Hoosier Daddy: President Obama to Indiana on Monday
At Concord Community High School in Elkhart, Ind., Monday at noon ET, President Obama will deliver brief remarks and then take questions from the audience of approximately 1,700 locals in a town hall meeting devised to sell the stimulus package.
Elkhart County — a Republican bastion that Obama lost 44 percent to 56 percent last November, despite his impressive feat of winning the Hoosier State — has seen its unemployment rate triple in the last year, from 4.7 percent last year to its current rate of 15.3 percent. (The city of Elkhart has an unemployment rate approaching 18 percent.)
Elkhart County has 16,000 total people unemployed and has lost 8,000 jobs in the past year, many of them layoffs in the recreational vehicle industry. RV manufacturers Keystone RV Co., Monaco Coach Corp., and Pilgrim International have laid off hundreds of workers, and dealers have been forced to close down. Quite logically, as the economy has soured, fewer Americans are buying RVs.
Tickets for the town hall were snapped up on Saturday within 40 minutes.
The president will fly on Air Force One Monday morning, accompanied by Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood, a former Republican congressman from neighboring Illinois; Sen. Evan Bayh, D-Ind., one of the 16 centrist senators who recently helped negotiate changes to the stimulus bill; as well as Elkhart’s congressman, Rep. Joe Donnelly, D-Ind., and Reps. Baron Hill, D-Ind., and Andre Carson, D-Ind., all of whom voted for the stimulus package.
Two opponents of the bill will also be on board: Rep. Brad Ellsworth, D-Ind., one of just 11 House Democrats to oppose it; and Rep. Fred Upton, R-Mich., a close friend of White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel who voted against the bill but has been working with the White House on adding a business tax cut provision. Elkhart is on the Michigan border, in an area called Michiana, and Upton has been a frequent guest in the Obama White House, having been invited for the bipartisan Super Bowl Party and the bill signing for the expansion of the State Childrens Health Insurance Program, or SCHIP.
Former Indiana Democratic Congressmen Lee Hamilton and Tim Roemer will also be on board. Conspicuously absent: Obama friend Sen. Dick Lugar, R-Ind., whom Senate Democrats and the White House have been lobbying to support the bill.
Obama will be introduced at the event by Ed Neufeldt, a 62-year-old unemployed RV worker from Elkhart who has two young children, 13 and 7, and is currently surviving on unemployment insurance.
According to the Elkhart Truth newspaper, Elkhart Mayor Dick Moore has a list of 18 shovel-ready infrastructure projects that he estimates would cost $92.4 million and create 2,300 jobs, such as a $34.3 million railroad overpass along Prairie Street, $17 million for Elco Theater renovations, and $10.92 million for Elkhart Community Schools.
The White House claims that the stimulus package would create or save 79,300 jobs in Indiana over the next two years; provide an income tax credit of up to $1,000 for 2,480,000 workers and their families; create a new $2,500 partially refundable tax credit for four years of college for 76,000 Indiana families; offer an additional $100 per month in unemployment insurance benefits to 456,000 unemployed Indianans and extend unemployment benefits to an additional 89,000; and provide funds to modernize at least 176 Indiana schools.
-jpt
Email
Sen. DeMint: GOP Race Could Go Until Convention
Obama Avoids Questions on Contraception Rule
How does an RV manufacturer fit into Obama’s plans for this country’s energy policy? As I understand it, he believes in higher gas prices and profits taxes on gasoline companies.
So is Obama going to tell these people that in his green vision for our country, these jobs are not coming back?
If they are not coming back, a few new school construction projects will get people through the tough times, but it won’t give them any new jobs in the long run.
And if there’s no job to support a family in the long run, there’s no need for snazzier schools.
What can he do to keep the RV manufacturers in business?
Posted by: MayBee | February 8, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Will any of this spur demand for RV’s or will government be the employer from now on?
Posted by: dave | February 8, 2009, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
Obama needs to do more of these. The appropriate way for a president to sway Congress is by convincing the people who elect them, and allowing soundbites and shallow bumpersticker thinking to dominate the message is a disservice to the country.
Shallow soundbites like “RV manufacturers won’t be brought back by schools/roads/infrastructure” ignores that all industry – from RVs to artificial hip production – will only grow in a place with a well educated workforce, roads, infrastructure, etc.
Posted by: jhw539 | February 8, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
“What can he do to keep the RV manufacturers in business?”
Buy ‘em up and call it “public housing”, perhaps? They CAN’T be worse than those poison FEMA trailers.
The now-”traditional” homeless, and those made newly-homeless by the about-to-be-bailed-out-AGAIN bankers, or by simple poverty, can then wander the freeways in RVs — rolling Flying Dutchmen — until the “crisis” of capitalism passes, or the cows come home, or pigs fly … whichever comes first.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 8, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm
“Shallow soundbites like “RV manufacturers won’t be brought back by schools/roads/infrastructure”"
===
I think it’s very accurate to say RV manufacturers won’t be brought back by a gasoline-hostile energy policy.
Posted by: MayBee | February 8, 2009, 9:26 pm 9:26 pm
I don’t think this is good use of a president’s time. It smarts of campaigning (which I think he misses dearly). Also, he’s asking folks to go tell their Senators to vote “yes” on this bill. That’s like a teenager asking their mom to please convince dad to let them go to the concert.
Posted by: Interested08 | February 8, 2009, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm
Unless Obama stacks the crowd he is in for some hostile folks. If it turns out any other way be suspicious, very suspicious!
Posted by: shawndell | February 8, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Human Intelligence- I don’t think the homeless could hang out driving on the freeways in the RV’s because if they could afford the gas for those big time super duper guzzlers on the freeways then they wouldn’t be homeless to begin with cause they’d be more like middle class folks but then maybe they could just park it under a bridge which would be more practical.
Posted by: amber | February 8, 2009, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm
“Also, he’s asking folks to go tell their Senators to vote “yes” on this bill. That’s like a teenager asking their mom to please convince dad to let them go to the concert.”
It’s also like shredding the Constitutional separation of powers. And when He uses the online army to do it, it’s like … electioneering out-of-season.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 8, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
Why is the Obama administration late for everything? He wants the porkulus bill passed right away but now Geinther is going to be late for his presentation to the American people. I’m growing tired of Obama!
Posted by: jack | February 8, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
Not to worry, “amber” — those RVs can be green-fitted for sails, or something, and run on all the hot air left over from the presidential plane-in.
Or, as you suggest, free-standing emergency bridges can be built under which to park. When the economy “recovers”, hahaha, the shovel-ready soldiers can return, enclose the “bridge” and call it a garage, and perhaps build an actual house onto it.
The Ghost Dance of the Winnebago. Coming soon.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 8, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Johnathon- CHILL!! The title doesn’t ask who anybody’s dad is. It’s about that 62 year old man with the children who’s gonna introduce Obama. Dude, that was creepy!
Posted by: amber | February 8, 2009, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
I find the title “Hoosier Daddy” offensive. Of course, what do you expect from ABC or most of these whacked out media folks that never do their homework when the “report” the “news.”
I did not vote for Obama, but I was willing to give him the benefit of the doubt. It did not take long for him to loose this. It was slipping fast with some of his early comments, but after last Thursdays campaign speech that only served to drive the wedge further, he is not my president.
At least the media has stopped comparing him to Lincoln. Lincoln, one of the greatest men who ever lived, brought a divided country back together again. Based on everything I have seen after 2.5 weeks in office, Obama will continue to keep our country divided between the left and the right.
So much for change we can believe in.
Posted by: Floppy Dog | February 8, 2009, 10:01 pm 10:01 pm
Concerned in OH, you state: “2.) After the theatre is renovated (huh?), what jobs are those people gonna have? They’re gonna be unemployed again.”……Excellent point! I heard this same type of stimulus, when it was used in Japan in the 90′s, described as “they cemented everything in site”. Then after everything was done…it was all back to the unemployment line. While these projects DO employ people, they don’t create long term job growth.
Posted by: Interested08 | February 8, 2009, 10:04 pm 10:04 pm
Oops, I meant “sight”, not “site”.
Posted by: Interested08 | February 8, 2009, 10:05 pm 10:05 pm
Yah, no matter what anyone thinks about the content of the article, the TITLE is tacky and demeaning to the office, and to the people in IN. Leave the funky pun headlines to the evening news sportscasters.
Posted by: Interested08 | February 8, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
MayBee: “I think it’s very accurate to say RV manufacturers won’t be brought back by a gasoline-hostile energy policy.”
You’re delusional if you think any energy policy will keep gasoline cheep (FACT: 8 years of oil man Bush didn’t prevent $4 gasoline). And the point of infrastructure is to provide the basis for the next industry. You don’t try to save the typewriter country, you educate their kids for the next industry.
Look at 21st century industries. Do you think Cummins or Zimmer are in Indiana thanks to national energy policy, or because the roads are good, the power reliable, and the schools turned out some good engineers and businessmen who set up shop where they were born?
Posted by: jhw539 | February 8, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
As Joe obiden said this ARRA America Rape and Reaping Act has a 30% chance of working and then it may not be right. Folk obama knows he is in trouble with ARRA as he had to sent rambo the vulgar to strong arm democrats to hold them in line on the vote. It time to tell obama you promised us transparency and all we have got is tax cheats and lobbyist so far. This won’t stimulate a thing but rape our grand children of FREDOM,LIBERTY and LIFE. Its time obama to grow up and be responsiblity. No More lies. DEFUND ACORN NOW
Posted by: bob | February 8, 2009, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
I, too, thought the headline was offensive.
Posted by: ydice | February 8, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
Hoosiers vote for your livlihoods next time. Bush was elected 2x’s and had enough time to destroy America. He and his party did not have an agenda for average Americans.
Posted by: sngeorgia | February 8, 2009, 10:11 pm 10:11 pm
I think BHO should take a 90 minute detour to the northwest while he is in Elkhart. If you want to see the “best” of the government in action, go to Benton Harbor, Michigan. 72% on some form of government assistance, 80+% of the kids live in single parent homes, and on and on. It is truly sad what we have done in the name of “taking care of the people.” No one in their right mind can support more government after seeing this mess. Vote NO on the stimulus.
Posted by: Jim | February 8, 2009, 10:14 pm 10:14 pm
Interested08: “While these projects DO employ people, they don’t create long term job growth.”
You see no long term benefits to things like the interstate freeway system, improved primary education, Hoover dam, or upgraded interstate transmission lines then?
Investment in infrastructure can take a while to pay back, but it certainly can pay back. Ignore the scraps of paper called dollars for a moment. If people are employed creating something of value they are increasing the nations real, material wealth. If they are unemployed, they are making nothing, creating no real wealth. Other than collecting soundbites for the next election, there is no argument against getting people working again creating products and wealth for our nation.
Posted by: jhw539 | February 8, 2009, 10:16 pm 10:16 pm
Jim: ” If you want to see the “best” of the government in action, go to Benton Harbor, Michigan. 72% on some form of government assistance, 80+% of the kids live in single parent homes, and on and on. It is truly sad what we have done in the name of “taking care of the people.”"
What a load of nonsense. Citing a town of about 10k people where the major factories have shut down as an example of… what? “We” have done nothing in the name of “taking care of the people” other than keeping them from starving like in some third world nation. “We” are not the Whirlpool corporation that off shored their labor requirements. The TRUTH of the matter is Benton, Michigan is a shining example of what the free market will do (for good or ill – it is much cheaper to buy a washing machine now).
Posted by: jhw539 | February 8, 2009, 10:22 pm 10:22 pm
Here are some facts about Benton Harbor from the 2000 Census:
42 percent of adults over the age of 16 are not considered part of the labor force because they are no longer seeking work. This compares with a national average of 36 percent, suggesting that a disproportionate number of Benton Harbor residents have given up hope of finding a decent job.
Of all households, 87.3 percent have income less than $50,000.
Almost 70 percent of houses have a market value of less than $50,000. In nearly half of households, gross rent took up more than 35 percent of total income.
More than 16 percent of housing units are vacant. A trip through the city reveals boarded-up houses, many of which are quickly deteriorating.
The Benton Harbor school district, which began to decline in the 1970s, is now the third poorest in Michigan. Ninety percent of Benton Harbor school children live in poverty.
This, ladies and gentlemen, is what more government programs can do for you!
Posted by: Jim | February 8, 2009, 10:24 pm 10:24 pm
I, too, thought the headline was offensive.
???????????????????????????????????????????????
Oh well. Maybe I missed something that was
disrespectful–like Obama is going to be like this dad figure to all these people out of jobs and hurting. Then that is disrespectful to the situation if that’s the case.
Posted by: amber | February 8, 2009, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
Jim: “This, ladies and gentlemen, is what more government programs can do for you!”
What government program did this? Specifically; I’m curious what government program is unique to this city that caused this. And how is this not a result of the factories shutting down?
Posted by: jhw539 | February 8, 2009, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
Come to think if it – the title really sucks. : (
Posted by: amber | February 8, 2009, 10:29 pm 10:29 pm
jhw539 – better check your facts, friend. Benton Harbor and Benton Township together form this microcosm of population. In total we’re talking more than 25,000 people. Second, Whirlpool manufacturing left Michigan for Ohio, not off shore, because the geniuses in Lansing made it much more expensive for Whirlpool to do business in Michigan. Thank God Whirlpool still has it’s corporate HQ here or who knows how bad it might be. And, by the way, Whirlpool has historically dumped millions of dollars into Benton Harbor. Too bad we don’t have more Whirlpools. Too bad we don’t have less government.
Posted by: Jim | February 8, 2009, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
The headline is outrageous. Did ABC use this for any other presidential visitor to Indiana? Pitiful.
Posted by: gumby | February 8, 2009, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
jhw539 – I did my homework – now you go do yours. Study it out in your mind, friend, and don’t let the media taint your thinking. Best wishes!
Posted by: Jim | February 8, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
Everyone complaining but no one has the answer!!!!!
Pass the darn STIMULUS PLAN!!!!
Posted by: sisterdearest09 | February 8, 2009, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Jim: “I did my homework – now you go do yours.”
I’ve done my homework, and it seems to say that St. Joseph just across the river from Benton Harbor has a 2% unemployment rate and the EXACT same government as Benton Harbor (population 11,182 as of the 2000 census you like to cite, and the township adds less than 4,000 to this number).
You’re picking a poor industrial town that is dying and blaming it on government programs that have nothing to do with it.
And I noticed you weren’t able to cite a single specific government program to blame for the unemployment in Benton Harbor.
Posted by: jhw539 | February 8, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Jim- What you’re describing is a corporate decision to move productions to Ohio, which obviously hit the local economy hard. But you didn’t answer JHW’s question on how “government” has hurt the region.
Posted by: kathy | February 8, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Look at 21st century industries. Do you think Cummins or Zimmer are in Indiana thanks to national energy policy, or because the roads are good, the power reliable, and the schools turned out some good engineers and businessmen who set up shop where they were born?
=====
So do you think good roads, well-built schools, and reliable power are all that is needed to keep any one area of the country viable?
If you build a road in a town, business will come. Is that what you think?
I think industries shut down in one town and that town often doesn’t come back. Workers have to move on to the next town, where someone has decided to create a company.
I also know government policy can favor one industry over another. There’s no pretending changes in policy won’t affect particular industries.
Posted by: MayBee | February 8, 2009, 11:01 pm 11:01 pm
I googled Hoosier Daddies and there were thousands of sites with the term. If you glance at the sites, It appears to be a sports term and one that’s thrown around loosely throughout Indiana. It’s actually not a snarky or innuendo laden title.
Posted by: kathy | February 8, 2009, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
Maybee: “So do you think good roads, well-built schools, and reliable power are all that is needed to keep any one area of the country viable?”
I never said that it’s all that’s needed, but it is exceptionally difficult to find modern industry located somewhere with poor schools, bad roads and intermittent power supply. Not a lot of money in crushing rocks by hand anymore. Perhaps you have an example (just to stay Indiana local, I’ll stick with Zimmer, Warsaw, and Cummins, Columbus, for my argument, but I can offer bigger fish like Microsoft and Google if you prefer)?
Posted by: jhw539 | February 8, 2009, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
jhw539:”We” are not the Whirlpool corporation that off shored their labor requirements. The TRUTH of the matter is Benton, Michigan is a shining example of what the free market will do (for good or ill – it is much cheaper to buy a washing machine now).
====
Both Cummins and Zimmer, who you lauded in an earlier comment, are every bit as international as Whirlpool.
Posted by: MayBee | February 8, 2009, 11:18 pm 11:18 pm
Passing the stimulus/pork bill just to “do something” is foolish. The economy will recover on its own, in its own time. Everything is cyclical.
Throwing good money after bad is not the way to go. President Obama should go back to his message of hope. His scare tactics are making a bad situation worse.
Posted by: NoMoreFear | February 8, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
I never said that it’s all that’s needed, but it is exceptionally difficult to find modern industry located somewhere with poor schools, bad roads and intermittent power supply
====
The RV companies operating in the area didn’t shut down because of poor schools, bad roads, or intermittent power supply.
They are modern industries, with workers who did the jobs they were asked to do, and leadership that was educated.
Posted by: MayBee | February 8, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
“So much for change we can believe in.”
“after 2.5 weeks in office” “he is not my president”
Change doesn’t happen in 2.5 weeks, and if he’s not your president – then move to Canada.
People don’t like the stimulus plan, but Bush didn’t do a darn thing for 8 years to even try to fix the economy. As for too many Govt. programs, those same type of programs got us out of the Depression.
By the way, I don’t find Hoosier Daddy offensive, I’m from IN and am glad to see a President visit us regardless of the headline.
Posted by: Jesse | February 8, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
“go to Benton Harbor, Michigan. 72% on some form of government assistance, 80+% of the kids live in single parent homes, and on and on.”
Well, a HUNDRED percent of the corporations and the very rich are “on” some form of government assistance — and most of THEIR children are raised first by servants, then by prep schools.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 8, 2009, 11:32 pm 11:32 pm
jhw: but it is exceptionally difficult to find modern industry located somewhere with poor schools, bad roads and intermittent power supply.
======
Outside of the US and Europe, it is exceptionally easy to find modern industry in exactly these kinds of conditions. Not that it makes a difference in this discussion.
Posted by: MayBee | February 8, 2009, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Outside of the US and Europe, it is exceptionally easy to find modern industry in exactly these kinds of conditions. Not that it makes a difference in this discussion.
***************************************************
I’ve traveled pretty extensively and stayed in Western Europe for periods of time, both in urban and non-urban areas. The infrastructure problems seemed far less pronounced to me. I didn’t see or experience modern industry juxtaposed with bad roads and electrical failures. The combination of modern industry and poor infrastructure is in the developing countries.
Posted by: kathy | February 8, 2009, 11:48 pm 11:48 pm
Maybe- Sorry, I misread your posting. Yes, you find modern industry mixed with the infrastructure outside Europe and the US. I’m obviously tired.
Posted by: kathy | February 8, 2009, 11:51 pm 11:51 pm
I am a Republican, and I just love the position of “doing nothing” or fear of spending in an effort to turn the tide of a downward economy. Drastic times require drastic measure. This is still the land of the brave. I am wholely in support of a stimulus package. When you count the number of Americans, including Puerto Rico, Alaska, the Islands, paying tax for one month mus exceed 900 billion. Keep delaying and the unemployment rate goes up and there will be less and less tax payers. I think a whole lot of hallabolo is being made about the money.
Posted by: Lee | February 9, 2009, 1:00 am 1:00 am
Is there any way we can get him to stay there?
Posted by: Sluggo | February 9, 2009, 2:13 am 2:13 am
Obama is going to be the best president we would ever have because he is a consensus builder who would try to be as non partisan as possible but the Republicans will try to make it difficult for him because if he is successful in the first four years it means that the Republicans would not win the white house..and so like Rush Limbaugh they would want him to fail..they place Republicans getting into power ahead of the country progressing. Republicans destroyed this country..I say good riddance. God bless President Obama and God bless America!
Posted by: Stanley | February 9, 2009, 2:45 am 2:45 am
Hmmmm! It is too late to discuss these stimulus package. He doesn’t know how to fix the economy.
Posted by: anonymous | February 9, 2009, 5:44 am 5:44 am
Thank you Lee!!!
I have gotten so down on Republicans that I forget that there are some Republicans that can think for themselves…
I apologize for lumping you in with the rest… And thank you…
Your comment is very much appreciated…
Posted by: braith morgan | February 9, 2009, 6:29 am 6:29 am
This event is going to be a riot – literally. People are going to lay into Obama for giving the Republicans everything they want and screwing the American people in the process.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 9, 2009, 6:40 am 6:40 am
what is a few construction jobs going to do besides put money in the pockets of already rich firms. the mayor said the jobs will go to the best bidder!!they may not not even be from indiana!! the answer for the economy is right under our nose. stop the bs war on drugs that has broke this country from its start!!you simply cant police every aspect of peoples lives,and the goverments answer is to lock up non violent offenders,overflow the prisons,pass that whole buck to us the tax payer!! the simple reason behind it all is money and jobs.. if they de criminalize lite drug use(like booze is) they (the goverment)would loose lots of money and jobs.then they would have what we have here in elkhart. welcome to america the worlds bigest slave state!!where we allow our goverment to get rich enslaving the very people they are here to serve!
Posted by: go green | February 9, 2009, 6:57 am 6:57 am
It just cracks me up to see Republicans still whining about Barack Obama.
You lost. You have no good ideas.
We won. We’re taking our country back.
Yes. We. Can.
Posted by: Jan | February 9, 2009, 7:00 am 7:00 am
The GOP should stop Hijacking the Stimulus Package and holding it Hostage because the way George Bush and the GOP spent our money will be characterized by an Era of Irresponsibility and Neglect, while Obama wants to spend our money wisely and on rebuillding Americsa, if the GOP lets him. The awful truth is that One Party has destroyed America while the other Party the Democratic Party wants to restore it.
For instance: If you have a home in which you used your money to spend on alcohol, good times and neglected your roof, your bills, and now your roof is in danger of collapsing because you used your money on good times instead of the upkeep of your home and now the Argument is you are unable to borrow money to fix your roof before it caves in because you used your money foolishly in the past is also recklesslness and neglect on the part of the lender, so they let the roof collapse.
In the Bush years 30 billion was spent in Afghanistan — 50 billion in Iraq and now Congress wants to say we cannot spend necessary money at home which has so long been neglected? States were given no money in the Bush years and now they still want to keep money out of the States on a fraudulent theory.
It is now time to for Congress to put money back in to the United States and to spend money wisely and not fraudulently, irresponsibly and in the dark as in the Bush years. Obama believes in transparancey, hence you can find the Stimulus package on line for all to see.
GOP say this money will be more of the same. It will not be more of the same. This money will be used for Americans, for jobs, to rebuild for improvement and innovations to improve life not on wars and countries which have nothing to do with American people or on big business who do not need the money.
Bush and the Republicans inherited a Surplus from the Democrats and yet the GOP has created the worst economic crisis ever. The GOP should stop hijacking the Stimulus and do the right thing and let money flow back into America again, instead of holding the Democrats hostage from their quest of bringing help to the people and restoring American again.
Posted by: Angellight | February 9, 2009, 8:16 am 8:16 am
This event is going to be a riot – literally. People are going to lay into Obama for giving the Republicans everything they want and screwing the American people in the process.
*************************************************
Flash- Did you have too much coffee to drink this AM? Cause you sound like a Keith Olbermann zinged on Java —minus those big melodius words.
Posted by: amber | February 9, 2009, 11:05 am 11:05 am
Human Intelligence? Coulda fooled me!
Posted by: ThinkingVoter | February 9, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
How did Elkhart become the poster child for the recession?
===
Barak Obama, our president, came to my home town yesterday. I listened. I heard eloquence but also transparent lies. I was profoundly disappointed. And as I continued to mull over his words, I was astonished at his audacity to come here, of all places. And I felt used, because this visit was the apex of disingenuity. Because he, his policies, and his party are the cause of the problems we face here in Elkhart County. Our president was treated graciously and hospitably, but most of the audience left wondering how his rhetoric and flagrant spending would address our problems.
Let me list the causes…
1) Our very successful RV industry displaced most other employers. The Elkhart economy was a one horse show, and was ripe for this type of tragedy. In retrospect, our economy should have been more diverse. This was not his fault, but it does make our situation unique – Fortunately not all of America is in our economic condition. Our situation should not be publicized as the norm in America – it is the extreme. We are the New Orleans of Katrina, not the soup kitchen of 1938: we are isolated but hurting.
2) For the last decade, we were told by many that $4 gas was to be the norm, since we were prohibited from drilling for oil. After all Europe pays $8 per gallon and why shouldn’t we? This made the use of RVs much less attractive. (Remember the ANWAR opposition 8 years ago came form the Dems, Obama’s party). And we were all assured that under the incoming administration the gas taxes would go up and the opportunity to domestically produce and use inexpensive conventional fuels would go down. RVs need cheap gas – The GOP was the Drill Here – Drill Now – Pay Less party. Here in Elkhart, we all expect the cheap gas we now enjoy will disappear as soon as the new administration gets around to restoring the ban on drilling. The RV companies were listening.
3) RVs are low mileage vehicles simply because of their size. A small RV is simply an SUV, and a small SUV is a minivan. There is no faddish “green technology” here, and no guarantees of federal support. In fact we heard:
Pitching his message to Oregon’s environmentally-conscious voters, Obama called on the United States to “lead by example” on global warming, and develop new technologies at home which could be exported to developing countries.
“We can’t drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times … and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK,” Obama said.
“That’s not leadership. That’s not going to happen,” he added.
The RV industry got the message loud and clear – there is no room for them at the table.
4) We were told that the economy was in near fatal depression and descending so fast it might be irreparable. Folks stopped buying optional things. This “trash talking” of the economy is continuing in the press, in Washington, and even here in our own “town meeting”. Now the word “catastrophe” is being used in the highest circles. Where is the “The president must be the economy’s chief cheerleader” talk we heard a few years ago? (This may gall the White House, but Bill Clinton and Bob Rubin were models of discipline compared to this Administration when it came to the economy and the role of the Economic Cheerleader-in-Chief.
5) In Obama’s mind, RVs are owned by rich white suburbanites and retirees. (He has said “The suburbs bore me.”, also “Obama’s Youth Movement: The Nation: Young Voters Flock To The Democratic Hopeful, But Can They Drive His Agenda?” His disdain for both us and our values was apparent form his San Francisco speech (Referring to working-class voters in old industrial towns decimated by job losses, the presidential hopeful said: “They get bitter, they cling to guns or religion…”). Both our customers and our workers realize they are targets, not participants in the present administration. The words of accommodation are over and we are instead being shown a clenched fist. This instills a paralyzing fear that depresses the other sectors of our local economy.
I think Obama’s visit to Elkhart is the epitome of hutzba. He and the policies he espouses caused this. Now he wants to use our misfortune to reward his own political agenda and constituency. How much of the “affordable housing” or Acorn money will come to Elkhart? None.
But that is OK. Just let us compete, as we have done so successfully for so long, without onerous taxes or regulations and we can recover on our own.
Posted by: Bob | February 11, 2009, 9:00 am 9:00 am