By MichaelJames

Feb 14, 2009 9:55am

Flight 3407, R.I.P.

Readers of a certain age will recall the moment in Simon and Garfunkel’s concert in Central Park when Garfunkel gives a shout-out to sax player Gerry Niewood.

Niewood, 64, and another member of jazz great Chuck Mangione’s band, guitarist Coleman Mellett, were on that tragic Continental Flight 3407 which crashed in Buffalo Thursday night.

The passenger roster is stunning. For those who believe in God, you might wonder what exactly the plan here was.

In addition to Beverly Eckert, whose loss we discussed yesterday, human rights advocate Alison Des Forges died in the crash as well. An expert on Rwanda, Burundi and the Democratic Republic of Congo, she was senior advisor for Human Rights Watch’s Africa division. Des Forges was named a MacArthur Fellow in 1999 for her work on Rwanda.

On board were decorated Vietnam veteran Clay Yarber, a Marine who twice survived helicopter crashes; and 24-year-old Maddy Loftus, a college hockey player whose friends recall her beautiful smile; the cantor of Williamsburg, N.Y., synagogue Temple Beth Am, Susan Wehle, who had just released the CD "Songs of Hope and Healing."

If you knew others on the plane and want to share memories or anything else, please feel free below.

- jpt

User Comments

What will the black boxes tell us?
What would these have told us?

Posted by: ghost | February 14, 2009, 10:36 am 10:36 am

Tragic loss.

Posted by: Teresa | February 14, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am

I live in Buffalo and I think this is pretty tragic. Most people only know Buffalo as a place where we get lots of storms, now they know it as a place where a plane crashed. It is completly tragic. Two plane crashes in the same state in less than a month. WGRZ was on all day telling us the latest info.

Posted by: Mike | February 14, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am

Gerry Niewood was an AEPi fraternity brother of mine;’62 pledge class at the University of Buffalo. He used to take me to Jazz clubs when everyone else was into rock & roll. He was passionate about Jazz, even then.
I remember the “Concert in the Park” and Paul Simon’s singling out of Gerry’s contribution.
So terrible to loose him.

Posted by: Chuck Gilinsky | February 14, 2009, 12:11 pm 12:11 pm

I was in that band with Gerry, at the S&G concert in 1981. He was a great musician, and a great, great person. We’re very sad today to lose him.

Posted by: Rob Mounsey | February 14, 2009, 12:26 pm 12:26 pm

Gerry Niewood was a member of my current big band. His exuberance and youthful playing made him the incredibly great jazz player that he was. A consummate musician, professional and super dedicated and fun guy. I am immeasurably grateful to have had his presence in so many of my rehearsals and concerts and having played on gigs with him for the past 27 years. He will be sorely missed and we will always remember him.

Posted by: Russ Kassoff | February 14, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm

I first learned of Gerry Niewood when I heard the original Friends & Love concert recording back in the early 70s, when I was still a teenager–his virtuosity on reeds just blew me away. I’ve followed him ever since, and was privileged to finally see and hear him live at the Friends & Love reunion concert in Rochester, NY in 2007, and he was just as incredible then. With him on stage was guitarist Coleman Mellett, whom I didn’t know of then, but thought what a terrific talent he was. And now they’re both gone. It’s heartbreaking.

Posted by: Tom Fleming | February 14, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

Pilot error.
Flight into known icing.

Posted by: katz p ajamas | February 14, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

I do believe in God. It is because I do your opening paragraph upsets me. I can’t recall you attributing the seldom called “Miracle on the Hudson” to God. Were the people on that flight not important so their salvation was not in God’s hands?
P.

Posted by: P.Flower | February 14, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm

“For those who believe in God, you might wonder what exactly the plan here was.”
I believe in God and I know that nothing happens without his permissive or direct will. We may never know during our lifetimes on earth what God’s entire plan is, we are so small and our comprehension so limited compared to Him. It is OK not to understand everything that happens everyday. I trust God when He says that he loves me and has my best interest in His heart. (John 3:16). Life is eternal whether spent in glory or not. Things that happen on earth sometimes cannot be fathomed by the limits of our human knowledge and wisdom.
May God Bless the families of the victims as they mourn their losses. May God comfort them with loving memories in the days and years to come.

Posted by: John | February 14, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

I believe in God and I think the plan is that it is guaranteed that everyone will die one day. We just don’t know where or how or what moment. An event like this reminds me to redeem the time, number my days and apply my heart to a wisdom that transcends myself and touches others with the love of God.

Posted by: Eternity | February 14, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm

I really hope you are not calling God out on this…that would be more catastrophic than this accident. It’s a terrible thing that happened here and certainly (I know it will happen) God will use this for his glory and the edification of others. Quiet your mind, try not to be cynical about God and I think you might see Him work.

Posted by: Steve | February 14, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm

Gerry Niewood, sax player extraordinaire — I remember the S & G concert in the Park. You flew. Rest well, and play for whatever free spirits you find along the way.

Posted by: AT | February 14, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

I do not believe in God. I find it hard to reconcile one plane not crashing as a “miracle” where another falling out of the sky is just “God’s bigger plan.”
I also don’t believe that people who have faith are stupid or naive. What upsets me is when people of faith get upset by people who have different views — be those views atheistic, agnostic, or simply believing in a different god than their own.
I’d fight for the freedom of religion of any person of faith, but I think most religious people wouldn’t fight for my religious views.
This plane crash was a tragedy. It was a terrible loss. There were a lot of big contributors to society on that plane and the world mourns their loss.

Posted by: Nat | February 14, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

Coleman Mellet, or better known as Coley to those who knew him back at the De Matha High School Band Program was a very nice soft spoken person who walked the hallways always in a cheerful mood. He was always patient whenever helping out other people during his free time. Helping out other band members who played the clarinet work on their music. From one of the people who was part of the class of 92 as well as the Music Program, Coley touched our lives in one way or another and we will always remember him for the friendship as well as his patience with other people who he helped out along the way during our De Matha days. Coley, may you be in peace at our Lord’s Home. Our prayers are with you and your family, Godspeed Coley.

Posted by: Denis Yogore | February 14, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

==Pilot error.
Flight into known icing.==
The all of the PICs of all those flights reporting icing inbound are guilty.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 14, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm

we fly into known icing everyday. it is almost always a different condition, i.e. you never know til your in it.

Posted by: jt | February 14, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

==We may never know during our lifetimes on earth what God’s entire plan is, we are so small and our comprehension so limited compared to Him.==
And, yet, He sent His Word with His plan to us. The only thing missing for too many is receiving Him.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 14, 2009, 2:40 pm 2:40 pm

Deicing boots on such an aircraft work in cycles. They inflate, deflate, inflate, deflate, and so on, to break off accumulated ice from the leading edge.
Sometimes, while it is inflated, ice forms on the inflated boot, and, when the boot cycle into deflation, the ice remains. That ice distorts the airflow, causing air separation from the upper surface of the wing farther forward, and the farther forward air separation gets, the closer to stall you get.
So, since the stall speed increased and they let the gear and flaps down, that increased their problems and down they went in a stall/spin.
The answer, then, in those conditions, is to add ten knots to the approach speed, just for safety. You can always bleed speed off over the threshold.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 14, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

Maybe pilot error, but this aircraft IS certified to fly into known icing conditions. De-icing boots on the leading edges of surfaces are designed to break away accumulated ice. The question can be – When was the deicing system activated, and was it working? If too much ice accumulates before the boots are activated, they will be rendered useless. So when was the system activated? If not activated until too much accumulation, then yes – pilot error. But if the system was on but not functioning, then mechanical. Yes – I do know that the statistics show that pilot error contributes to the majority of crashes, but not always. This is what the investigation will show. The Flight data recorder will tell when the boots were activated. Whatever happened, we know the result – A great tragedy and loss. Godspeed to those aboard. -

Posted by: Jason | February 14, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm

My heart is saddened by what must be the horror for the families and friends of the crash victims. If any read this, know that we are thinking of you.

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 14, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

==If too much ice accumulates before the boots are activated, they will be rendered useless.==
Not true.
If ice accumulates on the leading edge and the boots are cycled, the ice will break off.
The question remains that, if they were cycling, did ice accumulate WHILE the boots, even on one wing, accumulate and stay while the boot[s] deflated. THAT would be a real problem.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 14, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

The question remains that, if they were cycling, did ice accumulate WHILE the boots, even on one wing, accumulate and stay while the boot[s] deflated. THAT would be a real problem.
——>>
The question remains that, if they were cycling, did ice accumulate WHile the boots, even on one wing, and stay while the boot[s] deflated. THAT would be a real problem cuz the boots would not be able to break THAT ice cuz the boots would inflate inside the accumulated ice.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 14, 2009, 3:27 pm 3:27 pm

Just for clarification:
Deicing boots don’t stay inflated. If they did, ice would accumulate on them, and they wouldn’t work.
They cycle through inflation and deflation.
That means that, when they are deflated, and ice accumulates, then they inflate, the ice breaks off.
If they inflate, and ice accumulates, then they deflate, then inflate, the boot will inflate inside the accumulated ice. The ice, then, will not break off. More ice will accumulate on that ice, and so on.
Accumulated ice on the leading edge on any airfoil disturbs the airflow over that airfoil such that the airflow over the surface separates from the surface farther and farther forward. It separates too far forward, it will stall.
In training, when we do stalls, separation of the airflow is what leads to the stall.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 14, 2009, 4:06 pm 4:06 pm

By the way, prop blades don’t have deicing boots. They are electrical. However, ice can accumulate on improperly-heated prop blades and impede their efficiency, too.
The same thing goes for engine inlets whose intake of air can be impeded by ice. The lips of the engine inlets are engine bleed-air heated. I use the informal term, “hot lips,” to refer to engine inlet lip heat.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 14, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm

==If too much ice accumulates before the boots are activated…==
Sooo, you’re saying that, in YOUR scenario, the boots on you hypothetical aircraft are not inflated/deflated. Okay.
==… they will be rendered useless.==
Now, we know that deicing boots break off of accumulated ice by inflating.
However, in this scenario, you say that this is not the way they work, that this deicing system is useless when the ice forms on the deflated boots which are inflated. In other words, when the boots are inflated they do NOT break off the ice, is THAT it?
Please explain how, when ice forms on the deflated boots which are, then, inflated, they, in your view, don’t break off the ice.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 14, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Approval for flight in icing does not constitute approval for flight in freezing precipitation. The maximum droplet size considered in icing is 0.5mm – the thickness of a mechanical pencil lead. Anything larger than this is freezing precipitation and has not ever been flight tested.
This accident is very similar to others where the horizontal stabilizer at the back of the airplane ices up.

Posted by: Shawn Coyle | February 14, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

==Approval for flight in icing does not constitute approval for flight in freezing precipitation. ==
Then all those PICs of flights that reported icing inbound oughta be violated.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 14, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

==This accident is very similar to others where the horizontal stabilizer at the back of the airplane ices up. ==
We MAY find that the deicers weren’t working on that thing. If they weren’t, and there was enough ice loadin’ up the stabilizer, THAT coulda led to sudden up-pitch and stall and, then, the spindown. The boxes will tell.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 14, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

==Approval for flight in icing does not constitute approval for flight in freezing precipitation. ==
Then, what were Delta and NorthWest doin’ fliyin’ through it on the ILS? All of them accepted clearances to fly the approach. Were all of them wrong?

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 14, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm

Read FAR 121.341
With ice protection, airplanes are allowed into icing conditions.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 14, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

While I appreciate the contributions of those on the flight who were more prominent and well known, I mourn the passing of each life, both from the flight and the house on which it landed.
The loss experienced by family and friends is no less painful because the loved one was a private citizen.

Posted by: mad | February 14, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm

I remember the kindness of Matilda Quintero – a wonderful flight attendant whose eyes sparkled with genuine interest and concern for those she was serving. I met her on a flight from Newark, on the same type aircraft – 3280 to Burlington VT on JAnuary 22nd. For some reason, her presence and that experience made me remember her name tag. When I saw the news of 3280 – I was sickened. May her family find peace and solace in her memory – the same peace Matilda has now.

Posted by: Dennis | February 14, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

A tailplane stall due to ice is a catastrophic event if not recognized early or handled properly. I was surprised to see how many prop commuter planes have had accidents due to this, and sadly, it appears this may be another event…

Posted by: djn | February 14, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

Gerry Niewood- Multi-woodwind player (sax, flute) coming in to Buffalo, NY for a concert with Chuck Mangione and the Buffalo Philharmonic Orch.
An old acquaintance, A musical mentor, a true musical genius who was one of the new musical innovators who brought the soprano sax in to a re-birth at a time when jazz fans were searching for a new direction among the metallic sounds of the early seventies. One of the most under-rated soloists who was so melodic in his playing that his improvisations became new melodies of their own. He searched for and found new notes, not in the typical “runs” but explored the fringe of Melodic, Harmonic, Mixolydian and Phrygian modes always coming back to the basic structure of a composition. Gerry was generous in sharing his knowledge and technique to those of us where were young and thirsty for a new and peaceful sound while displaying a uniquely fresh and different palette of tonal colors. I could never get enough of Gerry. Every improvisation was a fresh, new approach, never laying down the same lines. He was an extension of Trane, Shorter, Bechet, and even Herbie Mann. He was a quiet and peaceful soul who didn’t want the limelight but was always there in the section as a multi-reed marvel who mastered all of the woodwinds including the haunting alto flute. Your absence leaves a void that cannot be filled in this lifetime.
Joe Sorrentino- Tenor
Buffalo,NY

Posted by: Joe Sorrentino | February 15, 2009, 3:17 am 3:17 am

==A tailplane…==
Not the technical term.
==… stall…==
If THAT’s what it is. We don’t know cuz we don’t know that the deicer wasn’t working on the horizontal stabilizer. If it was, then a horizontal stabilizer stall prob’ly didn’t happen. If it DID happen, if it isn’t THE cause, it is one-a them.
==… due to ice is a catastrophic event if not recognized early or handled properly.==
IF you’re on a coupled approach, you’re not gonna recognize it until it happens, and, then, it’s too late cuz reaction takes too much time.
3407 may have coupled the approach cuz it appears they hit the ground flat. In other words, IF they were coupled, the autopilot tried to stay at altitude as the airplane lost altitude. From 2300 feet, they didn’t have the time to disengage AND fly outta it. That’s just speculation, though, of course, though some of those elements would point to THAT scenario.
HOWEVER, at glide slope interception, if coupled, they woulda had to reset the autopilot for the decent. So, they were at, or just inside the final approach fix and decending toward the outer marker when they lost control. I know this cuz, at the FAF, the gear comes down with about 15 degrees flap. They didn’t get to 15, rather to 10, according to NTSB. That means, maybe, that the person operating the flap handle was distracted by something and released the handle before setting the flap. They hit the ground just inside the outer marker.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 15, 2009, 4:09 am 4:09 am

NTSB says that all the deicers were working.
If that’s so, the horizontal stabilizer couldn’t have stalled as the result of ice, UNLESS so much ice loaded it up on an inflated device that the ice remained when the boot deflated.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 15, 2009, 4:59 am 4:59 am

First and foremost my prayers are with the families involoved with this incident.
As for using this as an opportunity to spout out if this is an issue of pilot’s negligence I think it is silly. The article is a call-out for people to say nice things about people who lost their lives on 3407.

Posted by: Jon | February 15, 2009, 5:09 am 5:09 am

==…to share memories or anything else, please feel free below. ==
“Or anything else”
Tapper invites ALL comments, as you can see.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 15, 2009, 5:18 am 5:18 am

We will all miss Gerry Niewood, a wise and gentle person; I remember talks on the roof at Eastman, what a really likeable guy Gerry was. In addition to being a consummate musician, Gerry was a great friend. And my heart is sore for all those people, and the violence and permanence of their end of days.

Posted by: Peggy Stern | February 15, 2009, 9:42 am 9:42 am

The writers seem technically cognizant
although the “cuz” and “woudda”
references seem incongruent. Like
the spell check of the computer era,
figure on many planes going down into
a perfect landing on a place other
than a certifed runway at an International Airport/Municipal Airport…like the Hudson River, a
Clarance suburb, World Trade Center,
the Seattle Needle…The computer
can land the plane but a skilled
pilot will know when to over ride
that feature and get “hands on” control
of the aircraft. Arnold Scharzennegger
has offered his Terminators to fly
all US aircraft…The Governor of California is a GENIUS…the fools just
won’t listen to him!

Posted by: john edward rogan | February 15, 2009, 10:28 am 10:28 am

==The writers seem technically cognizant
although the “cuz” and “woudda”
references seem incongruent. ==
Posting here is not a dissertation. It is not formal writing. It is informal. You don’t have to like it.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 15, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

The prelim says that the doomed turbine-prop [not technically a "turbo-prop"] was on autopilot when it hit the ground. The “report” says that autopilot in such conditions violates company policy. We’ll see whether the first officer challenged the captain on the use of autopilot in violation of company policy. If she didn’t, the record will show that she didn’t do her job.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 15, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm

“Turbo-prop” is a term given to a recip with a turbocharger on it.
3407 was turbine-powered; it is a jet engine with a prop on it. There is no turbocharger on that engine.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 15, 2009, 4:00 pm 4:00 pm

We had Chuck Mangione at our performing arts center last year – I have fond memories of the show and spending time with his bandmembers as I was backstage and transportation to/from the airport.
The guys were great musicians and will be sorely missed – RIP Boys…..and all the others who perished with them.

Posted by: Todd | February 15, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm

Capt.Sully had just remarked how at least the commercial aviation hasnt had a fatality in two years.This crash kinda cancelles the confidence the public might of gained by the successful hudson river crash.Just another black eye in a already struggling airline industry! sucks

Posted by: SCOTT | February 16, 2009, 1:52 am 1:52 am

==This crash kinda cancelles the confidence the public might of gained by the successful hudson river crash.Just another black eye in a already struggling airline industry! sucks==
Oh, for God’s sake, lemme break down the real for you. This is just ONE accident! It’s not indicative of anything in the “industry.”

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 16, 2009, 7:03 am 7:03 am

Interestingly, this same model of the Bombadier DASH 8 series was permanently taken out of service by SAS due to landing gear programs. Perhaps this new model has other bugs to work out. Take it out of service worldwide until analysis and findings are complete.

Posted by: Robert E. Connors | February 16, 2009, 12:53 pm 12:53 pm

==Perhaps this new model has other bugs to work out. ==
Every airplane “may” have bugs to work out. Let’s just ground everybody until we are certain that nothing will EVER happen again.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 16, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

All of my heartfelt condolences to the loves ones lost in this terribel tragedy. One would ask: Since when does a 24 year old get a job as a co-pilot? Right out of college? I am always looking in the pilots seats to see who is flying my plane!

Posted by: Ctgal | February 16, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

I too live near Buffalo and I believe we acted with warmth and compassion.
I had tickets to the Chuck Mangione concert Friday (2/13) as I have for every Mangione concert within 2 hours of here. I have never met Coleman Mellett though I saw him last in 2007 as I did Gerry Niewood. I last talked to Gerry at Casino Niagara in the Bears Den after a Mangione gig. I am blessed to have the music of these men on CD but saddened I will not see them perform ever again. Rest in peace. I know there is one hell of a jazz band in heaven!!

Posted by: Ted VanD | February 16, 2009, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm

==One would ask: Since when does a 24 year old get a job as a co-pilot?==
One would answer: When the 24 year old gets the flight hours and training in the aircraft. Rebecca Shaw had nearly 800 hours in THAT type and, from what I remember, about three thousand total flight hours.
==Right out of college?==
You got sumpin ‘gainst college grads?
== I am always looking in the pilots seats to see who is flying my plane!==
Yeah, uh-huh, it takes you two seconds to walk by the flight cave, and you can conclude one way, or the other, huh?

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 17, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm

I am wondering about Flight 3407… It seems to me as if there was a combination of two factors in the tragedy: 1) Pilot error – de-icing equipment engaged early in the flight; ice still on the wings and tail near end of flight; yet, autopilot engaged during approach for landing. Scenario appears to have violated safety standards if not actual written guidelines. 2) Mechanical failure – de-icing features (liquid and ballooning) did not appear work effectively. Also, flaps may have been compromised by weather/icing (i.e., functioned on one side and not the other). Conclusion: A) Misuse of autopilot along with ice on the wings, tail and flaps lead to the pitch and roll or death spiral; B) In addition, there were likely maintenance issues with the ballooning mechanism (on the wings and tail) and the flaps. N.B. The down turn in the global economy may have changed the airline industry in previously unseen ways. Inadequate maintenance is now manifesting as airplane catastrophes or near catastrophes. The record of airplane disasters (or near disasters) that have recently made the news are the Hudson River landing, the hard landing at Heathrow Airport and now the Buffalo Crash. Prior to settling on the “bird strike” as the reason for the Hudson River landing, there were serious rumors of maintenance issues with the aircraft. Assuming the maintenance rumors were accurate – Could a properly maintained aircraft have made it to its original destination or at least nearby Tetoboro Airport and not been forced into the Hudson River?

Posted by: btheboss | February 17, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm

==there was a combination of two factors in the tragedy: 1) Pilot error – de-icing equipment engaged early in the flight…==
So what?
==…; ice still on the wings and tail near end of flight…==
Ice was on the wings of others near the end of their flights, including another Q400 after the wreck.
==…; yet, autopilot engaged during approach for landing.==
NTSB says it is not uncommon to couple the approach.
== Scenario appears to have violated safety standards if not actual written guidelines.==
NTSB says coupled approach didn’t violate FAR. Company standard MAY have been violated.
== 2) Mechanical failure – de-icing features (liquid…==
There IS no liquid deicers on the airplane.
==… and ballooning) did not appear work effectively.==
We have yet to find out whether ice played a part to the degree it would have had to be a part of what is speculated to have happened. The ice loads that they and others reported didn’t amount to much and are common. They are flyable. Does THAT mean that ice played NO role? No.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 17, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm

==1) Pilot error – de-icing equipment engaged early in the flight…==
Crews operating a transport are required to flick the decicers on in icing conditions. It doesn’t matter where they are at the time of icing conditions.

Posted by: Mr. Incredible | February 17, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.