By Lindsey Ellerson

Feb 11, 2009 12:45pm

Michelle Obama Talks About Balancing Work and Family

ABC News’ Yunji de Nies reports:

At Howard University today, First Lady Michelle Obama told a crowd of 250 students, she still struggles with the challenge of balancing work and family.

"There isn’t a day that goes by, particularly after having kids, that I don’t wonder or worry about whether I’m doing the right thing? For myself, for my family, for my girls?" she said.

Mrs. Obama explained that she has gone through many phases in her life – as a student, a professional, a wife, a mom – and that for each one, the solution was different.

"There is no right way or wrong way to do any of this.  And the choices and decisions will change given your circumstances," the First Lady said, "The question I hate most is that we ask of young people is ‘what are you going to be when you grow up?’ And the truth is I still don’t know and I’m 45!"

Mrs. Obama has said that she will focus much of her time in the White House on the challenge of the work/family balancing facing many American women.  Mrs. Obama made brief remarks at the start of a panel discussion entitled "Home, Work, Community: the Role of African American Women as Change Agents" held at Howard University’s business school as part of their Black History Month celebration.

School administrators were informed that the First Lady would attend just 24 hours before the event.  Word spread on the campus of 10,000 and the 250 tickets were gone within minutes.

Rochelle Smith, a freshman at the communications school, said Michelle Obama is an inspiration. 

"She’s a positive Black woman and positive role model that’s not necessarily an actress or a singer," Smith said.  "So it’s like we have the power to be smart, not just beautiful."

Wearing a bold red dress and long strand of pearls, Mrs. Obama told the crowd that she has been working to get to know the local community – then said she felt redundant telling them that, joking "if you watch any TV I’m sure you’ve seen." 

The First Lady has been on a "listening tour," visiting federal agencies and local community organizations throughout the District of Columbia.

"We [she and the President] believe that our first job as new members of this community is to listen," she said, adding that she hoped to be invited to many more events at Howard.

This was not Mrs. Obama’s first visit to the historically black college – she was here last June when then-candidate Barack Obama participated in a presidential debate hosted by PBS.  In September 2007, Mr. Obama received an honorary doctorate of law degree from Howard University.

-Yunji de Nies

User Comments

What? She didn’t give ‘em any fashion advice?
jpt quotes Obama:
“We [she and the President] believe that our first job as new members of this community [federal agencies and local community organizations throughout the District of Columbia] is to listen,”
Horsepuckey: during the campaign, Obama was palsy-walsy enough with that “community” to LOBBY federal agencies for votes … and even if He spent His entire Senate term running for Emperor, He WAS a Senator in DC.
Oh, Lord … to have Roslynn Carter back again …

Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 11, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm

congratulations for all you do Michelle,
Here come the haters

Posted by: watching | February 11, 2009, 1:01 pm 1:01 pm

I’m proud to have this woman as our First Lady.

Posted by: obamamama | February 11, 2009, 1:13 pm 1:13 pm

Human Intelligence
Oh Lord, …stop hatin’ and get over the jealousy. She is poised, beautiful, intelligent and accomplished, which means she as done more in her life than most people (hmmm, hmmm) will ever do…do you think your bitter comments will affect her one bit…?

Posted by: Informed and Educated | February 11, 2009, 1:14 pm 1:14 pm

Michelle Obama:”We [she and the President] believe that our first job as new members of this community is to listen,”
====
Why does everybody- including Michelle Obama– keep pretending Barack Obama is new to Washington? He tried to do this in his speech yesterday, too, when he kept denigrating the results that come out of Washington.
He was a US Senator for 4 years, in Washington.

Posted by: MayBee | February 11, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm

It’s probably time to stop referring to her situation as a struggle. Grandma lives in the same household and there is an enormous staff. How is she to inspire others of limited resouces when she whines in spite of all the advantages?

Posted by: mad | February 11, 2009, 1:43 pm 1:43 pm

I think some of her first priorities should be more focused on our country and not on posing for the cover of Vogue magazine.

Posted by: BubbaRight | February 11, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm

Michelle Obama is an inspiration and a great role model for young women all across the country.

Posted by: Alison | February 11, 2009, 1:53 pm 1:53 pm

It is with ultimate pride that I can read the words coming from the mouth of this beautiful, talented, and successful woman and know that she represent all the women of America. We’re not only lucky, but fortunate to have her.

Posted by: Haitiana4Obama | February 11, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm

mad 1:43:51 is exactly right: Grandma lives in the same house looking after the girls and keeping their daily routines on schedule.
The Obamas seem to have a disconnect that can’t be bridged. They try so hard to come across as “common folk” that they end up coming across as disingenuous whiners or out-and-out liars (take your pick).
Remember that Obama comes from a self-proclaimed underprivileged background which some of his supporters likened to Abe Lincoln’s log cabin, studying-by-lantern-light background.
I’ll take “underprivileged” if it includes the same private schools and universities Obama enjoyed. And I’ll also take the “struggle” of raising a family if it includes a grandma/nanny and a full-time staff like Michelle enjoys.

Posted by: marylou | February 11, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm

I can’t see that she has done any work. She lives in the White House, has servants to do the work while she takes trips and talks about balancing work and family. Does she have a clue ? She is like the CEOs who are whining about giving up their million dollar bonuses. I agree, she is getting to know DC; I doubt that she was ever there until now. It’s not about race; it’s about the arrogance.

Posted by: KC_1971 | February 11, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm

What a boring question to force this brilliant, dynamic, highly educated woman to talk about! Why aren’t men challenged to answer this question? I’d love to hear what John McCain would say — “That’s Cindy’s department — you’ll have to ask her.”

Posted by: Laura | February 11, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm

If she attended cabinent meetings, folks would be mad about her not spending time with the kids. If she jumped in like Hilary Clinton, she’d be overreaching. It’s so pathetic to criticize each thing this woman says or wears. Did anyone jump on Nancy Reagan for spending a bazillion dollars on china? Did anyone call Laura Bush out when her kids were drinking underage? Please!
The truth is that she grew up in a small apartment and was educated in Chicago’s public school system. The truth is that she was often playing the role of a single parent to support her husband’s career ambitions. The truth is that she sacrificed her career goals to be a wife and mother. What’s elitist and disconnected about that? It’s the thing thousands of women do every day, and our first lady can inded relate.

Posted by: Carla in Atlanta | February 11, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm

If she attended cabinent meetings, folks would be mad about her not spending time with the kids. If she jumped in like Hilary Clinton, she’d be overreaching. It’s so pathetic to criticize each thing this woman says or wears. Did anyone jump on Nancy Reagan for spending a bazillion dollars on china? Did anyone call Laura Bush out when her kids were drinking underage? Please!
The truth is that she grew up in a small apartment and was educated in Chicago’s public school system. The truth is that she was often playing the role of a single parent to support her husband’s career ambitions. The truth is that she sacrificed her career goals to be a wife and mother. What’s elitist and disconnected about that? It’s the thing thousands of women do every day, and our first lady can indeed relate.

Posted by: Carla in Atlanta | February 11, 2009, 3:24 pm 3:24 pm

Carla, you are right. I’ll bet she was disappointed with her career trajectory and struggled to get by on that $300,000 salary.
Who wouldn’t?

Posted by: mad | February 11, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm

I can’t see that she has done any work.
====
That’s not fair. She had the job at the University of Chicago Hospital (where Valerie Jarrett was on the board). She did the really important work of getting David Axelrod paid consulting work before the Obama campaign could get up and running.
The initiative she and Axelrod started was then able to hire Obama’s friend Dr. Eric Whittaker. Of course, Dr. Whittaker came from another important job that Mr. Obama had gotten for him- through Tony Rezko.
So really, she did a lot of work keeping Obama’s friends paychecks flowing.

Posted by: MayBee | February 11, 2009, 3:31 pm 3:31 pm

“The truth is that she sacrificed her career goals to be a wife and mother.”
————
This is very true. The $300,000 job at the hospital which started as her husband was elected to the Senate, has disappeared now that she is in DC.
The position has been totally eliminated. Very jarring to feel one’s work was so little appreciated or needed.

Posted by: mad | February 11, 2009, 3:48 pm 3:48 pm

PUH LEEZE!!
Like this woman is an authority on the subject.
When is the last time she cooked for the kids??
When did she clean the house?
When did she drive them to school and pick them up?
What is her exact job description anyway? Smile. Waive to the camera. Wear ridiculous dresses.

Posted by: Stick a sock in it! | February 11, 2009, 3:49 pm 3:49 pm

“This is very true. The $300,000 job at the hospital which started as her husband was elected to the Senate, has disappeared now that she is in DC.”
The fetid swamp of the right wing mind offers up their latest smear…
The Office of Community Affairs was created in 2001.
Michelle joined the office in 2002 and became the executive director.
In 2005, she became VP.
The story of her position being eliminated?
The University of Chicago Medical Center late Friday confirmed a massive restructuring that will trim $100 million in expenses, or nearly 7 percent of its annual budget, amid the economic downturn and unpaid bills owed the hospital from the state Medicaid program for the poor.
Initially, the hospital is eliminating 15 senior executive jobs, including vice president for community and external affairs, a position that had been by incoming First Lady Michelle Obama. Her duties will be taken over by Dr. Eric Whitaker, a friend of her husband, President-elect Barack Obama, and a long-time executive vice president for strategic affiliations and external affairs.

Posted by: Ryan C | February 11, 2009, 4:14 pm 4:14 pm

Carla:
“If she jumped in like Hilary Clinton, she’d be overreaching. It’s so pathetic to criticize each thing this woman says or wears. Did anyone jump on Nancy Reagan for spending a bazillion dollars on china? Did anyone call Laura Bush out when her kids were drinking underage?”
Geez. when did you start paying attention? Hillary got raked over the coals for her hairdos alone. The press ridiculed Nancy Reagan relentlessly, and there was wall to wall coverage of the Bush twins’ teen age embarrassments. Michelle Obama has gotten a virtual pass in comparison. You’ve hardly even heard a squawk about her getting a chair at the executive table, which is really quite extraordinary.

Posted by: JM Hanes | February 11, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm

My only concern is the need for her to constantly try and indicate she is smarter and brought the President where he is today – this is not true; however it is an Afro-American Woman issue – it is one in cases that are Virtually Untrue to Get over It!! Ms. Obama, while you are accomplished in your own right; you are Not smarter, can not be President @ this time; – He is a Leader for you, your family & Us – Be Proud – I am

Posted by: Carolyn Jones | February 11, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm

CAN WE GIVE HER TOO, THE FIRST 100 DAYS-SHE IS STILL TRYING TO KEEP HER BALANCE.
THIS JOB IS A TUFF ONE, ONLY SAFE PLACE SHE HAS IS….THE BATHROOM?????

Posted by: GEEWHIZGUYS | February 11, 2009, 4:58 pm 4:58 pm

For the commenters who are responded to her claim that her family is new to DC:
While Obama was in the Senate, she and the girls lived in Chicago, and he lived in a small apartment in DC. So yes, she and the girls are new to the city.
Why all the hate and sniping?

Posted by: Jo | February 11, 2009, 5:08 pm 5:08 pm

I find it interesting that many people are jumping on the woman for what’s being deemed a “lack of work.” As First Lady, I believe what she’s doing is within her role. Do you really expect her to just sit back and do nothing? If she did, I bet others would say that she was simply basking in the glow of being waited on hand and foot at the White House. Let’s get real here people. As First Lady making appearances is an aspect of her role. She wants to be involved and connected to people, what’s so wrong with that? If you’re still questioning what her job description is as First Lady, please tell me, what exactly did Laura Bush do as First Lady? What was she involved in? Did she ever leave the White House other than to attend her husband’s functions and take vacations with him?
And why can’t Mrs. O admit that it’s a struggle having to fulfill all the responsibilities of her various roles? Balancing the personal and professional is a real concern for modern women. Being the First Lady does not mean she has no problems. The fact that she has her mother there to help does not free her from all she’s expected to do.
As for the comment, “I’ll take ‘underprivileged’ if it includes the same private schools and universities Obama enjoyed.” First, is Obama the one claiming to have been underprivileged or is that simply a moniker that is being put on him? Second, unlike say, George W. and others, Obama’s private school education came from the hard work of his parents and grandparents and not necessarily from a trust fund. He had to keep earning being able to attend those schools. Furthermore, his admission to such esteemed colleges was not based on his family connections but rather on his own warrant and skills. He had to pay his own way. He only recently paid off his school loans, and that’s only because of his book sales. That to me is relatable enough to the common man.

Posted by: Orleanas | February 11, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm

She is one amazing lady, I am so grateful that she is our first lady.

Posted by: Alissa | February 11, 2009, 5:30 pm 5:30 pm

Jo:For the commenters who are responded to her claim that her family is new to DC:
=====
I specifically said Barack Obama is not new to the city. I said nothing about her or the girls.
It isn’t sniping or hate. They are using that “Barack is new to DC” to position him politically.
I used one example of his speech in FL yesterday, when he was denigrating the things “Washington” does.
He also tried it during his press conference, when he said he “inherited” this deficit that the “Republicans” ran up.
He is trying to escape any criticism that would come if people remember he was in the Senate for 4 years, voting “yes” on spending bills. He is trying to get people to forget the Democrats controlled the Congress for the last two years, and he was part of it.
He (with an assist from Michelle) is trying to pretend he is not part of the Washington governing culture. He is.

Posted by: MayBee | February 11, 2009, 5:54 pm 5:54 pm

Why so many haters on this blog. Get over it.

Posted by: Boondock | February 11, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm

MayBe,
Obama probably didn’t feel like a part of the DC community, living in a rented apartment and going home on weekends to be with his family. (Same as Biden, who never had a house in DC but commuted daily to Delaware.) The Obamas are now making DC their home and want to be part of the community. By the way, DC culture is not at all the same as government or political culture in Washington.
And yes, sniping — many of the posts here are mean-spirited, slander or both. Your accusations about her “work”, for example.

Posted by: Jo | February 11, 2009, 6:23 pm 6:23 pm

Well, I believe the Media is giving a free pass to the current first family.Just check the covers Mrs Clinton had in past years.Clinton’s daughter didn’t have the same treatment as the Obamas’children do. Chelsea was mentioned and use over and over as a joke as an “ugly” child. I hope that the media should respect the children who didn’t have a choice on the public life of their parents. In reference the magazine cover, I believe was not in a good time; however, as soon as the public opinion starting saing who cares about Vogue and its cover of the month during such crises; I guess, someone will anounce part of the profit from the sales of this mentioned issue will end up any way on the hands of some non-profit organization and I hope it will be for a very good cause.It just a matter of a very good PR.

Posted by: Lucia | February 11, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm

Well, I believe the Media is giving a free pass to the current first family. Just check the covers Mrs Clinton had in past years. Clinton’s daughter didn’t have the same treatment as the Obamas’ children do. Chelsea was mentioned and use over and over as a joke as an “ugly” child. I hope that the media should respect the children who didn’t have a choice on the public life of their parents. In reference the magazine cover, I believe was not in a good time; however, as soon as the public opinion starting saying who cares about Vogue and its cover of the month during such crises; I guess, someone will announce part of the profit from the sales of this mentioned issue will end up any way on the hands of some non-profit organization and I hope it will be for a very good cause. It is just a matter of a very good PR.

Posted by: Lucia | February 11, 2009, 6:31 pm 6:31 pm

The fashion industry is taking a beating, too, and it involves many small businesses. As I posted in the “Vogue cover” thread, “Vogue knows a good thing when they see it; Mrs. Obama promotes American design, especially young, emerging designers. It would be great if she could use her “celebrity” to benefit these small entrepreneurs. When the retail clothing industry is suffering, this kind of focus can be very helpful!”
Her sense of style, mixing well-made clothes by American designers and items from more reasonable stores such as target and H&M, seem very appropriate for the times.
Let’s give her some time to figure out what her role will be. As another commenter noted, it’s a rare combination of high profile “job” with no specific duties.

Posted by: Jo | February 11, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm

Jo:Your accusations about her “work”, for example.
====
Those aren’t accusations. It’s all true.
If Obama didn’t feel like part of the DC community, it is probably because he spent 2 of his 4 Senate years campaigning rather than governing. That doesn’t make him “new” to Washington, no matter how his political advisers try to repackage it.

Posted by: MayBee | February 11, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm

Again, MayBe, DC is not “Washington”. You are conflating the community with the local industry.

Posted by: Jo | February 11, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm

Maybee, remember he had to go back to Chicago every weekend for church? One can’t fault a man for devotion to the teachings of his church.

Posted by: mad | February 11, 2009, 7:33 pm 7:33 pm

Again, MayBe, DC is not “Washington”. You are conflating the community with the local industry.
=====
Actually, I’m saying he’s not new to either. He’s trying to portray himself as new to both.

Posted by: MayBee | February 11, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

It is with ultimate pride that I can read the words coming from the mouth of this beautiful, talented, and successful woman and know that she represent all the women of America. We’re not only lucky, but fortunate to have her———————————————————————
Michelle Obama does NOT represent ALL women. You may want to open your eyes and look around.

Posted by: Patti | February 11, 2009, 11:53 pm 11:53 pm

Seriously, there’s too much of freedom in America with all due respect to all citizens around the country.Michelle Obama, haven’t said or done anything negative to deserve bashing like punching bag.
K

Posted by: fowobi77 | February 12, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am

“You can put lipstick on a pig — but it’s still a pig.”
`OBAMA, 2008

Posted by: DEENA | February 12, 2009, 12:44 am 12:44 am

She’s an inspiration to me and many women in my circle. She’s a woman of substance and service. She’s honest about her challenges and sincere in her engagement with the local community. I have never been more proud of a First Lady.

Posted by: Marcelisa | February 12, 2009, 12:56 am 12:56 am

It interests me that at a time when the Obama’s are constantly reminding us all that the way forward is mutual respect working together towards common goals to actually achieve something positive, that there are still people racing to post the first resigned, cynical and snippy comment that they can!
Firstly, if you don’t have anything nice to say, don’t say anything! Secondly, if you have the time to be cynical, why not use that time to volunteer in your community, learn about it, be of benefit to it, learn, grow, MOVE ON!
For myself, I like the fact that for the first time in a long time I look at the US with some respect and optimism, and I look at your first couple as inspirational. I’ve joined a local volunteer group helping people with literacy problems. Seems a bit more useful than being snotty on blogs.

Posted by: Parsnip | February 12, 2009, 5:50 am 5:50 am

I don’t care if they do put lipstick on her. She’s still a pig. She us just plain hideous, period!

Posted by: Machod | February 12, 2009, 6:01 am 6:01 am

“It interests me that at a time when the Obama’s are constantly reminding us all that the way forward is mutual respect working together towards common goals…”
———————-
I find that interesting as well. Mr. Obama was partisan and disrespectful on the campaign trail, but now he is constantly reminding us that the way forward is mutual respect.

Posted by: mad | February 12, 2009, 8:58 am 8:58 am

Whenever Michelle Obama talks about what a great mother she is, I remember that she was quoted as saying that as long as parents are home in the evening, the kids don’t care anything about what’s going on during the day.
Now she acts as if she is hovering over the girls and supervising every mouthful.
Well, good luck to her. She may be first, but she’ll never be a lady. You can put on pearls, but you can’t change a attention-addicted, self-promoting, angry, delusional, and racist personality overnight.

Posted by: Anon 02.12.09 | February 13, 2009, 2:03 am 2:03 am

I hope it make all the HATERS feel good to try and put Michelle Obama down. But guess what, this woman have graduated from a top notch college, she is a lawyer, she was making a six figure salary, she has two beautiful kids, and her husband is the President of this United States. Guess what? She did it all without the good will of the HATERS, so stuff it. All the ones who put her down, there are just as many, if not more who is so glad to have Michelle Obama as our First Lady. I know I am proud. This is the first time that I even give a darn as to what the First Lady does, or wear or say. Thanks to this beautiful,black ,smart, down to earth woman, and yes someone who speaks her mind if she choose too. When I talk to my young daughter, I will tell her there is a First Lady to be proud of. I will tell her that you can’t let hate and jealousy stop you from attaining your goals. Bless you First Lady Obama.And President Obama.

Posted by: A. Darton | February 13, 2009, 3:00 pm 3:00 pm

The sniping comments here are ridiculous. And I say that as someone who isn’t even a fan. I’m not comfortable with everything Michelle Obama says or does (or wears) – but there’s no doubt that she is a very well-educated and poised woman. Her job as First Lady is to do community-type activities that are photographed and promote non-controversial issues. So far, that is exactly what she has been doing – just the same as Laura Bush. She has a different take on the job from Laura Bush, but there’s nothing wrong with that. She comes from a different perspective than Laura Bush, and that’s just fine. Both ladies represent America in their own unique way, and it’s nice to see them out there.

Posted by: Sam | March 29, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.