support of African Americans and Non-Racisit people,This is Priceless has Rush Limbaugh OD Or go into cardic Arrest yet? hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahalolol this is Priceless!
Posted by: Angie | January 31, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm
If Mr. Steele is elected chirman because he is “black,” just think how many African Amemricans are elated with Clarence Thoamas as supreme court justice.
Posted by: what667 | January 31, 2009, 1:09 pm 1:09 pm
Let’s be clear: the fact that you put quotation marks around a statement does not make it a quote. You left out the core of Rush’s position with that move. I put that on the level of mistaking the sandwhich for the bread – its the part in the middle that counts. In this case it is unmistakeable that you selected pieces of the discussion and drew your conclusion from these pieces. This is exactly the point I was making all along – Rush has been misquoted. You misquoted him and then drew this vacuous conclusion that he is being unpatriotic.
Regarding his staff – guess what? they get it. They understand that people will miss the meat of his argument and his statemeants and draw conclusions based on the selected sound bites. His staff understands how Rush is hated by the left and that listening to his argument will be passed over and guys like you will conclude (based on rigorous scrutity and strict adherence to the facts) that “Rush is unpatriotic.”
It is tough to pay close attention after this clear evidence that your conclusions are based on emotion.
There are two things worth discussion. (1) Rush has not just come out of the closet to take advantage of these difficult times. He has been consistent for as long as he has been on the scene. Not that it matters but you are flat out wrong there. (2) Personally, I am supportive of this President. I respect the process by which he was elected and hope he is successful in everway. Like most conservatively minded people I want to know more about this stimulas package. (Turns out I have actually read parts of it.) I wonder if this is not a spending package dressed up as a stimulas package. (Hmmm..is there some taking advantage of tough times to forward a spending package going on here?) There is a lot of spending proposals that happen in 2011 – I guess I wonder how that is going to stimulate the economy today. But, the jury is out and I don’t know enough to speak with dead certainty on all the specifics. In the interim, I anxious for this President to be successful and will continue to support him (and here is the tricky part – even if I disagree with the direction he is taking this country). Whatever he does I will get the facts before drawing any conclusions. But, either way, he is our President and I plan on sticking with him, thick or thin. (Here is the important part – I will get the facts first and then draw conclusions. I don’t draw conclusions and omit the important parts to get the facts to fit.)
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | January 31, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
One other thing: I am not planning on moving to Canada because Obama is President.
If memory serves, Susan Sarandon, Tim Robbins and Barbara Streisand were all moving as soon as Bush was elected. Talented folks – but don’t let the door hit you in a the arse. And, go ahead and toos in your American citizenship while you are at it, ok?
WAIT! They are still here.
And we were so close too! Darn – I hate that when that happens.
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | January 31, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Steele is there to counter Obama. When is he RNC going to come up with an original idea. The Dems. had women running for Pres. and VP first. They gave us Sarah the loser barracuda. Dems. ran and elected Barack Obama a black man, for president. THe Repub. found themselves Michael Steele. A maybe, “I think I am black” to lead their party. Not gonna work.
Posted by: YoYolite | January 31, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Well Lone Star Rules , we do disagree upon properly quoting and intent. But, in using your definition, I thank you for providing the complete “sandwich” since some will feel it is needed. As I posted earlier, your posting only further illustrated my point. For those who may not have been as clear (as my posting may have offered some opening for different interpretation), your citing makes it quite crystal clear. So thanks again!
Your interpretation of his staff comments is…well different. I can’t debate your view because that is how you comprehend their comments and I SO differently. I will just leave it as it is a different view.
Absolutely, my conclusion is based upon emotion. I thought Rush Limbaugh’s comments a HORRIBLE thing to say and a terrible thing to wish for our country. The last time I was this incensed was when someone threw a shoe at former President Bush and there were those who supported that action. It is fine to disagree (we are supposed to, if we do) But, these are our elected officials who represent us! They are elected to do the best that they can do to benefit the American people. Unfortunately, well-meaning mistakes can be made and consequeces can appear. Therefore, to personalize it to a level of; “I hope he fails,” only encompasses us all. It is just an evil thing wish upon anyone.
Yes! I know Rush has been around (some 20 years I believe)and in my opinion this is his schtick. Personally, I honestly question if he really believes what he does or just panders to the ratings which of course translates into revenues.
Thus far, I cannot be convinced on this one. Given the moment and time, Limbaugh’s hope for President Obama to fail only means he is hoping for more hardship and pain for the USA and people. …and to prove what? That Republicans know better? Isn’t it really time to leave the party politics at the door?
Finally, I am glad that you support the president and like you, I want to know more about the stimulus package too, in order to evaluate its objective and probability for success, based on my experiences and knowledge. As someone else posted, I will voice my concerns over those things of which I disagree. However, once it reaches its final form and is passed. I only wish it to be a great success and beneficial in moving the USA and all of us forward. I don’t want it to fail. I want it to succeed because if it does, I believe I will too.
Posted by: FS | January 31, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Absolutely, my conclusion is based upon emotion. I thought Rush Limbaugh’s comments a HORRIBLE thing to say and a terrible thing to wish for our country.
Case closed.
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | January 31, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
this is pretty funny. The issue at hand here is not whether or not Steele was qualified, but why the pick was made in the first place. It is quite clear the reason he was chosen was the same reason why Palin was chosen as their potential VP: charade a “change” to make it look like the party changed is tune. In reality, the party has done no such thing, in fact, it has just shown its true cynical colors. The Neocon faction controlling the “republican” party actually obtain their roots from ex-democrats from the New Deal split. The Neo-cons adopt a wilsonian foreign policy of policing the world, deficit spend like crazy, particularly on defense expenditures to the detriment of our country back home, create gigantic beaurocracies that are inefficient and costly (like homeland security) and still pretend they stand for true conservatism. Further, they dont even respect individual liberties, as their fanatical base constantly attempts to legislate lifestyle choices through banning gay marriage and persecuting people with different points of view. The current incarnation of the “republican” party are the worst combination you could possibly imagine: not socially conservative but actively oppressive, and spend-happy for the special interests.
Posted by: JJ | January 31, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
The Republican campaign slogan for 2012 should be:”STEELE the vote, like we did in 2000″.
Posted by: d-man | January 31, 2009, 4:45 pm 4:45 pm
Come on republicans?
This is too weak and too pathetic.
Didn’t you people learn anything from that “since we have Palin on the ticket, the hillary supporters will come running” mentality?
….I guess not.
Posted by: Tony | January 31, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
I’m a black conservative woman. Frankly, the comments here by Democrats regarding Michael Steele being a “Token Black” and “Uncle Tom” are highly offensive.
I have closely followed Michael Steele’s career since his appearance at the 2004 Republican Convention. Mr. Steele is highly intelligent, qualified, and articulate. He has worked long and hard to obtain the RNC Chairmanship and deserves it! That’s why he got it. In fact, there have been talks about him being the next chairman for a few years. It has nothing to do with tokenism or the RNC trying to trump Obama’s election as America’s first black president. Nothing!!
The negative comments on this board about Michael Steele’s nomination just illustrate the ignorance and prejudice of the commentators. Democrats always try to marginalize black conservatives as “Uncle Toms’” or “Token Blacks’”. Is it because we dare to engage in critical thought and refuse to think in lock-step with others? We refuse to play victim? We believe in personal responsibility? We believe that it’s not the government’s job to support us and our families?
To Marlene who posted, “racist behavior and their stance of intolerance.” Can you please provide examples this behavior? Are you saying that there are no racist white democrats?
“Black people are not going to flock to the GOP just because of Steele. We are not as stupid as you GOP believe we are.”
Are you sure Marlene? Blacks vote 90% democrat, collectively. The percentage implies that most who share our race aren’t capable of thinking for themselves as individuals. The presumption that you and all blacks think alike is proof of that!
That’s how I see it anyway.
Posted by: NO UNCLE TOM HERE! | January 31, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
No Uncle Tom Here.
I am not a ditto head, but DITTO to you. Like you I genuinely like Michael Steele and it has nothing to do with his race. Frankly he is a smart and capable guy and, though unlike you I have not followed his career since the beginning, I am impressed with him everytime I hear him speak. In spite of the shallow comments on this board by some of the posters about race there is little doubt that the RNC is in good hands with him. I have a lot to learn about him but, based on the few times I have heard him speak, I am excited for the Conservative movement and the RNC.
The funny thing about the Democrats is that they are fast to point the racist finger at the Republicans yet quality people like Condoleeza Rice and Michael Steele (and at one time, Colin Powell – though, I believe he will be back) tell me that they (meaning the Dems) continue to reason with their emotions and not their brains. Its like they are saying the Republicans are the party of rednecks and there is no getting around it. I happen to live in Texas and know a few rednecks and have probably been accused of being one my own darn self but, redneck or not, if any of these Black Conservatives were running for any office I would be among their supporters in a flat out heartbeat and can say with certainty my vote and my support has nothing to do with race in every single case. Regarding Michael Steele at the helm of the RNC – I may actually join the Republican party now. Fact is, I think the Republican party is about ideas and and principals and has some things to overcome in selling its brand but with the quality people that are part of the new leadership I have complete confidence that the future of the RNC is bright.
I remember in 2004 the democratic brand was at an all time low – from nowhere here comes Obama and re engergizes the party. It will happen again for the Republicans.
Thanks NO UNCLE TOM HERE – your comments are appreciated.
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | January 31, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
NO UNCLE TOM HERE!: I don’t think many are questioning Mr. Steele’s qualifications or abilities. I believe many are circumspect of the timing. The Republican party tried to fool the electorate with the elevation of Sarah Palin. A candidate of which the party finally admitted was not vetted properly and unqualified. Her job was to capture the female voters who supported Hillary Clinton. But, Palin was REALLY unprepared. Many found this offensive to put forth such a candidate and extremely superficial. Also, the campaign was SO negatively racially charged (although a fabulous job was done in containing most of it–it was still there.)that many found this offensive. The RNC strategy was about winning rather than showing differences in ideology and their plans to make our country .
For the party to now say that it is for all genders and ethnicities… well, its hard to feel the love.
Does anyone remember the woman who said she was afraid because Mr. Obama was an arab and Mr. McCain quickly said; “No, no ma’am, he is a good man, good American, good family man.” (paraphrasing)
…I suppose if you are an arab american you cannot be a good man, american, or good family man.
So, there’s a lot of this going on in the RNC. Had Mr. Steele been chosen earlier, or a couple of years down the road, I don’t believe there would be an issue.
The problem with the Republican party is that no one TRUSTS them or their motivations anymore. (IMHO)
Posted by: FS | January 31, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
It is about time someone like steele stood back up for his party. The right has been walking a fine line up until now when options are far and few. I clearly thought newt in 94 was the revolution but bush clearly saturated that by jumpping ahead of the line.
Mccain vs. Gore 2000
Kerry vs. Mccain 2004
Bush vs. Obama 2008
Posted by: htown | February 1, 2009, 1:38 am 1:38 am
Without bush there would be no obama.
Obama used all of bushs campaign technics to become elected all the way down to his stage setup.
Most left leaning critics will argue till the sun goes down but obama clearly copy and pasted his whole campaign from bushes 2000 and 2004 run.
then he use the media to tell him exactly what the voters wanted
E.G. the 510 campaign promises.
“dont tell me words dont matter”
he used them all
Posted by: ricky | February 1, 2009, 1:51 am 1:51 am
Alexander the great didn’t get as far as he did by singing we are the world. I agree we should all hold hands and run free in the field of flowers but get real. Just as soon as you think we have peace and comfort reality kicks in the form of real conflict. Which has lasted for centuries and it is not going to “change” until mothernature says so we can pretend everythings OKAY and stick our head in the ground but real human nature will always overpower the weak, which seems to always be the peaceful. This is well above me as one human to another though assuming all wars are over and division is unified is asking for trouble.
Posted by: htown | February 1, 2009, 2:10 am 2:10 am
How come the State of Maryland, a bastion of Liberalism, was so racist as to vote for the Democratic white guy, instead of the Black man? After all, we were repeatedly told that the only reason Obama couldn’t win the election, was racism. He won, so I guess we’re not racist anymore, but what about Maryland?
Posted by: we_are_not_amused | February 1, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am
MIKEY STEELE THE magic negro lives near DC and frolics with the silly twits they call the GOP OOooooo (this could go on)
Posted by: A LA BAMA | February 2, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm