Clinton open to more engagement with Iran
ABC News’ Kirit Radia reports: Secretary of State Hillary Clinton today held the door open for more engagement with Iran, echoing remarks made last night by President Barack Obama. She also said the United States is willing to scrap a planned missile defense program in Eastern Europe if Iran changes its behavior.
"There is an opportunity for the Iranian government to demonstrate a willingness to unclench their fist and to begin a serious and responsible discussion about a range of matters. We still persist in our view that Iran should not obtain nuclear weapons, that it would be a very unfortunate course for them to pursue. And we hope that there will be opportunities in the future for us to develop a better understanding of one another and to work out a way of talking that would produce positive results for the people of Iran," Clinton told reporters at the State Department, where she spoke alongside Czech Foreign Minister Karel Schwarzenberg, whose country holds the 6-month rotating EU presidency.
Last night at his first prime time news conference, President Obama told reporters, "My national security team is currently reviewing our existing Iran policy, looking at areas where we can have constructive dialogue, where we can directly engage with them. And my expectation is, in the coming months, we will be looking for openings that can be created where we can start sitting across the table, face to face, diplomatic overtures that will allow us to move our policy in a new direction."
Soon thereafter, Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad responded positively, saying his country was willing to talk with the United States, but wanted fundamental changes in American behavior first.
Clinton also signaled that a planned Missile Defense Shield in Poland and the Czech Republic, said to be a defense against a missile or even nuclear strike from Iran, may not be necessary if Iran changes its behavior. Her remarks signal what could be another carrot for Tehran to change its behavior as the U.S. and its allies look to prevent Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons.
"If the Iranians continue on this path, certainly one of the options for free countries, like the Czech Republic, other Europeans and the United States, is to defend ourselves. So this is one of those issues that really will rest with the decisions made by the Iranian government," Clinton said.
"If we are able to see a change in behavior on the part of the Iranians with respect to what we believe to be their pursuit of nuclear weapons, you know, then – you know, we will reconsider where we stand. But we are a long, long way from seeing such evidence of any behavior change," she added.
Email
CPAC: Romney Struggles to Convince Voters
Obama Backs Off Birth Control Battle?
All one can do is hope you can make someone dee the light, convince them their way is the wrong way, and maybe we can live in peace if they would give it a try.
Posted by: Rose Szymanski | February 10, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
So, who is in charge of foreign policy? Biden appears to be interacting with Iran, Afghanistan and Israel. Holbrooke and Jones are interacting with Pakistan and Afghanistan. Christopher Hill is interacting with Iraq. Susan Rice has a Cabinet position. They all appear to report to Obama. Hillary seems to be left out of the loop, no? Is the bus going to run over her?
Posted by: Sigmonde | February 10, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
Rose Szymanski – That is the problem we tell them that their way is wrong. let them figure out what is best for themselves. Set a good example for others to emulate as Dr. Paul says, but don’t force your values on them. I am glad Clinton finally sees the light.
Posted by: Huh | February 10, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
Iran will talk all the while at the same time they are launching missle strikes into America.
Posted by: pester | February 10, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
Yeah Sigmonde, let’s keep American foreign policy in limbo, with a stooge like Rice pushing the administration line no matter what. Heaven forbid we let “qualified” people speak for America, let’s stay “our way or the highway” for the rest of the world. It’s worked so very, very well for 8 years……..
Posted by: JR | February 10, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
If they ever get a warhead and if they ever get a delivery system, then pinheads like you can worry, but since that would be years in the future (assuming they really want to commit suicide) you should be getting more overheated by the current lack of mental heath coverage in America, it’s much more pertinent to you.
Posted by: JR | February 10, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
I’m sorry, looks like I meant “pester”:
If they ever get a warhead and if they ever get a delivery system, then pinheads like you can worry, but since that would be years in the future (assuming they really want to commit suicide) you should be getting more overheated by the current lack of mental heath coverage in America, it’s much more pertinent to you.
Posted by: JR | February 10, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
The most striking comment in Obama’s “economic fright-fest” press conference was the President’s statement that his administration and Iran, a state sponsor of terror, may soon find a way to interact with “mutual respect.” Perhaps President Obama can respect a regime that stones women for adultery, tortures and imprisons homosexuals, calls for the destruction of the Jewish state, ships weapons into Iraq to kill American soldiers, and supports terrorist groups dedicated to that goal and to killing Americans everywhere. If so, the American public is unlikely to share his feelings.
Posted by: Compassion for Mordor | February 11, 2009, 9:13 am 9:13 am
Maybe she’ll send Chelsea there as an exchange student? Of course, the Mullahs might get confused and think it’s Amy Carter…
Posted by: Grand Old Party | February 12, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm