Official: Obama Accomplished More in 30 Days Than Any President in Modern History
"President Obama has accomplished more in 30 days than any president in modern history," a senior White House official said this morning in a background briefing for TV reporters.
Pointing to legislation on children’s health insurance and the "Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act," and most especially the stimulus bill, the official compared President Obama favorably to Presidents Reagan, Clinton and Bush, pointing out that the previous presidents’ major economic bills were all months away from becoming enacted into law at this point in their presidencies.
"He has a set of wins under his belt" as he comes to address a joint session of Congress this evening, the senior White House official said, contrasting the president with Bill Clinton, who at this point in his presidency had been dealing with the gays in the military controversy, with passage of Family Medical Leave as a legislative win.
Obama, conversely, can point to a $787 billion bill that made major changes in energy, education and tax policies, the official said, describing the bill as a "major paydown" on what candidate Obama ran on.
The provisions in the bill promoting energy independence, the official said, constitute "the largest energy independence investment policy ever in the U.S.," and maybe even in the world.
Recent polls by ABC News/Washington Post, CBS News/New York Times, and others showing the president with high approval ratings is "earned," the official said. "This isn’t just the afterglow of the inauguration."
The official had beckoned us to his/her office to give us some context and preview tonight’s address.
The President, the official said, "will have an integrated approach" to the economic solutions he has proposed, discussing how all of the proverbial legs of the stool — financial stabilization, stimulus, regulatory reform, credit markets — are necessary for a recovery.
The message and tone: "We will get through this economic hardship," the official said. "Here are the actions necessary to take to do so."
Previously when "Americans have faced challenges we have pulled together and done the tough things necessary," the official said. "America has gotten through it together."
He will "acknowledge the difficulty of the moment, but he says optimistically that we can get through it" by honoring the values of "responsibility, accountability and a set of common interests."
"Every time the U.S. has measured up," the official said. But "it’s time to own up. You can’t just kick the can down the road for another administration to deal with."
Despite a jittery Wall Street, the official said the president will not specifically address the banking industry, or those who run the financial system. Rather, he will "paint a picture of stability in the financial system and what it means to all of us."
There will be "big stuff" in the speech on four main topics: education, health care, energy independence and the fiscal situation, all addressed with the theme of responsibility.
The format for these big issues will largely be "here’s what we’ve accomplished; here’s what we need to do to press to the goal line."
For instance, on health care, the president will discuss the State Children’s Health Insurance Program which he recently signed into law giving four million additional children health insurance. He will discuss the measures in the stimulus bill that add billions to assist the unemployed with health insurance, and the investments in health care technology being made that will ultimately achieve cost savings. And then the president will discuss additional measures he feels the U.S. needs to take on the issue.
The president will not discuss specific hard choices he supports, the official said, such as specific cuts in Social Security necessary to ensure future solvency of the program. This speech wouldn’t be the right time for that.
Afghanistan and other foreign policy issues will be mentioned — especially what the U.S. owes to its troops — but mostly the president will address those issues in a speech on Iraq to be given in the next few days. On national service, the president will call for congressional action on a bill promoting national service offered by Sens. Ted Kennedy, D-Mass., and Orrin Hatch, R-Utah.
"It’s not just a bee hive of activity," the official said. "We’re moving out on all fronts because this point in time requires energy, purpose and clarity."
- jpt
Email
Rick Santorum Sweeps 3 States
Pentagon to Open Additional Jobs to Women
He seems to value getting it done first over getting it done right. The people who invest in the nation’s future have determined quite forcefully that he has got it wrong.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 24, 2009, 1:27 pm 1:27 pm
Yes he has done More In 30 Days more then what Bush did in 8 years, And I got to say at least He cares more about this Country and where its going then Bush ever Did. All W cared about was War,And Iraq. Maybe if Bush was More of A President and Actually Payed a Little more Attention to this Country we Might not be in the Mess were in! Keep up the Good work President Obama!
Posted by: Angie | February 24, 2009, 1:30 pm 1:30 pm
“President Obama has accomplished more in 30 days than any president in modern history,”
Translation: Isn’t the President awesomely awesome?
Mr Tapper, could you please give us the name of this official who is working for the President’s Department of Propaganda?
Posted by: David in San Diego | February 24, 2009, 1:31 pm 1:31 pm
jpt quotes unnamed Obama shill, er, “official”:
“The president will not discuss specific hard choices he supports, the official said, such as specific cuts in Social Security necessary to ensure future solvency of the program. This speech wouldn’t be the right time for that.”
Hahaha. It’s gonna be another … campaign speech, huh? Well, good luck with THAT.
Posted by: Hardly Choices | February 24, 2009, 1:32 pm 1:32 pm
“We’re moving out on all fronts because this point in time requires energy, purpose and clarity.”
Where have I heard that before?
“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”
Rahm, is that you?
Or, is it German Interior Minister Wolfgang Schäuble:
“We learned from the worldwide economic crisis of the 1920′s (1930′s) that an
economic crisis can result in an incredible threat for all of society. The consequences of that depression was Adolf Hitler and, indirectly, World War II and Auschwitz…”
Posted by: His Story | February 24, 2009, 1:34 pm 1:34 pm
Wow Jake, just pumping out glossy Obama talking points eh? I guess they finally got to you huh?
Posted by: G | February 24, 2009, 1:35 pm 1:35 pm
Ok, so when will it be fair for me to finally use the word “huberis” to describe Obama?
Posted by: dan-O | February 24, 2009, 1:36 pm 1:36 pm
“the official compared President Obama favorably to Presidents Reagan, Clinton and Bush,”
Quick! Roll out the sandblaster and re-do Mt. Rushmore with this quartet of quislings!
“Mr Tapper, could you please give us the name of this official who is working for the President’s Department of Propaganda?”
–> Yeah, REALLY — what’s his/her name, rank, and salary?
Other stuff one might hesitate to believe: the corporate “popularity” numbers for Obama.
Everybody KNOWS this is nowhere.
Posted by: Hardly Choices | February 24, 2009, 1:38 pm 1:38 pm
Is depression here or not? not very clear. But if you look at the past history recessions and depressions come and go. Economies go through cycles and recession is part of the cycle.
In the mean time, I just came across a very helpful website on the current economic downturn and employment:
http://www.recessioninfocenter.com/2008_tax_tips_for_recession.html
Posted by: Jeff | February 24, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
The president will not discuss specific hard choices he supports, the official said, such as specific cuts in Social Security necessary to ensure future solvency of the program.
——————————
Color me shocked…
Posted by: mad | February 24, 2009, 1:39 pm 1:39 pm
Well, then he can quit and go home and let somebody clean up his mess.
Posted by: Sally J | February 24, 2009, 1:40 pm 1:40 pm
dan-O:
What is “huberis”?
Posted by: Dave | February 24, 2009, 1:48 pm 1:48 pm
Bush Destroyed This Nation’s Economy, Along with his Majority Ruling Seante and Congress, who Together Passed George W. Bush’s..
[[2001 One Trillion Dollar Stimulus Package]]
———–
Putting America in Debt to [[Communist-Socialist China]] via Owing the Chinese Government [[20 Billion Per Month]] to Finance the 2 wars in [[Iraq & Afghanistan]] with Interest !!
————-
Oh yeah, George W. Bush is Great !!
I guess if you are the Corporate Color, Your Incompetency is [[Excusable, Permitted and Forgivable]] ?
Obama has been in office for 4 1/2 Weeks and is doing More for the American People, than bush, Cheney and his then Majority Republican Senate and Congress, could ever Imagine…Period
———-
United States Total Debt (Split)
End of fiscal year Intra-Governmental Holdings Debt Held by the Public
1999 2.020 trillion 3.636 trillion
2000 2.269 trillion 3.405 Trillion Bush Years
2001 2.468 trillion 3.339 trillion
2002 2.675 trillion 3.553 trillion
2003 2.859 trillion 3.924 trillion
2004 3.072 trillion 4.307 trillion
2005 3.331 trillion 4.601 trillion
2006 3.664 trillion 4.843 trillion
2007 3.958 trillion 5.049 trillion
2008 4.216 trillion 5.809 Trillion Bush Years
2009* est 5.900 trillion 6.400 trillion
Posted by: O. | February 24, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
Isn’t it just too convenient that the two polling companies that do daily polls, Ras and Gallup, both show Obama’s approval declining over the month, yet the NYT and WaPo-ABC polls just happen to come out now to allow this kind of Obama “official” spindoctoring?
Just too convenient. I guess the Obama “official” and Jake both missed this Gallup article:
For the first time since Gallup began tracking Barack Obama’s presidential job approval rating on Jan. 21, fewer than 60% of Americans approve of the job he is doing as president. In Feb. 21-23 polling, 59% of Americans give Obama a positive review, while 25% say they disapprove, and 16% have no opinion.
Posted by: G | February 24, 2009, 1:49 pm 1:49 pm
“President Obama has accomplished more in 30 days than any president in modern history,”
====
Can I ask how hard it is for a Democratic President to get Nancy Pelosi to write a gigantic spending bill?
If he wants to keep “accomplishing” things, all he needs to do is ask Pelosi to keep cranking out spending bills.
What he’s done is an “accomplishment” like participating in your school-wide field day is an accomplishment.
I want to see him brag about doing something difficult.
Posted by: MayBee | February 24, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
“Mr Tapper, could you please give us the name of this official who is working for the President’s Department of Propaganda?”
I have little problem with an official giving out an assessment or even talking points and being identified as such.
So we know this is the administration that is praising itself and can assess the information accordingly.
Its when talking points are just read as news without any identification that they are talking points that it becomes a problem.
That is what right wing media like FoxNews does.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 1:51 pm 1:51 pm
“Clarity”!? Hahaha. Maybe Der Won could appear in drag — that inaugural dress, with the stumble-train, would be cute — to keep people from tuning out. Or give the whole speech in pig Latin.
Posted by: Save-r-Create | February 24, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
Bernanke states recession could end this year……now, this is the same man that stated pubically in 2007 that the US was not sliding into any recession.
Borrowing money from China because our government is BROKE, and spending money that we do not have (trillions) is insane! For example in the stimulus 300 million for saving the wetlands mouse in San Francisco Does anyone in their right mind really believe this will help any folks that are having their homes foreclosed on, or that have lost their jobs or their retirements!!!
Jake your a tooting the horn of Obama and you have NO IDEA of the destruction that lies ahead for all Americans.
Posted by: Mike | February 24, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
That is sure enough true. Not since the end of George Bush has any White House resident done so much damange to my 401K. Thanks a bunch!
Posted by: beebop | February 24, 2009, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
“In Feb. 21-23 polling, 59% of Americans give Obama a positive review, while 25% say they disapprove, and 16% have no opinion.”
And these are nice middle-class people, remember, who know about domestic surveillance of telephone polls.
Everybody KNOWS this is nowhere.
Posted by: Killer Bees? | February 24, 2009, 1:56 pm 1:56 pm
beebop — perhaps, you haven’t heard yet that Nancy Pelosi wants a Windfall Tax on Retirement Income. In other words tax what you have made by investing toward your retirement—still yet to come!
Yes, Obama has and will do more damage than any President in the history of America and he is doing it FAST!
Posted by: Mike | February 24, 2009, 1:57 pm 1:57 pm
“The people who invest in the nation’s future have determined quite forcefully that he has got it wrong.”
Do these folks really invest in the nation’s future or just their own?
Posted by: Skip | February 24, 2009, 2:01 pm 2:01 pm
“Isn’t it just too convenient that the two polling companies that do daily polls, Ras and Gallup, both show Obama’s approval declining over the month, yet the NYT and WaPo-ABC polls just happen to come out now to allow this kind of Obama “official” spindoctoring?”
ROFLMAO!
Oh no, Obama only has a 59% approval rating in daily Gallup poll!
And Rasmussen shows a fairly consistent 60% approval (give or take a pt thru-out the month)
Daily polls with rolling averages are going to be more volatile than snapshot polls.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 2:02 pm 2:02 pm
“And these are nice middle-class people, remember, who know about domestic surveillance of telephone polls.”
ROFLMAO!
So Obama’s poll ratings are due to people fearful of surveillance!
Right wing nuttery at its finest!
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 2:03 pm 2:03 pm
George W. Bush Destroyed This Nation’s Economy, Along with his Majority Ruling Senate and Congress, who Together Passed George W. Bush’s..
[[2001 One Trillion Dollar Stimulus Package]]
———–
Putting America in Debt to [[Communist-Socialist China]] via Owing the Chinese Government [[20 Billion Per Month]] to Finance the 2 wars in [[Iraq & Afghanistan]] with Interest !!
————-
Oh yeah, George W. Bush is Great !!
I guess if you are the Corporate Color…
Your Incompetency is [[Excusable, Permitted and Forgivable]] ?
Obama has been in office for 4 1/2 Weeks and is doing More for the American People, than Bush, Cheney and his then Majority Republican Senate and Congress, could ever Imagine…Period
———-
United States Total Debt (Split)
End of fiscal year Intra-Governmental Holdings Debt Held by the Public
1999 2.020 trillion 3.636 trillion
2000 2.269 trillion 3.405 Trillion Bush Years
2001 2.468 trillion 3.339 trillion
2002 2.675 trillion 3.553 trillion
2003 2.859 trillion 3.924 trillion
2004 3.072 trillion 4.307 trillion
2005 3.331 trillion 4.601 trillion
2006 3.664 trillion 4.843 trillion
2007 3.958 trillion 5.049 trillion
2008 4.216 trillion 5.809 Trillion Bush Years
2009* est 5.900 trillion 6.400 trillion
Posted by: O. | February 24, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
“perhaps, you haven’t heard yet that Nancy Pelosi wants a Windfall Tax on Retirement Income. In other words tax what you have made by investing toward your retirement—still yet to come! ”
ROFLMAO!
Right wingers are still passing around a debunked email that began in 2006!
See snopes for the truth!
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 2:05 pm 2:05 pm
“For example in the stimulus 300 million for saving the wetlands mouse in San Francisco”
Ahhh yes the claim that was originally made up and now Mike asserts it was $300M vs $30M.
I guess Mike is a right wing talking points spam bot between this and the Windfall Retirement tax by Pelosi (roflmao).
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
By SCOTT MAYEROWITZ
ABC NEWS Business Unit
Nov. 8, 2007
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke came to Capitol Hill this morning (November 2007).
Bernanke said the Federal Reserve sees growth “as remaining sluggish during the first part of next year, then strengthening as the effects of tighter credit and the housing correction began to wane.” Bernanke went as far as to say that today’s problems will ultimately help the economy.
“The recent developments may well lead to a healthier financial system in the medium to long term,” Bernanke told the Joint Economic Committee. “Increased investor scrutiny of structured credit products is likely to lead ultimately to greater transparency in these products and to better differentiation among assets of varying quality.”
This was 2007 and look at the results in 2009. Now the man (working for Obama) says the recession will end in 2009.
Posted by: Mike | February 24, 2009, 2:10 pm 2:10 pm
The Right Wingers
Are losing their Minds Lying,Digging up old Debunked News, Spewing Fox News,Rush Limbaugh Lies,Poor things you gotta feel a Little for them. Mean while Their Parties Approval ratings Are sinking beyond Return Pretty soon The Republicans ratings will be as low as Bush what can I say Keep it up Right wingers!
Posted by: Angie | February 24, 2009, 2:13 pm 2:13 pm
Ryan, you do realize that your debt chart assigns both 2000, 2001 and 2009 to Bush?
So Obama’s tab only begins in 2010? Shouldn’t then Bush’s tab begin in 2002?
Pretty sloppy for an ideologue.
Secondly, you ignore my point re the polls. All the daily polls show a significant downward trend since inauguration….and along comes the NYT and WaPo to bolster Obama sychophants like yourself, the Obama “official” quoted above and the Obama media army at the networks and cable.
Coincidence?
Posted by: G | February 24, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
“So Obama’s poll ratings are due to people fearful of surveillance!”
Could be: anybody who HAS a job certainly would be engaging in risky behavior to disapprove telephonically of ANY member of the “Obama” organization …
… and at THAT, the ratings are not so hot. When those numbers halve AGAIN, He’ll be where Bush was post-Iraq.
Posted by: Killer Bees? | February 24, 2009, 2:14 pm 2:14 pm
Completely agree. Our Smartest Clueless Leader has accomplished the accumulation of $1.5T deficit in 30 days, more than all Presidents combined.
Posted by: kat | February 24, 2009, 2:15 pm 2:15 pm
Mike – scary, scary stuff.
Lord knows what will happen to the economy with jokers like Bernanke and “Doogie Houser” Geitner in charge.
Posted by: G | February 24, 2009, 2:16 pm 2:16 pm
Oh, yes. Obama the Great has achieved wonderful things.
Coddled terrorists and dictators. Got Iran laughing at him. Had to apologize to China.
Crashed Wall Street. Consumer confidence has plumetted.
Mr. Hopie Changie better get on the stick.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 2:17 pm 2:17 pm
“The official had beckoned us to his/her office to give us some context and preview tonight’s address.”
Uh … did he/she proffer shoe-boxes full of cash, sexual favors, maybe an ambassadorship?
Posted by: Killer Bees? | February 24, 2009, 2:19 pm 2:19 pm
Obama has indeed achieved great things.
He has put a tax cheat in charge of Treasury. And the sheeple barely peeped their outrage. And the media excused him.
There are more tax cheats in the Obama cabinet than any other administration in history.
But Joe Biden lectures US that it’s patriotic to pay taxes. ROFL
You’ve been so had and you don’t even know it yet.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 2:20 pm 2:20 pm
jpt quotes Obama Propaganda Ministry:
“He has a set of wins under his belt”
… and a set of bats in His belfry, and half a bag of marbles in His mouth.
Posted by: Killer Bees? | February 24, 2009, 2:21 pm 2:21 pm
Angie,
Don’t get angry. We real librals also know how to balance the budget and creating wealth for ALL, not just to those who do not contribute and from whom creating “too” much.
Experience matters. Speech tanks markets.
Posted by: Ace | February 24, 2009, 2:23 pm 2:23 pm
@O.
2000 2.269 trillion 3.405 Trillion Bush Years
2009* est 5.900 trillion 6.400 trillion
Bush not in office in 2000 and not much of 2009. ???
Posted by: ajax | February 24, 2009, 2:24 pm 2:24 pm
Hilda Solis is supposed to be confirmed soon.
What a step up for the cabinet. The spouse is the tax cheat this time rather than the nominee.
Posted by: mad | February 24, 2009, 2:26 pm 2:26 pm
BO has done more to ruin America than any other president.
And more to turn it into the socialist country he and his radical friends always dreamed of.
Posted by: harry | February 24, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
“Obama, conversely, can point to a $787 billion bill that made major changes in energy, education and tax policies, the official said”
Yep, that bill got passed fast, under 24 hours from printing to passed for over 1000 pages of legalese; with many changes in committee that were in neither the House or Senate bills stealthed in after the fact.
Sure nobody read it, or knew exactly what was in it, but they passed it like good Congress-critters.
I wonder what kind of legislation they’d pass if they read things first; instead of rubber-stamping the unknown.
Obama, the largest, least studied, least debated spending bill of all time; with uninformed votes passing it. I guess you can be proud of that if you want. We forced the hand of the Government to pass our bill without their even understanding what it was, we strong-armed the nation.
Hey, whatever makes you proud I guess.
Posted by: Gekkobear | February 24, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
I’d say this is a highly debatable claim…
Posted by: matt | February 24, 2009, 2:32 pm 2:32 pm
Obama’s rich Hollywood friends and radical associates must be so proud of the damage he has inflicted upon our country.
In their eyes America deserves it.
Posted by: tyler | February 24, 2009, 2:33 pm 2:33 pm
jpt quotes Obama staff:
“He has a set of wins under his belt”
Uh … confronted with crap like this coming from the WH, it should be okay to note He also has a brace of bats in His belfry (if He thinks this kind of PR passes muster)?
Everybody KNOWS this is nowhere: the revelation of the fall of this government — the White House AND most of the Congress — into helpless pomposity is in the very aether.
No amount of censorship, nor all the king’s horses and all the king’s men, can put it back together again.
Posted by: Killer Bees? | February 24, 2009, 2:36 pm 2:36 pm
AJAX
Bush was in Office in 2000
Posted by: Angie | February 24, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
“We’re moving out on all fronts because this point in time requires energy, purpose and clarity.”
Huh? Of all the words I could think of to describe the Obama administration to date, “clarity” is not one of them.
Posted by: John F. | February 24, 2009, 2:39 pm 2:39 pm
Bush was in Office in 2000
—————————
Elected November 2000
Took office January 2001
Posted by: mad | February 24, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
Will He bomb as badly as Geithner did?
Could be the first Congressional address is the last, and goes down in History — the real history, that apparatchiks can’t spin — as the Obama’s Fat Tuesday Flop.
Posted by: Only Lent | February 24, 2009, 2:41 pm 2:41 pm
What a step up for the cabinet. The spouse is the tax cheat this time rather than the nominee.
****************************************************
Due to Hilda Solis being sympathetic to union issues, the GOP may very well battle her nomination quite fiercely, not saying a word about their real concerns.
Posted by: kat the real one | February 24, 2009, 2:42 pm 2:42 pm
LOL, Only Lent. Who said right wingers don’t have a sense of humor?
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | February 24, 2009, 2:44 pm 2:44 pm
“Pretty sloppy for an ideologue.”
I would agree since that was not my post.
It helps to check your own reading comprehension before commenting on another’s.
“Secondly, you ignore my point re the polls.”
I did not ignore it. You falsely represented what the polls said.
Then you claimed conspiracy on the part of two other polls (which were not daily) which is just silly.
“All the daily polls show a significant downward trend since inauguration”
First off there was going to be a drop post inauguration based on historical trends, not a big one but certainly a few points.
Secondly there are two daily polls.
One is Rasmussen, which shows approval hanging around 60% the whole month.
Gallup shows his approval for today’s poll at 59%. He has lost about 3 or 4 pts off his average in Gallup over the month.
The other polls are more snapshot polls and since we do not have previous polls to compare them to debating his rise or fall in those polls is pointless.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 2:45 pm 2:45 pm
Gekkobear:”Yep, that bill got passed fast, under 24 hours from printing to passed for over 1000 pages of legalese; with many changes in committee that were in neither the House or Senate bills stealthed in after the fact.”
Many changes in committee? Could you cite some of these stealth changes that were not in the House nor Senate bills?
Posted by: jhw539 | February 24, 2009, 2:46 pm 2:46 pm
“Everybody KNOWS this is nowhere: the revelation of the fall of this government — the White House AND most of the Congress — into helpless pomposity is in the very aether.”
ROFLMAO.
Another favorite right wing tactic, tell a lie then claim everyone knows it to be true!
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 2:47 pm 2:47 pm
Obama claims he has done more than any other president in 30 days.
The hubris is breathtaking.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 2:48 pm 2:48 pm
Obama: The only president to ram the biggest spending bill down the throats of congress who admit they didn’t even read it, all because of an “emergency”. And then he left town for 4 days before signing this “emergency” bill.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 2:49 pm 2:49 pm
“with many changes in committee that were in neither the House or Senate bills stealthed in after the fact.”
When in doubt, the right wing just makes it up.
Please tell us what stealth changes were made?
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 2:50 pm 2:50 pm
“LOL, Only Lent. Who said right wingers don’t have a sense of humor?”
It’s Obama who’s the “right winger”.
AFTER your flaky figure-head’s Mardi Gras Massacre over at the Capitol, see if you’re still laughing.
Posted by: Only Lent | February 24, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
Today’s new Gallup poll puts him at 59%. Compare him to previous presidents one month in, such as G W Bush (62%), Jimmy Carter (71%), Bill Clinton (59%), George H. W. Bush (63%), and Richard Nixon (60%), and you’ll discover that all we’re seeing is the public withhold judgment.
Now compare his disapproval ratings (people who’ve already made up their minds they don’t like him), 25% to George W Bush (21%), George Bush (13%), Ronald Reagan (18%), Jimmy Carter (9%), and Richard Nixon (6%). The only one with a higher disapproval rating was President Clinton, on his way to losing both houses of Congress.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 2:51 pm 2:51 pm
I think it would make a better impression on the right-wingers if he landed on top of Wall St. in a helicopter and declared ‘mission accomplished, the financial crisis is over’.
Posted by: Skip | February 24, 2009, 2:52 pm 2:52 pm
Unfortunately, my friends, there are many a two legged who eschews the factual in favor of their cherished distortions. I must go because a song beckons. And no, it isn’t a siren song of fantasies over fact, but of the birds. Yum!
Posted by: kit kat | February 24, 2009, 2:53 pm 2:53 pm
AJAX
Bush was in Office in 2000
Angie,
Did you just get your degree from the Joe Biden school of history????
Bush took office in January 2001…two thousand and ONE !
No wonder you never get the facts right!
Posted by: Mike_C | February 24, 2009, 2:54 pm 2:54 pm
RyanC: These Limbaughbots have been swilling the radical right-wing kool-aid so long they can’t help themselves. They react rabidly, knee jerk style, to absolutely anything that happens with their cynicism, hatred and sarcasm. I am surprised they have not attacked the Obama children by now.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | February 24, 2009, 2:55 pm 2:55 pm
“Obama claims he has done more than any other president in 30 days.”
Looks like that is the case.
Though the time frame is arbitrary.
The whole first 100 days emphasis is overwrought anyway.
“The hubris is breathtaking.”
No, landing on an aircraft carrier 3 months into a 6 year war under a banner of Mission Accomplished is breathtaking hubris.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 2:56 pm 2:56 pm
Just like the drug-addict comedian Limbaugh, they all want Obama to fail.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | February 24, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
“RyanC: These Limbaughbots have been swilling the radical right-wing kool-aid so long they can’t help themselves. They react rabidly, knee jerk style, to absolutely anything that happens with their cynicism, hatred and sarcasm.”
Of course.
But that’s why its important that their lies are ppinted out swiftly and loudly.
They are cowardly bullies and slink away from confrontation.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 2:57 pm 2:57 pm
“I think it would make a better impression on the right-wingers if he landed on top of Wall St. in a helicopter and declared ‘mission accomplished, the financial crisis is over’.”
OMG!
Skip, that was priceless!
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 2:58 pm 2:58 pm
Mike and Ajax
Sorry I was wrong thats Right Bush took Office in 01, My Bad but Jeez Mike no need to Attack!
Posted by: Angie | February 24, 2009, 2:59 pm 2:59 pm
“11 States Declare Sovereignty Over Obama’s Actions”
ROFLMAO!
Anatomy of a right wing lie
Take neoconfederate/secessionist crap that is proposed regularly by crackpot state legislators.
Call it passed legislation and assign
the motive for it to Obama’s actions.
Voila!
You have factoids that will be eagerly hovered by your gullible base.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 3:01 pm 3:01 pm
William
I dont think they want Obama to Fail they are Just whiney Babies because their Party is Being Held Responsible for this Mess, And Its clear to see Republicans are going down in Flames at Least I hope they dont want him to fail Because we all will Fail!
Posted by: Angie | February 24, 2009, 3:02 pm 3:02 pm
My portfolio is down about 40% in the days since Obama took office. Everytime this guy opens his mouth, I take a beating.
Posted by: PA | February 24, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
“The only one with a higher disapproval rating was President Clinton, on his way to losing both houses of Congress.”
When THIS right-wing “Democrat” loses both houses of Congress, it may well be to independent candidates who AREN’T wholly owned by the corporations.
This “Obama” caper — going with identity politics over Democratic substance — will finally be the end of the Democratic Party, which has been retreating to the right since JFK.
Posted by: Killer Bees? | February 24, 2009, 3:03 pm 3:03 pm
Today’s new Gallup poll puts him at 59%. Compare him to previous presidents one month in, such as G W Bush (62%), Jimmy Carter (71%), Bill Clinton (59%), George H. W. Bush (63%), and Richard Nixon (60%), and you’ll discover that all we’re seeing is the public withhold judgment.
Now compare his disapproval ratings (people who’ve already made up their minds they don’t like him), 25% to George W Bush (21%), George Bush (13%), Ronald Reagan (18%), Jimmy Carter (9%), and Richard Nixon (6%). The only one with a higher disapproval rating was President Clinton, on his way to losing both houses of Congress.
———————————-
Peach,
Why do you think that all the Obama-bots out here today are NO longer touting Gallup…now its ABC’s poll because that one shows the “O” at 67%!
By next week I’m sure MSNBC will have a poll that shows Obama approval rating at 96.5 %…LOL
Posted by: Mike_C | February 24, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
Limbaugh, the right-wing hero and self-proclaimed head of the GOP clearly stated, more than once, that he “hopes Obama fails.”
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | February 24, 2009, 3:06 pm 3:06 pm
“you’ll discover that all we’re seeing is the public withhold judgment.”
Which would mean he would have higher no opinion figures which he does not.
In fact most people have an opinion of him one way or the other.
For Gallup based on historical average of President’s 1st month:
Obama’s approval is about average.
His disapproval is higher than average and his no opinion percentage is lower than average by about the same margin.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
“Heck, I can tear something down faster than I can build it too. That doesn’t mean I’m accomplishing something good.”
The cognitive dissonance of right wingers is astounding.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 3:07 pm 3:07 pm
“The cognitive dissonance of right wingers is astounding. ”
The blind devotion to a failed belief system exhibited by you lefties is too.
Posted by: Notanobammunist | February 24, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
Once again, right-wing haters distort the truth. The Gallup daily tracking poll for yesterday was 63%
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | February 24, 2009, 3:09 pm 3:09 pm
“they all want Obama to fail.”
Get a clue: He HAS failed. How long He’s allowed to slide, skating on the birthday suit, is the main remaining question.
If this person weren’t “black”, half the DEMOCRATS would be calling for His impeachment by now.
Posted by: Killer Bees? | February 24, 2009, 3:10 pm 3:10 pm
Mike, you’re right. I’ll note that the bloom is off the rose with ubber Obama lover Chris Matthews.
His show was a hoot yesterday. He’s mad at Obama for fumbling the economy so badly and called him Barney Fife.
It was devastating. For Obama.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
“Why do you think that all the Obama-bots out here today are NO longer touting Gallup…now its ABC’s poll because that one shows the “O” at 67%!”
OMG he’s at 59% in Gallup!
The world is ending!
ROFLMAO!
What are right wingers going to say if the polls changes by the end of the week as daily tracking polls are wont to do?
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
Tearing a house down is a faster & easier accomplishment than BUILDING a house.
Obama has been incredibly destructive to our nation in such a short time – in that way you could say he has ‘accomplished’ a lot. A lot of REALLY bad things for our future.
Posted by: Dan Dren | February 24, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
“…blind devotion to a failed belief system…”
Sounds like the GOP!
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | February 24, 2009, 3:11 pm 3:11 pm
This is all too stupid to even be called socialism.
Never again will Americans be able to say the words Obama and fiscal responsibility in the same sentence without nearly killing themselves laughing.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
I am surprised they have not attacked the Obama children by now.
——————————–
WJLP,
No, that is the territory of the liberals. Attacking Palin’s kids, stalking McCain’s daughter’s friends on Facebook….etc
Posted by: Mike_C | February 24, 2009, 3:12 pm 3:12 pm
“If this person weren’t “black”, half the DEMOCRATS would be calling for His impeachment by now.”
Right wingers aren’t racist so stop saying that!
Obama’s job approval among Democrats is at 86%.
Poor right wingers…all they have left are on their face ridiculous lies.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
sounds like Obama’s version of MISSION ACCOMPLISHED.
Posted by: exocet | February 24, 2009, 3:13 pm 3:13 pm
Market Watch is reporting the worst of the recession MAY be past. And we haven’t spent a cent of that trillion dollars homeowners are on the hook for.
LOL. Suckers.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
“Once again, right-wing haters distort the truth. The Gallup daily tracking poll for yesterday was 63%”
That was yesterday. Today its a 59% so Gallup wrote an article about how its the 1st time its dipped below 60%.
That is what the right wingers are crowing about.
A dip in a daily tracking poll that still has him at 50% approval.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Peach:”And we haven’t spent a cent of that trillion dollars homeowners are on the hook for.”
What trillion dollars homeowners are on the hook for? Did I miss a national real estate tax or are you just making stuff up again?
Posted by: jhw539 | February 24, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
“A dip in a daily tracking poll that still has him at 50% approval.”
Whoops a typo, that should read 59%
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 3:17 pm 3:17 pm
It’s so amusing watching posters defend a bill that no one read and all the earmarks in all the various spending/bailout bills. Likes sheep over a cliff.
It was apparent that would be the response though when there was nary a peep out of the little sheep when a tax cheat was put in charge of our Treasury.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 3:19 pm 3:19 pm
clarity?
this administration? riiiiight
Posted by: william tashkent | February 24, 2009, 3:20 pm 3:20 pm
The blind devotion to a failed belief system exhibited by you lefties is too.
***************************************************
The failed belief system is the one behind the GOP, which has caused it to abysmally lose their senate seats and the election. As a matter of fact, it’s a siren song for continued failure. Excuse me, I’m long overdue with my bird rendezvous.
Posted by: kit kat | February 24, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
He pushed lots of snowballs down the hill (with the help of a no-contest majority of Democrats) and we will see how big and how destructive these snowballs turn out to be when they hit the bottom of the hill.
Posted by: Will Stanton | February 24, 2009, 3:22 pm 3:22 pm
“42% of Americans don’t pay federal income tax. They helped get Obama and other Democrats elected. So that’s representation without taxation.”
So Peach is just a right wing spam bot today.
And the concept of representation without taxation is an excellent American ideal.
One we began to uphold when we got rid of racist things like the poll tax enacted by your right wing forefathers.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 3:23 pm 3:23 pm
No when one mentions that Obama’s race is the only reason he is popular and absurd notion that Democrats would seek to impeach him if he weren’t black they will likely be called racist as that is the behavior on display.
Why does Obama’s race need to figure in your assessment of him at all?
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
The poll tax was almost exclusively the province of the Democratic Party. And a higher portion of Republican Senators voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act than did the Democrats.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 24, 2009, 3:26 pm 3:26 pm
“Why does Obama’s race need to figure in your assessment of him at all?”
Perhaps because I have scarcely read an assessment of him anywhere in the MSM that doesn’t mention his race.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 24, 2009, 3:29 pm 3:29 pm
“It’s so amusing watching posters defend a bill that no one read and all the earmarks in all the various spending/bailout bills. Likes sheep over a cliff.”
Peach begins to back away from her flat out lie that the stimulus bill HR1 contained earmarks.
The new spending bill does contain earmarks but it has yet to even be voted on.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
I guess you have to bang your own drum when the stock market takes a beating this bad during your first 30 days …. business makers know that the decisions he and his “team” are making have been terrible for America. Releasing partial details for the second coming of TARP alone sent it down almost 400 points.
As a side note, I love reading the remarks from the 0pologists who just rant and think that that will change anyone’s mind. I guess when you have no skin in the game and no idea of what is going on around you, all you have is words … just meaningless ranting words?
Posted by: beebop | February 24, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
“they all want Obama to fail.”
Guess what …we do NOT want him to fail. He has chosen to fail !
Going off the deep end for Geithner. Yep, he was the man we just had to have, no matter what! Now after being in the middle of all this mess for over a year, he decides now he needs to change his approach – right after his boss promises he will go public with “clear & specfic details”.
Yep, that worked well !!! Dow plummeted 389 pts!
Now today His brilliant plans for AIG are blowing up in everyone’s face!
This President spends day after day depressing the hell out of the American people by forecasting doomsday if we dont pass the great “stimulator” immediately. The great new revelation from the “stimulator”…..a new term…that cant be clearly defined! The “created/saved job”.
The “new” math gone wild!
By all means, “we” wanted him to do all this! “We” wanted to see what was left of our 401K/IRA accounts to get sliced up by another 40-50%.
Guess what folks, These are not MY policies. They are Obama’s! I sure as hell wish they were working. I’d love to take a real vacation, fix a few things around my house that need work…etc. I am not looking forward to paying out of my pocket for those who extended themselves too far with their mortgages. I should have gone for the big house with the 2 hot tubs tennis & basketball courts in the backyard and four-car garage!
Those of us who actually took a mortgage that fit our budget, those of us who actually make our payments each & every month…we get the bill for the irresponsibility promoted by Barney Frank!
Posted by: Mike_C | February 24, 2009, 3:30 pm 3:30 pm
“The failed belief system is the one behind the GOP, which has caused it to abysmally lose their senate seats and the election. As a matter of fact, it’s a siren song for continued failure. Excuse me, I’m long overdue with my bird rendezvous.”
Marxism hasn’t worked anywhere else. It won’t work here either, tovarishch.
Posted by: Notanobammunist | February 24, 2009, 3:33 pm 3:33 pm
Ryan C
Where were you when the bill was being signed on President’s Day?
I guess one Senator’s monorail is what another Senator’s constituents call an “earmark.” That’s the way I look at it. And. Read up. They won’t even start work on it until sometime in 2011. This was sooooooo important to stimulate the economy RIGHT NOW that they couldn’t wait for their break and read the darn thing?
RIGHT.
Posted by: beebop | February 24, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
“The poll tax was almost exclusively the province of the Democratic Party. And a higher portion of Republican Senators voted for the 1964 Civil Rights Act than did the Democrats.”
Did I say Republican or Democrat?
I said right wingers.
And the Dixiecrats certainly fit that bill.
But since you brought up parties, why are the Republicans seeking to enact a defacto poll tax by demanding people pay to have state ID cards?
Why is the emphasis of Republicans in regards to voting the or seeking restrictions or the creating of obstacles?
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
beebop:”If half of the things said about the Palins had been said about the 0bama’s there would have been civil unrest.”
Nothing like a good persecution complex. Obama was called a terrorist, his wife referred to as a “baby momma,” jokes about his extended family taking over the Whitehouse, etc. etc. There was no civil unrest. The things said about Obama and his family on the fringe right wing blogs were every bit as hateful as those about Palin on the fringe left wing. That you don’t even comprehend that speaks volumes about the “woe is oppressed me” view you embrace.
Posted by: jhw539 | February 24, 2009, 3:37 pm 3:37 pm
“Why does Obama’s race need to figure in your assessment of him at all?”
Because if He weren’t in a “black” birthday suit (albeit with no American black bloodline or cultural experience), He wouldn’t even have been a PLAYER in the Democratic primaries.
He has never accomplished ANYthing but ally Himself with mobsters and mob-like white guys promoting Him as a figure-head for whoever needs one.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 24, 2009, 3:42 pm 3:42 pm
beebop:”I guess one Senator’s monorail is what another Senator’s constituents call an “earmark.” That’s the way I look at it.”
There is no monorail funding in the stimulus bill, and there is no LA-Vegas funding in the bill either (that’s not even one of the Federal Railroad Administration defined corridors going after the high speed rail funding).
Earmarks are a defined type of Congressional spending. There were none in this bill. You can redefine pi to equal 3.0 if you want, it doesn’t make it true.
Posted by: jhw539 | February 24, 2009, 3:43 pm 3:43 pm
jhw539
When the “fringe right blogs” get the same amount of readership as CNN, MSNBC, ABC, and CBS, you let me know, mkay? As for the “baby momma” comment, Mrs. 0bama used the same expression to introduce her husband at an event and only took offense when it was used by FOX news, so please don’t come here and whine about “persecution” complex. The 0bamas are a classic case.
Posted by: beebop | February 24, 2009, 3:44 pm 3:44 pm
….reading lamp, not reading lap. I know how blogs get when you misspell a word!!!
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
Nice stenography there Jake!
Save yourself some time and just give Obama’s flacks the password to your blog and let them post their propaganda directly.
Posted by: OxyCon | February 24, 2009, 3:45 pm 3:45 pm
What would you 0pologists do without “right wing” in your condemnations of everyone and everything you don’t agree with. Listen up youngster. I voted for Democrats for 36 years, so your shout down politics doesn’t impress me.
Posted by: beebop | February 24, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
“It was apparent that would be the response though when there was nary a peep out of the little sheep when a tax cheat was put in charge of our Treasury.”
But wait Peach, I thought people were so tired of Obama that he was going to be out of office soon.
So I guess the people are only sheep when they disagree with you.
Not exactly a newsflash.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 3:47 pm 3:47 pm
today’s liberals have become the new socialists of 1939 Germany!to blindly follow a leader, that is on the path of destruction! to deny the truth, even when everything is falling down around them!their right, we need a new American revolution!god save america from the liberal brainwashed!
Posted by: bob green | February 24, 2009, 3:50 pm 3:50 pm
ROFL! ROFL! ROFL! ROFL! ROFL! ROFL! ROFL! ROFL! ROFL! ROFL! ROFL! ROFL! ROFL! ROFL! ROFL! ROFL! ROFL!
Posted by: Indievoter | February 24, 2009, 3:51 pm 3:51 pm
Recent polls by ABC News/Washington Post, CBS News/New York Times, and others showing the president with high approval ratings is “earned,” the official said. “This isn’t just the afterglow of the inauguration.”
How can you spout this propaganda of theirs without at least a hint of doubt at its veracity? I cannot believe journalism has fallen so far it reports the rhetoric of the sitting administration, the ones in power, and not exercise your First Amendment right and obligation to question it. Isn’t it those in power who must be held accountable? It certainly shouldn’t be those out of power who are examined. Please begin investigating and not ‘passing on’ this mumbo-jumbo.
Posted by: lukematthews | February 24, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
I am always amused by the rabid right-wingers who criticize the media whenever something is reported that they do not like. “Liberal media bias” blah, blah, blah. Of course they think Limbaugh, Hannity, Drudge, Coulter, Carlson, Novak, Buchanan, O’Reilly, Matalin, are just fine.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | February 24, 2009, 3:52 pm 3:52 pm
Hypocrites
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | February 24, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
god save america from the liberal brainwashed!
Let them save themselves.
God is pretty busy as it is working with those who are interested in knowledge versus campaign rhetoric and making America a better place to live and work for everyone — not just those with their hands out.
Posted by: beebop | February 24, 2009, 3:53 pm 3:53 pm
“How can you spout this propaganda of theirs without at least a hint of doubt at its veracity”
Jake clearly identified that this was an administration official passing on background.
Contrast that with FoxNews which just reads GOP talking points on the air as news.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
“Nice stenography there Jake!
Save yourself some time and just give Obama’s flacks the password to your blog and let them post their propaganda directly.”
If Tapper HADN’T posted this, how would we know that the Obama propaganda people are actually buttonholing potentially-critical journalists and attempting to spin the network coverage of a speech as yet undelivered?
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 24, 2009, 3:54 pm 3:54 pm
beebop:”Listen up youngster. I voted for Democrats for 36 years, so your shout down politics doesn’t impress me.”
On that hilarious note (pot, meet kettle, now get off my lawn!), I have to head back to work.
Posted by: jhw539 | February 24, 2009, 3:55 pm 3:55 pm
I say the President just turn everything back over to Bush right now. Hell, the guy lost a popular vote, and squeaked out a re-election by 5 electoral votes. No, No, No….just hand it over to Sarah Palin tomorrow… she’s the most tremendous, popularist, smartest, prettiest Republican living. What’s the point of an election?
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 3:56 pm 3:56 pm
“God is pretty busy as it is working with those who are interested in knowledge versus campaign rhetoric and making America a better place to live and work for everyone — not just those with their hands out.”
Demonizing those on government assistance from a supposed 36 year voter for Democrats.
The lesson as always? Right wingers lie.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 3:57 pm 3:57 pm
beebop: have you ever been laid off from a job? The implication of your post is that these people “with their hand out” are not interested in work. Well I have two hard working sons, homeowners both with young families and who always pay their bills and save for retirement. Now both are laid off from CAT. Do they “have their hand out?” Yes they do. Would they much rather be working. Absolutely. Your implication stinks. It is an insult to hard workers who lost jobs through no fault of their own.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | February 24, 2009, 4:03 pm 4:03 pm
today’s liberals have become the new socialists of 1939 Germany!
Posted by: bob green
===========================================
Liberals and socialists were persecuted in Nazi Germany. What’s your point?
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | February 24, 2009, 4:04 pm 4:04 pm
BruhMan,
The story about the mouse in its original form was wrong. There is no “earmark” in the traditonal sense for it.
HOWEVER…That does NOT mean that 30 million will NOT be spent on the salt marsh mouse.
Does this look familar to you?
“For an additional amount or ‘‘Watershed and Flood Prevention Operations’’, $290,000,000, of which $145,000,000 is for necessary expenses to purchase and restore floodplain easements as authorized by section 403 of the Agricultural Credit Act of 1978 (16
U.S.C. 2203) (except that no more than $30,000,000 of the amount provided for the purchase of floodplain easements may be obligated for projects in any one State): Provided, That such funds shall be allocated to projects that can be fully funded and completed with the funds appropriated in this Act, and to activities that can commence promptly following enactment of this Act.”
This paragraph DOES allow for 30 million dollars to spent in a state for prjects such as the salt marsh mouse habitat in San Fran.
Now, how many people out there think that Nancy Pelosi will not be pulling for that 30 million to go her district????
This is one I want Obama to keep his promise on. If California takes 30 million from this Glob of money, I want to know where in CA it goes and for what project!!!!
Posted by: Mike_C | February 24, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
beebop: are you truly that naive? What position do you think an “administration spokesperson” is going to take???? When you read a report like this, you take it with a grain of salt, thats all. I don’t suppose you had the same rants against the media when they reported Bush spokespersons defending all his BS. Then it was gospel, right?
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | February 24, 2009, 4:08 pm 4:08 pm
“Jake clearly identified that this was an administration official … ”
He even went so far as to say “senior”, leaving it to readers to wonder which one.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 24, 2009, 4:09 pm 4:09 pm
“If the Bush administration had done the same thing, it would NEVER have made it to this stage without serious questioning”
The Bush admin did much worse than that.
They passed talking points along to FoxNews which then shaped Fox’s coverage.
Where is your outrage at that beebop?
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 4:10 pm 4:10 pm
“When you read a report like this, you take it with a grain of salt, thats all”
Exactly.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 4:11 pm 4:11 pm
I joined this thread to help beat back the threat to the First Amendment that your attacking people who don’t kiss the ring represents.
You don’t have to like my politics. I voted for Hillary Clinton and God, do I wish she was in the White House right now!
Posted by: beebop | February 24, 2009, 4:12 pm 4:12 pm
Some on here do not appear to like conservatives and that is there right. I do think they should get there facts straight though. First of all; we don’t like the liberal media but, we don’t think Rush or Hannity or any of the others are unbiased, they are very biased, but they don’t lie about it and say they are. They are conservative commentaters and proud of it.
Posted by: Randy | February 24, 2009, 4:16 pm 4:16 pm
The entire media is turning into the Huffington Post. Only here at ABC there is no swearing.
It must be a God given talent to know who listens to what media and who voted for whom. Goodness. All of that “hope” and “change” amounts to so much business as usual from the other side of the aisle, doesn’t it?
After eight years of being told to “shut up” by the GOP, imagine how furious the Clinton Democrats are going to be in two and four year’s time. When you marginalize a large portion of the base, you better expect to reap the “rewards.”
Posted by: beebop | February 24, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
“I voted for Hillary Clinton and God, do I wish she was in the White House right now!”
So a Hillary Clinton lover who hates people with their hand out and defends Bush.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 4:18 pm 4:18 pm
Some on here do not appear to like conservatives and that is there right. I do think they should get there facts straight though. First of all; we don’t like the liberal media but, we don’t think Rush or Hannity or any of the others are unbiased, they are very biased, but they don’t lie about it and say they are. They are conservative commentaters and proud of it.
Posted by: Randy | Feb 24, 2009 4:16:36 PM
===================================
they don’t lie….
How’s the koolaid?
Posted by: Omentum | February 24, 2009, 4:19 pm 4:19 pm
“After eight years of being told to “shut up” by the GOP, imagine how furious the Clinton Democrats are going to be in two and four year’s time. When you marginalize a large portion of the base, you better expect to reap the “rewards.”"
Oh no not PUMA!
The media/right wing creation that fizzled post convention!
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 4:20 pm 4:20 pm
“Rush or Hannity or any of the others are unbiased, they are very biased, but they don’t lie about it and say they are.”
FoxNews’s slogan is fair and balanced.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
So let me see if I can understand these right wingers: Tapper quotes an adminstration spokesperson (same as he often did when covering Bush), and that automatically makes Tapper a member of the biased liberal media? Would he not also be the case when he quoted Cheney or Rice? Was he then a member of the conservative media? You people make astounding leaps in logic!
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | February 24, 2009, 4:21 pm 4:21 pm
There is a name for the integrated approach to the solutions that the President is proposing. It is called socialism.
Posted by: RSP | February 24, 2009, 4:22 pm 4:22 pm
So let me see if I can understand these right wingers: Tapper quotes an adminstration spokesperson (same as he often did when covering Bush), and that automatically makes Tapper a member of the biased liberal media? Would he not also be the case when he quoted Cheney or Rice? Was he then a member of the conservative media? You people make astounding leaps in logic!
Sorry son. “Cheney” and “Rice” are NAMED SOURCES … as opposed to an unnamed administration source …. get the difference now?
Posted by: beebop | February 24, 2009, 4:23 pm 4:23 pm
“Rush or Hannity or any of the others are unbiased, they are very biased, but they don’t lie about it and say they are.”
FoxNews’s slogan is fair and balanced.
The slogan for the New York Time’s is “All the News That’s Fit to Print.” Was there a point?
Every media features opinions.
Posted by: beebop | February 24, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
So beebop: I guess you think Hillary should resign as Sec. of State, huh? Things are going so badly.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | February 24, 2009, 4:25 pm 4:25 pm
Mike_C,
Yes, I read the Bill. And spending that amount for Agriculture, Farming, will benefit us all. What we saw on display was an United States Senator, giving on the record testimony, that monies would be spent on “Nancy Pelosi’s mouse. A mouse that probably walks around in sun shades and flip-flop sandals.” That stuff is ignoramus talk.
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 4:27 pm 4:27 pm
“There is a name for the integrated approach to the solutions that the President is proposing. It is called socialism.”
No … it is called “fascism”, because the corporations are calling the shots (and looting the Treasury), with the connivance of a weak legislature whose members hold office by means of corporate contributions and of government bureaus HUD, HHS, et al. which function NOT to serve the needs of the public (the mass of the people), but to do the bidding of, and to enrich, the corporations.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 24, 2009, 4:30 pm 4:30 pm
“Was he then a member of the conservative media? ”
Apparently yes.
Last week when Gibbs did not do well answering some of Jake’s questions(which are usually quite good), he was praised as a hero by right wingers pointed here by Drudge.
Though to be fair there are plenty on both sides who accuse Jake of partisanship
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 4:34 pm 4:34 pm
If the online poll at CNN is any indication, less than 40 percent of Americans are going to be watching the speech tonight and more than 25 percent will be ignoring it. Sounds like some more Bush to me ….
Posted by: beebop | February 24, 2009, 4:35 pm 4:35 pm
Mike_C,
I have re-read that section AGAIN!!! And if you want to interpret that to mean money for a marsh mouse, that’s a stretch, is about all I can say. Now, with transparency we should all be able to track how this money is being spent. I understand you skepticism, because the last
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Sure hope you naysayers have an appetite for CROW.
You will be eating a lot of it when Obama’s plans begins to pull this country out of the ditch.
Bon apetite.
Posted by: Omentum | February 24, 2009, 4:36 pm 4:36 pm
Did the same “senior official” write the ridiculous remarks delivered by Bernanke today (which clearly were not his own)?
Note that television is pitching the “Congressional” address as an address to “the people”. This is in the same vein as using a crowd in Elkhart to generate teevee time for the Executive.
You’d think SOMEbody in the Congress would take exception to being used in this cynical way while the country is falling apart.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 24, 2009, 4:38 pm 4:38 pm
Maybe Obama should give more speeches during the evening hours while the market is closed. Today he finally gave us all a break from his daily doom and gloom because he had to spend the day practicing how to be a good speech reader. The markets responded positively. ARE YOU LISTENING PRESIDENT OBAMA ????? LOL
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 24, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
Mike_C – I don’t want to get between you and Ryan but didn’t you leave something out in your last post to him? The big “HOWEVER” point you made in a previous post?
Let me refresh your memory:
“HOWEVER…That does NOT mean that 30 million will NOT be spent on the salt marsh mouse.”
as posted by Mike_C
Posted by: seriously? | February 24, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
The final report on the market today: Up 236 points.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | February 24, 2009, 4:39 pm 4:39 pm
The final report on the market today: Up 236 points.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | Feb 24, 2009 4:39:57 PM
========================
crickets today….
when it dips again
the naysaysers hair will be aflame again claiming Obama don’t instill confidence in the markets.
Posted by: Omentum | February 24, 2009, 4:44 pm 4:44 pm
“crickets today….”
Yeah, crickets today…. from Obama, finally! The market is trying to tell him to give it a rest already.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 24, 2009, 4:50 pm 4:50 pm
“The final report on the market today: Up 236 points.”
Given that Geithner and his associates are playing around with a few TRILLION public dollars, it’d be TRULY weird if they couldn’t hold the slide for ONE day.
Some might quibble about … AIG … of course …
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 24, 2009, 4:52 pm 4:52 pm
GOP strategist Feehery was slapped down by a lil ole lady Noora O’Donnell yesterday because for all the GOP slobbering about pork in the stimulus Bill, he couldn’t name one pork project. At least if you run in front of the cameras have your ducks in line to shoot. “Ahhh, come on you can’t put me on the spot like that. I can’t think of anything right now.” That was a follow-up to his ranting about this “porkulus” spending bill. A simple statement…follow-up, name a pork project, because the San Fran Marsh Mouse is a little dated. The Disneyland-Vegas line is flat out lying, and $5 Billion for ACORN has been shot with more holes that a target at an Marine rifle range.
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
“I don’t see any reason to destroy the franchise value or to create the huge legal uncertainties of trying to formally nationalize a bank when it just isn’t necessary,” Bernanke said at the Senate Banking Committee hearing.
The Fed chairman’s remarks eased concern among some investors that the Treasury’s capital-injection plan would hurt banks’ shareholders and lead to nationalization. The Standard & Poor’s 500 Banks Index climbed 13 percent, the most in more than two weeks, to 66.88 at 3 p.m. in New York.
“Today at least there seems to be a growing sense of relief that nationalization was de-emphasized and put into perspective,” said Marshall Front, who oversees $500 million as chief executive officer of Front Barnett Associates in Chicago. “There’s a bit of relief that that’s not going to happen.”
to much Gloom and Doom from Obama and not enough confidence in Giethner. it take’s Ben to restore some confidence…
Posted by: PA | February 24, 2009, 4:53 pm 4:53 pm
“The final report on the market today: Up 236 points. ”
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | Feb 24, 2009 4:39:57 PM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Amazing, isn’t it? Bernanke (Bush Admin.) speaks and the market rallies. Obama speaks and the market no likely.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 24, 2009, 4:54 pm 4:54 pm
“I NEVER said the original story was right. I STATED that the bill DID have provisions to provide 30M for a project like that.
That is FACT, not a lie!”
And those projects were wetlands restoration not mouse protection.
The whole thing was made up by Republicans.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
Jennifert7: Of course the details of his speech tonight were released to Wall St. early today. Or did you conveniently overlook that part?
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | February 24, 2009, 4:57 pm 4:57 pm
I hope the DOW crashes to ZERO. You alls belief in it is fake anyway. GM, McDonalds, Intel, MicroSoft, DuPont, Johnson & Johnson, Merck, you name it they all make crappy products that are OVERRATED. THIS ECONOMY IS FAKE, the values of these stocks are reflecting their true worth. Yep, you $1 bill in Band of America is only worth $0.50. Yep, that stack of wood at Home Depot that you paid $20 per 2×4 is only for $2.50. Please stop being market watchers people.
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 5:00 pm 5:00 pm
Bernanke announcing that he thinks the recession will be over soon helped boost confidence today, so the market went up a bit. This is always the case – the thing to watch out for is whether it falls sharply tomorrow (which is also generally what happens after the slight upturn), or stays up.
Regarding the stimulus – throwing money into the system will almost undoubtedly help in the short term. However, since the efforts are aimed at propping up a system of over-borrowing rather than actually fixing the flawed system (keep growing debt & consuming as a nation rather than producing), these efforts will make a worse crash inevitable.
Also remember that it’s not just “the chOsen one” who is practicing this flawed policy, but that Bush was doing the same.
Posted by: Dan Dren | February 24, 2009, 5:02 pm 5:02 pm
“If the online poll at CNN is any indication, less than 40 percent of Americans are going to be watching the speech tonight and more than 25 percent will be ignoring it. Sounds like some more Bush to me .”
An online poll?
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 5:03 pm 5:03 pm
More anticipatory spin: according to Wolf Blitzer, he and John King had lunch with the Executive and “senior aides” today — Blitzer and King now sound like Chris Matthews during the primaries.
It’s uh “fulsome” propaganda from the WH.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 24, 2009, 5:05 pm 5:05 pm
“Bank stocks surged after Bernanke said it is unlikely banks will be nationalized or even majority-owned by the government.”
Cause and effect.
Posted by: Hmmm... | February 24, 2009, 5:07 pm 5:07 pm
“Bernanke announcing that he thinks the recession will be over soon helped boost confidence today, so the market went up a bit.”
Well … that wasn’t QUITE what he said: it was bracketed with “if and only if”s. Moreover, it was clear the remarks he was READING were not his own.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 24, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
“Of course the details of his speech tonight were released to Wall St. early today. Or did you conveniently overlook that part?”
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | Feb 24, 2009 4:57:42 PM
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Yeah, okay Will. Have it your way. What was leaked about the speech? Why, it was that Obama was going to end on a positive note. YES WE CAN!!! O-bam-a, O-bam-a. Junior finally decided to to take Bill Clinton’s advice.
But whatever….the market doesn’t rally based on some un-named WH official leaking sugar coated information about a speech the teleprompter reader-in-chief is going to deliver.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 24, 2009, 5:09 pm 5:09 pm
Still campaigning?
Posted by: catleya | February 24, 2009, 5:13 pm 5:13 pm
jennifer,
This may be hard to do, but, take a cue from your Rep leaders as they all called the (insert insult here)-in-chief, Mr. President yesterday.
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 5:14 pm 5:14 pm
“Accomplished more than any president?” Yeah but was any of it good? More like he spent “more money than any other president” that is… Wake up people!
Posted by: Grey Proctor | February 24, 2009, 5:17 pm 5:17 pm
I watched Bernanke’s testimony this morning. As Chris Dodd began his opening remarks the Dow was up ~80 points. As he continued speaking the Dow dropped, dropped, dropped, all the way down to 2 points over yesterday’s close…It reminded me of those voter response polls during the presidential debates where voters would respond real-time to remarks made during debates by the candidates.
Market up today due to (a.) Bernanke’s remarks, and (b.) bargain hunters. We’ll see if it holds tomorrow – It is not my opinion market is up due to release of excerpts of Obama’s speech – There isn’t much there that the market hasn’t already priced in.
Posted by: tjp612 | February 24, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
Pure bunk!
Posted by: Martel | February 24, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
“This may be hard to do, but, take a cue from your Repuklican leaders as they all called the (insert insult here)-in-chief, Mr. President yesterday.”
Posted by: BruhMan | Feb 24, 2009 5:14:34 PM
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
It will be hard. After listening to your democrat leaders, Pelosi and Reid, I thought all presidents should be addressed as “biggest failure ever.”
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 24, 2009, 5:21 pm 5:21 pm
For all the GOP talking points about private investors…where are they??? Thousand of people are getting out of the market as fast as they can. I think the President explained, in full detail, why the Government is picking up the slack. To fill the void left by private investors to chickeny to invest. John McCain said on Sept 16, 2008…the day after the second worst day in DOW history, that the “fundamentals of our economy are strong.” Not even his fat-cat, rich lobbyist believe that crap anymore. Do something smart…stop watching the DOW, sell every piece of stock you own, sell your house if you have a mortgage, and pay off credit card debt. I did all the above, and bought three houses cash…there’s gonna be renters in this country for a loooooong time.
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 5:22 pm 5:22 pm
This is just one of the many liberal papers spewing it’s usual nonsense and people eat it up because they are just starved for anything, deserate and empty souls longing to stay dependant on their “daddy” ( Government) Americans are children who live in vain and that is what is most sad. Obama accomplished “nothing” ..and pretending he has is just insane.
Posted by: Mark | February 24, 2009, 5:23 pm 5:23 pm
I thought all presidents should be addressed as “biggest failure ever.”
Posted by: jennifert7 | Feb 24, 2009 5:21:23 PM
Nope, just those by the last name Bush’d!!!
A funny thing, I told a few of my Republican friends that back in 2000 GWB would somehow, someway have us back in Iraq. Somehow, someway he’d squander Clinton’s surplus. Somehow, someway he’d end up being the worst President in history. I wanted McCain to be President in 2000. Not in 2008, though. He compromised his principles. Look at his votes in 2001, he rejected almost everything-Bush up to Sept 11. Then he became a Bush cheerleader. And I saw it coming, he was trying to position himself to be an adopted grey haired son of Prescott Bush. And, Lord, I thank Thee for not allowing Sarah Palin anywhere near the People’s House. The prayers of the righteous were answered on Nov 4, 2008.
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 5:31 pm 5:31 pm
Rot ruh, Gallup shows Obama’s approval rating has dropped another 4 pts since it’s last daily tracking poll. Down to 59. Can’t be too happy about that.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 24, 2009, 5:35 pm 5:35 pm
BTW Bruhman, I should have disclosed that I voted for Hillary. Just so ya know.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 24, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
“For all the GOP talking points about private investors…where are they??? Thousand of people are getting out of the market as fast as they can. I think the President explained, in full detail, why the Government is picking up the slack. To fill the void left by private investors to chickeny to invest.”
=======================
I’m a privat investor. I’m “chicken to invest” because I don’t trust the government, and specifically, the intentions of the Obama administration! He hasn’t exactly made it a secret he prefers socialist approach towards dealing with the economy vs. capitalist approach. This is why so much cash has been pulled from the markets.
Markets are down 2000+ points since election day, yesterday Dow hit lowest point since 1997. I guess this was overlooked in The One’s “list of accomplishments”….
Another “accomplishment” overlooked: “The Conference Board’s confidence index dropped more than anticipated to 25, the lowest level since data began in 1967, the New York-based research group said today.”
Posted by: tjp612 | February 24, 2009, 5:37 pm 5:37 pm
Bush’d approval ratings couldn’t hit 59 in his last 4 years combined. So, yeah, after 34 days in office, we still have an extremely popular President. Ru-Roh!!!!
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 5:38 pm 5:38 pm
The title should read;
Official: Obama spent More in 30 Days Than Any President in Modern History
Posted by: Eduardo | February 24, 2009, 5:39 pm 5:39 pm
What time is President Pelosi speaking tonight?
Posted by: jim | February 24, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
Don’t trust the Government??? What’s the government have to do with you taking your money and giving it to a company to research, develop, and put out a product? The government has nothing to do with you investing. You’re chickeny, because those companies were allowed to cook the books forever and the jig is up. Be honest!!! Take your cash tomorrow, and be a private investor in a rail companies plans from Disneyland to Vegas. Do it yourself!!! Take your cash and invest in a company that will be doing Agriculture , Farming work over the next few years. The government has let in be know money will be given to these industries. You won’t because YOU’RE the chicken. Don’t blame the government because you lost your confidence. The DOW and many parts of the economy are FAKE.
jennifer,
Sorry you picked the loser. I didn’t vote for anybody in the Primary, they hadn’t done anything or convinced me of such by that time. By Nov 4th, it was apparent who was interested in governing and who was interested in politics. John McCain knew better than to pick Palin. HE KNEW BETTER!!!
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 5:46 pm 5:46 pm
“Official: Obama spent More in 30 Days Than Any President in Modern History”
And spent more time away from the White House, and grabbed more teevee time.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 24, 2009, 5:50 pm 5:50 pm
bruh-man…The night is young as they say…
Posted by: Parallax View | February 24, 2009, 5:53 pm 5:53 pm
The people who invest in the nation’s future have determined quite forcefully that he has got it wrong.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | Feb 24, 2009 1:27:14 PM
**************
How beautifully said.
In addition, the 42% of Americans who don’t pay federal income taxes don’t have an investment in the country and in fact are taking largess while accepting what is really welfare.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 5:55 pm 5:55 pm
“John McCain knew better than to pick Palin. HE KNEW BETTER!!!”
McCain picked Palin when it was becoming apparent that, contrary to the Obama-wins script, he might WIN the so-called election.
(Palin IS set up nicely for Next Time, if she wants it. Whatever her flaws and gaucheries, she looks pretty good if the alternative is elite-right “Democrats” trailing Bush-retread Geithner and a crowd of Clinton retreads.)
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 24, 2009, 5:57 pm 5:57 pm
Gallup’s new poll shows that Bush’s poll numbers were higher than Obama’s at this time of his first month in office. Even after the contested election.
Mr. Hopie Changie had better get moving to get those poll numbers back up. He’s committed to uniting the country. Well, of course he was committed to not hiring lobbyists too. He never mentioned he wouldn’t hire tax cheats so maybe we shouldn’t be surprised.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
Sorry if that was offensive, but Hillary caused her own defeat. She had no strategy for after Super Tuesday. I’ve actually seen video of her saying the Dem Primary won’t last long, she’ll have the nomination wrapped up by then. Ruh-Roh Shaggy…what do we do now??? She should sue Mark Penn, Terry McAulife, and everyone on her staff that gave her that dumb advice. Don’t even put campaign staffs in the small states? What kind of strategy is that, especially when Howard Dean has been talking about a 50 state strategy for the Dems for a while. After losing Iowa, blow more than $1.5 Million dollars on a pizza party??? Who does that??? To agree Florida and Michigan should be punished for voting early, until she needed the delegates…that was a loony campaign. Sorry if that piece was offensive, but it’s fact.
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 5:58 pm 5:58 pm
“Bush’d approval ratings couldn’t hit 59 in his last 4 years combined. So, yeah, after 34 days in office, we still have an extremely popular President. Ru-Roh!!!!”
========================
Comments above attributed to yet another fine product of the U.S. education system…
“There are a couple of data points worth keeping in mind as we await President Obama’s address to the nation tonight – and as we digest an aide’s claim today, as Jake Tapper reports, that his strong approval rating is “earned.” One, while his rating is high, it’s also dead average for a new president. The other is the impressive partisanship beneath it.
We have approval ratings for each of the last nine elected presidents after their first month in office, back to Dwight Eisenhower. (We’re leaving Johnson and Ford aside.) There’s been a healthy range, from a low of 55 percent for George W. Bush after the disputed election of 2000 to a high of 76 percent for his father 12 years earlier. (I’m using ABC/Post polls since Reagan, Gallup previously).
But the average? Sixty-seven percent. And Obama’s? Sixty-eight percent, as we reported in our new poll yesterday. His initial rating, then, is strong – but it’s also generally typical for a new guy.”
Posted by: tjp612 | February 24, 2009, 6:01 pm 6:01 pm
I call him Bush’d on purpose tjp!!!
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 6:07 pm 6:07 pm
She was right. The primary shouldn’t have lasted that long. Then Team Obama did what they always do when getting desperate, whip out that old reliable race card. I won’t even get into the allegded voter fraud that took place to just even keep Obama in it after Iowa. THAT should really bother you!
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 24, 2009, 6:09 pm 6:09 pm
I think it’s the Democrats that are investing in America’s future.
Posted by: Skip | February 24, 2009, 6:12 pm 6:12 pm
Yeah, right jennifer. Hillary ran a Republican campaign against a fellow democrat. Name one, just one case of voter fraud. I’ll wait as long as you need. Just ONE SINGLE FILED CASE OF VOTER FRAUD…I’LL WAIT. Like I said, I didn’t vote for either, didn’t even prefer either Hillary nor Obama, at first. But when she had no strategy, she had no business running.
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 6:14 pm 6:14 pm
“Comments above attributed to yet another fine product of the U.S. education system…”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Meh, let’s throw a few hundred billion dollars at it and see if that helps. That’s always worked in the past, right? Oh wait………
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 24, 2009, 6:16 pm 6:16 pm
“Comments above attributed to yet another fine product of the U.S. education system…”
Unless you were educated in China or somewhere, yes I was educated in the United States, and proud of it.
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 6:18 pm 6:18 pm
jpt writes:
He will “acknowledge the difficulty of the moment, but he says optimistically that we can get through it” by honoring the values of “responsibility, accountability and a set of common interests.”
No “prosperity is just around the corner”, huh?
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 24, 2009, 6:21 pm 6:21 pm
“I won’t even get into the allegded voter fraud that took place to just even keep Obama in it after Iowa.”
By all means get into it.
Because you have nothing.
Hillary lost the nomination because Obama took Iowa, fought her to a standstill on Super Tuesday then kicked her butt for two months.
No conspiracy or big secret.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
First of all, I used the word “alleged” when talking about the caucus voter fraud. Look up the meaning of the word. Secondly, there is an entire documentary on it. Google it.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 24, 2009, 6:26 pm 6:26 pm
No jennifer, let’s have our government just stand by and what it all go to hell. I’m for that too. I have survival skills, what about you??? I’ve grown up without a lot (empty fridge, bare cupboards, little saving) what about you??? This administration is taking steps so that what lots have experienced (depression year type of living) doesn’t happen in these times. But, you’re still hung up on Sisterhood of the Traveling Pantsuit not getting elected!!! Turn you calendar young lady, that was sooooo last year.
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 6:28 pm 6:28 pm
….watch it all go to hell….sorry, I type kinda fast. I know how blogs are when you misspell a word or two.
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 6:29 pm 6:29 pm
“Official: Obama Accomplished More in 30 Days Than Any President in Modern History”
—————————————
Activity should not be confused with results. If all this action doesn’t work, Obama will be an abysmal failure and his “accomplishments” of his first 30 days will be down the toilet. Bernanke’s comments today have significant red flag caveats: “”if actions taken by the administration, the Congress, and the Federal Reserve are successful in restoring some measure of financial stability — and only if that is the case, in my view — there is a reasonable prospect that the current recession will end in 2009 and that 2010 will be a year of recovery.”
The 236 point rise in the Dow today says that people heard what they wanted to hear and disregarded the caveats. God help us!
Posted by: Robert Petty | February 24, 2009, 6:30 pm 6:30 pm
Right, alleged….that means unsubstantiated!!! As in, not proven…yeah…right!!! Alleged…..
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
“No jennifer, let’s have our government just stand by and what it all go to hell. I’m for that too. I have survival skills, what about you??? I’ve grown up without a lot (empty fridge, bare cupboards, little saving) what about you??? This administration is taking steps so that what lots have experienced (depression year type of living) doesn’t happen in these times. But, you’re still hung up on Sisterhood of the Traveling Pantsuit not getting elected!!! Turn you calendar young lady, that was sooooo last year.”
Posted by: BruhMan | Feb 24, 2009 6:28:26 PM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Huh?
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 24, 2009, 6:32 pm 6:32 pm
Robert Petty, I think the President has been quite clear about expectations. If his plans don’t work, it’s gonna be 4 years and out for him. Had you not heard him say that? Abysmal failure is a bit pessimistic to be planning after only 34 days in office, dontcha think???…wink, wink!!!
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 6:35 pm 6:35 pm
“Look up the meaning of the word. Secondly, there is an entire documentary on it. Google it.”
ROFLMAO!
They should just call that docu “Sour grapes, the story of PUMA”
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
I can’t understand why anyone attributes anything meaningful to the daily ups and downs of Wall St. Those guys stampede with as much reason as a herd of frightened cattle. We might as well read a horoscope or a weather report.
Posted by: Skip | February 24, 2009, 6:37 pm 6:37 pm
No wonder Obama doesn’t understand the markets.
His only business experience is selling his book. Maybe next time we can elect the President of Barnes and Noble to run the country. He couldn’t do any worse.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 6:38 pm 6:38 pm
It’s funny how a few, far extreme republicans would have us believe that FDR’s spending only worsened the Great depression and that it was really WWII that turned our economy around. Yet, wasn’t WWII nothing more than massive government spending on top of what FDR had already spent? Hey, wars are not free, ya know! Sadly, all that good government spending went on bombs and killing. We got freedom and security, though. GOOD NEWS>>>>Obama’s stimulus ensures our freedom and security and spends, not on massive bombs and killing, but on the good old U. S. of A. infrastructure and energy production (as in cheaper ways to get the electron to the energy grid!) Obama/Biden…yes we can!
Posted by: CommonSense | February 24, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
Gallup has Obama at three points below where Bush was at the same time in his presidency.
hmmm
Bush
Approve-62
Disapprove-21
No Opinion-17
Gallup From Feb 2001(scroll down to second poll from bottom- 2/19-21/01)
Obama
Approve-59
Disapprove-25
No Opinion-16
Gallup from Feb 22 2009
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 6:42 pm 6:42 pm
“Sadly, all that good government spending [in wwII] went on bombs and killing.”
Not exactly, all the warplane factories became the new airline industry.
Posted by: Skip | February 24, 2009, 6:44 pm 6:44 pm
How is it that the goverment gave me a stimulus check last year and it was for three hundred dollars and then this year they turn around and say that they gave me a check for three hundred and seventy three dollars and then they reduce my refund for seventy three dollars. Don’t theyhave records? Are they in place for them to see? This is exactly why our economey is in the situation that it is because we never seem to keep records to know where our money is being spent.
Posted by: Dorothy | February 24, 2009, 6:45 pm 6:45 pm
Okay RyanC and Bruhman, you both just keep on thinking it’s only far-right wingers who disagree with the policies of the president. lol
Bruhman, did you not realize that people in the United States could get an education out side of the public education system? It’s not necessary to leave the country to do so.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 24, 2009, 6:49 pm 6:49 pm
“It’s funny how a few, far extreme republicans would have us believe that FDR’s spending only worsened the Great depression and that it was really WWII that turned our economy around. Yet, wasn’t WWII nothing more than massive government spending on top of what FDR had already spent”
Yes it is quite hilarious that government spending was bad and prlonged the Depression and only World War 2 brought us out of the Depression.
That when WW2 was an example of massive government control (from rationing to wages) of the economy, something I doubt any Republican would advocate.
But that’s what you get from people repeating talking points who do not understand them.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 6:51 pm 6:51 pm
Ryan, there is a new Gallup poll out today that has Obama at 59%. It’s right on their website.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 24, 2009, 6:52 pm 6:52 pm
Common, I guess they don’t understand that GDP rose, unemployment fell and National Debt declined when FDR instituted the New Deal. That all reversed when Republicans convinced the President that all was still bad and he halted plans for about a year. But, who needs facts?
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 6:53 pm 6:53 pm
“Ryan, there is a new Gallup poll out today that has Obama at 59%. It’s right on their website.”
There is also a historical comparison done by Gallup using the exact time frame, not a cherry picked daily tracking poll.
Gallup was comparing Presidential 1st months.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 6:54 pm 6:54 pm
It’s so amusing watching those Obama supporters who pretend they didn’t read what was just posted that proved a point.
But it was inevitable when we saw them defend Obama appointing a tax cheat at Treasury Secretary.
It was inevitable when they defend Obama for appointing over 17 lobbyists to his administration, despite his repeated promises he would not do so.
It was inevitable when they defended a Democrat controlled Congress approving the largest spending bill in our nation’s history without even reading it.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
jennifer,
A stoke for you ego….Bush beats Obama at the 30 day mark. It’s hard to screw up going on vacation now isn’t it? So, Bush signed No Child Left Behind, But Your Child Left Unfunded, and went on vacation. And he still only managed 62%
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 6:56 pm 6:56 pm
My kids will certainly get a private education or will be educated at home, even if it means I’ll need to work three jobs…
Fortunately, I was educated in an era when public schools were not extensions of the liberal agenda as they are today (broadly speaking).
Posted by: tjp612 | February 24, 2009, 6:57 pm 6:57 pm
BruhMan,
Are you by chance from Hawaii?
Posted by: tjp612 | February 24, 2009, 6:58 pm 6:58 pm
“There is also a historical comparison done by Gallup using the exact time frame, not a cherry picked daily tracking poll. ”
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
ROFLMAO
Yeah, k.
heh.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 24, 2009, 6:59 pm 6:59 pm
Nope, is that in the US education system?
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm
1 hour 51 minutes till mezmiration!!! This outta be good.
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 7:10 pm 7:10 pm
“Why is the emphasis of Republicans in regards to voting the or seeking restrictions or the creating of obstacles?”
Obstacles to voter fraud are to be desired.
A bulletin for the hapless, but felicitously-named Mr. LePetomaine: all of the columnists and commentators you named readily identify themselves as purveyors of conservative opinion. Bryan Williams, Wolf Blitzer, Charlie Gibson, Katie Couric, Diane Sawyer et al. purport to be objective journalists. If they identifed themselves as liberals, and acknowledged that their news reporting was infected with their personal opinions, I would have no objection to them.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 24, 2009, 7:12 pm 7:12 pm
“It was inevitable when they defend Obama for appointing over 17 lobbyists to his administration, despite his repeated promises he would not do so.”
Quick Peach, name those 17.
Its funny how a ranting article on India Daily is taken as fact and passed around the right wing blogosphere.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 7:13 pm 7:13 pm
“…the drug-addict comedian Limbaugh…”
So I guess it’s perfectly fine to refer to the dope-smoking, coke-snorting president…
Fair and balanced, as always.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 24, 2009, 7:18 pm 7:18 pm
You tell us, Ryan C.–how many lobbyists? And while you’re at it, how many tax cheats?
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 24, 2009, 7:19 pm 7:19 pm
Ryan, don’t even bother. They won’t even know who held those positions in the last administration. They are just copying and pasting. No facts at all. Hell, I’m against the government spending over $790B too, but the alternative is more catastrophic, so I can accept it. 17 lobbyist???, I guess they were ready to accept over 140 if McCain had gotten elected.
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 7:26 pm 7:26 pm
“You tell us, Ryan C.–how many lobbyists?”
I know of 3 that received waivers.
“And while you’re at it, how many tax cheats?”
You tell us.
You made the accusation.
BTW, how horrible do you rate the crime of being a tax cheat?
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 7:29 pm 7:29 pm
“Ryan, don’t even bother. They won’t even know who held those positions in the last administration. They are just copying and pasting.”
That is why the simplest way to derail their lies is to ask them to explain them.
Because most (certainly not all) are just parrots they will fumble around.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 7:30 pm 7:30 pm
“So I guess it’s perfectly fine to refer to the dope-smoking, coke-snorting president…”
Did you mean ex-president?
Posted by: Skip | February 24, 2009, 7:32 pm 7:32 pm
“So I guess it’s perfectly fine to refer to the dope-smoking, coke-snorting president”
You are free to do as you wish.
Though I find it odd people rush to defend Rush’s drug addiction when he himself was so hard on other people with drug problems.
But then again hypocrisy is a virtue to right wingers.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 24, 2009, 7:34 pm 7:34 pm
National Journal, January 24, 2009:
“As of January 21, Obama had nominated two recent lobbyists to high-level administration posts, and 12 of the 112 White House staffers that Obama had named had been registered as lobbyists at some point since 2005.
“At least a dozen lobbyists worked on Obama’s transition team, and at least one member of his national security team was a lobbyist.”
It’s not just Indian newspapers…
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 24, 2009, 7:38 pm 7:38 pm
“… I find it odd people rush to defend Rush’s drug addiction…”
Read carefully: I certainly didn’t defend Limbaugh’s addiction, any more than I condemned Obama’s use of marijuana and cocaine (a felony). I just strive for fairness and balance.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 24, 2009, 7:41 pm 7:41 pm
“Did you mean ex-president?”
Earth to Skip: Mr. Obama has acknowledged using cocaine and marijuana. There is no evidence that Bush did either, or perhaps you were referring to Clinton.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 24, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
“…I condemned Obama’s use of marijuana and cocaine (a felony).”
My mistake, I thought you were refering to Bush.
Posted by: Skip | February 24, 2009, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm
Is Rush Limbaugh an elected official?
You all sure do get your panties in a twist over him.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 24, 2009, 7:44 pm 7:44 pm
Cocaine use (felony)…WOW…I guess mmmmmBush’d getting multiple DUI’s weren’t felonies? Get a grip Barracks lawyer!!
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 7:45 pm 7:45 pm
Well in fairness Bush claimed he never got arrested, when in reality he got a DUI for getting drunk and driving off the road and into a hedge.
Posted by: Skip | February 24, 2009, 7:46 pm 7:46 pm
Ryan C., contact the National Journal and ask them if their source was the India Daily. Meantime, here are a few names for you:
William Lynn
Henry Rivera
Mark Patterson
Bill Corr
Daniel Shapiro
Marc Gitenstein
Rather than do any further homework for you, I’ll just go with the National Journal.
As for tax cheats, we have Geithner, Daschle, the poor woman who had to withdraw as Enforcer or whatever the hell that new job was, and apparently Hilda Solis, unless she’s an innocent spouse. Of course, those are just the ones we know about.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 24, 2009, 7:47 pm 7:47 pm
“In 1999, at a hotel suite “somewhere in the Midwest,” McClellan recalls the Bush mind when dealing with rumors that the then-Texas governor had used cocaine.” from Jake P. Tapper of ABC.
WOW, there were witnesses, he doesn’t have to admit it.
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 7:48 pm 7:48 pm
“Well in fairness Bush claimed he never got arrested, when in reality he got a DUI for getting drunk and driving off the road and into a hedge.”
Posted by: Skip | Feb 24, 2009 7:46:27 PM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Better than driving off a bridge and running off while there is still a young girl trapped in the passenger seat.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 24, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
A conversation between Bush and an old friend, author Doug Wead, touched on the subject of use of illegal drugs. In the taped recording of the conversation, Bush explained his refusal to answer questions about whether he had used marijuana at some time in his past. “I wouldn’t answer the marijuana questions,” Bush says. “You know why? Because I don’t want some little kid doing what I tried.”
WOW, you mean the former-President tried “someting”???
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
“when we saw them defend Obama appointing a tax cheat at Treasury Secretary.”
In a way, Geithner’s being a tax cheat isn’t really the WORST thing, though it may be the TACKIEST thing, about Obama’s appointment of Geithner.
The WORST thing about Bush holdover Geithner is that Obama apparently considered Geithner indispensable BECAUSE of his father’s having funded Obama’s mother’s adventures through the Ford Foundation.
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 24, 2009, 7:50 pm 7:50 pm
Oh jennifer, how shameless. The ole Bush drank and drive but he ain’t no Ted Kennedy dribble??? Yeah, gotcha!!!
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
“In 1999, at a hotel suite “somewhere in the Midwest,” McClellan recalls the Bush mind when dealing with rumors that the then-Texas governor had used cocaine.” from Jake P. Tapper of ABC.
WOW, there were witnesses, he doesn’t have to admit it.
Posted by: BruhMan | Feb 24, 2009 7:48:43 PM
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
A witness to what, exactly? Did you leave out some of the text or something?
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 24, 2009, 7:53 pm 7:53 pm
“Better than driving off a bridge and running off while there is still a young girl trapped in the passenger seat.”
Well, he probably didn’t want to get dinged for drunk diving …
Posted by: Human Intelligence | February 24, 2009, 7:55 pm 7:55 pm
Just reading a story
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 7:58 pm 7:58 pm
While we’re on the subject of drunken escapades let’s not forget Cheney getting popped and shooting his buddy in the head with bird-shot.
Posted by: Skip | February 24, 2009, 8:01 pm 8:01 pm
“While we’re on the subject of drunken escapades let’s not forget Cheney getting popped and shooting his buddy in the head with bird-shot. ”
Posted by: Skip | Feb 24, 2009 8:01:00 PM
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Could you please provide evidence to back up your claimed Cheney was “popped.”
Thanks! ;)
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 24, 2009, 8:04 pm 8:04 pm
Well I hope so. How else did he mistake his friend for a bird?
Posted by: Skip | February 24, 2009, 8:06 pm 8:06 pm
Speaking of education, back in Illinois where the billions for schools in the “Stimulus” are being touted, there is a small “detail” that is being left out. None of the money HAS to go to local school districts. If they cut the education spending, the money (in the form of a block grant)can be used for whatever the new governor and the legislators “create” in their “artificial budget hole.” Hey, but we’re used to it here. Laws are passed only to have ‘new’ laws passed to undo what was just done. The same with promises…grants…you name it. Alot of punishing of legislators by the new regime. Shame they don’t realize what they are doing to the people.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | February 24, 2009, 8:10 pm 8:10 pm
BruhMan, do you actually, seriously think that George Bush’s DUI’s were felonies? Please–just tell us, yes or no?
We’re going to rank you up there with Angie, who is busy preparing her book report on Bush’s misdeeds as president in 2000.
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 24, 2009, 8:41 pm 8:41 pm
“Well I hope so. How else did he mistake his friend for a bird?”
Posted by: Skip | Feb 24, 2009 8:06:54 PM
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Ah, you “hope” so. I hate to burst your shiny red balloon, but hope doesn’t make your statement about Cheney anymore true than it gets daddy a job and puts food on the table.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 24, 2009, 8:56 pm 8:56 pm
Yes!!!
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 8:59 pm 8:59 pm
Please, no more questions. I’m watching the President of the United States in a joint address to Congress.
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 9:01 pm 9:01 pm
Investing in a new energy grid will stimulate the economy by creating JOBS. Education will keep teachers, principals, administrators, public funded professors employed. Tax cuts for the three Republicans that voted. It’s all stimulus…stupid!!!
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
Okay, enough, I’m sick of a President so competent. I’m sick of a President so popular. I’m sick of a President so eloquent. I’m sick of a President always thinking of the American people. Enough!!! Take us back to the old days when our President had eggs thrown at his inauguration motorcade. Take us back to the old days, when our President takes the stand and mutters either “I cannot recall, or I plead the 5th”. Is this America???…Where can I be???
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 9:15 pm 9:15 pm
Enough, I can’t clap this long….my hands hurt!!! And, what a First Lady…WOW, I’d cheat on my wife with her!! Enough, no I wouldn’t, I’m kidding!!!
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 9:18 pm 9:18 pm
he signed ledbetter and schip which were passed twice during the bush administration. bravo.
Posted by: damitajo1 | February 24, 2009, 9:19 pm 9:19 pm
Bruhman-
Even Keynes would disagree with your statement.
First of all, once the borrowed Chinese money runs out on the stimulus, then you have massive unemployment, because the “jobs” that were created, disappear once the money has dried up.
So, while there may be some effect, it disappears once the borrowed money goes away.
Ask yourself-if all spending is stimulative, why wasn’t the trillion given directly to the people?
Thanks for playing though.
Posted by: milton friedman | February 24, 2009, 9:20 pm 9:20 pm
That so GD foolish, I don’t know what to say. 3.6 million jobs, work, people getting paid to do somethiing, have dried up on their own, over the last few months. That’s the same Michael Steele jobs vs work nonsense. Borrowed Chinese money??? Guess what the other industrialized nations are doing? Putting for stimulus packages, by their governments because private investment worldwide has all but evaporated. Handing out the “trillion” as you call it, even though it’s not, would stimulate…what? This package is a combination, tax cut to people, spending by the government to jump start investment and create jobs.
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 9:28 pm 9:28 pm
Note to Ryan C & Fascist Hyena:
If you’d simply put down the Crack pipe for a day or two, your words might ACTUALLY make sense!
Otherwise, PLEASE don’t fill up important news blogs as if they’re your personal platform to further your own agenda.
Instead, I would like to read intelligent, thought-provoking and insightful opinions, not the rantings of what appear to be Sore Losers.
Why not start a Plog (Pollution Log)? I think you’d be much more comfortable there and quite welcomed, certainly!
Peace!!!
(That’s p-e-a-c-e, for those of you who have forgotten such a lovely word, as well as the Concept behind it.)
Posted by: Namaste1209 | February 24, 2009, 9:32 pm 9:32 pm
I think the President has a confidence problem. I think he’s getting bogged down by that 59% poll number jennifer’s been pointing out.
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 9:35 pm 9:35 pm
When is the part where the President says “Fool me once, shame on me….fool me twice….The point is, you can’t fool me again, heh heh heh”??? Oh, that guy is gone….I get it!!!
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 9:39 pm 9:39 pm
Looking at my Gucci, it’s about that time!!!!
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 9:43 pm 9:43 pm
Sounds like the President knows he has a mandate, and didn’t lose the popular vote or squeak out a 5 electoral vote win. This guy has the nation, the wind, the legislators, and the American people with him.
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 9:47 pm 9:47 pm
Accomplished more? Try saddled my generation with more debt that any president in U.S. History. Now try to explain to your children why THEIR grandkids are still gonna be paying for the stimulus package passed this year…
Posted by: Bert | February 24, 2009, 10:02 pm 10:02 pm
On CNN they are mocking him a bit for a “Huey Long” type speech even promising to cure cancer with no specifics.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 10:17 pm 10:17 pm
Multi-generational theft we can believe in!
Posted by: Good Lt. | February 24, 2009, 10:20 pm 10:20 pm
S&P futures down already.
Of course, most of the indicators have been down since Democrats took control of Congress in 2006.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
Dear Namaste 1209:
I decline to do anything end everything you suggest. Too bad for you.
Love always,
Hyena with An Agenda
Posted by: Fascist Hyena | February 24, 2009, 10:21 pm 10:21 pm
No Lt Dan, I’m not Keith Olbermann. I just happen to enjoy the fact we have a competent, popular President. Is that okay or no?
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 10:31 pm 10:31 pm
Obama’s “Read My Lips” moment: “If you make less than $250,000 a year, you will not see your taxes increase. Not by one dime. Not one dime.”
Hello? We’re all going to pay more in taxes when Obama lets the Bush tax cuts expire.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 10:33 pm 10:33 pm
Is PiYush putting everyone to sleep. I’m watching college hoops now. Who’s PiYush???…Oh, you thought his name was “Bobby”….good God!!!
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 10:35 pm 10:35 pm
“There were no earmarks in the stimulus bill” – said with a straight face. LOL. Bill Clinton is about to understand what the meaning of “is” is. Obama is an accomplished liar. No honest person can say that the stimulus bill has no earmarks. I’m sure Obama is making a semantic allusion, but it’s an attempt to deceive. It’s a lie.
Posted by: tex | February 24, 2009, 10:37 pm 10:37 pm
PiYush is done already? That wasn’t much of a rebuttal!!!
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 10:39 pm 10:39 pm
“There were no earmarks in the stimulus bill” – said with a straight face. LOL. Bill Clinton is about to understand what the meaning of “is” is. Obama is an accomplished liar. No honest person can say that the stimulus bill has no earmarks. I’m sure Obama is making a semantic allusion, but it’s an attempt to deceive. It’s a lie.
Posted by: tex | Feb 24, 2009 10:37:01 PM
*******
A bald faced lie. Even ABC in this blog last week said that it was a lie and that the anti-stimulus bill was loaded with pork.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 10:40 pm 10:40 pm
I just checked ESPN for five minutes to get the scores. I thought PiYush was gonna have a bold, Republican, rebuttal??? It’s over??? What did he say??? “Hello America, I’m PiYush Jindal. I’m trying to posture to knock Bible Spice outta contention for 2012. Good night, and good luck.” Was that it?
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 10:42 pm 10:42 pm
Axelrod asked whether he’s disappointed there are over 8,000 earmarks in the spending and omnibus bill. LOL
Obama promised no earmarks at all; he didn’t say in certain bills it would be permitted.
Snagged. Even Axelrod could hardly hold his head up answering that one.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 10:43 pm 10:43 pm
Good post, Tex.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 10:49 pm 10:49 pm
The president’s speech was on the net for anyone who wished to look for it at 5:15.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 10:50 pm 10:50 pm
Oh sure, you just walk around everyday quoting Keynesian economic theories on a daily basis so much you have it coming out of your ears. Please spare me!!!
Posted by: BruhMan | February 24, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
Someone actually said to me today that if China insisted on a seat at the table in the WH, we’d have to give it to them because they own so much of our debt now.
Posted by: Peach | February 24, 2009, 10:51 pm 10:51 pm
“President Obama has accomplished more in 30 days than any president in modern history”
That’s right. The Messiah got the largest pork barrel bill in US history passed using fearmongering, hiding the details, with no debate whatsoever and all his minions kissing his ass in the process.
Quite an accomplishment, indeed. The next generation that will be paying for it will be so grateful.
Posted by: Mauricio Villablanca | February 24, 2009, 10:57 pm 10:57 pm
i am a big proponent of separation of powers.
however, let me say this.
the house and senate jump and put together a spending every time the executive branch asks for one.
no debate.
no hearings.
no fact finding.
no delays.
just another treasonous robbery of our treasury and betrayal of our children and grandchildrens’ future.
sounds like a complete take over of the idiots in congress by chairman obama.
adois
heyharvey
lancaster, taxifornia
push 1 for english gringo dummies
got leaf blowers?
Posted by: Harvey | February 24, 2009, 11:20 pm 11:20 pm
It took Bush 8 years to leave behind a trillion dollar deficit. It took Obama 30 days to double it! What a great achiever. And we haven’t even had a 9/11 or we haven’t had a major hurricane yet. I wonder what Afghanistan will do to the deficit?!!!
Posted by: Betty | February 24, 2009, 11:24 pm 11:24 pm
in denver, liar barak said that we can look forward to a smart box put in our house to monitor our energy usage so that the government can collect data on u.s. energy needs and trends.
not in my house dude.
i am already worried about putting a camera in the digital t.v. kinda like the stealth cameras planted in your digital computer. no smart box. and no boxcars.
adios,
jarvey (formerly harvey)
lancaster, mexifornia
push 1 for gringo english
got amnesita?
Posted by: Harvey | February 24, 2009, 11:25 pm 11:25 pm
Bush never vetoed ANY pork!! Some of you must have been in a coma for 8 years. Jindal just said that Republicans were irresponsible and that they need to be more fiscally conservative. Now some of you have already forgotten what he said.
So to those people I say you don’t have the credibility to criticize anything.
Posted by: JV | February 24, 2009, 11:45 pm 11:45 pm
I didn’ know America had so many economists. Everybody is worried about what Obama is spending more than they were ever concerned on the billions used to fund the Iraq war.
Go figure!
Posted by: clarity | February 25, 2009, 2:38 am 2:38 am
The multi-generation theft that people are frequently using in posts– borrowed from no shame McCain is totally twisted. The real multi-generation theft transpired under Bush
which lead us to a kazillion dollar deficit.
Posted by: clarity | February 25, 2009, 2:42 am 2:42 am
Bush did what? A gazillion? Aw come on you can sling better mud than that. By the time Obama and this democratic “party” is finished with the US budget and economy it will make any spending done under Bush look like chump change. And, that is not too mention that the dems had more political control than is admitted. The republicans screwed up because too many “crossed” the aisle and were/are not much more than democrats with a republican name tag. Hang on America the worst is yet to come!
Posted by: Ron | February 25, 2009, 7:49 am 7:49 am
“I NEVER said the original story was right. I STATED that the bill DID have provisions to provide 30M for a project like that.
That is FACT, not a lie!”
And those projects were wetlands restoration not mouse protection.
The whole thing was made up by Republicans.
————————————-
Ryan C ,
Simple thing for simple minds….
where exactly do you think the salt marsh mouse lives…Death Valley?
It truly is incredible that you seem to want to refuse say the shy is blue, but I suppose if it flaots your boat…Enjoy!
The FACT is there plain and simple.
A. The original story was WRONG!
B. The “stimulator” DOES provide 30M for a state for wetland restoration projects!
C. That foolish mouse lives in a wetlands area (strange to you Im sure, yet still true!).
D. Time & the “tranparency” will tell us where that 30M goes in CA.
As I said from the beginning, only a fool would believe that Nancy Pelosi is going to just let 30M go to some other district in CA. She MAY NOT get it, but she will certainly be fighting for it.
The Lie you are perpetrating is that the is NO way for the “mouse project” to be funded by the “stimulator”. That is WRONG, As anyone can see for themselves.
Posted by: Mike_C | February 25, 2009, 8:36 am 8:36 am
BruhMan,
You are correct, Jindal shot himself in the feet last night. Both feet with a single shot.
Very disappointed in his speech!
Posted by: Mike_C | February 25, 2009, 8:38 am 8:38 am
He scares scares me — talking out of both sides of his mouth on social security and a host of other things. My first impression of this man was “he is not up to the job”. He proves it everyday. Please where is the charisma? I don’t see it anywhere.
Posted by: dazey | February 25, 2009, 9:08 am 9:08 am
How difficult is it to spend other people’s money and doll it out like candy to babies? For someone to say that this is an accomplishment is absurd. It takes guts to say NO. Obama will go down as the biggest governement spender in history, not just US history, but in the history of mankind…..is this something to be proud of? What ever happened to personal resposibilty in this world? Isn’t that what all of this comes down to? Taking care of yourself and your family? And don’t give me the “well what happends when someone cannot take care of themselves” line. There are already numereous governement programs that address this problem.
Posted by: John | February 25, 2009, 1:29 pm 1:29 pm
Maybe Obama has accomplished “more” in his first 30 days. Who knows? But, is he accomplishing good policy? I haven’t seen it.
Posted by: mountainaires | February 25, 2009, 1:50 pm 1:50 pm
Yes he did more to destroy liberty in 30 days then anyone before.
He put our Children and there children and so on in so much debt that they will never see prosperity
He came in office with a 450Billion dollar deficit (mostly due to the War pushed on us by terrorists) and in 30 days he brought the deficit to 6 Trillion dollars!
Hurray!!!
Posted by: spock | February 25, 2009, 6:41 pm 6:41 pm
a microchip in your arm
a gps in your car
an energy meter in your house
a zipper for your mouth
a jailcell for the uneducate-able
Posted by: oh no | February 25, 2009, 9:10 pm 9:10 pm
On Drudge articles point to now 4 officers…I think he is the first president in history to have military members defy him on grounds he is ineligible, on pain of court martial just to show in court proof that he’s not. Now that’s historical.
Posted by: oh no | February 25, 2009, 9:13 pm 9:13 pm
There are probably 100,000 wetlands in the United States that need protection or restoration, yet H.R.1 (the “stimulus” bill) saves the wetlands in Nancy Pelosi’s district.
Yeah, I’m sure that was just a coincidence.
Posted by: dream | February 26, 2009, 10:17 am 10:17 am
And the $8 billion high-speed rail line from California to Las Vegas, which is in Harry’s Reid’s state.
That was no “earmark” — that was just another coincidence.
Posted by: dream | February 26, 2009, 10:54 am 10:54 am
To all you uneducated and misinformed americans…..would you guys check the facts before placing the blame of the increasing debt on Obama. Do you guys think before you speak?
Iraq war, afghan war, Prescription Drug reform, Bush Tax Cuts were all NOT budgeted for…OBama just put them on the books. Guess what that does to the debt…ummmmm increases it!? Hell yes it does, so before you speak, do some fact checking! OH yeah, did you all know that the bush tax cuts will increase our debt by $7 trillion dollars over the next 9 years? I bet you $7 trillion you NEVER heard that on FOX NEWS!
Posted by: Jim | July 15, 2010, 1:52 pm 1:52 pm
grand children need to pay for our
previous debts, we had them and we raised them. Let it become their problem. It gives them something to do to unify the people in America and
do away with racism. then all of the problems will be resolved.
Posted by: Miracle | December 19, 2010, 7:43 pm 7:43 pm