Fiscal Responsibility? Not from this Congress…
ABC News’ Jonathan Karl reports: The House Appropriations Committee just posted its $410 billion 2009 Omnibus spending bill. It’s a doozy. This is the bill that will fund the government’s operations until the end of the fiscal year. It’s larded with thousands (so many, I can’t count them all yet) of earmarks and adds up an increase in overall discretionary spending of more than 8 percent, the biggest one year increase since 1978 (with the exception of the spending boost after the September 11 attacks). And this is a bi-partisan feeding frenzy. Roughly 40 percent of the money for earmarks (i.e. pet projects inserted by individual lawmakers) have been inserted by Republicans. I am still combing through the bill, but here is what has caught my eye so far: – The City of North Pole, Alaska (motto: "Where the Spirit of Christmas Lives Year Round") gets $1 million to improve its wastewater treatment system. That’s $571.43 dollar per citizen. – $1.75 million to acquire land for the Cape Cod National Seashore. – $2.2 million for the Center for Grape Genetics in Geneva, NY – $2.4 million for the Southeastern Poultry Research Lab in Athens, GA – $42,000 for "Arbuscular Mycontizal Fungi" in Wyndmoor, PA – $1 million for Corn and Soybean Research in Wooster, OH – $1.8 million for the Honey Bee Lab in Weslaco, TX – $1.8 million for Swine Odor and Manure Management Research in Ames, Iowa – $443,000 for Beaver Management and Control in Mississippi – $208,000 for Beaver Management and Control in North Carolina – Several hundred thousand for "Blackbird Management" programs in KS, LA, ND and SD. – $657,000 for Brown Tree Snake Management in Guam – $1,049,000 for "Mormon Crickets" in Utah (I am told they are neither Mormon nor are they crickets) – $162,000 for Rodent Control in Hawaii – $209,000 to "Improve Blueberry Production and Efficiency" in Georgia – $254,00 for the "Montana Sheep Institute" – $413,000 for Tri-State Joint Peanut Research in Alabama – $2.9 million for Shrimp Aquaculture in AZ, HI, LA, MA, MS, SC and TX – $277 million for 2nd Avenue Subway – $210 million for LIRR terminal in Grand Central
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
Ron Paul has never voted for an unbalanced budget. So there is one true fiscal conservative proven over the long haul. Of course if the budget gets passed, then all congressmen and congresswomen will try to get their share for their district. Everyone in DC should watch which way Paul votes and then do the same.
Posted by: Huh | February 23, 2009, 4:59 pm 4:59 pm
“The City of North Pole, Alaska (motto: “Where the Spirit of Christmas Lives Year Round”) gets $1 million to improve its wastewater treatment system. That’s $571.43 dollar per citizen”
They will need that for all of the waste that comes out of their Governor’s mouth.
Posted by: Jwench | February 23, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Most of those are seemingly valid agricultural, climatalogical, biological or general scientific research-related items. Should we go back to the Bush-era of nose-thumbing science?
Certain LOCAL projects, like that Alaska wastewater, the New York second-avenue Subway, and the LIRR terminal should be striken as they are local only, and should be footed by the cities/states.
Posted by: Tim | February 23, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
Each of these items is a particular and complex issue. Much of this so-called pork is actually necessary spending needed to preserve crop production, save human lives and facilitate commerce. Actual pork comes in the form of million dollar bonuses for CEO’s, money that disappears from the economy by being spent on useless and overpriced luxury items like second mansions and corporate jets.
Unless you are willing to carefully research and intelligently discuss each issue, which as a responsible journalist you should be willing to do, please refrain from expressing pointless and uninformed opinions.
Posted by: James P. Walsh | February 23, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
I am having issues with the fact that you guys think the budget say exactly what things are going for. . . you can’t be that naive. That’s how no name agencies pay the bills. Or maybe they changed it since there are so many conspiracy theorists. Who knows. Don’t believe it anyway.
Posted by: immichalus | February 23, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
It’s easy to point at line items and laugh at them if you have no idea what they are intended to do. “Oh, haw haw, honey bees, how absurd.” Well, in fact, honey bee research is vital to our agriculture industry, which depends upon them for pollination. Similarly, Mormon Crickets are a huge pest, and cause massive trouble in Utah. But I’m sure it’s easier to just sit back and call them “pork” without actually doing any, you know, reporting. Weird that I would expect a reporter to actually report the facts, isn’t it.
And peanut research? Insane! Unless, uh, we just had a major health scare with our peanut industry. Fortunately that hasn’t happened. Er…
Also, note that virtually all of these projects will, in fact, create jobs. How crazy that a stimulus bill would create jobs. Wacky stuff.
Posted by: Dave J. | February 23, 2009, 6:04 pm 6:04 pm
If there are “thousands” of earmarks in the bill, why is it that you have singled out mostly science, environmental and agricultural projects? Many of these appear to have obvious benefit for farmers and other small and medium-sized businesses or the general public in more than one state. It is legitimate to argue that funding these should not be a high priority right now, but there is a difference between earmarks that are still worthy projects and earmarks that are pure pork. Pork projects that benefit few and have no wider impact – like the bridge to nowhere – should be eliminated. How about doing your job as a journalist and providing an educated assessment of these projects instead of going for the cheap shot?
Posted by: ren | February 23, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
AMERICA is FINISHED!!!!!! WE clearly see here what the pinheads and corrupt politicians have done. We will never recover because Obama has added millions more to the welfare rolls with his so called stimulus and appointing people who will usher in tens of millions more illegal Mexicans-never mind that tens of thousands of them will be hard core drug dealers. Have your children been sold out—you betcha–thanks George Bush, Obama, McCain, Lindsey Graham, Napitano, Solis and all the rest of the Washington sellouts. Why have we allowed this sellout? Liberal republicans and democrats are idiots and evil that is for sure!!!!!
Posted by: rockychance | February 23, 2009, 6:08 pm 6:08 pm
Exactly, the grape project is for the study and growing of better wine.
Silly? how much money in tax revenue and jobs does Washington State, California, Oregon not to mention FRANCE receive thanks to their wine industry?
We cannot look at just one item and let is seem out of context without thinking of the larger ramifications
Posted by: Jon NY | February 23, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
Well, congressmen are voted in to represent the interests of their constituents. So if these projects are for the benefit of the people in their districts, I would say they are doing their jobs!
Posted by: Bob z | February 23, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
It’s a shame that things that matter are often lumped with things that aren’t……………….
The world has lost most of its bee population over the last 10 years. Most of our food crops are pollenated by bees… and won’t set sead without them. Even biofuels grains are dependant on bees………………
Sanitation depends on sewer systems. The people that live in that part of ALaska might be hunters and fishers… never having earned dollars in their lives. They still need to dispose of their waste properly, for opur benifit.
Posted by: MrSleepy | February 23, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm
The inference in your headline accentuates the ignorance of so many in this county as it relates to the sciences. If you know anything about science you have to know that all living things have the same DNA language and to understand even plants can lead to a better understanding of our lives and the lives of organisms that have a direct impact on our existence. It’s much easier to study generation after generation of grapes as oppose to humans or large mammals. How long would you have to conduct research to follow five generation of even apes as oppose to plants. Obama is on the right track in pushing us to become more science conscious and smart. You show the honey bee lab listed above. Are aware that the fruits you eat depend on pollination by honey bees and that the population of honey bees has been dramatically declining in America. We now have to import bees from Australia just to insure decent crops across this country. Talk about devastating the economy – just imagine shifting from depending on foreign company’s for fuel to depending on them for apples, oranges, peaches, corn, wheat, etc. Get your heads out of your ideological holes and become more learned than your inferences indicate.
Posted by: August | February 23, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
Reporters are out to “make a buck” by stirring up controversy. I don’t see an issue with most of these so called “pork” projects. They make sense. The thing to remember is that there are a lot of things that industry won’t or can’t do because they don’t turn a profit. Like the bees. Bees are used to pollinate crops and are dying for some unknown reason. If we left it to industry it may be too late.
Oh and another thing, in a 400 BILLION budget the reporter lists about $18 MILLION in spending. A whopping 0.0045 %. Most science is dirt cheap compared with the size of the budget but it gets cut and called pork because people can’t see what use it is.
Posted by: Graham | February 23, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Since when does science = lard?
Construction jobs are not the only ones which need protecting/stimulating! It’s about time we see the bigger picture and recognise that if we are too recover, as a nation (and even as a planet); all memembers of the population need to be able to benifit. Including scientist and artist etc.
Rick et al you should know better. The Note is increasingly becoming just a nah saying blog.
Posted by: Alex | February 23, 2009, 7:25 pm 7:25 pm
It’s VERY revealing that Re-pug-licans find fault in a few billion dollars in “pork” yet can’t wait to spend TRILLIONS MORE chasing a few terrorists around caves. 3000 people were killed in the 911 attacks. But since 911, 300,000 Americans have been killed by preventable medical errors, mostly in hospitals and large clinics. That’s 100 TIMES THE TOLL FROM TERRORISM. If a CEO of a company mis-directed his priorities that badly, he’d be fired. It’s time to STOP spending MORE ON DEFENSE THAN THE ENTIRE REST OF THE WORLD COMBINED.
Posted by: AlChemist | February 23, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
The only ‘doozy’, as written by the author, to report here is the level of ignorance of the reporter. The food and fiber security this nation enjoys (and is taken for granted by people such as the writer) was built on publically funded research. This kind of research is long term and returns a slow, but incredibly stable investment. Not the kind a privately owned company would invest in but the kind needed to build sustainability in our nation’s food security. This is either lazy reporting or reporting as the result of a poor educational background. Reminds me of Sarah Palin and her ignorant criticism of fruit fly research that is benefitting our understanding of human health. Our country is in trouble when our reporters become some of the least informed among us.
Posted by: Lily | February 23, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
I’m not really sure what the point of this “scoop” is. Prove to me that this is wasteful spending. This is lazy, snarky, blog-age journalism at its worst. Just because you’re not familiar with the economic ramifications of agricultural pests, for example, doesn’t mean that pest management appropriations are automatically “pork”. Or did you just think it’s “funny” that government could be spending money on “fungi” “beavers” and “crickets”. Infantile! Do your homework.
Posted by: John | February 23, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
Business as usual. The Dems just passed a pork laden bill. They don’t get the picture. I hope the American people let them know exactly how they feel. These earmarks for grapes, rodents and unnecessary expenditures need to be stopped. Our legislators take us for granted and that the money will always flow.
Posted by: jschmidt | February 23, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm
Why isn’t any one asking: is this this the proper role of government? No it is not. Tell me anywhere in the Consistution where it states that it’s the Federal Gov’t's role to fund scientific research. States may do this because this is a role that the reserve under the 9th and 10th amendments. Get the Federal gov’t our of science, energy, housing, health care, etc. and we will all see a standard of living that we should be enjoying now, but with a lot less debt and taxes. Those who think that gov’t can spend until there’s not tomorrow should be more than willing to bear the burden of such irresponsible actions.
Posted by: JoeR | February 23, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm
Tim, you crack me up. You are a well spoken individual but…”Actual pork comes in the form of million dollar bonuses for CEO’s, money that disappears from the economy by being spent on useless and overpriced luxury items like second mansions and corporate jets.” Disappears from the economy Tim?? Isn’t buying stuff pumping money back into the economy? Keeps all those mansion and jet builders employed, they need thier jobs too! And as long as these CEOs are keeping thousands of people employed (and doing right by them), the company profitable, growing and fiscally strong, at the same time being environmentally aware, I don’t care how big the bonus is. It’s when they are losing money and laying people off and the company is going to the dogs, yet they still pay themselves millions that you need to cry foul and they need to be held accountable. Any of us would be fired if our job performance were that bad. But don’t let class envy distort your views so. It’s not a zero sum game. It’s not like there is only so much cash out there and the more they make the less there is for the rest of us. Doesn’t work that way. And are you positive “Much of this so-called pork is actually necessary spending needed to preserve crop production, save human lives and facilitate commerce.” You know this for a fact? Where is your data coming from? You’re sure it’s necessary Federal spending? Is it possible some of these things would be better served on the State level? I don’t know, I am asking. But I humbly direct you to your own last paragraph. To others…why is it when someone doesn’t agree with you they are automatically ignorant or uninformed? Someone can’t have a point in there some where that doesn’t match what you believe with out being stupid? Is there no such thing as a difference in opinion anymore? We all need to slow down, breath deeply and realize we are all in this together and start treating each other with a little more respect whether we agree or not. Anger and hate are not going to convince anyone to rethink their position. Be calm, stick with facts that you KNOW, and relax. If you’re as right as you think you are, time will vindicate you. You don’t have to force feed it. In the meantime all the angry words and name calling is accomplishing nothing, except to make you look worse than the person you are firing at.
Posted by: calm down folks | February 23, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
wonderful, wonderful!! I love the idea of no earmarks. Glad this only has 9000 of them. Maybe if there were 10,000 then something would be done. I am sure the messiah will make sure there are no earmarks. Right!!!
Posted by: platteman | February 23, 2009, 8:34 pm 8:34 pm
Is anyone really surprised?
Posted by: LongT | February 23, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm
alchemist – THANK YOU!
I am still upset about the so-called liberal media’s treating of bee colony collapse and global warming.
We are in trouble, and grape genetics, as well as the affect of Monsanto-type seeds, should be studied.
I look forward to your future posts, alchemist!
Posted by: marcie1000 | February 23, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
From reading all the posts….ABC News’ Jonathan Karl better find a new career cause you sure missed the target on this story. Better get out there and chase some ambulances for stories. This is a spending bill…so what did you expect? Now go look at the stimulus bill and give us your thoughts.
Posted by: mercury57 | February 23, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Bonuses for failure……I guess that is the fee I see every quarter on my 401…oops, 201k statement.
Posted by: mercury57 | February 23, 2009, 9:33 pm 9:33 pm
I see many, many valid points here. I am mostly intrigued by the money for shrimp aquaculture research…in Arizona, aka, the desert! Seems out of place, but it is out of context, so what do I know?
Posted by: MB | February 23, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
There are “No Earmarks In This Bill” Obama told me so and I believe every word he says. He is the greatet ever and can do no wrong.
Posted by: blindedone | February 23, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
I’m all for Swine odor control. Ever lived near a pig farm?
I just don’t get the outrage. Americans elected a liberal Democratic President and liberal Democratic Congress. There’s going to be massive spending increases and lots of pork. What’s the big deal?
Did people think that Democrats are going to become fiscal conservatives? They’re Democrats, they spend! Get use to it.
Posted by: nathan | February 23, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
Thank god there are so many posters on here more knowlegeable than the author of this article. This is a spending bill. Not the stimulus bill. The annual spening bill. They do this EVERY YEAR! The guy who wrote this article needs to take some history lessons or something. When he refers to these as “earmarks (i.e. pet projects inserted by individual lawmakers)” as if it’s nothing but ‘pork’, I have to wonder if he is even familiar with what a spending bill is.
Posted by: keredte | February 23, 2009, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
Let’s see…without bees many crops are non existant–and the bees are dying off. Many informed individuals are aware of the beneficial effect of red wine on the cardiovascular system–why not use genetic info to determine how to increase the effect? If you were aware of the health impacts of industrial farm animal production you would want research done because those impacts have severe ramifications on public health. Swine odor is simply an indicator of problems we cannot see.
I would suggest you do more research before you write another such “critical review.”
Posted by: Nancy | February 23, 2009, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
Jonathan Karl,
I dare you to tag which earmarks on that list are from Democrats and which from Republicans.
That would be way more effective and SIGNIFICANT, rather than throwing out that 40% stat.
Posted by: jon | February 23, 2009, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
Looks to me like Mr Klein needs to get outside the Beltway and talk to some people who actually work for a living, like a few farmers.
Posted by: EFG | February 23, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm
United States Total Debt (Split)
End of fiscal year Intra-Governmental Holdings Debt Held by the Public
1999 2.020 trillion 3.636 trillion
2000 2.269 trillion 3.405 Trillion Bush Years
2001 2.468 trillion 3.339 trillion
2002 2.675 trillion 3.553 trillion
2003 2.859 trillion 3.924 trillion
2004 3.072 trillion 4.307 trillion
2005 3.331 trillion 4.601 trillion
2006 3.664 trillion 4.843 trillion
2007 3.958 trillion 5.049 trillion
2008 4.216 trillion 5.809 Trillion Bush Years
2009* est 5.900 trillion 6.400 trillion
Posted by: O. | February 23, 2009, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
In a half-hour segment on “Meet the Press” on Sunday, the varying threads of the GOP political psychology came into sharp contrast.
On one side sat Charlie Crist, the Moderate Republican Governor of the state of Florida, who not only openly campaigned for the president’s stimulus package but also sent some very public plaudits the Obama’s way.
“I think there is a national leader, his name is President Obama,” he told host David Gregory when asked if his own party had national leaders.
“The people elected him. And I’m willing to give him a good shot and try to help make this work.
We’re in a tough time, as we talked about before.
I think we do need to be bipartisan. We need to be, in fact, nonpartisan. We’re all Americans. Our country is at a dire point and we need to do everything we can to work together to get America through this.”
Pressed as to whether he thought “the president has the right prescription to ease this recession,” the Florida Republican replied, without pausing:
“I think he’s on the right track.” Asked if he thought it was a mistake for “the Republican Party to define itself by opposition to the stimulus,” he said: “It may be.”
The show’s other guest, Bobby Jindal, did not offer such willing praise for the president.
The Louisiana Governor, known superficially as the conservative Obama, pledged that the party would and should work in a bipartisan fashion. But his pitch was one of philosophical defiance, especially on matters like the stimulus.
“The Republican Party has got to offer conservative alternative solutions.
I think our obligation is to work with the president every chance we can, to be bipartisan,” he told Gregory. “We need to work with the president every chance we can.
But on principle we should be unafraid to stand up on principle and to point out our alternative solutions.”
The two governors, both rumored to harbor presidential ambitions, represent the current bookends of Republican thought.
Their appearances on “Meet the Press” underscored the complex question facing the party.
How does the GOP restore its power: through reaffirming principles or expanding its approach?
Not surprisingly, the two had different diagnoses when it came to rebuilding the Republican brand.
JINDAL: “I don’t think we expand by becoming an imitation of the other party.
I think we expand by standing on principle for what we believe in. I think that attracts voters. They may not agree with us on everything, but they will respect our honesty and will respect the results.”
CRIST: “You shouldn’t be the party of no. Well, there’s a time to say no. But I think you need to be a party that works across the aisle, where you participate.
Both [Republicans and Democrats] have to do that. I think it’s important for both Democrats and Republicans to work together for Americans.”
Posted by: O. | February 23, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Would’ve been nice if you reported this BEFORE the stupid congress signed it.
Posted by: BlameAmericaLast | February 23, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
I am against imprudent government spending, but most of these projects sound legitimate. Improving sanitation systems is valid. Keeping the wild population under control is valid. Improving the subway system is valid. Allotting land to the national park service is valid. These aren’t “pork” projects. There are a couple of suspect projects on the list, but most of them all right by me.
Posted by: Eric | February 23, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
$1.75 to acquire the Cape Cod National Seashore? Why? So Teddy Kennedy can expand his vacation home beachfront property?
Posted by: BlameAmericaLast | February 23, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Good Grief!!!
Posted by: from Ohio | February 23, 2009, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
Nobody is saying these aren’t valid studies or initiatives however the PRIVATE sector who benefits from them should foot the bill. Most citizens can give a rats behind about (pick any of these but let’s go with this) $209,000 to “Improve Blueberry Production and Efficiency” in Georgia. If blueberry growers pool their money together to fund it that’s fine but I don’t want to pay for it…unless I am buying blueberries then just figure it into the price I pay for the product. This is disgusting, both Reps and Dems stop the insanity…there should be a line item veto in these cases!
Posted by: hege1321 | February 23, 2009, 11:03 pm 11:03 pm
THESE ARE NOT WASTEFUL EARMARKS!
It shows rather than being wasteful, many congressmen are making a concerted effort to ensure pressing problems get funding.
2 Examples:
WITHOUT BEES THERE’D BE WORLDWIDE FAMINE – and for unexplained reasons there is a worldwided crash of bee populations. Some crops tended and cared for right now will NEVER PRODUCE thanks to NO BEES! This is critical. If anything this is too late!
IF WE ARE GOING TO CUT FUEL USE – Subway improvements in our major metros is a MUST – building extensions of the NYC subways will help CUT FUEL USAGE in the largest metro in the nation.
BROWN SNAKES have decimated the bird population of guam. If not controlled some now rare species will disappear forever.
LANG ACQUISITION FOR PARKS COSTS MONEY! What is so shocking that the Fed. Govt. allocates money to buy land to expand the national parks?
SHRIMP AQUACULTURE COULD BRING THOUSANDS OF JOBS BACK FROM CHINA – But we have to find ways to do it better and cost effectively vs. a vs. China. That is NOT a given, otherwise those jobs and that industry would have never collapsed in the USA just as it was starting to head to China en masse.
BLACKBIRDS FLOCK IN THE MILLIONS IN THOSE STATES. Without proper control, various bird spread illnesses that can seriously sicken and KILL HUMANS and our pets and livestock are always at high risk of epidemic spread should these blackbird flocks just be allowed to expand by the millions yearly.
WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT IS CRITICAL FOR ALL SPECIES NOW, BECAUSE THERE ARE no WILD SPACES LEFT. The notion that so many of the species that were once common in the USA can fend for themselves is illiterate idiocy
This reporter is simpleton assuming anything spent by the Govt. is a waste.
A bridge to connect a community of 50 people in the middle of nowhere Alaska is a boondoggle, a waste.
BUT THE LARGE MAJORITY OF THINGS ON THIS CLOWN’S LIST ARE WORTHY PROJECTS, AND DESERVE FUNDING.
Posted by: Jonathan Seer | February 23, 2009, 11:16 pm 11:16 pm
To the one who said, “improving sanitation seems valid”…not at over half a million per person!!!!!!
To the “There are “No Earmarks In This Bill” Obama told me so and I believe every word he says. He is the greatet ever and can do no wrong.” This is the budget not the Stimulus Bill!
Posted by: hege1321 | February 23, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
Chimpy Mc EmptySuit in action.
Posted by: Bill | February 23, 2009, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
Jughead O’Teleprompter is a moron.
Posted by: Hugh | February 23, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
Ok then… You’ve set the stage for Civil War…Ready?
Posted by: Nigra | February 23, 2009, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
An estimated 14 billion dollars worth of crops is dependent on bee pollination in the U.S. Bees are disappearing at an alarming rate as documented by studies at the University of Pennsylvania and Texas A&M. Unless we are prepared to eat gruel, we need to find out what is causing this. Therefore spending money to study bees IS NOT PORK. No bees= no pollinated crops, no pollinated crops=dead livestock, dead livestock= starving citizens. Wake up people.
Posted by: CaffeineHat | February 23, 2009, 11:42 pm 11:42 pm
Chimpy mc Telepromter o’emptysuit will pollinate the Bees! Didn’t you get the memo from God?
Posted by: Nigra | February 24, 2009, 12:17 am 12:17 am
May I suggest that america turn its pitchforks on journalists, the days of the media being our only source of information is—over…when we needed you–during the bush admin….where were you???go back to that place…and take your fleas with you
Posted by: cowgirl | February 24, 2009, 12:23 am 12:23 am
What crack journalist Jonathan Karl doesn’t mention is that the projects he mentions (outside of the final two which obviously are necessary infrastructure projects) represent 2/1000ths of 1 percent of the stimulus bill. This article is such false hysteria. Mr. Karl is acting as if 2/1000ths of 1 percent of the bill is rampant runaway recklessness. This is such extremist right wing fearmongering that Mr. Karl comes off looking amateurish at best.
Posted by: ElodieStClair | February 24, 2009, 3:16 am 3:16 am
Most of the bill I can support, and I am a Republican, by vote, but environmentalist at heart. For rat and snake control the amonunt is too little. The corn,soy, and swine research is for alternative energy. But hey,
EVERYONE WISE UP !!!
if the bees don’t stick around none of this will matter
Posted by: jester13 | February 24, 2009, 3:23 am 3:23 am
Tim, here’s a thought. Our country can go broke instead.
Posted by: Sandy | February 24, 2009, 3:44 am 3:44 am
Where would we be without brown tree snake management in Guam?Or grape genetics?
Posted by: ron | February 24, 2009, 4:00 am 4:00 am
PLEASE TAKE TIME TO RESERCH: “Cloward-Piven Strategy” Part 1,2,3 of Manufactured Crisis. Please read this
Posted by: Mags | February 24, 2009, 6:52 am 6:52 am
It’s not that science itself = lard. Some of these projects may be worthwhile. The problem is that we currently have a massive national debt, accruing by the hour, and no one in Washington seems willing to face up to the fact that China won’t lend to us forever. Money doesn’t grow on trees. It comes from us, the taxpayer, or the Government’s printing presses. In the latter instance, driving inflation which ultimately leads back to the citizens anyway. Many Americans are frustrated with the stimulus and omnibus not because they think science is irrelevant, but because they believe no one in Washington is acknowledging the obvious: we’re broke, and borrowing out of control.
Posted by: Jess | February 24, 2009, 10:40 am 10:40 am
Wow so you have found about $20M of questionable spending in a $410B bill. That’s about 0.005%. So in other words the bill is 99.995% non-pork.
And you’re complaining about what?
Posted by: darth | February 24, 2009, 11:19 am 11:19 am
Send the Brown Snakes from Guam to KS, LA, ND and SD. Killing two birds with one stone (snake) so to speak.
Posted by: maggie may | February 24, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am
Having seen some of the food genetic research, such as was noted about grapes. The federal government funds such research to help make certain food more viable to be grown in countries that are experiencing famines and cannot grow any productive food. So genetic research is being used to combat famine across the globe. Each project should be looked at more in context than just slinging mud at a line item.
Posted by: Charlie | February 24, 2009, 12:01 pm 12:01 pm
Chuck Schumer: Republican Governors,”If you don’t want some of the Stimulus Money, Don’t Accept Any of the Stimulus Money”
Dear Director Orszag:
In recent days, a small minority of governors, mostly Republicans, have publicly weighed the possibility of foregoing certain emergency provisions provided under the American Economic Recovery and Reinvestment Act signed last week by President Obama.
I believe this prospect not only would undercut the stimulative effect of the recovery package, but also is inconsistent with a key provision included in the law passed by Congress. To protect the integrity of the recovery program,
“I urge the administration to issue implementation guidance clarifying that while any Governor may exercise his or her Discretion to [[Accept or Reject]] the Federal Funds provided in the stimulus, [[No Governor]] should have the authority to [[Arbitrarily Adopt a Select Subset of the overall package”.
As you know, Section 1607(a) of the economic recovery legislation provides that the Governor of each state must certify a request for stimulus funds before any money can flow. No language in this provision, however, permits the governor to selectively adopt some components of the bill while rejecting others.
To allow such picking and choosing would, in effect, empower the governors with a line-item veto authority that President Obama himself did not possess at the time he signed the legislation.
It would also undermine the overall success of the bill, as the components most singled out for criticism by these governors are among the most productive measures in terms of stimulating the economy.
For instance, at least two governors have proposed rejecting a program to expand unemployment insurance for laid-off workers.
Economists consistently rank unemployment insurance among the most efficient and cost-effective fiscal stimulus measures; by one frequently cited estimate, it provides an economic return of as high as $1.73 for every dollar invested.
Thus, by denying this provision for their residents, these governors are not just depriving some of the neediest Americans of relief in a dire economy; they are undermining the overall stimulative impact of the package.
No one would dispute that these governors should be given the choice as to whether to accept the funds or not. But it should not be multiple choice.
The composition of the package was rightly dictated by economic considerations; we should not let the implementation of the package be dictated by political considerations.
Sincerely,
Charles E. Schumer
United States Senator
Posted by: O. | February 24, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Oh, I think I finally understand the conservative position – get rid of ALL government services 100 percent, and let the invisible hand of the market place take care of everything. Well, except for a perhaps a trillion here or there to fight useless wars overseas. But don’t do ANYTHING that promotes civility and opportunity to the people of the United States.
Posted by: SM | February 24, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
You can do better than this article, Johnathan. You ought to hold yourself to a much higher standard. You know full well that not only does this spending make up a tiny portion of the budget, but most of the research is incredibly worthwhile. You’re so smug wanting to write a story on “pork” and not finding out what the actual substance of the provisions are.
Posted by: Ben | February 24, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
Seriously, do legislative aides for senate and congress continue to lurk around on these boards this long after the election? No one else in their right minds would defend any of this kind of nonsense to an already ridiculous package.
Posted by: inforef1 | February 24, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm
As a college student I was assigned by my political science professor to pick out a “stupid” earmark. I chose one spending millions to study the sex life of this fly. As it turned out, that fly could have wiped out out cattle industry. As a professor now I do not judge earmarks as there are usually underlying reasons for the ones that look silly. Additionally, I have never encountered an earmark that did not ultimately pay for itself in terms of jobs produced; most make a profit for the country. If we eliminated them all, we probably would flip into a depression. Regardless, they are less than one percent of the budget anyway so please get on a new topic and quit misleading the people!
Posted by: David | February 24, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
This is suppose to keep the government running to the end of this fiscal year. What do these items mentioned due with running the federal government. Maybe not raw pork but some of it does smell.
Posted by: William | February 24, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm
Our turn. The “Subway to Nowhwere”. The “Terminal -of- Nowhere”. You think it’s cheap building wastewater handling where environmentalists don’t want a blade of “pristine” grass bent? A lot of federal money are ‘matching funds’… under the idea that some localities need help establishing basic services… and the feds choose to do so… probably in your state too.
Jwench… how sweet is your governor’s breath?
Uh, Dave J. He -is- reporting… he’s just not doing much research/analysis… other than finger-pointing.
Posted by: RR | February 24, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm
Trying to become William Proxmire, who used ignorant critiques of science projects to further his Congressional career?
Posted by: TT | February 24, 2009, 5:56 pm 5:56 pm
I am appalled at Jonathan Karl’s lack of professionalism and intellectual honesty in his so-called reporting on “earmarks”. The largely science-oriented projects he cites as pork are indeed important and are job-creators. Why is the job created for a scientist, artist or farmer not as important as a machinist? When someone clearly defines earmarks I will be more impressed, but I know that for sure that Mr. Karl will not be the ultimate judge. ABC News just lost a viewer.
Posted by: Cindy | February 24, 2009, 7:16 pm 7:16 pm
Hey, can we stop with all the Republican crap and remember that just like all you in the lower 48 (some of whom choose to live in obvious Hurricane zones just as one example…) then it’s okay to expect a bail out…
Hey, this is our home…
North Pole is in serious need of some upgrades… basic service upgrades… I have to have my water tested each year because before waste dumping was regulated they were dumping volatiles into the ground… now there is a plume that runs under my house…
We are a working family.
We pay taxes…
Are we not entitled to the same benefits as everyone else?
I don’t wait in a welfare line to get my check and go home and buy drugs with the money.
How come I have to work to support these people and they don’t have to do anything like community service or anything???
Maybe I should milk the system too, and I would understand all the hate…
Aren’t we all just tryin’ to live???
Posted by: Robynne | February 24, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
Hey, civil war sounds like a fair way to fix things… oh but wait… WE AREN’T ALLOWED TO HAVE GUNS ANYMORE, NOW THAT’S ONLY FOR CRIMINALS!!!
Posted by: Robynne | February 24, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
IT TOTALLY SOUNDS LIKE SOMEONE IS “GREASING THE PALMS” OF SOMEONE WHO OWES FAVORS FOR FAVORS. SURE, SOME OF THESE PROJECTS ARE NECESSARY BUT THAT’S NOT WHAT THIS STIM PACKAGE WAS CREATED FOR…
Posted by: AB | February 24, 2009, 7:31 pm 7:31 pm
I wholeheartedly agree, nor do I believe that the money will ever be spent for things it was intended for… Not here, not anywhere… then why is it being brought up as an issue in this venue… except for the fact that Alaska is now “on the map”…
Fact remains… there are services in a lot of communities across this country that will never see a dime or an ounce of improvement in their quality of life because of this “bill”… regardless of how many promises are made…
Sad thing is, these days???
That’s the American Way…
Posted by: Robynne | February 24, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
Mormon crickets…. try to drive down a road covered with them, you can’t your car will be in the ditch because it’s like driving on ice. You should look into what you think is pork and make sure you know what your talking about. This is a real problem for Utah and Nevada they destroy crops because the swarm is so big.
Posted by: Brad Hutchings | February 24, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
ABC “World News” has become no better than the “local news” tripe. Substance and non-U.S. reporting have all seriously declined in quality, since Peter Jennings passed on. The story by Jonathan Karl is another example of the elimination of factual in-depth ethical reporting from ABC. ABC News is 90% hype now, seeming to relish in sensationalizing the misery of many people – focusing on the most negative aspect of almost every story related to the economy; instead of highlighting positive events.
Would someone please let us all know what the definitive definition of “pork barrel” spending is; because it appears to be: “any spending [I] do not understand”; if one uses the statements from other posters, as a basis for the definition?
Posted by: Peter Jennings' Mourner | February 24, 2009, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm
My Senator, Saxby Chambliss of Georgia wrote in an email this week “If we do not get a handle on federal spending – including both discretionary and entitlement programs – and make reforms now, we will pass this burden to our children and grandchildren. We must reform our budget process, put an end to wasteful spending and implement the fiscal responsibility that taxpayers demand and deserve.”
Then he puts almost $3 million in the package for poultry research and improving blueberry production.
What an embarrassment! Just like all the others in Washington.
Posted by: KM | February 24, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
Congressman: Pease watch thenews and read the newspapers, have you all not learned we are in a CRISIS in this country???? We have citizens all over the country, standing in line for food.
We have thousands of SENIOR citizens that must decide between medicine or food. IN California alone 47% (864,000) of residents over 65 are unable to pay for their basic needs.This is according to the San Jose Mercury News on 2/24/09.
We have crumbling schools, teachers being laid off. The list of urgent problems go on and on. It is a very sad thing in this country that people do not have the basics and must stand long hours in line for food. Wake up Americans and write to your Senators and Congressmen about these WASTEFUL EARMARKS.
Posted by: Kathy | February 24, 2009, 11:29 pm 11:29 pm
Are we to believe a town in Alaska should not have funding for waste-water treatment because you invoke the name ‘Santa Clause’? One could reasonably argue for mechanisms to have such projects considered for funding by some other mechanism, but your insistence on making them seem trivial is dishonest and disingenuous.
Posted by: Todd Sands | February 24, 2009, 11:35 pm 11:35 pm
I agree with several of the commenters on this story that there’s nothing inherently wrong with helping people with their sewage system in North Pole AK, or with Mormon crickets, snakes in Guam, swine odors or whatever. Every area has its own peculiar needs. In my area, honeybee population have been seriously affected by Africanized bees, so research is needed. After all, government exists to provide services to its citizens, and these seem to be legit projects. (Sewage treatment is a huge issue in permafrost areas, by the way.) We need to get away from the tone of ridicule (largely driven by Republicans) that just because it’s an earmark, it’s wasteful, it’s “pork.” I detected that tone of ridicule in the ABC report, too. Each project deserves to be evaluated on its merits.
By the way, it’s wrong to take the total dollar value of a project and simply divide by the number of citizens it serves — again, as if to say, it’s wasteful. The dollars spent add value and substantially offset the cost.
Jim M
Posted by: Jim Maish | February 24, 2009, 11:36 pm 11:36 pm
This is a joke. The government is just laughing in our face. I can’t believe there’s people in here actually agreeing with all this pork they’re tossing out. Who’s going to pay for it?
I never it possible that we could have a worse president than Dubya. But Obama has pulled it off.
Posted by: RJF | February 25, 2009, 3:41 am 3:41 am
You guys are kidding right?this is nothing but pork for the radical left agenda ,no wonder we are down the tubes,1 million for mormon crickets”give me a break ,what are you doing stimulating the crickets ?
Posted by: melanie | February 25, 2009, 3:57 am 3:57 am
The growing of successful grapes in this country is a multi million dollar business, in New York and in California for sure, and in other states such as Washington. The wine industry needs such help as studies of genetics of grapes which are hardy and those which cannot be grown in certain climates. So it isn’t pork; it is good farming. I don’t know about some of the other parts of the package but grapes are very important to our economy.
Posted by: MJC | February 25, 2009, 11:34 am 11:34 am
Why are these various projects “pork” when compared to the half a billion (or more) to buy 4 more F-22 or for that matter compared to the continued costs of the dubious F-35 program? “Pork” has no objectified meaning, it’s just a dog-whistle used as spin in an attempt to influence budget decisions.
Posted by: Dave R | February 28, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm
Tim Bishop is an idiot. 2.2 Million dollars to study grape genetics ????
I live in “wine country” , I don’t give a damn if the wineries are here.
What about the # of ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS those wineries employ ??? We the tax payers suffer for that.
Congessman Tim Bishop , you lost my respect and my vote.
Posted by: craig | March 1, 2009, 11:39 am 11:39 am
And this is a bi-partisan feeding frenzy. Roughly 40 percent of the money for earmarks (i.e. pet projects inserted by individual lawmakers) have been inserted by Republicans.
In light of the economic crisis increasing development Surely there’s time to reconsider the depression like state our “Country’s” sliding into.., There’s spending (pork)expanding waaay past President Obama’s whole entire 2001 political career… CHANGE!! THE BILL.., The American public needs to know which elected officials worked on these projects these are and kick theM out of Washington D.C….
Posted by: Hiroader | March 10, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Simply put.., Don’t let these elective officials hide behind the Obama administration… (((The American public needs to have these officials put a name on these projects…)))In light of the increasing development of this “economic crisis”.., In the reguard for ((human))welfare all the birds,bees,mushrooms,snakes,trees provisions in this bill should be CHANGED!!! Any elected official who wants to put their name & face on these projects let the “Face the Nation” or “Meet the Press”… They shouldn’t be able to hide behind the Obama administration and call themselves public servants… Americans heard the Obama campaign for 3 years and this bill except for the “stem cell research”, Is an complete 360* degrees for just being in office for a mere two monthes…….PUT A ELECTED OFFICIALS NAME& FACE ON THOSE PROJECTS!!!…
Posted by: Hiroader | March 10, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm