By Jennifer Parker

Feb 4, 2009 6:59pm

Obama Insists $800-Billion Stimulus Pass By This Weekend

If the vote on the stimulus bill were held in the Senate today — it wouldn’t pass.

So Senate Democratic leaders and the White House are working with a centrist group of Republican and Democratic senators to try to come up with an amendment that addresses the concern that too much of this spending just isn’t stimulus.

Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid has assured the president that he will pass such an amendment and get this bill passed by this weekend.

The president told Republican senators Olympia Snowe and Susan Collins of Maine today that the bill has to be scrubbed.

One thing he did insist, though, is that the stimulus bill be at least $800-billion.  Any less than that, he says, will not do what the economy needs right now.

The president is targeting a group of about six Republicans in order to get the bill passed through the Senate.

Senate sources say they need at least three additional Republicans to pass this bill by this weekend.

–George Stephanopoulos

User Comments

Why does the bill have to be $800 billion if half of it is in pork like ATV trails ect.? Spending money on things that will not help the economy is stupid especially since we have to borrow all of the money.

Posted by: Sandy | February 4, 2009, 7:15 pm 7:15 pm

Last year, they rushed the stimulus through and the money all vanished to God knows where. This stinks to high heaven. The Congress is listening to the American people now and it’ll be a better bill when OUR WILL is heard over that of a man who can’t even screen his cabinet correctly.

Posted by: Jon | February 4, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm

TARP “had to pass” by a weekend this autumn, and look at the results from it. The bill the House passed is not stimulus. Most of the spending doesn’t even occur until 2010, or later. Defeat it now, and work on a bill that is truly stimulating to the economy.

Posted by: jjsmith | February 4, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

it better pass by this weekend or what? perhaps the end to socialism as you had hoped for?

Posted by: catman | February 4, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm

President Obama wants it passed by this weekend, because support is declining every day as we find out more about the wasteful spending.

Posted by: jjsmith | February 4, 2009, 7:24 pm 7:24 pm

someone help me as i am a poorly educated conservative. this bill buys jobs at 300,000 a crack, doesnt seem like a deal to me. i think the liberals are going to tar and feather their man if he does not gitter done.

Posted by: catman | February 4, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

The ‘rush’ leads one to think that there is something that is not being told and ‘transparent’—that we are FLAT BROKE and in debt to China and India and they are calling the note on us? Watch closely to see where the next ‘stimulus’ is allotted, IF they tell us— and demand of our leaders that they keep close watch on our money! When China and India want what we already owe them, will it be our defense programs/military expertise that we give them? How we will repay the next trillion? and the next?

Posted by: cat rowan | February 4, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm

LoL… or 500 million Americans will lose their jobs every month !

Posted by: obamo | February 4, 2009, 7:27 pm 7:27 pm

Haste makes waste. Mr. President I thought by now you would have learned that. You got schooled from your cabinet picks by rushing them through and we all know how well that turned out.
There is no reason to ram this bill of pork through before the weekend. None. I would say you have caused enough damage for one week. We just keep creeping towards socialism, don’t we Mr. President sir!
To the republican senators: Keep your spines! Do NOT sell out! Unless they let you impeach Pelosi first, then maybe…

Posted by: Heidi | February 4, 2009, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm

The “stimulus package” is now $900 billion.
It includes:
A $246 million tax break for Hollywood movie producers to buy motion picture film.
• $650 million for the digital television converter box coupon program.
• $88 million for the Coast Guard to design a new polar icebreaker (arctic ship).
• $448 million for constructing the Department of Homeland Security headquarters.
• $248 million for furniture at the new Homeland Security headquarters.
• $600 million to buy hybrid vehicles for federal employees.
• $400 million for the Centers for Disease Control to screen and prevent STD’s.
• $1.4 billion for rural waste disposal programs.

Posted by: CW | February 4, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm

Are all you people idiots? (thank you Claire McCaskill for the inspirational word!!). If nothing passes, and soon, unemployment will quickly rise to double digits. If you people knew anything about economics you would realize that we need a stimulus bill NOW and not in six months – - – waiting another six months will mean failure and catastrophe. And “government spending,” for all you wannabe Reaganties out there, IS STIMULUS – - – you can’t build a bridge with a tax cut! I’m surprised some of you who posted can even spell!

Posted by: Paul | February 4, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm

The “stimulus package” also includes:
• $160 million for “paid volunteers” at the Corporation for National and Community Service.
• $5.5 million for “energy efficiency initiatives” at the Department of Veterans Affairs National Cemetery Administration.
• $850 million for Amtrak.
• $100 million for reducing the hazard of lead-based paint.
• $75 million to construct a “security training” facility for State Department Security officers when they can be trained at existing facilities of other agencies.
• $110 million to the Farm Service Agency to upgrade computer systems.

Posted by: CW | February 4, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm

When Bush was still in office, what ever he wanted. And look where that got us. At least Obama is looking out for all the people, not just his rich friends. Every day more and more people are lossing thier jobs by the thousands. Stop the houseing colapse and the bleeding, and we can start the healing process. From most posts I see, the “R”‘s lost, and are still lost. To bad we all suffer for the past 8 years.

Posted by: harley1592 | February 4, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Never mind. You people are idiots.

Posted by: Paul | February 4, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm

Obama, your own words are the best here, and I quote “you can put lipstick on a pig and it’s still a pig”.
Yeah Obama, remember that one?! That’s what this “stimulous” bill is.

Posted by: Yahtzee! | February 4, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm

Mr. President, the PEOPLE have spoken! Not only no, but hell no!!!! Stop trying to implement socialism!!! We won’t have it!!!

Posted by: bo | February 4, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm

We were told last year that the bailouts had to pass or the economy would fail.
Look where we are today !!
So now this bill has to pass by the weekend. Or what? the boogie man is going to come? $900 billion of taxpayers money is a lot of money.
Take your time. Make sure that it will work. For what I have read the bill is not going to make jobs immediately. It will take years to implement.

Posted by: CW | February 4, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm

Paul…
I am with you.
For some reason the abc boards have become fox 2.0………
People with an opinion that represents maybe 20% of voters seems to be doing 80% of the posting.
Take heart.
It’s probably 5 people with multiple e-mail/screen names…… ;-)

Posted by: Green Fairy | February 4, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

I think Mr. Obama will be one of the worst President our country would ever want to know.

Posted by: young_voter | February 4, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm

We saw what happened with the last stimulus (bailout) bill when it was ramrodded through without much thought!! This one needs to be examined and thought through and cut way down to get rid of ALL pork and earmarks and pet projects and waste. We need to put the money in the hands of We the People so we can spend OUR money as we see fit and not as our Socialist-leaning Government sees fit. We might just buy homes and cars and things like that and get the economy going if we had more money in OUR pockets. Better than blowing money for Hollywood or STD or other pork!

Posted by: Mary | February 4, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm

What is wrong with you people? If a package doesn’t pass, and pass soon, it will mean double digit unemployment. The middle class will suffer, and suffer big. But I guess the only people leaving feedback here are brainwashed Reaganites who believe the way to stimulate the economy is to give tax breaks to the wealthy and let it “trickle down.” So if you’re wealthy and you left one of these posts, then fine, you’re rich and don’t think putting people back to work is worth it. If you’re middle income or poor and you think this way, you’re a fool. 95% PLUS OF ECONOMIST ARE PUSHING FOR A STIMULUS LARGER THAN WHAT HAS BEEN PROPOSED (> 800,000).

Posted by: Paul | February 4, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

Obama is pathetic, clueless, irresponsible and dangerous for this country.
I’d like to see him resign by the weekend.
But before he leaves, I’d love to see Rangle, Geithner, Dashle and all the rest pay the penalties and fines for failing to pay their taxes. They should not be above the law.

Posted by: kate | February 4, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

young_voter…
1)You may want some of the education money.
2)While you are absolutely entitled to your opinion… the gross negligence of your comment comes from making a prediction that has no factual basis, ONLY opinion.

Posted by: Green Fairy | February 4, 2009, 7:49 pm 7:49 pm

How about a REAL stimulus ? Lets simply do a pre-packaged national bankruptcy , and wipe out all debt of every kind including Federal Debt and all personal debt and just start over . At the same time re-write the Federal Tax Code so tax returns can be done on a post card .
The only losers would be those holding huge amounts of debt . The entire country would be set free to expand and grow . Anyone who is in a home will stay there , including those on the verge of foreclosure .
It’s a radical idea perhaps….but sounds saner than writing blank checks to big banks and funding temporary job measures. By the time the current bill gets passed ..if at all ….there will likely be another one million un-employed , making the current bill even less effective .
We need a TOURNIQUET NOT a box of BANDAIDS !!! This recession is the real deal Storm of the Century Event !!!

Posted by: J Young | February 4, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm

“you can’t build a bridge with a tax cut!” — and you can’t build a bridge with food stamps. There’s more money for food stamps than bridges.

Posted by: A Communist President is still détente | February 4, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm

green fairy and paul….perhaps you dont get it. only 32% favor this 300.000 per job pork bill. that means 68% say no.so mr obama the american people are telling you to keep your grubby socialist hands off my denero. compphrende senoir obama.

Posted by: catman | February 4, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Thank you, Green. It does appear that these posts are full of FOX watchers – - – people who think with something other than their brains.

Posted by: Paul | February 4, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Just design the bill without Palosi and it would probably be fine. When will Palosi go away or step down? Dont they understand that most Dems and Reps agree that Palosi is not good for the Congress and much less the country.

Posted by: CAW | February 4, 2009, 7:52 pm 7:52 pm

Sounds like blackmail to me. Government is not the solution; government is the problem.

Posted by: Gotterdammerung | February 4, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm

Even Carter didn’t shoot from the hip this bad.
Obama will be thrown out 2012, two years after his Democrat masters.

Posted by: A Communist President is still détente | February 4, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm

I don’t think that Americans are opposed to a stimulous as long as it does what it is supposed to do. Create jobs and stimulate the economy. The problem is that the bill as it is now written does neither. It is wasteful pet projects by congress, nothing more.

Posted by: bo | February 4, 2009, 7:56 pm 7:56 pm

Catman:
That 300,000 figure has been derailed – - – it’s based on old data – - – get your head out of FOX NEWS for a change. And people are not supporting this because right wing pundits are exploiting the more egregious aspects of the plan – - – STD education, national mall repair, etc., all of which account for .1% of the total bill. This supposed backlash is driven by BONER (excuse me, BOEHNER) soundbites.

Posted by: Paul | February 4, 2009, 7:57 pm 7:57 pm

Mary… there isn’t any “pork” in the bill — no special interest earmarks, which is the long accepted definition of pork (pork barrel spending).
There are legitimate issues with some of the prescribed spending and debate on these components is merited. But, please get some facts before you start quoting same ol’, same ol’ “talking points”. Thanks.
PS — I work in the entertainment business and would like to remind you it is one industry that has a strong “made in America” component.
Also — are you aware that entertainment (movies, TV, videos, etc.) has consistently been among the TOP exports of the good ol’ USA for years?
Yep. We won’t be hoarding any money, we will spend it and people will have jobs. 98% of our industry is not those big names you see on screen and on the tube. We’re working class middle income Americans, just like (presumably) you are.

Posted by: Green Fairy | February 4, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

Gosh, I never realized ABC News web readers were so right wing. Hmm, maybe I need to watch/listen to more Rush Limbaugh to understand your points of view.

Posted by: Paul | February 4, 2009, 7:59 pm 7:59 pm

1st Obama said the stimulas Had to be Passed with No pork as fast as possible. Then he Changed it to Pass by the Presidents Day Holiday on Feb 16. Now he Changes it to This Weekend. I Guess this is the kind of Change Obama was talking about for Washington!!!

Posted by: Disgusted in Ohio | February 4, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm

The American people are by and large, stupid. Most of Congress are either crooks, liars, power mongers or perverts. This country is going down no matter if this Porkulous bill is passed or not.

Posted by: seneca264 | February 4, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm

The great Nobel laureate James McGill Buchanan, Jr. was correct and Obama/Congressional Democrats are the perfect example of the “public choice” theory.

Posted by: A Communist President is still détente | February 4, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

paul..perhaps we need money for math students beacuse i dont think you get it. lets try again….900 billion divided by 3million jobs equals…hmmmm…300,000 per job. since when did people listen to republicans? the people are doing their own home work. we are at 7.2% unemployment, meaning 92.8% are working, more working than jimmy carters era. this isnt liberal its just plain stupid. if you got rid of every illegal their would be lots of work to go around and state wouldnt be in budget deficits.

Posted by: catman | February 4, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm

Obama is actively trying to take down the American economy so he can institute socialism and have complete control over my life and yours…

Posted by: John | February 4, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm

Only 39% of Americans support this plan and that support is falling. The CBO has released a report that says the stimulus plan as presented would ultimately hurt the economy more than help. The American people are not being fooled. Rasmussen has a poll out that shows that 50% of Americans think the stimulus plan will cause more harm than good as well.
http://washingtontimes.com/news/2009/feb/04/cbo-obama-stimulus-harmful-over-long-haul/

Posted by: Patty | February 4, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm

I need a new poolhouse,and make my pool bigger. Why? well I figure if this CEO can spend the money foolishly, Why can I not ask for some of it .

Posted by: JPrez | February 4, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

Who are we creating new jobs for? Illegal immigrants or American Citizens. What kind of protections are there that they will have to hire US Citizens to improve the nations infastructure?????????

Posted by: Wade | February 4, 2009, 8:07 pm 8:07 pm

These posts are depressing (as most are, I suppose); nothing constructive at all (thank you seneca264: ‘this country is going down’).
We’re entering “The New Depression.” It will be a long and difficult recession. Many people won’t be directly impacted (after all, even if unemployment is 30% that still means 70% are working). BUt indirectly everyone will suffer. Just think about what will happen to the crime rate and the poverty rate. You will be affected. How about some positive posts, like your suggestion on what money should be spent on, instead of criticizing and not suggesting anything (like most Republicans appear to be doing).

Posted by: Jose | February 4, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Who will get the jobs??????????????

Posted by: Wade | February 4, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Good God above, WHY does it have to be passed this weekend? So Obama gets a “win?” Why cripple this country for DECADES to come? It must be slowed down. Now.

Posted by: Liz | February 4, 2009, 8:09 pm 8:09 pm

Obama has said his stimulus plan will either create or SAVE 3 million jobs. If the plan is 800 Billion dollars that means that we are paying more than $275,000 for each job. Who can possibly defend this cost for each job?

Posted by: Patty | February 4, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

The second half of the first 700 billion hasn’t been used yet. What are they waiting for if it’s so dire to get another 800 billion NOW? This is rediculous! They have sat on the 350 Billion from the first bailout and don’t know what to do with it. Government messes up more than it fixes. STOP THE STIMULUS NOW!

Posted by: Kary | February 4, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

we want our jobs,healthcare, education system taken back from illegals.

Posted by: catman | February 4, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

People write your Senators and urge them to vote NO!!!!! speak up

Posted by: neofred | February 4, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm

Could someone just hit the reset button on the economy and lets start over from the beginning? If you want to get Americans buying again just hit reset and bang all credit card debt just disappears. Too good to be true I guess. The last time I checked, Credit Card debt is less than the $800 Billion that Obama is calling for. Maybe I’m wrong.

Posted by: Wade | February 4, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Catman,
The numbers will change. The bill will be changed and explained.
PS — the polls you are talking about are not so exemplary of the general public as say, polls during an election.
A lot of people have gone on about their business, so to speak. I’ve asked a few friends and all they say is, something like… “wait until it’s in a final form before I make my decision about it”.
And– I will remind you … the ONLY poll that counts is in the voting booth and this administration and their policies were voted in.
PS — No pork in this bill. Ill-advised spending? That’s debatable (and SHOULD be debated) — but there are NO Special Interest Earmarks.
I won’t even get into the “socialism” argument with you… sheesh, that’s almost as ridiculous as the bc (I won’t even spell that one out!)
bye bye… gotta hit the feed trough

Posted by: Green Fairy | February 4, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm

Wade…Unions will get the jobs

Posted by: neofred | February 4, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

The Republicans got together last weekend and decided in masse to fight Obama on everything claiming that the stimulus bill is full of pork, blah, blah, blah. Apparently, they want this president to fail just as Limbaugh admits he does. We have a disaster in this country brought on by Republican leadership and so obviously we should listen to everything they have to say! Right? Just how well do tax cuts work? Look at our economy…that says it all. Our country is in dire straits and it is time to quit listening to the Republican naysayers. It’s time to get on the right track, get the stimulus done, and hope it isn’t too late for it to work.

Posted by: sosupernova | February 4, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

We are now officially a mixed economy.

Posted by: Wade | February 4, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

I believe Obama and Congress are about to hear a very loud ROAR of dis-satisfaction!

Posted by: Geeeez | February 4, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm

Neo Fred, I hope you are correct.

Posted by: Wade | February 4, 2009, 8:15 pm 8:15 pm

Paul said: “95% PLUS OF ECONOMIST ARE PUSHING FOR A STIMULUS LARGER THAN WHAT HAS BEEN PROPOSED (> 800,000).”
First off, I dispute your assertion. At best, it’s 95% plus of Keynesian-style economists. News flash…they are not the ONLY economists out there! There is plenty of dispute amongst economists concerning this stimulus package, and it boils down to what economic model they believe in more. Your quote of statistics is deceptive at best. Cite your source, please, and let us judge the veracity of your claim.

Posted by: MikeO | February 4, 2009, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm

Something must be passed, if not this month then next month at the latest. Every month for the past four months we have lost hundreds of thousands of jobs. That means that by years end we would lose another 3-4 million jobs – - – the unemployment rate would be 13-15%.
Maybe you’re sitting in a nicely heated home enjoying a hot chocolate. Maybe you have no employment or financial worries. MOST PEOPLE ARE NOT SO LUCKY! Every month that goes by where nothing is done is another catastrophic scenario. The government must do something. Read about what happened in 1929-1933 and then tell me the government should do nothing.

Posted by: Paul | February 4, 2009, 8:17 pm 8:17 pm

I’m a Republican . I voted for Mc Cain reluctantly . I fully support Obama’s presidency now that he is our President . I do not support this wasteful in-efficent spending of our tax dollars . See above for my take on what we should have as a stimulus package . Our economy will one day recover from this mess …..hoever …I fear it will never ever be the same .

Posted by: J Young | February 4, 2009, 8:19 pm 8:19 pm

Paul,
You don’t need to watch FOX or listen to Rush to understand the Republican point of view on this stimulus package. Just use your common sense, if you have any.

Posted by: Change in 2012 | February 4, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

Are all you people idiots? (thank you Claire McCaskill for the inspirational word!!). If nothing passes, and soon, unemployment will quickly rise to double digits. If you people knew anything about economics you would realize that we need a stimulus bill NOW and not in six months – - – waiting another six months will mean failure and catastrophe. And “government spending,” for all you wannabe Reaganties out there, IS STIMULUS – - – you can’t build a bridge with a tax cut! I’m surprised some of you who posted can even spell!
Posted by: Paul
Most of the going on is nothing but BS to get people to support this pork bill. Tax cuts always work to improve the economy, always have and always will. You might like to go back in history and take a look at the rise in tax income when taxes were cut. The most of the tax cuts being talked about by the Obama gang is for the 40% that don’t pay taxes now. That is a welfare check to me not a tax cut. Then we know that even the guy in charge of the IRS now does not pay his taxes. This group is the one always wanting to increase taxes and I see why, they just don’t pay theirs so why not.
Kill this bill today and go back the drawing board. If it passes tomorrow it won’t help and faster than if they go back and do a good bill. Good bill coming from the far left bunch by be a pipe dream. But we got hope from the Blue dogs who don’t want this anymore than anyone else except the far left.

Posted by: Robert | February 4, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

What happened to the supposed Obama intelligence? He has had a very rough start with the stimulus plan and nominees.
Democrats tried to put through a stimulus pland that was nothing but a bunch of giveaways to their special interest supporters. They were caught and are about to pay a huge cost.

Posted by: James | February 4, 2009, 8:20 pm 8:20 pm

I stole the following from an economist’s comment on this latest Bali-Out. You can find the following and more at mises.org
Just as “war is too important to be left to the generals,” accounting is too vital for the economy and everyone’s finances to have been left to the experts, whether they be visionary professors, auditors eager to strengthen their position, analysts, (ex-)investment bankers, or any of the manifold international committees. All have been as arrogant in the defense of their false science as they have been ignorant of their role as mere sorcerer’s apprentices playing with a fire that has been on the verge of provoking the most severe financial crisis to ravage the world since 1929.

Posted by: picomanning | February 4, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

sosupernova – nice conspiracy theory. There are Democrats and Republicans in the Senate working together to remove the “pork” from this spending bill. I’d like to see how much they cut out of this pig before it is voted upon. I would venture to guess that if this bill has more in it to put money directly back in the pockets of small business, as well as focus on job creation and infrastructure repair/upgrade, and get rid of all of the “pork” that requires some serious creativity to explain how it stimulates the economy and/or creates jobs, it will get plenty of support from the Republicans, especially since they are actually being given input on this (as opposed to the House version).

Posted by: MikeO | February 4, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm

Paul…put the Kool-Aid down, double digit unemployment is going to happen after this passes, it is a spending bill, READ IT FOR GOD SAKES…Nancy Pelosi said “If this bill doesn’t pass 500 million Americans will be out of work”. Yes she said “500 Million Americans”, there isn’t that many Americans in America. no even close. talk about an idiot

Posted by: neofred | February 4, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm

Los Angeles Times, Jan. 17, 2009:
‘Though economists might quibble with specifics or express concerns about longer-term effects, the vast majority agree that some kind of massive government spending plan is necessary.
“Most conservative economists are all for it,” said Mark Zandi, a founder of Moody’s Economy.com who advised GOP presidential candidate Sen. John McCain of Arizona.
The reason is fairly straightforward. A recession is a prolonged drop in demand for goods and services. Both consumers and businesses have cut back hard on spending. With economic insecurity higher than at any time since the Great Depression, consumers and businesses are more reluctant to resume spending than in previous downturns’

Posted by: Paul | February 4, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm

Can anyone tell me where the stimulus plan is posted? I have looked all over for it.

Posted by: JK, in Michigan | February 4, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Whatever happened to the “by Presidents’ Day” deadline? This is a serious matter and I would hope that Congress takes their time to get it right. The American people deserve better than Presidents who slam “bold initiatives” through Congress without much thought. The same was done with the Patriot Act and the TARP and both of those things have serious problems. Obama should do us all a favor and stop the fear-mongering. Expectations have a real impact on the economy and his negativity and indignation at times is unwarranted. One final thing, doesn’t the amount “$800 billion” just sound stunningly arbitrary??

Posted by: Joe C. | February 4, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm

Paul…you should change your screen name to Chicken Little…”the sky is falling!” Or perhaps Paulsen, since he was screaming the same just a few months ago, got his $$$ bill rushed through, and the effect? $800 billion, $900 billion, or more, is a HUGE debt to take on. If we decide to take on this MASSIVE DEBT (may just be a down payment on an even larger debt), we better make sure it is the RIGHT and MOST EFFECTIVE thing to do.

Posted by: MikeO | February 4, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm

Paul and others…When you can’t win an argument on its merits, you resort to name-calling. Pretty childish of you. The fact is that most economists agree that this bill will not stimulate the economy. Most Americans are against this bill as it stands. And 80% of Americans believe that the plan will not stimulate the economy quickly enough. Not a very strong vote of confidence for our new president. But as Rahm Emanuel stated, you can’t waste a good crisis. Now they say it has to be passed by this weekend. Why? Because support is rapidly declining. It’s still a pig of a bill.

Posted by: jjsmith | February 4, 2009, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm

Kill this bill today and go back the drawing board. If it passes tomorrow it won’t help and faster than if they go back and do a good bill. Good bill coming from the far left bunch by be a pipe dream. But we got hope from the Blue dogs who don’t want this anymore than anyone else except the far left.
Yes….Kill this bill today ….write your Senator and urge them to kill this pork barrel, grow government socialist spending bill, this bill will no great jobs, in the private sector, the few union jobs it does will be temporary and will will really be in a mess, Michigan style.write your Senator and urge them to “VOTE NO”

Posted by: neofred | February 4, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

160 million for “PAID VOLUNTEERS” at the Corporation for National and Community Service.
Can anyone tell me what a “PAID VOLUNTEER IS.
Webster defines a volunteer as A PERSON WHO SERVES WITHOUT PAY.

Posted by: Dan | February 4, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm

JK…Look at the website for the U.S. House. When you read the bill, it may make you nauseous.

Posted by: jjsmith | February 4, 2009, 8:33 pm 8:33 pm

PAID VOLUNTEER IS
Just like jury duty

Posted by: Geeeez | February 4, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

Paul…sorry, try again. Nothing in Zandi’s posts on Moodyseconomy.com say anything about just “throwing money” at it (specifically pork). Just because they might advocate spending doesn’t mean they are advocating wanton, careless “pork” spending that seems more targeted toward implementing a social engineering agenda than pure job creation or economic stimulus. CUT THE PORK!

Posted by: MikeO | February 4, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

JK, in Michigan:
The easiest place is C-Span. From there you can get both current versions plus CBO estimates.

Posted by: A Communist President is still détente | February 4, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm

Sheeple, sheeple, please calm down. There is nothing to fear. You will be kept safe. Please stay tuned to your local t.v. and radio stations. You will soon receive instructions on where to report to your assigned community indoctrination center. You will be required to bring all firearms and ammunition and surrender them to your community representative. You will then be required to submit a DNA sample, finger prints, and face scan. Please be patient, this procedure will not take very long. Please bring all forms of identification with you, including passports. All forms of I.D. will be confiscated and you and your family members will be provided with a new biometric universal I.D. You will be required to maintain this I.D. on your person at all times. You will be required to surrender your Universal I.D. card to any law enforcement, civilian security force, or military forces upon request. Failure to do so will result in arrest. Conviction will result in a mandantory 1 year sentence to community work camps. Etc, etc, etc, etc,………………….. We can only blame ourselves for this mess. We allowed it to happen.

Posted by: seneca264 | February 4, 2009, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

Yo Catman. Stop with the “Socialism” crap already. The current administration’s policy of “make government work for the tax payer” is a good thing. Who gives a crap if the Government helps the economy or if the private sector does it. If it helps, it helps. As for those of you who think “aw, let’s just do nothing and eventually the system will work itself out”, you’re kidding yourselves. The Stock Market is played by people who make more than $200k in a year and have residual income. There are the few Day Traders out there, but for the most part, the Stock Market is made up of wealth investors. The Market is crashing nearly every day because the wealthy want their money and don’t trust it. Once again the wealthy control what this country does and doesn’t do. If the Government can build a serious stimulus (and enough with the “Pork” crap, there are plenty of legitimate Revenue Generating plans in the Stimulus package) then it benefits the entire economy, not just the wealthy. The difference is, you and I are use to a government that doesn’t represent the people, and doesn’t work for the people. The answer isn’t to bash the new administration, but to hold them accountable for making government work for the people again. If they don’t, fine, bash them all you want. But right now, they’re TRYING to do something, and they’re the only ones trying. Get some Dems and Reps in a room and don’t let them leave until they agree on a plan that works. Pass that plan and post it on the White House page for all to see. Then make sure the people responsible for managing the money spent monitor the spending, and that those given the money are held accountable, and I mean real accountability (you mess up and don’t do what you agree to do with the tax payers dollars, you go to jail, period)!

Posted by: WeaponX | February 4, 2009, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

Neofred:
What do you mean by your post that unemployment will go to double digits even if this passes since it’s a spending bill? What do you, or many of the people on this post, think that a SPENDING BILL, does? GOVERNMENT spends money on infrastructure, for example, to create construction jobs, thereby putting people to work and a multiplier salary into the economy. IS that the problem: people’s hang-ups with the word SPENDING? Spending means the government creates jobs to stimulate the economy. Am I missing something here NeoFred? Spending is stimulus, properly targeted. The point of spending IS to create jobs, so that hopefully the unemployment rate will not reach 15%.

Posted by: Paul | February 4, 2009, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm

So Congress is talking about subsidized housing and subsidized car buying(new tax credits). We are America the Subsidized. “In Debt We Trust.”

Posted by: Geo | February 4, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

$44 million for construction, repair and improvements at US Department of Agriculture facilties
$209 million for work on deferred maintenance at Agricultural Research Service facilities
$245 million for maintaining and modernizing the IT system of the Farm Service Agency
$175 million to buy and restore floodplain easements for flood prevention
$50 million for “Watershed Rehabilitation”
$1.1 billion for rural community facilities direct loans
$2 billion for rural business and industry guaranteed loans
$2.7 billion for rural water and waste dispoal direct loans
$22.1 billion for rural housing insurance fund loans
$2.8 billion for loans to spur rural broadband
$150 million for emergency food assistance
$50 million for regional economic development commissions
$1 billion for “Periodic Censuses and Programs”
$350 million for State Broadband Data and Development Grants
$1.8 billion for Rural Broadband Deployment Grants
$1 billion for Rural Wireless Deployment Grants
$650 million for Digital-to-Analog Converter Box Program
$100 million for “Scientific and Technical Research and Services” at the National Institute of Standards And Technology
$30 million for necessary expenses of the “Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership”
$300 million for a competitive construction grant program for research science buildings
$400 million for “habitat restoration and mitigation activities” at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
$600 million for “accelerating satellite development and acquisition”
$140 million for “climate data modeling”
$3 billion for state and local law enforcement grants
$1 billion for “Community Oriented Policing Services”
$250 million for “accelerating the development of the tier 1 set of Earth science climate research missions recommended by the National Academies Decadal Survey.”
$50 million for repairs to NASA facilities from storm damage
$300 million for “Major Research Insrumentation program” (science)
$200 million for “academic research facilities modernization”
$100 million for “Education and Human Resources”
$400 million for “Major Research Equipment and Facilities Construction”
$4.5 billion to make military facilities more energy efficient
$1.5 billion for Army Operation and Maintenance fund
$624 million for Navy Operation and Maintenance
$128 million for Marine Corps Operation and Maintenance
$1.23 billion for Air Force Operation and Maintenance
$454 million to “Defense Health Program”
$110 million for Army Reserve Operation and Maintenance
$62 million for Navy Reserve Operation and Maintenance
$45 million for Marine Corps Reserve Operation and Maintenance
$14 million for Air Force Reserve Operation and Maintenance
$302 million for National Guard Operation and Maintenance
$29 million for Air National Guard Operation and Maintenance
$350 million for military energy research and development programs
$2 billion for Army Corps of Engineers “Construction”
$250 million for “Mississippi River and Tributaries”
$2.2 billion for Army Corps “Operation and Maintenance”
$25 million for an Army Corps “Regulatory Program”
$126 million for Interior Department “water reclamation and reuse projects”
$80 million for “rural water projects”
$18.5 billion for “Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy” research in the Department of Energy. That money includes:
$2 billion for development of advanced batteries
$800 million of that is for biomass research and $400 million for geothermal technologies
$1 billion in grants to “institutional entities for energy sustainability and efficiency”
$6.2 billion for the Weatherization Assistance Program
$3.5 billion for Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grants
$3.4 billion for state energy programs
$200 million for expenses to implement energy independence programs
$300 million for expenses to implement Energy efficient appliance rebate programs including the Energy Star program
$400 million for expenses to implement Alternative Fuel Vehicle and Infrastructure Grants to States and Local Governments
$1 billion for expenses necessary for advanced battery manufacturing
$4.5 billion to modernize the nation’s electricity grid
$1 billion for the Advanced Battery Loan Guarantee Program
$2.4 billion to demonstrate “carbon capture and sequestration technologies”
$400 million for the Advanced Research Projects Agency (Science)
$500 million for “Defense Environmental Cleanup”
$1 billion for construction and repair of border facilities and land ports of entry
$6 billion for energy efficiency projects on government buildings
$600 million to buy and lease government plug-in and alternative fuel vehicles
$426 million in small business loans
$100 million for “non-intrusive detection technology to be deployed at sea ports of entry
$150 million for repair and construction at land border ports of entry
$500 million for explosive detection systems for aviation security
$150 million for alteration or removal of obstructive bridges
$200 million for FEMA Emergency Food and Shelter program
$325 million for Interior Department road, bridge and trail repair projects
$300 million for road and bridge work in Wildlife Refuges and Fish Hatcheries
$1.7 billion for “critical deferred maintenance” in the National Park System
$200 million to revitalize the National Mall in Washington, D.C.
$100 million for National Park Service Centennial Challenge programs
$200 million for repair of U.S. Geological Survey facilities
$500 million for repair and replacement of schools, jails, roads, bridges, housing and more for Bureau of Indian Affairs
$800 million for Superfund programs
$200 million for leaking underground storage tank cleanup
$8.4 billion in “State and Tribal Assistance Grants”
$650 million in “Capital Improvement and Maintenance” at the Agriculture Dept.
$850 million for “Wildland Fire Management”
$550 million for Indian Health facilties
$150 million for deferred maintenance at the Smithsonian museums
$50 million in grants to fund “arts projects and activities which preserve jobs in the non-profit arts sector threatened by declines in philanthropic and other support during the current economic downturn” through the National Endowment for the Arts
$1.2 billion in grants to states for youth summer jobs programs and other activities
$1 billion for states in dislocated worker employment and training activities
$500 million for the dislocated workers assistance national reserve
$80 million for the enforcement of worker protection laws and regulations related to infrastructure and unemployment insurance investments
$300 million for “construction, rehabilitation and acquisition of Job Corps Centers”
$250 million for public health centers
$1 billion for renovation and repair of health centers
$600 million for nurse, physician and dentist training
$462 million for renovation work at the Centers for Disease Control
$1.5 billion for “National Center for Research Resources”
$500 million for “Buildlings and Facilties” at the National Institutes of Health in suburban Washington, D.C.
$700 million for “comparative effectiveness research” on prescription drugs
$1 billion for Low-Income Home Energy Assistance
$2 billion in Child Care and Development Block Grants for states
$1 billion for Head Start programs
$1.1 billion for Early Head Start programs
$100 million for Social Security research programs
$200 million for “Aging Services Programs”
$2 billion for “Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology”
$430 million for public health/social services emergency funds
$2.3 billion for the Centers for Disease Control for a variety of programs
$5.5 billion in targeted education grants
$5.5 billion in “education finance incentive grants”
$2 billion in “school improvement grants”
$13.6 billion for Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
$250 million for statewide education data systems
$14 billion for school modernization, renovation and repair
$160 million for AmeriCorps grants
$400 million for the construction and costs to establish a new “National Computer Center” for the Social Security Administration
$500 million to improve processing of disability and retirement claims
$920 million for Army housing and child development centers
$350 million for Navy and Marine Corps housing and child development centers
$280 million in Air Force housing and child development centers
$3.75 billion in military hospital and surgery center construction
$140 million in Army National Guard construction projects
$70 million in Air National Guard construction projects
$100 million in Army Reserve construction projects
$30 million in Navy Reserve construction projects
$60 million in Air Force Reserve construction projects
$950 million for VA Medical Facilities
$50 million for repairs for military cemeteries
$120 million for a backup information management facility for the State Department
$98 million for National Cybersecurity Initiative
$3 billion for “Grants-in-Aid for Airports”
$300 million for Indian Reservation roads
$300 million for Amtrak capital needs
$800 million for national railroad assets or infrastructure repairs, upgrades
$5.4 billion in federal transit grants
$2 billion in infrastructure development for subways and commuter railways
$5 billion for public housing capital
$1 billion in competitive housing grants
$2.5 billion for energy efficiency upgrades in public housing
$500 million in Native American Housing Block Grants
$4.1 billion to help communities deal with foreclosed homes
$1.5 billion in homeless prevention activities
$79 billion in education funds for states

Posted by: neofred | February 4, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm

10
Shorewood
$300,000
Tennis court improvement and rehab – A backhand shot from a prosperous southwestern suburb that should be vigorously returned by taxpayers.1
9
St. Paul
$2.1 million
Western Avenue reconstruction “including bike facilities, traffic calming elements” and “public art” – An artful attempt to have patrons, a.k.a. taxpayers, underwrite the collaboration of St. Paul public works engineers and artists in creating fun sculptures, playful signs, “traffic calming elements” and bike facilities.2
8
Burnsville
$50,000
Greenhouse gas tracking program – How exactly does a city-run greenhouse gas tracking program stimulate the economy?
7
St. Cloud
$150,000
Street sign upgrade program – The state has mandated that street sign lettering be 150 millimeters for capital letters and 113 millimeters for lower-case letters.3 A case of a city government asking the federal government for funds to comply with a state government mandate to replace signs that were already pointing the right way and doing the job.
6
Hanover
$750,000
LED streetlight conversion – How many years worth of city electric bills will it take to pay off the $750,000 cost of changing the bulbs in this city with an estimated population of about 2,500?
5
St. Louis
Park
$3.5 million
New water meters for St. Louis Park residents – The city wants to open the federal tap to give 12,800 water customers new water meters and install remote meter monitoring equipment.
4
Roseville
$1.5 million
New clubhouse and maintenance shop for city golf course – Roseville’s city-run Cedarholm Golf Course, a 9-hole par 3 course, lost over $800,000 between 2000 and 2007 (years inclusive).4 Why should all taxpayers be asked to “chip in” even more money at this losing enterprise?
3
Burnsville
$550,000
Nicollet Commons water feature rehab – Burnsville expects taxpayers to open the federal floodgates for a $550,000 upgrade for the water fountains and sculptures in its highly touted town square style park.
2
Duluth
$6 million
Spirit Mountain snowmaking and maintenance facility – This multi-million dollar snow job attracted national media attention to Duluth.
1
St. Cloud
$750,000
Skateboarding Park – Ever since a local entrepreneur closed the doors of his skate park in 2006, enthusiasts in St. Cloud have tried to raise a quarter of a million dollars to start building a huge state-of-the-art skate park “plaza.” The city even agreed to carry donors’ debt for four years, but donations–to use skateboarding terminology–continue to “grind” along well short of their goal. So the city has done a “kick turn” and asked taxpayers to foot the bill for the entire project. Taxpayers need to become familiar with another skateboard term and “grab” their wallets.

Posted by: neofred | February 4, 2009, 8:38 pm 8:38 pm

JK: this site presents a partial list of items in the bill. You be the judge for each item as to whether or not it’s pork. The House bill is 647 pages long and I had difficulty deciphering the few sections I attempted to read. http://stopthejunk.com/2009/01/economic-stimulus-bill-list-of-items/———
Some is valid job creation, infrastructure, and direct stimulus. Some is pork (Paul asserts only .1% is pork, but, as we’ve seen, one man’s pork is another man’s stimulus, so I’d rather judge myself rather than take someone else’s word for it).

Posted by: MikeO | February 4, 2009, 8:39 pm 8:39 pm

Contact your Senator and urge him/her to vote no. Do it as soon as you can. (202)224-3121 is the Capitol switchboard.

Posted by: jjsmith | February 4, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Sandy,
You mentioned that “it will be a better bill when OUR WILL is heard over that of a man who can’t even screen his cabinet correctly.” Well, if you recall on Nov. 4, our will was heard when Barack Obama was elected President of the United States of America. You might not agree with his policies, but they can’t be much worse than the policies of the last administration that helped guide us into this mess. He’s been in office for 15 days and already has made progress such as proposing limits to bailed out banks’ CEO pay, SCHIP funding for uninsured and under-insured children, and reaching across the aisle for ideas and input from Republican leaders. Give him a break, and the rest of us a chance to see what he has to offer. We didn’t get into this mess overnight and guess what–we won’t get out of it overnight either, no matter how you look at it or who is running the show. Even if John McCain would have won the election, it would take time to dig us out of this ditch. I would at least give him time to start digging before making judgments.

Posted by: Tracey | February 4, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm

Paul …IT’S WASTEFUL PORK. eveyone knows it…..bridges to nowhere. someone is going to have to pay this bill. 70% income tax from your kids and grand kids

Posted by: neofred | February 4, 2009, 8:44 pm 8:44 pm

Ugh. You neocons are hopeless. Right wingers got us into this mess, right wingers will screw it up with their faulty economic analysis and their obstructionism. Government must create jobs, and soon. The only ones saying no are the wealthy because, well, they’re wealthy and don’t give a flying **** about the rest of the country. And the Republicans are the party of the wealthy; they just want tax cuts for their wealthy buddies.

Posted by: Paul | February 4, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.
Thomas Jefferson

Posted by: JustStopIt | February 4, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm

Paul…the example you provide concerning job creation from government spending is valid. I would add on the purchase of automobiles for the federal government falls in the same category. However, just because spending such as this DOES create jobs does NOT mean that ALL items in the bill do.
Bottom line, though, there is a significant amount of spending paralysis on the part of both consumers and businesses due to worry about the future (a valid worry), and they are creating a self-fulfilling prophecy (not spending due to worries about the future result in reduction in aggregate demand, resulting in further economic turmoil, and the cycle continues). No matter how much $$$ the government throws at this, NOTHING will change unless consumer and business confidence increases and they actually start spending and investing their money.

Posted by: MikeO | February 4, 2009, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

neofred: Do you have the slightest idea what the intent of the stimulus bill is? To generate jobs by spending money on projects that will result in immediate paychecks (that will in turn be spent). And every one of the projects you posted would do that.
If you do not want any stimulus bill, fine, that is an option.

Posted by: jhw539 | February 4, 2009, 8:47 pm 8:47 pm

($426 million in small business loans), that is one I would be okay with, if it was in the billions, not millions.
($5 billion for public housing capital)????? can you see whats wrong with this picture?

Posted by: neofred | February 4, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm

I believe congress and senate and the presedent are doing this the wring way. they are only destroying the economir more. if they want a one america they should move to mexico ,

Posted by: Ftank | February 4, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm

Man, I really need a big fix by this weekend or else the sun will fall from the sky. Quick we need to do it now. Hurry, limited time offer. Keep spending what we don’t have.
This is all nonsense. I’m bewildered on how many stupid comments are here.
Government is out of control. Will it be after everyone is squeezed out of the middle class that we realize big government screwed everyone?

Posted by: PutRonPaulInCharge | February 4, 2009, 8:51 pm 8:51 pm

It has to pass this week-end because they can’t take anymore negative publicity over their pork laden payola bill.

Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | February 4, 2009, 8:52 pm 8:52 pm

Paul…some would say YOU are using faulty economic analysis.
“Government must create jobs”…some of the bill WILL create jobs. Some will simply create WORK (temporary…what happens when the work is done). Still more will not do anything (that would be the pork). How about “PRIVATE ENTERPRISE must create jobs”? The jobs in the private sector, reliant upon money from the private sector (read YOU AND ME) will be the jobs that are more lasting and won’t be reliant on MY TAX MONEY YEAR AFTER YEAR to be sustained.
Don’t get me wrong. There are some good things in this bill. But there are some significantly bad things with a hefty price tag that have got to go.
I think the moderate Democrats and Republicans that are working together on amendments relating what to cut are on the right track. I don’t think the bill needs to be scrapped; however, it does need some significant cuts of “pork” programs.
Remember, President Obama does NOT have line-item veto. It’s all or nothing on the bill that arrives on his desk. The trimming of the pork needs to be done NOW, before it arrives on his desk.

Posted by: MikeO | February 4, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm

Paul…Do you really believe that republicans are the “party of the wealthy?” Give me a break. Do your stereotypes help us in discussing these issues? Not likely. By the way, which party is the one that thinks they’re above paying taxes? I’ll give you a hint – it starts with a “d”. Good night, all. Have a good time slugging it out.

Posted by: jjsmith | February 4, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

No wonder we can’t get crap done in this country because it’s always has to be my way or the highway mentality. It will never be all your way nor will it be all my way but sensible people have to come together in the interest of good will for all. Being an obstructionist because of idiotic ideology and party interest instead of contributing in the interest of “all Americans” is treason, in my opinion. Fortunately, the majority of posters in here do not represent the majority of Americans. The majority of Americans are sick of the partisanship and sick of the self-interest of politicians in bed with the robber barons. President Obama is Mr. Smith goes to Washington. The Washington establishment will do everything they can to discredit him and they have the vocal minority of dittoheads who follow right behind echoing their foolish call.

Posted by: Liz in Texas | February 4, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

JK, in Michigan:
Go to
http://appropriations.senate.gov/

Posted by: Mary | February 4, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm

neofred said: “($426 million in small business loans), that is one I would be okay with, if it was in the billions, not millions.”
I would agree with this statement ONLY if it was going to businesses with a good business plan that had good market research and analysis and has a likelihood of succeeding (i.e. has an adequate market for their product to make the business profitable, if not in the short-term as it recoups start-up costs or needs a short-term influx of capital to ride out this economic downturn). But money for yet another antique store or pizza shop or “sell it on eBay” store in an already saturated market is a bad idea and doesn’t need to be propped up with MY MONEY!

Posted by: MikeO | February 4, 2009, 8:58 pm 8:58 pm

jhw539…there temporary make shift jobs, they don’t produce a profit making product, for every dollar the government spends it has to be taken from someone. When the government “spends” money on a makeshift (Union) jobs that don’t produce a profit making product, what happens? the jobs run out, people get laid off, the bubble burst BIG TIME, and burst much worst that we have now. except we have a huge bill. Simple economics

Posted by: neofred | February 4, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

I think giving additional tax breaks to homebuyers is nuts. This ecourages people who shouldn’t be buying a home, to buy, thus getting themselves into a financial mess. Affordable interest rates is the way to go. Giving people rebates to buy foreign vehicles is also nuts. Investing in roads and bridges is a must and would provide jobs. Making more funds available for home insulation, solar power would be a good investment and provide jobs.

Posted by: Greenthumbx | February 4, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm

MikeO.. there is a lot of money going to nothing, and little going to something that will work.

Posted by: neofred | February 4, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm

Greenthumbx…I don’t have a problem with giving first time homebuyers a tax credit but I do have a problem with “all” homebuyers getting a tax credit.

Posted by: Liz in Texas | February 4, 2009, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm

The senate needs to shut up and scrub the bill and then pass it, instead of delaying while the American people suffer. Propose something and quit playing political games.

Posted by: David Graham | February 4, 2009, 9:05 pm 9:05 pm

Thank you David G. Succintly and well said. Just no more scrubbing with more tax cuts for the wealthiest 1%.

Posted by: Paul | February 4, 2009, 9:07 pm 9:07 pm

If you do not want any stimulus bill, fine, that is an option.
Posted by: jhw539 |
that is not an option if we don’t speak up. I might be a right winger, this bill does not help either the right or the left wingers. were all Americans and we need to stand together,This is a power transfer of government, think of the interest on this bill . WRITE YOUR SENATORS URGE THEM TO “VOTE NO”

Posted by: neofred | February 4, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm

And by the way, even by conservative estimates, the Iraq and Afghanistan wars will have cost the US taxpayer more than one trillion dollars. Well, that was money well spent, huh! Haliburton laughed all the way to the bank, and now HALIBURTON IS MOVING TO DUBAI because they said they want to be closer to their profit centers. Classic! So don’t expect Haliburton to be contributing any more tax monies to the Treasury – - – Dubais is a tax haven!

Posted by: Paul | February 4, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm

I don’t have a problem with spending but I do have a problem with govt. spending because this is what happens, they hire 2 people at minimum wage to do the work and six supervisors making 100K to oversee the 2 people making minimum wage and at the end of six months when the project is over the 2 people making minimum wage are still out of work with no further advancement in skills. Or take head start, it is a failure and has been proven that the advancements that kids make are wiped out by the fourth or fifth grade but this is one that they just won’t let go of, so they are going to hire more teachers for head start and pretend that it is helping students. Everyone has seen these state training programs and they are utter failures. In my state they have blown billions on one failed worker retraining program after another within the same commission that has been there for 40 years and they still keep funding it hoping for a different outcome, and it NEVER happens.

Posted by: NoMoreMr.NiceGuy | February 4, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

One classic definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result.
Government waste and government control is what got us into this mess. More of the same won’t make it any better.
You’re insane if you think so.

Posted by: CG | February 4, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm

The telegraph from UK is reporting that Obama will remove the claus from the Stimulus package to buy American.

Posted by: CW | February 4, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

neoconfred said: “there is a lot of money going to nothing, and little going to something that will work.”
You will get no argument from me on that one.
Bottom line is this: I DON’T WANT MY MONEY WASTED in this bill (or any bill, for that matter). Buy cars, build buildings, develop an energy infrastructure, and at the same time, put money back in the consumers’ pockets and businesses’ capital reserves. If you get one sector of the economy kick-started, the ripple effect will be able to be self-sustaining. Those 92%+ that still have a job, if/when they start spending, will start creating the jobs (real, sustainable jobs) for those that are unemployed. THAT is how this economy works. The government creating and SUSTAINING all of the jobs is called SOCIALISM (government control of the factors of productions, which includes labor). There is NO IMMEDIATE FIX. The free market is what has and what will drive this economy. There are some smart things the government can do to influence this, but the tens, if not hundreds, of billions in this bill for “pork” is NOT a smart thing to do.

Posted by: MikeO | February 4, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

THank you neofred. I will vote no because there are too many tax cuts in this bill already. No more tax cuts to the wealthy!

Posted by: Paul | February 4, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm

And by the way, even by conservative estimates, the Iraq and Afghanistan wars will have cost the US taxpayer more than one trillion dollars. Well, that was money well spent, huh! Haliburton laughed all the way to the bank, and now HALIBURTON IS MOVING TO DUBAI because they said they want to be closer to their profit centers. Classic! So don’t expect Haliburton to be contributing any more tax monies to the Treasury – - – Dubai is a tax haven!

Posted by: Paul | February 4, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

CG, no government regulation is what got us into this mess and you think goverment control is what got us into this mess? LOL…Government waste is not what got us into this mess. Corporate greed, with our government turning a blind eye, is what got us into this mess.

Posted by: Liz in Texas | February 4, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm

Paul…we are talking about a bill to create jobs and stimulate the economy. Whatever your feelings on the US involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan (and the spending involved) have NOTHING TO DO WITH WHETHER OR NOT THIS BILL WILL STIMULATE THE ECONOMY.
What, did you run out of rational arguments to support your position, so you must throw out a red herring to try to distract us? Or is that just the next item on your list of talking points?

Posted by: MikeO | February 4, 2009, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

Posted by: CW | February 4, 2009, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm

I would like someone in our government to list for each item in the stimulus package where, what kind and how many jobs will be created. That should be too difficult a task.

Posted by: Jim McDaniel | February 4, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm

Paul: the government turns a blind eye because of brib, er, I mean, because of lobbying from corporations, among other things. There is plenty of greed to go around on both sides of the stage.

Posted by: CG | February 4, 2009, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm

Paul said: “THank you neofred. I will vote no because there are too many tax cuts in this bill already. No more tax cuts to the wealthy!”
Your first statement shows you to be the Keynesian you are (not trying to use that as a derogatory term, simply stating that you support the economic theory that government spending, not tax relief and the resultant private sector spending, is what is needed to “fix” the economy) and would oppose any tax cuts (a la Paul Krugman).
As far as tax cuts to the wealthy…where exactly is that in this bill? I noticed something about cutting the BOTTOM tax bracket from 10% to 5%, and the second-lowest tax bracket from 15% to 10%. Please point out where (preferably page number and paragraph) in the actual bill that there is tax cuts for only the wealthiest 1%. Thanks.
Third, are you saying you would oppose this bill because there is too many tax cuts? Isn’t THAT obstructionist? Those have been in there from Day 1 of this Porkulus bill.

Posted by: MikeO | February 4, 2009, 9:24 pm 9:24 pm

Isn’t Harry Reid an amazing man. All the best economists in the world simply say it’s broken but we can’t say for sure what will fix it. Maybe this, maybe that, but Harry has it down to a science, people. He says it must be at least $800 billion or it won’t work, Obama says it must be passed by this weekend or it won’t be in time to work. We’re getting the bums rush, folks. They know they can’t legislate the problem away. The only other thing they know to do is throw money at it. Wouldn’t common sense dictate that if nothing at all is done the economy will soon come to life? We’re all too greedy not to spend and borrow and loan for profit. Left alone the economy will fix itself, maybe sooner than if we tamper with it and definitely at less expense than their plan which no one can promise will help.

Posted by: mmonroeliveson | February 4, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

Harry Reid has nothing to do or say with this proposal. He is very lucky that he and his sons are not in prison for past bank and land dealings. We will get him next.For now, no stim package will either be considered or voted on. The American people who run this government will decide. No one else. Voters decide who stays or goes. Remember that. 2010 & 2012 are coming fast. The present BHO mess dictates he will be finished in 4 yrs. god help us all. For all you guppies out there who still believe in this false massiah reap what you sowed, a barren field of empty promises, what CHANGE???

Posted by: patriot629 | February 4, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm

CG: “Government waste and government control is what got us into this mess. More of the same won’t make it any better. ”
We can also say the Republican low oversight, no regulation, tax cut and borrow philosophy is what got us into this situation. So why are we listening to the same failures now?

Posted by: jhw539 | February 4, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm

Jim McDaniel said: “I would like someone in our government to list for each item in the stimulus package where, what kind and how many jobs will be created. That should be too difficult a task.”
They won’t because they CAN’T. The best they can do is provide some rough numbers based on the economic model in which they believe. It is ALL CONJECTURE AND SPECULATION.
They make “reasonable” estimates based on economic models they have built around their paradigm. The best we can do is listen to their explanations, their justification as to why their economic model and predictions should be trusted, and possibly actually back their model with some solid historical data from which the cause-effect relationships they assert can actually be demonstrated. Then we can judge if their predictions have some validity.
However, some will simply settle for “these economists said so, so they must be right.” Sorry, not good enough for me.
I wish I had a better answer for you.

Posted by: MikeO | February 4, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Posted by: CW | February 4, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm

Oh Noes…
WASHINGTON — The White House’s nominee for Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Leon Panetta, has earned more than $700,000 in speaking and consulting fees since the beginning of 2008, with some of the payments coming from troubled financial firms and from a firm that invests in contractors for federal national security agencies, according to financial disclosures released Wednesday.

Posted by: realnyer | February 4, 2009, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

I agree the only reason they’re in such a hurry to pass this is because it becomes more confusing daily. How is this supposed to bail out the people who NEED it? I lost my job last week and whenever my state finally decides to give me unemployment benefits that amount to less than 1/2 my normal pay. This bailout means didly squat to me and from reading comments, it means that to all average americans. By average I mean, people who are losing their jobs left and right and can’t afford luxuries such as heat, food, and housing. How does a credit for those fortunate enough to buy a house or car help average americans. THis is a joke. I wish this was a bad nightmare.

Posted by: Vonzy | February 4, 2009, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm

CW: “Obama is taking out the clause that requires that money from the stimulus be used to buy USA products.”
Duh. Because several other countries – who buy goods from us – basically threatened a trade war if he did not. One thing the Republicans have right is the counter-productiveness of isolationist tariffs and I’m glad Obama understands reality when it is pointed out to him.

Posted by: jhw539 | February 4, 2009, 9:36 pm 9:36 pm

Why can’t the government just give every tax PAYING AMERICAN a pre-paid debit card for $50,000 to do what we wish. Its our money!

Posted by: lisa | February 4, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm

catman: why do you use the word ‘socialism’ to sneer at Democrats. You don’t even know what socialism means, let alone the difference between socialism and fascism is (and by the way Republicans are fascists). So why don’t you write back and give us the definition of Socialism and then if you’re correct then we want you to prove your point :what exactly is it about the Democratic policies that are socialism and why didn’t you mind when the rich got national socialism from
George W. Bush. I’m tired of you cons using buzzwords and slogans…get a freekin’ brain.

Posted by: JL | February 4, 2009, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

The “stimulus bill ” have to pass by the weekend? Or what?
A lot of the stuff in this bill is NOT stimulus. It belongs in Obama’s budget.
By the way, where is his budget? That will be more spending. It never ends. America is out of money. we all need to cut wasteful spending. Our government should do the same. NO to the “stimulus” waste.

Posted by: CW | February 4, 2009, 9:40 pm 9:40 pm

We know this is very drastic…considering the colossal collapse republicans left behind! If we can enough helicopters to fly around the country everywhere drop down bundles of cash it would be even better! I saw John McCain mouthing the same nonsense that George Bush did, for eight years. Tax cuts and more tax cuts for the rich! That how we got into this humongous collapse in the first place! Believe me Republicans are up to the same ignorant, partisan and dogmatic nonsense that turn America into a socialist country. But under the circumstances that Republicans left behind, we have no other choice. What we need right now is just like President Obama has proposed more spending! The more we can spend is better and we should as fast as we can and as vast quantities as possible! And only US Government is able to do that, because that Republicans have caused so much damage to our financial system by their poor, incompetent management. And that’s the only way possible to revitalize America. Pork or no pork, focused or unfocused, what we urgently need is more and huge amounts of government spending. All of that is needed to save our America from collapse after all the years of poor judgment and damage done to our country by the Republicans. Republicans are mouthing the same dogmatic stuff and trying to sound like fiscal conservatives, safeguarding interests of the people! Oh, my Lord, look who’s talking? All the damage done to our country over the past years, the same people are asking for same old stuff like tax cuts? I don’t understand what Republicans are all about. They are stuck in the same old worn out rut! All I know is their policies and ideas have ruined our country. After all the devastation done to America by the Republicans by their policies and their actions they are still mouthing the same spectacularly failed ideas! Boehner is saying the same stupid stuff like a trained Myna bird. We have tried all those Republican stuff and our country is not a Socialist state for all practical purposes. We know Republicans have ruined America. But Republican leaders like Kantor, Boehner, McCain, Kyle can’t help but to try selling the same snake oil to us Americans! We need government spending pork or no pork in huge amounts, to save our country from collapse!!!

Posted by: Student of John M. Keynes | February 4, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

Lisa,
I couldn’t agree more with you. There is no better way to get things moving quickly. At least YOU have a brain.

Posted by: Vonzy | February 4, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

hahahaha! I wonder what will happen if the bill DOESN’T pass??? Something it going to hit the fan (anyway)

Posted by: Mister X | February 4, 2009, 9:41 pm 9:41 pm

To all: check out http://www.rasmussenreports.com for their latest poll on support for the current stimulus bill. Only 37% of those polled support it, down from 42% last week (and 45% two weeks ago). Only one polling agency; can’t find anything from others. Kinda puts a damper on the “massive public support” claim by some. Cut the pork, and the numbers go up. Show the American public how each item will create a job or stimulate the economy (like Jim McDaniel wants), and the numbers go up.

Posted by: MikeO | February 4, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm

I’m tired of this crap! We’re Americans…TAKE THE BAND AIDS OFF!!! This bill is only going to get our nation in further debt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Posted by: Bear | February 4, 2009, 9:46 pm 9:46 pm

Seriously the American people deserve the money .We could pay our mortgage buy food , clothing pay our utilities.
This will especially help the people who are laid off . It will save our homes,and possibly start the economy rolling. Even if it takes a couple of years to spend . This could be our cushion that all the economists tell us to save in case we lose our jobs. Well its time to act now.

Posted by: lisa | February 4, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm

You call what we had for the last 8 years no oversight, no regulation, and low taxes? We have laws and rules for everything. There is no free market. We’re told the free market “failed” in order to add more government control. From their perspective, WE the people aren’t smart enough to take care of ourselves. Someone else has to do it for us, using our money of course.
Have you looked recently at where your money goes? If you add it all up, you’ll see more than 50% of your money goes to government of one form or another. Local income tax, state income tax, federal income tax, social security, medicare, sales tax, real estate tax, sales tax, just to name the obvious ones. Then we have hidden taxes, like the gasoline tax, not to mention various government subsidies. And let’s not forget inflation because of their central bank (it’s not ours!), which many call a hidden tax.
The Federal Reserve and ridiculous government requirements are what caused the problem we are in. If the government had to ask us for money NOW for what they want to do, instead of borrowing it or creating it out of thin air, we the people wouldn’t be nearly as complacent. But when you get “deficit” spending, it isn’t obvious to the average person what that means, so we the people allow the government and central banks to continue their practice of serfdom.
Serfdom, you ask? Do you really think you are free?

Posted by: CG | February 4, 2009, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

Leon Panetta’s financial disclosure was just released. Very interesting………..http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aRSPws0NGUWs&refer=home

Posted by: CW | February 4, 2009, 9:49 pm 9:49 pm

To Student of John M. Keynes…are you advocating spending money anywhere and everywhere, regardless? That is what you seem to be implying. If that was the answer, then why hasn’t all the deficit spending over the last two years (and all the pork in all of those bills) just caused the economy to hum these past two years? I am not trying to justify the deficit spending from any era or administration, but, based on your logic, the economy should be soaring. Leave your high-and-mighty prose for the coffee shop talk over your $4.00 decaf mocha latte with a twist (or whatever).
Give us some FACTS and solid rationale on why your proposal will work.
And, by the way, how do you propose we PAY for all of this?

Posted by: MikeO | February 4, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm

On the evening news, and that would be on the All Barak Company, I don’t watch Fox, One of the Republican Govenors were on that supports the bill. Why, he was asked? It lists 15,000 things budgeted for individual cities, some of which were in his state. Because it will create DOZENS OF JOBS was the reply. Dozens of jobs. Aren’t we losing about half a million jobs per month? There is money is there to replace DC’s sewer system. There is money in there to build a city park down in Florida. Those are both items that should be paid for with local funds. We need a package that has money in it to create millions of jobs now. Before Paul or anyone else starts describing me as a right winger, I’m a registered Democrat.
We need a stimulus package. But we need one that will create millions of jobs within the next couple of months, not in 2010. And no where is it written that it needs to be over $800 billion. It needs to be what is necessary. It needs to be well thought out, comprehensive, and free of any controversial items. Obama wants it done now so he can make a big show out of signing it on President’s Day. Forget that. Get it done correctly, so six months from now, we don’t need another stimulus package. This isn’t about photo ops or who won. This is about doing what’s best for the country and this package isn’t it.

Posted by: Melanie | February 4, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm

Lisa…you just said POSSIBLY start the economy rolling. You want to go further in debt taking a chance with this bill…r u serious? Americans spending too much money, and living beyond our means is why we’re here today, and ur asking our gov to go in further debt. What lefties don’t understand is THE MORE MONEY WE PRINT THE LESS OUR DOLLAR IS WORTH! Get that??? The gov is going to print more money to pay for this and the fact our dollar depreciates would offset any improvement from the bill, but the bill isn’t geared towards improving our economy today, so it doesn’t matter. This bill moves through we lose two ways…
1. The bill isn’t going to improve our economy over the short term
2. This could be the beginning of our country going bankrupt

Posted by: Bear | February 4, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm

I completely agree with Student of John M. Keynes. I agree, what we need right now is nothing but huge amounts of pork spending! This sounds like poison to those provincial and narrow minded Republicans. We have listened to them long enough, haven’t we? Look where we are right now? This huge pork spending has to be besides a huge targeted spending. A huge multi trillion dollar spending spree by the US Government should be able to most certainly to prop up the economy. President Obama is absolutely right. MORE SPENDING THE BETTER.. Don’t buy into Republican nonsense! This is exactly what FDR has to go save our country!

Posted by: steve sachs | February 4, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm

MikeO: “It is ALL CONJECTURE AND SPECULATION.”
As is the “Don’t worry and do nothing and we won’t make a Great Depression 2!”
It is conjecture and speculation supported by a minority of economists that doing nothing would be in any way better than the stimulus.

Posted by: jhw539 | February 4, 2009, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm

“someone help me as i am a poorly educated conservative” They all are.

Posted by: Mooseketeer | February 4, 2009, 11:17 pm 11:17 pm

Obama’s stimuless in really just a big spending bill. America see’s through this bill, no matter how much the media tries to protect their Messiah.
I’m surprised that all theses libs would follow their Leader without any thought. They spent the last year talking about how Bush scared us into giving up 700 billion and it had no effect, now Obama is doing the same thing but because he is the new guy. our Messiah, we must all follow him now.
Sorry, folks, the players have changed but the same old polatics remain the same

Posted by: jon | February 5, 2009, 2:17 am 2:17 am

We are discussing this issue along with a whole slew of others over on my political blog. Recently we began tackling the issue of where the Republican party needs to go in order to rebound. We have topics on all sorts of topics including the idea of third party viability. An exert from there:
Regardless of which of the above categories you fall into, the bottom line is that the lack of respectful, intelligent, logical, honest, and non-judgmental debate in America is the single largest obstacle to our country getting back to the state that it needs to get to. It keeps us divided and in turn keeps us powerless. Without a united front against the government waste, corruption, control, and theft, the American people have no chance to combat it. The politicians know that and they do their best to create the environment the way it is so we don’t stop arguing with each other long enough to realize that both parties are taking advantage of us daily.
So I am asking all of you to take a moment and jump over there and join in on the conversation. Be respectful and offer your version of where the party is wrong or right and what needs to change. Get there here:
http://standupforamerica.wordpress.com
Hope to see you there.

Posted by: USWeapon | February 5, 2009, 3:44 am 3:44 am

Since we are already 9 trillion in the tank, how about we cut spending and taxes, try to live within our means like most families have to. Common sense suggests that the answer to to much debt is not lots more debt. How many of you out there would live that way, how many of you would run a buisness that way. Call congress tell them to take the stimulus bill and burn it, (should make on helluv a bonfire) and ask them to start cutting spending.

Posted by: Philip V. | February 5, 2009, 3:47 am 3:47 am

Hmmm…..
Now Obama wants it passed by the weekend?
Well Mr President, perhaps if you had kicked Pelosi in the @ss to start with, this bill would have been in a better positon to be acceptable to the American people right now!
There was absoultely ZERO bi-partisan talks in the House. This pork pile is by-product of Pelosi-Frank Inc.
The last thing this country needs now is another TARP-like bill rushed thru the process with no debate full of liberal pork!
As far as the President’s “requirement” to sign this thing on President’s Day, he better get used to that “I screwed up!” line. He let Pelosi & Frank turn this into a liberal partisan mess and now the American people are saying NO.
You promised to change the way Washington worked Mr. President, but so far your not making much of an impact.
At this point, This thing needs to have all the pork stripped out, and as I have implored here over & over, Obama needs to demand that accountablity be written into it.
That accountability is that each and every appropriation in this bill should have the name of the responsible senator/representative as well as an estimate of the number of jobs that appropriation will create.
Obviously something like an appropriation for increases in unemployment benefits will not create jobs. That is ok and should be easily understood by most people.
Something like Pelosi’s birth control pork that was in the original house bill however would have a hard time with justifying its job creation numbers against the total amount of the appropriation.
TRANSPARENCY – Mr. PRESIDENT – TRANSPARENCY
NOT A RUSH TO SIGN A PORK LAIDEN BILL THAT WILL NOT CREATE THE JOBS WE NEED!

Posted by: Mike_C | February 5, 2009, 9:17 am 9:17 am

It sounds like this bill is going to be passed no matter what the people say. Americans should vote on this decision
before we throw ourselves under the bus.

Posted by: lisa | February 5, 2009, 9:26 am 9:26 am

How long are you going to keep George, ABC? Time to go. He is not credible anymore. The “anger” mentality might turn your way soon.

Posted by: young conservative | February 5, 2009, 12:32 pm 12:32 pm

Wow – there are sure a lot of whiners on here. Come on Green Fairy – if you don’t get your way or convince people to think like you do you’re going to cwy like a little momma’s boy…no there are not 80% of the people on here who are thinking ‘with their brains’ thank-you – there’s now more like 90% and growing. Get over it – the Democrats and our new President are losing popularity faster than good ‘ol H.W. Too bad – if you want to go pout about it – go ahead – we won’t miss you. In the meantime – quit calling people names and stupid when obviously you are the stupid one.

Posted by: newtonianlass | February 5, 2009, 3:28 pm 3:28 pm

young conservative | Feb 5, 2009 12:32:52 PM……I think its more of a conflict of interest (or is that an oxymoron with MSM?).

Posted by: deanbob | February 5, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm

No spending package is perfect. Go through every piece of spending legislation that the GOP controlled congress pushed through from 2001-2007, with far less of a majority than the DEMS have now, and you will also find “pork”.
But remember, on man’s pork is another man’s essential sustenance.
The GOP, in behaving the way it is, is literally disintegrating before the eyes of the american public. For this reason, the GOP “red dogs”, including Voinovich, Snowe and Co. are seriously working to side with the DEMS against their own party.
It is just a shame watching this once great party – the GOP – shoot itself in the foot, and then in the rear-end, and now, in the head. wow.

Posted by: bonncaruso | February 5, 2009, 5:15 pm 5:15 pm

I think that is precisely what I was talking about the taxes are coming out of the working Americans paychecks to keep the taxes going out here and companies get bailouts,why not give the Americans something the companies getting what they want and I know that they are not the ones paying the taxes out here Ithink if my messege is read throughly then it would be understood that that is why now I feel like Americans need a bailout now and as many Americans working out hereand to keep a job they have to have one to go to that is stilloperating and not closed down or moved to another country like how so many or talking about doing.Where some of the other countries are coming over here to work Americans are going to have to go over to other coutries to work.The amout of companies and people living in america do not think that it will not take exactly what Obama is asking for.If in 3 to 6 months 3 different companies can get a stimulus worth the money that they got and they hard working Americans getting taxes taken out of their checks and while everybody playing around and time is not waiting on nobody people are loosing jobs,homes and most of all people have families with little children that don’t understand if you got to go stay in a shelter because you lost your job or your house and the people that is against the stimulus don’t realize the place where they work could very well be one the the companies to lay off or close down,then they would feel the same way that people who are getting laid off or loosing their jobs or their houses.If they need to decide on whatever where it concerns the stimulus then that is fine,but they need to try to get things together think about the Americans that whose jobs are not giving them time frame on a decision on whether they have a job or whether you get to keep your house.If you can decide on a stimulus in a matter for the companies with no problems then they can do it for the Americans.

Posted by: Lisa | February 5, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

I think that is precisely what I was talking about the taxes are coming out of the working Americans paychecks to keep the taxes going out here and companies get bailouts,why not give the Americans something the companies getting what they want and I know that they are not the ones paying the taxes out here Ithink if my messege is read throughly then it would be understood that that is why now I feel like Americans need a bailout now and as many Americans working out hereand to keep a job they have to have one to go to that is stilloperating and not closed down or moved to another country like how so many or talking about doing.Where some of the other countries are coming over here to work Americans are going to have to go over to other coutries to work.The amout of companies and people living in america do not think that it will not take exactly what Obama is asking for.If in 3 to 6 months 3 different companies can get a stimulus worth the money that they got and they hard working Americans getting taxes taken out of their checks and while everybody playing around and time is not waiting on nobody people are loosing jobs,homes and most of all people have families with little children that don’t understand if you got to go stay in a shelter because you lost your job or your house and the people that is against the stimulus don’t realize the place where they work could very well be one the the companies to lay off or close down,then they would feel the same way that people who are getting laid off or loosing their jobs or their houses.If they need to decide on whatever where it concerns the stimulus then that is fine,but they need to try to get things together think about the Americans that whose jobs are not giving them time frame on a decision on whether they have a job or whether you get to keep your house.If you can decide on a stimulus in a matter for the companies with no problems then they can do it for the Americans.

Posted by: Lisa | February 5, 2009, 6:24 pm 6:24 pm

The Borgen Project has some good info on the cost of addressing global poverty.
$30 billion: Annual shortfall to end world hunger.
$550 billion: U.S. Defense budget

Posted by: Abel Tsegga | February 5, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm

I am a bit confused about this debate – some folks saying we are doomed without this bailout and others saying it would not help much. As someone without any background in finance, I am having difficulty to grasp the situation. Is it going to create enough jobs to keep folks employed? Where is this money coming from? Do we not have the right to know this? Is it borrowed or printed? If borrowed, what are the terms of the payment? Can our job creation pay for this loan the government is getting? Will there be a tax hike? If printed, what are the likely scenarios for devaluation of the dollar and inflation?

Posted by: JP | February 7, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm

I am neither wealthy (actually I fall below the poverty line) nor am I Republican. However, even I understand basic spending. Never, ever, ever, ever rush big purchases especially if it just leads to more debt. Something needs to be done soon, sure, but it should be done carefully and thoughtfully. Personally, I’d rather see lots of small stimulus packages targeting specific industries with well-planned economic goals designed by economists (not politicians) but approved by politicians rather than one huge lump amount that will quickly turn into an all-you-can eat pie contest to see who can consume the most before it’s gone.

Posted by: ekoja22 | February 8, 2009, 6:37 am 6:37 am

Agree or disagree, we got what we paid for with the TARP money. The banking sector is still alive and flush with cash. We even got a few non banks to get chartered and join the fray. Some of the big banks didn’t need the money, others needed it desperately – we had some implosions,a couple of bankruptcies, a number of merger/take overs/ buy outs and a few runs on the bank. The adjustments in banking were in large part possible because the Federal government bought warrants (a la TARP) in these companies. In the meantime, it is worth noting that the Federal government is buying nearly $4 Billion dollars a day of mortgage backed securities with the expectation of getting their fill when they have $500 Billion in assets in their coffers. This latter move has a direct impact on long term rates – and, hence, the reason we are enjoying record low interest rates on long term rates. In the end, we got what we paid for with TARP. Oh yeah – one other thing worth mentioning, the money that Paulson used to buy the warrants (preferred stock at a high rate of return) will ultimately be restored in the Fed’s accounts. In fact, the banks that took the TARP money have big incentives to buy the government out and several of those that took the money could have weathered the storm. There are those that have objected that Paulson did the right thing buy using TARP to infuse liquidity into the big banks and he should have stayed the course in buying the troubled assets the banks were holding. As far as I can tell, the money was well spent (actually invested); we will have to see what the overall impact is in the next couple of quarters. Plus, the Feds will ultimately sell off their interest in the mortgage backed assets and, it is forecasted (or at minimum assumed) they we will ultimately get our money back there as well. Yes, the Feds bailed out the banks but it was not a giveaway program the terms “bailout” suggests and was a very different beast than the stimulus bill up in front of Congress today.

Posted by: Lone Star Rules | February 8, 2009, 9:32 am 9:32 am

Imagine how many Viagra pills could be bought with $800 billion.
Boy, that would stimulate the citizens.
The tricle down would increase sales of other personel medical and visual products and keep a lot of people busy.

Posted by: JustCheckingYourProstate | May 15, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm

Leave a Reply

Do you have more information about this topic? If so, please click here to contact the editors of ABC News.