In Weekly Address, President Says Stimulus Plan Needed to Avoid “National Catastrophe”
In his weekly presidential address, President Obama said the abysmal jobs numbers released Friday compel the Senate to pass his stimulus bill or risk a "national catastrophe."
"Yesterday began with some devastating news with regard to our economic crisis," he said, invoking "another round of alarming employment figures -– the worst in more than 30 years. Another 600,000 jobs were lost in January. We’ve now lost more than 3.6 million jobs since this recession began."
That said, the president said he was "pleased to say [the day] ended on a more positive note…by the evening, Democrats and Republicans came together in the Senate and responded appropriately to the urgency this moment demands."
You can watch the address HERE or listen to the audio HERE.
President Obama then warned, "if we don’t move swiftly to put this plan in motion, our economic crisis could become a national catastrophe. Millions of Americans will lose their jobs, their homes, and their health care. Millions more will have to put their dreams on hold."
Mr. Obama described his opponents as offering "tired old theories that, in eight short years, doubled the national debt, threw our economy into a tailspin, and led us into this mess in the first place" and "a losing formula that offers only tax cuts as the answer to all our problems while ignoring our fundamental economic challenges…"
Then after this shot, the president offered this note of bipartisanship, saying the American people "don’t expect Democratic solutions or Republican solutions -– they expect American solutions."
After outlining some of the jobs his plan will create — he’s back to saying the bill will "save or create" more than 3 million jobs over the next two years — the president concludes by saying, "Americans across this country are struggling, and they are watching to see if we’re equal to the task before us. Let’s show them that we are. And let’s do whatever it takes to keep the promise of America alive in our time."
In the address, the president said the bill will create "16,000 [jobs] in Maine, nearly 80,000 in Indiana –- almost all of them in the private sector, and all of them jobs that help us recover today, and prosper tomorrow."
The reference to Maine — with its two GOP moderate senators, needed to pass the bill — is not a coincidence.
Mention of Indiana — where the president will visit Monday — is an unmistakable reference to Hoosier GOP Sen. Dick Lugar, an Obama friend whom Democrats have also targeted for his vote.
- jpt
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
The Republicans Have stripped the Bill for Education,They have stripped the Tax cuts President Obama wants to give the Middle class,The way I see it we had a Republican President for 8 years And Republicans held power in congress for 6 of those 8.We have tried their ways Tax cuts, Tax cuts, And look at the Results! now the Country has Elected a Democrat President as well as Democrat congress. I say LETS TRY THE DEMOCRATS WAY REPUBLICANS BROUGHT US TO THIS MESS!And President Obama is trying to get us out!
Posted by: Angie | February 7, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am
The only “National Catastrophe” we have is electing the most inexperienced incompetitent president that refuses to listen to we the people.
Posted by: Pork Barrel Obama | February 7, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Instant stimulus: Cut payroll taxes in half immediately and commit to cutting payroll taxes for six months. This stimulus bill is not stimulating – it’s sucking the taxpayers dry to grow government.
Obama is not working for us, and neither are the rest of the politicians in D.C. They are working to enrich themselves and their political careers.
Posted by: MadTaxpayer | February 7, 2009, 10:10 am 10:10 am
Ahh, when all else fails, bash Bush. Right Angie???
Hon, you fail to recognize that the democrats controlled congress the last two years.
Does Barney Frank mean anything to you Missy??
None the less, show me the legislation the democrats proposed that would have saved us from this mess, yet Bush vetod it. I’ll wait for your response, with links.
Posted by: Renae | February 7, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
I would rather take a President who is reckless about sex than a President who is reckless about money. Money owns sex, but sex does not necessarily knows money.
Posted by: young_voter | February 7, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
No to “stimulus” bill. Here’s why:
Since Obama’s earnest drive to convince the nation to weaken its economic strength through redistribution as well as weaken its national defense, has confirmed the very threats to our Republic’s survival that the Constitution was designed to avert, it no longer is sustainable for the United States Supreme Court and Military Joint Chiefs to refrain from exercising WHAT IS THEIR ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL DUTY TO DEFEND THE NATION FROM UNLAWFUL USURPATION. The questions of Obama’s Kenyan birth and his father’s Kenyan/British citizenship (admitted on his own website) have been conflated by his sustained unwillingnes to supply his long form birth certificate now under seal, and compounded by his internet posting of a discredited ‘after-the-fact’ short form ‘certificate’. In the absence of these issues being acknowledged and addessed, IT IS MANIFEST THAT OBAMA REMAINS INELIGIBLE TO BE PRESIDENT UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION. Being a 14th Amendment ‘citizen’ is not sufficient. A ‘President’ MUST BE an Article 2 ‘natural born citizen’ AS DEFINED BY THE FRAMERS’ INTENT.
Posted by: Ted | February 7, 2009, 10:14 am 10:14 am
I would almost borrow a line for current thinking about government in general. Throughout the world. Take a real hard look at existing programs. If they work, determine not only why, but how to make them even more successful. Take a real hard look at new initiatives too. But only after a complete inventory and assessment of existing programs.
By not doing the previous, yes we do have the same old tired ideas which brought about the current world financial meltdown.
“The fellow that can only see a week ahead is always the popular fellow, for he is looking with the crowd. But the one that can see years ahead, he has a telescope but he can’t make anybody believe that he has it.” Will Rogers (1879-1935).
Posted by: denny99 | February 7, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am
I would rather take a President who is reckless about sex than a President who is reckless about money. Money owns sex, but sex does not necessarily knows money.
_______________________________________________
Wow….You must have hated our last President.
Posted by: Paige | February 7, 2009, 10:29 am 10:29 am
Did Obama go to the opera on his way back in from Hawaii? He needs to be impeached before it’s to late!
Posted by: KellyR | February 7, 2009, 11:03 am 11:03 am
Thank goodness Obama has Changed things and doesn’t use FEAR as tool of governing. That was one of his big whiny rants about Bush, wasn’t it?
Posted by: Interested08 | February 7, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am
I appreciate Obama’s concern, but the reality is that we are going to get much poorer over the next decade, and there is nothing anybody can do about it.
Posted by: Huh | February 7, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am
DOH-Bama/Reid/PorkyPelosi are the real catastrophe in America
NOT FIT TO LEAD>>NOT FIT TO SERVE
Posted by: DOH-bama Cabinet of Corruption | February 7, 2009, 11:16 am 11:16 am
Ted-
Stay in the bunker pal.
Posted by: capvid2 | February 7, 2009, 11:57 am 11:57 am
The ongoing “National Catastrophe” is inaction! Pass the Bill and make it work!
Posted by: DTNC | February 7, 2009, 11:58 am 11:58 am
Goodbye ‘HOPE’, and welcome to the politics of fear. So what kind of capitalist society do we live in, when the Netflix CEO goes on record for “begging” the government to raise taxes, instead of capping pay?
And, the Big O-trash is now setting the KILLER of the USS Cole sailors free? The man who was responsible for KILLING 17 of our soldiers….gets away? And our enemies are laughing at us.
another day in the O Admin, another day that the US becomes a laughingstock, and Americans are less safe.
Posted by: decentAmerican | February 7, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
Ted said: “Since Obama’s earnest drive to convince the nation to weaken its economic strength through redistribution…”
The Republicans already weakened the nation through redistribution; they redistributed all the money from the middle class to the richest Americans.
Posted by: Skip | February 7, 2009, 12:06 pm 12:06 pm
It’s nice to see a President that is willing to provide proactive leadership for a change. Shame on Pelosi and Reid. Shame on the Republicans. But go Obama, go! Keep them honest. Please remember that I lambasted Obama through the whole election. He has clearly proven my prognostications wrong. He is a solid, smart leader, and will make a few mistakes, but we are way better than we were a month ago.
Posted by: WestCoastMessenger | February 7, 2009, 12:14 pm 12:14 pm
The Republicans Have stripped the Bill for Education,They have stripped the Tax cuts President Obama wants to give the Middle class,The way I see it we had a Republican President for 8 years And Republicans held power in congress for 6 of those 8.We have tried their ways Tax cuts, Tax cuts, And look at the Results! now the Country has Elected a Democrat President as well as Democrat congress. I say LETS TRY THE DEMOCRATS WAY REPUBLICANS BROUGHT US TO THIS MESS!And President Obama is trying to get us out!
Posted by: Angie |
—————————————-
I might try the Obama tax cuts like the Giethner tax plan which is don’t pay your taxes until you get a promotion. How does that sound.
When structured correctly, tax cuts do work look at Ireland.
Posted by: Jimmy | February 7, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Doing nothing will make the matter worse. Thank you Mr. President we appreciate your efforts you are showing now!
I regret to say, the past 8 years was a period when the precious time was wastage!
Posted by: RST | February 7, 2009, 12:22 pm 12:22 pm
The stimulus might actually work if it were designed to actually get money into the people’s hands. This is complete nonsense. This money will be wasted with little or nothing to show. Big wow… a $1000 tax credit. What the hell are people suppose to do with that when so many are racking up tax loses this year and the previous. $15000 credit to a buy a house…wow, and where the heck are we suppose to be buying houses when so many people have no jobs or money anyway. So they are going to spend about 2 to 3% of this so-called stimulus money on helping people already in trouble. Wow again. How generous they are. Nevermind those who will be in trouble soon or those who will be in trouble later…because there are a whole stack of people lined up to be in trouble in coming months.
This bill is a joke. This is the national equivilent of the FEMA hurricane Katrina assistance.
Posted by: Dude23 | February 7, 2009, 12:24 pm 12:24 pm
Jimmy wrote:When structured correctly, tax cuts do work look at Ireland.
By all means Jimmy, lets look at Ireland:
From the UK Independent:”The increase in the number of people declaring themselves insolvent was particularly high in Scotland and Northern Ireland – jumping 75 and 39 per cent respectively in the final quarter of 2008″.
Posted by: Josh | February 7, 2009, 12:28 pm 12:28 pm
I could be wrong, but I don’t remember the Bush years being marked by only cutting taxes.
I remember one bi-Partisan tax cut bill passed in 2001, and then a whole lotta spending. Farm bills, transportation bills, Medicare part D, spend spend spend.
The overspending part is the same tired theory.
Posted by: MayBee | February 7, 2009, 12:33 pm 12:33 pm
President Obama said, “…tired old theories that, in eight short years, doubled the national debt, threw our economy into a tailspin, and led us into this mess in the first place…” Yet this current stimulus bill is little more than the Democrats’ “old theory” of just throwing taxpayer money at a problem in order to solve the problem. This has been done for 50 years regarding Education and look at those results. NOTE: And most of the money “being thrown” from the current stimulus bill won’t happen for 2-3 years down the road!!
Deny it all you want, but the Bush tax cuts were working just fine for nearly 6 years. They got us through the 2000-01 recession, 9/11 and the 2001-02 corporate greed scandals. 5 million jobs were created in the 52 consecutive months from Sept 2003 to Dec 2007. And they were working fine even when the housing market began its downturn at the same time that energy prices skyrocketed. Unfortunately the federal government’s interference in the housing market–specifically forcing lending institutions to lower their lending standards, and give loans to individuals who could not afford the loans–along with additional displays of corporate greed, came to roost. This turned what should have been a simple cyclical problem into a disaster. Instead of the housing market rebounding once the prices of homes dropped low enough, the result was the near collapse of our financial system, which brought a freeze on ALL loans. There are millions of individuals who are seeking to purchase homes–which would could have turned the economy around almost overnight–but instead they were, and are, unable to get their loans. But also small businesses and corporations were, and are, unable to obtain the loans necessary just to run their businesses. And so the layoffs began–and continue.
The original TARP bill was suppose to free up the money and allow the financial institutions to immediately start giving out the loans again. But that has not worked. Instead the problem still persists. Until individuals, small businesses and corporations can once again obtain the loans they want and need, this crisis will not end. Even should the bill create a million new jobs, unless small businesses and corporations can get loans they will not be able to expand their businesses when there is a new demand for their products and services.
Posted by: James Danley | February 7, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
Obama is Playing the Fear Card.
ATTENTION people – this money is coming out of your wallet. It has to be paid back, with interest.
Who do you think is going to pay it back? – You!
How high will our taxes go in two years to pay for this? How low will the dollar sink in value?
And how high will interest rates skyrocket in order to attract money to buy this debt?
You think the news is bad now? It is now going to get worse. The Democrats have unleashed the economic nightmare genie that cannot go back in the bottle.
Posted by: Sally J. | February 7, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
This is just nuts. Four times Obama has been borderline treasonous.They just let Obama run from country to country behind a sitting presidents back.
The first time that (we know of anyway) happen in 2006 when Obama traveled to Kenya under the guise of a fact finding mission when in reality he was campaigning for his cousin Raila Odinga
Next Obama sends people to Canada to talk free trade. He denied it of course but we now know he lied. As a matter of fact he lied twice during that time. He lied to his supporters, then lied about denying he sent anyone to Canada. Its Obama. He cant help but lie.
After seeing he was able to get away with it twice, he moves onto his third crime. He goes behind President Bush’s back in Iraq trying to stall troop withdrawal so he could get the credit. Obama’s people were so brazen and knew nothing would happen, admitted it.
Now it has come out Obama was talking to Syria and Iran. “before winning the November 4 election, Obama unofficially used what experts call “track two” discussions to approach America’s two foes in the region.”
“Former defense secretary William Perry, who served in Obama’s election campaign, participated in some of these meetings focused on “a wide range of issues that separate Iran from the West: not only their nuclear program but the Middle East peace process, Persian Gulf issues,” Boutwell told AFP.
The Pugwash official declined to name the other participants, except to say they had considerable clout.
“We had very, very senior figures from both the Iranian policy establishment and from the US; people who have very close, good access to the top leaders in both countries,” Boutwell said.
“The Cable,” the blog of the specialist magazine Foreign Policy, said Iran’s permanent representative to the International Atomic Energy Agency (AIEA), Ali Asghar Soltanieh, was “among the Iranian officials who attended the Pugwash dialogues.”
Posted by: a crime | February 7, 2009, 12:37 pm 12:37 pm
Obama is a liar and uses the politics of fear.
All he knows how to do is to campaign and cast blame elsewhere.
The only thing the porkulus bill stimulates is Obama’s ego, Pelosi’s hubris, and the push toward socialism.
It will rob our children blind! All just to pay back Obama’s special interests that got him elected.
What a disgrace Obama is!
Posted by: Michelle | February 7, 2009, 12:38 pm 12:38 pm
west coast messenger….are you blind?
we are “way better” now?
let’s see:
– the stock market took the biggest inaugural day drop IN HISTORY when the O took office
– the government spent 140 million dollars on that fiasco day, when 42 million spent on Bush was called extravagant
– the O is closing Gitmo
– the O is dropping charges against the terrorist who killed 17 of YOUR American soldiers
– millions were without power and freezing to death in Kentucky in an ice storm, while your O was watching the super bowl, with the heat turned up.
– the O wants to freeze pay on ceo’s, which means that wall street will lose talent and corporations will do worse.
– the O has made America look weak, by going on Arab TV FIRST and saying we are willing to talk, and then Iran comes back and says they will talk, but with “preconditions”
– the O is now raising fear with his stimulus plan
– the O has LIED multiple times already, with his “transparency” promise that wasn’t, and him refusing to hire lobbyists in his white house, but now he has hired…what…17?
– and 3 of his cabinet selections have dropped out due to fraud and corruption.
This has to be the worst 2 weeks in Presidential history.
How long will you protect your messiah? How long until you see that he is a complete and utter fraud?
Posted by: decentAmerican | February 7, 2009, 12:42 pm 12:42 pm
Skip wrote: “The Republicans already weakened the nation through redistribution; they redistributed all the money from the middle class to the richest Americans.”
The top 5% of the nation’s wage earners account for 60% of the total federal income tax revenue. The bottom 50% of the nation’s wage earners only account for 3% of the total federal income tax revenue. So the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts did not take money away from the middle class. It just gave back more of the richest American’s money back to them AS WELL AS allowing the middle class to keep more of their money.
Posted by: James Danley | February 7, 2009, 12:43 pm 12:43 pm
Obama:Let’s show them that we are. And let’s do whatever it takes to keep the promise of America alive in our time.”
———-
Sometimes, Mr. President, “whatever it takes” means fighting against unnecessary spending to create a focused stimulus plan.
These bills were crafted without strategy. Four months ago, there was nobody saying the components of this bill were exactly what the country needed for a sound future.
Just doing *something* isn’t the right answer when doing nothing isn’t an option. We have to do the right thing.
The Congress has to be smart, because there’s no going back and repudiating their vote for the package once it passes.
Posted by: MayBee | February 7, 2009, 12:49 pm 12:49 pm
Concerned in OH:
Do you trust whatever report comes out!!!! Even the WMD Report was taken seriously by some, but it came later to be proved wrong. It was nothing but a huge embarrassment.
Posted by: RST | February 7, 2009, 12:50 pm 12:50 pm
“NATIONAL CATASTROPHE”
Perhaps the national catastrophe is having a clueless “leader” in office whose only skill is to read a teleprompter and spew platitudes–a man filled with ambition but lacking leadership skills and experience
Obama works for us and he is a public servant.
He needs to realize that the presidency is a real
J-O-B and not just a title with perks.
Obama needs to be held accountable and he answers to we the people.
Posted by: Michelle | February 7, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
James wrote among many things:
“Unfortunately the federal government’s interference in the housing market–specifically forcing lending institutions to lower their lending standards, and give loans to individuals who could not afford the loans–”
This conservative mythology will persist. Those initial loans were supposed to be structured so lower income people COULD afford to pay them. There is nothing wrong with structuring loans this way and no one can prove that when done properly these loans aren’t profitable. However I do agree with you that greedy people abused the system. -And those people were not lower income people.
Posted by: Skip | February 7, 2009, 12:54 pm 12:54 pm
You can play with the numbers all you want James, but there are many ways to transfer wealth. One way is to start a very expensive war and then give no-bid contracts to all your friends at taxpayer expense. Do we believe that all the money spent in Iraq is just gone?
Posted by: Skip | February 7, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
“Don’t think just do it!” What results have we had when we took this path: Oh let’s see: The Patroit Act, the Invasion of Iraq, The 1st 700 billion to 1.3 TRILLION bailout, and NOW STILL not satisfied another bloated pork filled “stimulus package” that puts us into the Abyss and our children enslaved to China and the international banking cartel for the next 100 years. Jeez, slow down O’bomba!!! You haven’t even made any speeches or press conferences yet! Can you take a little time before you push the US off the CLIFF!?! Sheesh!!!
Posted by: hmn... | February 7, 2009, 1:03 pm 1:03 pm
As an American, I am disheartened and dismayed that Senators Collins, Snowe and Specter are going along with the stimulus boondoggle. The consequences will be tragic. I will do everything in my power to see that all three of these Senators are defeated when their terms expire. I would rather see Democrats in these seats–at least I wouldn’t feel betrayed. The American People and the people of Maine and Pennsylvania should be ashamed.
Posted by: Monty | February 7, 2009, 1:05 pm 1:05 pm
Jake- I would love it if you could find a way to ask Obama which “tired old theories” he thinks led us into this tailspin (if not subprime lending and overspending), and I’d really enjoy hearing him have to back up his assertion that most of his opponents offer up only tax cuts as a solution.
Posted by: MayBee | February 7, 2009, 1:06 pm 1:06 pm
Obama spreads his fear message to the people and then goes to the opera: priceless!
Posted by: jim | February 7, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm
spread teh fear obama!
you’re as bad as bushboy
Posted by: verdinet | February 7, 2009, 1:18 pm 1:18 pm
Obama and the rest of the Socialists are playing on our fears! They lie through their teeth!
Tax cuts have a history of working, JFK, Reagan, Bush 43, All put tax custs in place for people who pay taxes and we came out of recessions.
The Obama plan will extend the recession just as Carter did!!
Obama pushed for the first trillion dollar bailout and it did nothing, they did not even spend it all! and now they want 3000 dollars from every American man woman and child to pay for there pet projects.
How does and of this pork package stimulate the economy, Eductaion NO, Democrat retreats NO, Movie producers NO please say what it stimulates and when!!
Not we need to spend money,
Give the 3000 dollars to each American to spend!!
or give a tax holiday for two months, which will only cost 350 Billion dollars
Using a crisis to push your socialist ideas Obama, Politics as usual!!
Posted by: spock | February 7, 2009, 1:19 pm 1:19 pm
Thou if he keeps nominating his friends then the taxes they all owe could pay for it!!
Posted by: spock | February 7, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
“The Republicans Have stripped the Bill for Education,They have stripped the Tax cuts President Obama wants to give the Middle class,”
dear angie.. the gop doesn’t have the power to strip anything.
Obama and the democrats have the power.
If obama agree to remove things you don’t approve of, BLAME HIM.
He’s the one with the final say.
Posted by: verdinet | February 7, 2009, 1:20 pm 1:20 pm
Massive inflation is coming. If you don’t believe Ron Paul, check out the federal reserves own plots of adjusted reserves and adjusted monetary base.
Posted by: Huh | February 7, 2009, 1:21 pm 1:21 pm
I wonder which saying we are going to hear more from Obama; “I made another bone-headed mistake” or “We need to do this or face a national catastrophe”? The first two weeks I think “bone-headed mistakes” won but “national catastrophe” may catch up.
Posted by: JeffR | February 7, 2009, 1:28 pm 1:28 pm
Skip, I don’t have a problem with private institutions trying to structure loans so that low income individuals can obtain mortgages. But my main problem was with the federal government extorting the loan institutions–threatening heavy fines for institutions that did not lower their loan standards and failed to give loans. Many of the loan institutions pushed the flexible subprime rates knowing that should the rates ever increase, their customers would not be able to afford the mortgages. And then they compounded the situation by reselling many of these mortgages to other institutions that were unaware that these were high risk loans.
Instead of interfering with the free market (forcing institutions to give loans) the federal government should have encouraged construction companies to donate at least 1% of their newly built homes to poor and low income families by offering additional tax credits. Then these poor and low income families would only have had to worry about furnishing their homes and paying their utilities and property taxes.
Posted by: James Danley | February 7, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
Massive inflation is coming
*******************************************
Does that have something to do with the air and global warming?
Posted by: amber | February 7, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
People it is time to invest in a ticket to Washington DC……get the train, plane, bus, or auto, get there now!
We must protest this abomination of the pork pie for the rich. We need the whole pie for AMERICA and her people!
Vote these crooks out of our government.
WE THE PEOPLE ARE THE GOVERMENT!
Posted by: Get to Congress | February 7, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Last year they said: “we need this stimulus package to avoid an economic catastrophe.” You’ve never heard a word about it since and the economy continues to worsen.
I think those that keep making bold doom-n-gloom predictions about economic stimulus and charging the tax payers billions to implement it need to stop making predictions.
Posted by: Don | February 7, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
Massive inflation is coming. If you don’t believe Ron Paul, check out the federal reserves own plots of adjusted reserves and adjusted monetary base.
Posted by: Huh | Feb 7, 2009 1:21:18 PM
———————————
The federal reserve BANK is a cartel of the worlds riches people!
It is not federal or part of the Government.
IT is the wealthy, The biggest bank and they OWN the smaller banks, most of them are part of the cartel. The ones who rule the WORLD!
Posted by: thegoverment is NOTthefederalreservebank | February 7, 2009, 1:41 pm 1:41 pm
The only national catastrophe we have is Obama as president. He’s working to get government to take over America and he’s spending the little guy’s tax money on worthless things. The rich get richer and the poor get poorer. What’s the matter with your people who voted him in. Are you brain dead???
Posted by: Linda | February 7, 2009, 1:44 pm 1:44 pm
Remember Bush and Cheney’s Iraq war that cost us 1.5 trillion or more when all costs are going to be added up. President Obama’s stimulus program is 500 billion dollars less than Bush and Cheney’s spent in Iraq! We never saw Sen. Lindsey Graham jumping up and down and pirouetting on the US Senate floor protesting for that kind of self-destructive pork. The same goes for John McCain, who’s jumping up and down like screaming most illogical and absurd things. Other Republican leaders like Kantor, Boehner, Kyle, Mitch McConnell were no better. Playing the same old wasted, tried and proven wrong, dead Republican politics. As usual they are misleading American people; they are pretending to safe guard public money and interested. They conveniently forget they are the ones who got us to this situation in the first place, that requires this kind of drastic measures. These Republicans are an insult to the intelligence American public, besides they go as far as to propose the same fail policies. What we really need to save our country is a multi Trillion dollar spending program much larger than President Obama is proposing. Let the truth be told that proposed rescue/stimulus isn’t big enough. Just days ago Paul Volker pointed this out Americans. We know this is very drastic…considering the colossal collapse Republicans left behind! If we can find enough helicopters to fly around the country everywhere drop down bundles of cash it would be even better! I agree this is drastic. President Obama isn’t happy about what he has to do. These are drastic times; to fill the huge holes that Republicans left behind is going to take Trillions of dollars to fix. But under the circumstances that Republicans left behind, we have no other choice. What president Obama is doing is exactly what FDR had to go save our country during the great depression! These are terribly drastic times. We need drastic measures! US Government may have nationalize banks to separate them from the “good” “bad” and the “ugly” couple of months down the road. There’s 62 Trillion dollars worth “unregulated” insurance instruments called Credit default Wraps. When you thing how badly Republicans have mismanaged America is truly heartbreaking. But John McCain goes on TV mouthing the same nonsense that George Bush did, for eight years. John McCain isn’t smart enough to understand he has to move beyond the conservative mantra of “Tax Cuts” “Small Government” “No Regulation” “Let Marketplace Decides…” I can understand, a man like John McCain who doesn’t know how to use a computer, can he really understand what future holds for America. John McCain’s type of politics is over for good. The debate and the experiment have been ended. Americans have the proof of such policies and practice. They have discarded it. All that dogma belongs to the ash-heap of history. But Republicans have not learned anything it seems. For America to prosper and be respected and powerful in the world, possible when we revitalize America. President Obama has to prevent America from a colossal collapse, after all the years of poor judgment and damage done to our country by the Republicans and to go beyond to lay the foundation for America’s future. President Obama is proposing to do is what FDR did to save our country for disintegration. President Obama is planning to go even further and lay the foundation for a strong future in terms of healthcare, infrastructure, schools and universities, research and science, education and jobs, business and industry to prosper and America to be strong and lead the world. Who’s holding all this back? Fairly and squarely it is obvious Republicans are holding America from going forward by their narrow-minded, provincial and past-based politics. If Republicans refuse to change and adopt themselves to suit America’s future they will be left behind. And that’s already happening! Let’s move America forward into 21st century, but it’s up to Republicans to join us or not, they are facing extinction if they do not!
Posted by: elytis | February 7, 2009, 1:46 pm 1:46 pm
Hold on a sec. I thought “scaring people” with talk of “catastrophes” and the need to act quickly when done by the Bush administration talking about national defense, was wrong and evil and using fear to get what the president wanted. Now the Obama administration comes in and the president talks about “catastrophes” and the necessity of haste, talking about the economy, and that’s the appropriate way to pitch the stimulus plan? I thought we had “chosen hope over fear.” This would be silly if it were not so serious.
Posted by: moderate | February 7, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
There is a difference between playing on people’s fears and responding to a frightening situation impacting our country.
Only those willing to ignore the state of our economy and deny the fact the US had the largest one month job loss of roughly 600,000 jobs in January would be unable or unwilling to differentiate between the two..
Posted by: Paige | February 7, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
If Collins or Snowe vote to saddle my unborn grandchildren with a trillion dollars of debt, my family is prepared to BOYCOTT ALL MAINE products until they are out of office. That means no more LL Bean, no Tom’s of Maine, no Maine lobsters, etc.
Posted by: citizen-sane | February 7, 2009, 2:07 pm 2:07 pm
Paige: you are confusing the economic situation with Obama’s presidency. We’re discussing the fact that his proposed actions are nothing new. They have been proven not to work in the past and will not work this time.
Nobody is ignoring the state of the economy. Those that see the government for what it is and understand basic economics understand that what Obama is pushing on us is not going to work, will not make him look good and will only put us deeper in the hole.
Lets go. Shake it off and wake up!
Posted by: Don | February 7, 2009, 2:08 pm 2:08 pm
Elytis, I don’t know where you get your figures, but I would challenge your statement that the stimulus costs less than the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Your statement is contradicted by news reports I have seen from the Washington Post and other news sources. The Iraq war has cost an estimated 591 trillion so far. And that was over SIX years. So while combining the Iraq and Afghanistan wars for those six years might approach the stimulus figure, that is spending over time. So I think comparing that to one grand spending bill is apples to oranges.
And it does not change the fact that much of the money being spent here is in no way stimulative. Example– Pell Grant increases. I am a college professor; I know tons of students with Pell Grants. I defy you to find a single one of my students who would tell you that the additional 400 a year would be the difference for her between staying in school or not. Yet the aggregate of all those students all getting the extra 400 per year adds up to 14 BILLION dollars. That is ridiculous. And it is not stimulative– the students will not get that additional funding until fall at the earliest and so it cannot be spent until, say, September. And we saw how much help the 500 rebates were last year– minimal. Additional Pell Grant money is not going to save any jobs or prevent any of those students from joining the unemployment lines. It is such spending, aimed not at saving the economy but currying favor with traditional Democratic interest groups or satisfying campaign promises, to which I object. Let’s keep improving the bill,
Posted by: moderate | February 7, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
Please hurry and give ACORN their $4 billion so they can get started on BO’s reelection.
It will be a catastophe for Obama if he doesn’t pay back all of those who helped elect him.
Posted by: sammy | February 7, 2009, 2:12 pm 2:12 pm
He is not scaring People he is Right,Look at the Job losses in the last few months. Dittoheads stop listening to your almighty Limbaugh, A man who just signed a 38 Millon dollar Contract to spew his Garbage!The President is right if we dont act now things are gonna get alot worse!
Posted by: Angie | February 7, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
you are confusing the economic situation with Obama’s presidency. We’re discussing the fact that his proposed actions are nothing new. They have been proven not to work in the past and will not work this time.
______________________________________
No, they are not and it is a disappointment that he allowed the Republicans to manipulate the Bill to be 42% of tax cuts. You are correct, these actions are nothing new, have not worked and will not work.
Tax cuts and tax rebates only generate about $1.00 in economic activity vs. investment in Infrastructure generates about $1.59 in economic activity. If you are good with throwing away .59 on the dollar I would hate to see your ECON 101 grade.
btw- Telling people to “shake it off” is obnoxious.
Posted by: Paige | February 7, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
angie:The President is right if we dont act now things are gonna get alot worse!
====
If we do the wrong thing now, things are going to get a lot worse, too.
Nobody on Capital Hill can even state the size of this bill right now.
There is no way they’ve even read it. I doubt Obama has read it. I doubt he has any clue what the spending consists of- because nobody does.
It was not carefully put together.
If it was, President Obama could use his radio address to specifically explain *how* this bill will work to create jobs, and why this spending is different than the kind of out of control spending he campaigned against.
He is only arguing against his detractors, rather than trying to convince us of the merits of his bill. That is a big huge clue.
Posted by: MayBee | February 7, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
Moderate:
The President is not scaring anyone. It is the reality. The entire world is fighting hard to tackle the problem. Our nation is no exceptional. When you hear people are losing their jobs, is that not the reality??? Are you waiting until you are affected to realise that the problem do really exist??????
Posted by: RST | February 7, 2009, 2:25 pm 2:25 pm
John Nichols — a very wonderful writer who’s been an absolutely intemperate supporter of The Puppet — writes today:
“The plan is now more weighted than before toward tax cuts
(which will account for more than 40 percent of the overall cost of the
package) that will do little or nothing to stimulate job creation for a
country than lost almost 600,000 positions in January alone … In every sense, the Senate plan moves in the wrong direction.”"
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
In 1999 I worked two jobs that whole year. Starting in 2000 my work increased by 10x 1999. From 2002 through 2006 I made over a million dollars. But after Nancy Polsi and Barney Frank got their new jobs my work started slowing down. Now it has been over 2 months since I have worked. The Dems created our problems and the Repubs got the blame. Now we are in for 2 to 4 more years of the same. OMG we are in trouble with the present Washington teenagers running the show.
Stop the spending maddness!
Posted by: Gene | February 7, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
Obama himself is a “National Catastrophe”
Posted by: Oliver | February 7, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
Clinton began the crap that then continued with Bush (at least he kept us safe) and now is declining fast with Obummer, the worst yet. He is not attractive; he’s a bonehead with huge ears. He’s not Christian because no true Christian murders the most innocent among us. He’s socialist through and through. When the country comes to its senses, it will rue the day this Kenyan was ever made president. He’ll never be mine. He, Barney Frink, Nasty Pelosi, Horrible Reid are bad people who hope for this country’s destruction. Just watch.
Posted by: L. | February 7, 2009, 2:27 pm 2:27 pm
The only catastrophe here is obama. That’s change I can fear!
Posted by: hanna | February 7, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
On November 24, 2008, President Barack Obama designated Christina Romer as Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers upon the start of his Administration. She is a Garff B. Wilson Professor of Economics at the University of California Berkeley. Her recent work has focused on the impact of tax policy on government and general economic growth. This work looks at the historical record of US tax changes from 1945-2007. She is a proponent of tax cuts over increased spending. Her analysis indicates we get a $3 to $4 dollar bump in GDP for every $1 cut in taxation. She concludes we only get a $1 increase in GDP for every $1 in increased spending.
This is why I say Congress is driving the Stimulus package, not the President.
Congress must be held accountable.
Posted by: Holman | February 7, 2009, 2:28 pm 2:28 pm
Sammy said:
The Iraq War has cost $591 Trillion over 6 years.
Sammy, I think you meant $591 billion. You are off by a factor of 1,000. Hey, even a genius like Nancy Pelosi could get confused by big numbers. Don’t sweat it.
Posted by: George Emerson | February 7, 2009, 2:31 pm 2:31 pm
What a lier, seems like he is trying to extend the depression just like FDR. Shut up obama.
Posted by: Jason | February 7, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
By the way, the Iraq War appears to be going quite well. Iraq will be the foothold that democracy needs in the Middle East. 10 years from now, it will be conventional wisdom that Bush made a great move by taking Saddam out of power. Of course, Obama has stopped stamping his feet and crying about bringing home the troops and that we have failed. He was wrong and, even if he won’t admit it, the truth of his incorrect take on the war will be apparent in the next couple of years.
Posted by: George Emerson | February 7, 2009, 2:34 pm 2:34 pm
It’s pretty funny that our cool new president is so stressed that he has to get away for the weekend–and after only two weeks in office.
Be careful what you wish for–he wanted glory, fame, and power.
What this narcissistic man will do to America is the real catastrophe.
Posted by: riley | February 7, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Concerned in OH wrote:
By all means Jimmy, lets look at Ireland:
From the UK Independent:”The increase in the number of people declaring themselves insolvent was particularly high in Scotland and Northern Ireland – jumping 75 and 39 per cent respectively in the final quarter of 2008″.
—————————
Hi Concerned…Northern Ireland and Scotland are part of the U.K. Jimmy was referring to the economic growth in Ireland, as in the Republic of Ireland, which is a separate country from the U.K.
Posted by: Craig in NYC | February 7, 2009, 2:35 pm 2:35 pm
Just cancelled plans to vacation in Maine for two weeks this summer. I also called LL Bean, which I regularly spend hundreds of dollars with, to let them know that I will not spend another penny with them if Snow and Collins votes for this pork fest spending package. I wil also stop purchasing from the local Hannaford Market, and plan to boycott all Maine products!
If the Democrats feel so strong about this package, let them pass it. Any RINO that joins with them should feel the rath of the RNC!
Posted by: Rand | February 7, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Listen to Holman.
Educate yourselves like he has.
Conservatives like facts and seek them out.
Liberals shy away from facts because the facts will force them to revise their opinions and admit they are wrong. Who wants to admit they are wrong? Not liberals.
Posted by: George Emerson | February 7, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
Elytis wrote: “What president Obama is doing is exactly what FDR had to go save our country during the great depression!”
You are right! President Obama is trying to do some of the same things that FDR did.
In a recent study, “New Deal Policies and the Persistence of the Great Depression: A General Equilibrium Analysis,” economists Harold L. Cole and Lee E. Ohanian conclude that FDR’s actions delayed economic recovery by seven years.
Mr. Cole is quoted as saying:
“President Roosevelt believed that excessive competition was responsible for the Depression by reducing prices and wages, and by extension reducing employment and demand for goods and services,” [...] “So he came up with a recovery package that would be unimaginable today, allowing businesses in every industry to collude without the threat of antitrust prosecution and workers to demand salaries about 25 percent above where they ought to have been, given market forces. The economy was poised for a beautiful recovery, but that recovery was stalled by these misguided policies.”
Mr. Ohanian is quoted as saying:
“High wages and high prices in an economic slump run contrary to everything we know about market forces in economic downturns.” [...] “As we’ve seen in the past several years, salaries and prices fall when unemployment is high. By artificially inflating both, the New Deal policies short-circuited the market’s self-correcting forces.”
In addition to the massive spending bill, the Democrats are poised to pass the Employee Free Choice Act which will eliminate the secret ballot making it easier for non-union businesses to become unionized. Passage will ultimately result in higher wages and higher prices–exactly what FDR’s policies did. And it will likely result in a much longer and much deeper recession.
Posted by: James Danley | February 7, 2009, 2:38 pm 2:38 pm
HOLMAN….
GREAT POST! Any Democrat that can deal with facts should read the post by HOLMAN!
Posted by: rank | February 7, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
The stimulants should have been separated from the pork. The pork voted on its own merits individually. Let the congressmen show where they stand-no voting ‘present’.
Didn’t this guy say something about ‘no pork’. The only ‘change’ I’ve seen are the tax cheats in his cabinet and releasing the guy who led the attack on the USS Cole.
Posted by: Jack Kinch(1uncle) | February 7, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
2012 cannot come soon enough – please do not fall for Obama’s marxist theories, and please do say NO to Obanma’s stimulus deal. PLEASE DO THE RIGHT THING FOR AMERICA!
Posted by: GC | February 7, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
Everyone, including Obama, seems to forget that we are in this situation because of greedy individuals who are now barely effected by whats going on. Most of these problems can easily be battled if CEO’s and other execs would take less pay and put more into their businesses, which could very well provide workers more pay, which would be the best step towards stabilizing the economy. Obama what are you doing??
Posted by: Brian | February 7, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Wow Moderate you nearly hit every talking point from daily kos, but you forgot that 9/11 was an inside job.
“Remember Bush and Cheney’s Iraq war that cost us 1.5 trillion or more when all costs are going to be added up. President Obama’s stimulus program is 500 billion dollars less than Bush and Cheney’s spent in Iraq! We never saw Sen. Lindsey Graham jumping up and down and pirouetting on the US Senate floor protesting for that kind of self-destructive pork. The same goes for John McCain, who’s jumping up and down like screaming most illogical and absurd things. Other Republican leaders like Kantor, Boehner, Kyle, Mitch McConnell were no better. Playing the same old wasted, tried and proven wrong, dead Republican politics. As usual they are misleading American people; they are pretending to safe guard public money and interested. They conveniently forget they are the ones who got us to this situation in the first place, that requires this kind of drastic measures. These Republicans are an insult to the intelligence American public, besides they go as far as to propose the same fail policies. What we really need to save our country is a multi Trillion dollar spending program much larger than President Obama is proposing. Let the truth be told that proposed rescue/stimulus isn’t big enough. Just days ago Paul Volker pointed this out Americans. We know this is very drastic…considering the colossal collapse Republicans left behind! If we can find enough helicopters to fly around the country everywhere drop down bundles of cash it would be even better! I agree this is drastic. President Obama isn’t happy about what he has to do. These are drastic times; to fill the huge holes that Republicans left behind is going to take Trillions of dollars to fix. But under the circumstances that Republicans left behind, we have no other choice. What president Obama is doing is exactly what FDR had to go save our country during the great depression! These are terribly drastic times. We need drastic measures! US Government may have nationalize banks to separate them from the “good” “bad” and the “ugly” couple of months down the road. There’s 62 Trillion dollars worth “unregulated” insurance instruments called Credit default Wraps. When you thing how badly Republicans have mismanaged America is truly heartbreaking. But John McCain goes on TV mouthing the same nonsense that George Bush did, for eight years. John McCain isn’t smart enough to understand he has to move beyond the conservative mantra of “Tax Cuts” “Small Government” “No Regulation” “Let Marketplace Decides…” I can understand, a man like John McCain who doesn’t know how to use a computer, can he really understand what future holds for America. John McCain’s type of politics is over for good. The debate and the experiment have been ended. Americans have the proof of such policies and practice. They have discarded it. All that dogma belongs to the ash-heap of history. But Republicans have not learned anything it seems. For America to prosper and be respected and powerful in the world, possible when we revitalize America. President Obama has to prevent America from a colossal collapse, after all the years of poor judgment and damage done to our country by the Republicans and to go beyond to lay the foundation for America’s future. President Obama is proposing to do is what FDR did to save our country for disintegration. President Obama is planning to go even further and lay the foundation for a strong future in terms of healthcare, infrastructure, schools and universities, research and science, education and jobs, business and industry to prosper and America to be strong and lead the world. Who’s holding all this back? Fairly and squarely it is obvious Republicans are holding America from going forward by their narrow-minded, provincial and past-based politics. If Republicans refuse to change and adopt themselves to suit America’s future they will be left behind. And that’s already happening! Let’s move America forward into 21st century, but it’s up to Republicans to join us or not, they are facing extinction if they do not! “
Posted by: Jonathan | February 7, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
That’s the latest right-wing assertion: that FDR’s policies extended the Great Depression, because a couple of right-wing economists have said so. It’s all fine and good -you can argue about it for decades but unfortunately you can’t prove it.
Posted by: Skip | February 7, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
For those who complain about the cost of the War in Iraq, one could also make the case that spending tens of billions of dollars prosecuting and incarcerating individuals for drug possession and usage is a waste of time and money. In fact, there must be a trillion dollars spent every year enforcing all criminal laws. Is this a waste of money?
Posted by: James Danley | February 7, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
In response to you saying, Mr. B.H. Obama, that this pork package you’re selling as a stimulus is needed to prevent a catastrophe, i say YOU ARE THE CATASTROPHE.
Posted by: randy | February 7, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Paige: being a master degreed economist working in the field for the last 15 years I can professionally say that your superficial analysis – while sounding informed – is the same sort of mass media rhetoric you hear everyday in the news.
I would suggest you take the ECO 101 class, work for the government in a budget office and a few other things like I have so that you can understand better what real investment in an economy is and what would be appropriate and constitutional stimulus.
Posted by: Don | February 7, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
On monday the Obama’s are going to a local school and reading Chicken Littles “the sky is falling” to the children. He wants to pass the message to the people who voted for him.
Posted by: jeff | February 7, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
This is a repeat of the 1930′s. The people in charge of our government are Marxists just as those who created the “New Deal”. Read The Forgotten Man by Amity Shlaes. This book will make the hair on your neck stand up and it’s happening again.
Posted by: tdrag | February 7, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
What Holman has written are not facts, they are only assumptions!
Posted by: RST | February 7, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
The president has no clue how to be president.
I’m not sure he’s qualified by the Constitution either
Posted by: George | February 7, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Obama you are feeding Americans more arrogant, obfuscating rhetoric again!:(
Pelosi’s over-reaching orgy of a spending package will not stimulate anything but American anger at the democrat demagogues! :)
Fix this partisan spending package or keep quiet Obama! Democrats will pay in 2010 and 2012, including Obama, if this monster of a spending packsage passes!
Posted by: aware2u | February 7, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
Obama is a fraud!
Posted by: Jack | February 7, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
For all who think this can be fixed with money being thrown around, look at America’s main problems, Credit and Foreclosures. Pay the people more and fix the problem. Executives, Professional athletes, celebrities, etc… must eventually stop hoarding the money. That’s is our best solution.
Posted by: Brian | February 7, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
The sooner the world realizes that Obama is in way over his head the better. Pelosi/Reid are now running the show while Mr. O. dances around playing big man. This guy has to go.
Posted by: Bob | February 7, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
being a master degreed economist working in the field for the last 15 years I can professionally say that your superficial analysis – while sounding informed – is the same sort of mass media rhetoric you hear everyday in the news.
______________________________________
So what is you plan? You are in disagreement with most Economist on this issue including nobel prize winners. Please inform us on what we clearly don’t know!
Posted by: Paige | February 7, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
“Tax cuts and tax rebates only generate about $1.00 in economic activity vs. investment in Infrastructure generates about $1.59 in economic activity. If you are good with throwing away .59 on the dollar I would hate to see your ECON 101 grade.”
Cuts and rebates are totally different things.
No business is going to invest in new equipment in response to a one time rebate. The rebate under discussion would amount to $40 per family per pay check.
That would be help and supportive of the family at a rough time. But it will not change their buying behavior.
So Obama is putting together a package that has “tax action” in it but he is purposefully picking action that will not be that helpful to the GDP. Romer knows this and that why she has a multiplier of under 1 for them.
What would have been nice is to have seen some leadership and for him to have reverse two years of rhetoric and proposed tax cuts that would be helpful to investors.
Posted by: BertieW | February 7, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Right on Jake! :)
Pay to play Obama is much worse than Blago!
Obama is way out of his depth! He thinks he can continue to use Chicago style cesspool politics! :(
Posted by: aware2u | February 7, 2009, 3:04 pm 3:04 pm
Obama has become the “National Catastrophe.”
Posted by: Maria Martinez | February 7, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Thank God. It is Obama in the helm. Just imagine if McCain is in the seat. The country would be in real diabolic crisis. McCain knows nothing about economics. He is pushing that the Republican way is the right way of solving the economic meltdown. Give me a break. The only role of Republican senators is to be quiet. Sit down and learn. There are far too many senators who like to talk on subjects they do not know anything.
Posted by: T888tai | February 7, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
Right!
The sooner the world realizes that Obama is in way over his head the better. Pelosi/Reid are now running the show while Mr. O. dances around playing big man. This guy has to go. – Posted by: Bob
Posted by: aware2u | February 7, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
90 of 100 Kentucky counties have been declared disaster areas due to recent ice storms (sorry Al Gore…). It’s been nearly two weeks and Obama hasn’t visited the state. Bush visited New Orleans less than 48 hours after Katrina, and he was crucified by the media. Where is Obama?
Posted by: Where is Obama? | February 7, 2009, 3:08 pm 3:08 pm
Jonathan
Interesting Post and you are 100 percent right, Mccain Or Grahm Didnt have Melt downs and Tantrums when Bush/Republicans were sinking Millions of dollars a month In Iraq!Now President Obama wants to Invest Money in America, something that has not been done in about 6 years. And those two as well as the Other Republicans are having Meltdowns about spending! LAUGHABLE. Well thank god Mccain didnt win with him thinking the Economy was SOUND, And what about when Mccain went off to Washington for the Wall ST Bailout no tantrum there REPUBLICANS ARE HIPOCRITES! PARTY FIRST COUNTRY LAST FOR REPUBLICANS
Posted by: Angie | February 7, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
“McCain knows nothing about economics.”
And Obama does??? The guy has never worked a real job and has never run anything in his entire life!
Posted by: Huh? | February 7, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
These Liberals are unbelievable!! First they cry out with the rest of us after 9/11 that we need to go after the terrorists involved. Then the Liberals turn their backs on the country for their political gain and cried out that we shouldn’t be at war. They then spread decent in the country by claiming that Bush and his administration is using fear to prop up the war. It’s funny how we now have a Liberal President in the White House who has zero morals and who is now using fear to justify the most ridiculous spending spree in our country’s history. This guy is going to destroy our country and way of live with his Socialist actions. This country started to move towards Socialism during the FDR days and with ever Democrat in office, we have gotten closer and closer.
Posted by: txcunderground | February 7, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
T888tai
Obama is not at the helm! He is just a mouthpiece enjoying the perks! :(
Posted by: aware2u | February 7, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Financial Crisis =’s Barney Frank, Chris Dodd, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, etc.
Pretty sure those aren’t Republicans or Republican entities…learn the facts, dumb Americans.
Posted by: Barney | February 7, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
We will have a National Catastrophe yet Obama took time out for a date night, well I am 100% sure if I had a crisis of doom and gloom around me dating would be the last thing on my mind.
Obama seems to be sending mixed messages, or he is not sure what a National Catastrophe really is.
Posted by: SJ | February 7, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
James Danley wrote “That’s the latest right-wing assertion: that FDR’s policies extended the Great Depression, because a couple of right-wing economists have said so. It’s all fine and good -you can argue about it for decades but unfortunately you can’t prove it.”
It isn’t a right wing assertion, Mr. Danley. Henry Morgenthau, Secretary of the Treasury appointed by Roosevelt and one of the archtects of the New Deal testified before the Ways and Means Committe in 1939, a year after the New Deal had ended that it had been a complete failure. Here’s what he had to say: “We are spending more money than we have ever spent before and it does not work. … I want to see this country prosperous. I want to see people get a job. I want to see people get enough to eat. We have never made good on our promises … I say after eight years of this Administration we have just as much unemployment as when we started … and an enormous debt to boot.”
Posted by: MinniePearlJam | February 7, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
The only winners here are the Democrats! Queen Nancy debated this bill for 8 hours (8 HOURS! That’s $100B/hr!) before voting on it, with NO Republican amendments allowed. None! It’s a laundry list to entrench the Democratic base at taxpayer expense! You wanna stimulus biil? Keep the tax cuts, the $50 billion for infra-structure (big whoop for all of Odumbo’s campaign rhetoric!), and give each state $2 billion dollars to spend as needed. Total would be less than $500B with the bulk going to tax cuts. Kill the rest of the pork!
Posted by: Dilligaf | February 7, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
Post fron another blog – “The American people will never knowingly adopt socialism. But, under the name of ‘liberalism,’ they will adopt every fragment of the socialist program, until one day America will be a socialist nation, without knowing how it happened.” – Norman Thomas, U.S. Socialist Party presidential candidate 1940, 1944 and 1948
Posted by: Anti-Socialist | February 7, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
Paige: just as many economists – even some nobel laureates disagree completely.
Google: the broken window falacey. You’ll see that in order for the government to spend they have to have money. They get that money from: raising taxes on our income, borrowing from us or printing more money.
You’ve probably heard that there is an opportunity cost to any action. If they government takes money out of our pockets in the form of taxes, or borrowing or printing which leads to a devalued dollar and inflation then that simply means that they are taking from Peter to pay Paul. I don’t spend my money on a holiday because the government is spending my money on a road in Florida.
No new jobs are created, no new economic growth just shifting things from one industry to another.
If however the government did NOTHING then I would take that holiday and spend my money in South Beach and the businesses down there would profit and the Florida government would have more tax revenue to fix their own roads.
That’s another issue: the federal government has no constitutional authority to impose programs on the states. They are stomping all over the state’s rights.
Posted by: Don | February 7, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm
How do the Democrats spell N-A-F-T-A-?
Posted by: So Much For Promises | February 7, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
obama (for those still needing proof) has demonstrated what an amateur he really is; it’s virtually impossible to put any stock in anything he has to say. this imo makes it almost impossible for him to lead any but the most ignorant in the electorate (granted that’s a substantial number).
here we have a guy with NO leadership or governing experience, therefore by definition a lack of the judgement required for such a position, self-evidently full of nothing but hot air (can’t really blame him, talking is all he’s ever known), breathtakingly ignorant of even recent U.S. or world history, which to intelligent people makes him come across like an inexperienced juvenile naturally in WAY over his head.
how anyone can defer THEIR legislative agenda to hyperpartisans such as pelosi and reid and then not be ashamed in throwing tantrums upon discovering obamaniacs don’t constitute a majority simply demonstrates that this guy really has very little idea what he is doing. obama has seemed to be all about playing dress up and now that he’s in charge, it shows.
Posted by: mike | February 7, 2009, 3:36 pm 3:36 pm
Paige: in addition to the economic analysis there is also ample evidence to bear this out. Just look at the tax rebate “stimulus” from last year. We were told we had to have it or the earth would explode. Now you don’t hear anything of it and the economy continues to circle the drain. Then we were told the TARP bailout had to happen or the earth would explode. That fizzled with a whimper and the question: where is all that money? And the economy contiues to circle the drain and the circles are getting smaller.
Now B.O. ( that stinker ) is telling us: we need this “stimulus” or it will be a national catastrophe.
Isn’t doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results the definition of insanity?
Posted by: Don | February 7, 2009, 3:38 pm 3:38 pm
Obama is a FRAUD!!!!
Posted by: TRAV | February 7, 2009, 3:41 pm 3:41 pm
SCARE TATICS!! SCARE TATICS! SCARE TATICS! THE American people are sick of hearing this….Pelosi all but said “Screw You” to all the American people when commenting on bipartisansip and how she doesn’t care if we like it or not the Dems. will pass the unspeakable bailout package one way or another (mainly to save her Assets in the stock market or what ever….Please America young, middle, and old take a look at what is really going on around us and stand up and lets be heard the we do not want this and it can not be crammed down our throats… I guess its going to take the whole true working class to quit paying taxes since its “voluntary” according to our new Vice President, to put these Politicans out and honest people in…..Please Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reliey tell us how the honest person can help……..
Posted by: iggy | February 7, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
Sure, this going to work. Other then the obama bootlickers it’s looking more like voter remorse judging by posts I see here and other websites.
No change just keep spending money this country doesn’t have. Obama Bush act 2.
Posted by: James Villa | February 7, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
Gee Whiz! Mr. Obama you and Congress knew this was coming 2 years ago. Your Democrat Party was in control of the purse strings. Like Congress always is. Why did Congress do nothing way back then??? Is it because Congress wanted this to happen? Your Stimulas PORK Package looks like it was designed in the 1960s. Has the Democrats been planning this Socialist take over for 40 years? How sad it is to have to talk out of both sides of your mouth.
In case I’m close to being correct This was all a joke.
Posted by: john smith | February 7, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
This sounds like the politics of FEAR to me! The economy will be find it if the government gets out of the way. This pork filled SPENDING bill is disgusting. This is not a fist bump for the economy but a fisting of the American public.
Posted by: Krump | February 7, 2009, 3:46 pm 3:46 pm
“If however the government did NOTHING then I would take that holiday and spend my money in South Beach and the businesses down there would profit…”
That’s if there are any businesses left by the time you get there Don.
Posted by: Skip | February 7, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
The only thing Obama has to do to see a “national catastrophe is look into the mirror, or look to the leadership in either side of congress….
Posted by: Nobamanation | February 7, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
Don:we need this “stimulus” or it will be a national catastrophe. Isn’t doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results the definition of insanity?
===
Yes. And Geithner is expected to announce his proposals next week that will probably exceed the amount of TARP money already allocated. Many economists expect the administration to request another $350 billion from Congress.
Let’s also not forget the auto manufacturers will be coming back in March for more money.
If Obama is on solid ground with his proposals, he will put them forward and explain them. If not, he will keep scaring us into spending more than $3,000,000,000,000 in the first months of his presidency.
Posted by: MayBee | February 7, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
MinniePearlJam, that was actually Skip’s comment. I totally agree with you.
Posted by: James Danley | February 7, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm
I love that all the Democrats have done since 9/11 is claim that Bush and Republicans used fear as a tactic to get their way on Iraq and the broader war on terror. They hammered the Republicans at every turn saying they were trying to scare Americans. The threat was exaggerated.
But not the economic threat. “If we dont pass this bill, we are facing disaster.” Umm, fear tactic anyone. These hypocrites are using fear tactics to get their way on a spending bill disquised as stimulus. They believe that the American people are stupid and will buy anything labeled as change from Bush. Unbelievable that Obama, Reid, Pelosi, Frank, Dodd are the leaders we think will deliver “real change”.
I also love the “Give Obama a chance” line I am hearing ad-naseum. I guess Dems mean the same chance they gave Bush in 2000 – they are still whining about how the election was stolen from them. They never gave Bush a chance even after 9/11 when they pretended to support the President for about a week.
By the way, the only documented stolen presidential election was Kennedy in 1960; funny we never hear about that one – just George Bush, because he is so scary.
Please just listen to Obama and Reid and Pelosi – is this really what we are pinning our hopes on??? Clearly we will see another change from this clown and his minions in four short years.
Posted by: Ted | February 7, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
Even “Republicans” — or whoever they are now that the neo-cons have decamped — ought to recognize that taxing the er RICH is only the FIRST thing that should be done, particularly in light of the lop-sided enrich-the-rich policies since the 70s.
InSTEAD, not even “Democrats” — whoever THEY are, now that the Party’s been hijacked by the “Obama” machine — can manage to utter the phrase.
Instead, these craven clothes-horses are taxing CIGARETTES (an addiction limited mostly to the poor, who arent’t exactly in a position to go to a spa to kick ‘em) … and lining up the poor and near-poor for ANOTHER round of “credit”, in which people who can’t afford it are herded into paying forEVER for huge energy-hog houses they. don’t. need. and. can’t. afford. — so that the “economy”, which is to say the banks and other corporations, can proceed on its accustomed parasitic path, and everybody at the top of the WASP heap can have a “job” that pays hundreds of thousands, if not millions, a year, while the Democrats prance around in every-day pearls that cost more than the annual income of millions of “the American people”.
Is there not ONE actual Democrat left in the Democratic “leadership” who can explain these things?
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
I agree with the folks that are saying Obama should not have a stimulus bill. Eighteen days ago Obama wasn’t even our President. This man must have a few devils on his backside that he owes. There should be no more stimulus plans at all. The reason we’re in this mess today is nobody thought they wouldn’t be able to get all the money they wanted on credit cards. I guess it was a really nasty surprise when their credit cards were being taken away. The U.S. Government has been running itself on that concept too. NO MORE STIMULUS. Start paying your bills Uncle Sam, just like the rest of us are going.
Posted by: elainekramer | February 7, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
Hey Obama lets put Bozos face on all our currency because the rest of the world is going to laugh when we try and buy somthing after you stimulate us.
Posted by: James Villa | February 7, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
Wow, So many young Obamaboto’s on the page. This is the mother of all PORK spending bills no more no less. Regardless of whom you believe caused this mess this bill not do anything but make things much worse. What happens when the Gov can’t sell the T bills they will have to issue to fund this thing? They will have to print money! Welcome to the 70′s kids with 17% + inflation. If you are lucky enough to have a job your pay won’t buy you anything or worse. Yea the “O” man knows what he’s doing all right. Just what Soros told him too.
Posted by: Who cares | February 7, 2009, 3:58 pm 3:58 pm
Hey if some Senator tried to bring up a bill to bring back slavery do you think in the spirit of bipartisanship the idea should be talked about? OF COURSE NOT! A bad bill like this spending bill is just the same. It needs to be crushed. Your not partisan your sticking to your values!!
Does anyone in Washington even have values anymore?
Posted by: No Kiddin | February 7, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Hey Obama what if you can’t smooze the Chinese and Japanese into buying treasuries. Then what lame one?
Posted by: James Villa | February 7, 2009, 4:05 pm 4:05 pm
So much for “Hope” over “Fear”!
Posted by: meaux | February 7, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Hey Obama, I wore hip waders during your campaign speeches and now that your president i’m wearing depends.
Posted by: James Villa | February 7, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
Thank you Obama!
As a owner of a restaurant, this stimulus bill should put some of my competitors out of business by not giving them sufficient tax relief. For myself, I will follow the example of Giethner and Foley and use some “creative accounting” to keep my tax burden low. And now that Janet Napalitano is in Homeland Security, (she was very weak on immigration here in AZ), I will be replacing my legal workers with undocumented ones. I will feel good about it in that this new bill will provide them tax credits, food stamps, and unemployment insurance.
Again, Thank You Obama!
Posted by: rederic111 | February 7, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
The only National Catastrophe – is BARRACK HUSSEIN OBAMA AND HIS BAND OF GREEDY SOCIALISTS IN THE CONGRESS.
I hope the Trophy Generations are ready to say good-bye to having everything they want, their jobs and any future possibility of amassing any personal wealth.
It’s all about sharing now………..and that gargantuan debt will be the ball and chain around the ankles of future generations for a very long time.
Posted by: IlonaE | February 7, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Here is how this bill was written. How much to get that bridge fixed in San Fransisco? 290 million and it will be totaly rebuilt? Great lets do that then. Now about this healthcare thing. Lets put Oh say 231 billion into that. That sounds like a nice number. No..no.. don’t worry about what we spend the 231 billion on. Just lump it into healthcare. Even if we waste the money on nothing we can still say we had good intentions.
Posted by: No Kiddin | February 7, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
Obama and congress……My preciouses….they are liars,tricksy, no real concern for the peopleses.
Posted by: littleleeers | February 7, 2009, 4:24 pm 4:24 pm
Hey Who Cares…….
This package will make the 1970′s look like easy street!! I remember it well – I was working in Mannhattan – prime went to 19% at one point. It was the age of Jimmy Carter…..Obama will make him look like a piker!
And when this economy starts to crawl out of it’s big abyss – the inflation will be the next thump on the head.
God help us.
Posted by: ILonaE | February 7, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Don -
Housing Prices have plummeted by 19%
Homeowners have lost over 2 Trillion dollars in equity
GDP continues to fall at a 6% rate and is expected to worsen
Unemployment is at 7.6%, but most experts believe the number is double that due to outdated tracking methods
Dow has dropped 41% from 10/07
Business Credit has dried up
Bank failures and near-failures are common
SO….Your solution as a “an economist working in the field” is to do nothing and you prefer to spend your money on a vacation in South Beach to stimulate the economy.
There-in lies the problem. The vast majority of Americans are not as fortunate as you are and can not AFFORD a vacation, have NO money to spend and can not find a job to provide them money to spend.
No spending – no economy.
Posted by: Paige | February 7, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
“Isn’t doing the same thing over and over again expecting different results the definition of insanity?”
Well, as The Puppet said (borrowing Axelrod’s words written for ANOTHER disappointing “black” politician, Deval Patrick: “Just words.”
The saying quoted above is attributed to Albert Einstein … the wild-haired mathematical genius who was, by today’s televised-politician standards, soooo badly dressed.
It’s also the definition of perseverance:
“If at first you don’t succeed, try, try again.”
(Attribted to Thomas H. Palmer (1782 – 1861)’s Teacher’s Manual (1840), and “often quoted in nineteenth-century children’s literature”.)
And that’s why we keep on trucking with the WORDS, kids … once the umbrage of the un-rich at their cruel subjection by the very rich — in this case, most of “our” supposed representatives in the wholly-owned corporate Congress — rolls beyond words, history tells us it’s darned hard to stop.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 4:28 pm 4:28 pm
Republicans whatever it takes lets get rid of this man in four years. Please get to work now and all Repunlicans will help you. We don’t want either of them after four years.
Posted by: Jane | February 7, 2009, 4:29 pm 4:29 pm
Is there a numbered list ANYWHERE of what this money is being spent on before I say if its a good or bad thing?
EXAMPLE:
1.. 200 billion on bees
2.. 801 million on child abuse
3.. 34 million for new windows in a Detroit court house.
4.. 3 billion on sugar beet production
How can we make a ration decision without those facts and why has not our Representatives given us those Exact sort of facts instead of platitudes.
Posted by: Just the Facts Maam | February 7, 2009, 4:31 pm 4:31 pm
After the Jimmy Carter recession which lasted roughly 1978-1981, the “change” that Reagan brought was tax cuts, tax cuts, and more tax cuts. In little over a year, the Carter recession turned into a Reagan Boom. Fixing a few bridges has never helped the economy.
This is the largest Pork Bill ever signed into law, Obama’s new legacy. He complains about the deficit he inherited? He just added nearly a trillion dollars to it, nearly 25% increase.
Our economy is not in danger. Inflation remains incredibly low at 0.1%, employment is still near 93%, gas prices remain reasonable. All we need are a few tax cuts and warm weather to jumpstart the economy.
Posted by: Joe S. | February 7, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
“Obama and congress……My preciouses….they are liars,tricksy, no real concern for the peopleses.”
Righty-oh.
So … how to stop them — before Monday, remember — from moving to enslave future generations of the American un-rich to the stupid game of dynastic corporatism they’re trying to pass off as “democracy”?
Otherwise, “national catastrophe” will look like the good ole days by the time the long, hot, waterless summer rolls around.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 4:37 pm 4:37 pm
@ ILonaE,
Thanks for your reply. The only thing most of the O nation knows about the 70″s is Disco Music.
Posted by: Who cares | February 7, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
A whole lot of people will deserve what’s coming with Pres. Obama-just hope me and mine won’t be dragged down with them.
Posted by: Kathy | February 7, 2009, 4:43 pm 4:43 pm
Obama is a pathetic, pandering, platitude who’s in way over his head. In the same perpetual campaigning breath that he bemoans the doubling of the National Debt, he resorts to scare tactics to pitch his ridiculous, debt and budget busting Trillion Dollar welfare and pork package. The arrogance is unrivaled and it’s insulting and offensive.
Posted by: nid | February 7, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
My company has not reduced staffing levels yet, but may need to later this year. However, as an owner let me give some “free” advice to you liberals in the USA. When YOUR candidate won the election and YOUR leaders – Obama, Reid, Pelosi, Rangel, etal. – started rattling the cages about increasing my taxes even though I work 3,000 hours per year, I made a simple choice. No new car this year. No vacation this year. No long weekend trips this year. Fewer and less expensive restaurant trips this year. I cut all spending I deemed not critical for the next 12 months. I refuse to pay more taxes and keep my spending the same level as then it is my personal savings that would suffer. The reason all you liberals are whining and complaining in the first place is because none of you planned more than 1 day into the future! Save some money, invest it, watch it grow over the long-term (hopefully) and then when this crap happens which it does in cycles you can withstand it without help from either of the idiot parties in control of this country. Until you do that then you are subject to living under the rule of either the Democratic morons or the Republican morons. Free yourself from both parties and you will enjoy life. It may mean smaller homes, less Starbucks, smaller cars, no vacations to Martha’s Vineyard, etc. but then and only then can you tell everyone else to stick it.
Now if you are suffering economically due to a medical condition, I am sorry and would love to find a way to set up a fund for people with catastrophic medical issues to help you financially but never as a tax, only as a charitable organization. Keep the bureaucrats away and you will prosper.
Posted by: Steve | February 7, 2009, 4:46 pm 4:46 pm
“How can we make a ration decision without those facts and why has not our Representatives given us those Exact sort of facts instead of platitudes.”
As poet Kenneth Patchen once wrote, “I don’t want to alarm you, but … ” they say it’s not WRITTEN down anywhere. (Is this so “our” representatives can claim later, as they did — except for Democratic hero Barbara Lee — with the “emergency” Patriot Act, that they didn’t actually READ it, and they’re sorry-sorry-sorry but it’s the law-law-law?)
No kidding. If you watch television, one or another news channel comes out with dribs and drabs from time to time.
And you might read John Nichols’ — he’s editor of the Capital Times in Madison, Wisconsin — “More Bipartisanship, Less Stimulus”, published today:
“The plan is now more weighted than before toward tax cuts (which will account for more than 40 percent of the overall cost of the package) that will do little or nothing to stimulate job creation for a country than lost almost 600,000 positions in January alone … In every sense, the Senate plan moves in the wrong direction.”
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
Paige: absolutely. If you understood what caused the current economic situation you would know that it was government policy. No economy is always up. Business cycles are a natural part of any economy. The government intervention only exacerbates those cycles. That is what’s happening now.
As for helping the economy by spending my holiday in South Beach: thanks for the laugh but yes, that is EXACTLY the kind of REAL economic stimulus we need.
Paige, you really need to understand economics, government policy, political vs. economic business cycles etc… before engaging in a discussion on these topics.
Posted by: Don | February 7, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
My husband employs around nine people-Obama supporters one and all. Until just recently, I hoped he wouldn’t have to fire a few.
Posted by: Kathy | February 7, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
I don’t know why everyone keeps complaining about pork. I love pork, especially bbq and pulled. Go Obama in 2012.
Posted by: waldo | February 7, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
If this is such a “catastrophe,” why doesn’t Obama show some leadership. To date, the plan is “pork,” not stimulus. And where is the money coming from to pay for the pork? The Democrats led the housing bubble fiasco with the CRA, Fannie, Freddie, and HUD so that anyone, no matter how unqualified, could buy a home. And now we’re supposed to trust the Democrats with a trillion dollars? Great Depression 2 is on the horizon. Hail Obama’s “hope and change” for the worse!
Posted by: judithod | February 7, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
Yeah well Waldo, I’m thinking you had better freeze some of that pork for the future because when the ridiculous stimulus passes and the dollar is being cranked out on printing machines, pork, along with everything else will go thru the roof due to hyper inflation.
Posted by: Kathy | February 7, 2009, 4:55 pm 4:55 pm
Clearly the new President is incompetent. We are in for a rough 4 years.
Posted by: Snarky | February 7, 2009, 4:56 pm 4:56 pm
We already have a “National Catastrophe” called Obama! If Congress and the Supreme Court would uphold their oaths to protect the U.S. Constitution by holding Obama accountable by requiring that he prove his citizenship and release his other hidden information the catastrophe could become suddenly less. With the background information he has made available as support for president he could not get a job as a server at McDonald’s.
Posted by: Enough is enough | February 7, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
“A government big enough to give you everything you want is a government big enough to take from you everything you have.”
- Gerald Ford, August 12, 1974
Posted by: Tony D | February 7, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
Obama has gone from the leader espousing hope to projecting fear, uncertainty and doubt. You must do what I say or everything will collapse. Dear Obama, if you keep saying it will come true.
Posted by: Buddha | February 7, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm
you really need to understand economics, government policy, political vs. economic business cycles etc… before engaging in a discussion on these topics.
____________________________________
hmm… Just because someone doesn’t agree with you, has facts to support the other side, – you play the condescending “you just don’t get it” card…
Posted by: Paige | February 7, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
So much for “No more politics of fear”
Posted by: JohnB | February 7, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
This bill will do NOTHING GOOD for America, just for the Government…
It amazes me the number of comments that people make saying that this mess was created by Bush for the last 8 years…
It’s obvious that many people don’t know CIVICS… Congress has been controlled by the Democrats/Socialists since 2006… That’s where all of the spending bills come from… The President is the Commander-in-Chief in charge of the Armed Forces; he just has the power of a veto over legislation…. If you know CIVICS then you’d know that this is how our Republic works.
Posted by: lifenliberty | February 7, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
you will believe it’s a catastrophe when you lose your job and try to get another one.
Posted by: Paul Wall | February 7, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
don, what started the ball rolling was Fannie Freddie endorsed by, I’m sure, your heroes-barney frank and Pelosi. Then it took off big time and yes, Repubs got involved. Don’t believe everything little Katie Courec tells you, do some homework on your own.
Posted by: Kathy | February 7, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
“The Democrats led the housing bubble fiasco with the CRA, Fannie, Freddie, and HUD so that anyone, no matter how unqualified, could buy a home…”
The Republicans just tried to ignore the bubble till they got McCain in, but they didn’t make it. These unqualified people you talk about, are they all the Republicans that bought McMansions that they knew they couldn’t afford?
Posted by: Skip | February 7, 2009, 5:10 pm 5:10 pm
Let’s see this weekend Obama is at Camp David. Next weekend it is home to Chicago. Real Leadership liberals. How about staying home and working on a compromise if it so important! No it is much better and easier to leave town. Vacation days #1 & 2 this weekend and #3 and #4 next weekend. Love to be a democrat, 4 days vacation after 3 weeks of work.
Posted by: Steve | February 7, 2009, 5:12 pm 5:12 pm
You can expect that this spending bill for Government will cost you the following:
- More of your freedom
- More American Jobs (unemployment will be about 12- 15% come Summer.
- Ultra high Inflation
- Ruin to the future generations of Americans; and possibly the end of America as we know it.
Posted by: lifenliberty | February 7, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
There’s no catastrophe in the fact the Unemplyoment has risen by a mere 2% of the workforce. It’s all part of the typical economic cycle and quite frankly it’s long overdue considering that this economy has operated with excessive employment over the past 4-5 years. All the hand-wringers crying about job losses fail to mention the fact that wages are up 4% year over year while at the same time liberal econo-frauds like Krugman and Reich complain about stagnant wages. Grow up folks.
Posted by: Nid | February 7, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
Republicans doubled the national debt! They took a budget surplus and raised it to a trillion dollar deficit.
Bush never vetoed a spending bill.
Again, what the heck do Republican know about fiscal discipline?
Moody’s Economy says
$1 tax cut = $1.02 into the economy
$1 stimulus = $1.59 into the economy
Again, you foolish Republicans don’t know ANYTHING about creating jobs because:
Total jobs created under Bush = 3 mil
Total created under Clinton = 23 mil
Remember when not 1 Republican senator voted for the “Deficit Reduction Act of 1993″ and Al Gore had to come in to break the tie?
Don’t tell me that Republicans are concerned about the budget!
Posted by: JV | February 7, 2009, 5:18 pm 5:18 pm
Typical conservative spew: “It’s cyclical.” This is the standard response for everything for which ignorance cannot explain.
Throw some facts out there please!
My brokerage sent a note out to the investors and here is what the Director of Research had to say:
“Market performance under Democrat Presidents has exceeded the market performance of Republican Administrations by almost 6.0%, and median market returns under all administrations by just under 3.0%. History tells us to expect better market performance going forward under Democrat leadership.”
And this is not from what you cons would call a commie-lib. So take that!
Posted by: JV | February 7, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Poor people bought homes they could in no way afford and plenty of rich ill informed bought properties at the height of the bubble hoping to flip them. And who’s gonna pay? all the middle class schlubs that have been studiously paying their mortgages for the past 20 years or so. throughout history, the rich have ended up with their heads on pikes, the poor have held the pikes and the middle class have hid in their cellars guarding their roots and grains. Don’t think for a minute that we’re way too sophisticated for this to play out again.
Posted by: Kathy | February 7, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
“Don’t tell me that Republicans are concerned about the budget!”
Except for their public pronouncements — as distinct from private practice — on abortion, there’s not a dime’s worth of difference between the parties.
“The word ‘bipartisan’ simply means that some larger-than-usual deception is taking place.” – George Carlin
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
What has happened to the 90-day moratorium on foreclosures? Nothing has been heard recently about that. What will help homeowners in trouble?
Posted by: Anonymous | February 7, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
Steve:
Here is a fact!!
George W. Bush spent more than a third of his two terms on vacation! 490 days!
Posted by: JV | February 7, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
Nid – Where do you get such rosy statistics? Please give us the link.
Posted by: Facts DO INDEED matter | February 7, 2009, 5:25 pm 5:25 pm
“And who’s gonna pay? all the middle class that have been studiously paying their mortgages for the past 20 years or so.”
And cigarette addicts … most of whom are — go figure! — poor people.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 5:26 pm 5:26 pm
Well of course…if “Moody’s Economy” says so….
The MSNBC drones have a new flag to wave these days. (Although, perhaps you should check and see what the CBO says about the longer term effects of this Giant Welfare Pig of a Plan…”worse than if the Gov does nothing”)
The silly Gov spending-multiplier stats that to which all you “new economists” are clinging do not consider the fact that the “stimulus” will greatly devalue the dollar, raise interest rates, raise taxes, reduce “real income” and crowd out private investment; all of which do nothing more than rob the economy of the capital needed for true long term economic growth.c
Posted by: Nid | February 7, 2009, 5:28 pm 5:28 pm
The important thing is that President Obama looks clean and sounds articulate as he spends us into the crapper. When Bush was whizzing our money down the drain he was wrong because he was so inarticulate. When Obama whizzes twice as much money down the drain it’s okay because he reads a teleprompter with flair. Oh yeah that thing about Bush being a Republican counted against him big time too. My dog could fart a bailout bill out her arse and if she was a democrat it would be considered BRILLIANT!
Posted by: oopstheydiditagain | February 7, 2009, 5:29 pm 5:29 pm
“Rosey stats”??? No, simply facts…although you’re not likely to get that news from Rachel Maddow….try the CBO, DOL and BEAS.
Posted by: Nid | February 7, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
People just don’t get it. If you believe only infrastructure projects and increased welfare spending will create economic prosperity, then you obviously don’t understand how economies work.
This pork-laden “stimulus” bill doesn’t help anyone other than politicians and possibly some construction workers and government employees.
What about the private sector? There are many unemployed software engineers, accountants, secretaries, retail workers, etc. Only dramatic tax cuts for small and large businesses will help stimulate employment across the board. Small businesses provide 80% of all jobs. That’s where the bill should be targeted.
The bill should also reduce taxes on ACTUAL taxpayers. More money in their pockets and increased confidence in our economy will spur spending, increasing demand for products and services and giving businesses reason to hire more workers.
Instead, this abomination is filled with huge amounts of wasteful spending Democrats have wanted to burden us with for the past four decades to ensure their power. It will only create a drag on our economy while putting us all in deeper debt. It won’t work. It CAN’T work.
The irony is I’ve worked two jobs to get out of debt for the past five years and the government is just burying me deeper in it. It’s disgusting.
Posted by: Carl | February 7, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
So, because the president says so, we should just roll over and sign off on this conversion to socialism? I thought this president wasn’t going to engage in scare tactics? So much for CHANGE.
Posted by: capitolguy | February 7, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Nicotine addicts-I was one and not poor by a long stretch. thank you Libs for getting me to quit-seriously. However, there are plenty more vices according to Libs to over tax… carnivores-shame on us- fat people- drinkers-carbon tax abusers etc. etc. Plenty more and at some point they just may target you no?
Posted by: Kathy | February 7, 2009, 5:32 pm 5:32 pm
“What will help homeowners in trouble?”
Cancel the mortgages and pay for it by … cutting out a couple of wars, or whatever. Why should poor people live in terror, and “banks” be bailed out to do it all AGAIN??
Oh, right: “responsibility”! HAhahaha.
Responsibity — and no National Health — for the poor and near-poor, bailouts and Kobe beef at the White House for those who are almost-unimaginably-rich, and for their corporate Congress.
Let’s do something ELSE.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 5:36 pm 5:36 pm
Sorry to burst your Obama=Salvation bubble, but yes economic activity (emplyoment included) is cyclical. The rate of employment tends to be a lagging econimic indicator…coincident at best. Considering that the long term average unemployment rate in the US hovers around 6% and that 4%-5% unemployment is considered to be “Full Employment”, 7.6% does not represent a “Catastrophe” by any reasonble and truthful definition.
Btw, do you think is simply a coincidence that the investment markets have rallied and credit spreads have narrowed over the past week?
Posted by: Nid | February 7, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
Nid:
Here is your cycle:
Bush #1 = Bad economy
Clinton = Good economy
Bush #2 = Terrible economy
Obama = Good economy
Posted by: JV | February 7, 2009, 5:41 pm 5:41 pm
“So, because the president says so, we should just roll over and sign off on this conversion to socialism?”
It ISN’T “socialism” — it’s corporate FASCISM, with a little barking about “bipartisanship” and impending “catastrophe” to make the medicine go down.
Meanwhile, the masters of the universe are about to distribute MORE bazillions, on Monday, to the BANKS.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 5:43 pm 5:43 pm
Not sure why you would presume to know for whom I cast my vote, especially since none of my posts endorsed a particular party or candidate. Clearly you’ve read at least a portion of the CBO’s report, did you skip the part regarding the longer term negative effects of passing this Trillion Dollar Welfare Giveaway? Look again, it’s in there. As for previous government waste….I’m against it. Although there’s no denying the fact that the boondoggle being pitched by Obama, far and away exceeds anything that’s ever been perpetrated on American taxpayers….it’s a loser that does little more than pay off the liberal institutions in the short term while setting the table for a deeper, greater “catastrophe” in the long term.
Posted by: Nid | February 7, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
“The Martians are coming,”
Thank God … the Space Brothers!
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
What has happened to the 90-day moratorium on foreclosures? Nothing has been heard recently about that. What will help homeowners in trouble?
Posted by: Anonymous | Feb 7, 2009 5:23:55 PM
======
Sorry to disappoint you, but it’s your fault because you should have chosen the right person in the first place. She is now taking care of States, and not chairing White house Task Force on working families. She is not taking care of homes now – that is PBO’s responsibilities, which he has no clue.
Posted by: Comrade | February 7, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
This spending bill will not prevent a catastrophe, It will create one. Not everyone out here is a DUFUS for BO.
Posted by: Pedro | February 7, 2009, 5:52 pm 5:52 pm
…..This terrible “Stimulus” Bill currently in the Senate is a ripoff of the hardworking American taxpayer.
…..Obama must stop trying to scare the American public into supporting this bill.
…..It is useless to try to contact any of the Senators because all calls are sent to a Voice Mailbox which, of course, is FULL and then they hang up on the caller- disgusting.
…..This whole affair is really upsetting because it is to detrimental to the taxpayers who always foots the bill for all of the Congressional excessive spending.
Posted by: hwm982xx | February 7, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
“The Martians are coming,”
Thank God … the Space Brothers!
********************************************
But it sounds more to me like War of the Worlds, Part 3.
Posted by: amber | February 7, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
I wonder where all these fiscal conservatives were for the past 8 years?
They didn’t seem to have any complaints over for Dubya’s trillion dollar deficit.
Posted by: Mike C | February 7, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Reply to JV:
“Bush #1 = Bad economy
Clinton = Good economy
Bush #2 = Terrible economy
Obama = Good economy”
Bush #1 = Dumb move raising taxes – Democrats controlled Congress
Clinton = Economy got worse, over reached and lost the house of Representatives for the fist time in 50 years 1994
Bush #2 = Republicans is Congress started acting like the Democrats of spending like drunk sailors…then 9/11/2001. Yet amazingly, until the middle of 2008 we had some of the lowest national unemployment numbers in decades (near 5.0%). 2008 the Housing bubble burst – Thank you Democrat policies of giving money to people who couldn’t pay it back.
Obama = Carter 2; possibly FDR 2
The problem through the last 15 years… Big Government built by BOTH SIDES… It’s not a party thing. The President of the United States is the Law Enforcement Arm of the Government… Congress (Makes the Laws and Taxes) and their out of control spending is, and will be the problem until it they are STOPPED!
Posted by: lifenliberty | February 7, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Psst…. Republicans I’m sorry to tell you this, but a Stimulus bill IS a Spending bill. That’s what a stimulus is, your spending money to jolt the economy. That’s economics 101.
Posted by: Mike C | February 7, 2009, 5:59 pm 5:59 pm
56.7% more jobs are created under Democratic administrations
The only time in the last 25 years that the budget was balanced was under a Dem administration.
The stock market gains an average of 11% per year under Dems, 1.4% under Repubs.
Those are statistical facts.
Posted by: Mike C | February 7, 2009, 6:03 pm 6:03 pm
“Psst…. Republicans I’m sorry to tell you this, but a Stimulus bill IS a Spending bill. That’s what a stimulus is, your spending money to jolt the economy. That’s economics 101.”
A stimulus bill is a spending bill but a spending bill necessarily isnt a stimulus bill.
As you will find out to your bitter regret in the next couple of years.
Posted by: BertieW | February 7, 2009, 6:05 pm 6:05 pm
No a stimulus bill is not a spending bill….even though Obama figured correctly that all the drones would jump all over that silly little sound bite.
A stimulus package would inject some capital into the system for the short term while providing tax relief that would facilitate the formation of capital for longer term growth and is appropriately direct to the floors of the House and Senate without previously being vetted by committee.
Spending bills which fund controversial government institutions and unproven liberal-based ventures to the tune of $500 billion in taxpayer assets require longer and more in-depth debate and committee review.
Posted by: Nid | February 7, 2009, 6:06 pm 6:06 pm
Let the “catastrophe” happen . . . it beats caving in to the Marxist regime that’s currently running this country. These leftist thieves are about to plunder the treasury.
Posted by: rplat | February 7, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
I wonder where all these fiscal conservatives were for the past 8 years?
*************************************************
Actually, they’ve been visible all over the place from the looks of it. Physically conservative people are predominant in America, despite the proliferation of all the Bali’s and workout places and the tracks. This is really a physically conservative country. I think Sarah Palin sets a good example with her hunting and running for us to get off our padded butts and out of our velvet ruts.
Saracrats 2012
Posted by: amber | February 7, 2009, 6:10 pm 6:10 pm
For all of you out there hung up on the fact that GW created a $1 trillion deficit in 8 years, look at it this way…the Messiah is is determined to DOUBLE that amount in his first month as President. Doesn’t look very promising for the remaining 47 months, that’s for sure! What will you lemmings say at the end of his first term? The deficit is huge, of course, but for good reason!
Posted by: sloly | February 7, 2009, 6:11 pm 6:11 pm
You party followers can bicker all you want and if so (and I believe you will), the drama will go on.
The truth of the matter is that it is corrupt politicians (including Obama) that are to blame.
Statements like this…
“if we don’t move swiftly to put this plan in motion, our economic crisis could become a national catastrophe. Millions of Americans will lose their jobs, their homes, and their health care. Millions more will have to put their dreams on hold.”
makes it seem like we as citizens can vote on the issue. I vote don’t move! Oh wait, I’m not a corrupt congressman so I can’t vote.
Posted by: Citizen Bob | February 7, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
“President Says Stimulus Plan Needed to Avoid “National Catastrophe”"
Thank God we have gotten past the politics of fear.
Hope and Change… Hope you don’t mind us leaving nothing but Change in your pockets when were done.
Posted by: johndotdoe | February 7, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
”
56.7% more jobs are created under Democratic administrations
The only time in the last 25 years that the budget was balanced was under a Dem administration.
The stock market gains an average of 11% per year under Dems, 1.4% under Repubs.
Those are statistical facts.
”
All skewed by the fact that Clinton was president during the ’90′s.
Being president during the productivity gains of the industrial revolution, or the transistor revolution or the wide spread adoption of computer technology in business makes you look very smart.
But its not repeatable.
Posted by: BertieW | February 7, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
A Historical Fact or Inconvenient Truth is that Tax Cuts DO spur economic growth. Also, they are not the cause of the current financial mess despite what President Obama and Democrats would like voters to believe. The only “urgency” is to RAM this pork-filled, massive spending bill through Congress under the guise of “stimulus” BEFORE any closer scrutiny.
Posted by: Look Closer | February 7, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
A stimulus bill LOWERS tax rates in order to encourage those who have lots of money to create more jobs – ergo putting people to work. And, I don’t mean “green jobs,” whatever that is!
Drill in our own country, cut the tax rate some, get the hell out of the way – and the economy will right itself shortly! THEN we can start looking at alternative energy like nuclear! This bill is payback for all those who voted for the Self-Annointed One. And, I would not give one thin dime to ACORN!
Posted by: Old Woman | February 7, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
“Thank you Democrat policies of giving money to people who couldn’t pay it back.”
Do you mean all the Republicans living in huge houses and just paying the interest?
Posted by: Skip | February 7, 2009, 6:22 pm 6:22 pm
The bill isn’t even written and Obama and his ### ##### are defending it. They haven’t even read the first draft, which runs into hundreds of pages.
Leave it to Arlen Spector to do his usual toadying. Might as well be a Democrat again, even though he is despised by them too. He will be defeated by a Dem in two years, anyway. As for Maine, why bother voting Republican…
Posted by: Touch me, Titus | February 7, 2009, 6:25 pm 6:25 pm
From hope to fear in just about 2 weeks.
Posted by: bob m | February 7, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
The last 2 years have been the democrat way. Harry and Nancy raised the minimum wage as their first action. Economists warned it would effect the economy adversely, and it did. This is the Harry and Nancy castastrophe.
Education spending should be in the education budget. This is a horrible bill. It will not create real jobs. IT is a payoff to special interests.
Posted by: Karen | February 7, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
I also think we are on the verge of an American catastrophe. Let’s impeach Obama before he causes it to happen!
Posted by: jeff | February 7, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
Info for those thinking of sending messages to Senators:
I was able just now to send a “Please DO vote against the “stimulus”" message to Senator Feinstein just now … don’t know about the telephone situation.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
What would we do without the faithful Republicans (and “moderate” Dems) trimming the pork and frying the bacon?
Posted by: wickedlittledoll | February 7, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
It IS a sensitive matter, because it related DIRECTLY to the separation of powers provided for in the Constitution — surely this is a good reason NOT to forbid discussion of the subject.
This hoo-hah is more about His ego than about “national catastrophe”, and pretty much everybody knows that. But His feeling good about Himself over REALLY isn’t worth the generations-long price tag OR the corporatist precedent of ever more “emergency” legislation.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
The only ‘national catastrophe’ that we face is the mischief that will be caused by Obama as he seeks to destroy the United States. This spending plan will accomplish very little, if anything at all, to stimulate the economy. It will, however, further his socialist agenda. Further, Obama knows that there is no ‘catastrophe’ and that is why he rushed full steam ahead with this abomination before anyone could carefully study it and find the error. No principled leader would allow a mindless twit like Nancy Pelosi to formulate anything of vast importance. By the same token, principled leaders do not scream ‘Fire!’ in a crowded theater with the intention of frightening and panicking theater goers into making bad decisions. I’m tired of this petulant adolescent who makes fists, mocks and ridicules, bullies, has hissy fits, complains of fatigue, parrots ‘I won’ and other asinine phrases, and trashes the previous administration. Junior Obama needs to grow up, try to emulate an adult, and get his act together. It isn’t quite as easy as he thought to establish a dictatorship, is it? And having a real job does tend to make one weary. Those that have carried his water are already getting wet, after less than a month yet, and I fear they will all be drowning after a year.
Posted by: Annie | February 7, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
@ Angie: The “Democratic” way –to stimulate government instead of the private (free) sector — has already been tried: in Japan. It resulted in 10 years of recession. The best way, Angie, to stimulate the economy is to put the money BACK in the hands of taxpayers. Not bigger government programs.
Posted by: justin | February 7, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
BertieW, Facts are facts. And the fact is the Economy has seen more improvement under Dem Administrations than Republicans. I know it’s a bitter pill to swalllow, but it’s reality.
Posted by: Mike C | February 7, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
We’ve been doing Tax cuts, and tax cuts for the past 8 years, how did that work out? The worst economic crisis since the Great depression. Surely, we MUST keep on doing it.
Posted by: Mike C | February 7, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
“A losing formula that offers only tax cuts as the answer to all our problems…” is the Republican’s position?
What bunk… Who is playing politics as usual? Obama. So much for ‘hope’ and ‘bipartisanship’. This guy more and more sounds like a Democratic operative and hack…
Posted by: Ken | February 7, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
“The last 2 years have been the democrat way. Harry and Nancy raised the minimum wage as their first action. Economists warned it would effect the economy adversely, and it did. This is the Harry and Nancy castastrophe.”
The last 2 years have been anything but the ‘Democrat’ way. Bush vetoed and the Senate Republicans filibustered most of their legislation. Just Google Bush+veto and read all about it. Are you trying to say that the housing market collapsed because they raised the minimum wage? If you want to be taken seriously you gotta do better than that!
Posted by: Skip | February 7, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Jake, kudos for pursuing Gibbs with your transparency question on Friday! That took guts!
Will you please consider a second transparency probe? On his January 19th radio show, attorney Philip Berg stated that, in reply to a F.O.I.A. request, the State Department confirmed that the White House occupant did NOT have an AMERICAN PASSPORT under the name of Barack Obama until he was issued a diplomatic passport after he became a US senator. This means that when Obama entered Pakistan in 1981 he did so via a passport issued by a country to whom he had allegiance, most likely Indonesia where he was unquestionably an Indonesian citizen when his mother was married to Lolo Soetoro and Barry Soetoro (a.k.a. Barack Obama) attended school there REGISTERED as an Indonesian citizen.
How about it, Jake? If you believe asking such a question wouldn’t endanger your life, would you be willing to ask that one?
Posted by: Honestly registered voter | February 7, 2009, 6:47 pm 6:47 pm
Psst…. Republicans, I’m sorry to tell you this, but a Stimulus bill IS a Spending bill.
I wonder where all these fiscal conservatives were for the past 8 years? They didn’t seem to have any complaints over for Dubya’s trillions of debt.
Posted by: Mike C | February 7, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
Bravo Annie!
Posted by: Nid | February 7, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
The democrats will use this money to buy votes in 2010 and 2012.
Obama learned from the corrupt Chicago machine how to use taxpayers money to remain on the roost.
Posted by: James Villa | February 7, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
If tired old ideas double the debt in 8 yrs then I guess energenic new ideas like Obama’s will increase the debt sooner. NO THAMKS
Remember Nancy says “SELL SELL SELL”
Posted by: NO RANCID PORK | February 7, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Mike C wrote: “The only time in the last 25 years that the budget was balanced was under a Dem administration.”
And the Republicans held majorities in both Houses of Congress during the last 6 years of the Clinton Administration.
Mike C wrote: “That’s what a stimulus is, your spending money to jolt the economy.”
It’s not government spending, it’s the people spending that will stimulate the economy. Many people saved their last stimulus check. A one time check rarely works. What is needed is permanent tax cuts across the board. When people know that they will have more money each month, they will actually change their spending habits. As was mentioned earlier, in anticipation of Obama winning the election and the Democrats gaining seats in both houses–and raising taxes on the top 5%–many of the top 5% of wage earners changed their spending habits and began saving. Look what happened. Those of you who do not believe in trickle down economics, got a good taste of what happens when the “wealthy” stop spending.
Posted by: James Danley | February 7, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
We’ve been doing Tax Cuts for the past 8 years – look where it’s gotten us. None of you like to admit that, I know. Your philosophy is out-dated.
I’ll tell you what, if the stimulus doesn’t work, then you can come back and complain. But some of you seem awfully worried that it will work. Just in time for 2010.
Posted by: Mike C | February 7, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
“HMMM” again: it looks like the DNC’s suddenly announced that IT has taken over The Puppet’s online army:
“To build a wall between Obama’s White House and the political organization he built, the mailing list and his Web site … are now maintained by the DNC.”
This is sooo absolutely opposite to the “news” pre-Friday that we don’t know just how convincing the announcement really IS — especially if the Senate phones are closed.
On the other hand, if it’s in the hands of the DNC, it should be swift work to determine how many correspondents are on the “Obama” list …
(Maybe some brave news person will ask Darth Gibbs about it on Monday. :^|)
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
“Your philosophy is out-dated.”
And Marxist-socialist, big government control is a totally new concept? Change, that is?
Too funny.
Posted by: Nid | February 7, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
The only “national catastrophe” is having this neomarxist as potus. The people who are going to “put their dreams on hold” are the next two generations of fiscally responsible taxpayers. This pork bill is truly a Pelosi,Reid obamanation.
Posted by: blagonation | February 7, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
“Many people saved their last stimulus check.”
Those who didn’t GET “stimulus check”s are those who need ‘em the MOST.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
Ah Nid, I love how you guys fall back to Strawman arguments, when faced with facts. It only proves that I’m correct.
Posted by: Mike C | February 7, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
“I’ll tell you what, if the stimulus doesn’t work, then you can come back and complain. But some of you seem awfully worried that it will work. Just in time for 2010.”
And that’s it exactly! The Republicans have nothing to gain by the stimulus plan working. They will oppose it regardless.
Posted by: Skip | February 7, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
“And Marxist-socialist, big government control is a totally new concept? Change, that is?”
The so-called stimulus is NOT “Marxist-socialist” ..It is not even a “jobs” program.
Don’t get confused just because He’s not (yet) sporting a mustache.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 7:06 pm 7:06 pm
The so-called stimulus is NOT “Marxist-socialist” … It is not even a “jobs” program.
Agreed that the “Stimulus” is a payoff to special interests, including those of the corporate variety. It’s also a pander to organized labor and a restriction on personal liberties and free enterprise. Bottom line, it’s a catch-all bribe in an effort to cement power for Obama and his Marxist influenced ilk.
Posted by: Nid | February 7, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
Some people are deathly afraid that Obama will mobilize the people. The people haven’t been mobilized in generations, and when they are, its not going to be very comfortable for many who are used to lives of comfort.
I’ll tell you this: if the Blue Dog Quislings get their way, some of the best parts of this bill are going to get cut out. Anyone now who is against aid to the states is completely and utterly insane.
Forget pressuring Republicans, its time to turn up the heat on the DINOs.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 7, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
“This pork bill is truly a Pelosi,Reid obamanation.”
It is foul almost beyond belief … but it is NOT “neomarxist”. It is “corporatist” …
It is not, in short, “communist” or “socialist” in ANY way, but rather a hysterical leap into State Capitalism.
It is a waaay bad idea, Twitter kiddies, that will blight your old age, if you have one. They can’t “fix” this mess — they’re going to have to “restructure”, or watch it all fall down … and it’d be nice if there were some $ that hasn’t been transferred to the rich to DO that with. Not to mention a shred or two of believability.
When the USSR “fell”, they called restructuring “perestroika”. What “fell” then wasn’t “communism” — it was bureaucratic centralism, which is the very. same. thing. that’s fallen in the US.
Remember Humpty-Dumpty? It’s just like THAT.
(If yer old enough to vote — even if you’re NOT old enough, or NEVER intend to vote — you might want to send a bunch of Senators a message BEGGING them not to vote for a bunch of tax cuts and miscellaneous hooey. This is NOT a “jobs” bill.)
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Whenever the M-L epithet comes out, its a sure sign of guilt and fear.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 7, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
I really hate the comments about “Republicans not cooperating” with Democrats on this PORKULUS bill.
Don’t you people realize that the Democrats control both the House and the Senate??
Ipso facto, Democrats DON’T NEED Republican votes to pass ANY of the legislation they want, so there must be SOME OTHER REASON WHY Democratic leaders are INSISTING on NOT DOING the passing of this legislation WITHOUT Republican “support”…such as, Democrats just might need COVER for the BLAME to be tacked onto WHEN THIS CRAP BILL FAILS!
Because Democrats DO HAVE THE VOTES WITHOUT Republican “cooperation” (a fact that they trumpeted BEFORE installation of obama, listening to them complaining about the lack of “bipartisanship” on the part of Republicans is LAUGHABLE.
But, since Democratic “bipartisanship” means, “you AGREE WITH OUR IDEAS”, it’s no wonder that they are now WHINING about Republicans not going along with their socialist reorganization plan for America.
God SAVE us from the obamination and his fiscal vampires!!!
Posted by: Chsico3 | February 7, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
The $80 billion blank check that is “aid to the states” is one of the more egregious elements of this welfare bonanza.
Posted by: Nid | February 7, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
“God SAVE us from the obamination and his fiscal vampires!!!”
A hearty cradle-Methodist “Amen!” to THAT.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
Although Obama problably is enamored of Marxist ideology, he and many of his peers are actually Social Democrats espousing government regulated mixed markets–liberal, big government Keyensian economics.
Also, although this stimulus bill is a spending bill, there should be a difference between the two. Spending bills are ‘business as usual’ for the pandering politicians who use public money to build bigger government and to bribe voters. A stimulus bill should ‘stimulate’ the economy into growth. Until banks start lending and productive businesses hire people to produce needed services and products, this economy will flounder. The stimulus bill should have the same effect of breaking the Great Depression our run-up and entry to world war II had on this economy. This bill does not do that. The democrats are trying to hoodwink the public by calling a spending bill a stimulus bill. If the democrats don’t know the difference between the two and the republicans can’t lead a grassroots rebellion, we’re in for a rough ride.
Posted by: JRG3 | February 7, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Direct aid to the states is the most stimulative use of federal money, except for food stamps and unemployment benefit extensions.
Anyone against direct aid to the states is against the very idea of government being founded to promote the general welfare.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 7, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm
Obama sure know how to fearmonger when he wants something. The stimulus is important, but do you think that stuff like an “unending recession” is just a bit of overkill?
Speaking of killing, this talk may just anger the public even more and squash the remaining support for it from everyone besides POTUS Obama and Dems in Congress?
Posted by: matt | February 7, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
Some people here seem to be terrified that government might do something the people want, and that works.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 7, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
After an outcry from members of Congress, Wells Fargo canceled its planned 12-night Las Vegas retreat for more than 1,000 of the company’s employees and guests. Just think of the money that these 1,000 people could have spent in Las Vegas over the nearly two weeks: Gambling; three meals a day; and shopping galore. But instead the dealers won’t be getting any tips from the Wells Fargo group; waiters won’t be getting any tips from the Wells Fargo group; and stores won’t be visited by the Wells Fargo group. Las Vegas took a hit with that one cancellation.
As other businesses cancel their retreats and conventions all across the country, tourism spending will come to a screeching halt. That will result in thousands of more layoffs! Instead of condemning these businesses for excessive spending, Congress should encourage businesses to spend, spend and spend even more.
Posted by: James Danley | February 7, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
“The democrats are trying to hoodwink the public by calling a spending bill a stimulus bill. If the democrats don’t know the difference between the two and the republicans can’t lead a grassroots rebellion, we’re in for a rough ride.”
Trying to hoodwink AND bamboozle. Let us pray that Democrats who want to keep BEING in DC will jump off this. Or maybe they’re finishing the institutional suicide they started with that silly “black” versus “woman” primary business.
If there were a lamp-post handy, we’d run right out and hang John Kerry in effigy.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
Direct aid to states in the wake of a true “catastrophe” is fine and good and econimically sound….a blank check to fund alreadly bloated governments which survive via over taxation is not. A rise in unemployment to the tune of three or four pecentage points and a rise on the number of foreclosures in a ridiculously overdone housing markted is not catastrophic….it’s a needed thinning of the heard and a return to economic discipline.
Posted by: Nid | February 7, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
Amber Alert!!
We’re on a path to socialism. I want to live in a capitalistic country, not socialistic one like Sweden or California. I think government really needs to bug off and leave us alone. It’s this way -bigger government=loss of individual freedoms. I really think this stimulus crapola stuff is like socialism. And before you know it, they’ll be teaching Marxism instead of Democracy in the public schools.
Sarahcrats 2012
Posted by: amber | February 7, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
In doubling the national debt in two weeks by the amount it took his crazed predecessor and the Republican Party eight years, President O will bring on a national catastrophe – the collapse of the dollar and hyperinflation. The Federal Government is completely bankrupt; there is no money for anything save payments on the $62 trillion of existing debt in unfunded liabilities. The only way to finance this is to print the money. We are falling into the abyss of the Weimar Republic of the 1920s and today’s Zimbabwe. The astonishing thing is that this national suicide is presented as our certain deliverance. We are asked to believe that a fire can be doused with gasoline. The conflagration will consume everything.
Posted by: Iceberg | February 7, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
I can’t believe I’m hearing things like “thinning the herd” from the now social-Darwinist and yet creationist party!
Posted by: Flash Override | February 7, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
Flash Override, in the immortal words of Sargeant Hulka, “Lighten up, Francis.” You are overwrought, and overreaching, rather like our President, prior to his retreat to Camp David. (Yeah, those first three weeks have been exhausting. Sounds like time for a mini-vacation. No one back in Washington he needs to be conferring with or comparing notes with or otherwise dealing with in order to develop a workable stimulus bill and get it passed. And then he complains about the symbolism of corporate jets and company retreats. Yikes.)
But I digress. You say that those of us who are against direct aid to the states are against the very notion of government providing for the general welfare. Oh, really? Giving a state like mine a blank check would be disastrous and wasteful. I have watched my state legislature fritter away their revenues in good times and have no desire to watch the feds hand them piles of my money to pull them out of the holes they have dug. Yes, helping states with things like unemployment insurance and other mandates in areas that are being stressed by the economic downturn is fine. That is not what the direct aid will be limited to. So I’m not pleased about it.
Many of your other comments are equally off the wall, so I should not be surprised to see this hyperbole.
Posted by: moderate | February 7, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
Flash, social Darwinism isn’t actually that far removed from creationism. They do compliment one another. For one, both presume that the greatest amount of entitlement, in the forms of wealth and afterlife, belongs to a select few.
Posted by: heather | February 7, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm
Why should Obama care if everyone’s children and grandchildren will still be paying off his pork bill?
His children are set for life.
Posted by: sammy | February 7, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
Learn the parable of the POST TURTLE. A farmer was driving down a country road when he spied a turtle sitting on top of a fence post along the road, desperately flailing his legs. The farmer stopped to ponder the curious sight. The farmer concluded that:
1) The turtle did not reach the top of the fence post by himself;
2) Someone had to put that turtle up there; and
3) Now that he was atop such a high and lofty post he had no clue what to do there.
Posted by: socialism101 | February 7, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm
‘moderate’ I sense a strong whiff of cognitive dissonance from your direction.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 7, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
“I want to live in a capitalistic country, not socialistic one like Sweden or California.”
An OLDER person might want to live in a place where you can go to a DOCTOR when you have … oh, a heart attack or whatever.
As for California, it’s about as “socialistic” as Pelican Bay prison: the prison guards union, in fact, pretty much runs the State Police … which kind of cuts out the middle man, and probably saves a lot of money for, oh, pensions for public employees or something.
In California, I think they still DO let school kids have lunch even if they don’t have any money (did you try paying for your lunch using a mouthful of “personal responsibility” at the cafeteria check-out register?).
That lunch thing might be “federal”, though, and not exclusively a California failing — but if they’d just STOP doing that, it’d help to “thin the herd”, as someone wrote here, EARLY … before the little buggers start needing medical care, and housing, and wanting to go to Harvard, and all that.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
Please explain how tax cuts are bad for the country.
Posted by: DMJ | February 7, 2009, 8:24 pm 8:24 pm
Again with the presumption of party and political endorsement…..I guess if it helps you sleep at night, have at it. Thing is, only 1/3 of the public approves of this recipe for disaster….at last check there were more registered Dems in the US than Repubs….sweet dreams.
Posted by: Nid | February 7, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
Unintended consequnece….I guess you can force a bank to lend money to an unqualified borrower…home ownership is a right after all….even create a “corporation” to guarantee the loan (while turning your head as the folks on the front line lie and cheat to line their pockets)….too bad a day a reckoning always seems to come and then you have to figure out how to keep a roof over the heads of all those votes you’ve purchased over the years.
Posted by: Nid | February 7, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
Just want to note that current Nobel Laureate in Economics Paul Krugman blogged this week that America is facing a possible “deflationary trap”.
And here’s his reaction today to Obama compromising with the Republicans:
“My first cut says that the [Republican-requested] changes to the Senate bill will ensure that we have at least 600,000 fewer Americans employed over the next two years.
The real question now is whether Obama will be able to come back for more once it’s clear that the plan is way inadequate. My guess is no. This is really, really bad.”
Just something to keep in mind–that Obama is also getting criticized harshly from the left.
Posted by: Danny | February 7, 2009, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm
Nobel’s Three Amigos….Al Gore, Jimmah Carter and Krugman.
As they say, great comedy writes itself.
Posted by: Nid | February 7, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
” … he complains about the symbolism of corporate jets and company retreats. Yikes.”
Then takes off to play Lincoln and whatnot for all of next week … after flying Marine One AND AF1 the whole 160 miles to the Democrats’ retreat in Williamsburg.
It’s sooo weird: we remember the WASPy William Cohen bragging once on teevee about having flown … 600,000 miles, I think it was.
Our political er “leaders”, particularly The Puppet — like the itinerary-driven corporatocracy whose lifestyle He apes — may suffer from plane-brain … a condition in which champagne bubblea, or some darn thing, displace that part of the brain that used to light up for “self-criticism” and rhetorical restraint.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
truth = Ron Paul
Posted by: Joe | February 7, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
By the way, Jake, thanks for mentioning the reason for Obama’s references to Maine and Indiana. That’s the kind of political information I find useful and informative here.
Posted by: Danny | February 7, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
I for one feel the country is certainly in an amount of trouble not seen in the last 40 years but to continue to use fear tactics to accomplish ones personal goals is extreme.
Catastrophe, total failure, large scale disaster, a horrible event,utter ruin and great and sudden calamity. Not sure some other none frightening words could be used by the administration.
Posted by: William | February 7, 2009, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm
It is all BS. Welfare housing, computers, Condoms, new cars, while that may stimulate the Democratic Party, little of anything is geared to stimulating the economy. The President had a hissy fit, lost his trend of thought, babbled, and could only come up with the kind of one liners you hear at a Roast, but it was bull. He is pushing a disastrous agenda on us and you seem to think it is manna from Heaven. Wake up America, stop the manipulation.
Posted by: Joanne | February 7, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
You’re correct Angie. It only took the full Democratic control 2 years out of the last 8 to ruin it for everyone.
Posted by: AmericanPie | February 7, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
By the way…it appears that one man’s “promote” is another man’s entitle/gurantee/fund/give-away.
Posted by: Nid | February 7, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Citizens of Texas:
Any chance there is some wiggle-room in that document y’all signed back in 1845?
Posted by: tjp612 | February 7, 2009, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm
You Republicans are pathetic! You are convinced there is only one political party in this nation that can do anything ‘right’… As I said earlier, I hope that you are not having to stand in a food pantry line one day soon, and I hope that you don’t have to stand in the unemployment line – or worry about your home being foreclosed. Unfortunately, then and only then, will you be able to identify with the poor people of this Nation that are praying for our President to succeed. Of course, you Republicans have no back bone – so, you won’t be able to cope with the loss! On a final note, how many times did George W. go to Camp David and his ranch in Crawford on Air Force One??? Why shouldn’t the current President travel via Marine One and/or Air Force One – after all, he is the President of the United States – Whether you Republicans like it or not!
WE, THE PEOPLE WON!
Posted by: Sandi | February 7, 2009, 9:04 pm 9:04 pm
In case you missed it….only about one third of Americans approve of this nightmare of a welfare bill….perhaps some are even Dems?
Posted by: Nid | February 7, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
Yeah, but LOOK at what you “Won.”
Nancy’s Boy is no prize.
Posted by: ceeLeelee | February 7, 2009, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
“Reporter restrained after Panetta hearing”
At The Politico
More “change you can believe in”….in fact, ignore it at your own peril.
Posted by: Nid | February 7, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
“You Republicans are pathetic! You are convinced there is only one political party in this nation that can do anything ‘right’… As I said earlier, I hope that you are not having to stand in a food pantry line one day soon, and I hope that you don’t have to stand in the unemployment line – or worry about your home being foreclosed.”
There are many of us who were raised to believe and who practice a non-reliance on others for our existence. We believe we control our own destiny. As such, we do not make purchases (such as homes we cannot afford), have created safety nets (in the form of savings) in the event we lose our jobs, and have diversified our skills (through education) or have honed entrepreneurial skills to improve our empolyability. We carry little debt. We are in the best position to revive our economy given the resources we have cultivated.
However, despite Obama’s fear mongering, see this “stimulus” package for what it is: it is a spending bill and massive over-reach for Democrats.
I, for one, see the writing on the wall and will be managing my money accordingly, saving in advance of expected inflation (due to increase in money supply), continued slumping of stock market (for many reasons), little to no chance I will receive Social Security benefits, and expected nationalization of health care (which will lower overall quality to the point only the truly “rich” can afford quality care).
Save up, America!
“Pathetic Spineless Republican”
Posted by: tjp612 | February 7, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
No one can or will say that this stimulus bill will work. What will happen if it doesn’t work? These politicians democrat and republican are so out of touch.
Posted by: Jean | February 7, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
“”My first cut says that the [Republican-requested] changes to the Senate bill will ensure that we have at least 600,000 fewer Americans employed over the next two years.”
Soooo the Bill increased from $811B to $850B and that costs 600,000 jobs.
Obviously we should be trimming the size of the Pig to gain jobs.
BTW- Ben Nelson web site has a spreadsheet with line item comparisons of whats in the Senate and House Bills.
The ACORN Stabilization Fund has dropped from $4.2B to $2.25B.
Posted by: BertieW | February 7, 2009, 9:37 pm 9:37 pm
Krugman’s made a career, and garnered a meaningless hunk of bronze, by distorting facts and figures to support a social/political agenda.
Posted by: nid | February 7, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm
Paul Krugman writes, today:
“… to appease the centrists, a plan that was already too small and too focused on ineffective tax cuts has been made significantly smaller, and even more focused on tax cuts … This is really, really bad.”
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm
Several years from now historians will look back on the “Panic of ’09″ and realize that to a degree it was contrived, and that the proposed solutions were even more so. This crisis is being enhanced and manipulated by those who wish to exploit the fears and ignorance of the US public, as demonstrated by the first rush to “do something” with the initial 700B bail out, which has apparently done nothing, despite being so urgently needed when addressed last September. This issue of Obama’s claims of the depth of the crisis and his rush to implement a panicked response is based on evidence weaker than, and more intentionally manipulated than, Bush’s “Weapons of Mass Distruction” justification for the war in Iraq. The new stimulus bill is a Trojan Horse, jammed full of spending with no hope for truly correcting the core problem of fiscal irresponsibility. Mr. Obama, where is your scapel? Where is your presidential leadership? You are not leading Congress, but simply following their politically motivated and wasteful spending.
Posted by: Dave in GA | February 7, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
300 million Americans
1 TRILLION Dollars/300 million Americans
3,333.33 PER MAN WOMAN AND CHILD
or
1Trillion Dollars/435 members of Congress
2,298,850,574.71 per member of Congress
Who can spend the money faster??? Which group will do more good with their portion of money?
Mind you
1 – IT’S NOT CONGRESS’ MONEY!
2 – About 45% of Americans don’t even pay taxes!
What a waste…
Posted by: lifenliberty | February 7, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
Too late! The “National Catastrophe” was electing Obama President.
Posted by: Robert | February 7, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
“2 – About 45% of Americans don’t even pay taxes!”
There are those who don’t make enough $ to pay taxes (the unstimulated, er, POOR) … and then there’s the Puppet’s cabinet picks (and, if anybody’d dare to research it, likely a sizeable proportion of the Congress, its chicks and chattels, and the rest of the political and corporate uber-classes … )
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 10:00 pm 10:00 pm
“Too late! The “National Catastrophe” was electing Obama President.”
C’mon … His handlers bought the mob-friendly figure-head the formerly “Democratic” nomination, then the “election” (in which His “post-partisan” pal McCain didn’t … really … run very hard) fair and square, for a mere ONE billion, give or take, dollars.
So now … naturally … His masters get bailouts and stimuli and airplanes and ambassadorships and cabinet posts. It’s the Chicago Way.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 7, 2009, 10:08 pm 10:08 pm
What do you mean national catastrophe? We have HOPE and CHANGE. That’s what you said!
Posted by: Nope | February 7, 2009, 10:09 pm 10:09 pm
Why a national catastrophe? Mr. President why don’t you and the Congress just level with the American public and just tell us just how REALLY BAD it is. Stop the dancing around it and just tell us. Tell us how your stimulus bill is going to do nothing more than just make it tolerable but in reality may do nothing much in long run. Your just grasping for straws
Posted by: Why | February 7, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
If these tyrants are not stopped then all we will have is CHANGE.
Hey buddy can you spare a dime?
Posted by: lifenliberty | February 7, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste,” said Rahm Emanuel. “It is an opportunity to do things that you think you could not do before.”
It’s quite possible that the economic crisis, this so-called “National Catastrophe”, might have been, at least partly, engineered by insiders from the beginning – for the purpose of enriching the elite and turning the rest of us into government workers?
Posted by: Hmmm... | February 7, 2009, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
Obama and Congress don’t seem to understand that their plan pretty much guarantees a “National Catastrophe” by creating too much debt and not targeting things that would actually stimulate the economy.
Posted by: Mario | February 7, 2009, 10:55 pm 10:55 pm
Obama is well on his way to becoming the National Catastrophe himself. The only thing standing in his way is Pelosi.
Posted by: Frank | February 7, 2009, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
I’m beginning to think the “National Diaster” that may overcome us is President Obama. For some reason I think this man has not been truthful with the American citizens. There has to be a reason he expects to have a stimulus bill. Perhaps he has people he could pay back (ACORN) or some other folks. Anyway nobody is believing what he’s saying amymore.
Posted by: elainekramer | February 7, 2009, 11:15 pm 11:15 pm
tjp612 wrote:
“There are many of us who were raised to believe and who practice a non-reliance on others for our existence.
“We believe we control our own destiny.
“As such, we do not make purchases (such as homes we cannot afford), have created safety nets (in the form of savings) in the event we lose our jobs, and have diversified our skills (through education) or have honed entrepreneurial skills to improve our employability.
“We carry little debt.
“We are in the best position to revive our economy given the resources we have cultivated.
“However, despite Obama’s fear mongering, see this ‘stimulus’ package for what it is: it is a spending bill and massive over-reach for Democrats.
“I, for one, see the writing on the wall and will be managing my money accordingly, saving in advance of expected inflation (due to increase in money supply), continued slumping of stock market (for many reasons), little to no chance I will receive Social Security benefits, and expected nationalization of health care (which will lower overall quality to the point only the truly ‘rich’ can afford quality care).
“Save up, America!”
Bravo!
Posted by: Bravo! | February 7, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
I really think that they don’t think this will work, and don’t care if it works. They just want to solidify their own political power and secure their livelihoods after public life by paying off their cronies. Same old thing for members of both parties, but this is the Mother of All Pork.
Posted by: Grand Old Party | February 7, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Enough with the word ‘package’!! This is a package alright. A package of flaming dog poo that the democrats are lobbing at our front doors… wrapped in a pretty bow now doubt. The joke really is on us because we can’t throw it back before the damage is done. Please write, call, fax your senators and representatives, it’s still not too late. My Senators are Inhofe and Coburn and I’ve been calling them everyday to tell them to keep up the fight from this package of you-know-what from hitting our front doors.
Posted by: Wendy | February 7, 2009, 11:59 pm 11:59 pm
I have a friend who works for a government agency who stands to benefit from the “stimulus” package. He states they are in “full growth mode” and are frantically seeking ways to spend the hundreds of millions in funding they expect to receive. He claims this spending will “create” jobs.
I formerly worked as a consultant to this same agency and know the agency fairly well. My observations:
- This funding will create few jobs and those that are “created” will go to those with very specialized skill sets (namely scientists and consultants) who are not suffering from economic downturn. Because demand will exceed supply for positions needed, costs will go up.
- This agency is already frought with waste and inefficiency…it does not use the funding available effectively and additional funding would be throwing good money after bad.
- There is no way this agency could spend this money in a “targeted, timely, and temporary” fashion.
Winners: Politicians, special interests, lobbyists, government, unions, ACORN, states who receive bailout $$$, etc. (and of course the FOBOs – Friends of Barack Obama)
Losers: The rest of us…
Posted by: tjp612 | February 8, 2009, 12:02 am 12:02 am
Would some one please remind the Fraud-in-Chief, that we do’t need fear mongering coming from the White House. How soon he forgot his own words from his inaguaral address, ” Americans have chosen HOPE OVER FEAR” so shut up already.
Posted by: daniel | February 8, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am
America is Already in Ruin….dah. President Obama has been in office 3 weeks. This is what the previous administration and party left us. A run away Wall Street that had emptied the coffers, tax-cuts to the upper 1% that didn’t spend it, leaving American workers in service jobs, not investing in what has made America strong in the past, making and selling things, years of minimum wages, a broken education and healthcare system, an energy system broken by them “playing with the rich and famous of big oil” (remember the dumU went begging for oil and was told no, then the “big guys” jacked the price up for his American people). I own a cabinet making business, and I make a living for my family and extended family only. In the 15 years I’ve been around, I have never employed no more than 1 person in my small business outside of family. So lets get honest here. Tax cuts should have been bigger for working (service jobs) families so the stimulation of the economy would be there, keeping it ticking. All of the hateful angry partisan comments is just blinding to people, and that’s what is important in these times. Stop! It’s us that’s hurting. Remember, we were angry that some terrorist group killed fellow americans, and we focused on our angry and fear…..we didn’t ask questions about our own country. That’s why this is all happening.
Posted by: sngeorgia | February 8, 2009, 12:13 am 12:13 am
“Keeping teachers employed makes more sense than building more prisons to deal with the drop out rate that we will be dealing with along with the resulting crime.”
Not to be a broken record but there is a difference between a “gee here is a good idea” bill and a “stimulus bill”.
Just supposes that hoping against hope that *this* time there is an improvement in student performance that results from spending more money. When does the increased capability of these children start showing up in the economy? 10 years?
The education funding is a sop to the teachers union- it will not impact the economy any time soon.
Posted by: BertieW | February 8, 2009, 12:22 am 12:22 am
Paige: you don’t have facts. You have statistics that you got from somewhere which mean nothing. Statistics can be generated to support ANY argument.
If you understood economic data and statistics you would know this.
Is being in the field of discussion and having years of professional experience and expertise and informing someone not in the field condescending nowadays? I had no idea. To me that sounds more like an opportunity for you to learn something new that you don’t know.
I guess that would take a sense of humility though.
Not being in the medical profession but having stats that support a different opinion than my doctor I should probably argue with him about his diagnosis. 20/20 did a show that completely refutes what he said.
Have another cocktail Gracie
Posted by: Don | February 8, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am
sngeorgia…
Have you forgotten about personal responsibility? Don’t people read the prospectus before investing? I do. The stock market is a gamble, if you don’t have the money to waste, do invest in it. You invested, you lost, nobody’s fault but yours for investing in it. Education? Are you kidding me? How much money do we have to throw at a broken system before someone says enough? The Dept of Educ should be disbanded and the education responsibility given back to the states! The states! Healthcare? The bill is laden with healthcare for none other than…. illegal aliens? And again, another personal responsibility problem. Since when did it become the government’s (that’s my tax dollars) to take care of everyone’s health? When? I don’t know what to say to the kool-aid drinkers, I just don’t. If you want to live a life where the government takes care of you, get a map of the world pick somewhere else and go there.
Posted by: Wendy | February 8, 2009, 12:33 am 12:33 am
JV says:
“Nid:
Here is your cycle:
Bush #1 = Bad economy
Clinton = Good economy
Bush #2 = Terrible economy
Obama = Good economy”
JV … sheesh. Are you for real?
Let’s try again:
Carter = horrible economy
Reagan = legendary turnaround to an excellent economy and period of extreme US prosperity
George H. W. Bush = fair to decent economy
Clinton = decent to great economy UNTIL THE AFTERMATH OF THE 2000 ELECTION when Al Gore contested the results
George W. Bush = decent to horrible economy (BTW, I am no fan of Bush, no indeed)
Obama = we’ll see, but I suspect an unprecedented dismantling of our economic system, accelerated reliance/kow-towing to the World Order, and a sweeping shift for the worse in the quality of life for a lot of people.
The trouble with you libs is, you absolutely refuse to acknowledge truth and you think you can revise history to suit your limp arguments.
Posted by: Yosemite Fudd | February 8, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am
I spent the afternoon reading the Senate and the House bill on Thomas and I do not see the reckless spending that I am hearing about on Republican News Network. I am reading about jobs being produced by spending that has to be spent by the end of 2010 on all sorts of projects that have been identified as an embarrassment for the United States over the past 4 to 8 years. I am not sure if the Republican News Network thinks the Army or Air Force is going to build their own housing or upgrade their own hospitals and clinics. I tend to think that those jobs will go to civilian contractors. Upgrading the motor fleet of the U.S. government and military with more fuel-efficient vehicles might be a waste but it will move many vehicles and employ many people in the automotive industry. Keeping teachers employed makes more sense than building more prisons to deal with the drop out rate that we will be dealing with along with the resulting crime. I guess we really (and I mean our news anchors) need to ask for specific instances of this package that justifies voting against passage and how that balances against millions more of job losses over the next couple of months. I guess if the electorate wanted more of the same (which is what Senate Republicans seem to be telling us we need) McCain would have been elected and we would not be having this conversation. We are not even two weeks into and new administration and the losing party is trying to overturn the outcome of the election. That is truly the definition of loser.
Posted by: Dennis Walton | February 8, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am
There is no national catastrophe on the horizon…this nation is filled with great people who do not deserve to be hoodwinked by rhetoric from the Democrats.
Constant fear mongering and spreading of panic…they are chicken little…they being Congress and the President…
I have never lost hope in America and I do not fear…I am constantly reminded daily that it is important for me to live within my means, within my budget and not spend!
I will not lose hope that those who do wrong will admit their mistakes and take the consequences just as I make mistakes and take the consequences of decisions and actions.
Best deal on the planet…start from scratch
Eliminate and make illegal to include pork in any legislative actions and no pork in executive orders
Change the tax code for individuals, families and business
Stop acting like you can have everything you want and concentrate on needs…big difference between a want and a true need
And pray before you decide anything…the Lord has been gracious to this country from the first steps on the soil and from the patriots steps that brought us freedom…they prayed and the Lord answered many a prayer…one thing this nation has not done is go back to one basic tenant–prayer and thanksgiving to the Lord who enabled the establishment of the United States of America.
Posted by: pat | February 8, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am
@ sngeorgia,
“I spent the afternoon reading the Senate and the House bill on Thomas and I do not see the reckless spending that I am hearing about on Republican News Network. I am reading about jobs being produced by spending that has to be spent by the end of 2010 on all sorts of projects that have been identified as an embarrassment for the United States over the past 4 to 8 years.”
There is an article at CNN that shows $$$ cut from bill. It would appear you perhaps are reading the wrong bill (?). This is a SPENDING bill, not a jobs creation. Example of one cut:
“$4.5 billion for General Services Administration”
Is the GSA now in the business of creating jobs? Perhaps a few, but the jobs created would be within the growing bureaucracy and would not be of benefit to those who needs jobs most: construction, manufacturing, retail, etc.
Posted by: tjp612 | February 8, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am
“America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and
lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.”
— Abraham Lincoln
If you voted for this incompetent FRAUD Obama, then YOU are to blame.
Shame, Shame…..SHAME on you.
Posted by: decentAmerican | February 8, 2009, 1:28 am 1:28 am
socialism101:
The turtle was put up there by a terrible flood that raised the water up high enough to set the turtle atop the fence post. The water starts to slowly recede.
Flood is symbolism for Bush btw.
Posted by: JV | February 8, 2009, 1:33 am 1:33 am
Bravo:
The only fear mongering (which is a catch phrase that the informed came up with to capture the state of Bush politics) was the CODE RED warnings before the 2004 elections and never heard from again.
Posted by: JV | February 8, 2009, 1:35 am 1:35 am
Is obvious that Republicans are hopeless, pessimistic, and ignorant. Yes, you!
Don’t worry, you’ll still have g-a-y marriage and abortion to rally around.
Posted by: JV | February 8, 2009, 1:38 am 1:38 am
If you want to spend Billions of your tax money supporting activists who threatened banks into making subprime loans (with a little help from Barney Frank)and who committed rampant voter fraud then the “stimulus” package is for you. If you like giving up your meager jobs to an illegal worker that the “stimulus” Might create then by all means support the “stimulus” package. Everybody except a few gullible die-hards know this “stimulus” package is nothing more than taxpayer funded bribes for votes. Nothing more. We’ve been had.
Posted by: Mellisa J. | February 8, 2009, 1:38 am 1:38 am
Now he threatens us and tries to scare us. Good show, idiot. That’ll really help.
What a loser. We’ve got to endure 4 years of this now.
Posted by: midwestlady | February 8, 2009, 2:00 am 2:00 am
Who’s playing on our fears now?
Posted by: Who's Playing On Our Fears Now? | February 8, 2009, 2:18 am 2:18 am
Bush, Obama, Republicans, Democrats. Does it really matter?
Our whole system of politics is hopelessy corrupt – from your local city council right up to the President.
Yet, they expect all of us to be good citizens and obey their laws!? I say to hell with that!
Cheat on your taxes, disregard the laws, and pocket ill-gotten money anyway you can just like our elected class does.
By the way, your wasting your time watching the “news”. Its all propaganda ddesigned to keep the shell game going; Democrats, Republicans, Democrats, Republicans, on and on and on and on.
Posted by: Your a Fool If You Obey the Laws. | February 8, 2009, 2:38 am 2:38 am
midwestlady: He’s not even been in office 30 days and he’s lied, make horrible Cabinet appointments, is forcing the financial RAPE of the American Taxpayer, etc…
I may have voted for him, but now I WANT TO SEE HIM GET IMPEACHED!!!
Posted by: Justanotherpeon | February 8, 2009, 3:16 am 3:16 am
POTUS: Impeach
Pelosi: Impeach
Reid: Impeach
Geithner: Recall
Barney Frank: Recall
Chris Dodd: Recall (overturn the “sweatheart deal” he received from CountryWide)
Charlie Rangel: Recall
Posted by: Justanotherpeon | February 8, 2009, 3:21 am 3:21 am
MY Stimulus Program For Liberals (Who love taxes):
1. $100,000 payments from the DNC each time Obama asks for a waiver on his ‘no lobbyist’ policy for administration appointees (We may have just paid off the National Debt).
2. $100,000 for each time Harry Reid proclaimed the war lost, the surge unsuccessful, or Nancy Pelosi attractive (Well, two outta three ain’t bad).
3. $75,000 for each time Obama heard the phrase, ”God Damn America!” This is for lunches at Bill Ayers’ house only…if we taxed Barrack for each time he heard Jeremiah Wright say that, he’d have to ‘throw a member of his family under the bus’ (come to think of it, an ‘Obama Bus Throw Tax’ would work, too…Daschle got tossed 10 hours after Obama said he was ‘with him.’
4. $100,000 per ‘Botox Injection Tax.’ Hillary would have to borrow money from Bill’s foundation, or, to save interest…cut out the middle man and go straight to Saudi Arabia. Word has it Nancy Pelosi wants to cut oil consumption to ensure her supply of Botox goes undisrupted.
5. A New York Times Tax–$100,000 for every day the Iraq War remains unmentioned during an Obama Administration.
6. $400,000 ‘Time Magazine Cover Tax.’ The Fairness Doctrine be damned—we’ll take your Obama-inspired $4.8 million any day!
7. A $100,000 ‘Chris Matthews Leg Furrowing Tax!’ This is tricky. We’ll have to trust Matthews, unless he holds these truths evident, so to speak.
8. Lastly, let’s just tax the contents of William Jefferson’s freezer, Tom Daschel’s unclaimed W-2, Bill Clinton’s foreign money (money was never foreign to him), and any money that Barney Frank apportioned to anyone he ever slept with (pages excluded).
Hey, I am just spreading the liberal wealth around…
Posted by: Lance | February 8, 2009, 4:30 am 4:30 am
Republicans don’t care how many people are put out of work. They are why we are in this mess in the first place with the overspending and the deregulation and the failed trickle down that they are responsible for foisting on us all. So, now too, they don’t mind fiddling while Rome burns. They have theirs. These senators who are being such llth hour converts to being ‘pork police’ after wasting 9 trillion dollars since the year 2000, have their perks, their wealth and their privilege. They don’t have to feel any urgency. They can personally afford to grandstand and obstruct and play ‘get Obama’ politics with the American peoples’livelihoods. That’s why their party was turned out during the last two elections. They are making up for their weakness and unpopularity by pretending to care about the budget when they busted the budget for the last eight years. I hope we can return to the partisan politics of George W. Bush but do so in reverse and this time the Democrats can just rule without the Republicans’ consent like they did without the Democrats’ consent during the reign of error of GW Bush. Let them be kicked to the curb. They need it.
Posted by: JL | February 8, 2009, 5:24 am 5:24 am
JL, you must really enjoy your community college poly sci class! Let’s see, Obama-rich, Biden-Rich, Hillary-rich, Bill-rich, Barney Frank-rich, Harry Reid-rich, Nancy Pelosi-rich….c’mon…get out of the shallow end of the pool, fool.
Posted by: Lance | February 8, 2009, 5:28 am 5:28 am
Hey JL:
Its good to know those terrible wealthy Repubs are being countered by John Kerry, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, Ted Kennedy, Barrack Obama, Barney Frank, Barbara Boxer, Hillary and Bill, John Edwards, and all those other poor liberals…
Posted by: Lance Morrison | February 8, 2009, 5:34 am 5:34 am
Just a thought. Is this a heist? Are we witnessing the largest robbery in the history of the world? Seriously.
Posted by: JW | February 8, 2009, 6:04 am 6:04 am
everyone ought to go to usmayors and check out the projects that are ready to go that could be started tomorrow with this money. You can search the projects database by type or by city. Check out your city and ones around you and find out what they will do with the money.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 8, 2009, 6:59 am 6:59 am
The Republicans already weakened the nation through redistribution; they redistributed all the money from the middle class to the richest Americans.
Posted by: Skip | Feb 7, 2009 12:06:32 PM
This is either an outright lie or you (like so many of our electorate) are almost criminaly misinformed by our media. Please tell us where and how the Repubicans “redistributed” money from the middle class to the wealthy. This is insane! Have people actually come to belief that a tax cut is redistribution of wealth? Boy would it be great to be a democrat politician these days. Many people now don’t understand that money taxed away from them is was actually money that belonged to them. Are you Skip suggesting that the lowering of tax rates on the wealthy from a percentage of 41 to 37 is a form of wealth redistribution? I would love to be educated on just how that makes sense! What’s more Bush lowered the percentage rate on taxes on every income earner in this country. With that in mind, I would love to be enlightened on just how that is redistribution of wealth as well. We’re in big trouble in this country if this guy’s post is an example of how many Americans understand economics. The money in your paycheck is your money people! The government is not ENTITLED to a certain amount of it. In fact the government had to pass a constitutional amendment to tax income back at the turn of the 19th century. That’s how negatively the framers viewed the idea of income tax! Like I said, it must be nice to be a democrat politican these days. Many people in this country have been brainwashed into believing that their money doesn’t belong to them!
Posted by: rocco | February 8, 2009, 7:02 am 7:02 am
Mental Disease,
When the bill comes out of conference, it requires 3/5 vote, filibuster or not. Please see “Schoolhouse Rock – How a Bill becomes a Law”
Posted by: Flash Override | February 8, 2009, 7:02 am 7:02 am
rocco,
If a tax increase is a redistribution of wealth, it follows ipso facto that a tax cut is as well.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 8, 2009, 7:04 am 7:04 am
This guy is the most amateurish fear monger known in history. What’s he going to say if something really bad happens?
This is a recession stupid, not 9/11. Way to lead Curious George.
Posted by: Steve B. | February 8, 2009, 7:15 am 7:15 am
Flash Override – What’s the big hurry? When we are planning on spending trillions of dollars, we should at least take a few weeks to DISCUSS it! This is being rammed down our throats and we can’t help but wonder WHY!?!
Posted by: M. Smith | February 8, 2009, 7:19 am 7:19 am
Steve, this is not an ordinary recession. If it were, job losses would have stabilized by now, but they are actually getting worse. We have lost twice as many jobs as the last two major recessions. Its time to wake up and smell the coffee.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 8, 2009, 7:25 am 7:25 am
Smith, I totally agree. I think that if it were discussed more, however, the main result would be to expose the right-wing Democrats as morally and ideologically bankrupt, kill their ‘compromise’, and end up with gridlock in DC. Not that that would be a bad thing, normally.
Government entities are going to be entering their next budget cycle very soon. If there isnt aid to the states, the public sector is going to join the private sector in dumping people onto the streets. This recession is already feeding on itself, and that would in fact push us over the brink.
If you believe that we need a revolution in the US, you may be excited about this prospect. It is amazing how quickly people’s attitude changes when their circumstances do. Right now, calling something socialist or communist may turn people against it, but that may not be the case a few months from now.
Given the really close relationship between the unemployment and suicide rates, I believe that this recession has already surpassed 9/11 in the deaths it has caused.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 8, 2009, 7:36 am 7:36 am
The only catastrophe is Obama himself! We have a usurper in the White House. Free the original birth certificate. Mr.Obama, what is the name of the hospital where your mother gave birth to you?
Posted by: Catastrophe Ubama | February 8, 2009, 7:38 am 7:38 am
I so disagree with the Republicans and the Dems for not “Ram rodding” them over one of the first important decision to save our country/me. Why are the Dems giving in to these jerks that put us here. Cutting Head-start, construction on buildings, hybird cars, (remember the tax-payer will be paying the fuel bills) pell grants, (people need training for better jobs, like contruction, green energy), even school lunch programs. This is Obstructionist at it’s best.
Posted by: sngeorgia | February 8, 2009, 7:47 am 7:47 am
What should concern us most is the fact that our President believes that HIS way is the only way.So far he has put his stamp on our taxes being used for overseas abortion, closing Gitmo, stopping the trials of known terrorist,first interview on TV was with Arab television, and now we must do this his way. All I can say is be careful what you wish for because you just might get it. Remember the line he used ” We have chosen the climate of hope over fear ” Really?
Posted by: Homer Cook | February 8, 2009, 7:49 am 7:49 am
Why the All-Everything Bill? Would not true leadership start with say the ten most important things to get the economy moving? Instead we fund computer for the department of agriculture and on and on with spending that has little to do with truly driving economy in a positive direction. Not a promising start for the new President who we place our trust.
Posted by: Jeff | February 8, 2009, 7:56 am 7:56 am
HIS way? I don’t get Obama. He puts together this spending package, and lets the “bipartisan” idiots tear it apart, and NOW, finally, he goes on the road to sell a bill that has $350 billion in tax cuts, $50 billion in subsidies for the nuclear, coal and oil industries (which replaced $40 billion of actually stimulative aid to the states). I’m beginning to think Obama is actually a Republican.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 8, 2009, 7:59 am 7:59 am
I seem to recall some pompous ass pronouncing the end to using FEAR in politics.
Then again when the claim is a conspiracy theory you can’t expect much out of the person that uses it.
If you don’t accept and promote the chosen ones desired path then the USA is DOOOMED. What a crock!
His arrogance is appalling but no more then the embarrassment his election causes this nation.
Posted by: Brian | February 8, 2009, 8:04 am 8:04 am
For an immediate economic stimulus to the tune of BILLIONS, the U.S. simply needs to end the H1B visa program. The H1B visa program used primarily by Indian outsourcing companies, Microsoft, Google and banks, is nothing more than a way to suck BILLIONS out of the U.S. economy and discriminate against capable Americans. Every employee of the aforementioned companies that was laid off was replaced by an H1B visa “guest worker” because you can get two H1B visa workers for the cost of one American (or so they say).
For the last 8 years, the outsourcers claim is that no Americans are smart enough to do tech support jobs, accounting and banking jobs. How smart do you have to be to answer telephones, use a spreadsheet or count money?!
Well, look at Citi, BofA and all the other failing banks that employ the best and the brightest H1Bs. Last I looked, they are failing and accepting corporate welfare. Meanwhile, the H1Bs they employ are sending their money to India’s banks. How stupid can we be?! Blinded by greed I suppose.
BILLIONS are being sucked out of the economy by the H1B program.
Posted by: Common Sense | February 8, 2009, 8:11 am 8:11 am
Jake, just a suggested question… President Obama says the stimulus will “save or create” 3 to 4 million jobs. How will they measure jobs saved?
Posted by: S.P. Gass | February 8, 2009, 8:14 am 8:14 am
It’s too late to avoid a “national catastrophe”, he is already in the office of the Presidency.
Posted by: Bob | February 8, 2009, 8:20 am 8:20 am
It won’t be 3 to 4 million jobs anymore, since the Senate just cut about 1 1/4 million jobs out of it.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 8, 2009, 8:23 am 8:23 am
If you want to control all capital, the first principle of Socialism, you have to have a crisis large enough to convince people that giving government total power over capital is necessary to save them.
The second step is to institute wage controls. Obama has established the ground work for that by ‘freezing’ a few salaries at the federal level and some business executives who have been bailed out. Barney Frank publically stated the freeze on wages will be extended to other business.
The third and final step will be to set price controls, something that the Left has been experimenting with unsuccessfully on and off for years.
We will be socialist nation and never know how it happened; the transitional step to total Communism.
Posted by: Dave | February 8, 2009, 8:26 am 8:26 am
Dave, your version of ‘socialism’ is perfectly consistent with the ideology of Adam Smith rather than Karl Marx.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 8, 2009, 8:33 am 8:33 am
He says we need it to avoid a national catastrophe, it’s a little too late for that. It happened in November when that traitor was sent to the White House.
Posted by: Mike Gibson | February 8, 2009, 8:40 am 8:40 am
Meanwhile, Vice Plagarizer Joe Biden is threatening pre-emptive war against Iran.
“Vice President Joe Biden warned Saturday that the U.S. stands ready to take PRE-EMPTIVE action against Iran if it does not abandon nuclear ambitions and its support for terrorism.”
Where’s the outrage from all the leftists and liberal media?
Posted by: Catastrophe Ubama | February 8, 2009, 8:41 am 8:41 am
I can’t find the Republican response. Bush’s Saturday addresses were always followed by a Democrat response. Weren’t they
Posted by: nuke | February 8, 2009, 8:43 am 8:43 am
Catastrophe, it is good to see that you are beginning to find out that the media isn’t really that “liberal” after all.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 8, 2009, 8:46 am 8:46 am
Dave,
/——-
Bush’s “tax cuts for the rich” increased federal income tax revenue by 35.83% over clinton, and his “corporate welfare” increased federal corporate tax revenue by 45.82%. His tax cuts drove average wages up by 29% and GDP by 47.78%. Look at the federal budget.
——–/
What part of Bush’s policies that caused a 7.2% unemployment rate don’t you get. Lemme put it another way. Is it better to have H1Bs pay taxes to boast that more income went to the feds while H1B deposits went to Indian banks or is it better to have the same income go to the feds while Americans work and contribute to the U.S. economy?
Posted by: Common Sense | February 8, 2009, 8:46 am 8:46 am
Dave, can you give us a citation for that? I cant find your figures using Google. If you could post me some info on where you found those numbers, I’d appreciate it. Unfortunately, they don’t seem to like direct links here though.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 8, 2009, 8:49 am 8:49 am
Move forward on the stimulus (spending) bill in spite of 200 economist, and a Nobel Laureate advice that it is harmfull.
Move forward on the stimulus (spending) bill in spite of the bipartisan Congressional Budge Office advice that it will hurt the Nation on the long haul.
Move forward on the stimulus (spending) bill in spite of the advice of the former Comptroller General claiming with the current disorganization it is bound to fail.
Smooth talking politicians from Chicago can be very effective.
Posted by: Dave | February 8, 2009, 8:51 am 8:51 am
Not so fast, Mr. prez, that’s my money you’re tossing to those incompetent, failed executives, apparently to be used at their discretion — or gigantic lack thereof. Who told you that you could inflict this trillion dollar debt on the people — and by the way, who is going to make these loans to the government, and just exactly who is going to collect the interest on these loans, and while we’re at it, what will be the overall amount of that vampiristic interest gouge? You should not be trying to stampede the people into accepting this furious debt because if you do you might begin to look like an instrument of big money, and that is not how you represented yourself as a candidate. Don’t hide, Mr. prez, either stand for the people or step aside and let someone else do the job.
Posted by: republicus | February 8, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am
Does anybody else see the lack of leadership here? FDR and Reagan were optimistic…… This guy is chicken little!
Posted by: John K | February 8, 2009, 9:04 am 9:04 am
Anybody, and I mean ANYBODY, that thinks that republicans know anything about running a country, or economics, after the shape they left this Country in after the last 8 years, IS A COMPLETE MORON !!!
The republican party has proven over and over and over again that they are imept, incompetent and WRONG.
Posted by: John McNugget | February 8, 2009, 9:10 am 9:10 am
The economy obviously needs this stimulus package, but why are so many unessential programs getting huge funding during this crisis???? Its throwing my tax dollars down the tube, maybe if the senate and house paid their taxes they would spend this money a little wiser.
Posted by: Tennessee | February 8, 2009, 9:17 am 9:17 am
The Republicans are wrong? Who was it that pushed for the “American dream” for all, regardless of income? The “Republicans” went along with it since there was a Democratically controlled Congress…..that’s why I’m a Conservative first. Everyone can’t be on welfare! It makes no sense!!
Posted by: John K | February 8, 2009, 9:18 am 9:18 am
rocco,
/——–
This is either an outright lie or you (like so many of our electorate) are almost criminaly misinformed by our media. Please tell us where and how the Repubicans “redistributed” money from the middle class to the wealthy.
———/
Since you asked, here is an example. Middle class IT earners were replaced by Indian H1Bs. Since it is illegal to discriminate against Americans in the hiring process, the banks and other large corporations laid off their American workforce and began began ‘contracting’ with H1B slave suppliers. It is legal for Indian H1B-dependent outsourcing vendors to hire only Indians and discriminate against Americans. The CEOs of Banks and big business are now absolved of any wrong-doing. They now get their undeserved bonuses, but the middle class worker who held the jobs before the H1B replaced him is now on unemployment. Wealth was transferred from the middle class worker to the CEO. The burden is now on the rest of the middle class earners to pay the unemployment of the laid off American earner as well as the bonus of the CEO.
The BILLIONS of CEO bonuses paid to Merrill Lynch and similarly suited failing execs is nothing compared to the BILLIONS the U.S. economy loses to the H1B program every year. These same BILLIONS used to be cycled through Americans and kept the wheels of fortune cycling in the U.S.
Posted by: Common Sense | February 8, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am
Does any Liberal/Democrat realize that their party is the one that controlled the Congress and the Senate and financial policy for the past two years? The only thing that has changed is there is now no one standing in their way. Obama is now gleefully waiting for them (The same ones) to send him legislation that he will quickly sign! Pay attention to your Socialist propaganda outlets and you will see who is working on the financial legislation to be signed by your President. It is the same ones that were in charge before they destroyed the thriving economy two years ago. The Socialist media talked you into voting Liberals in, you did, the economy crashed, now they are telling you to blame someone else and like good followers, you are, adamantly!!!!!
Posted by: DEF | February 8, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am
To those who complain that we had a republican president for 8 years, I DEFY YOU to show we had a conservative one. He was NOT. Bush was a fiscal LIBERAL by any standard that you wish to choose. His drug benefit for seniors was the 2ND LARGEST entitlement in government history!
Obama promised me a TAX CUT! He said that 95% of Americans would get a TAX CUT – where is it? There are posters on here saying that Bush’s tax cuts didn’t work – Obama ADMITTED in a primary debate that it RAISED REVENUE – it did! So that notion is BS. Obama also said he would replace the politics of fear and replace it with ~hope~. A total lie from a radical socialist THUG, (who never ran anything other than his mouth), proven by the FACT that now he is trying to scare us, (some ‘change’ huh?), into supporting this outrageous liberal spending bill that will:
1. Eventually cause rampant inflation
2. Not help the economy according to the CBO
3. Hobble our children and their children in debt.
Get RID of the liberal CRAP in this bill (like money to ACORN THUGS), and make it ‘shovel ready’ infrastructure projects ONLY!
Posted by: Mike M | February 8, 2009, 9:34 am 9:34 am
If their true objective is to stimulate the economy, then give each Citizen one million dollars each! Three hundred million dollars in the right hands would defiantly stimulate the economy, while some would waste what you give them, some would invest in small businesses, some would buy houses, some would buy new cars, most would store the remaining in American banks! Everyone knows if you give to the poor, most will waste what you give them! What most don’t realize is, if you give to the wealthy, they also will waste what you give them! Trillions to save millions, that should be your first clue, that you are being robbed by expert liars, thieves and connivers!!!!!
Posted by: DEF | February 8, 2009, 9:47 am 9:47 am
Mike M,
There are over $350 BILLION in tax cuts in the recovery bill and you know it. Stop playing dumb.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 8, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am
I see some republicans still trying to seperate from ol georgie boy. Sorry folks, that will work about as well as it worked for McCain. This one man made every single republican look like a complete boob. Like it or not, george bush is the poster child for republican incompetence. I mean come on, this man was booed by millions at inauguration. lol.
Posted by: JudyC | February 8, 2009, 9:53 am 9:53 am
The CBO actually said that the plan will increase GDP by about 2.5% and add 2-3 million jobs.
Yes, this is a bit less than what Obama says about the bill, but it did not say what you think it did. If the ‘liberal media’ was more accurate, they would tell you what the CBO actually said.
They did say that the GDP increase would be offset by about a 0.3% decrease from the ‘crowding out’ factor of government bonding.
Overall that makes some sense. But if industry is not investing now, the only investment is going to come from government.
Another couple of months of this and the middle class is going to be begging for socialism.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 8, 2009, 9:57 am 9:57 am
Flash Override: Welfare checks (i.e. tax refunds to those who don’t pay taxes) are not tax cuts. You lack any basic understanding of economics. Go back to watching the Daily Show.
Posted by: Sal | February 8, 2009, 10:03 am 10:03 am
If the purpose is to create jobs, why not offer a matching funds grant for any small businessman who wishes to start a new business with his own money?
Posted by: Wayne Bevan | February 8, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
If they’ll lie on their campaign trail without flinching, then they have no problem lying once their lies gain them their objective!!! Quit being so naive you fools, your children depend on you, to protect their Nation! If you catch your child in a lie, do you trust him/her to tell the truth next time without question? If you catch your politician in a lie, do you trust him/her to tell the truth without question the next time? Sad to say but most trust their lying politician more than they do their lying child!!!!!!!!
Posted by: DEF | February 8, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
Obama and Pelosi need to stop this “We won” retoric. The only people they want to be bipartisan is the republicans. 48-49% of voters did not vote for them. The republican Senators and Congress that are voting against this bill are largely from states that did not vote for Obama and don’t want this new bill. Even states that voted for Obama are not fairly represented as it was often one or two large counties/cities that took the decision away from the rest of the state. Obama/Pelosi and the rest of the Dems should be careful.
Pride commeth before the fall. If you need proof, look at what has happened to prideful republicans in the last few elections.
Posted by: taxed to death | February 8, 2009, 10:04 am 10:04 am
And if none of this works, who will take the responsibility for the failure and waste of our tax money?
If it fails will the President and all those that voted for it resign from office?
————
Too much debt got us into this mess, adding more will not cure the problem. It is like an alcoholic drinking more alcohol to stop being addicted to booze. Crazy.
Posted by: Sally J. | February 8, 2009, 10:13 am 10:13 am
This whole episode is like a blitzkreig into socialism. Hurry up and get in line for slavery. The only big employer in larger cities is already government, this will finish us off.
Of course, if you think Detroit is a paradise you’re happy about this scam.
There is nothing more deceitful and proud of defeat than a Democrat.
Posted by: IVote | February 8, 2009, 10:19 am 10:19 am
Five hundred Million jobs lost in America, we have to do something fast according to Pelosi. For anyone that doesn’t know, Pelosi is the leader of the House of Representatives, she has held that position for the last two years. She is not very aware of how many Citizens there are in the United States, yet her followers think she is coherent enough to spend your money! Obama ran a campaign and visited fifty seven States, almost all of them, spewing campaign lies everywhere he went. I have a great Idea, all of their supporters should just send in their money so they can personally help bailout their wealthy friends!!!
Posted by: DEF | February 8, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am
The only catastrophe is Obama himself! We have a usurper in the White House. Free the original birth certificate. Mr.Obama, what is the name of the hospital where your mother gave birth to you?
Posted by: Catastrophe Ubama
===========================
See, everytime republicans get any chance of respect, an idiot like this takes it all away. You guys really need to get rid of the dead weight in your party. THEY are the reason the party is in shambles.
Posted by: IndependentMan | February 8, 2009, 10:23 am 10:23 am
The American Dependency on Government Act of 2009, aka, stimulus, is the only national catastrophe we’re facing. Socialism in it’s most ugly form is about to rear it’s head. If you’ll support me, I’ll give you stuff, lot’s of stuff, and I’ll keep giving you stuff as long as you support me. This spending glut does nothing more than secure a liberal majority for the next 30 years.
Posted by: billbrady | February 8, 2009, 10:32 am 10:32 am
“See, everytime republicans get any chance of respect, an idiot like this takes it all away. You guys really need to get rid of the dead weight in your party. THEY are the reason the party is in shambles.”
Belle has her own views. I dont think she is or has ever been a Republican.
Hillary Democrats like TaxasDarlin were the ones pushing the birth certificate thing.
Posted by: BertieW | February 8, 2009, 10:34 am 10:34 am
This stimulus bill is just a legal method of buying the vote of the majority (who pay little to no taxes). I guess the 30% of my income that goes out in taxes and the 10% that goes out in contributions is not enough for the leeches in Washington.
Posted by: taxed to death | February 8, 2009, 10:42 am 10:42 am
I am a Democrat and I voted for Obama. I am now deeply embarassed to have to admit that, having seen the PORK and the EARMARKS and the SPENDING, SPENDING, SPENDING.
I believed in Obama. I trusted him with my campaign donations. And now he has pretty much gone back on everything he has said during the campaign. HE is fear-mongering, not Republicans. SLOW DOWN, Mr. President.
It’s like we Democrats are drunk with power. This is crazy!!!
Posted by: Average Guy | February 8, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Where is Silky today to defend this PORK BEYOND BELIEF.
IMPEACH OBAMA NOW or, liberals, good luck with your impending train wreck. It’s all yours and you guys know it.
Then it will be time for one last, LOL.
You DEMS are so hateful. You have no idea where you are really going. That is clear. Clear for all.
But, hey, Kool-Aid tastes good doesn’t it. Have some more. YOU WON, after all.
Viel Gluck. You’ll need it!
Posted by: USA | February 8, 2009, 10:46 am 10:46 am
I know LIBERALS love this whole thing. The ruin. The disaster. The catastrophe. That’s what they live for.
But, if there is one who is not afraid to admit they are out there today, could you please answer one sincere question?
EXACTLY HOW MUCH SPENDING WOULD BE TOO MUCH?
Forget about how to pay it back. Seriously.
HOW MUCH IS TOO MUCH?
Posted by: USA | February 8, 2009, 10:49 am 10:49 am
Liars have no limitations on promises, there is always tomorrow for what they say to come true, therefore they haven’t lied, yet!! The Socialist media has been Treasonous to the American people for helping the Constitutional over-throwers get this far in accomplishing their mission!!!!!! They have the people believing that government is their god and that the people should turn to it (Them) for their every need! Government has no competition other than God, they are both governors of mankind, one is visible on the outside of the skin in the form of a human, lavished with makeup, expensive clothes and payed servants, while the other one is visible through faith from within, with millions of servants, humbly feeding the poor all around the world! The Poor feeds the Poor. Have you ever wondered why god (government) kicked God (Of Faith) out of school and blasphemes him every chance they get? The stronger your belief is in him, the less you need them, God is a thorn in their side, he costs them money and power!!!! Speaking of that, they need more from you now, they promise it will be better tommorow, please give!
Posted by: DEF | February 8, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am
DEF…
Amen
Posted by: taxed to death | February 8, 2009, 11:02 am 11:02 am
Common Sense wrote: “What part of Bush’s policies that caused a 7.2% unemployment rate don’t you get.”
Here are some facts. The recession of 2000-01 caused the unemployment rate to go from 3.9% in Dec 2000 to 4.2% in Jan 2001; and continued to steadily climb to 5.0% by Sept 2001. The 2001 Bush tax cut bill was not signed into law until Jun 7, 2001. While not yet showing in the unemployment figures, there were signs that the new tax cuts were just beginning to take effect. Then came the attacks of 9/11. The economy took a major hit with unemployment peaking at 6.3% in Jun 2003. The 2003 Bush tax cuts bill was not signed into law until May 28, 2003. These tax cuts were made retroactive to Jan 1, 2003. The combination of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts brought the unemployment rate steadily downward–5.7% in Dec 2003. Beginning in Sep 2003 through Dec 2007 we had 52 consecutive months of job growth. The unemployment rate bottomed at 4.4% in Mar 2007. In spite of continued job growth, there was a slight increase of unemployment to 4.9% in Dec 2007, as the effects of the downturn in the housing market and the skyrocketing of energy prices were taking effect. In spite of the downturn in the housing market and the skyrocketing energy prices GDP continued to grow–.09% in the first quarter and 3.3% in the second quarter.
The Bush policies were doing quite well, in spite of all of the negative hits to the economy. That is until the effects of the flexible subprime mortgage rate fiasco and the explosion of home foreclosures (due to so many mortgage payments doubling) really kicked in by the middle of the year. The unemployment rate jumped from 5.0% in Apr 2008 to 5.5% in May 2008.
Now then, 2008 was an election year. With the economy taking a such a hard hit, and the prognosis was getting better for a Democratic victory for President and the Democratic majorities of both Houses of Congress seeming likely to increase, and the continued rhetoric that the Democrats wanted to eliminate the Bush 2001 and 2003 tax cuts, the “wealthy” in anticipation of higher taxes changed their buying habits. They began to save more and spend less. At the same time, the mortgage companies and the banking crisis was exploding and caused lending to freeze. THIS really hurt small businesses and Corporate America because they were unable to freely borrow to run their businesses. That is when layoffs really kicked in. So with the “wealthy” cutting back on their buying and the middle class beginning to lose jobs (meaning they could no longer buy things), the snowball effect kicked in. So the unemployment steadily rose from 5.5% in May 2008 to its current 7.6%.
Posted by: James Danley | February 8, 2009, 11:09 am 11:09 am
Every year for the past 8 years, at least 100,000 Indian H1B visas are issued. For every 100,000 Indian H1Bs replacing American workers, 10 BILLION dollars per year gets sucked out of the U.S. and grows the Indian economy. That’s a lot of money for our economy to lose year after year. End H1B now for an immediate stimulus to the U.S. economy!
Posted by: Common Sense | February 8, 2009, 11:15 am 11:15 am
I hope no Republicans sign this bill. Let it fall as a DEMOCRAT Stimulus Package, and let them take their responsibility. The Republicans better take a stand on this. This stimulus will destroy our country’s future economy.
The Dems want to initiate the “Fairness Doctrine” to shut up the voice of common sense. They think they can say and do whatever they want because they were voted in, so let them have their day and divide our country. This is the true change they want. Power to the government – of the government – for the government – by the government.
They think they’re above all including the law, and the Cremlin also thought this. They want to prosecute President Bush for war crimes. Just imagine how many of them would be in jail if they were prosecuted for their crimes. The tax evasion is just the tip of the iceberg.
I never imagined a time so dark in our history, and I am outraged.
Posted by: Dale Bingaman | February 8, 2009, 11:18 am 11:18 am
To “avoid a national catastrophe”? Sorry, Barry O, but we’ve already had our national catastrophe…in case you missed it, it happened on Jan 20, 2009.
Posted by: Robert | February 8, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am
The poor has hired the wealthy to spend their money for them! They travel to and fro in lavish jets, planes and pimped out Cadillac’s discussing how to get even more money and power! The poor watches them from the doors of their shacks, as they pass in their luxury and glory wondering when they are going to get theirs. They are chained to a life of dependency waiting to be fed by the very ones that robs them and their neighbors (The ones they used to turn to for help, who can’t afford it now) and have no clue why they are so poor and destitute. The government has become that insatiable leech on our society that Jefferson tried to warn us about!!!
Posted by: DEF | February 8, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Search “rules for psychopaths” you will see what drives the left.
Also, search “manufactured crisis” and “Barack Obama” to see the tools that are being used on our free society.
Does freedom really mean nothing else to lose? (Me and Bobby McGee–Janis Joplin)
Posted by: William | February 8, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
It seems our ‘Obama friendly’ media has forgot to do!,their fourth estate thing once again,when last Friday Obama chose pay off a political ‘debt?’ to a former Hussein-era intel chief,and Billionaire UN ‘Oil for Food’ Bureaucrat one Nadhmi Auchi, by refusing to prosecute! a ‘USS Cole’ conspirator. Perhaps??, Americans will ‘never’ know the truth!,that being explosive materials is just like DNA in that explosive’s composition will point to where it originated???, with regards to the shaped which damaged the Cole, & killed 19 Sailors,the answer is Iraq! a nation at that time ’1999′ was lead! by Dicator and Chief Saddam Hussein!, that can’t be right?, Iraq never enagaged in terrorist actions??,only in the limited mentality of our own media. Oh yeah, by the way the stimulus thing???, way back in 1912 on a very cold,clear April nite they rearranged! the deck chairs on the Titanic,things did not work out then, & they shall not work now.
Posted by: james r. | February 8, 2009, 11:36 am 11:36 am
And if none of this works, who will take the responsibility for the failure and waste of our tax money?
If it fails will the President and all those that voted for it resign from office?
——————
AND IF IT DOES WORK…..everybody that DIDN’T vote for SIT DOWN AND KEEP YOUR MOUTHS SHUT !!!!!
Posted by: V for Vendetta | February 8, 2009, 12:03 pm 12:03 pm
If McCain is against it, I’m all for it.
This man has been wrong about every single thing for the past 2 YEARS!
Posted by: GayleNY | February 8, 2009, 12:07 pm 12:07 pm
Dog spelled backwards is God, mans best friend, either way! Obama can’t afford a dog right now, it would be out of character for him. This Scheme to take America away from the Constitutionally guaranteed Citizen ownership political structure, CHANGE it to government ownership as quickly as possible, is anything but “mans best friend”. Enslave the people before they realize they were captured into Socialism, the task could be accomplished smooth as pudding, for a good conniver. How’d Obama put it don’t be bumfuzzeled or hornswaggled, he felt so masterful of the art of conniving that he warned you about it, his image protectors gasped and cringed at his revelation. He just laughed and repeated it when they said; huh? The poor can’t afford to pay the wealthy to take care of their every need, their expensive lifestyles are too great a cost. How many poor babies could be fed with what just one politician wastes in a DAY? How many shacks could be turned into mansions, if they’d just stay in their mansion and forgo any partying for just one vacation? How many vagrants (Street people) could they help if they would just give up a golf outing and build an insulated barn-like shelter. They could defiantly feed the poor, if they truly wanted to!!!! They don’t want to, that’s why there are missions in most towns, people feeding the people, while the government is steadily taking credit, while steadily robbing the poor. They used to put blinders on horses, so they couldn’t see the carriage, plow or load they were dragging behind them and get spooked (Revolt), but this is ridiculous, people getting up every morning and putting their own blinders on, so they can’t see what’s dragging them down and cursing anyone who tries to help them remove them!!!
Posted by: DEF | February 8, 2009, 12:09 pm 12:09 pm
Dear V for Vendetta.
best case scenario for Republicans.
Obama’s plan works….. 1-2 years after the next Republican president takes office.
Posted by: taxed to death | February 8, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm
This bills needs to be pared down to (a) emergency aid to states and (b) shovel-ready infrastructure projects including shoring up the ailing electrical grids and existing new-energy pursuits.
Guiding principles should be: what will stop the bleeding immediately, and what will constitute investments in long-term new industries? Immediate crisis intervention in state shortfalls: will stop massive layoffs (which would mean more people losing their homes, loss of revenue, and further downward spiral) while buying states a little time to restructure. Shovel-ready: No time to allocate money and then cook up make-work projects. Needed, ready-to-go projects only, with contracts going to local existing businesses and not adding to government payrolls.
Everything else on that bill is fluff and should be cut out.
At the heart of this crisis: the fundamentals of the economy are broken. Most incomes do not cover living expenses (safe housing, for example), and credit has been used as a safety net rather than borrowing for a specific one-time need. The income-expense ratio for most people is unsustainable — a major reason for this credit crisis. We also cannot power an economy on mostly low-paying service industries alone. Our old-style manufacturing is a ghost of its former self. We also need to move away from being a net importer of food. We can’t continue depend on other countries for our basic needs. We need innovation in new industries at home. That will require a mix of science and industrial revitalization, not to mention education to prepare our own home-grown people to compete in such work. And maybe just maybe such new industry would also result in other countries’ demand for these new products and thus help even out our trade imbalance…
If we as a country can diversity our economy (multiple strands of retail and low-paying services do not constitute a diversified economy), revenue income for government increases as a result. At the same time, we need to take a long hard look at what services are needed from government and gradually spin off everything else into the private sector (not suddenly, as sudden government employee layoffs could cause massive economic disaster and too much human suffering in the short run). New income-generating industries are the only way to increase revenues without tax increases. That, plus bringing government down from its bloated size by spinning off the nonessentials is needed to reduce the federal deficit. And maybe this will head off a devaluation of the dollar as well.
Posted by: AD | February 8, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
AD for president.
Well said and so true. The only problem with that plan is that it would strengthen the country, economy, and the workers of American and it would weaken the politicians and the bottom feeders that feed off of hate and fear.
Posted by: taxed to death | February 8, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Obama is a laughing stock. He’s fallen off a cliff in just 2 1/2 weeks. He wanted 80 Senate votes and he has to pull out all the stops to just get 60. What a joke this guy is. He has totally misread the electorate’s dislike for Bush as a mandate for his socialist polices that the country does NOT want.
If they are successful in cramming this crap sandwich down our throats, we will see huge GOP wins in 2010. W’s follies will be a long-lost memory and the pain and suffering of Obama’s trillion-dollar kickback to his base will be front of mind.
To our liberal friends: enjoy the next two years. The sun is already setting on Hope. T = -715 days and counting.
Posted by: Sal | February 8, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
Interesting. Tried to post a link to Senator Lamar Alexander’s website where there are copies of his recent speeches to the Senate describing why he opposes this so-called stimulus plan and proposes some legitimate and less costly alternatives that potentially could save the country money, put more money in the American people’s pockets and help the economy, but it was deleted. I’ve seen others deleted as well. Guess that’s the perogative of Mr. Tapper. But a link to a Senator’s web site is different than a link to a far right or left wing organization, IMHO.
Posted by: taxed to death | February 8, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
I’m just curious as to what happens when (and if) we do get the alleged jobs? What happens when people from the hills of Eastern Kentucky, and other states like us, have to drive hundreds of miles to get a job under this stimulus plan? This isn’t going to affect us in the least. Small towns like mine will continue to suffer. And even if it does work out, it will only last for a short period of time. What happens when the work is done? People go home and, once again, file for unemployment. Mail us a check. It’ll stimulate the economy better than having to file for unemployment and bankruptcy in the end.
Posted by: KY girl | February 8, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
** “President Obama then warned, “if we don’t move swiftly to put this plan in motion, our economic crisis could become a national catastrophe”.**** Well my oh my, isn’t this the politics of fear that Obama rallied against? This sure didn’t take long, did it?
Posted by: Interested08 | February 8, 2009, 9:22 pm 9:22 pm
On George’s show this morning, George Will made one point that makes a lot of sense: for Democrats when the government is spending money, that’s stimulus. The President said something very similar the other night when he was pep-rallying the democratic caucus. That tends to be different from my understanding of stimulus – I tend to think of stimulus as money the government spends to boost the economy in a tangible way. Using the military as an example: if the Navy needs a jet that creates jobs at the factory and the suppliers of those factories and the suppliers of those suppliers and so on and so forth. It tends to be a kind of organic response that results from a kind of artificial insemination of sorts. It is like the government throws down a bunch of seeds and fertilizer and we get a wide range of benefits from the new crop. There is a built in expectation of an oversupply of benefit or, at minimum there is a break even point that makes the money spent justifiable. If the Navy loses the plane they order another one and the process starts all over again. (Using bombs is a better example) When I read the Bill and its many provisions I was struck by what I viewed to be a bunch of things that did not meet this test. We collectively refer to this as “earmarks.” And, based on the President’s telling “there have never been a Bill that came through Congress that didn’t have earmarks.” (This comment was a surprise after he vowed to veto any Bills that had earmarks during the Presidential debates.) The poster boy for these seemingly unproductive projects are things like the Frisbee Park in Austin or the millions slated for new sewer lines in St. Louis. The list goes on and on and the more I read the more it appeared that the greater part of this Bill were earmarks that, though likely to be good projects to support do not appear to be the stuff that meets my test of what constitutes stimulus. It all made a lot of sense after George Will made that observation. If you follow the money from there (like any good detective) and throw in that the Democrats feel entitled because they have the White House and the Congress and were shunned a few short years ago by their Republican counterparts you have the makings for a rampage. They want this stuff because they want it and they are including it because they can. And, if you believe that anytime the government spends money (regardless of where or how it is spent) then this is all the more justification that what they are doing is right and will fix our collective economic woes. I found George Will’s observation very helpful in understanding why otherwise intelligent people are insisting on what one would think are appropriations in what is supposed to be an economic stimulus (a la my definition above) plan. I just thought I would mention this; it made a lot of sense why the Democrats are dead set on loading this package up with what appears to be some of their favorite sons’ pet projects (from the “one man’s earmark is another man’s pet project”). The other thing that George Will said is that none of these guys have any idea if any of this will work or not – it is a pure crap shoot. So, Guess we can keep arguing about it and I sort of like all this (cable like) chatter – I like to read your comments and hear your thoughts. But, if George Will is right (and even the most liberal of you have to admit that George Will is a smart guy) we need to get on with the stimulus part of this Bill (whatever that means) and do it with some swiftness (even if your pet project didn’t make the cut).
Posted by: Lone Star Rules | February 8, 2009, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
You know, by the time reepubs and dems fight it out, the American people could have taken a share of all this bailout money, enough to pay off their personal debt, mortgages, creditcards,etc., and stimulated the economy better than any self-centered politician could (or would) hope to. That’s how you stimulate the economy……….give it to the people that spend!
Posted by: lowpressure | February 8, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
“if we don’t move swiftly to put this plan in motion, our economic crisis could become a national catastrophe.” – If this is true, why hasn’t Obama spent any of the $350 B he got from Congress in the beginning of January? Why is he going to Camp David, to elementary schools, to Wilmington retreats instead of coming up with a plan to spend the $350 B he already has?
Posted by: dave | February 8, 2009, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
Dave Wrote:
” “if we don’t move swiftly to put this plan in motion, our economic crisis could become a national catastrophe.” – If this is true, why hasn’t Obama spent any of the $350 B he got from Congress in the beginning of January? Why is he going to Camp David, to elementary schools, to Wilmington retreats instead of coming up with a plan to spend the $350 B he already has?”
Dave, the Administration is comming up with ideas to spend the remaining money as we speak. Geithner is expected to present his plans for the money on Tuesday. From what we know right now, $50bn will be used to shore up the paralyzed housing market, and that Geithner and his team have big plans to overhaul the new TARP program.
Posted by: The Drunken Observer | February 9, 2009, 1:33 am 1:33 am
The official toll is that we’re losing 500,000 jobs a month, and its been doing that for the last several months. Before then, we were losing jobs at a somewhat slower rate. If you look at the chart you’ll see that the rate appears to be accelerating with a purpose. This does not look like it will correct, it looks like it has enough strength to continue and it may even pick up speed. What will provoke the job loss rate to slow down? Tax cuts work really well when business is excellent; when business is down, tax cuts are obviously less effective since taxed revenues are down, in some cases way down, but they will help. However, government has been deficit spending for a very long time, so very soon you’ll be looking at reducing government spending to match the cuts. The stimulus package must be aimed very well to have the desired effect, and spending money on infrastructure that’s been neglected for decades is an insightful a way to do it. One way or the other, government has to get smaller after this.
Posted by: Mike Bentley | February 9, 2009, 3:01 am 3:01 am
RED ALERT: Smoking Gun, Chicago Style????
Search for video titled Smoking Gun: Democrat Insider Says “Obama Has Secret Plan to Fund a Patronage System”
This blog won’t let me give you the URL.
I believe it. Listen particularly to the last line the guy says.
Posted by: tanarg | February 9, 2009, 3:09 am 3:09 am
Thank you George Bush. President Obama is using exact same tactics, SCARE the American public. President Obama a man of change and hope does not resort to fearful words. How about deleting frisbee parks and all the other pork. I want to know how many jobs will be generated and when…No Bull Just Facts.I am a nurse living in a cold house because of cost of heating/ How about President Obama not waste fuel campaigning and stay in his new home helping us poor folk.
Posted by: Deborah | February 9, 2009, 3:30 am 3:30 am
What I hate about Republicans, they would watch the country disintegrate rather than agree on any stimulus package. This should have been passed a long time ago, and it shouldn’t be partisan politics, USE YOUR HEAD, wouldn’t at least ONE Republican agree with the Bailout, if he wasn’t TOLD to disagree?
Posted by: able | February 9, 2009, 7:11 am 7:11 am
oh its bad out there in my home town of 20,000. 2000 jobs lost in last 6 month projected anothre 7 hundred in next couple months….all this could have been avoided but bush though things were strong atleast the fundamentals. so sad how the gop destroyed america.
Posted by: T | February 9, 2009, 8:06 am 8:06 am
I just saw in a Latin newspaper that GM plans to use 1 billion of the bailout money in it’s Brazil Operations. WOW, I guess we are more concerned with stimlating the Latin America economy than our own. Way to Go GM, way to go Congress! Give them a little more money to shore up their China and Mexico operations as well.
Posted by: Starkgranger | February 9, 2009, 10:58 am 10:58 am
Where have I heard those words before?
Oh yeah! George W. Bush. Some change?
Posted by: Angelo | February 9, 2009, 11:50 am 11:50 am
“The official toll is that we’re losing 500,000 jobs a month, and its been doing that for the last several months. Before then, we were losing jobs at a somewhat slower rate.” Posted by: Mike Bentley
This spending plan won’t prevent you from losing your job if your company can’t afford to keep you and it won’t get your job back for you if the company can’t afford to hire you back. At best, this bill will offer you a job on a road crew or building windmills sometime next year. But when that project ends, your job ends too.
Posted by: Justin Thyme | February 9, 2009, 12:19 pm 12:19 pm
Wow, all these comments do a great job of illustrating how uninformed the American people are on just about everything.
Everyone arguing back and forth, this …ism that …ism Republican this, Democrat that, citing propaganda as sources to back up pointless arguments.
Nobody’s perfect, but FWIW:
If you are a Republican, support Ron Paul. If you are Democrat, support Kucinich. Be good to each other, its going to be a long Depression.
And read “war is a racket’ is by Smedley Butler. Google it up, it’s a short read.
Pray for peace. The life you save may be your own.
Posted by: Well, you know... | February 9, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm