Obama: Gregg Withdrawal “Something of a Surprise”
In a telephone interview with the Springfield, Illinois State Journal-Register said the news of Sen. Judd Gregg’s withdrawal as a nominee for Commerce Secretary "comes as something of a surprise, because the truth, you know, Mr. Gregg approached us with interest and seemed enthusiastic.’
"But ultimately, I think, we’re going to just keep on making efforts to build the kind of bipartisan concensus around important issues that I think the American people are looking for," the president said.
– Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller

Email
Santorum: Money Will Not Defeat Obama, Ideas Will
Rick Santorum's Full Speech at CPAC 2012
Jake -
Can you get this all in one blogspace? It’s like reading half a story when you break it up this way.
Thanks-
NPage
Posted by: NPage | February 12, 2009, 6:17 pm 6:17 pm
So is the President really trying to get us to believe all it takes to get a cabinet position is to call him and ask for one?
Posted by: MayBee | February 12, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
Oh, sure, Gregg approached a Democratic president. Uh huh. We all believe that. /s
Gregg quit because he couldn’t stomach that a president who says we’re in the worst economy since the depression has decided today decided to lift sanctions and give $$ to Syria.
Posted by: Peach | February 12, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
Gregg also confirmed that he has no plans to run for Senate again when his term is up in 2010.
****************************************
Amazing what e-mail will do. After he stepped in it, he must have received plenty
Posted by: Thinking | February 12, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
If it is a lie that Mr Gregg asked for his name to be placed in que to become Commerce Sec I want him to man up and say it is a bold face lie I did not want in any way to consirt with these people I ask that you tell me why the WH would say something like that when it isn’t true this is not the Bush WH this is The Obama WH and by the way why would the Dems think a lilly livered GOPer would stand buy his word?
Posted by: Bonnie Kimberly | February 12, 2009, 6:33 pm 6:33 pm
A senior administration official told FoxNews that they have known of the resignation for two days.
Posted by: mad | February 12, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
It breaks my sad heart.
There’s nothing quite so sad as
Unrequited love.
==============
Posted by: kim | February 12, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
“Good for Gregg. It’s pretty hard for a Republican to stomach lifting sanctions and giving money to Syria at the same time as the president is saying we’re in the worst economy since the depression.”
Peach is being a good little parrot and spreading this lie around.
Obama did not lift sanctions, the Commerce Dept granted a waiver for Boeing to overhaul two Syrian airliners for the purpose of safety.
There is not money going to Syria.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 12, 2009, 6:40 pm 6:40 pm
Peach: “It is being widely reported that the Obama administration has lifted the sanctions against Syria.”
Right – sanctions were lifted in the specific and limited case of allowing the repair of two 747s. Quite an exageration to turn that into “OMG SANCTIONS ARE ALL LIFTED!!11!!!” Can you cite where he is giving money to Syria, or were you flat out lying about that?
Posted by: jhw539 | February 12, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
“It is being widely reported that the Obama administration has lifted the sanctions against Syria”
ROFLMAO.
Widely reported?
It was 1 article that YOU pointed me too that you didn’t even bother to read.
What happened?
Did you get this morning’s talking points and only read the article headline?
Posted by: Ryan C | February 12, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
Good for Gregg. He likely couldn’t stomach what the so-called Stimulus Bill turned into – a nightmare. Despite Obama saying that “nearly all economists agree”, Gregg knows that hundreds of economists disagree and many of them took out a full page add in the NYT to say so.
Posted by: Ron | February 12, 2009, 7:07 pm 7:07 pm
“But keep pretending your hero didn’t make yet another foreign policy goof.”
ROLFMAO…..issuing a narrow waiver is now a foreign policy goof!
“Like he had to apologize to China the first week of his presidency.”
Except he didn’t apologize. Yet another thing you made up.
“And like Iran didn’t make fun of him after that ill-conceived interview with Al Arabia.”
So what?
Iran made fun of Bush constantly.
Obama got to go on the only pro-America/Western Arab station and reach an audience we need to speak to.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 12, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
Census. Obama couldn’t reach Con Census with Gregg on manipulating the census. I was all excited about an appointment that had no seizures with turbo tax. what a letdown.
Posted by: seven | February 12, 2009, 7:09 pm 7:09 pm
“Gregg knows that hundreds of economists disagree and many of them took out a full page add in the NYT to say so.”
Many of them?
It was the Cato Institute who believe in the free market no matter what.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 12, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
“Can you cite where he is giving money to Syria, or were you flat out lying about that?”
That appears to be completely made up.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 12, 2009, 7:11 pm 7:11 pm
“was pulling a stunt by having a stealth, rationed healthcare provision inserted in the stimulus bill.”
On Monday, Bloomberg ran an opinion piece from Betsy McCaughey, a staffer at a conservative think tank who also used to be a Republican Lt. Gov. of New York, attacking the economic stimulus plan. Specifically, McCaughey insisted that the policy would create a “new bureaucracy” called the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology, which will “monitor treatments to make sure your doctor is doing what the federal government deems appropriate and cost effective.” McCaughey said the federal government would then “‘guide’ your doctor’s decisions,” adding, “Keeping doctors informed of the newest medical findings is important, but enforcing uniformity goes too far.”
The claim, not surprisingly, isn’t true. The National Coordinator for Health Information Technology isn’t “new”; it was created by George W. Bush five years ago. More importantly, the measure is about medical records, not limiting physicians’ treatments.
In fact, the language in the House bill that McCaughey … referenced does not establish authority to “monitor treatments” or restrict what “your doctor is doing” with regard to patient care, but rather addresses establishing an electronic records system such that doctors would have complete, accurate information about their patients “to help guide medical decisions at the time and place of care.”
Remember, McCaughey got it wrong. Limbaugh and Drudge took the wrong information and exaggerated it further. Then Fox News took Limbaugh’s lies, and stretched them even further still. That none of this is grounded in reality in any way was of no importance to any of these clowns. Untold thousands of Americans, who don’t know better, get their “news” from these people, and have no idea they’ve been lied to.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 12, 2009, 7:23 pm 7:23 pm
I smell a rat. Did the Republicans set POTUS up by having Gregg offer himself up for the job so they’d have an inside man, have him refuse to sign the stimulus package, and then have him withdraw when the package was passed to take the story of the win away from the president? This story stinks, as a certain Republican said.
Posted by: Halli Casser-Jayne | February 12, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Ryan C, it’s so enjoyable to follow your posts. thanks! I love a man who deals in facts. Keep up the great work.
(If only you were a journalist.)
Posted by: Jan | February 12, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
What is not a surprise for our Smartest Leader PB0?
Housing problem is a surprise.
Banking problem is a surprise.
Job problem is a surprise.
Economic problem is a surprise.
Tax problem is not a surprise.
Posted by: two cats | February 12, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm
Gosh, apparently Obama doesn’t understand (or is just plain lying) when he says all the economists agree that government spending will improve the situation.
Even the bipartisan Congressional Budget Office has said the spending will WORSEN the situation.
And FDR’s own Treasury Secretary admitted they made the depression worse with all the government spending, something most non-partisan economists and historians recognize.
But Obama just keeps up the spin. Or, as we quaintly call it in flyover country, he keeps up the lies.
Posted by: Rob | February 12, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
“Gosh, apparently Obama doesn’t understand (or is just plain lying) when he says all the economists agree that government spending will improve the situation.”
Except he didn;t say all economists.
He probably meant respected economists versus the ideologues over at Cato.
“Even the bipartisan Congressional Budget Office has said the spending will WORSEN the situation.”
The CBO is concerned about the amount of debt carried for the long term. But they think spending would help in the short term.
“And FDR’s own Treasury Secretary admitted they made the depression worse with all the government spending, something most non-partisan economists and historians recognize.”
Made up from whole cloth.
Some free market economists think New Deal spending prolonged the Depression or had no impact.
Most historians think the New Deal helped.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 12, 2009, 9:29 pm 9:29 pm
Gosh, one has to wonder: If Bambi can’t vet his own cabinet using domestic intelligence/vetting procedures, how in the world can we trust him to appropriately analyze CIA intelligence?
We can’t. It speaks volumes that Bambi doesn’t have what it takes to figure out whether his own cabinet are tax cheats or not.
Posted by: Peach | February 12, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm
olive branch returned.
Enough to the bipartisan experiment Mr President!!!
You won
You have a mandate by the people
Not the Repugnicans …. they were fired.
Posted by: Omentum | February 12, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
Wow Gregg wasn’t going to go along with something illegal like moving the Census from Commerce (where it belongs by law) to the White House.
Or it could have been he saw first hand what “bipartisan” meant to Obama from the stimulus debate (seems to mean you must agree with everything Obama says, ditto for patriotism these days) and said “Um, yeah, I’ll pass on that treatment thank you”
Posted by: Zaggs | February 12, 2009, 10:10 pm 10:10 pm
I see all the good little Obamabots are out calling any one who doesn’t agree with them “liars”. It’s two years worth of old.
Good for Senator Gregg. Obviously Obama, once again, yaps on about transparency yet clearly he tried to pull a fast one on Gregg with the Census fiasco. Obama thinks everyone is his puppet. WRONG!
One flap after another with this guy. So embarrassing for the dems and it’s only going to get worse.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 12, 2009, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
“You have a mandate by the people”
Hahahahahaha. Over 58 million people did NOT vote for him. He’d be wise to remember that.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 12, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
The census thing is a giant lie. I swear, all of these dittoheads and right wing fruitcakes are just a bunch of lying degenerates:
“As they have in the past, White House senior management will work closely with the Census Director given the number of decisions that will need to reach the President’s desk,” White House spokesman Ben LaBolt said in a written statement. “This administration has not proposed removing the Census from the Department of Commerce and the same Congressional committees that had oversight during the previous administration will retain that authority.” …
Kenneth Prewitt, who served as Census director from 1998 to 2001, said he worked with White House staff during the 2000 Census on budgeting, advertising and outreach efforts.
Idiots..
Posted by: Tungsten | February 12, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
I owe President Obama an apology. During the transition, when the news of the massive questionnaire potential nominees had to fill out was occupying our attention, I complained that they were being too intrusive in their vetting and that no one would want to jump through all those hoops in order to take a cabinet position. Boy, was I off-base. The vetting was as far from too stringent as it could be. They don’t seem to know what a nominee is going to do next. No, Gregg did nothing unethical or illegal, like, say, Geithner, but they knew going in he was a Republican. Seems like they would have been more thorough in seeing how comfortable he was with Obama’s policies and leadership style, far more than a Democrat nominee. Seems like they would have pressed him hard about things like his views on their stimulus proposal or their plans for the Census.
Posted by: moderate | February 12, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
Ok I have to say this…
Republicans I am very concerned about your rationale. Imagine if you will a plummer (not Joe the Plummer) just a plummer.
You hire the plummer to fix your sink. After a full day’s work you notice the drain leaking, the sink cracked, and the hot and cold faucets reversed. You fire the plummer. Question …. do you allow that same plummer to come back and direct the new plummer you hire to fix the sink.
EXACTLY!!!
No how do you expect the Republicans who WERE FIRED to come back after an abysmal 8 years and demand to dictate policy.
Get a grip
Get a life.
Get over it
You lost.
Posted by: Omentum | February 12, 2009, 11:43 pm 11:43 pm
Ryan C -
Well – this is the third time I’ll say this. Apparently someone doesn’t like the fact that I’m mentioning that FDR’s Treasury Secretary said what he did about throwing money at the problem.
FDR’s Treasury Secretary most certainly did say, years after the depression, that throwing money at the problem only made it worse. You can look it up if you’re interested in historical facts.
Posted by: peach | February 13, 2009, 12:24 am 12:24 am
Notice the difference in tone from the media in the question from the media with the worshipful nature at the so-called press conference by the chosen one. The fact that this guy decides to not be a part of Obama’s team is clearly of much greater concern for the media than the qestion of how our gov’t plans to spend a trillion dollars we don’t have!
Posted by: Truthseeker | February 13, 2009, 1:05 am 1:05 am
To Ryan C:
Just google the words “FDR Treasury Secretary said money didn’t work”.
I know you libs like to pretend it didn’t happen, but even FDR’s treasury secretary admitted that throwing money at the depression didn’t work. It’s historical fact.
Posted by: Rob | February 13, 2009, 8:01 am 8:01 am
Tungsten,
Sorry, dear, but “the census thing” is NOT a “giant lie.” The fact that the White House was taking control of the Census out of the hands of Gregg and putting it into the hands of Rahm Emmanuel is NOT a Republican fantasy. This morning, when they were not going on endlessly about the NY plane crash, folks on all the cable shows were talking about this and the way it influenced Gregg’s decision. Are you thinking Andrea Mitchell is a right-wing paranoid? Last night, it was a fact calmly discussed by folks both pro- and con-Gregg. Do you think Anderson Cooper is delusional? Sorry, it was a power grab, a promise made to placate the powerful house black caucus, whose members did not want Gregg, a Republican, handling the census, so crucial to apportionment. When Richardson was nominated, the census was mentioned as part of his bailiwick. When Greg was nominated, it was not.
Posted by: moderate | February 13, 2009, 8:38 am 8:38 am
Maybe if Obama would start doing what is right, instead of ONLY doing what he thinks will help him get re-elected, he wouldn’t have these problems. Choosing Gregg was a lame attempt to get a Republican Senate vote for his stimulus plan, but also to get Republican support in the next presidential election. Every decision his administration makes is so politically calculated. All he needs to do is the right thing. But, of course, that will NEVER happen as long as he is listening to people like Rahm Emanuel, James Carville, Paul Begala, and George Stephanopoulos. They are all from the Clinton administration, and they are using the same tactics they used then, whatever it takes to get us re-elected. There are two more than qualified, loyal Democrats who could immediately fill the positions of Commerce and HHS Secretaries. However, instead of doing the right thing by nominating Gen. Wesley Clark and Gov. Howard Dean, Obama would rather risk the embarassment of choosing people who have ethical or loyalty deficits.
Posted by: KMB | February 13, 2009, 9:08 am 9:08 am