VP Biden Pokes Fun at Chief Justice Roberts
Before he administered an oath to senior White House staffers and their deputies today, the vice president had a little fun at the expense of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.
The normally eloquent, quite brilliant John Roberts slightly botched the oath of office when administering it to President Obama yesterday, misplacing the word "faithfully" and causing some minor awkwardness on stage.
Today, after Mr. Obama praised his staffers as "an extraordinary collection of talent" who "inspire great confidence in me," the president asked his Number 2 if he wanted to administer the oath.
"Am I doing this again?" Vice President Biden asked. A few minutes before, he had sworn in seven individuals who had been confirmed by the Senate to Cabinet and Cabinet-level posts.
"For the senior staff," Mr. Obama said.
"For the senior staff?" Biden repeated. "Alright."
Biden tried to get a copy of the oath to read to the senior staffers.
"My memory is not as good as Justice Roberts," Biden explained, prompting some laughter and groans from the audience.
– jpt

Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Wow. I am the first to comment? Love it. The story is great. Good fun to start things off.
Now I wonder how long it will take for the rabid right-wing haters to pillory Joe?
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | January 21, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
In his inaugural address, President Obama quoted Scripture when he said “the time has come to set aside childish things.” Much of what Washington DC is about is childish, wasting a lot of valuable time to solve serious problems. That also applies to the media, which loves to repeat childish things to exacerbate “gotcha politics.” I am sure the quote was partially aimed at the media. Stop publicizing childish things and report on what the country is doing to get healthy again.
Posted by: John Thielbahr | January 21, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
Yes, John. We must always at all times be deadly serious. Thou shalt have no fun, ever.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | January 21, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
Good one, Veep Biden!
It isn’t, however, as good as when you said “a three-letter word: jobs. J-O-B-S, jobs.”
Posted by: I'm With Stupid | January 21, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
Siccing BIDEN on Roberts is how the Pretender-in-Chief is countering the curse of the Lincoln Bible?
Yeah, THAT’LL really work.
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 21, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
For the “CHIEF” justice to forget the word faithful is shameful…that is the reason Obama voted a NAY during the Robert’s nomination…Roberts was nominated by Bush.. same level of language skills…
Posted by: nisha | January 21, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
The “Curse of the Lincoln Bible” ?????
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | January 21, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Fox news is calling it “A Slap in the face”
Posted by: chris | January 21, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
LOL, Chris. Fox News, a bastion of “fair and balanced” reporting. Excuse me while I wretch.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | January 21, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
I’m trying really hard to find a reason to like this
administration, but the media and the comments like this is making it very hard
Posted by: jane | January 21, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
“As a former Federal officer who administered the oath of office to a lot of newly hired Federal employees, I can assure you that Justice Roberts not only screwed up the cadence but the oath itself. There is always a break between “I (and your name)” and “do solemly swear (or affirm)”.
Plus Obama isn’t the President “to” the United States but President “of” the United States.”
And that doesn’t even mention, Robert’s getting the ‘faithfully’ out of order.
Posted by: pefros | January 21, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Go Joe….have a little fun. Loved it.
Posted by: sara wilson | January 21, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
“For the “CHIEF” justice to forget the word faithful is shameful…that is the reason Obama voted a NAY during the Robert’s nomination…Roberts was nominated by Bush.. same level of language skills…”
I’m with you!
Posted by: I'm With Stupid | January 21, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
I’ll take up for “that Joe”. He should have insisted that staff members email the pledge to his blackberry, you know “the way they did it when FDR was President.”
Posted by: david | January 21, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Oh please, Biden was doing some good natured ribbing as I’m positive he has received over the years. It’s much better than the claptrap I was seeing yesterday saying it was deliberate on Roberts part because he didn’t like Obama. It’s no more a slap in the face to Roberts than it is to give Biden grief about the stuff he says or some of the priceless stuff Bush has said. I’m almost positive we will see the incident on SNL. Laugh! This country needs to take things like this in stride. Let’s worry about more serious issues that the VP giving the Chief Justice a little business.
Posted by: Catherine | January 21, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
I’m with you Catherine. It’s clear Justice Roberts had very little to do on Inauguration Day but get the oath right – and he muffed that – but still . .. laugh a bit and move on. ..
Posted by: pefros | January 21, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
“Fox news is calling it “A Slap in the face”"
Then we know the opposite is true.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 21, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
I enjoy the attention being given to this non-subject.A little humor can help in times of peril.
Posted by: Eric Drexil Holland | January 21, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
This very discussion is nuts and I consider my own choice to post somewhat suspect in this regard. It was a simple transposition and NOT A BIG DEAL. Biden likely only mentioned it so that the news media would drive home the point that it was the justice that flubbed it, and not Obama, as some viewers didn’t realize that.
I think come credit is owned to Obama for knowing the difference and giving the justice the opportunity to fix it. I do not believe this reflects in anyway on the chief justice.
Move on… :P
Posted by: Whys | January 21, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Well… what happened to all those Bushies yesterday that claimed President Obama was the one who muffed the oath of office?… Nowhere to be seen today. Same thing with the stock market going down yesterday…Nowhere to be seen today…Oh well, I guess that’s to be expected…
Posted by: leftyintexas | January 21, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
“The “Curse of the Lincoln Bible” ?????”
You think Lincoln liked having his Bible drafted into the coronation-by-Disney?
Look up “hubris” … as Obama’s bait-and-switch Mellow-drama attempts to lurch past prologue, and the censors slice away at references to the Lincoln Bible.
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 21, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm
As for me , I didn’t like Roberts screwing up my president’s oath.. I listened to it, he actually got the president to say something ridiculous..
I never liked Roberts, not one bit…
Running two clauses together like that was so uncoordinated.. so far from all oath swearing tradition was inexcusable…
so we laugh?,
okay I’ll laugh to, with a snarl.
Posted by: Rich | January 21, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
“Obama was the one who muffed the oath of office?”
Obama interrupted Roberts. Roberts then misplaced “faithfully”.
The Lincoln Bible is not mocked, it seems. WherEVER one lays the “blame”.
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 21, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
So Roberts misspoke. Get over it.
Posted by: T | January 21, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
“You think Lincoln liked having his Bible drafted into the coronation-by-Disney?”
You think Lincoln enjoys being the father of the party the belched forth George W. Bush?
BTW, I love how your prediction of this being a huge gaffe for Obama that would haunt him appears to have been nothing more than a little joke with its target being CJOSC Robert.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 21, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
“Obama interrupted Roberts. Roberts then misplaced “faithfully”.”
As someone else pointed out earlier, when administering an oath there is always a pause after asking one to state their name and then begin the oath.
Roberts seemed a little nervous and who wouldn’t be.
This is not a big deal.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 21, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
I think Justice Roberts should be commented for at least attempting to administer the oath from memory. I believe he’s the first that I’ve seen not just read it from a hunk of paper in front of him.
Posted by: fruit&nuts | January 21, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
Talent my backside!!!!! Richardson withdraws, Geither or whatever his name is, does not pay taxes and Clinton is up to her eyeballs in shady deals. Come on folks, you cannot possibly believe that this array is any different from any other same old Washington garbage!!!!!! Obama talks a great game but look at who he surounds himself with—-”Business as Usual”
Posted by: rockychance | January 21, 2009, 4:26 pm 4:26 pm
Let’s get this show on the road – together! What an incredible show of support and enthusiasm by the American people. I am so proud of the inauguration. My prayers and hopes are with the new administration and all of us. The future is in our hands.
Posted by: Mom | January 21, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
To prosecute Bush—You bet he deserves it but not for what liberals think!!! He deserves it for failing to protect the innocent American people who the drug dealers from Mexico have tortured for 8 years because he would not protect the border and for a lying reason for being in Iraq. He does not care about the people who have paid for his mistakes with their lives, only his own stupid arrogance and he deserves prison for it!!!!!
Posted by: rockychance | January 21, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Stop living in a lie!!!!! Lincoln only emancipated the slaves as a way to undermine the south in the war. Lincoln was no friend of the slave and that is a fact. Lincoln knew the north did not treat blacks well and he fully accepted it. The truth is Lincoln was an ego-maniac who only wanted the south to accept his forced union on them—hero to slaves-no way-only and ego driven man who put 600,000 men in their graves for his ideas!
Posted by: rockychance | January 21, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
“This is not a big deal.”
It’s SO “not a big deal” that Wolf Blitzer, Joe Biden, and a zillion punditos passing for “liberal” are trampling each other in a rush to make the blown oath a story about Roberts … rather than a story about Obama’s presumptuous decision to draft the Lincoln Bible as a prop in His hokey coronation.
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 21, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Ok–laughter aside, let’s get on the business of getting out of this terrible mess we’re in.
If President Obama acheives his goals for his administration and for the country in 4 years (and maybe 8, if he goes for a second term), he will be voted as one of the greatest American presidents in history, with a great chance of his “self” being plastered in places like Mt. Rushmore.
That, in the end, will severly anger every conservative, right-wing, fascist Republican in this country.
Ah . . . how sweet it could be!
Posted by: Shashi Gowda | January 21, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Biden has always been quick to attack anyone he disagrees with. I don’t remember ABC or the mainstream media calling angry joe to task when he continuously screwed up on basic U.S. History questions. (Remember, he’s the guy that doesn’t know the Articles of the U.S. Constitution and thought Roosevelt was President at the start of the Great Depression and that he (Roosevelt) went on T.V. (in 1929) to calm the American people. What a moron.
Posted by: South_Texan | January 21, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
President Obama . . .
Posted by: pefros | January 21, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
What goes around comes around. Joe & Barak’s antics to get the senior staff sworn in today, strangely reminded me of Laural & Hardy! The “Leaders” weren’t organized & didn’t seem to know what they or the other was doing! Scary!
Posted by: getagrip | January 21, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
I sure hope Obama doesn’t put up with sarcasm in his administration.
Posted by: MBell_TX | January 21, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
What about all of Biden’s gaffes? Or is it that Biden is just plain stupid? We know for sure he does’nt know his history! One more thing Biden is a nasty, vicious person!!
Posted by: Valerie Tarantolo | January 21, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
“The “Leaders” weren’t organized & didn’t seem to know what they or the other was doing!”
But haven’t B&O finally squeezed themselves onto the same public page on how many positions in His administration Obama offered Biden?
Fire up the kiln for the commemorative door-stops honoring this vital “Democratic” accord …
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 21, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
MBell_TX,
i don’t think he will/wants to. Did you see him touching Biden’s elbow ever so slightly after the comment and the cold face afterwards. it was clear he didn’t find it amusing.
Posted by: Question | January 21, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
Unfortunately, there is relevant significance on the oath to the office per the constitution. Those 35 words are to be exactly spoken as written; (hence their quotation marks)They require that strict interpretation to insure that the office taker(s) do not start make subtle adjustments and alter the power and role of the Office. Hence, it’s relevant for President Obama to be sworn in again in lieu of the gaffe. This would not be unprecedented as two previous Presidents had to repeat at the oath due to similar technicalities. In order to save face for the Chief Justice, it should be handled in a low key manner.
As far as the VP quip, it’s interpretation it’s really a matter on the type of personal relationship between him and the Chief Justice.
However, the propensity of media outlets to use this comment to inflame partisanship in these very difficult times for the Nation is inappropriate and wrong. As Americans, we must start rejecting this baiting whether we are conservatives, liberals or independents and apply our attentions to help solve the challenges ahead.
Posted by: EGP | January 21, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
Roberts interrupted Obama, and Georgie Boy was the Pretender in Chief for eight miserable years.
Posted by: leftyintexas | January 21, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
ahhhh, Joe. I think Joe is going to give us some laughs in the years to come. Obama is such a straight man. He doesn’t want to offend or isolate anyone, but hey, there’s always Joe! I like how Obama holds out hisarm to Joe after he says that, sort of a ‘steady there boy…” gesture. We wont have the complete idiocy to laugh about this presidency. I think what we’ll more have is stinging and accurate zingers. As for Roberts, I think he justwanted to say “Hussein” so badly he forget how to do his job. That’ll happen when you’re being a partisan.
Posted by: Frank | January 21, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
President Obama did not look amused by the statement. Good for hims for showing some class.
Posted by: Greg | January 21, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
pefros: Don’t get me wrong, CJ Roberts messed up a bit and I’m sure he was mentally kicking himself (like we all do when we publically say something incorrectly. Everyone is making a big deal out of nothing. Biden was just adding some levity. Let’s face it, these days we can all use a laugh now and again. what’s it to you if he uses the Lincoln Bible. It was significant to Obama to use the Bible of a man he admired. I wasn’t a fan of George Bush, but if it had been the same situation with him, I would defend that decision as well. Move on and complain about something significant like maybe all the American jobs moving pollution, health care, the state of the schools…or better yet, put down the keyboard and try to make things better.
Posted by: Catherine | January 21, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
The “childish things” quotation was taken out of context. Also,the “God given promise of freedom and equality” attributed to God did come from the Bible. Slaves were owned in the Bible and there was no equality.
Posted by: Anna Stewart | January 21, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Oops! I didn’t proof. I intended to say did not come from the Bible.
Posted by: Anna Stewart | January 21, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
“Remember, he’s the guy that doesn’t know the Articles of the U.S. Constitution”
Actually Joe stated the proper role of the VP.
Palin, the same person who a few months earlier did not know what the VP did, offered the right wing Cheney version from her talking points.
But hey cling tight to that campaign rhetoric that saw you get your butts kicked.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 21, 2009, 5:16 pm 5:16 pm
EGP: One of Justices has already weighed in on if it was a legitimate oath. He pulled case law out of his pocket and indicated it was legit. I suspect Obama understood the mistake. It’s not easy to stand up in front of all those people and recite from memory if you are used to it. Can you imagine the Chief Justice who rarely has to do anything like that. Cut Roberts a break.
Posted by: Catherine | January 21, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
I do blame Roberts for screwing up the swearing in of President Obama. What in the world was this guy thinking? From now on I think the incoming president should be able to pick a competent person in the Supreme Court to swear him or her in.
Posted by: Vicki | January 21, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
[i]Actually Joe stated the proper role of the VP.[/i]
No, he didn’t. He said that the VP is the president of the senate in the case of a tied vote. The VP is always president of the senate, but only votes in the case of a tie.
Posted by: Vatar | January 21, 2009, 5:34 pm 5:34 pm
“Unfortunately, there is relevant significance on the oath to the office per the constitution. Those 35 words are to be exactly spoken as written; (hence their quotation marks)They require that strict interpretation to insure that the office taker(s) do not start make subtle adjustments and alter the power and role of the Office. Hence, it’s relevant for President Obama to be sworn in again in lieu of the gaffe.”
As much as I find this situation with the SF Chronicle up in arms about the oath to be amusing, I think you are totally wrong. The semantic meaning of the two (or three) statements is the same. Obama will fulfill the oath as much as he ever intended to.
But there was a fun argument being made on Volokh that Rice was the first black President.
Posted by: BertieW | January 21, 2009, 5:40 pm 5:40 pm
I think Roberts just wanted to overstate Obama’s middle name too, and after that, he lost focus. If you listen to the tape, he said “Hussien” much slower than “Barak” or “Obama”. It’s a r ight wingnuts big talking point. After Robert’s big overemphasis (gee, as if Republicans didn’t beat that dead horse enough) then Roberts lost his place and his concentration. He was just sitting there waiting to say “Hussien”, you’re right, and after that, he was essentially done. ROberts didn’t go there to administer the oath, he went there to say “Hussien”.
Posted by: debbie | January 21, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Party is over guys. His wife messed up also by announcing Joe had choice of VP or SOS.Glad to see Obama in control and not for Obama I would not respect Joe at all, but since he is VP I’ll hold my breath and hope he gets serious and speaks less in years to come. This is not popularity contest, or ego boster sharing sessions. Joe get it together, please and don’t forget who’s your boss. Relax and have your fun soon enought but right now get to work since all you have been talking about is Jan 20. can’t come fast enough. IT WAS yesterday, so let’swalk the talk.
Posted by: zorra | January 21, 2009, 5:47 pm 5:47 pm
As a women, I am offended this site called Roberts “Brilliant”. In his arguments to make abortion illegal unless the husband gave permission there was nothing “Brilliant” about it. It was Draconian. In a world where men cheat far more on their spouces than women, I found it highly highly offensive to have this idea that a husband is to be gatekeeper of his wife’s body, and if she is pregnant she must go to him FOR PERMISSION to end a pregnancy, withouth ANY stipulation that the baby is even his!!! What if this ‘husband’ is a constant cheater, so she cheated too, and it’s not even his! What if they are separated and again, it’s not even his baby! His argument was NOT brilliant, as he is NOT when it comes to issues of women. Sandra Day O’Connor slapped himaround goodwith her VERY eloquent reprisal. I am horrified this man is chief justice. I agree with the posters about his obession to call Obama out onhis middle name. Roberts is a partisan matriach freak. That a man like him is in a position of law is simply dangerous. And typical. Typical that a guy like that chooses a profession that is all about exerting power over overs.
Posted by: Jen in MI | January 21, 2009, 5:48 pm 5:48 pm
Do all presidents take the oath using their first, middle and last names?
Posted by: ted | January 21, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Things are going to change… oh deary… oh deary. The court is packed with right wing imbeciles… time to get rid of them like Roosevelt did. Time for young liberal minds on the supreme court. The Exxon travesties of 2008 showed who was bought out.
Posted by: Northwest Artist | January 21, 2009, 6:00 pm 6:00 pm
Am I the only one that watched the oath? OBAMA started repeating too soon, before Roberts was finished speaking. This caused Roberts to flounder.
Posted by: Anon | January 21, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
“Am I the only one that watched the oath? OBAMA started repeating too soon, before Roberts was finished speaking. This caused Roberts to flounder.”
And THEN, according to both recollection AND the SF Chronicle, after Roberts misspoke and then corrected himself, OBAMA repeated it WRONG.
The hubris of using the Lincoln Bible will out.
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 21, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
Well, I see the coronation of The One didn’t raise the IQ level of one single lefty that posts here. I guess when all you have to do all day is sit around waiting for The One to send your mortgage payment in for you and watch Oprah, you’re IQ is going to stay below 80.
Posted by: Ann | January 21, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
“Am I the only one that watched the oath?”
EVERYBODY, really nearly everybody in the electrified world, saw JUST what happened with the oath.
That some major media and the punditocracy have raced to pretend what happened DIDN’T happen is an unhappy sign that the media fix is still on for the “Obama” organization.
I’m no Roberts fan, but his intention to have the first line be “I BHO do solemnly swear” may well have been an attempt NOT to have the “Hussein” middle name hanging out at the pause, and/or to make the old new by not pausing at the name, but going three words — THREE words — further, to “swear”.
If Obama hadn’t decided to interrupt Roberts in the middle of Roberts’ first line … Roberts might not have misplaced “faithfully”, which he corrected … only to have OBAMA say it back in the WRONG order.
Wolf Blitzer should be ashamed of himself. Meanwhile, there’s an accurate account (of what everybody saw anyway) in the SF Chronicle.
Posted by: Belle Starr | January 21, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
I’d put my money on Chief justice Roberts.
Posted by: LongT | January 21, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
Feinstein should have cued Biden in on how to deliver the “oafe”.
Posted by: david | January 21, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
Everybody and their horse is reporting what actually happened – Roberts fumbled the ball. It’s I’m sure he’s forgiven, people make mistakes.
First he blew the cadence by continuing past the first correct phrase, “I Barack Hussein Obama . ..”
No big deal – except then (after a clear and complete response from Obama) Roberts got lost, hestitated, stumbled verbally, misplaced the ‘faithfully’ and at the same time told Obama to say “President TO the United States”.
Very messy and incorrect delivery of the line.
Credit where credit is due. It was messy but they recovered.
Posted by: pefros | January 21, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
I just listened to the video/audio again and it appears to me that both screwed up. Obama twice jumped the gun and did not let Roberts finish a phrase before he started repeating it. After that, it all seemed to get out of sync, with Roberts misplacing “faithfully” resulting in “execute the office of the United States faithfully” instead of “faithfully execute the office of the United States”. But of course it was Obama’s day, so it must have been Robert’s fault completely.
Posted by: LongT | January 21, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
Man I just watched that oath again. Even after Obama gives Roberts a second chance to say it right, Roberts stumbles through it.
Posted by: pefros | January 21, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
That was an unfortunate joke. But easy, Mr. President. Just joke about your own mistake. Say something like “I am sure our senior staff will do a good job of taking the oath.” I understand your eagerness to show respect for political adversaries like Roberts but you also have to lift up your political allies like Biden, too.
Posted by: teddymaniac | January 21, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
The part that surprise me is Roberts not being able to get ‘Office of the President of the United States’ correct . . . as he stumbles through the first time he says ‘President to the Unites States”.
How the hell did he get “Office of the President of the Unites States” wrong?
Posted by: pefros | January 21, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
“Do all presidents take the oath using their first, middle and last names?”
Some have.
Some have not.
Its up to each President.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 21, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
I agree that the incoming President should choose who swears him or her in.
Posted by: Lori | January 21, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
“No, he didn’t. He said that the VP is the president of the senate in the case of a tied vote.”
No. He stated the only duty of the VP in the senate is to vote in a tie break.
The role as “President” of the Senate has become almost entirely ceremonial (except for tie votes) with the President pro Tempore (the longest serving Senator) serving that role.
“The VP is always president of the senate, but only votes in the case of a tie.”
That was not the issue.
Caribou Barbie proclaimed the VP as in charge of the Senate helping to craft policy and then in the debate claimed the Constitution granted her the authority to do so.
Neither were true but she of course did not know that being an imbecile.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 21, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Chief Roberts is as stupid as his President Bush was, no doubt about it.
Posted by: incognite56 | January 21, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
“How the hell did he get “Office of the President of the Unites States” wrong?”
I guess it was a mistake, pefros. Like someone not being able to spell “United” correctly, no?
Posted by: I'm With Stupid | January 21, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
Yes, a mistake . . . I can understand a slip of the finger on a typo in a chat room. . . Roberts surprised me blowing the phrase President of the United States, he seemed almost lost at times. Guess he got stage fright and lost his composure.
Posted by: pefros | January 21, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
Chief Roberts is an extremist of the ultra right and except the two other judges of the Supreme Court, he never had the chance to be face to face with a person of a different ideology, much less someone that is the President of the United States….Pardon him, please, he was very nervous, and behaved like a kid, JAJAJAJA.
Posted by: incognite56 | January 21, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
Yes, a mistake . . . I can understand a slip of the finger on a typo in a chat room. . . Roberts surprised me blowing the phrase President of the United States, he seemed almost lost at times. Guess he got flustered and lost his composure.
But you’re right, everybody makes mistakes. Of course, it was an inaugural oath for the President. I feel for him and it will be over with soon enough.
Posted by: pefros | January 21, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
“But you’re right, everybody makes mistakes. Of course, it was an inaugural oath for the President. I feel for him and it will be over with soon enough.”
I don’t agree with all of his political/legal positions, but I do feel sympathy towards him for that gaffe. Of course, no matter what else happens during his tenure as Chief Justice, he has secured his place in history by messing up the oath of office!
Posted by: I'm With Stupid | January 21, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
Belle is correct in my opinion, PEBO jumped at the introduction, not the introductory phrase, which ended up throwing off Roberts.
But since the meaning of the phrases is identical it doesnt matter at all.
Posted by: BertieW | January 21, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
Prior to giving the oath of office, Chief Justice Rehnquist rehearsed the oath of office numerous times prior to the inauguration and brought a copy of the oath with him to the podium. Chief Justice Roberts is a meticulous man and has made few public missteps in his life; consequently, it is rather incomprehensible that he should botch his participation in one of the most important events in the history of this country.
Posted by: Jean Standish | January 21, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
The oath was over 24 hours ago and is old news. I feel bad that Obama has to deal with Biden’s inability to be serious and recover gracefully from an obvious obliviousness as to what the hell is going on. Taking jabs at others in no way makes him look smarter. I am getting wary of what the hell this country just did I hope I am not apologizing for voting for Obama/Biden in 4 years.
Posted by: Shannon | January 21, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Roberts is exactly one of the examples of the kind of brainless people Bush needed at the highest position of the Judicial Sustem to do all he wanted and put us in the critical situation we live now. Besides the unfortune of been seen before the eyes of the world as being governed by an incapable alcoholic for 8 years.
Posted by: incognite56 | January 21, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Too funny!
Posted by: anonymous | January 21, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
“Prior to giving the oath of office, Chief Justice Rehnquist rehearsed the oath of office numerous times prior to the inauguration and brought a copy of the oath with him to the podium. Chief Justice Roberts is a meticulous man and has made few public missteps in his life; consequently, it is rather incomprehensible that he should botch his participation in one of the most important events in the history of this country.”
Interesting comparison and observation.
Posted by: pefros | January 21, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
Obama took the oath again,today.
And it was obvious that Obama was not happy with Biden’s negative comment.
Biden is already destroying a positive start with negative comments.
Obama would do well to get rid of Biden.
Expect more Biden screw-ups. He can’t control himself and will be a black spot on the Obama administration with his conduct and comments
Posted by: Eric | January 21, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Ryan C:
“”No, he didn’t. He said that the VP is the president of the senate in the case of a tied vote.”
No. He stated the only duty of the VP in the senate is to vote in a tie break. ”
What Biden actually said in the debate:
“And the primary role of the vice president of the United States of America is to support the president of the United States of America, give that president his or her best judgment when sought, and as vice president, to preside over the Senate, only in a time when in fact there’s a tie vote. The Constitution is explicit.”
Note that
1. the Constitution dosent say explicitly or otherwise that a VP is supposed to give best judgment.
2. The Vice President is *always* the President of the Senate.
The only two functions of the office described in the Constitution are to take over as President and to serve as the President of the Senate.
Any actual executive jobs are assigned by the POTUS.
“Caribou Barbie” said that she was going to use the role to advance the President’s agenda in the Senate. By the way that was the traditional role of the early VP’s who had their office at the Senate.
That is also the role that Biden saw for himself as articulated at the debate:
“I would be the point person for the legislative initiatives in the United States Congress for our administration.”
So in essence Biden and Palin were proposing to play the same role as VP.
Posted by: BertieW | January 21, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
President Obama didn’t particularly like VP Biden’s attempt at humor because President Obama is President and acts like one.
I on the other hand thought Biden was pretty funny.
. . .. poor John Roberts’ .. .one of the biggest days in American history and he blows the only few lines he’s given. I have to presume he’s apologized in private for his slip up . … wonder if he’ll acknowledge publicly.
Posted by: pefros | January 21, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
“one of the biggest days in American history”
Maybe top 100. The guy hasnt done anything yet.
Posted by: BertieW | January 21, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
I was very surprised how the chief justice of the United States make mistakes in this historic inauguration. I hope it is not intentional. Not only that, I didn’t like the vice president Jo Biden’s comment either.
Posted by: Kassa | January 21, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
Joe, do that again and I will lock you up in Guantanamo!
Signed,
ABE
P.S….Mr. President Obama, better put your emergency order in for a case of duck-tape. You are going to need it for your co-pilot, Joe.
Posted by: Abe Lincoln | January 21, 2009, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
Very inapprpriate to make fun of such a solemn event… Very inappropriate!
Posted by: Holly | January 21, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
OMG Biden was so funny that was awesome!
Posted by: robin | January 21, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
It wasn’t Chief Justice Roberts who botched it. Any unbiased person watching would notice Obama jumping in before Roberts could finish his phrases.
What do you do with someone who had difficulty memorizing/ saying 2 phrases? Didn’t Obama practice at all the night before?
Posted by: BJ | January 21, 2009, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
Lighten up people! Biden is known for making some serious wisecracks. Clearly he was trying to be funny and not insulting! I mean he makes a point!
Posted by: Givemeabreak | January 21, 2009, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
I did not vote for President Obama, but he gave me some hope with his reaction to Biden’s snippet at Chief Justice Roberts mistake administering the Presidential Oath, I appreciated the his shaking of his head and giving the impression that he thought such a comment was uncalled for and unnecessary. Perhaps he understands that is not the way to unify support….I believe Biden is going to make it difficult on President Obama to unify various groups of people with his lose lips and poor attitude.
Posted by: Jody Britt | January 21, 2009, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Though I didn`t vote for him , President Obama is a class act as he kept a poker-face as Mr. Biden was making a stupid remark. Kudos to President Obama.
Posted by: Sammy | January 21, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
God forbid anything happens to President Obama , for Joe Biden is nothing but a clown.
Posted by: Sammy | January 21, 2009, 10:52 pm 10:52 pm
How can this phony Biden talk trash about John Roberts? He switched two words and he probably only did that because Obambi didn’t even let him finish the first sentence. Not much mention about that from the press though. God forbid they ever call out HIS mistakes.
Posted by: Ryan | January 21, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
Chief Justice Roberts made an unacceptable mistake. Either of my kids would have done a better job. My son is brilliant and my daughter would be slow and deliberate.
Posted by: NJ | January 22, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am
President Obama and Cheif Justice Roberts are both human. As humans we make errors and should accept this as both men concerned did with dignity and humour.
God Bless President Obama and Chief Justice Roberts and God Bless the United States of America.
From Melbourne, Australia.
Posted by: Duncan McKenzie | January 22, 2009, 1:25 am 1:25 am
I think the senior white house correspondent from abc should know that john Roberts isn’t the chief justice of the supreme court, he’s the chief justice of the UNITED STATES! Maybe the entire white house needs a change. And Obama the oath of office hasn’t changed for many years.
Posted by: anonymous | January 22, 2009, 1:33 am 1:33 am
Why would anyone pillory Joe, William LePetomane? He is the most enormous source of unintentional hilarity we’re going to have for 4 years – the man has the worst case of foot in mouth disease ever, and he’s all ours for 4 years! I can’t wait for it!
Posted by: Anniee451 | January 22, 2009, 3:37 am 3:37 am
Shannon: “I am getting wary of what the hell this country just did I hope I am not apologizing for voting for Obama/Biden in 4 years.”
You should be apologizing now.
Posted by: Anniee451 | January 22, 2009, 3:49 am 3:49 am
In his inaugural address, President Obama quoted Scripture when he said “the time has come to set aside childish things.” Then all of the Obama supporters booed Bush/Cheney at the innaguration as Obama criticised the outgoing administration in a final shot of pure-partisanship. Now his “team” is making fun of a surpreme court justice. NICE. The Bush team, for whatever you think of them, was entirely classy & obliging to the incomming Obama team….this is the payback they get…Booing a man in wheelchair. Classy. To all of you who voted for Obama this is your team, your legacy.
Posted by: jodi | January 22, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am
I DID NOT VOTE FOR OBAMA FOR THAT REASON, BIDEN, I HAVE COME TO LIKE HOW OBAMA HANDLES HIMSELF AND I HOPE AND PRAY THE HE DOES A GREAT JOB AND THAT HE AND HIS FAMILY STAY SAFE. GOD BLESS AND GOOD LUCK MR. PRESIDENT.
Posted by: KATHY K | January 22, 2009, 10:07 am 10:07 am
Classless, no integrity and childish. Both of the Bidens need to be briefed on protocol. Mrs. Biden went on Oprah and blundered her way such that her husband had to shush her. Now the VP had to be shushed by the President. At least Obama had the decency to be upset by Biden’s comments on Justice Roberts and he had the guts to show it.
Posted by: chotolal7 | January 22, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am
“The Bush team, for whatever you think of them, was entirely classy & obliging to the incomming Obama team”
The Bush team refused to allow the Obamas the use of the Blair House until last week because of prior commitments.
They were lying and had to rush in John Howard to stay there.
So Bush pal and former PM of Australia took precedence over our President Elect being in a secure location.
Posted by: Ryan C | January 22, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
Hi from Ireland. Congratulations on your new President. I think you all should get over the oath thing. Justice Roberts is a good an honourable man. Let him be. Your new President is alos a man of integrity and honour who has taken this whole mix up in good humour without a comlaint. he has been gracious to Justice Roberts……God bless them both. Joe Biden is a different issue…….Let’s just hop God spares your wonderful President Barack Obama for many years to come. The thought of ‘President Biden’ gives me shivers!! God Bless you America
Posted by: Mary | January 22, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
Please excuse my typos…….we are all human it seems!!
Posted by: Mary | January 22, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Who cares about Justice Roberts stumble? I for one am just overjoyed that we in America have a real President again and we will hopefully restore reason, rationality, and intellect to its rightful place. Good riddance to the Religious Right Republican neo-con Bush regime. Eight long years of HELL is finally over!
Posted by: Mark | January 22, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
Oh come on, that was funny. I like Biden’s sense of humor. I am sure it got him over many a rough patch in his life. It wasn’t said maliciously, so let’s take it as it was said, and that was with humor at a mistake at a very serious, but happy, moment.
Posted by: Sarah Who? | January 22, 2009, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
Say it isn’t so Joe!…May I suggest a few lessons in diplomacy, ethiquete and decorum and a few more lessons on professional respect. Thats right, and I am not even a democrat.
Posted by: Get Real | January 23, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
I think Obama didn’t like Biden bringing it up because he knew that he was also part of the gaffe by responding before Roberts finished the first part of the oath. Watch the video.
Posted by: LongT | January 23, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
Right until President Obama chose to toss his ETHICS out the window, I just shook my head at the ignorance of Joe Biden’s comment, let’s add arrogance. It is business as usual in Washington.
Posted by: Deborah | January 23, 2009, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
`Joe Biden and his wife’s first impressions with media “just stellar”. they just keep the insult train rumming. We all know JOE Biden lives for the sound of his own voice but it would prudent to THINk before you speak, both of you!
Posted by: Deborah | January 25, 2009, 4:11 am 4:11 am
Sarah Palin not qualified to be Vice-President? I seriously question Obama’s competence as President for picking that bungler. He is an embarrassment to this country, not just to Obama.
Posted by: we_are_not_amused | January 25, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
By the way, President Obama looked about as disgusted by Biden’s words as everybody else was. You don’t gratuitously insult the Chief Justice of the United States. I wonder if President Obama wishes he had picked Sarah Palin as V.P.? There is something about keeping one’s friends close and enemies closer, but what does it say about keeping fools close?
Posted by: we_are_not_amused | January 25, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
I know President Obama chose Mr. Biden for a reason. The media makes a mountain out of a mole hill… and so do a lot of you. Mr. Biden is who he is… It is okay to have a different personality… and Judge Roberts probably wasn’t offended by the comment. I think everyone is reading in to the small tap on the elbow… I think it just meant.. lets get on with it… we have a lot to do… nothing more. Barak is just a serious guy.. and probably a little tired. Just leave it alone already. It is not an issue. I am sure Joe Biden has a lot of great qualities… Barak wouldn’t have chosen some dummy. He may be rough around the edges.. whatever…
Posted by: Robin | January 26, 2009, 4:08 am 4:08 am
Indignation is greatly over-represented in web comments.
Posted by: John Dalmas | April 4, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm
I don’t get it. He makes an innocent joke and people goes wild. What is this?
Posted by: Anne K | April 10, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm