By Caitlin Taylor

Jan 28, 2009 8:03am

The Note, 1/28/09: Old Habits — Journey to post-partisanship takes a detour in Congress

By RICK KLEIN President Obama learns Wednesday what bipartisanship means when it’s left to Congress to define — and if this is harmony, how long until the next song comes on? It may be the president’s great bad luck that Republicans used the moment of his inauguration to rediscover fiscal discipline. It may be House Republicans’ lasting mistake to stand in the way of the new president’s momentum. It may be House Democrats’ fault for crafting a bill only they want to vote for — though it’s hard to imagine them developing a package that a large number of Republicans would ever wind up supporting. But here we are, after all those meetings and phone calls, the public and private injections of this thing called "bipartisanship," and the House will approve a stimulus measure Wednesday that almost no Republicans will support. The prospects for GOP support in the Senate are better, but not by much. And so, Obama won’t get the big bipartisan coalitions Ronald Reagan and even George W. Bush did in the early days of their presidency, at least not this time. Welcome to Washington, Mr. President. Old habits do indeed die hard, sir. "President Obama faces the first test of the bipartisanship he pledged in his campaign when the House votes today on an $825 billion economic stimulus plan opposed by most Republicans," USA Today’s David Jackson and Richard Wolf report.  An opposition party is finding its voice — maybe by accident, but it matters just the same. This is what you get when you come to office not just to govern, but to govern like no one has before. "It was the love affair that could never be, President Barack Obama and congressional Republicans," Politico’s Patrick O’Connor and Jonathan Martin write. "Beneath the polite give and take between the new president and the newly disempowered Republican caucus, there was a sense that Obama’s honeymoon had already begun to ebb. For the first time, it seems, congressional Republicans, shut out of power and seemingly cowed by the harsh verdict of voters and wild popularity of the new president, are finding their voice, rallying in large numbers against the centerpiece of Obama’s agenda."  "Long before Barack Obama became president, he spurned the ‘smallness’ of American politics and the old habit of muscling past the opposition to get things done. But old habits die hard," the AP’s Nancy Benac reports. "While Americans overwhelmingly embraced Obama’s message of unity, already there are Democrats thirsting for the spoils of victory and Republicans pushing back with force."  The battle is joined: "But the final product is certain to fall well short of the Republican ideal of seeing a package heavy with tax breaks and light on new domestic spending, and both the White House and Democratic leaders worry that GOP lawmakers will use procedural tactics to stall a final vote as they seek to erode support for the plan with the public," Shailagh Murray and Paul Kane write in The Washington Post.  "President Barack Obama is unlikely to get the broad bipartisan support he seeks for his $825 billion economic stimulus bill in either chamber, despite a Tuesday charm offensive in which he allowed both House and Senate Republicans to question him directly about his plans on their turf," per Roll Call’s Emily Pierce and Steven T. Dennis.  House Republican leaders hardly sent an inviting message by telling their members to vote against the package even before they met with the president to discuss it. But that was a plea (trap?) for Obama to insert himself into the legislative process, if not in the House (too late for that) than with his former colleagues in the Senate, and then in the conference committee.

User Comments

Obama needs to extend the same courtesy of listening to the Republicans he is extending world terrorists. But being the socialist dictator he is, he will do what he wants whether its the best thing for America or not.

Posted by: HH | January 28, 2009, 8:21 am 8:21 am

HH, I think you have had a rough day already. Poor dear, maybe you should call it a day? It was rough getting to work this morning. But the weather should have nothing to do with such nastiness.
Dictator? REally tell us how you really feel? LOL

Posted by: scentsofroses | January 28, 2009, 8:37 am 8:37 am

He would probably have the support of Republicans if it were actually a stimulus package instead of a Democratic free-for-all. (And yes, I have read it). There is so much spending in the bill that has absolutely nothing to do with creating or maintaining jobs. Get all of that out of there and put that stuff into separate bills, each of which needs to stand on their own merits. But do that AFTER a true stimulus package is presented and passed.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 28, 2009, 8:39 am 8:39 am

oh – and they need to take out of there the stipulation that Illinois doesn’t get anything unless Blago is out of office. That is NOT the federal government’s place to decide who can and can’t be governor of a state. I thought that was petty & childish….it reminds me of middle school girls….”don’t be her friend or we won’t let you hang out with us”.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 28, 2009, 8:41 am 8:41 am

He wants bi-partanship in case it doesn’t work.

Posted by: LongT | January 28, 2009, 8:43 am 8:43 am

Neither Democrat nor Republican should vote in support of this so-called economic stimulus plan.
How can you call this an economic stimulus plan?
What Obama is calling a plan is simply an OUTLINE of what they want to do. It does not detail who, what, when, where and how the $825B will be used. It is a GENERIC DRAFT and $825B is a lot of money to put into the Democrats hands without concrete information.
Obama says the money will be used to modernize schools, build new roads, and automate hospital records. He says this will put 3.5 million people to work. Yet, he has not said what schools, cities, states, average pay for the jobs, nor given an invitation for contractors to bid on some of the work.
My concern is that Obama already has his cronies set up to get most of the work. The cities who voted for him and his supporters will reap most of the benefits.
So no, I do not think neither Republicans nor Democrats should vote right now on any so-called economic stimulus plan until the plan is complete.
When you create a plan, it needs to be Ready, Aim, and Fire.
Obama’s plan is Ready, Fire, Aim.

Posted by: knowdalaw | January 28, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am

Earth to all….bipartisanship does NOT mean going against your foundational beliefs and just rolling over and going with whatever the other party wants. The Democratic Congress was stonewalling the Republicans before President Obama ever met with the Republicans. Sen Boehner’s message to the GOP prior to the meeting was to vote against the bill IF IT REMAINED AS CURRENTLY WRITTEN (i.e. the way it looked prior to President Obama meeting with them, and with no Republican input). I see this being mis-reported on all the major news outlets, stating the Boehner told them to vote no, period. The GOP wants to help the economy and the family in need, and they support the tax cuts and the spending that they see will have a positive economic impact with job creation, etc. What they are objecting to is the pork that is in the bill that they see as having NO economic impact.

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 8:44 am 8:44 am

The difference between Democrats and “ditto heads” is obvious. Democrats represent their constituents. Ditto heads represent their mis-guided idealogies as directed from their on-the-air god.

Posted by: Pat from Michigan | January 28, 2009, 8:45 am 8:45 am

You’re on your own bigshot!

Posted by: LongT | January 28, 2009, 8:52 am 8:52 am

GOP Do you care that we are heading into a Depression?
GOP- NO
GOP Do you care that Each passing day more and more People are losing their Jobs and Big corporations are about to close?
GOP-NO
GOP-We want Tax cuts,Tax cuts and More Tax cuts That is all we bring to the table!
GOP We understand you are still stuck in the stoneages still Trying the old Trickle down thing, BUT IT HAS NOT WORKED! Explain to me all the people that have or are losing their Jobs they now dont pay Taxes how will A tax cut help these people? What about JOBS GOP?How are Tax cuts going to provide JOBS? I think the time has come for the GOP To think Anew! I mean look after 8 Years of Bush and The GOP Spending us into The hell Hole The Gop now wants to become Fisical Conservative,Thats a good step now Lose the Trickle down Idea. Realize GOP The Economy does not grow from the top up But from the Bottom Down same thing when you Build a house You start from the Ground up! Get with the Program GOP!

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 8:52 am 8:52 am

While this package will create some jobs, it will not take us out of the mess we are in. Obama has not really addressed the lack of credit in this country. This package does little to create jobs for highly educated highly skilled labor (with few exceptions). I hope Republicans vote no, because this is spending money for the sake of spending. This is a disaster. No plan is better than the bad one, when it costs us the tax payers over 1 Trillion dollars.

Posted by: BHO | January 28, 2009, 8:56 am 8:56 am

It looks like we’ll just have to vote more obstructionist Republicans out in 2010. Within 4 years they’ll have gone the way of the dinosaur.

Posted by: Eric | January 28, 2009, 8:56 am 8:56 am

HH, let us know if you ever decide to join us in reality.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 8:57 am 8:57 am

A communist giveaway to all the government workers and unionized brethren represented by their shrewd Democratic agents. But let’s not foregt we only won by a slim margin, so let’s try to “blah-blah” our way into those votes too. Mold it, pinch it, tiwst it, prop it up, slap on some paint and new tires and roll it out the door. AHH SWEET IRONY…well atleast the freemarket is still alive and well up on the hill.

Posted by: chris | January 28, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Pat, Have you read the package? Probably not, just being led blindly by your “god” Obama

Posted by: ditto head | January 28, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Hey everyone, google Democrats on an escalator. Too funny but so true!!!!

Posted by: ditto head | January 28, 2009, 9:01 am 9:01 am

That first stimulus package worked so well, and has been so well managed and accounted for. So yah, let’s throw some more money out there!
And nothing for IL, until Blago is gone. But it’s OK for OTHER states to be handed a pile of federal dough to spend at THEIR governor’s discretion, because ONLY IL has corruption and wasteful spending issues.

Posted by: Interested08 | January 28, 2009, 9:01 am 9:01 am

This “stimulus package” amounts to nothing more than support for the democrats favorite liberal pet projects and organizations. Billions of dollars that will not create a single job. Pocket stuffing for favors rendered. Tax cuts, are the only credible items about this package.

Posted by: samiam | January 28, 2009, 9:03 am 9:03 am

Well, it’s like Limberger said. “I want ot see Obama fail” Apparently the same holds true for the republicans. They don’t really care about the American people. They care about their business interests. If it were not for the fact that the republicans take positions accoding to the religious right, I doubt they could be elected because they care little for the common man.

Posted by: Johnny W. | January 28, 2009, 9:03 am 9:03 am

HH – thanks for the dose of reality for the moonbats…
You’re right, when he’s not giving his first televised interview to the Arabic world, he’s having lattes with terrorist muslims in GITMO…oh, but its a rough day when he has to “reach across the isle” to repulicans – who he so desperately needs for approval of his pork laden stimulus plan – so when it fails he can blame EVERYONE who voted for it.
Nice strategy for your first/second week in office .
CHANGE we can believe it (NOT)

Posted by: disgusted | January 28, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am

WHAAAT? Do you mean the republicans are not buying the mesiah’s line of xxxx? What is wrong with them? Do they not know that they are just supposed to bow down and not look at him when he is present. Those stupid republicans.

Posted by: billy bob | January 28, 2009, 9:07 am 9:07 am

Angie, you do a good job of MISREPRESENTING the GOP position, which you proceed to try to rip apart. However, your statements are far from the truth. You are so blinded by your ideology that you refuse to listen to what the other side is saying, only hearing what you want to hear. Try listening to the other side and understanding their position…oh, wait, that sounds too much like the standard definition of bipartisanship, where yours, apparently, is simply rolling over and saying, “Go for it, whatever you want. We’re behind you.”

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 9:07 am 9:07 am

Vote NO. WHEN THE PLAN FAILS (AND IT WILL), REPUBLICANS CAN TAKE BACK THE HOUSE, THE SENATE and the PRESIDENCY.
“When the government is big enough to give you everything, it is big enough to take everything away”

Posted by: Alexandra | January 28, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am

Oh, Johnny W, get a grip!

Posted by: LongT | January 28, 2009, 9:11 am 9:11 am

Bipartisanship. This from a man who said “I have political capital and I intend to use it!”, and who shut out completely the opposition party in crafting the bill. Translation: You may fill your cabinet with Clintonistas, and Bush lackeys and call it “Change”, but you still need people other than yourself and your acolytes to get anything done in DC, Barack! Welcome to the Big Leagues, now STOP acting like a rookie!

Posted by: hmn... | January 28, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am

obama’s “vote for my package” isn’t bi-partisan.
and No one voted for their congress critter to cave to him

Posted by: tralala | January 28, 2009, 9:14 am 9:14 am

Angie, i have news for you, without a tax cut for small business a lot more people will be laid off. It workes like this, every april 15th taxes are due and if a small company has to send uncle sam money then that is less they have to build their business and hire people. Tax breaks therefore stimulate business which stimulates the economy. Obamas plan is to give people who dont even pay taxes about $500, oh boy, that will do nothing.

Posted by: billy bob | January 28, 2009, 9:16 am 9:16 am

It’s certainly not President Obama’s fault. What it boils down to is racism. The whites of America are so distraught over an African American running the country, that they will do anything to discredit every move the man makes. Shows how little progress whites have made over the last couple hundred years.

Posted by: Carmen | January 28, 2009, 9:20 am 9:20 am

Just because Obama is taking a bipartisian approach, doesnt mean he’s going to hold up his plans and not get things done. If the GOP wants to be “old hat”, then let it be.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 9:22 am 9:22 am

Albert Camus once said this:
“The welfare of the people in particular has always been the alibi of tyrants.”
It fits “Messiah” Obama to a tee and the sheep of this country fell for it. Once Obama falls flat on his face we, The GOP, will be here to pick up the pieces.

Posted by: Steve | January 28, 2009, 9:23 am 9:23 am

The media loves a fight. They want to cast this as Republicans refusing to cooperate with the new President. That’s not good for our democracy: its not about politics, its about having a public debate on what to survive the economic crisis ahead of us. The Republicans are the minority party, they are supposed to be the loyal opposition; raising objections and alternatives is how they serve the country. If the media insists on casting this as a mere political game, the country loses. If Republicans allow themselves to be cast as mere politicians, their party will shrink even more than it has.

Posted by: Amy | January 28, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am

Obama’s such a fool, and the people who believe this clown. You will all be very, very disapointed soon…

Posted by: for sure | January 28, 2009, 9:24 am 9:24 am

Here’s the thing….you can criticize all you want…it’s a free country. But unless you have a better idea to bring this country out of this depression….what’s the point? Negative energy isn’t going to create jobs. Atleast Obama is TRYING to do something to stimulate our economy. And he’s not just pulling stuff out of the air. He has met with countless economists, etc to come up with a good plan. The plan may not be perfect but what’s the alternative? The Dems won the election yet Obama is trying to bring in Republican ideas and he has. How wonderful would it look to the rest of the world and to us, that the United States is indeed UNITED in a common goal.

Posted by: mommyandkai | January 28, 2009, 9:25 am 9:25 am

I lend to small business. 95% of the time the bottom line is managed down. The #1 rule in owning a business is to pay as little to uncle sam as possible. Tax cuts arent going to grow jobs. Give $$ to people to spend which will increase the revenue of small business and they will have to manage down their bottom line by hiring people.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am

Its racism, its racism, lets play the race card and gather more guilt and shame points from white people. Carmen grow up! Bo would never be potus without a very lot of white votes.

Posted by: sam | January 28, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am

The only reasons the Republicans are opting out is politically they can. The bill will pass without them and their is a bigger benefit of voting no. If the Republicans had the numbers in the House and Senate to kill the bill, you would see alot more Bipartisan support because they would be seen as holding up the process as oppossed to defending some ideology that won’t happen. (BTW . . . Democrats do this too . . . welcome to American politics.)

Posted by: scott_mich | January 28, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am

I really don’t think the problem is President Obama. I do believe he wants a bi-partisan bill to be passed. The real problem is Nancy Pelosi and the other idiot congressional representatives that will vote for any bill as long as it means they can keep their seats in congress. The first bailout should not have passed, this bailout/recovery package should not pass either. All we are doing by passing these bailout bills is handing rich people more money, while we, the poor, and the middle class, pay the taxes that will foot that bill. America is in a sad state of affairs, and the greedy, rich, mf-ers are ripping us off on a daily basis. I am afraid it is time to REVOLT agains this government.

Posted by: Angelo | January 28, 2009, 9:28 am 9:28 am

Obama was successful in removing some of things that were objectionable to the minority and added some additional corporate breaks they suggested. In my view he is working in a bi-partisan manner. But with people like Mike Pence and Boehner it’s all or nothing.
Funny Pence’s district in Indiana has lost thousands of jobs during his time in office from 2000 to present. This was during the supposed Bush boom years.
He’s an ideologue that puts party and policy above people. He’s a self serving former radio talk show host with a smooth tongue but an empty suit. If this is the best the GOP can put forward they are in desparate straights.

Posted by: Tom. Tescher | January 28, 2009, 9:29 am 9:29 am

GOP Do you care that we are heading into a Depression?
GOP- NO
GOP Do you care that Each passing day more and more People are losing their Jobs and Big corporations are about to close?
GOP-NO
GOP-We want Tax cuts,Tax cuts and More Tax cuts That is all we bring to the table!
Posted by Angie
____________________________________
Earth to Angie.
The GOP is no longer in power.
If we really are heading for a Depression, you have nobody to blame but your own party.

Posted by: marco | January 28, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am

Billy BOB
I Think you should read this stimilus Package. Obamas Plan does Include Small Business Tax cuts as well As Tax Incentives to People who Hire and create Jobs, The problem with the GOP Is not enough Tax cuts going to the rich And Wealthy You see when it comes to helping The Average person The GOP Want no part of it!

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 9:30 am 9:30 am

You people are just too funny going back and forth between each other like you do….

Posted by: BladeRunner | January 28, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

MARCO
The Point is the Gop were in Power for 6 years A republican President for 8 So therfore they Created this Mess now they Offer nothing to Fix it Only their same old tired Failed Idealogy Of lets give the wealthy Rich all the Tax cuts and pretend it Creates Jobs and trickles down

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

The Republican Party’s Economic plans have “been in the toilet” for the last eight (8) years. Now with “good intentions”, the new President reaches out to the Republican opposition and they “snap the olive branch in half!” There is NO Debate and Compromise with these Arrogant, PMS (“Permanent Mouth Sneering”) Republicans.
Both campaign promises; Bipartisanship and “Changing the tone in Washington” should be scrapped, as both are useless and a waste of time during a most critical time for our Country!

Posted by: bobj72 | January 28, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am

I hope Obama turns out to be a better than average president, but I have my doubts.

Posted by: LongT | January 28, 2009, 9:33 am 9:33 am

I am all for helping Obama and the Dems burn the country to the ground!!! Then we can form a government that supports the people like it was intended to be…

Posted by: as if | January 28, 2009, 9:34 am 9:34 am

Good morning. Let’s continue patting ourselves on the back for our two party system. One in which one party has elevated themselves the financial caretakers of the United States. Yet, they are always “in” halfway. (I won’t begin to list the ways). If you want the markets to self correct, start making the case. START THE DIALOGUE. Stay true to your ideology start the recession/depression plans for the United States. Yet, everyone KNOWS they’ll stop short of that–so much for sticking to your framework. Instead, there will be market intervention and only solution coming is tax cuts, tax cuts, tax cuts. It’s tiresome.
It appears we are idea bankrupt. It seems like this problem is exacerbated by party alliances.
On a week where 50,000 people lost their job no one really questions the appropriateness of their gamesmanship.

Posted by: Mavsreader | January 28, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am

MARCO
One more thing My Party is at least trying to do Something, While the GOP are only thinking about their Reelections and could give a rats A$$ about the state our Country is In.

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am

Don’t let ABC NEws jerk your chain, folks! This is what democracy looks like, per an article in the New York Times:
“In a session with House Republicans, Mr. Obama said he would not compromise on a central element of his plan that has drawn particular Republican opposition: his campaign promise for a middle-class tax credit that would also go to low-wage workers who earn too little to pay income taxes but are subject to payroll taxes for Social Security and Medicare… But, Republicans interviewed after the meeting said, Mr. Obama told them he would listen to proposals to expand on provisions cutting taxes for small businesses and would be open to corporate tax cuts as well if Republicans cooperated to close tax loopholes for big business.”

Posted by: Amy | January 28, 2009, 9:35 am 9:35 am

mommyandkal…the GOP IS offering what they feel is a “better” idea, which is getting more $$ into the consumers’ hands (tax cuts) and more wise (not wasteful) government spending, one that will have an economic impact and create jobs. Read the actual bill…a lot of it will raise your eyebrows, wondering “how does this stimulate the economy?” A good example of this is the recently-removed contraception $$, but there is much more. Pelosi et al refuse to allow any GOP input, and President Obama will need to put pressure on them to start listening to the GOP if this is going to be a more “bipartisan” bill.

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 9:37 am 9:37 am

I thought the heavens were going to open up when BO got in office. No wonder his approval went from 84 to 68 already. next week it will be 50 the following week 40 and so on. soon it will be just as bad as the last idiot in office. Congress approvals are lower than bush’s and I’m sure will continue to fall. Don’t expect government to fix anything. They aren’t smart enough

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am

nice try marco. why not get off the party bit for awhile, eh? Lets not forget that bush was in charge when the market tanked, when there wasnt any WMD and when 9/11 happened, even though he was given a report warning him of the attack. Dont forget Karl Rove will now have to testify and your beloved party will get exposed even more for firing those lawyers.
You see, the door swings both ways. Theres alot to pin on the Democrats. I thing the $$ set aside in the recovery bill for condoms was an idea from Mars. Who knows how the bailout is going to pan out? Its not like the new deal worked right away. Theres going to be slips along the way. Why not be creative and look for solutions instead of bashing a party? Its so boring.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 9:38 am 9:38 am

To all Republicans on Board against President Obama here is a question for you
Do you think the Republicans as well as President Bushes Economic plans have been good for the Last 8 years?
What Jobs did President Bush create during his 8 years of Presidency? last I checked Unemployment is about to reach a new Historic High

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am

We finally have a president who can think for himself instead of loser bush. If the republicans don’t want to participate, Obama will just have to fix things himself. The republicans want to sabatage the economy for their own interests.

Posted by: Jim Bob | January 28, 2009, 9:39 am 9:39 am

Where do you think $825 Billion comes from? It comes from you and me. Who are the Dems going to give this to? It’s going to be given to corporations. Not you or me.
Who has to pay this money back? You and me. The bill doesn’t make much sense now does it?
Lower our taxes, we’ll spend more. Give me a big fat $7,000 check for the taxes I paid this last year. I’m likely to spend it.
Drill for oil so our gas prices lower. This will increase business and personal travel and therefore tax revenues will increase to pay the billions back. It will increase spending at vacation spots as well.
Open our 401k’s so we can dig into them without penalty. We can use this money to pay off our debt and therefore spend more money on other things.
Money to big business will go no where.

Posted by: BT | January 28, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am

Angie 9:35 AM….I call BS on your statement. You are being blinded by your hatred of the GOP, and you are unwilling to listen to anything they are ACTUALLY saying (see Amy 9:35 AM for specifics…she does a good job of shedding light on some of this).

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 9:40 am 9:40 am

MIKEO
President Obama has already got the Dems to compromise They Pulled the Condoms and Birth control spending out of the Bill I fail to see giving people maybe a little more in their Paychecks a week will help Create Jobs And you really think People are going to spend that Money no people are going to pay off their Debt

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 9:42 am 9:42 am

If it’s such a great plan then Obama, Pelosi and Reid deserve full and exlusive credit. To paraphrase Bahney Fwank when asked about the lack of oversight legislation in the past few Congresses, “cowwect me if I’m wrong but they had the majowity, right? They could have passed whatever they wanted!” The Republicans were duped by Paulsen and Bush into supporting the first failed bailout package. They won’t put their names down on this pork-a-palooza. Even the GAO thinks it’s a terrible plan. You won, Democrats! Have at it! Stand up and be counted! Republicans? We don’t need no stinking Republicans!

Posted by: Woody | January 28, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am

MIKEO
You really think anyone Belives the lying GOP They are only Caring about their ReElections They want to make the Dems look bad so they can come back into Power

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am

CHAOS
Don’t expect BHO’s ratings to fall below 13%. I think we know why.

Posted by: enoughalready | January 28, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am

We have’nt had a decent president since Kennedy, That includes Obama.. He’s another fake president helping the elite to take over!

Posted by: as if | January 28, 2009, 9:45 am 9:45 am

I am against this package as presented. I’m with the poster that wrote that much more needs to be detailed and specified regarding exactly who will receive these funds and who will be accountable. Cry me a river… and you can cry for months as far a I’m concerned! Isn’t that what Paulson did and voila! the money was given AND no one can tell you what has happened to it? No one can even provide some semblance of how what money has already been given has helped our economy. To me, Nancy Pelosi needs to be less critical of the past administration (Get over your hate of Bush, Nancy!) and worry more about what is on the table now.
If you want money to go towards contraception, well… you need to explain how this is helping the economy, jobs etc. I need to be convinced! ..So, Obama administration state your argument! I actually agree with Ellesbelle that most of these items need to come about as seperate bills and be passed or defeated upon their own merit.
Its an early defeat for President Obama, but oh well! …time to go back to the drawing board and come back with MUCH more clarity.

Posted by: FS | January 28, 2009, 9:46 am 9:46 am

This article portrays Obama as the victim. Obama was the, if not the most, to the Far Left Senators in the Senate. It’s to be expected that there will be ideological head butting with Republicans.
This so called “stimulous” bill has a whole lot of possible bad consequences attached to it.

Posted by: Mike | January 28, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Good lord, people. Do you miss Bush already? Do you have better ideas how to run the country? Do you have the guts to stand before both Dems/Reps? If you have better ideas how to fix this country, go ahead, fix it, and stop whinin. BTW Obama isn’t liberal or socialist (?), he’s a moderate.

Posted by: goo | January 28, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am

Why is it the GOP Had no Problem Bailing out Wall Street and going along with Bush/Paulson Plan? why Because thats Wall Street GOP MOTTO-TO HELL WITH MAIN STREET!
WE HAVE TO KEEP OUR WEALTH CEOS ON WALL STREET WEALTHY!

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am

angie–Ever herad the old saying ‘Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice shame on me?”

Posted by: enoughalready | January 28, 2009, 9:50 am 9:50 am

Obama plans to continue the Bush policies on economics and war. where’s the change? I dont see the differance!

Posted by: for sure | January 28, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am

It’s gonna be another long day of desperate people demanding handouts, following a deceitful leader, pointing their finger at anyone they can who opposes their leader. I and others like me will be labeled stupid many times over the course of the day, because I have a good job, pay my taxes and pay my bills and contribute to charity, have served my country in the military, raised productive children with good jobs, look after my elderly mother and did it all without any government handouts as did my parents. So I’m part of the problem? So my principles are invalid? For 50+ years the Democrats have built a support base based on the idea that the government would help the poor and under privileged. Every time the Democrats have been in control the Democrat leaders got rich while the suffering of the masses continued. When the Republicans are in control the Republican leaders got richer while the masses suffered. Some people never learn that what you get out of life is proportionate to your contribution. Nobody is going to make things better for you. You have to do it for yourself. It’s not about race or gender or national origin. Now I must work. You people might want to get up from from your computer terminal and seek to do the same.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | January 28, 2009, 9:52 am 9:52 am

MIKEO
Listening to the Gop what are they Offering? all they are doing is bashing the Bill and saying no no no! Listen to what same old Tax cuts for the Wealthy and screw the Middleclass?And I find it Funny they are now all of a sudden Fiscal Responsible Where were they when they Helped Bush spend us into this Mess

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am

what’s really funny is you have people saying Obama needs to listen to republicans
HE IS DOING EXACTLY THAT DUMBASSES…
what’s really sad is republicans never returned the same favor when Bush was president

Posted by: Death to conservatism | January 28, 2009, 9:54 am 9:54 am

Angie 9:39 AM….From the Congressional Budget Office:
Federal Income Tax Revenues (Individuals)
2003: $793.7 billion
2007: $1,163.5 billion
Federal Income Tax Revenues (Corporations)
2003: $131.8 billion
2007: $370.2 billion
From the Bureau of Labor Statistics:
Unemployment
2003: 6.3% (highest monthly rate)
2007: 4.4% (lowest monthly rate)
GDP also grew at annual rate of 3% per year during that period
Now you can argue round and round about which types of jobs were created, but that has more to do with where & how consumers spent their money, and how businesses responded to demand (specifically, the price that consumers were willing to pay for various goods & services), but that has nothing to do with tax cuts.
Bottom line, although the tax rates on all (I remember getting a huge additional amount back when I filed my taxes in 2004 due to the 2003 tax cuts) went down, federal income tax revenues (both individual & corporate) went UP. Government, of course, spent like a drunken sailor on liberty (shore leave), but across-the-board tax cuts did NOT lead to this economic situation. If you look at what was going on in the economy starting in 2007, the housing bubble was bursting and gas prices soaring (neither of which had to do with tax cuts), and other factors that you can more reasonably attribute this economic downturn to.

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Since the government is suppose to be by the people and for the people why is the government not bailing out working Americans from their debt by way of vouchers and in turn the Finance, Bank and other financial institutions would get theirs and workers would not have much more of their paycheck to buy back into American again

Posted by: G-MR. DO GOOD | January 28, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am

“But let’s not foregt we only won by a slim margin, so let’s try to “blah-blah” our way into those votes too.”
Two words…Electoral Landslide. It’s wasn’t a “slim margin.” A “slim margin” is losing the popular vote, but winning the electoral vote.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 9:56 am 9:56 am

All the more reason to vote out more GOP next election. The party of Reagan is dead. The NeoConnies that run the party are mindless sheep that want America to fail.

Posted by: Clint | January 28, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am

“You people might want to get up from from your computer terminal and seek to do the same.”
Many of us are working at our computer terminals. But way to attempt to condescend.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 9:58 am 9:58 am

“The NeoConnies that run the party are mindless sheep that want America to fail.”
Actually, currently, they don’t know what they are.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am

The stupid GOP is trying to negotiate from a position of weakness. The Dems can pretty much do anything they want. President Obama went out of his way to try to include the GOP in drafting the bill and all he gets for his efforts are obstructionism. The voters are tired of all the partisan bickering and it’s going to hurt the GOP in 2010. I predict that the Dems will win a filibuster-proof majority because adults are tired of the childish antics of the Republicans.

Posted by: Dave | January 28, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am

North Park I build schools, churches office buildings ect. The bottom line is the less i pay in taxes the more I am willing to purchase capital expenditures and hire people. Giving someone who pays no taxes $500 does nothing.

Posted by: billy bob | January 28, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Uh, the GOP voted to say “no” before the President met with them? How insensitve to the American taxpayers that is left struggling in the middle. YOU CAN PUNCH A HOLE IN SOMETHING, DON’T IF YOU CAN’T FILL IT. GOP what are your solutions? Do you just want to fight something without a cause. You angry bastards

Posted by: sara wilson | January 28, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Bundling is an age old way of presenting proposals so complicated no one fully cpmprehends the provisions. Insurance companies have used bundling ever since they wrote the first whole life insurance policy. Fear and sense of urgency is normally used to sell bundled policies. The fear and urgency factors cause us to make rash and later regrettable decisions. Buyer beware. You won’t receive what you thought you were buying.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | January 28, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

Angie said: “Listening to the Gop what are they Offering? all they are doing is bashing the Bill and saying no no no! Listen to what same old Tax cuts for the Wealthy and screw the Middleclass?And I find it Funny they are now all of a sudden Fiscal Responsible Where were they when they Helped Bush spend us into this Mess”
I call BS on this. Provide me one verifiable quote where the GOP is saying don’t give a tax cut to the middle class, and only to the upper class. At most, they object to sending money to individuals that had no income tax liability to begin with. Also, they are not bashing the entire bill, just the parts that they view as frivolous “pork” spending and lacking in potential economic stimulus and/or job creation. Third, there is no justification to the spend-happy attitude for the past 8 years, and they seem to have acklowledged that as a big mistake. Fourth, see my other comment on “Bush spent us into this mess”; government spending did not crash the economy. Along those lines, if “government spending during the Bush administration got us into this mess”, how will more of the same type of government spending get us out of this mess?

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 10:00 am 10:00 am

It’s a bit sad to see that so many of you want Obama to fail. I didn’t want Bush to fail, it happened on its own. If you truly want OUR president to fail in these tough times then I question your values and your patriotism. How can you have pride for this country if you want its leader to fail? It’s fine to disagree but please bring a solution to the table. That is all…

Posted by: dan | January 28, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Gotta love all these BHO groupies that say “Republicans want America to fail.”
Which party is it that has been kowtowing to terrorists, homos, rapists, cop killers, pedophiles, welfare recipients, etc.. for the last 40+ years?
Me thinks not the Republicans.

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 10:02 am 10:02 am

Stimulus Package? More like welfare for crooked, mis-managed business! The first ‘stimulus’ package did nothing but give the crooks fill for the ‘holes’ they’ve created. Citizens,(abased to mere ‘consumers’ now) have no say to the passing of these ungodly amounts of money being released to these mis-managed companies. I’m all for something ‘stimulating’, but this is a far cry from real help for the citizens of this county.

Posted by: gdguynbalt | January 28, 2009, 10:02 am 10:02 am

“Me thinks not the Republicans.”
Methinks you’re not getting enough oxygen to your brain.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am

Silky the paid blogger. Just as I suspected. If you’re not a paid blogger you’re stealing time from your employer. So which is it?

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | January 28, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am

sara wilson 10:00….still pushing half-truths (vote no before meeting with President Obama). The actual position was to vote no AS IT CURRENTLY STOOD WITHOUT ANY ABILITY FOR THE GOP TO PROVIDE INPUT. The GOP and President Obama appear ready to work together; it’s the Democratic Congress that is digging in its heels and is unwilling to allow the GOP anything except rubber-stamping their proposal. Get your facts straight.

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am

There are similarities to the “America is driving less” impact on gas prices at play with the current economy and the “stimulus package” isn’t going to change it because Americans are scared and scared Americans stop spending and when that happens the American economy comes to a screeching halt.
So creating “new” jobs just isn’t going to make a great impact, stopping the loss of jobs is what is called for here however business is in a “Phoenix Death Spiral” which will continue until the folly of that mistaken approach earns its consequences.
Part of the solution lies with business taking pay and compensation package cuts top to bottom while keeping employees on the job. As employees start seeing a threat reduction spending will return, slowly, but the downward spiral will lose momentum and an economic reversal will begin.
Throwing taxpayer money at Corps that “just cannot function without a new 500 million dollar jet” or that even THINK about such folly should be cause for impeachment of any politician who supports such blatant disregard for the American taxpayer dollar.

Posted by: chuck, Illinois | January 28, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Ok Dan, how about a flat tax across rhe board. That would be a grear stimilus to the economy as well as getting rid of thousand of pages of complicated tax laws.

Posted by: billy bob | January 28, 2009, 10:05 am 10:05 am

Also gotta love the BHO groupies that say “Republicans want BHO to fail.”
Wasn’t it Democrat Senate Majority leader Reid that told Americans that the “war is lost.”
I don’t want BHO to fail as President. I want his left wing policies to fall flat on their faces and into the trash heap.

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 10:06 am 10:06 am

“Silky the paid blogger. Just as I suspected. If you’re not a paid blogger you’re stealing time from your employer. So which is it?”
Just had my yearly performance appraisal and received all 1s and 2s. But nice try. Not that it’s any of your business.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am

Dan, by the way, Bush failed by the media standards, historians will wright it different.

Posted by: billy bob | January 28, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am

silky–Any refutiations of my posts? Or just childish liberal namecalling?
TYPICAL.

Posted by: enoughalready | January 28, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am

Dan; It’s not that we want our leader to fail. We just don’t want to watch him destroy our country with bad policies. As a leader he is dynamic. He just needs to get a grip on reality instead of trying to buy more votes if we are to experience economic recovery.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | January 28, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am

The big problems is in GOP. They destroyd the american and the world economy and now are interested to stand againist to those who want to solve the world and american problem.
The better thing to do now is to study ways in which the american and all people of the world to sting the GOP party, because they ramain with old idiology.
We all need to fight with GOP.

Posted by: CANDY LEGEND | January 28, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am

Silky, do you work for the Govt.?

Posted by: billy bob | January 28, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am

1 week in office and nobody is happy. wow! Detroit has to be furious about the emissions crap and gays are mad because of Warren and anti-war nuts are mad because now it will take till may 2010 to pull out troops or longer if it puts our troops in danger. Obermanns mad becasue of lobbyists are in the white house. The only happy ones are the abortion crowd, which makes the life crowd mad. CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN.

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 10:09 am 10:09 am

The repulicans had better stand up to barry and the rest of the socialist democrats. History will eventually expose them as the reason the housing market collapsed.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am

billybob–Does anyone take the media seriously anymore?
What matters is that Bush protected America. This recession will end and soon be forgotten, but not the FACT that Bush provided security for 7+ years.
Smoke on that liberals.

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am

The big problems is in GOP. They destroyd the american and the world economy and now are interested to stand againist to those who want to solve the world and american problem.
The better thing to do now is to study ways in which the american and all people of the world to sting the GOP party, because they ramain with old idiology.
We all need to fight with GOP.
Posted by: CANDY LEGEND | Jan 28, 2009 10:09:05 AM
Words of wisdom, I am impressed with such deep thought.

Posted by: billy bob | January 28, 2009, 10:11 am 10:11 am

candy–So now Democrats are going to solve all the world economic problems? I recommend not letting Barney Frank or Chris Dodd anywhere near analyzing investments.
You are a true blue BHO supporter, aren’t you.

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

“Ok Dan, how about a flat tax across rhe board. That would be a grear stimilus to the economy as well as getting rid of thousand of pages of complicated tax laws.”
Got a link to the how the numbers shake out with a flat tax? Considering we’ve always used a progressive income tax structure that has by and large worked and that just about every economist of note has supported a progressive structure, that sounds like a dangerous thing to tinker with at such a vulnerable moment.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 10:15 am 10:15 am

enoughalready, I’m not sure you’ve said anything in any of your posts. Although, this:
“angie–Ever herad the old saying ‘Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice shame on me?”"
…is WAY too easy pickings.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am

still pushing half-truths (vote no before meeting with President Obama). The actual position was to vote no AS IT CURRENTLY STOOD WITHOUT ANY ABILITY FOR THE GOP TO PROVIDE INPUT.
_______________________________________________
House Republicans shouldn’t have said anything prior to the meeting. Obama was coming to the Hill to negotiate with them on the bill and listen to their concerns. This media stunt shows nothing but bad faith and was a bone-headed, disrespectful, power-play by the House Republicans.

Posted by: Paige | January 28, 2009, 10:18 am 10:18 am

Billy Bob don’t you manage down your bottom line?
Youre saying if you had extra cash you’d automatically purchase equipment and hire people? That doesnt make sense. Maybe you’d hire more people if you got a large contract thats bigger than what you can currently handle. But you can get a working capital LOC for that. Or finance the equipment purchase for the big job..the interest expense would manage down the bottom line nicely.
Why would you hire more people if your revenues are flat? Im surprised your still in business. Oh wait your not, your on a message board instead.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am

What a joke, the repub created a 13 trillion dollar national debt and now they say the stimulis is to much. Bhoemer is a hypocrite, where was he when the repubs were spending the money

Posted by: BSKI | January 28, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am

silky, google Steve forbes, flat tax, he has it all figured out. the guy is a smart mad and Obama would do good to listen to him, but he wont.

Posted by: billy bob | January 28, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am

silky–Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is stupidity at its finest.
Why should the GOP sign off on another “package” that is more than double the last one? You know, the one were no one seems to be able to find $350 billion dollars.

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 10:20 am 10:20 am

WORKER MAN
Thats all you Republicans can say about Bush Is he Kept us Safe? He kept us safe? What about Jobs What about his Economic Policies? Yes I will give him that he has Kept us safe. But on the other hand he Failed to get Bin Laden, The war In Iraq was Senseless and has Nearly Bankrupted our Country, And he pretty much has ran The country into the Ground BUT HE KEPT US SAFE HAHAAH LOLO

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 10:21 am 10:21 am

“silky–Doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results is stupidity at its finest.”
Yeah, but in this case doing the same thing over and over again made us the most powerful country in the world. Are you feeling okay?

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 10:22 am 10:22 am

angie–I’ll take security over cyclical downturns anyday of the week.
Without national security, these discussions would mean squat.

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am

silky…
You sound like a typical lib (just a guess)!! The Repubs tarp was stupid and Obama’s 800 billion is stupid also.. I’ve never seen anyone borrow their way out of debt??

Posted by: for sure | January 28, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am

Angie, don’t forget to mention that 9-11 did happen on his watch

Posted by: BSKI | January 28, 2009, 10:24 am 10:24 am

silky–What are referring to?
FDR thought he could spend his way out of a recession, and where did that lead? To the Great Depression.

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 10:25 am 10:25 am

Silky; 1′s and 2′s aren’t very good on a scale of 1-10.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | January 28, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

WORKERS MAN
First of all The 350 Billion Dollar scam of Bush/Paulson Was a bailout For Wall street! Obamas Plan is a Stimulis,The reason being for the Missing 350 Billion dollars I belive is at the Fault of your party who passed it with No Oversight, No Accountibility Obamas Plan has Oversight Accountability and Transparency!

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 10:26 am 10:26 am

“silky…
You sound like a typical lib (just a guess)!!”
Do you have a specific point your referring to?
And you SPEND your way out of a recession. The majority of the debt is thanks to your guy, not mine. My guy is looking to invest in our future, while creating a ton of jobs.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am

“FDR thought he could spend his way out of a recession, and where did that lead? To the Great Depression.”
Your timeline is incorrect. And spending IS what got us out of the Great Depression.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am

“the FACT that Bush provided security for 7+ years”
That’s nice you don’t count the 4,000 lives lost on September 11th, eight months into Bush’s first term, after the memo he received entitled “Al-Queda deternmined to attack America homeland.” You are a generous man. Sweet of you too to ignore the estimated 13 billion dollars Bush’s administration lost to fraud in Iraq. You give your President a lot of leeway, I suppose you are as patient towards the Democratic President as well?

Posted by: Amy | January 28, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am

angie–Did you wake and bake this morning?
Congress passed Bush’s plan with no oversight. That is the job of the legislature.
Are you having a hard time admitting that the Democratic controlled Congress didn’t do their jobs?

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am

I think we can all agree that the repubs and the dems have failed this country for the last 8 years. BArney Frank, Chris Dodd, Paulsen, Bush the list goes on on both sides. So why would government be able to pull us out of the mess they put us in?

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am

worker man-”What matters is that Bush protected America. This recession will end and soon be forgotten, but not the FACT that Bush provided security for 7+ years.
Smoke on that liberals.”
With that sort of logic you could claim that Clinton did a good job too although I doubt you think that.
I do love the security Bush provided while he let our country decay into its current state. A president should be able to multi-task and if that is all you can say then I don’t feel you have done a good job defending Bush. I would rather have whatever you’re smoking because it’s working for you.

Posted by: dan | January 28, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am

BSKI
Yes 911 Did happen on his watch and he still Failed to get Bin Laden Instead he decided to Start a war With a country who had No Involement what so Ever with 911 Real smart he was Mean while Bin Laden and the Terriost Networks our Still operating!WORKER MAN Without a Job and Money to Pay your Mortgage of feed your self Is Security going to pay or Bills feed your Family?

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am

North Park you are cluless, that is why you work for someone else.

Posted by: billy bob | January 28, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am

silky–World War 2 got us out the Depression. Not bloated government spending on public works.

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 10:31 am 10:31 am

“government is the problem” Ronald Reagan. The most accurate words ever spoken. by the “great communicator”

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am

“Silky; 1′s and 2′s aren’t very good on a scale of 1-10.”
I’ve never seen a Fortune 500 company use a 1-10 scale for performance appraisals. All three I’ve seen have been 1-5, with 1 being the highest mark.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am

WORKER MAN
Yes, security is important but but were was the security on 9-11????That happen on Bushed watch.The same thing happen to his father, Cheney talked him into Iraq war and the economy of the country went down the drain. He lost the election. Bushed did the same thing.The courts appointed him otherwise he would have lost the election. It is the resposibility of the president to do both,,,,SECURITY & ECONOMY

Posted by: BSKI | January 28, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am

“silky–World War 2 got us out the Depression. Not bloated government spending on public works.”
Spending related to World War II. And the investments in infrastructure began to pay off.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am

GOP
Your ideas haven’t worked
Step aside.

Posted by: Omentum | January 28, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am

Worker Man
I do belive It was your Party That still had most of the power When the Bush/Paulson scam passed

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 10:33 am 10:33 am

WORKER MAN
It is obvious you don’t know when the depression came about

Posted by: BSKI | January 28, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am

No society, “house”, divided within itself, will stand. What’s up for America? A fallen nation? This is where we are headed and fast. This government party system love the idea, but will this really make them look good? I hate the idea. Big corporate names are gone now. Will the name America disapear too! Honestly, America, we really don’t have that chose to continue to hate, be greety, and claw our way on top of one another for a prize. We either come together as a people with a functional government or we disappear. Call it evolution, if you like. I would prefer to put the bakes on this mess and start working, together.

Posted by: anchor | January 28, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am

“That’s nice you don’t count the 4,000 lives lost on September 11th, eight months into Bush’s first term, after the memo he received entitled “Al-Queda deternmined to attack America homeland.” You are a generous man. Sweet of you too to ignore the estimated 13 billion dollars Bush’s administration lost to fraud in Iraq. You give your President a lot of leeway, I suppose you are as patient towards the Democratic President as well?”
Don’t forget the 4,000 plus lives lost in Iraq (plus the countless Iraqi civilians) and in addition to the trillions of dollars and the psychological on those who will be injected back into society and the consequential financial cost associated with that.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 10:35 am 10:35 am

silky–NO
That millions of men joined the military, thus freeing up low paying, factory jobs for those left behind.
My grandma worked in one of those factories and by today’s standards, it would have been closed due to safety hazards.
FDR turned a recession into a depression by increasing the size of government and more money than it took in. Something rarely done before 1928.
Damn you Keynes.

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am

Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Chuck schumer, harry reid, maxine waters, pelosi, ACORN, barry O, all are the reason the housing market collapsed.
They were very loud advocates of “affordable housing” and forced the banks to drop their lending standards or face being penalized. Somehow the media has fooled everyone into believing that George Bush sabatoged the economy. The only thing Bush did wrong regarding the housing crisis was not standing up more to the socialist dems.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 10:37 am 10:37 am

“No society, “house”, divided within itself, will stand.”
Actually, I think Obama’s approval rating is a good barometer for where the country is in terms of cohesion. We’re doing okay in that regard. This message board is not an accurate snapshot.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am

angie–”Worker Man
I do belive It was your Party That still had most of the power When the Bush/Paulson scam passed”
Are you on crack? Democrats have been in control of both House and Senate since 2006.
You voted for BHO, didn’t you?

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 10:41 am 10:41 am

I have a small business. A dinky business is a better word. I’m paying taxes today and I have about 6 forms in front of me, -w5 941 940 w-3 w-2 unempoyment tax, relocation tax, sales tax, real estate tax. I’d like to let silky figure this out and pay them for me. I’ll bet he’s never made payroll before.

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am

dave–All of us law abiding, play by the rules, homeowners couldn’t agree more.
Also, those “affordable mortgage homeowners” drove down the valued prices of houses by bringing their ghetto to once respectable neighborhoods. Another reason the housing bubble burst.

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am

CHAOS–I bet she’d do a better job than Tim Geithner or Charlie Rangel.

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am

Ya know a man killed himself, his wife and children yesterday because he lost his job. An elderly man was found frozen to death in his home because he could not afford to pay his electric bill. Unfortunately, I’m sure there will be many more stories such as these.
Don’t you think there are MUCH MORE important matters to concern ourselves with than the partisan politics and rhetoric?
KNOCK! KNOCK! Mr. Bush is gone and can do no more (whether you think it was bad or good) Mr. Obama is here for at least 4 years, and the problems facing our country RIGHT NOW are very real! Isn’t it time to stop living in the past and pay closer attention to the present instead of pointing fingers? No matter WHO was responsible (its now irrelevent), the problem is here!
…and how do you feel about this stimulus package????

Posted by: FS | January 28, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am

“government is the problem” when Republicans are put in charge of it.
Let them go back to running their corporations and leave governance to the Democrats.

Posted by: Amy | January 28, 2009, 10:47 am 10:47 am

“That millions of men joined the military, thus freeing up low paying, factory jobs for those left behind.”
The contracts are what tipped the scales back. SPENDING.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am

And in case you BHO groupies don’t know, Charlie Rangel is in charge of the tax codes, yet he didn’t know that he was supposed to pay taxes on a vacation house.
OOPS. Not to worry though, he’s a Democrat (and black) so don’t expect any reprecussions.

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am

“I’ll bet he’s never made payroll before.”
Not with my own money, no. But I was in charge of payroll for an internet startup when I was in college.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am

Maybe if Republicans would actually put some effort into solid ideas and get off the tax cut mantra as their solution to the economic problem (as usual) something could actually get done and they could take part in the credit when this package works. That’s what is missing that they don’t agree with in this package. Tax cuts only help the rich. Any idiot can look at our economic history to see this. History also clearly shows that our economy will begin to get back on track just as it has every time we’ve had a Dem POTUS.
The Dems and Obama have given them a chance to take part in the credit and they have declined. The package will get passed anyway and the Republicans will gnash their teeth and stamp their feet, throwing a tantrum like the whiny children that they are and show that they just can’t get along with others and were no help as usual.

Posted by: 1-Human | January 28, 2009, 10:50 am 10:50 am

“Also, those “affordable mortgage homeowners” drove down the valued prices of houses by bringing their ghetto to once respectable neighborhoods. Another reason the housing bubble burst.”
Ah…veiled racism. I see. And no, you’re wrong.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am

FS–”No matter WHO was responsible (its now irrelevent), the problem is here!”
Ever heard of learnig from past mistakes so that they are not repeated in the future?

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am

BillyBob, I do alot of successful contractors. they manage down the bottom line. They finance their working captial. They dont hire just becasue they pay less taxes. They need work then they hire. let me know if im saying anything clueless here.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am

amy: I suspect you benefit from government in some way.

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am

“Democrats have been in control of both House and Senate since 2006.”
Why are all your arguments based on half truths? The Democrats have had control of the senate by one vote for the past two years. Republicans had a safe majority the previous 6.

Posted by: Amy | January 28, 2009, 10:52 am 10:52 am

“And in case you BHO groupies don’t know, Charlie Rangel is in charge of the tax codes, yet he didn’t know that he was supposed to pay taxes on a vacation house.”
Some of the best financial advisors’ own finances are a mess. Many doctors smoke. One has nothing to do with the other.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 10:53 am 10:53 am

silky: with other peoples money, You said it all with that one statement.

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am

“amy: I suspect you benefit from government in some way.”
Amy is too articulate to need government help. You, on the other hand, have surely benefitted from a goverment handout at some point in your life.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am

Workerman: I can count two times this country had a foreign attack on US soil that lost civilian lives in the last 100 years.
9/11 and pearl harbor. Again foreign attacks where civilian lives were lost. One of those times happened during the Bush Administration. I’d be more worried about the slick roads today than being kept safe from a terrorist. If Bush did something to protect us from icy roads, I’d be more happy.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 10:55 am 10:55 am

CHAOS
I am dreading doing my taxes, as a matter of fact. I work two jobs and end up paying more in taxes. This year I’m going to open an IRA, however, and claim that deduction. Maybe that will bring it down. I’m looking forward to Obama getting his middle class tax reduction through Congress. Yay, Obama!

Posted by: Amy | January 28, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Silky; So you work for a Fortune 500 company? Then aren’t you part of the evil mega-corporation problem?

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | January 28, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am

silky–It is not racist to point out that my property value in 2003 was X amount of dollars. And in 2006, it was that same X amount minus 20%.
What changed you ask? The formerly well kept house that now had “affordable homeowners” in it. “Cutting the grass is for white people” was the answer I received when I asked them to take care of their property.
Tell me again, who is the racist?

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am

Listen up liberals,
9/11 was the result of 8 years of military cut-backs by good ol’ bill clinton.
The same band of crazies attacked the same target in 93′, but bill clinton still thought it was safe enough to play hide the cigar in the oval office all day.
As a result of bill’s military cut-backs, our different agencies knew that that the terrorists were up to something but they didn’t have the man power nor the intelligence to put the pieces together.
Liberals hate the military and are ALWAYS trying to shrink it.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 10:57 am 10:57 am

“silky: with other peoples money, You said it all with that one statement.”
I said all of what? You’re not saying what you think you’re saying.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am

Let me ask you this Republicans on Board Last spring when Bush sent his Tax Rebates to some and If you received one Did you accept it or did you send it back and say No way?

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am

“Tell me again, who is the racist?”
You.
Everybody’s property values were dropping by 2006.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am

DAVE
What is your Point Bush blew Military spending up and what did he Accomplish? Did he get Bin Laden? The war In Iraq was senseless, And Afghanistan is getting worse

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am

northpark–Are you on crack?
Pearl Harbor was an attack on a military base, not civilians.
Did you know that the WTC was bombed in 1993 under Clinton’s watch? Or that time after time Al Qaeda struck America interests overseas.
9/11 was a culmination of Al Qaeda slowly stepping up attacks on American interests, due to getting no response from backboneless Democrats. Bush put them on the run for 7+ years, and now they are getting cozy again, now that we have another spineless Democrat running things.

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am

CHAOS, dont you put sales tax onto your customers? Everybody pays property taxes dont ya know? Unemployment tax, well what controls do you have to minimize that? Doesnt it also cost to hire? w-5 advanced income credit thats your choice. w-3 is a summary is it not? why are you complaining about that? People think they can run a business like a lemonade stand! haha

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 11:04 am 11:04 am

I am amazed at the number of people that want our counrty to fail. Talking heads, no achievements of there own, ever… but think they have the answers. Oops! I used the wrong word… “think”. They let Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh do their thinking… that is scary.

Posted by: MrSleepy | January 28, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

workerman if im on crack then you cant read. there was civilian lives lost in pearl harbor. 68 civlians lost their life. 1993 WTC bombing resulted in no loss of civilain life. thank you.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

silky; LIberals spend other peoples money easily, you made payroll with other peoples money not form your check book. there is a big difference .

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

“Silky; So you work for a Fortune 500 company? Then aren’t you part of the evil mega-corporation problem?”
Not really. They operate ethically as far as I can tell, and are HQ’d in Amsterdam, anyway. We didn’t get any bailout money.
And people tend to forget the 1993 WTC attack when talking about attacks on US soil. There were fatalities and they were trying to knock one of the towers down that time, too.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

Why do little small Businesses complain about Taxes? do you Know the things they get to write off and In obamas new plan they will be able to write off more then they have currently been Read up on it

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

It’s certainly not President Obama’s fault. What it boils down to is racism. The whites of America are so distraught over an African American running the country, that they will do anything to discredit every move the man makes. Shows how little progress whites have made over the last couple hundred years.
Posted by: Carmen
———-
Carmen, that kind of talk will not help anything and you can’t be so short sighted as to not know that 48% of all whites who voted, voted FOR Obama. Please, don’t lump all of us in with the dorks on the right.

Posted by: 1-Human | January 28, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am

silky–You are obviously black. since you are so touchy.
Property values dropped nationwide because the same thing that was happening in my neighborhood was/is happening nationwide.
Damn you liberal social engineers.

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 11:07 am 11:07 am

north park: it’s the paper work and also the taxes that are out my pocket, that are why I charrge more for my services. this brings the cost up to everyone. The companies don’t pay taxes. this is true they pass it on to the consumer. So if you think that is true than raising taxes on the big companies is just going to cause inflation correct?

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am

Angie, yes and the SBA is a great program for these small businesses! No real reason to not get a loan, especailly if the fees go down! They really have nothing to gripe aboout.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am

northpark–Six people died in 93. So yes it was an attack on American civilians.
And silky, they were trying to knock one building into the other one. Thus destroying both of them.
Selective history anyone?

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am

“FDR turned a recession into a depression by increasing the size of government and more money than it took in.”
Unemployment was at 25% when FDR took office. FDR put my grandfather to work building roads, which got him through the Depression and resulted in some fine infastructure in Maine. My Dad served his country in WWII and went to college on the GI Bill, which lifted our family’s fortunes further, so yeah, to CHAOS’s comment, I guess I have benefited from government programs.

Posted by: Amy | January 28, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am

After 911 The Housing Market Boomed Mortages Became Eaiser, Interest Rates were lower, And people went crazy and started Buying homes! Beacause of the Easy Credit And low Interest rates, And let me see who was in control then Oh President Bush and Republicans thats right they let Wall Street the Banks and the Free market go wild now its bursting

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am

CHAOS Im not for raising taxes on small business but im also not for cutting them. Im for raising taxes on fellas who bring $200M plus in paychecks home every year! (M means thousands in the real world) You have to expect paperwork if youre running a business, it’s called administration/office expenses.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am

northpark : get a clue. IF I went to the SBA for a loan I would still be trying to start a business. they are the biggest joke and most successful businesses do not use them. We go to banks with a plan and they lend us the money because they know we will pay them back. the SBA is a red tape nightmare.

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am

workerman, I was not aware 6 civilians died in 1993. my bad, but it only brings my count up to 3. My comment about icy roads still stands.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am

Since all you liberals are in the giving mood, how about paying my cable bill?
Spread the wealth, right?

Posted by: BO=BS | January 28, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am

“silky–You are obviously black. since you are so touchy.”
No, I’m not. You are obviously racist, since you’re…well…racist.
“Property values dropped nationwide because the same thing that was happening in my neighborhood was/is happening nationwide.”
Lol! Yeah, that’s it. It didn’t have anything to do with too much building and people defaulting on loans.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Angie
My point was we have not been attacked in 7 years- thank you President Bush.
The world was also been relieved of a murdering tyrant who used chemical weapons to murder 750,000 of his own people- thank you President Bush.
On a side note, why are liberals always running around claiming to be for human rights, but then fight like comanches against the USA when it tries to take out dictators who commit mass murder?
Example 1: Vietnam was lost because of liberal hippies screaming “make love not war”. America left prematurely and as a result, MILLIONS of South Vientamese were slaughtered by the north. Thank you Jane Fonda.
Example 2: Iraq was almost lost because of the same hippy chants “Bush lied kids died!”. Thank you Michael Moore.
If liberals would ever set aside their hatred/contempt for America for just a second, they might see that the world would be much better off if America were stronger militarily.
Instead, idiots like BO have sworn up and down that they will “cut back military spending”. He has said that dozens of times.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

You can tell who has never run a business here.

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Chaos
Obamas plan is not to Raise taxes on small Business but rather He is going to give them huge tax breaks.

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am

northpark
Since you didn’t even know that Americans died in the 93 WTC bombings, you obviously have no grasp of what has been happening since then.

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am

CHAOS: the SBA is a great program, i’ve seen many customers get work they wouldnt have gotten without the SBA, you sound like you dont enjoy running a business. Remember all the reasons you got into it, maybe you’ll feel better. You are your own boss remember.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am

workerman your analogy is weak and insulting. I have not insulted you at all. I’ve been very respectful to you.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 11:20 am 11:20 am

Angie
Please you tube “barney frank denying there is a problem”. He can be seen, along with DOZENS of other top socialist democrats, denying there is a problem with fanny/freddie and at the same time pushing for more cheap mortgages. These spreadthewealtharounders continue to proclaim that any “regulation of the 2 institutions would only decrease affordable housing”.
Liberals are socialists and without the media’s protection would have been exposed a looooooong time ago.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am

Angie
Obama’s plan is to give “95% of Americans a tax break”, but the problem is 50% of Americans pay no federal taxes.
In Econ 101, we would call that a welfare check.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am

So called bipartisan efforts by President Obama are an illusion at best. Essentially, his view of bipartisanism is for the Congressional GOP to get on board with what he wants – period – full stop – end of analysis. But is that a bad thing ? As the president pointed out last week – he won – and his view trumps the minority party in Congress. He doesnt need the GOP to pass anything he wants – they have zero legislative value to his agenda. These so called bipartisan meetings are purely political – and a win/win for the adminstration at present. If the GOP back his agenda – he has political cover if elements fail. If they do not – they are “just being obstructionist”. But to call these meetings an attempt to “reach across the aisle” is disingenious.

Posted by: undecided2012 | January 28, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am

silky–I said the word “ghetto” and you call me a racist.
So what do you call the fella that told me “mowing grass is for white people?”

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 11:23 am 11:23 am

Dave
I fail to see what we were suppose to win in Iraq, yes I agree Saddam Hussein had to be stopped But there were other ways not Blowing the Country up! Holy wars cannot be won, Every stop to think maybe thats why other countries Hate us because we come off as Bullies Demanding they live the way we live or Die! you cannot Go into other countries trying to Change their Cultures.

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 11:24 am 11:24 am

Ha ! my spelling sux.

Posted by: undecided2012 | January 28, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am

Dave
I asked a question on Board A while back Did you receive one of the Bush Socialisit Rebate check? If you did did you keep it or send it back?

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 11:26 am 11:26 am

northpark–You can insult me all you want. I’m not a touchy feely PC liberal.
Just get the facts straight.
Claiming that the 93 WTC bombings had no civilian casualties just shows your lack of knowledge that I as a conservative have grown accustomed to from liberals.

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 11:27 am 11:27 am

“And silky, they were trying to knock one building into the other one. Thus destroying both of them.
Selective history anyone?”
Huh? What’s selective?

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am

northpark–So if you can’t even get those easily refuted facts straight, what else are you wrong about?

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 11:28 am 11:28 am

Dave, you need a history lesson on 9/11. Ever read the memo given to Presdident Bush in August of 2001? The one entitled “Bin Laden Determined To Strike in US?”
Read the memo and tell us, did Bin Laden attack us because Clinton did nothing (as you stated) or because Clinton pursued him?
Here’s a hint: “After US missile strikes on his base in Afghanistan in 1998, Bin Laden told followers he wanted to retaliate in Washington”
Now you can blame Clinton for getting Bin Laden all riled up.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3617289.stm

Posted by: Amy | January 28, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

“Unemployment was at 25% when FDR took office. FDR put my grandfather to work building roads, which got him through the Depression and resulted in some fine infastructure in Maine. My Dad served his country in WWII and went to college on the GI Bill, which lifted our family’s fortunes further, so yeah, to CHAOS’s comment, I guess I have benefited from government programs.”
ZING!

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

President Bush got Warning after Warning about Bin Laden and his Plan for 911 And what did Bush Do NOTHING!

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 11:31 am 11:31 am

Angie
Other countries hate us because they are JEALOUS of us. America has 500lb poor people in welfare lines. Our “poor” people live like sultans compared to other countries middle and upper classes. I lived in Europe several years back, and believe me when i say that there are no trailer parks/ghettos filled with 500lb occupants!
Capitalism has created the most wealthy, generous and powerful nation the world has ever seen. France and Germany have been around for how long and we crush them in every aspect. That has to create a little jealously, doesn’t it?

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am

DAVE
Hello are you out there Did you get that Socialisit Refund Check From Your President?

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am

silky–You stated “There were fatalities and they were trying to knock one of the towers down that time, too.”
ONE of them down?
Since you can’t get your facts straight either, I must ask you the same question as I asked “northpark.” If you can’t get simple facts correct, what else are you wrong about?

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am

“Obama’s plan is to give “95% of Americans a tax break”, but the problem is 50% of Americans pay no federal taxes.”
dave, you are either a colossal moron or a flat-out liar. You have been proven wrong on this multiple times, yet you continue to say it. Obama NEVER, EVER once said that. If you can prove he did, then prove. Otherwise, consult his tax plan, which has not changed since the beginning of the campaign. It says, “95% of workers and their families.” Get it right.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am

Dave
Did you get that check from Bush SOCIALISIM?

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am

keep trying workerman, you just said the same thing only with different words. Very weak. And no I havent insulted you. But saying someone is wrong on one thing must be wrong on everything is very narrow minded. And by looking at your posts its evident how narrow minded you are…Very concerning, good thing Im not you.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 11:35 am 11:35 am

angie–I can’t speak for “dave” but I got one. And turned around and donated it plus $500 extra to charity.
Us Republicans are so evil, huh?

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am

Angie,
Last year I paid $28,500 in federal taxes, therefore any rebate Bush gave me was not a welfare check.
Now my trashy cousins who are reproducing as we speak and collecting welfare checks by the bucket loads would fall into that 50% catergory i was telling you about. They pay no federal taxes but yet, barry O wants to give them a “tax break”.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 11:37 am 11:37 am

Dave another right wing Idealogy Other countries are Jealous of us thats why they hate us, No Its because certain Republican Presidents Have tried to Instill American ways And American cultures Down their Throats LIVE LIKE US OR DIE!

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am

“silky–You stated “There were fatalities and they were trying to knock one of the towers down that time, too.”
ONE of them down?”
Who frickin cares? It didn’t happen, probably woulnd’t have worked even if they got one down, and what do I stand to benefit by employing the “selective history” thing on this point? Get a grip.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am

The Repugs of congress went hog-wild when they were a majority, so give them their own medicine.

Posted by: Godseyesore | January 28, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am

Silky
Please keep up the long-standing “open minded” liberal tradition of calling people morons and liars.
Barry said DOZENS of times that 95% of Americans would get a tax break. Did you see all of the people in chicago nov 4th crying because they were never gonna have to pay for their mortgages again?
They just elected a sugar daddy, which is what all liberal politicians are.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Worker Man
Great for you what charity Did you donate too? but I thought Republicans think Donating to Charity is a form Of Socialisim DAVE get your facts straight obama wants to give the tax breaks to WORKING families.

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 11:41 am 11:41 am

Angie
Yeah, sometimes Americans marching into other countries and holding guns to the leaders heads forcing them to embrace democracy has been a good thing, right?
Last time I checked Germany has not started any more holocausts lately, have they?
Or Japan has not been dominated by BRUTAL Imperialistic tyrants that bomb our military bases in Hawaii lately, have they?
The list goes on, but then again, liberals aren’t interested in facts.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 11:45 am 11:45 am

Well, I gotta run.
PS: I got laid off last week. Not to worry, I won’t be getting on the gubmint gravy train. I have something most BHO groupies don’t. Marketable skills and education. No liberal arts, theater, or urban studies classes in my past.
As my 97 year old granddad now says: “pimps and prostitutes always outbreed hard workers. That is how BHO got elected.”

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 11:46 am 11:46 am

angie–Can we atleast date before you ask me such personal questions?

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 11:48 am 11:48 am

Dave, you need a history lesson on WWII, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Serbian/Bosnian War, the Iraq and Afghanistan Wars.
But God, where to start?
“Vietnam was lost because of liberal hippies screaming “make love not war”. America left prematurely…” 50,000 American servicemen killed is not enough for you? Were you even around in the 60′s and 70′s? I was, and believe me, the Vietnam War was a lesson Bush should have learned from and didn’t (I find it interesting the Vietnam War wasn’t worth his life to fight in.)
You and the “liberals hate the military” mantra…do we really need to go over the list of Democrats who have served and Republicans who haven’t?

Posted by: Amy | January 28, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am

“Barry said DOZENS of times that 95% of Americans would get a tax break.”
No, he didn’t. You are LYING. Until you can prove otherwise, I’m going to refer you to his tax plan, which I have done multiple times now, and which has been available for all to see since the beginning of his campaign.
http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/taxes/Factsheet_Tax_Plan_FINAL.pdf

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Angie
Did you really say “republicans believe charity is a form of socialism”?
You liberals have clearly lost your marbles.
Please check the US gov’t data taken after the 2004 election. Republicans are FAR more generous with their money then liberals. Liberals are always FAR more generous with OTHER people’s $$$.
Joe biden for example made $2.59 million in the last 10 years and has given less then $3,000 to charity, which is around 1%. Now that is what I call patriotic joe!
Or how about the messiah of global warming? He gave roughly what biden made. Awesome!
And finally, who can forget barry O??
The man who has a brother living in a hut in kenya and a relative living in a slum in boston.
Barry, it is just like you said. We truly are “our brother’s keeper”.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am

Oh one more thing. My pen-is is really small and Im ashamed of it.

Posted by: worker man | January 28, 2009, 11:52 am 11:52 am

I’m tired of all the talk of partisanship, like it’s a bad thing! Partisanship is a result of congressmen and senators realizing that their loyalties lie with the voters and taxpayers – not with the president. It is their job to look out for us and they feel a massive spending bill is too expensive, they are obligated to speak up.
By the way, Clinton and Bush both had stimulus bills that passed, but there was fierce debates over them – as there should be.
I should also mention that there are conservative democrats who are also opposed to this bill – it’s not just the republicans.

Posted by: Bisque-it | January 28, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am

“Other countries hate us because they are JEALOUS of us. America has 500lb poor people in welfare lines.”
No, that’s why they LAUGH at us. They hate us because of our foreign policy.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 11:53 am 11:53 am

Dave
Since your Pointing out The democrats Personal Finances How about a list of Republicans Charity Donations cant wait for this one

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 11:55 am 11:55 am

“As my 97 year old granddad now says: “pimps and prostitutes always outbreed hard workers. That is how BHO got elected.”"
So, your 97 year old granddad is also a moron and a liar. Awesome.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Amy,
50,000 serviceman bravely gave their lives to a conflict that was a noble cause but was doomed from the start because liberals were never going to allow America to win.
Regardless, you ignored my pointing out that MILLIONS of south vientnamese were slaughtered after we left. But who cares, right? MAKE LOVE NOT WAR, right?

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 11:56 am 11:56 am

Silky
Did you hear that 1,800,000 people attended barry inauguration, but only 12 missed work that day?

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am

“Last time I checked Germany has not started any more holocausts lately, have they?
Or Japan has not been dominated by BRUTAL Imperialistic tyrants that bomb our military bases in Hawaii lately, have they?
The list goes on, but then again, liberals aren’t interested in facts.”
What these examples have to do with Iraq is beyond me.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 11:59 am 11:59 am

Angie…to continue Dave’s comment. Republicans aren’t against charity; they are actually for it, giving tons to the charities of their choice. What conservatives ARE against is the forced redistribution of wealth by taking from them and giving to the folks the government deems “worthy” to the point where the folks receiving the “government blessing” frequently refuse to do what they need to do in order to get back on their own two feet, instead choosing to stay on the welfare program.
By the way, I didn’t pay nearly the amount of income tax that Dave did (he must not be a public school teacher with a family of 3 on a single income), but I did pay well more than the amount I received in the government check. As far as I was concerned, the government was giving me some of my own money BACK that they had taken earlier.
Did EVERYONE that received the check actually pay more in FITW during the year than they received back? I guess that is the million (or trillion) dollar question.
God bless SNOW DAYS!

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

“Republicans think Donating to Charity is a form Of Socialisim…”
What kind of nonsense is this? Just google “Faith Based Initiative” program and learn something about Republicans.
While many liberals are crying that the government needs to “do something” about poverty, convict recidivism, drug abuse, preventing former drug abusers from relapsing, disease in third world countries, etc. many evil republicans (many through their churches) are out there doing something about it.
Get off your high horse. The truth is, democrats and republicans have more in common than most people care to realize.

Posted by: Great big sigh | January 28, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

“Did you hear that 1,800,000 people attended barry inauguration, but only 12 missed work that day?”
No, but I can tell that engaging you in any kind of debate is a fool’s errand and I quit. You’re a mess, dave. You should really try to do better.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Silky,
I would like a formal apology from you because you have called me a “liar and a moron” MANY times regarding this (we have argued about this before). Please apologize after you read this posting.
In the last few debates, Obama has stressed that he will cut taxes for 95% of Americans. Here’s a quote from the first debate, courtesy of CNN:
My definition — here’s what I can tell the American people: 95 percent of you will get a tax cut. And if you make less than $250,000, less than a quarter-million dollars a year, then you will not see one dime’s worth of tax increase.
The second debate, again courtesy of CNN:
So let’s be clear about my tax plan and Sen. McCain’s, because we’re not going to be able to deal with entitlements unless we understand the revenues coming in. I want to provide a tax cut for 95 percent of Americans, 95 percent.
And the last debate, again courtesy of CNN:
If I can answer the question. Number one, I want to cut taxes for 95 percent of Americans. Now, it is true that my friend and supporter, Warren Buffett, for example, could afford to pay a little more in taxes in order — in order to give — in order to give additional tax cuts to Joe the plumber before he was at the point where he could make $250,000.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 12:02 pm 12:02 pm

Dave
What is it again we are suppose to Win in Iraq? and Im still waiting on all the list of Republican charity they give and I dont mean to the rich and wealthy on wall street Thats another thing no more corporate welfare!

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm

Silky,
I would like a formal apology from you because you have called me a “liar and a moron” MANY times regarding this (we have argued about this before). Please apologize after you read this posting.
In the last few debates, Obama has stressed that he will cut taxes for 95% of Americans. Here’s a quote from the first debate, courtesy of CNN:
My definition — here’s what I can tell the American people: 95 percent of you will get a tax cut. And if you make less than $250,000, less than a quarter-million dollars a year, then you will not see one dime’s worth of tax increase.
The second debate, again courtesy of CNN:
So let’s be clear about my tax plan and Sen. McCain’s, because we’re not going to be able to deal with entitlements unless we understand the revenues coming in. I want to provide a tax cut for 95 percent of Americans, 95 percent.
And the last debate, again courtesy of CNN:
If I can answer the question. Number one, I want to cut taxes for 95 percent of Americans. Now, it is true that my friend and supporter, Warren Buffett, for example, could afford to pay a little more in taxes in order — in order to give — in order to give additional tax cuts to Joe the plumber before he was at the point where he could make $250,000.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 12:04 pm 12:04 pm

“So, your 97 year old granddad is also a moron and a liar. Awesome.” Posted by: Silky
Try to be mature and refrain from personal attacks. It makes you look rather small-minded.

Posted by: Be nice | January 28, 2009, 12:05 pm 12:05 pm

MIKE O AND DAVE
Please do state the Republicans charities you too are Ranting about Im cant wait too see!

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm

“In the last few debates, Obama has stressed that he will cut taxes for 95% of Americans. Here’s a quote from the first debate, courtesy of CNN:
My definition — here’s what I can tell the American people: 95 percent of you will get a tax cut. And if you make less than $250,000, less than a quarter-million dollars a year, then you will not see one dime’s worth of tax increase.”
Yeah, a “tax cut.” You need to actually pay taxes to have a “tax cut” apply to you. How does somebody who doesn’t pay taxes experience a tax cut?

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm

Angie
Liberals don’t walk the walk when it comes to helping the poor, left-leaning columnist Nicholas Kristof confesses in a we-can-do-better column for the New York Times Sunday edition.
The only debate is whether conservatives give 30 percent more to charity than liberals, as Arthur Brooks, author of “Who Really Cares,” claims, or twice as much as liberals, as a study by Google indicates.
Kristof admits to being “unhappy with my findings,” echoing sentiments from the researcher Brooks:
“When I started doing research on charity,” Mr. Brooks said, “I expected to find that political liberals – who, I believed, genuinely cared more about others than conservatives did – would turn out to be the most privately charitable people. So when my early findings led me to the opposite conclusion, I assumed I had made some sort of technical error. I re-ran analyses. I got new data. Nothing worked. In the end, I had no option but to change my views.”
Other findings from the data:
- Conservatives are more likely to donate blood, and more likely to volunteer
- If liberals and moderates donated blood as often as conservatives, the U.S. blood supply would increase by 45 percent
- Conservative donations tend to support religious institutions, while liberal donations shade toward the arts and education (Kristof argues that the former is more likely to help the needy, citing research showing that donations to education disporportionately favor wealthy Americans)
- Conservatives give more to non-secular charities than liberals (when proportion of income is considered)
- The middle class gives less than the working poor
- Individuals from European countries donate far less than Americans, though European governments give more humanitarian aid per capita than the U.S.
Of course, donations are important regardless of the donor’s political ideology. These studies are often little more than fun facts for friendly teasing between political rivals.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Be nice, workerman was everything but nice. Although I dont agree people should stoop to a lower level, workerman brought it upon himslef..Dig on Silky. haha

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

MIKE O
So you have no Problem that President Bush may have gave Rebate Checks to people who dont Pay taxes Its ok But if Obama proposes it Its Socialisim And an outrage a little Hipocritical dont ya think?

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

“Try to be mature and refrain from personal attacks. It makes you look rather small-minded.”
That’s not a “personal attack.” It’s a true statement. What his granddad said is false and antagonistic. The false part makes him a liar, and the false and antagonistic part makes him a moron.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm

dave DISRESPECTS President Barack Obama by referring to The President as “barry.” dave shows DISRESPECT for The Office of the U. S. President – because DAVE IS AN INTRACTABLE, FIERY-EYED RACIST!”
(dave, if it would be too difficult on your psyche to Respect The Man, at least have enough Character to Show Respect for The Office Of The President of the U.S.A.)
And this guy with the absurd moniker “worker man” is an outright racist hatemonger!

Posted by: bobj72 | January 28, 2009, 12:10 pm 12:10 pm

FYI,
Convservatives gave to charities to churchs to buy their support haha!

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

DAVE
Since you were ranting about Biden Gore And Obama can you name any Republican Politican that Donates to charity?

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 12:12 pm 12:12 pm

North Park
Thats right the only time Republicans will give is if The charity they are donating too will Support them Republicans dont dare do and Expect nothing in Return

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Silky,
I give up. You have consistently been an “open minded” liberal by calling me a liar. When I proved you wrong, you side stepped. I hope that everyone who gets into discussions with you sees how futile they are, and how ridiculous you can be.
Dave said:
“Barry said DOZENS of times that 95% of Americans would get a tax break.”
Silky responded with:
“No, he didn’t. You are LYING. Until you can prove otherwise, I’m going to refer you to his tax plan, which I have done multiple times now, and which has been available for all to see since the beginning of his campaign.”
Dave posted:
In the last few debates, Obama has stressed that he will cut taxes for 95% of Americans. Here’s a quote from the first debate, courtesy of CNN:
My definition — here’s what I can tell the American people: 95 percent of you will get a tax cut. And if you make less than $250,000, less than a quarter-million dollars a year, then you will not see one dime’s worth of tax increase.
The second debate, again courtesy of CNN:
So let’s be clear about my tax plan and Sen. McCain’s, because we’re not going to be able to deal with entitlements unless we understand the revenues coming in. I want to provide a tax cut for 95 percent of Americans, 95 percent.
And the last debate, again courtesy of CNN:
If I can answer the question. Number one, I want to cut taxes for 95 percent of Americans. Now, it is true that my friend and supporter, Warren Buffett, for example, could afford to pay a little more in taxes in order — in order to give — in order to give additional tax cuts to Joe the plumber before he was at the point where he could make $250,000.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 12:15 pm 12:15 pm

Angie said: “So you have no Problem that President Bush may have gave Rebate Checks to people who dont Pay taxes Its ok But if Obama proposes it Its Socialisim And an outrage a little Hipocritical dont ya think?”
—————-
When did I say I DIDN’T have a problem with Bush giving people who didn’t pay taxes a rebate check? Looks like you’re reading something into my comments that’s not there. Slow down, take a breath, and try to actually READ and UNDERSTAND what I’m writing before you go making assumptions.

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 12:17 pm 12:17 pm

Bobj72
Did you know that 1,800,000 went to barry’s inauguration and only 10 missed work that day?

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

I agree with Silky how can you give someone a Tax cut If they dont Pay taxes, I do belive Obama meant Working families meaning 95 Percent of people make under 250,000 Dollars a year

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

Angie, and by the way, it’s spelled HYPOCRITICAL. Sorry, it’s the public school teacher in me coming out. :)

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 12:18 pm 12:18 pm

MIKEO
But from what I am hearing out of you and Dave is its ok You Deserved that Rebate check But if Obama Proposes it Its socialisim! correct?

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

MikeO
THANKS

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 12:21 pm 12:21 pm

“the only time Republicans will give is if The charity they are donating too will Support them Republicans dont dare do and Expect nothing in Return” Posted by: Angie
I’m just wondering, do you have any facts – statistics from official sources – to back up your wild hypothesis or are you just making this up as you go along?

Posted by: Taking no sides | January 28, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

The “Psuedo Intellects” from “Right of center to the Far Right fringe” seem to be Intimidated by “Silky?” Why, I ask? Is it that he has a consistent, well-reasoned, logical argument? You even embarrass yourselves by accusing him of being a “Paid Blogger.” (Quite an honor I’d say.) But if True, where’s the Counter from your camp?
It’s clear there’s NO consistent, coherent, logical argument from ANY OF YOU! And regardless of how you may decorate it, it comes down to Republican’s having the arrogant desire to “call the shots!”
I for one (1) say; “take your half-baked ideas” to the back of the line! You lost and you don’t want to participate in “mature bipartisanship.”
dave DISRESPECTS President Barack Obama by referring to The President as “barry.” dave shows DISRESPECT for The Office of the U. S. President – because DAVE IS AN INTRACTABLE, FIERY-EYED RACIST!”
(dave, if it would be too difficult on your psyche to Respect The Man, at least have enough Character to Show Respect for The Office Of The President of the U.S.A.)
And this guy with the absurd moniker “worker man” is an outright racist hatemonger!

Posted by: bobj72 | January 28, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Angie
My “ranting” about al gore and biden was pretty significant. They are 2 very important socialist democrats who apparanently are very cheap!!
I just love exposing the dems for what they are- hypocritical socialists.
27/50 members of congress are among the top 50 most WEALTHY (truly the party of the people).
Also, did you know that for barry’s inauguration, 600 private jets descended on D.C.? 600!
When Bush was ingaugarated, only 300 did.
That global warming crowd sure are watching their “carbon footprints” these days.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

Angie/Silky…now you’re putting words in President Obama’s mouth or trying to infer “what he actually meant” but I don’t believe that was Dave’s objection. Silky accused Dave of saying something that President Obama didn’t say. He proved you wrong. You owe him an apology on that. Be mature enough to apologize, though. Remember, “words have power.” And an apology when you are caught accusing someone of something that turns out to be wrong is appropriate and civil. It’s not admitting you agree with him. Don’t be afraid…go ahead. It won’t hurt. And you’ll feel better about yourself afterwards. It would also help your credibility.

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 12:27 pm 12:27 pm

“That’s not a “personal attack.” It’s a true statement. What his granddad said is false and antagonistic. The false part makes him a liar, and the false and antagonistic part makes him a moron.”
Posted by: Silky
Well, you’re the one who has to live with your conscious, not me, so if you’re at peace with yourself after referring to a 97-year-old man who you know as a “a moron and a liar” then all’s good I suppose. Just remember, when you call someone names, you reveal more about yourself then the person you’re attacking.

Posted by: Be nice | January 28, 2009, 12:30 pm 12:30 pm

MikeO
I Am not putting words into the Presidents Mouth. But Commonsense How can you get a tax cut If you dont Pay taxes? and I belive he meant The 95 percent of Working Families that make under 250,000 Dollars a year Not alot of People make that

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm

How does a “tax cut” apply to somebody who doesn’t pay taxes?

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

northpark: I do enjoy running my own business and have been moderately successful, but all people should know this: the consumer (end user) always pays all the taxes, so raise taxes on me or on gm or ford, you will may more for the product period. So who gains by larger taxes? people who are dependent on the goverment and the goverment

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 12:36 pm 12:36 pm

Angie said: “But from what I am hearing out of you and Dave is its ok You Deserved that Rebate check But if Obama Proposes it Its socialisim! correct?”

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

Angie,
please, don’t you know the difference between charity and socialism. OMG please find a dictinary

Posted by: Lizzie | January 28, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm

“dave DISRESPECTS President Barack Obama by referring to The President as “barry.” dave shows DISRESPECT for The Office of the U. S. President – because DAVE IS AN INTRACTABLE, FIERY-EYED RACIST!”
Posted by: bobj72 |
Were you equally outraged by the disrespectful names that people called former president Bush – “Dubya” being among the kindest?
Fact is, all presidents get affectionate little nick-names.

Posted by: Come ON! | January 28, 2009, 12:39 pm 12:39 pm

Posted by: dave | Jan 28, 2009 12:18:00 PM; You said; “Did you know that 1,800,000 went to barry’s inauguration and only 10 missed work that day?”
I ask; “Do you think that will have a significant impact on the GDP?” Employment Statistics I have learned over the years, indicate more than 70% of workers in all segments of the labor market, have more than five (5) Vacation Days due to them at the end of each year.
dave, you DISRESPECT President Barack Obama by referring to him as “barry.” dave you show DISRESPECT for The Office of the U. S. President – because you DAVE, ARE AN INTRACTABLE, FIERY-EYED RACIST!”
(dave, if it would be too difficult on your psyche to Respect The Man, at least have enough Character to Show Respect for The Office Of The President of the U.S.A.)
And this guy with the absurd moniker “worker man” is an outright racist hatemonger!

Posted by: bobj72 | January 28, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Obama did say he was only going to raise taxes on the weathly, only 5% of the country. (his words) He did say he was going to give everyone else a tax break, where do you get your news from? I saw it on just about every news channel there it. Why all the shouting and name calling?(Angie and Silky) Why all the anger? your guy won remember? Can’t take the truth?

Posted by: why? | January 28, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

Of course, the Terrorists are much smarter than Republicans. Until Republicans learn that the Terrorists are the enemy rather than other Americans who disagree with them, the Terrorist will win. It’s a pity, bin Laden is so smart and Bush, Cheney and the Republicans are so dumb and so un-American.

Posted by: Sammy | January 28, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Angie
Silky refuses to admit that he was not only wrong, and he also refuses to apologize- very sad.
The point I was making is that barry ran around shoving “tax break” checks down people’s throats who pay no taxes. That is what economists call WELFARE.
Please don’t end up looking as ridiculous as silky did. Just admit you are wrong and move on.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 12:41 pm 12:41 pm

Angie said: “I Am not putting words into the Presidents Mouth. But Commonsense How can you get a tax cut If you dont Pay taxes? and I belive he meant The 95 percent of Working Families that make under 250,000 Dollars a year Not alot of People make that.”
———-
The second you try to infer what he “meant”, you are “putting words in his mouth.” And that wasn’t what the disagreement was about, not what he meant. It was about what he SAID. Dave made a claim that President Obama made a specific statement, Silky denied that the President ever made that statement and called Dave a liar. Dave proved him wrong. Apology is warranted. You can go round and round about what he MEANT, but the issue was what he SAID.

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

bobj72
Barry is a socialist
BO is a socialist
Barry is a socialist
BO is a socialist
Barry is a socialist
BO is a socialist
Barry is a socialist
BO is a socialist

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm

“Well, you’re the one who has to live with your conscious, not me, so if you’re at peace with yourself after referring to a 97-year-old man who you know as a “a moron and a liar” then all’s good I suppose. Just remember, when you call someone names, you reveal more about yourself then the person you’re attacking.”
I’m Irish…I have an albatross of a conscience. It’s a blessing and a curse. If his 97 year-old granddad really feels that way, then I stand by my comments.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

LIZZY
Its spelled DICTIONARY If your gonna point out something at least spell it Right and Yes I do know the Difference Do you?
MIKE O But Bush did the Same thing People who Didnt pay Taxes Got a rebate Check. why is ok For your President Bush and What he did Was not Socialism

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 12:44 pm 12:44 pm

Did it ever occur to anyone that the amount of discourse and discussion between liberals and conservatives on this discussion board (presenting ideas, providing rationale and, if possible, evidence to support the ideas) is more than the Democratic Congress is allowing the GOP? We’re more bipartisan than Congress!

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm

“Silky refuses to admit that he was not only wrong, and he also refuses to apologize- very sad.”
The 50% you’re referring to…does that include people who file and end up owing nothing? Does it include people who should file and don’t? Does it include those who are on the rolls but who do not make any money? Ultimately, you need to file to experience a “tax cut.” That is not disputable.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

Posted by: Come ON! | Jan 28, 2009 12:39:20 PM
I can tell you, I never referred to President Bush as “Dubya.” As I honestly thought it was an affectionate moniker, created by his Republican followers to ‘hype’ his “Cowboy Diplomacy.”
And NO I do not, and did not respect anyone who chose to show such disrespect for the President of the U. S. No one whom I am personally associated with, would show such disrespect.

Posted by: bobj72 | January 28, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Even people who owe nothing have been paying all year. Your interpretation of this is wrong.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

Angie said: “MIKE O But Bush did the Same thing People who Didnt pay Taxes Got a rebate Check. why is ok For your President Bush and What he did Was not Socialism.”
——-
As I said before, when did I EVER say I agreed with President Bush sending “rebate checks” to folks who never paid income taxes or didn’t pay as much as they received back. Again, you are reading things into my comments. I would think that from my 12:37 post that I would consider that, too, as Socialist. However, I suppose I could spin it and make some claim that he did that to appease the Democrats and call it bipartisan, but I won’t go there. I might just be making things up (since I don’t know for sure and won’t make any claims as such). :)

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Dave
Maybe I am wrong But like I said 95 Percent of working Families do not make 250,000 dollars A year, And Obama stated if you Make over that your Taxes will go up. If you Make under that You will Not be Taxed. Obama was Talking about the Salaries People make Stating that 95 Percent of American working Families do not Make 250,000 a year. I fail to see where he says Everyone will get a tax cut HOW CAN YOU GET A TAX CUT IF YOU DONT PAY TAXES??????

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

“Barry is a socialist”
The progressive tax structure is inherently “socialist.” By your definition, the U.S. is a socialist country. Maybe it’s not the place for you?

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm

Yeah What about the People that dont File Their Taxes? And Mike and Dave I am pretty sure people knew what the President Meant or Else he would not Have been Elected!

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

Dave, you jump from characterizing liberals as cowards and appeasers in Vietnam, to stingy, selfish DINKS (dual incomes, no kids, formerly called Yuppies, formerly Beatniks, formerly Flappers and I don’t know what else.)
No amount of factual information slows your drive to scapegoat a group you call “liberals.” As a matter of fact, I just gave blood last week. But what would you do with that fact? Throw it out the window because it doesn’t agree with your preconceived idea of how liberals behave.
Liberals exist in your imagination as everything you don’t approve of. “They” are to blame for everything, “they” don’t have the correct values, “they” don’t have jobs, oh, they do, but “they” are so selfish they don’t contribute to charity. And you wonder why the liberals you insult on this board end up calling you a moron?

Posted by: Amy | January 28, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm

Silky
Please apologize for calling me a liar and a moron after I proved you DEAD wrong before I respond to your further posts.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

“Yeah What about the People that dont File Their Taxes? And Mike and Dave I am pretty sure people knew what the President Meant or Else he would not Have been Elected!”
It’s not even a matter of interpretation. There is no wiggle room. You cannot experience a tax cut if you don’t pay taxes. Period.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

Why is it that Every Democrat President is called a Socialist?

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm

Your point is still wrong, dave. And I’ve proved that to you multiple times, so I’m not retracting anything because I think you are either ignoring the truth or consciously being deceptive. Either way leads to the same conclusion.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 12:58 pm 12:58 pm

Silky said: “Even people who owe nothing have been paying all year. Your interpretation of this is wrong.”
————-
If they paid but “owe nothing” based on their allowed deductions to reduce their taxable income, which is $8950 for single filers on this year’s tax returns and $17900 for joint filers, then they should get every dime back (someone who “owes nothing” would get back a max of $895 and joint filer $1790 WITHOUT an additional refund. If they get back more, as long as it is on par with the amount they paid in, good for them. Honestly, I personally don’t even have that much of a problem if they get back some of their “payroll” taxes like FICA-SS and FICA-Medicare. Where I have the problem is with someone getting back MORE than they paid in (for ANY taxes). Please read my words carefully, I am not trying to be evasive in what I am saying.

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 12:59 pm 12:59 pm

SILKY
I Agree You cannot get a Tax cut If you dont Pay Taxes!I cant Figure out for the Life of me Why Republicans cant See the logic and Commonsense in that

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

The Founding Fathers have to be rolling over in thier graves. This country is going the wrong direction and it will be evident in less than 6 months. Obama is losing support from the left and the right. He is failing as we write. I’m just glad I don’t depend on the goverment.

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 1:00 pm 1:00 pm

Amy,
I don’t doubt you are blood giver (me too, sometimes), I was just pointing out that studies have shown (they are all over the place really) that conservatives are more generous with their $$$ then liberals are.
Liberals have just been able to build up this lie that they belong to the party of people, when in reality, all they do is shove entitlements down voter’s throats using OTHER people’s $$$.
This accomplishes 2 things: democrats keep getting elected and the poor stay poor. Welfare is the new form of slavery.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Silky said (or quoted, I have lost track): “Yeah What about the People that dont File Their Taxes? And Mike and Dave I am pretty sure people knew what the President Meant or Else he would not Have been Elected!”
————
Are you SURE that is what everyong believed? C’mon, just apologize and let’s move on. You are actually presenting some good discussion and arguments, and hopefully many reading this discussion forum are at least getting a clearer picture of what each side believes, even if they are disagreeing with it.

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm

angie: Carter and BO are but I don’t think Clinton was. At least Carter lived up to his socialism, got give him credit for that. But BO is just another politician.

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm

Almost as troubling as the contents of the package and how it will be spent is the speed at which the left is attempting to jam it down the throats of the American people. “It’s urgent,” they howl. What’s urgent is the need for Democrats to ram this thing through so Republicans have little time to publicly oppose it. Whenever the opposition starts obstructing, the media gets involved and constituents begin to pay attention, giving the opposition — and their arguments — traction. The bill was written in the House under the leadership of Speaker Pelosi, with zero Republican input. I caution Republicans: do not fall for Obama’s eleventh hour plea to get on board. You might appreciate his overtures to you but his motives are transparent. To Obama GOP support is only ideal so Democrats aren’t solely to blame when voters see that almost $1 trillion of their taxpayer money was used to lavishly reward our new president’s supporters and advance a liberal agenda instead of helping struggling businesses and families.

Posted by: mogo | January 28, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm

DEMOCRATS KEEP GETTING ELECTED AND THE POOR STAY POOR
Really Dave alot of People became Sucessful And Wealthy under the Clinton years, more then I can say for the Bush years seems to me under Bush years the Rich are about to become Poor! Losing all their money in the stock Market,Businesses closing up And Unemployment lines are becoming longer and longer PLEASE DONT FOOL YOURSELF DAVE SOME ARE SMARTER THEN THAT

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm

I have to back to work now. I wish everyone good luck and I hope barry fails in implenting his socialist agenda. I will leave with some of barry’s awesome quotes….
Dreams from my Father-
“In college I sought out the marxist professors”
In a chicago radio interview-
“It was a tragedy that in the 60′s the courts did not get involved with wealth redistribution”
To Joe el plumber-
“I just wanna spread it around a bit”
And one of my favorites from Thomas Jefferson-
A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.”

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Comment by Angie: “I Agree You cannot get a Tax cut If you dont Pay Taxes!I cant Figure out for the Life of me Why Republicans cant See the logic and Commonsense in that.”
——-
If it is simply a lowering of a marginal tax rate, then you are correct. If it is a refund of taxes (income and/or other payroll) already paid, then you are correct (although some others might not support my “caving in” on returning FICA payments to the taxpayer, but I can live with that). If it is a fixed amount check sent to everyone, regardless of whether or not that person has actually paid in that amount and/or is not already receiving it back
with his/her normal tax return/refund), then you are incorrect.
My question to ALL is this: what does the bill ACTUALLY say? Is it a lowering of the marginal tax rate for all (or the “95% that make less than $250,000″)? Is it a rebate check, where some will get back more than they have paid in? Is it a mid-year change to the final tax rate that will result in some getting back more than they have paid in during the year? I can’t tell; all I hear are talking points from both sides. If it is not money going to folks that did not even pay in the amount that they are getting (a.k.a. “redistribution of wealth”), then why does the GOP think that it is? Anyone got a solid answer on that?

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

well said DAVE!!!

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

“Silky said (or quoted, I have lost track): “Yeah What about the People that dont File Their Taxes? And Mike and Dave I am pretty sure people knew what the President Meant or Else he would not Have been Elected!”
————
Are you SURE that is what everyong believed? C’mon, just apologize and let’s move on. You are actually presenting some good discussion and arguments, and hopefully many reading this discussion forum are at least getting a clearer picture of what each side believes, even if they are disagreeing with it.”
That was Angie, I think. It wasn’t me.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

“My question to ALL is this: what does the bill ACTUALLY say? Is it a lowering of the marginal tax rate for all (or the “95% that make less than $250,000″)? Is it a rebate check, where some will get back more than they have paid in? Is it a mid-year change to the final tax rate that will result in some getting back more than they have paid in during the year? I can’t tell; all I hear are talking points from both sides. If it is not money going to folks that did not even pay in the amount that they are getting (a.k.a. “redistribution of wealth”), then why does the GOP think that it is? Anyone got a solid answer on that?”
No, I don’t. And that is the question. All the prior talk related to his platform plan. All bets are off on that at this point.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm

CHAOS, noone is raising taxes on buinesses’ as we are in a recession. The only tax raises are for people who make over $250M. And if your lifestyle happens to be marginal on a $250M AGI, then youre living it up and need to tone it down a little. thats all.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

Comment by North Park: “CHAOS, noone is raising taxes on buinesses’ as we are in a recession. The only tax raises are for people who make over $250M. And if your lifestyle happens to be marginal on a $250M AGI, then youre living it up and need to tone it down a little. thats all.”
——–
Quite the judgmental statement (“living it up and need to tone it down a little”). Do you know what that individual/family’s debt obligations are? Or how much that individual/family already gives to the charity(ies) of its choice? How can you be so sure they’re “living it up”? And based on WHOSE standards? Who defines “living it up”? I am assuming by your comments that you don’t fall into the $250k+ category; however, your comments reflect a class warfare attitude of “because you make more than me, you should not be able to fully enjoy the fruits of your labor and should be responsible for giving up more of your income so the government can give it to whoever it sees fit, because ‘you can afford it.’”

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm

northpark: Who was the last dem to lower taxes? I don’t make over 250g and I will see my taxes go up in the next 4 years. He can’t raise taxes onthe wealthy and get enough to do what he wants he has to raise it on the middle to.

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 1:42 pm 1:42 pm

Why does BO want republicans on board with this stimulus bill? He has all the votes he needs with the dems. It can pass without any republicans voting for it. So if it’s so good then vote it in and lets see what happens.

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm

The word “fair” gets tossed around a lot in discussions about what an individual should have to pay in income taxes. “Fair” is very subjective and open to wide interpretation, and can essentially be used to defend one’s position without actually defining it, appealing to what their target audience might possibly define “fair” as.
Some would define “fair” as: you make way more money than I do, so you should pay for most, if not all, of the services provided by the government, since you obviously can afford it. (disclaimer: I realize this is a categorization that may not be true for all, but it is an accurate representation of how I see some using the word).
Others would define “fair” as: “I work hard for my money, and just because I make more than others, I have to pay a larger PERCENTAGE of my income out in taxes. All I want is to pay the same percentage of my income as everyone else, not be penalized by paying a larger percentage (that some want to increase) of my income for my economic success, just because you think I ‘can afford it.’”
This “fair” thing was thrown around a lot during the election, and it’s obvious that people have differing definitions of “fair.” I would assert that President Obama believes more along the lines of the first definition (as that is how I heard him use the term throughout the campaign).
Thoughts?

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Mike O, Are you seriously debating that if someone makes more than $250M and are marginal (meaning no savings) then they are not living it up? Pluhese. get a life! It’s like spending $2800 a week!
My families AGI is under $90M. We live in a really nice neighborhood (Amherst NY), have two kids. Live in a 1600 sq foot house and pay $5M annual in property taxes. We live just fine and actually find $$ to put away. If I had $250M I’d be saving a ton more. If you’re taking home that cash and cant afford to lose any, you are living it up. ask anyone on the street. I swear your just typing to type!

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm

CHAOS: how did you calculate your tax increase? Oh wait your crystal ball? thought so. please dont address me if you cant backup your claims.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm

Chaos
BO wants the republicans on board so that in a year from now when his plan fails MISERABLY he can say “you republicans voted for it too”!
This is exactly what Rush has been saying, which is why the democrats are scrambling now and starting a petition to shut him up. Democrats are always about free speech until you say something they don’t agree with.

Posted by: BOstinks | January 28, 2009, 1:59 pm 1:59 pm

Norht Park, you keep saying 250M. You mean 250K, right?

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Roman numerials for thousand is a capital M. $25M = $25,000 $25MM= $25 Million.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

Went to the House Appropriations Committee Web site to view the bill that the Democrats wrote (http://www.rules.house.gov/111/LegText/111_hr1_text.pdf). It’s 647 pages! Yeah, let’s rush this thing through and not look at it in detail.
Someone want to help figure out what it is saying as far as tax relief. It looks like it starts on page 251 of the document.

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

Mr. Rush wants to see this administration fail, and the country to further erode…such thoughts are motivated by pure arrogance.

Posted by: hh | January 28, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm

what is K anyway? Never made any sense to me….the media uses B for Billion and M for Million b/c they dont think the readers can comprehend roman numerals..unless of course youre watching a movie, they’ll throw 15 roman numerials out at you at once as you try to figure out what year the stupid movie came out.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 2:06 pm 2:06 pm

Ha!! If the media is going to brand the passage of this historic bill, after a productive meeting with Republican congressional leaders yesterday and several concessions to the bill to make it more appealing to the other side of the aisle, as a “failure of bipartisanship”…hey, as a Dem, I’m OK with that!!

Posted by: Annathelion | January 28, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm

These Republicans naysayers here are truly comtemptable. Bill Clinton left a surplus for Bush! After eight years of incompetent government leading to uncontrolled greed and excess, we are now in the worst financial crisis since the depression and at the edge of being the worst ever. Yet, all you can do is criticize! Dont you realize that if Obama fails then you fail! You lose your jobs, houses, tuition money etc etc. Stop the imaturity and hatred and start helping out!

Posted by: James | January 28, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

norhtpark : over the next 4 years I will bet that my taxes will go up. do you want bet they won’t. I will address you when I want to. Free speech you know that thing you guys want to end. Rush Limbaugh and the petition against him proves this.

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm

EVERYONE STOP RUSH LIMBAUGH HE IS AN UNAMERICAN SKUM!

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

james: he also left a 9 trillion debt.

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

hh
You are further proof that the liberal media is extremely effective (as if any more proof is necessary after the election of BO). Rush has CLEARLY stated that if BO’s goal is American socialism, which it obviously is, he hopes he fails. That is not arrogance talking, that is someone who knows that capitalism works and socialism does not.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

see! read angie above

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm

The true colors come out -
WHEN THINGS DON’T GO YOUR WAY, CRY RACIST!
That argument is getting worn-out, sweetie pie.
This bailout is nothing more than payback for ACORN and all the other Obamabots!
How do condoms stimulate the economy liberals?

Posted by: usa | January 28, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

Dave,
I thought you went to work? Your comment on Rush being misinterpreted is the only thing we have agreed on all day. I got what Rush meant, he wants Obama to fail in implementing his policies.

Posted by: Amy | January 28, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

Republicans partisan? hahahahah
When they had the majority they certainly didn’t make any effort at all to get the democrats involved. They used filibustering and cloture to control what was legislated.
So now they will do their utmost to delay any activity despite the fact that ordinary americans are losing their homes, their jobs, their health care – — and our infrastructure is in disrepair.
They’ve been the party for the wealthy and big business for so long they have completely forgotten about the rest of us and our indifferent to the pain their delays inflict.
I will especially remember Boehner for his stupid remarks about more money for birth control during these hard times – he thinks thats a bad idea. ARGH!

Posted by: true blue | January 28, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm

North Park…your statements are purely subjective based on your own personal lifestyle. I make half of what you do. In my book, YOU are living it up and should pay MORE in taxes. Puhlease, get a life, and pay more so I can pay less! One man’s “struggling to get by” is another man’s “living it up.” Your comment is TOTAL CLASS WARFARE.
Who appointed YOU to be who determines “living it up” and “can afford it”?
Explain to me why someone who does better economically should pay a larger percentage of their income to the government? I am not talking about a larger amount, as that would happen with any fixed percentage as income goes up. I am talking about a larger PERCENTAGE. Because it’s “fair”? See my comments on the term “fair” in a recent post.

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

Amy
I couldn’t stay away! I am at work now, but I still must defend America against the socialist liberals as long as my boss doesn’t see me.
Rush is a true American patriot, plain and simple. Now, what do i consider un-American?
Hmmm… how about sitting in a church for 20 years where the theme on Sundays is
“GD America”
“America is the worst terrorist nation in the world”
“America created AIDS virus”
“America deserved 9/11″
“America is run by greedy rich white folk”
After listening to that filth for 20 years, no wonder barry’s wife has never been proud of her country!

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm

DAVE
Thats the problem The Republicans and the fat A$$ Drug addict doesnt Understand OBAMAS GOALS ARE NOT SOCIALISIM!I recall Limbaugh saying that if we didnt support Bush and his Policies or the Iraq War then we were Unpatriotic and Unamerican EAT YOUR OWNS FILTHY WORDS RUSH!

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm

Funny how Rush can even think straight with all the drugs he takes and getting busted at the airport with Viagra PRICELESS

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

The K is from kilo, from the metric system, which represents 1,000 of whatever the base measurement is (kilogram is 1000 grams, kilometer is 1000 meters). Who says you can’t learn anything in the public school system? I learned that back in elementary school (back when the US was considering going to the metric standard…am I dating myself?)
Not trying to bust on you, North Park, at least not with this comment :) As a public school teacher, I just want to emphasize that you can get an outstanding education in the public schools.

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm

trueblue 2:19 pm…so “what’s good for the goose is good for the gander”? I thought President Obama wanted to move beyond partisan politics, “Change you can believe in” and such. Your comment doesn’t seem to reflect that attitude. Maybe THAT’S the problem in Congress right now.

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

If only Rush had a better idea than Obama does on how to keep people fed, employed and with health insurance during the upcoming economic crisis. Or, how come those super successful capitalists we keep hearing about didn’t do so well in a deregulated, free market, Republican era.

Posted by: Amy | January 28, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

RUSH A PATRIOT
He is nothing but a fat lazy piece of s–t He sits behind a microphone all day Bashing people who dont agree with him and when you do call his show and try to Debate and call him out on his stuff he Hangs up HES SLIME!

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Mike O your AGI is half but fo you have a fmaily, a house, two cars?? Seriously dude, telling me a faimly making under $90M is living it up? How so? do you know what AGI is? ..I take home $500 a week my mortgage and escrow is $910 how is that living it up? Wait a minute dude, do you even know what an escrow is?

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm

I am also at work, and defending America from neocons in between calls, at least, until my boss finds out.

Posted by: Amy | January 28, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

Angie
You know what is funny to me? That after all of the liberal smear jobs the media did on Rush to destroy him, like they did with 200 reporters in Alaska, joe the plumber, ect, all they can find on him is that he was addicted to pain pills and takes viagra. NOOO!!!!!
Wouldn’t you think that barney frank running a gay prostitution ring out of his house or having a gay affair with the head of fannie mae, while at the same time encouraging ZERO regualtion of it, would be more newsworthy?
Or barry O’s biggest senate campaign organizer being a convicted felon and slum lord who “helped” him purchase a million dollar mansion through a sweetheart deal would be more newsworthy?
Or barry’s wife’s salary tripling after he authorized funds to her hospital would be more newsworthy?
Or joe biden being busted for plagerism in college and during his first presidential run in the 80′s would be more newsworthy?
Or bill clinton being accused of rape by juanita brodderik, or paula jones suspiciously being audited right after she said he was getting a little too frisky with her, would be more newsworthy?
Bottom line, democrat’s scandals are for the most part ignored/covered up until the public demands the liberal nut-job media cover them. You obamabots are living proof of that.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

Amy said: “how come those super successful capitalists we keep hearing about didn’t do so well in a deregulated, free market, Republican era.”
——
Don’t kid yourself into thinking we have been in a deregulated, free market era. Many did do well, but factors outside of their control (housing bubble bursting, financial industry problems) have dragged them down, too. It’s one of the risks in the free market economy. No one ever said it was perfect (no economic system is), just better than any alternative, offering incentive for those that are willing to work for it. Yes, there is room for corruption and cheating to occur, but there is in any economic system. Just ask anyone from the former Soviet Union who wasn’t a party member if there was any corruption.

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm

Mike O you are becomming very annoying. K is for Kilo but the US uses pounds. So to me that doesnt make any sense. All American financial institutions use roman numerials. Only car dealerships and media use K for thousand and M for Millions. What does the M stand for mr smarty? What does the B stand for?? this logic means $25,000 should be $25T correct. Man you are annoying.
As for your other question…Im not a tax czar so I cannot explain to you why rate rates differ between incomes. You should try google. Im sure there is a logical explaination for a flat tax across the board would seem like the first idea.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm

Mike O, just becasue someone was in the market when it was going good, does not mean they were in it when it tanked. The people that made out by doing illeagel activities should not be let off the hook b/c the market went back down. sheesh now I know where you get your flat tax rate logic from.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm

North Park said: “Mike O your AGI is half but fo you have a fmaily, a house, two cars?? Seriously dude, telling me a faimly making under $90M is living it up? How so? do you know what AGI is? ..I take home $500 a week my mortgage and escrow is $910 how is that living it up? Wait a minute dude, do you even know what an escrow is?”
——-
Struck a raw nerve, did I? I made that absurd assertion to prove a point. YOU had no problem passing judgment on someone with a certain income level is living it up, but had serious problems with me doing the same. A little bit hypocritical, isn’t it?
And, by the way, I have a Bachelor’s of Business Administration in Finance, and I teach Business Management, Finance, and Business Law in high school. So I guess you could say I do know what an escrow is (since my property taxes and property insurance are held in escrow by my mortgage company to pay them either semi-annually or annually).
My my, aren’t you the judgmental one?

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Workerman you really know how to work the system. Wow, I am really impressed. You took that check for $500 and added $500 and gave it to charity.
Any chance you will be claiming it to the IRS?! Wow, talking about getting your money’s worth. LOL

Posted by: scentsofroses | January 28, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Rush is a patriot? Now THAT’S funny.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

first lesson of socialism/communism is to get rid of free thinking people who are smart and articulate. hence the petition against Rush. I can’t believe that the libs are so stupid that people won’t see this as an anti-freespeech move.

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

silky : you have never listened to Rush have you? He inspires alot of people to be thier best and also he is very much a constitutionalist.

Posted by: CHAOS | January 28, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm

North Park said: “K is for Kilo but the US uses pounds. So to me that doesnt make any sense. All American financial institutions use roman numerials. Only car dealerships and media use K for thousand and M for Millions. What does the M stand for mr smarty? What does the B stand for?? this logic means $25,000 should be $25T correct.
——–
In data networking, KB stands for KiloByte (1000 bytes) and KBPS stands for Kilobit (1000 bits) Per Second (actually is sometimes used for 1024 bits or bytes). MB stands for MegaByte (1.000,000 bytes) and MBPS for Megabit (1,000,00 bits)Per Second. Like I said, I’m not trying to bust on you for your use of M as thousand, just trying to answer your question as to why some use K for thousand. My my, you are sensitive!

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Chaos
Its not about Free speech Its about Rush and him wishing the President Fails, If he does we all do, No matter What party you Favor Ds or Rs At the End of the day WE ARE ALL AMERICANS AND IF AMERICA FAILS WE ALL FAIL, WE ARE IN THIS TOGETHER United we stand Divided we fail Funny I didnt hear anyone wishing President Bush to Fail So its not about speech its about Principle!

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

“I am also at work, and defending America from neocons in between calls, at least, until my boss finds out.”
I want to party with you, lady!

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm

CHAOS
I have listened to Limbaugh and sorry to Inform you the man Seriously has Problems the only people he Inspires are the Gun toting Bible loving deep racisit (by the way i am white)South!

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

“silky : you have never listened to Rush have you? He inspires alot of people to be thier best and also he is very much a constitutionalist.”
I’ve heard him plenty, though it’s been at least 10 years. He is a pig, out only for he and his, and all about dividing people. He knows that he needs to keep his base angry. It’s good for his ratings and it’s good for his taxes. I despise the man. He’s a Michael Moore type figure to me.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

CHAOS
As I have said before, liberals are always praising free speech until you say something they don’t want to hear. Remember the Fairness Doctrine?
The scary thing is that with the media now more powerful then ever, they could probably spin it in a way that most Americans might agree with.
Have you seen any of the reports conducted in both Europe and in the US, where the mainstream media gave barry O 86% favorable coverage and mccain 33%?
In some reports it was even more lopsided. And silky, please call me liar or a moron, i would LOVE to make you look ridiculous again.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm

North Park said: “Mike O, just becasue someone was in the market when it was going good, does not mean they were in it when it tanked. The people that made out by doing illeagel activities should not be let off the hook b/c the market went back down.”
————
When did I say anything about the financial markets? Sounds like you are reading into my comment something that is not there. I am talking about that business (large or small) that was doing well and expanding when times were good. That goes from the small entrepreneur that might have been able to expand his/her business like adding on to his/her restaurant, to the large business expanding. Since economic activity has dropped significantly over the past year, those folks are being impacted by other sectors.
As far as your comment concerning folks profiting from illegal activities needing to be held accountable, I am in total agreement. Not everyone who did well in the good times was a crook, though.
As far as my “flat tax” comments, I don’t remember advocating for a flat tax (although I will go on the record and say that I am in favor of one). I was simply referring to someone who already pays a larger percentage of his/her income based on income level will now be required to pay an even LARGER percentage of his/her income. It’s punishment for doing well economically.
Perhaps you would care to explain why that individual/family would have to pay an even larger percentage of his/her income, carrying an even larger tax burden, so that the government can spend even more?
Please, cease with the ad hominem attacks. You are presenting valid arguments; I am just responding to them. No need to attack me.
To quote Uncle Hulka from the movie Stripes…”Lighten up, Frances.”

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

MikeO you proved no point. It good to know you admit being a jerk. You see thats how you “touch nerves” by participating in a debate only to not be truthful. Obviously it is somehting youre proud of. You have issues.
Your explaination of M K and B is not that funny either. More like bad nerdy funny

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm

Dave
I bet you get all of your Information from Fox news the most Biased News channel on tv, Only MORONS Like you Belive Everything out of Limbaugh,Hannity,Oreily but you know what The Public has woken up to their biased one sided reporting ITS ABOUT TIME!

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm

Republicans got it wrong for 8 years and put us in the biggest hole in our history. And now they have a better idea? History shows that Dems create jobs more than Republicans. History shows the market does better under Dems. And every recession since 1843 happened under a Republican President. Those are the facts.

Posted by: Doug | January 28, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

Heres what you said, “Many did do well, but factors outside of their control (housing bubble bursting, financial industry problems) have dragged them down, too.” Thats not true and very ignorant of you.
You imply people who did well in the beginning also suffered at the crash. Im saying not so.
It is a free market true, but not so free when there is corruption.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm

What’s the difference between Rush Limbaugh and the Hindenburg?……One is a Nazi Gas Bag…………the other was a dirigible.
After 8 years of Bush’s fascist dictatorship, maybe it’s time for a socialist dictatorship.
No matter how much Obama screws up, it cannot possibly be as bad as the immature, irresponsible Bush and Cheney Team of Criminal Incompetents.

Posted by: Sammy | January 28, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

“As I have said before, liberals are always praising free speech until you say something they don’t want to hear.”
For example?

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

Angie
Thanks for calling me a moron, that is a very liberal “open minded” thing of you to do. (An open minded liberal is about as easy to find as patriotic liberal- they just don’t exist).
But I have an idea, instead of calling me names, why not argue with what I am saying? Silky called me a moron too, and I made him look pretty ridiculous.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm

“As I have said before, liberals are always praising free speech until you say something they don’t want to hear.”
Silky, To answer your request for an example: The Fairness Doctrine

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

“Silky called me a moron too, and I made him look pretty ridiculous.”
You did? Anybody with half a clue who has been following the exchange recognizes that you were still wrong on the point you were trying to make.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

“Rush is a patriot? Now THAT’S funny.”
I finally get a chance to post this:
Republicans who did not serve in the military: Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Bill O’Reilly, Michael Savage, George Will, Bill Kristol…
Democrats who served their country: Jimmy Carter, Walter Mondale, George McGovern, Ted Kennedy, Al Gore, John Kerry, Tom Daschel…

Posted by: Amy | January 28, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm

Golly Mike O you keep asking questions like you deserve a reply! Your remarks are borderline ridiculous which makes you out to be a complete douchebag and you need to control your condescending remarks! You get no respect that way.
In fact you cant even remember what you said an hour ago. bye! stay ignorant and wrong! it suits you!

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm

North Park said: “MikeO you proved no point. It good to know you admit being a jerk. You see thats how you “touch nerves” by participating in a debate only to not be truthful. Obviously it is somehting youre proud of. You have issues.
Your explaination of M K and B is not that funny either. More like bad nerdy funny
———–
I’m not trying to be a jerk. However, when you make flawed assertions or use false logic, I will call you on it (like your presumptiveness in judging someone else’s lifestyle based on a given income level, but took offense when someone judged your lifestyle based on similar, equally subjective criteria). Do I honestly think that you make too much and live too well? Absolutely not, but that is a purely SUBJECTIVE judgment based on my life situation, not on some objective standard. That is where the problem lies, with some judging others based on their personal life situation, and assuming it is an objective fact instead of a subjective opinion.
As for my K, B, M explanation, I wasn’t trying to be funny. I was simply trying to explain why some use one set of terminology and another. How you read denigrating humor into that statement is beyond me.
I guess you feel the need to attack me. I’m a big boy; I can take it. I’m not attacking you (or anyone), just pointing out the flaws in their logic and flaws in their assertions. If you’re not prepared to defend or justify your statements, I would suggest you find another activity to entertain yourself.

Posted by: MikeO | January 28, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

Dave, im no liberal and youre a moron.

Posted by: North Park | January 28, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm

“”As I have said before, liberals are always praising free speech until you say something they don’t want to hear.”
Silky, To answer your request for an example: The Fairness Doctrine”
So because a few Democratic Senators have said that it’s worth looking into reinstating it “liberals are always praising free speech until…blah, blah, blah?” This is where you lose people. This is where you lose credibility. You take something that two or three people say and attribute it to tens of millions. It makes no sense whatsoever.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

“Dave, im no liberal and youre a moron.”
I’m Silky Johnson and I approve of this message.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Damn you white racists holding up my welfare bill today!
Barrack promised to put gas in my car and pay my mortgage.
Stop holding up the bailout!!!

Posted by: kkk hater | January 28, 2009, 3:40 pm 3:40 pm

Dave, I agree, the petition against Rush Limbaugh is just plain silly, but its also true, in the course of voicing his opinions, Rush has disseminated lies and misinformation to an uneducated group of Americans for decades, and the mainstream media refuses to refute his arguments, because they so respect the millions he makes in their field. (See: Rush Limbaugh is a Big, Fat Liar, by Al Franken.) PS Katie Couric had Rush on her first news hour show, I turned him off and haven’t watched CBS News since.

Posted by: Amy | January 28, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Dave, I agree, the petition against Rush Limbaugh is just plain silly, but its also true, in the course of voicing his opinions, Rush has disseminated lies and misinformation to an uneducated group of Americans for decades, and the mainstream media refuses to refute his arguments, because they so respect the millions he makes in their field. (See: Rush Limbaugh is a Big, Fat Liar, by Al Franken.) PS Katie Couric had Rush on her first news hour show, I turned him off and haven’t watched CBS News since.

Posted by: Amy | January 28, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm

Dave the Moron sounds Just like Rush,Hannity,Oreily and the Rest of the Republican Freak show

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

Oh and Dave one more thing I am no liberal I am an American!

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm

“You did? Anybody with half a clue who has been following the exchange recognizes that you were still wrong on the point you were trying to make.” Posted by: Silky
Sorry to disappoint you, but to an unbiased observer, I thought Dave seemed a bit more factual, less hysterical and made more reasoned arguments.

Posted by: Just following along | January 28, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm

Angie
Your comments are really causing me to reflect on what I hold dear and believe. Keep up the good work! The level of intelligence you convey with each new post is astounding.
However, you do realize that if liberals were forced to stop calling republicans “dumb” they would be robbed of 3/4 of their insults.
-Regan was dumb (he was even more targeted by the media as a stupid hick then Palin). Regan being called a senile old hick didn’t quite match up to his record, though. Ending the cold war, getting us out of the Carter years by bringing down record inflation/ unemployment rates, ending the iranian hostage crisis.
-George W Bush was very dumb. This is despite the fact that he got higher grades at Yale and Harvard then John Kerry, never flunked out of lawschool like the messiah of global warming..err climate change did, never got caught cheating in college like Biden.
-Sara Palin
This woman rose to power on her own. She didn’t sleep with it like pelosi,huffington and clinton did, she earned everything herself.
Just keep watching Farenheit 9/11 and saying to yourself “Bush lied! Kids Died”. It will make you smarter, I promise.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Thank you Just Following Along! These obamabots refuse to listen to reason.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm

choking on that heaping plate of big black crow yet you moronic disgusting republicans??
watch your republican troglodyte obstructionist a$$es get voted out of office in 2010 and after as well ,cause EVERYONE sees who is dragging their feet .
the republican president/treasury didnt have a problem spending/doling out the first 350 bil without ANY oversight ,during the last gasp 25th hr machinations of the generally utterly moronic bush administration.
now that theres a promising,intelligent fair minded politician/president (who just happens to be a democrat) allocating those TARP funds ,additionally promising AND PROVIDING the needed transparency the republicans somehow “forgot” to include on their “watch” , all the idiot republicans cry/whine all at once , mostly because because their fat stupid drug addict ideologue(s) tell/bid them to.
bipartisanship? you gotta be kidding me. after the last +/-30 years worth of republican greed mongering and ineptitude? not likely simpletons.
this country has really been on the skids since that moron reagan worked his trickle down voodoo economics b/s spell on the overtly ignorant american voter .
hint: get ready for we liberals raising/taking and subsequently appropriating your taxes for whatever wild-eyed liberal pork laden “project” we so desire. obstructionism will only result in less republicans in the governing process ,which will then allow even more liberal laws. catch 22 for you!!
youre in it deep now republitards.
GET USED TO IT OR MOVE!!

Posted by: listen up! | January 28, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

Dave, It’s true, they do refuse to listen so why bother trying?
I was a liberal once (I’m now a moderate, conservative democrat – sort of a Reagan Democrat), so I understand where they’re coming from, but no amount of arguing with them or pointing out facts will alter their point of view or even consider another point of view.
Sometimes it’s better to cut your loses, shake your head and walk away.
I have to say though, liberalism sure has changed over the past few years. It was once about being open-minded, loving and accepting of everyone’s beliefs – no judgments. Now, it’s about silencing or humiliating those you don’t agree with. Makes me long for the hippie free-love days.

Posted by: Just following along | January 28, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

listen up
Put down the crack and start looking for a job. Just because your sugar daddy got elected doesn’t mean you won’t get to live in that apartment for free.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

a reagan democrat = traitor to the democratic party
youre a turncoat puma loser ,you probably pull for a different football/baseball/basketball team, every year ,whichever one is popular or whatever suits your fancy at that particular moment.
honestly , you and the puma losers just drop the front and say youre NOT real democrats. i ,and most other TRUE liberals sure dont consider you one ,no matter how you voted.

Posted by: riiight | January 28, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm

yeah davie boy ,check back in with me after april 15th k?

Posted by: ahahaha,yourestupid | January 28, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm

Just following along
The problem with the democratic party is that they once elected a man who said “Ask not what your country can do for you…….”
and now recently elected a man who said
“In college I sought out the marxist professors”
“It was a tragedy that the courts of the 60′s didn’t get involved with wealth redistribution”
“I just wanna spread it around a bit”
Notice the difference?
The democrats of yesterday have turned into barry obama socialists.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

Just following along
Well, you know how it is with us liberals, some of us woke up from our bong induced comas and realized the Republicans had started two wars, grown the wealth of the top 1%, silenced government scientists who wanted to address global warming, refused to finance stem cell research to save the two-cell “souls”, attempted to put social security account money into the stock market, lost 13 billion dollars in fraud in Iraq…oh, you know, we are a little testy. Glad to see your still mellow, though, read the paper much?

Posted by: Amy | January 28, 2009, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

You Know Dave first of all I dont like Michael Moore,Hes too far left Just as your too far right, Secondly Talk about being openminded You sure are listen to your Rants about Socialisim do you even Know what Socialisim means? if so please do define

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm

Dave
why do you Insist on lying about What President Obama said or Hasnt Said or are you repeating sound Bites off The Hannity show?

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm

riiight – a traitor? No, those who let the democratic party shift its philosophy are the traitors.
Dave – you’re right. The party has changed significantly from the days of JFK when the emphasis was on doing good for the country, not pandering to people who want the country to do good for them.
Amy and Angie, I’m not going to waste my time on either of you. Life is simply too short and too precious.

Posted by: Just following along | January 28, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

“Sorry to disappoint you, but to an unbiased observer, I thought Dave seemed a bit more factual, less hysterical and made more reasoned arguments.”
Right, of the two of us I’M the one who comes off hysterical. Gotcha.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 5:19 pm 5:19 pm

“Amy and Angie, I’m not going to waste my time on either of you. Life is simply too short and too precious.”
Back at you.

Posted by: Amy | January 28, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Angie
Socialism is gov’t owned enterprise. It means you pay 50% in taxes to give the gov’t control of every aspect of your life because it knows what is “best for you”. That is my definition of socialism.
i have also lived in EU for a while and I have seen the fruits of socialized health care, and let me say that I was begging to return to the US.
Barry has surrounded himself with socialist individuals and sought out marxist professors in college. His own statements expose him as a socialist. That does not make me far to the right, it just makes me right about calling him a socialist.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

Come to think of it, I think dave is just following along. It’s clear as day that much of what dave has posted is not only not factual, but not capable of being quantified at all. The guy has been all over the place spewing gross exagerations, half-truths and blind, partisan bs.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

He’s not talking about putting healthcare in the hands of the government, dave.

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm

“No, those who let the democratic party shift…”
From what to what?

Posted by: Silky | January 28, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm

Silky
You called me a liar and a moron (and not just today) because I said barry promised 95% of AMERICANS a tax break, when in fact roughly 50% of Americans pay no federal taxes to begin with. I called that a welfare check. You repeatedly said barry NEVER said that. Really, did you ever listen to one of his cue card speeches?
After I proved you wrong without a doubt, you refused to apologize and admit you were wrong.
If you are going to say I post “half truths, gross exagerations” please be more specific. You’ve seen how the whole “moron/liar” thing worked out, so start arguing with facts or quit responding to my posts.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

dave DISRESPECTS President Barack Obama by referring to The President as “barry.” dave shows DISRESPECT for The Office of the U. S. President – because DAVE IS AN INTRACTABLE, FIERY-EYED RACIST!”
(dave, if it would be too difficult on your psyche to Respect The Man, at least have enough Character to Show Respect for The Office Of The President of the U.S.A.)
And this guy with the absurd moniker “worker man” is an outright racist hatemonger!

Posted by: bobj72 | January 28, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm

“Come to think of it, I think dave is just following along.” Posted by: Silky
Sorry to disappoint you but, alas, just following along and dave are in fact two different people, and just following along is quickly tiring of this silly conversation.

Posted by: Just following along | January 28, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm

Vote democrat, it’s easier than working!

Posted by: ha ha | January 28, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm

Bobj72
Barry is a socialist
BO is a socialist
Barry is a socialist
BO is a socialist
I respect BO as much as he respected the oval office when he sat in rev racist’s church for 20 years.
I am no racist, but I would LOVE for you to point out anything that I have ever said that would lead you to believe such a ridiculous thing.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm

dave ,is your brain working?
to get or be promised a “tax break” would imply in itself that whoever was getting the aforementioned “tax break” HAD ALREADY PAID TAXES , OR WAS GOING TO HAVE TO PAY TAXES.
and dave ,wheres your empirical evidence to support your claim that 50% of the legal american populace doesnt pay any federal income tax?
sounds a lot like typical rush/hannity tripe/drivel to me ,but please…FACTS?

Posted by: tard = you(probaly according to my statistics) | January 28, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm

Dave
So your denfination of Socialisim does not fit into Obamas plans or Character,Well let me tell you this
1-If you have Elderly parents OR Grand parents and the recieve Medicare by all means get them off of it (SOCIALISIM)
2-Godforbid you should lose your Job and cant buy food dont dare apply for Food Stamps STARVE TO DEATH (SOCIALISIM)
3-Godforbid you should become Injured and cant work Dont you dare Apply for Social Security Disability (SOCIALISM)
So Dave I say to you if these things should ever Happen to you then Suffer because you dare wouldnt want to apply for these Social Programs But I Often wonder How many Hipocritical Republicans out there do apply for Recive some of these Programs or know people that do

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

dave, your rejoinder is pedestrian and oh so juvenile. Conversely, the claim I make is accurate and fairly easy for the average adult to understand.
dave DISRESPECTS President Barack Obama by referring to The President as “barry.” dave shows DISRESPECT for The Office of the U. S. President – because DAVE IS AN INTRACTABLE, FIERY-EYED RACIST!”
(dave, if it would be too difficult on your psyche to Respect The Man, at least have enough Character to Show Respect for The Office Of The President of the U.S.A.)
And this guy with the absurd moniker “worker man” is an outright racist hatemonger!

Posted by: bobj72 | January 28, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

TARD
Excatley Dave is a parrot for Hannity,Rush and Oreily. He cannot produce Facts That 50 Percent of Americans dont pay Taxes the only thing he can do is keep repeating and ranting the conservative far right nonsense!

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm

Tard
I said it is roughly 50% that pay no federal taxes, and that is due to deductions and credits. Check with the tax policy center on that one. Also, the wall street journal has debunked barry’s plan as a glorified welfare program MANY times.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm

The Republicons are being played.
Obama gets his bill passed while showing he is very responsible, responsive and presidential.
The submissive Republicons continue to prove that they are the party of yesmanship, obediently following the cues from the only leaders of the GOP: Drudge and Rush Limpbaugh

Posted by: Truth Matters | January 28, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm

Angie
Keep up with the “open minded” liberal name calling please, as I said before, it makes you look incredibly intelligent.
As for your sobstory about grandparents on the streets and starving people running around in the US. Here is a newsflash, we don’t have starving people in the USA. In actuality, our poor people often weigh 300+lbs (imagine explaining to a starving person in India/Africa that the USA has “poor” people who smoke cigarettes and have pot bellies. They would probably think you were crazy.
My point is that capitalism has allowed us to become the greatest, wealthiest, most generous nation in the history or the WORLD. We have so much that all of the food kitchens in my city are often filled with fat people and are ALWAYS filled with the smell of cigarettes.
We already have shelters, food pantries, clothing donation centers in place. We don’t need a nation on welfare, which barry’s plan of socialism will simply make us like france and will take away our 400lb poor people.
America invented the “middle class”, and guess what. Our poor-middle class lives better than 99.99% of the world. You liberals refuse to believe that, which is why you are always trying to turn this country into Cuba.
Have you ever heard what happened to that little country when a young, charismatic man came along in the 50′s and promised change? Well, ever since he took power people have been dying on rafts to get here. But hey, cuba has better healthcare then us, just like mike moore said. YEAH FREAKIN RIGHT!

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

Vote democrat, it’s easier than working!
Posted by: ha ha
So true, for if you follow, the Great Party will giveth.
Only schmucks work these days – these are the days of a chicken in every pot(the tofu version, of course); a mule for every farm (since tractors and the fuel that runs them will soon be outlawed) and great reward for all those who obediently follow!

Posted by: Yup | January 28, 2009, 6:20 pm 6:20 pm

DAVE
I Kinda feel sorry for you Kinda You are so absored In the Far right Idealogy that you are quite Sad!

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm

dave– ok. well in my hometown the food shelves are empty, and there is alot of skinnt sickly looking people around here.

Posted by: T | January 28, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

So, dave is comparing Obama to Castro? Are you freaking kidding me? This why bipartisan is a dead word, Republicans won’t bend, and go to extremes, just like dave, to make their points. But, Obama will keep trying to work with them, even as they spit in his face. Viva la revolucion! lol

Posted by: gravy | January 28, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

I’ve been watching this whole exchange between Dave & Angie and I have one question…. Angie – how old are you? I thought name calling went out with middle school. It really doesn’t add to your credibility.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 28, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Angie
Is that how you liberals describe people who love America these days? As being absorbed in the “far right ideology”.
I suggest you put down the peacepipe and go live in Europe for a while like I did. The government there not only guarntees it will babysit you your whole life, but weed/mushrooms are legal in a lot of places, right up your alley!

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Posted by: dave | Jan 28, 2009 5:39:52 PM;
You said; “I am no racist, but I would LOVE for you to point out anything that I have ever said that would lead you to believe such a ridiculous thing.”
I say; “You are such a novice.” I know you, but you have not a clue about me. You are the “classic average White guy” – who takes for granted he can say or do whatever he pleases. (Include being disrespectful of the Office Of The President Of The United States!) And your attitude is; “Damn anyone who would choose to challenge me.”
I’ll be kind enough to share with you, how you’re easily identified; “You’re the typical “racist-gunslinger”, shooting-off your verbose pontification with NO Regard for anyone, but yourself. (Assuming you have ‘the right’ to go unchallenged.)
You see, there are some of us out here who live by the creed; “acquiescence is acceptance.” So you will be challenged sir, whenever you “cross the line.” For if WE should fail to challenge you, your ‘veiled venom’ may well filter into the minds of the misguided, miseducated or ill-informed.

Posted by: bobj72 | January 28, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm

Gravy
Castro publicly endorsed barry and the 2 have VERY similar political beginnings/messages. In case you weren’t aware, castro hates the US but loves barry. Sounds a little fishy to me.
I am not saying barry is a murdering tyrant like fidel, but you have to admit the similarities are there regarding policy and message. No actually you don’t, you obamabot lemmings jumped off the cliff a looong time ago.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm

North Park said: ” Only car dealerships and media use K for thousand and M for Millions” That is not true. I have worked in accounting and finance departments for 25 years. No matter what the industry (healthcare, education, law firms & financial institutions), we used ‘K’ for thousands and ‘M’ for millions.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 28, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

bobj72
Your posts get more bizarre every time our paths cross. Tell barry I said hi.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm

dave…Many world leaders endorsed Obama. Especially leaders of color? And please share with us what,”similarities regarding policy and message”, they share.
The lemmings are wearing GOP pins, and seem to have taken their American flag pins off…

Posted by: gravy | January 28, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm

dave how is obama wanting to care for the poor and the working class and wanting fair treatment of all beliefs being anything like castro.

Posted by: T | January 28, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm

dave’s just a Republican mouthpiece, no thoughts of his own, just tow the Republican party line, right dave?
Your comparison of Obama to Castro was chilish, at best. But, many republicans have lashed out like angry children on these boards, since the election, and the inauguration.

Posted by: gravy | January 28, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm

GravyT
Many world leaders did endorse barry, with chavez and castro being 2 of them.
Fidel leapt on the scene in the 50′s with the same message as barry’s. CHANGE! CHANGE! CHANGE! Without many people asking what the CHANGE! was about. He had enormous support and the masses were enthralled with him.
Fidel promised free healthcare, free education, free daycare, ect. By the time he was finished, diplomas were not worth the paper they were printed on and people were dying in rafts trying to flee.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm

T
Thats the problems with Republicans They dont care about other People only their own Ideals and their own Party

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

T- it’s because Pres. Obama doesn’t think we can take care of ourselves.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 28, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm

Dave
I Dont recall Obama saying he is going to give Free Healtcare, Free Day care or free anything
Oh An Ellsbells
you say Im name calling why dont you go back and read Daves Post obama is a socialist,Obama is a Maxtrist

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 7:04 pm 7:04 pm

dave…Where did Obama promise any of those things?
Funny, you keep comparing,”change”, to a revolutionary in Cuba. You’re so scared, it’s not even funny. I’m scared for you! Do you lock youself up at night, gun in hand…waiting for the boogey man?

Posted by: gravy | January 28, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

Angie,
I don’t mean to call you a liar, but you are definately fibbing.
I did said barry is a socialist (I could prove that in court) but i never said he was a marxist.
I posted that in dreams from my father barry said “in college I sought out the marxist professors”.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm

May 29, 2007 … “The time has come for universal, affordable health care in America,” Obama in remarks prepared for delivery Tuesday in Iowa City.
http://www.barackobama.com/2007/05/29/obama_offers_universal_health.php – 42k
From CNN:
“Obama traveled to Fairfax, Virginia, to unveil a plan meant to increase women’s economic security. The plan includes a tax credit of up to $1,000 for families, an increase in the minimum wage and tax cuts to help working women pay for child care, among other provisions.”
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/17/us/politics/17early.html

Posted by: Listen carefully | January 28, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm

Gravy
Dave is afraid of CHANGE Because he knows Change meaning the country will not be ran on far right Idealogy like the past 8 years

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

dave, court is in session, prove Obama’s a socialst. None of you right wingers were using that terminology until Rush, Hannity and Billo did. So, please present your evidence that President Obama is a socialist…But, the evidence you present in this court can only come from what he’s done as President, not from things he’s said.

Posted by: gravy | January 28, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm

I do recall Fox news stirring that word Socialism up

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm

Angie…that’s a fact. But what scares me, is that he, and his right wing pals just keep spewing the things that they are told to say by FoxNews. Nothing original. dave used the word lemming earlier, he’s proving himself to be a FoxNews lemming…
dave, seriously, do you wear a GOP lapel pin now, instead of an American flag?

Posted by: gravy | January 28, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm

Listen up people,
Barry sat in an anti-capitalist, racist preacher’s church for 20 years. The insane pastor even inspired him to write a book titled after one of rev racist’s speeches “audacity of hope”.
Barry’s political career was kicked off in bill ayers’ living room. That man blew up multiple gov’t buildings, has never apologized, has advocated overthrowing the evil capitalist powers, and has been photographed standing on the American flag multiple times.
Barry’s wife said twice in public that she has never been proud of her country. What would she do in private? Give bill ayers high-fives?
Now take those associations, add in barry’s own ridiculous comments, the 1933 Germany-like adoration from the media and it is very scary.

Posted by: dave | January 28, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm

They did Angie, all during their coverage of the inauguration, and several times during the election. Bill Crystal was the one I remember the most. “Socialistic policy”…”Socialist type of language”..”Socialist type of agenda”…lol Planted all over their broadcasts, and dave swallows it, hook-line and sinker.

Posted by: gravy | January 28, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm

ellsbell—its not we cnat take of our self just we cnat protect ourslevs from the corrupt rich and big business.

Posted by: T | January 28, 2009, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

dave…None of that has ANY substance. Please come up with something that makes sense. Where is you evidence that Obama is a socialist? Please tell me that last post wasn’t it, ya think THAT would hold up in a court of law? As you stated your evidence would…
And your STILL bringin up Bill Ayers? lmao Come on!

Posted by: gravy | January 28, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

dave keep it up rush limburger is so proud of you fro spreading hate and fear. my self i chose hope and prosperity for all not just the rich.

Posted by: T | January 28, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

DAVE POST 7;19 pm
Dave is Definatley without a doubt a loyal Fox News,Hannity,Oreily Fan He probably watched Hannitys little Documentry of Obama and quite Frankliy Dave sounds very Paranoid

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

Gravy Remember when they calle Michelle and Baracks fist bump a Terrriost fist Jab hahaah Ah want a good laugh tune into Fox News

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Vote democrat- it’s easier than working!

Posted by: ha ha | January 28, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm

“1933 Germany like adoration from the media”? First Castro, now Hitler? What’s next, dave? Sadam Hussein? They do share a name…How about Hugo Chavez? Robert Mugabe? How many tyrants and murderers can you possibly attempt to link to Obama?

Posted by: gravy | January 28, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Angie, that was hilarious. The famous fist bump/signal to terrorists. It didn’t signal anyone, except the right wing…”It’s over”. hehe
dave…fist bump ya dawg, nothin but love…

Posted by: gravy | January 28, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm

Vote democrat-it’s easier than working!

Posted by: ha ha | January 28, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

“vote democrat, it’s easier than working”
Yeah, ha ha, we saw that the last 3-4 times it was posted. It means nothing, just another Hannity/Rush/O’Rielly anti Obama catch phrase, like socialist. lol
But keep trying, I’m very entertained by it all.

Posted by: gravy | January 28, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

5

Posted by: gravy | January 28, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

vote republican its easier to rape the poor and working class then care about them.

Posted by: T | January 28, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

Bottom line here is, Barrack Obama has said from the beginning that he was interested in bipartisan cooperation in Washington. And, it’s clear that the Republicans aren’t hearing it. And many Dems are still fighting along policial lines as well. If these people can’t work together, we’re ALL doomed.
Nancy Pelosi needs to start playing nice, she’s not the big Dem dog anymore. (no pun intended, jokes welcomed). Did you see her face when Obama held his bipartisan congressional pow wow? Girl looked like she was gonna spew chunks.

Posted by: gravy | January 28, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

i agree gravy i am a democrat but i dont like pelosi.

Posted by: T | January 28, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

T ,she’s gonna be a thorn in Obama’s side. I hope he can talk her down.

Posted by: gravy | January 28, 2009, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Agree I dont like Pelosi she has to go He is gonna have nothing but Problems with her she is too Partisan

Posted by: Angie | January 28, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Michelle and Nancy need to have a knock down, drag out…er…sorry…Sit down, a cup of tea, perhaps?

Posted by: gravy | January 28, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

How dare house Republicans question Obama! They should follow the media’s lead and agree with everything he says without question.

Posted by: obama=socialism | January 28, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

“T” said so eloquently…
its not we cnat take of our self just we cnat protect ourslevs from the corrupt rich and big business
Huh???

Posted by: obama=socialism | January 28, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

shake the haters off, Mr President.

Posted by: Paul Wall | January 28, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

BO, please realize that history already has a neville chamberlain and we don’t need a second.
You are doing everything in your power to weaken America, which has been the long tradition of liberals in power. Please wise up.

Posted by: BOstinks | January 28, 2009, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

obama=socialism=hater
Post something that makes sense. Do any republicans have minds of their own? Or, do they get a daily script?

Posted by: gravy | January 28, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm

Bostinks…be specific.
And a Neville Chamberlain comparison? Really…

Posted by: gravy | January 28, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

For those who don’t know, Neville Chamberlain attempted to work with the Hitler govt., before Hitler invaded Poland. The right are attempting to tie Obama down as a defeatest, someone in the Chamberlain model. lol
If you want Obama to fail, you are anti-American.

Posted by: gravy | January 28, 2009, 10:19 pm 10:19 pm

T- Who can’t protect themselves from big business? We’re doing just fine. The government needs to just stay out of it all. By the time they get done spending the money in this so-called stimulus package, the recession will be over all on its own. It’s going to take up to two years for a lot of the package…the amount of time a recession usually reverses itself without interference.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 28, 2009, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

Angie – Obama is a socialist. And that isn’t name-calling, it’s labeling his politics – just like calling someone a democrat, a republican, a libertarian. Someone who wants to “redistribute the wealth” is a socialist. Someone who wants to legislate tolerance is a socialist. Someone who wants the government to provide many services (which could be better done privately) is a socialist. Unlike your name calling which personally attacked another poster with rude names.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 28, 2009, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm

Gravy,
I’ll try to make more sense, like your buddy “T”. I do have a mind of my own, which is why I can question Obama proposals, and not just agree with everything he says. Not a “hater”, just have a different viewpoint…still allowed in the USA…for awhile anyway.

Posted by: obama=socialism | January 28, 2009, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

for the first time in my adult life im proud to be a republican ~wink~

Posted by: david reyes | January 28, 2009, 11:37 pm 11:37 pm

we hope the stimulus works and it did pass THe House but it has to pass the senate and has to go through a conference report the money for family planning and other ridiculous thigns are already out of it… the far left people that think they are owed something need to take a few steps back… and if you fall off a cliff so be it!

Posted by: JG | January 28, 2009, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm

Why does anyone care if Obama has the Republicans on board or not? We already know they are sore losers and want him to fail. Rush Limbaugh said he wants Obama to fail and i believe the rest of the Republicans do as well. They do not care about the good of the country, they care about their party ideology and their fat cat patrons with whom they are in alliance. So I don’t see why anyone cares what the Republicans think or if they are on board or not. They have already shown they are not interested in being truly bi-partisan. To them, bi-partisan means ‘their way, or the highway’.. Besides, isn’t this the party that drove our country over the cliff in so many ways during the last eight years? Since when were they concerned about “overspending”, seeing they ran up multiple trillions in debt during the tenure of George W. Bush when the Congress was also under GOP control. So why all of a sudden is their opinion so important? I believe the mainstream media is complicit in giving too much play to the right wing noise machine. I mean, after all, these people LOST at the polls during the last election. They set up this economic depression we are in, they ruined our international alliances and fostered terrorism by their stupid, short-signted jingoism, so again. WHY are we supposed to care what these un-American hypocrites think? They are not interested in helping out the average citizen. A lot of them should go to jail for the crimes they committed while the GOP was in power.

Posted by: JL | January 28, 2009, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

JL,
Maybe because they were elected. The ones who lost are no longer in office. The ones who won are still in office and therefore we need to care about their opinions. That’s how it works. One could just as easily argue that Pelosi, Reid, Kennedy, etc are just as responsible for all the messes you describe whe they were “bi-partisan.”

Posted by: obama=socialism | January 29, 2009, 12:12 am 12:12 am

The newsmedia is really cheerleading for the Republicans. You’d think the Republicans had won by the amount of air time they’re getting. And by the way for you media moguls out there..the O in Boehner cannot be pronounced like a “a’ in English or German. In English it should be pronounced like a long “o” and have the same sound as “poem” “Joe” “oboe” or ‘toe’. So why do the media keep pronoucing it as ‘bayner’? You have no excuse for that pronunciation. If you pronounce it that way you should go back to school and learn English…it should be pronounced to rhyme with loner. Except with a ‘b’.

Posted by: JL | January 29, 2009, 12:18 am 12:18 am

JL
Rush said if barry’s goal his socialsim then he wanted him to fail. I think our founding fathers would agree with rush, don’t you?

Posted by: BOstinks | January 29, 2009, 12:21 am 12:21 am

JL – You seemed shocked that the media would “cheerlead” for the Republicans… Haven’t you figured out they aren’t happy unless they are slamming those in power- no matter what the party? And it is a really bad bill – it needs to be slammed. I really expected much better.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 29, 2009, 6:52 am 6:52 am

dave; I intend to redirect my attention to more formidable and productive purposes. Responding to you – Lends Credibility to your baseless, pedestrian hatemongering.
You YEARN FOR ATTENTION and many participants can’t resist challenging your hatred. But, I will Force Myself to IGNORE YOUR baseless, pedestrian hate.

Posted by: bobj72 | January 29, 2009, 8:10 am 8:10 am

Posted by: ellsbells930 | Jan 28, 2009 11:04:22 PM;
You said; …….”Someone who wants the government to provide many services (which could be better done privately) is a socialist.”………
Response; Right! Social Security should have been “Privatized.” Er… Invested in the Stock Market. Now whose proposal was that???

Posted by: bobj72 | January 29, 2009, 8:17 am 8:17 am

bobj72 – Social Security is the largest ponzi scheme in the world. It, like Medicare, should never have been put into place by the Federal government. And yes, SS should be privatized, since it exists. Eventually the market WILL go up again – just like it always has.

Posted by: ellsbells930 | January 29, 2009, 8:50 am 8:50 am

Did anyone notice that the Prez said in his inaugural speech that it is up to the American worker to get us out of this mess, then a mere ten days later he is saying that “only government” can get us out? We have an inexperienced Prez that has captured the hearts of most Americans who will believe and excuse anything he says. Wake up, America! If your idea of “stimulus” is fattening the pot for Al Gore and providing funding for the voter mob squad (ACORN), then side with the Dems. I’m fed up with their idea of bipartisanship, which is “let’s compromise and do it my way.”

Posted by: Sandra | January 29, 2009, 9:44 am 9:44 am

Posted by: Sandra | Jan 29, 2009 9:44:41 AM;
You said; I’m fed up with their idea of bipartisanship, which is “let’s compromise and do it my way.”
I say; “Sorry to say, there is some mysterious factor causing you to become delusional!!!” A Minority Party has ‘earned the right’ to be in the minority. And that is; If you’re invited in, you’re being treated as “an equal.” Don’t “Blow it” by refusing the ‘invite’ or humiliating the Host who extended the invitation to you. (Bad manners, both socially and politically!)
Now, for the sake of simplicity, I ask you to complete this thought; “To the Victor go the Sp_ils.” ‘Nuff said.

Posted by: bobj72 | January 29, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm

Posted by: ellsbells930 | Jan 29, 2009 8:50:14 AM;
You said; “bobj72 – Social Security is the largest ponzi scheme in the world. It, like Medicare, should never have been put into place by the Federal government. And yes, SS should be privatized, since it exists.”……
I say: “Would it surprise you if I suggested, better than 55% of the ‘Voting aged population’ DISAGREES with You!!!
Don’t tell me, I know………… You’re right anyway – Right? I can’t determine if it’s “mule-headed stubborn” or “just plain arrogance!”

Posted by: bobj72 | January 29, 2009, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

The Republicans suffer from amnesia, it hasn’t been 10 days since former Pres. George Bush left the oval office and somehow the Repubs want to stall and come off as they are looking out for the better good of the people. It took eights years for America to go from having surplus money in the treasury,to a bankrupt economy. The Repubs don’t want to buy into the program to prevent bipartisan blame if the plan fails and the economy slips further into a recession. Now they want to come off as saviors for the people of the United States, but tell me where were these 100 economist when the nation was slipping two years ago. Some economist came forward with truth about the state of the economy, however quickly there were economist weighing saying the opposite. So who are we to believe the Repubs and there overt hidden agenda to regain power, or should America banned together and realize that we are in this together…

Posted by: Jbmotogp | January 30, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.