Feb 24, 2009 11:53pm
President Obama’s Toughest Opponent
You saw President Obama’s toughest opponent tonight.
No, it certainly wasn’t Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal.
It was Obama himself, and all those promises he made to the American people. About the financial stabilization funds helping them, and not funding lavish executive hijinks. And about all those billions in the stimulus bill to lay broadband cable, and invest in medical technology.
Obama 2010 and Obama 2012 will be judged on what he promised tonight. And that will be tough for anyone to measure up to.
- jpt
Email
Santorum Clarifies Concerns on Women in Combat
Gulf of Mexico to Become Gulf of America?
Finally, a President with the courage to really lay it on the line.
For example, he didn’t need to disavow Bush’s chicken**** accounting lie about the war cost and the AMT, but he’s actually going to be honest about the true deficit.
Posted by: Tungsten | February 25, 2009, 12:05 am 12:05 am
After eight years of bumbling and cowtowing to special interests, we finally have a President who has the courage and the integrity to place America first. The Repubicans have failed this country and their chosen responder to Obama’s call to action was a dismal failure as well.
Posted by: algwriter | February 25, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am
Obamacrat: ” If I were unemployed, and I was sitting on my beehind collecting $400/wk, whereas I can go out and get a job, work my tail off and get $600/wk, what would I choose to do?”
This speaks volumes about why you have such a hatred of welfare programs – you personally would abuse them so you assume everyone else is just the same. And you do realize that unemployment benefits are of limited duration, right?
What is the GOP’s plan again – more tax cuts like we’ve had in the last 8 years? Remember we just finished with Bush and a Republican Congress whose answer was always tax cuts. Have a surplus? Tax cut! Going to war? Tax cut! Recession? Tax cut! How much below Reagan levels do you think we can go and remain a first world nation? We can only defer all infrastructure maintenance so long before we start to envy Baghdad’s electrical grid…
Posted by: jhw539 | February 25, 2009, 12:28 am 12:28 am
Great Speech!!!
Ed Rollins said it best in terms of Bobby Jindal. He said “it was a good night for Sarah Palin”!
Posted by: Sara | February 25, 2009, 12:30 am 12:30 am
Hold on Jake. I must have missed where Obama said “I promise”. What he outlined was his plan and what he hopes it will do for the country. Nowhere did he say he promised this would happen. You are once again creating the news rather than reporting it. Stick to the facts please.
Posted by: Mike | February 25, 2009, 12:32 am 12:32 am
And of course it’s true that if we don’t get any better or get even worse, Obama will be judged on that. But to suggest that this speech somehow increases his expectations is just partisan spin from you.
Posted by: Mike | February 25, 2009, 12:34 am 12:34 am
I only have one gripe with Obama’s speech.
Still no jetpacks.
We were promised them DECADES ago.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | February 25, 2009, 12:34 am 12:34 am
Jake Tapper,
Thank you for that. Very insightful! We will see what all of this brings. Praying for all of us that it will work, and do what it is intended to. We all need this to work.
your independent viewer/reader
Posted by: dz | February 25, 2009, 12:37 am 12:37 am
I liked that he wants to get rid of those cold war era weapons systems. Just guarding and storing those systems is costing us Billions. Slash them in half and we still have the ability to destroy the planet multiple times.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | February 25, 2009, 12:38 am 12:38 am
I agree with Mike there. These were not promises. This was a vision for the future.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | February 25, 2009, 12:40 am 12:40 am
Too bad Obama didn’t consult with you, Jake, before giving his speech. He probably had never considered the potential downside to such an ambitious agenda. Better to lower the basket than learn to jump. With all of the press leaving for jobs within the new administration how did you, old sage, get left behind?
Posted by: keller | February 25, 2009, 12:45 am 12:45 am
We kats will sell short at the open, big.
PBO spoke, and the Dow will go down trip digits.
Posted by: kat | February 25, 2009, 12:54 am 12:54 am
I am more positive going forward. Finally, and for the first time in eight years, we have a president with an optimistic outlook, a clear vision and an undisputed willingness to make an effort to help the middle class. I will sleep better tonight.
Posted by: DH | February 25, 2009, 12:54 am 12:54 am
I never thought he would keep the promises he was making. The way the Demcrats conduct business is why I left the party and will stay that way. No confidence, is what I feel right now. Nothing coming out of the White House will surprise me in the least. I only see things getting worse. Everyone better watch their doors.
Posted by: Barbara | February 25, 2009, 12:55 am 12:55 am
The Party of No is the equivalent of Chicken Little. Will someone please tell those fools that the sky is not falling. They need to borrow courage from the Democrats. Good grief.
Posted by: DH | February 25, 2009, 1:00 am 1:00 am
I never heard the word promise. Funny that Jake is saying that Obama promised, like we’re deaf and dumb. BTW- What’s the big deal about laying that broadband cable and improving on the medical tech? That’s promisable even though it didnt get promised. Sorry but I don’t like spins no matter who or what their favorable or not favorable to. Please try to remember we consumers of the news aren’t as dumb as we may seem.
Posted by: amber | February 25, 2009, 1:00 am 1:00 am
Well, in any event, it’s for sure that Obama’s toughest opponent is not Kenneth the Page, governor of Louisiana.
Wow, what an epic fail from the GOP’s new “star”.
Posted by: Tungsten | February 25, 2009, 1:10 am 1:10 am
“it certainly wasn’t Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal”
NO, IT CERTAINLY WASN’T!!!
AAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
AAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
PRE-EXISTING CONDITION!!
VOLCANO MONITORING!!
LEVITATING TRAINS!!!
AAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Americans can do ANYTHING!!!!!
Americans can do ANYTHING!!!!!
Americans can do ANYTHING!!!!!
Americans can do ANYTHING!!!!!
Americans can do ANYTHING!!!!!
Americans can do ANYTHING!!!!!
Americans can do ANYTHING!!!!!
Americans can do ANYTHING!!!!!
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
G.O.P. = R.I.P.
Posted by: R Mutt | February 25, 2009, 1:13 am 1:13 am
It’s a sad day when we can blame someone who has been in office a little more than a month for all of the problems of the world without realizing that the problems he inherited were from a previous administration. Many of you elected a man into office for 8 continuous years without doing any research of his capabilities. Look at the historical data and you will see that the Texas Ranger baseball team was almost bankrupted, and another large corporation under his leadership was bankrupted and you wonder why this nation was bankrupted. I can’t believe you want more of the same reasoning and ideas. That will not solve the issue but yet you are unwilling to give new and fresh ideas an opportunity! If hitting your head against a brick wall hurts then try not hitting your head against the brick wall.
Posted by: six2squid | February 25, 2009, 1:16 am 1:16 am
I heard so many stupidities said tonight by Mr. Jindal that I wonder how in the world will the GOP come back.
All the GOP has is strange people from the 1800′s with modern clothes. No ideas, no creativity, Many lies, Much corruption, Much manipulation.
Republicans wish they would have an Obama or a Hillary…but they don’t.
Posted by: Al | February 25, 2009, 1:39 am 1:39 am
Over 9000 earmarks already identified in the multi-billion dollar omnibus bill that goes before the House of Representatives for a vote next week. And, though this is on the table now, notice how President Obama only declared accountability in next year’s budget!
Again, over 9000 earmarks, on the table now, for next week’s multi-billion dollar spending bill, and watch our mainstream media avoid mentioning even one of these earmarks. But, there will be countless pieces written on the republicans saying “no”.
In 36 days, Barack Obama has already spent more money (that we don’t even have) than George Bush spent on Iraq, Afghanistan, and Katrina combined.
Governor Jindal said it perfectly when he said, “Who among us would ask our children for a loan, so we could spend money we don’t have, on things we do not need?”
Posted by: Thank God for Karma | February 25, 2009, 1:41 am 1:41 am
So you Repubs still don’t like Obama?
Who would you rather have …
Bobby Jindal?
AAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!
O!!! M!!! G!!!
AAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
G.O.P. = R.I.P.
Posted by: R Mutt | February 25, 2009, 1:45 am 1:45 am
“than George Bush spent on Iraq, Afghanistan, and Katrina combined.”
===================================
Ah, but Wolfowitz said – and Bush agreed – that the war in Iraq would pay for itself so I still expect that money to come back. With interest.
You wouldn’t want to accuse the Republicans of lying to us. Won’t you.
Posted by: Willem van Oranje | February 25, 2009, 2:09 am 2:09 am
I’ve heard several references to the Republican’s response to Obama’s bill as the strategy that Newt used in 1994 that led to the Republicans congressional gains.
Sadly, for them, it is always political posturing instead of finding solutions to problems confronting the nation.
Republicans don’t govern, and they don’t lead. They talk about how government is the boogeyman. Well guess what? You can’t govern if you don’t believe in government, e.g., George W. Bush.
And if Bobby Jindal is the Republican’s future, the Democrats can look forward to a long tenure in Washington. Jindal sounded like a 12 year old, and the leader of a pep team with a “the Republicans are great” chant.
Posted by: tessablue | February 25, 2009, 2:16 am 2:16 am
My sister came up with the perfect nickname this evening during the GOP response: “Little Bobby Jindal”.
That, in a nutshell, sums him up. That pathetic performance by the Louisiana governor was embarassingly painful to watch, and I almost felt sorry for him. It was like watching a 14-year-old freshman trying to play an obviously adult role in a high school drama production.
Posted by: Donald from Hawaii | February 25, 2009, 2:27 am 2:27 am
Jindal and Palin sitting in a tree, means 2012 for the Republicans is R – I – P!!
What a joke!
If Jindal and Palin are the best the Republicans can offer America, then they are out for a generation or more!
Posted by: Davis | February 25, 2009, 2:32 am 2:32 am
Bravo Obama, Bravo!
Jake, you missed the point, Obama’s promises are our collective success.
It’s not all on his shoulder- He didn’t create this mess but he has the guts to roll his sleeves up to rescue our country and probably you from unemployment.
Posted by: clarity | February 25, 2009, 2:34 am 2:34 am
An ultra inexperienced president tried his best to boost people’s confidence by mouthing anything he could. Has anyone checked his work on affordable housing in IL? The results — 39 defunct affordable housing projects, 8 million tax payers’ dollars, and a slumloard in jail. Will that be the future of the $800 billion?
I fear.
Posted by: amy | February 25, 2009, 2:34 am 2:34 am
jindal looked like the shamwaoohhh guy
what a difference with Barack!!
Posted by: thierry | February 25, 2009, 2:51 am 2:51 am
Right, Amy, we should have elected someone with lots of experience… in being wrong about everything, with 20th century answers to 21st century problems, who married into money, who lights up a room like a wet match.
Posted by: altlic | February 25, 2009, 2:52 am 2:52 am
PiYush [[Bobby]] Jindal actually Believes he is the Next Ronald Wilson Reagan.
Rush Limbaugh has touted PiYush Jindal as the…
“Next Ronald Wilson Reagan”
Now PiYush Jindal appears to Believe him.
Bland & Boring [[PiYush Bobby Jindal]]
PiYush Jindal: A Few Weeks Ago said..
“I will take the Money, from this Stimulus Package, but if I were still in Congress, I would’ve Voted Against it”
So Contradicting & Hypocritical
Note: If YOU are Against the Money being Allocated to YOUR STATE, Don’t Accept It…Period.
Close Your Mouth, Take the Money and take it with a…
BIG SMILE !!!
But Never, Ever Double Talk.
You will still be Accepting the BULK of the MONEY, so what Principle have You Displayed, when you Speak of..
[[Conservative Republican Principles]]
Borderline-Bull Spit and Political Ambition Above the State and the People, Jindal is suppose to place..
FIRST
——————
PS: Mr. Jindal, Once the Government sends YOU the MONEY…
YOU will be Responsible for the STATE’S ALLOCATED …BILLIONS.
Posted by: O. | February 25, 2009, 2:58 am 2:58 am
Poor Bobby who is a bright guy himself But misguided..was WAY out of his league, Was like watching a major league hitter VS double A hitter,
Which just reminds all the big mouth talking heads/critics who thinks being President is as easy as it looks.
I hope its a palin/ jindal ticket it would make for great COMEDY and reality TV.
Posted by: sam | February 25, 2009, 4:08 am 4:08 am
Did not watch the speech last night. He is a worse President in this history since he took office in January. He is corrupt so as his cabinet members and all the Democratic Congress. He has poor approval rating below 50′s now. He is no Ronald Reagan. Blame the mainstream news media for this because they helped him win the election. He has a ‘lack’ of experience and leadership.
Posted by: anonymous | February 25, 2009, 4:34 am 4:34 am
Well I belive that we don’t need any more bailouts for the worst co. that don’t know how to run there co ( the big 3) they need to file chapter 7 or 11 which ever will be better for them an the money they already have do some good with it. Also AIG does’nt need to be given any more $$$$ so they can take there vaction on us.
Posted by: bill of gvill | February 25, 2009, 5:02 am 5:02 am
If anyone has had the opportunity to hear Bill Clinton answer questions on the economy, I think you’ll come to the same conclusion I did — this is doable. Clinton found industries that needed expansion for the next decade — technology, for example — and funded them in his own 1993 economic recovery package, for which no Republicans voted.
That economic plan, as we know, brought us economic expansion like we hadn’t seen for the last decade.
According to Clinton, it’s a very solvable problem — and he thinks Obama has found the right industries for sustained economic growth for the next decade.
Bush fed the oil industry. That took us back a decade.
Obama has chosen a green economy and electronic records, as well as the immediate infrastructure projects, to produce jobs.
I also think shoring up mortgages so people can stay in their homes is going to pay both long-term and short-term dividends.
I hope the right wing ideologues and the Fox News media will give Obama a chance. They fought Clinton for eight long years — and continue to bad mouth him to this day — much to the detriment of America.
Posted by: Jan | February 25, 2009, 5:40 am 5:40 am
It’s funny that all you people criticize Obama. One trip to Chicago?? How many trips did Bush make to Texas or Camp David?
Give Obama a chance, he is trying, looking into all options that would help us. What did Bush do? He let us slide into this and now someone else has to clean it up.
What would we have if the Repubs were in. More of the same we had in the last four years.
It sounds like Jindal is another Palin.
Palin chants about ethics, what about her ethics in office, having to pay back $7,000.00.?
GIVE OBAMA A CHANCE. He’s been in office 1 month and is doing more work than the previous president.
Posted by: smt | February 25, 2009, 6:13 am 6:13 am
Trust me Jake no one is going to hold it against him.
For all the GOP talk, we hat phonies.
Posted by: Thinking | February 25, 2009, 6:15 am 6:15 am
OBAMA: “Regulations were gutted for the sake of a quick profit at the expense of a healthy market. People bought homes they knew they couldn’t afford from banks and lenders who pushed those bad loans anyway. And all the while, critical debates and difficult decisions were put off for some other time on some other day.” THE FACTS: This may be so, but itPolitics News FACT CHECK: Obama’s words on home aid ring hollow (AP)
isn’t only Republicans who pushed for deregulation of the financial industries. The Clinton administration championed an easing of banking regulations, including legislation that ended the barrier between regular banks and Wall Street banks. That led to a deregulation that kept regular banks under tight federal regulation but extended lax regulation of Wall Street banks. Clinton Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, later an economic adviser to candidate Obama, was in the forefront in pushing for this deregulation. ___ OBAMA: “In this budget, we will end education programs that don’t work and end direct payments to large agribusinesses that don’t need them. We’ll eliminate the no-bid contracts that have wasted billions in Iraq, and reform our defense budget so that we’re not paying for Cold War-era weapons systems we don’t use. We will root out the waste, fraud and abuse in our Medicare program that doesn’t make our seniors any healthier, and we will restore a sense of fairness and
balance to our tax code by finally ending the tax breaks for corporations that ship our jobs overseas.” THE FACTS: First, his budget does not accomplish any of that. It only proposes those steps. That’s all a president can do, because control over spending rests with Congress. Obama’s proposals here are a wish list and some items, including corporate tax increases and cuts in agricultural aid, will be a tough sale in Congress. Second, waste, fraud and abuse are routinely targeted by presidents who later find that the savings realized seldom amount to significant sums. Programs that a president might consider wasteful have staunch defenders in Congress who have fought off similar efforts in the past. ___ OBAMA: “Thanks to our recovery plan, we will double this nation’s supply of renewable energy in the next three years.” THE FACTS: While the president’s stimulus package includes billions in aid for renewable energy and conservation, his goal is unlikely to be achieved through therecovery plan alone. In 2007, the U.S. produced 8.4 percent of its electricity from renewable sources, including hydroelectric dams, solar panels and windmills. Under the status quo, the Energy Department says, it will take more than two decades to boost that figure to 12.5 percent. If Obama is to achieve his much more ambitious goal, Congress would need to mandate it. That is the thrust of an energy bill that is expected to be introduced in coming weeks. ___ OBAMA: “Over the next two years, this plan will save or create 3.5 million jobs.” THE FACTS: This is a recurrent Obama formulation. But job creation projections are uncertain even in stable times, and some of the economists relied on by Obama in making his forecast acknowledge a great deal of uncertainty in their numbers. The president’s own economists, in a report prepared last month, stated, “It should be understood that all of the estimates presented in this memo are subject to significant margins of error.” Beyond that, it’s unlikely the nation will ever know how many jobs are saved as a result of the stimulus. While it’s clear when jobs are abolished, there’s no economic gauge that tracks job preservation. The estimates are based on economic assumptions of how many jobs would be lost without the stimulus. ___ Associated Press writers Tom Raum, Ricardo Alonso-Zaldivar and Dina Cappiello contributed to this story.
Posted by: Cali | February 25, 2009, 6:31 am 6:31 am
I watched part of it and there is no doubt that the things he wants to do can be done….if the Government can get its act together. Most of us suspect the Government was the major player in the economic meltdown to begin with. But….
Obama keeps going on about a school in SC that sits beside a railroad track. Mr. President, the money sucking school system in Chicago, wasn’t there a story last summer where the kids went on strike becasue of the lousy conditions there?
While Obama was talking I couldn’t help but get distracted with the permanent grin on Nancys face. Was she thinking about some event that had recently made her happy and just needed a smoke or was she just wanting to grab a set of pom pom’s and do a cheer? In any event they needed to get her out of camera view next time.
Posted by: david | February 25, 2009, 6:31 am 6:31 am
Thanks Bush…
Bye Bush
United States Total Debt (Split)
End of fiscal year Intra-Governmental Holdings Debt Held by the Public
1999 2.020 trillion 3.636 trillion
2000 2.269 trillion 3.405 trillion
2001 2.468 trillion 3.339 trillion George W. Bush Jr.
2002 2.675 trillion 3.553 trillion
2003 2.859 trillion 3.924 trillion
2004 3.072 trillion 4.307 trillion
2005 3.331 trillion 4.601 trillion
2006 3.664 trillion 4.843 trillion
2007 3.958 trillion 5.049 trillion
2008 4.216 trillion 5.809 trillion George W. Bush Jr.
2009* est 5.900 trillion 6.400 trillion
Posted by: O. | February 25, 2009, 7:35 am 7:35 am
what’s not to like about Jindal? look at the resume of this 37 year old young man. look at what all he has done. i’ve heard him in interviews and he speaks quite well. he is one smart guy. if america has truly come to the point where what matters most to us is simply having someone who looks the part, looks presidential, sounds presidential, why spend all this money on education. lets all just go to acting school. now i’m not saying here that obama is not smart as well, I’m just tired of the commentators who want to be critical of jindal for all the wrong reasons.
Posted by: likejindal | February 25, 2009, 7:48 am 7:48 am
AND ANOTHER WINNER: WOO-HOO!Obama’s reported pick for chairman of the National Intelligence Council, talked business with the Bin Laden family even after September 11.
Amid the criticism that has already emerged about President Obama’s reported pick for the powerful position of chairman of the National Intelligence Council, there is an as-yet unmentioned problem that is likely cause even bigger troubles: He had business ties to the bin Laden family after the 9/11 attacks.
Charles “Chas” Freeman, a former US ambassador to Saudi Arabia, had business connections with the bin Laden family and their Saudi Binladen Group, a multibillion-dollar construction conglomerate founded by the father of Osama bin Laden. As chairman of Projects International Inc., a company that develops international business deals, Mr. Freeman asserted in an interview with the Associated Press less than a month after September 11 that he was still “discussing proposals with the Binladen Group—and that won’t change.”
In an interview, Freeman contested the notion that international companies who had business with the bin Laden family should be “running for public-relations cover”, noting that bin Laden was still “a very honored name in the kingdom [of Saudi Arabia].”
In the same interview, Freeman also contested the notion that international companies who had business with the bin Laden family should be “running for public-relations cover,” noting that bin Laden was still “a very honored name in the kingdom [of Saudi Arabia]”, despite its family tie to the Al-Qaeda leader. (Freeman wasn’t immediately available for comment.)
Mr. Freeman frequently maintained that the larger bin Laden family was closely aligned with American interests. Contrary to the notion that the family was still supporting and even funding Osama bin Laden, the bin Laden family and its business conglomerate were part of the “establishment that Osama’s trying to overthrow,” as Mr. Freeman told The Wall Street Journal in a separate interview less than two weeks after September 11.
However, the Journal also noted that Freeman’s connections with the bin Laden family went beyond business: Freeman’s Middle East Policy Council, a think tank dedicated to Mideast issues, was receiving “tens of thousands of dollars a year from the bin Laden family” at that time. Since the rumors of his appointment broke, Freeman has been criticized because the pro-Saudi MEPC also accepted donations in the millions of dollars from the Saudi royal family.
Subsequent investigation by US intelligence agencies and journalists of bin Laden family ties to Al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden raised questions about the authenticity of the family’s claim of financial and emotional distance from the world’s most-wanted terror leader. A number of experts, including Vincent Cannistro, a former CIA counterterrorism specialist, assert that while some members of the bin Laden family have disowned Osama bin Laden in a complete sense, other factions have not. Carmen bin Laden, a sister-in-law of Osama, told Der Spiegel that “bin Ladens never disowned Osama; in this family, a brother remains a brother, no matter what he has done.”
Posted by: cali | February 25, 2009, 7:50 am 7:50 am
The time has come, the time is now! Matterews and Olberman must go! Enough of the unprofessionalism shown at MSNBC.
Posted by: Jeff | February 25, 2009, 7:55 am 7:55 am
Posted by: O. | Feb 25, 2009 7:35:45 AM
And people have the nerve to say Bush didn’t have any part in this mess…what liars they are…lol
Posted by: Jwench | February 25, 2009, 7:58 am 7:58 am
Obama’s plan in a nutshell: We’re broke so we’re going to spend more money.
The people who actually pay taxes and have invested in the nation’s future have already spoken, and they aren’t at all confident the president knows what he’s doing.
Posted by: Peach | February 25, 2009, 8:10 am 8:10 am
When the president speaks about shared responsibility, he doesn’t really mean it.
42% of Americans don’t pay federal income taxes. Where is their share of the burden? They have representation in Congress without the taxation.
Posted by: Peach | February 25, 2009, 8:12 am 8:12 am
First of all, Obama’s rating is 59% not below 50 and is NOT poor but is the best then any other president at this point. You cant just blog lies and not expect someone to correct you at some point. Also the approval changes every day and pls believe that, after what many repubs and democrats called a great speech and call to action, his approval ratings will be back up. He has done more good or work in the first month than any other person in history and that is a economical fact. Bitter bloggers that lost are upset with Jindal’s performance and rightly so..just dont take to the blogs with lies to vent ..take it up with the RNC.
Posted by: Annaa | February 25, 2009, 8:16 am 8:16 am
Anna -
Gallup published the polls of Bush and Obama at the same time into their presidencies and Obama was 3 pts behind.
Bush
Approve-62
Disapprove-21
No Opinion-17
Gallup From Feb 2001
Obama
Approve-59
Disapprove-25
No Opinion-16
Gallup from Feb 22 2009
Posted by: Peach | February 25, 2009, 8:18 am 8:18 am
I’ll admit Jindal’s delivery wasn’t the best, but the words of the speech were right on. Delivery can be taught. Afterall, Obama spent 20 years perfecting his delivery by studying Rev. Wright. The difference between Obama and Jindal is job performance. Let’s look what Jindal has done in LA., vs. what Obama did in Chicago. Jindal does the work. Obama just talks about it. He has no idea how to actually get it done. Obama: our American Idol president.
Posted by: jennifert7 | February 25, 2009, 8:22 am 8:22 am
So are they going to replay Jindal’s response to the HS students that laughed at Obama’s economic speech (btw crafted by some of the best experts and grads)?? With Jindal they will be rolling on the floor in laughter..and will conservative journalists post their reaction on their sites and play it on their radio’s?
Posted by: Anna | February 25, 2009, 8:23 am 8:23 am
Oh my gosh. Dilbert is hysterical today.
Some corporate exec is being questioned by congress whether they flew to DC in a private jet.
The exec responds: Yes, the same jet that took you on a fact-finding trip to Aruba.
Posted by: Peach | February 25, 2009, 8:26 am 8:26 am
JWENCH—
THERE ARE STILL SOME HONEST REPORTS OUT THERE!
IN AP NEWS THIS MORNING: The Clinton administration championed an easing of banking regulations, including legislation that ended the barrier between regular banks and Wall Street banks. That led to a deregulation that kept regular banks under tight federal regulation but extended lax regulation of Wall Street banks. Clinton Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, later an economic adviser to candidate Obama, was in the forefront in pushing for this deregulation. ___
Posted by: cali | February 25, 2009, 8:30 am 8:30 am
Peach-
Ok three pts I concede..no big deal. I actually think thats pretty good after all of the drama that has occurred. One would think it would be lower.
Jennifer-
Yeah LOOK at LA. They took federal funds for Katrina and its still a mess.He is a walking contradiction that offered zero ideas. And he WILL be taking some stimulas funds so that is totally buying into a socialistic agenda right? Socialism trumps Rev. Wright anyday..
Palin hasnt said anything on the matter cause her state will be accepting all stimulus funds and the volcano funding is actually for her state-research it.
Posted by: Anna | February 25, 2009, 8:30 am 8:30 am
JWench,
Thank You
President Obama is Right, this Nation, his Administration and his Political Party [Inherited] this Debt Below…
————
United States Total Debt (Split)
End of fiscal year Intra-Governmental Holdings Debt Held by the Public
1999 2.020 trillion 3.636 trillion
2000 2.269 trillion 3.405 trillion
2001 2.468 trillion 3.339 trillion George W. Bush Jr.
2002 2.675 trillion 3.553 trillion
2003 2.859 trillion 3.924 trillion
2004 3.072 trillion 4.307 trillion
2005 3.331 trillion 4.601 trillion
2006 3.664 trillion 4.843 trillion
2007 3.958 trillion 5.049 trillion
2008 4.216 trillion 5.809 trillion George W. Bush Jr.
2009* est 5.900 trillion 6.400 trillion
Posted by: O. | February 25, 2009, 8:30 am 8:30 am
JWENCH-SOME LIGHT READING FOR YOU TO ENLIGHTEN YOU..IF THAT DOESN’T WORK FOR YOU–TRY U-T UNDER HOUSING REGULATION CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS AND GET IT STRAIGHT FROM THE HORSES (THEY’RE REALLY DONKEY’S) MOUTH
Some links on economic crisis:
__Vid: Burning Down The House: What Caused Our Economic Crisis?
__Vid: Barack Obama & Friends Caused U.S. Economic Crisis
__Vid: Democrats in their own words Covering up the Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac Scam that caused our Economic Crisis
__Article: NY Post: “O’s Dangerous Pals: Barack’s ‘Organizer’ Buds Pushed for Bad Mortgages” by Stanley Kurtz
__Article: Obama Sued Citibank Under CRA to Force Bad Loans”
__Article: “Barack Obama and the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis”
__Article: “Sleeper Cell: ACORN, Obama, and the Housing Crisis” by Bud White
__Proof: McCain Letter Demanded 2006 Action on Fannie and Freddie
__Proof: Fact Check: Did McCain warn about Fannie, Freddie 2 years ago? CNN (True, McCain did give a warning.)
Posted by: Cali | February 25, 2009, 8:38 am 8:38 am
What I found striking about President Obama’s speech was what was lacking! He stated: “Regulations were gutted for the sake of a quick profit at the expense of a healthy market. People bought homes they knew they couldn’t afford from banks and lenders who pushed those bad loans anyway.”
President Obama failed to apologize to the American people for his complicity in forcing lending institutions to give loans to individuals who could not afford the loans.
Posted by: James Danley | February 25, 2009, 8:46 am 8:46 am
Jindal is better when he is speaking off the cuff.
Posted by: Michelle | February 25, 2009, 8:55 am 8:55 am
President Obama stated: “I have told each of my Cabinet, as well as mayors and governors across the country, that they will be held accountable by me and the American people for every dollar they spend.”
The Cabinet yes! But mayors and governors to be held accountable by the President of the United States? Is THAT the change all of you voted for?
Posted by: James Danley | February 25, 2009, 9:04 am 9:04 am
If you look at the nature of these posts, you still see nothing but the “yea, our side is better” mentality. I’d like to hear comments on a great article in “The Weekly Standard” by Matthew Continetti entitled “The Age of Irresponsibility”. Our problems as a nation in a nutshell. (Try to read it through non-partisan glasses.)
Posted by: Randy the A/C guy | February 25, 2009, 9:15 am 9:15 am
Everyone will hear what they want to hear with Obama. He very skillfully says just enough and nothing at the same time.
Take the line about “…launch(ing) a new effort to conquer a disease that has touched the life of nearly every American by seeking a cure for cancer in our time…”
No promise of finding a cure (of course he can’t say that). I think there are quite a few research scientists would take issue with the idea that wa are not presently and vigorously “seeking” a cure for cancer. Just enough “feel good” but really, nothing there.
And then there is this statement:
“Our children will compete for jobs in a global economy that too many of our schools do not prepare them for.”
This is nitpicking but c’mon. A sentence in a prepared speech about education ending in a preposition? How about, “Many of our public schools do not prepare your children to compete for jobs in a global economy.” Teacher’s unions need to be held accountable for this, but nothing. No stick or carrot for the teachers, just a throw away line. Those who can afford to will send their children to private schools to prepare them for the future.
I really do not know if President Obama’s newfound optimism will counteract his earlier fear mongering. Time will tell. Everyone will hear what they wanted to hear…
Posted by: Smoke&Mirrors | February 25, 2009, 9:34 am 9:34 am
nice dive on wall street…thnx O! I’d be ok if if he never talked again…I believe the market agrees w/ the sentiment. Where’s Bernake? HURRY!
Posted by: Cali | February 25, 2009, 9:48 am 9:48 am
Randy the A/C guy, thanks for referring Matthew Continetti’s article. It certainly is well written, but most importantly it is right on the mark!
Posted by: James Danley | February 25, 2009, 10:08 am 10:08 am
I’m watching Barney Frank talk down to Bernanke–can he just go smack Frank every time a lie and pass the blame & buck comes out of his mouth?! I think Bernanke wants to..Makes me like & yrust him more. A/C guy–article is great..
Posted by: Cali | February 25, 2009, 10:16 am 10:16 am
Keep up the good work, Jake. We need a combative, engaged press corps. If it’s Rick Santelli today, they could go after you tomorrow. We all applaud you for fighting the good fight.
Posted by: Manny | February 25, 2009, 10:27 am 10:27 am
Is this all there is — a very brief and disparaging report after an otherwise, highly lauded speech?
Posted by: kat the real one | February 25, 2009, 10:43 am 10:43 am
Posted by: O. | Feb 25, 2009 7:35:45 AM
And people have the nerve to say Bush didn’t have any part in this mess…what liars they are…lol
————————————–
Jwench ,
Exactly WHO said this…and WHERE?
Your the top of the Lying class out here!
Posted by: Mike_C | February 25, 2009, 10:56 am 10:56 am
Shorter Obama: We are broke. I will take all your money so that I can spend more. I promise I will make you better off. I promise. Love me. Love me.
Posted by: holymoly | February 25, 2009, 10:59 am 10:59 am
I’ve heard a lot of people talk a lot of shinola in my time, but this snake oil peddler sets new standards.
I’ve never read much of your stuff, Mr. Tapper, but your work has become one of my favorites. Please continue to ask the hard questions at the press conferences.
Posted by: samiam | February 25, 2009, 11:06 am 11:06 am
Obamacrat: your characterization of those who have lost jobs is unfair and biased. I have two sons, both laid off from CAT. They have both worked hard, paid their mortgages and other bills every month, saving what they can. Raising families. Now both are forced to take unemployment money. Would they rather be working? Absolutely. You owe people like my sons an apology for your gross generalizations about the unemployed.
Posted by: William J. LePetomane | February 25, 2009, 11:10 am 11:10 am
I’m watching Barney Frank talk down to Bernanke–can he just go smack Frank every time a lie and pass the blame & buck comes out of his mouth?! I think Bernanke wants to..Makes me like & yrust him more. A/C guy–article is great..
————————————-
Cali ,
Bumbling, Stumbing, Barney Frank!!!!
The poster child for “not me, its everyone else’s fault!”
Then again, look where he comes from, the great Commonwealth of Taxachussetts! Currently being run in the ground by Obama’s bossum buddy Duval Patrick. Massachusetts, Home of the “Big Dig”, the single greatest example of corruption and waste on Infrastructure in this country’s history!
Add to that the corruption of their past couple of Speakers Of the House, the bra-stuffing state senator, and a boston city councilman on the take and you can see how much fun its going to be to watch them waste money from the “stimulator”.
The have so badly mismanaged their state that they are now raising tolls on the roads even more, but will take away the toll hikes…IF a new gas tax gets approved. A tax that will give Taxachusetts the highest gas tax in the country!
I wish I could say that the people in Mass. would waje up and replace Bumbling Barney, but they have also keep Ted Kennedy in the Senate for 40 yrs after he drove off a bridge and killed a woman!
Posted by: Mike_C | February 25, 2009, 11:11 am 11:11 am
Cali | Feb 25, 2009 8:38:30 AM,
You can add a NYT article by Steven A Holmes on 9/30/1999 to that list.
Spells it all out. Not that the government educated will digest it. And for those trying to pin this mess on Bush, notice the date of the article.
Posted by: wilky | February 25, 2009, 11:14 am 11:14 am
William J. LePetomane,
We disagree about many things here, but on this one we agree. Obamacrat was WAY out of line with that characterization!
The vast majority of people who have lost jobs in this past year are looking to mooch off the system. The unemployment beneifts is the one component of the “stimulator” that will have an immediate positive effect for those who need help now!
I know a number of people who got hit by this thing, and none of them are sitting around home waiting for someone to just fix it for them. They are all aggressively looking for work in their field and even willing to work outside their normal area of expertise in order to get through this!
I think we all know of people who do indeed take advantage of the system, but the vast majority of people do not want to get along that way.
Posted by: Mike_C | February 25, 2009, 11:21 am 11:21 am
Great Presidents with Great Oratory Skills, that Americans Connected with…
1. President: Barack H. Obama
2. President: John F. Kennedy Jr.
3. President: Ronald Wislon Reagan
4. President: William J. Clinton.
5. President: Franklin D. Roosevelt
6. President: Harry S. Truman
7. President: Teddy Roosevelt
8. President: Abraham Lincoln
PiYush [[Bobby]] Jindal is Mr. Rodgers and I don’t want Mr. Rodgers Near the Oval Office, only as a Visitor…
Nor do I want the Alaskan Earmarks Queen of the Frozen Tundra
[[Sarah Palin]]…
No Where Near The White House…Period
In That Order
Posted by: O. | February 25, 2009, 11:30 am 11:30 am
O, I know it’s hard for you to understand anything but proven facts being what they are, Jindel turned down a FULL SCHLORSHIP TO HARVARD, and YALE BUT ELECTED TO BE A ROAD SCHOLAR AT OXFORD..I think I heard that BHO got into Harvard w/ the recommendation by his Muslim friend that he thw under the bus when it became inconvenient…hmm…brains or oratory skillls and a magic touch of a good dentist??? Let me guess..u’re suffering? Just show up at BHO’s next townhall and be touched by his magic..all your problems will evaporate, I’m sure.. BTW, Jindel’s writings are available from college..BHO is still hiding his somewhere w/ his thugs watching over it? I’ll tell u what, if u could present one (not his memoirs), I’d be happy 2 help make ur life better..
Posted by: Cali | February 25, 2009, 12:13 pm 12:13 pm
Cali: Reality
1. President Barack H. Obama is Your and My President.
2. Obama is a Columbia- Harvard Grad.
3. Author of Books.
4. Grammy Award Winner [[Oratory Skills]]
5. Respected the World Over.
6. Married, Family Man.
7. Universally Loved and Respected.
Posted by: O. | February 25, 2009, 12:31 pm 12:31 pm
O, that’s great that we agree on some facts. Yes, he is unfortunately our pres. He does have great oratory skills (b…s…er). As for 2012, who knows, our wonderful leader might have something great in store for us…
Posted by: Cali | February 25, 2009, 1:02 pm 1:02 pm
Great post, and too true. It’s easy to paint in broad strokes.
Posted by: cordelia525 | February 25, 2009, 1:04 pm 1:04 pm
I think short selling should be banned.
The traders and investment firms are feeding the gloom and doom scenario..creating this bear market to set them up so they can ask for more money.
At this point, they all can take a flying leap- I’ll put my money in a mattress or SD box first.
Posted by: bdog | February 25, 2009, 1:15 pm 1:15 pm
re: “The people who actually pay taxes and have invested in the nation’s future have already spoken, and they aren’t at all confident the president knows what he’s doing.”
Posted by: Peach | Feb 25, 2009 8:10:56 AM
You guys are so desperate now that you just make stuff up off the top of your head while you are posting?
The Republicans are getting downright desperate that this man might not fail, like they HOPE.
The tax-payers spoke in November.
Obama won.
His job approval ratings have gone UP since his 53% of the vote in November.
May we have a LINK to your ridiculous, fact-less assertion; or are you simply coming to us as a bald-faced liar?
Posted by: Jan | February 25, 2009, 2:30 pm 2:30 pm
“I’ll admit Jindal’s delivery wasn’t the best, but the words of the speech were right on.”
The above brought to you by Jennifer7, supposed Hillary Clinton supporter.
Posted by: Ryan C | February 25, 2009, 3:05 pm 3:05 pm
New York Times:
Once the recession ends, taxes on the not-so-rich will need to rise, too.
There are many ways this could happen. Congress could pass a consumption tax, which would bring the side benefit of encouraging people to save more. Or it could raise tax rates. Or it could get rid of the various subsidies for housing, which create an incentive to overinvest in housing. (How’s that working out, by the way?)
————————————-
The New York Times doesn’t believe the president’s pledge:
“If your family earns less than $250,000 a year, you will not see your taxes increased a single dime. I repeat: not one single dime.”
A consumption tax or housing subsidy change will affect everyone, regardless of income.
Posted by: mad | February 25, 2009, 3:15 pm 3:15 pm
Obama 2010 and Obama 2012 will be judged on what he promised tonight
========================================
As he should be. But when judging also compare against 2008 and where he began with the mess that was left.
Posted by: indy_voter | February 25, 2009, 4:49 pm 4:49 pm
And people have the nerve to say Bush didn’t have any part in this mess…what liars they are…lol
————————————–
Jwench ,
Exactly WHO said this…and WHERE?
Your the top of the Lying class out here!
Posted by: Mike_C | Feb 25, 2009 10:56:40 AM
Well if you would look at the post I referenced instead of looking to bash you might know why I said that. IT was in reference to this post
Posted by: O. | Feb 25, 2009 7:35:45 AM
Posted by: Jwench | February 25, 2009, 7:21 pm 7:21 pm
Sorry, but I don’t buy the “mess” he was left with because he knew exactly what he was getting into. The problem with Obama all along has been playing the blame game and making promises he couldn’t possibly keep. He’s still campaigning. You are so right, Jake. Now he’s out there. I thought last night he showed how inexperienced he is-no concept of reality. The part about curing cancer did it for me. Pelosi has been Speaker for how long? What an idiot. Someone please tell her not to think out loud about the number of troops in Iraq.
Posted by: RL in Illinois | February 25, 2009, 8:11 pm 8:11 pm