By Danny

Feb 11, 2009 12:22am

The Krugman Democrats

ABC News’ Teddy Davis reports: New York Times columnist Paul Krugman spoke at the "Thinking Big, Thinking Forward" conference in Washington, D.C., on Feb. 11, 2009.
Ferdous Al-Faruque/ ABC News President Barack Obama’s economic recovery package is still making its way through Congress. But a group of progressive activists and liberal academics are already worried that it won’t go far enough. "We’re very aware of the [President Franklin] Roosevelt mistake of 1937," said Robert Borosage, president of the liberal Institute for America’s Future. "The economy started to improve, he cut spending, and we did not get out of the Depression until the war started." To push back against those in both parties who want to rein in government spending as soon as possible, Borosage’s group has teamed up with Demos, the Economic Policy Institute, and the American Prospect magazine to organize a "Thinking Big, Thinking Forward" conference. Wednesday’s 800-person gathering, which is taking place at the Capital Hilton Hotel in Washington, D.C., is intended to make the case that "jobs-based growth" and a "broadly shared prosperity" will require far more than a short-term stimulus. Think of this group as the Krugman Democrats, so named because its intellectual leader is New York Times columnist Paul Krugman, the Princeton professor who recently won a Nobel Prize for economics. Krugman, who was recently named by Forbes Magazine as the most influential liberal in the U.S. media, will keynote the "Thinking Big" conference. Also on the agenda are Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell (D), Rep. George Miller, D-Calif., and former Obama policy director Karen Kornbluh.    Asked how he would pay for the sustained public investments in health care, education, renewable energy, and infrastructure that he supports, Borosage said he would close tax loopholes, raise capital gains taxes, and allow President Bush’s tax cuts for wealthy to expire while also cutting the Pentagon budget. Robert Borosage, president of the liberal Institute for America’s Future, spoke about the state of the economy and President Barack Obama’s stimulus plan at ABC’s Washington, DC, bureau.
Ferdous Al-Faruque/ ABC News "Once the economy starts to recover, you’ve got to pay for it," said Borosage. "You just shouldn’t equate fiscal responsibility with cutting spending." The Krugman Democrats acknowledge that Obama needed to pick off a couple of Republicans in order to get his recovery package through the Senate. But they think the White House blundered with its initial emphasis on post-partisanship and talk of winning 80 votes in the Senate. "They made a huge mistake in their messaging on the recovery plan. They allowed post-partisanship to be a louder message than the crisis," said Borosage, referring to the Obama White House. "Instead of the debate being: ‘Why aren’t the Republicans joining this utterly necessary thing?’ The debate became: ‘How many votes does Obama have from Republicans?’" ABC News’ Ferdous Al-Faruque contributed to this report.   

User Comments

Krugman needs to grow a set.

Posted by: Sluggo | February 11, 2009, 2:55 am 2:55 am

It isn’t Paul Krugman who ‘needs to grow a set’. It is the President.
We gave him a mandate to fix the economy after the Conservative Republicans destroyed it with Reaganomics (Freidman’s supply-side economics).
Obama has wasted too much time and effort trying to get Republicans to act responsibly. They don’t know how.
Bipartianship is dead (except for three Republicans who are being targeted for elimination in their next elections).
Why can’t we learn from history and not make FDR’s mistake?
Republican demands to give more tax cuts to the rich and starving education, science and desperate states is insane.
This is NO way to create jobs. It is preserving the superiority of the rich in our class system.
We need to provide jobs and secure homes now and stimulate growth for the future.
Count me proudly as a Krugman Democrat.

Posted by: stsabc | February 11, 2009, 3:53 am 3:53 am

This is just a rush to grab power. They passed TARP, needed more, and here we are. One this money is spent, if it is somehow working, and more is needed, they can pass another bill. Likely it will be easier with something to show for the first bill. If it tanks, then we can look for other options.
http://federalistblogs.wordpress.com/

Posted by: Federalistblogs | February 11, 2009, 4:50 am 4:50 am

If simply spending money was the answer we all should be millionaires. I don’t think anyone disagrees with Obama that some sort of spending is needed but where he is getting resistance is how he wants to spend it. The sums of money are enormous so a sprited debate should be expected and accepted-none of it needs to be about politics rather it should be about doing the right thing for all of us.
As for Krugman, I know he is an expert but experts can be wrong too. (by the way, where was his voice in early summer?)
(and to the Reagan hater) we had a string of 25 years of reasonable prosperity but even in this Presidents speech he admitted it was the banks( too bad he didn’t have the courage to include fannie and freddie in this)practicing unsafe lending that caused this mess. While running a year on year balanced budget is a good achievment not one President or Congress has ever addressed the ever increasing size of unfunded mandates now said to be near 50 trillion.

Posted by: david | February 11, 2009, 6:26 am 6:26 am

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.