Obama Signs SCHIP
"All right," President Obama said to the assembled jubilant masses in the East Room of the White House today. "Please, everybody have a seat," he told the rejoicing crowd.
"This is good," he said to the group, which fully well knew not all the news from the Obama White House as of late has been good.
"This is good," the president said to cheers and applause.
The president was there to sign the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, or SCHIP, which his White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel helped create a decade ago, and which President Bush vetoed last year.
By doing so, the new president said, "we fulfill one of the highest responsibilities that we have: to ensure the health and well-being of our nation’s children. It’s a responsibility that’s only grown more urgent as our economic crisis deepens, with health care costs that have exploded, and millions of working families are unable to afford health insurance."
The nation has 8 million uninsured children, part of the more than 45 million uninsured Americans total, the president said.
"It’s hard to overstate the toll this takes on families — the sleepless nights worrying about somebody getting hurt or praying that a sick child gets better on her own," the president said. "The decisions that no parent should ever have to make — how long to put off that doctor’s appointment, whether to fill that prescription, whether to let a child play outside knowing that all it takes is one accident, one injury to send your family into financial ruin."
The president took the time to say that his stimulus package currently being debated in the Senate would also serve the cause of health care.
"If Congress passes this recovery plan," he said, "in just one month we will have done more to modernize our health care system than we’ve done in the past decade. We’ll be on our way to computerizing all of America’s medical records, which won’t …just eliminate inefficiencies, won’t just save billions of dollars and create tens of thousands of jobs, but it will save lives by reducing deadly medical errors."
The president took another opportunity to assail the "criticisms of this plan that frankly echo the very same failed theories that helped lead us into this crisis in the first place … I reject these theories. And by the way, so did the American people when they went to the polls, in November, and voted resoundingly for change."
Sitting down to sign the bill with myriad writing implements so different bill sponsors could get one — "I’ve been practicing writing with eight pens," the president said, "running out of signature," he added to laughter — President Obama signed SCHIP into law.
"There you go," he said.
– jpt

Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
Welcome to Amerika!
Posted by: Gill | February 4, 2009, 6:27 pm 6:27 pm
With all the damage done today, welcome to America. We are shooting right passed socialism and going straight for communism.
Posted by: Heidi | February 4, 2009, 6:34 pm 6:34 pm
Bad deal for tax payers.
Posted by: Lee | February 4, 2009, 6:36 pm 6:36 pm
I guess the is the “Change” you people voted for.
As it sits now – I hope I have some change left in four years
Posted by: OMG | February 4, 2009, 6:39 pm 6:39 pm
“and which President Bush vetoed last year.”
Twice.
Bush ultimately signed a bill that extended the act itself but did not expand the program.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 6:43 pm 6:43 pm
“With all the damage done today, welcome to Amerika. We are shooting right passed socialism and going straight for communism.”
ROFLMAO….yes expanding an existing program of children’s health insurance means Stalinism is right around the corner!
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
“I guess the is the “Change” you people voted for.”
Yup.
Obama campaigned on this(actually all the Democrats did) and now has delivered.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
“Bad deal for tax payers.”
Its a great deal for taxpayers who now foot the bill for the uninsured using emergency rooms.
Now instead of paying the higher cost of emergency room care for any medical problem, insured patients can use a regular doctor for illness/malady not requiring emergency care and it helps with preventative care (which leads to fewer expenses down the road dealing with disease).
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Yay……NOT!
Posted by: Bob | February 4, 2009, 6:48 pm 6:48 pm
Agreed – Bad news for tax payers.
Also bad news for those of us covered by private health insurance. While we drew a stay of execution with Daschle’s withdrawal yesterday, it’s only a matter of time before private health coverage will be absorbed into what will be nationalized/rationalized health care.
Thenk only the truly wealthy (and, of course, our government “leadership”) will be able to afford quality healthcare…but the good news is we’ll all be equal!
The youngest of our children will have no idea of what this country once was.
Posted by: tjp612 | February 4, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
Bravo!! Finally a president who puts the welfare of PEOPLE over that of corporate fat cats.
Posted by: Ryan | February 4, 2009, 6:50 pm 6:50 pm
You people are sick, how dare you deny the right for children to have health care. You can parade individual responsibility in the case of parents but children have no choice! They die without health care and if you as a decent human being can sit and let that happen, shame on you!
Posted by: HonestAmerican | February 4, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
This is not an objective report. It doesn’t tell us any facts about the bill, or why critics opposed the bill.
All it does is rebroadcast Obama’s spin, word for word.
This is nothing but a puff piece.
Posted by: Rich | February 4, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
Maybe one of these days the ditto heads with their buzzwords of Amerika, change,socialism, and communism will be in an uninsured position with a seriously sick child. Under those circumstances, their hate filled diatribes would be quickly forgotten.
Posted by: kathy | February 4, 2009, 6:55 pm 6:55 pm
RECORD OPPORTUNITY
In the past it’s been difficult for the uninsured, especially children, to receive quality ongoing and follow-up healthcare because there was no previous record of their condition or treatments. Valuable time was wasted gathering basic information, and in some cases essential health histories have been lost. The lack of continuity in treating the uninsured is one of the big problems facing our health system. This SCHIP extension will potentially insure 4 million children, making portable electronic health records more important than ever.
Posted by: Jeremy Engdahl-Johnson | February 4, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
“Bravo!! Finally a president who puts the welfare of PEOPLE over that of corporate fat cats.”
You may want to do some research – This move actually FAVORS “corporate fat cats” as it will ease the burden of corporations to provide health care to childers (there are several million children previously covered by private health insurance who are now eligible for health care courtesy of the tax payer.
Mank no mistake, Obama and the “corporate fat cats” are both in favor of nationalized health care.
Posted by: tjp612 | February 4, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
He’s a great man, I’d much rather my tax money go for kid’s healthcare than Wall Street. Keep fighting the Good fight Obama. The rich hate this any money diverted to the poor and middle class is less they get.
Posted by: HEGE1321 | February 4, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
Posted by: Lee | Feb 4, 2009 6:36:30 PM
Bad deal for tax payers.
—————————————-
But a good thing for taxpayers (you) if they(you)have kids, and they (you) lose a job and insurance coverage. It will give you some piece of mind to know that your child/children will be covered
Posted by: fempharoh | February 4, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
If the government would just fine halliburton for fraud. They could insure everyone.
Posted by: Dude | February 4, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
“Also bad news for those of us covered by private health insurance. While we drew a stay of execution with Daschle’s withdrawal yesterday, it’s only a matter of time before private health coverage will be absorbed into what will be nationalized/rationalized health care.”
I think you meant “rationed” not rationalized.
And the system envisioned by Obama is not nationalized healthcare which is a top to bottom healthcare system run by the government but a single payer system similar to MediCare.
“The youngest of our children will have no idea of what this country once was.”
ROFLMAO.
So right wingers are for torture and infinite detention even though those are directly at odds with our Constitution and American ideals but making sure all children have health insurance and therefore access to healthcare is the death of this nation.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 7:01 pm 7:01 pm
Can anyone in favor of this bill state why it is a good idea for children previously covered by private health insurance to now be covered by government insurance?
I can’t speak for everyone who opposes this bill, but this is the primary reason I oppose this bill (not because I’m a cold-hearted capitalist).
There are better ways to address the needs of uninsured children.
Posted by: tjp612 | February 4, 2009, 7:02 pm 7:02 pm
“Maybe one of these days the ditto heads with their buzzwords of Amerika, change,socialism, and communism will be in an uninsured position with a seriously sick child. Under those circumstances, their hate filled diatribes would be quickly forgotten.”
They will use the government service than rationalize it away later in a fit of cognitive dissonance.
See Joe the Plumber rationalization of his being on welfare.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
well this Schip should put a lot of people out of work….me for one. I guess the upside is me kids will have medical insurance. OH wait they already did. Hope I keep my job thanks Mr President
Posted by: Nick | February 4, 2009, 7:03 pm 7:03 pm
“If Congress passes this recovery plan,” he said, “in just one month we will have done more to modernize our health care system than we’ve done in the past decade. We’ll be on our way to computerizing all of America’s medical records, which won’t …just eliminate inefficiencies, won’t just save billions of dollars and create tens of thousands of jobs, but it will save lives by reducing deadly medical errors.”
I want what he’s smokin’….
Posted by: tjp612 | February 4, 2009, 7:05 pm 7:05 pm
“I think you meant “rationed” not rationalized.”
No, I meant rationized. The government will pre-determine what treatments the sick will receive. This is different from “rationed” which implies who will get what and how much (but healthcare will also be “rationed” as well).
It’s not here yet, but it’s coming.
Posted by: tjp612 | February 4, 2009, 7:08 pm 7:08 pm
Lol Nick, funny.
Of course all of these lives being saved will be offset by the extra deaths from small cars with less sheet metal because of the CAFE changes that Obama is allowing.
The Obama giveth and the Obama taketh away.
Posted by: BertieW | February 4, 2009, 7:14 pm 7:14 pm
“Can anyone in favor of this bill state why it is a good idea for children previously covered by private health insurance to now be covered by government insurance?”
Well I seek a single payer system and I see your fear as a desired consequence.
Hell take Kucinich’s bill which puts government insurance in direct competition with private insurance. Public insurance wins based on lower overhead costs to healthcare dollars spent.
“There are better ways to address the needs of uninsured children.”
Name them.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 7:20 pm 7:20 pm
Well gee kathy, you tell me, does it seem just a little like we are heading towards socialism and communism after today. I can’t help it you have rose colored glasses on. I mean with the government now involved in PRIVATE business with the whole giving them money and then telling them how much they can get paid thing. I thought that alone would be enough, but oh no, we took one step closer to national healthcare. I am so glad, there are hoards of 30yr old kids that need free healthcare. Give me a break. How did the stock market react today with the One’s moves kathy?
Posted by: Heidi | February 4, 2009, 7:22 pm 7:22 pm
“Of course all of these lives being saved will be offset by the extra deaths from small cars with less sheet metal because of the CAFE changes that Obama is allowing.”
The NAS committee could not come to agreement on the question of safety and fuel economy. Some panel members dissented from the conclusion that past fuel economy improvements have had a negative impact on safety. They cite several problems with the majority analysis. The majority findings are further predicated on the assertion that past data can be used to evaluate current and future safety implications. However, it is clear that the cars and trucks of today are not the same as those from 10-20 years ago—and those differences drastically influence the nature of accidents today. Since the release of the panel’s report, several studies have shown that increasing weight is bad for highway safety. These studies cast further doubt on the theory of fuel economy having negative safety impacts.
UCS and the Center for Auto Safety, in both Building a Better SUV and Drilling in Detroit, demonstrate that fuel economy can be improved while actually improving safety. First, both the NAS and the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy conclude that large fuel economy gains are achievable simply through technical modifications that do not affect vehicle safety in any way. Second, if there is serious concern about the fact that over 40,000 people die on U.S. highways every year, then a significant focus should be placed on the most important factor, vehicle design—safety standards should be tightened to require better technology to avoid crashes and better protect occupants when crashes do happen. Third, even if weight were to be taken out of vehicles, high-strength materials that have superior crash safety performance can be used and vehicle size, a more important safety factor, can be maintained. Finally, reducing the weight disparity between heavy vehicles and light vehicles can actually improve safety of the overall fleet.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 7:28 pm 7:28 pm
“I mean with the government now involved in PRIVATE business with the whole giving them money and then telling them how much they can get paid thing.”
They were welcome to stay private and not ask for a cent of taxpayer money.
Once the taxpayer becomes such a huge stockholder it is incumbent upon the government to protect the taxpayer.
“I thought that alone would be enough, but oh no, we took one step closer to national healthcare.”
“I am so glad, there are hoards of 30yr old kids that need free healthcare.”
Actually there are 45 millions people who are currently uninsured and therefore suffer from lack of healthcare.
“How did the stock market react today with the One’s moves kathy?”
The right wing motto…when in doubt, make it up
Quarterly numbers from Kraft Foods Inc., Walt Disney Co. and Time Warner Inc. provided the latest reminder of the economy’s struggles. The weaker-than-expected reports and a profit warning from Costco Wholesale Corp. left investors fearing that consumers are cutting back even more than most analysts thought.
“Or how bout you Ryan C, you seem to have on the same glasses”
I do.
I think single payer is the way to go.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
Oh my, the forces of Fear and Greed are out in force! We just have so much better things to spend our money on than insuring unprotected children, and if we do it will lead us to communism? -Totalitarian socialism?
This was a purely democratic process. The Democrats won fair and square and now will legally implement their agenda. None of us are the least bit afraid that our democracy is threatened at all by this.
Posted by: Skip | February 4, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
Well…I think it’s a good idea. My husband and I are barely making it….month to month, paycheck to paycheck. We have our children insured through DSHS in our state (Washington) because to insure them through his work it would be nearly $400.00 per month….then we would not be making it! I have no insurance. My ex-husband refuses to pay for insurance for my teenaged daughter because it costs $17.00 more per month than the court says he has to pay for coverage….which I was willing to have him take out of my share of the support payments but he still refused! If my teenaged daughter was not insured I don’t know what I would do…she has asthma and gets sick all the time….she has even ended up in the hospital a few times! I don’t know if “free” insurance is the answer, because then everyone pays for it….but maybe regulating the cost of coverage so it’s more affordable? We could afford maybe $200.00 per month, but not double that! And now that people are losing their jobs and coverage I think at least insuring the kids is a good idea……Those who have it all don’t always think of those that don’t or those that struggle to make ends meet! I had good coverage for my entire family….until I lost my job because of having to stay home to care for my sick children….they told me after they fired me that I could have requested a family leave of absence….nice huh?…..
Posted by: hopeforthefuture | February 4, 2009, 7:35 pm 7:35 pm
“However, it is clear that the cars and trucks of today are not the same as those from 10-20 years ago—and those differences drastically influence the nature of accidents today.”
No no no. Because at this point you arent going to be introducing airbags and ABS brakes. The A/B comparison is between cars that will have the same safety features.
If we are talking about companies trying to drastically increase CAFE, while incidentally not pricing themselves out of the market, they will do it by reducing weight, eg the amount of steel, in a car.
Hence more deaths.
Posted by: BertieW | February 4, 2009, 7:36 pm 7:36 pm
I can see alot of Family Practices and Pediatricans get out of the practice. I can see them specialize in another medical area. Long Long Long waits for medical attenion for all children as the illegal citizens anchor kids flood the system.
Posted by: Geeeez | February 4, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
Wow … most of you people probably don’t have any kids and if you do and are wealthy enough to pay for their insurance … GOOD FOR YOU …
It is over $300 to cover my son on my insurance and that is about a 4th of my check and being a single mom that makes it VERY difficult …
What if you were the one in need … I bet you’d be happy as a gosh darn clam that this bill took affect … What if you lost your job tomorrow and not only had to pay for your insurance but for that of your child or children for that matter … what would you do then?
Probably talk crap about Obama and what he didn’t do for Healthcare … you people are never happy …
Posted by: toomuchnonsense | February 4, 2009, 7:37 pm 7:37 pm
well, isnt it better to be using that tax money for a good cause. i mean, your saving millions of childrens lives, illegal or not. you would think a decent person would help any poor child, no matter if they are legal americans or not. isnt that supposed to be a good thing?
Posted by: xXxunknownxXx | February 4, 2009, 7:39 pm 7:39 pm
tjp12:
“I want what he’s smokin”
You should write for Saturday Night Live.
I almost choked on my sandwich because I was laughing so hard.
Posted by: Donoke9-10 | February 4, 2009, 7:40 pm 7:40 pm
Actually there are 45 millions people who are currently uninsured and therefore suffer from lack of healthcare.
****************************************
Hmmm….. I think that was before we had millions of layoffs.
Too bad we can’t layoff the GOP and take their healt care and pensions too.
Posted by: Thinking | February 4, 2009, 7:42 pm 7:42 pm
Next step will be chip implants!
Posted by: Geeeez | February 4, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Thank you President Obama. You’ve made the world a better place to live in a short amount of time. Please keep up the good work.
Posted by: Eric | February 4, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
So does this mean I can/should stop paying the $972 a month on Cobra for my 4 kids on Cobra?
Posted by: Kevin | February 4, 2009, 7:51 pm 7:51 pm
Every single govt sponsered heatlth care has gone BANKRUPT!!!!! How about giving people a tax credit to pick thier iwn health care. How could illegals get around that. Maybe they should try to pay taxes.
This country is broke and our officials run our treasurey like it’s AMSCOT!!!!! Can ANYONE name one single govt office that is run fabulously? I doubt it. Wake up sheeple! They are taking advantage of our weakness at this time to put forth a less than stellar agenda.
Posted by: Katrina | February 4, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
Da da da dum dum dum dum, de de dum, so-cial-is-m here we come…come on now; let’s have a giving our country away singalong!
Q. What is the definition of a socialist? A. A lazy communist.
All of the smokers should file a massive lawsuit, claiming that their civil rights have been violated, and they are being singled out, and discriminated against…hello, ACLUUUUHOOOO…WHERE ARE YOU?
Hmmm…no answer. They must not be at home right now.
Hey, I’ve got it! We will call PETA! I am CERTAIN that some animals were mistreated somewhere along the line of this sad story!
Yuk…all of a sudden, I don’t feel so good…I think I will go see my doctor…hey, where is my national health care?
Posted by: Ian | February 4, 2009, 7:54 pm 7:54 pm
I resent my tax dollars paying for someone’s kids who don’t have health insurance.
Posted by: Sara | February 4, 2009, 8:00 pm 8:00 pm
…”computerizing all of America’s medical records, which won’t …just eliminate inefficiencies, won’t just save billions of dollars and create tens of thousands of jobs, but it will save lives by reducing deadly medical errors.”
Puleez. Anyone who’s actually dealt with “health care computerization” knows the jobs this creates will be IT departments, who will shrug their shoulders when the system goes down AGAIN.
And…AND…everything is STILL printed out and kept as “hard file.” Unless you want to knock someone over getting to a computer, log them out, log yourself in, (thanks to HIPAA, which wasn’t meant to be the bloated monster the government made it), or wait for a computer to boot up, then look up info, you need the “old fashioned” information in an emergency.
Efficiency is in the eye of the profiter.
Posted by: LaughingCynic | February 4, 2009, 8:02 pm 8:02 pm
The SCHIP law is a great idea, to bad it is going against Obama’s campaign promise of not taxing the lower income. The tax on RYO (roll your own) tobacco was increased from $1/lb to $24.62/lb. With the average smoke consuming a carton of cigarettes a week, the increase will affect him and his/her family $12/wk. It is the poor or Laid-off that are rolling their own cigarettes. The new weighting of taxes on RYO tobacco and lessening of tax on cigars is estimated to cause the loss of jobs for 117k people.
Posted by: Russ | February 4, 2009, 8:03 pm 8:03 pm
“If we are talking about companies trying to drastically increase CAFE, while incidentally not pricing themselves out of the market, they will do it by reducing weight, eg the amount of steel, in a car.”
This is hilarious, right wingers are ###### about children getting health care no matter how many die but draw a line in the sand when it comes raising fuel economy standards that may (or may not) increase traffic fatalities.
Bertie, just curious would you support a return to the 55 mph speed limit on interstates as it has been shown to improve fuel economy and save lives.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 8:05 pm 8:05 pm
Just another reason to hoard your $$, alll tax paying citizens….we’re screwed more and more everyday
Posted by: Goose | February 4, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
The majority of the American people are stupid, self-absorbed, and greedy. This plan was implemented in Hawaii for approximately 6 months before it went bankrupt. The reason why? Parents were opting out of their work medical plans to save money. Hellllllllooooooo…..is anyone paying attention? I didn’t think so.
Posted by: seneca264 | February 4, 2009, 8:14 pm 8:14 pm
Oh goody, taxpayers can now support illegals children’s health care up to age 30. So can we take away the children’s driver licenses?
Why work when the money and the health care are free.
Posted by: bill-tb | February 4, 2009, 8:16 pm 8:16 pm
We are at the precipice of socialism. It will only take a slight nudge to catapult our once great country into the chasm, where in the darkness, the groping masses scream for more and more from a government considered omniscient to all their needs. It’ll be worse than 1984, worse than can be imagined. The land of Socialism is a mere hairbreadth away from that point of no return, that veritable hell on earth- COMMUNISM! The tentacles of pernicious communism will have seized our once America the Beautiful, now rendered to Amerika of the Dark Forces. But the liberals, steadfast in their childlike view of the world, are blinded by their idealism. They will be the complicit ones of the ONE. It may be too late for the apocalypse awaiting us. We should pay heed to the wiser, prescient voices among us.
Posted by: Heather | February 4, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
“This is hilarious, right wingers are ###### about children getting health care no matter how many die but draw a line in the sand when it comes raising fuel economy standards that may (or may not) increase traffic fatalities. ”
I was contrasting all the hypothetical lives saved that the Big O is taking credit for with all lives that inadvertently be cost. Sorry if that is uncomfortable for you.
Posted by: BertieW | February 4, 2009, 8:18 pm 8:18 pm
“But the liberals, steadfast in their childlike view of the world, are blinded by their idealism.”
No, we’re just not scared of your baloney.
Posted by: Skip | February 4, 2009, 8:21 pm 8:21 pm
“I resent my tax dollars paying for someone’s kids who don’t have health insurance.
Sara”
Well I resent my tax dollars going to fund bombing people and then rebuilding everything that was bombed.
Posted by: tim | February 4, 2009, 8:22 pm 8:22 pm
“The SCHIP law is a great idea, to bad it is going against Obama’s campaign promise of not taxing the lower income. The tax on RYO (roll your own) tobacco was increased from $1/lb to $24.62/lb.”
Which translates to about a 90 cents per pack (assuming 20 cigarettes) in total fed tax.
“The new weighting of taxes on RYO tobacco and lessening of tax on cigars is estimated to cause the loss of jobs for 117k people.”
Taxes went up on cigars.
Where did you get the job loss figures?
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 8:23 pm 8:23 pm
“But the liberals, steadfast in their childlike view of the world, are blinded by their idealism.
Posted by: Heather”
Hey Ayn Rand, speaking of idealism, you need to go take a walk on Wall Street and see what greed will bring this country to.
Posted by: tim | February 4, 2009, 8:25 pm 8:25 pm
“I was contrasting all the hypothetical lives saved that the Big O is taking credit for with all lives that inadvertently be cost. Sorry if that is uncomfortable for you.”
Not really uncomfortable for me as I am having fun pointing out that your “concern” for people’s lives always has to do with corporate profit.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
The goverment has no money to pay for this. Our debt is currently being floated by the Chinese and the Arabs and are no longer so eagar to finance our goverments wreckless fiscal policies
People are out of touch with reality on the stimulus it will further the decline of our standard of living and it will not create jobs.
Posted by: James Villa | February 4, 2009, 8:26 pm 8:26 pm
President Barack Obama ride-on i’m with you….Let all the haters keep fighting shadows we’re heading to better tomorrow with a lot hopes ahead.
Posted by: Omo ori le ede america | February 4, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
When will people realize that nothing is for free. We will pay one way or another……. Rest assured the bill will come due.
Posted by: Katrina | February 4, 2009, 8:28 pm 8:28 pm
“The goverment has no money to pay for this.
Posted by: James Villa ”
Yes, healthy children who have a good education is horribly expensive and counterproductive for a country. It’s a better investment to house people in prison who get free healthcare. Don’t help the kids who haven’t committed a crime. Your tax dollars are only meant for criminals.
Posted by: tim | February 4, 2009, 8:29 pm 8:29 pm
NO NEW TAXES, OBAMA PROMISED IN HIS CAMPAIGN.
Posted by: Sara | February 4, 2009, 8:30 pm 8:30 pm
“When will people realize that nothing is for free. We will pay one way or another……. Rest assured the bill will come due.
Posted by: Katrina”
Exactly.
What I’ve seen is right wingers think spending any money on unaborted children who haven’t committed a crime is a bad thing. At the same time, they are more than happy to spend unlimited funds on putting people into prison. There is a link between the two.
Posted by: tim | February 4, 2009, 8:32 pm 8:32 pm
“I didn’t know 30 year old illegals were “State Children”.”
Wow Ashley Todd’s biggest fan was able to uncork this chestnut by combining the two nuttiest poster ideas here.
Or is this the talking point Hannity is using?
I have to admit that I am quite confused since one has to be under the age of 19 and a citizen to be eligible.
Sec 605 of the bill
Nothing in this Act allows Federal payment for individuals who are not legal residents. Titles XI, XIX, and XXI of the Social Security Act provide for the disallowance of Federal financial participation for erroneous expenditures under Medicaid and under CHIP, respectively.
But hey no one ever accused the right wing of being honest.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 8:35 pm 8:35 pm
This is good to rebuild america’s health care system.
Expanding childrens health coverage for 4 million more children-giving a total of 11 million of our precious
american children Health Care !
After years and years of gross neglect
this is very refreshing !
THIS IS GOOD INDEED!!
Posted by: Chris | February 4, 2009, 8:36 pm 8:36 pm
“NO NEW TAXES, OBAMA PROMISED IN HIS CAMPAIGN.”
That would be George Bush Sr.
Obama was quite clear that he was going to raise taxes.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
“When will people realize that nothing is for free. We will pay one way or another……. Rest assured the bill will come due.
Posted by: Katrina”
Exactly.
What I’ve seen is right wingers think spending any money on unaborted children who haven’t committed a crime is a bad thing. At the same time, they are more than happy to spend unlimited funds on putting people into prison. There is a link between the two.
—————————————-
any compassionate person can see the need for children to have care but it should be in the free market. Parents shoudl be given a tax credit to rest assured that these services are given to tax paying citizens.
Can you name one govt office that is run fabulously. People talk about Wall Street being corrupt and they are correct. I also knwo that 1/3 of my check goes to the govt and they have perpetually done a poor job at handling our hard earned money. Let me keep MY money to place it where I choose.
Posted by: Katrina | February 4, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
It is almost unbelievable how some people would actually leave children uninsured. Like the diabetic child in Vermont or cancer stricken 5 year old, both unable to receive necessary care. But then again I forgot we have a Republican Party in this country.
Posted by: Newsrook | February 4, 2009, 8:37 pm 8:37 pm
“Let me keep MY money to place it where I choose.”
That’s just the problem. Given the choice right-wingers will do just that- Keep it!
Posted by: Skip | February 4, 2009, 8:40 pm 8:40 pm
“Can you name one govt office that is run fabulously. People talk about Wall Street being corrupt and they are correct. I also knwo that 1/3 of my check goes to the govt and they have perpetually done a poor job at handling our hard earned money. Let me keep MY money to place it where I choose.
Posted by: Katrina”
You should take a visit to a country where the government doesn’t work at all. It might make you feel a bit better about this government. No, this government is not perfect. But, over the last 30 years, we have been electing people who are only intent on destroying it (Thank you, Grover Norquist). The best societies are ones that combine industry and government. With only industry, you get anarchy (as defined by what happened on Wall Street, for example). With only government, you get tyranny. Neither solution is perfect and there is nothing free about the free market. That’s a fantasy.
Posted by: tim | February 4, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
I am one of those parents that Obama has been talking about, worrying about something happening to my kids, wondering if I should push off my children’s doctor checkups, etc. Until recently my husband and I were both working, paying our mortgage, health insurance and other bills. Life was good. All this changed with the economic meltdown. We both lost our jobs and are unable to pay our health insurance bill – $525 for a couple plan on the Healthy NY program. Our 4 kids were on the Child Health Plus Program at $15 a month per child – $60 total per month, and we would have managed to scrape that together for our kids’ sake. But the problem is that we no longer qualify for the Child Health Plus program because we need to show proof of income, which we don’t have now. We applied for Medicaid but there’s a waiting time to get your appointment with them, then another waiting period to be covered and so on. I just found a part time job and my husband is looking for a job as well, but they are not easy to come by these days… So in the meantime, we are all uninsured, hopefully not for much longer….
Posted by: Frieda | February 4, 2009, 8:42 pm 8:42 pm
“Tim any compassionate person can see the need for children to have care but it should be in the free market. Parents shoudl be given a tax credit to rest assured that these services are given to tax paying citizens.”
The point of insuring the children is that they are not in a position to do so themselves and should not be left to the lottery of the parentage as to whether they get health care at all.
“Can you name one govt office that is run fabulously.”
Human endeavors are rarely run fabulously all the time.
But you will find more governments than businesses that have stood the test of time.
“Let me keep MY money to place it where I choose.”
Can anti-war people have this option?
How about people without children, should they be excused from property taxes?
Or how about people who do not drive should they be exempt from taxes that pay for the roads?
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 8:45 pm 8:45 pm
Typical liberal, tax and spend.
Posted by: Sara | February 4, 2009, 8:46 pm 8:46 pm
“That’s just the problem. Given the choice right-wingers will do just that- Keep it!”
That’s not the problem.
The problem is people thinking that government funding should be ala carte where they pay for what they want and do not pay for what they do not want.
Our system of government does not work that way.
Even funnier is that argument tends to come from right wingers who will scream at you for calling our country a democracy vs a republic.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
“It is almost unbelievable how some people would actually leave children uninsured. Like the diabetic child in Vermont or cancer stricken 5 year old, both unable to receive necessary care. But then again I forgot we have a Republican Party in this country.
Posted by: Newsrook”
I suggest you reread my previous post. Do you really think we don’t want to insure our kids? Of course we do. We are trying very hard. But sometimes, all this red tape leaves you hanging in the middle… Why do I need to show to the Child Health Plus program that I have income? I have been a legal US citizen all my life, but I just lost my job, so I don’t have any income now – just living off savings. If I am ready to pay my premiums, why deny my kids health care? Why should it bother them that I lost my job and add insult to injury???
Posted by: Frieda | February 4, 2009, 8:48 pm 8:48 pm
“Typical liberal, tax and spend.
Posted by: Sara”
When has a Republican ever balanced a budget?
Posted by: tim | February 4, 2009, 8:49 pm 8:49 pm
Government that had the power to give you everything, also has the power to take it away
Thomas Jefferson
Posted by: Tommy | February 4, 2009, 8:50 pm 8:50 pm
Those who think that Republicans don’t spend and borrow/tax, are living in OxyContin Land.
The only difference between a GOP person and a Democrat person is who they think they should support.
Fiscal irresponsibility has actually been bigger historically under Republicans than Democrats.
Please come back from OxyContin Land.
Posted by: tim | February 4, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
My civil rights have been assaulted and my pocket book will be affected roughly $800/year. I’m a single parent of two boys with no child support or government help. Recently laid-off, things look that much worse to me now. This will not help my family. Being honest, I will find another way to fund my habit of 30 years.
With the taxes going from $1/lb to $24.62/lb on RYO tobacco will primarily affect the lower income an average of $12/wk. Not to mention the estimated loss of 117k jobs. Until recently the taxes were weighted on the tobacco consumed by the wealthier class, cigars.
Thank you Government of United States of America for making my road of Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness more difficult for me.
Posted by: Russ | February 4, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
I hope this bill includes helping babies before their lives are taken by abortion.
Posted by: Sara from Arizona | February 4, 2009, 8:53 pm 8:53 pm
Ryan C
Does that apply to ACORN too because I don’t want my money to them either..
The fact is we need to know where our money is going. That is not an unreasonable request.
Posted by: Tim | February 4, 2009, 8:54 pm 8:54 pm
“Government that had the power to give you everything, also has the power to take it away
Thomas Jefferson
Posted by: Tommy”
Who is giving anything when we are paying for it with our taxes?
It’s time for the taxes to help U.S. CITIZENS, NOT CORPORATIONS.
When you can quote me something that says the U.S. government was intended for corporations and not citizens, I might agree with you.
The government is us. It’s time we stop giving it to private entities.
Posted by: tim | February 4, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Tell that to the children of Hawaii who are now in a bankrupt healthcare system.
Posted by: Katrina | February 4, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
“The fact is we need to know where our money is going. That is not an unreasonable request.
Posted by: Tim”
You cry about ACORN but have no problem with the money stolen in Iraq by Halliburton with cost-plus accounting ($50 pencils) or the prison privitization system with finding ways to make jaywalking a crime punishable by prison time in order to increase the headcount for compensation purposes. Tell me, if you are a shareholder of a prison corporation, do you want to see crime decrease? Yes, the free market can sometimes go against what is best for society!
Don’t be a penny wise and a dollar stupid!
Posted by: tim | February 4, 2009, 9:02 pm 9:02 pm
Tim,
Your point is well taken but you don’t offer a solution to where the money is going to come from.
This goverment has proven it has no ability to manage money or programs sucessfully. But only offers excuses for failure through partisen politics.
Posted by: James Villa | February 4, 2009, 9:03 pm 9:03 pm
“Thank you Government of United States of America for making my road of Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness more difficult for me.”
Weren’t you talking about smoking Russ?
Shouldn’t you have said “-my road of Death and disease, Liberty and Pursuit…”?
Posted by: Skip | February 4, 2009, 9:06 pm 9:06 pm
“My civil rights have been assaulted and my pocket book will be affected roughly $800/year. I’m a single parent of two boys with no child support or government help. Recently laid-off, things look that much worse to me now. This will not help my family. Being honest, I will find another way to fund my habit of 30 years.”
Or better yet quit since you have two boys and no job.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 9:08 pm 9:08 pm
“Tim,
This goverment has proven it has no ability to manage money or programs sucessfully. But only offers excuses for failure through partisen politics.
Posted by: James Villa ”
Social security was running well until the 1980s when Ronald Reagan raided the Social Security Trust Fund (with the help of Alan Greenspan). Every president after (Democrat and Republican) continued to do it and now it is bankrupt.
The first step to fixing the problem is not looking at the government is the enemy. This also started in the 1980s. As long as we keep electing people who are intent on destroying the government, we can’t expect the government to work…can we?
The second step is to work on the waste and there is waste.
But, when things work properly, they do work. Many concepts now in private industry started with the government, like the internet.
I don’t think the government is fully the answer. But, I don’t think the government is fully the problem either.
What I’ve seen is the best countries work with a collaboration between the government and private industry.
Can you name a country where there is no government, everything is ran by corporations, and the citizens are fully happy and not being exploited?
Posted by: tim | February 4, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
I am very happy. Thank you President Obama! Caring for kids.
All you naysayers: The democrats won fair and square. (more than I can say for the Bush regime!) It is what the MAJORITY of Americans want.
Posted by: Linda | February 4, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
I am very happy. Thank you President Obama! Caring for kids.
All you naysayers: The democrats won fair and square. (more than I can say for the Bush regime!) It is what the MAJORITY of Americans want.
Posted by: Linda | February 4, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
Congratulations, Obama & Democrats, on screwing the people of this nation.
On the surface, your socialist medical program sounds great: expanding medical coverage to tens of thousands of children. Looking deeper, however, your program is anything but great.
You do not merely allow, but in fact require, all children within certain income ranges to be covered by your program. This is important to understand because it allows you to force parents to accept any and all “medical treatments” you deem appropriate – regardless of the numerous objections parents have had (and will continue to have) against your experimental vaccines and other procedures.
Furthermore, by doing this you have insured than an entire generation of children will grow up under such coverage – coming into adulthood expecting the government to pay for all(and decide what is appropriate) medical treatment. That will undoubtedly make it far easier for you to abolish the quality of healthcare this nation has long enjoyed and relegate us to the lack of quality common throughout the third world.
To add insult to injury, you have intentionally left your program open to use by illegal aliens. In a day and age where America is sick of illegals, you have so kindly turned your back on the American people and provided the people we don’t want here with yet another free ride which will encourage even more to come here and ruin our society.
Then, as the icing on the cake, you have decided to finance all of this not with your own pocketbooks or even that of the wealthy, but instead at the expense of the poorest of the poor. You are raising taxes by another $6.10 per carton on name-brand cigarettes. You are increasing the tax on smokeless tobacco products by 165%. You are increasing taxes on cigars – even the cheapest of the cheap to ridiculous levels, and you have single-handedly doubled the cost of roll tobacco – which is smoked by those who cannot even afford to pay for real cigarettes.
(And aren’t you the one who told us you’d never raise taxes on anyone earning less than $250,000 per year? Apparently, you can’t keep your word on even the barest of your promises, Mr. Obama.)
Posted by: KDurham1968 | February 4, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
“Does that apply to ACORN too because I don’t want my money to them either..”
Oh yes the modern right wing boogey man ACORN.
ACORN can apply for grants just like everyone else.
But hey they fight for poor minorities so naturally right wingers hate them.
“The fact is we need to know where our money is going. That is not an unreasonable request.”
Not at all.
Which is why I like Obama’s path of transparency.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 9:11 pm 9:11 pm
Will somebody put de-republicanization in a comdey skit? That would be hillarious. You know have some folks who vote against their best interests without knowing on there? Like a Joe the plumber mom with no job and 2 kids who is against SCHIP because she heard from Limbaugh or her southern baptist pastor that its socialist?
Posted by: karl | February 4, 2009, 9:12 pm 9:12 pm
All but one of my relatives on both sides of my family tree have lived to be 90+. The vast majority smoke with no ill effects of smoking anywhere, thank you for thinking about me.
Posted by: Russ | February 4, 2009, 9:14 pm 9:14 pm
KDURHAM1968,
Great post.
Posted by: Sara from Arizona | February 4, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
“This is important to understand because it allows you to force parents to accept any and all “medical treatments” you deem appropriate – regardless of the numerous objections parents have had (and will continue to have) against your experimental vaccines and other procedures.”
It does nothing of the sort. This is merely a mechanism to pay for health insurance.
“That will undoubtedly make it far easier for you to abolish the quality of healthcare this nation has long enjoyed and relegate us to the lack of quality common throughout the third world.”
Currently we are ranked 37th by the WHO on our healthcare system yet we spend the most healthcare dollars per capita in the world.
“To add insult to injury, you have intentionally left your program open to use by illegal aliens.”
Sec 605 of the bill
Nothing in this Act allows Federal payment for individuals who are not legal residents. Titles XI, XIX, and XXI of the Social Security Act provide for the disallowance of Federal financial participation for erroneous expenditures under Medicaid and under CHIP, respectively.
All the right wing have are lies and scare tactics.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 9:17 pm 9:17 pm
It’s smoke and mirrors yet again.
Force loss of choice by increasing taxes on it by 2138.0% and claim it is going to help the ones it will affect the most.
Posted by: Russ | February 4, 2009, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
“Force loss of choice by increasing taxes on it by 2138.0% and claim it is going to help the ones it will affect the most.”
Smoking related illness costs taxpayers tens of billion to say nothing of the lives lost to those illnesses.
It is in the interest of society to reduce this habit.
Given the failure of prohibition, making the habit an expensive one has been shown to get more people to quit and stop people from starting.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 9:23 pm 9:23 pm
“Smoking related illness costs taxpayers tens of billion to say nothing of the lives lost to those illnesses.
It is in the interest of society to reduce this habit.
Given the failure of prohibition, making the habit an expensive one has been shown to get more people to quit and stop people from starting.”
Gee, what about senseless driving? How about alcohol? Why aim the tax burden towards the goods consumed by lower class?
Posted by: Russ | February 4, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
“It is in the interest of society…”
You’re going to scare them using the ‘S’ word Ryan.
Posted by: Skip | February 4, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Stop blaming parties!!!! Poor politicians on both sides are corrupt. That is a fact. People need to focus on the future. Blaming Republicans is just pathetic. The Dems are in power now and if they mess it up worse then who will we blame?
The fact is they mishandle our money, feed us bull and expect us to do nothing about it. How is it wrong to question how our tax money is handled? Anyone to not quesetion how our money your money is spent is a fool. Then again a fool and their money soon part ways.
Posted by: Tommy | February 4, 2009, 9:27 pm 9:27 pm
Is the plan to fund this still to tax Tobacco? If so, apparently we need 22 million new smokers to make it work. My Irish neighbor moved here to get away from her country’s national health care plan. Wonder where she’s moving next?
Posted by: NewCongress2010 | February 4, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
Thank you President Dork – basically this sends a message to HAVE ALL THE BRATS you want .. don’t use protection – and the guy across the street who goes to work everyday will pay for it! We’ll sit home and watch The View! What a wondeful message to send to our youth – the guys a fraud!!
Posted by: Marcus | February 4, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
“If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it’s free.”
PJ O’Rourke
The Liberty Manifesto (1993)
Posted by: Tony D | February 4, 2009, 9:31 pm 9:31 pm
Gov’t BUDGET??? Is that something like – ahhhh we spend what we want. They (taxpayers) will keep paying it………..
We’re slaves to the plutocracy of the US. Gov’t and Rich are in bed together and they won’t be happy till 1% of population has 100% of money.
Posted by: Charlotte | February 4, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Insurance isnt the answer, its the problem.
Posted by: Flash Override | February 4, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
“Gee, what about senseless driving? How about alcohol? Why aim the tax burden towards the goods consumed by lower class?”
I agree that so called sin taxes have a larger direct impact on the lower classes because the upper classes more easily absorb the cost but the goal of those sin taxes also has more of a direct impact on the lower classes.
At some point the cost of smoking is weighed vs the cost of other items needed and many decide that quitting is the best option.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
Next week – we’ll pass something else that promotes laziness and sexual freedom to have 14 kids you can’t support! Film at 11!
Posted by: President 125 lbs. | February 4, 2009, 9:34 pm 9:34 pm
“If they reduce this habit, how are they going to pay for all these new liberal goodies being financed from it?”
If you reduce the habit, you reduce the costs of smoking related illness.
If tobacco taxes become insufficient to pay for SCHIP, they will just have to find a different revenue stream.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
Where is the information on paying insurance for grownup illegals up to 30 years of age. PULEEZE tell me that someone here is smoking crack…instead of our ‘ignant’ politicians.
They do love those common ignorant illegal job sucking aliens…..
Posted by: Charlotte | February 4, 2009, 9:38 pm 9:38 pm
This bill will also encourage more illegals to cross the border. Oh good.
Posted by: Sara from Arizona | February 4, 2009, 9:44 pm 9:44 pm
Smoking is a choice. If an adult makes the choice, then ideally, they should stay conscious of the costs incurred- in both actual expense and the eventual health consequences. But ultimately, the individual controls his or her smoking, not the government. It can’t stop addictive pursuits anymore than it can legislate morality.
Posted by: Heather | February 4, 2009, 9:45 pm 9:45 pm
Well if this doesn’t promote morality I don’t know what does – SIGH!!
Posted by: Kim | February 4, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
Ryan C writes:
I have to admit that I am quite confused since one has to be under the age of 19 and a citizen to be eligible.
****************************************
Nice try Ryan……all your posts dance and avoid the issue…..health care for illegal immigrants…….ever heard of ANCHOR babies RYAN???……if they are born in the USA..they are CITIZENS….they come under your welfare program……look it up in your FUNK and WAGNALL’s dictionary…they are CITIZENS….Obama just signed us all up for caring for them.
Posted by: socialism101 | February 4, 2009, 9:48 pm 9:48 pm
“While the law in question does not explicitly provide for a determination of what medical treatment is appropriate, it most definitely does so implicitly.”
Oh so its a secret….
“The courts have already determined that as long as the government is paying for the treatment, parents may not refuse the treatment on behalf of their children.”
Name the case.
“As for the WHO and its evaluations – a socialist organization hardly provides an objective viewpoint. Nevertheless, even if we were to accept the WHO’s viewpoint, that would make us 37th out of almost 200 seperate sovereign nations in this world – far from the bottom of the pack as you seem to want to imply.”
Ummm we’re 37th. You implied we were by far the best in the world.
“Moreover, as anyone from nations like Canada, the UK, France, and others who already have your socialized programs can attest – US healthcare far exceeds their own.”
Except it doesn’t. Also you are comparing 3 very different healthcare systems in how they operate. I know its easier when Rush tells you they’re all socialist (in fact that seems to be your go to answer for fact inconvenient to your bs) but there are some difference.
“we do not wait days to weeks for basic medical care like those socialist nations do.”
Business Week, no great fan of a national healthcare system, reported in late June that “as several surveys and numerous anecdotes show, waiting times in the U.S. are often as bad or worse as those in other industrialized nations — despite the fact that the U.S. spends considerably more per capita on health care than any other country.”
“In fact, numerous individuals from those nations have foregone the medical care in their homeland in favor of medical care here in the states because of the exceptional quality we have.”
Wow numerous individuals. I love argument by anecdote. It always show a bankruptcy of the idea.
“As for the exclusion of illegals you refer to, open your eytes and read a bit more… That exclusion only applies to those who can positively have been determined to have been in the United States for more than five years.”
You are not eligible for the program unless you are a citizen or legal resident.
But hey the right wing loves to beat up on hispanics so I get it. And given how they went 2 to 1 to Democrats and are the fastest growing demographic, who am I to stop a right winger from digging their electoral grave.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 9:50 pm 9:50 pm
“health care for illegal immigrants…….ever heard of ANCHOR babies RYAN???……if they are born in the USA..they are CITIZENS….they come under your welfare program.”
Yes and since they are born in the US and are citizens they are entitled to the rights and benefits that we impart to citizens.
IOW the whole “we’re paying for illegal immigrants” spiel is a lie.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 9:52 pm 9:52 pm
SOCIALISIM1O1
You have a good point, it will be expensive.
Posted by: Tommy | February 4, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
Arrogance and greed + tax cheats and lobbyists = Obama’s administration
Posted by: CW | February 4, 2009, 9:53 pm 9:53 pm
“You’re going to scare them using the ‘S’ word Ryan.”
Scare them?
After watching avid defenses of torture then reactions of horror at insurance programs for children, they scare ME.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 9:54 pm 9:54 pm
“Smoking is a choice. If an adult makes the choice, then ideally, they should stay conscious of the costs incurred- in both actual expense and the eventual health consequences. But ultimately, the individual controls his or her smoking, not the government. It can’t stop addictive pursuits anymore than it can legislate morality.”
Would you like to see gasoline taxed over 2000% to fund cleaner air?
Posted by: Russ | February 4, 2009, 9:55 pm 9:55 pm
Correction: Would you like to see gasoline taxes increased over 2000% to fund cleaner air?
Posted by: Russ | February 4, 2009, 9:56 pm 9:56 pm
“look it up in your FUNK and WAGNALL’s dictionary.”
I haven’t heard that name in years.
Also I thought they did encyclopedias not dictionaries.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 9:57 pm 9:57 pm
Liberals are happy that we are going down the path towards Socialism!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Sara from Arizona | February 4, 2009, 9:59 pm 9:59 pm
Well done Mr. President, you have my most sincere affection and support!
I am SO PROUD of you, President Obama!
YOU GO OBAMA – use YOUR political capital, push through what is good and right, overturn and put a stop to what is wrong and economically unsound policy (it is not only immoral but economically dumb for society to let ANY child in the USA go without health care to the point that they become REALLY sick and burden the emergency rooms, hence more costs down the road).
More than half of us support you, this SCHIP bill is one small victory for us that have worked hard to put you where you are – keep it coming Mr President, I’m loving it!
Next on the agenda, stop sending my tax dollars to fund the WAR MACHINE, no more empire-building across the world, no more illegal bribes to dictators with MY tax money. Keep my money here at home, put it to good use, for the betterment of American people, infrastructure, society.
Posted by: Nicole | February 4, 2009, 10:07 pm 10:07 pm
Finally, thank you Obama for putting MY tax dollars toward good use, rather than sending more pork to the military-industrial complex. Finally, i am at least happy my money is going to constructive things!
Next on the agenda: Slash military pork, slash unecearry nation/empire-building/dictator bribe money. Stop giving expensive military aid and weaponry to forign countries; retool our energy sector and help put America back on the Map – as leader in education, health care, and prosperity.
After 8 years of Republican banana-country rule, Obama is finally putting us on the right path again!
All these ‘socialism’ type comments are completely ignorant!!! You wanna stop socialism?? Stop the immoral bailout of banking fat cats; stop the socialization of losses, but the privatization of profits, and stop the military pork spending!!
Posted by: Nicole | February 4, 2009, 10:13 pm 10:13 pm
Great now social workers will ask kids in school if their parents yell or drink or own a gun and it’s off to “Child protective services” or worse for those kids. Watch “Conspiracy of Silence” and see what “mandatory health screenings” have in store for you and your kids. Go ahead. Watch ten minutes, and see what you find… Children in CPS are ten times more likely to be abused there than in the home. No wonder Hilliary and Obama want “National Health Care” for all…
Posted by: hmn... | February 4, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
According to Michael F. Cannon, director of health-policy studies at the Cato Institute, a free-market think tank, the new law includes kids in families of four earning up to $80,000 per year. But the Congressional Budget Office reports that 77 percent of such children already have private health insurance.
It also discourages work.
According to The Urban Institute:
“A single mother of two earning minimum wage in New Mexico who increased her earnings by $30,000 would find no change in her net income: She would pay an additional $4,000 in taxes and lose $26,000 in SCHIP and other government benefits.”
Great way to destroy the incentive to move up the economic ladder. SCHIP expansion will have all sorts of unintended consequences. It would be fiscally irresponsible even in a good economy. In a bad economy, it invites a lot of abuse. I’m sure we’ll be hearing about that soon enough.
Hope and Change!
Posted by: Stacy | February 4, 2009, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
“Correction: Would you like to see gasoline taxes increased over 2000% to fund cleaner air?”
Of course not. I was just championing the right of smokers to smoke free from governmental interference. I also championed smoking as a conscious choice with an awareness of its impact on health and income. I thought I was clearly advocating free market principle and choice. Perhaps the mindfulness clause of choice put you on the defensive. Oh well, I need to get back to my Forbes and finish today’s edition of the WSJ.
Posted by: Heather | February 4, 2009, 10:23 pm 10:23 pm
Sorry, Nicole but those of us who actually pay taxes aren’t happy about the bill.
Posted by: chattyway | February 4, 2009, 10:25 pm 10:25 pm
Nicole: “Next on the agenda, stop sending my tax dollars to fund the WAR MACHINE…”
Boy, are YOU going to be disappointed!
Posted by: Justin | February 4, 2009, 10:27 pm 10:27 pm
“This bill takes care of illegals up to age 30, thanks Obama for wasting more tax payer money.”
Except that the program is limited to those under the age of 19 and those who are citizens or illegal residents.
The right wing only has lies and scare tactics sprinkled with racism.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 10:28 pm 10:28 pm
“Are babies of illegal immigrants born IN THE UNITED STATES considered to be U.S. CITIZENS by LAW??”
Yes.
And because they are citizens saying we are paying for illegal immigrants is a lie.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 10:30 pm 10:30 pm
Anyone want to come to a Tea Party??????????
Posted by: Sara from Arizona | February 4, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
“.for the record, I am an independent.”
I didn’t call you a Republican. I called you a right winger.
“its about the destruction that socialism certainly brings to all nations it encounters.”
ROFLMAO.
Any more tidbits from the John Birch society?
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 10:38 pm 10:38 pm
President Obama,”This is good.” According to what standard? All this tells me is that our healthcare system is now irretrievably doomed. The Federal government implementing Medicare is what started the downward spiral & this has pretty much sealed our fate.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | February 4, 2009, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
“Again Schip covers those up to age 30.”
And to prove that you linked to another blog comment making the same erroneous claim.
ROFLMAO.
SCHIP is for those under 19 and who are legal residents or citizens.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 10:41 pm 10:41 pm
Sara from Arizona,
Sure, I’ll come to the tea party; but only if you promise to serve scones and clotted cream.
Posted by: Nicole | February 4, 2009, 10:44 pm 10:44 pm
Not that the media is reporting it, but the Mexican government isn’t far from collapse. If they do become a full-fledged narco-state, we’ll see a tidal wave of illegal immigration.
Good thing we’ll have SCHIP available to ease their healthcare burden! It’s crucial we show compassion to the needs of illegal immigrants as our own citizens suffer and our economy edges ever closer to the abyss. Well done, Mr. O!
Posted by: Stacy | February 4, 2009, 10:45 pm 10:45 pm
Nicole ……this is great….you and RYAN C both tout the party line without any idea of the facts…….much less the economic impact………..I will respect you much more if you will just be straight and level with the folks like Ryan C has…..babies born on U.S. SOIL of illegal immigrants are covered by the legislation because BY LAW..they are U.S. CITIZENS. It’s O.K….you can say it.
Posted by: socialism101 | February 4, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Why should I, the taxpayer, pay for the health care and bad habits of others? I have enough of my own problem without giving care to women who give birth to 8 kids (while having 6 more at home with no father or job so to speak) because she wanted one more baby!! Wait and see what government health care will be like…ever been to a county run hospital in a inner city?
Posted by: my two cents | February 4, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
In most states there is children healthcare. The big thing on the federal level is this is another step to nationalized healthcare that puts us in the direction of Europe. Which has been a disaster. I know this is a concern for most parents. I am one my self. But I do know that Nationalized Healthcare will be disastrous to our nation. There should be another method other than having government healthcare.
Posted by: aforefreedom | February 4, 2009, 10:47 pm 10:47 pm
Nicole -you aren’t going to like it very much when this turns into Universal Healthcare and you need your gall bladder out… and you have to wait 6-9 months for the surgery – instead of the 1 week you do now. But if you want to be in pain for the better part of a year, be my guest. I don’t want any part of it.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | February 4, 2009, 10:53 pm 10:53 pm
Anyone want to come to a Tea Party??????????
*******************************************
If the attendees don’t mind discussing issues on a more elevated conservative platform than what is found here. Unfortunately, my conservative sisters and brethren are off platform and wallowing. But alas, Rush replaced William F Buckely long ago, and that vulgar Ann Coulter totally eclipses Peggy Noonan.
Posted by: Heather | February 4, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
And yes, only children under 19 years of age qualify:
Under Section (F) “QUALIFYING CHILDREN DEFINED”
“(A) CONTINUOUS ELIGIBILITY- The State has elected the option of continuous eligibility for a full 12 months for all children described in section 1902(e)(12) under title XIX under 19 years of age, as well as applying such policy under its State child health plan under this title.”
Posted by: Nicole | February 4, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
“Nicole -you aren’t going to like it very much when this turns into Universal Healthcare and you need your gall bladder out… and you have to wait 6-9 months for the surgery – instead of the 1 week you do now.”
Please explain how health insurance is going to increase wait times.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 10:54 pm 10:54 pm
Ryan C – So it’s better to be in Europe & have to wait MONTHS for surgery that you can get in a week here? Somehow, I don’t think so. It’s better to not be able to have a broken leg set in a timely manner, because “you don’t stand for your job, so it doesn’t matter”? I don’t think so.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | February 4, 2009, 10:56 pm 10:56 pm
My son, who lives in Canada, has told me about heath care there. He had to wait over 24 hours to have a hospital look at his broken jaw. He also had to share a room with 4 other people. The Socialist heath care in Canada was very poor compared to the US. This is what we will be heading towards. Just think of the added burden on Doctors and hospitals. My sister who is a nurse in California says that the illegals seeking services have put the hospital to the breaking point. where she is a head nurse. This is a terrible bill.
Posted by: Sara from Arizona | February 4, 2009, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
Ryan C, you obviously didn’t read the bill. There is no provision to exclude the children of illegal aliens.
Posted by: Stacy | February 4, 2009, 10:59 pm 10:59 pm
Ryan,
When Illegals have children here on US soil, don’t the children become US citizens?
Posted by: Sara from Arizona | February 4, 2009, 11:04 pm 11:04 pm
“Ryan C – So it’s better to be in Europe & have to wait MONTHS for surgery that you can get in a week here?”
Actually its better to seek out statistics regarding wait times instead of believing the right wing garbage feed to you.
It also helps to know that Europe does not have the same healthcare system form country to country though many have similar elements.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
The DIRTY litle secret that the LEFT does not want you to know……….ANY child born on U.S. soil is considered to be a U.S. Citizen BY LAW…………….the new legislation covers them………..California is in economic distress………………….be informed before you buy into this propoganda.
Posted by: socialism101 | February 4, 2009, 11:05 pm 11:05 pm
“Ryan C, you obviously didn’t read the bill. There is no provision to exclude the children of illegal aliens.”
Sec 605 of the bill
Nothing in this Act allows Federal payment for individuals who are not legal residents. Titles XI, XIX, and XXI of the Social Security Act provide for the disallowance of Federal financial participation for erroneous expenditures under Medicaid and under CHIP, respectively.
If the child is brnn here, they are citizens of the United States and are the same as you are in that regard.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
Stacy,
YES, there IS a provision to exclude “illegal aliens”
YOU obviously did NOT read the bill:
“SEC. 211. VERIFICATION OF DECLARATION OF CITIZENSHIP OR NATIONALITY FOR PURPOSES OF ELIGIBILITY FOR MEDICAID AND CHIP.”
“(4)(A) A State may elect (in a plan amendment under this title) to provide medical assistance under this title, notwithstanding sections 401(a), 402(b), 403, and 421 of the Personal Responsibility and Work Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, to children and pregnant women who are LAWFULLY residing in the United States (including battered individuals described in section 431(c) of such Act) and who are otherwise eligible for such assistance”
Read it, please, i’m TIRED of republican scum lies!!!!
Are you THAT dense???
Posted by: Nicole | February 4, 2009, 11:07 pm 11:07 pm
“Ryan,
When Illegals have children here on US soil, don’t the children become US citizens?”
Yes. And as citizens they are eligible for the program.
Which is why saying this program is for illegal immigrants is a lie.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 11:08 pm 11:08 pm
“My son, who lives in Canada, has told me about heath care there. He had to wait over 24 hours to have a hospital look at his broken jaw. He also had to share a room with 4 other people.”
And what did this cost your son?
Posted by: Ryan C | February 4, 2009, 11:09 pm 11:09 pm
“Nicole -you aren’t going to like it very much when this turns into Universal Healthcare and you need your gall bladder out… and you have to wait 6-9 months for the surgery – instead of the 1 week you do now. But if you want to be in pain for the better part of a year, be my guest. I don’t want any part of it.”
TYPICAL right-wing lies, scare tactics.
Here are the wait times in the good ‘ol UK where i lived for several years (and where they are “socialists” that believe in universal health care coverage for all citizens:
http://www.performance.doh.gov.uk/waitingtimes/2008/q1/index.html
VERY few people wait more than a couple weeks for big surgeries, further, the RICH always get their way; don’t you know that in most nations that have universal care,the wealthy can opt for private insurance, which puts them in private hospitals, with a private room, and they pay ALOT for ‘private, quick’ service. the Rich never have to wait (i had my private insurance while studying abroad, so i was one of the ‘privileged’, but it warmed my heart when my friend told me that she was so relieved that she didn’t go broke after her mother recieved very affordable life saving operation within a very resaonble time.
Two fools in this country: Those that say the wealthy, or those with private insurance will suffer under universal health care coverage are WRONG: the better-off will never suffer under any system, they can always buy-in private insurance and opt for so-called “better, quicker” care if they are willing to PAY!
and second type of fools: those that say the average citizen will be worse off under universal health care simply does not know the facts:
http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSN07651650
Read all about the USA as worst-performing industrial nation, warms the heart! Thanks repubs!
Posted by: Nicole | February 4, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
Liberals = Socialism.
Posted by: Sara from Arizona | February 4, 2009, 11:19 pm 11:19 pm
Nicole writes:
YES, there IS a provision to exclude “illegal aliens”
YOU obviously did NOT read the bill:
“SEC. 211. VERIFICATION OF DECLARATION OF CITIZENSHIP OR NATIONALITY FOR PURPOSES OF ELIGIBILITY FOR MEDICAID AND CHIP.”
****************************************
Nicole..simple question….are CHILDREN of illegal immigrants born on U.S. soil considered to be U.S. citizens by LAW???
It’s o.k…..we all know the answer…..can you admit that babies of illegal immigrants born on U.S. soil are covered by the legislation??? It is really a simple question that clarifies the debate.
YES__________
NO___________
If you agree that they are in fact COVERED……can you defend the legislation???
Posted by: socialism101 | February 4, 2009, 11:21 pm 11:21 pm
“The DIRTY litle secret that the LEFT does not want you to know……….ANY child born on U.S. soil is considered to be a U.S. Citizen BY LAW…………….the new legislation covers them..”
This is NOT a dirty “liberal” secret. This law has been on the books for, oh let me see, as long as the 14th amendment of the US Constitution has been on the Books!
“The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
The first sentence of the 14th Amendment says:
“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.”
Posted by: Nicole | February 4, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
The elderly have healthcare why shouldn’t children? How many old people do you see refusing Medicaid or SS? Children are our future, invest in those that have productive years left.
Posted by: Hege1321 | February 4, 2009, 11:28 pm 11:28 pm
Chill out people. Unless youre one of the uninsured, you wouldn’t even understand what a relief this is for millions of others. .
Posted by: Miranda | February 4, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Liberals = Socialism.
Conservatives = Third World Dictatorships ruled with military force and think God blesses their greed and hatred. LOL
Posted by: Hege1321 | February 4, 2009, 11:30 pm 11:30 pm
Hege1321 do the “children” include the children of ILLEGAL immigrants that are born on U.S. soil?
Be careful before you buy into this legislation.
Posted by: socialism101 | February 4, 2009, 11:31 pm 11:31 pm
Bush expanded Medicaid drug benefit to enrich the pharmaceuticals…funny when a Republican expands a social programs they are never called Socialists LOL
Posted by: Hege1321 | February 4, 2009, 11:33 pm 11:33 pm
It shouldnt even matter, being an “illegal immigrant” doesnt make you less of a human. Everyone deserves a chance at life and health. Some travel much farther than you’ll ever have to seeking that. Humanity doesn’t end at country borders.
Posted by: Miranda | February 4, 2009, 11:34 pm 11:34 pm
Where is the rest of the story? Where does the funding come from? I heard on NPR that much of it will come from additional taxes on cigarettes. There is a tipping point that makes products profitable on the black market. I am for assuring health care for our children. But doing it in a way that they get sick from contaminated products on the black market would now be more likely. Not to mention it becoming a gateway into the harder substance markets. There has got to be a smarter way to do this. Increasing the crime rate and the percentage of children that are affected by substance dependencies is not the best way to do it. There has got to be safeguards that keep the market value of these substances at a price that makes it unprofitable on the black market.
Posted by: MBell_TX | February 4, 2009, 11:38 pm 11:38 pm
Miranda,
I agree with you; I think part of the UN Declaration on Human Rights claims that it is a human right to migrate to better living conditions…
That said; the POINT is that the LAW Obama signed DOES NOT cover ‘illegals’. It only covers lawful immigrants and citizens, and only gives States the OPTION to even cover immigrants, under Bush, States were FORCED to NOT cover legal immigrants, hence the burden was placed on our nations emergency rooms…
some much for the so-called states’ rights party of ‘compassionate’ conservatism:
Posted by: Nicole | February 4, 2009, 11:39 pm 11:39 pm
MBell_TX,
Don’t black markets make products more expensive…i’m sure the tobacco people will fight tooth an nail against their products entering such below-market prices…
Further, it is basic economics that when taxes are levied on any item, consumption of that item decreases;
in this case, less consumption of cigarettes is good for public health; especially young teen health; and further; another bedrock economic assumption is that since smoking produces NEGATIVE EXTERNALITIES via second-hand smoke, health costs’; loss productivity; etc; taxes are justified to make smokers internationalize the true cost of smoking imposed on others
Posted by: Nicole | February 4, 2009, 11:44 pm 11:44 pm
I didn’t make children I can’t afford to take care of. I shouldn’t have to pay for irresponsible parents, it is your responsibility to pay for your kid’s health care. As long as a responsible person like myself is not paying for someone else’s mistakes, I couldn’t care any less about this plan. If you can’t afford health care for your kids, you shouldn’t have had them and you shouldn’t expect others to pay for your offspring’s needs. Disgusting.
Posted by: Red | February 4, 2009, 11:46 pm 11:46 pm
CE,
This bill has nothing to do with “poor” or “out of luck” parents, that is what welfare is for. If I remember correctly this bill is for parents who make less then 75 grand a year or some amount like that. Which is why Bush vetoed this in the first place, all this is is just another attempt at the government to run more people’s lives. YES! Also, why dont they in the article explain why Bush vetoed it?
Posted by: Dan | February 4, 2009, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
Nicole, Section 211 is MUCH longer than what you posted.
The law allows for immigrants, both legal and illegal, to access SCHIP funds, although illegal immigrants can only do so for 90 days. But 90 days is 90 days. Long enough to rack up some impressive medical bills, eh? It will be abused. Count on it.
From Section 1:
‘(A) The State submits the name and social security number of the individual to the Commissioner of Social Security as part of the program established under paragraph (2).
‘(B) If the State receives notice from the Commissioner of Social Security that the name or social security number, or the declaration of citizenship or nationality, of the individual is inconsistent with information in the records maintained by the Commissioner–
‘(i) the State makes a reasonable effort to identify and address the causes of such inconsistency, including through typographical or other clerical errors, by contacting the individual to confirm the accuracy of the name or social security number submitted or declaration of citizenship or nationality and by taking such additional actions as the Secretary, through regulation or other guidance, or the State may identify, and continues to provide the individual with medical assistance while making such effort; and
‘(ii) in the case such inconsistency is not resolved under clause (i), the State–
‘(I) notifies the individual of such fact;
‘(II) provides the individual with a period of 90 days from the date on which the notice required under subclause (I) is received by the individual to either present satisfactory documentary evidence of citizenship or nationality (as defined in section 1903(x)(3)) or resolve the inconsistency with the Commissioner of Social Security (and continues to provide the individual with medical assistance during such 90-day period); and
‘(III) disenrolls the individual from the State plan under this title within 30 days after the end of such 90-day period if no such documentary evidence is presented or if such inconsistency is not resolved.
Posted by: Stacy | February 4, 2009, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
socialism101,
Do you deny that the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution states that all people born on US soil are American citizens?
Do you deny that the US Constitution says this?
Posted by: Nicole | February 4, 2009, 11:49 pm 11:49 pm
Stacy,
You point is moot. 90 days is 90 days. It is meant to cut lawful immigrants and citizens a break – meaning id there is some discrepancy in the match-up between names in the database and documentation, as it has been known to happen, then the child does not have to wait weeks before they can get the rightful care due to them..
and if it is determined that the child is not here legally, the illegal parents will then go back to doing things as they did under the Republicans…they will go to the emergency room with their sick children, instead, and they will continue to work in unregulated, slave-wage labor conditions, employers will continues to pay the ‘guest’ worker taxes, and big business will hum along happily.
Posted by: Nicole | February 4, 2009, 11:54 pm 11:54 pm
My taxes paying for healthcare for people who broke the law and are here illegally. This makes me ill.
Posted by: Sara from Arizona | February 5, 2009, 12:07 am 12:07 am
Bad deal for those who smoke.
Posted by: Sara from Arizona | February 5, 2009, 12:15 am 12:15 am
Nicole asks:
Do you deny that the 14th Amendment to the US Constitution states that all people born on US soil are American citizens?
Do you deny that the US Constitution says this?
***************************************
NO..I agree..thank you……this is what I have been asking YOU and Ryan C to admit ALL NIGHT……you did not want to go here…………..the new legislation covers the CHILDREN of illegal immigrants that are born on U.S. soil………………………you have failed to admit this (until now)and you have failed to tell the American people why they should pay for health care of children of illegal immigrants born on U.S. soil.
Posted by: socialism101 | February 5, 2009, 12:19 am 12:19 am
socialism101 writes:
“NO..I agree..thank you……this is what I have been asking YOU and Ryan C to admit ALL NIGHT……you did not want to go here…………..the new legislation covers the CHILDREN of illegal immigrants that are born on U.S. soil………………………you have failed to admit this (until now)and you have failed to tell the American people why they should pay for health care of children of illegal immigrants born on U.S. soil.”
socialism101 ,
If you agree that 14th Amendment to the US Constitution states that all people born on US soil are American citizens, then this bill does not merely cover the children of legal and illegal immigrants, it covers the current CITIZENS of the USA – children born on USA soil, no matter who their parents are, are lawful American citizens.
I object to you calling children who are American citizens “children of illegals” as it does not matter what their parents are; THEY, the children, if born in the USA, are lawful American citizens.
Don’t like what the Constitution says? Then convince people to change it
Posted by: Nicole | February 5, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am
“Bad deal for those who smoke. ”
And the Republicans’ baby, women, and child-hating policies are a bad deal for everyone else. Boo hoo.
Posted by: Nicole | February 5, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am
Something seriously wrong with this picture. People are losing their jobs, their homes, struggling to stay afloat, so of course let’s raise taxes. Perfect solution.
Posted by: Sara from Arizona | February 5, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am
Nicole writes:
Don’t
***************************************
We weren’t talking about the constitution….we were talking about the SCHIP legislation…..not found in the Constitution by the way…….when confronted by the fact that the SCHIP legislation covers the children of ILLEGAL immigrants, you cloak your arguments in the very Constitution that condemns the SCHIP legislation….you want us to believe that it is for the “uninsured children”…..you just “forgot” to mention that the SCHIP legislation covers the children of illegal immigrants…..a MAJOR problem with the economics of funding it………….I guess you haven’t been following the current economic woes of California……… I have no problem with the 14th amendment….my problem is with the LEFT such as yourself who try and hide the fact that SCHIP covers the children of illegal immigrants (born on U.S. soil).
Posted by: socialism101 | February 5, 2009, 12:42 am 12:42 am
Oh, to see the GOP implode – pure greed, on one side, fighting against pure racism, on the other. Oh my!
Is there a reason Bush opposed immigration reform?
Big Business Republicans want the illegal immigrants because they provide a cheap source of labor for many industries.
BUSH SAID: “For decades, the United States has not been in complete control of its borders. As a result, many who want to work in our economy have been able to sneak across our border, and millions have stayed.”
Here’s what Bush wouldn’t admit: that the gang of which he’s a charter member, wanted those porous borders.
They wanted them because the flow of illegals drove down real wages across the board in the United States in agriculture, the building trades, the domestic trades, the food service and hospitality trades and a whole host of other industries that counted their fortunes on Wall Street while their laborers worked harder for less and the minimum wage remained stagnant since 1997.
Now having outsourced enough American labor to be noticed, the GOP gang of Robber Barons has a problem and it’s not economic — it’s good old fashioned American racism!
Oh, to see the GOP implode – pure greed fighting against pure racism. Oh my! Dog eat dog! Let the feasting begin!
Posted by: PA | February 5, 2009, 12:47 am 12:47 am
“Baby hating policies”, you mean like those not pro-life.
Posted by: Sara from Arizona | February 5, 2009, 12:53 am 12:53 am
I think this is great and for the record the taxes that are being raised are tobacco taxes so whoever said that was wrong needs to read up a little better on the subject. tobacco is bad for the health anyways so to raise those taxes to in turn recieve a great health program it is a smart decision
Posted by: cassi | February 5, 2009, 12:59 am 12:59 am
Just b/c the words ?children’s health insurance” were attached to this bill everyone thinks it’s the right thing to do-WRONG! This is for families making $80,000 who do not have insurance on their kids. this program was intended for the the poor. I sure as hell don’t wanna pay for somebody’s kid if the parent’s make that much money & rtoo irresponsible to get healthcare for their kid do you? But you will now!
Posted by: dntvot4hm | February 5, 2009, 2:06 am 2:06 am
There’ll not be one incumbent re-elected for another term after these bozo’s get done spending all this money with no hope of paying it back in 3 generations. Do you need health care. Sure, pay for it. Just yesterday a bicyclist was turned down for care at 14 different hospitals in Japan. They have had socialized health care there for many years but there was no place to put him. 14 hospitals refused care to a man who dies at the 15th hospital. There weren’t enough doctors and/or bed spaces to accommodate one more patient. There’s not reason why any one would wish to become a doctor if he is not generously paid for his services. Ask a Canadian. She’s a health care professional here in the states but left Canada to make 5 times her net Canadian salary. American liberals are out of their socialistic minds. Seig Heil, America. It’s coming.
Posted by: WhatChange? | February 5, 2009, 5:52 am 5:52 am
dntvot4hm sure raise taxes for smokers but please since it is a way to fund insurance can we please share the burden of raised taxes? I want all cookies, chips,snacks , hamburgers, fast food, BEER, Soda, taxed as well .
After all that is unhealthy too……
Posted by: DS | February 5, 2009, 6:09 am 6:09 am
Nicole said “And the Republicans’ baby, women, and child-hating policies ” Republican policies are NOT baby, women, and child-hating. They are pro-self reliance, meaning you keep your money & take care of yourself and your family.
Posted by: ellsbells930 | February 5, 2009, 6:29 am 6:29 am
Hege1321 said “The elderly have healthcare why shouldn’t children? How many old people do you see refusing Medicaid or SS?” Why would they refuse it? They are just getting back the money they put in to the system. That being said, Medicare & SS are two of the WORST programs the Federal government has ever created. SS is the largest Ponzi scheme in the world. Medicare is the cause of the mess our healthcare system is in today. Why should we perpetuate that?
Posted by: ellsbells930 | February 5, 2009, 6:34 am 6:34 am
The problem with government programs like these is they never end up serving only whom they are intended to serve. People will, by nature, take advantage of the program who probably don’t need it.
I would rather they had just brought back nurses in schools, I think it would have been way cheaper and far less susceptible to being abused.
But history will tell how this turns out. Hopefully it won’t be in the same conversation of disappointment our children have with SS and Medicare.
Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 9:21 am 9:21 am
Hey, does this mean that they will cut the smoking cessation funding out of the bailout? This is insanity. How will you pay for this then if everyone quits?
Posted by: Tommy | February 5, 2009, 9:51 am 9:51 am
When will the hypocrisy cease republicans.
While they are in the womb….you speak for them … your scream for them….. you chant for them …. your march for them … you fight for them
once they are born
the hell with them…..
Posted by: Omentum | February 5, 2009, 10:45 am 10:45 am
“Nothing in this Act allows Federal payment for individuals who are not legal residents. Titles XI, XIX, and XXI of the Social Security Act provide for the disallowance of Federal financial participation for erroneous expenditures under Medicaid and under CHIP, respectively.”
Ryan_C,
This is typical Run around the document tree BS. I lost count how many times I saw you post that little quote. Do you have any idea what those sections are? Try reading them!
The question here is exactly HOW do you PROVE you eligible for these benefits? I do assume you are against illegals accessing this program…right?
Stop for a moment and actually think about this. The government can not track billions of dollars it just gave to legal companies here in our own country. Social security fraud is a huge problem in this country. Do you honestly think ILLEGAL aliens are going to obey the law????
Instead of citing those 3 sections in a document that most law students would pull their hair out trying to understand, This would have been much easier!!! -> From the SS Handbook..
1725.2 How do you prove that you are a U.S. citizen?
You may be a citizen of the U.S. by birth or by naturalization. Acceptable evidence is a birth certificate showing birth within the U.S. Other acceptable evidence of U.S. citizenship includes:
Form N-550 and N-570 (Certificate of Naturalization issued by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS));
A U.S. passport issued by the U.S. Department of State (DOS);
Form I-197 (U.S. Citizen Identification Card issued by INS);
Form FS-240 (Report of Birth Abroad of a Citizen of the U.S. issued by DOS);
Form FS-545 (Certification of Birth issued by a foreign service post);
Form N-560 and N-561 (Certificate of Citizenship issued by INS); or
Form DS-1350 (Certification of Report of Birth issued by DOS).
This is a better definition, but it does not cover how we should handle the case of an illegal entering the country just to give birth so the kid gains “citizenship” status.
It is insane for this legislation to leave any opening for US taxpayers to support children born here in that way!
By the way, Stacy’s post about sec 211 is dead on!
Curious with all your continious posts abot sec. 605, you never once brought up 211, which is the real text of the bill that is applicable to this issue!
There is inherently a 90-day out that as Stacy correctly pointed out, will be abused to the tune of billions & billions.
The bottom line here is Obama just signed a law that gives illegal aliens the ability to apply for child healthcare with just a SSN. If the SSN is invalid, they get the 90-days of benefits ANYWAYS!i
For all tohse who think this bill is a good thing, Is there something inherently broken in your brains??? Do you not understand the built-in disaster that exists here???
Posted by: Mike_C | February 5, 2009, 11:25 am 11:25 am
I AM SO ANGRY!
Tom Daschle, and Nancy Killefer are two of the finest, and most competent public servants you could possibly hope for in these appointments. They have been assassinated by the Washington healthcare lobby through their paid Bush Republican henchmen in congress. These Bush republicans are the same people blocking the economic recovery plan put forth by the Obama administration.
I am BURNING MAD America. And you should be too. Tome Daschle and Nancy Killefer were exactly what we needed to help turn this country around and fix our economy, and catastrophic healthcare crisis.
If I were their boss I would tell them to get right back to Washington. And dare congress to not approve them. How ridiculous is it to reject highly qualified people that this country needs just because they made a mistake on their taxes. Don’t stand for that anymore America. They apologized, and paid their taxes, and that should be it. Their country needs them. But President Obama has to do what he thinks is best. I understand that. I’M JUST SO MAD at the anti American Bush Republicans.
Like many of you I have been trying to enjoy the after glow of this Beautiful historic election. But I see that the republicans in congress and their cohorts aren’t going to be good sports, and LOSER’S!
SO BE IT!
In spite of President Obama’s repeated offers, and gestures of collegiality to Republicans. Bush Republicans have seized upon every opportunity to stab President Obama in the back. And by doing so they are stabbing you, and the rest of the American people in the back. Well, you don’t have to put up with that. And you shouldn’t put up with that. President Obama has only been on the job two weeks. And he inherited two wars, and the worst economy since the great depression.
We had an election. And president Obama, and the democrats won BIG. And Bush Republicans lost miserably!
The Bush Republicans are the ones responsible for the worst economic crisis since the great depression. And the Bush Republicans are responsible for the worst healthcare crisis in American history. A healthcare crisis that is killing hundreds of thousands of you every year. Rich, middle class, and poor a like. Insured, and uninsured. Men, women, children, and babies.
President Obama, and the Democrats should take back all the concessions they granted the Bush Republicans, and tell them to put up! or shut up!
Everyone, start calling and contacting these Bush Republicans and tell them to stop blocking President Obama, and the Democrats recovery plan. And stop trying to block, and corrupt healthcare reform. Tell them to get on board with President Obama and the Democrats, or GET OUT!!
If these Bush Republicans refuse to cooperate I want all of you to immediately begin the process of removing them from office by every legal means possible. Including impeachment, and recall. I want you to bring the full weight and power of the movement down on their heads that swept President Obama, and the Democrats into control of the whitehouse, and congress. Take no prisoners. Use all the techniques you learned over this past historic election. Be flexible, creative, adaptable, and relentless like you were in the past.
To my cyber warriors I call on you again. You are among the best and the brightest. I call on you to move this fight from the cyber world to the living rooms, dens, and work places of the voters these Bush Republicans misrepresent. I know I can count on you. This is a fight worth fighting.
To my fellow World citizens. As an American I invite, and welcome you and your advise, input, and help. By delaying Americas recovery, and healthcare reform, these Bush Republicans are delaying our commitment to your recovery, and to being the better America for you that we aspire too.
I had hoped it would not come to this after our historic election. I had hoped that the Bush Republicans would respect the overpowering will of the people, and the World. But I guess not. All the Bush Republicans really care about is them-selves. Well, SO BE IT! Lets finish the job.
Sincerely
jacksmith — Working Class :-)
Posted by: jacksmith | February 5, 2009, 11:32 am 11:32 am
“once they are born
the hell with them….. ”
Its blanket, one liners like this that make you come across as just a partisan hack.
Republicans and Democrats want the same thing, both want good heath care for kids. They differ on the METHOD to achieve that.
I’ve been in the military 12 years, I’ve lived government health care most of my life. While it’s not all that bad, it’s not nearly as good as what my wife gets in the commercial sector. But, since it’s free, I use it. Why would I pay for my own health care elsewhere even when its better?
This is what happens over time with all government programs. Check out the health care websites in Germany. There is a link for those with private insurance and those with government insurance. The two web pages are completely different, even the office you visit is completely different. The private insurance treatment is also far better and timely.
So the end result is not good health care for our children, its Bureaucratic meritocracy forcing us to accept what they give us.
And in the end, only the rich receive the best health care. The rest of us settle with what the government gives us.
How different is that?
Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 11:33 am 11:33 am
Jacksmith,
Your rant is really quite telling. Endemic of what seems to be a growing portion of America that believes when a Democrat steps on it, somehow it was a Republican that pushed it in front of him to step on, as If Democrats can never do any wrong.
The facts are those people screwed up, even Obama admitted a screw up, yet you blame the other party for their screw up? Your rant is illogical and largely absent from reality. The fact that you are so upset about it is also disturbing.
If you stub your toe, do you blame Bush too?
Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 11:38 am 11:38 am
This is bad for tax payers and for those of us who have private health insurance… By the time Obama’s time in office is up in 4 years, I’ll have no health insurance but I’ll be paying for everyone else in this country illegally to have great medical care… Those of you who voted for him… No complaining now… You wanted him and now you’ve got him!!!!!!!!
Posted by: Kristen | February 5, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
Why dont we start drug testing people on foodstamps and take the State money we save from the ones that fail and pay for this.STOP taxing people who smoke.If I have to pay $5.00 a pack I should be able to smoke wereever the hell I want!!!!!
Posted by: Kevin | February 5, 2009, 12:25 pm 12:25 pm
Anyone who believes (like ‘jacksmith’) that Republicans caused the current economic conditions is blindly following their fellow Democrats and the useless main stream media. A huge part of the problem is the mortgage/housing issue, which goes back a few years to when the Democrats were warned about the way Fannie & Freddie were doing business, but the Democrats ignored the warning. Now the result of their ignorance is clear. I wish for once that someone would take as much time researching a topic to learn the facts about it as they do to write uninformed and ridiculous posts all over the place. I truly have no patience for stupid people… it’s their own fault.
Posted by: Citizen | February 5, 2009, 12:34 pm 12:34 pm
“A huge part of the problem is the mortgage/housing issue, which goes back a few years to when the Democrats were warned about the way Fannie & Freddie were doing business, but the Democrats ignored the warning.”
Let’s not forget that the Republicans ignored the warning just as much, and it was the Democrats that passed regulations first.
Posted by: Skip | February 5, 2009, 12:47 pm 12:47 pm
“Republican policies are NOT baby, women, and child-hating. They are pro-self reliance, meaning you keep your money & take care of yourself and your family”
Can we translate that into just ‘Selfish’?
Posted by: Skip | February 5, 2009, 12:51 pm 12:51 pm
“Can we translate that into just ‘Selfish’?”
I think self absorbed would be a better term.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 5, 2009, 12:55 pm 12:55 pm
Can anyone produce evidence that a child has been denied health care? Just curious. I’m too lazy to look.
Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 12:56 pm 12:56 pm
Skip,
When did Dems pass regulation? and howw many times did Bumbling Barney Frank organize opposition to Bush & Republican efforts to regulate Freddie/Fannie ?
He is the same clown who takes every opportunity to still slam Bush when a microphone/camera is infront of his face, yet wont admit his own involvement in all this.
If he were a Republican, every nighttime news magazine show in the mainstream media would have done a huge investigative story on him & his involvement!
The fact that he is still involved in writing things like this pork pile “stimulus” package and now the ‘new’ TARP bill is ridiculus.
The pork that he & Pelosi filled up the stimulus bill has been exposed and is now forcing major rewrites as the senate at least attempts to put together a bill the American people wont choke on!
Posted by: Mike_C | February 5, 2009, 12:57 pm 12:57 pm
“and howw many times did Bumbling Barney Frank organize opposition to Bush & Republican efforts to regulate Freddie/Fannie ?”
ROFLMAO.
The Republican controlled both houses of Congress so they had the votes and controlled the chairs to bring the agenda for it.
Just so we’re clear the GOP was able to ram thru their tax cuts but when it came to regulations they now say were needed they could not be bothered to even take it to the floor to vote on.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 5, 2009, 1:16 pm 1:16 pm
“You know or should know the intent of the 14th Amendment.”
Intent is for the courts to argue and they have held up being born in the United States equals citizenship every time.
“It was NOT to give citizenship to children of illegal aliens who came into the country solely for the purpose of giving birth on American soil!”
Geee I guess the millions of Irish that were streaming into this country were completely unnoticed or the millions of Chinese for that matter and no one realized that we were giving those illegal immigrants’ children citizenship.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 5, 2009, 1:22 pm 1:22 pm
LOL,…I had not even gotten a chance to say just how incredibly hypocritical it is to fund children’s health care by taxing a substance that the same group of liberals say kills thousands of people every year! Now we are saying even “third-hand” smoke is killing people.
If tobbaco products are this dangerous, just make them illegal !
OOPS….can’t do that, we collect to much money from selling those “death sticks” !!!!!!
LOL…I thought Obama PROMISED NOT TO RAISE THE TAXES ON THE MIDDLE CLASS !!!!
Posted by: Mike_C | February 5, 2009, 1:23 pm 1:23 pm
“I had not even gotten a chance to say just how incredibly hypocritical it is to fund children’s health care by taxing a substance that the same group of liberals say kills thousands of people every year! Now we are saying even “third-hand” smoke is killing people.”
How is it hypocritical?
Raising the price of cigarettes leads to more people quitting and fewer people starting.
It serves the goal of reducing smoking while funding children’s health insurance.
That’s called win-win.
“If tobbaco products are this dangerous, just make them illegal !”
Prohibition doesn’t work.
Didn’t work with alcohol and it doesn’t work with drugs.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 5, 2009, 1:26 pm 1:26 pm
“How is it hypocritical? ”
DUH….. Healthcare funded by one of the largest causes for increases in the cost of healthcare!!!
if you want to believe the direction we are now headed, tobacco will soon be targeted by many organizations for illegal status. In the past year or so stories are coming forward about people being told they cant smoke in the own residences!
Quite a bit different from alcohol!
Posted by: Mike_C | February 5, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
“Geee I guess the millions of Irish that were streaming into this country were completely unnoticed or the millions of Chinese for that matter and no one realized that we were giving those illegal immigrants’ children citizenship.”
Not sure the analogy is close enough to compare. Most of the Irish and Chinese you speak of came over by boat and were far easier to account for through the immigration process. I doubt hardly any of them were illegal. Back then the laws were different, but the most common way they were denied entry in the US was because of infectious diseases. That was the basis of all our immigrant laws.
Today with the porous southern border, those laws are circumvented, leading to illegal status, which is different.
Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
“It serves the goal of reducing smoking while funding children’s health insurance.
That’s called win-win.”
BIG problem here. As more people quit, less money to pay for child health care… then what? Your attaching a growing cost to a dwindling income. That’s just plain stupid.
This program will be bankrupt in 2 years.
Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 2:43 pm 2:43 pm
If Bush was against it, then I know I am for it !!! 8 years of that administration and some of you still don’t get it. Guess it’s going to take YOUR job being on the next closings list.
Posted by: Lisa | February 5, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
“It serves the goal of reducing smoking while funding children’s health insurance.
That’s called win-win.”
Not to mention that using taxes to influence behavior is the doorway to abusive government. That is wrong and should be illegal.
Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Yes, this IS the change we’ve been waiting for and look forward to more.
Posted by: T.Smith | February 5, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
BIG problem here. As more people quit, less money to pay for child health care… then what? Your attaching a growing cost to a dwindling income. That’s just plain stupid.
This program will be bankrupt in 2 years.
—————————-
KR,
Exactly,…but there is nothing hypocritical about that….according to the liberals!
I can’t wait to see what Pelosi/Reid & Crew decide to do about oversight on this one!!!!
Posted by: Mike_C | February 5, 2009, 3:21 pm 3:21 pm
“Not to mention that using taxes to influence behavior is the doorway to abusive government. That is wrong and should be illegal.”
So it should be illegal to use taxes to influence behavior.
I guess that kills Republican tax credit ideas for stimulus. After all tax credits are using taxes to influence behavior.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 5, 2009, 3:32 pm 3:32 pm
“BIG problem here. As more people quit, less money to pay for child health care… then what? Your attaching a growing cost to a dwindling income. That’s just plain stupid.”
The goal is to reduce smoking while funding childrens health insurance.
When a point is reached where the tobacco taxes are not enough to fund this, other revenue streams will have to be found or the program will have to be scaled back or cut.
“This program will be bankrupt in 2 years.”
Hmmm since its a ten year old program that has been running on tobacco taxes I doubt that will happen.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 5, 2009, 3:35 pm 3:35 pm
“I guess that kills Republican tax credit ideas for stimulus.”
Surely it would, but then maybe we’d all think about a flat tax instead of using the tax system like some lever to pull when you don’t like the way things are?
I’d be quite for that. At least I’d know what my taxes are this year cause as of right now, I don’t have a clue.
Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
“When a point is reached where the tobacco taxes are not enough to fund this, other revenue streams will have to be found or the program will have to be scaled back or cut. ”
Thats rich. Scaled back or cut.
You are right about other revenue streams. It’s called your wallet.
Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
“Hmmm since its a ten year old program that has been running on tobacco taxes I doubt that will happen.”
hmm what did he sign then if this thing has been in for 10 years?
Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
“Not sure the analogy is close enough to compare. Most of the Irish and Chinese you speak of came over by boat and were far easier to account for through the immigration process.”
Millions came over and the only federal law was the submission of passenger lists. States were in charge of immigration.
So during a time when many quarters of this country felt besieged by the new waves of immigrants with a different religion or racial background, Congress and the states still decided that anyone born on US soil is a citizen regardless of parentage.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 5, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
“hmm what did he sign then if this thing has been in for 10 years?”
This is an expansion of the program.
You made a blanket statement that health insurance based on tobacco taxes was doomed to fail in short order.
When in fact the program has been chugging along on tobacco taxes for 10 years now.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 5, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
“Thats rich. Scaled back or cut.”
Oh I agree. The program is likely to be so popular there is no way it will be cut. That’s why you keep trying to attach illegal immigration to it. Gets the right wing’s racist wing all fired up.
“You are right about other revenue streams. It’s called your wallet.”
And I will gladly pay taxes for children’s health insurance.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 5, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
“I’d be quite for that. At least I’d know what my taxes are this year cause as of right now, I don’t have a clue.”
The flat tax is a regressive tax as its impact upon those with less income is much greater than those will a great deal of income.
Right wingers love it because they see it as “starving the beast” to quote Norquist along with allowing rich people to accumulate more and more wealth and power.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 5, 2009, 3:59 pm 3:59 pm
Ryan,
At some point your going to realize you lost!
Yes, the children are citizens, but at that time, people were expected to make it on their own!
Guess what, there was no printing of government documents in a foreign language. The people were expected to learn ENGLISH! If they needed a doctor, but could not afford one, they either didnt go, or they gave up other things to help pay for the doctors services!
America was an OPPORTUNITY, NOT A HAND OUT!
Now if you can manage to get back to reality here, I still dont see where you have admitted this bill is seriously flawed and ripe for astronomical amounts of fraud!
Your attempts at trying to draw parallels between the immigrants of 1800’s and today’s illegal aliens are an insult to those people who came here and worked hard for they got!
Posted by: Mike_C | February 5, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
“The flat tax is a regressive tax as its impact upon those with less income is much greater than those will a great deal of income.”
Interesting. Have you looked at the Tax systems of the former communist block countries, including Russia? All rejecting Carl Marx progressive taxation and adopting flat tax principles? If Russia abandoned Marx, why don’t we? Obviously it didn’t work for them.
“The program is likely to be so popular there is no way it will be cut.”
So popular because people will become dependent on it, and thus dependent on Government. That’s proven good practice in history huh?
“This is an expansion of the program.”
So… we going to expand smokers too? Hard to believe this logic escapes you.
“And I will gladly pay taxes for children’s health insurance.”
And that should be your choice, not force the rest of the country to conform to your choices. Free country right? Make it a choice whether you pay into it or not. Novel idea?
Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
And I will gladly pay taxes for children’s health insurance.
————————————-
Ryan C,
If your willing to pay for any child’s heathcare, then I assume you are ready to jump on board and pay for 3 meals a day, comfortable housing, free education….and then provide them with a ready made job rght after college!
Posted by: Mike_C | February 5, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
“At some point your going to realize you lost!”
How did I lose?
You guys want to create a 2nd class citizenry in direct violation of the 14th amendment.
“Yes, the children are citizens, but at that time, people were expected to make it on their own!”
You may not have noticed but the country has rejected the idea of a government that does not assist the people a long time ago.
“Your attempts at trying to draw parallels between the immigrants of 1800’s and today’s illegal aliens are an insult to those people who came here and worked hard for they got!”
Your failure to realize that immigrants of today illegal and otherwise break their backs as much as the immigrants of 150 years is something I can’t help you with.
So is it the skin color?
Posted by: Ryan C | February 5, 2009, 4:51 pm 4:51 pm
“You guys want to create a 2nd class citizenry in direct violation of the 14th amendment. ”
No, we want the law to be followed and ensure that legal citizens are the only ones to recieve public treasury funds. Is that asking too much, or does the law not really matter?
As far as those who jump the border to have their kids so they can be US citizens, obviously there is something wrong with that. I would be in favor of changing the law to citizenship be granted at birth from those of legal status. I don’t think that is unreasonable. My wife came here through all the legal methods and it ticks her off that others don’t and get the same benefits. Why follow the law if the law is not followed?
Posted by: KR | February 5, 2009, 5:42 pm 5:42 pm
“No, we want the law to be followed and ensure that legal citizens are the only ones to recieve public treasury funds. Is that asking too much, or does the law not really matter?”
And these children by definition are legal citizens.
You cannot deny them services because of their parents.
Its a violation of the equal protection clause.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 5, 2009, 7:17 pm 7:17 pm
RE: Obama signs SCHIPS.
Editor:
I live in California, ground zero and the welfare state for illegal aliens.
According to Assemblyman Chuck DeVore, member of the State Budget Committee, it costs Californians $10.5 Billion a year to educate, medicate and incarcerate illegal alines. We have a deficit over $42 Billion!
Carmen
Posted by: Carmen | February 6, 2009, 12:16 pm 12:16 pm
We have a Constitution. There is a 10th Amendment that states: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
Obama has already violated his oath of office and needs to be tried for treason, as do most Democrats and Republicans in Washington.
Posted by: Howard Pierce | February 7, 2009, 3:16 pm 3:16 pm
In my opinion, our Governor should clear California of all of these illegal alien from coming to this state draining all the resources. They should be sent back to their own country. We do not owe them anything. The are leaches. Americans are not getting jobs any more because those people are getting the jobs that Americans should get. California is in a mess because they have such the life out of this state, and they get every thing free where as our citizens cannot reap the benifits that our fore fathers and mothers worked so hard for.
Send those people back before California sinks
Posted by: louise | February 19, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
What Obama supporters fail to realize is that. 47 % of he country did NOT. I repeat do NOT vote for Obama. Of those 47 % my opinion is most of them want Obama to fail. I’m counting down the years and months already. You people have raised Obama’s bar so high. He can do nothing but fail. With this tobbaco tax, PROVES our president is a socialist. This is just the first of many taxes coming down the pike. So you don’t smoke huh? Wait for taxes on tires to go up, in the name of road contruction costs. To be silly for sec. How about Obama raise taxes in candy bars, so he can start up a new Obesity program. Don’t you Obama supporters get it yet? EVERY socialist program this guy creates, will be funded by YOU! It’s called taxing one group to pay for another group. Smokers are just the start. America Obama supporters or not better wake up and smell the communism!
Posted by: Mark F | March 16, 2009, 6:17 am 6:17 am
Well….it seem like we have a memmory loss out there…..Weapons of mass destruction….lets go to war…Government keep your hands off the businesses. When the ever so wise leaders WATCHED wall street fall and America crumble. The Republicans did NOTHING ! They Dominated BOTH HOUSES ! You who are shouting the most gained the least from Bush which was Higher intrest rated more work and less pay. Then after you got the hell worked out of you they sent your job over seas and said thanks for the vote now get out of my face. Geniuses the time to scream at Washington was when the crook was in office not after he’s gone. The only 2 presidents who inherited a bigger mess than President Obama was Lincoln and FDR.
Posted by: Cornbread | August 30, 2010, 8:46 am 8:46 am