By Danny

Feb 18, 2009 9:04pm

Obama and Bush Allies Target Poverty

ABC News’ Teddy Davis and Ferdous Al-Faruque report: The Rev. Jim Wallis (left), who sits on President Obama’s faith-based council, has teamed up with former Bush speechwriter Michael Gerson (right) to fight poverty.
Ferdous Al-Faruque/ ABC News Bush and Obama allies came together this week to promote a series of initiatives to reduce poverty in the United States. "The moral test, the religious test, the Biblical test of any society is how we treat the most vulnerable," said the Rev. Jim Wallis at the Tuesday launch of the Poverty Forum. Wallis, who sits on President Barack Obama’s faith-based council, teamed up on the project with Michael Gerson, a former speechwriter for President George W. Bush. Wallis and Gerson, the Poverty Forum’s co-chairs, recruited one liberal and one conservative from the faith community to study eight different issues affecting the poor.  The proposals, which range from asset building to family policy, have been sent to the Obama administration through the White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships. Wallis says he and other representatives of the Poverty Forum are scheduled to meet on Friday with Joshua DuBois, the head of the president’s faith office, and Martha Coven from Obama’s Domestic Policy Council. Gerson, who now works as a Washington Post columnist and senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, called the Christian leaders who collaborated on the Poverty Forum’s policy proposals an "orgy of strange bedfellows." "It demonstrates that bipartisanship is possible at a time when this is being questioned," said Gerson. "But more than that, it demonstrates that the most effective bipartisanship is achieved around innovation, not just dialogue but action." Of the group’s 28 initiatives, the proposal of greatest concern to liberals on the panel according to a source familiar with its work was the recommendation to keep Bush’s "unborn child" provision as part of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program (S-CHIP). Progressives are typically weary of ratifying any language which could later be used to build a legal argument against abortion rights but Wallis sees the provision as a useful tool for expanding health-care coverage. "We’ve got to get past the old fear of slippery slopes and what this language might mean to this legal argument," Wallis told ABC News. "We didn’t do this to get into a debate about abortion," he added. "The unborn child regulation here actually helps you to cover women who are undocumented." The initiative of greatest concern to conservatives on the panel according to a source familiar with its work was the call to increase to the minimum wage and index it to inflation. "There were some questions about timing on a proposal like this, particularly at a time where you want to do job creation for low-income people because there is some trade-off in minimum wage laws," Gerson told ABC News. "But I came to the view, and I think many conservatives would, that I don’t have an ideological objection to increasing the minimum wage under the right circumstances. And the proposal here in the Poverty Forum is actually a pretty moderate one." The proposal calls for increasing the minimum wage by "at least" $1.00 above the $7.25 rate which becomes effective in July 2009 and then regularly adjusting it for inflation. Another possible point of contention for conservatives is the Poverty Forum’s call for restoring federal voting rights for ex-felons. Gerson, who supports the proposal, defended the idea, saying, "We are the society of the second chance." "That is a basic commitment of many faith communities: that our actions in life are not a final judgment on our identity as a person," he added. Other measures proposed by the Poverty Forum include depositing $500 into a savings account for every child born in the United States, establishing a "financial services corps" to promote economic literacy, and extending the child care tax credit. To read the Poverty Forum’s complete list of proposals, click here.

User Comments

It is very good to hear that even though elected officials on the Republican side won’t work with Obama some private citizens are doing that. This is such a serious problem and needs people to come together to find solutions.

Posted by: Annie | February 18, 2009, 9:25 pm 9:25 pm

BUSH was a flaming liberal. He needs to be in jail for one selling out the average American who has to live in fear because the drug thugs are coming across the unprotected border and harming innocent Americans. I say, put Bush in jail for the rest of his natural life for causing the death of hundreds of innocent Americans on the border and thousands in Iraq–jail the bum!!!!

Posted by: rockychance | February 18, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

How screwed are the average Americans by Bush and Obama. Man, we have to have a leader to get us back on a track of safety and not spending billions(no make that trillions) on the welfare cheats in California and elsewhere. God save the nation and send us a real leader, I pray!!!!!!

Posted by: rockychance | February 18, 2009, 9:42 pm 9:42 pm

Annie – I agree. It is refreshing to see that some people are willing to work together in a bipartisan manner. It’s a shame that we can’t get our ELECTED officials to do the same.

Posted by: jmb | February 18, 2009, 10:36 pm 10:36 pm

Thank goodness we have individuals with major differences coming together to work out plans to assist the broken in poverty get out of their dire situations. Where’s Liberman? I thought he said he would do what he could do for them 8 years ago.

Posted by: Gg51 | February 18, 2009, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm

Private, bi-partisan initiatives like this further illuminate the ideological extremism of congressional Republicans.

Posted by: godblessusa | February 18, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm

That $500 in every baby’s bank account
will come from people like me…..and
will be taken away from the “baby’s”
account as soon as the benevolent can
grab it to pay for a new Ponzi scheme
…….like taking it and putting it
into a lock-box for the “baby’s” re-
tirement….i.e. the old social security
scam, run by Uncle Sam, of course.

Posted by: Trajan | February 19, 2009, 12:49 am 12:49 am

Other measures proposed by the Poverty Forum include depositing $500 into a savings account for every child born in the United States, establishing a “financial services corps” to promote economic literacy, and extending the child care tax credit.
———————————–
$500 dollars in an account accessible by the parent(s). For those who are not responsible when it comes ot the kids they have created, that $500 wont be in that account for 30 days!!
I swear there are people, well meaning but incredibly stupid and naïve, that love to create all this help for a system that has basically raised kids right though school to take advantage of the system. Go into any public school near your home and just watch. Virtually no discipline, kids being told to do something and just ignoring it. Kids getting into trouble on purpose to avoid classes. Kids in the classes that are always asking for help without ever trying to do the work on their own.
And then we wonder where all the abuse of government programs and services comes from!

Posted by: Mike_C | February 19, 2009, 12:20 pm 12:20 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.