Obama Wins Economic Approval, Despite Deficit Woes
(Updated with additional material at 3:30 p.m. – check here for our full poll at 5 p.m.)
A month into his presidency six in 10 Americans approve of Barack Obama’s handling of the dominant issue of the day – the nation’s economy. But the bipartisanship he’s championed is badly lacking.
A new ABC News/Washington Post poll finds that Obama draws 60 percent approval for handling the economy – a smashing 36 points higher than George W. Bush’s final rating on the same issue. But the partisan gap in this assessment is vast: While 83 percent of Democrats approve of Obama’s economic work, just 24 percent of Republicans agree. That underscores the challenges Obama faces not just on his economic package, but in reaching successfully across hard-set party lines.
Political allegiance isn't the only dividing line on Obama's economic performance, arguably the single most important metric of his month-old presidency. Age is another: Young adults, central to Obama's election campaign, are by far the most supportive of his work on the economy – 72 percent approve, compared with just 51 percent of middle-aged Americans, 40 to 49, his weakest age group on the issue.
And there's income: Among people with less than $50,000 in household incomes, two-thirds approve of Obama's handling of the economy. Among those with incomes over $100,000, that slides to 50 percent. Two possible reasons: Better-off Americans are more apt to be Republicans. And in they're in Obama's crosshairs on taxes.
Full results of the poll, completed last night, will be released at 5 p.m.
Other results find that Obama’s summit today on government spending comes at a time of heightened public concern about the federal budget deficit – especially among critics of his $787 billion stimulus program.
Eighty-seven percent of Americans are concerned about the deficit, as near unanimity as might be possible on a political issue. That includes 59 percent who are "very" concerned about it – up 10 points in two months as Obama took office and pushed his stimulus plan through Congress.
The increase in high-level concern about the deficit has occurred entirely among Republicans and Republican-leaning independents, who've tended to be more critical of the stimulus spending, as well as less inclined generally to support the new Democratic administration. In this group the number who say they’re “very concerned” about the deficit has soared from 47 percent in December to 73 percent now.
Among people who strongly oppose the stimulus plan – again, chiefly Republicans – even more, 81 percent, say they’re highly concerned about the deficit.
"Very concerned" about the deficit Now Dec. 14 All 59% 49Republicans 73 47Democrats 50 51
Obama is holding a summit at the White House today with 130 invited participants to discuss the federal budget deficit, including the federal obligations to Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid. He’s said he aims to cut the deficit in half in the next four years, mainly by reducing spending on the Iraq war, reversing a tax cut on better-off Americans and streamlining government operations.
Update:
The agenda for Obama’s summit includes Social Security and Medicare, two critical programs whose financial integrity is in broad doubt. Just 39 percent of Americans are confident Social Security will be able to pay them their full benefits throughout their retirement; about the same number, 37 percent, think they’ll get adequate health coverage from Medicare. And the numbers who are “very confident” of these dives to 11 and 8 percent, respectively.
On this the lines aren’t so much partisan as generational. Among people currently of retirement age, 65 and over, 78 percent are confident they’ll get their full Social Security benefits. But among adults approaching retirement, age 50 to 64, that drops sharply, to 44 percent. And among those under age 50 just 25 percent expect full retirement benefits from the program.
On Medicare, moreover, fewer seniors, 67 percent, expect adequate benefits throughout their retirement, and that plummets to three in 10 adults under age 65.
It matters in terms of confidence in retirement assets overall: There’s a strong relationship between Americans’ expectations that they’ll receive full Social Security and Medicare benefits and their confidence that they’ll have adequate resources in their retirement years.
Email
Best Commencement Speeches of 2012
Joe Biden Recalls Death of Wife, Daughter
When will the public reconcile their growing support for the stimulus spending with their equally burgeoning demand for a more balanced budget? They simply don’t add up.
Posted by: matt | February 23, 2009, 8:23 am 8:23 am
Translation: Deficit spending OK only is the president is a Republican.
Posted by: OGLiberal | February 23, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
“…only IF…”
Posted by: OGLiberal | February 23, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm
This is getting out of hand. the spending the Demos are lining up is pretty daunting.
Now it seems a $Trillion or so is pocket change.
this is starting to get worry some. One 911 type attack right now takes the USA down hard.
What if China quits buying our debt?
Pretty soon states will have to secede from the union to survive.
Posted by: OnlyinTEXAS | February 23, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
I’m really sick of hearing Obama say that he “inherited” this deficit. He voted in favor for much of what he “inherited”. He needs to quit trying to convince the American people he is our “economic saviour” when he is partly responsible for this mess to begin with from his time as Senator!
Bail-outs DON’T WORK!!! Nobody ever wins when you rob Peter to pay Paul!
Posted by: Democratic Capitalist | February 23, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm
Amazing. 87% of Americans are now worried about the deficit and now Obama suddenly wants to cut it by 2/3 in FY 2009.
Posted by: mm | February 23, 2009, 1:54 pm 1:54 pm
OGLiberal, no actually deficit spending is bad regardless of which party does it. I think the concern is that President Obama is spending several times more than President Bush ever did.
Posted by: Open-Mind | February 23, 2009, 1:55 pm 1:55 pm
Stupid question. You’d be an idiot if you weren’t concerned with the deficit. The better question would be whether you believed a deficit now is worth the investment to get this country moving forward again. Republicans will universally say no because they do not see any government spending as investment. Democrats will say yes because they see most government spending as an investment. I am an Independent….given the state of the economy left by the previous administration investment is necessary and worth short term deficits. The size of the deficit is in proportion with the gigantic mess left behind.
Posted by: indy_voter | February 23, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
as a black Man I’m still trying to understand how you all desenters can PLACE the BLAME for this ECONOMY MESS on President Obama, when President Bush is the one who was in charge for the last EIGHT YEARS, Mr Obama just took office last month and you are blaming him only because he wants to expose the truth; you see Mr Bush kept you blind and n the dark, now that the light has come to town most of you can’t stand to see yourself
Posted by: vern | February 23, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
It is beyond disengenous of the Republicans to suddenly fiegn concern for the deficit that they created. They are fooling no one. These are serious times, and the republicans with few acceptions have proven once again, that they just don’t get it.
Chenny exclaimed: “Deficits don’t matter”….and Wolfowitz exclaimed “we need to drown the federal government in the bathtub”….
The Neocons logic is flawed. They are simpley do nothing offer no solution ideologues.
I am in the building industry, and I am here to tell you that you would be hard pressed to find a builder, developer, contractor who is not thrilled to see some of this stimulus money.
The Republicans just voted against the largest tax cut in history.
So which is it? They are simpley just disagreeble creatures.
Posted by: Mark in Florida | February 23, 2009, 1:58 pm 1:58 pm
“We are at the verge of bankruptcy, we are moving into a New Era, believe it or not, with the dollar and our economy and the world economy. This is a New Era.” — Ron Paul; January 24, 2008
Sad but true. This debt will crush us.
Posted by: Huh | February 23, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
Get even sicker please, because the reality is that the previous administration, that is the Republicans ran up a 5 trillion dollar deficit, and he didn’t bother to balance the budget or give the American people an explanation! Maybe the republicans should have not robbed Peter to pay Paul for their upper 1% tax cuts in a time of war, thus neglecting our country in whole. It appears that Republicans are confused, or just dishonest with a few that they can continue to feed Mountain Dew.
Posted by: sngeorgia | February 23, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm
President Obama is not spending anywere near what Bush spent. The fact of the matter is Republicans spend FAR more than Democrats. The national debt was just under $1 trillion when Reagan took office. When Clinton took office, the national debt was at $3 trillion. The debt rose slightly during Clinton’s tenure but mostly due to interest accruing, and he actually paid down $600 billion on the debt and balanced the budget, something no Republican President has done since the 19th century. Bush increased the national debt by another $5 trillion, putting it a little over the $8 trillion Obama now has to deal with. No one likes spending, but please, don’t put it on the Democrats.
Posted by: facts | February 23, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
Little late for republicans to be worried now. They spent almost 10 trillion dollars in 8 years during bush’s term. The democrats would have to start spending 1.25 trillion per year just to match them. RIP GOP
Posted by: rightbehind | February 23, 2009, 2:04 pm 2:04 pm
OGLiberal, no actually deficit spending is bad regardless of which party does it.
========================================
So, everyone should pay cash and never be in a deficit. No credit cards. No mortgages! No college loans! No car loans! Cash for everything. If you don’t have enough money to pay cash well tough luck. Just as it is unrealistic for people to not have deficit spending the same goes for governments. The question is not whether it is deficit spending but whether it is deficit spending that will reap rewards for the economy later on.
Posted by: indy_voter | February 23, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
Why should the govt. take care of anyone’s retirement? Or health care. These programs weren’t always available but people have come to depend on them and that is just plain stupid. Is it any wonder you see so many older people having to work, it is because they thought they could get by on $600 a month and never bothered to think about the future. If none of these entitlement programs were around we wouldn’t be facing these financial catastrophes. They don’t even put these programs on the books and they haven’t for years so no one ever knows the real cost to our country.
Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | February 23, 2009, 2:09 pm 2:09 pm
The level of republican hypocrisy no longer amazes me. It’s sad, but expected.
Posted by: libertyrulz | February 23, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Any republican who rails against Obama for the deficit has not been paying attention for the past 8 years. Bushie Jr. ran up the deficit by over $5 trilion dollars, and 6 or those years the repubs had majorities in the congress. Junior cut taxes to win votes but he and the repubs didn’t control spending (again to win votes): they just ran up the deficit, figuring it would be someone else’s problem after Junior left office. What is needed is a balanced budget amendment to the constitution. You cannot trust politicians to be fiscally responsible — the 8 years of Bushie Jr. has taught us that.
Posted by: Chuck Wavy Dean | February 23, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Democratic Capitalist, most of the deficit increase is related to two wars and Obama had nothing to do with those. Bush said the Iraq war would cost $50B and it is likely to cost $2T. Who in their fiscally right mind would cut taxes to the richest at the time of starting two wars? It never has happened before. This is Bush’s fault and it is also the fault of those who only seem to have learned how to complain since Obama got into office.
Posted by: jack | February 23, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Where the HECK were these people while republicans ran it up so much under Bush? It sounds to me like they’re only worried if a democrat is spending it.
Posted by: FedUp | February 23, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
Chuck Wavy Dean, FedUp – Ron Paul stood against the republican’s spending. He voted against the Iraq war and has never voted for an unbalanced budget. He now questions Obama’s spending policies. I see no hypocrisy in Ron Paul’s statements. At least there is one republican. For the others though, you are right, they have renewed their supposed fiscal conservatism now that a dem is in the White House.
Posted by: Huh | February 23, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
It’s all the Republicans fault. No, it’s all the Democrats fault. No, it’s his faulit, no her fault, no their fault. You bunch of boobs. Always looking to see who to blame when all you have to do is look in the mirror.
Posted by: Lee | February 23, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
So, Republicans are not too concerned about the deficit when we’re spending the money on a war of choice in Iraq, but they’re worried about spending money on American citizens? So, it’s fine to spend money on Iraq’s people and infrastructure, but it’s “irresponsible” to extend unemployment benefits for American families struggling to put food on the table, or “pork” to devote money for infrastructure in our own country?
Posted by: TruthSeekr | February 23, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
Only 50% of the dems are very concerned about the deficit because the other 50% are living off the taxpayers already and all they want is more government hand outs that someone else has to pay for…..
Posted by: atlanta3430 | February 23, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm
We are screwed and we all know it. Obama should go back to Chicago. They like him there.
Posted by: b | February 23, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
Vern, Mark in Florida and FedUp: I AGREE.
I’m a 60 year old white woman and I don’t care what color a person is, it’s what’s inside. Pres. Obama is doing the right thing…he is intelligent and trying to straigten out his horrible mess left by Bush and Company. Perhaps if some of these Republicans hollered as much when Bush was in charge there wouldn’t be a huge mess. and Yes it IS Bush’s fault. He had a Repub. congress for six years. This did not happen over night. And when the Dems had the majority it was by one. Bush was in charge or should I say Cheney and the did nothing…Where were they this past Oct. Nov., Dec and Jan?
Be glad we now have a President who speaks well and we can all understand him and he wants to talk to everyone and involve everyone not just stand idly by and watch his rich friends on Wall Street rob us blind.
Posted by: Barb | February 23, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
OMG – The Democrats have all the power & they are still blaming the Republicans….UNBELIEVABLE!
Posted by: STANDOURGROUND | February 23, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Truth Seeker: And you are right also. Yup it’s ok to bomb Iraq for no reason, then spend tons of money to rebuild it, but when our own country needs it that’s another story.
Posted by: Barb | February 23, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Truth Seeker: And you are right also. Yup it’s ok to bomb Iraq for no reason, then spend tons of money to rebuild it, but when our own country needs it that’s another story.
Posted by: Barb | February 23, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Jack- The deficit spending has nothing to do with the war. In fact, most of the money spent in Iraq comes back to the United States. The deficit is the result of massive spending on entitlement programs over that last 30 years.
Posted by: mm | February 23, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
The size of the national debt is too large regardless of how we got there. Now lets stop making it bigger and figure out how to reduce it so we do not continue to mortgage our future. We are already paying $200 Billion a year (about 5% of our budget) on interest and that is going to go up very soon with this stimulus borrowing.
Congress is a bunch of drunken sailors on leave with money and none of them could run a lemonade stand and make a profit even if the lemonades, the cups and the location were free.
Posted by: jim 234 | February 23, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
OMG – The Republicans caused all this & they are trying to blame Obama… UMBELIEVABLE!!
Posted by: bajacalla | February 23, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
What am I missing here? 87% are concerned, 59% are very concerned, and 50% of Democrats are very concerned, but “almost all of the concern coming from Republicans”?
This is an American people concern, not a Republican concern.
Posted by: Scott | February 23, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
Obama seems to have short term and long term goals. The stimulus plan is just that, a means to stimulate the economy and help keep people employed until the markets sort themselves out. A short term solution to a crisis that also allows us to invest in infrastructure and innovation that we will need in the future. This the short term approach. Long term he has said continually that we need to balance our budget by cutting inefficient government programs, pay-as-you-go government, and yes raising taxes back to where they were at under Clinton for the wealthy. The long term goal involves getting our government to be fiscally responsible. These two things are not a contradiction, and only those that allow themselves a strict non-bending ideological approach would interpret it as so. Ideology should become the new dirty word in politics as there is no black and white situation. Government should have some flexibility, allowing spending at times and fiscal responsibility at others so they can respond to crisis and good times. Strict ideology fails to allow one to adapt to the punches that invariably will land at some time.
Posted by: Ordermonger | February 23, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
The US Government is not a business. It has nothing to give. Any money that any citizen recieves has been loaned to us from China w/ a running interest rate. Use your brain. Make due and survive with less. Don’t be weak and stupid by willingly destroying your own country for short term relief.
Posted by: sunder111 | February 23, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Bedwetters,…You think spending another Trillion dollars is good for the deficit? Looking at the poll Democrats numbers have not changed much,since they are the Tax and spend party,why should they?They don’t pay taxes or are on welfare & food stamps,which Obama just increased,so Welfare will expand in the states and more will become dependent on the Government and Tax payers for their existence…Bush is gone now Obama is going to fix it? Hope you do not get tired of standing in line for Free Bubble-up and Rainbow stew.
Posted by: lash larue | February 23, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Let’s start at the beginning and give Clinton some credit for the housing crisis we are in now. His administration is the one that pushed Fanny Mae to lower the lending practices and give people loans who should have never been given one to start with! That was the beginning of all of this! Let’s see… yes, the war cost A LOT of money. War costs money…. the alternative… let the terrorists continue to spread fear. I didn’t see very many people against the war after they attacked us on our own soil! I stand behind this war. I was against Bush’s bail-outs and I’m against Obama’s bail-outs. Let the free enterprise system work itself out instead of growing our government!
Posted by: Democratic Capitalist | February 23, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
“The increase in high-level concern about the deficit has occurred entirely among Republicans and Republican-leaning independents,” …
So 87% of the country is Republican then? Then how is it we have a Democratic President and a Democratic majority Congress???
Posted by: Phil | February 23, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
If the USA ever ceases to exist or is taken over by a foreign power, it won’t be because of a military defeat, it will be because of the fiscal irresponsibility of our political leaders. What Bushie Jr. did to the federal deficit while in office is a crime for which he should have been impeached, removed from office and thrown in jail. People — WAKE UP! Write to your elected reporesentatives and DEMAND that they pass a balanced budget amendment to the constitution!
Posted by: Chuck Wavy Dean | February 23, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Obama is turning this country into socialist country, that’s fine but the problem is we are running atop capitalism currently. He is executing a text book chapter, the clashes between him (and his liberal party) and wall street will run so high that we will see Dow hit 5000 this year. Tax the wealthy is not the solution and will certainly not going to work. He figured out he doe not need the top 5% for his vote but he did not understand that this 5% is actually 30% or 40%, future is gloomy and dark…
Posted by: scott | February 23, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Well said Indy_voter. It’s also important to note that Texas started talking about seceding from the union way before Obama was elected – Who cares! – and guess what, whether you’re sick of it or not, he did inherit this mess.
Posted by: guessagain | February 23, 2009, 2:37 pm 2:37 pm
Who do you think pays more taxes in this Country — Democrats or Republicans? There is a good reason why more Republicans are worried about deficit spending! They know they’ll be paying the majority of the bill.
Posted by: Mike | February 23, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
I was against the Bush tax cuts when he institued them. We were just starting to pay off the national debt under Clinton and it was predictable that we would fall into a deficit even without war spending. If Bush truly made the hard decisions like he said he would have raised taxes like his father when we got involved in Afghanistan and Iraq to fund those wars. Instead we have paid almost $1T so far to fund a war in Iraq that was started under false pretenses and has served to help ruin the reputation of the US in the world. Bush placed his reelection above the real needs of the US, unlike his father.
Posted by: Ordermonger | February 23, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
How can he reduce it when in one month he increased it, and Bush took 8 years to do such.
Obama is a used car salesman, and the public fell for it.
Posted by: bpower | February 23, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
“Concerned About the Deficit? You Join 87% of the Nation” – “The skyrocketing increase in worry about the deficit has occurred entirely among Republicans.”
If we were actually to believe these two statements, we would have to conclude that 87% of the nation is Republican! That would be hard to explain in light of the last election’s results!
This article seems filled with some very misleading “numbers” – including poll results showing that only 50% of Democrats but 73% of Republicans are “Very concerned” about the deficit. What were the other categories? Pretty concerned? Quite concerned? Concerned? Concerned-but-I-think-something-else-is-more-critical-right-now?
These poll results also show that less Republicans than Democrats were “Very concerned” back before Christmas. Given eight years of unparalleled deficit spending at a net rate of about $600 billion a year, why are Republicans ONLY NOW catching up with Democrats in their concern over this?
I think the realistic answer must be simply that Republicans no longer feel “in control” to spend the deficit in the ways that THEY WANT! Charging at the Capitol Mall on the national Visa card seems okay when YOU are doing the charging and SOMEBODY ELSE will have to pay all the bills! But it is a whole different ballgame when these roles are reversed!
I think Republicans are MUCH MORE concerned that all this need for emergency deficit spending is going to bring a spotlight to bear on THEIR OWN history of irresponsible fiscal management – since 1981 or before.
Posted by: Jordan | February 23, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Let me see if I get this right? We were alright as long as the GOP said so and we could spend all our children’s money as long as it was for the righteous war and as long as Bush and Company said it was OK. The housing market was OK as long as they said it was OK. The Feds told us the banks were OK so they were. Now that a Dem is President all that is NOT true we have to be very careful and we can’t spend money we can not have a plan. And if we don’t have a plan but depend on the REP governors we will be just fine Oh yes and we need to stop all this pork spending on stuff like kids health care and make them and their unemployed parents pay up or just die. nOw does that about sum it up? No plan and no taxes and help for all those near do wells?
Posted by: Bonnie Kimberly | February 23, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
I am worried that Republicans who have totally lost their moral compass want to hijack the media with their obstructionist rhetoric. We endured 8 years of pure he$$ under the Bush regime and all they want to do is obstruct this President from day one. They just adamantly refuse to cooperate and work together to pick up the broken pieces of this country and find new ways to put it back together that include transparency. They are all about private profit and socialized debts and that is never going to cut it again with the American people. People are talking revolution and they mean it. We need to wipe out both parties from the House and the Senate as they are all part of the corruption problem and we need to outlaw lobbyists or thiings will never improve.
Posted by: eyeonyou | February 23, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Not until Obama stops the Clinton policy of giving houses away for free will America recover. Bush should’ve done it; now its Barrack’s turn.
Posted by: Brent | February 23, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Obama inherited an aweful situation but he is only making it worse. First of all our Constitution doesn’t authorize the President to make laws or policy. The Executive(President) is supposed ENFORCE the laws while the Legislative(Congress)CREATES the laws, and the Judiciary(Supreme Court) INTERPRETS laws to decide if they are Constitutional. Obama is up in the White House making laws with Executive Orders and a democratically controlled Congress like he is King or Dictator of America. Bush did the same thing and I called him out on it too. Obama is supposed to be a Constitutional lawyer which would make one think that he would understand and give a @#$% about the document he studied and now took an oath to defend. The Constitution cleary states that Congress can only tax the people directly “for the general welfare of the people” and such tax MUST BE reapportioned EQUALY to all Americans, not some or those that he thinks needs it. He can’t spend my tax money on bailing people out of their houses, it’s Constitutionally illegal and immoral.
Posted by: Gabulldawg79 | February 23, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Of course it only concerns Republicans . . . most Democrats are hard core socialists and couldn’t care less if the country becomes another Cuba.
Posted by: rplat | February 23, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
We’re doomed there is no way out of it pretty soon they’ll take over the banks, the media. (Socialism)here we come….Change
Posted by: Spark | February 23, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
How ironic that Obama passes the largest spending bill in American history,increasing the government’s responsibility to assistance programs,and then a week later he acts like he cares about fiscal responsibility.How can he possibly tell the NYT that he will half the deficit by the end of his term?I’ll tell you what he will claim;after the spending money is gone,he will let the Bush tax cuts expire,raise everyone’s taxes and business taxes to try to cut his trillion $ deficit.What would the deficit be if we didn’t accept this muti-trillion $$ spending spree? Obama is still acting like he’s campaigning and wrapping the media around his finger.Did we see any media covering the Americans in Denver and Phoenix who were PROTESTING the spending bill? NO,all we saw were Obama’s puppets that were cheering their hero on,but a majority of Americans were against his spending bill.
Posted by: kim | February 23, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
One needs only to go back 33 days ago to the Bush regime to know what happened. I don’t hear them complaining about the billions upon billions spent in Iraq, a war based on total and complete fabrications.
Posted by: ronnierayjenkins | February 23, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Brent: Under “the Clinton policy of giving houses away for free” WE DID NOT HAVE A DEFICIT!!! Clinton turned over an economy with a BUDGET SURPLUS. Bush gave that surplus away in the form of tax cuts that really only benefited his rich cronies, and then started TWO WARS: one for the right reason and the other for purely personal vengeance and greed. Under the Bush regime, the deficit went from $0 to trillion$ in little more than a year.
Posted by: Jordan | February 23, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
The country won’t become like Cuba. There will be a revolution though. Hard working Americans are tired of the entitleist mentality and will unite. Our government is corrupt and everyone in it needs to go. Big government does not work in a democracy.
Posted by: bo | February 23, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Isn’t it ironic that the Republicans weren’t that worried about the deficit two to three years ago, when their man Bush took a surplus and blew it while bloating the government. Now, all I hear is Obama is wrong from the ultra right Republican leaders, but all they offer is the same old solutions that got us into this mess in the first place. Maybe they should offer solutions and work together to solve this problem instead of trying to block any effort to bring America out of this financial hole. They won’t, because they’ve blocked themselves into a corner. Too bad, America deserves better.
Posted by: algwriter | February 23, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
So, NOW all of a sudden the Republicans are concerned about the deficit ?!?! Regardless of whether the president is a democrat or a republican, I just Thank God that GW couldn’t run for a 3rd term so the lemmings could vote him in again…The gene pool is a goner. This has been coming since we started opening factories on foreign soil 50 years ago, we went off the gold standard 40 years ago, stopped the draft 30 years ago to disgrace the thousands who paved the way for our present-day lethargy and somewhere along the way, we also decided not to pay the extra $1.50 for American built cars so we could maintain our economy and everyone expects some kind of quick fix and an $80,000 job right out of college ?. I wish everyone all over the world would move here just to drink the milk and never feed the cow…I’m ashamed of all of you. Should I send you some cheese to go with your wine ? – The Justified Cynic
Posted by: God Help Us All... | February 23, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
For all those who want to blame it on Bush – the Democrats were in charge of Congress the last two years and had to approve all of the spending including Obama as a Senator. They hold as much responsibility as Bush. There is plenty of blame to go around for all parties. The blame game is getting very old. It is time for Obama to take responsibility for his actions and move forward, not look back. The deficit spending is a major concern.
Posted by: Concerned | February 23, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
Obama can just run those money-printing presses and print more money to pay off the debt of the US. Easy as pie! The rule is supposed to be “don’t TELL anyone you’re printing lots of money,” though. Them telling the world could cause inflation if the US didn’t control certain banks.
Posted by: Mister X | February 23, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Yes Obama inherited SOME debt. But why he is trying to make people think it wasn’t him and the democratic control legislature that approved how many bailouts in the last year? Now that he has paid off most of his ‘campaign debts’ he become concerned about spending? Its just more hot air like we’ going to have transparancy.
Posted by: deanbob | February 23, 2009, 3:14 pm 3:14 pm
Just for the record, I was concerned about the deficit before the current financial meltdown. I was concerned about the billions of dollars being spent in Iraq on our “glorious war.” I’m still concerned, but I’m happy to see that the money is going to Americans.
Posted by: Wallis Warfield Simpson | February 23, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
I find it a bit hysterical that republicans are concerned about the deficit NOW. really???? Where were you for the past 8 years? During Bush times 300 biLLION dollar bills were nothing, and were FOR nothing, and raised not an eyebrow collectively among you. Oh but NOW that we have to keep from falling into the precipice, NOW you are concerned. Yeah. Too little too late. Go sit in thecorner. The whole deficit problem is YOUR fault, repubs. FDR spent heavilky during the depression. The deficit was never an issue because you should NOT be spending in good times, as Bush was, with all yourblessing. It’s not Obama’s fault he needs to spend NOW. In fact, it’s republicans.
Posted by: Frank | February 23, 2009, 3:18 pm 3:18 pm
The poll seems to suggest that only Republicans are concerned about deficit.
Where were the ‘concerned’ Republicans when they doubled the deficit?
Where were the ‘concerned’ Republicans when thye helped Bush to waste $1 trillion in Iraq?
What a bunch of hyprocrites.
Posted by: BrokerS | February 23, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
OMG – The Democrats have all the power & they are still blaming the Republicans….UNBELIEVABLE!
Posted by: STANDOURGROUND | Feb 23, 2009 2:26:23 PM
****************************************
Thanks for the laugh. All I’ve heard for 8 years is “But! Clinton!!!” So hunker down – it’s going to be a long while for you on this subject. It’s funny how republican’s seem to think they can go from 8 years of blaming Clinton to dogging on the new guy the moment he walks in. Somehow they give a complete pass to the Bush years here.
Posted by: FedUp | February 23, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
Washington has done what it wants (be they democrats or Republicans).When you say Republicans weren’t concerned about spending before now, other than political rhetoric, how does one back that up with any facts. Just because Bush and the GOP control legislature spent like democrats does mean that weren’t MANY Republicans expressing their unhappiness about it. Did Washington listen whe the voters said no to the first bailout? And the second?
Posted by: deanbob | February 23, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
So, let’s add trillions more in bailouts and a trillion more in “stimulus”. This is stranger than fiction.
Posted by: Geo | February 23, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
We all need to STOP putting the blame on the GOP and Democrats and START doing something ourselves to better our economic condition. Stop waiting for a handout and get out there and do something to better your life. You have to work at McDonalds and shop at thrift stores for awhile then so be it but PLEASE stop complaining.
Posted by: vr | February 23, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm
Investing 1$ trillion in the USA is a wonderful investment.
How otherwise would this Nation get out of the economical down spiral the GOP brought us into?
The GOP is the least any reasonable person should even listen to.
Posted by: BrokerS | February 23, 2009, 3:25 pm 3:25 pm
Liberals love to use the term “inherited” – but the fact is that the Obama administration took complete ownership of this mess on January 20th – and has been making things worse since then.
Obama DOUBLED THE BUDGET DEFICIT with a single stroke of his pen when he signed the so-called “stimulus” bill, which will do nothing to help the economy.
So how does Obama plan to cut the budget deficit by half, as he claims? He doesn’t say. But you can be sure a massive tax increase for all Americans is on the horizon – which will drive American businesses into the ground, create massive unemployment, and destroy our economy.
Anyone who has any trust in the Obama administration is a complete and utter fool.
It is high time for a revolution in this country, to purge our government of destructive Liberal ideology.
Posted by: One_American | February 23, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
Amazing that people are finally starting to care about the deficit. We were going bankrupt during the war, spending billions every week, and the deficit didn’t matter to most people as long as they were under the illusion they were being kept “safe” from terrorists.
The sheeple of the USSA seem to only care when it is right in front of their faces, spelled out in triplicate.
Posted by: Max | February 23, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm
Max | Feb 23, 2009 3:27:02 PM….Your last sentence also applies to their level of debt situation.
Posted by: deanbob | February 23, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
deanbob – Go take a gander of the last 10 years on the website Citizen’s Against Government Waste and just look at the bar the republican’s raised on pork (waste, earmarks, whatever you wish to call it.) They completely raised the bar in that area. And it is but one area. Not to mention government grew at an alarming rate under Bush Co. as well. There are your facts.
Posted by: FedUp | February 23, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
oh, PLEASE. I’ve been concerned about deficit spending for YEARS because Bush ran it into the stratosphere. Now a Democrat is in the White House and Republicans want to suddenly make us think that they are the party of fiscal responsiblity and restraint? I realize that the Limbots are stupid enough to fall for it but the rest of us are NOT. And, fyi, I am a moderate Independent.
Posted by: allie08 | February 23, 2009, 3:34 pm 3:34 pm
dan | Feb 23, 2009 3:17:43 PM…..Statistically, who donates more (or their own) money to charities? Hint: its not democrats.
Posted by: deanbob | February 23, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
as a black Man I’m still trying to understand how you all desenters can PLACE the BLAME for this ECONOMY MESS on President Obama, when President Bush is the one who was in charge for the last EIGHT YEARS, Mr Obama just took office last month and you dummys are blaming him only because he wants to expose the truth; you see Mr Bush kept you blind and n the dark, now that the light has come to town most of you can’t stand to see yourself
Posted by: vern
________________________________
The problem vern, is that the Democrats were in control of Congress for the last two years of Bush’s term and that’s when the recession started. Yes, the Democrats DO carry some of the blame.
Yes, Obama is the first black President and that is a milestone, however, nothing is ever a free lunch. With the Presidency, comes a price. The President ALWAYS takes the blame whenever a recession hits. whether the recession is the President’s fault or not.
Posted by: marco | February 23, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Bush really screwed the country up a lot more than any of us could have predicted. Obama has a LOT of work to do just to restore us to where we were when Bush took office.
Posted by: Eric | February 23, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Republicans being concerned about the deficit is like a debutante being concerned that $500 for a roofer is too expensive to fix the leak just after she comes home from her $100K shoe and handbag shopping spree.
Posted by: jeff | February 23, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Market is down another 200 pts today.
Way to go Obama and your porkulas package. The only thing stimulated is your boys pockets that helped you steal the election.
By the way, your boys at ACORN breaking into forclosed homes, saying there going to protect the people. LOL! Get a clue, you don’t pay your mortgage, your out of your home!
Posted by: jim3857 | February 23, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
Why should people worry, Obama will save us from any issue – especially if you are very bad on personal financial decision making. Multiple credit card overdraft, can’t pay your $2500 mortgage, can’t pay for that extra piece of rock cocaine or oxycodine, no problem. Isn’t that the reason he was elected – to solve all these minor problems. All hail Obama, All hail Obama. Next week will be a worship service for our beloved leader! Newsflash – Obama is Human.
Posted by: Deputy Dawg | February 23, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm
“The problem vern, is that the Democrats were in control of Congress for the last two years of Bush’s term ”
….ahhhh, let’s get a bit more specific. There was a slim democratic mmajority in the house ALONE, not hte ssenate, in the last two years of Bush’s EIGTH term years. Do go on the government site and plot, actually get your EXCEL spreadsheet and PLOT, an XY PLOT of government spending throughout our ENTIRE history, and you will see s omething remarkable with the second bush. Actually, starting with Reagan, and that is SPENDING, runaway spending during republican presidential years starting with Reagan are obscene, but NOTHING compared to when you get to GW Bush. The slope of hte plot goes exponential. And the thing that burns most intelligent folks, is that is was for….what???? what did all the money go???? how are your roads? brigdes? did we go to the moon? did we invent hte atom bomb? Look at the spending during those times we DID have HUGE investments i n innovation or wars, and it’s still NOTHING compares to GW. GW BUSH spend money like nobody else, and all on…nothing. crap. Tax ‘credits” (more like HUGE handouts) to the most wealthy who in turn, invested in a China for a better rate of return. The WORST economic policy possible – ####### money into the wind in tune of trillions, all going to foreign countries so they can build up their businesses to take americna jobs away while Americans fall deeper into debth draining equity out of thier homes for the past 8 years becuase our economy stopped growing. I dont see a whole lot of blame to give ot democrats. Handing out trillions to the most wealthy to invest in China really isn’t a democratic idea. I’m not all hog-wild about all things democrat, believe me, but compared to republicans, their freakn geniuses.
Posted by: frank | February 23, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
the stock market loves this adninistration. we are all in the stock market whether you know it or not. what a shelling i am taking and i played by the rules.time to get out and hoard cash and or gold.the stimulus bill that did not stimulate.
Posted by: catman | February 23, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Its sad how all of you are playing the blame game while the economy is bleeding out. There is plenty of blame to go around: reps, dems, wall st., unions, etc. We all wanted a nut, right?
Now, I’m not looking for an instant fix, but someone better at least STOP THE BLEEDING. I don’t care if they punch their card blue, red or purple, but its now clear that Obama doesn’t have the answer.
How bad must things get before we (dems and reps) admit that Obama doesn’t have the answer and he is just taking blind stabs in the dark by throwing money every which way but loose?
Posted by: tom | February 23, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
The numbers on the poll have more to do with class warfare than political parties. Household incomes at $50k or under are in favor of the way Obama is handling the economy where as it drops to 50% on households making over $100k. I guess you get punished if there are 1 or 2 successful people under 1 roof.
Posted by: Chuck | February 23, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
One_American – The take from others and keep for myself ideology of the so called conservatives is what put us in the position we are in today. The fact of the matter is that Bush (a Republican) “inherited” a budget surplus from a Democratic administration and squandered it on tax cuts for his rich buddies and then added to it with an unnecessary war to keep Cheney’s friends at Halliburton raking in the dough. I think Captain Jack Sparrow and Mr. Gibbs said it best in Pirates of the Caribbean “take what ya can – give nothin back” pretty much sums up the “conservative ideology”.
Posted by: dan | February 23, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm
What’s happening to US? As a nation we are becoming more and more willing to buy into schemes that defy common sense. Why aren’t we DEMANDING that our presidents BALANCE BUDGETS anymore? Not even during a major crisis like this? Obama has promised change and I’ve hoped that change meant financial responsibility too.
Not to even mention balancing the budget while spending like this? What is it, some sort of shame to talk about balancing the books?
Enough is ENOUGH – Demand: Mr. Obama, BALANCE THE BUDGET within your first term in office!
Posted by: Average Joe | February 23, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
I have to laugh at Republicans being “very concerned” about the federal deficit. After G.H.W. Bush raised our National Debt (the accumulation of 8 years of deficit spending), by $5 TRILLION dollars…. MORE THAN ANY OTHER PRESIDENT IN HISTORY!!!…. now the Republicans are “very concerned”. You want to know why they are concerned now????? Because very few Republicans even understand how we got into this HUGE deficit. It didn’t just start with G.H.W. Bush…. it goes back to Ronald Reagan (“lower taxes, but don’t lower expenditures”)…. President Bush I (G.W. Bush), followed EXACTLY in Reagans footsteps…. and G.H.W.Bush followed in his father’s footsteps. Ladies and Gentlemen, an announcement: “THE POLITICAL PARTY OF OUR COUNTRY THAT LIKES TO CALL THEMSELVES “CONSERVATIVE” ARE ACTUALLY THE BIGGEST SPENDERS OF YOUR TAX DOLLARS…. AND HISTORY PROVES IT!
Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | February 23, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
“We all need to STOP putting the blame on the GOP “…no, I think we really need to dig in our heels and make sure it sticks, in fact. I was listening in on an economic roundtable, and read THE ECONOMIST magazine frequently, and it’s unanimous that we need a economic stimulus package, except for folks who do not understand the economy, which seems to be unanimously republicans. Honestly. They do NOT GET what they have done. And that just means they’ll do it again and again and again. One economist said, and I quote ” at least this should put the nail in the casket the idea that simply handing out trillions to the most wealthy creates anything but huge deficits”….well, does it???? I dont think so. I stil l hear “when did a poor man give you a job?” I’ll tell you when, when collectively, all those poor people buy the products that americans make, when those ‘poor’ or middle class people collectively eat in our restaurants, buy US made clothes and US made Ipods or computers. Collectivley the buying power of the middle class and lower class outstrips the most wealthy and what they buy DOES fire up over 75% of our economy. Not to mention that a good number of hte works projects from the depression STILL make MONEY for the counties that own them, such as northeast skiing resorts that were created DURING the depression by works projects, that are STILL owned by the tax payer of their respective counties and STILL bring in profits and revenue year after year. Those poor folks who cut those trees, they bring in jobs, specificallly Gunstock mountain and Sunapee MOuntain ski recreational resorts in NH. Those weren’t good investments, they were GREAT investments! And they provided jobs. NEVER would a republican ever thought of them or supported them, yet here they are, getting revenue to help run their schools by them. Go figure.
Posted by: lov'n skiin in nh | February 23, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
isn’t not balancing the budget basically a continuation of w’s policy??
Posted by: Average Joe | February 23, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Republicans don’t seem to have memories that work. They caused the deficit. Bush and Cheney were in a surplus and by their tax cuts and wasteful spending CAUSED the deficit. Obama is just trying to fix your mess. Unfortunately, it does cost money to repair serious damage.
Since everything the republicans touch turns to disaster, they need to stop touching.
Posted by: ImProgressive | February 23, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
I think it would be more prudent for everyone to concentrate on getting the economy back on solid ground and moving forward first. All the polls show is that the Republican Party lost touch with the majority of us – the middle class.
Posted by: CND FOX | February 23, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
Now that Obama has rewarded poor preformance from the banking, auto and mortgage (borrowers) industry, I get to pay for it. For the pst 21 years, I worked 2 jobs to get ahead. As he raises taxes on those that actually pay taxes, pay out mortgages on time and lived within our means, I’m about ready not to work for others. Why bust my rear to pay off others misdeeds? Maybe I’ll shift gears and be a nonproducer.
Posted by: fedup_11 | February 23, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Bush & Obama both spend like the proverbial sailor on shoreleave. It’s not a democrats vs. republicans issue – it’s whether the politician is pandering to special interests. Both of these guys seem like “pander bears” to me.
Posted by: Mac819 | February 23, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
I see wall street is confident that these packages will not work. the market has plunged again. Watch!! Another trillion will be needed to take it over. Thanks candoers
Posted by: Jim Rod | February 23, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
“isn’t not balancing the budget basically a continuation of w’s policy??
Enough is ENOUGH
– Demand: Mr. Obama, BALANCE THE BUDGET within your first term in office! “………………..there is only one way to balance to the budget 0- get out of Iraq immediately and afghanistan soon there after. But it seems Bush screwed up both so very very badly one, Iraq, we need to leave while it’a a mess, I dont see we havce a choice, but afghanistan i think we need to stick it out as that is where the taliban actually IS. And no, JUST a huge deficit was not GW’s plan, Gw’s plan was a huge deficit caused by war and more war, AND handouts, HUGE handouts, TRILLIONS of dollars in handouts ot the most wealthy, who can then invest it all in China because their economy was growing at 8% while ours grew less than 1%.So even IF Obama s pent as much as bush, which he is not, it’s STILL not the same since Obama’s spending STAYS IN THE US> that ALONE is a HUGE improvement on GW spend-like-hell plan.
Posted by: matt | February 23, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
87%? Give it a little more time and watch the numbers drop as sure as night follows day and as we all sink deeper into this mess brought on by Democrats & Republicans alike. Unfortuantely, Obama is in over his head and is being guided by the same culprits, mostly “Clintonians,” who were probably most responsible for this economic mess (e.g. circa 1998: “Glass-Steagull repeal, deregulation, Fannie Mae Freddie Mac, government forced loans to those who could ill afford mortgages, etc…)
Posted by: leo | February 23, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm
“Open Mind,” You may have an open mind but your facts are terribly wrong. By the time we finally get fully out of Iraq, the sticker price will FAR exceed Obama’s stimulus plan. It’s already >$1 Trillion. And that’s just one of Bush’s programs. The drug entitlement program he put in place will also far outstrip the stimulus plan. You may want to dump on O and cheer for W to your last breath, but at least get your facts right.
Posted by: Reality Check | February 23, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
One_American….. CLEARLY (LOL) you don’t understand the difference between the Annual Federal Deficit and the long term National Debt. Here, let me explain it to you…. over the past 8 years, the Bush Administration has been spending more money than they have been taking in (that’s a “federal deficit”)…. every year, for the past 8 years, that “deficit” has accumulated so high, that our NATIONAL DEBT (Overall what our government has borrowed to pay expenditures)… it rose by $5 TRILLION during the past 8 years. It takes 1,000 Billion to make 1 TRILLION…. so, your hero, G.H.W. Bush…. spent $5,000 Billion in those 8 years (not including the amount that the government did in fact have in revenue to pay the bills). Now, do you really think that Obama can solve this problem just during his first term in office…. G.H.W. Bush spent more money than any other President in the history of our nation. You have to be “not to bright” to think that Obama’s going to fix the NATIONAL DEBT, let alone the annual defecit, within his first couple of months as President.
Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | February 23, 2009, 4:01 pm 4:01 pm
Between what I have to pay for the 8% that bought a home they could not afford and the tax hike they are going to implement here in CA, I think it’s time to move.
Posted by: Chuck | February 23, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
How many of you on here have credit card debt, an ARM, 2 new cars, debt… debt… debt. We can blame government ALL we want, but until everyone takes resposibility for their spending and living beyond their means nothing will change. As long as people think they can LIVE on someone else’s dime and then declare bankruptcy or scream “unfair” treatment because the bank or my employer or whoever screwed me… we are in for a long road ahead. Nobody FORCED anyone to spend money they didn’t have… how about some of us take some resposibility for our own actions and quit claiming to be the VICTIM here! No, it’s the American Way to live it large and then let our government come along and bail us out! We have become the laughing stock of the world! GROW GOVERNMENT GROW! Let’s lose our freedom… one bail-out at a time!
Posted by: Democratic Capitalist | February 23, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
I am in the building industry, and I am here to tell you that you would be hard pressed to find a builder, developer, contractor who is not thrilled to see some of this stimulus money.
Mark,
I dont believe anyone was against the money that is ACTUALLY going to get people to work on REAL jobs! What we are ticked off about is the foolish stupidity & mentality of Emanuel…”Never let a good crisis go to waste!”
THAT IS THE FLAWED LOGIC HERE!
You are in Fla, there are over 750,000 unemployed in your state.
This “stimulator” is supposed to create/save 206,000 jobs in the next 2 years! Do you have any idea how many jobs it will actually create?
You in a great position to answer this question since your one who will be hiring “contruction workers”. Will you hire the best qualified even if they are “white males” ?
OR will you follow Obama’s advisor, Mr Robert Reich….
“And if construction jobs go mainly to white males who already dominate the construction trades, many people who need jobs the most — women, minorities, and the poor and long-term unemployed — will be shut out.”
I am sure the people who be using the buildings you work on would like to know!
Posted by: Mike_C | February 23, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm
No matter how you come up with the answer it is the same. You spend more than you make = deficit. So why is the gov’t spending more that it receives in taxes? Maybe if Obama actually made some of his cabinet pay taxes it would help. Maybe, because the rich knows how to beat the system and the middle class just gets screwed. Maybe if Obama’s Chief of White house staff, Emanuel paid property taxes on the house that he lives in Chicago would help IL with their budget shortfall. Oh yea, Emanuel doesn’t have to pay property taxes on the house that he and his wife live in because it is own by the “Rahm Emanuel and Amy Rule Charitable Foundation”. A non-profit organization that is exempt from paying property taxes. Thank Emanuel, you just gave me an idea about how to beat the tax system. I am going to set up a non-profit organization, have this org purchase my house and pay me 400,000 a year from donations. In your case kick backs for favors in the White House. Seems like Obama cabinet is making Bush’s cabinet look like small criminals.
Posted by: camp50 | February 23, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
why is it sooo darned difficult for US to demnad that Obama balances the budget within 4 (FOUR!!!) years. WHY??
Posted by: Average Joe | February 23, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
“see wall street is confident that these packages will not work.”…wallstreet is all about how much money will be made today, ok maybe next week, or this quarter, that’s it. These stimulus plans are mix of short term a nd long term goals. Wallstreet isn’t into long term. They can trade stock this afternoon if it doesnt’ perform, they’re not going to wait it out over teh long run. They are all about what makes money todya, by end of day, or trade it. obama’s plan is going to take time, and that is not what they want to hear. Ah well. Nothing will work within 7 days time. Nobody, nobody, c ould make them “happy” right now. You need to wait it out and let it start which will take a few months and until then, we are going to keep going down and wallstreet, and most folks, know it. Bush put us in the downward death spiral and for now, that is exactly how we are going to stay until the stimulus starts being spread a nd programs start. That’s going to take a few months. And even then, it wil lbe years before we are actually economically healthy. Dont blame the man who took over hte sinking ship that there is water in the stern. He knows. He stepped on board into the puddle.
Posted by: frank | February 23, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
“why is it sooo darned difficult for US to demnad that Obama balances the budget within 4 (FOUR!!!) years. WHY??”……………….answer: Iraq War, Afghanistan War…It’s not that difficult to understand, Joe.
Posted by: duhhhhh | February 23, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
We’re being told the only way to cure an economy burdened with huge deficits is by running up a deficit. Of course the majority of Americans would be concerned about printing more money–its unsustainable.
Posted by: MakesNo$ense | February 23, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
I personally am impressed as all hell with all that Obama has done in so short a period of time. What DID bush do all day? Honestly? He screwed up the wars horrendously, he spent trillions on nothing, nothing, as if it just evaporated. You’d think for all the deficit bush got us in our bridges would be solid and paved in gold, yet they are talking about closing one near me due to disrepair and no funds to fix it. Iguess Obama’s funds will finally fix the stupid thing. Where did all those trillions over the past 8 years go that a interstate highway bridge couldn’t be repaired??? Where DID all the bush trillions go? Bush raised the deficit ceiling how many times? 6 times? 7? For what? The wars? What else? Money to schools has gone down, college loans and grants have gone down, highways have gone to hell. where did all the money go? At least withObama’s plan you see, ahhhhh, THAT is finally getting fixed! I dont have to feel like i’m risking my life to drive to work anymore. And I’m surethe guys who work on the road will be happy with the money intheir pockets as well. Personally, I’m impressed with the man. I think he knows what going on. I trust him. He’ll balance the budget when he can. At least I see his spending is for real things.
Posted by: mary | February 23, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
The spin is now reaching absolutely unprecendented levels. He’s spending and spending and spending and AT THE SAME TIME preaching spending restraint.
The zombies that watch the liberal media will buy a lot of his garbage, but they WILL NOT BUY THIS.
Posted by: Rdef | February 23, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm
what i do understand is that he doesn’t want to bother with that.. if he can’t balance the budget in 4 years (FOUR LONG YEARS for pete’s sake!!) how can we believe a word of anything he says??
where is the money coming from – falling from the sky??
Posted by: Average Joe | February 23, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
Blaming Bush and the GOP is commendable, but it’s not enough. The next Congressional elections are not far away and that is the time for voters to massacre every Republican running for office. Those jerks tried to completely destroy our country and elections are our chance to finish these fascist pigs off.
Posted by: Crusher | February 23, 2009, 4:17 pm 4:17 pm
Lets get a couple of things straight up front. 1. This mess we are in started more than 8 years ago during the Clinton years. Remember during his term as Preident they (congress) past the bill that said everybody is entitled to a home. Thats where is started. 2. Two Congressmen Barney Frank, and Chris Dodd both who where in charge of the Finance dept. said that we were just fine when in fact we were already starting to have problems because the banks were giving out loans based on stated income and not actual income. 3. do you remember what happened this past summer (late August) when the gas prices went through the roof? Do you remember that Nancy Polise would not hear the repulicans re more drilling on our shores and the price of oil went through the roof. 4. Since obama’s been elected he has not once talked up our economy but always down. Even that rat Bill Clinton said he needs to start being more positive about the economy. Do you get the picture now? If not your blind and you’ll never see.
Posted by: Oldrtoy | February 23, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Mike C….lets see in gov’t construction jobs you are usually required by LAW to use X% of minority subcontractors. Yep no matter if they are qualified or not to handle the job. What usually happens is the GC (General Construction Company) has to fire the minority sub contractor for poor workmanship. Or another situation the minority company can’t bond the job but hey the bonding will be wave because it is a minority company. I call that discrimination. And for the final situation. Minority company is set up but it is really a shell company that has a token african american owning 51% so that the real sub contractor can do the work. But the minority gets a kick back to do nothing but allows the real sub contractor to do the work. WHy dont’ you ask Rekzo, who built several housing projects in Chicago how that went. I hear those projects are built so badly that they are going to have to be bulldozed down. Oh that was another Obama buddy…Rekzo.
Posted by: camp50 | February 23, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
“Of course the majority of Americans would be concerned about printing more money”…you need to learn how the econony works. First, the worry about ‘printing more money” is not accurate. We are selling treasury notes and they are still a good buy,and are being bought, because Obama IS trusted around the world. The fact that he isworking to save our financial institutions and fix the economy is making the confidence in buying our treasury bills highs. We have no inflation, just the opposite, no one is buying anything. The only time you worry about “printing money” is when (1) no one buys your money, or (2) inflation, neither of those things is anywhere near the problem of unemployment constanbtly going up, and folks NOT spending money. The latter are the REAL problems ofthe economy. The economy is not burdened by the deficit, per se, not to the first order, the economy is burdened by lack of investment, lack of buyers, and lack of new business growth and lack of new industry, to which Obama IS trying to answer those problems. If yo u want to know a little bit about hte economy works, try reading something
FACTUAL like THE ECONOMIST magazine for a change. Not as much drama as republican radio, but when yousay cliche’s like “printing money” when in fact, that is actually not a concern at all right now, we all know where you’re getting your talking points from.
Posted by: frank | February 23, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
I personally think it’s time for the American people to stand up. It’s time for a 2nd Revolutionary War. Anyone who believes anything ANY politician says is a FOOL! What a bunch of blind followers of ignorant propoganda we’ve all become! I feel sorry for our children and our children’s children for the whole we are digging them!
Posted by: Democratic Capitalist | February 23, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Here are some sobering facts. Iraq and Afghanistan are cheap in terms of the budget numbers. Right now the United States has about $56 TRILLION in liabilities, much it in the form of Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. No one likes to talk about the 800 pound gorrilla in the room (the real deficit number). This is the number that is going to whack us all across the head within 20 years or less. Now, politicians are talking about universal health care, global warming regulations (pure BS), etc., etc. Can somebody answer me this one simple question? How are we going to pay for all these new promises/regulations when we can’t even begin to pay for what has been promised so far???
Posted by: Patrick | February 23, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
Oldrtoy…… Do you even understand what we’re talking about here??? We’re not talking about the economic crisis… we’re talking about the “National Debt Crisis” and the “Annual Federal Deficit Crisis”!!! MY GOD, NO WONDER REPUBLICANS DON’T KNOW WHAT’S GOING ON…. THEY DON’T EVEN UNDERSTAND THE SUBJECT!
Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | February 23, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
“The next Congressional elections are not far away and that is the time for voters to massacre every Republican running for office. “…I agree. I’m not for all things democrat, by a long shot,but it angers me to no end how destructive and obstructionist republicans have become. this stimulus WILL help, and republicans did nothing but block it and cause problems and now all the crocodile tears on the deficit after THEY blew it o ut of hte water. it’s like Paris Hilton complaining that tic tacs are too expensive for her to buy. We need to kick more and more and more of them out of office until they either smarten up or just dissolve into nothing. I’d rather they listen to their more intelligent side, their Mitt ROmmey side, but they are just the most obtuse party of the stupid people. maybe ROmney should start his own party. Let joe the plumber start his. I honestly do not see how Palin and Romney can be in the same party. they shouldn’t be. The party needs to completely implode andbegin again.
Posted by: frank | February 23, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
oldrtroy…nicely stated but the Dem’s blogging do not want to face the facts of the failed banking and housing industry. Infact the MEDIA won’t even blame Reid, Frank & Dodd or question them on WHY they kept telling Bush that the banking and housing industry was just fine. Bush question the deregulatin 27 times while in office, McCain introduced a bill that would put some checks and balances on Fannie & Freddie only to be shot down by FRANK, DODD, REID & PELOSI. Yes the deregulation started during the Clinton years and the sub-prime lending as well. Obama & ACORN help speed the process up with filing a lawsuit against a bank who would not loan a couple money for a house. What Bank, wants to spend a half of million dollars in defending itself in a lawsuit…But hey it is all Bush’s fault and no matter how we lay out the facts, the Dem’s enjoy blaming others for things that failed.
Posted by: camp50 | February 23, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
“Where DID all the bush trillions go? Bush raised the deficit ceiling how many times? 6 times? 7? For what? The wars? What else? Money to schools has gone down, college loans and grants have gone down, highways have gone to hell. where did all the money go? At least withObama’s plan you see, ahhhhh, THAT is finally getting fixed! “…..to China. No kidding. Bush spent over 300Billion a year in “tax cuts” ,eeerr, HANDOUTS to the top 2%, who in turn, invested it in china because their economy, as one put it, was growing at 8% while ours was not growing 1%. No kidding. obama is putting the tax code for that tax bracket BACK to Reagan levels, as it should be. TRILLIONS left this economy never to return, in fact, that money was invested in Chinese businesses, factories, and industries that compete with ours, but the wealthy never had a single string attached to that money. Just hand out trillions and HOPE they do something useful with it, when in fact, they actually acted AGAINST our economy. all the while, folks went deeper into debt taking capital out of their homes. Americans were overconfident with their realestate, so were banks, who used risker and riskier loans to make money becuase there was no money to made inbusiness. Our economy has not grown for 8 years. Any “growth” can actually be easily traced to refinancing and spending that money, which was actually only borrowed money, more debt, not actual ‘growth’.
Posted by: frank | February 23, 2009, 4:32 pm 4:32 pm
Camp50…. I would agree with you that President Clinton signed into law, 2 bills that helped create the economic mess…. but you need to do a little more research before you go blaming Frank, Dodd, Reid or Pelosi…. go check your facts buddy. THE TWO LAWS THAT CREATED THE CURRENT ECONOMIC CRISIS WERE THE 1999 FINANCIAL SERVICES MODERNIZATION ACT, AND THE 2000 COMMODITY FUTURES MODERNIZATION ACT…. BOTH SPONSORED AND COSPONSORED BY REPUBLICANS DURING A REPUBLICAN CONGRESS AT THE END OF THE CLINTON ADMINISTRATION.
Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | February 23, 2009, 4:33 pm 4:33 pm
Democratic Capitalist – The deficit is inherited in the sense that it stems from several major policy directions fostered by the Bush Administration: 1) the initiation of the Iraq War 2) the reduction of taxes on higher incomes at the same time while 3) domestic spending was continued. Obama did not support the war in Iraq nor the simultaneous tax reduction. Thus, he inherited the results of the Bush Administration policies and actions.
Posted by: 63tango | February 23, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
frank… I’m impressed. You know a lot about the economy and what is happening. I agree TOTALLY with your earlier statement… “If you want to know a little bit about how the economy works, try reading something
FACTUAL like THE ECONOMIST magazine for a change. Not as much drama as republican radio, but when you say cliche’s like “printing money” when in fact, that is actually not a concern at all right now, we all know where you’re getting your talking points from.”……………… LOL……. that’s the problem here… they all just listen to “FOX NETWORK”… and they never do any reading for themselves!
Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | February 23, 2009, 4:40 pm 4:40 pm
However, when it is all said and done, if America, not tomorrow but today, pulls back its horns and has the Commander in Chief by executive order, mandating all military stationed in any part of the globe, to pack up and get the hell home and restore, America back to the sovereign nation that was handed, to all future generations by the Founding Fathers, America will continue self-destructio.
If Imperialism had ever worked, America would not ever have come to existance; this is nothing but the truth. Great part of the present scandalous American economic condition plus many other areas, is due to having become once again an abusive Empire, where gun diplomacy it not much different than that of Hitler and other desposts.
George Washington: “overgrown military establishments are under any form of goverenment inauspicious to liberty and are to be regsrded as particularly hostile to Republican liberty”.
George Washington: “No pecuniary consideration is more urgent, than the regular redemption and discharge of the public debt; on nome can delay be more injurious, ore an economy of time more valauable”,
So, what did I miss in my commentary, please?
Posted by: H. D. Schmidt | February 23, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
“Yes the deregulation started during the Clinton years”…the reason why even economists will not side with you on this ‘argument’ is that during the clinton years we WERE growing a new industry – the IT industry, and computer industry were booming with the commerical availability of hte internet, and who made that possible?????? Gore. Laugh all you want that “Al Gore invented the internet” but in fact, he did make the money available to make the internet (the information superhighway – remember????) available for everyone. Republicans dont value investment in technology and industry. this always puzzles me, and economists,that republicans dont notice the atom bomb, going to the moon, the internet, all the BIG leaps in technology a nd American industry occur under democratic presidentsas a result of their vision and investment in something that helps the greater society at large by putting us ahead in technology AND creating jobs. And when you loosen loan regulations WHILE you are swimming in money, no biggie. It was fine for Clinton to loosen them as it is Fine for a rich person to take out a million dollar mortage. But Bush NOT tightening regulations when growth Stopped, during bush’s many years of stagnation, WAS criminal, THAT is akin to a janitor taking out that million dollar loan. The time to tighten was NOT during clinton’s term. in fact, during clinton’s term, it WAS the right thing to give folks a chance when inother times, you could not absorb the loss. The person who SHOULd have tightened regulations was Bush. If you made a ton of money 9 years ago, THAT is when you could make risky investments, NOT 9 years later when you have money coming in. Bush ran the country into a death spiral downward. Fact.
Posted by: Frank | February 23, 2009, 4:41 pm 4:41 pm
Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, and Harry Reid should go to jail for their role in helping create this mess.
Posted by: Patrick | February 23, 2009, 4:42 pm 4:42 pm
If you go to the hospital with appendicitis and die of a staph infection, the hospital doesn’t get off the hook simply because the patient was “aready sick.”
How long do you think you can “blame Bush”? Ask Clinton how long that kind of thing works (for those of you old enough to remember 1994).
Besides, nobody “left” Obama anything. He took it. He said “give it to me because I’m the only one who can fix it.” So you voted for him. Then he signed the bill he says will fix it. It’s his now. You gave it to him by voting for him.
You may hate Bush and the Republicans, but they don’t make the laws anymore, so they can’t do much to fix it. If it doesn’t get fixed, it’s clearly Obama/Pelosi/Reid’s fault. Although it’s early yet, the indicators are uniformly negative. Mid-term elections are only 20 months away, and the Dems will be the only incumbents around to take the fall if the only thing being “stimulated” is the national debt.
Posted by: Dave H | February 23, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
rdef: What do you recommend as a reliable news source?
Posted by: Mike in Carolina | February 23, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
“You know a lot about the economy and what is happening. “….why thank you, mr. X, my employer is certainly banking on as much ;-)
And speak of the devil, it’s time to get back. Good day all.
Posted by: frank | February 23, 2009, 4:47 pm 4:47 pm
It is laughably transparent how Republicans are now so concerned about the deficit and fiscal responsibility, only a month after the Democrats take office. After spending us billions into the hole in eight years of war and allowing the rampant overrun of Washington by large corporate interests, they suddenly realize this is bad, just when it politically suits them as a ludicrous series of attacks on those who inherited their mess and are now faced with having to take extreme measures to bring America back to health from their failed way of doing business. And that is not all, these Republicans seek to still obstruct any steps being made to make things better in the long run by not voting, voting against anything they did not introduce, and in general trying their best to ensure nothing gets done. Not all are like this, just most. I admire Charlie Crist and Arnold S. and the other few who have decided to put the good of America before the machinations of their party to place themselves in a favorable position for the next election. Want to be in a favorable position for the next election? Show how you can be a part of the solution now instead of the problem, and how you can work with others to achieave great things. Otherwise, no one will buy your crooked spin in four years either.
Posted by: iamwomaninmi | February 23, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Bottom line … who cares what Republicans or Democrats think? Our political leaders owe it to the American Public to put partisan politics aside and to figure out how to help those who can’t help themselves. Might I suggest that the media do away with the status quo where measurements like this are concerned. As, it’s time we measure success by results that count, not opinions.
Posted by: Jdverde | February 23, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
you people seamed to forget barney franks and the dems have controled thhe banks for the last 2 years and the rep didnt have enough votes to stop them and it was the dems that put in the couminity reinvestment act witch gave poor people houses even if they couldnt afford them
Posted by: davidpatrick344 | February 23, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
Patrick….. as Jesus said, “Forgive ‘HIM’ Lord, for he knows not what the hell he’s talking about!”… LOL… that’s all I have to say about your comment.
Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | February 23, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
“Had McCain, Palin and their policies been elected and adopted, we’d be taking steps toward recovery right now, and would have been out of the recession by the end of ’09. With Obama in office – duplicating FDR’s failed policies – we’ll be in a depression very soon.”……………….. LOL! Anoter “Forgive HIM also Lord!, He also knows not what he’s talking about”…… The Republicans put us in this mess, and this person thinks that it’s “McCain” would have fixed the situation…. man, GO DO YOUR RESEARCH!
Posted by: X-Repbulican Because of Bush | February 23, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
Good God, are Democrats naive… who do they think is paying for the stimulus package? Is the money coming out of think air?
No, it’s coming from the pockets of those who started with nothing but worked their butts off, and that group includes a LOT of Republican voters.
Posted by: Phil | February 23, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
davidpatrick344, your best bet is to restrict
your listening to the Rush Limbaugh show
and educate yourself politically by more knowledgeable entertainment hosts.
Posted by: spacerook1 | February 23, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
“If you go to the hospital with appendicitis and die of a staph infection, the hospital doesn’t get off the hook simply because the patient was “aready sick.”"………….but if you die from an infection that started in the appendix, then the appendix IS the causal reason for death. Do you imagine that all bush has done has no causal effect to where we are now? Are the troops home from Iraq? did the Towers suddenly appear and those 3000 dead in New York and 4000 dead in Iraq suddenly rise from the graves? To suggest that all is forgiven and the waters calm from the past eight years is not only niave, it’s just not accurate. We will be feeling the effects of bush foriegn policy and economic policy alone for decades, and the performance of republicans, their obstructionist hypocritical crocodile tears over the stimulus plan and Rush’s wish for us to fall into Depression were more than a little bit despicable. I, again, am not for allthings democrat. I was horrified by even the suggestion of protectionist wording, and I certainly do not, to a first order, want to reward bad behavior, but there needs to be some pragmatic realism to the situation at hand that republicans cannot seem to grasp. The comparison to a plane going in death spiral is quiteaccurate, I assure you. we have not moved far enough away from the precipice to be sure we will not fall into a Depression, on the contrary, that is still a very real possibility. We in the industry are all of an opinion that 8000 is the bottom of the market, we think. We hope. but that is a fragile expectation andonce an expectation is shattered panic sets in too soon. This rising unemployment is verymuch the fallout of the stock market crash all those months ago and the death grip Americans have one their wallets right now. What remains to beseen in the future, we can only guess. Obama is doing the right thing with the very few tools he has. I have to give that to him. He was square on arguing with Democrats against protecdtionism. The man has been correct on his views and ideas. He has obviously studied the problem exhaustively. Honestly, you folks who are obstructionist and, forgive me, quite ignorant on these matters, SHOULd make an effort to education yourself. The wallstreet journal, the ECONOMIST magazine, do READ and education yourself. Thiscountry is only as strong as its weakest link, and at the risk of being uppity, I have to say, our weakest link has been our electorate, clearly. bush’s second term election was unforgivable. Kerry promised “pay as you go” and you all voted Bush back in. before you whine one more word about deficits, do remember that. This deficit of our would have been HALF or even less, had you voted for Kerry. And he was, economically, again, a far superior choice to Bush. If you do not believe me, do googgle the numerous award winning economists pleading with the American electorate for Kerry over Bush and see their reasons why. It’s a bit chilling to see their predictions now. I have to go. good day.
Posted by: Frank | February 23, 2009, 5:04 pm 5:04 pm
Bottom line … who cares what Republicans or Democrats think? Our political leaders owe it to the American Public to put partisan politics aside and to figure out how to help those who can’t help themselves. Might I suggest that the media do away with the status quo where measurements like this are concerned. As, it’s time we measure success by results that count, not opinions.
Posted by: Jdverde | February 23, 2009, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm
I’m not crazy about Obama but the Repubs are trying to say Obama has done more damage in one month than bush did in 8 years. It is so stupid, it made most people laugh. The Repubs whining about the debt is ridiculous since they have nearly doubled it in 8 years!! I don’t think Obama is going to be a great or terrible president just mediocre. His approval numbers will probably average in the 50s over the next 4 years unless he does something idiotic like invade a country. I was against the Iraq war, against Bush’s bailouts last fall and now I’m against Obama’s stimulus. Our debt has always and will always be a very important issue for me. Saddling our country down with so much debt is destroying our country.
Posted by: Lou | February 23, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm
Phil…. LOL… you should have been saying that 8 years ago when our National Debt was only at $5 TRILLION (Before Bush raised it to $10 TRILLION)…. the fact that you, and the other Republicans ARE ONLY NOW complaining about a $780 Billion stimulus…. after your Republican President put our nation in debt to the amount of $10 TRILLION dollars…. gives yous ABSOLUTELY NO CREDIBILITY AT ALL!…. Your complaining now is so sad. You should have been complaining 4 years ago when Bush ran for a second term, after he increased the debt by $2 TRILLION during his first term in office. NO CREDIBILITY… YOU HAVE NO CREDIBILITY. All I see from Republicans now is party “rhetoric”, they are not interested in the state of our country…. they have lost all credibility.
Posted by: X-Republican Because of Bush | February 23, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm
President Obama walked into a burning building, so-to-speak. These issues were building long before he got here. He is doing his best to “put out the fires” that were dumped in his lap and I hope the American people are smart enough to realize this. This horrible situation can not be fixed quickly. At least he is trying…more than the Bush Admin. did. But it has to be stressed that it is not only the “blue collar” folks who need to step up to do their part….this predicament didn’t come soley from us/them. Large Corporations and greed from White collar and above need to be accountable as well.
Posted by: Brenda | February 23, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
It doesn’t matter who caused all of this mess, what matters is can we be responsible enough in these desperate times of our country to do what is right to get ourselves out. The time for playing the blame game is over. The time for equal responsibility for our actions is right now.
Posted by: B-Man | February 23, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
eyeonyou,
Did you even read my post? I said in clear English that I called out Bush for writing and implementing illegal executive orders too. Based on your logic its o.k. for Obama to violate the Constitution with executive orders because Bush did it and what I am saying is NEITHER nor ANY President have a right to do it. And as far as calling me a neocon you couldn’t be farther from the truth. I voted for Obama as a lesser of two evils in my opinion, but I am an independent that lends conservative and libertarian. Ron Paul was my man and I donated and helped in his campaign and promote the Campaign for Liberty now. I can’t stand neocons because they are big government socialist like many liberals. It just shows that many Obama supporters’ blind loyalty makes them believe that anyone critical of Obama must be a neocon. Please drop this false paradigm ,America, and wake up and realize that the GOP and Dems in their current forms are just opposite wings of the same bird of prey. This isn’t about party, or right or left this is about Americans and restoring our Constitution that so many men and women have died over two centuries.
Posted by: gabulldawg79 | February 23, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
I’m fed up with the Republicans picking apart President Obamas stimulus package. Where were they when George Bush was throwing our money at the big corporations with no strings attached and no transparency? Obama did inherit the worst financial crisis since the great depression. And how do you suppose it developed? Wern’t the republicans at the helm for eight years? He has a very daunting job ahead of him, and hopefully, he can get us out of this mess. I have alot more confidence in our President than I had in the previous one who transfered the largest amount of wealth from the middle class to the wealthiest segment of our society.My prayers are with him.
Posted by: T. Robeson | February 23, 2009, 10:12 pm 10:12 pm
I am not sure who you are polling. Everyone that I talk to think that the Government should just stay out. Everything that they do makes it worse. When are they going to quit already. American needs to Wake Up and see this. This is crazy they are sending our economy into a downward spiral. I am afraid. My husband has a good job and this is the first time I have been afraid. I am not spending money and I am a big spender. I have quit spending and I am saving my money that may not be worth anything soon. Our retirement is going too. I am sorry but this sucks.
Posted by: Sherri | February 23, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
I do blame the previous administration for the beginning of this recession. But Obama was a Senator then too. But I know that he did not vote for anything good or bad he only voted present most of the time. I am not sure he stood for anything. Know he is trying to play Mr. Popular and pay the Dems back for voting him in and he wants them to vote him back in. He is the best politician of them all. He knows how to play politics and he is playing politics with our money which seems to be disappearing fast. Isn’t he so wonderful. What a change we can believe in. I am so happy to be bailing the homeowners that do not pay for their house payment too. I live in Peoria Az. and I am fine in my house. I do not want to bail out my neighbor.
Posted by: Sherri | February 23, 2009, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
Can we believe in Poll? Never.all bias and subjective.
The honeymoon has not been over yet. Give the man 6 months to a year.
Sit back , relax and take the ride.
Posted by: ndn | February 24, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
the numbers are high as he hasn’t asked us to pay for it yet. when your taxes go up, ratings will plummet. also I don’t think the 900 billion to rebuild Gaza was anounced yet. the same Gazan’s seen dancing in the street after 9/11
Posted by: alan | February 25, 2009, 8:43 am 8:43 am
With all the money that has been given to banking astablishments and car industries that are taking the money and running, leaving without care for the people and employees that have worked hard.
Do you realize how much money every US citizen would have received if we were given the money instead of the bankers and car industry. I think the issue of stimulus and recession would not be an issue right now.
I am a laid off employee and we are all feeling the recession right now in Riverside. If I was to receive Government monies, I can certainly assure you that I would be spending the first million dollars within the first year within my community enriching my economy and families well being.
Oh, and I can assure you after every adult US citizen had been paid a couple million dollars each, it still would be less than the monies they have paid out and are still thinking of paying out.
What in the world do these industries think we are “STUPID?” to pay for their greed, leaving employees unemployed and fending for themselves running away with Government money. Who do these companies think the government is? Don’t they understand their taking my money and closing their doors for business or restricting Loans that we have to pay back while pocketing my money and paying their investors. It was because of their greed that gave money to illegals and to those who could not pay the money back. I simply find these companies unethical and we need to take our money back and give it to the people that made it in the first place. The American Tax Payer.
Then we can tell those that lay off hard working American employees to blow smoke up their tute. Frankly, I don’t like being lied to when they took my hard earned tax dollars.
Posted by: Julie Chutes | February 26, 2009, 3:30 am 3:30 am
Obama is such a Light Weight, Pelosi is playing him like broken drum. What a mistake we, as US Citizens, have made. I don’t want a socialist govenment. This can only lead to terrible strife in the future.
Posted by: Jerry | February 26, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Don’t know much about the economy or how to fix it. I trust our President!
As I listened to McCain and Pailand and folks like Limbaugh- I’m appalled that any decent American can associate themselves with the party.
Posted by: Marie | February 26, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
I have no idea WHO you are polling. Everyone that talks about having voted for Obama has turned on his lack of clear leadership and his abandonment of his campaign promises. They think he keeps saying whatever he thinks will make people approve of his spending, and that he has turned out to be a lier.
A leader that claimed he was ready on day one does not get a honeymoon when the economy hits the skids…and it does not matter who or what caused it. George Bush isn’t there anymore, and none of the buffoons he has brought into his administration have a CLUE about what to do….and his press secretary is the biggest lying joke of all. Cannot imagine who you are polling, unless they all live in South Chicago.
Posted by: rufus | March 5, 2009, 10:06 pm 10:06 pm
ok, its real americans have gone nuts! go find out who picked the company to haul in gas for iraq, then check to see how much was lost, and we repaid everytime, same as construction!who agreed to rebuild every building?while Iraq is sitting fat & not helping, we are going broke.the lowest bidder was thrown out the window the last 8yrs why?
I am so sick of the party fights, who cares, its time to get together and fix this country!not to pick sides!
Posted by: debby | March 24, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
it IS an American problem, NOT REPUBLICANS VS DEMOCRATS.
if you hated bush, you should hate Obama. if you Loved Bush, you should LOVE OBAMA.
Obama is carrying ALL the major policies that Bush admin did and only extending them all. using SOME of the SAME PEOPLE.
PLEASE AMERICA, ITS TIME TO WAKE UP and take back our Republic. were not a democracy. we are a constitutional republic. if we dont take it back now, next year will be too late. you have till about December 09.
stop fighting among each other (which is what they want) and fight what the REAL PROBLEMS.
Posted by: Doral | May 13, 2009, 3:21 am 3:21 am
we are in this mess because of ourselves. We allowed our government to make a mocker out of us. When Bush came in he continued where his father left off. Now Obama, has to clean up his mess. We need to reduce our consumption of foreign imports. We need to rise as a nation and move as one. We need to take steps into creating a better tomorrow. Reducing the cost of food, giving farmers and groccers a tax cut for the next 5 years. Put a end to credit card companies with issuing out new cards, or raising limits for the next 5-10 years and lowering the APR below 6% regardless of the individual’s credit score at this time.
Posted by: Look around | July 2, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm