Feb 15, 2009 1:08pm

From the Fact Check Desk: Is McCain’s ‘Transparency’ Attack on President Obama Accurate?

On CNN’s "State of the Union," today, President Obama’s election rival, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., attacked the Democrat for lack of transparency.

"Candidate Obama said that these (legislative) conferences would be open to the public," McCain said. "Said that the American people would have 5 days to view (legislation) on the Internet. There (were) commitments made that certainly aren’t being kept now."

Is that true?

Yep.

On June 22, 2007, at New Hampshire Community Technical College in Manchester, NH, then-Sen. Barack Obama said, "when I’m president, meetings where laws are written will be more open to the public. No more secrecy. That’s a commitment i’m going to make to you as president. No more secrecy."

And, the future president further pledged, "when there’s a bill that ends up on my desk as president, you the public will have five days to look online and find out whats in it before I sign it, so that you know what your government’s doing."

This was later massaged to a pledge that President Obama "will not sign any non-emergency bill without giving the American public an opportunity to review and comment on the White House website for five days."

Clearly, as Politifact points out, President Obama didn’t abide by that promise for the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, or the S-CHIP bill.

Politifact thus labeled this President Obama’s first broken promise. 

The stimulus bill, meanwhile, wasn’t posted onto the White House website until Friday. The President will sign it four days later, on Tuesday.

The stimulus bill clearly would be considered "emergency" legislation, but if one goes by the original language President Obama used in 2007, this bill will also fall short of the ‘five days on the White House website before signing it’ pledge.

The good news about this broken Obama promise — he still can fix it for future legislation. It’s not a one-shot deal.

White House spokesman Tommy Vietor’s response: "During the campaign, the president committed to introducing more sunlight into the lawmaking process by posting nonemergency legislation online for five days before signing it. The president remains committed to bringing more transparency to government, and in this spirit the White House has posted legislation expected to come to the president’s desk online for comment. We will be implementing this policy in full soon; currently we are working through implementation procedures and some initial issues with the congressional calendar. In the meantime, we will continue to post legislation on our Web site for comment as it moves through Congress over the next few weeks."

In the next few days we will review the suddenly budget-hawkish rhetoric of congressional Republicans and the way they spent money in the Bush era. Feel free to post nominees below.

- jpt

User Comments

Obama has stressed for weeks that this spending bill was a national emergency.
So why didn’t he sign the bill Friday night?
It’s such an emergency he immediately went on a 3 day vacation. Yes, we can see just how much of a national emergency this legislation was.
Maybe he should have given congress a few days to do something we quaintly called “reading the bill” before voting on it. Even Dems say that no one read it.

Posted by: Peach | February 15, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm

In the next few days we will review the suddenly budget-hawkish rhetoric of congressional Republicans and the way they spent money in the Bush era. Feel free to post nominees below.
=============
Is the idea if they spent money before, they must agree to all spending from here on out? Even though we just passed the most expensive bill in history?
Will we also review the complaints about “the bridge to nowhere” from Democrats, who now can’t find a bad way to spend money?

Posted by: MayBee | February 15, 2009, 1:17 pm 1:17 pm

Interesting. On the one hand, you have Jake criticizing Obama for not waiting 5 days to sign the legislation and on the other hand you have Rausch Limbaugh criticizing him for waiting 5 days to sign the legislation ‘if its such an emergency, why wait?” and on and on and on….

Posted by: Flash Override | February 15, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm

The stimulus bill clearly would be considered “emergency” legislation
==============
Possibly, but why spend the money to fly Sherrod Brown in from his mother’s funeral weekend if Obama is just going to wait until Tuesday to sign in anyway?
Why wasn’t it enough of an emergency for Obama to postpone his Friday night flight to Chicago to sign the bill at midnight?
Or, why wasn’t transparency important enough to wait ONE more day to sign the bill, thus fulfilling his promise?
It’s all these loopholes and waivers that make it seem insincere and easy to criticize.

Posted by: MayBee | February 15, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm

“Clearly, as Politifact points out, President Obama didn’t abide by that promise for the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act … ”
The “Obama” organization — and many associated non-profits — also hyped this legislation as being about women and pay, when in fact it extends a bureaucratic deadline for filing lawsuits.
The “Obama” organization lies about everything. Casting back to the Bush administration to disparage the Republican recalcitrance NOW seems to ignore the fact that the “Obamas” are curiously unwilling — now that they’re in power — to look into domestic surveillance, torture, lying to Congress to start wars, and the like … possibly because the “Obamas” are now acting LIKE the Bush administration.
Assuming that the Republicans will NOW roll over for a nominally-”Democratic” administration, just because the hijacked Democrats rolled over (and over and over) for democratic abuses under Bush … seems to have been a miscalculation on the part of the “Obama” organization.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 15, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

Didn’t Obama promise he wouldn’t sign any legislation with pork or earmarks? I seem to recall that quite vividly and of course we all know this bill is loaded with pork.
Yet ANOTHER broken campaign promise.
Just like the no lobbyists. But what can we expect from a man who has hired so many tax cheats.
Oh, by the way, headline this morning:
Obama to hold fiscal responsibility summit.
No joke. And no, there are no reports of the media breaking into hysterical laughing as he reported his upcoming “summit” (read: vacation get-away on taxpayer dollars).

Posted by: Peach | February 15, 2009, 1:24 pm 1:24 pm

4 days vs 5 days. Who cares.

Posted by: Amoreena | February 15, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

You crybaby Republicans will find something wrong with everything President does. You are nothing but a bunch of bullies. Be thankful he is trying to do something to help this country instead of sitting around talking about it–trying to get Republicans to agree–the Republicans are not going to agree with ANYTHING that goes on!! What do you want, another George Bush??? I say get some of those Republicans out of office who cause all the trouble–John McCain, for one!

Posted by: lola | February 15, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

FIRST of all, Mr. Tapper, keep on keeping on! I loved your presser Friday where you pushed Gibbs on the Catapillar question and how you just moved on in the face of mendacity.
I voted for the president, but the only way to keep people honest is by having a strong fourth estate.
I’d love if you would follow up on the fact that the leadership in the house and senate voted for the Bush trillion dollar tax cuts and rammed that through budget reconcillation; but object to spending to avert a depression.
I’d also like it if we could find out, if the Sweedes did so well and Japan lost a decade as the president said on Nightline are we going to let ‘culture’ stop us from nationalizing the banks?
Please press this; the White House MUST have the political courage to not go small bore and unless people understand the insolvency of the banks a political argument can not be made.

Posted by: Rhoda | February 15, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm

I thought McCain lost the November election — if he had won, maybe his opinion would be worth something — but won the pick a Loser V.P. slam dunk competition (albeit by a much closer margin)!!!

Posted by: DontGet818OnMeNow | February 15, 2009, 1:45 pm 1:45 pm

Hey Jake,
First of all, you are the ONLY main stream journalists who seem to have maintained your honor and duty- keep up the great work. But watch your step!
I am hoping you will become the next Sam Donaldson- only better looking.
I wonder how many Obama-maniacs have put their Kool Aid down and realize just WHAT they have wrought?
This failed president is a liar and will doom the United States for a depression.
Just as he keeps reminding us, speech after campaign speech.
He will be in campaign mode for the rest of his term.
The American people have been screwed- but we will have our chance to take the country back in 2010.
You hear me- Specter, Snowe and Collins?
TERM LIMITS- and let’s DUMP Pelosi, Reid, Fwank, Dodd, Waters and the rest!

Posted by: CoolPillow | February 15, 2009, 2:00 pm 2:00 pm

“[why] … are we going to let ‘culture’ stop us from nationalizing the banks?”
When it comes to the pass that Lindsay Graham is FOR nationalizing the banks, and the former-Democrats including Obama are worried about creating the (false) perception blablabla that “private” capital is REALLY running things …
you KNOW the name of the game is bazillions of bucks to ALL the wrong (private) people — on their way OUT of the country with it, presumably doubt — crumbs to the “middle class”, worse than nothing to the burgeoning underclasses of former-”middle”-class and the unmentioned millions upon millions of poor people.
The “Obama” organization so truly sucks … it’s difficult to understand why people aren’t ALREADY rioting in the streets. Maybe when the weather’s warmer.

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 15, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm

I’m sure McCauin would have scrubbed plenty of promises he made to the American people if he was in the White House right now.
And he would only have better luck at` crossing the aisle because the Dems are far less in lockstep with their ideology than the GOP. Caee in point, McCain and his pal Graham.

Posted by: matt | February 15, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm

Yeah, and McCain said “Country First” and then picked Sarah Palin as his running mate.
McCain = LOSER

Posted by: R Mutt | February 15, 2009, 2:11 pm 2:11 pm

Republican supporters… you idiots will never be happy with anything unless it REPUBLICAN, REPUBLICAN, REPUBLICAN! I am so sick of all you idiots thinking that ‘the GOP is the only political party that has the answers’!

Posted by: Sandee | February 15, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm

I don’t recall anyone seeking Kerry’s good opinon after 2004 – so why do we still have to hear from old man cranky-pants now?

Posted by: lisa | February 15, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm

I think its clear that Obama is a puppet for Pelosi and Reid in addition to being a proven liar.

Posted by: Sluggo | February 15, 2009, 2:22 pm 2:22 pm

My goodness….. I see the 0-supporters are obsessed with doing everything they can do defend him, no matter how much he fails! Let’s be clear, if I vote for somebody, I will continue to question them and their motives, because the President WORKS FOR THE COUNTRY. Yet, the 0-supporters will accept anything and eveyrthing that 0 does, without question!
get this straight….THIS IS NOT A MONARCHY! HE IS NOT KING!!!
in just a matter of weeks, the 0 has:
— LIED, LIED, LIED. Will the media catch up on this, like when he lied about the Caterpillar hiring and layoffs?
– Closing Gitmo, and releasing terrorists to a neighborhood near you and your family.
– Dropping charges for the man that killed our USS Cole soldiers.
– Committed to immigrating Hamas terrorists from Gaza to the US.
– wants to take the us Census from the Commerce dept to the white house.
– is going to bankrupt our economy and make our children and grandchildren pay our debts with this stupid stim bill.
– insisted I WILL HAVE NO LOBBYISTS IN MY WHITE HOUSE, and yet has hired, what….17 now?
– And has had 4 cabinet selections DROP OUT. You all complained big time when you thought that McCain didn’t vet Palin, yet how much did 0 vet this cabinet selections? Sounds like POOR JUDGEMENT to me.
– And the Wash times reports that the 0 is just a complete buffoon in his news conferences, with legal counsel whispering things in his ear when he is talking about terrorism. Totally clueless.
– in his news conference, he has preselected names he calls on. He calls on someone from Huff PO! that’s a lib site! how would you guys react if Bush had called on Rush or Hannity in a press conference?
This is just a few weeks! And, after, oh so much hard work, next week he is going on vacation? he hasn’t been at work for a month, and vacation already?
THIS IS CHANGE? Will you ever question this man on anythng he does?

Posted by: decentAmerican | February 15, 2009, 2:29 pm 2:29 pm

Hey obama PROMISED a week (5 or 7 days) for the public to read all bills before they were voted on..
now, the spending bill
he had to call some poor chap back to washington from his mother’s funeral to vote on friday.
and now obambi isn’t signing the bill til tuesday
but the taxpayers got stuck with the private jet cost. and the guy missed part of his own mothers Service.
Obama.. he SUCKS

Posted by: verdinet | February 15, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm

Now, now, the Obama supporters don’t care about his promises. And they certainly don’t care about his policy since they will not have to pay their mortgages or pay to put gas in their cars.
The only thing they have ever cared about is Obama’s coolness. The rest is just gravy.

Posted by: Plumber | February 15, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm

Obama needs to be sure there are no illegal provisions in the bill before he signs it. Claiming ignorance of the bill’s contents after the fact would be quite embarrassing.

Posted by: mad | February 15, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm

Hmmmm… I’m an Obama supporter and I pay a mortgage… hmmm… I also pay a car payment.
Go Barack !

Posted by: PulSamsara | February 15, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm

So, hmmmm, Burris found to have lied about Blago’s donation request. If Burris is ousted (doubt it, given the Lib control), does that mean his vote is void, and the stim got only 59 votes? Will the Big-0 sign the bill, knowing that this is pending, or will he wait and do the right thing (cough, cough, gag, gag) until it is resolved?

Posted by: decentAmerican | February 15, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm

The GOP:
Seeking to lead by going backward.

Posted by: godblessusa | February 15, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm

I am so sick of the cry-baby repubs that started the mess that we are in..get over it..NO one wants you anymore except for a few southern white males. You are irrelevant and out-of-touch with America. And by the way if you go to the White House website the bill has been there for days. And as for the cry-babies don’t you have staff that the taxpayers pay for to help go through bill for you? THe repubs just don’t want to read it. Quit whinning!

Posted by: Delores | February 15, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Jake, here is nice one:
During the Senate debate, 36 of the Senate Republicans voted for an amendment (S.AMDT 168 by DeMint) that would have cut taxes over the next decade and added 2.5 TRILLION to the National Debt.
John McCain and 35 of his Republican colleagues voted for that Amendment.
How can McCain claim to be a “fiscal conservative” or complain about “generational theft” when he and his fellow Republican Senators voted in favor of this amendment?
One of the criticisms by Republicans was also that the Stimulus bill wasn’t “timely, targeted and temporary”. The proposed amendment by Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC) that would replace the recovery bill entirely with *permanent* tax cuts, some of which DeMint referred to as “broad based.”. These tax cuts weren’t “targeted”, nor were they “temporary”.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | February 15, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm

My bet and I would stake money on this is that it will become even more less transparent. This President wants to handle the census! We were afraid of Bush and Rove…Axlerod and Rahm are the snakes in the grass…Jake, you are the only guy in main stream media I trust and that was only after you agreed about media bias. The rest of the pansies that call themselves journalists need to look it up in Webster’s or go back to school and get a clue! Be HONEST! This is your’s and your children’s country too! What happened to wanting the best ? Living with integrity? Have any of you questioned why not one article was written or seen when he was head of Harvard’s review? The man is secrecy personified with lots of bullies on his payeoll! How many czar’s, cabinet members does anyone need? It shows he is incapable of thinking one original thought for himself! All I hear is him putting fear of God into people and taking all your money! Maybe that’s why everyone is broke in lower middle class! You gave all your money to this man in the past 2 years of campaigning!

Posted by: Di | February 15, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm

“Massaged” is the new “Change.”

Posted by: mad | February 15, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Hey Plumber,
The Gravy Train stopped running with George Bush’s departure. Gravy was what he dished out to the likes of Halliburton and Blackwater. I didn’t hear you squawking then. No, we’re going to get a bit of meat out the the middle class. Those that can’t see that because they are blinded by Rush Limbaugh’s big fat idiotic claims deserve to be frustrated.

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | February 15, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm

Yes it’s true.

Posted by: Jean | February 15, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

The last eight years of republican rule has driven us to the brink of disaster, so now all the sore loser can talk about is how bad the new administration is. They would have to swallow their bitter words when things begin perking up due to the stimulus. Now all the taliban republicans want to do is to see the failure of Obama’s administration, when we already are looking forward to a change and better days, even though the near future may be darker before the dawn. Anyone remember the days when old man McCain was rushing from pillar to post to “help’ the economy?? And what a disaster that was?? And lied to Letterman in the process?? How could anyone want to listen to this old fool now?? He was a liar and is now a sore loser and is not to be taken seriously, especially when he had such poor judgment with the whole Palin effect. Gosh, it’s time for him to go back to metamucil and Cindy’s retirement arms.

Posted by: Karen | February 15, 2009, 3:39 pm 3:39 pm

“The stimulus bill clearly would be considered “emergency” legislation, but if one goes by the original language President Obama used in 2007, this bill will also fall short of the ‘five days on the White House website before signing it’ pledge.”
Funny thing, Jake, if it is such ‘”emergency” legistlation”, why didn’t President Obama postpone his Valentine’s Day getaway to stay and sign it? Of course, Nancy Pelosi didn’t give the Representatives (or the American people) two days to look it over before bringing it up for a vote in the House, either.
I’m starting to think that most of the ‘urgency’ with this legislation was the need to pass it before more people started asking questions about what was in it.

Posted by: I'm With Stupid | February 15, 2009, 4:02 pm 4:02 pm

Obama is a BAD MAN, I tell you!!
He thinks he’s FANCY!!!
He goes out to dinner with his wife!!!
BAD MAN!!!
BAD BAD MAN!!!
HE SHOULD QUIT!!
BECAUSE HE’S BAD!!!
LOLOLOL

Posted by: R Mutt | February 15, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

Does anyone care about what it will be like for our kids and grandchildren in the years to come?
Wake up and smell the coffee YES something has to be done now and so many people laid off and Prez O is still going like he is running for Prez and of coarse WHO is paying for all the bills when he is FLYING all over in a personal jet

Posted by: Karen | February 15, 2009, 4:07 pm 4:07 pm

He flys around in a AIRPLANE!!
WHO DOES HE THINK HE IS?
BAD MAN!!
GO AWAY BAD MAN OBAMA!!
LOLOLOL

Posted by: R Mutt | February 15, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

Funny thing, Jake, if it is such ‘”emergency” legistlation”, why didn’t President Obama postpone his Valentine’s Day getaway to stay and sign it?
Posted by: I’m With Stupid
===============================================
Can the obstructionists finally settle on one line of attack? What is it, Obama should sign in NOW or should he wait ONE more day?
Funny thing not mentioned here, the obstructionist all claimed the Bill was not a Stimulus, just a spending bill. But they also claim they have not read it. So how do know it’s not a stimulus bill? That’s just silly.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | February 15, 2009, 4:15 pm 4:15 pm

Karen: “Does anyone care about what it will be like for our kids and grandchildren in the years to come?”
==========================================
So you want your kids and grandchildren clean up the mess and repair a broken country YOU left behind?
That’s not what I teach MY children.

Posted by: Willem van Oranje | February 15, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm

Willem van Oranje:
You should know better than to employ LOGIC here.
Logic is BAD!!!
YOU MUST BE A BAD MAN TOO!!!!
LOLOLOL

Posted by: R Mutt | February 15, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

Huffington Post posted all three versions of the bill within hours of them being passed. HuffPo readers were asked to volunteer to take sections of the original House bill, and compare it to the Senate bill and the final bill.
If anyone wanted to read and make comments, the bills were certainly available to the public on the internet.
The Lily Ledbetter Act failed to pass in the 110th Congress, and was reintroduced to the 111th Congress. Information on this bill was certainly available to the public well in advance of President Obama’s signing.
The S-CHIP expansion bill has been around for a long time; Bush vetoed it. The Senate added two amendments before final passage, and President Obama signed it. The information was available to the public, and was reported on in the MSM.
As Jake remarked, we are very early in this administration. I believe the process of posting legislation to the gov website will continue to improve.
People who make no effort to read information that is readily available, and then condemn the administration for making unprecendented efforts to improve the process look foolish to me.

Posted by: Just_Sayin | February 15, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm

Yeah big emergency, the obama left on vacation, the witch from the congress left and no one read the bill. The reason it was such a big emergency is because the more the American people learned about this bill the more they disliked it. So they had to call it a emergency so it would pass before the pressure got so hot on congress and teh senate that it failed. That and only that was the emergency. They wanted their pork and they had to get it before the American people woke up. Good by to America I am afraid. We will have to fight to get it back. Thank you cool aide drinkers. You voted in the witch, Reid, Kennedy, Franks, Boxer, Freakinstien, Dobbs, Waxman, Etc. Obama is not the one with the power are the one that is going to destory American it is the congress and senate.

Posted by: Bob | February 15, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm

Bill Passed Friday and he is signing on Tuesday. That is 5 days so get a life…

Posted by: James | February 15, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm

McCain voted against the first Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act did he vote for it this time?

Posted by: Julie | February 15, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm

“Bill Passed Friday and he is signing on Tuesday. That is 5 days so get a life…”
~~~~~~~
That must be the democrat new math.

Posted by: Plumber | February 15, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Speaking of McCain and transparency, I’m still waiting to hear when Sarah Palin will return her $150,000 ‘borrowed’ wardrobe …

Posted by: R Mutt | February 15, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm

Pelosi is the real president.
Obama is just the window dressing.
Everyone knows he can’t make decisions but an expert at voting present.

Posted by: sammy | February 15, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm

Success to Obama/Pelosi/Reid is an increase in Americans getting welfare.
An increase in those needing handouts, and dependent on the government.
That’s their best chance at reelection.

Posted by: reed | February 15, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

When Obama goes line by line eliminating waste will he skip the billions to ACORN?
If so who will sign up the dogs, cats, and Disney characters to vote for him?

Posted by: bailey | February 15, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm

To all of you blind believers–look up the facts before you blindly and stupidly accuse the Republicans of starting this mess with the housing and bank credit! Blame BARNEY & DODD and MAXINE WATERS & ALL THE OTHER IDIOTS YOU VOTED IN! Truly, no wonder all of you morons are so broke and waiting with your hands out! GROW UP! I am NOT a republican or a democrat and certainly don’t care for Bush nor for Obama..I care about what’s best for this really messed up coubtry and it’s only getting worse! Do you believe that Pelosi, Reed and Obama would ever take a paycut for you? Sacrifice for you? NO! They are in Rome and Chicago spending YOUR money and having a ball at YOUR EXPENSE!

Posted by: Di | February 15, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm

I wish it was easier to see what the Republicans are going on about, especially McCain who surprise surprise does not agree with Obama.
There was an election and Republican notions did not fly with the American people… are we going to let change happen or not?
Republicans are making a 50/50 bet that the Stimulus investment in America won’t work and they might pick up some seats two years from now…
At this rate they and Rush Limbaugh may be in for a rather shocking surprise.

Posted by: Artist3d | February 15, 2009, 5:06 pm 5:06 pm

All praises to Obama, our dear leader! Only through his grace we are saved from economic collaspe! If I could only touch the hem of his garmet. These stupid legislators need to stop questioning Obama, stop trying to actually read legislation, and stop trying to analyze his policies. Simply vote however Obama directs you. That is his first commandment.

Posted by: Ed | February 15, 2009, 5:11 pm 5:11 pm

Mr. McCain is a bitter grouchy old man who is still mad that America liked Obama better than him.
He sold his soul to the right wing of his party and turned his back on everything that had ever made him stand up. He chose an unqualified hack of a running mate and had a terrible campaign that he ought to be embarrassed about. Since he can’t own up to any of this he blames the media. He needs to go sit down and be quiet till he figures it out and rediscovers the Mac many of us once admired.

Posted by: Annie | February 15, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

OMG! There are millions of dollars in this bill for alien autopsies! Tell me how that is stimulus? What about the handouts to one-armed bandits? Listen to me people — don’t believe what the press says is in the bill, we commenters know so much more and whats really in it! ONly believe Rush!

Posted by: Flash Override | February 15, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Is this the SAME MCCAIN who “suspended” his campaign to VOTE for BUSH’s $800 BILLION as a show of bi-partisan support for the banks without even reading it—BUT can no longer be bi-partisan for a $787 BILLION that requires accountability simply because it is now a DEMOCRAT in the White House—YUP, it’s the same Mccain, taking the same inconsistent positions—so tell us, why is he news today????

Posted by: BENIGHSE | February 15, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm

Obama’s stealing the census from Congress has suddenly awakened and enraged the Republicans. Maybe this will arouse them as well to challenge Obama for stealing the Presidency itself. They surely know he is not an Article 2 “natural born citizen” (which is more than merely being a 14th Amendment “citizen”) by virtue of either Obama’s birth to a dad of Kenyan/British citizenship or birth in Kenya itself — as manifested by his unwillingness to supply his long form birth certificate now under seal.

Posted by: Ted | February 15, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm

Enjoy your $13 from the stimulus…there is a place that provides a roof over your head, medical, clothes, food and all of your needs that you feel you are entitled to—jail! That is what we are in now w/ this new government! We are following in Chavez’s steps. Go there if you think it’s so great! You should all read this and be very VERY scared!

Posted by: Truthsayer | February 15, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

McCain might be sitting in the White House right now if he had stood up against the first bailout bill.
And, yes, Obama has lied over and over again and is never held accountable for what he has said and done.

Posted by: Gault | February 15, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm

There’s already been more transparency in the first month of Obama’s administration than the entire eight years of the Bush (Cheney?) administration. Are we really supposed to be upset that we only get four days to review this bill (that has been developed and debated for nearly a month) instead of five?
And I’m not at all disappointed that I didn’t get a chance to see the S-CHIP and Ledbetter bills – why should we wait five days to encourage fair pay and the expansion of health insurance for children? These bills had been around for ages – it just took a President with the right priorities to see them through.
And someone may want to remind the Republican party that bipartisanship means reaching across the lines, not grasping each other desperately and marching in lockstep with their colleagues. Bipartisanship doesn’t mean making demands and throwing blame.

Posted by: Erin | February 15, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm

Too bad. I voted for him to:
1. Beat McCain
2. Keep the GOP out of office
3. Get things done
4. listen to me
So far I am happy, but I do not believe he could make many of happy no matter what he does or says.

Posted by: Thinking | February 15, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm

The bill could have been read for three months as it was being debated. The only thing those congress people had to do was read the last edits. Besides, the republicans did as much and more during their eight year stint (six for congress), but I don’t recall them complaining about time to read bills. I recall a three hour extended vote while arms were twisted to support GOP legislation. This is the pot calling the kettle black.

Posted by: PA voter | February 15, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm

Who’s seen the SNL send-up of teh congressional Republicans? Funniest thing I’ve seen in a long time.

Posted by: Flash Override | February 15, 2009, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm

I take that back, nothing is near as funny as “Kittens inspired by kittens after the doctor.”

Posted by: Flash Override | February 15, 2009, 6:19 pm 6:19 pm

You repubs got us into this mess!!! McCain ddn’t win so he should shut up his complaining…..he picked an idiot to run with him and that was his first poor judgement call…. I keep looking for Palin’s repub. clothes to be given to charity….. Republicans get over it — you lost the election….

Posted by: antirepub | February 15, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

The SNL skit stunk to high heaven. Even with a partisan, liberal audience there was dead silence during the skit. The most inappropriate thing for SNL to do was introduce the Obama girls for ridicule. It was inappropriate and definitely not funny. Unfortunately, there are a number of people who will believe that that is what the Republicans did because SNL told them so…

Posted by: Crickets | February 15, 2009, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm

Why wouldn’t John McCain stay home and learn how to use a computer than telling utter nonsense on TV? That way he will serve our nation better. The more talks these days more I lose respect for him. Remember his concession speech about that he and the Republicans should rally go beyond partisan difference for the sake of our country? I guess his moment of generosity didn’t last that long! The face remain that Republicans have destroyed America. President Clinton’s budget surplus was 486 Billion and on a trajectory of surplus 5.60 Trillion… After eight years of Republican abuse of America the current situation of our country is dire. But we are confident that we the people will prevail. And our country will be resorted to it greatness. We have a wonderful President; even in the wake of colossal Republican destruction of America, I am so relieved that we have an intelligent man as our President who is at the helm of our ship of state. President Obama is full of dignity and intelligence. He articulates America’s vision of leadership for the future. Unlike his floundering and self-destructive predecessor George Bush, President Obama is a great compliment to the office of the President of the United States. I think he’s going to be one of our great American Presidents like Washington, Lincoln or FDR. Republicans are so struck in the past like John McCain isn’t smart enough to understand he has to move beyond the conservative mantra of “Tax Cuts” “Small Government” “No Regulation” “Let Marketplace Decides…” I can’t understand, a man like John McCain who doesn’t know how to use a computer, can he really understand what future holds for America. John McCain’s type of politics is over for good. But Republicans have not learned anything it seems. What President Obama is doing is laying the necessary foundation to revitalize America, again. President Obama has to prevent America from a colossal collapse; after all the years of poor judgment and damage done to our country by the Republicans and to go beyond to lay the foundation for America’s future. President Obama is proposing to do is what FDR did to save our country for disintegration. President Obama is planning to go even further and lay the foundation for a strong future in terms of healthcare, infrastructure, schools and universities, research and science, education and jobs, business and industry to prosper and America to be strong and lead the world. Now, John McCain has started to lie publicly. It is sad to see once admirable politician like John McCain become a desperate and tragic charactor.

Posted by: charleschaplin | February 15, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

“In the next few days we will review the suddenly budget-hawkish rhetoric of congressional Republicans and the way they spent money in the Bush era.”
___________________________________________________
Sure, you will. I’ll believe that when i see it. The media has let the Repubicans trounce this stimulus bill for it’s “wasteful spending,” without mentioning that the wasteful spending of the Republicans is at the center of our current problems.
Republicans wanted the trillions of dollars in tax cuts for the wealthy and a trillion dollar war of choice in Iraq, but now they’re suddenly concerned about the budget? Right. This is purely politics. They gave Bush anything he wanted, and now they want to obstruct Obama.
Republicans want our president to fail so badly that they’re saying so publicly and even going as far as compare themselves with the insurgency of the Taliban! Yeah, that’s EXACTLY what America needs — a Republican party that patterns itself after terrorists.

Posted by: Gimme a break! | February 15, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm

Haven’t read it!? It’s just like politicians and partisans to be sitting on all branches of the idiot tree and slinging crud at each other, after having spent weeks criticizing/praising, analyzing, and commenting on the viablility of something they haven’t read. Nor have they bothered to offer alternatives – real ones, in writing with fleshed out details, not just what they read in the paper or heard from some special interest backed talking head somewhere.
Just remember, the deeper this crisis gets, the cheaper it is for the vultures, foreign and domestic, to buy up/steal even more of this country.
For people who profess to love their country so much, I haven’t seen such lazy and shallow efforts in exercising their duties since… well, probably the previous sessions of congress.

Posted by: Paul_Revere | February 15, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm

Pelosi is the real president.
Obama is just the window dressing.
Everyone knows he can’t make decisions but an expert at voting present.
Posted by: sammy | Feb 15, 2009 4:52:22 PM
________________________________________
This is a tired pathetic move to try and drive a wedge between nancy and the president.
I even hear it on Foxnews , its laughable, they both are democrats.. they both wants to help the little guy and that what voters voted for .
I like the move they both will play good cop bad cop .
The FRINGE losing party which is the republicans needs to grab a seat and be quiet if they don’t want to help.

Posted by: mark | February 15, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm

So much for the national emergency Obama whined about for 3 weeks.
He kept telling us we had to have a spending package ASAP. So fast even Democrats admitted they hadn’t read the bill.
So they passed it and what did Obama do? Went on vacation for 3 days. Yes, we can all see this was a serious emergency. /sarcasm

Posted by: Peach | February 15, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm

Why did they have to vote on Friday? Why was it so rushed, and told it had to be voted on Friday? Obama took off Friday for his vacation in Chicago. Couldn’t the Senate have sat on this and *read* the bill over the weekend, and voted Monday?
It seems rather obvious that Obama was afraid if they actually read it, and more people actually had time to see it, it wouldn’t have passed.
Disgraceful.

Posted by: sarainitaly | February 15, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm

When the country goes into a depression, just remember this spending bill that most economists say will be death to the economy.
I know it’s fashionable for Obama to lie and say most economists agree with him, and for the media to cover for him, but anyone with a brain watching CNBC can see the handwriting on the wall and hear what the true analysts and economists are saying.

Posted by: A31 | February 15, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm

So they passed it and what did Obama do? Went on vacation for 3 days. Yes, we can all see this was a serious emergency. /sarcasm
_______________________________________
I had no idea Saturday and Sunday was consider vacation , Silly me !I should have gone to work knowing its doors dont open till monday .
i think you need to go look at president bush when it comes to the word VACATION. his name is right next to it in the dictionaRY.
When Bush wins election you never hear from him again, You Maybe see him 6 times in a term it always seems , President Obama was out on the trail in full energy mode all week .Something we have never seen in any President.
Other presidents win and they go on permanent vacation until election time.

Posted by: sam | February 15, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm

I voted for president Obama. I believe he has better access to facts and qualified opinions than I do. I decided to give him the trust that George Bush completely destroyed. The republicans are still doing the “same old same old” as anyone truly following the news will see. Stop nitpicking and give the guy a chance, he’s looking good to me so far

Posted by: Cathy Piller | February 15, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

uh, Sam, honey -
Why didn’t Obama stick around Friday night and sign the legislation? Why didn’t he sign it in Chicago on Saturday? Or today? Or Monday?
Why is he waiting until Tuesday?
I mean, if it’s such a big emergency and all. But we can see why.
It would have given people too much time to oppose the bill. Opposition was building hugely. Congressmen on both sides of the aisle said the call opposed to the legislation nearly mirrored the same level of anti phone calls they received with regard to Bush’s guest program legislation.
Obama couldn’t let more people read the darned thing or he wouldn’t have gotten his little goodies and payoffs for his union and ACORN buddies.

Posted by: Peach | February 15, 2009, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

A31: “…just remember this spending bill that most economists say will be death to the economy.”
Interesting definition of most. I haven’t even seen a reputable argument that a majority of economists share any position, pro or con on this bill. Although the Nobel winners in economics – a nicely circumscribed set of economists of defined qualification – that are on record are majority in favor of the stimulus or recommend a larger one.

Posted by: jhw539 | February 15, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

You are entitled to your own opinion.
The facts, however, are that public support for the bill has been fairly stable, at well over 50%.
Support for Obama is not slipping either, at over 60%.
Support for the Democratic members of congress is RISING over the last two weeks, and of course, so is disapproval of the Republicans.

Posted by: Flash Override | February 15, 2009, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

Peach: “Opposition was building hugely. Congressmen on both sides of the aisle said the call opposed to the legislation nearly mirrored the same level of anti phone calls they received with regard to Bush’s guest program legislation.”
Ah, a fan of the American Idol style of government. Lets have the fanatics burning up the phone lines override the national election we just had! And ignore the polls showing no loss of support for the stimulus – it actually kicked up from 52% to 59% support in the favor/disfavor/no opinion gallup poll after Obama started pushing it directly.

Posted by: jhw539 | February 15, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm

Press coverage of the ‘stimulus’ bill — twice the number of Republicans as Democrats were given talking time, and less than 5% of the commentary was given by economists.
This is the state of our media. Political operatives opinions are more important to them than experts. The commentary edge given the Republicans is because the media agrees with them on the concept of the government and the economy.

Posted by: Flash Override | February 15, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

I don’t think it’s too bad that Obama has told the people they would post the bills online and the American people would have 5 days to view (legislation) on the Internet. That is happening on certain bills, I guess.
But when Obama was in Peoria, he told the crowd if the stimulus bill was passed the CEO of Caterpillar, James W. Owens, said he would be able call some of the people that were laid-off at Caterpiller. Mr. Owens told President Obama that he didn’t say anything like that. There will need to be more lay-offs before Owens could start to bring people in. Luckily, somebody on Obama’s team backed up Mr. Owens. Guess Obama needs a hearing aid? Or just thought the he could use the bully pulpit to get Mr. Owens to bring laid-off people back to their former jobs.
You’re only the President of the United States and the jobs you create will be shorter than your own term.

Posted by: elainekramer | February 15, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

One thing really bothers me. We recognize Obama as the first black president, but we say nothing of his being the first undocumented president. Why is that?

Posted by: tanarg | February 15, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

jhw539 – Apparently you didn’t see the Rasmussen poll which showed support for the spending bill down to 30-something percent. Drastically down.
And let me just add – it really shows which posters have ever watched CNBC or read a financial publication. American Idol form of government indeed. It’s quite sad and telling that more Americans know the names of judges on talent shows than the names of SCOTUS judges.

Posted by: Peach | February 15, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

If people are unhappy with Obama, they should think about asking Congress to investigate whether he is even a natural born citizen. He may only be a naturalized citizen, if that. But because he has been hiding his original, complete birth certificate (nobody has seen it), we just do not know if he’s even a legal president.
If it turns out that he’s found to be ineligible to be president according to the Constitution, then everything he does now will be null and void. Everything. Every appointment, every bill, every signature on every document — all of it will be as if it never happened.
Would you rather this occur now, when the damage can still be contained, or do you want to wait three years or two, until the matter is totally unavoidable due to demonstrations by people who are fed up with the cover-ups?
Please ask your state’s senators and congressmen to help the people of America learn the truth about the identity of the man living at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. He may, in fact, be an impostor.
Don’t you want to be sure? Are you really sure now that he’s the legal president?
I’m not, and there are millions of us who feel this way, and we will not be silenced.

Posted by: tanarg | February 15, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

Peach:
” Apparently you didn’t see the Rasmussen poll which showed support for the spending bill down to 30-something percent. Drastically down.
And let me just add – it really shows which posters have ever watched CNBC or read a financial publication.”
Two things on the Rasmussen poll: One, the results are adjusted to fit their proprietary, undisclosed likely voter model. In a non-election year, I have very little respect for changing the results like this. Second, their question includes the “stimulus with changes” option. Everyone always wants it passed with improvements, just like the generic Democrat/Republican polls better than a specific candidate.
And you are the one who claimed that irate phone calls are somehow more representative of majority will than the national election we held just a few months ago.

Posted by: jhw539 | February 15, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

I just have one question..where is the alternate bill that the repubs supposedly wrote in rebuttal to the Stimulus Bill? They don’t have one do they? They are just lying with nothing to offer.

Posted by: delores | February 15, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

“If people are unhappy with Obama, they should think about asking Congress to investigate whether he is even a natural born citizen. He may only be a naturalized citizen, if that. But because he has been hiding his original, complete birth certificate (nobody has seen it), we just do not know if he’s even a legal president.”
Oh and while Congress is at it they need to investigate if the moon landing was faked, the conspiracy behind the assassination of JFK – oh and those aliens living at Roswell!

Posted by: JKS | February 15, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm

Republicans trying to take credit for the stimulus bill in their home states, after voting against it:
“Young boasted that he ‘won a victory for the Alaska Native contracting program and other Alaska small business owners last night in H.R. 1, the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.’
One provision would have made it harder for minority businesses to win contracts, and Young explained that he ‘worked with members on the other side of the aisle to make the case for these programs, and was able to get the provision pulled from the bill.’
Yet later in the day Young — who recently told McClatchy that he would’ve included earmarks, or local projects, in the bill if it had been permitted — issued another statement blasting the overall measure.
‘This bill was not a stimulus bill. It was a vehicle for pet projects, and that’s wrong,’ he protested.
Funny how they complain about lack of input in the process in the same breath they brag about it, and complain about the pork in the same breath they brag about it.
Republican bizzarro world indeed.

Posted by: Flash Override | February 15, 2009, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Note: When President Bush took office in 2001, Republicans and Democrats in Washington had built a strong consensus on the need for
[[Fiscal Responsibility]].
Bush Blew that apart within a few months. With the country in a recession, a temporary return to deficits was inevitable.
But Bush’s [[Tax Cuts and Spending Increases and Clear Disdain for the Pay-As-You-Go Approach]] that had brought deficits down in the [1990s], brought a return to [Permanent Deficits].
These actions almost certainly didn’t cause the current crisis, but they have left the Federal Government in a much weaker position to combat it.
—————————————
Time Magazine: Tax Cuts Solution, Aint The Solution……
When Ronald Reagan slashed taxes on capital gains and high earners in the early 1980s, inflation was pushing the middle class into top tax brackets, financial markets had been stuck in a funk for 15 years and income inequality had been declining for almost five decades.
Like him or not, the man’s actions fit the times and the U.S. economy boomed for most of his two terms in office.
Big Note: Bush came to Washington facing almost diametrically opposing economic conditions, yet he offered up the same solutions as Reagan. Guess what: they weren’t what the economy needed.
Hahaha !!!
The GOP’s One Trick Party Rule…[[Tax Cuts]]
You Need a Decent Balance of All Things and [[100% Tax Cut Bill]] would be a JOKE !!!

Posted by: O. | February 15, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

There is Over [[230 Billion Dollars]] of [[Tax Cuts]] in Obama’s Stimulus Plan and that’s [[ENOUGH]]
Tax Cuts in an of themselves…
[[Will Not Work]]
You Tax Cuts Junkies, account for why [[Tax Cuts]] Did Not Work for Former President George W. Bush…
George Tried it in his 2001 Stimulus Plan, which was Passed by his Majority Republican Senate and Congress and it [[FAILED]] !!
Look at the Damn Mess since then.
Not to mention George W. Bush’s 20 Billion Per Month, Middle Eastern Wars, Financed with Interest by [[Communist-Socialist China]] and..
His De-Regulation of Mortgage Corporations, Banks, Wall Street, with the Bankers Running Wild, with No Restraint, No Constraints All Courtesy of [[De-Regulation]]…
Not to Mention the Mortgage Madness, all under George’s Watch, if you want to Call it [[George's Watch]] ?

Posted by: O. | February 15, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm

Uh, tax cuts did work under President Bush. Have you forgotten that he inherited a recession and then 911 happened? We recovered pretty well and very quickly from those events under Bush.
The current economic problems are the result of the democrat Congress refusal to reign in Freddie and Fannie, despite President Bush’s pleas to do so. Remember, the democrats took over in 2006. The economy was fine until then.
So the whole “tax cuts don’t work” is a joke. Even more of a joke is someone who would rather have the government spend his money than do it himself.

Posted by: Plumber | February 15, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Plumber – Your revisionist history is amusing!
___________________________________
President Bush and the Republican Congress Increased Debt by More Than $3 Trillion. Under President Bush and the Republican Congress, our national debt has risen by $3 trillion to $8.9 trillion, or about $30,000 for every man, woman and child in America. [US Department of the Treasury]
President Bush and the Republican Congress Doubled Foreign-Held Debt. President Bush and the Republican Congress have doubled our foreign debt to more than $2 trillion. It took 42 presidents 224 years to build up the same level of foreign debt. [Senate Budget Committee]
CBO Found Cost of Bush Tax Cuts Exceeds Budget Deficits. According to a letter from the CBO to the House Budget Chairman, the cost of the Bush tax cuts exceed projected deficits. “On that basis, CBO estimates that the revenue loss in JCT’s projections would lead to additional debt-service costs of $46 billion in 2007, for a total budgetary cost of $211 billion. On the same basis, the agency estimates the total budgetary costs, including interest, for 2008 through 2011 to be $233 billion, $245 billion, $269 billion, and $215 billion, respectively.” CBO expected budget deficits of between $150 billion and $200 billion in 2007 and $113 billion, $134 billion, $157 billion, and $35 billion for 2008 through 2011 respectively. [CBO, Letter to Chairman Spratt, 7/20/07]

Posted by: Paige | February 15, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm

So you cared about deficits then, but not now Paige? How’s that working for you?
You can’t revise the fact that Bush inherited a recession, and then we were hit with 911 and he brought back the economy until the democrats took over in 2006.
Nor can you revise the fact that the current problems are a result of Barney Frank and Chris Dodd and their pals and friends of Angelo.
You can try of course as the scribble below shows, but you won’t succeed.

Posted by: Plumber | February 15, 2009, 8:57 pm 8:57 pm

Plumber -
You are quick to say the recession happened after 9/11 on Bush watch, but somehow fail to mention the catastrophic events of 9/11 also happened on his watch.
You mention Fannie and Freddie/Dodd and so forth, but fail to mention the predatory lending practices and pure greed by banks making loans to people with few assets and bundling them and selling them to other banks because they were even more greedy. Just watch 60 Minutes tonight.
If you want to ignore facts that is your decision, but pretending they don’t exist is pure negligence.
The CRACK in your theories Plumber is the pure hypocrisy of all that have posted.

Posted by: Paige | February 15, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

So much for the national emergency Obama whined about for 3 weeks.
He kept telling us we had to have a spending package ASAP. So fast even Democrats admitted they hadn’t read the bill.
So they passed it and what did Obama do? Went on vacation for 3 days. Yes, we can all see this was a serious emergency. /sarcasm
Posted by: Peach | Fe
*********************************************
TERRIBLE! A man who actually has family values rather than just talk about them. Spending a Saturday and Sunday VACATION with his family is one of the WORST things I have ever heard of.
Imagine having a bill pass on Friday and putting it on the White House website for the whole country to read until he signs it on the fifth day (Tuesday). OUTRAGEOUS!

Posted by: Truth Matters | February 15, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm

Where did the Obama’s attend church today?

Posted by: mad | February 15, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Politifact has Obama’s promises kept to promises broken ratio at 7:1.
Perhaps McCain might adopt a more fair and less partisan position toward the president…the American people as well as history may regard him more kindly.

Posted by: Danny | February 15, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

All I remember is candidate Obama was a serial liar.

Posted by: young_voter | February 15, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

Not reading the fine print gets many into trouble from buying houses to cars.They should have passed the bill in stages from the most critical to the least (least= mouse habitats). Which makes me think Obama already knew who he wanted to pay back, gave Nancy a draft and said “get to it Gal”. In any case while the uproar is over whats in the bill Obama and his team of a-d-d assistants are over all over the place getting ready for other legislation such as putting 30 year olds on Mommie and daddys health care plans, letting terrorist off the hook and preparing for more gun restrictions. So much confusion in fact that one would quickly forget his staff of high profile tax cheats and lobbyist now in his employment.

Posted by: david | February 15, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Looks like McCain lost all credibility when he picked Palin. Too bad, I didn’t think she was that bad, nor he. On the other hand nobody is listening to the guy anymore. How many ways can you say OBAMA WON?

Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | February 15, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm

Is the bill on the WH web site? How about a link to that portion of the web site.

Posted by: Peach | February 15, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm

Did any of you bother seeing what the White House said today? They want to lower your expectations…hint, hint—they KNOW this is a trillion $$$$ mistake and the tab is on us!!! I’m past looking back but looking forward, we’re quickly going to hell in a handbasket!

Posted by: Truthsayer | February 15, 2009, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

delores, dear — the Republican version of their “stimulus” bill is in written form and was detailed in various financial publications, none of which you apparently read. Pity that.

Posted by: Peach | February 15, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm

jhw539: ROFL. That’s it. When there’s a poll you don’t like, just attack the credibility of Rasmussen or whomever took the poll. Got it.
I don’t like your poll either. Outlier numbers. There you go — see how that works?

Posted by: Peach | February 15, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

david:”least= mouse habitats”
Thanks for including this – whenever I see this blatant lie referenced (there is, in TRUTH, no money marked for mouse habitat in the bill), it allows me to immediately assess the credibility and value of the rest of the post. Great time saver.

Posted by: jhw539 | February 15, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

“…when I’m president, meetings where laws are written will be more open to the public. No more secrecy. That’s a commitment i’m going to make to you as president. No more secrecy.”
Reminds me of a joke.
How can you tell when a politician is lying?
His lips are moving.

Posted by: Baddabing | February 15, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

jhw539: ROFL. That’s it. When there’s a poll you don’t like, just attack the credibility of Rasmussen or whomever took the poll. Got it.
***************************************************
I’d recommend you read jwh’s posting again. You apparently didn’t understand it well.

Posted by: kathy | February 15, 2009, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm

David, read it again…it’s very cleverly worded so that it’s the habitat for the mouse..$30,000,000 count the zeros and remember that when everyone is losinf their house and can’t put food on the table. You are protecting the little mouse’s house. Good job Pelosi—maybe you’ll get into heaven! NOT!

Posted by: Remember | February 15, 2009, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm

Peach:”Is the bill on the WH web site? How about a link to that portion of the web site.”
Not too hard to find.

Posted by: jhw539 | February 15, 2009, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm

Thank you Mr. Tapper for having the curiosity that journalists used to have. Thank you for asking tough questions and for giving us facts instead of opinion, You are a credit to your profession. Keep up the great work!
M

Posted by: rushbaby | February 15, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm

Peach:”I don’t like your poll either. Outlier numbers. There you go — see how that works? ”
That doesn’t make any sense since the Rassmussen poll is the one with the largest difference from the major polls (Pew, CNN/Opinion Research Corporation, Foxnews/Opinon Dynamics, etc.). Words have definitions and meanings, and based on reality the Gallup poll doesn’t fit the definition of an outlier at all.

Posted by: jhw539 | February 15, 2009, 10:34 pm 10:34 pm

Is it really McCain’s attack, or is he acting as a GOP surrogate?

Posted by: kathy | February 15, 2009, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm

Speaking of transparency, the Republicans are now demanding Roland Burris resign after it has come to light that Blagojevich’s brother asked him for a contribution…hmmm…I wonder who let the cat out of the bag? What say you, Jake? Could it be that needing his vote, Reid and Durbin suddenly caved and welcomed Burris with open arms, knowing that they could get rid of him as soon as the “rushed” stimulus bill passed? This is Axelrod’s M.O. isn’t it?

Posted by: RL in Illinois | February 15, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm

John McCain still doesn’t understand the economy.
Next rant from old guy who lost the race….

Posted by: kravitz | February 15, 2009, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm

What is this so called blog? Is this suppose to be a talking points primer from foxnews or rush limbaugh. Remember that President Obama won the election so get over it.

Posted by: James Williams | February 15, 2009, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm

RL in Illinois:”Reid and Durbin suddenly caved and welcomed Burris with open arms”
? They fought him tooth and nail and were desperate to find a graceful out when – as Republicans gleefully pointed out – they didn’t have a leg to stand on.
Also, the stimulus could have passed without him, it just would have meant Kennedy risking his life by stopping treatment and coming back up to Congress to vote for it – something the Republicans would probably have maintained their filibuster to force. Heck, they are on record as filibustering to force a guy to fly back from his mother’s wake. No place for human decency when Republicans are in a filibuster’n mood (which is, by the way, a historic record amount of time and double what the latest Democratic minority ever dared to do).

Posted by: jhw539 | February 15, 2009, 11:06 pm 11:06 pm

Silly, defensive argument. This has Axelrod written all over it. Ingenious. You just have to admit when it comes to playing the game Ax and O are the best. They had their and can eat it too. The best part is they can blame it on the Republicans.
ps. Kennedy wouldn’t miss this to save his life.

Posted by: RL in Illinois | February 15, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

cake

Posted by: RL in Illinois | February 15, 2009, 11:27 pm 11:27 pm

So what? Obama is a liar just like the rest of the DC crowd. Are we suppose to be suprised???
The more they lie, the more we love ‘em! :)

Posted by: ajax | February 15, 2009, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm

Some of you people just wont move on will you. The election is over, Obama won,did you argue about GW’s qualifications after he stole Florida ?
Your country will remain in a state of decay & division. If all you can do is whine on & on about the past, then that is where you remain.
It’s obvious what George W was, The Bushes are a bunch of criminal thieving robbers with no respect for the constitution.They make Nixon look like a liberal.
If you are wondering where a lot of money went under Bush, check out how much they gave to the other God freaks.
The evangelical churches & schools got billions of free tax payer funds & pay no tax in return.
They create no revenue or employment thus contribute nothing to the national economy.
The fact that Obama has stated that the churches will get none of the stimulus money is a huge leap foreward.They have been sucking your country dry for so long now that they actually think they are automatically entitled to it.
Even though it would contribute nothing to a national economic recovery.
They are parasites & should be treated as such.

Posted by: brian dillon | February 15, 2009, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm

As hard as it is to understand, I think McCain is starting to make Palin look intelligent.

Posted by: unshrub | February 15, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm

@brian dillon,
And what does that have to do with Obama promising something and then not delivering?

Posted by: ajax | February 15, 2009, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm

How come Obama can make promises and not come through on them, but get a pass?
Someone else Lied, so Obama gets to also? Is that how it works now. Damn, some change.

Posted by: ajax | February 15, 2009, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

“Some of you people just wont move on will you. The election is over, Obama won,did you argue about GW’s qualifications after he stole Florida ?”
There is a little button up there that stands for PLAY. Obama said the words, but yet, he has gone back on his promise.
BUT YET.. you bring up BUSH.
Sounds to me like YOU have not moved on!@

Posted by: ajax | February 15, 2009, 11:57 pm 11:57 pm

John suspended his campaign to help fix the economy. Tell him to start running for president again this Tuesday.

Posted by: doug | February 15, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm

For that matter, only one section of 4 parts of the stimulus bill is on line. Many of the last hour amendments can’t be found either, like e-verify and when it was crossed out. Sneaky and underhanded game playing. The Stimulus Plan was crafted by obfuscators.

Posted by: Der Kempt | February 16, 2009, 12:26 am 12:26 am

Like everyone, McCain sees through Obama’s “bipartisan” politics. Perhaps, we should have put up with “Moosekiller” to get John.

Posted by: Mihann | February 16, 2009, 12:29 am 12:29 am

jhw:Heck, they are on record as filibustering to force a guy to fly back from his mother’s wake.
===
The Republicans didn’t filibuster
anything.
Harry Reid set the time and date of the vote, not the Republicans.
If Brown has a complaint, it should be with Reid or Obama. Reid for setting the day of the vote, Obama for wanting him to fly in, while Obama himself went out of town rather than sign the bill.
Apparently Obama could take his personal time and wait until Tuesday, but he couldn’t let Sherrod Brown do that.

Posted by: MayBee | February 16, 2009, 12:53 am 12:53 am

Boo hoo, poor widdle McCain and the other poor widdle losers who are so bitter and mean. Republicans are looking like clowns who don’t care about anyone or anything but themselves. The country deserves better than what republicans are amounting to. We are in a meltdown that republicans caused and they are the ones who are so outraged about everything. Amazing cluelessness.

Posted by: Vicki | February 16, 2009, 1:14 am 1:14 am

You know….. everyone gets caught in a lie every once in a while that they have to dig themselves out of….but what we’ve seen with Obama is a pattern of behavior…in a very short time…
To ignore that, would mean we don’t value ethics….
You’re either ethical….or you’re not…
There’s no middle ground, no gray area…..
We don’t aspire to …or respect, selective ethics….
I’ve come to accept, there will be die-hard supporters of Obama…no matter what he does….
But I can’t believe all who voted for him, will accept that he manipulated them, to get their votes…
We have , yet another ‘shady situation’ now, with Blago’s appointment to fill Obama’s Senate seat,
This is a chance for Obama to do the right thing….the ethical thing…
A test to his bipartisan rhetoric…
The democrats should remove him..which would mean holding a special election to fill the seat….
But that would mean taking a chance a republican could win the seat….
Obama very much needs to brush off the ‘smell’ of illinois corruption…
If he does’nt……It will be akin to him holding up ‘THAT’ finger…to all of us…..

Posted by: J Moore | February 16, 2009, 5:27 am 5:27 am

Paige,
You misread what I said: Bush inherited a recession from Clinton. It threatened to become much worse after 911. The Bush tax cuts stopped that.
And yes, 911 happened on President Bush’s watch. You apparently think there was no threat before that time. You fail to mention the Gorelik wall (as in Jamie also of Fannie Mae, and Clinton fame) which made it impossible to identify the threat. Perhaps you haven’t heard of that.
AS for 60 Minutes, I’d be embarrassed citing them as a newsource. If Fannie and Freddie hadn’t tampered with historic credit practices “because everyone deserves a house they can’t afford” no predatory lending could have happened. The blame lies with Frank and Dodd and their refusal to reign Freddie and Fannie in.
You make a lot of allegations Paige, but are vary short on facts. Let me know when you get to that stage of your research.

Posted by: Plumber | February 16, 2009, 7:16 am 7:16 am

Its time that John McCain becomes the man I voted for in 2000 and stop being so frightened by the new leader of the republican party, Rush Limbaugh.

Posted by: Charles Bombaugh | February 16, 2009, 8:37 am 8:37 am

When Obama said he never knew about Wright’s sermons after sitting in the pews for 20 years–that should have been a clue about his character and credibility.
It’s been one lie after another.

Posted by: reed | February 16, 2009, 8:38 am 8:38 am

“The stimulus bill, meanwhile, wasn’t posted onto the White House website until Friday. The President will sign it four days later, on Tuesday.
The stimulus bill clearly would be considered “emergency” legislation, but if one goes by the original language President Obama used in 2007, this bill will also fall short of the ‘five days on the White House website before signing it’ pledge.”
Call this an “emergency” is ok, but to have the Congress vote on it without A SINGLE MEMBER being able to read & COMPREHEND IT is a total FARCE!
That is not “Change” of ANY KIND!
It is politics as usual and in the end, it is us, the American Taxpayers, who get screwed!
By the Way Sen. Chuckie Schumer, there are PLENTY of Americans who do CARE about Billions of pork being wasted on your BS liberal pet projects…i.e salt marsh mice…
Exactly how many jobs is that going to create?
Talk about arrogance!

Posted by: Mike_C | February 16, 2009, 8:47 am 8:47 am

“The country deserves better than what republicans are amounting to.”
Someone once said the people deserve the government they elect (or something very close to that).
Unfortunately, most of us do not get the opportunity to vote yea or nay on Nancy Pelosi or Barney Frank!
So we get a 1071 page of crap that will take weeks to figure out, but it was so important to “do something”, Our leadership decided it was not important enough to allow the members of Congress to actually READ IT!
Obviously after all their whining & complaining about TARP, Pelosi/Frank & Co. are gladly willing to repeat its mistakes all over again!!
I know im curious to know if we are still spending 650,000,000 more to get people ready for the Digital TV conversion. It was in the house version, and the senate version. I assume it probably is still in the final version.
The Digtal TV “switch” was originally supposed to be turned ON this Thursday! Now after a campaign that has run for well over a year, people still are “not ready”??? The “ON” time has now been pushed out until June 12.
So in the deep wisdom of this “stimulus” bill, we need to now spend 650 Million more dollars, in addtion to the 1.3 Billion already spent to inform people who dont understand this thing and give them vouchers.
OMG, if there is anyone out there with a TV who does not understand that this id going to happen, they are morons!!!
There has been an ongoing campaign of annoucements and ads for well over a year!! Why on earth do we need to spend over half a BILLION dollars NOW!!!
Exactly how are we going to anything differently in the next 4 months that we have not done the previous 16 or 18 months!
If you want absdoulte proof of how the government(Republican OR Democratic controlled) CANNOT run anything correctly, just look at this extremely simple problem and how badly screwed up it has become! 30% of the near 50 million vouchers mailed out have “expired” !
I cant wait to “watch” as this “transparency” we keep hearing about shows us just have many 100′s of billions of dollars get wasted with this bill !

Posted by: Mike_C | February 16, 2009, 9:06 am 9:06 am

One thing that is transparent about Obama is that he isn’t used to having a steady job.
BO’s such a lightweight he may be off to Hawaii this weekend.
Leave the decisions to Reid and Pelosi.

Posted by: sammy | February 16, 2009, 9:10 am 9:10 am

I can’t believe that people are still pushing the mice meme. That has been so completely debunked as to make anyone who brings it up look like 1) and idiot, or 2) a really, really bad political operative.

Posted by: Flash Override | February 16, 2009, 9:15 am 9:15 am

AS for 60 Minutes, I’d be embarrassed citing them as a newsource
______________________________________
Yes, because the far right-wing Blogs are keeping you so well informed….

Posted by: Paige | February 16, 2009, 9:43 am 9:43 am

Think about it. Why was there not enought time to read the entire bill? If Obama is not signing it until tomorrow, why not let Congress (and the American public) have the bill over the weekend?
Who would sign or agree to anything without thoroughly reading what you were signing? C’mon, America, wake up! We are being scammed.

Posted by: NeedCoffee | February 16, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am

And yes, 911 happened on President Bush’s watch. You apparently think there was no threat before that time
____________________________________________
And the CIA briefer who flew to Bush’s Texas ranch during August of 2001, amid a ton of reports and data of a pending al-Qaeda attack, to call the president’s attention personally to the now-famous Aug. 6, 2001, memo titled “Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in US.” Bush reportedly heard the briefer out and replied: “All right. You’ve covered your ass, now.” (WashPo & countless other news agencies)

Posted by: Paige | February 16, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am

Hey Flash,
Since I didn’t spend my entire weekend “debunking” liberal minutia…
Why don’t you enlighten me?
LOL…seriously,, I used it as an example, Since the idiocy of voting so quickly on this bill left the weeding out of things like this to internetters, instead of Congress!!!
It points out how insane it is to have a 1000+ page bill and then force a vote on it in less than 24 hours from the time it was put into final form!!!
Of course there is tons of foolish pork in that bill. Also someone tell Sen Chuckie Schummer that millions of Americans DO care about that “pork!”
On more important and REAL point…
Why didn’t the Democrats, who “claim” to care so much about the working people and jobs, include 9 Billion to continue production of the F-22 Raptor???
That would have immediately placed almost 100, 000 jobs in the presidents “saved Jobs” column!!!
My guess is that it makes too much sense to spend a few billion ACTUALLY doing something like that which would give those people some job security and confidence to spend!!!…you know ACTUALLY stimulating the economy!!!

Posted by: Mike_C | February 16, 2009, 9:55 am 9:55 am

Why was the MSM fawning over Obama in the election?
Jobs.
“Chicago Tribune’s Jill Zuckman joins President Obama’s administration as the Department of Transportation’s director of public affairs and assistant to Secretary Ray LaHood.
“Zuckman was a Washington-based correspondent at the Tribune and also made frequent appearances on MSNBC and Fox News.
“She is the second Tribune reporter to take a job in the administration. Peter Gosselin is now the chief speech writer for Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner.
“This move is somewhat of a trend- Jay Carney, formerly of Time Magazine, is now Vice President Biden’s communications director and CNN’s Dr. Sanjay Gupta is supposedly among the top picks to become the next surgeon general.”

Posted by: QuidProQuo | February 16, 2009, 9:59 am 9:59 am

Why was there no time to read the entire bill if it wasn’t going to be signed right away by President Obama?
That’s not transparency.

Posted by: EnquiringMinds | February 16, 2009, 10:01 am 10:01 am

Too bad Obama isn’t mature or smart enough to tell Congress to take the weekend to actually read the bill before pass it. Since he knew he wasn’t going to sign it until Tuesday, this would have been the adult thing to do.
But Bambi couldn’t risk people actually reading just how much money he was spending on his union buddies and ACORN.

Posted by: Peach | February 16, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am

Why are the republicans so upset with the stimulus package is it because they played a big role in getting us into this situation we are in they were very negligent in their duties when they had control along with George Bush.They should have tried something like this before now, the stimulus that Bush tried did nothing but add to the deficit and did nothing to stmulate the economy so it’s time they shut up unless they have an excuse as to why they did nothing to stop the recession when they indeed knew what was happening to the housing market long ago.They knew there were people losing jobs homes banks going to fail and did nothing so they should stop listening to their great leader Rush and think for themselves if that is at all possible.

Posted by: damehen | February 16, 2009, 10:39 am 10:39 am

In Obamaland there is no difference between truth and lies. Just words, just words.

Posted by: Rasputin3.14 | February 16, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am

John Mccain doesnt Understand Economics so what is he ranting about? Last I checked the country REJECTED Him and the Republicans Ideals.Amazing a man that voted 95 Percent of the time with W And helped put our country in this mess. Well If Mccain is against The Stim Bill that makes me even more for it.Mccain retire already and Republicans Go reinvent your Party W Has destroyed you!

Posted by: Angie | February 16, 2009, 11:17 am 11:17 am

Jake, you might also research why Republicans are still appearing on cable and network news programs at nearly twice the numbers of their Democratic counterparts, even though it’s readily apparent that voters clearly rejected the GOP over the last two election cycles, to the point where they no longer control Congress and the White House.
This proportional misrepresentation in the mainstream media affords Republicans the opportunity to manufacture drama and controversy in places and instances where none might otherwise exist.

Posted by: Donald from Hawaii | February 16, 2009, 11:29 am 11:29 am

” the stimulus that Bush tried did nothing but add to the deficit and did nothing to stmulate the economy so it’s time they shut up unless they have an excuse as to why they did nothing to stop the recession when they indeed knew what was happening to the housing market long ago”
—————————–
Now here is brilliant logic!!!
Bush’s $600/person stimulus didnt do much…your right about that, BUT…
Why then do you think giving people $13 extra per paycheck is going to have any effect on the US economy?
There is NO intellignet reason to think that the economy is even going to notice it! ZERO!!!!
No question times are tough, but if you do have a job, getting $13/check extra is not going to alter your current home budget situation one bit!!!
Most people are going to do the same thing with it that they did with Bush’s checks!!! Save it!!!
People are going to spend when they have confidence that the job they have today is not going away in the near future! Care to point out the specific pages in the bill that are supposed to make anyone with a job feel confident???
There is no consenus that this bill is going to do anything! Both sides can bring forth theie “economist of the day” to support whtever their position is.
Instead of spending time to focus on actual real solutions, Pelosi & Reid created a series of blobs of money that may or may not end up creating jobs.
Take a GOOD LOOK at the document created by the US Conference of Mayors.
It shows infrastructure jobs that are ready-to-go..AND in an amzing stoke of genious, they took each project and stated the money required and the number of jobs it takes!!!!
What a concept!!
If the liberal idiots in Congress who wrote this pile of prose had done that, then we would actually have had a way to see what things worked & what thingsa did not! Of course that makes sense, so we can’t possiblly do that!
Lets just keep going along doing the same things we have done for decades.
Obama had a chance to impose his will on this process and hold Congress’s collective feet to the fire. He too chose the easy way out!
Now we all have to hope that someone can wave the magic wand over this gathering of billion & million dollar blobs to actually create stimulus to the economy.
Everyone including the talking haeds on Sunday keep saying “We had to do something!”….Seems to me we heard that in the fall When Bush/Paulson & the Congress panicked. We just HAD to do something right then too, the result…NO ONE knows where the money went!
Yet the same buffoons have done the same thing again and we are supposed to be dumb enough to believe this time is different!!!
Can someone point out in that 1071 pages exactly HOW the oversight is different????

Posted by: Mike_C | February 16, 2009, 11:51 am 11:51 am

Donald from Hawaii,
Why not ask the Democrats, are you seriously claiming that media has now “switched” sides? LOL!!!!!
Actually id love to see more of Pelosi and her “500 Million Lost jobs a month” intelligence on the screen.
Or “Chuckie” Schumer have more time to defend his pork stuffing bills because Americans dont care!
Let bring Bumbling Barney Frank on to keep Telling america how bad spending money in Iraq is, yet he has no idea how much we spend in Afghanistan, let alone how much this beast we just passed will cost us or how much more Geithner thinks he needs for TARP II.

Posted by: Mike_C | February 16, 2009, 12:00 pm 12:00 pm

Did McCain really make this astute observation and statement of accountability on Obama transparency, or is he assuming a stance suggested by GOP operatives? I’m inclined to think it’s not his own after some of his campaign debacles — like announcing the fundamentals of the economy were strong last September, referring to Gov Palin as his soulmate, and wandering the stage during the town hall debate with Obama to name just a few. I’m not trying to attach ageism to some of his behaviors, but simply making the observation that McCain doesn’t appear to have the perspicacity or discernment to form such an observation and conclusion.

Posted by: kathy | February 16, 2009, 12:08 pm 12:08 pm

Obama promised:
1. Make government open and transparent.
2. Make it “impossible” for Congressmen to slip in pork barrel projects.
3. Meetings where laws are written will be more open to the public. (Even Congressional Republicans shut out.)
4. No more secrecy.
5. Public will have 5 days to look at a bill.
6. You’ll know what’s in it.
7. We will put every pork barrel project online.
All promises broken.

Posted by: Sally J. | February 16, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm

Hey Mike C Unlike the Garbage Fox News, and Rush Limbaugh is Shoving down your Throat after 8 years of An IDIOT For a President, and 6 of those Years a Republican Congress And the Results of their Leadership. The More the Republicans are against the Stim Bill the More the Public is for it.And As for Mccain Ranting I believe he Lost,The people Rejected him I work in the Public and I can tell you NO ONE CARES WHAT THE REPUBLICANS THINK! Unless of course your from Texas.

Posted by: Angie | February 16, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

There is no Pork in That Bill that is a REPUBLICAN LIE! If you consider A middle class tax cut,Infrastructure,Extending Unemployment Benifits,Money to the States about to go Bankrupt,Education PORK Then you Republicans are Sad!

Posted by: Angie | February 16, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm

Posted by: Angie | Feb 16, 2009 12:25:47 PM
You cannot be serious. There is $30 million to save Nancy Pelosi’s mouse. There is $2 billion for ACORN, and to make room for that spending on infrastructure was cut.

Posted by: drjohn | February 16, 2009, 12:40 pm 12:40 pm

DRJOHN
Prove it

Posted by: Angie | February 16, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

“There (were) commitments made that certainly aren’t being kept now.”
Thanks for that video. There are others. It’s not easy to lie with every single sentence you speak, but Obama did it.

Posted by: drjohn | February 16, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm

Washington Times:
Lawmakers and administration officials divulged Wednesday that the $789 billion economic stimulus bill being finalized behind closed doors in Congress includes $30 million for wetlands restoration that the Obama administration intends to spend in the San Francisco Bay Area to protect, among other things, the endangered salt marsh harvest mouse.
ACORN gets $2 billion in something labeled “Neighborhood Stabilization Programs.”

Posted by: drjohn | February 16, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm

“There is $30 million to save Nancy Pelosi’s mouse. ”
100% false – right winger lie – keep spreading it – says a heck of a lot about you.

Posted by: JKS | February 16, 2009, 12:52 pm 12:52 pm

JKS
Limbaugh is telling them these things! they are being LIED TOO!

Posted by: Angie | February 16, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm

drjohn pulls the non-updated article from the Washington Times – they even corrected their false story, yet he must continue to spread it.

Posted by: JKS | February 16, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

I don’t understand how Obama, who claims thing are in such poor shape and something needs to be done, takes a long weekend at home, after being on the job less than 3 weeks?
Is this going to help anyone?
First thing that should have been done this weekend was fire Tim Gientner, who still has not paid his taxes.
Then start to re-evaluate his entire cabinet.
Why doesn’t the media ask Rolland Burris how much he had to pay the Obama re-election team for his seat. We know several members of the Obama cabinet have paid large amounts for their positions. In case you have forgotten at first the democrats said they would never seat Burris, then Obama had a talk with the heads of each House and Senate, and all the sudden Senator Burris is wonderful and here with us today.
The stimulus bill the most porked up bill ever – China and Japan have called it destined for failure.
This is not a party issue people its a failure to do the job, it is not a race issue, its a failure to do the job as president.

Posted by: Science | February 16, 2009, 1:12 pm 1:12 pm

To angie, jks and the other hate speech liberals…..
If Obama & The Dems and you care so much for the American worker, Why are we still waiting for this administration to authorize the continuation of the F-22 raptor program.
That program holds near 100,000 American jobs!
We see a lot of gum-flapping about “SOMETHING” had to be done…WHY was this not included!!!

Posted by: Mike_C | February 16, 2009, 1:33 pm 1:33 pm

The recovery bill passed on Friday.
Friday Saturday. Sunday, Monday,
..and he signs on Tuesday. Well that is close to 5 days.
As for the Ledbetter act…well that was long OVERDUE
just like her pay.
We voted the GOP out, and we don’t care to hear their lying prattle. They are no Christians, all they do is lie, deceive, and lie some more. The media has had them on 2-1 over Dems, and I guess I’ll keep listening to C-Span.

Posted by: bdog | February 16, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm

If Obama & The Dems and you care so much for the American worker, Why are we still waiting for this administration to authorize the continuation of the F-22 raptor program.
That program holds near 100,000 American jobs!”
You act like Obama and Dems have already let this fail when you said yourself the deadline is not until March.
Dems do support the project as well as Obama’s Secretary of Defense.

Posted by: JKS | February 16, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm

“You act like Obama and Dems have already let this fail when you said yourself the deadline is not until March.
Dems do support the project as well as Obama’s Secretary of Defense.”
———————————–
JKS,
It is incredible that you are so blinded by extreme partisanship that you can’t understand!!!!
I am not the one running around to every camera available speading more & more fear to the American people, all the time sitting on the fact I only have to say so, and approximately 100,000 American jobs are saved!
Why should those workers and those families be made to wait? For what purpose are we waiting? Obama seems perfectly capable to me of walikng and chewing gum at the same time! Surely the great one can handle talking on TV about the stimulus at the same time he approves the f-22!!!
You dont think it would help all those familes to know NOW, TODAY, that there future for the next 3 years is secure?
That would be a SOLID step forward to giving the people confidence.
No, You would rather keep up the partisan blabber than actaully start putting forth REAL solutions!
I have known about the F-22 issue for quite a few months actually, YET I have not seen any of you bring it up! I have been waiting to see if this bill in its final form would address it!
Im pretty sure you have had ZERO knowledge of the fact this program held that many jobs until I brought it up and then you googled it hoping you could punch a hole in what I brought forth.

Posted by: Mike_C | February 16, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm

“Im pretty sure you have had ZERO knowledge of the fact this program held that many jobs until I brought it up”
You are dead wrong.
In addition, the only blindness by “extreme partisanship” I have witnessed is how you address others. I’m not interested in your biased assumptions.

Posted by: JKS | February 16, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Maybe Obama wont sign the bill for the F22 because it is a collosal waste of time and money. Sorry about the 100 K jobs but seriously join the rest of the country who are already in the toilet. Maybe the money can be done to support something besides make work for defense companies.

Posted by: mike | February 16, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm

Maybe Obama wont sign the bill for the F22 because it is a collosal waste of time and money. Sorry about the 100 K jobs but seriously join the rest of the country who are already in the toilet. Maybe the money can be done to support something besides make work for defense companies.
————————————
mike,
Now here is the real voice of reason…LOL
LETS SPEND 700 Billion & HOPE we fix the financial system…..
LETS SPEND 800 Billion & HOPE we can create/save a few jobs…..
Lets NOT spend 9 Billion and KEEP nearly 100,000 jobs!…
So, now you liberals get to choose which jobs we should save. Im sure that will fly well with American public. Talk about destroying ALL confidence!!!!
JKS,
If you knew ANYTHING at all, why not bring it up over the past few weeks? It was a slam dunk for the DEMS & Obama, yet they continue to let 100,000 familes sway in the wind. Proof Positive that this adminstartion and its congressional allies care more about their agenda than the American people and their jobs!
Persoanlly I couldn’t care less what you think about me. I am not the issue, the issue is JOBS & CONFIDENCE.
We know where mike stands, he has no interest in working towards a solution!
Do you favor extending the F-22 ? OR do you want put another 100,00 on the unployment rolls?

Posted by: Mike_C | February 16, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm

got this from newsmax. same thing is popping up on other sites.. there’s a video of Obama pledging to have a 5 day wait period before signing anybills and promising to go thru it line by line with us to elimate pork. there is areason why he broke his pledge, he is getting a piece of this pork, i wonder how much….
The bill now spans more than 1,000 pages. While Democrats removed some provisions that fiscal conservatives objected to, most of the pork remains. Among them:
The plan has more than $3 billion in “neighborhood stabilization” and Community Development Block Grant funding, much of which may go to benefit ACORN, a low-income housing and voter registration “community” organization that is under federal investigation for its suspicious voter registration practices.
$1.3 billion to bailout AMTRAK, the perennial money-loser railroad.
$1 billion for educational programs, including courses on sexually transmitted diseases.
$30 million for restoration of wetlands to be spent in the San Francisco Bay Area – House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s district. The money will go in part to protect the endangered salt marsh harvest mouse.
$200 million for a low-pollution, coal-fired power plant in President Barack Obama’s home state of Illinois.
$45 million for ATV four-wheeler trails, and government office renovations, according to RNC Chairman Michael Steele.
$200 million to provide computers to community colleges.
$50 million for the National Endowment of the Arts.
Over $650 million in coupons to help consumers buy digital TV converter-box coupons.
A reported $300 million for hybrid vehicles and electric-powered cars. According to the Washington Times, this item will include buying golf carts for federal workers.

Posted by: jaj | February 16, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm

Mike_C – I think the F 22 is already outdated, overblown and not necessarily where the military needs to be spending money. From a stimulus perspective, yes, it will keep jobs, but the complete irony is watching all these free market, hyper fiscal conservatives suddenly find their inner Karl Marx and go all command economy on us when it comes to big defense programs – like yourself……

Posted by: JKS | February 16, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm

JKS..Without going into specifics and enough said, you could never be MORE WRONG regarding the F-22…The Raptor does not just dominate the airspace…IT OWNS IT..How much is too much when you are talking National Security…Infinite

Posted by: Parallax View | February 16, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm

Johnny just wants to spend money the traditional GOP way: on fruitless wars and tax cuts for the rich!

Posted by: wickedlittledoll | February 16, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm

Parallax View – Specifics are important here. No one is suggesting compromising National Security. F 22 was designed to fight the likes of China and Russia for the Cold War. It performs substandard in heat, does not have long range capability and must take off and land from a fixed base. Yes, it has many great features too that are mind-blowing, but it doesn’t change the question if this the best area of National Security to spend taxpayer’s money?

Posted by: JKS | February 16, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm

The real question is ….IS MCCAIN ACCURATE ABOUT ANYTHING.
Give him a day or two he will flip flop on anything.
Hmmmmm…..
Wonder why he didn’t get elected????

Posted by: Omentum | February 16, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm

Barack Obama is dishonest. Simple as that.

Posted by: mary | February 16, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Have some of you even looked at that bill? Huffington post has 3 versions. The House version, the Senate Version and a brief Summary by theSenate Appropriations Committee of the finaly bill.
From what I see there are quite a few mistruths on here as to what actually passed. Go do your research and quit whining. Just type in 2009 stimulus bill Huffington post. It’s that simple.

Posted by: Jwench | February 17, 2009, 7:14 am 7:14 am

On the F22,
The F22 serves an important strategic role folks. The F22 is the most capable air superiority fighter in the world. It is what keeps us one step ahead of everyone else. It is NOT a waste of money. I was a pilot in the Navy and if you study the history of air power, you’ll know that whoever has that “edge” is the “superpower”.
If you wish to reduce our status as a superpower, by all means kill programs like the B2, F22 and support for new Aircraft Carriers. Maybe we can join the likes of Ukraine, Poland, and Taiwan and get bullied by Russia and China in geopolitics.
Fact is Russia is reconstituting, China has been building its military capacity for a decade. The last thing we should do is get off our game.
American’s live a sheltered life under the umbrella of such assets as aircraft carriers, B2s, and F22′s. Don’t go poking holes in the umbrella. You won’t like a your life without that shelter. Ask the Georgians.

Posted by: KR | February 17, 2009, 9:27 am 9:27 am

And btw, National Defense has always been, and will always be, a command economy. To lump national defense in the same boat as billions for community organizing is just silly. National Defense should always be steady and consistent, and in our case, on the tip of technology and capability to keep our edge over strategic competitors.

Posted by: KR | February 17, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

KR – The F22 can not land on an aircraft carrier.
It is estimated roughly 2/3 of the existing F 22′s have major corrosion problems.
To suggest the F 22 is the only thing keeping America from losing its “superpower” status is selling America way short and simpleminded.
There is something called options and with the BILLIONS in cost overruns and repairs for the F22, it would be prudent, wise and in the best interest of our National Security to consider all of them.

Posted by: JKS | February 17, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am

“KR – The F22 can not land on an aircraft carrier.”
I know that, I flew off carriers. I never said it DID fly off CV’s, I mentioned CV’s as one of our “edges” in superpower status as something that must be maintained and improved.
“It is estimated roughly 2/3 of the existing F 22′s have major corrosion problems.”
All new aircraft have development problems after production. Doesn’t mean you scrap it or don’t fix it. Complex aircraft in todays military MUST be funded and maintained, not only to keep the airframes viable, but to keep our flyers safe. I flew in the late 90′s, I saw first hand 6 friends of mine perish from training. I blame at least 4 of those crashes on poorly funded maintenance. So don’t lecture me on military funding unless you’ve been there.
“To suggest the F 22 is the only thing keeping America from losing its “superpower” status is selling America way short and simpleminded.”
I explicitly did not say “only”, it is definitely one of those assets contributing to that. The latest Sukoi’s being sold around the world are on par, if not superior to our current inventory of F18′s, F16′s, and F15′s. The F22 is the only thing in our inventory that is better than it is. For that reason alone, it is worth keeping it up. The Russians are also selling their most advanced Air to Air missile systems that, at least in the IR realm, is superior to ours until we get the newest AIM9 deployed. We still have a slight edge in radar guided missiles but that is fading fast. The last thing we want is to accept status quo while our competitors are advancing.

Posted by: KR | February 17, 2009, 11:12 am 11:12 am

Change we can count on. Are you awake yet? If you would have done your homework before you voted, we wouldn’t be in this situation. Well, if your on the pinko side, maybe it is the change you wanted. WAKE UP AMERICA!

Posted by: Foxwood | February 17, 2009, 1:37 pm 1:37 pm

JKS…”Specifics are important here” NOT ON A PUBLIC SITE….PLEASE be mindful of your comments………

Posted by: Parallax View | February 17, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm

JKS…”Specifics are important here” NOT ON A PUBLIC SITE….PLEASE be mindful of your comments………
Are you kidding me? This information is widely available.

Posted by: JKS | February 17, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm

Tapper, keep up the good work. At least you will ask a serious question not just set the Prez or his spokesman up for a good soundbite.
Thanks!

Posted by: alhauswife | February 17, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

I recently came across your blog and have been reading along. I thought I would leave my first comment. I don’t know what to say except that I have enjoyed reading. Nice blog. I will keep visiting this blog very often.
Elaina

Posted by: Elaina | February 23, 2009, 7:05 am 7:05 am

Wasn’t the Obama “promise” above only one of seven he made in the same speech? How did the others fare?

Posted by: Tom Dittman | March 2, 2009, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.